Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CONCRETE MASONRY
ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA
(bNTENTS PART A
CONCRETE MASONRY
FOR BUILDINGS
Chapter 1 Application
Use tabs
to locate
Chapter 2 Manufacture Chapters
Chapter 5 Properties
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
"I
CONTENTS PART B
DESIGN OF CONCRETE
MASONRY BUILDINGS
Chapter 1 Overview
Chapter 2 Acoustics
Chapter 3 Robustness
Chapter 4 Fire
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Chapter 7 Movement
Chapter 8 Durability
Chapter 10 Footings
Use tabs
to locate
Chapters
a
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
'/'ll
CONTENTS PART C
CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE
MASONRY BUILDINGS
Chapter 1 Overview
Chapter 2 Specification
Chapter 3 Detailing
Lintels
Vertical Reinforcement
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
and Mullions
Bond Beams
Shear Walls and
Connections
Control Joints
Thermal Performance
Ancillary Details
Chapter 4 Estimating
Chapter 5 Construction
Appendix A CD-ROM of
CAD details
Use tabs
to locate
Chapters
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
C
C
4-J
0
a-
a-
Chaster 1
Application Contents
S This chapter describes the typical applications of 1.1 THE MANY FACES OF CONCRETE
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I
for projects involving lower levels of supervision or non-
0. plain blocks used as the loadbearing leaf in cavity repetitive construction.
construction and non-loadbearing partitions, Metal and glass sheeting provide attractive and
reinforced hollow blockwork in large building panels functional surfacing, but do not have the loadbearing
and retaining walls: properties necessary to support vertical gravity loads
applied from above.
mixed construction consisting of unreinforced and
reinforced hollow blockwork Similarly, metal and timber framed walls generally do
nct provide the requisite load bearing properties.
Reinforced concrete masonry provides efficient resistance
to wind loads and earthquake loads in large panels in Masonry walls do not have these disadvantages. They
low-rise commercial and industrial buildings such as: can be laid to fit into an existing structure and can
be laid around openings and other structural members.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
AESTHETICS,
COLOUR ANDTEXTURE
Plain face
Plain face units are available in a number of textures,
each of which tends to reflect the type of mix
employed. The coarsest face is obtained from a 'no-
fines' mix. The texture becomes less coarse as the
fines content and the moisture content in the mix is
increased, giving a more workable concrete.
Honed face
To achieve a finely striated finish that appears similar
to that produced by a diamond saw cut, dense concrete
units can be honed by passing them through a machine
that grinds approximately 2 mm from the surface Both
the face and an end can be honed to facilitate corners
in the finished masonry.
Polished face
Further polishing after honing will produce a very
smooth surface approaching that normally associated
with terrazzo. The block undergoes several passes of Rowing wall ofshotblastandsmoothface, sandstone-
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
the polishing disks, initially to remove scratches and coloured concrete masonry
striations, then to grind smooth and finally, to put a
shine on the surface. Both the face and an end can be
polished to facilitate corners in the finished masonry.
Colour variations can also be achieved in polished and
honed masonry.
,-,---
v...
"
Polished reconstructed granite blocks used for the external
skin of a house
Split face
Split face units are amongst the most popular facing
units supplied. They are produced as double-sized'
elements. After curing, the elements are split by
shearing to defined profiles.
0 The standard splitter induces a vertical split giving a
block or brick with a tailored finish. If a more rugged
0 character is sought the unit is split in a special machine
using angled blades. Alternatively, the unit may be
0 put through a hammer mill to remove the longitudinal
arrises following splitting. The size and colour of the
coarse aggregate particles in the concrete mix have a
considerable effect on the appearance of the finished
face. Where the colour of the coarse aggregate contrasts
with that of the matrix, the aggregate particles will
'read' quite clearly in the finished face. Normally,
aggregate particles do no exceed 15 mm in size, and
10-mm maximum is preferred. Split face units often
come in the full range of sizes for 90-mm and Retaining wall blocks being split on a special splitter to
110-mm-thick units. 140-mm and 190-mm-thick units give a profiled face
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
In
S Slump block and brick
Slump block and brick umts, known as adobe units,
have irregular dense faces. They are produced using
a concrete mix having greater workability and higher
moisture content than normal masonry mixes. The unit
is extruded in the normal way but tends to slump after
manufacture - hence the name. Although the height of
the unit is constant, some variation in plan dimensions
is inevitable. However, it is the variability which is the
principal attraction of this type of unit and which gives
the resulting wall its character. The maximum height of
slump block is limited by the process. Normally, only
90-mm-high or standard brick-size units are available.
Rumbled bricks and blocks
A rumbled surface is achieved by putting the units
through a machine known as a 'rumbler'. This is a
rotating tilted drum through which the units tumble
under gravity. At the upper end a series of blades or
protuberances cause the arrises to spall. In the lower "Adobe" or "slump" bricks
end the spalls get rounded off through contact with
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
"Multi-blend" rumbled bricks in interior application Plain ribbed blocks used to assist acoustics in an auditorium
Spilt-ribbed
Split-ribbed blocks provide the most vigorous texture
obtainable in concrete masonry. Cores set within
moulds, which are manufactured for double-sized units,
form the nibs. Since the blocks are withdrawn vertically
from the cores, at the moment of extrusion, they must
have a small draw to permit easy de-moulding. As
a result, the connecting nibs are very lightly tapered.
The units are split in the conventional way, the splitter
being applied to the mid-point in each connecting nib.
The rugged face disguises any tendency for the taper to
read in the finished wall.
A wide variety of profiles has been used, the main
variations being the size of the split nib relative to
the smooth-faced channel, the extent of draw in the
channel and the connecting radii between the channel Split-rib block detail at top of wall
face and the nib walls. Design considerations are similar
to those for plain ribbed block, and most units are
190 mm high to minimise horizontal lointng. The advent
of multi-blended colour processes has had an immense
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
i!i
II ii:
"I I
U 1iII'1i1IJi1ii.
II?",
A*
4q/ha/jrs.tu, N
a
I
,
.1
q
lq,
-
iIII1
4I'u''
Split-ribbed wall to domestic building
7/Iiwl! IflIbIfl
jj3j; 7
.:
angjlflft;1
Ii ,
1 IRUUU
Jiwaai
ll1"I',
1
'F
IIIIIIVI
I' I '
I3l1
I
-
Contra sting end wall of split-ribbed blocks to office
building
IIIIII!t'.IIII1II
III
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
__.__-I_J.I I -. I
trqiIiLhIP - !i L!I L!J'
!ii'
1t!i!1!1iI!IL!1
Use of different blocks to produce a profiled banding effect Simple screen block wall
Screen Blocks
- - - iliji IiII
The range of screen blocks is considerable. It differs
IJ
greatly between manufacturers and it is essential to
determine local availability before detailing a screen-
block wall.
Screen blocks can be manufactured in most colours, i:
-
-. -
.IJ
- Iia - -
- - -
-. -i*ri
- .- - - - -- -- -- I
_______ -
-, - _-__-,_-
I,ã
-' -
UI_ UI
--
'- -_s- -.
I _1 III
-
- .-
,.
-
.-
- -t j
:
- --
.:-
'
.- -
--
--
- __
I
, ,
I Ifl
ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE RMAL BEHAVIOUR
Noise can be one of the most intrusive and annoying The thermal performance of building envelopes has
phenomena in modern buildings. Noise travels from its become a major focus of government initiatives in
source through the air, through open windows or doors, Australia, with the governments of Victoria, South
thiough walls and into living or office spaces. It may Australia and Australian Capital Territory introducing
be controlled by isolating the noise at its source (eg by legislation requiring walls to have higher insulation
enclosing it within walls that will absorb and dissipate values than previously
it), or by preventing the noise from reaching the living
In 1993, Standards Australia published AS 2627.1 Thermal
or office spaces (eg by erecting sound-resistant walls in
insulation of roof, ceilings and wails in dwellings, which
its path).
sets requirements for thermal performance of walls
Concrete masonry is particularly suited to these and ceilings of dwellings, depending on the location
applications: of the dwelling within Australia. Calculated values of
It may be used for sound barriers adjacent to busy insulation to be added to various wall types, including
roads and similar sources of noise. brick veneer and cavity brick walls, are also included.
Other wall types, such as single-leaf masonry walls were
Concrete masonry loadbearing walls and non- not included in the deemed-to-comply tables, and the
loadbearing partitions in buildings, used in Standard recommends that their suitability should be
conjunction with paint and render or plasterboard, checked using the method set out in the Standard. This
can provide the sound attenuation required by the can be done using Part B:Chapter 9.
S BCA.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I
design requirements, design charts and tables and a
worked example for the design of concrete masonry to
provide enhanced thermal performance. Part C of this
Manual provides specification and detailing for thermal
performance.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Manufacture Contents
S This chapter describes the manufacture of concrete 2.1 HISTORY
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.5
I From air curing with occasional water sprays used
early in this century, curing techniques have also been
developed and refined. Low- and high-pressure steam
curing systems and burner curing systems are used
now. In some cases, these are supplemented by the
introduction of carbon dioxide into the curing chambers
after curing is completed, to reduce block shrinkage.
In Australia, concrete masonry followed American
developments, although the introduction of modern
high-production extrusion machines occurred much
later. Blocks were originally made in primitive moulds.
This practice continued until the 1950s when the first
modern blockmaking plant was established in Adelaide.
The introduction of similar machinery to other Australian
cities and towns followed.
Several types of block-, brick- and paver-making Figure 2.6a
machines are used in Australia Typical modern
blockmaking machines are shown in
Figures 2.6a, 2.6b and 2.6c.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 2.6c
MANUFACTURING METHODS
and
QUALITY CONTROL
Ii
necessary poolan agents aggregates
Regular checks of Regular sieve analysis
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
BATC H IN G
Regular checks:
Scale and dispe
Aggregate moisture content
compensating batch weights
Automawadpensing
SITE
Reguiar:. HANDLING
Correct mix consistency
Correct muungbme
BLOC STORAGE
Regular checks: and
Mould setting and wear DISPATCH
Density control
L Height control
Cycle time
BLOCKMAKING MACHINERY
From the mixer, concrete of the correct proportions
and workability is transported either by gravity or
mechanically to the blockmaking machine.
Machine pallets are heavy steel plates designed to
act as a mould bottom. Before each new cycle of the
machine, a fresh machine pallet is placed under the
mould. The mould is filled and the blocks vibrated. The
blocks are then extruded downwards from the mould,
remaining on the pallet which travels with them to
form a tray on which they are transported until they are
cured and about to be assembled into 'cubes' at the
packaging station.
Figure 2.10 Typical Mixer for Concrete Masonry Manufacture
Figure 2.11 shows a concrete block mould, with cores,
stripper shoes and head. The latter are laid back at
an angle in this photograph to show the details. They
normally occupy a vertical position. During mould filling,
the head and shoes are raised clear of the mould to
allow concrete to enter. When the mould is filled and
while it is being vibrated, the head and shoes press on
the top of the 'green' blocks. At the end of the vibration
period, they are moved down to extrude the blocks from
the mould. This particular mould is fitted to make four
1501 blocks, ie four 400 x 150 x 200 mm hollow blocks
and is quite small by modern standards. At the lower
left and right of the mould, the drive pulleys for the two
vibrator units may be seen. The latter are attached to
the mould body and are driven by two powerful electric
motors by means of belts.
S
Figure 2.11 Concrete Block Mould
9R
Most high production block machines used in Australia
employ similar mould, core, stripper shoe and machine
pallet arrangements. They differ only in size, the number
of units that can be made per machine cycle (ie on
each machine pallet), the system of actuation (electro-
mechanical or electro-hydraulic) and the method by
which vibration is applied to the mould and the green'
blocks. Mould vibration systems are either vibrator
units directly attached to the mould or remote units jc0
connected to the mould by rods.
Most concrete segmental payers are manufactured
using specialised paving machines of European origin,
as described previously. Hollow-block machines are
also widely used for the production of some types of
concrete segmental payers. Rectangular units can be
manufactured 'on edge' in the block machine, ensuring
that the whole of the machine cavity is effectively used.
Thus, for each machine cycle a larger number of units
may be manufactured in this way than would otherwise Figure 212a Blockmaking Machine with Automatic Rack
result from units manufactured 'on the flat'. Loading and Unloading Equipment
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
CURING
In the early days of concrete masonry, units were
usually cured by being left in the storage yard for at
least four weeks and sprinkled occasionally with water.
Curing was doubtful and variable and depended on
weather conditions. Extreme colour variations, caused
by differential surface drying, resulted from this
method of curing. With the arrival of high production
manufacturing and handling equipment, accelerated
curing techniques became necessary to avoid enormous
accumulation of stock.
Low-pressure steam curing was one of the earliest
accelerated curing methods used. In this system,
saturated steam, at atmospheric pressure and at
temperatures above about 70°C, is introduced into
insulated chambers containing racks of green blocks.
Hydration, the chemical reaction between cement and
water which causes hardening, is accelerated at high Figure 2.15a Typical Low-pressure Installation using Burners
temperature in a vapour-saturated atmosphere. About to Heat the Chamber and Produce the Steam
70 to 80% of the 28-day atmospheric-temperature cured
strength of the concrete is developed in 18 to 24
hours by this process. Units may thus be handled and
packaged the day after moulding
Other low-pressure curing systems use gas or oil
burners to heat the curing chamber. Steam is generated
by spraying water on a hot plate that is heated by
the burner. These systems offer economies in capital
expenditure, as a steam boiler is not needed. They
can be programmed for automatic operation without
the need for an attendant, resulting in economy in
operation. The results achieved are generally similar to
those available with medium temperature low-pressure
steam curing. Burner systems have the advantage that
a drying period may be added at the end of the curing
cycle. A typical installation of this type is shown in
Figures 2.15a and 2.15b,
Figure 16 shows a modern installation employing
Figure 2.15b Rear View of above Installation
automatic handling of 20-high racks.
95
PALLETISING AND PACKAGING
After being cured, blocks are unloaded from the racks
or curing chambers. They are removed mechanically
from the machine pallets and transported by conveyor
to the palletising station, where they are assembled
into 'cubes' of standard sizes, usually measuring
approximately 1.2 x 1.2 x 1.2 m. Figures 2.17a and
2.17b show typical cubing equipment.
Between the machine pallet stripping station and the
cuber, inspection is often made for units of sub-standard
appearance. If any are found, they are rejected and
removed. Sampling for testing for compliance with
Australian Standards AS/NZS 4455( 1) and AS/NZS
4456(Ref 2), as appropriate, is carried out also at this
stage.
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 2.18
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 2.19
Figure 2.20
i
REFERENCES
4
AS/NZS 4455-1997 Masonry units and segmental
payers, Standards Australia
2 AS/NZS 4456-1997 Masonry units and segmental
payers - Methods of test, Standards Australia
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Common Masonry
Units Contents
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
This chapter describes the most common masonry 3.1 COMMON MASONRY UNITS
units and the coding system commonly used to
describe and specify them. 3.2 NATIONAL METRIC CODING
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
190 190
190
190
90
190 190
10.31 10.42
Solid - full length Hollow - channel
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
190
190
190
190
98
10.83
Solid full length
190
140
40
NC indicates uCits which are not as common as others and it would be prudent to chock with manufacturer before specifying them
120 mm SERIES 110-mm-thick walls
PLAIN FACE - FULL HEIGHT
190
90 190
190
190
110 110 110 917
1201 (NC) 12.02 (NC) 12.03 (NC) 12.11 (NC) 12.739 (NC)
Hollow - full length Hollow - three quarter Hollow - half Hollow - universal Hollow -45° oquint
ID
390
190
190 110
12.25 (NC)
Hollow - corner return
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
e76
110 230 110 - 230
76
120.715 120.716
Standard brick Splitface brick
162 162
110 110
STANDARD BREAKAWAY
Hollow - double brick height Hollow - double brick height
NC indicates units which ore not as common as others and it would be prudent to check with manufacturer before specifying them
mm SERIES 140-mm-thick walls
PLAIN FACE - FULL HEIGHT
190
190
190
140 90
390
190 190
190 190
190
190
140
15.09 (NC) 15.10 (NC) 15.22 (NC) 15.25 (NC) 15.45 (NC)
Hollow - control joint Hollow - control joint half Hollow - seven-eighths closure Hollow - corner return Clean-out stretcher
190
190
90
15.48 (NC) 15.739 (NC)
block Hollow - 45° squint
NC Indicates units which are not as common as others and it would be prudent to check with manufacturer before specifying them
200 mm SERIES 190-mm-thick walls
PLAIN FACE - FULL HEIGHT
190 190
190
190
190
190 90
190 190
190 190
190
40
390
190 - 190
190
20.09 (NC)
Hollow - control joist
190 190
190
190 190
20.10 (NC) 20.21 (NC) 20.23 (NC) 20.24 (NC) 20.56 (NC)
Knock-out bond beam corner Jamb - full length Jamb - half Pilaster
Hollow - control joint half
190
190
190 190 190
390
65 65 90
20.57 (NC) 20 713 (NC) 20.715 (NC) 20.739 (NC) 20.925 (NC)
Pilaster - with control joint Bsllnose - full length Bullnose - half Hollow - 450 squint Single corn - full length
NC indicates units which are not as common as others and it would be prudent to chock with manufacturer before specifying them
200mm SERIES -O-mm-thick walls
PLAIN FACE - HALF HEIGHT
70
60
20.38
Sill block
90
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
190
90
190 90
20.121 (NC) 20.122 (NC) 20.123 (NC) 20.126 (NC) 20.127 (NC)
Hollow - full length Hollow - three quarter Hollow - half Three-quarter lintel Hollow - half height
390
195 195
NC indicates unita which are not as common as others and it would be prudent to check with manufacturer before specifying them
300 mm S 290-mm-thick walls
PLAIN FACE - FULL HEIGHT
190
190
190
90
290
190
190 190
NC indicates units which are not as common as others and it would be prudent to check with manufacturer before specifying them
SCREEN BLOCKS Decorative walls
190 90 190
290 290
390 390
90 90 90
10905 (NC) 10.908 (NC) 10.931 (NC) 10.934 (90 mm) (NC) 10.935 (90 mm) (NC)
15.934 (140 mm) (NC) 15,935 (140 mm) (NC)
390 390
90 90 90 90 190
10.936 (90 mm) (NC) 10.938 (90 mm) (NC) 10.939 (90 mm) (NC) 10.940 (90 mm) (NC) 20.925 (NC)
15.936 (140 mm) (NC) 15.938 (140 mm) (NC) 15.939 (140 mm) (NC) 15.940 (140 mm) (NC)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
190
390
140
15.745 (NC)
Louvre block
NC indicates units which are not as common us others and it would be prudent to check with manufacturer before specifying them
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Applied Finishes Contents
This chapter describes the finishes that are 4.1 RENDER AND PLASTER
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
I GENERAL
RENDER AND PLASTER
plasters are commonly used with concrete masonry as For normal masonry surfaces, the only treatment
surface coatings Gypsum plasters are limited to internal required will be the design of the first render coat to
use but portland cement plasters may be used both have water retention properties compatible with the
externally and internally. As well as their decorative and suction of the masonry surface and, depending on
protective functions, renders and plasters can contribute weather conditions, light fog spraying.
to the fire resistance and acoustic performance of In all cases, marked colour differences will result from
concrete masonry walls. uneven suction. Excess suction will make the render or
Many types of external finishes and colours are plaster coating stiffen prematurely and difficult to work
available. Smooth finishes are not recommended for to achieve a satisfactory finish.
external walls since they tend to become unevenly
discoloured and weathered after a very short period of OLD CONSTRUCTION
exposure. Textured finishes, which are inherently uneven Where old surfaces are to receive render or plaster, they
do not show the effects of dirt fallout and weathering must be examined carefully before determining the
to the same degree. However, when the time comes appropriate treatment. Paint, dust, grease, oil and loose
for maintenance, they are more difficult to clean and or deteriorated surface material and other deleterious
repaint than smooth surfaces.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
LI')
STRENGTH OF COATS CONTROL JOINTS
The first undercoat should not be stronger than the Control joints in render and plaster coatings should
base material itself. Each succeeding coat should not be formed in the same planes as the control joints,
be stronger that the coat before it. Excessively strong construction joints or any material interfaces in the base
mixes have caused many failures. With such renders material.
and plasters, shrinkage and structural movement cause
comparatively few widely spaced cracks of considerable DETAILING
width On the other hand, weak mixes tend to crack in
For best resistance to weather and to reduce the effects
a pattern with a large number of closely spaced cracks
of weathering discolouration, careful detailing of sills,
so small as to be almost imperceptible. In the first case,
copings, drip grooves, flashing and other features is
stress development will disrupt bond between the coat
most important.
and its base but with the weaker mixes, the closer
spacing of cracks will provide sufficient stress relief to
reduce the risk of bond failure. Recommendations for
mixes for various exposure conditions are given below.
parts sand
Type 2 1 part portland cement: I part lime : 6 to 6
parts sand
Type 3 1 part portland cement :2 parts lime : 8 to 9
parts sand
Types of mix recommended for given exposure
conditions are set out in Table 4.1.
I Moderately strong
porous materials
Moderately weak
porousmaterials -
Type 1
Type2
Type 2
Type2
Type 2
Type2
Type2
Type2
Type2or3
Type2or3
Type2or3
Type2or3
PLASTERBOARD
Plasterboard 600 25
600
GENERAL Masonry with max
25
true surface
As an alternative to wet render and plaster, plasterboard
may be fixed to masonry walls to provide an internal
lining.
FIXING PROCEDURES
Fixing to masonry using plaster cement - fixing
methods for true or irregular surfaces are illustrated in
E1
r
Figures 4.1 and 4.2.
75x50x 10mm
Plaster daub
A.
Plasterboard Control joint bead
FIXING METHODS
To overcome problems of differential movement when
fixing to plain or rendered concrete masonry walls, tiles
are fixed using flexible adhesives rather than cement
mortar. Adhesives allow relative movement between
tiles and the wall without cracking or bowing. The
dimensional accuracy of concrete masonry units provides
true wall surfaces, which make possible the fixing of
tiles with very thin coats of adhesive provided the units
have been laid accurately. If not, a thin rectifying render
coat should be applied before applying the adhesive and
fixing the tiles.
ADHESIVE TYPES
Both cement base and organic adhesives may be used,
many types are available for different uses and service
conditions. It is therefore impracticable to suggest
detailed fixing methods other than to say that the
adhesive manufacturer's instructions should be followed
exactly.
JOINTS
Joints between tiles should not be less than 2 mm
wide for tiles up to 100 x 100 mm and proportionately
wider for larger tiles. They should be filled with flexible
material or a crushable tile grout. These are readily
available from manufacturers of sealants.
Provision for movement must be made by expansion
joints at not more than 5-rn spacing horizontally
and vertically and at internal corners. Expansion
joints should be at least 5 mm wide and filled with
compressible material. Where the wall itself has a
I GENERAL
PAINTS AND
PROTECTIVE COATINGS
S
S
Properties Contents
This chapter describes the typical properties of 5.1 INTRODUCTION
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
5.3 REFERENCES
I
4-J
INTRODUCTION
Most concrete masonry manufacturers adopt sound of eighteen parts, but only some of the parts are
management techniques and some have quality applicable to concrete masonry wall units and only a
systems complying with AS/NZS/ISO 9002(Ref ) which few are relevant for commonly-available products. The
set out internationally-recognised quality assurance testing standards that are relevant to the supply of
requirements. concrete masonry walling units to most projects are as
follows.
Designers are required to specify the dimensional
tolerances, compressive strength and resistance to salt
attack using the following standards:
AS/NZS 4456.3 Determining dimensions
AS/NZS 4456.4 Determining compressive strength of
masonry units
AS/NZS 4456.10 Determining resistance to salt attack
For face masonry, which does not have an applied
finish, designers may also wish to specify limits for
efflorescence potential and permeability to water using
the following standards:
AS/NZS 4456.6 Determining potential to eflloresce
AS/NZS 4456.16 Determining permeability to water
The following standards are also available for use by
manufacturers and in abnormal circumstances (such as
research or product development), and should not be
routinely called up by specifiers or designers.
AS/NZS 4456.1 Sampling for compliance testing
AS/NZS 4456.2 Assessment of mean and standard
deviation
AS/NZS 4456.7 Determining core percentage and
material thickness
AS/NZS 4456.8 Determining moisture content and dry
density
AS/NZS 4456,12 Determining coefficients of contraction
AS/NZS 4456.14 Determining water absorption properties
AS/NZS 4456.15 Determining lateral modulus of rupture
AS/NZS 4456.17 Determining initial rate of absorption
(suction)
PROP ERTI ES
SHELL THICKNESS AND WEB THICKNESS OF
HOLLOW BLOCKS
DIMENSIONS AND TOLERANCES
Minimum thicknesses of face end shells and webs of
The work sizes of a masonry unit are the principal hollow concrete blocks can be calculated from
dimensions from which any deviations are measured and AS/NZS 4455, which states:
are nominated by the manufacturer. For example, overall Masonry units and segmental payers shall be able to be
lengths, heights and widths of prismatic units are work handled, transported to the purchaser and laid.
sizes. So too are the principal dimensions of the cores
and face shell in hollow units, since they influence NOTE: Integrity does not include aesthetic characteristics
strength and weight. of masonry or paving units.
AS/NZS 4455 Clause 2.1 requires manufacturers For hollow masonry units, this requirement is deemed to
to make available the work sizes, face shell width be satisfied if the characteristic uncon fined strength is at
of hollow units and the characteristic unconfined least 3 MPa for cored units and 2.5 MPa for solid units
compressive strength ('0) discussed in detail below.
AS/NZS 4456.3 provides two methods of determining For solid and cored masonry units, this requirement is
dimensions, one based on averaging the dimensions deemed to be satisfied if the average measurements of
over 20 units and the other based on measuring the each part of five random-sampled units (measured at the
dimensions of individual units. same positions on each unit) are not less than the values
given in Table 2.4-
AS/NZS 4455 Table 2.1 sets out dimensional deviation
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
units at all.
Because of the method of manufacture, concrete
masonry units can be manufactured to much tighter
tolerances than other masonry units and they generally
meet category DW4. Category lDW4 requires not only
the average dimension of units to be within ± 3 mm of
the work size, but also that the dimensions of individual
units be controlled by requiring that the standard
deviation of dimensions be not more than 2 mm. This
limits the potential for big variations in the size of
Figure 5.1 Proportions of Units
concrete masonry units, which is common for other
[Based on AS/NZS 4455 Figure 2.1]
types of masonry units.
I The most commonly applied minimum face-shell
dimensions and web dimensions for hollow concrete
blocks, complying with AS/NZS 4455 Table 24, are
given in Table 5.2.
90orless 25 25 25
Testing for core percentage and material thickness does
not need to be carried out as part of routine quality
over 90 to 140 25 25 30 control. If a test is required, it should be carried out in
25 accordance with AS/NZS 4456.7.
overl4Oto 190 30 30
over 190 35 30 38
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S 290 119
190
90
51
70
97
90
9.9
4.8
9.1
4.4
8.2
4.0
7.3
3.6
110 100 110 8.3 7.6 6.8 6.1
140 55 77 5.8 5.3 4.8 4.3
190 51 97 7.3 6.7 6.0 5.4
NOTES:
1 Percentage solid will vary, depending on the manufacturer
2 Some low densities may not be available in various locations
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH LATERAL MODULUS OF RUPTURE
AS/NZS 4455 specifies a characteristic unconfined Lateral Modulus of Rupture is a measure of the
compressive strength (0) of at least 3 MPa for hollow 'sideways' bending strength of masonry units. If the
units and 2.5 MPa for solid units. These values are lateral modulus of rupture of units is too low, a wall
in the standard to ensure that the units have a basic could crack vertically when subjected to horizontal
level of resistance to breakage during handling and out-of-plane loads such a wind or earthquake. AS 3700
transport. However, AS 3700 requires the designer to uses a default value of 0.8 MPa for characteristic lateral
nominate the required strength on the drawings, and it modulus of rupture.
is recommended that this be done in consultation with It is not common, nor is it a requirement of AS/NZS
the manufacturer. 4455, to test for lateral modulus of rupture. If a test is
Compressive strength tests should be carried out in required, it should be carried out in accordance with
accordance with AS/NZS 4456.4. A masonry unit is AS/NZS 4456.15. This test requires three units to be
placed in a compression testing machine and subjected glued together
to increasing load until it fails. From the maximum load, end-to-end, the resulting beam to be supported on its
the unconfined compressive strength may be calculated. side and subjected to a breaking load, see Figure 5.2.
Solid or cored units must be fully bedded in the test Unless required otherwise, it is a reasonable expectation
and the compressive strength calculated using the that hollow concrete masonry units have a characteristic
full-bed area. On the other hand, hollow units must be lateral modulus of rupture in excess of the AS 3700
bedded only on the face shells, and the compressive value of 0.8 MPa, probably in the range 1.0 to 2.0 MPa.
strength calculated using the face-shell area. An aspect
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
PLAN
Test specimen
Tank
I Tap
n-dry density
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
concrete,
(kg/rn3)
Maxium water
<1400 1400-1700 1700-2000 >2000
I
absorption,
(kg/rn3) 320 290 240 210
c in
EN C ES
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Contents
1.1 GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
1.9
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1.11 GLOSSARY
1.13 BIBLIOGRAPHY
>
0>
Chaster 1
Overview
For many years, concrete masonry has been a The purpose of this Part of the Manual is to
mainstay of Australian building. However, unlike redress these shortfalls by:
its glamorous sisters, reinforced concrete and explaining the requirements of the Building
structural steel, this Cinderella product receives Code of Australia (BCA) and the use of AS 3700
little attention in structural engineering courses Masonry structures to design concrete masonry
and its aesthetic qualities are shunned in favour of buildings and building components;
clay brickwork.
providing simple design charts which will assist
the rapid selection of concrete masonry
members; and
providing comprehensive design examples
which show the origin of the charts and the
use of the Standard.
EN!L
DESIGN CONS
1.1.2 MASONRY WALL TYPES
The main types of masonry wall are as follows.
1.1.1 BUILDING TYPES Single leaf:
In this manual, buildings are considered under three Unreinforced single-leaf walls Figure 1.1(a)
broad headings: Reinforced single-leaf walls Figure 1.1(b)
Low-rise commercial and industrial buildings Veneer:
with large wall panels Unreinforced veneer walls Figure 1.1(c)
Factories Cavity:
Warehouses Unreinforced cavity walls Figure 1.1(d)
Shopping centres Cavity walls with one or more
Auditoriums reinforced leaves Figure 1.1(e)
Schools and hospitals
Hybrid:
High-rise and medium-rise commercial and Diaphragm walls Figure 1.1(f)
residential buildings with loadbearing and Reinforced-cavity walls Figure 1.1(g)
non-loadbearing fire-rated walls
Home units Table 1.1 compares these wall types.
Office buildings There are many options open to designers for the
Hotels provision of attractive finishes to concrete masonry.
Residential buildings Walls may be face block or brick (plain face, ribbed or
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
ii
High-rise and medium-rise commercial and
residential buildings
2 Home units
3 Boarding houses, guest houses, hotels, motels,
aged accommodation
4 Dwellings within other buildings
5 Offices
6 Shops
8 Laboratories
Residential buildings
I Single dwelling houses, multiple dwelling houses
such as town houses, row houses, villa houses,
boarding houses and group houses.
iDa Non-habitable out-buildings such as garages and
sheds
1')
Solid or hollow concrete masonry Hollow concrete blockwork
II
Vertical steel
reinforcement
(optional)
Honzontal steel
reinforcement
to bond beams
(optional)
Bed-joint
reinforcement
(optional)
Masonry-veneer ties
Stmctural
backing
Flashing
Weepholes
I
(C) Unreinforced Veneer
Vertical steel
reinforcement (optional)
Outer leaf
Outer leaf
Inner leaf Cavity ties
Horizontal steel
reinforcement
(optional)
Cavity ties
Inner leaf
Open perpends
p as weepholes
for drainage
of cavity
Cavity ties
Outer leaf
I Horizontal steel
reinforcement
in cavity
Inner leaf
Inner leaf
Inner leaf outer leaf may be
hollow concrete masonry
Construction Hollow or cored Hollow, cored or solid Brick or hollow or cored Brick or hollow or cored
concrete block brick or block concrete block Concrete block
Reinforcement Can include vertical Requires structural Not usual, but there is no Diaphragm wall is not
reinforcement or support reason why one leaf should reinforced. Reinforced-cavity
bond beams not be reinforced wall has horizontal and
vertical reinforcement
Waterproof No, requires painting Yes, provided Yes, provided Yes, generally
or sealing to prevent construction is flashed construction is flashed
water penetration
Aesthetics Depends on the coating Face masonry does not Face masonry does not Face masonry does not
system, painted split or require painting require painting require painting
painted ribbed units are
attractive
Cost Most economical form Structural support adds Approximately 50% more More expensive than
of masonry but must be considerably to cost expensive than single-leaf cavity wall
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
waterproofed
ILl
1.1.3 LOW-RISE COMMERCIAL AND Each system is particularly suited to single-leaf
INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WITH LARGE construction but can also be constructed as the
WALL PANELS structural leaf of a cavity wall.
Selection of the appropriate masonry system will depend Each system can be either loadbearing (supporting roof
on the wall panel sizes, the support conditions and the or floor loads) or non-loadbearing, eg contained within a
magnitude of the design out-of-plane horizontal wind, grid of supporting members.
earthquake or fire loads.
Once the masonry walling system has been selected
and checked for these out-of-plane horizontal loads, it Note: The maximum permissible
must be checked for in-plane horizontal shear load, length of honzontal bond beam is.
vertical load and combined load. 9.12 metres for 190-mm thick walls
6.72 metres for 140-mm thick walls
If masonry walls are continuous over two or more
storeys, the fixing of walls to intermediate floors will
greatly improve the structural efficiency by reducing the
wall spans. Reinforcement may be continuous at
intermediate floors, thus reducing the bending moments
at mid span (Figure 1.2)
In buildings with large internal clear spans (eg
S factories and warehouses), the spacing of portal frames,
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Self-weight of wall
or earthquake, Non-loadbearing panels or partitions, which are
distributed to supported laterally within a structural frame but
columns through
masonry wall receive no imposed load from it, Figure 1.5. Where
non-loadbearing walls are built between concrete
floor slabs, they should be adequately attached at
the top to the underside of the slab, and at the
sides, to prevent lateral movement, Figure 1.6.
Figure 1.5 Non-Loadbearing Wa//System
Bonded or tied piers and cross walls will provide
further lateral support. These walls may be either
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Pngnonloadbeadng
walls in this manner avoids
complicated slab reinforcement
The BCA Vol 1 requires that walls that separate Uving Living
soleoccupancy units or walls that separate a sole-
Living
occupancy unit from a plant room, lift shaft, stairway, Living
public corridor, hallway or the like, have certain values UNIT 1 UNITS
of R(N0te 1) It also requires that walls between a
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTES:
I Values given are the basic BOA requirements, however,
different states have elected to vary some of these values
which will require checking with the local authority.
DESIGN FOR ROBUSTNESS
1
B
C q C
I lfl
Table 1.3 Fire Resistance Leve/s (minutes) for Structural Adequacy/lntegrity/lnsu/ation in Type A Construction,
Excluding Carparks (Extract from Building Code of Australia Table 3 in Specification C1.1)
Class of Building
7 or8
2,3 or4 part 5 or 9 6 (Factories,
Building Element (Residential) (Offices) (Retail) Warehouses)
External Walls
(including any column and other building element incorporated therein) or other external building element excluding a roof,
where the distance from any fire-source feature to which it is exposed is:
For loadbearing parts -
I less than 1.5 m
1.5 to less than 3 m
90/ 90/ 90
90/ 60/ 60
120/120/120
120/ 90/ 90
180/180/180
180/180/120
240/240/240
240/240/180
3ormore 90/60/30 120/ 60/ 30 180/120/90 240/180/90
For non-loadbearing parts -
lessthan 1.5 m - / 90/ 90 - /120/120 - /180/ 180 - /240/ 240
1.5 to less than 3 m - / 60/ 60 -/ 90/ 90 - /180/120 - /240/180
3 m or more -I -I - -I -I - -I -I - -I -/ -
Common Walls and Fire Walls
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Class of Building
7 or 8
2,3or4part 5or9 6 (Factories,
Building Element (Residential) (Offices) (Retail) Warehouses)
External Walls
(including any column and other building element incorporated therein) or other external building element excluding a roof,
where the distance from any fire-source feature to which it is exposed is:
For loadbearing parts -
less than 1.5 m 90/90/90 120/120/120 180/180/180 240/240/240
1.5tolessthan3m 90/60/60 120/ 90/ 60 180/120/ 90 240/180/120
3 to less than 9 m 90/ 30/ 30 120/ 60/ 30 180/ 90/ 60 240/ 90/ 60
9tolessthan 18m 90/30/ - 120/ 30/ - 180/ 60/ - 240/ 60/ -
l8mormore -/ -/ - -/ -/ - -/ -/ - -/ -/ -
For non-loadbearing parts -
lessthan 1.5m -/90/90 -/120/120 -/180/180 -/240/240
1.5tolessthan3m -/60/30 -/90/ 60 -/120/ 90 -/180/120
-/ -/ -/ -I -/ -/ -
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3mormore - - -/ -/ -
Common Walls and Fire Walls
90/90/90 120/120/120 180/180/180 240/240/240
Internal Walls
Fire-resisting lift and stair shafts -
Loadbearing 90/90/90 120/120/120 180/120/120 240/120/120
Non-loadbearing -/90/90 -/120/120 -/120/120 -/120/120
Bounding public corridors, public hallways and the like -
Loadbearing 60/60/60 120/ -/ - 180/ -/ - 240/ -/ -
Non-loadbearing - / 60/ 60 -/ -/ - -/ -/ - -/ -/ -
Between or bounding sole-occupancy units -
Loadbearing 60/60/60 120/ -/ - 180/ -/ - 240/ -/ -
Non-loadbearing -/60/ 60 -/ -/ - -/ -/ - -/ -/ -
Other Loacthearing Internal Walls; and Internal Beams, Trusses and Columns
60/ -/ - 120/ -/ - 180/ -/ - 240/ -/ -
Table 1.5 Fire Resistance Levels (minutes) for StructuralAdequacy/Integrity/Insulation in Type C Construction,
Excluding Carparks (Extract from Building Code of Australia Table 5 in Specification Cli)
Class of Building
7 or8
2,3or4part 5or9 6 (Factories,
Building Element (Residential) (Offices) (Retail) Warehouses)
'External Walls
(including any column and other building element incorporated therein) or other external building element excluding a roof,
where the distance from any fire-source feature to which it is exposed is:
lessthanl.5m 90/90/90 90/ 90/ 90 90/ 90/ 90 90/ 90/ 90
1.5 to less than 3 m -/ -/ - 60/ 60/ 60 60/ 60/ 60 60/ 60/ 60
3mormore -/ -/ - -/ -/ - -/ -/ - -/ -/ -
Common Walls and Fire Walls
90/ 90/ 90 90/ 90/ 90 90/ 90/ 90 90/ 90/ 90
Internal Walls
Bounding public corridors,
publichallwaysandthelike 60/60/60 -/ -I - -/ -/ - -/ -/ -
Between or bounding
sole-occupancy units 60/ 60/ 60 -/ -/ - -/ -/ - -/ -/ -
Bounding a stair if required
to be fire-rated 60/60/60 -/ -f -/ -/ - -/ -/
119
DESIGN FOR
VERTICAL LOADS
Loacibearing Walls
Medium-rise commercial and residential buildings (up to
1.5.1 GENERAL approximately five storeys) are often designed with
loadbearing masonry walls supporting concrete floor
Although masonry walls have traditionally been slabs (Figure 1.11). In this case, the walls must be
relatively thick, there is an increasing trend towards analysed for vertical load capacity. The magnitude of the
thinner loadbearing walls. While walls were once loads can vary considerably, while loads of
230-mm bonded brickwork, they evolved to two leaves of approximately 30 to 35 kN/m per supported floor are
110-mm brickwork separated by a cavity and to 110-mm common.
single-leaf masonry. More recently they have continued
to evolve to two leaves of 90-mm masonry separated by Residential Buildings
a cavity and to 90-mm single-leaf masonry, which is now The gravity loads on low rise residential buildings are
common. generally of a low magnitude, thus obviating the need
for stringent analysis provided the robustness limits are
Historically, little attention was paid to the vertical observed, careful engineering judgment is exercised and
gravity loads on masonry walls, but today, as the there is suitable detailing to accommodate wind uplift.
designs are being refined and the margins of safety are
being trimmed, it is necessary for the design engineer
1.5.2 ROOF LOADS
to check the loads and wall capacities.
It is necessary to consider the uplift forces applied by
Low-Rise Commercial and Industrial Buildings
the roof structure to masonry walls, tie down and
with Large Wall Panels lintels. In areas of high wind, these uplift forces will be
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Gap ensures
no vertical load is
transmitted to wall
t.atera pressures
due to wind, fire Lateral pressures
or earthquake, due to wind, fire
Self-weight of wall
distributed to or earthquake,
columns through distributed to
masorny wall
4
wall supports
Figure 1.10 Non-Loadbearing Wa/I System Figure 1.11 Loadbearing Wall System
1.13
Table 1.6 Permanent Loads of Typical Roofing/Ceiling Linings (Extract From AS 1684)
D
Timber decking 45-mm thick with roofirigof mass 10 kg.m2 and battens
Timber plank or plywood 45 mm thick covered by metal-foil-coated bituminous membrane
plus 10-mm plaster ceiling and battens
Roofing of mass 10 or 20 kg/rn2 plus 10-mm plaster ceiling, battens and lightweight insulation
_,wboard 50 mm thick plus roofing of mass 10 kg/rn2_______
Roofingof mass 60 kg/rn2 plus 10-mm plaster, ceiling battens and lightweightinsulation
0.4
0.6
0.9
I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I
Roofingtype (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa)
Li 1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
I
1.4 0.25 -1.0 0.3 2.1
. - -.- -2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-0.7
-1.7
-2.7
2.1
2.1
2.1
-5.0 -3,7 2.1
Important Note: These tables must not be used as a substitute for proper calculations in accordance with Australian Standards
and the Building Code of Australia.
A simplified approach for the uplift due to wind loads Table 1.8 Wind Pressures on Roof
on housing is given in AS 4055 (Table 1.8) (Extract from AS 4055)
The formulae given in Figure 1.12 may be used to
calculate the vertical forces on internal and external Ultimate Net pressure UpUft pressure
walls of a simple building. Wind wind speed coefficient on roof, p (kPa)
category V(m/s) Tile Sheet
It is not uncom.rnon for strong wind or cyclonic wind to
cause sufficient uplift on a roof to peel off the cladding Ni W28N 34 0.04 0.44
or even to remove the rafters or trusses. To prevent this N2 W33N 40 0.34 0.74
occurrence, roof structures must be properly anchored to N3 W41N 50 0.93 1.33
the walls or, if uplift is particularly severe, to the N4 W5ON 61 1.74 214
footings via the walls. Several alternatives are shown in N5 W6ON 74 2.89 3.29
Figure 1.13 N6 W7ON 86 4.16 4.564
In reinforced masonry construction, the roof structure Cl W41C 50 -1.6 t 1.68 2.08
may be secured by holding-down bolts or brackets to C2 W5OC 61 -1.6 285 3.25
a horizontal bond beam tied to the slab below via C3 W6OC 74 -1.6 454 4.94
vertical reinforcing bars in the masonry cores and C4 W7OC 86 -1.6 1.6.38 6.78
starter bars set into the footings.
In cavity masonry construction, roof anchors may 4
S pass down the cavity between the two leaves of
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
:______
ii Holding-down
Hoop-iron
- Connector
between
top plate
'in, bolt hooked under
strap fixed to
roof truss
and truss
horizontal bars
in bond beam
Table 1.9 Floor Permanent Loads and Imposed Loads in Self-contained Houses (Extract From AS/NZS 1170.1)
p
Permanent load unfactored Permanent load factored (1.2 x unfactored)
Floor construction Uniform (kPa) Uniform (kPa)
I
150 mm 3.8 4.5
175 mm 4.4 5.3
200 mm 5.0 6.0
General
1.5
1.8 on 350 mm2
2.25
2.7 on 350 mm2
Important Note: These tables must not be used as a substitute for proper calculations in accordance with Australian Standards
and rhe Building Code of Australia.
