Labor Law 2

Assignment No. 3
February 17, 2018

Articles 261-272, Labor Code

Duty to Bargain Collectively

Master Iron Labor Union vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 92009, February
17, 1993.
Caltex Refinery Employees Association vs. Brillantes, G.R. No.
123782, September 16, 1997.
Kiok Loy vs. NLRC, G.R. L-54334, January 22, 1986
Collective Bargaining Unit
Factors to be considered in determining the appropriate collective
bargaining unit
1. Will of the employees (Globe Doctrine)

International Alliance of Educators vs. Quisumbing, G.R. No.

128845, June 1, 2000.

2. Affinity and unity of the employees’ interest (Susbstantial

Mutual Interest Rule)

SMC Supervisors and Exempt Employees Union vs. Laguesma, G.R.

No. 110399, August 15, 1997.

San Miguel Corporation vs. Laguesma, G.R. No. 100485, September

21, 1994.

University of the Philippines vs. Ferrer-Calleja, G.R. 96189, July 14,

1992.

St. James School of Quezon City vs. Samahang Manggagawa sa St.

James School of Quezon City, G.R. No. 151326, November 23,
2005.
Philtranco Service Enterprises vs. BLR, G.R. No. 85343, June 28,
1989.
3. Prior collective bargaining history

National Association of Free Trade Unions vs. Mainit Lumber

Development Company Workers Union, G.R. No. 79526, December
21, 1990.
 San Miguel Corporation vs. Laguesma, G.R. No. 100485, September
21, 1994.

4. Similarity of employment status

Philippine Land-Air-Sea Labor Union vs. CIR,G.R. No. L-14656
Belyca Corporation vs. Ferrer-Calleja, G.R. No. 77395, November 29,
1988.
De La Salle University vs. De La Salle University Employees
Association, G.R. No. 109002, April 12, 2000.