(1) Collision theory:-

In this section we shall attempt to understand the origin of the Arrhenius parameters by studying a class of gas-phase reactions in
which reaction occurs when two molecules meet (collision theory).

Under this theory, reaction occurs only if two molecules collide with a certain minimum kinetic energy along their line of
approach (Fig. 1). In fact, in the collision theory, a reaction resembles the collision of two defective billiard balls: the balls
bounce apart if they collide with only a small energy, but might smash each other into fragments (products) if they collide with
more than a certain minimum kinetic energy. take place in planetary atmospheres and govern their compositions and temperature
profiles.

NOTE: This model of a reaction is a reasonable first approximation to the types of process that The importance of the collision
theory is that it provides a 'proof' from first principles that reactions (or, strictly speaking, gas phase reactions!) can indeed
display Arrhenius-like behaviour.

Fig. 1: In the collision theory of gas-phase chemical reactions, reaction occurs when two molecules collide, but only if the
collision is sufficiently vigorous, (a) An insufficiently vigorous collision: the reactant molecules collide but bounce apart
unchanged, (b) A sufficiently vigorous collision results in a reaction.

[ TOP ]
(1-1) The reaction profile in the Collision theory:

A reaction profile in collision theory is a graph showing the variation in potential energy as one reactant molecule approaches
another and the products then separate (Fig 2). (NOTE: Recall that the potential energy of an object is the energy arising from its
position (not speed), in this case the separation of the two reactant molecules as they approach, react, and then separate as
products.)

Fig. 2: A reaction profile. The graph depicts schematically the changing potential energy of two species that approach, collide,
and then go on to form products. The activation energy is the height of the barrier above the potential energy of the reactants.

This profile shows:

 On the left, the horizontal line represents the potential energy of the two reactant molecules that are far apart from one
another.
 The potential energy rises from this value only when the separation of the molecules is so small that they are in contact,
when it rises as bonds bend and start to break.
 The potential energy reaches a peak when the two molecules are highly distorted.
 Then it starts to decrease as new bonds are formed.
 At separations to the right of the maximum, the potential energy rapidly falls to a low value as the product molecules
separate.

For the reaction to be successful, the reactant molecules must approach with sufficient kinetic energy along their line of approach
to carry them over theactivation barrier, the peak in the reaction profile. As we shall see, we can identify the height of the
activation barrier with the activation energy of the reaction.

[ TOP ]
(1-2) Derivation of the rate law through the Collision theory:

With the reaction profile in mind, the collision theory predics that the rate law for a reaction:

is proportional to:
(a) The encounter rate;
(b) The minimum energy requirement;
(c) The steric factor.
where:

(a) The encounter rate:

The rate of collisions between species A and B is proportional to both their concentrations: if the concentration of B is doubled,
then the rate at which A molecules collide with B molecules is doubled, and, if the concentration of A is doubled, then the rate at
which B molecules collide with A molecules is also doubled. The kinetic theory of gasses goes even a step further and allows us
to write:

where NA is Avogadro's constant, kB is Boltzmann's constant, T is the temperature, s is the collision cross-section (see fig. 3),
and m is the reduced mass given by:
Fig. 3: The collision cross-section for two molecules can be regarded to be the area within which the centre of the projectile
molecule (A) must enter around the target molecule (B) in order for a collision to occur. If the diameters of the two molecules
are dA and dB, the radius of the target area is d = 1/2 (dA + dB) and the cross-section is pd2.

(b) The minimum energy requirement:

Next, we need to multiply the collision rate by a factor f that represents the fraction of collisions that occur with at least a kinetic
energy Eaalong the line of approach (Fig 4), for only these collisions will lead to the formation of products. Molecules that
approach with less than a kinetic energy Ea will behave like a ball that rolls toward the activation barrier, fails to surmount it, and
rolls back.

Fig. 4: The criterion for a successful collision is that the two reactant species should collide with a kinetic energy along their line
of approach that exceeds a certain minimum value Ea that is characteristic of the reaction. The two molecules might also have
components of velocity (and an associated kinetic energy) in other directions (for example, the two molecules depicted here
might be moving up the page as well as towards each other): but only the energy associated with their mutual approach can be
used to overcome the activation energy.