FNFOR HORIZONTAL LOADS
Table 1.10 Wind Pressures on Wa/Is of Houses
Wind, earthquake and fire loads will be exerted on the (Extract from AS 4055)
masonry walls as out-of-plane horizontal pressures,
transmitted from any unreinforced masonry to any Ultimate Net pressure Horizontal wall
reinforced sections within the walls and then to the Wind wind speed coefficient pressure
supporting structure, footings and foundations. The category V (m/s) C
masonry walls may also contribute to the shear Ni W28N 34 1.00 0.7
resistance of the structure. N2 W33 N 40 1.00 1.0
N3 W 41 N 50 1.00 1.5
1.6.1 WIND LOAD N4 W 50 N 61 1.00 2.2
AS/NZS 1170.2 gives a method of calculating the N5 W 60 N 74 1.00 3.3
ultimate horizontal wind pressure acting on masonry N6 W 70 N 86 1.00 4.4
walls. This ultimate pressure may be used to calculate Cl W 41 C 50 1.35 2.0
the ultimate moments and shear loads and compared C2 W 50 C 61 1.35 3.0
directly with the ultimate capacities given in Part B: C3 W 60 C 74 1.35 4.4
Chapter 6 of this manual. C4 W 70 C 86 1.35 6.0
A simplified system of calculating wind pressures on
the walls of houses is set out in AS 4055 and
reproduced in Table 1.10
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1.6.2 EARTHQUAKE LOAD Table 1.11 Horizontal Seismic Force on Unrein forced
AS 1170.4 Clause 52(Note 1) gives a method of Masonry Gable Ends, Chimneys, Parapets etc, for
calculating the ultimate horizontal seismic force acting Domestic Structures
on architectural components such as masonry walls.
Forces on walls due to self-weight plus plasterboard to
The following formula and tables derive the force in kPa
one face, F (kPa)
exerted by a i-m2 section of masonry wall in typical
applications. These ultimate pressures may be used to Acceleration, a
Site
calculate the ultimate moments and shear loads and
factor, S 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11
compared directly with the ultimate capacities given in
Part B:Chapter 6 of this manual 190-mm hollow concrete blockwork 55% solid. G5 = 2.31 kN/m2
Horizontal earthquake force (per unit area) 0.67 0.17 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.31
1.00 0.25 0.29 0.34 0.038 0.42 0.46
= aS ac a Cci I G < O.SGc
1.25 0.31 0.37 0.42 0.47 0.52 0.58
where:
a = acceleration coefficient 1.50 0.38 0.44 0.50 0.56 0.63 0.68
S = site factor 2.00 0.50 0.59 0.67 0.75 0.84 0.92
ac = attachment amplification factor
140-mm hollow concrete blockwork 75% solid, G = 2.32 kN/m2
ax height amplification factor
Cci = earthquake coefficient for 0.67 0.17 0.40 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.31
architectural components 1.00 0.25 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.42 0.46
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Notes:
1 At the time of publication, AS 1170.4 was being revised by
Standards Australia.
I IQ
Table 1.12 Horizontal Seismic Force on Unrein forced Table 1.13 Horizontal Seismic Force on Close-Spaced
MasonFy Exterior Walls or Parapets, Walls Adjacent to or Reinforced Masonry Exterior Ductile Walls, or Enclosing
Enclosing Stairs etc for General Structures (Ccl = 1.8) Vertical Shafts, or Full-height Partitions Required to Have a
FRL for General Structures (Cci = 0.9)
Forces on walls due to self-weight plus plasterboard to
one face, F (kPa) Forces on walls due to self-weight plus plasterboard to
Acceleration, a one face, F (kPa)
Site
factor, S 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 Acceleration, a
Site
I 190-mm hollow concrete blockwork 55% solid. G = 2.31 kN/m2 factor, S 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11
0.67 0.33 0.39 0.45 0.50 0.56 0.61 190-mm hollow concrete blockwork 100% solid. G= 4.18 kN/mJ
1.00 0.50 0.58 0.67 0.75 0.83 0.92 0.67 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55
1.25 0.62 0.73 0.83 0.94 1.04 1.15 1.00 0.45 0.53 0.60 0.68 0.75 0.83
1.50 0.75 0.87 1.00 1.12 1.25 1.37 1.25 0.56 0.66 0.75 0.85 0.94 1.03
2.00 1.00 1.17 1.33 1.50 1.67 1.83 1.50 0.68 0.79 0.90 1.02 1.13 1.24
2.00 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.35 1.50 1.66
140-mm hollow concrete blockwork 75% solid. = 2.32 kN/m2
0.67 0.34 0.39 0.45 0.50 0.56 0.62 140-mm hollow concrete blockwork 100% solid. G = 3.10 kN/m2
1.00 0.50 0.59 0.67 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.67 0.22 0.26 0.30 0.34 0.37 0.41
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1.25 0.63 0.73 0.84 0.94 1.05 1.15 1.00 0.33 0.39 0.45 0.50 0.56 0.61
1.50 0.75 0.88 1.13 1.25 1.38 1.25 0.42 0.49 0.56 0.63 0.70 0.77
2.00 1.00 1.17 I1.00
1.34 1.51 1.67 1.84 1.50 0.50 0.59 0.67 0.75 0.84 0.92
2.00 0.67 0.78 0.89 1.00 1.12 1.23
110-mm hollow concrete blockwork 90% solid, G0 2.20 kN/m2
0.67 0.32 0.37 0.42 0,48 0.53 0.58 0.9.
1.00 0.47 0.55 0.63 0.71 0.79 0.87 Near the top of the building, therefore h/h0 = 1.0 and a = 2.0.
1.25 0.59 0.69 0.79 0.89 0.99 1.09 Directly fixed to the structure, therefore ac 1.0.
Type I or Type II building, therefore I 1.00.
1.50 0.71 0.83 0.95 1.07 1.19 1.30
Masonry density = 2200 kg/rn3.
2.00 0.95 1.11 1.26 1.42 1.58 1.74
ci)
= 1.4.
Near the top of the building, therefore h/h0 = 1.0 and a 2.0.
Directly fixed to the structure, therefore ac = 1.0.
Type I or Type II building, therefore I = 1.00.
Masonry density = 2200 kg/rn3.
1.6.3 FIRE S
The horizontal forces on masonry walls due to fire are Diagonal bracing
difficult to quantify. AS 3700 requires that reinforced
Bond beams
masonry walls be designed for a pressure of 0.5 kPa.
Refer to Part B:Chapter 4 of this manual.
Portal
frames
1.6.4 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Low-Rise Commercial and Industrial Buildings
with Large Wall Panels
Typical load paths for large wall panels using mixed
construction are shown in Figure 1.14. The first step is
to design any unreinforced masonry for out-of-plane
horizontal loading. The next is to design any reinforced
cores or bond beams for out-of-plane horizontal loading
including those exerted from the unreinforced masonry.
Finally the combination of reinforced and unreinforced
UNREINFORCED MASONRY PANELS
masonry should be checked for in-plane shear capacity.
SUPPORTED BY BOND BEAMS AND
(If the reinforced cores and bond beams are sized and PORTAL FRAMES
spaced such that the wall qualifies as wide-spaced
reinforced masonry as defined in AS 3700 Clauses 8.5
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I )fl
DESIGN FOR MOVEMENT
1.21
DESIGN FOR DURABILITY
C)
>
C)
>
0
1 99
DESIGN FOR
THERMAL PERFORMANCE
Residential Buildings
In 2003, the ABCB (Australian Building Codes Board)
published amendments to the BCA to reduce energy use
and greenhouse gas emissions.
Housing Amendment 12 has been adopted in
Tasmania (subject to some additions), South Australia
and Northern Territory;
Western Australia and Queensland adopted the
recommendations of Amendment 13, with some
modifications of the BCA model;
New South Wales will not adopt the Amendment, but
will instead implement the BASIX online approval
system based on NatHERS and limited Deemed-to-
Satisfy values;
Victoria did not adopt the amendment, opting
instead for 5-Star Rating;
ACT did not adopt the amendment, opting instead
for 4-Star Rating.
The acceptable forms of construction to achieve the
statutory requirements are set out in Part B:Chapter 9
of this manual (Note 2)
Notes:
I At the time of publication, the ABCB was in the process
of draftmg amendments to the building regulations (BCA
Volume 1) covering the thermal performance of high-rise
and medium-rise residential buildings.
2 At the time of publication, the ABCB was in the process
of drafting amendments to the building regulations (BCA
Volume 2) covering the thermal performance of Class 1
residential buildings.
1.23
SWDESIGN OF FOOTINGS
r
r- Protection
When houses and other small buildings are constructed .j.. zone
on clay or similar soils, moisture movements in the soils
will lead to expansion or contraction of the soil causing
the building to either cantilever beyond a shrinkmg soil
mound or sag between an expanded soil rim. Reinforced
masonry panels in the ground floor of a building may Protection
be designed to act compositely with concrete footings zone Protection zone
to which they are connected by starter bars. This form MONOLFTHC SLABS
of construction can lead to significant savings in footing
costs. - Protection
zone
Low-Rise Commercial and Industrial Buildings
with Large Wall Panels
The piers and footings of large low-rise buildings are
beyond the scope of this manual. However, slabs and
footings for relatively small low-rise buildings are within Protection
zones
the scope of AS 2870 and this manual. Considerable
Protection
cost savings are achievable when reinforced masonry zones
walls are structurally connected to footings of reduced
cross section as described below. NON-MONOUTHIC SLABS
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Residential Buildings
The most common form of construction for new housing
in Australia is unreinforced brick walls (either cavity or
brick veneer) supported by reinforced concrete strip
footings or stiffened raft slabs. As the supporting soil
contracts or expands, the cantilevering or spanning
concrete footings or rafts are forced by the mass of the
supported building to deflect. Any unreinforced
brickwork may crack, moving sympathetically with the
deflected concrete supporting structures. The design
solutions adopted in AS 2870 Figure 3.1 cater for this
scenario by ensuring that the internal and external
concrete beams or footings have sufficient depth to
minimise the possible deflection, and articulating the
masonry wall at points of weakness ensuring that
indiscriminate cracking is minimised. For relatively
stable soils, these systems will provide effective and
economical solutions.
However, there is another practical approach to house
and small-building design that is common throughout
northern Australia. Walls may consist of strong panels of
reinforced hollow concrete blockwork tied monolithically
to the concrete footings or slabs. The strong, stiff
combination of wall and slab or footing span discrete
distances over expanding or shrinking foundations,
without cracking or showing other signs of distress.
Integrated footing/wall deep-beam systems in which
the reinforced concrete slab or footing and the concrete
masonry wall are structurally connected may be
considered to act compositely to resist the loads when
soil movement occurs. The concrete ground beams or
footings may be poured integrally with reinforced
concrete floor slabs, or they may be separate from the
floor.
The design must also make provision for the control of
termite attack. AS 3660 provides deemed-to-comply slab,
footing and masonry details that are resistant to
termites (Figure 1.16)
GLOSSARY
Bond beam
An element of reinforced masonry consisting of main
Set out below is a general glossary of concrete masonry
reinforcement grouted horizontally into hollow
terms. Where appropriate, the definitions have been
blockwork. Due to cover limitations in thin blocks, the
expanded to give more information
most common hollow concrete blocks used in bond
Additional terms associated with a specific subject are
beams are 140-mm, 190-mm or 290-mm wide. The
given in the Chapter covering that subject.
blockwork may consist of lintel blocks (U-shaped),
Hollow concrete block H blocks, Double-U blocks, hollow blocks with knock-out
Concrete masonry unit complying with AS 4455 that webs or hollow blocks with rebated webs.
consists of concrete face shells and webs between cores.
Mixed construction
Face shells Masonry walls consisting of a combination of
The two vertical faces of a hollow concrete block that unreinforced masonry and reinforced masonry (reinforced
are visible in a completed wall. Typically the minimum cores and/or bond beams) where the spacing of the
face-shell thickness of 140-mm wide blocks is 25 mm reinforced elements is greater than the spacing
and for 190-mm or 290-mm-wide blocks is 30 mm. In permitted for reinforced masonry (ie spacing greater
all cases the face shells are tapered to facilitate easy than 2.0 metres for out-of-plane bending and a
removal of the blocks from the moulds during horizontal spacing greater than 2.0 metres for vertically-
manufacture although, in some blocks intended for reinforced cores, or a vertical spacing greater than
reinforced use, the taper is kept to a minimum. 3.0 metres for horizontal bond beams for in-plane shear.)
Webs Reinforced masonry
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
The transverse parts of a hollow concrete block that Masonry walls into which specified quantities of main
join the face shells. Webs may be full height (the same reinforcement are incorporated at centres not exceeding
height as the face shells), rebated (shorter than the face specified limits as follows:
shells by up to 50 mm to allow horizontal steel to pass
For out-of-plane bending, if either horizontal or
through) or knock out (with planes of weakness which
vertical main reinforcement is incorporated at centres
enable them to be partially removed during
not exceeding 2.0 metres, the masonry is considered to
construction). Some blocks, such as lintel blocks, are
be "wide-spaced reinforced masonry". The reinforcement
U-shaped without vertical webs.
requirements specified in AS 3700 Clause 8.5 are:
Water thickener The main reinforcement in the direction of bending
A methyl cellulose additive for mortar to hold the shall -
moisture in suspension thus permitting the proper be spaced at centres not exceeding 2000 mm
hydration of the cement and reducing the tendency to include an area of at least 100 mm2 within
dry out. A water thickener may also include an agent 300 mm of the edges of the member; and
which assists workability of the mortar. (C) be such that A5t 0.0013 b d
Bed-joint reinforcement For in-plane shear, if horizontal main reinforcement is
Small-diameter steel reinforcement placed in the mortar incorporated at centres not exceeding 3.0 metres
joints of masonry walls, Bed-]oint reinforcement together with vertical main reinforcement at centres not
consisting of two 3-mm-diameter galvanized wires held exceeding 2.0 metres, the masonry is considered to be
in position by smaller cross wires will assist in the "wide-spaced reinforced masonry". The reinforcement
1 7!
Close-spaced reinforced masonry
A system of reinforced masonry that is fully-grouted and
contains reinforcement at a maximum spacing of
800 mm both horizontally and vertically. The minimum
area of horizontal and vertical reinforcement shall be
0.0013 Ad.
Wide-spaced reinforced masonry
A system of reinforced masonry, satisfying the criteria
for reinforced masonry for the particular action being
considered, but not satisfying the requirements for
close-spaced reinforced masonry.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I ')
STANDARD
DESIGN CHARTS
0>
OR
Draw a horizontal line on the transparency at the
required height of the walls, from the vertical axis to
the curve representing the design load. The length
of this line is the permissible length of wall between
supports. The plan view at 1:100 scale of each wall
may be rapidly checked using the transparency.
S
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anon.
A Guide to Selecting Concrete Masonry Walls for Noise
1.13.1 STANDARDS Reduction
National Concrete Masonry Association, USA, 1970
Structural Standards
AS 3700 Masonry structures Anon.
AS 3600 Concrete structures Noise Control with Concrete Masonry in Multi-Family
AS 1684 National Timber Framing Code Housing
AS 2870 Residential slabs and footings - TEK 18, National Concrete Masonry Association, USA,
Construction 1972
AS 2904
Concrete Masonry Blocks Out Noise in Apartments, Twin
AS 2627.1 Thermal insulation of roof/ceilings and
Houses, and Multiplex Building
walls in dwellings
CM226, National Concrete Masonry Association, USA
Loading Standards
Anon.
AS/NZS 1170.0 Structural design actions - General
Reports on Various Sponsored Tests
principles
Concrete Masonry Association of Australia and its
AS/NZS 1170.1 Structural design actions - Permanent,
Member Companies
imposed and other actions
AS/NZS 1170.2 Structural design actions - Wind actions Beranek, LL (Ed)
AS/NZS 1170.3 Structural design actions - Snow and Noise Reduction
ice actions McGraw Hill Book Company mc, USA, 1960
AS 1170.4 Minimum design loads on structures - Copeland, RE
Earthquake loads Controlling Sound with Concrete Masonry Concrete
AS 4055 Wind loads for housing Products
AS 1530.4 Fire resistance tests of elements of USA, July 1965
building construction
Harris, CM (Ed)
1.13.2 ACOUSTICS Handbook of Noise Control
McGraw Hill Book Company mc, USA. 1957
BCA 2004 Building Code of Australia, Class 2 to
Precast Concrete Handbook, Chapter 9, Clause 9.2
Class 9 Buildings, Volume One, Australian Building
Codes Board, 2004
Acoustic Properties
National Precast Concrete Association Australia and
BCA 2004 Building Code of Australia, Class I and Class Concrete Institute of Australia, 2002
10 Buildings, Housing Provisions, Volume Two, Australian
Building Codes Board, 2004
Parkin, PH and Humphreys, HR
Acoustics, Noise and Building
AS 1191-2002 Acoustics - Methods for laboratory Faber and Faber, UK, 1969
measurement of airborne sound insulation of building
elements Stanley, RC
Light and Sound for Engineers
AS/NZS 1276.1.1-1999 Acoustics - Rating of sound Hart Publishing Company, UK, 1968
insulation in buildings and building elements Part I
- Airborne sound insulation Weston, ET, Burgess, MA and Whitlock, JA
Airborne sound transmission through elements of
ISO 140.6E-1998 Acoustics - Measurement of sound buildings
insulation in buildings and of building elements Part 6 Experimental Building Station - Department of Housing
- Laboratory measurements of impact sound insulation and Construction, EBS Technical Study 48. 1973
of floors
ISO 717.1-1996 Acoustics - Rating of sound insulation
in buildings and of building elements Part I - Airborne
sound insulation
Anon.
Sound Reduction Properties of Concrete Masonry Walls
Technical Report No.55, National Concrete Masonry
Association, USA, 1955
I ')Q
S 1.13.3 FIRE Effects of Workmanship, Mortar Strength and Bond
Pattern
Gnanakrishnan, N, Lawrence, SJ and Lawther, R
Cement and Concrete Association, London, 1977
Behaviour of Cavity Brick Walls Exposed to Fire
Proceedings of the 8th International Brick/Block Shrive, NG
Masonry Conference Dublin September 1988, Compressive Strength and Strength Testing of Masonry
pp. 981-988 Proceedings of 7th International Masonry Conference
Melbourne, February 1985, pp. 699-710
Lawrence, SJ and Gnanakrishnan, N
The Fire Resistance of Masonry Walls - An Overview Sinha, BP and Hendry, AW
Proceedings of the 1st National Structural Engineering Compressive Strength of Axially Loaded Brick Walls
Conference I.E. Aust., August. 1987, pp. 431-437 Stiffened Along Their Vertical Edges
Proceedings of Fifth International Brick Masonry
Lawrence, SJ and Gnanakrishnan, N
Conference Washington, 1979.
The Fire ResLstance of Masonry Walls - A Summary
of Australian Research and its Relevance to Codes and Sinah, BP and Pedreschi, R
Building Regulations Compressive Strength and Some Elastic Properties of
Technical Record 531, National Building Technology Brickwork
Centre, North Ryde, NSW:-April-1988 The International Journal Of Masonry Construction,
Vol 3, No 1, 1983
1.13.4 VERTICAL LOADS
1.13.5 HORIZONTAL LOADS
Atkinson, RH, Noland, JL and Abrams, DP
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I QCi
Anon.
Thermal Insulation of Concrete Masonry Walls
TEK 38, 1972, National Concrete Masonry Association,
USA
Anon.
Concrete Masonry Cavity Walls
TEK 62, 1975, National Concrete Masonry Association,
USA
Anon.
Tables of 'U' Values for Concrete Masonry Walls
TEK, 67, 1975, National Concrete Masonry Association,
USA
Anon.
New Findings on Energy Conservation with Concrete
Masonry
TEK 68, 1975, National Concrete Masonry Association,
USA
Delsante, AE
A Comparison of the Thermal Performance of Three
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1.13.8 FOOTINGS
Anon.
Articulated Walling (TN61)
Cement and Concrete Association of Australia, 1998
Johnston, RK
Slabs for Reinforced Single Leaf Masonry Housing
Standards Australia Seminars on AS 2870, July 1996
Mitchell, PW
The Structural Analysis of Footings on Expansive Soils
Research Report No 1, 1981 - W Smith, Consulting
Engineers, Newton, South Australia
Symons, MG, Amey, DJ and Johnston, RK
In -plane Bending of Single-Leaf Block Walls
Pacific Concrete Conference, New Zealand, November,
1988
Symons, MG
Strength of Masonry Wall Panels
University of South Australia Business Development
Services - Project No 4508 23rd March, 1995
Walsh, PF
Concrete Slabs for Houses
Technical Paper No 48 (Second Series), 1984 - CSIRO
Australia, Division of Building Research
1.31
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
U).
0
4-J
0
0
Chaster 2
Acoustics Contents
This chapter describes the acoustic performance of 2.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
concrete masonry used in buildings to:
Reduce reflected noise within a building, and 2.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
2.5 GLOSSARY
BASIS OF DESIGN
thiough the wall material, the total sound detected on
the quiet side may include radiated transmission caused
2.1.1 BACKGROUND by the vibration of the wall or wall lining.
Noise travels from its source through the air, passing Designers should consider both:
through walls, floors, ceilings, open windows or doors the control of reflected noise generated within a
and into living or office spaces. It may be controlled by room, and
isolating the noise at its source by enclosing it within
walls that will absorb and dissipate it, or by preventing the reduction noise transmitted into a room from
the noise from reaching the living or office spaces by outside via the roof, ceilings, walls, floors and
erecting sound-resistant walls in its path. openings.
When sound impinges on a wall it divides into The Building Code of Australia considers only the latter
reflected and absorbed sound. Absorbed sound is (reduction of noise transmitted from outside a room).
partly dissipated within the wall and partly transmitted Control of noise that is transmitted mechanically
through the wall. In addition to the sound transmitted through the building structure and noise originating
from equipment or machinery are beyond the scope of
Subjective Reaction dB Otigin of Sound this Manual. The most effective treatments will include
dampening and isolating the source from the structure.
200 ocket launch at lOOm
2.1.2 CONTROLLING REFLECTED NOISE
190
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I
Power lawnmower
between sound absorption and sound resistance.
Very loud 90 Printing plant
Alternatively, wall systems may be custom-designed
Very loud radio
incorporating an inner leaf of sound absorbing masonry
80 Noisy factory
and an external masonry leaf of high sound resistance.
Shouting
Loud - 70 Busy street
Noisy photocopying room
60 - Average radio/air terminal
Absorbed sound
Stadium
Noisy 50 - Average conversation Dissipated sound
Restaurant/store
Normal - 40 Corridor
Private office/study room LThrough
30 Soft radio/library ansm ission
Quiet Quiet conversation/TV studio Reflected
sound
20 Recording studio
Very faint 10
Whisper at 1 m
'Sound-proof' room - tRadiatedl
transmission
Quiet human breathing
I
Threshold of hearing 0 Acoustical test room
1000-4000 Hz
Figure 2.1 Intensity Levels of Some FamiliarSounds Figure 2.2 Sound Transmission, Absorption and
Reflection
Sound absorption is maximized with units consisting
of lightweight aggregates or units with unpainted open
texture and high internal porosity, such as no-fines
concrete. Unrendered and unpainted concrete masonry Untreated OIJIOYIJOIIIL lUII pa.,..
absorbs more sound than surface-treated walls. A light surface 1 coat 2 coats 1 coat 2 coats
0.7
spray painting reduces sound absorption only marginally,
although paint that is brushed on tends to seal the 0.6
0
outer pores, reducing sound entry and dissipation. 0.5
Not all reflected sound is objectionable. It would be
0
most undesirable to have a room in which all sound C-)
to be given.
A Noise Reduction Coefficient is a measure of the
ability of a wall to absorb sound. Figure 2.3 shows
the estimated Noise Reduction Coefficients for concrete
masonry walls with various combinations of surface
texture and finish. Although these figures provide DENSEWEIGHT AGGREGATE UNITS
a useful guide, in critical situations tests should be
carried out on the actual materials intended for use.
Figure 2.3 Estimated Noise Reduction Coefficients for
See various references from Portland Cement Association Concrete Masonry Walls
(USA) and National Concrete Masonry Association (USA)
in Part B:Chapter 1 Clause 1.13.
room, they are often responsible for the transmission of the wall (called the "coincidence frequency"), then
of this noise through the ceiling spaces into adjacent acoustic energy is transferred effectively through the
rooms. This can be prevented by extending the walls wall and may reduce its sound transmission resistance
performance by up to 8 dB. The resonance can be
acting as sound barriers up to the roof or underside
damped by the inclusion of acoustically-insulating
of the floor above, or by providing some sound
material within the cavity. The "cross-over frequency"
resistance layer above the absorbing panels. F which is defined as the frequency above which the
Environmental noise from outside the building can be sound transmission loss performance of the masonry
controlled by providing external walls of high sound wall plus cladding is better than that of the bare wall
resistance. As in the case of internal walls, special alone but below which the sound transmission loss is
attention must be paid to doors, windows, gaps and degraded, is:
cracks. = 108/(M.d)1/2 for empty cavities or
= 60/(M.d)V2 for cavities filled with fibrous
2.1.4 AIRBORNE SOUND RESISTANCE sound aborbing material
I
To achieve high sound transmission resistance, the Where:
opposite properties from those required for good sound M = surface mass of the drywall (kg/m2)
absorption are required. The following factors affect the
airborne sound resistance. d = depth of cavity (m)
. Class 3 Buildings, residential buildings other than R (airborne) not less than 50
Class 1 and Class 2, being the common living place Any walls that separate a sole occupancy unit in a
for a number of unrelated people. They include Class 2 or 3 building from a plant room or lift shaft:
boarding houses, guest houses, hostels or lodging R (airborne) not less than 50
houses, the residential parts of hotels and motels,
A door assembly incorporated in a wall that
the residential parts of schools, accommodation
separates a sole occupancy Unit in a Class 2 or 3
for the aged, disabled or children and the staff
building from stairway, public corridor, public lobby
accommodation areas of health care buildings
or the like:
b Class 9c Buildings, aged-care buildings.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
from common spaces to sole-occupancy units; and R (airborne) not less than 45
(C) from parts of different classifications to sole Any walls that separate a sole occupancy unit in a
occupancy.' Class 9c building from a kitchen or laundry:
This objective is further expanded for walls in BCA Vol 1 R (airborne) not less than 45, and
Clause FF5.1 BCA Vol 1 Clauses FF5.2 and FF5.5, which Impact sound resistance.
spell out the particular applications where there are Walls requiring impact sound resistance shall consist
requirements to provide both airborne sound resistance of two leaves separated by a gap of at least 20 mm
and impact sound resistance. BCA Vol 1 Clauses FF5.3 and where required for structural purposes,
and FF5.6 further state that the sound insulation must connected by resilient ties.
not be compromised by doors or pipes. It is worth
noting that the BCA Vol 1 does not aim to reduce the Any walls that separate a sole occupancy unit
noise entering a room from outside the building, only in a Class 9c building from a bathioom, sanitry
to restrict sound passing from room to room or room to compartment (not en-suite) plantroom or utilities
public space within the building. room:
S
STC TEST RESULTS - Masonry Walls with and without Various Claddings
90 140 190
I
I
(a) Bare Wall Bare Wall (h) Bare Wall
i...
13
90 140
16
190
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
13 3813 16 13
90 140 190
(insulation
both sides)
Note: These test results yield Sound Transmission Class (STC) which is similar to, but not identical to, Weighted Sound Index (R)
STC TEST RESULTS - Bare Masonry Walls
S
60
59
58
57
56
-
-- IW
1W
55 RI
lit-
54
53
52 2271' -
WI
It I
51
RI
50
49 7.30U
48 29u 13.
47
46
45
44 28 12. 21
43 16 6,23. 24 25
42 ."20,4 118
41
40
39
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
38 8,19w
37 15
36
. 35
4-
34
32
14
iii_
-a.-
30
100 4' 200
Wall Surface Density (kg/rn2)
I
DATA DETAILS
0
0 1 42 174 90 Basalt brick E8S1044
2 52 260 140 Dense hollow EBS1O51
3 50 253 140 Dense hollow EBS1192
4 42 151 110 Clinker bnck E8S238
5 45 195 110 Dense brick E8S257
6 43 170 150 Dense hollow EBS287
7 49 214 200 Dense hollow EBS4O7
8 38 110 110 Lightweight concrete EBS449
9 42 208 110 Dense hollow LCA 529-83
60 1.
59
58
57
56 -w
55 rn
54 JR 23U
53 lIE
52
II 5,19
51 3.
50 22U
49 1,15 18
48 4,17k
47 2,14U 6,20,21
46 16
45 9. 8. .13
44 lOU
43 12 -A.
i_I
C.)
,-
42
41
ii 11 U
w
40
39
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
5 38
37
.
36
35
34
4- itS a-
32
31
0
Cl, 30
100 200 300
WaD Surface Density (kg/rn2)
DATA DETAILS
Surface Unit
Data density thickness
number STC (kg/rn2) (mm) Unit matenal Render Test reference
20 47 215.0 140 Dense concrete hollow 13-mm. 2 faces CMAA Internal Report
21 47 215.0 140 Dense concrete hollow 13-mm, 2 faces EBS No. 48 ref no. 6017-2
22 50 295.0 150 Woodwaste & cement, hollow 13-mm, 2 faces EBSN0. 48 ref no. 7063
23 54 265.0 190 Dense concrete 13-mm, 2 faces EBS No. 48 ref no. 6079
Note: These test results yield Sound Transmission Class (STC) which is similarto, but not identical to, Weighted Sound Index (R)
STC TEST RESULTS - Masonry Walls with Plaster Cladding
60 ,&I
59 -w W
58 10u
.i. . .ài.
56
IL .." W IS
-
£
,
- '' ,-:
13
- i:
.i: ,
i-a-.
-- ,
O
49
48
47 - 14U 5 2.R5...
'I
45 15. - -
j
:i
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
30
i
S U
DATA DETAILS
Plaster-
Surface Unit board
Data density thickness thickness
number SIC (kg/rn2) (mm) Unit material (mm) Notes Test reference
10 58 190.0 190 Lightweight concrete 13 Timber & metal furring, insul. CMAA Internal Report'
11 57 240.0 190 Lightweight concrete 13 Resilienttimber studs, insul. CMAA Internal Report
12 47 220.0 140 Dense concrete 13 1 face, resilient studs CMAA Internal Report . -
13 53 225.0 190 Dense concrete 13 1 face, resilient studs. insul. EBS No.48 ref no. 6029-1
14 48 140.0 110 Scotia lightweight 13 Plasterboard glued RTAT621F172
15 45 117.0 90 Scoria lightweight 13 Plasterboard glued RTAT621F175
16 46 168.0 90 Scotia brick 13 28-mm furringchannel RTAT62-01F121
Note: These test results yield Sound Transmission Class (STC) which is similar to, but not identical to, Weighted Sound Index (R)
S WORKED EXAMPLE
2.13
GLOSSARY
Sound Level Meter
A sound level meter in its simplest form is a
This glossary of technical terms relevant to Acoustics
microphone and amplifier capable of measuring the
is in addition to the general Glossary given in Part B:
intensity of a complete sound, either as a whole or
Chapter 1. Where appropriate, the definitions have been
at each of a number of frequency bands or ranges in
expanded to give more information.
the audible frequency spectrum, or its intensity in a
Sound "weighted" scale. The meter is fitted with electronic
Sound is created by vibrating bodies. It is carried filters to permit the exclusion of frequency ranges other
from the source to the receiver, usually the ear, by a than that being measured and a calibrated measuring
compression and decompression wave. The ear is an device. Other filter networks are built into the electronic
extremely sensitive frequency and pressure measuring circuits to enable weighted sound level measurements
device, capable of responding to minute variations in to be made over the full audible frequency range as an
both phenomena. It perceives sound as a combination alternative to measurements at each frequency band.
of frequency spectra as a series of pressure variations.
Airborne Sound
Sound audible to humans is generally in the frequency
Airborne sound results from a source which is remote
range from 125 Hz (low pitch) to 5 kHz (high pitch).
from the receiver and which is transmitted to the
Noise receiver through the air as pressure waves.
Noise may be defined as unwanted sound or sound
Impact Sound
pollution. With ever-increasing sources of noise and a
Impact sound in a structure such as a wall results from
trend towards higher population densities, noise control
a body striking the structure and causing sound to be
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Chaster 3
Robustness Contents
This chapter provides the robustness requirements 3.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
to ensure that masonry has a basic degree of
strength and stiffness in addition to that 3.2 GLOSSARY
determined by calculation considering
applied loads. 3.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Designers are required to design masonry walls to This glossary of technical terms relevant to Robustness
withstand the loads set Out in the Australian Standards is in addition to the general Glossary given in Part B:
called up in the Building Code of Australia (BCA). The Chapter 1. Where appropriate, the definitions have been
principal loads (called actions in AS/NZS 1170) are expanded to give more information.
permanent and imposed actions specified in AS/NZS Isolated pier
1170.1, wind actions specified in AS/NZS 1170.2 or AS
An isolated pier is a masonry member where neither the
4055, snow and ice actions from AS/NZS 1170.3 and
thickness nor the length exceeds one fifth of its height.
earthquake loads given by AS 1170.4. Designers are also For example, a member which is 2.4 metres high will be
required to consider earth pressures and fluid pressures. considered as an isolated pier if its length is less than
Notwithstanding this requirement to consider the loads 480 mm. If it is greater than 480 mm, it is considered to
in the Australian Standards, it is possible for the lateral be a wall.
loads on some walls to be neglected. For example,
Length, L
consider the internal loadbeanng masonry walls in the The length used for robustness calculations measured
basement of a threEstorey regular building in between vertical supports, or, if an opening is
earthquake design category A. These walls may be incorporated, from a vertical support to the edge of the
considered remote from wind loads for design purposes, opening.
but may still be prone to some wind pressure when the
doors are open. They may not be required to have a fire
resistance level although could be subjected to
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
7.0
/////'//U'/
Laterally-supported Line
bothendsandtop
and supportinga / No 1
concrete slab
6.0
Length
5.0
E
C,,=27, Ch=36
t
U,
C
4.0
Laterally-supported Line
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
C.
C. both ends and top
3.0 No 2
and not supporting a
C
concrete slab
2.0
Length )
1.0
C5=6, Ch=36
:2
Laterally-supported Line
0 fgD both ends, No.3
0 10 20 30 40 5.0 60 70 80 90 =a,
top free
Length of Wall Between Supports (m) ,- /,
Length )
Lenl
Maximum height = 4.320 (m) Maximum height = 3.240 (m)
Line No. 7 Line No. 8
C,,=27, Ch=l2
7 4'////A////,'////t//,
Laterally-supported Line
(c) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL one end and top
No. 5
= and notsupportinga
C,, = 13.5 C,, = 6.0 concrete slab
Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
=0 top and bottom bottom only C,,6, Ch=l2
=
' 2 Laterally-supported Line
one end, No. 6
Maximum height = 0.720 (m) topfree
Length Line No. 10
Maximum height = 1.620 (m)
Line No. 9 Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
E
C0=27, Ch=36
t
0
4.0
5
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Laterally-supported Line
LJWUP CIIUa allu top
3.0
DO
a)
No 2
and not supporting a
= 4 concrete slab
a)
a)
2.0 3
Length )
1.0 6
C0=6, Ch=36
.
/ Laterally-supported Line
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 6.0 70 80 90
.P / both ends,
top free
No.3
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
/ /////////////////////t
I enøth
ci
Laterally-supported Laterally-supported DO
a)
No. 4
and supporting a
top and bottom Os top and bottom
a) concrete slab
and supporting a and not supporting a
concrete slab concrete slab
Length
Maximum height = 4.800 (m) Maximum height = 3.600 (m)
Line No. 7 Line No. 8
C0=27, Ch=12
I I I
Laterally-supported Line
(C) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL ) oneendandtop No. 5
and notsupportinga
C = 13.5 C = 6.0 1 concrete slab
Length
Height to length 5:1
Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
a) Do
top and bottom a) bottom only C0=6, Ch=l2
Laterally-supported Line
one end, No. 6
Maximum height 0.800 (m) top free
Length Line No.10
Maximum height 1.800 (m)
Line No. 9 Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
C=36, Ch=36
Laterally-supported Line
both ends and top
No. 1
and supporting a
concrete slab
Length
C,,=27, Ch=36
Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Line
both ends and top
No 2
and notsupportinga
concrete slab
Length >
C,,=6, Ch=36
DO
/ Laterally-supported
/ Line
0
both ends,
0 10 2.0 30 40
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
50 60 70 80 90 = / topfree / No. 3
Length
Length
Maximum height = 5.280 (m) Maximum height = 3.960 (m)
Line No. 7 Line No. 8
C,,=27, Ch=l2
''
I I
i Laterally-supported Line
(C) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL DO 'A oneendandtop No. 5
0 and notsupportinga
C,, = 13.5 C,, = 6.0 concrete slab
Heighttolength5: 1 Length
DO Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
0)
= top and bottom bottom only C,, 6, Ch = 12
Laterally-supported Line
one end. No. 6
Maximum height = 0.880 (m) top free
Length Line No. 10 .-. ////7///////////////////
Maximum height = 1.980 (m)
Line No. 9 Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
1
/2/
7.0 ,, Laterally-supported Line
// both endsand top
No. 1
= , and supporting a
concrete slab
6.0
4 //////////////////////
2
k Length )
E
5 C=27, Ch=36
,4Q
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Laterally-supported Line
0. both ends and top
3.0 No. 2
and notsupportinga
=
0 concrete slab
2.0
Length )
6
C=6, Ch=36
=0 0
Laterally-supported
both ends,
Line
No.3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m) I top free
lnath
Length
Maximum height = 5.520 (m) Maximum height = 4.140 (m)
Line No. 7 Line No. 8
C5 = 27, Ch = 12
I I I I
Laterally-supported Line
one end and top
(c) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL No.5
and notsupportinga
C = 13.5 C = 6.0 concrete slab
////// ///////////////////////
Height to length 1
Length
Sc Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
-C
=0 top and bottom
Sc
0 bottom only C = 6, Ch = 12
Laterally-supported Line
one end, No. 6
Maximum height = 0.920 (m) top free
Length Line No. 10 I
Maximum height 2.070 (m)
Line No. 9 lonøth
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
7.0
D
// Laterally-supported
both endsandtop
Line
No. 1
and supportinga
6.0 ., ////////////////////////
concrete slab
0
5.0 -
I 5
C,,=27, Ch=36
Length
Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. Line
bothendsandtop No.2
3.0
and not supporting a
= concrete slab
2.0
U 6
C=6, Ch=36
Li
)
/ Laterally-supported
/ Line
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90 =
w // both ends,
topfree / No. 3
Laterally-supported Line
(C) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL . oneendandtop No. 5
j and not supporting a
C, = 13.5 C,, = 6.0 concrete slab
/
1
Length
Height to length 5: 1
0 Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
= top and bottom 0 bottom only C = 6, Ch = 12
-
Laterally-supported Line
one end, No.6
Maximum height = 1.000 (m) top free
Length Line No. 10 .-.- /
Maximum height = 2.250 (m)
Line No. 9 ten
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
8.0 C0 = 36, Ch = 36
7.0 .-.
-
00
// Laterally-supported
both ends and top
Line
a,
No. 1
= andsupportinga
concrete slab
6.0
Length
5.0
E
C0=27, Ch=36
t
0
1
I I I I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
.' / andbothendsandtop
4 Laterally-supported Line
0.
3.0 2 No.2
notsupportinga
=
0)
0)
5=._. / ///////////////////// concrete slab
2.0
Length )
3
1.0
6 C0=6, Ch=36
0) Laterally-supported Line
m 0 I both ends, No. 3
0 1.0 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
//7//////////////////y
top free
( Length
Le
Laterally-supported Line
(d) FREE-STANDING WALL one end and top
(c) ISOLATED PIERS No. 5
= and notsupportinga
C0= 13.5 C = 6.0 concrete ab
Length
Heightto length 5: 1
00 Laterally-supported -c Laterally-supported
00
top and bottom 0 bottom only C = 6, Ch = 12
-'S 7
C / Laterally-supported Line
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
Q
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0 4
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
Length
5.0
C,,=27, Ch=36
S Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Line
both endsandtop
=
3.0
andnotsupportinga / No 2
a, concrete slab
////////////////////////
2.0
kLength
1.0
a) Laterally-supported Line
0
both ends. No.3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
top free
/
Length
Len
Laterally-supported Line
(c) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL oneendandtop No. 5
and notsupportinga
= 13.5 C,, 6.0 1 concrete slab
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations Of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
1
: both ends andtop
and supportinga
No. 1
concrete slab
6.0
4 k Length
5.0 2
E
C5=27, Ch=36
5 I I
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. Laterally-supported Line
0. both ends and top
No. 2
ci
3.0 and notsupportinga
0 concrete slab I0
a)
3
2.0
Length >
6
C5=6, Ch=36
il,001 Laterally-supported
both ends,
Line
No.3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 top free
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Length
Length
Maximum height 5.040 (m) Maximum height = 3.780 (m)
Line No. 7 Line No. 8
C5=27, Ch=l2
Laterally-supported Line
(C) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL fa , oneendandtop No. 5
0 and not supporting a
C= 13.5 C = 6.0 1 concrete slab
/////,
Length
Height to length 5:1
-c
as Laterally-supported .0 Laterally-supported
0 Os
top and bottom 0 bottom only C5=6, Ch=l2
1/7/7, '//////////////////////, f.a
Laterally-supported Line
one end, No. 6
Maximum height 0.840 (m) =0 top free
Length Line No. 10
Maximum height = 1.215 (m)
Line No. 9 Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects øf control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
S
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
E 3 C=27, Ch=36
t
0
4.0
Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Line
0. both ends and top
3.0 No 2
and not supporting a
= concrete slab
a)
2.0
Length )
6
±0 .=
.
// Laterally-supported
both ends,
Line
No.3
0 10 20 30 40
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
50 60 70 80 90
- // /////////////////////t/
top free
Length
Length
Maximum height = 6.840 (m) Maximum height = 5.130 (m)
Line No. 7 Line No. 8
C0=27, Ch=l2
I I
J Laterally-supported Line
(C) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL 0,, , oneendandtop No. 5
a, and notsupportinga
1 concrete slab
Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED MASONRY -
horizontal and vertical reinforcement1 U
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
C=48, Ch=48
Laterally-supported Line
both ends and top No. 1
and supporting a (off
concrete slab ' cha
Length
C=36, Ch=48
I I I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Laterally-supported Line
bothendsandtop
a)
No 2
= and notsupportinga
concrete slab
Length
Cv6t, Ch=48
-= / -2 Laterally-supported Line
/
a)
0 both ends,
.o No. 3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 topfree
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Length
Both horizontal and vertical reinforcement, I Values based
complying with AS 3700 Cl. 8.5, must be included on reinforcement
at spacings not more than 2 metres in either direction terminating at supports C=48, Ch16t
Laterally-supported Line
one end and top
a
No. 4
= and supporting a
concrete slab
Length
C = 36, Ch
I I
// ,4////,t'///A-'///,k/z
Laterally-supported Line
= one end and top
No. 5
=a) and notsupportinga
concrete slab
Length
C=6t, Ch=16
Laterally-supported Line
a, // oneend,
topfree
No.6
( Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED MASONRY -
horizontal and vertical reinforcementt
9.0 -
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
Length
5.0
E C0=36, Ch=48
t
0
I I
Laterally-supported
I
,, Line
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0. both ends and top No.2
a, and notsupportinga (off
concrete slab chart)
////////////////////////
2.0
6 k Length >
Cv6t, Ch=48
Line
Laterally-supported
both ends,
No.3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 top free (off
Length of Wall Between Supports (m) I ' chart)
Length
Both horizontal and vertical reinforcement, Values based
complying with AS 3700 CI. 8.5, must be included on reinforcement
at spacings not more than 2 metres in either direction terminating at supports C,, = 48, Ch = l6t
Laterally-supported Line
-C
00 one end and top No. 4
a' and supporting a (off
concrete slab chart)
Length
C,,=36, Ch=16
Laterally-supported Line
-C
00 , oneendandtop No. 5
a, and not supporting a
concrete slab
Length
C,,6t, Ch=16t
Laterally-supported Line
oneend, No.6
top free
/
( Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED MASONRY -
vertical reinforcement onlyt
9,0 -
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
8.0 - C=48
7.0 Laterally-supported
1&4 bothendsandtop
and supporting a
concrete slab
6.0 ////////////////////////
2&5 2,5&8 Maximum height = 6.720 (m)
5.0 - Line No. 1
E
C = 36
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. .-..
0.
