Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Wuthering Heights is a novel written by the Irish author Emily Brontë in 1847, which
belongs to the Romantic period. The plot revolves around the lives of two houses,
and their inhabitants, in the moors of Northern England. Many characteristics of the
Romantic are present in the novel, as well as elements of the Gothic. Romanticism
emerges as a reaction against Neoclassicism, in which reason prevailed over
emotions. In Wuthering Heights, on the contrary, Emily Brontë created characters
who are ruled (and tormented) by their emotions, which is characteristic of the
Romantic period.
One of the most interesting features of the novel is the point of view of the narration,
or the framing device. In a “chinese box narrative structure” (Eagleton, 2005:136),
the story moves from one first person narrator to the other, as well as many other
“voices” which are included. The unreliability of the narrators (first Lockwood, and
then Nelly Dean) is representative of the complexity of the novel. It is not easy for the
characters to fall into a clear cut categorization of hero and anti-hero, which makes
them more round and complex.
Wuthering Heights possesses many Gothic elements such as violence, the presence
of ghosts, an isolated setting of extreme weather and landscapes, and the existence
of repressed feelings or desires in some of the characters. From a queer
perspective, some of these elements are interesting to analyse taking into an
account the discourse of normative sexuality, where, for example, violence in
sexuality is considered a perversion. There are many instances in the novel, such as
the relationship of Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff, Heathcliff and Isabella Linton
and Hareton Earnshaw and Catherine Linton, where sadomasochism is present. The
purpose of this essay is to explore to what extent the presence of sadomasochism in
Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff’s relationship in the novel benefits or empowers
her.
Masochism can be defined as “the activity of getting sexual pleasure from being hurt
or controlled by another person”.1 There are some important concepts to keep in
mind when discussing this practice. To begin with, the idea of consent is of major
value. Without consent of the participants, the practice is not masochistic but violent.
Masochism has a lot to do with dominance and power, and its counterparts:
subordination and powerlessness. These dynamics can be seen as representative of
the social and economic conflicts of the time. As Terry Eagleton points it
“There is a delight in both domination and subjugation, one which reflects something
of the complex class dynamics of the Brontës’ world. The lower middle class is
caught between deference and defiance, and it is as though sado masochism is the
‘political unconscious’ of this ambivalence.” (Eagleton, 2005:132)
1
Cambridge Dictionary
1
Essay- Panorama de la Literatura de los pueblos de habla inglesa
Macarena Mina 16/11/2017
Sado-masochism sometimes involves an inversion or defiance of the masculine and
feminine roles. In the relationship between Heathcliff and Catherine Earnshaw, she
plays the role of the dominant, the “mistress”, and he plays the role of the
submissive. Her inclination towards engaging in S/M (sadism and masochism) can
be seen at the beginning of the novel, when she is still a girl. Nelly describes this
behaviour in her account of the events to Lockwood:
“In play, she liked, exceedingly, to act the little mistress; using her hands freely, and
commanding her companions: she did so to me, but I would not bear slapping, and
ordering; and so I let her know.” (Brontë, 1847: 29)
When they are children, Catherine and Heathcliff enjoy and take part in
sadomasochistic play consensually. Nelly claims, “the boy would do her [Catherine’s]
bidding in anything,” and “he yielded completely” to Catherine’s dominance in play
and superiority in education (Brontë, 1847: 29,48).
However, a disruption in their roles happens when Catherine marries Edgar Linton.
Brontë portrays Heathcliff in a state of alienation, and when he comes back to
Wuthering Heights, he is ready to play the role of the dominant, by inflicting pain on
others. Although he does not speak about it in terms of sadomasochism, Terry
Eagleton addresses this change of roles:
“[Heathcliff’s] alienation from Catherine estranges him from himself to the point
where his brutalities become tediously perfunctory gestures, the mechanical motions
of a man who is already withdrawing himself from his own body. Heathcliff moves
from being Hindley's victim to becoming, like Catherine, his own executioner.”
(Eagleton, 2010:105)
Heathcliff’s relationship with Isabella Linton proves to be something other that
sadomasochistic. At the beginning of the relationship she is willing to engage in the
submissive role, but the fact that she had to flee from her house escaping from him
shows the crossing of the line between sadomasochistic role play and gender
violence. This can clearly be seen in Isabella’s account of the events to Nelly:
“I must get quite away. I’ve recovered from my first desire to be killed by him: I’d
rather he’d kill himself! (...) I gave him my heart, and he took and pinched it to death,
and flung it back to me” (Brontë 1847: 125)
Although in playing the dominant role Catherine can be seen as an empowered
woman, breaking the patriarchal discourse where men control and decide over
women; there are some aspects which show it is not that so. In the story, Catherine
and Heathcliff’s relationship is portrayed as something metaphysical, where they are
both outsiders, and the only place for their love to actually flourish is after death. This
has to do with two aspects present in the novel.
The first one is the ideology of romantic love, in which their love transcends their own
reality, and it exists in spite of the conditions which make it impossible (the fact that
she is married and then dead, for example). Catherine sees Heathcliff as part of
2
Essay- Panorama de la Literatura de los pueblos de habla inglesa
Macarena Mina 16/11/2017
herself, which becomes clear when she speaks to Nelly about this and says “I am
Heathcliff! He’s always, always in my mind, not as pleasure, any more than I am
pleasure to myself, but as my own being” (Brontë:1847, 59). As she cannot think of
herself outside him, is she really taking the role of the dominant or mistress? Or is
she just taking the masculine role borrowed from Heathcliff on the account that she
feels they are the same entity? If it is the latter case, Catherine’s character is not
actually breaking the patriarchal discourse by inverting roles of dominance but
actually reinforcing it. The question would be whether she would be able to place
herself in the dominant role without incorporating the masculine identity of Heathcliff
in her own.
The other aspect which may question Catherine’s empowerment as a female
character is the fact that there are some other roles, outside the patriarchal
discourse, at stake. The existence of the racial discourse present in the novel, where
Heathcliff is presented as the “ethnic other” from the beginning of the story, shows
that, even though Catherine is a woman, Heathcliff is considered “inferior” because
of his ethnicity. Inside that discourse, it is hard to make up the hierarchy of the
characters, and it is therefore hard to know whether her dominance is not just
representative of the imperialistic discourse where the ethnic other is treated as
inferior, and usually made to incorporate these ideas, by hating himself. He shows
this feeling when saying to Nelly “I wish I had light hair and a fair skin” (Brontë 1847:
39). In some other instances, Catherine herself treats him as inferior when asking
him to get clean after coming back from the Grange. This may explain why Heathcliff
comes back to Wuthering Heights as someone who falls into the stereotype of
“civilized” and why he is willing to suffer pain by being dominated by Catherine.
In conclusion, although there is clearly a presence of sadomasochism in the
relationships portrayed in the novel (some of which were not analysed in this essay,
such as Hareton and Catherine, which proves to be the healthiest example of
successful, consensual sadomasochism in the novel), it cannot be said that, in the
case of Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff’s relationship, it proves to be
empowering of her character as female. In fact, when seen from the perspective of
romantic love and the imperialistic discourse, it becomes more clear that the
patriarchal discourse is even reinforced.
3
Essay- Panorama de la Literatura de los pueblos de habla inglesa
Macarena Mina 16/11/2017
Works cited
● Eagleton, T. (2010). Myths of power: A Marxist Study of the Brontës.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.98-122.
● Eagleton, T. (2005). The english novel. Malden, MA: Blackwell, p.123-142.