It follows from very general arguments concerning the probability that a molecule has a specified energy that the fraction of
collisions that occur with at least a kinetic energy Ea is (from the kinetic theory of gasses):

i.e. at this stage we can conclude that the rate of reaction, which is proportional to the rate of collision multiplied by the fraction
of successful collisions, is:
Note that this equation now has the Arrehenius form, i.e.:

This means that at this stage we can already conclude that The activation energy, Ea, is the minimum kinetic energy required for a
collision to result in reaction.

(c) The steric factor

However, it is often found that the experimental value of A is smaller than that calculated from the kinetic theory so far, i.e.:

One possible explanation is that, not only must the molecules collide with sufficient kinetic energy, but they must also come
together in a specific relative orientation (Fig 5).

It follows that the reaction rate is proportional to the probability that the encounter occurs in the correct relative orientation. The
pre-exponential factor A should therefore include a steric factor, P, which usually lies between 0 (no relative orientations lead to
reaction) and 1 (all relative orientations lead to reaction).

E.g. 1: The reactive collision in which two NOCl molecules collide and break apart into two NO molecules and a Cl 2 molecule:

E.g. 2: For the hydrogen addition reaction in which a hydrogen molecule attaches directly to an ethene molecule to form an
ethane molecule:

This very low value of P which suggests that the reaction has very stringent orientational requirements.

Some reactions have P > 1. Such a value may seem absurd, because it appears to suggest that the reaction occurs more often than
the molecules meet! An example of a reaction of this kind is the reaction in which a K atom plucks a Br atom out of a
Br2 molecule:

In this reaction, the distance of approach at which reaction can occur seems to be considerably larger than the distance needed for
deflection of the path of the approaching molecules in a non-reactive collision! To explain this surprising conclusion, it has been
proposed that the reaction proceeds by a 'harpoon mechanism'.

ASIDE: The harpoon mechanism is based on a model of the reaction that pictures the K atom as approaching the Br 2 molecules,
and when the two are close enough an electron (the harpoon) flips across to the Br2 molecule. In place of two neutral particles
there are now two ions, and so there is a Coulombic attraction between them: this attraction is the line on the harpoon. Under its
influence the ions move together (the line is wound in), the reaction takes place, and KBr and Br emerge. The harpoon extends
the cross-section for the reactive encounter and we would greatly underestimate the reaction rate if we used for the collision
cross-section the value for simple mechanical contact between K and Br2.
Fig. 5: Energy is not the only criterion of a successful reactive encounter, for relative orientation may also play a role. (a) In this
collision, the reactants approach in an inappropriate relative orientation, and no reaction occurs even though their energy is
sufficient, (b) In this encounter, both the energy and the orientation are suitable for reaction.

[ TOP ]
(2) Activated complex theory

The activated complex theory (ACT), formerly known as the transition state theory, is a more sophisticated theory of reaction
rates that offers the following advantages over the collision theory:

1. It can be applied to reactions taking place in solution as well as in the gas phase;
2. The advantage that a quantity corresponding to the steric factor appears automatically, in contrast to the collision theory
where P had to be grafted on as an afterthought.

NOTES:

(1) The concepts used in the derivation of the rate constants in terms of the ACT are based on statistical thermodynamics.

(2) The reason why P appears automatically in the ACT framework is that the orientation requirements are carried in the entropy
of activation. Thus, if there are strict orientation requirements (for example, in the approach of a substrate molecule to an
enzyme), then the entropy of activation will be strongly negative (representing a decrease in disorder when the activated complex
forms), and the pre-exponential factor will be small. In practice, it is occasionally possible to estimate the sign and magnitude of
the entropy of activation and hence to estimate the rate constant.
(3) The general importance of activated complex theory is that it shows that even a complex series of events (not only a
collisional encounter in the gas phase) displays Arrhenius-like behaviour, and that the concept of activation energy is applicable.

[ TOP ]
(2-1) The reaction profile in the ACT:
Activated complex theory is an attempt to identify the principal features governing the magnitude of a rate constant in terms of a
model of the events that take place during the reaction. Let us have a look at a typical the reaction profile (i.e.a plot of the
'potential energy' vs. 'reaction coordinate'), for a bimolecular reaction between A and B forming products P (fig. 6). This plot
illustartes the following features:

 Initially, only reactants A and B are present.