3.0 Laterally-supported
= both endsandtop
2.0
-. 10
/
and notsupportinga
concrete slab
Maximum height
I
5.040 (m)
1.0 Line No. 2
-C
0
C,, = 48
C))
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
(I) Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
ci)
Laterally-supported
oneendandtop
C/) and supportinga
concrete slab
0 (b) WALLS WITHOUT VERTICAL SUPPORTS
Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
top and bottom top and bottom
and supporting a and not supporting a C,,=36
concrete slab concrete slab
'/////////////////////// I I I
Laterally-supported
Maximum height = 6.720 (m) Maximum height = 5.040 (m) one end and top
Line No. 7 Line No. 8 and notsupportinga
concrete slab
///////////////////////;
Maximum height = 5.040 (m)
(c) ISOLATED PIERS (d) FREE-STANDING WALL
Line No. 5
C= 30 C = 12
Laterally-supported
bottom only
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
21
REINFORCED MASONRY -
vertical reinforcement only1
9.0
7
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
8.0 C, = 48
7,8 &
Maximum height = 9.120 (m)
5.0 - Line No. 1
E
4,0 C,, 36
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0 Laterally-supported
= both endsandtop
a)
S 10 =0) and notsupportinga
2.0 , concrete slab
Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
-C top and bottom top and bottom
a)
= and supporting a =a) and not supporting a C,, = 36
concrete slab concrete slab I I
Laterally-supported
Maximum height = 9.120 (m) Maximum height = 6.840 (m) oneendandtop
Line No. 7 Line No. 8 a) and not supporting a
concrete slab
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
17
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontal reinforcement only1
9.0 -
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
8.0 Ch = 48
7.0 -- Laterally-supported
both ends andtop
and supportinga
concrete slab
6.0
0 Ch = 48
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0
Laterally-supported
a both endsandtop
and notsupportinga
2.0
concrete slab
Length
Laterally-supported
both ends,
topfree
/////////////////////
Length )
Maximum length = 6.720 (m)
Line No. 3
Horizontal reinforcement
complying with AS 3700 Cl. 8.5
Spacings not necessarily limited
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
2 15
9.0
8.0
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontal reinforcement only1
Ch = 48
I
7.0 Laterally-supported
bothendsandtop
and supportinga
concrete slab
6.0 ////////////////////////
1,2 & 3 Length )
5.0
I Maximum length = 9.120 (m)
Line No. 1
E I
0 Ch 48
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0
3.0
= Laterally-supported
1)
w bothendsandtop
and notsupportinga
5) 2.0
concrete slab
CS
/ ////////////////////
0
1.0 Length )
Maximum length = 9.120 (m)
± 0
Line No. 2
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m) Ch = 48
Laterally-supported
both ends,
topfree
Length >
Horizontal reinforcement
complying with AS 3700 Cl. 8.5
Spacings not necessarily limited
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations 0f loads and masonry properties
ig
MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
vertically-reinforced cores1
9.0
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SI PPORTS
8.0 C = 36
7.0 Laterally-supported
- both ends and top
and supportinga
,. t concrete slab
6.0 ///////////////////////
Maximum height = 5.0 40 (m)
5.0
14&7
- Line No. 1
E 2,5&8
t
(0
0
4.0 = 30
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0 Laterally-supported
= both ends andtop
a)
and notsupportinga
2.0 concrete slab
10
Maximum height = 4.21 0 (m)
1.0
Line No. 2
f' _.)
0 10 20 30 40
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
50 60 70 80 9.0
/
////
Laterally-supported
//; one end and top
and supporting a
concrete slab
(b) WALLS WITHOUT VERTICAL SUPPORTS
Laterally-supported
Maximum height = 5.040 (m) Maximum height = 4.200 (m) oneendandtop
Line No. 7 Line No. 8 and notsupportinga
concrete slab
Vertical reinforcement
an continuous pastor
0
= into support
Vertical reinforcement,
Maximum height = 1.680 (m) complying with AS 3700 Cl. 8.5,
Line No. 10 at spacings greater than 2 metres
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations 0f loads and masonry properties
2 ')Ci
MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
vertically-reinforced corest
9.0 -
(a) WALLS WITH VERTICAL SUPPORTS
8.0 C, = 36
7.0 Laterally-supported
1,4& 7
=
// both endsandtop
and supportinga
concrete slab
6.0
-I 2, 5 & 8
//////////////////////
Maximum height = 6.840 (m)
5.0 Line No.1
E
30
S 0
0.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3.0 Laterally-supported
= both endsandtop
4,
0) 10 and notsupportinga
2.0 concrete slab
4,
0
C0 = 36
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m) /N////,/,4/,
Laterally-supported
a,
'A
.. one end andtop
and supportinga
concrete slab
(b) WALLS WITHOUT VERTICAL SUPPORTS
Laterally-supported Laterally-supported
top and bottom top and bottom
0 a, C = 30
and supporting a = and not supporting a
concrete slab concrete slab
Laterally-supported
Maximum height = 6.840 (m) Maximum height = 5.700 (m) oneendandtop
Line No. 7 Line No. 8 and notsupportinga
concrete slab
Vertical reinforcement
-c
continuous past or
a,
= into support
///////////////////////,
Vertical reinforcement,
Maximum height = 2.280 (m) complying with AS 3700 CI. 8.5,
Line No. 10 at spacings greater than 2 metres
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
321
WORKED EXAMPLE
Mortar joints
Mortar type M3 (or M4)
3.5.3 MASONRY PROPERTIES
Joint thickness 10 mm
The purpose of the following worked example is to
demonstrate the steps to be followed when performing Concrete grout
manual calculations or when preparing computer Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
software for the analysis and design of masonry. = 20 MPa
The worked example also serves the purpose of Minimum cement content 300 kg/m3
demonstrating the origin of the Standard Designs which
are based on similar masonry capacity considerations. Steel reinforcement
Although comprehensive in its treatment of AS 3700, the N12, N16 or N20 as required for structural purposes and
worked example is not intended to analyze or design determined in other chapters of this manual.
all parts of the particular structure. It deals only with
enough to demonstrate the design method.
3.5.3 MASONRY PROPERTIES
All design and detailing shall comply with the
requirements of AS 3700. It is the designer's
responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints,
chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties and
connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
2 'Y)
DESIGN BRIEF ROBUSTN ESS
Design for robustness, the wall indicated in the Wall is unreinforced masonry.
following drawings. Laterally-supported at the top.
Top supporting a concrete slab.
Has one vertical support. other end free.
1050
C = 36 Table 4.2
Ch = 12 Table 4.2
2700
Length of wall
175
L = 3.70 m
H
2700
>-
S 175
2.7
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
5
2700 Wall to be = 0.54 m Not isolated pier
designed
= 133 mm
= 0.133m
I
Robustness limit
4.500
S tr 0.133
4500
800
3700
II-
-fi = 33.8
> Ch = 12
<kt tr C, 4.6.2(b)
= 1.0 x 0.133 x 36
=4.788m OK
NOTE: Walls of top floor do not support a
slab and must therefore be checked separately
3.23
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
e
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Fire Contents
This chapter provides the design requirements for 4.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
masonry subject to fire as specified in the BCA
(Building Code of Australia). 4.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
4.5 GLOSSARY
BASIS OF DESIGN -
1000
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
4.2.7 CHASES
Masonry walls are usually cored or hollow Thus at any
140- or 190-rn 'T.
hollow bêock
one point in the wall, the cross-sectional area could be
wide-spaced different from the area at an adjacent section. Small
reinforcement local reductions in area do not diminish the capacity of
oras mixed the wall to insulate against heat transfer, the heat being
constnction
absorbed into the adjacent material. Therefore, from the
aspect of providing insulation, a small number of chases
up to 30 mm deep would have little effect.
Of more concern is the effect of chases on structural
Vertically-reinforced cores
adequacy. For vertically spanning walls, it is unlikely
Vertically-Reinforced Cores that a vertical chase would have significant effect, but a
long straight horizontal chase near the mid-height of the
Figure 4.4 Reinforced and Mixed Construction wall would significantly reduce the structural
Arrangements for Concrete Masonry Wa/Is adequacy. For walls intended to span horizontally in
two-way action (panel action), a vertical chase must be
treated as a free end.
Mixed construction consisting of vertical
reinforcement and unreinforced masonry AS 3700 Clause 6.7 provides rules for chases, which are
between summarised in Table 4.1
If the intended frame spacing exceeds 6.84 metres in
190-mm blockwork or 5.04 metres in 140-mm blockwork 4.2.8 RECESSES
(or if there are no supporting frames at all), very large Small local reductions in area of material do not
wall panels may be designed using unreinforced significantly diminish the capacity of the wall to
masonry that spans horizontally between vertical insulate against heat transfer, the heat being absorbed
reinforced cores. These reinforced cores must be into the adjacent material. AS 3700 Clause 6.6 requires
designed to withstand a lateral pressure 0.5 kPa. If the that the total face area of recesses on both sides of any
wall is subject to vertical load, it must be designed for 5-m2 section of the wall shall not exceed 10,000 mm2
a bending moment equal to the vertical load multiplied (eg 1 recess 100 x 100 mm, 2 recesses 50 x 100 mm, etc).
by an eccentricity of height divided by 36. Using this
system of mixed construction, 190-mm-thick walls up 4.2.9 DOORS AND WINDOWS
to 6.84 metres high can be constructed, Figure 4.4.
Similarly 140-mm mixed construction can be constructed If a door or window is incorporated into a fire-resistant
masonry wall, the masonry should be considered to have
up to 5.04 metres. For many years, it was difficult to
achieve 180-minute or 240-minute fire resistance levels a free edge at the interface with the door or
window, although it must be remembered that any
in reinforced construction, because the small cores of
the then available 140-mm and 190-mm blocks were
buckling of the door or window under the action of fire
not appropriate for reinforcement or grout. These levels could exert a lateral line load on the masonry wall The
magnitude of this line load and means of assessing it
can, however, now be achieved using purpose-designed
is not well understood by researchers and has not been
blocks with large cores that are quite satisfactory for
reinforcing and grouting. included in AS 3700.
Table 4.1 Design Requirements forChases. (Based on AS 3700 Clause 6.7)
I I
before chasing
/ Walls with
Vertical11) H/2 <30
>30
.. .* S
*
.*
.
H
>H/2 <30 x S
>30 x *
Horizontal12) L/2 <30 .. .* I*
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
( L
>
>o
> L/2 <30 * .* .
NOTES:
I >30
LEGEND:
x 'C
I Although not a requirement of AS 3700, it is better Ignore - for Structural Adequacy, if chase < 30 mm
to run services through the cores of hollow block deep; for Integrity and Insulation, as well as chase
masonry rather than to chase it. <30 mm deep the following must also apply. Any
2 If horizontal chasing is unavoidable, it is best placed chase cross section shall not exceed 1000 mm2
close to the top or bottom of a wall. Although (eg 10 mm deep x 100 mm wide, 20 mm deep x
AS 3700 will permit quite long horizontal chases, 50 mm wide or 30 mm deep x 33 mm wide).
it is best to ensure that chases are kept short with The total face area of the chases on both sides of
unchased masonry at regular intervals. any 5-rn2 section of the wall shall not exceed
100,000 mm2 (eg two chases 2.5 m long x 20 mm
wide)
.
'C Consider - for purposes of Structural Adequacy,
Integrity and Insulation, the thickness of the wall
should be measured from the base of the chase to
the opposite face (ie the thinnest section).
In addition, for Structural Adequacy, the chase should
be considered as an unsupported free edge and the
wall panel should be considered to consist of a
number of smaller sub-panels.
.
must be designed to withstand the bending moment
caused be any vertical loads applied at an eccentricity surface filled with a flexible Jointing compound.
of height/36. Such a detail will not be suitable for expansion.
The BCA makes provision for the placing of non-
combustible mineral fibre insulating material in the gaps
between the fire wall and abutting
ng structure or roof.
STANDARD DESIGNS
4.3.2 STANDARD DESIGN CHARTS
How to Read
4.3.1 GENERAL The general procedure with most charts is as follows:
Design and detailing Select the required wall thickness (and, if
All design and detailing shall comply with the appropriate, the reinforcement arrangement).
requirements of AS 3700 and, where appropriate,
AS/NZS 1170.
Select the appropriate support conditions
(eg, supported on four sides).
It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects
of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness Project the length of the wall between vertical
of ties and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports and the height of wall between horizontal
supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads supports to determine the design point.
and masonry properties. Control joints and openings Select a curve which is above or to the right
must be treated as free ends as specified by AS 3700. of the design point. Read off the load capacity
Masonry properties corresponding to the selected curve. If necessary,
The standard designs in this chapter are based on interpolate between curves.
masonry properties complying with the General Check that the masonry wall is adequate for other
Specification set out in Chapter 1 of this manual,
loadings, design requirements and construction
modified as noted on the standard design chart and as
noted below. Where units are required to have over 45% requirements. Some charts have superimposed the
robustness requirements for the same conditions.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTES
S
FIRE RESISTANCE LEVEL FOR INSULATION
Masonry llnitThickness (mm) and Type Material Thickness (mm) > 1800 kg/rn3 1800 kg/rn3
>'>
90 cored or solid 90 60 90
90 cored or solid
12 mm cement render each face 102 90 90
(1)
110 cored or solid 110 90 120
(1)
110 cored or solid
12 mm cement render each face 122 120 120
140 hollow
(2)
(fl
88) +
(3)
190 hollow>2>(Er>3>90) 90 60 90
190 hollow2>(Er>3> 100) 100 90 90
I
190 hollowfullygrouted 190 240 240
(1)
90 cored or solid + 90 cored or solid
cavity wall 180 240 240
90 cored or solid + 110 cored or solid
cavitywall 200 240 240
110 cored or solid + 110 cored orsolid
cavity wall 220 240 240
NOTES:
1 Cores less than 30% of the unit volume
(For 90-mm and 110-mm units, material thickness will be 90 mm and 110mm respectively, irrespective of howthe units are bedded)
2 Coresgreaterthan3o% of the unitvolume
3 Equivalent thickness of the masonry unit (net volume divided by face area)
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
S
0-mm lea
<45% basalt
9.0
a = 0.75, ah 1.0
8.0
Laterally-supported
I
both ends
7.0 and top
6.0 Length
Fire-resistance level,
5.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
a
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
= 0.75, ah = 2.5
9.0 V
Laterally-supported
one end
a,
8.0 and top
7.0 Length
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
t
Cd,
0
0.
4.0
Supporting a concrete slab
0.
3.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
=
ci,
a, 60/2. 16
90/2.04
2.0
'1_120/ 1.92
180/ 1.86
FRL/Height, (m)
1.0
0
a,
0
0 1.0 20 3.0 40 5.0 6.0 70 8.0 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer s responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
Li ifl
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
90-mm leaf
45% basalt
9.0 -
a5f-2O, ah=l.O
8.0
- .-.. f/ Laterally-supported
both ends,
.0)
top free
7.0
.-
Length
6.0
Fire-resistance level,
5.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
E
S 0
0.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
3.0
= Robustness governs
0)
in shaded area
2.0
FRL/Height, (m)
n- 60/0.8 1
jj- 90/0.77
120/0. 72
-180/0,70
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
a=2.O, ah=2.5
9.0
Laterally-supported
one end,
0)
top free
8.0
S 7.0 Length
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
E
4.O
0
0.
0.
3.0
= Robustness governs
0) in shaded area
2.0
FRI/Height, (m)
1.0 60/0.8 1
90/0.77
L 120/0.72
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
4.11
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
110-mm leaf
<45% basalt
9.0
a)=O.75, ah=l.O
8.0 'V /////////////////////
Laterally-supported
both ends
7.0 andtop
/
6.0 Length
t0
U)
4.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
3.0 60/2.64
r
= 1 90/2.49
a)
0) 120/2.35
2.0 180/2 .2 7
-240/2.20
FRL/Height, (m)
1.0
Fire-resistance level,
FRL (minutes), for
0 10 2.0 3.0 40 50 6.0 70 80 90 Structural Adequacy
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
a = 0.75, ah = 2.5
9.0
,/ ////////////////////,
Laterally-supported
one end
8.0 and top
7.0 Length
6.0
t
(4
0
4.0 - Not supporting a concrete slab
3.0 p- 60/2.64
= 90/2.49
a)
0) 120/2.35
2.0 180/2.27
2 40/2.20
FRL/Height, (m)
1.0
0
Fire-resistance level,
FRL(minutes), for
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 50 60 70 8.0 90 Structural Adequacy
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations 0f loads and masonry properties
ii 1
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
a = 2.0, ah = 1.0
8.0
..''
-
o / Laterally-supported
both ends,
7.0
/ topfree
6.0
( Length
Fire-resistance level,
5.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
E
t0
0,
4.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Robustness governs
3.0 in shaded area
2.0
FRL/Height, (m)
60/0.99
_______________f-90!0.94
180/0.85
0)
0
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 8.0 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
a=2.0, at=2.5
9.0
-
,-...
/ Laterally-supported
one end.
Length
7.0
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
t
0,
0
0.
4.0
S
0. Robustness governs
3.0 in shaded area
0)
2.0
FRL/Height, (m)
- 60/0.99
90/0.94
Th 120/0. 88
0)
0
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
41
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
a=O.75, ah=l.O
8.0 7 /////////////////////
Laterally-supported
both ends
and top
7.0 -
/
6.0 Length
t
'I, 4.0
0 60/3.36
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
_i 90/3.17
3.0 120/2.99
= 180/2.89
4,
4) 240/2.80
2.0 FRL/Height, (m)
0 10 Fire-resistance level,
FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
I
a=O.75, ah=2.5
9.0
Laterally-supported
04 one end
a'
=
8.0 // /////////////////////
and top
7.0 Length
6.0
Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
5.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
t
C
C.
4.0
\\ -60/3.36
C- 90/3. 17
3,0 120/2.99
= 180/2. 89
4,
4, 240/2.80
2.0 FRL/Height, (m)
Co
1.0
0 Fire-resistance level,
on FRL (minutes), for
4,
0
Structural Adequacy
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
A IA
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
0-mm leaf
45% basalt
9.0
a5f2.O, a=l.O
8.0 -
.-.
// Laterafly-supported
a / both ends,
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. - Robustness governs
0.
3.0 in shaded area
=
a)
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
ah=2.5
9.0
Laterally-supported
one end,
top free
8.0
Length
7.0
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL (minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
E
4.0
0
0. Robustness governs
0.
3.0 in shaded area
=
0)
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
4.1
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
8.0
70
Fire-resistance level,
FRL(minutes), for
6.0 Structural Adequacy
240/3.80
3.0
=
a)
a) aVfO.75, ah= 1.0
2.0
//
a)
0
/
Laterally-supported
both ends //
andtop
/
a)
0
k Length
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
1.0 a)
// one end
and top
a)
0
- Length
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 6.0 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
/1 1
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
190-
<45% basalt
9.0
a=2.O, ah=l.O
8.0 - Laterally-supported
both ends,
ii)
7.0
=
I top free
6.0
( Length
- Robustness governs
5.0 in shaded area
E Fire-resistance level,
t
0
FRL (minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
a.
a.
3.0
= FRL/Height, (m)
ci)
ci,
60/ 1.7 1
2.0 90/1.62
_j
120/1.52
180/1.47
240/1.43
af=2.O, ah=2.5
9.0
Laterally-supported
one end,
c Length
7.0
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
Robustness governs
0
a. in shaded area
a.
FRL/Height, (m)
60/171
90/1.62
120/ 1. 52
Th180/147
240/1.43
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
4.17
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
-mm leaf
45% basalt
9.0 -
a=O.75, ah=l.O
8.0
-..- ,////////////////////////
/ Laterally-supported
both ends
7.0 z andtop
I
6.0 kLength
5.0
Fire-resistance level,
FRL (minutes), for
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9.0 Structural Adequacy
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
7.0 Length
6.0
5.0
Robustness governs in shaded areas
3,0 60/2. 70
= 90/2. 52
a) 120/2.40
a)
2.0 ii 180/2. 16
240/2.04
FRL/Height, (m)
1.0
Fire-resistance level,
a)
0 FRL(minutes), for
0 1.0 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 8.0 90 Structural Adequacy
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
A IQ
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
90-mm Ie
45% basalt
9.0
a=2.O, ah=l.O
8.0 __% /
.-, / Laterally-supported
both ends,
7.0
= / top free
I
< Length
6.0
5.0 -
E
4.0
S 0
0.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. - Robustness governs
in shaded area
2.0
FRI/Height, (m)
60/ 1.01
90/0.95
1.0 120/0. 90
180/0.8 1
240/0. 77
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
a=2.O, ah=2.5
9.0
Laterally-supported
one end,
=U,
top free
8.0
Length
7.0
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRI (minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
E
4.0
0
0
0 S Robustness governs
0.
in shaded area
=
U)
U,
2.0
FRI/Height, (m)
60/1.01
j- 90/0.95
120/0.90
180/0.8 1
240/0. 77
0 1.0 20 30 40 5.0 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
S NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
0-mm leaf
5%basalt
9.0
a = 0.75, ah 1.0
8.0
Laterally-supported
both ends
7.0 andtop
t0 4.0
60/3.30
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
j-9O/3.°8
3.0 '-120/2.93
= 180/2. 64
a)
240/2.49
2.0 FRL/Height, (m)
1.0
0 Fire-resistance level,
FRL (minutes), for
a)
0
Structural Adequacy
0 10 20 3.0 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
a= 0.75, ah=2.S
9.0 -S /1 Laterally-supported
one end
andtop
8.0
La 7.0 Length
6.0
E
supporting a concrete slab
rNot
t
0
0
4.0
60/3.30
j-90/3.08
3.0 120/2.9 3
= '-180/2.64
a) --240/2.49
2.0 FRL/Height, (m)
1.0
Fire-resistance level,
FRL(minutes), for
'a) Structural Adequacy
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 8.0 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
.0- leaf
:5% basalt
9.0
a=2.O, ah=l.O
8.0
Laterally-supported
both ends,
top free
7.0 -
Length
6.0
Fire-resistance level,
5.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
E
t
S 0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. Robustness governs
0.
3.0 -- in shaded area
=
0 10 20 3.0 40 5.0 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
ah=2.5
9.0
.-
-..
. 00
/ Laterally-supported
one end,
a)
top free
8.0
Length
7.0 -
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
E
4.0
0
0. S Robustness governs
0.
3.0 in shaded area
=
0)
0)
L180'099
240/0.94
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
4.21
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
Fire-resistance level,
FRL(minutes), for
8.0
Structural Adequacy
7.0
Supporting a concrete slab
5.0
FRL/Height, (m)
60/4.20
90/3.92
120/3,73
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
71180/3.36
240/3. 17
at 0.75, ah 1.0
2.0
Laterally-supported
both ends
a)
1.0 and top
a,
0
Length
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
a= 0.75, ah=2.5
9.0 / ////////////////////,
Laterally-supported
one end
and top
8.0
7.0 Length
6.0
- Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
5.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
E 60/4.20
4.0 90/3.92
0 _______ - 120/3.73
180/3. 36
3.0
= FRL/Height, (m)
a)
2.0
Fire-resistance level,
FRL (minutes), for
1": Structural Adequacy
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
i-mm leaf
% basalt
2
9.0
af=2.O, ah-l.O
8.0
Laterafly-supported
both ends,
0,
=
7.0 - / top free
.1
Length
6.0
Fire-resistance level,
5.0 FRL (minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
Robustness governs
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
in shaded area
FRL/Height, (m)
2.0 -60/1.58
1-90/1.47
120/ 1. 40
-180/1.26
-240/1.19
0,
0
0 10 20 3.0 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
a5=2.O, a=2.5
9.0
Laterally-supported
n00 one end,
.0,
7.0 Length
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
-- Robustness governs
in shaded area
FRL/Height, (m)
2.0 60/1.58
__j- 90/1.47
120/1.40
180/1.26
L24o/1, 19
I': 0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
4 9.'
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
190-mm leaf
45% basalt
i'.
9.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
8.0
_I
7.0
a5fO.75, ah=l.O
7 //////////////////////
Laterally-supported
a, both ends
2.0 andtop
/
1.0 Length
0
Fire-resistance level,
a,
0 FRL (minutes), for
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Structural Adequacy
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0 -
I' Length
Fire-resistance level,
± 0 FRL (minutes), for
0 10 2.0 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90 Structural Adequacy
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
A ')A
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
190-mm leaf
45% basalt
9.0
a=2.0, ah=l.O
8.0
Laterally-supported
both ends,
topfree
7.0 /
Length
6.0
Robustness governs
5.0 in shaded area
Fire-resistance level,
FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
FRL/Height, (m)
I 90/2.00
120/ 1.90
180/ 1. 7 1
-240/1.62
a=2.0, a-2.5
9.0
Laterally-supported
one end,
a)
= I' top free
8.0
Length
7.0
Fire-resistance level,
6.0 FRL(minutes), for
Structural Adequacy
5.0
E Robustness governs
t
0
4.0 in shaded area
0.
3.0
FRL/Height, (m)
=
a) 60/2.14
a)
1-90/2.00
2.0 -120/1.90
L_240/162
1.
0
=0
a)
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
49
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
0-mm leaf
orizontally-reinforced
nd beams
a) Li
a- NOTE: Also .4
7fl
check Structural
Adequa;y of
HR Reinforced
bond beams
unreinfc rced
C masonry
C,
6.0
C
a)
E
a)
C-) ' Length 'I
C
Reinforcement* required to
a)
achieve a Fire Resistance Level
(FRL) for Structural Adequacy
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Ca
Reinfocement = N12 N 16
= of up to 240 minutes
C
- Robustness governs
in shaded area
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
H
9.0
6' -
Robustness governs
in shaded area
*
Minimum reinforcement to resist
0.5 kPa lateral load in accordance
with AS 3700, Clause 6.3.5
0 10 20 30 40 5.0 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
1' --rneáf
H. tally-reinforced
:ond beams
HI H Reinforced
bond beams
NOTE: Iso check
Structu alAdequ.cy
of unrei forced masonry
Ct
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
or Reinforced
bond beams
E
C
NOTE: so check
C Structu alAdequacy
ofunrei forced masonry
C
C
C-
C
.E 4 () -
a)
-
ReinforcEment 12 i N20
' Length
Reinforcement* required to
'I
CC.
=
C
NJ
30
C
C- -
C-:
C)
Ct
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
A ")Q
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
190-mm leaf
Horizontally-reinforced
bond beams
NOTE:
Struc
of unr
Reinforced
0 H H
bond beams
6.0
N20
cc
C
C
C
cc I' Length 'I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Reinforcement* required to
a achieve a Fire Resistance Level
C
(FRL) for Structural Adequacy
of up to 240 minutes
0 -
C
C,
0 10 20 30 40 5.0 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
I' Length
Reinforcement* required to
achieve a Fire Resistance Level
(FRL) for Structural Adequacy
of up to 240 minutes
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
4.99
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
where P (kN/m) <2.25 H (m) 140-mm leaf
Vertically-reinforced
cores
9.0
Reinforcement* required to
achieve a Fire Resistance Level
8.0
(FRL) for Structural Adequacy
of up to 240 minutes
7.0
6.0
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0
Reinforced cores
a
0)
2.0
Reinforcement - N12
NOTE: Also check
Structural Adequ cy
of unremforced m asonry
1.0
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 30
Horizontal Spacing of Vertical Reinforcement for Wall of Unlimited Length (ml
These charts are valid where applied vertical load P (kN/m) is less than the value *Mii reinforcement to resist
given by 2.25 H (m). If this is not the case, the reinforced niasonry must be checked 0.5 kPa lateral load in accordance
using AS 3700, Clause 6.3.5 for a bending moment equal to PH736 with AS 3700, Clause 6.3.5
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
A Qfl
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
'I.
where P (kN/m) <2.25 H (m) 'mie.
ly-reinfo
9.0
ILl
IlL
8.0
Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
7.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0 .-
5,0
0
4,0
I N16 -
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
i
PH136
9.0
8.0
Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
7.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
S
6.0 S
1i.
Reinforced cores
5.0 N20
t0
0.
4.0
0.
3.0 einTottement N12
ci) Honzorital
fl n
2.0
NOTE: - so check Reinforcement* required to
Structural Adequ .cy achieve a Fire Resistance Level
ofunreinforcedm' .
(FRL) for Structural Adequacy
of up to 240 minutes
ii)
*Miim reinforcement to resist 0.5 kPa lateral
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 load in accordance with AS 3700, Clause 6.3.5
Horizontal Spaci ig of Vertical Reinforcement for Wall of Unlimited Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
4.1
WORKED EXAMPLES
Concrete grout
Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
4.4.1 GENERAL = 20 MPa
2700
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
2700 Wall to be
designed
Level 1
600
2100
SECTION A-A
IA
110+90
cavity walls (50 cavity)
Horizontal coefficient (for one end supported) Units must have a material thickness
a 2.5 6.3.2.2 of at least 55 mm for 30 minutes insulation
6.5.2 Table 6.3
Slenderness ratio Actual material thickness
fH tm =90+ 110
s= 6.3.2.2
= 200 mm
0.75 x 2700 >55mm OK
90
= 22.5
= 5.6 In (
720 + 13
90
= 24.6
> 22.5 OK
A 'fl
S
EXAMPLE 2
DESIGN BRIEF
For low-rise industrial building, design for fire resistance, Wall A' and Wall 'D' shown below.
P = 10 kN/m P= lOkN/m
400
Bond beam
Steel Steel
portal frame portal frame Steel portal Steel 2700
frame portal frame -
Bond beam
6500 -I-- 6500
S WaIIA
190-mm hollow concrete block
reinforced as shown in detail below
Door
Wall D
190-mm
400
3000
opening hollow
concrete block
4
FIRE RESISTANCE LEVELS Moment capacity of vertically-reinforced cores
Mcap = 13.2 kN.mlcore Part B:Chapter 6
I -storey building used as a warehouse this manual
Class 7 0.5 (kPa) b H2 6.3.5
Type C construction BCA Table CI.] 8
Wall less than 1.5 m from boundary (fire source) 0.5 x 2.0 x 6.42
8
Required FRL: 90/90/90 = 5.1 kN.m/core OK
ie Structural adequacy 90 mins
Integrity 90 mins PbH 6.3.5
Insulation 90 mins 36
10 x 2.0 x 6.4
36
STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY = 3.6 kN.mlcore OK
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
A
Moment capacity of INTEGRITY
horizontally-reinforced bond beam For 90 minutes integrity, units must have a
Mcap = 22.6 kN.m Part B:Chapter 6 material thickness of at least 100 mm for
this manual denseweight concrete (>1800 kg/rn3) or
0.5 (kPa) b L2 6.3.5 at least 90 mm for lightweight concrete
8 (<1800 kg/rn3) Table 6.3
0.5 x (1.5 + 0.4 + 1.35) x 6.82
8 Use 190-mm hollow concrete units with
=9.4kN.m OK a material density less than 1800 kg/rn3
and material thickness greater than 90 mm
Cover to reinforcement
C = 30 + 5 + 15
= 50 mm INSULATION
>30mm OK Table 6.2 Similar requirements to integrity Table 6.3
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Slenderness ratio
s= avfH 6.3.2.2
0.75 x 3000
190
= 11.8
S
NOTES
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Chaster 5
Vertical Loads Contents
This chapter provides the design requirements for 5.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
masonry subject to vertical loads resulting from
superstructure weight and the vertical component 5.2 GLOSSARY
of overturning loads. It includes the load
capacities of unreinforced masonry walls, grouted 5.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
masonry walls and reinforced masonry lintels.
5.4 STANDARD DESIGNS
When vertical loads aie applied to masonry walls, This glossary of technical terms relevant to Vertical
consideration must also be given to any bending Loads is in addition to the general Glossary given in
moments induced by eccentricity of the loads. Part B: Chapter 1. Where appropriate, the definitions
have been expanded to give more information.
The principal factors affecting the compressive capacity
of a wall or pier are its slenderness ratio, its Concentrated load
cross-sectional properties and compressive strength, A concrete slab bearing on the top of a wall will
the eccentricity of any load, rotational restraint and the usually distribute concentrated loads to the wall as a
buckling mode. relatively uniform load
For the design of a cavity wall subjected to vertical Loadbearing wall
loading, each leaf must be considered sepaiately, Any wall that supports loads in addition to its own
therefore assuming that no mutual support is being self-weight.
supplied by the individual leaves. Non-loadbearing wall
In multi-storey buildings, the maximum vertical load on Any wall that supports only its own self-weight.
each loadbearing wall would result from the application
of the maximum imposed load to all floors that
contribute load to the wall, Figure 5.1. However this
will probably not give the maximum eccentricity and
may not necessarily lead to the worst case for design.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I IL IL
: :.± IL
A
IL
B
.,
PL IL
PL PL ft
1
Figure 5.1 Typical Analysis for Maximum Vertical Load on Figure 5.2 Typical Analysis for Maximum Eccentricity on a
a Wa/I in a Multi-storey Building Wall in a Multi-storey Building
S DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
For a wall that is supported along one or both of its
vertical edges, two-way action will stiffen the wall
53.1 WALLS SUBJECT TO VERTICAL provided there is sufficient shear capacity at the
COMPRESSION FROM UNIFORM LOADS connection of the panel to its lateral supports.
Behaviour of Walls in Compression Control joints are not capable of effectively transmitting
When relatively squat masonry units (eg 76-mm x shear across the joint and must be treated as free ends.
110-mm x 230-mm bricks) are crushed in a compression Vertical chases in masonry also diminish the
testing machine, the platens tend to hold the unit shear transfer to adjacent lateral supports.
together, inhibiting the formation of cracks giving an AS 3700 provides for two alternative approaches to the
apparent increase in strength. AS 4455 requires that this design for compression:
apparent confined strength be modified by a reduction Design by simple rules (Simphfied Design),
factor to yield an equivalent unconfined strength. This
or
does not apply to hollow concrete blocks, since the tall
thin face shells may be consdered to be unconfined. Design by refined calculation (Refined Design) This
(Initial failure is usually by splitting of the webs rather allows for further choice between the assumption of
than by face-shell crushing). eccentricities or their calculation by an equivalent-
When relatively squat masonry units (eg 76-mm-high frame approach.
bricks) are built with mortar into a wallette and Simplified Design Method
subjected to a vertical load, the mortar expands laterally The Simplified Design Method enables masonry
and tends to split the brick. For tall units (eg 190-mm loadbearing walls and piers to be designed using
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
concrete blocks) the widely spaced mortar joints have tabulated coefficients based on conservative values for
less effect. AS 3700 accounts for this phenomenon by the expected eccentricities and buckling mode of three
means of a factor, kh (obtained from Table 3.2) which is particular applications, viz:
used to modify the characteristic unconfined , A wall or pier supporting a concrete slab that bear
compressive strength of a masonry wallette. The
on the top
relationship between the characteristic unconfined
compressive strength of the masonry units and This is the most common case for the loadbearing
characteristic unconfined compressive strength of a walls in medium-rise residential and commercial
masonry wallette is given by AS 3700 Clause 3.3.2. buildings. Charts for this case are plotted in this
manual.
The basic compressive capacity, F0, of a stocky wall is
given by multipying the characteristic unconfined A wall or pier supporting other systems that bear
compressive strength of a masonry wallette by the on the top
bedded area and the capacity reduction factor. If the This case covers the situation where a steel or
cores are grout filled, further capacity can be included timber roof bears directly on the top of the wall.
The capacity of grouted masonry is substantially less Generally, the magnitude of the loads will be
than the sum of the strengths of the hollow masonry relatively low and vertical load capacity will not
and the grout core, due to the interaction of the core represent a problem. No charts are provided for this
and its surrounding shell. The mechanism of failure is
case.
influenced by the differing deformation characteristics
of the materials, and possible shrinkage effects between A wall or pier supporting a load applied at the face
the grout core and the tapered shells. of the masonry
This case often occurs in town-house construction
C where timber floors are fixed to the face of masonry
F0 = 0 'm Ab + k 73.2(2)
party walls. Charts are provided for the case of
1.3
140-mm blockwork.
This basic compressive capacity must be further The slenderness coefficient (a) allows for restraint at
modified to account for the eccentricity of any load, the top and bottom of the masonry. For a member
rotational restraint and the buckling mode. This is done laterally supported at both top and bottom, av = 1.0
by determining the appropriate value of the reduction and for a member laterally supported and rotationally
factor, k. restrained at only its bottom, av = 2.5. One of the
For a wall that incorportes engaged piers, the consequences of simplification has been that, despite
thickness may be increased by a factor, kt, from appearances to the contrary, these values for av do
Table 7.2. not relate to the values used for the Refined Design
Method. The value of av used in Equations 7.3.4.3(1),
Lateral supports must be designed for any horizontal 7.3.4.3(2) and 7.3.4.3(3) for Refined Design is not the
forces plus 2.5% of the vertical load, but not less than same as the value av = 1.0 used in Equations 7.3.3.3(1),
a pressure of 0.4 kPa as set out in Clause 2.6.3. If the 7.3.3.3(2) and 7.3.3.3(3) for Simplified Design.
thickness of an engaged pier exceeds 0.25 times its
height, it should be treated as a lateral support rather For a wall that is supported along one or both of its
than an engaged pier. Many commonly constructed vertical edges, allowance is made for the strengthening
returns will not have sufficient length to be effective as effect of two-way action in compression.
lateral supports
labs bearing on the walls below
Refined Design Method
The Refined Design Method permits the assessment of
compressive strength based on eccentricities and fixity
determined by either of two methods, ie the assumption
I
Wall fixed to slab Light floor or roof frame 7.3.3.3(1), 7.3.3.3(2) and 7.3.3.3(3) for Simplified Design.
but not supporting it bearing on wall
The Refined Design Method permits the assessment of
eccentricities and fixity by either of two methods, ie the
assumption of eccentricities (Figure 5.4) or their
calculation by an equivalent-frame approach
(Figure 5.5). Both methods are described in the worked
example.
The bending moments at the top and bottom of the
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
(From above)
W7 (From slab)
NOTE
In both cases
e' is measured
from the centreline tw tw
of the loaded leaf
6 6
0.8
5.3.2 WALLS SUBJECT TO VERTICAL
COMPRESSION FROM CONCENTRATED 0.7
LOADS 0.6
Concentrated loads are imposed by beams, lintels,
0.5
columns, anchorages, etc. An analysis for concentrated Compressive
loads must be carried out immediately under the load 0.4 stress on joint
and at a distance below of 0.5 times the height of the (MPa) 1.0
0.3
wall. The concentrated load is assumed to disperse at C
an angle of 45° from the area of load application.
The basic compressive strength capacity, F0, should be i0.1 0.25
calculated using the area which lies within the zone of =
dispersion at the cross-section under consideration. If 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
the load capacity immediately beneath a bearing plate
Slab Stiffness/Wall Stiffness
is being calculated, the bearing area should be used
rather than the full bedded area of the member
Figure 5.6 Joint Fixity Factor for use in Refined Design
The factor kb allows for the enhancement of strength Method
in the region beneath the load but is limited to solid,
cored or grouted hollow masonry. For ungrouted hollow
blockwork, no enhancement is permitted and kb is unity. / 4
\e2 e1 - - e1
e2 e2
e
0 e21
ei
an opening, provided there are sufficient number of Steel lintels with a duplex coating, hot-dip galvanised
masonry courses above and sufficient strength at the in accordance with AS/NZS 4680 with a coating
supports. AS 3700 Commentary suggests that the load mass of 600 p/rn2 and a coating of at least
exerted on the lintel can be assumed to be exerted by a 50 microns of two-pack non-inhibitive epoxy primer to
triangle of masonry above the opening. AS/NZS 3750.13 and at least 200 microns of two-pack
End Support high-build epoxy micaceous iron oxide to AS 3750.14.
AS 3700 Clause 4.12 requires that lintels be supported
R5 - For applications in saline or contaminated water
on the masonry abutments for a distance of at least
including tidal splash zones and within 1 km of an
100 mm.
industry producing chemical pollutants.
Corrosion Resistance
Detailing and Capacities
Steel lintels and arch bars must comply with the
Detailing information is given in PartC:Clause 3.2.2,
durability requirements of AS 3700 Table 5.1 for the
while permissible spans for certain applications, in
particular exposure classification. AS 3700 Clause 5.2.2
accordance with BCA-Volume 2, are given in Part B:
makes it clear that lintels or arch bars supporting
Page 5.9.
the external leaf of a cavity wall or veneer wall are
considered to be in an "exterior environment".
Corrosion protection requirements in AS/NZS 2699.3
are as follows:
RU, RI, R2, R3 - For all applications except as listed
for P4 and R5.
t Steel ]intels, hot dip galvanised in accordance with
AS/NZS 4680 or AS/NZS 4791, except that the
minimum coating mass shall be 300 g/m2 for RO, Ri
and P2 and be 600 p/rn2 for R3.
Steel lintels with an inorganic zinc silicate coating,
abrasive blast cleaned to a minimum of AS 1627.4
Class 2.5, and a coating of at least 75 microns of
inorganic zinc silicate in compliance with AS/NZS
3750,15 Type 3 or Type 4, except that for R3 the
average coating thickness shall be not less than 100
microns in compliance with AS/NZS 3750.15 Type 3.
Steel lintels with a duplex coating, hot-dip galvanised
in accordance with AS/NZS 4680 or AS/NZS 4791,
except that hot-dip galvanising to be at least
300 g/rn2 and a coating to be at least 50 microns of
two pack non-inhibitive epoxy primer to
AS/NZS 3750.13 and at least 125 microns of two-pack
high-build epoxy micaceous iron oxide to AS 3750.14.
STANDARD DESIGNS
5.4.2 STANDARD DESIGN CHARTS
How to Read
5.4.1 GENERAL The general procedure with most charts is as follows:
Design and Detailing Select the required wall thickness and material
All design and detailing shall comply with the details.
requirements of AS 3700 and, where appropriate,
AS/NZS 1170. Select the appropriate support conditions
(eg, supported on four sides).
All charts in this chapter (except the Table on page 5.18)
are based on the Simplified Design approach set out in Project the length of the wall between vertical
AS 3700 Clause 7.3.3. supports and the height of wall between horizontal
supports to determine the design point.
The basic compressive capacity, F0, representing the
compressive strength of the masonry before Select a curve which is above or to the right
consideration of slenderness or eccentricity is noted of the design point. Read off the load capacity
with each chart. corresponding to the selected curve. If necessary,
It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects interpolate between curves.
of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness Check that the masonry wall is adequate for other
of ties and connectors, and strength and stiffness of loadings, design requirements and construction
supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads requirements. Some charts have superimposed the
S and masonry properties. Control joints and openings robustness requirements for the same conditions.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
140-mm leaf
BARS V M BARS V M
300
70
70
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
190-mm leaf
BARS V M BARS V M
ioo.L.
BARS V, M BARS V M
Li
NOTES
300 300
V Shear capacity (kN)
Moment capacity (kN.m)
Mortartype. M3
Block characteristic compressive strength,
= 15 MPa e 129 (N12 bars)
127 (N16 bars)
I
Grout compressive strength. f 20 MPa
95
125 (Y20 bars)
STEEL LINTELS AND ARCH BARS Permissible Spans
I
Maximum clear span (mm) for following loading cases:
Llkg/m) 8lk
I
75
1(5.89
ik
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
75
8k 100
spans> 1 m
81 k90
100
Robustness governs
in shaded area
40
50
60 _ Laterally-supported
70
80
a)) / bothendsandtop
and supportinga
90 concrete slab
100 = Fd
Length )
Design compressive force,
Fd (kN/m)
0 10 2.0 3.0 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
8.0
7.0
6.0
-- Robustness governs
5.0 in shaded area
Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
In
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
af
Strength grade
Face-shell bedded, 25 mm face shell
Height 190 mm, -' 1 kN/m
9.0
8.0
7,0
.- Robustness governs
in shaded area
6.0
10
5.0 20
t
0
0.
40
50
60
a5 = 1.0, a = 1.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. 70
3.0 Laterally-supported
80
C bothendsandtop
a) 90 00
a) 'a) andsupportinga
100 = Fd
2.0 concrete slab
1.0 Length
8.0
t \\
7.0
Robustness governs
6.0 in shaded area
5.0 10
20
30 Simplified Design Method
40
50
a5=1.0, ah=2.5
60
70
3.0 Laterally-supported
80
a) 90 one end and top
a>
and supporting a
2.0
100 = Fd
I concrete slab
a)
1.0
0
0
F.
1.0 2.0 3.0
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
40 50 60 70 80 90
( Length
NOTE: Ills the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
5.11
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
S
ngth grade 15 MPa
-ight 190 mm, F0 = 181 kN/m
Face-shell bedded, 25 mm face shell
9.0
10
8.0 - 20
Robustness governs
in shaded area
7.0 30
6.0 40
5.0 - 50
a. 90
3.0
H 100 = Fd
/ Laterally-supported
bothendsandtop
a, andsupportinga
a, 2.0 concrete slab
////////////////////////
Length >
10
0
Design compressive force,
Fd (kN/m)
0 10 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
8.0
,L
Robustness governs
7.0 - in shaded area
10
6.0 20
30
40
5.0
50
E
60 Simplified Design Method
t
(0
0
a-
4.0
80
70
a=1.0, ah-2.5
a- 90 ////,U'/.1
3.0 Laterally-supported
= 100 Fd -C
a, 00 oneendandtop
a,
=ci) andsupportinga
2.0 concrete slab
1.0
( Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
g, 1'
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
190-mm leaf
Strength grade 15 MPa
Height 190 mm, F0 = 218 kN/m
Face-shell bedded, 30 mm face shell
Robustness governs
in shaded area
70
80
90
100 = Fd
Laterally-supported
bothendsandtop
/ and supporting a
concrete slab
Length
t0
0.