 As the reaction event proceeds, A and B come into contact, distort, and begin to exchange or discard atoms.
 The potential energy rises to a maximum and the cluster of atoms that corresponds to the region close to the maximum
are referred to the activated complex, (AB)‡ or C‡. The configuration at the actual peak of the potential energy curve is
called the transition state.
 After the maximum, the potential energy falls as the atoms rearrange in the cluster, and it reaches a value that is
characteristic of the products, P.

NOTE: At the transition state, the two reactant molecules have come to such a degree of closeness and distortion that a small
further distortion will send them in the direction of products. (Although some molecules entering the transition state revert to
reactants, if they pass through this configuration then it is inevitable that products will emerge from the encounter.)

Fig. 6: A reaction profile. The horizontal axis is the reaction coordinate, and the vertical axis is potential energy. The activated
complex is the region near the potential maximum, and the transition state corresponds to the maximum itself.

In other words we have:

which in terms for the ACT, we have:

or:

i.e. the reaction between A and B proceeding through the formation of an activated complex, C‡, that falls apart by unimolecular
decay into products, P. Note that we not all (AB)‡ will proceed to products, and in fact, some will decay back to A and B, i.e.

The scope now becomes to derive an expression for k2 from first principles, which as we have said before, is done through
concepts from statistical thermodynamics. This formulation is known as the Eyring equation.

[ TOP ]
(2-2) Derivation of the rate law through the ACT (the thermodynamic derivation):

In a simple form of activated complex theory, we suppose that the activated complex is in equilibrium with the reactants (pre-
equilibrium), and that we can express its abundance in the reaction mixture in terms of an equilibrium constant, K‡.

Then, if we suppose that the rate at which products are formed is proportional to the concentration of the activated complex, we
can write:

The full activated complex theory gives an estimate of the constant of proportionality to give:

Thus, if we compare this expression with the form of the rate law, i.e.:

we would find:

But since we may think of K‡ as an equilibrium constant, then it may be expressed in terms of the standard reaction Gibbs
energy, or in this context, theactivation Gibbs energy, and written D‡G. It follows that:

i.e.:

But:

i.e.:

This expression has the form of the Arrhenius expression, i.e.:

if we identify the enthalpy of activation, D‡H, with the activation energy and the term in square brackets, which depends on
the entropy of activation,D‡S, with the pre-exponential factor.

[ TOP ]

(2-3) The activated complex theory and reactions between ions.

The simplified (thromodynamic) approach to the activated complex theory simplifies the discussion of reactions in solution. We
can combine the rate law:

with the thermodynamic equilibrium constant:

i.e.:

Let us now define ko2 as the rate constant with the activity coefficients equal to 1, i.e.:

At low concentrations the activity coefficients can be expressed in terms of the ionic strength, I, of the solution by using the
Debye-Huckel limiting law (see P.W. Atkins, Physical Chemistry, 6th Ed. Section 10.2c, particularly eqn 10.19) in the form:

where A = 0.509 in aqueous solution at 298 K and zJ is the charge numbers on particle J.

Thus,
 (Eqn. K.Salt.Effect)

This equation expresses the kinetic salt effect, the variation of the rate constant of a reaction between ions with the ionic strength
of the solution (see fig. 6):

 If the reactant ions have the same sign (as in a reaction between cations, or, between anions), then increasing the ionic
strength by the addition of inert ions increases the rate constant.
 Conversely, ions of opposite charge react more slowly in solutions of high ionic strength.

This because if reactant ions have the same sign, the formation of a single, highly charged ionic complex from two less highly
charged ions is favoured by a high ionic strength because the new ion has a denser ionic atmosphere and interacts with that
atmosphere more strongly.

Conversely, if reactant ions have opposite same signs, the charges in the activated complex cancel out and the complex has a less
favourable interaction with its atmosphere than the separated ions with a solution of a high ionic strength.

>> TECHNICAL NOTE: A plot of log(k/k0) vs. l1/2 should be linear wheer the gradient gtives infomation about the charge type
of the activated complex for the rate determining step. (see Fig 5 below).
Fig. 6: Experimental tests of the kinetic salt effect for reactions in water at 298 K. The ion types are shown as spheres, and the
slopes of the lines are those given by the Debye-Hückel limiting law and the Kinetic salt effect equation above (Eqn.
K.Salt.Effect).