4.0
a=1.0, ah=2.5
0.
3.0
Laterally-supported
ci, oneendandtop
ci)
andsupportinga
2.0 _, concrete slab
1.0 Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
40-mm leaf
Strength grade 15 MPa
Height 190 mm, F0 = 401 kN/m
Face-shell bedded (25 mm) and fully-grouted
0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
60
80
LWI 100
S'hi
120
200
220 Laterally-supported
both ends and top
240=Fd °
and supporting a
concrete slab
Length )
Design compressive force,
(I, Fd (kN/m)
-o 0 10 2.0 3.0 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
0 Length of Walt Between Supports (m)
Ct,
0
Face-shell bedded (25 mm) and fully-grouted
ci) 9.0
8.0
Robustness governs
7.0 in shaded area
20
6.0 40
60
80
5.0 100
120
E 140 Simplified Design Method
0,
4.0 160 a0=1.0, ah-2.5
0 180 Fd
0.
0.
3.0 Laterally-supported
= oneendandtop
0)
a,
and supporting a
2.0 concrete slab
1.0 Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
9.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
260
I E
Simplified Design Method
280
4.0 a5=1.O, ah=l.O
300
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. 320
0.
340
=
3.0
360 / Laterally-supported
380 / bothendsandtop
and supporting a
2.0 concrete slab
400 = Fd
/ ////////////////////
1.0 Length )
Design compressive force,
a) Fd (kN/m)
0
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Robustness governs
8.0 in shaded area
100
7.0 120
140
160
6.0
180
200
220
5.0
240
260
E Simplified Design Method
4.0 280
a5=1.O, ah=2.5
300 = Fd
0
0.
0. ////,UY/
3.0 Laterally-supported
=
a, one end and top
and supporting a
2.0
I concrete slab
( Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
Id-mm leaf
thgradelOMPa
Fully-bedded
t76mm, F0=219kN/m
Robustness governs
in shaded area
10
20
30
40 Simplified Design Method
50 a=1.O, a=l.O
60
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
70
80
90
laterally-supported
100 -
110
' bothendsandtop
120 = and supporting a
130 Fd concrete slab
kLength >
Fully-bedded
9.0
8.0
7.0
Robustness governs
6.0 in shaded area
5.0 10
20
30
E 40 Simplified Design Method
t
U,
0
4.0 50
60
70
a= 10, ah=25
0.
0.
90
80 /,4//U
Laterally-supported
100 -C
one end and top
110 a,
and supporting a
2,0 concrete slab
1.0 Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
S
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
g 1L2
S UNREINFORCED MASONRY
ngth grader
Face-shell bedded. 25 mm face shell ightl62m ' - lkN/m
Robustness governs
in shaded area
10
20
30 Simplified Design Method
40 a=1.O, ah=l.O
50
S / VzU/
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
60
70 Laterally-supported
80 both ends and top
90 and supporting a
100 = Fd concrete slab
I
' Length
8.0 1t
7.0 -
6,0 -
5.0 II_
I tlW1
10
20
30
40
Robustness governs
in shaded area
I
50
60
3.0 70 Laterally-supported
=
a)
ci,
80
90 .
=
=Ø / oneendandtop
andsupportinga
2.0 100 = Ed concrete slab
1.0 IanOth
NOTE: It is the designer s responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness 0f supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
140-mm leaf
Strength grade 15 MPa
Height 190 mm, F0 = 181 kN/m
Face-shell bedded, 25 mm face shell
9.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
8.0
Timber floor
7.0 loading face of wall
6.0
Concrete slab
5.0
/'z/z/4
=
3.0
10 = F..a .=
/ Laterally-supported
bothendsandtop
and supporting a
2.0 timberfloor
.-,
Length )
Design compressive force,
Fd(kN/m)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Robustness governs
in shaded area
8.0
S
Timber floor
7.0 loading face of wall
6.0
Concrete slab
5.0
t
U,
0
4.0 a = 1.0, at = 2.5
0.
0.
3.0
/,U//U
10=Fd Laterally-supported
= one end and top
1.0 Length
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
S
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of oads and masonry properties
R IQ
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
140-mm leaf
Strength grade 15 MPa
Height 190 mm, F0 = 326 kN/m
Face-shell bedded. 40 mm face shefl
Robustness governs
In shaded area
10
Simplified Design Method
a5 = 1.0, ah = 1.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Laterally-supported
both en ds and to p
20 = Fd and supporting a
timber floor
1
I' Length )
Design compressive force,
Fd (kN/m)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Robustness governs
in shaded area
8.0
>-
0 ---
Timber floor
7.0
- ..Ioading face of wall
//
/,.
6.0
4
/
Concrete slab
5.0
10
E Simplified Design Method
t0
0.
4.0 a5 = 1.0, ah = 2.5
0.
3.0 Laterally-supported
=
a, one end and top
a) 20Fd and supporting a
2.0 timber floor
1.0 Length
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REFINED DESIGN METHOD - Reduction Factors for Eccentricity and
Slenderness Using Calculated Eccentricities
BASIS OFTABLE
The following table sets out some typical eccentricity to thickness The values have been reproduced here to give an
i. ratios and reduction factors for masonry walls in medium-rise indication of the accuracy of the assumed
buildings. They are based on calculations of moments and loads for: eccentricities and to assist designers in
the upper floors slabs rangingfrom 3.0 to 4.0 metres span; determining the appropriate analysis method to use.
slab span to thickness ratios of approximately 20:1; These values of eccentricity to thickness ratios and
reduction factors should not be used for design
imposed loads of3 kPa;
II. without confirmation by the analysis method
wall heights from 2.4 metres to 3.6 metres; described in this manual.
wall thicknesses of 90, 110, 140 and 190 mm;
joint fixity factorgiven in the Figure 5.6 (Page 5.5);
a 0.85 above the slab (forthe top storey);
a = 0.75 below the slab (forthe second-top storey).
I
REDUCTION FACTORS (K) USING CALCULATED ECCENTRICITiES
Height Thickness Above slab Below slab Above slab Below slab Above slab Below slab
Location H (mm) t (mm) ei/t e1/t K
I
Sr Sr K
* The calculated eccentricity ratios for external walls above the slab exceed 0.33. In these situations the actual support conditions must be
differentfrom the mechanism implicit in the moment distribution and joint-fixity factor used to calculate these values. Use of the assumed
values is considered reasonable in these cases
I
WORKED EXAMPLE
Mortar joints
Purpose of the worked example Mortar type M3 (or M4)
The purpose of the following worked example is to Joint thickness 10 mm
demonstrate the steps to be followed when performing Concrete grout
manual calculations or when preparing computer Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
software for the analysis and design of masonry. = 20 MPa
The worked example also serves the purpose of
demonstrating the origin of the Standard Designs which Minimum cement content 300 kg/rn3
are based on similar masonry capacity considerations.
Although comprehensive in its treatment of AS 3700, the
worked example is not intended to analyze or design
all parts of the particular structure It deals only with
enough to demonstrate the design method.
Design and detailing
All design and detailing shall comply with the
requirements of AS 3700 and, where appropriate,
AS/NZS 1170
It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects
of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness
of ties and connectors, and strength and stiffness of
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
5.21
DESIGN BRIEF VERTICAL LOADS
1050
Roof
Area of roof acting on wall
7.5 x 5.33
2700
AR=
2
Level 3 = 20.0 m2
175
Floor 1 WaIls
Only the internal leaf is loadbearing
Cont...
Permanent load MASONRY PROPERTIES
Gwi
g1H1L1
- Lw1 Width of masonry unit
t = 90 mm
1.62 x 2.70 x 3.70
3.70
Face-shell thickness
= 4.37 kNIm tfs = 25 mm
=0.458.01OOO
6 x 50,000 <22 JaH ahL 7.3 .3 .3(3)
)+ 1.4
= 181 kN/m -92 /1.0x2700x2.5x3700
90 '
= 38.9
use 30.0
Design capacity
f0 = k F0 7.3.3.3
=0.35x 181
= 63.4 kN/m
>61.2kN/m OK
S
DESIGN BY REFINED CALCULATION Slenderness and eccentricity factor 7.3.4.5(2)
0.75 x 2700 tw
- l.0x90 = 0.872 OK
= 22.5
<cp.j a H ah L 7.3.4.5(5)
S (12!)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
tfs ty
2
=
90
N/075x2700x2.5x3700
= 1.61 OK
= 33.7 OK
Design capacity
Option 1 - Assumed Eccentricity 7.3.4.4 Fcap = k F0 7.3 .4 .2(1)
= 0.437 x 181
Slab load = 79.1 kN/m
Fdsj = 18.3 kNIm > 61.2 kN/m OK
= 2.0 kPa
Distribution factor to walls
Fixed end moment R(EI)
L2 L
FEM = (1.2g1 + 1.5q1)- DF
= R(EI)
382 L
C', =1.2x4.38)+(1.5x2.0)1_- 89
-o = 14.9 kNmlm = 2206 + 89 + 89
('3
0 = 0.0373
Walls
0
('3
4-J
Thickness Moment distributed to wall under slab
=90 mm MAG DF FEM
> = 0.0373 x 14.9
Allowance for openings =0.56kNmIm
p = 0.7
Axial load on wall
Effective width (allowing for openings) FdA = 61.2-5.2
b =pb = 56.0 kN/m
=0,7x 1000
= 700 mm Compressive stress at top of wall
FdA
Stiffness factor = Ab p
R=0.75 56.0 x 1000
- 50,000 xO.7
Elastic modulus = l.6MPa
E = 1000 m >0.25MPa OK
= 1000 x 8.06
= 8060 MPa Ratio slab stiffness to wall stiffness
2206
89 + 89
= 12.3
S
Joint fixity factor Conservative extrapolation
J = 0.4 of AS 3700 Commentary
or FIG 5.3 this manual
=0
tw 7.3.4.5(4)
<
t. e
1-
tw tw
= 0.90 OK
7.3.4.5(5)
1
(12!)
2- tw
= 1.66 OK
Design capacity
Fcap = k F0 7.3.4.2(1)
= 0.505 x 181
= 91.5 kN/m
> 61.2 kN/m OK
5.27
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S C, aster 6
Horizontal Loads Contents
This chapter provides the design requirements for 6.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
masonry subject to horizontal loads - either
outof-plane pressures or in-plane shears due 6.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
generally to wind or earthquakes.
6.3 STANDARD DESIGNS
6.5 GLOSSARY
BASIS OF DESIGN
4 6.1.4 BENDING AND SHEAR IN
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
6.1.1 WIND LOADS Bending in Unreinforced Masonry
Australian designers have for many years been required When unieinforced masonry walls built in stretcher bond
to design buildings to withstand wind loads. The and laterally supported on two or more adjacent edges
experience of cyclonic winds, commencing with Cyclone are subjected to horizontal out-of-plane pressures (due to
Tracey in 1974, has led to much research and innovation wind, earthquake or some other load), they may collapse
in the design and detailing of masonry structures for only after the masonry units have rotated relative to the
wind loads and the adaptation of reinforced masonry for units immediately above and below. AS 3700 includes a
Australian conditions. Wind loads can be manifested as method of assessing the resistance to horizontal
uplift on bond beams and lintels (described in pressure based on the virtual work involved in causing
Part B:Chapter 5 of this manual) or as horizontal loads this rotation to take place. The method results from
- either out-of-plane or in-plane shear (described in extensive research sponsored, in part, by the Concrete
this chapter). However, despite this activity, the rational Masonry Association of Australia at the Universities of
design of unreinforced and reinforced masonry for wind New South Wales and Melbourne, Deakin University and
loads is still not widespread, particularly in the southern CSIRO. The basis of the empirical method is set out
states. in the Commentary to AS 3700 and in other published
papers.
6.1.2 EARTHQUAKE LOADS
Test data indicate that three primary types of failure
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Long experience in many parts of the world has led develop in unreinforced masonry panels subject to
designers to the conclusion that unreinforced brickwork horizontal out-of-plane pressure. For each particular
does not behave well when subjected to the horizontal masonry panel, the failure pattern and capacity depends
loads resulting from earthquakes. The brittle, low tensile on the type of edge support (ie no support, lateral
strength of the medium leads to cracking and collapse. support or rotational restraint), the number of edges
In many parts of the world where severe earthquakes supported and the height-to-length proportions of the
are common, hollow concrete blockwork reinforced wall, Figure 6.1.
with close-spaced reinforcement is used to provide a
Horizontal Failure Line A horizontal failure will occur
ductile medium capable of withstanding repeated load
when the vertical bending capacity (influenced by bond
reversals without significant loss of strength. Australia
strength, section modulus and compressive load) is
does not have a history of severe earthquakes and the
exceeded. If a wall is relatively long compared to its
use of unreinforced brickwork has become widespread.
height and the top edge is supported, a horizontal crack
However, the 1989 Newcastle earthquake demonstrated
may appear in mortar joints near the mid-height. This is
the possible risks associated with the collapse of
usually the first crack to appear, is often not noticeable
unieinforced walls under the action of even moderate
and does not constitute a structural failure. A horizontal
earthquakes. Thus the introduction of some quantity
failure must also develop at or near the base of the wall
reinforcement to moderately increase ductility and
before collapse can occur. It is normal to assume that
strength is considered appropriate. It is unlikely that
the wall is rotationally unrestrained (due to lack of bond
the Australian public will accept the costs associated
strength).
with the widespread substitution of "close-spaced"
reinforced hollow blockwork for unreinforced brickwork. Vertical Failure Line A vertical failure line will occur
The use of "wide-spaced" reinforced masonry provides when the horizontal bending capacity (influenced by
considerable improvement of strength and ductility at a bond strength and section modulus of perpendicular
more reasonable cost and is therefore considered more Joints and the lateral modulus of rupture of units) is
appropriate. exceeded A vertical failure may be manifest either as a
zigzag pattern around the line of the joints, or as a
6.1.3 ADVANTAGES OF REINFORCED MASONRY vertical crack passing alternately through perpendicular
joint and masonry unit. If a wall is relatively high
The effectiveness of reinforced concrete blockwork when
compared to its length, a vertical failure line will appear
compared with unreinforced masonry is demonstrated by
first. If a wall is continuous past a vertical support, a
the Modified Mercalli Scale which is reproduced in part vertical failure line will develop before collapse occurs.
in Table 6.1.
Diagonal Failure Line A diagonal failure line radiates
It can be seen that an earthquake classified as MM8 on out from any corner where both vertical and horizontal
the Mercalli Scale in which "alarm may approach panic",
edges are supported and forms as the units rotate
masonry that has not been designed to withstand relative to the adjacent units. For structural collapse to
lateral loads, unreinforced masonry or poorly constructed
occur, these diagonal failure lines must cause a
masonry are in various stages of destruction while
mechamsm. The slope of the diagonal failure lines is
reinforced masonry which has been designed to governed by length-to-height proportions of the masonry
withstand lateral forces of Dig remains "undamaged". units. A diagonal failure line will occur when the
diagonal bending capacity (influenced by equivalent
characteristic torsional strength, related to bond
strength, and the equivalent torsional section modulus)
is exceeded.
Table 6.1 Effects of Earthquake Intensity Based on the Modified Mercalli Scale
EFFECT ON:
EARTHQUAKE MASONRY STRUCTURES
INTENSITY EFFECT ON: Reinforced Unreinforced
(Mercalli EFFECT ON: NON-MASONRY Designed for Not designed Normal Poor
scale) PEOPLE STRUCTURES lateral loads for lateral loads workmanship workmanship
I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
outdoors
II
racked and distorted damaged sometimes collapsing
completely.
Brick veneers fail
MM 10 Some well-built Most masonry structures destroyed together with their footings
wooden buildings
seriously damaged
MM11 Wooden-frame
structures destroyed
Walls With Openings height or length of the panel (whichever is the lesser)
Walls with openings are considered to form sub-panels be ignored.
either side of the opening, Figure 6.2. The edges of When a long window or door is to be supported by
the sub-panels adjacent to the opening are regarded as a short length of masonry, care must be taken to
being unsupported (ie no lateral support or rotational ensure that the masonry is built into the supports or
restraint) with the remaining edges being supported. To is continuous past the supports so there is sufficient
simplify the calculations, the openings are assumed to rotational restraint to support the load from the window
extend for the full height of the wall. The pressure on or door.
the opening (ie on the door panel or window glazing) is Shear in Unreinforced Masonry
considered to be fully transferred to the edge of the two
adjoining masonry sub-panels. These are checked for The shear resistance of unreinforced masonry is
flexural capacity as panels supported top, bottom and at influenced by two components, the shear bond strength
one end, subjected to a horizontal line load at the other (the ability of the mortar to bind the masonry units to
end and a uniform horizontal pressure. each other and to their supports) and the shear friction
strength (the frictional resistance to sliding once the
AS 3700 does not give guidance on the permissible size bond is broken). When the masonry is subject to
of small openings that may be ignored. In the absence earthquake loading, the vertical movement of the
of data to the contrary, it is suggested that openings structure relieves the gravity load, thus reducing friction
whose maximum dimension is less than one fifth of the resistance.
Vertical
honzontal
and diagonal
failure lines
p
andve
Assume lateral load on
failure in.-.
opening fully transferred
to adjoining panel edge
1'
+
1.> H
NOTES;
I At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the
manual will be amended.
Earthquake Design Category B Earthquake Design Category C
Application Application:
aS < 0.1 Structure Type II aS < 0.1 Structure Type III
Buildings intended for large numbers of people, in most Building intended for post-earthquake recovery
major aieas (except Adelaide, Geelong, Latrobe Valley 0.1 < aS < 0.2 Structure Type II
or Newcastle) on rock or not more than 30 m of dense
Buildings designed to contain a large number of people
sand and gravel, firm stiff or hard clay or controlled fill or people of restricted or impaired mobility built:
0.1 < aS < 0.2 Structure Type I In most major areas (except Adelaide, Geelong,
Normal buildings in most major areas except (Adelaide,
Latrobe Valley or Newcastle) on a soil profile with
Geelong, Latrobe Valley or Newcastle) on soils softer
more than 12 metres of very soft to soft clays,
than described above.
very loose to loose sands, silts or uncontrolled fill
Analysis Requirements: characterized by shear wave velocities less than 150
AS 1170.4 Clause 2.73
m/sec, or
Ductile regular structures - Nil. In Adelaide, Geelong, Latrobe Valley or Newcastle on
Other structures (ie non-ductile or irregular) - a soil profile with not more than 12 metres of very
Static or dynamic analysis. soft to soft clays, very loose to loose sands, silts or
Detailing Requirements: uncontrolled fill.
AS 1170.4 Clause 2.73 aS > 0.2 Structure Type
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Non-ductile regular structures over four storeys shall Normal buildings in Adelaide, Geelong, Latrobe Valley or
incorporate some reinforced masonry, reinforced concrete Newcastle on a soil profile with more than 12 metres of
shear walls or braced frames. very soft to soft clays, very loose to loose sands, silts or
uncontrolled fill characterized by shear wave velocities
Non-ductile irregular structures over three storeys shall
less than 150 rn/sec.
incorporate some reinforced masonry, reinforced concrete
shear walls or braced frames. Analysis Requirements:
AS 1170.4 Clause 2.74
AS 1170.4 Clause 4.3 - All structures
All structures - Static or dynamic analysis.
All parts of the building shall be tied together in
horizontal and vertical plane so that forces from all Detailing Requirements:
parts of the building are carried to the foundation. AS 1170.4 Clause 2.74
Each beam or truss shall be connected to the Structures over three storeys shall incorporate some
support by a connector with a strength in the reinforced masonry, reinforced concrete shear walls or
direction of the span of 5% of its gravity load. braced frames.
Walls shall be anchored to the roof and restrained at AS 1170.4 Clauses 4.3 and 4.4.1 - All structures
the floor(s). The connectors and restraint shall be All parts of the building shall be tied together in
capable of withstanding 10 a S kN per metre run horizontal and vertical plane so that forces from all
(ie up to 2 kN per metre run in Type II buildings parts of the building are carried to the foundation.
and 1 kN per metre run in Type I buildings). Each beam or truss shall be connected to the
AS 1170.4 Supp 1 Commentary permits the restraint support by a connector with a strength in the
to be provided by friction calculated in accordance direction of the span of 5% of its gravity load.
with AS 3700. It also requires loadbearing walls
AS 1170.4 Clauses 4.3, 4.4.2, 4,4,4, 5.1, 5.2 and 5.4 -
supporting slabs to be arranged at right angles to All structures
prevent the slab from lumping off its support during
earthquakes.
Walls shall be anchored to the roof and restrained at
the floor(s), The connectors and restraint for masonry
If the distance between connectors exceeds 1.2 m, walls and other masonry members shall be capable of
the wall shall be designed for bending between the withstanding the greatest of:
connectors.
lOaS kN per metre run of connection
AS 1170.4 Clause 5.1, 5.2 and 5.4
0.33aS G0
Non-ductile, non-structural components such as
unieinforced masonry walls, gable ends, chimneys, 0.05G0
parapets shall be restrained to resist a force of F = aS a0 ax C I Gc
Fp aS a0 a C01 I G.
See Part B:Chapter 1 of this manual.
See Part B:Chapter I of this manual.
NOTES:
1 At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the Cent...
manual will be amended.
AS 1170.4 Supp I Commentaiy Earthquake Design Category D
Permits the restraint to be provided by friction Application:
calculated in accordance with AS 3700. It also 0.1 < aS < 0.2 Structure Type III
requires loadbearing walls supporting slabs to be Building intended for post-earthquake recovery built:
arranged at right angles to prevent the slab from In most major areas (except Adelaide, Geelong,
jumping off its support during earthquakes. Latrobe Valley or Newcastle) on a soil profile with
If the distance between connectors exceeds 1.2 m, more than 12 metres of very soft to soft clays,
the wall shall be designed for bending between the very loose to loose sands, silts or uncontrolled fill
connectors. characterized by shear wave velocities less than 150
Connections of loadbearing walls to the structure m/sec,
shall have ductility, rotational capacity or strength or
to resist shrinkage, thermal changes and differential In Adelaide, Geelong, Latrobe Valley or Newcastle on
foundation settlement when combined with a soil profile with not more than 12 metres of very
earthquake forces. soft to soft clays, very loose to loose sands, silts or
AS 1170.4 Clauses 4.4.3 - All structures uncontrolled fill.
Floor and roof diaphragms shall be designed for a force aS > 0.2 Structure Type II
equal to; Buildings designed to contain a large number of people
P = 0.5aS(Gdiaph+Gattached) + V or people of restricted or impaired mobility in Adelaide,
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S NOTES:
1 At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the
manual will be amended.
Earthquake Design Category E 6.2.3 DESIGN OF MASONRY WALLS FOR OUT-
Application: OF-PLANE EARTHQUAKE LOADS
aS > 0.2 Structure Type III AS 1170.4 requires that walls be designed for
Building intended for post-earthquake recovery built in out-of-plane loading in accordance with Clause 5.2.
Adelaide, Geelong, Latrobe Valley or Newcastle on a This is made clear in at least four locations in AS 1170.4
soil profile with more than 12 metres of very soft to soft (Clause 2.71, Clause 5.2.1, Note attached to Clause 6.2
clays, very loose to loose sands, silts or uncontrolled fill and Figure 1 Flow Chart).
characterised by shear wave velocities less than Worked Example No 2 in this chapter is typical of
150 rn/sec. residential or commercial construction and includes:
Analysis Requirements: 110-mm cored brick (230 mm x 76 mm high) non-
AS 1170.4 Clause 2.76 loadbeaiing outer leaf and 90-mm hollow block
Regular structures - Static or dynamic analysis including (390 mm x 190 mm high) loadbearing inner leaf
vertical effects on critical members i wall height of 2.7 m
Irregular structures - Dynamic analysis including vertical each leaf is considered as acting independently to
effects on critical members support the out-of-plane force caused by its own
Detailing Requirements: weight
AS 1170.4 Clause 2.76 wall length of 3.7 m from the support to a window
All masonry components shall be reinforced.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTES:
I At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the
manual will be amended.
in
6.2.4 BENDING IN UN REINFORCED MASONRY 6.2.5 SHEAR IN UNREINFORCED MASONRY
Vertical Bending Strength For loads other than earthquake loads,
The vertical bending moment capacity is given by the Vd = V0 + V1
least of:
0 'ms AdW + kv 1d AdW
=fk 'mt Zd + d Zd
representing a combination of flexural For earthquake loads,
bond strength and compression, Vd = V0 + Vle
= 3.0 1 kmt mt Zd = 0 1'ms w + 0.9 kv 1de AdW
representing an upper bound on flexural where 1de =
bond strength and compression, The gravitational force acting vertically on a wall
M = 1d Zd consists of two components: the self weight of the wall
representing the compression where and attachments (which contribute to both the out-of-
'mt = 0 (ie at a damp-proof course or plane earthquake load on the wall and its frictional
interface with another material). resistance), and the weight of other parts of the
td shall not be taken as greater than 0.36 MPa. structure (which are supported laterally by a shear core,
Horizontal Bending Strength shear walls or structural frame and therefore do not
contribute to the out-of-plane earthquake load on the
The horizontal bending moment capacity is given by the wall). Although neither AS 3700 nor AS 1170.4
least of: specifically requires the gravitational force G0 to be
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Mch = 2.0 0 k mt (1 + td/1mt) Zd Nmm/m factored down, the following policy has been adopted in
representing a zigzag failure around the this manual:
mortar Joints with a combination of torsional the self weight of the wall and attachments is not
bond strength and compression, factored, since it contributes to both load and
Mch 4.0 0 kp 'mt Zd Nmm/m resistance
representing an upper bound on the zigzag the weight of other parts of the structure are
failure with torsional bond strength and
factored by 0.8, since they contribute only to
compression,
resistance.
Mch = 0 (0.44 ut + 0.56 1'mt Zu)
representing a straight vertical failure
alternating through masonry unit and mortar.
Diagonal Bending Strength
The diagonal bending capacity is given by:
Mcd = ft Z
AS 3700 gives formulae for calculating the torsional
section modulus of various types of masonry units.
NOTES:
1 At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the
manual will be amended.
All
6.2.6 BENDING IN REINFORCED MASONRY 6.2.7 SHEAR IN REINFORCED MASONRY
When reinforced masonry is subjected to bending, the The in-plane shear resistance of reinforced shear walls,
moment resistance is provided by a combination of the with a height/length ratio (H/L) less than 2.3 and
reinforcement in tension and a width of concrete face specified quantities of reinforcement crossing the
shell in compression, AS 3700 permits a width of 2 t on potential crack lines is given by:
either side of the reinforcement for vertically-reinforced
Vd =0 (vr Ad + 0.8 f5 As).
masonry and 1.5t on either side of the reinforcement
for horizontally-reinforced masonry.AS 3700 limits the This includes the shear strength of the masonry
area of tensile reinforcement used for design purposes (enhanced by the confining action of the reinforcement,
to a 'balanced failure' value. This does not mean that diminishing from a theoretical maximum of 1.5 MPa to
more reinforcement can not be placed in the wall, only a limit of 0,35 MPa at H/L = 2.3) and 0.8 times the
that it can not all be used for design to resist bending. tensile strength of the reinforcement crossing the
The unconfined masonry compressive strength, i'm' potential crack planes. In the worked examples, the
significantly underestimates the crushing strength of formula has been modified to give reduced shear
reinforced masonry and there is little capacity, accounting for the fact that not all of the steel
likelihood of brittle failure due to over-reinforcement. present crosses potential shear cracks.
The limiting quantity of tensile reinforcement for design The spacing of the reinforcement is limited to
purposes is given by: 2.0 metres horizontal spacing of vertical reinforcement
ASd = (0.29) 1.3 m b and 3.0 metres vertical spacing of horizontal
reinforcement.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTES:
I At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the
manual will be amended.
1')
6.2.8 TIES AND CONNECTORS AS1I7O.4 Clause 5.1.4 states:
Architectural ... components required to be designed to
Ties and connectors that fix a masonry wall to the
resist earthquake forces shall be attached so that the
supporting structure shall be capable of transmitting
forces are transferred to the structure. The attachment
the loads imposed on the wall by wind or earthquake to
shall be designed to resist the earthquake forces
the supports. These requirements are covered by three
specified in this section. Friction due to gravity shall not
Australian Standards:
be considered in evaluating the required resistance to
AS/NZS 1170.2 Wind actions Clause 2.5.5.
earthquake forces, Minimum anchorage forces are
AS 1170.4 Earthquake loads Clause 3.3.2, Clause 4.3.3, specified in Section 4.
Clause 4.4.2, Clause 5.1.4 and Clause 5.2
However, AS 3700 Clause A8.3 provides a formula for
AS 3700 Masonry structures including Clauses 4.11.4, 2.6, shear strength of unreinforced masonry which accounts
A3.5 A8.3 and Table AS for the possible reduction of gravity loads due to vertical
The loads required to be transmitted vary with building acceleration.
location, soil type, use to which the building is put, AS 1170.4 Clause 5.2 gives the formula for calculating
elevation, shielding from wind and topography. the horizontal forces, F = a S ac a Ccl I G and
AS/NZS 1170.2 Requirements Table 5.1.5(a) requires that Ccl for connections be twice
AS/NZS 1170.2 does not specifically mention ties and the value for the architectural component which is
connections except that, in Tropical Cyclone Regions C connected.
and D, Clauses 2.5.5 require "cladding" connections to AS 1170.4 Supplement 1 Commentary Clause C4.3.2,
be designed to resist fatigue loading states clearly that it is permissible to rely on friction
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTES:
1 At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the
manual will be amended.
6.13
Performance of Head Ties and Connectors
Many commercially available head ties do not have
sufficient shear resistance to support large wall panels.
The designer should carefully check the shear capacity
using the tie characteristic shear strength provided by
the tie manufacturer.
Vcap 0tie Ftie /S
where:
Vcap= ultimate capacity of ties kN/m length of wall
G1 for earthquake G3 for earthquake capacity reduction factor, taken as 0.75
0tie
or or
0.8 G1forwind 0.8 G3 for wind Ftie = characteristic shear strength of a single tie,
provided by the tie manufacturer
S = proposed spacing of head ties, to correspond
with perpendicular joints.
pr-
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
rtibut.
en:'
emal leaf
or con
emat leaf t2m)
G3- - : of internal wall F -Tie or connec
G4-Setfweightofotherparts 0tie Capacity red
of structure torties(-
1 lit
STANDARD DESIGNS
6.3.2 STANDARD DESIGN CHARTS
How to Read
6.3.1 GENERAL The general procedure with most charts is as follows:
Design and detailing Select the required wall thickness (and, if
All design and detailing shall comply with the appropriate, the reinforcement arrangement).
requirements of AS 3700 and, where appropriate,
Select the appropriate support conditions
AS/NZS 1170.
(eg supported on four sides).
It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects
of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness Project the length of the wall between vertical
of ties and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports and the height of wall between horizontal
supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads supports to determine the design point.
and masonry properties Control joints and openings Select a curve which is above or to the right
must be treated as free ends as specified by AS 3700. of the design point. Read off the load capacity
Masonry properties corresponding to the selected curve. If necessary,
The standard designs in this chapter are based on interpolate between curves,
minimum masonry properties complying with the Check that the masonry wall is adequate for other
General Specification set out in Part C:Chapter 2,
loadings, design requirements and construction
modified as noted on the standard design
chart and as noted below. requirements. On some charts, the robustness
requirements for the same conditions have been
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Notes:
I All hollow sections are BHP Duragal.
of all hollow sections are based on Grade C450L0 in accordance with AS 1163. All other sections are based
Grade 260 in accordance with AS 3679,
The orientation shows the dimension of the steel section when measured through the wall. For square hollow sections,
this value is the same as the side of the section, For rectangular hollow sections, this value is the same as the smaller of
ICapacities
the two sides of the section. It is important to ensure that the steel section will fit into the cores of the blocks.
4 The end connections indicated are the ones most likely to lead to efficient design and construction, although other e
connections can be used with each section. The nomenclature is as follows:
Designation Number of Anchors Anchor type Plate thickness (mm)
I. 2-M12, 8 2 M12 Dynabolrs 8
5 Shear capacity is based on the connection shear capacity, using the shear values provided by Raznset Fasteners (Aust)
Ltd for 20 MPa concrete.
Because there are no end plates on plate mullions, there is no contribution to shear capacity.
6 Moment capacities of Dura gal hollow sections are based on values provided by BHP in Dura gal design capacity tables far
steel hollow sections by Tubemakers. June 1996.
Moment capacities of plate muillons are calculated using AS 4100 assuming continuous lateral bracing by the adace
- masonry.
7 Blocks must be of a type and size to enable the mullions to be built into the masonry and the cores packed with mortar.
c ic
COMPOSITE MASONRY MULLIONS - Moment and Shear Capacities
Notes:
1 An inner leaf of 110-mm brickwork has been common for many years, although increasingly 90-mm is being used because
of the potential savings in both cost and floor space. Concrete blocks 90 x 119 x 290 mm and 90 x 162 x 290 are available.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
The 119-mm heights corresponds to 1.5 courses of 76-mm-high brickwork, whilst 162 mm corresponds to two courses of 76-
mm-high brickwork.
2 These tables are based on the most common cavity width of 50 mm. Capacities may be increased by increasing the cavity
width.
3 An outer leaf of 110-mm bnckwork is common. However, split, ribbed polished or fail-face 90-mm concrete blockwork is
sometimes used to provide an attractive economical external face.
4 These tables are based on a web width of 300 mm. This can be achieved using a mortar column tied within the leaves by
[J
cavity ties. A similar result could be achieved using masonry units bonded to form a diaphragm. In both cases, rainwater
must be prevented from crossing the cavity via the diaphragm.
5 End mullions are placed near the end of a wall and have masonry cavity walls extending on one side only. Intermediate
mullions are placed within a length of wall and have masonry cavity walls extending on both sides.
6 The calculation of the effective width of the composite mullion (te the width of each leaf which acts compositely with a
web) is six times the width of the leaf based on AS 3700 Clause 45.2. For an end mullion, the effective width is the web.4
width plus up to six times the minimum leaf width on one side only. For an intermediate mullion, the effective width is the
web width plus six times the minimum leaf width on both sides of the web (te up to twelve times).
7 The shear capacities given in the table is based on the following:
a characteristic shear strength at the interface of the supporting concrete slab. 'ns of zero
a shear factor. k, of 0.3
selfweightforawall2.7m and3.9ml'ugh
no additional applied vertical load
the formula in AS 3700 Clause A8.3 for shear arising from earthquake loads.
For other circumstances, the shear capacity may be increased.
If the wall transfers shear load across an interface confined by reinforcement, the characteristic shear strength, f'.
may be taken as 0.35 MPa.
The shear factor, kv, of 0.3 is appropriate to mortar joints, concrete interface and bitumen-coated aluminium or
embossed polyethylene damp-proof-courses and flashings. For other interface materials, 0.3 may not be appropnate..
Vertical loads as may be applied by supported floor slabs will increase shear capacity.
If the shear load is not caused by earthquake, the component of capacity which is derived from vertical load maybe
increased by 11%. See AS 3700 Clause 7.5.1.
The shear capacity is given for the length over which the composite mullion extends.
8 The moment capacities given in the tables are based on a characteristic tensile strength, 'mt' of 0.2 MPa and the section
j modulus based on composite action and self weight based on a wall height of 2.7 m or 3.9 m.
9 Walls higher than the value 3.9 m used in these tables will have shear and moment resistance higher than the tabulated
values.
4-
REINFORCED MASONRY - 140-mm leaf
Moment and Shear Capacities Afl exposure environments
BARS Vc Mc
BARS V M BARS Vc M
N12 5.1 2.6
N16 6.3 3.9 300 N12 10.2 4.9 N12 5.1 2.7
N16 12.6 5.7 N16 6.3 4.5
70
e 70
70
BARS Vc Mc
70 hear capacity
e 70
Moment capacity (kN.m)
ickness, 140mm
type,M3
characteristic compressive strength,
I5MPa
compressve strength, f 20 MPa
REINFORCED MASONRY - 1 mm leaf
Moment and Shear Capacities :n cover, c
100 N12 6.4 3.7 100 N12 8.2 5.1 N12 6.4 3.7
N16 7.6 6.4 N16 9.3 8.8 N16 7.6 6.6
N20 9.1 9.2 N20 10.6 12.7 N20 9.1 9.7
95
w
BARS V M BARS V M BARS V M
300 N12 12.9 7.2 300 N12 16.4 10.0 N12 8.2 5.2
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
N16 15.2 12.0 fi I N16 18.6 16.8 N16 9.3 9.0 129 (N12 bars)
N20 18.1 13.1 N20 21.3 22.6 N20 10.6 13.2 127 (N16 bars)
125 (N20 bars)
[1
.
( ) 129 (N12 bars)
127 (N16 bars)
125 (N20 bars)
N12
N16
N20
6.4
7.6
9.1
3.4
3.6
3.6
N12
N16
N20
7.9
10.2
13.1
3.6
3.6
3.6
N12
N16
N20
6.4
7.6
9.1
3.6
6.2
8.2
a
L
BARS V M BARS V M
e 95
129 (N12 bars)
127 (N16 bars)
BARS
N12
V
8.2
M
5.1
125 (N20 bars)
N16 9.3 8.6 129 (N12 bars)
N20 10.6 12.4 127(Nl6bars)
125 (N20 bars)
BARS V M BARS V M
BARS V M BARS V
k129(N12bars)
127 (N16 bars)
125 (N20 bars)
REINFORCED MASONRY - :30-mm leaf
Moment and Shear Capacities over, c = 15 mm
100 N12 6.4 3.7 100 N12 8.5 5.3 N12 6.4 3.7
N16 7.6 6.4 N16 9.6 9.1 N16 7.6 6.6
N20 9.1 9.2 N20 10.9 13.3 N20 9.1 9.7
300 N12 12.9 7.2 300 N12 17.0 10.4 N12 8.5 5.4
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1 N16 15.2 12.0 N16 19.1 17.6 N16 9.6 9.3 134 (N12 bars)
N20 18.1 13.1 N20 21.8 24.5 N20 10.9 13.8 132 (N16 bars)
130 (N20 bars)
e 4
95
(-3134 (N12 bars)
132 (N16 bars)
130 (N20 bars) I
HORIZONTALLY-REINFORCED UNTELS VERTICALLY-REINFORCED CORES
ADJACENT TO OPENINGS
RS V M BARS V M BARS V M
BARS V M BARS V M
e 95
N20 9.1 6.5
K
N20 10. 9
)k34(Nl2bars)
132 (N 16 bars)
130 (N20 bars)
12.2
BARS
N12
N16
V
8.5
9.6
M
5.3
9.0
4
134 (N12 bars)
132 (N16 bars)
N20 10.9 13.0
130 (N20 bars)
BARS Vc M BARS V M
BARS V M BARS V M
capacity(kN)
300 N12 12.9 6.9 300 N12 17.0 10.2
-nt capacity(kN.m)
j N16 15.2 9.9 I N16 19.1 16.9
190mm
N20 18.1 9.9 N20 21.8 18.6
M3
eristic compressive strength,
134 (N12 bars)
132 (N16 bars)
95
130 (N20 bars)
' ')n
REINFORCED MASONRY - 190-mm leaf
Moment and Shear Capacities Minimt ,r,c=3Omm
HORIZONTALLY-REINFORCED BOND BEAMS VERTICALLY-REINFORCED CORE1
IN MID-WALL
<1 N16 15.2 12.0 N16 17.5 15.3 N16 8.8 8.2 119 (N12 bars)
N20 18.1 13.1 N20 20.2 19.2 N20 10.1 12.0 117 (N16 bars)
115 (N20 bars)
BARS V M BARS V M
N12 6.4 3.6 N12 7.7 4.6
N16 7.6 6.0 N16 8.8 7.7
N20 9.1 6.5 N20 10. 1 9.6
e 95
K119(N12
bars)
117 (N16 bars)
BARS
N12
Vc
7.7
M
4.6
115 (N20 bars)
N16 8.8 7.9 119 (N12 bars)
N20 10.1 11.2 117 (N16 bars)
115 (N20 bars)
BARS Vc Mc BARS V M
N12 16.4 11.7 N12 17.9 22.0
N16 17.6 20.2 N16 20.2 32.2
N20 19.0 29.4 N20 23.1 32.2
I
0 BARS V M BARS V M
300 1. N12 12.9 6.9 N12 15.4 8.9
N16 15.2 9.9 N16 17.5 14.6
N20 18.1 9.9 N20 20.2 14.6
SHEAR CAPACITY (kN) FOR 140-mm THICK WALL WITH 1-N16 BAR PER END CORE1
Height
Length of wall (m)
of wall
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
2.3 4.6 6.9 9.3 11.7 14.1 16.6 19.2 21.7 24.6 27.3 30.0 32.7 35.5 38.3
6.0 2.7 5.3 8.0 10.7 13.5 16.3 19.1 22.0 24.9 28.2 31.2 34.3 37.4 40.5 43.7
5.0 3.2 6.3 9.5 12.7 16.0 19.3 22.6 26.0 29.4 33.2 36.7 40.3 43.9 47.5 51.2
I7°
4.0 3.9 7.8 11.7 15.7 19.7 23.8 27.9 32.0 36.2 40.7 45.0 49.3 53.7 58.1 62.5
3.0 5.2 10.3 15.5 20.7 26.0 31.3 36.6 42.0 47.5 53.2 58.7 64.3 69.9 75.6 81.3
2.7 5.7 11.4 17.2 22.9 28.2 34.6 40.5 46.5 52.5 58.8 64.8 71.0 77.1 83.4 89.6
3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
7.0 41.2 44.1 47.1 50.0 53.6 56.7 59.8 63.0 66.2 69.4 72.7 76.0 79.4 82.8
6.0 46.9 50.2 53.5 56.9 60.8 64.2 67.7 71.2 74.8 78.4 82.1 85.7 89.5 93.2
5.0 55.0 58.7 62.5 66.4 70.8 74.7 78.7 82.8 86.8 91.0 95.1 99.3 103.5 107.8
4.0 67.0 71.5 76.1 80.7 85.8 90.5 95.3 100.1 104.9 109.8 114.7 119.6 124.6 129.6
3.0 87.0 92.8 98.6 104.4 110.9 116.8 122.8 128.9 134.9 141.1 147.2 153.4 159.7 165.9
2.7 95.9 102.2 108.6 115.0 122.0 128.5 135.0 141.6 148.3 155.0 161.7 168.4 175.2 182.1
Remainder of wau reinforced with 1 vertical N16 at 2.0 m centres and 1 horizontal N16 at 3.0 m centres.
L. See Part C:Chapter3, DetaU Gi (Page 3.36) fordetails.
SHEAR CAPACITY (kN) FOR 190-mm THICK WALL WITH 1-N20 BAR PER END CORE2
7.0 3.5 7.1 10.6 14.2 17.9 21.6 25.4 29.2 33.0 37.3 41.3 45.3 49.4 53.6 57.8
4.1 8.2 12.3 16.4 20.7 24.9 29.2 33.6 38.0 42.9 47.4 52.0 56.7 61.4 66.1
5.0 4.9 9.7 14.6 19.5 24.5 29.6 34.7 39.8 45.0 50.6 55.9 61.3 66.8 72.2 77.8
E6.0
4.0 6.0 12.0 18.1 24.2 30.4 36.6 39.9 47.8 55.5 62.3 68.8 75.3 81.9 88.5 95.2
3.0 8.0 15.9 23.9 30.3 33.6 44.9 56.4 64.6 72.9 81.6 90.1 98.6 107.1 115.7 124.3
2.7 8.8 17.6 26.5 30.4 36.0 53.4 62.4 71.5 80.7 90.3 99.6 108.9 118.3 127.7 137.2
3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0
7.0 62.0 66.3 70.6 75.0 80.2 84.7 89.3 93.9 98.6 103.3 108.1 112.9 117.8 122.7
6.0 70.9 75.7 80.6 85.6 91.3 96.4 101.5 106.7 112.0 117.2 122.6 128.0 133.4 138.9
5.0 83.3 89.0 94.6 100.4 106.9 112.7 118.6 124.6 130.6 136.7 142.8 149.0 155.2 161.4
4.0 102.0 108.8 115.6 122.5 130.2 137.2 144.3 151.4 158.6 165.8 173.1 180.4 187.8 195.2
I
3.0 133.0 141.7 150.5 159.3 169.0 177.9 187.0 196.0 205.1 214.3 223.5 232.8 242.1 251.5
2.7 146.8 156.4 166.0 175.7 186.2 196.0 205.9 215.8 225.8 235.9 245.9 256.1 266.3 276.5
Remainder of wall reinforced with 1 vertical N20 at 2.0 m centres and 1 horizontal N 16 at 3.0 m centres.
See Part C:Chapter 3, Detail G2 (Page 3.37) for details.
REINFORCED CONCRETE MASONRY SHEAR WALLS - Shear Capacities 2
SHEAR CAPACITY (kN) FOR 190-mm THICK WALL WITH 2-N20 BARS PER END CORE3
Height
Length of wall (m)
of wall
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
I(m)
7.0 3.9 12.8 20.6 27.5 33.0 36.2 39.5 42.7 45.9 56.0 59.2 62.4 65.6 68.9 83.5
6.0 4.6 14.8 23.9 29.8 33.1 36.3 39.6 42.8 46.0 56.1 59.3 62.6 80.3 98.1 115.3
5.0 5.4 17.7 26.7 29.9 33.2 36.4 39.7 42.9 46.2 58.4 77.6 95.9 113.5 130.6 147.2
4.0 6.7 22.1 26.8 30.1 33.3 36.6 39.9 47.8 65.8 94.5 112.6 130.0 146.8 163.2 179.3
3.0 8.9 23.6 27.0 30.3 33.6 44.9 63.8 81.6 98.5 130.8 147.8 164.3 180.4 196.1 211.6
2.7 9.8 23.7 27.0 30.4 36.0 56.0 74.4 91.8 108.4 141.7 158.4 174.7 190.5 206.1 221.4
3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
7.0 100.8 117.7 130.4 138.1 146.6 154.5 162.4 170.3 178.3 186.4 194.5 202.6 210.8 219.1
6.0 132.1 141.6 150.4 159.2 168.8 177.8 186.8 195.9 205.0 214.1 223.3 232.6 241.9 251.2
5.0 157.7 168.0 178.3 188.7 199.9 210.4 220.9 231.6 242.2 252.9 263.7 274.5 285.4 296.3
4.0 195.0 207.6 220.2 232.9 246.4 259.3 272.1 285.1 298.1 311.1 324.2 337.4 350.6 363.8
3.0 226.9 242.0 257.0 306.6 324.0 340.7 357.5 374.3 391.1 408.1 425.0 442.1 459.1 476.3
2.7 236.6 302.8 321.0 339.3 358.4 376.9 395.4 413.9 432.5 451.1 469.8 488.6 507.4 526.2
0
-J
Remainder of wall reinforced with I vertical N20 at 2.0 m centres and 1 horizontal N16 at 3.0 m centres.
See Part C:Chapter 3, Detail G3 (Page 3.38) for details. 4-J
0
0
OUT-OF-PLANE SHEAR CAPACITY OF STARTER-BAR CONNECTIONS
kN/connection and (kN/metre length of wall)
Details of connection
Centres, 1-N 12 starter bar 1-N 16 starter bar 1-N20 starter bar
Arrangement4 S(m) Cog 200/lap 450 Cog 240/lap 700 Cog 290/lap 1000
190-mm hollow blockwork
2.0 29.1 (14.5) 30.2 (15.1) 31.6 (15.8)
For actual details of the connections given above, see Part C:Chapter 3, Details Hi, H2 and H3 (Pages 3.39 and 3.40)
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
without openings -mm leaf
390 x 190 units
25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
// 7 ////////////////////
8.0
// a,
=
Laterally-supported
both ends
and top
/,
7.0
/ Length )
lii! LWI
6.0
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
5.0
Robustness governs in shaded areas
0
4.0
IL'k I - Not supporting a concrete slab
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0
=
a)
0.5
2.0
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Laterally-supported
a,
both ends,
top free
4
Length )
Design pressure, wd (kpa)
Robustness governs
in shaded area
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 90-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0 -
V ////////////////////i
Laterally-supported
8.0
one end
and top
7.0
Length
6.0
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
5.0 -
0.
0
3.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
0)
2.0
0.5
1.0
0)
0
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
I
9.0
Laterally-supported
one end,
8.0
/ / top free
7.0
/ / Length
6.0
/ / Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
t
0,
0
0.
4.0
0.
3.0
=
0)
a)
2.0
/
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness 0f ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 110-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
, ////////////////////;/
8.0
7.0
6.0
lIEU
iiIn VUL.
// Laterally-supported
both ends
and top
Length )
/
Ift V_
_
0 - Supporting a concrete slab
5.0
a.
a.
3.0 0.5
=
0)
0)
2.0
1.0
-/ /
/ Wd 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.5
1.0
=0) 0 K
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
Laterally-supported
both ends,
topfree
8.0
4
7.0 Length )
Design pressure, wd (kPa)
6.0
5,0
I Robustness governs
in shaded area
t
0,
0
a.
4.0
a.
3.0
=
0)
2.0
on
=0
0)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
ç
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 110-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
5 mm face-shell bedded
Laterally-supported
one end
a,
= and top
0.5
10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 8.0 90
ength of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
8.0
' /
// / a,
=
Laterally-supported
one end,
top free
/ /
/
7.0 Length
6.0
/ / Design pressure, Wd (kpa)
Robustness governs
in shaded area
5.0
0
0.
4.0
//
0.
3.0
=
0)
0)
2.0
//
0 1.0 20 3.0 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
A 77
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 110-mm leaf
230x76 units
fully bedded
liii
9.0
I // /////////////////////
lii
LateraHy-supported
8.0
both ends
and top
7.0 4
6.0
'U Length )
ii.
Design pressure, wd (kPa)
I9&. U 'I
0 Supporting a concrete slab
5.0
Robustness governs in shaded areas
3.0
0)
0.5
2.0
9.0 /.
Laterally-supported
both ends,
top free
8.0
/
7.0 Length
Robustness governs
in shaded area
5.0
=
0)
3.0
2.0 I.. L
Wd = 4.0 3.0 2.0
-
1.0
-
- 0.5
0 1,0 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 9°
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 10-mm leaf
30 x 76 units
Ily bedded
9.0
/
8.0
/ Laterally-supported
7.0
/ a,
=
one end
and top
0
5.0
4,O
I11ti'i-- -.
LIWINU Robustness governs in shaded areas
0.
0.
3.0
=
0)
2.0 0.5
j-3.O 2. 1.0
11.0
0
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
Laterally-supported
one end,
a,
8.0
= top free
7.0 Length
=
a,
3.0
VVv
2.0
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 140-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
8.0
111L1!i
7.0
'hr1
Supporting a concrete slab
5.0
0.5
// /////////////////////
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
........
Laterally-supported
3.0 both ends
a,
and top
/
a 2.0
H/
//
1.0
Length )
/ /,
, 4.0 3,0 2.0 1.5
1,0
0 Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
0
0 10 2.0 30 4.0 50 60 70 8.0 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
5.0 -
t
0,
0
C.
4.0
C. Laterally-supported
3.0 - both ends,
top free
2.0 0.5
Length )
1.:
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
' .n
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 140-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
mm face-shell bedded
9.0 -
8.0
7.0 -
Laterally-supported
one end
w
0.5 = and top
2.0
Length
1.0
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
a)
0
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
8.0
7.0 -
Robustness governs
in shaded area
5.0
t0
0.
4.0
0. Laterally-supported
3.0 one end.
=
a) =a) top free
a)
a) 2.0
Length
±0
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
6.31
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 190- leaf
390x 190 units
30 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
8.0
TO -
6.0 -
5,0
t
0,
0
4.0
// /////////////////////
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. Laterally-supported
0. 1.0
3.0 both ends
= andtop
a
1.5
2.0
2.0 Length
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
8.0
Le
IiF
7.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
60
5.0
4.0 0.5
0,
0
0
0 Laterally-supported
L
3.0 both ends,
= topfree
2.0
1.0
Length )
4.0 3.0 2.0 1.5
1.0
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
w
0
0 10 2.0 3.0 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
U)
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
without openings 190- leaf
390 x 190 units
30 mm face-shell bedded
7.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
// ////////////////////z
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.5 Laterally-supported
-C
3.0 00 one end
0)
= and top
0)
1.0
20
Length
1.0
Design pressure, Wd (kpa)
on
0)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
9.0
8.0
7.0
Robustness governs
in shaded area
6.0
5.0
t
0
0.
4.0
0. Laterally-supported
one end,
top free
0.5 Length
1.0
0 Design pressure, wd (kPa)
on
±0
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 90-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
9.0
8.0
7.0
I
Open ng width 900 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
Laterally-supported
both ends and top
iI-
Opening
6.0
Length width
2.0
/
a)
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Laterally-supported
Opening width 1500 mm both ends and top
9.0
/
/
8.0
/
7.0
/ Length
Opening
width
/
6.0
/ Design pressure, wd (kPa)
/
5.0
/
-'I
E Robustness governs in shaded areas
t
0
a.
4.0
Supporting a concrete slab
a.
3.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
/
/
0 10 2.0 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings
U Laterally-supported
8.0
7.0
_LU both ends and top
E
6.0
t
0
4,O
Supporting a concrete slab
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
=
a)
2.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
Pr_
I-
Opening width 2700 mm
Laterally-supported
both ends and top
/ ////////// ///////////
-'//////////(//,',
\ Length
Opening
width
3.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
=
a)
a)
2.0
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings -mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Opening width 900 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
/ /
/
Laterally-supported
/
both ends, top free
8.0
/ /
7.0
// __liz
rOpening
6.0
/ Length width
t
0
4.0
//
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3.0
=
a
2.0
J1.00.5
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Laterally-supported
Opening width 1500 mm
//
9.0 both ends, top free
an______
8.0 -
__liz=
ri'
//
Opening
7.0 -
Length Width
6.0
- Robustness governs
/
in shaded area
5.0
E
/ /
//
t
0)
0
4.0
0.
3.0
=
a,
//
2.0
0.5
//
1.0
a,
0
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
with openings 90-mm leaf
x 190 units
Openig width 2100 mm 5 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
/ / Laterally-supported
//
/
both ends, top free
8.0
/
7.0
/ / / __liz
rOpening
6.0
/ / Length width
5.0
/ / Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
//
Robustness governs
E in shaded area
S
t
0 /
//
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3.0
=
ci,
2.0
/\s%
ci)
&__
//
1.0
0
m
± 0
0 10 20 30 40 5.0 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
-p
with openings 110-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Opening width 900 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
Laterally-supported
_'I
both ends and top
8.0
7.0
6.0
_I'Length
/
Opening
width
5.0
2.0
Laterally-supported
Opening width 1500 mm both ends and top
9.0
8,0
U
Opening
7.0
Length width
6.0
5.0
-
11 Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
3.0
=
'1)
2.0
1.0
/ -2.0 1.5 1.0
IWd 0.5
/
0 7
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings
90u
Opening width 2100 mm face-sh - eded
9.0
/ Laterally-supported
/ both ends and top
8.0
/
/
7.0
/
6.0 Opening
Length width
t0
a.
4.0
a.
Robustness governs in shaded areas
r
2.0
/ Wdl.5
1.0 / 1.0 0.5
/
/
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Laterally-supported
Opening width 2700 mm both ends and top
9.0
/
/
8.0
/
/ Opening
7.0
/ width
6.0
/ Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
5.0
/
Robustness governs in shaded areas
2.0
0 10
/ Wdl5 1.0 0.5
/
/
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9.0
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
6.39
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
with openings
390x 190 un
25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
Open ng width 900 mm
/ /
/
Laterally-supported
/
both ends, top free
8.0
/ / ___'I
7.0
/ / /
/
Opening
6.0 width
/
Length
5.0
/ / Design pressure, w (kPa)
//
Robustness governs
in shaded area
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
a)
a)
2.0
/w - 1.0
(I)
-o
03 a)
1.0
0
/
0 0 10 2.0 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
03
0
NJ
Laterally-supported
Opening width 1500 mm
0 9.0 both ends, top free
8.0
Opening
7.0 - Width
Length
- Robustness governs
in shaded area
5.0
t0
Cd,
0.
4,0
0.
3.0
=
a)
2.0
1.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 110-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Opening width 2100 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
/ /
8.0
/ / Laterally-supported
both ends, top free
/ /
/
7.0
6.0
/ / Opening
/ Length width
5.0
/ / Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
//
Robustness governs
E in shaded area
//
t
0
0.
4.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0
3.0
=
/>d.
2.0
0)
0
0 10 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 9.0
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
S NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
6.41
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 11O rn leaf
230x76 units
Opening width 900 mm fully bedded
9.0
Laterally-supported
both ends and top
8.0
7.0
6.0
50
lit II Length
Opening
width
2.0
-c
a)
1.0
/
0
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 60 7.0 8.0 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
IIi
Opening width 1500 mm
9.0 Laterally-supported
both ends and top
I--
8.0
7.0 /
Opening
width
6.0
Design pressure, wd (kPa)
5.0
iii
4.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
0
0.
0.
3.0
Robustness governs in shaded areas
=
a)
a)
2.0
/ r
a)
0 I
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 7.0 8.0 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
/19
S UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 110:: leaf
230x 76 units
fully bedded
9.0
Laterally-supported
both ends and top
8.0 //
7.0
/
Opening
6.0 Length width
0.
0.
3.0 Robustness governs in shaded areas
=
0)
2.0
0.5
1.0
0
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
//
both ends and top
8.0
1.0
6.0 Ii // Length
Opening
width
5.0
Supporting a concrete slab
E
2.0
//
Wd 1.0 0.5
1.0
/ 20 30 40 60 80 90
0 10 50 7.0
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
6.43
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings leaf
230x76 units
Opening width 900 mm fully bedded
9.0
Laterally-supported
both ends, top free
8.0
___'I
7.0
___I'
Opening
77
6.0 Length width
7 77
7.
7 7 Robustness governs
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3.0
7 7 in shaded area
=
7 7
1.0
07
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
8.0
7,0
6.0
7
7 7 Design pressure, wd (kPa)
5.0 -
7 7
E 7 7
4.0
77
0 Robustness governs
0.
in shaded area
3.0
=
7
7
2.0
,-
V
7 Wd
11.0
V
7
0
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
Lid
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings
3i 76its
Opening width 2100 mm Ilybedde.
9.0
Laterally-supported
II
both ends, top free
8.0
00 ______
7.0
V Opening
6.0 V Length width
V
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
5.0 V
V
E V
V
0 V Robustness governs
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0. in shaded area
0.
V
2.0
V
V-VWdO.5
V
0)
0
0
/ V
10 2.0 30 40 5.0 60 7.0 80 go
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
8.0
7.0
Opening
width
6.0
V Length
50
I
V
/V
V
E V
4.0
V
0
0.
0
V Robustness governs
in shaded area
3.0 V
=
C) \\ V
V
2.0
w(-0.5
1.0
V
00 V
0
V
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
S NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 41:
390x1'' units
Open ng width 900 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
/
IL
IN
8.0
7.0
E
U)
6.0
5.0
4.0
t.I1 Robustness governs in shaded areas
0 Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
2.0
1.0
0.5
/
Opening
1.0
Length width
8.0
7.0
h.
6.0 Robustness governs in shaded areas
5.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
t
U)
0
0.
4.0
Laterally-supported
0. both ends and top
3.0
=
0)
2.0
0)
= 0
Design pressure, Wd (kpa)
0 10 2.0 30 4.0 50 60 7.0 8.0 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
with openings 140-
390 x 190 units
Opening width 2100 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
-iii
9.0
/
8.0
7.0
1.I
6.0
5.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
t
0 Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
a.
a. both ends and top
3.0
=
0>
0>
2.0
0.5
/
Opening
Length width
a>
0 Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
TO
6.0
5.0
-
t
c0
4.0
rn
/U
0 Laterally-supported
a. both ends and top
a.
2.0
-
a,
0
/ Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 140-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Opening width 900 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
/ Laterally-supported
/
both ends, top free
/...
ii
8.0
7.0
/ // II' /
/
Opening
6.0 width
/
Length
//
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
5.0
Robustness governs
E in shaded area
0,
4.0
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0
=
2.0
/
1.0
a)
0
o 0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Ct3
C
0
Laterally-supported
__I'
0 9.0 both ends, top free
L. 8.0
I 7.0 r.Al1'
Length
Opening
width
t
0)
0
0.
4.0
0.
3.0
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
S
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
flQ
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
with openings 0-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Opening w' th 2100 mm 5 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
Laterally-supported
both ends, topfree
8.0
7.0
/
Opening
6.0 Length width
Robustness governs
E in shaded area
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0
=
0)
2.0
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
8.0
/
Opening
7.0
Length width
Robustness governs
in shaded area
5.0 --
2.0
=0
0)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
Ei4q
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 0-mm
390 x 190 units
Open ng width 900 mm 30 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
7.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
E
-
'I,
4.0
0 Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0 both ends and top
II
3.0
0.5
/
=
0
0)
0) 2.0
Opening
/
1,0
0 Length width
(I)
-o
('3 0)
0 Design pressure, wd (kPa)
0 0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Ct,
0
N4
7.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
t0
U,
0
0.
5.0
4.0
2.0
'II 0.5 /
Laterally-supported
both ends and top
__i1
/ Wd = 2.0 1.5 1.0
IOpening
/ Length width
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 0-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
9.0
Opening width 2100 mm
,r
8.0 Robustness governs in shaded areas
- H Supporting a concrete slab
7.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
. E
C
4.0
Laterally-supported
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
C.
C. both ends and top
3.0
= 0.5
U
2.0
Wd2011.5 1.0
/
Opening
1.0
Length width
7.0
. Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
/
=
U
a,
3.0
NI 0.5
Laterally-supported
both ends and top
'a 2.0
/ 1.0
Opening
1.0
// Length width
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
A 1
UNREINFORCED MASONRY
with openings 19'- leaf
390 x 190 urnts
Opening width 900 mm 0 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
Laterally-supported
both ends, top free
8.0
7.0
6.0
ri opening
1/ width
Length
Robustness governs
E in shaded area
t
cd)
0
4.0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
0.
3.0
=
0)
2.0
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Laterally-supported
both ends, topfree
0)
Opening
Length width
Robustness governs
in shaded area
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
UNREINFORCED MASONRY -
with openings 190-mm lea
390 x 190 units
Open ng width 2100 mm m face-shell bedded
9.0
/ /
/
Laterally-supported
/
both ends, top free
8.0
/ /
//
7.0
/
//
Opening
6.0 Length width
//
5.0
__ Robustness governs
E in shaded area
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3.0
=
2.0
/ / Wdl.O 0.5
1.0
/ /
0 1.0 2.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Laterally-supported
Opening width 2 '0 mm
9.0
8.0
/ /
/ Opening
7.0
/ / 7 Length width
6.0
/ Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
5.0
/ // Robustness governs
in shaded area
t
C"
4.0
/ /
0
0.
0.
3.0
=
a,
a,
2.0
1.0
/ Wdl.O 0.5
//
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, ir addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontally-reinforced bond beams 140-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Bar diameter 12 mm .5 mm face-shell bedded
E
- 8.0
a)
Reinforced
= nIH bond beams
7
Err -
0
- Robustness governs
in shaded area
C.)
d 4.0 3,0 2.0
(I,
Cc
C-)
>0 a)
1
Reinforced
PH H bond beams
Robustness governs
in shaded area
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
S
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
S REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
horizontally-reinforced bond beams 140-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Bar diameter 16 mm 25 mm face-shell bedded
LLU
- 80
0
70 I\1I1__ I
HH
Reinforced
bond beams
6.0
C
E
Cl
IItt I' Length 'I
C
= Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Ct
NJ
0 Robustness governs
in shaded area
1.0
Bar diameter 16 mm
Reinforced
H H
bond beams
C;
C
=
5)
50- I' Length 'I
5)
C-)
C;
NJ
=C Robustness governs
in shaded area
C;
C.
C') i0 -
C;
Cl
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontally-reinforced bond beams mrn
390 x 190 units
Bar diameter 12 mm 30 mm face-shell bedded
a) Li1Li
cc
Reinforced
E HH bond beams
7u
0
0
=
a)
L)
0
tLtuIi -. I' Length
3.0
0
=
o2
00 -
0.
3.0 2.0 1.5 I 0.5
C/) 1J
C.,
>a) 0
1.0 2.0 3.0 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
ength of Wall Between Supports (m)
WLU
.1.
00
a, fll fl
Reinforced
= bond beams
.08
a, /
= 00
0
0
Ct
3.0 -
C
U
00
C.)
CO
0.
Cl) 1.0
CO
C.)
>0
a)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports. in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontally-reinforced bond beams
= 7fl -
Reinforced
C H H
bond beams
6.0
C
5)
5)
C
=
I' Length 'I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S C
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 go
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Bar diameter 12 mm Li
Reinforced
HI H bond beams
0.5
Wd 4.0 2.0 1.5 1.0
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontally-reinforced bond beams 19O-. 'I-;
390 x 190 Units
Bar diameter 16 mm 30 mm face-shell bedded
C-
Reinforced
= bond beams
C- -
5.0
I' Length ':
C)
- Design pressure, wd (kPa)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Ct
=
o 3.0
C
Ct
Ct
C-
LiLi
9.0 --
C-C
L!!J Reinforced
C- HR bond beams
C)
=
== -
C
Ct
0.5
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of WaU Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
' cQ
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontally-reinforced bond beams 190-mm leaf
90 x 190 units
Bar diameter 16 mm 0 mm face-shell bedded
111111__IkI
t'It1I II H H
Reinforced
bond beams
'kilL
_IAV
' Length
0.5
1103.J
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
Bar diameter 16 mm LU
'111! Ii H] H
i. Reinforced
bond beams
50
4.0
1.0
I' Length
C-
0 10 20 30 4.0 50 60 7,0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
S NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
6.59
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontally-reinforced bond beams 190-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Ba diameter 20 mm 30 mm face-shell bedded
LIII_K Reinforced
IL"
HI H bond beams
' I
0.5
1.0
U)
c3
J0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
4.0 50 60 7.0 80 90
0
r
0 u-U
.1.
Reinforced
H! H bond beams
0.5
0 1.0 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
i;r
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
horizontally-reinforced bond beams 190-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Bar diameter 20 mm 30 mm face-shell bedded
Reinforced
HH bond beams
0,5
S "Ut
Bar diameter 20 mm
I
HI H
I'
Reinforced
bond beams
Length 'I
0.5 Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
1.0
1.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 6.0 7.0 80 90
Length of Wall Between Supports (m)
S NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
661
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
vertically-reinforced cores -mm Iea''
390 x 190 units
Bar diameter 12 mm mm ace-s e '
9.0
8.0
7.0
E
0,
4.0
0 Reinforced cores
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
3.0
4)
4) 0.5
2.0
Ii I
9.0
8.0
7.0
0 Reinforced cores
0.
0.
3.0
4)
4)
2.0
1.0
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
vertically-reinforced cores 190-mm leaf
390 x 190 units
Bar diameter 12 mm 30 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
8.0
Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
7.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
E
.4J
0 Reinforced cores
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
a,
3.0
2.0
__i.
1.0
Wd 4.0 3.O 2.0 1.5
Bar diameter 12 mm
9.0
8.0
Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
7.0
Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
E
4.0
0 Reinforced cores
0.
0
3.0
=
a,
a)
2.0
jl0 1<
ntal '
"no
Design pressure, Wd (kPa)
U 1,0 20 30 40 50 60 7.0 80 9
Horizontal Spacing of Vertical Reinforcement for Wall of Unlimited Length (i
NOTE: Ills the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
6.63
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION
vertically-reinforced cores Om': leaf
390 x 190 units
Bar diameter 16 mm 0 mm face-shell bedded
9.0
8.0
Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
7.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
0 Reinforced cores
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0.
3.0
=
a,
2.0
Bar diameter 16 mm
9.0
8.0
- Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
7.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
5.0
E 0.5
4.0
0 Reinforced cores
0.
0.
3.0
0
a
2.0
1.0
NOTE: It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
REINFORCED AND MIXED CONSTRUCTION -
vertically-reinforced cores
Bar diameter 20 mm
Reinforced cores
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I
Horizontal 'I
Bar diameter 20 mm
'i1uiu
9.0
8.0
Supporting a concrete slab
Robustness governs in shaded areas
7.0 Not supporting a concrete slab
6.0
0.5
5.0
E
4J LIII
0 Reinforced cores
0.
3,0
=
a) -C
a)
a)
2.0
NOTE: It is the designers responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties
and connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry properties
WORKED EXAMPLES
Mortar joints
Mortar type M3 (or M4)
For low-rise industrial building in Sydney on less than 30 m of hard clay, design unreinforced masonry
(Wall D') and reinforced masonry (Wall A' and Wall 'C') for wind load of 1 kPa and earthquake loading.
Bond beam
J
Steel portal Steel Steel portal Steel
K
frame portal frame ) frame portal frame -3
Bond beam
Wall A 6500
190-mm hollow concrete block
vertically-reinforced at 2.0-m centres
> k
10200 6800
600
WALL A' ARRANGEMENT WALL 'B' ARRANGEMENT
4.200
Bond beam
2670
b
Steel portal Steel
Bond beam
200 frame portaltrame-
7070 6500
Bond beam
6500 1800 WaI1C 400
Bond beam 190-mm hollow
WaIID
200 concrete block
Door 190-mm
with bond beams
opening S 3000
hollow
2000 and vertical
concrete block
reinforcement
Masonry Properties
400
x Bond beam (4-Y20 bars)
2700 4
I
fj1
I
2001 hollow concrete
blockwork
Steel portal
frame
6500 400
x - Bond beam (4-Y20 bars)
3000
2001 hollow concrete
Reinforced core Door blockwork (Wall D)
(1-Y16) opening
-- 100 -
/ .- Li Floorslab
/
( 2850 900 3050 600
WALL 'D DETAILS
190 NOTE:
= 10.9 kN/m
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
6.69
Shear friction strength Lateral load parameters
V1 = 0.9 k de Adw A 8.3 2(h0+tj) 7.4.4.2(a)
G=
_0.9x0.3 xO.18x60,000 lu + tj
1,000 2(190+ 10)
= 2.9 kNIm 390 + 10
= 1.0
Shear capacity at mortar joint
Vcap = V0 + V1 A 8.3 A=(1+tY'i1 +G2 7.4.4.2(b)*
= 9.0 + 2.9 =(390+ 10)Jl + 12
= 11.9 kN/m 566
*
Mortar joint thickness Note: Terms A
tj = 10 mm Density of wall material and C are not
Dens = 21.8 kN/m3 used in AS 3700,
Length of masonry unit but are included
1= 390 mm Material thickness of wall here for
tm =96 mm simplicity
Height of masonry unit
h = 190mm cont...
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
p 7n
Height of wall acting at mid-height of the Diagonal moment capacity
panel being designed Mcd = 0 lt Zt 7.4.4.2(b)
He = 6.5 - 1.5 Assuming that bond beams 2666
=0.6x1.Olx
= 5.0 m do not distribute vertical loads 1000
to the ends of the panels = 1.61 kNm/m
60.000 Hd
=0.I4MPa 1.0x3.05
1.5
For concrete blockwork = 2.03
kmt = 1.0 7.4.2 > 1.0
2Ld
Table 7.4
6.71
Lateral load capacity
(k1 Mch + k2 Mcd) 7.4.4.2
Wcap
Ld2
= 2 x 2.066 [(lxl.14)+(2x1.61)]
3.052
= 1.94 kPa
> Windload
wd=l.OkPa OK
REINFORCED MASONRY
Masonry Properties
190
U)
-o
Ct31
0
I.
CD
C
K-- Steel portal
frame
Steel
portal frame 30
Er-
145 145
NOTE:
20-MPa grout in all
> K reinforced cores
10200
600
2-N20 bars
WALL A ARRANGEMENT
tSTLd
tt C
190
2
600 2000 2000
)K) 200 200
100 100
2000 - 200
2000
0.9 = 1.0-p1 = 0.1
SECTION A-A
iS 7)
Width of masonry unit Effective depth
t= 190mm
d = tu - ts - ti -dr- - C
2
Face-shell thickness NOTE:
= 190-30-5- -20
t=30mm tandt 2
may vary = 125mm
Taper in face-shell depending on
t = 5 mm manufacturer Area of main reinforcement
A = 310 mm2
Bedded area of ungrouted masonry
Ab = 2 t 1 p1 4.5.4 Spacing of main reinforcement
2 x 30 x 1000 x 0.9 Sm = 2000 mm
= 54,000 mm2/m 2000 mm OK 8.5
Ad=2tslpI+tulp2 h 190
=(2x30x l000xO.9)+(190x l000xO.1) tj 10
= 73,000 mm2/m = 19.0
6.73
Design characteristic grout strength Moment Capacity for Reinforced Masonry
= 1.3 3.5 Width of compression face
= 1.3 x 15 b=2t0x2 8.5
= 19.5 MPa = 2 x 190 x 2
<2OMPa OK = 760 mm
<400 x 2
Capacity reduction factor =800 OK
0 = 0.75 Table 4.] <Distance to structural end + 2 t
OK
Out-of-plane Shear Capacity for
Reinforced Masonry Design area of reinforcement
Characteristic shear strength Asd = A5
'ms = 0.35 MPa (at interface) 3.3.4(d) =310 mm2
vm = 0.35 MPa 8.6.3 (0.29) 1.3fmbd 8.5
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1 bd
0
= Cross-sectional area and spacing of shear reinf.
=0.75x500x310x 125x
A5 = 0 (ho tirrups) S = NA 0.6x500x310 1
1.3 x 8.06 x 760 x 125]
At + f
A d) > Wind load
Vcap = 0 (fvm b d +
Wdw B H2
= 0.75 [(0.35 x 200 x 125) +
Md-
8
(17.5 x 310) + o] 1.0x2.0x6.42
= 10.6 kN/core 8
> Wind load = 10.2 kN.mlcore OK
WdWBH
Vd- 2 > Earthquake load
1.0x2.0x6.4 Wide B H2
Md -
2 8
= 6,4 kN/core OK 0.6 x 2.0 x 6.42
8
> Earthquake load = 6.1 kN.m/core OK
Wde B H
Vd -
2
0.6 x 2.0 x 6.4 Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
i Bond beam
200->( Adh=2tslpl+tulp2
(1-N20 bar) 6970
=(2x30x6970x0.92)+
6500 1800 2000
Bond beam
(190 x 6970 x 0.08)
=20O X = 490,700 mm2
(1-N20 bar)
Al 2000 2100
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Ash 1240
Adh 490700
4000 = 0.0025
WALL 'C' ARRANGEMENT >0.0007 OK
Vertical:
4000 - (3 x 200) Height of shear wall (to load application)
p = 0.85 = 1.0- = 0.15
4000 H = 6.970 m
Horizontal:
6970-(3x 200) Length of shear wall
0.92 = 1.0- p1 = 0.08
6970 L=4.000m
1 Nl6bar
grouted
NOTE: H to L ratio
Wall D 20-MPa grout in all
reinforced cores H 6.97
Steel portal frame L - 4.00
2-N20 bars - 2-N20 bars 2-N20 bars = 1.74
grouted grouted grouted <2.3
L Design as shear wall 8.6.2(a)
2
1800 2000 Shear stress value
100 10
Vertical reinforcement
15 0.5x6.97
4.00
(2-N20, or equivalent, in each core) = 0.63 MPa
Asv=2x3l0x3cores
= 620 mm2/core x 3 cores For H/L> 1.0
= 1860 mm2 Area of horizontal reinforcement
crossing potential crack
Ad=2ts1pI+tulp2
= (2 x 30 x 4000 x 0.85) +
A s Ash L
H
(190 x 4000 x 0.15) 310 x 4000
= 318,000 mm2 6970
= 534 mm2
6.75
In-plane shear capacity (based on stress) In-Plane Shear Load on Wall 'C'
Vcap = 0 (fvr Ad + 0.8 fsy A) 8.6.2
r.SW - I -
1 1 8.6.2(a)
Ab m Assume all shear load is resisted by end walls.
Half of load goes directly to floor slab,
1
2563 half of the residual goes to each end
= 0.978
Total shear load at one end
Anchorage steel is 2-N20 bars at end of wall 6.5 x 35.2
Vt = (0.7 + 0.65)
Area of anchorage steel 4
I
= 2 x 310 = 77 kN
= 620 mm2
Shear on wall 'C'
Centroid distance 77 x 4.0
Vd
1' = 100 mm (4.0 + 2.0)
=0.1 m = 68 kN
<l38kN OK
In-plane shear capacity
(based on anchorage) 8.6.2
0.75
[0.978 x 55.4 x +
- 6.97
500 x 620
(4.0 - 2 x 0.1)1
1000
= 138 kN
this over-rides stress-based capacity
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
' 7
BUILDING AND SITE PARAMETERS
DESIGN BRIEF
Home units: AS 1170.4
For medium-rise residential building, design Normal use 2.2.3
the unreinforced and reinforced masonry for
earthquake loads Structure: Type I AS 1170.4
1=1.0 Table 2.5
1050
Location: Sydney AS 1170.4
a=0.08 Table 2.3 Fig 2.3(b)
Walls to be
2700
designed
2700
12300 aS = 0.08 x'1.25
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Level 2
175
= 0.10
Earthquake Design AS 1170.4
2700 Category B Table 2.6
Level 1
600 Unreinforced brickwork loadbearing walls
with 3 residential storeys and a reinforced
190-mm 290x 1000
2100
blockwork blade columns blockwork basement and shear core
to be designed
Base Total storeys = 4
100
Non-ductile building AS 1170.4
Irregular shape 2.7,3(b)&(c)
3000 1000
Carry out static (or dynamic) analysis.
SECTION A-A Provide a reinforced masonry core
S 2000
Outline of basement level
7300
1600
a
Wall to be designed
41 800
/ Balconies at level 1
IA
3700 / Typical residential floors
NOTE:
References are to AS 3700, unless stated otherwise
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual. AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
677
BASE SHEAR Structural response factor AS 1170.4
R= 2.5 6.2.6(a) and
Height of structure above base DR 96495 Al
hn = 4 storey heights + roof
= (0.1+ 2.1+ 0.6 + 2.7 + 0.175 + 2.7 + Calculate gravity loads for strength limit state
0.175 + 2.7) + 1.05 of the masonry components of the building.
= 12.3 m A separate analysis should be carried out for
the stability limit state.
Fundamental period
AS 1170.4 Floor area
T--
- 46 6.2.4 A= 10x41.8
12.3 = 418 m2
46
= 0.27 seconds Dead load for floors, partitions, walls & roof
G = [Gslab + Gwalls]NO. + Groof
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Earthquake design coefficient in the Total gravity load for top three floors
fundamental direction Gg=(G+WcQ)A AS 1170.4
1.25 a AS 1170.4 = (21.4 + 2.5) 418 6.2.5
C= (Fundamental)
T2 6.2.3 = 10,000 kN
1.25 x 0.08
0.272/3 Base shear
=0.241
=i [jj Gg
AS 1170.4
6.2.2
Earthquake design coefficient in the l.OxO.241 x l.25x 10,000
orthogonal direction 2.5
1.25 a AS 1170.4 = 1205 kN
C (Orthogonal)
T2 6.2.3
1.25 x 0.08 Limits on base shear AS 1170.4
0.212/3 V 0.01 Gg 6.2.2
= 0.281 0.01 x 10,000
lOOkN OK
NOTE: The fundamental period and earthquake design and
coefficient for the orthogonal direction are associated AS 1170.4
with the more rigid direction and lead to higher base
shear than the analysis in the fundamental direction.
V=
R''
r2.5 al
L f ..J 6.2.2
Because the basement structure in this example is 1.0 x 2.5 x 0.08 x 10,000
much more rigid in the orthogonal direction than in the 2.5
fundamental direction, only loads in the fundamental
direction have been considered. In practice, designers 800 kN
*
should consider both directions. Use V = 800 kN
Note: At the publishing date of this Marnial, AS I 170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
7Q
VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF Level4
HORIZONTAL FORCES 4- G=571kN
h4= l0.650m
Structural period 571 x 10.65
T = 0.27 secs = 54.719
<0.5 secs = 0.111
2700 F4 C,4 V
=0.111 x800
Number of stories = 89 kN
n=4 V4 = 89 kN
Level3
E1Ggi hk = (3143 2.200) + (3143 X 5.300) +
X
175 4- G3 = 3143 kN
(3143 x 7.975) + 571 x 10.65) h3=7.975 m
= 54,719 kNm 3143 x 7.975
Cv3
= 54.719
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
= 0.458
2700 F3 C,3 V
=0.458x 800
=366kN
V3 = 366 + 89
= 455 kN
LU
c.'J
Level 2
175 4... G=3143kN
h2=5.300m
3143 x 5.30
C2
= 54.719
= 0.304
2700 F2 = C,,2V
= 0.304 x 800
= 244 kN
V2 = 455 + 244
S = 699 kN
Level 1
4... G=3143kN
600
h1 = 2.200 m
3143 x 2.20
= 54.719
= 0. 126
F1 = C,1 V
2100
= 0.126 x 800
I = 101 kN
VI = 699+ 101
= 800 kN
Base
V = 800 kN
100 T
S
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
DESIGN OF BLADE COLUMNS IN BASEMENT Concrete floor acts as a diaphragm.
All piers and shear walls are 2.100 m clear height
The following analysis of the strength limit state plus 0.100-rn concrete floor = 2.200 m from
of the reinforced masonry blade columns in the top of footing to under side of beams
basement is carried out in the fundamental
direction only. The four 3.0-rn-long shear walls 10 columns (290 x 1000 cross section)
should also be designed by the same method. 290 x
Consideration should also be given to the strength 12
limit state in the orthogonal direction. A separate = 24,200 x 106 mm4
analysis should be carried out for stability.
4 shear walls (190 x 3000 cross section)
19 190 x 3000
'
12
= 427,500 x 106 mm4
6665
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
_ 1a
vu
- = 0.0124 x 800
= 9.9 kN
_
Reinforcd
6660
masonry
418
Reinforced
= 665 kN
2200
Masonry blade column specification
Each column is 290 x 1000 x 2100 mm high
with 2-N 12 vertical bars (one each end) and Top of footing
L
the column.
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
'
Blockwork Strength Design for Compression
Characteristic strength of units Steel reinforcement can NOT be tied in two
= 15 MPa directions
Use the refined calculation method for
Mortar type: M3 unreinforced masonry
Supporting a concrete slab at the top
Prism factor Laterally supported top and bottom
km 1.6
a = 0.85 7.3.4.3
Masonry characteristic strength
mb = km fuc H = 2200 mm
= 1.6 x 15
= 6.2 MPa No stiffening returns
k= 1.0 Table 7.2
Block height
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
= 190 mm Slenderness
aH
Sr =
Mortar thickness
= 10 mm 0.85 x 2200
- 1.0x290
Height ratio = 6.45
h
1.9
Concentric stiff beams in two directions apply
the vertical and shear loads
Compressive strength factor Eccentricity ratio
kh= 1.3
0.05
tw
Blockwork characteristic strength
= kh 'mb Slenderness and eccentricity factor
= 1.3 x 6.2 k5 = 1.18 0.03 Sr 8.4
= 8.06 MPa = 1.18 - (0.03 x 6.45)
= 0.987
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
6.R1
Basic compressive strength
fvr (1.5oo.5
F0 = 0 Em Ab + kc/1 A + fsyAs] 8.4
= 1.50 -(0.5 x 2.2)
= 0.45[(8.06 x 60.000) + = 0.40 MPa
H 2200 1=100mm
L 1000
= 2.2 Resistance to overturning
<2.3 .. Design as shear wall 8.6.2 PL
> 1.0 .. Horizontal reinforcement
v = {k5 +f (L - 21)} 8.6.2
Note: This is more conservative than Carry out similar analysis for shear walls in
AS 3700 requirements basement and shear walls in each floor
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
CHECK P-DELTA EFFECTS ROOF ANCHORAGE
m
PA for trusses to top plate and
- V h5 kd top plate to wall
I = 1952 x l0 mm4
L= 2200 mm
V L3
A
3E1
800 x iO3 x 2.2 x l0
- 3 x 8060 x 1.952 x 1012
= 0.18 mm
<17.6mm OK
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
6.83
EXTERNAL WALLS ABOVE TOP FLOOR Solid units (ie 110-mm units)
Section moduli Zd110 = Z110 =
Attachment amplification factor
ac= 1.0 AS 1170.4 1000 t2
Zd10 -
5.4.1 6
Wall to be
designed l000x 1102
For the top storey Level 3 6
h 11.250 AS 1170.4 = 2.02 x io6 mm3/m
h0 12.300 5.4.2
= 0.91 Mortar joint thickness
t = 10mm
Height amplification factor
AS 1170.4 Length of masonry unit
a= i.0+(--) 5.4.2
h l90 = 390 mm
= 1.0+0.91 1110 = 230 mm
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
=1.91
Height of masonry unit
Horizontal earthquake pressure h90 = 190 mm
Fp=aSacaxCcl tGc AS 1170.4 h110 = 76 mm
= 0.08 x 1.25 x 1.0 x 1.91 x 5.2.1
1.8 x 1.0 (1.62 + 2.12) Lateral load parameters
= 0.56 + 0.73 2(h0+t) 7.4.4.2(a)
G
= 1.29 kPa l + tj
<0.5 Ge 2 (190 + 10)
G90=
= 0.5 (1.62 + 2.12) 390+10
=1.87kPa OK = 1.0
2 (76 + 10)
G110-
Use Clause 7.4.4 to check the out-of-plane 230+ 10
bending capacity of the wall = 0.717
= 566
Characteristic flexural tensile strength of masonry A110=(230+ 10)Jl + 0.7172
mt = 0.2 MPa 3.3.3 = 295
Zd90
1000
6
r6()
L -t tlj t1.
= 141
76+ 10
B110 =
1000 x 902 r6 25 25 2
1l + 0.7 172
6 L 190
12(
190
)+ =70
8(25 ) <tu
=1.23x106mm3/m 190 =110mm
Use Equation 7.4.4.2(4)
for solid units coni...
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
P
S
For hollow units (ie 90-mm units)
Bt5 7.4 .4 .2(b)
<2.0ok'(l +-!.)Zd
1mt
7.4.3.2(2)
c90 = +tu-ts
L1.5B+0.9t5
141x25 <4.0 0 kp 1mt Zd 7.4 .3 .2(3)
= +90-25
L(1.5 x 141 + (0.9 x 25) =4.OxO.6x 1.OxV0.2x2.02
= 80 =2.l7kNmlm OK
Z110
r2B22 ii
- L3t+ 1.8 B] A L0= 1.6m
- 2x702x 1102 11 Ld=3.70m
x 110)+ (1.8 x 70)] 295 H H
Hd =
= 879 mm3
2.70
Equivalent torsional strength 2
ft = 2.25 7.4 .4 .2(b) = 1.35 m
= 2.25 IO Slope factor
= 1.01 MPa G Ld 7.4.4.2
Hd
Characteristic lateral modulus of rupture 1.0 x 3.70
= 0.8 MPa 1.5.2.9 1.35
= 2.74
Perpend spacing foctor > 1.0
kp=min.(2 , .P, i.o) 7.4.3.4 0.717 x 3.70
t h,
aim
1.35
k
9°
=min.(-' 190
90
190
190
' i.o)
1.96
>1.0
= 1.0
Aspect factor
kp
110
= mm. (
110
110
' -'110761.0) a
af =
= 1.0 Table 7.4
1-
3a 2Ld
Horizontal moment capacity 7.4.3 2.47
af90 -
Meh = 0 (0.44 ut Z + 0.56 mt Z) 7.4 .3 .2(4) 1 1.6
1- +
3x2.74 2x3.70
Mh90 = 0.6[(0.44 x 0.8 x 1.23) + = 2.50
(0.56 x 0.2 x 1.23)]
= 0.342 kNm/m 1.96
10 =
Mh110= 0.6[(0.44 x 0.8 x 2.02) + 1 1.6
1- +
(0.56 x 0.2 x 2.02)] 3x1.96 2x3.70
S = 0.562 kNmlm = 1.87
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 11704-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
Restraint factors
Rf1 = 1
Rf2 =0
2000
k1 = R1 Table 7.4
=1
Table 7.4 140-mm thick
G2 reinforced piers
1
100
k290 = I +
= 2.0 1600
k2tio= 1
p.172 100
=2.95
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Page 6.13
S = 1.8 m
8 Mcap 110 50 90
Wcap
= H2
8x2.2 DEAILA
- 1.8x2.72
= 1.34 kPa Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993
> 1.29 kPa OK is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual
will be amended.
Shear in connections at top of wall Design compressive stress at base
Earthquake coefficient for connections Gg
dc
=2 AS 1170.4 Adw
Table 5.1.5(a) 8.16x 1000
50.000
Design shear for connection = 0.163 MPa
[F H1
V0 = 2
2 Masonry bond strength (at concrete interface)
_2x l.29x2.7 f'ms=0
2
= 3.48 kN/m Shear bond capacity
V0 = 0 'ms Adw
Provide head ties with shear capacity and spacing 50,000
FV = 0.60 x 0 x
1000
Sø =0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3.48
0.75 Shear factor for concrete interface
= 4.64 kN/m k=0.3 3.3.5
Table 3.3
Shear friction capacity
Shear at base of wall Vie = 0.9 k de Adw
Wall is a Ioadbearing external wall 50,000
= 0.9 x 0.3 x 0.163 x
Design shear at base of wall 1000
=2.2kN/m
Zd110 =
= 1.68 6
1000 x 1102
Horizontal earthquake pressure 6
F = a S ac ax I Gc AS 1170.4 = 2.02 x i06 mm3/m
=0.08x 1.25x 1.Ox l.68x 5.2.1
1.8x 1.0 (1.62+2.12) Load factor on resisting loads
= 0.49 + 0.64 = 0.8
= 1.13 kPa
<0.5 Gc NOTE: Although AS 3700 and AS 1170.4
=0.5(1.62+ 2.12) do not require the application of the
=1.87kPa OK load factor YR = 0.8 when calculating
Gg, it has been applied to all gravity
Although the compression in the internal loads except those attributed to the
loadbearing leaf of the external wall will assist wall being considered. This is for
in resisting lateral earthquake and wind loads, consistency with the normal load case
AS 3700 Clause 7.4.4 does not make any and because the gravity loads could
provision for enhancement of lateral strength. be over estimated
t;t QQ
Imposed load of roof Permanent load
qR = 0.25 kPa g53= 25.0 xO.l75
= 4.38kPa
Factored roof loads (ignoring any live loads)
0.8 g AR Factored slab loads (ignoring live loads)
FdR=
L
FDs3 = 0.8 g53
0.8x1.2x33.5 L
5.70 12.6
= 0.8 x 4.38
= 5.64 kN/m 5.70
= 7.75 kN/m
Floor 3 walls
Only the internal leaf is loadbearing Total factored loads on internal loadbearing leaf
Fdw2
= FdR + Fdw3 + + Fds3
Height of wall
Hw3 = 2.70 m
S = 5.64 + 4.37 + 7.75
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
2
Length of loadbearing leaf = 19.9 kN/m
Lw3 = 5.70 m
19.9 x 1000
Use 90-mm denseweight hollow blockwork = 50,000
Density 2180 kg/rn3 80% solid = 0.4MPa
1 face with plasterboard 10 mm thick
Slab3 2.12x2.70x1.0
Area 1.0
(7.3 x 2.0) - (2.0 x 2.0) = 5.72 kN/m
2
= 12.6m2 Floor 2 wall
Fdw2= 5.72 kN/m
Slab thickness
t3= 175mm
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-I 993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended.
6.89
Total factored loads on
external non-loadbearing leaf
8.59 x 1000
=
ext
110,000
= 0.O78MPa
l0
=[o.6 x 1.0 x 0.2 x 1.23 x
I- l0
I0.40x 1.23
106
L
= 0.640 kNmlm
=r0.6 1.0x0.2x2.02xil
106]
+
L
06
0.078 x 2.02 x
106
= 0.40 kNm/m
Note: At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is being revised. When that is published, this Part of the manual will be amended
c on
lJ GLOSSARY
The product of acceleration coefficient, a, and site horizontal spacing, 3000 vertical spacing).
factor, S, provides the basic measure of earthquake
severity likely to be transmitted to a building on a Nonductile structures
particular site It is assumed in this manual that nonductile structures
include:
Earthquake design category
buildings with loadbearing walls or shear walls
A category assigned to a structure based on its
structure classification, acceleration coefficient and site consisting of unreinforced masonry, and
factor for the particular site. The categories are given in buildings with reinforced concrete masonry consisting
AS 1170.4 Clause 2.5 and Table 2.6. of wide-spaced reinforcement (greater than 800-mm
Categories Hi, H2 and H3 are used for domestic centres either horizontally or vertically).
structures, H3 being the most severe. Domestic Regular and Irregular Structures
structures are defined in AS 1170.4 Clause 2.2.2 and AS 1170.4 Clause A2 defines buildings regularity.
Figure 2.2.2 as one- or two-storey detached single
dwellings, terrace houses, townhouses and the like, with Oig
a maximum storey height of 2.7 m, maximum eaves 0.1 g is the force equal to 0.1 times the gravitational
height of 6.0 m, maximum ridge height of 8.5 m, force exerted by a particular element. A typical 190-mm
maximum width of 16.0 m and maximum length of hollow concrete, reinforced blockwork wall
10 times the width.
(consisting of grouted elements and ungrouted
elements) would have an average wall density of
Categories A, B, C, D and E are used for all other approximately 220 kg/m2 and a gravitational force of
structures, E being the most severe. approximately 2.2 kN/m2 This would correspond to a
Structure classification lateral working pressure at 0.1 g of 0.22 kPa.
A classification assigned to a structure based on its use. Out-of-plane horizontal load
Type III Buildings intended for post-earthquake A pressure or point load which acts perpendicular to
recovery the plane of the wall. This includes earthquake loads,
wind pressures or suctions on a building wall.
Type II Buildings intended for large numbers of people
or people of impaired mobility In-plane horizontal load
A force that acts in the direction of the plane of the
Type I Buildings not intended for post-earthquake
wall. This includes:
recovery and not intended for large numbers of a vertical compression resulting from gravity, or
people or people of impaired mobility - overturning forces and horizontal shear forces in
referred to in this manual as normal buildings.
shear walls intended to convey lateral earthquake
Ductility loads,
The ability of the structure or element to undergo or
repeated and reversing inelastic deflections beyond the a wind loads from the top of the structure to the base.
point of first yield while maintaining a substantial
proportion of its initial load-carrying capacity.
NOTES:
I At the publishing date of this Manual, AS 1170.4-1993 is
being revised. When that is published, this Part of the
manual will be amended.
6.91
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Movement Contents
This chapter provides the design requirements for 7.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
movement joints in masonry to control cracking
due to shrinkage of the wall, concrete slab 7.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
shrinkage, foundation movement and thermal
expansion or contraction. 7.3 STANDARD DESIGNS
7.5 GLOSSARY
I
BASIS OF DESIGN ___
Temperature Differential
Walls that are exposed to large temperature differentials
Unreinforced concrete masonry is a brittle material
(including those on the northern or western facades of
which will crack if long walls are constructed without
buildings in temperate areas) will be more likely to
a break or if its supports move. The following factors
suffer cracking than similar walls in benign
influence the formation of cracks in masonry which may
environments.
be controlled by the methods set out in clause 7.1.2.
Footing Movement
7.1.1 FACTORS INFLUENCING THE FORMATION Footing movement is a major source of cracking in
OF CRACKS IN MASONRY unreinforced masonry and is discussed fully in
Chapter 10 of this manual.
Shrinkage of Masonry Units
Concrete masonry units shrink as the concrete cures. Support Movement
To avoid this, units should be properly cured before Differential movements of supports can lead to cracking.
delivery to the site. Saturated units should not be laid For example, if a masonry wall is fixed to large steel
as they could be subject to subsequent drying portal frames it will move sympathetically with the
shrinkage. AS/NZS 4456.12 provides two tests, frames as they deflect under the action of lateral loads.
Coefficient of Residual Curing Contraction and A crack will develop in the bottom bed loint but this
Coefficient of Drying Contraction, for contraction of would not normally be noticed. However, if the masonry
concrete masonry units. These tests are not routinely wall is also bonded to a masonry shear wall (parallel to
performed, and are specified only when dealing with the frames) which is much stiffer than the frames, there
specific problems related to shrinkage and cracking. is potential for diagonal cracks to develop in the
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
masonry
Coefficient of Residual Curing Contraction is the
shrinkage which takes place in newly manufactured Mixing Clay and Concrete Masonry
concrete units (at constant saturated moisture content). Clay units expand while concrete units contract. It is
It is an indication of the likelihood of shrinkage related permissible to construct cavity walls with one leaf of
cracking as a result of cement hydration in the units. clay units and the other leaf of concrete units, provided
It is indicative of the lower bound of shrinkage in they are separated by cavities with flexible ties. While
the wall. little harm is done by incorporating the odd clay unit
into a concrete masonry leaf or the odd concrete unit
For exarnple: into a clay masonry leaf, large area of each should not
0.1 mm/rn represents at least 0 8 mm in an 8-rn be mixed in the same leaf since this will lead to
length of wall. differential movement and cracking.
0 0.3 mm/rn represents at least 2.4 mm in an 8-rn
E length of wall.
0> Although no limits are set in AS/NZS 4455 or
7.1.2 METHODS OF CONTROLLING CRACKING
0 IN MASONRY
AS/NZS 4456, a value over 0.1 mm/rn would normally be
regarded as relatively high.
Mortar
To avoid potential cracking from mortar shrinkage, the
Coefficient of Drying Contraction is the shrinkage which mortars recommended in the Standard Specification,
takes place in concrete units when dried from a provided in Chapter 1 should be used, viz:
saturated condition to a stable dry condition. It is an M3 applications - 1:0:5 + water thickener or
indication of the likelihood of shrinkage-related cracking M4 applications - 1:0:4 water thickener.
as a result of expelling all of the moisture from the
units. When combined with the shrinkage caused by the Applied Renders and Coatings
mortar, it gives an indication of the upper bound of the To minimise the risk of cracking, the specified render
mix should be suitable for the type of masonry and the
possible shrinkage in the wall.
thickness of any coat not more than 12 mm.
For example: If necessary, wire or expanded metal reinforcement can
0.6 mm/rn represents at least 4.8 mm in an 8-rn be used to control cracking. Control joints in renders
length of wall. and coating should be included wherever control joints
0.8 mm/rn represents at least 6.4 mm in an 8-rn are provided in the masonry.
length of wall.
Footings
No limits are set in AS/NZS 4455 or AS/NZS 4456. To limit cracking from footing movement, suitable
A value over 0.6 rnm/rn would normally be considered precautions include:
to be quite high.
Adequate drainage for the removal of water from the
Shrinkage of the Mortar foundations
If mortars with a particularly high cement content are
used, their shrinkage could provide sufficient tensile Ensuring that large trees are not placed adjacent to
force to crack the masonry. the footings
Shrinkage in applied renders and coatings a Correctly sized footings
Renders are prone to cracking if a high cement content a Inclusion of reinforcement in the wall
is used, if excessively fine sands are used (requiring
additional water) or if the render is too thick.
79
Supports
The potential for diagonal cracks to develop where
masonry walls are bonded to masonry shear walls
(parallel to and in conjunction with portal frames) which
are much stiffer than the frames, can best be avoided by
the incorporation of reinforced bond beams.
Reinforcement
The inclusion of reinforcement within the masonry will
greatly enhance its ability to spread the cracks and thus
restrict their width. Reinforced masonry will tolerate
larger deflections than unreinforced masonry before
collapse occurs. Therefore, design for strength will not
necessarily provide a guarantee of adequate
serviceability performance. In particular, centrally-
reinforced masonry walls may exhibit larger than
expected lateral deflections and crack widths due to
their small effective depth.
Control Joints
The strategic placement of control joints will limit the
o position and width of cracks.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
C
Q)
E
t3)
>
0
ri
S
7n
S STANDARD DESIGNS
Incorporating N16 horizontal reinforcement at not
greater than 400 mm centres
7.3.1 GENERAL On a soil of type A or S Site Classifications in
Design and detailing accordance with AS 2870, and
All design and detailing shall comply with the With a reinforced concrete footing of adequate
requirements of AS 3700. It is the designer's stiffness.
responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints,
chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties and No control joints are required for single-leaf, partially-
connectors, and strength and stiffness of supports, in reinforced masonry for houses as defined in AS 3700
addition to normal considerations of loads and masonry Section 12.
properties. Control joints and openings must be treated Hollow concrete blocks
as free ends. Width 90 mm. 110 mm, 140 mm and 190 mm
Masonry properties Height 190 mm
The standard designs in this chapter are based on
Length 390 mm
masonry properties complying with the Standard
Specification set out in Part C: Chapter 2, modified Face-shell bedded
as noted on the standard design The Standaid Minimum face-shell thickness,
Specification includes the following requirements: t5 = 25 mm for 90 mm, 110 mm and 140 mm units
Unreinforced Masonry Construction - t = 30 mm for 190 mm units
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Vertical control joints or articulation joints at least Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
10 mm wide shall be built into unrein forced masonry at = 15 MPa
the following locations;
Minimum characteristic lateral modulus of rupture,
centres not exceeding the following in straight = 0.8 MPa
continuous walls without openings:
For Class A and S sites - Articulation is not required
Solid or cored concrete bricks
Width 110 mm
For Class M, H, M-D and H-D sites -
External masonry face finish, Height 76 mm
rendered or painted 70 m Length 230 mm
Internal masonry sheeted Fully bedded
and/or face finished 6.0 m
Internal masonry rendered Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
= 10 MPa
and/or painted 5.0 m
Minimum characteristic lateral modulus of rupture,
at not more than 5 metre centres in a wall with
f = 0.8 MPa
openings more than 900 mm x 900 mm, and
positioned in line with one edge of the opening
at the position where a wall changes height by more
than 20%
at a change in thickness of a wall
at control joints or construction joints in supporting
slabs
at the junctions of walls constructed of different
masonry materials
at deep rebates
at a distance from all corners not less than 500 mm
and not greater than 3000 mm.
Reinforced Masonry Construction -
Control joints shall be built into reinforced concrete
masonry at all points of potential cracldng and at the
locations shown on the drawings. The spacing of control
joints should not exceed 16 metre.
The spacing of control joints may be increased in
reinforced masonry walls meeting the following criteria;
Consisting of at least 190 mm hollow concrete units,
and
Built less than 3 metres high, and
Incorporating a top reinforced bond beam, and
CONTROL JOINTS Concrete Masonry Houses
-
-I-
==E '.
;=== ====
__1_
Window
.- -_---_--_------
,-___-_-_-__-____-=.--
-
--
Ci Ci ci
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Mm. 500 5000 max. when openings >900 x 900 5000 mm. to 7000 max. depending on finishes
max. 3000
from corner * Carry window and door openings to top of wall and use timber orsimilar infihl panel
'a
'a---
'a_a
Reinforced masonry shown hatched
79
DESIGN BRIEF
Design control joints in the walls of an industrial building at the locations indicated.
15000
(
190-mm unreinforced blockwork Reinforced bond beams
ci
Ci indicates control joint
7500
190
20-MPa grout in
Sealant with backing rod bond beam
H = height of wall = Cc S
= 6.0 m = 0.0006 x 8000
> 3.0 m Provide articulation of both = 4.8 mm
S reinforced and unreinforced masonry <10.0mm OK 4.8
NOTE: Actual opening movement under
Sr = spacing of control joints in reinforced masonry normal environmental situations will be
= 15.0 m much lower than the calculated maximum
<16m OK
Detail at control joints provides for
= spacing of control joints in unreinforced masonry weather-proofing OK
= 7.5 m
<8 m OK Detail at control joints provides for the
horizontal out-of-plane support of all
Cc = coefficient of drying contraction reinforced and unreinforced masonry OK
=0.6mmlm
Relative in-plane movement between the
= maximum possible opening movement reinforced bond beam and the unreinforced
under the condition of repeated wetting masonry panel may lead to a little localized
S and drying of the unreinforced masonry bed joint cracking. but this is considered to
be minor OK
GLOSSARY 4 Mortar joints
Mortar type M3 (or M4)
7.4.1 GENERAL Joint thickness 10 mm
Purpose of the worked example Concrete grout
The purpose of the following worked example is to Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
demonstrate the steps to be followed when performing f = 20 MPa
manual calculations or when preparing computer
Minimum cement content 300 kg/m3
software for the analysis and design of masonry.
The worked example also serves the purpose of Steel reinforcement
demonstrating the origin of the Standard Designs which N12, N16 or N20 as noted.
are based on similar masonry capacity considerations.
Although comprehensive in its treatment of AS 3700, the
worked example is not intended to analyze or design
all parts of the particular structure. It deals only with
enough to demonstrate the design method.
Design and detailing
All design and detailing shall comply with the
requirements of AS 3700. It is the designer's
responsibility to allow for the effects of control joints,
chases, openings, strength and stiffness of ties and
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
7 Ifl
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
7.11
NOTES
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S Cha!ter8
Durability Contents
This chapter provides the design requirements to 8.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
ensure that both unreinforced masonry and
reinforced masonry have sufficient durability to 8.2 GLOSSARY
prevent erosion of the masonry units or mortar and
prevent corrosion of any steel reinforcement, ties, 8.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
connectors, lintels or fittings.
8.4 STANDARD DESIGNS
The durability of masonry and its components must This glossary of technical terms relevant to Durability
be such that the required function can be performed is in addition to the general Glossary given in Part B:
throughout the entire design life of the structure. While Chapter 1. Where appropriate, the definitions have been
some marginal deterioration of the units or mortar may expanded to give more information.
be acceptable over a long period, any substantial Protected Grade
deterioration of the masonry units, mortar, ties, Masonry units that would suffer substantial and early
connectors, lintels or reinforcement would be failure when subjected to the test method in
unacceptable. AS/NZS 4456.10.
Prevention of corrosion is of primary importance. Ties, General Purpose Grade
connectors and lintels should be galvanised to the Masonry units that, in the supplier's experience, can be
required thicknesses or, in extremely aggressive demonstrated to have a history of surviving under
environments, be manufactured from non-corrosive environmental conditions similar to the site considered.
materials such as stainless steel. Products that fit this category are not expected to meet
Concrete grout which protects reinforcement must have the mass-loss criterion for "exposure category" when
sufficient cement content to create an alkaline tested in accordance with AS/NZS 4456.10.
environment which lasts for the duration of the Exposure Grade
design life. Masonry units that, in the supplier's experience, can be
demonstrated to have a history of surviving in saline
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
environments.
DESIGN UI!ENTS
Built-In Components
Building accessories are commonly manufactured from
8.3.1 GENERAL galvanised steel and durability will be satisfied by the
prescriptive galvan.ising covered in AS 2699.1, AS 2699.2
AS 3700 Section 5 sets out the durability requirements or AS 2699.3.
for masonry units, mortar, built-in components and
reinforcement or tendons throughout the design life of The testing criteria for components in categories RU to
the structure. R4 are quite severe:
AS 3700 Table 5.1 defines the required classifications for Maximum temperature of 55°C (or 40°C if the
masonry units, mortar, built-in components and cover for component is embedded)
reinforcement or tendons for the particular environments Daily temperature cycles from ambient (say 13°C) to
and positions within the structure. 40°C.
The associated Clauses and Standards cited in The medium surrounding the accessory being
Table 5.1 are: initially alkaline pH up to 10 but reducing over time
AS/NZS 4456.10 provides a test and means of to become not less than 10 (ie close to neutral).
classifying the durability of masonry units. Remaining wet for a 3-month period.
AS 3700 Table 10.1 provides suitable mortar mixes Aerosol penetration to an extent depending on
for particular classifications distance from the coast:
AS 3700 Appendix F provides performance RU - Nil
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
REINFORCED MASONRY - Cover (C) and Effective Depths (d) urn leaf
d
Block thickness, t (mm) = 140
I
Note: Manufacturers may adopt vanations
from these values for core taper and
Core taper*, t (mm) = 5 face-shell thickness. If so, this will alter
Face-shell thickness *, t (mm) = 25 the effective depth,d, given lithe Table below
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
EXPOSURE CONDITIONS
REINFORCED MASONRY - Cover (c) and Effective Depths (d) 190-mm leaf
EXPOSURE CONDITIONS
t, in fresh water
Qn
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S S . S
z
WORKED EXAMPLE
Mortar joints
Mortar type M3 (or M4)
Purpose of the worked example
The purpose of the following worked example is to Joint thickness 10 mm
demonstrate the steps to be followed when performing Concrete grout
manual calculations or when preparing computer Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
software for the analysis and design of masonry = 20 MPa
The worked example also serves the purpose of
demonstrating the origin of the Standard Designs which Minimum cement content 300 kg/m3
are based on similar masonry capacity considerations. Steel reinforcement
Although comprehensive in its treatment of AS 3700, the N12, N16 or N20 as noted.
worked example is not intended to analyze or design
all parts of the particular structure. It deals only with
enough to demonstrate the design method.
Design and detailing
All design and detailing shall comply with the
requirements of AS 3700.
It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects
of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness
of ties and connectors, and strength and stiffness of
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
= 19.5 MPa
<f =20MPa
H
kk
t
ttl
C r
Grout ie By specifying grout f c = 20 MPa.
a design characterisitic compressive
strength of grout (f cg) of 19.5 MPa
may be used in structural design.
Masonry Unit This is the maximum value which is
Exposure grade. 5.3, Table 5.1 compatible with a concrete block of
Seek advice on availability strength f uc = 15 MPa.
from the manufacturer
Reinforcement
Mortar = total width of masonry unit
Type M4 5.4, Table 5.1 = 190mm
1 part Type GP cement, = work size face shell thickness at
4 parts sand plus its thinnest point
methyl cellulose water thickener Table 10.1 = 30 mm
t = taper in core of hollow units from thinnest
Built-in Components part of face shell to the thickest part
R4 durability classification 5.5, Table 5.1 = 5 mm (This should be checked
with the manufacturer)
Unless an alternative is proven Tables Fl, c = cover
by test result, wall ties and F2 and F3 = 20 mm
connectors shall be stainless steel 316 required cover Table 5.1
= 20 mm
Unless an alternative is proven by test result, maximum size of aggregate 10.7.2.5
lintels and shelf angles shall be galvanised = 20 mm
or coated in accordance with AS 2699.3 r = diameter of reinforcement
= 20 mm
Alternatives for lintels and shelf angles d = effective depth
include stainless steel 316, AS 3700 (Table F4) = t - t - tt - c - r/2
or abrasive blast cleaned and coated in = 1903052020/2
accordance with AS 2312 or AS 3750 (Table 5) = 125 mm
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Thermal
Performance Contents
This chapter provides design guidance for 9.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
maximising the thermal efficiency of buildings
using concrete masonry superstructures. 9.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
It considers masonry's resistance to the passage
of heat (thermal insulation) and the resistance to 9.3 STANDARD DESIGNS
gain or loss of heat (thermal mass).
9.4 WORKED EXAMPLE
9.5 GLOSSARY
ISOFDESIGN
Peak Energy Savings (without considering cost)
This criterion is similar to the previous one, but with an
9.1.1 INTRODUCTION emphasis on reducing the peak daily energy use. Such
an approach is attractive to power-generating authori-
Increasing community awareness of the need to con-
ties because the low peak demand can be more easily
serve energy has resulted in the provision of thermally
achieved using existing generating equipment. Greater
efficient buildings becoming the focus of community
reliance on the thermal mass properties of concrete
and regulatory attention. Large quantities of energy are
masonry will help achieve this end.
used for climate control of buildings and many of which
are designed with little or no thought for minimising Community Cost Savings (considers life-cycle cost
cooling and heating loads. Significant reduction in the discounted to present worth)
capital cost of heating and air-conditioning equipment, This criterion minimises the "life cycle cost" of the
the space it occupies and its energy consumption and building capital cost, heating and cooling equipment
operating costs, are possible. Well-insulated walls and capital cost and energy cost. While an important factor
intelligent facade treatment reduce summer heat gains in this approach is the minimising of energy use, it is
and winter heat losses over the life of a building. not the only consideration. This is the approach used in
Savings in running costs can be considerable and can AS 2627.1 and should be attractive to consumer groups
more than offset any additional capital costs. concerned with economic benefit to the population. It
will favour those low-cost building materials that also
9.1.2 ENERGY, COST AND GREEN ROUSE GAS have reasonable insulation properties, such as
EMISSIONS concrete masonry.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
It is important to understand that not all building First Home Buyer Savings (considers a relatively
systems will necessarily achieve simultaneously what short life-cycle cost discounted to present worth)
may be perceived to be desirable goals. The designer As for the previous one, this criterion minimises the
must balance the potentially conflicting goals of: "life cycle cost" of the building capital cost, heating
and cooling equipment capital cost and energy cost,
Minimising energy use, including heating and cool- but over a shorter period corresponding to the period of
ing energy as well as the energy used to produce the ownership of the "first-home buyer". The method used
building materials in AS 2627.1 can be adapted to provide building designs
Minimising cost, including heating and cooling cost that meet this criterion. It will also favour those
as well as the cost associated with particular low-cost building matenals that also have reasonable
insulation properties, such as concrete masonry.
building-construction practices
Minimising greenhouse gas emissions. 9.1.4 DETAILING BUILDINGS
9.1.3 CRITERIA FOR COMPARING ENERGY USE In all cases, sensible architectural design and detailing
are significant factors in achieving the criteria. In
AND COST
southern Australia, prominent north-facing shaded
When considering cost, it is also necessary to windows with large eaves overhangs will permit the
distinguish between the initial building cost (borne by entry of winter sun and restrict that of summer sun. In
the initial property owner) and the long-term heating northern Australia, large eaves around the building and
and cooling costs (borne by subsequent property users). well-designed ventilation will help keep the building
The problem is further complicated by government cool. Well-designed, properly-sealed doors and windows
policies and international commitments to particular will allow cross-ventilation in summer and restrict air
levels of greenhouse gas emissions. When analysing and heat leakage in winter.
energy use and costs, the following criteria should be
considered: 9.1.5 HEAT TRANSFER
Total Energy Savings (without considering cost) Heat is transfered through the building envelope from
This criterion relies on the insulation properties of the spaces of higher temperature to those of lower
roof and wall structures, together with some allowance temperature. Thus, in summer, the heat flow is into
for thermal mass, to minimise total energy use. This the building, while in winter it is usually in the reverse
philosophy forms the basis of the Home Energy Rating direction. Heat is transferred in a combination of three
Schemes (HERS) which are in use in various parts of modes - conduction, convection and radiation, defined
Australia, Such an approach is attractive to those who below.
are principally concerned with conserving energy over a
long period with little concern for the short-term cost. Conduction is the principal heat transfer mechanism
Lightweight concrete masonry is a good insulating through opaque airtight barriers such as external walls.
material and appropriate for this approach. Similarly, the Radiation is significant where, for example, glass is not
use of insulation in conjunction with concrete masonry shaded from direct sunlight. Glass transmits heat both
is suitable. by conduction and by radiation. Its comparatively poor
thermal insulation properties make large windows
undesirable.
Q,)
Convection becomes a problem only when poor Its good insulating qualities are derived primarily from
detailing or construction practice leave openings which the minute voids in the concrete of the units. In
allow transfer of heat by air leakage. general, it will be found that masonry units of lower
Much of the thermal advantage of using walls of high density concrete will have higher thermal resistance
thermal resistance will be lost if radiation and because of their greater voids content. Thermal
convection are not controlled by avoiding excessive use resistance is generally improved by substituting light-
of glass, shading them from summer sun and designing weight aggregates for dense aggregates in the masonry
and building to ehrmnate air leakage. concrete. It may be further improved by filling the cores
of walls of hollow blocks with granular
insulating materials such as perlite or vermiculite.
9.1.6 INSULATION
Where cores are filled in this way, measures must be
The primary method of restricting heat flow is by taken to prevent entry of moisture to the wall cores and
providing insulating materials in the roof and walls. the core-filling material. Such precautions include the
Such materials have a high thermal resistance or use of cavity wall construction, moisture-resistant
R rating. external coatings and the preventing of water entry by
A wall is typically made up of a number of components, good flashing and weathering practice.
each of which has a different ability to insulate against
heat flow. Dense concrete (as used in most concrete 9.1.9 DESIGN OPTIONS
masonry units) is not a particularly good insulator but The main options open to the users of masonry are:
lightweight concrete masonry is. Metal cavity ties are
S Insulation
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
all
1 Performance requirements
2 Performance calculations
3 Deemed-to-comply method
Total cost
7 Costofheatingand cooling
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
equipment
9 Presentworth of energy
charges
11 Unitcostofheatingand
cooling energy
15 Heatingandcoolingenergy
12 Areas
13 Thermal resistance, R
Dwellings shall include an appropriate combination of Section 3 and Appendices A, B and C explain the
roof, ceiling and wall materials, orientation, thermal background and methodology used to derive the
mass, double glazing (if advantageous) and thermal insu- deemed-to-comply levels of insulation prescribed in
lation to ensure the following performance: Section 2.
a mean indoor temperature of 18°C during the STEP 5 Calculated Values for Additional
heating season Insulation
a mean indoor temperature based on night time Clause 1.6 The required amount of thermal
resistance shall be obtained either -
cooling during the six-month cooling season of
... ; or
(13.9 + 0.48 Tai)°C (where Taj is the external mean air by calculating the added thermal
temperature) resistance required in accordance with
the least present worth of costs associated with the method specified in Section 3,
heating and cooling. provided that such a calculation yields a
total thermal resistance of the wall or
STEP 3 Deemed-To-Comply Method roof assembly which is not less than that
Provided the designer is prepared to adhere to the resulting from the use of Tables 2.1 and
design methods spelt out in Section 3 and Appendices 2.2. The assumptions made for the
A, B and C, the resulting solution may be deemed-to- thermal resistance of the uninsulated
comply with the Standard. wall or roof assembly is set out in
Clause 1 5 ... The addition of thermal resistance Appendix A.
specified in this Standard is deemed to
comply with the requirement for the
This option enables a designer to make use of
purpose-designed roof,/ceiling or wall systems that have
S
specified areas of the building... total insulation properties not less than those in
The principal requirements of these sections may be Tables 2.1 and 2.2.
summarised as: For example, single leaf masonry walls incorporating
Insulation complying with Section 2 or Section 3 insulation are not covered by Table 2.2 and may be
must be added to the components of the dwelling designed by this method
to minimise the energy requirements for heating and STEP 6 Total Cost
cooling, having due regard for overall costs The method described in Section 3 and Appendices A,
Maintenance of a mean indoor temperature of 18°C B and C to calculate the required additional thermal
resistance is based on minimising the present worth of
during the heating season all costs associated with heating and cooling.
Maintenance of a mean indoor temperature based on
Clause A2.2... basic approach used in deriving levels
night time cooling during the six-month cooling of resistance required for various
season of (13.9 + 0.48 Taj)°C where Tai is the external localities, ie to minimise the total costs...
mean air temperature
CH = Cost of heating/cooling equipment $ ()
Future costs modified by a present worth factor of
CL A Cost of installing insulation $/m2.m2 (8)
27, based on:
amortisation of costs over a 40-year period C1 A = Cost of insulation $/m2.m2 (8)
CT
= Present worth of energy charges
= Total cost
$ (9)
S
a Energy costs in accordance with Table A3. CH +CLA + C1A + CE
STEP 7 Cost of Heating and Cooling Equipment
12
The cost of heating and cooling equipment depends on
its capacity, which is a function of the amount of heat 11
Wall insulation
it is required to input or remove This depends on the 10
climate, layout of the house and the insulation. 9
Roof/ceiling
However, when compared to the total cost, the variation 8
insulation
in cost due to different capacities of heating and 7
cooling equipment is of little consequence and can be
safely ignored. 0
Co
STEP 8 Cost of Insulation Including Installation
Set out below are the costs at October 1992 for installed
insulation which were assumed in the preparation of
AS 2627.1.
Insulation in Roof/Ceiling 21
0
Approximate costs of glass wool batts:
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
R1.5 $ 7.20/rn2
Thermal Resistance, R (m2.IcfW)
R2.0 $ 8.50/rn2
R2.5 $ 9.60/rn2
These costs give a fixed cost component, Figure 9.1 Typical Installed Insulation Costs
d-s 11d. The heat flow upwards through a roof/ceiling system for
a particular temperature differential with internal
STEP 11 Unit Cost of Heating and Cooling Energy heating will be greater than the heat flow downwards
= Unit cost of heating energy cents/Mi through the same system for the same temperature
Heating equipment efficiency - differential with internal cooling.
zh
= 0.99 for electric resistive heating or 0.7 for gas 0.35 m2.K/W for heat flow upwards through an
Table A2 uninsulated roof/ceiling system consisting of a
pitched tile roof and a horizontal plasterboard
0.01 ch
li $/MJ ceiling
Z
= Unit cost of cooling energy cents/MJ Rod= 0.70 m2.K/W for heat flow downwards through the
cc
same roof/ceiling
Cooling equipment efficiency
= 2.0 for electric refrigeration or conditioning e correction factor for the difference between heat
flow upwards and downwards for non-reflective
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
or 0.33 for other dwellings Appendix F provides the formal proof of expressions
used for heating and cooling numbers.
Furthermore, allowance must also be made for the
space occupied by the framing between which the Appendix G provides the list of heating numbers (base
insulation is placed. temperatures 15°C) and cooling numbers (where the
base varies with climate).
- Aframe
The following points should be considered:
In the calculation of the heating numbers, it was
STEP 13 Thermal Resistance, R
assumed that a constant internal temperature of 18°C
Appendix E provides some thermal resistance values for
would be maintained for a full 24-hour period,
building components, including air spaces. Appendix D
combines these resistance values for common wall or allowing for a solar gain or 3 K during this period.
roof/ceiling structures.
HN
=
NDj (15 aj) kelvin days
Two observations arise:
The values tabulated are slightly conservative in It could be argued that, depending on their lifestyle, the
some situations and provide a reasonable basis for occupants, would be prepared to tolerate a reduced
design. period of constant temperature, say 18 hours.
The deemed-to-comply section of the Standard does
not provide insulation values for all wall and roof!
ceiling types. For example, single-leaf masonry walls
OQ
In the calculation of the cooling numbers, it was
10
assumed that a variable internal temperature of
(13.9 + 0.48aj)°C would be maintained for night time
cooling during the six-month cooling season.
CN
=
Naj kelvin days
where:
The sum is taken for those months where the
expression is positive
= mean air temperature for the period (°C)
= mean of the increments (sol-air less temperatures)
for the period (kelvin)
= mean internal air temperature for the period (°C)
It could be argued that, depending on their lifestyle, the
occupants, would be prepared to tolerate temperatures
in excess of these values for part of the period.
STEP 15 Heating And Cooling Energy
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Eh = 0.0864 A - HN
Ec = 0.0864 A CN
watts
= 0 0864 rn2 K days
m2.K R2.53
= 0.0864 watts.days 0 V
Where 1 watt = I joule/sec 0 1 2 3 4 5
= 60 x 60 x 24/1,000000 MJ/day Thermal Resistance, R (m2.K/W)
= 0.0864 MJ/day
STEP 16 Costs, Savings and Optimum R Values to Figure 9.2 Example of Minimum Cost plot for Melbourne,
Minimise Costs giving R = 2.5 minimum. (Based on AS 2627.1 Figure B2)
Steps 5 and 8 above provides the basic formulae to
combine energy, unit costs, present worth factor and
insulation costs. Values for each of these components
Optimum R Value for Roof/Ceiling
have been developed.
The detailed development of formulae is set out on
CT= Total cost Page 69 of AS 2627.1.
= CH + CL A + C1 A + CE Shown below is the approximate solution shown on the
= CH + (CL + C1)A + f(Ch. Eh + Cc. Ec bottom of Page 69 in the same format as that developed
It is possible to plot the costs against the corresponding on the next page for walls.
insulation values and read off the B value at the
It can be seen that the solution is the same, except for
minimum cost as shown in Figure 9.2. the complications caused by the different heat flows up
However, the B value corresponding to maximum saving and down in the case of roof/ceilings and the effect of
can be determined more efficiently mathematically by the wall studs in the case of walls.
calculating the savings as a function of B1,
dS
differentiating the expression and setting the dR1
0
differential to zero.
When.
The value of R1 corresponding to
dS B1 (1 + e)
= 0 will be the optimum value. =
dR
The equations are developed below: rHN ch CN Ccl
a = 0.000864
L zh zc ]
C0 = Present worth of the total energy costs of
uninsulated elements
Cs = Present worth of the total energy costs and
insullation costs of insulated elements
S = Savings per unit area for an element.
NDARD DESIGNS
Optimum R Value for Wails
C0 = Present worth of the total energy costs of
uninsulated elements 9.3.1 GENERAL
Cs Present worth of the total energy costs and Design and detailing
insulation costs of insulated elements All design and detailing shall comply with the
S = Savings per unit area for an element requirements of AS 3700 and state building regulations.
C= a bR1 Masonry properties
The worked examples in this chapter are based on
a' R1 masonry properties complying with the General
R wR
w +R'1' Specification set out in Part C:Chapter 2 of this
-
a? 1
-a-bR1
manual, modified as noted below.
R
i) Hollow concrete blocks
-1
Width 90 mm, 110 mm, 140 mm and 190 mm
R
(Rw + i) - a - b R1 Height 190 mm
Length 390 mm
Face-shell bedded
dR1 R R1 R12 Average face-shell thickness,
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
B1 Joint thickness 10 mm
2
R12(' =-
1b 9.3.2 CALCULATION OF R VALUES
The consideration of R values in this manual is based
on the following:
R1
-+ i) (a?)1/2 HA. Trethowen
R Values that are made-to-measure
Building Research Association of New Zealand
1/2
(Reprinted from ASHRAE Transactions Volume 91
Part 2 1986)
1/2
a? 9.3.3 STANDARD DESIGN CHARTS
R1=(--) -B
The following Charts are included:
Thermal Resistance of Concrete Masonry Units
Thermal Resistance of Masonry Walls, 90-mm
Thermal Resistance of Masonry Walls, 110-mm
Thermal Resistance of Masonry Walls, 140- and
190-mm
a in
THERMAL RESISTANCE OF CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
NOTE: The R values include allowance forthemial bridging across the concrete webs. These theoretical values are yetto be verified by test
These values do not include any contribution by airfilms.
Wckness
(mm) 190
- - - Hollow units without insulation
0.7
Units with mineral wool insulation in cores
0.6
140
0.5
110
0.4
0.3
E
0.2
I
F
E
I-
1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
Concrete Masonry Unit Density (kg/rn3)
9.11
THERMAL RESISTANCE OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS 90-mm
i-90
Internal
Outdoorairfilm 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Insulation
NO External masonry leaf 90-mm hollow block 0.12 0.17 0.14 0.22
YES lndoorairfilm 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
TOTALTHERMAL RESISTANCE, R(m2.K/W) 0.28 0.33 0.30 0.38
0 1)
S THERMAL RESISTANCE OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS 110-mm
___ 110
Internal
insulation Outdoorairfilm 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 1
NO External masonry leaf 110-mm hollow block 0.14 0.19 0.20 0.30
YES
lrrdoorairfilm 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE, R (m2.K/W) 0.30 0.35 0.36 0.46
>2100 18OO
YES
>2100 18O0
Wall detail (Not to scale) Component Specification Thermal resistance (rn2.K/W)
ç- 140
iU_ internal
insulation Outdoorairfilm 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
I Ii NO External masonry leaf 140-mm hollow block 0.16 0.21 0.27 0.40
YES
lndoorairfllm 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
TOTALTHERMALRESISTANCE,R(rn2.K/W) 0.32 0.37 0.43 0.56
75
io [140 50 Outdoorairfilm
External masonry leaf 140-mm hollow block
0.04
0.16
0.04
0.21
0.04
0.27
0.04
0.40
I Internal
insulation Airspace 50-mm ventilated 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
NO Plasterboard 10-mm gypsum 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
YES
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
i- 190
Internal
insulation Outdoorairfilm 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
NO Extemalmasonryleaf 190-mmhollowblock 0.18 0.23 0.38 0.54
YES
lndoorairfllrn 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE, R (m2.K/W) 0.34 0.39 0.54 0.70
io] [igo
75 50 Outdoor airfilm
External masonryleaf 190-mm hollow block
0.04
0.18
0.04
0.23
0.04
0.38
0.04
0.54
Internal
insulation Airspace 50-mmventilated 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
NO Plasterboard 10-mm gypsum 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
YES
lndoorairfllm 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE, R (m2.KJW) 0.54 0.59 0.74 0.90
0 IA
WORKED EXAMPLE
regulations.
Masonry properties
The worked examples in this chapter are based on
masonry properties complying with the General
Specification set out in Part C:Chapter 2, modified as
noted in the calculations and as noted below.
Hollow concrete blocks
Width 90 mm, 110 mm, 140 mm and 190 mm
Height 190 nun
Length 390 mm
Face-shell bedded
Average face-shell thickness,
av = 28 mm for 90-mm, 110-mm and 14-mm units
= 33 mm for 190-mm units
Material density as noted in the example.
Mortar joints
Mortar type M3 (or M4)
Joint thickness 10 mm
DESIGN BRIEF Web thickness (average)
w1 = 30 mm
For 190-mm hollow concrete blocks of =40 mm
density 2000 kg/rn3 with internal mineral = 30 mm
wool insulation, calculate the thermal
resistance (R). Web rebate
r = 0 mm
Joint thickness
390 j = 10 mm
h
SECTION OF INSULATED CONCRETE MASONRY BLOCK
Re =
THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY Aw/A Ac/At Ar/At Aj/
Density of concrete R Rc Rr Rj
Pconc = 2000 kg/rn3
= 0.238 + 0.689 0 0.074
Thermal conductivity of concrete 0.127 2.75 0.14 0.14
= 0.374 m2.KIW
r2400 - 20001
(1.44-0.515)
S k =
ioo- 1600]
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1600 2400
Density (kg/rn3) Resistance of inner face-shell
S2
cL
s2= Ct5
p-cone
33
Thermal conductivity of mineral wool insulation - 0.978 x 1000
= 0.034 m2.K/W
F-
= 0.045 W/m.K
(190- 33 - 33)
- 0.045 x 1000
= 2.75 m2.K/W
9.17
Thermal Resistivity (1/k)
Thermal resistivity is the reciprocal of thermal
This glossary of technical terms relevant to Thermal
conductivity. It is resistance to heat flow per unit
Performance is in addition to the general Glossary given
temperature difference and thickness. The unit of
in Part B: Chapter 1. Where appropriate, the definitions
measurement is metres kelvin per watt ([m.K1/W).
have been expanded to give more information.
Thermal properties of actual components may be
Thermal Conduction calculated from these figures by multiplying them by
The heat transfer mechanism whereby heat energy their thickness.
travels through matter. Heat moves in the direction of
Thermal Resistance (R)
decreasing temperature.
Thermal resistance is the reciprocal of thermal
Thermal Convection conductance and is designated R. It is a measure of the
Heat transfer by fluid flow in liquids and gases resulting resistance to heat flow per unit temperature difference
from density gradients caused by temperature variations. of the full thickness of the heat barrier. The unit of
In this context, convection in gases is significant where resistance is metres2 kelvin per watt (Im2K]/W).
air can move through openings in structures
Thermal Transmittance (U)
Thermal Radiation Thermal transmittance is the heat energy transmitted in
A form of electro-magnetic radiation which does not unit time through unit area of a given composite
depend on the presence of matter to transfer heat structure (eg a wall consisting of concrete masonry
energy. It can operate just as effectively in a total blocks, air films, cavities, etc) per unit temperature
vacuum. Opaque materials interposed between a heat difference between the air films on the two sides of the
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
radiation source and its object prevent heat transfer by structure. The unit of thermal transmittance is the same
radiation. Glass and other translucent materials offer as the Unit of thermal conductance (W/Im2K]). It is an
little resistance to radiated heat from the sun, its major overall measure of heat transfer from the air film on the
source. warmer side of a wall or other structure to the air film
Thermal Conductivity (k) on the cooler side. Thermal conductance on the other
The thermal conductivtty of a material is defined as the hand is a measure only of heat transfer through an
thermal energy transmitted in unit time through unit individual homogeneous element of the structure, from
area of a slab of a homogeneous material of unit surface to surface, not taking into account the effect of
thickness when unit temperature difference is main- air films or cavities. The property is commonly referred
tained between its surfaces, The unit of thermal to as the 'U-factor of a construction.
conductivity is watts per metre per kelvin (W/[m.K]). Thermal Mass
Temperature (K) Thermal mass (also known as thermal inertia or thermal
In thermal conductivity calculations, the temperature capacitance) is a measure of a material's ability to retain
unit adopted is the kelvin. The kelvin scale is known as its current level of heat energy when sublected to an
the thermodynamic temperature scale. Its zero point is external temperature differential.
- 273.15°C, absolute zero temperature. The freezing point
of water, 0°C, is equivalent to 273.15 K and a
temperature change of I K is the same as 1°C.
The conversion equation is K = °C + 273.15.
Thermal Conductance (C)
The thermal conductance of a structural component or a
structure is defined as the thermal energy transmitted in
unit time through unit area of a uniform structural
component or structure of particular thickness, per unit
temperature difference between surfaces. The unit of
thermal conductance is watts per square metre per kel-
vin (W/(m2K]).
Film or Surface Conductance (f and f0)
Film or surface conductance is the conductance of the
air film at the inner () or outer (f0) surface of a wall or
barrier. Its unit of measurement is W/(m2K).
Film conductance values thus apply to inner and outer
wall surfaces.
Air Space Conductance (a)
Air space conductance is the conductance of an
enclosed air space such as wall cavity or ceiling space
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0
-I
m
()
Thermal Performance
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
Footings Contents
This chapter provides guidance on the design of 10.1 BASIS OF DESIGN
masonry systems and the associated slabs and
footings used in houses and small- to medium- 10.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
sized low-rise commercial, industrial and
residential buildings. The emphasis is on 10.3 STANDARD DESIGNS
minimising cracking when the building is
subject to soil movement. 10.4 WORKED EXAMPLE
10.5 GLOSSARY
10.1
BASIS OF DESIGN
aesthetics of a building as demonstrated by the
following examples:
101.1 GENERAL Reinforced concrete slabs and reinforced concrete
Soil Movement masonry walls crack under load, but the steel
When houses and other small buildings are constructed reinforcing bars provide tensile strength to the
on clay or similar soils, moisture movements in the soils cracked sections and control the width of the cracks
will lead to expansion and contraction of the soil, once they have formed.
causing the building to either cantilever beyond a
A relatively flexible paint may bridge small
shrinking soil mound or sag between an expanded
discontinuous cracks in mortar or masonry units,
soil rim.
thus ensuring that these cracks do not detract
Footing Systems for Unreinforced Brickwork aesthetically.
The most common form of new housing in Australia is
unreinforced brick walls (either cavity or brick veneer) The first task is to define permissible crack widths in
supported by reinforced concrete strip footings or various combinations of masonry wall and coating type.
stiffened raft slabs. As the supporting soil contracts or The second is to predict what foundation
expands, the cantilevering or spanning concrete footings movement can be tolerated before cracks exceeding
or rafts are forced by the mass of the supported those permissible limits will form.
building to deflect. Any unreinforced brickwork may AS 2870 Table Cl Classification of Damage with
crack, moving sympathetically with the deflected Reference to Walls assesses the degree of damage
concrete supporting structures. The design solutions
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
IA A
DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS
10.2.3 INTEGRATED REINFORCED
The typical wall/footing systems illustrated in this MASONRY/FOOTING SYSTEMS -
manual are based on AS 2870 and AS 3700, and are DEEMED-TO-COMPLY CONSTRUCTION
supported by research listed in the Bibliography in USING FIGURE 3.1 NOTE 12
Part B:Chapter 1 and discussed herein. The beam sizes in AS 2870 Figure 3.1 (Figure 10.1)
provide adequate stiffness to ensure that non-structural
10.2.1 DESIGN OPTIONS wall systems placed on the slab are not subjected to
AS 2870 makes several design options available to the excessive deflection. However, Note 12 (Table 10.1)
designer: permits a reduction in these beam sizes to 300-mm x
300-mm with 3-L8TM reinforcement, if reinforced hollow
Deemed-to-comply design using AS 2870 Section 3
concrete blockwork walls are structurally connected to
Raft slabs or strip footings for unreinforced the beams and act with them to resist movement.
brickwork superstructures designed to Figure 3.1 or In this case, the walls should be 190-mm or 140-mm
Figure 3.2 (Clause 10.2.2 this manual). single-leaf hollow concrete blockwork, reinforced with at
Raft slabs for integrated reinforced masonry/ least N12 bars at not more than 2.0-metre centres, tied
footing systems designed to Figure 3.1 including to the footings with starter bars and incorporate a
Note 12 (Clause 10.2.3 this manual). continuous bond beam (with at least two N12 bars)
around the top of the wall. The walls should be
Design by engineering principles using AS 2870 adequately waterproofed.
Section 4 and Appendix F
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I
unreinforced superstructures (Clause 10.2.4 this must be taken to ensure the adequacy and continuity of
manual). internal beams, particularly at re-entrant corners where
Design of raft systems for unreinforced an internal beam is deeper than the external beams.
superstructures using Clause 4.4 (Clause 10.2.5 this AS 2870.1 Figure C3.4 shows a typical section and detail
at re-entrant corners.
manual).
Design of integrated wall/slab or footing sys-
Method:
tems for reinforced superstructures using Clause 4.7 Using AS 2870 Section 2, determine the Site
(Clause 10.2.6 this manual). Classification
Using AS 2870 Table 3.1, determine the equivalent
10.2.2 UNREINFORCED BRICKWORK - construction.
DEEMED-TO-COMPLY CONSTRUCTION
Using AS 2870 Figure 3.1 or Figure 3.2 determine the
USING AS 2870 FIGURE 3.1
required depth of internal beams or footings, their
AS 2870 Figure 3.1 (Figure 10.1) sets out the require- maximum spacing and the required slab
ments for concrete slabs and beams under particular reinforcement.
superstructures for various Site Classifications. Figure 3.2
provides alternative designs for strip footings.
Method:
Using AS 2870 Figure 3.1 Note 12, design the
external beams as 300-mm x 300-mm with 3-L8TM. LL!
Detail the connection to the internal beams, paying
Using AS 2870 Section 2, determine the Site particular attention to re-entrant corners.
Classification
Detail the structure in accordance with AS 2870
Using AS 2870 Figure 3.1 or Figure 3.2 determine the Section 5.
required depth of beams or footings, their maximum
spacing and the required slab reinforcement.
Detail the structure, including any required
articulation, in accordance with AS 2870 Section 5.
Other internal walls Loadbearrng
150
Slab internal walls Slab Fitment
mm.
fabric 1000 max. fabric
100 150
D
200
k 500 mm.
Same fabric
Reinforcement asforslab- Reinforcement
Table 10.1 Values and Notes forDeemed-to-comply Stiffened Raft (Based on AS 2870 Figure 3.1)
Edge and internal beams(1) direction satisfies the requirements for the maximum
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
'in c
10.2.4 UNREINFORCED BRICKWORK OR Method:
INTEGRATED REINFORCED Using AS 2870 Section 2, determine the characteristic
MASONRY/FOOTING SYSTEMS - surface movement, y for the particular soil.
MODIFICATION OF STANDARD RAFT
Using AS 2870 Table 4.1 and engineering judgment,
DESIGNS USING AS 2879 CLAUSE 4.5
determine the maximum differential footing
AS 2870 Clause 4.5 provides for the modification of movement, A, which the particular superstructure is
standard raft designs for unreinforced or reinforced able to tolerate before substantial cracking becomes
superstructures. This situation could arise where the a problem. See suggested values in Clause 10.2.4
geometry of the building dictates that the internal
beams be spaced at centres closer than the maximum Enter the structure geometry and capacities into a
permitted by AS 2870 Table 3.1 (Figure 10.1) grillage program with spring supports (to simulate a
compressible soil mound) and shortening or
Method:
lengthening vertical supports (to simulate expanding
Using AS 2870 Section 2, determine the characteristic or shrinking soil at the rim).
surface movement, Y for the particular soil.
Perform a non-linear analysis to calculate the
Using AS 2870 Table 4.1 and engineering judgment, cantilever lengths and the corresponding moments,
determine the maximum differential footing shears and deflections. These calculations should be
movement, A, which the particular superstructure is done twice, once for a shrinking soil and once for an
able to tolerate. before substantial cracking becomes expanding soil.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
E(BD3)
10.2.5 UNREINFORCED BRICKWORK - 12W
10.7
Table 10.2 Moment-Correction Coefficients (Extract from Mitchell - Bibliography, Part B:Chapter 1, Clause 1.13.8)
Moment Correction Factors (ut) for Sagging Condition with a Uniformly-distributed Load
I
m
2.50 >0.30 * * * * * * * * * *
0.20 0.56 0.99 * * * * * * *
0.10 0.31 0.27 0.56 0.89 * * * * *
0.05 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.20 0.48 0.98 * *
10.70
:,
0.01 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03
1.25 >0.10 * * * *
0.05 0.39 * *
* I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Moment Correction Factors (c) for Hogging Condition with a Uniformly-distributed Load
m
W/ky 2.1 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 15 20
0O >1.00 * * * *
0.50 0.69 0.72 0.76 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.84 0.86 0.87 0.90 0.93
0.10 0.41 0.48 0.55 0.60 0.64 0.68 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.82 0.86
0.01 0.19 0.27 0.35 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.61 071 0.77
2.50 >1.00 * * * * * *
1.25 >0.30 * * * *
0.20 * 0.92 * * :
* * *
I
0.10 0.70 0.98
0.01 0.37 * * * *
Notations used by Mitchell in Table 10.2 Formulae used by Mitchell in Table 10.2
B = Width of footing area Moment and stiffness for sagging condition
E = Young's Modulus of footing material with a uniformly-distributed load:
= Moment of inertia of footing
+
1 El=
L = Length of footing or covered area 8 12A
M Moment of superstructure loads about footing centre
Y = Maximum differential soil movement
Moment and stiffness for hogging condition
k = Swelling stiffness
with a uniformly-distributed load:
m = Power of polynomial defining soil surface under covered
area, or shape factor M
wLB(1) El=
12 A
w = Superstructure loads per unit area of footing
A = Maximum differential footing movement
In Q
10.2.6 INTEGRATED REINFORCED 10.2.7 DETAILING AND CONSTRUCTION
MASONRY/FOOTING SYSTEM - GUIDELINES
DESIGN USING AS 2870 CLAUSE 4.7 This section provides explanations of AS 2870 Sections 5
If the designer wishes to achieve more economical and 6 for detailing and construction of the earthworks,
designs for houses with reinforced superstructures than slabs, footings and concrete masonry superstructure.
are given in the deemedto-comply provisions of Fig 3.1 Clause 5.1 General
including Note 12, the following design approach can be
taken. Clause 5.2 Drainage
Clause 5.2.1 places requirements on floor levels, pointing
Method: out the need to consider plumbing, run-off, excavation,
Using AS 2870 Section 2, determine the characteristic filling, flooding, landscaping, stormwater discharge and
surface movement, for the particular soil. termite management.
Determine the required house geometry Clause 5.2.2 permits the 150-mm freeboard to be
wall layout, etc. reduced in certain circumstances, such as sandy well
drained soils (100-mm) and where external paved areas
Determine the moment capacity, shear capacity,
slope away (50-mm).
bending stiffness and shear stiffness of various
combinations of: Clause 5.3 Requirements for rafts and slabs
walls + slab + beams at continuous walls
Clause 5.3.1 requires concrete to be not less than
Grade N20 with a 20-mm maximum aggregate size.
walls + slab (no beams) at continuous wails
The slump is not specified, but a slump of 80 mm
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Clause 6.2 Permanent excavations The following additional requirements are detailed for
Clause 6.2 restricts excavations over 600 mm deep. Class H and E sites.
Ifl Ifl
STANDARD DESIGNS
6.3.2 STANDARD DESIGN CHARTS
Design charts contain data for Design By Engineering
10.3.1 GENERAL Principles. The data may be used in manual or
Design and detailing computer analyses used to design by engineering
All design and detailing shall comply with the require- principles in accordance with AS 2870 Section 4.
ments of AS 2870 for concrete slabs and footings, and List of Charts
AS 3700 for concrete masonry.
DESCRIPTION PAGE
It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects
Typical Edge Distances for
of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness
Slabs on Reactive Soils 10.12
of ties and connectors, and strength and stiffness of
supports, in addition to normal considerations of loads Reinforced Masonry - Section Properties 10.13
and masonry properties. Control joints and openings
must be treated as free ends as specified by AS 3700.
Masonry properties
The standard designs in this chapter are based on
masonry properties complying with the General
Specification set out in Part C: Chapter 2, modified as
noted on the standard design chart and as noted below.
Hollow concrete blocks
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
BASIS 0FTABLES'
Calculated in accordance with AS 2870 Clauses F4 (a), (b) and (C)
Ym
* Limitvalues apply (0.6
+ 0.025
Ifl 1')
REINFORCED MASONRY - Section Properties
U - -
Area
Moment
of inertia
Footing
condition
H = hogging
Shear
capacity
Moment
capacity
Description Variables A (m2) 1(m4) S sagging Vcap (kN) Meap (kN.m)
S 45 67
Masonry wall
W= 140 mm
R1-2-N12 0.426 0.111000 HandS 97 105 pn
W= 140 mm
300 = 2-N16 0.426 0.111 000 H and S 108 187
- 3-L8TM
I
Door opening in wall, W= 190 mm
plus 300x300 beam R1 =4-N12 0.145 0.000 285 HandS 39 296
2400 W140mm
R1= 2-N 12 0.131 0.000270 HandS 35 148
Door opening
W= 140 mm
300
R1=2-N16 0.131 0.000270 HandS 36 265
3-L8TM
Window W= 140 mm
opening R1=2-N12 0.285 0.015800 HandS 45 148
1100
W= 140 mm
300 R1=2-N16 0.285 0.015 800 HandS 46 269
3-L8TM
WORKED EXAMPLE
Mortar joints
Mortar type M3 (or M4)
Purpose of the worked example
The purpose of the following worked example is to Joint thickness 10 mm
demonstrate the steps to be followed when performing Concrete grout
manual calculations or when preparing computer Minimum characteristic compressive strength,
software for the analysis and design of masonry. = 20 MPa
The worked example also serves the purpose of
demonstrating the origin of the Standard Designs which Minimum cement content 300 kg/m3
are based on similar masonry capacity considerations. Steel reinforcement
Although comprehensive in its treatment of AS 2870, the N12, or N16 as noted Fabric and trench mesh as noted.
worked example is not intended to analyze or design Concrete slabs-on-ground and footings
all parts of the particular structure. It deals only with
Strength grade N20
enough to demonstrate the design method.
Maximum slump 80 mm
Design and detailing
All design and detailing shall comply with the require- Maximum aggregate size 20 mm.
ments of AS 2870 and, where appropriate, AS 3700.
It is the designer's responsibility to allow for the effects
of control joints, chases, openings, strength and stiffness
of ties and connectors, and strength and stiffness of
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0 Face-shell bedded
0
LL Minimum face-shell thickness,
= 25 mm for 90-mm, 110-mm and 140-mm units
= 30 mm for 190-mm units
For the house plan shown below, design the slabs Internal slabs without walls
and beams for alternative types of superstructures, P 1.OPLslab+O.SIL
using different methods, as follows: = (1.0 x 25 x 0.1 x 1.3) + (0.5 x 1.5)
= 4.0 kN/m2
I Design for unreinforced masonry superstructure
using deemed-to-comply provisions of AS 2870 External walls
Figure 3.1 P = 1.0 PLslab + wall + footing + roof 0.5 IL
= 1.0[(25 x 0.1 x 0.5) + (2.5 x 1.72) +
2 Design for reinforced masonry superstructure
(0.3x0.3x25)+( 1.0 x 8.0
using deemed-to-comply provisions of AS 2870 2
Figure 3.1 Note 12 (0.5 x 1.5 x 0.5)
= 12.2 kN/m
3 Design for reinforced or unreinforced super-
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE:
References are to AS 2870, unless stated otherwise
in i
SITE CLASSIFICATION
Using Site Classification Form
External beams
SL72
Using Figure 3.1 Note 12, external beams
may be reduced to 300 x 300 with 3-L8TM
400
reinforcement.
3-L11TM
Provide continuity at re-entrant corners and
lap internal beam reinforcement into external
k 300 300 beams
400
3-L8TM
300 300
10.17
DESIGN FOR REINFORCED OR UNREINFORCED Longitudinal Beams
MASONRY SUPERSTRUCTURE BY MODIFYING Width of beam
STANDARD DESIGNS USING AS 2870 B = 300 mm
CLAUSE 4.5
Width of slab
Check Design Parameters 4.5.1 W = 7.0
H=1.5m <3.0
Number of beams
y5=37mm OK (lOto8Omm) n=3
log
r(B D3)
I = 8.59
12W
This value can be calculated for H < 3
using the following formula, then checked
visually from Figure 4.1
Equivalent construction
Masonry veneer Moments and Required Stiffness
Using Mitchells tables
Permissible deflection
L For sagging, use the minimum footing specified
- 600 in AS 2870
7000 ie 300 mm x 380 mm deep with
- 600 3-L11TM and SL72 fabric
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
= 11.7
<20 OK Table 4.1 For hogging
( =0.89
Ys_ 37
A - 11.7 w L2 B
= 3.2
M
8n
(i-cc)
_16.5 x7.02x 13 (1-0.89)
- 8x5
Bearing Pressure Ratio = 28.9 kNm
Swell stiffness
k = 1000 kPalm wLB
2n
(i-a)
Average factored bearing pressure 16.5 x 7.0 x 13 (1 - 0.89)
w = 16.5 kPa 2x5
= 16.5 kN
Bearing pressure ratio
w 16.5 ML2
El req
ky 1000 xO.037 12A
= 0.45 28.9 x 7.02
12 xO.0117
= 10,096 kN.m2
Footing Exposure
Depth of design suction change
= 1500mm Beam Moment and Shear Capacities
Concrete cover
Depth of footing below ground CT =20 mm (To top of slab)
D 300 mm CB = 30 mm (To membrane)
10.19
For hogging of an edge beam FOR BENDING MOMENT:
C =20 mm Capacity reduction factor
3.5 0=0.8 AS 3600 Table 2.3
beff
133 = 1.0
in )fl
V0 =0 DESIGN FOR REINFORCED MASONRY
SUPERSTRUCTURE USING AS 2870 CLAUSE 4.7
=0
Section Properties at Door Openings
)1/3
= 2 b d0 (Ast c + V0 + P
1
b d0 (i) Bond beam
Area of tensile steel
=1.38x1.Oxl.Ox 300 x 349 x
190
10 A = 2 x 110
1/3
308 x 20 = 220 mm2
190
'300 x 349 290
= 56.3 kN Effective depth 100
d= 190 mm
vus = 0 4-N 12 bars
Width
Shear capacity b = 190 mm
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Elastic modulus
E = 15 000 MPa
= 15 x 106 kN/m2 4.4(c)
Stiffness parameter
El = 15 x 106 x 58.6 x 106
= 879 kNm2
100
(ii) Footing
Area of tensile steel
As = 150 mm2 300
Effective depths
k 300
db0t=300-30--- 10
= 256 mm
d0 = 300 - 20 - 7 -
= 269 mm
use 256 mm
Width
b = 300 mm
10.21
290
Effective moment of inertia
= 0.045 b d3
= 0.045 x 300 x
T
2400
=1.1(1.6
In 99
)1f3 Computer Runs
= 1 2 b d0 (Ast c + v0 + p
b d0 Site Classification: M
= 1.48 i.o i.o 300 x 256
103 Characteristic surface movement
( l50x20'/3 Ys 37 mm
'300 x 256'
=39kN Differential mound movement
Ym = 0.7 Ys F4(a)
=0
Edge distance for centre heave
Shear capacity of footing
Vcap = 0 vu AS 3600 8.2.2
e=- + -
H5
8
y
36
(y in mm)
= 0 (vuc + V) 1.5 26
+
=
= 0.7 (39 + 0) 8 36
27.3 kN =0.91 m
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
use 1.0 m
BOND BEAM:
Capacity reduction factor Edge distance for edge heave
=0.75 AS 3700 4.6.1
e=0.2L
2
Characteristic shear strength 26
=(0.2x 13.0) 0.6+
ms = 0.35 MPa AS 3700 4.5.4 or (0.2 x 7.0) 25
=1.4 1.64
Shear capacity of bond beam .. use 1.5 m
1O.7
Run 3 Permissible deflection for masonry veneer
Same as Run 2, but with reinforced masonry (which is the equivalent of reinforced external
internal walls and internal walls) Table 3.1
L Table 4.1
L\=20 or
Maximum deflection: 3.2 mm 600
Differential deflection: 0.6 mm 7000
=20 or
600
= 117mm
Run 4
Same as Run 3, but without any internal beams All of the cases with reinforced masonry
superstructures exhibit deflections
Maximum deflection: 3.4 mm considerably less than this limit!
Differential deflection: 1.1 mm
Considerable structural advantage
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Displaced shape
Run 4 - Deflections cros Slat
526 3,C(2L UI
10 ')fl
Crack
An unintentional plane of weakness in the structure
This glossary of technical terms relevant to Footings
which opens when subjected to the stresses
is in addition to the general Glossary given in Part B:
caused by thermal or soil movement, shrinkage,
Chapter 1. Where appropriate, the definitions have been
permanent, imposed, fire or earthquake loads. In some
expanded to give more information.
circumstances cracks may lead to unacceptable loss of
Foundation structural integrity and/or appearance.
The ground that supports the building.
Footing
The construction that transfers the loads from the
building to the foundation. The footings referred to in
this handbook are:
reinforced strip footings (independent of wall and
slab);
reinforced concrete slabs stiffened with beams;
reinforced concrete strip footings or slabs and beams
connected monolithically with reinforced hollow
concrete blockwork walls.
Articulation
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
ifl 7
U-
(I)
C
0
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTES
lfl ')Q
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1077
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
hapter 1
Overview Contents
This chapter provides an overview of the building 1.1 INTRODUCTION
design and detailing process, using Part B (Design)
and Part C (Detailing). 1.2 DESIGN AND DETAILING PROCESS
INTRODUCTION a t12 AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS
With the increasing complexity of Australian Standards Australian Standards cover a wide number of
and Building Regulations, designers, builders and applications, including providing design rules for the
tradespeople aie either being swamped with too much structural design of masonry and masonry components.
unnecessary information or being denied the important For example, AS 3700 Masonry structures is 'deemed-
information necessary for building to-satisfy" the performance requirements set out in
the BCA. The design rules of an Australian Standard
Competitive design fees are generally too low to permit
(including AS 3700) must be comprehensive, covering
the time for thoughtful and comprehensive detailing
all common construction cases, eg unreinforced and
and specification to be performed. Too often architects
reinforced brickwork and blockwork, in all sorts of
and structural engineers provide only the overall
exposures, subject to permanent, imposed, wind and
building dimensions of a building and its components
earthquake loads. Despite a desire to make Australian
on the contract drawings, omitting the details of how
Standards "user-friendly", the requirement that they
the various components are intended to "fit together".
These drawings are often accompanied by the briefest be both comprehensive and precise mitigates against
simplicity of use.
of specifications, indicating only the principal Australian
Standards, but failing to specify even the simplest of
material property requirements. 1.1.3 DESIGN AIDS
At the other end of the building process, builders While the Building Regulations (based on the BCA)
and tradespeople, accustomed to meaningless or provide the performance requirements and the
Australian Standards provide a comprehensive means
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Building Regulations.
Design and detailing aids translate the design rules
of the Australian Standards into practical generic
designs, details and specifications.
Project drawings, details and specifications (should)
provide the information necessary for all aspects
of the construction, and may draw on the generic
design and detailing aids to provide information in
an "easy-to-use" format.
DESIGN AND DETAILING
PROCESS
Step 9 - Thermal Performance
If the building is required to have a particular level of
Set out below are the design and detailing steps for the
thermal performance, design and detail using Part B:
masonry components of typical low and medium rise
Chapter 9 and detail using Part C:Chapter 3.
buildings.
Step I - Building Arrangement and Loads Step 10 - Footings and Supporting Structures
Determine the building layout, number of floors and Design and detail the supporting structures using
principal dimensions. This manual does not detail AS 3700 Concrete structures, AS 4100 Steel structures,
the steps required for determining loads, analysing a AS 2870 Residential slabs and footings and similar
structure for overall stability or designing for strength standards. Part B : Chapter 9 gives particular guidance
and serviceability of the other components, although for masonry and footings in residential buildings
some guidance is given in Part B:Chapter 1. designed to AS 2870.
Determine the required function of the masonry
components, eg:
Most masonry components are walls. Are there also
isolated piers and masonry lintels?
Are internal and external walls single-leaf masonry,
masonry veneer or cavity masonry? Are they
loadbearing or non-loadbearing? Can they be
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
reinforced?
Are walls require to resist out-of-plane wind loads,
earthquake loads and/or fire acting on the wall?
Are walls require to provide in-plane shear resistance
and load paths for wind loads or earthquake loads
acting on the whole building?
How are external walls to be weather-proofed?
Step 2 - Acoustics
Select the thickness of walls for acoustic considerations
using Part B: Chapter 2.
Step 3 - Robustness
Check the thickness of walls and piers for robustness
considerations using Part B:Chapter 3.
Step 4 - Fire
Design all walls and piers for fire load using Part B:
Chapter 4.
Step 7 - Movement
Detail and specify control and articulation joints for
building movement using Part B:Chapter 7 and
> Part C:Chapters 2 and 3.
I
ILl
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
I
Specification Contents
This chapter provides a detailed materials and 2.1 INTRODUCTION
construction specification for concrete masonry
structures. 2.2 SPECIFICATION - MASONRY 0
4-
0
INTRODUCTION
2.1.2 BASIS OF THE SPECIFICATION
In the preparation of this specification, the following
2.1.1 BACKGROUND convention has been adopted.
Set out below is a pro-forma specification which is Overall compliance with the requirements of the BCA
intended to give guidance to designers and specifiers is required.
who wish to specify masonry and its components.
Specifications based principally on AS 3700 have
i All building construction must comply with the been drafted to provide this compliance.
relevant State Building Regulations, which are set out in
Where there is no particular AS 3700 provision and
the Building Code of Australia (BCA), Volumes I and 2
the BCA does provide an Acceptable Construction
The BCA provides for compliance to be achieved Practice solution, this has been included.
through:
Where neither AS 3700 nor BCA Acceptable
Alternative Solutions, or
Construction Practice provide solutions, reliance has
Deemed-to-Satisfy Provisions, which may
been made on a combination of current practice,
include:
engineering judgement and supplier's information.
o Acceptable Construction Manuals
(eg AS 3700), and/or 2.1.3 HOW TO USE THE SPECIFICATION
o Acceptable Construction Practice
(eg Details included within the BCA document)
The shaded notes or items indicated by a hash symbol
(e.g. # or Use exposure Table 51) should
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
The BCA states that compliance with Australian be considered by the specifier and then, if appropriate,
Standard AS 3700 Masonry structures is deemed to deleted from the specification, making amendments as
satisfy the requirements of the BCA. required.
The BCA Volume 2 also provides Acceptable
Construction Practice for some masonry applications.
In some cases, these differ from the details provided
in AS 3700.
For example, at the time of preparation of
this specification (September 2004), the steel
lintels permitted in BCA Volume 2 Figure 3.3.3.5
(Acceptable Construction Practice) differ from
those given in AS 3700-2001 Table 12.8.
There are other details which comply with the
requirements of AS 3700 (and therefore meet the
requirement of the BCA), but are not published in
either document.
For example, at the time of preparation of
this specification (September 2004), draft
Australian Standard AS 4773 provides lintel
tables that have been prepared in accordance
with the design requirements of AS 3700, but
extend beyond range provided in AS 3700-2001
Table 12.8. Various suppliers also provide lintel
tables complying with the design requirements
of AS 3700, but not published in that document.
There are other details that are beyond the scope
of AS 3700 and the BCA Acceptable Construction
Practice, which may meet the requirements of the
BCA through the Alternative Solutions options.
For example, some suppliers offer lintels whose
design is not based on AS 3700, but instead are
based on test results.
0')
SPECIFICATION - .0
4, MASONRY
Masonry units intended for face applications and
exposed to the weather shall have:
SCOPE - Permeability not more than 2 mm/minute
This specification covers unreinforced and reinforced - Efflorescence Potential of Nil or Slight
masonry used in the walls and piers of the building. - Colour and texture within an agreed range.
Masonry units intended for exposure to lateral loads
AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS in excess of 0.5 kPa shall have a Characteristic
All components and installation shall comply with Lateral Modulus of Rupture not less than 0.8 MPa.
the Building Code of Australia (BCA) and the relevant Concrete masonry units shall have a Mean
Australian Standards, including AS 3700 and the Coefficient of Residual Drying Contraction not more
standards referred to therein.
than 0.6 mm/rn.
Non-Ioadbearing masonry 3.0 MPa 2.0 MPa5 reinforced hollow masonry in small buildings. However,
15 MPa units are commonly available and form the basis of
for internal walls (subject
many design charts in common use.
only to lateral loads less
5 AS 3700 Section 12 requires solid, cored and horizontally-
than 0.5 kPa) and built
cored units for use in small buildings to have a minimum
on stiff concrete slabs characteristic strength of 3.0 MPa. Therefore units with a
with deflection less than strength of 2.0 MPa do not meet this requirement and may
spa n/ 1000 not be used in small buildings as defined in AS 3700
Section 12
For general applications (except as listed for M4 or M2), Joint Material
Type M3 mortar shall be used. Type M3 mortar shall Backing rod for control joints, expansion joints and
consist by volume of: articulation loints shall be expanded polystyrene tube or
1 part GP or GB cement, 1 part lime, 6 parts sand bead.
(water thickener optional) Expansion material shall be compressible.
1 GP or GB cement, 5 parts sand plus Joint sealant shall be gun-grade, multi-purpose
water thickener polyurethane sealant
For the applications listed below, Type M4 mortar shall # Intumescent seals shall be acrylic co-polymer
be used. Type M4 mortar shall consist by volume of: sealant capable of providing the requisite fire
I part GP or GB cement, 0.5 part lime, 4.5 parts sand performance as specified in the drawings of BCA
(water thickener optional) as appropriate.
1 part GP or GB cement, 4 parts sand plus Control joints and articulation joints shall incorporate
water thickener de-bonding tape.
1 part GP or GB cement, 0-0.25 parts lime, Damp Proof Course
3 parts sand (water thickener optional)
Metal and metal-cored damp-proof courses (DPC5) shall
Elements in interior environments subject to saline not be used in locations with saline ground water or
wetting and drying subject to rising salt damp.
Elements below a damp-proof course or in contact Damp-proof-courses (DPCs) shall consist of one of the
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
In particular,
bitumen-impregnated materials of not less than
2.5 mm thickness, meeting the requirements of
the exposure conditions are less descriptive, Clause 7.5 of AS/NZS 2904, when used in walls that
I part GP or GB cement, 0-0.25 parts lime, 3 parts are not higher than 7.8 m above the level of the DPC.
sand is not listed, and
Note:
mortars containing methyl cellulose water thickener Refer BCA Vol 2 Clause SA 3.3.4.4.
are listed only for concrete masonry.
Flashings Wall Ties
Flashings shall comply with AS/NZS 2904. Wall ties shall comply with AS/NZS 2669.1 and the
Metal flashings shall not be used in locations that are following schedule.
subject to rising salt damp. For the applications listed below, ties shall be
Metal flashings shall be compatible with the materials galvanised steel or polymer designated R2 or greater.
with which they are in contact, and shall not give rise Elements in a mild environment
to electrolytic action. If there is potential for electrolytic Elements in an interior environments above a damp-
action to occur, flashings shall be isolated by inert proof course and enclosed within a building except
materials.
during construction
Flashings intended to hold their Shape shall be
Elements above the damp-proof course in non-marine
manufactured from rigid material. (e.g. metal-cored
exterior environments,
material)
Elements above the damp-proof course in other
Flashing in Concealed Locations (e.g. cavity flashings)
shall be: exterior environments, with a waterproof coating,
properly flashed junctions with other building
Uncoated annealed lead having a mass not less than
elements and a top covering (roof or coping)
10 kg/rn2 in lengths not exceeding 1.5 m, but shall
protecting masonry
not be used on any roof that is used to catch potable
water; Elements below a damp-proof course or in contact
classification design category 300 450 600 450 600 450 600
Ni Hi L1 L1 M2 L2 L2 L2 L2
N2 Hi, H2, H3 L1 M2 L2 L2 [2 M3
N3 Hi, H2, H3 M3 H3 L1 M2 M2
Cl Hi, H2, H3 M M H M M M M
N4 Hi, H2, H3 M H H M M M H
C2 Hi, H2, H3 M H H M H H H
L = Light duty Type A ties M = Medium duty Type A ties H = Heavy duty Type A ties
Notes:
i Not permitted under ECA Vol 2 Clause 3.3.3.2 and Figure 3.3.3.1. Although permitted by AS 3700 Section 12, the use of these
ties may not be appropriate.
2 Permitted under BOA Vol 2 Clause 3.3.3.2 and Figure 3.3.3.1.
3 Heavier duty than required by BCA Vol 2 Clause 3.3.3.2 and Figure 3.3.3.1.
4 Ties that are not marked 1, 2 or 3 are beyond the scope of BOA Vol 2 Clause 3.3.3.2 and Figure 3.3.3.1.
90x90x6 EA 3060 or 3010k 1550 or 2050 t930 or 2050 1680 or 1570 2640
90x90x8 EA 3310 or 3010 1670 or 2170 2100 or 2170 1820 or 1810k 2800
lOOx 100x6 EA 3400 or 3130 1730 or 2290 2160 or 2290 1870 or 1810 2870
lOOx 100x8EA 3660 or 3370 1870 or 2410 2340 or 2410 2020 or 1930 304O
l5Ox9Ox8UA 4200 or 4210 2710 or 337Q4 3380 or 3370 2840 or 2770 3920
Notes:
I The spans tabulated are clear opening widths, To determme the overall length of a lintel, add at least 300 mm to the clear
opening, thus providing at least 150 mm bearing length at each end.
2 For openings up to 1000 mm, the required bearing length may be reduced to 100 mm at each end,
3 Opening widths marked '' are from AS 3700 Table 12.8.
4 Opening widths marked " are from BCA Volume 2 Figure 3.3.3.5.
S Opening widths marked are additional to those from AS 3700 Section 12 and are calculated in accordance with AS 3700.
They are contained in draft Australian Standard AS 4773.
6 Load Type A applies to a lintel supporting a masonry leaf up to 600 mm high without roof or floor loads.
7 Load Type B applies to a lintel supporting up to 600 mm of masonry and a tiled roof up to 6.6 metres load width.
8 Load Type C applies to a lmtel supporting up to 600 mm of masonry and a metal roof up to 6.6 metres load width.
9 Load Type D applies to a lintel supporting a masonry leaf over 2100 loin high with or without tiled roof or metal roof up to
6.6 metres load width and/or timber floor up to 3.0 metres load width.
10 Load Type E applies to a lintel supporting a masonry leaf up to 3000 mm high without roof or floor loads.
11 The BCA Volume 2 Figure 3.3.3.5 values are limited to maximum roof span of 10.0 m and N3 fW4l) wind classification rather
than the limits imposed by AS 3700.
Slip joint material shall be placed between unreinforced at not more than 5 metre centres in a wall with
masonry walls and any concrete slab. openings more than 900 mm x 900 mm, and
Wall ties shall be installed in accordance with AS 3700 positioned in line with one edge of the opening
One layer of joint reinforcement shall be incorporated at the position where a wall changes height by more
into concrete or calcium silicate masonry at points of than 20%
potential cracking such as at the corners of door or at a change in thickness of a wall
window openings.
at control joints or construction joints in supporting
Lintels and arch bars shall be built in over openings in slabs
excess of 1.0 metre
at the junctions of walls constructed of different
Anchorages shall be installed at locations specified on masonry materials
the drawings and in accordance with the BCA Vol 2
Clause 3.3.3.3. at deep rebates
Mortar joints shall be 10 mm thick. at a distance from all corners not less than 500 mm
and not greater than 3000 mm.
Mortar loints in solid or cored face masonry shall
be fully-bedded. Joints shall be as specified on the
drawings.
At the time of publication, these were the ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED
requirements of AS 3700. However, draft AS 4773 MASONRY CONSTRUCTION (EXCLUDING
includes the following provision....not less than RETAINING WALLS)
470 mm for cavity walls or 230 mm for veneer
walls and not greater than 4500 mm, The designer MATERIALS
should check whether these requirements have been Additional Requirements for Reinforced Concrete
amended. Blocks
For control joints or articulation joints in cavity walls Concrete blocks for reinforced masonry shall have a
(ie not in veneer walls), extendible masonry ties shall be minimum characteristic compressive strength of 15 MPa
built into every fourth course. based on the face-shell width.
Where an articulation joint is adjacent to a door or Note: AS 3700 Section 12 permits the use of 12 MPa
window frame, a 10-mm gap shall be provided between units for reinforced hollow masonry in small buildings.
the edge of the frame and the masonry to allow for However, 15 MPa units are commonly available and form
movement. the basis of many design charts in common use.
Control joints and articulation joints, shall be 10 mm Reinforcement
wide and shall consist of a polystyrene backing rod and Reinforcement shall comply with AS/NZS 4671 and shall
a polyurethane material gunned into the joint to form a be:
10 mm x 10 mm flexible seal. The backing rod shall be Deformed bars - 500 MPa, normal ductility (N)
placed into the masonry at a depth, which permits the
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
CONSTRUCTION
All construction of reinforced concrete masonry shall
comply with AS 3700.
Vertical steel reinforcement shall be tied using tie wire
to steel starter bars through clean-out holes in each
reinforced core and fixed in position at the top of the
wall by plastic clips or template. Starter bars shall be
tied into position to provide the specified lap above the
top surface of the footing. The starter bars shall be held
in position on the centre line of a reinforced blockwork
wall by a timber member or template and controlled
within a tolerance of +,- 5 mm through the wall and
--, 50 mm along the wall.
.,) 1r
In severe marine environments, saline or contaminated INSPECTIONS AND TESTS
water including tidal and splash zones, and within I
All new work shall remain open until it has been
km of an industry in which chemical pollutants are
inspected and approved by the Builder. The following
produced, the minimum cover to the inside face of the
inspections shall be performed.
block shall be 30 mm.
Note:
AS 3700 Tables 5.1 and 12.2 and Clauses 10.7.2.5 and
12.2 permit lesser cover in some applications.
However, covers less than 20 mm are generally less
practical and could lead to honey-combing of the
grout.
Control joints shall be built into reinforced concrete
masonry at all points of potential cracking and at the
locations shown on the drawings. The spacing of control
joints should not exceed 16 metre.
The spacing of control joints may be increased in
reinforced masonry walls meeting the following criteria
Consisting of at least 190 mm hollow concrete units,
and
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Mortar
Mix Spot check As specified Hold
Bond strength Not required unless mix suspect As per AS 3700 (0.2 MPa) Witness
* Delivery docket
Note:
This specification is available in RTF format on the enclosed CD-ROM (Part C:Appendix A) as:
2-Speciuication(Chapter2)/SpecText.rtf
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
Contents
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 LINTELS
Reinforced masonry lintels
Steel Iintels and arch bars
3.5
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Detailing
This chapter provides detailing requirements
for typical building components and is a visual
reference to the CAD Details contained on the
CD-ROM in the Appendix.
INTRODUCTION LI NTELS
Ancillary details including window and door frames Care must be taken to avoid bar congestion, particularly
in a variety of materials, corner and intersection if the masonry also includes a combination of horizontal
details, piers, services etc. and vertical reinforcement.
CD-ROM of CAD Details Support of Reinforcement
This chapter also acts as a visual reference for the CAD Reinforcement should be positioned by using plastic
details supplied on the accompaning CD-ROM which is wheel-type reinforcement spacers, galvanised wire
located in Part C:Appendix A. hangers or reinforcing ligatures as shown.
Each of the details in this chapter has a note below Cover and Mortar Type
them indicating the file format type and file name for All drawings are based on 20 mm cover to reinforcement
easy retrival from the CD-ROM. and M3 mortar. However, designers must select an
appropriate cover and mortar from AS 3700 and amend
the drawings accordingly. See Part B: Chapter 6.
Details
The following drawings show common details for
horizontally-reinforced masonry lintels. For load capacity
information, see Part B:Chaters 5 and 6.
S
Detail Al
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
/
140
Reinforced Concrete Masonry Lintel
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: LintelsMasonry/A1.dxf
Detail A2
Notes:
Concrete blocks f1 5 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
/70 /
140
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Linteis_Masonry/A2.dxf
Notes:
Concrete blocks f1 5 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/m3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
95
190
Reinforced Concrete Masonry Lintel
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Masonry/A3.dxf
Detail A4
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/m3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
1
2 N20 (minimum cover, c = 20, effective depth, d = 125)
held in position by plastic wheel type supports
/ 125
/ 190
Reinforced Concrete Masonry Lintel
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lint els_Masonry/A4dxf
Detail A5
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
0
0
390 x 190 x 190
concrete lintel block (20.12)
/190
125
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Masonry/A5. dxl
etailA6
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
S - steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
0
0
390 x 190 x 190
concrete lintel block (20.12)
/ 95
190
NOTE: This detaii is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Linte]s_Masonry/A6.dxf
Detail Al
0
0 100 dia Fastlock column spacer
N clipped onto reinforcement bar
o R8 hangers 0
0
N-
c'J 302 long C,,
0 R8 hangers 0
0C,,
N-
302 long
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Masonry/A7.dxf
3.2.2 STEEL LINTELS AND ARCH BARS Steel lintels with a duplex coating, hot-dip galvanised
Loads on Lintels in accordance with AS/NZS 4680 with a coating
Masonry constructed in stretcher bond will arch over mass of 600 g/m2 and a coating of at least
an opening, provided there are sufficient number of 50 microns of two-pack non-inhibitive epoxy primer to
masonry courses above and sufficient strength at the AS/NZS 3750.13 and at least 200 microns of two-pack
supports. AS 3700 Commentary suggests that the load high-build epoxy micaceous iron oxide to AS 3750.14.
exerted on the lintel can be assumed to be exerted by a R5 - For applications in saline or contaminated water
triangle of masonry above the opening including tidal splash zones and within 1 km of an
End Support industry producing chemical pollutants.
AS 3700 Clause 4.12 requires that lintels be supported Details
on the masonry abutments for a distance of at least The following drawings show common details of
100 mm.
galvanised steel lintels. For information on capacities,
Corrosion Resistance including maximum spans, see Part B:Chapter 5
Steel lintels and arch bars must comply with the
durability requirements of AS 3700 Table 5.1 for the
particular exposure classification. AS 3700 Clause 5.2.2
makes it clear that lintels or arch bars supporting
the external leaf of a cavity wall or veneer wall are
considered to be in an exterior environment.
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
100
/ // Maximum
clear span
100
75
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Steel/B1.dxf
Detail B2
/,
100 Maximum
clear span
//
100
75
S
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Steel/B2.dxf
-=
0
0)
90
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
90 x 90 x 6 L Lintel
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Steel/B3.dxf
Detail B4
0
C)
4= 90
90 x 90 x 8 L Lintel
Scale 1:10
S
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Steel/B4dxf
Detail B5
0
0
// 100
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Steel/B5.dxf
Detail B6
/ 100
NOTE. This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Stee]/B6.dxf
n
Detail B7
0
IC)
90 /
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
150 x 90 x 8 L Lintel
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Steel/B7.dx[
Detail B8
N
0
IC)
/100
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Lintels_Steel/B8. dxl
r!AL REINFORCEMENT
AND MULLIONS - Although there is s slight increase in the amount
of reinforcement used, there is a reduction in the
3.3.1 VERTICALLY-REINFORCED MASONRY
amount of grout and the number of grouted cores.
Spacing of Reinforcement Depending on the relative costs of each component,
Vertical reinforcement placed in the cores of hollow this can lead to a net reduction in the total cost of
concrete blockwork spans vertically between horizontal the wall.
supports and provides strength enhancement to large
wall panels. The wall is more ductile and will perform better
under cyclical earthquake loading.
Tithe reinforcement is spaced at 800 mm or less,
the masonry is regarded as 'close-spaced reinforced The wall will exhibit reduced cracking and deflection
masonry, and may be considered ductile. This will when subjected to lateral loads.
have advantages in respect of earthquake loads. Support of Reinforcement
If the reinforcement is spaced at 2.0 m centres Reinforcement should be positioned by tying to starters
or less, (but wider than 800 mm), the masonry is
at the base and should be fixed at the top by plastic
spacers The position of the steel should be closely
regarded as 'wide-spaced reinforced masonry', with
controlled at the region of maximum moment, eg at
some advantages in respect of robustness. the mid-height of a wall. This may be achieved by
If the reinforcement is spaced further apart than breaking construction at this point and lapping the bars.
2.0 m, the masonry is regarded as 'mixed Care must be taken to ensure ccntinuity of moment
construction', consisting of unreinforced masonry resistance at laps.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Q 1')
Detail Cl
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by plastic wheel type support
U,
cJ
N
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C1.dxf
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/m3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by plastic wheel type support
C)
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C2.dxf
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/m3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by plastic wheel type support
U,
/ in position at the top by plastic wheel type spacers
fixed after grouting, but while grout is still fluid
I
N
.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S..
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf._Masonry/C3.dxf
Detail C4
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by plastic wheel type support
5,
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C4. dxl
2 IA
1lC5
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by plastic wheel type support
0
N- I
0
1 .1
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C5, dxf
Detail C6
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by plastic wheel type support
0 I
N
N I
NOTE This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C6.dx[
Detail C7
a-
E
0
0
N
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Cleanout unit
N
N
Height of first grout pour
3000 max above floor
Cleanout unit
190
Detail At Footing
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C7. dxl
21
Detail C8
C
E
0
0
N-
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Cleanout unit
C
E
0
0
Ni6 vertical bars N-
Cleanout unit
Ni 6 starter bar
Footing
190
Detail At Footing
S Scale i:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C8.dxf
3.17
Detail C9
0.
E
0
0
0
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Cleanout unit
E
0
0
Detail At Mid Height
190
Detail At Footing
NOTE; This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as; Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C9.dxf
21
Detail C1.O
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
= =
E
0
0
N.
Detail At Mid Height
/ 190
Detail At Footing
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reinf_Masonry/C1O.dxf
Detail CII.
110
zt'704
N 2 holes, 3mm larger
05,
+ than bar size
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Vert_Reint_Masonry/Cil. dx!
2 ')fl
3.3.2 GALVANISED STEEL MULLIONS Anchorage
Strength and Stiffness Steel mullions must be anchored to the supports top
and bottom. The following shear capacities assume
It is increasingly the practice in southern Australia
to provide lateral support to unreinforced masonry bolts set into concrete slabs. There should be provision
for relative vertical movement between the supporting
subject to lateral earthquake, wind or fire loads by
building in galvanised steel mullions. Although this is structure and the masonry wall/mullion combination.
a convenient practice, it is significantly more expensive Fire Separation
than reinforced masonry. Furthermore, the stiffness of If required, intumescent seals may be placed on top of
the mullion is considerably less than the stiffness of the the wall, either side of the steel spigot, to provide fire
masonry, which will possthly experience some cracking resistance.
under extreme load. Details
Wall Construction The following drawings show common details of
Steel mullions must be placed into open-ended galvanised steel mullions, Moment and shear capacities
masonry units such as "H' or "A" shaped blocks, during are given in PartB:Chapter 6
construction of the masonry or between the leaves of
cavity masonry.
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S 120 x 10 EMS
90 x 10 EMS
250
250
120
90
Nil
Nil
70x 10 EMS 250 70 Nil
Notes:
I All hollow sections are BHP Duraga].
2 Capacities of all hollow sections are based on Grade C450L0 in accordance with AS 1163. All other sections are based on
Grade 250 in accordance with AS 3679.
3 The orientation shows the dimension of the steel section when measured through the wall. For square hollow sections, this
value is the same as the side of the section. For rectangular hollow sections, this value is the same as the smaller of the two
sides of the section. It is important to ensure that the steel section will fit into the cores of the blocks.
4 The end connections indicated are the ones most likely to lead to efficient design and construction, although other end
connections can be used with each section. The nomenclature is as follows:
Designation Number of Anchors Anchor type Plate thickness (mm)
2-M12, 8 2 M12 Dynabolts 8
5 Blocks must be of a type and size to enable the rnullions to be built into the masonry and the cores packed with mortar.
Detail Dl
varies to suit situation
20 max, 5 mm Spigot
\
Block cores grout or mortar filled
2 holes 12 diameter
75 x 75 x 5.0 SHS
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Mullion base
plate (8 1?.)
ILl
/ // 175 x 95 x 8
2/M10 Dynabolts 50 50 6 cfw to SHS
//
175
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Steel _Mullions/Dl.dxf
Detail D2
- varies to suit situation
20 max, 5 mm
-- Mullion base
H
plate (8 F) 225 x 85 x 8
0 /50 6 cfw to RHS
2/ M12 Dynabolts
225
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Steel _Mullions/D2.dxf
,y)
varies to suit situation
20 max, 5 mm Spigot
0
0 \ (::::
c'.J
0
_1 ' d
L_
2 holes @ 12 diameter
50 x 50 x 5.0 SHS
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0
Mullion base
plate (8 F) 150 x 70 x 8 lE
50( /5 6cfwtoSHS
2/ Ml 0 Dynabolts
//
150
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Steel _Mullions/D3.dxf
0
0 0
1
L_
2 holes 12 dia
100 x 50 x 5.0 RHS
0
Mullion base
200 x 70 x 8 IE
plate (8 l) 0 0 6 cfw to RHS
S
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Steel _Mullions/D4dxf
Dtail D5
varies to suit situation
20 max, 5 mm Spigot
0
0
0 0
c'J
2 holes 12 dia
100 x 50 x 5.0 RHS
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
N-
200 x 70 x 8 F?_
Mullion base 0 0
plate (8 1) / 6 cfw to RHS
200
IL
2/ M10 Dynabolts
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Steel _Mullions/D5dxf
Detail D6
- varies to suit situation Spigot
20 max, 5 mm
150 x
0\
L.()
2 holes 12 diameter
-150 x50 x 5.0 RHS
150
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Steel Mullions/D6.dxf
S 3.3.3 COMPOSITE MASONRY MULLIONS Weather Resistance
If the walls containing composite masonry mullions are
Strength and Stiffness
exposed to rainwater, provision to prevent the transfer of
When cavity walls are subject to lateral earthquake,
moisture across the cavity will need to be made.
wind or fire load, the strength of the wall may
be increased by tying the two leaves together Details
monolithically, using ties together with either masonry The following drawings show common details of
units or mortar packrng. This will provide stiffness as composite masonry mullions. Moment and shear
well as strength, but is not considered to be ductile. capacities are given in Part B: Chapter 6
Notes:
1 An inner leaf of 110-mm brickwork has been common for many years, although increasingly 90-mm is being used because of
the potential savings in both cost and floor space. Concrete blocks 90 x 119 x 290 mm and 90 x 162 x 290 are available. The
119-mm heights corresponds to 1.5 courses of 76-mm-high brickwork, whilst 162 mm corresponds to two courses of 76-mm-high
brickwork.
2 These tables are based on the most common cavity width of 50 mm. Capacities may be increased by increasing the cavity
width.
3 An outer leaf of 110-mm brickwork is common. However, split, ribbed polished or fair-face 90-mm concrete blockwork is
sometimes used to provide an attractive economical external face.
4 These tables are based on a web width of 300 mm. This can be achieved using a mortar column tied within the leaves by
cavity ties. A similar result could be achieved using masonry umts bonded to form a diaphragm. In both cases, rainwater must
be prevented from crossing the cavity via the diaphragm.
5 End mulhons are placed near the end of a wall and have masonry cavity walls extending on one side only. Intermediate
mullions are placed withm a length of wall and have masonry cavity walls extending on both sides.
6 The calculation of the effective width of the composite mullion (ie the width of each leaf which acts compositely with a web)
is six times the width of the leaf based on AS 3700 Clause 4.5.2. For an end mullion, the effective width is the web width plus
up to six times the minimum leaf width on one side only. For an intermediate mullion, the effective width is the web width
plus six times the minimum leaf width on both sides of the web (ie up to twelve times).
7 Walls higher than the value 3.9 m used in these tables will have shear and moment resistance higher than the tabulated
values.
Detail El
0
C
Wir
300
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
C
C)
0
LC)\
Wire ties
300
A
C
C)
0
A
0
C)
Wire ties
300
A
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: MasonryMu]]ions/E1.dxf
2 ')
li REINFORCED MASONRY
BOND BEAMS
3.27
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
0
0
390 x 190 x 140
concrete lintel block (1512)
//
140
70 /
Reinforced Concrete Masonry Bond Beam
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F1.dxf
Detail F2
Notes:
Concrete blocks f1 5 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3,
70 maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
/ 140 - steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F2. dx!
Q
Detail F3
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
95 /
190
Reinforced Concrete Masonry Bond Beam
Scale 1:10
NOTE. This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F3.dxf
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
125
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F4.dxf
Detail F5
Q
390 x 190 x 190
0
c) concrete H block (20.48) or double U block (20.91)
Notes:
Concrete blocks f1 5 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3,
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F5.dxf
Detail F6
- 390x190x190
0
0 concrete H block (20.48) or double U block (20.91)
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3,
maximum aggregate 10 rnrn)
125
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
190 - steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F6dxf
Detail F7
0
0 100 dia Fastlock column spacer
clipped onto reinforcement bar
Q R8 hangers 0
0
(J 302 long
0 R8 hangers 0
0
N-
c'J 302 long
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F 7. dxl
Detail F8
1
20.12 lintel unit
Scale 1:10
Notes;
All reinforcing bars to be N20
All concrete grout to be N20
(minimum cement content 300 kg/m3,
maximum aggregate size 10 mm)
Mortar to be 1 part portland
cement to 5 parts clean sand,
plus 0.005 methyl cellulose
water thickner
For partially-grouted walls,
use 20.01 blocks for infill
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as. Bond_Beams/F6.dxf
2 2')
Core plate 20.20 block (ends removed)
Scale 1:10
Notes:
All reinforcing bars to be N16
All concrete grout to be N20
(minimum cement content 300 kg/rn3,
maximum aggregate size 10 mm)
Mortar to be 1 part portland
cement to 5 parts clean sand,
plus 0.005 methyl cellulose
water thickner
For partially-grouted walls,
use 20.01 blocks for infill
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F9.dxf
Detail F1O
. U
20.01 block
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/FlO. dxl
Detail Fli
60
/
All steel 60 x 10 FMS
0
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Bond_Beams/F11.dxf
2 2,1
SHEAR WALLS AND
CONNECTIONS
at the base and cogged into the bond beams and thus
lapped with the bond beam reinforcement at the top
(see Clause 3.5.2).
For information on capacities of reinforced shear walls,
see Part B:Chapter 6.
3.35
Detail GI.
Notes:
Concrete blocks 15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
0 5 db
1 N16
70
0 390 x 190 x 140
0 concrete lintel block (15.12) Standard Hook For N16
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
/70
/ 140
zI
1 N16 (minimum cover, c = 20, effective depth, d = 70)
tied to starter bars at the base of the wall and held
in position at the top by plastic wheel type spacers
fixed after grouting, but while grout is still fluid
0
N
140 mm Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Wall With 1-N16 Per End Core
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Shear_Walls/G1.dxf
Det
Notes:
Concrete blocks 15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/m3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
0 Pin 5 d,
1 N20
70
0
0
390 x 190 x 190
concrete lintel block (20.12) Standard Hook For N16
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S LI)
0)
190 mm Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Wall With 1-N20 Per End Core
Scale 1:10
NOTE; This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Shear_Walls/02.dxf
Detail G3
a
Notes:
Concrete blocks f15 MPa
Mortar M3 (1:5 + methyl cellulose water thickener)
Concrete grout N20 (minimum cement 300 kg/rn3, maximum aggregate 10 mm)
Reinforcement shall be held in position by
- steel ligatures; or
- steel hangers; or
- plastic wheel type support
2 N20
/ /
0
0 0 390 x 190 x 190
Standard Hook For N16
concrete lintel block (20.12)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
1 N16(7olongandllOODhook)
hooked around vertical bar and angled to
fit inside blockwork (held in position by
plastic wheel type supports and lapped
700 mm with similar bar in the other end of waIl)*
. .
190 mm Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Wall With 2-N20 Per End Core
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Shear_Wa Ils/G3.dxf
3.5.2 ANCHORAGE AT THE
MASONRY/CONCRETE INTERFACE
The purpose is to provide sufficient shear resistance and
anchorage at the top and bottom of a masonry wall to:
transfer shear to and from shear walls,
provide vertical anchorage against overturning of
shear walls, and
provide shear resistance to out-of-plane lateral loads.
Most commercially-available head ties do not have
sufficient shear resistance to support large wall panels
subject to the out-of-plane and in-plane horizontal loads
experienced in earthquakes.
If enhanced shear capacity is required, the masonry
must be positively tied to the supporting slabs by
grouted starter-bars or similar methods shown in the
following details. For information on capacities of the
details, see Part B:Chapter 6.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
i nil:
200
/ 200 /
0
LU
0LU
N
0
LU
0
LU
190
140
0
0 0
0
N-
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
190
,140/
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Starter_Bars/H2. dxl
Detail H3
290 290
//
o\ 0
IC)
N
0
0 0
0
0 0
N
N
140 / 190
//
N20 Reinforced Starter Bars
Scale 1:20
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Starter_Bars/H3.dxf
2 Afl
I CONTROL JOINTS
3.41.
Detail ii.
I
Window / door openhl g
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
II II II
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control_Joints/J1.dxf
Detail J2
I
H II
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control_Joints/J2,dxf
Q A')
Detail J3
Reinforced lintel
UIA VA
Window / door opening
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control_Joints/J3.dxf
Detail J4
Sill units
Control joints
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control_Joints/J4.dxf
Detail J5
IJJFAP7AFIVAP
Control joint
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control_Joints/J5.dx[
Detail J6
Control joint
Sealant
Section
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control_Joints/J6.dxf
S Detail J7
Articulation Joints
Scale 1:10
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Compressible foam
joint filler Articulation joint tie
Sealant
Sealant
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control _Joints/J7dxf
Detail J8
01 unit
-01 Unit
01 unit
03 unit
03 unit
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control Joints/J8.eps
Detail J9
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control oints/J9eps
Detail J1O
20-01
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
20-0 1
20-01
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Control_Joints/J11.eps
3.47
Detail J12
Pr,ns...l4.d .mpisiib4. j..a4 fills, sad slusfic isalsul
20-01
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
2001
Detail J13
20-01
P.sn,oaldsd co..p.ssIbl. jOIM lilkr and .latic s..l.at
20.41
LI
M AL PER FO R M AN C
Detail KI
//
90
S
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K1.dxf
Detail K2
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K2.dxI
Detail K3
10 100 90 10 100 50 90
7
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in IDXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K3.dxf
2 cn
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
0
-3
-3
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD (0
CD 0 o C Co
2. 0
CD
U) 01
CD
0 (0 C
o
3 CD
3 0 0
0 N
C)
3
S C)
CD 0 0
0
CD -'
D)CD C)
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD G)
0
C/]
(I) 00)
CD 0 Cl)
C) - Co
0
U)
C)
0 0) C) 9.
CD
\0 0) 0.
CD
CD
-L
I
0
0) N 0)
-l-.
Detailing
Detail K6
110
/ 110
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K6.dxf
Detail K7
10
// 75/50/ 110 10
/ 75 0
/ 110
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Therma]/KZ dx!
R')
Det.
10
//
100 50 110 10 100 50
/ 110
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
110-mm Concrete Masonry Veneer Wall with Reflective Foil
Insullation on Frame and 100-mm Airspace
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K8. dxl
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K9.dxl
140 140
/
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K1Odxf
Detail Ku
10,75,p0 140 10
¼2 /'
75 50 140
A/
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K11.dxf
Det 12
10 100,50/ 140 100 50 140
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
140-mm Concrete Masonry Veneer Wall with Reflective Foil
Insullation on Frame and 100-mm Airspace
Scale 1: 10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: TherrnaL/K12.dxf
Detail K13
190 190
Insulation inside
masonry cores
Uninsulated Insulated
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Thermal/K13.dxf
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
z
0
C
C,
C
E 0
0
E LI)
143
OU)
U)
0LI
C'..
>Q
C
C
- 0
0
C
C,,
wa_ . a)
0
0)0
>
Ii-
0
S S
ANCILLARY DETAILS
3.57
Detail LI
260
110 90 10
/
Veneer Ties
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Andillary/Lieps
Detail L2
250
110 90
I
Cavity Block Ties
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L2.eps
Concrete slab
DPC material
Concrete slab
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L3.dxf
Detail L4
Flashing
Weep holes
Lintel
E
U,
Caulking
>< 450 eaves
Frame sill
Timber sill
E E
CD. -
Caulking
Packing
Brick sill course
Flashing
Weep holes
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancilary/L4.dxf
Detail L5
Flashing
Weep holes
Lintel
Lintels
450 eaves
Caulking
Masonry screw
Timber sill
Packing
Brick sill course
Flashing
00CC
Brick ties from window
-- frame @ 344 crs
00CC
000C
Sealant
S
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CDROM as: Ancillary/L5.dxf
Detail L6
Flashing
Weep holes
Lintel
C C
E E
E
LI) 450 eaves
Caulking
Packing
Brick sill course
Flashing
Weep holes
Packing
00CC
000C
Caulking
S
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L6.dxf
Flashing
Packing
Brick sill course
Flashing
Weep holes
00 C
0 Brick ties from window
frame @ 344 crs
0000
0000
Caulking
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Andi]ary/LZdxf
Detail L8
Masonry anchor
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]lary/L8.dxf
LI
Detail L9
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
'C
0
C) 2020 block with webs
and inside face knocked out
Underlay membrane-7
0 Footing
0
Co
300
Detail at Footing
Scale 1:10
NOTE: This detail is available, in DXF format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anciilary/L9.dxf
Detail L1O
10-25
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
90 mm -90 mm CORNERS
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L1O.eps
Detail LII
15-22
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/Lileps
Detail L12
20-01
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L12.eps
Detail L13
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L13eps
Detail L14
10-142 or 10-139
10-142 or 10-13
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]Jary/L14.eps
p'c
10-101 or 10-10 Sr 10-113 or 10-117 10-101 r 1O-10 or 10-113 or 10-117
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L15.eps
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Detail L16
50-33
90 mm - 140 mm CORNERS
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]]ary/L16.eps
Detail L17
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
90 mm - 190 mm CORNER
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L17.eps
Detail U.S
90 mm - 290 mm CORNER
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L18eps
Detail L19
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
15-01
20-01
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L19.eps
71
Detail L20
15-03
13.0I
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
15 01
30-01
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L20.eps
'D 7')
Detail L21
20-0
30-01
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L21.eps
Detail L22
20-01
3001
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]lary/L22.eps
Notes on Intersecting Walls (Details L23 to L32)
To prevent the formation of cracks, the length of the
intersecting wall should be limited to a maximum of
1.2 m. This can be done by means either of a control
joint or an opening, such as a door or full-height wall.
The Detail, L23, is recommended only in cases where
the appearance of headers in alternate courses in the
intersected wall is acceptable.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Detail L23
10-01
90 mm -90 mm INTERSECTION
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]]ary/L23.eps
7,1
Detail L24
)5-01
10-01
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
90 mm - 140 mm INTERSECTION
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L24.eps
20-01
10-01
20-01
90 mm -190mm INTERSECTION
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancil]ary/L25.eps
Detail L26
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
90 mm - 290 mm INTERSECTION
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L26.eps
Detail L27
10-03
15 01 15-01
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]lary/L2Zeps
S Detail L28
20-01 o 50-31
15-02
35-01
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L28.eps
Detail L29
10-01 30-01
20-03
30 01
50-33
15-01
15 01
30-0 1
30-01 15-01
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]]ary/L29.eps
Detail L30
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L30.eps
Detail L31.
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L31.eps
2 7R
Detail L32
30-01
30-0
30-01
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancil]ary/L32.eps
3.79
C..., IIU.d ,.vt Sr malt.,
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L33.eps
Detail L34
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L34.eps
Detail L35
10.01
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
10-01
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anciiiary/L35,eps
15 01 10-01
NOTE: This detail s available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancil]ary/L36.eps
LI-
10-0 1
10-0 7
10-0 1
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
20-0 1
20-01
20-01
20 07
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L3Zeps
Q Q')
Detail L38
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L38.eps
Detail L39
20-01
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L39.eps
Notes on Column Details (Details L40 to L42)
The design of columns, which may include the use of
steel reinforcement and grout, should be undertaken by
a qualified and experienced person
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Detail L40
20-61
COLUMN - CORNER
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Anci]lary/L40.eps
au L41.
20.61
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
20-61
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L41.eps
2OI
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancillary/L43eps
Detail L44
NOTE: This detail is available, in EPS format, on the enclosed CD-ROM as: Ancil]ary/L44.eps
29
Note to Detail L44
The cutting of chases in hollow concrete block walls
should be avoided. Cut chases weaken walls and do not
permit the use of fair-face finishes.
Wherever possible, services should be located in the
cores of hollow block walls as suggested in Detail L44.
Although electrical services only have been illustrated,
similar principles may be applied to other services
capable of fitting within the cores.
To make this technique work, careful planning and
co-ordination is needed during the design and
construction stages.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
3.87
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Estimating Contents
This chapter provides guidance on calculating the 4.1 BASIS OF TABLE
quantities of masonry units, mortar and grout for
particular projects. 4.2 WORKED EXAMPLE
BASIS OF TABLE
DENSITY OF MATERIALS
There are slight variations in face shell widths, core The following densities can be used to calculate wall
tapers, core dimensions and web rebates of hollow mass, for purposes of determining vertical gravity loads
concrete blocks throughout Australia. When calculating on supporting structures, earthquake loads and sound
mortar and grout quantities, exact dimensions should attenuation.
be sought from the manufacturer and adjustments Density
should be made to account for the peculiarities of the Material (kg/rn3)
particular units.
Dense-weight concrete masonry units 2180
MO RTAR
The mortar volume tables are based on the following
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
assumptions:
u 90-mm- and 110-mm-wide Units are fully bedded
(considered to be solid or cored units) and have full
perpendicular joints. All joints are 10 mm thick and
an allowance of 10% for frogs, cores and wastage. If
a higher wastage is expected, the estimator should
make the appropriate allowance.
140-mm- and 190-mm-wide units are face-shell bedded
(considered as hollow units) and have face-shell
bedded perpendicular joints. Minimum face shell
widths of 25 mm and 30 mm have been allowed for
140-mm and 190-mm units respectively. All joints are
10 mm thick and an allowance of 50% for overflow
into cores and for wastage. If a higher wastage is
expected, the estimator should make the appropriate
allowance.
GROUT
The tabulated grout quantities are based on the
percentage solid for the most common core sizes, as set
out below. An allowance of 10% for wastage has also
been included.
Width of unit Percentage solid
(mm) (%)
90 68 (cannot be grouted)
110 100 (carmot be grouted)
140 55
190 51
Table 4.1 Block, Mortar and Grout Quantities
190 51 2500 1.10 0.44 10.0 4.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 0.4
P
230 76
140
190
90
55
51
68
3876
3876
4845
1.09
1.31
1.52
0.28
0.34
0.31
6.7
9.9
1.7
2.6
1.7
2.5
0.4
0.6
0.7
1.0
0.2
0.3
4
L1
CALCULATION OF NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED
Deduct openings m2
n -Numberofcorners Deductcorners:
H = Heightofwall(m) n x H xt
=Thickness of wall (mm) 1000 m2
Netarea of masonry m2
Dimensions of units
(length x heightx width) mm
WORKED EXAMPLE
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this worked example is to demonstrate the derivation of Table 4.1 and
to enable similar calculations to be carried out.
AIM
To find the number of blocks, volume of mortar and volume of grout required for the wall illustrated.
42 000
DATA
Face area of wall: A = 3.6 x 42.0
= 151 m2
Thickness of mortar: tm = 10 mm
N = N100
100
1250x 151 NOTE:
N
- 100 When ordering, make allowance
= 1890 units say for halves, fittings and breakage
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
C
Volume of grout in wall:
E Vg = V100
100
C,)
uJ l.7x 151
100
= 2.6 m3
A
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
. S
II
Estimating
1: Li
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Construction Contents
This chapter provides information on the 5.1 TYPES OF WALLS
procedures for constructing concrete masonry
5.2 CONSTRUCTING WALLS
structures.
TYPES OF WALLS
TYPES OF WALLS
Veneer walls (Figure 5.lc) are usually constructed
as the outer walls of buildings and rely on a structural
member of steel or timber to support the masonry
veneer, to which it is tied by wall ties.
Cavity walls and diaphragm walls (Figure
5.ld,e,f,g) are generally constructed to serve as
exterior walls where weather resistance is required,
without resort to protective coatings. Such walls may
be constructed of hollow or solid blocks, or standard
or modular bricks. Both leaves may be built of the
same type of unit, or one leaf may be hollow and one
solid. One unit may be brick and one block, provided
the heights of the units are such that at least every
seventh bed joint of standard brickwork aligns with a
bed joint of the blockwork (Seven courses of standard
height brickwork represent a height of 600 mm, ie
the recommended cavity tie spacing.) Blocks 162 mm
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
S
IS
Solid or hollow concrete masonry Hollow concrete blockwork
F
Vertical steel
reinforcement
Bed-joint - Reinforcement
reinforcement. may consist of vertical,
horizontal or bed-joint, or
any combination of these
(a) Unreinforced Single-leaf (b) Reinforced Single-leaf
Masonry-veneerties
Structural
backing
Flashing
Weepholes
Unreinforced Veneer
Vertical steel
reinforcement
I Outer leaf
Inner leaf
Outer leaf
Cavity ties
Horizontal steel
reinforcement
Cavity ties
Inner leaf
Open perpends
as weepholes
for drainage
of cavity Inner leaf or
outer leaf or both
Flashing Flashing -y itnforted
Cavity ties
Horizontal steel
reinforcement
in cavity
IC',
-J
Inner leaf
(f) Diaphragm
Inner leaf
Ii!
(g) Reinforced-cavity
Inner leaf or
outer leaf may be
solid or hollow concrete masonry
SETTING OUT
The accuracy of the line and level of the first course is
most important, because inaccuracies will be magnified
in successive courses (Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3), If
the first course is wrong, it will be difficult to build the
wall correctly. The first course should, therefore, be set
out and laid with the greatest care.
The bricklayer should first locate the corners or ends
of the wall and any openings, and fix the level of the
first course Profile boards and string lines are used
commonly for this purpose (Figure 5.4).
Figure 5.2
The bricklayer should then set out the first course 'dry',
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 5.4
cu
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
OFigure 5.6
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.9
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.10
As each block is laid, excess mortar extruded from the
joints should be cut of f with the trowel and returned to
the mortar board, to be reworked with the fresh mortar
(Figure 5.11).
When laying hollow blocks, mortar should be applied
only to the face shells and their vertical projections
on the head joints (Figure 5.12). Unless specified
otherwise, mortar is not applied to the cross webs or
to full head joints. This procedure helps to isolate the
faces of the wall from leakage paths through mortal
joints, so reducing the tendency for capillary leakage
caused by weather. In fully grouted reinforced block
walls, the unfilled sections of Joints are filled during
grouting, providing an additional 'key' for the grout.
The ends of units should be 'buttered' with mortar
(Figure 5.13) for face-shell bedding. Several units can
be placed on end so that the bricklayer can butter their
head joints or perpendicular joints in a single operation,
thus saving time.
Figure 5.11
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
SUBSEQUENT COURSES
After laying the first course (Figure 5.14), corners are
usually built up four or five courses (Figure 5.15).
Each course is then checked for level (Figure 5.16),
and corners are checked for plumb and to ensure that
the vertical faces of all blocks are in the same plane
(Figure 5.17).
The course height should be checked at this time, using
a storey or gauge rod with markings corresponding to
the height of each course, including the 10-mm mortar
joints (Figure 5.18).
When building corners, each course should be racked
back half a unit. The horizontal spacing should be
checked by using a spirit level placed diagonally across
the corners of the units (Figure 5.19).
When 'filling in' between corners, the string line should
be stretched between corners, at the level of the top of
each course, to maintain correct line and level
Figure 5.12
(Figure 5.20).
Figure 5.17
Figure 5.16
Figure 5.15
A
I
¶1
Figure 5.19
Figure 5.20
Figure 5.18
When laying large units overhand, each unit should be
tilted towards the bricklayer to enable the upper edge
of the course below to be seen. This allows the unit
to be placed more accurately. By rolling it to a vertical
position and 'shoving' it towards the adiacent unit, it
can be laid to the string line with minimum adjustment
(Figure 5.21).
When setting the 'closure' unit in each course, all edges
of the gap and one end of the 'closure' unit should
be 'buttered' with mortar. The unit should then be
placed with care to avoid disturbing the adjacent units
(Figures 5.22 and 5.23).
FINISHING JOINTS
Weather-resistant joints and neat appearance depend on
proper finishing. This operation is performed when the
mortar has hardened to the point where it is just plastic
under thumb pressure.
Figure 5.21 To finish the joints, a jointing tool is used. This is a
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
CLEANING
Figure 5.22
Special care should be taken to prevent mortar smearing
or dropping on the surface of the wall. Embedded
mortar smears can not be removed completely after
hardening, and show through most paints or surface
treatments. Mortar droppings adhering to a wall should
be allowed to dry before they are removed with a
brush or a trowel. When dry and hard, most of the
mortar remaining can be removed by rubbing with a
small piece of concrete block the same colour as the
wall (Figure 5.28). Many cleaning problems can be
avoided, particularly with coloured blocks, by using
coloured mortar that matches the wall. However, the
best treatment is to keep the walls clean while they are
being built.
Figure 5.23
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
5.9
Figure 5.26
Figure 5.25
Figure 5.24
Figure 5.27
Figure 5.28
I
SUPPLEMENTARY RECOMMENDATIONS a
Cavity Walls
Cavity walls with two leaves separated by a continuous
air space and connected by corrosion-resistant metal or
plastic ties embedded in the mortar joints are generally
used where weather resistance is required without
further treatment. They are built similar to single-leaf
walls except as noted below.
Care should be taken to keep cavities and wall ties
free from mortar droppings. If this is not done, rain will
penetrate the wall and cause dampness problems inside
the building.
After laying the first course, surplus bedding mortar
should be cleaned from the cavity using a timber batten
slightly narrower than the cavity (Figure 5.29).
Wall ties should be placed on the surface of the
masonry units at the specified spacings. Ties should be
laid, sloping down a maximum of 10 mm towards the
exterior leaf of the wall (Figure 5.30). Figure 5.29
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 5.31
F; ifl
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
5.11
Figure 5.34
Figure 5.33
Figure 5.32
Reinforced Concrete Block Walls
Reinforced concrete block walls consist of hollow blocks
with vertical and horizontal reinforcement fully encased
in concrete grout.
Except for short starter bars cast in the concrete footing,
the vertical reinforcing bars are usually placed in the
hollow cores after the wall is completed. The horizontal
bars are placed in U-shaped lintel blocks or in the
rebated webs of double-U or H blocks progressively as
the wall is built.
On completion of blocklaying and placing of
reinforcement, the vertical and horizontal bars are
encased completely in grout, placed by pouring or
pumping from the top of the wall or from the level of a
major change in wall thickness.
Blocklaying practice is much the same as for
unreinforced concrete block walls, except as discussed
and illustrated below.
The starter bars for the vertical reinforcement are cast Figure 5.35
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
; 19
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 5.40
Figure 5.38
Figure 5.39
Figure 5.41
Figure 5.42
Where appearance is important, and both faces of the
wall must maintain bond, the following procedure may
be adopted. Instead of using special cleanout blocks
for the first course, standard hollow blocks (Xci type
units) maybe used. One face shell and part of the
webs on that side are removed by sawing to reduce
the overall thickness of the blocks by approximately 50
mm. After cleaning the cores, the cleanout holes are
blocked by using 390 mm x 190 mm x 40 mm thick
(5031) units, laid to maintain bond (Figure 5.43). These
units are bedded in mortar to the X.01 units. To prevent
movement or damage, they should be restrained and
supported by propping over their full length and height.
Grout should be of such consistency as to give free flow
without segregation. The slump at the time of placing
should be approximately 225 mm. Grout used to protect
reinforcement should have a portland cement content
of at least 300 kg/m3 and a characteristic strength
greater than 12 MPa. A value of at least 20 MPa is
recommended. The recommended maximum aggregate Figure 5.44
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Figure 5.45
Closing units (50.31 units)
laid to maintain bond
Figure 5.43
Figure 5.46
1,1
PROTECTION OF MATERIALS AND WORK
DURING CONSTRUCTION
Masonry units should be stored and protected on site in
such a way as to prevent:
damage by chipping and breakage;
i wetting by rain or ground water, or increase in
moisture content from other causes;
contamination by mud, dust, atmospheric pollution
or other substances likely to cause staining or loss of
bond;
entry of salts in solution from ground or other
sources; and
damage by frost.
Except for chipping and breakage, all of the above-
mentioned damage may be prevented by stacking
units on supports clear of the ground, and covering
Figure 5.47 them with heavy polythene, tarpaulins or other suitable
material in such a way that some circulation of air is
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
maintained.
Mortar and mortar materials should also be stored on
5
site so that they are protected from contamination and
Wall thickness Mass dampness. Pre-mixed mortar should be kept dry and free
Ref. (mm) (kg/rn2) I from premature deterioration.
jtA 300 400
IMPORTANT: Concrete masonry units should not
4 8 200 260
C 150 220
wetted before laying. The only exception to this rule
D 100 150
is in extremely hot, dry conditions, when it may be
permissible to sprinkle the bonding surfaces lightly with
water immediately before laying, to reduce suction.
Completed and partly completed work should be
protected by covering when necessary to prevent
physical damage or surface contamination by rain or
water and extreme heat or cold. Exposed tops of walls
2 should be covered at the end of each day's work, or
immediately if rain begins during the day, to prevent
S
=
=1 I entry of water.
Precautions should be taken to prevent masonry being
sub)ected to loading until the mortar and or the grout
have hardened sufficiently to support the load without
damage.
Wind during the construction of masonry walls is a
2025303540
Wind Gust Velocity (m/s)
potential cause of collapse, with consequent hazards to
life and property. Temporary bracing should be provided
during construction and until the mortar has gained
sufficient strength to resist wind. Figure 5.48 sets out
Figure 5.48 recommendations for the maximum height of unbraced
masonry walls during construction. The maximum
unhraced heights of walls of mass or thickness other
than those shown in this chart may be interpolated.
The thickness of a cavity wall may be assumed to be
two-thirds the sum of the thicknesses of its two leaves.
These recommendations are based on free-standing
walls with free air movement on both sides. Where
temporary bracing is installed, it is permissible for the
wall to project above the bracing to the height shown
in this chart.
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
CIi. ster 6
Cleaning and
Maintenance Contents
This chapter provides guidance on the correct 6.1 GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE
methods of cleaning and maintaining concrete
6.2 WEATHERPROOFING
masonry to retain attractive finishes.
6.3 CRACKING, FOOTING MOVEMENT AND
CONTROL JOINTS
correctly sealed.
The following measures should be taken to minimise Weep holes
the occurrence of efflorescence in masonry walls. Cavity walls should include numerous well-positioned
Tops of walls and parapets weep holes to allow any moisture in the cavity to
Walls and parapets should have protection such as escape. Cavities should be free of mortar droppings.
flashings or capping to the top surface. A common Removal of mortar smears
source of staining of masonry is water entering walls The external face of the masonry should be kept clear
and cavities at this point via the exposed horizontal of mortar smears.
surface.
Window sills 6.4.3 REMOVAL OF EFFLORESCENCE AND
Window sills with an inadequate projection provide a STAINING
source of water entry to the walls and will promote Once an efflorescence or staining problem is identified,
staining. The incorrect installation of window flashings the following procedure is suggested.
will exacerbate this problem.
Engage an expert to identify and report on the
Flashings source of efflorescence or staining. The report should
Flashings should protrude to the outside face of the
consider possible contributions by poor detailing
brickwork. If the flashing is stopped short of the core
(allowing ingress of water and contaminants) and the
holes in the external leaf, any moisture entering the
wall will be channelled into the units, permeating the materials (including masonry units, mortar and grout).
mortar, dissolving calcium hydroxide and eventually Since the staining could continue for some time, it
passing to the outside surface where the calcium is suggested that a building be allowed to stand for,
hydroxide carbonates. say, six months from when the efflorescence first
Masonry units appears before any remedial action is taken.
Unless required otherwise, it is a reasonable expectation At the end of this time, any unsightly deposits will
that concrete masonry units have an efflorescence be visible and the appropriate cleaning strategy can
potential of nil or slight.
be devised and implemented. Cleaning strategies
Mortar may include:
Mortar should be hard and sound. The recommended Dry brushing efflorescence off the surface
mixes are:
Washing with low pressure water jet
Type M3 For general applications (except as listed
Steam cleaning
for M4).
High pressure water jet blasting
Preferred: 1 part Type GP cement, 5 parts
sand plus methyl cellulose water thickener. Washing effloresoence off the surface using
proprietary cleaners and chemicals
Alternative: 1 part Type GP cement, I part
lime, 6 parts sand. Wet abrasive (grit) blasting
Dry abrasive (grit) blasting.
S
Building maintenance should be performed at this apply selected cleaning solution starting at the top
time, including: of the wall;
Cracked mortar Should be pointed let the cleaning solution stay on the wall for 1 to 5
Control joints sealed with a polyurethane minutes, or as directed by the manufacturer; and
flexible sealant wash the wall with high pressure starting at the top
Flashings should be repaired (do not direct jet onto mortar joints).
Rainwater downpipes should be repaired or In general, the higher the water pressure, the more
installed if not already in place effective the cleaning and the greater the potential
A clear sealant may be applied or renewed to damage to the surface (see Table 6.1).
protect the masonry against ingress of Table 6.1 Water Jet Cleaning
rainwater.
General Pressure Cleaning
6.4.4 CLEANING METHODS pressure (kPa) Damage ability
The methods of general cleaning listed in order of Mains 300 Low Low
increasing rigour are:
Low Up to 1500 Low Moderate
Dry Brushing
Dry hand brushes from small soft to hard scrubbing Medium 1500- 3000 Damage to Moderate
S brushes can be used to remove soft or loose surface smooth-face masonry to high
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
deposits such as dust, salts and weak crusts. However, High 3000- 5000 Damage to
it is possible that surface deposits of soluble salts polished-face masonry High
will reappear if water enters the surface of permeable
masonry and subsequently evaporates from the surface. Very high 5000- 50 000 Damage to
Repeated dry brushing may eventually arrest the split-face masonry High
appearance of the salts, but washing will probably be
more efficient.
Acid should not be used through the jet equipment
Water Washing
because:
This is one of the gentlest processes available. Use
of bucket and brush or garden hose and brush can It pushes the chemical deep into the substrate
generally remove most surface dirt. This will remove making it difficult to remove
surface deposits of soluble salts, but will probably fail to Chemical does not remain on wall long enough to
remove hardened calcium carbonate or mortar smears.
work, thus operator tends to use higher strengths to
Soaking with water has been used since Roman times, compensate
a slow steady stream of water causes the dirt deposits
Can cause harm to operator and surrounding
to swell, loosening their grip on the underlying masonry.
environment.
Accumulated waters, cascading over the face of the
masonry, then wash the loosened dirt away. Chemical Cleaning
Many chemicals can be applied to concrete masonry
Steam Cleaning
without appreciable injury to the surface, but strong
This is not often used because it is slow. However,
acids or chemicals with a strong acid reaction should
it can sometimes help remove deep-seated soiling,
definitely be avoided, Even weak acid should be used
softening oily, greasy or tarry deposits and for killing
only as a last resort as it dissolves the cement matrix
mould or algae on damp surfaces.
of the masonry, beginning at the surface. This leaves
Low-Pressure Water Jet the face more porous so that it absorbs more water and
A pump unit projects a low-pressure water jet against exposes more aggregate, thereby changing the colour
the surface to dislodge loosely held material. Often and texture of the masonry.
used as a follow up to a loosening process, eg chemical
The general procedure is to thoroughly wet the masonry
or brushing. Cleaning should begin at the top of the
surface, spray or brush a minimum amount of chemical,
masonry so water will run down and pre-soften the dirt
below
allow it to act for 1 to 5 minutes and then scrub. Wash
it off using one of the methods described above.
High-Pressure Water Jet (Blasting)
This incorporates hot water and a 15° fan nozzle at an Precautions are necessary to protect the operator.
appropriate distance (at least 150 mm) from the surface Occupational health and safety requirements and
common sense should prevail.
and appropriate pressure. The general procedure is:
Organic solvents are generally used on small areas of
allow at least 7 days for mortar to harden;
greasy substances by using a bandage or poultice. This
remove large mortar dags with hammer and chisel or can he expensive since they tend to evaporate or be
scutch hammer; absorbed. The more commonly used solvents are white
spirit, carbon tetrachloride, methy and ethyl alcohols,
S mask or protect adjacent areas;
thoroughly wet the wall until suction of masonry unit
proprietary paint stripper or dry-cleaning agents. They
is complete;
also tend to leave a visible residue or stain on the
masonry. 6
Detergents are surfactants (surface active agents) and 6.4.5 GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING
promote wetting of the soiled surface by water. Small APPROPRIATE CLEANING METHODS
quantities of detergent are often used when washing
The appropriate cleaning method depends on the
with water, usually at low pressure. Detergents aie
purpose of the cleaning and on the extent of the work
by no means harmless, with many being chemically-
to be done. A guide to assist in the selection is shown
aggressive. They are most effective and can be used in
in Table 6.2, the principle of which was developed in
the removal of earth stains.
a document published by the National Trustt The
Acid cleaners should be used only after considerable table uses four variables:
thought is given to the consequences, such as effect I degree of resistance of the masonry to damage
on the masonry, operator and the environment. There is
common well-founded resistance to the use of acids on 'T tenacity or degree of difficulty of removal of the
concrete masonry. soiling
Hydrochloric acid (muriatic acid or spirits of salts) is Is severity or potential of the method for damaging the
widely used on clay bricks to remove mortar stains since masonry
it dissolves portland cement. However, for this reason, I cleaning ability of the method.
it can have serious effects on the surface of concrete
masonry if used incorrectly. Generally, a solution of When selecting a cleaning method, it must be
1 part acid to 20 parts water (maximum strength 1 part recognised that the removal of stains may alter the
hydrochloric acid to 10 parts water) is recommended, physical condition and appearance of the masonry.
while an area of less than 6 m2 should be treated at a The task is to select the method that achieves the
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
time.
desired degree of cleaning while resulting in the least
SAFETY WARNING: Never add water to acid, always damaging alteration to the masonry.
add acid to the water. Hydrochloric acid will not remove Table 6.2 can be used as a general guide in the
salts, and will most likely make removal more difficult. following way.
Phosphoric acid is used for the removal of iron-bearing Identify the masonry material ('B) and the tenacity of
deposits (rusty stains). A maximum strength of 1 part the soiling UT)
acid to 10 parts water should be used Phosphoric acid Select a number of provisional cleaning methods
should not generally be used on coloured concrete
such that the cleaning method ('c) must be as high
masonry as bleaching of the iron oxide pigments will
result.
as the tenacity of the soiling ('T)
Oxalic acid is used for the removal of hardwood timber Select a method with a severity (1s) that does not
stains. 120 grams of oxalic acid with 4 litres of warm exceed the masonry degree of resistance (1R)
water is the recommended mix. Bleaching solutions As an example, consider the removal of soft urban
such as sodium hypochlorite (pool chlorine) have also grime (1T = 3) from smooth coloured masonry units
been found to be very effective and a readily-available (1R = 3). Cleaning methods which have IC = 3 or 4 are
chemical for use on hardwood timber stains. considered and low-pressure water jetting is selected
Wet Abrasive (Grit) Blasting ('C = 3), This has an 1s of 2 to 3 and therefore should
The objective is not to dissolve and wash away the not damage smooth coloured masonry with an 'B of 3.
stain but to remove the outer portion of the masonry on The method should then be tested. If not successful,
which the stain has deposited. Water and grit (usually a method with higher 'C should then be considered.
sand) are directed onto the surface under pressure. However, if high-pressure water jetting with acid were
Water cushions the abrasiveness of the grit and selected ('C = 6) then this has an Is of 7 and would
therefore is less destructive than dry sandblasting. It probably damage masonry with an 'R of 3.
is generally acceptable only on concrete masonry units
C)
0 that are intended to have their aggregates exposed, eg
C split-face, shot-blasted.
Cl
ct
ci)
Dry Abrasive (Grit) Blasting
This is commonly referred to as sand blasting. It is
C seldom used as it opens the surface of the masonry
cT
thus making it more susceptible to pollutants and
staining.
-c
C
cc
C)
0
I
Table 6.2 Guide to Selection of Cleaning Methods for Concrete Masonry Surfaces
2 2 2 2
Lightweight units Deposited efflorescen ce Hand brushing Steam Cleaning
Composition mortar Oil, grease Hand brushing with detergent Organic solvents
Smooth, coloured units Soils Low-pressure water jetting Low-pressure water washing
Soft urban grime Mechanical scrubbing Hand brushing
Chemical
Bleach
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
4 4 4 4
Standard units Bird droppings Medium-pressure water jetting Medium-pressure water jetting
Fire-rated units Plaster Mechanical scrubbing
Tar with detergent
Old hard paint Chemical (acids)
Soft mortar smears High-pressure water jetting
Timber stains
Iron and welding splatter
Honed units Moderate urban grime Manual abrasive removal Very-high-pressure water blasting
Polished units Hardened mortar smears High-pressure water jetting
Very-high-pressure
water blasting
Wet sand blasting
Shot-blasted units Modern plastic paints Dry sand blasting Wet sand blasting
Split-face units Hard urban grime Mechanical grinding Dry sand blasting
10 -'- 10 10
S
I REFERENCES AND
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CD-ROM o
Details for CAD Contents
This appendix incorporates a CD-ROM containing A.1 CONTENTS AND HOW TO USE IT
the details in PartC:Chapter 3 for use in computer z
w
A.2 LIMITED-LICENCE AGREEMENT
0
aided drafting, as well as the Specification from
PartC:Chapter 2.
0
A.3 CD-ROM DIRECTORY
The enclosed CD-ROM contains the following groups of BY OPENING THE SEAL ON THE PAGE CONTAINING THE
files: CD-ROM YOU ACCEPT ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
OF THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENT.
Part C: Chapter 3 Detailing, as a PDF (Portable
Document Format) file. This requires Adobe Acrobat I In this agreement "files" shall mean the machine-
Reader, version 3.0 or higher which is available free readable inclusions on the CD-ROM.
off the web at the following URL - 2 You may use unlimited copies of the files for your
www.adobe.comlprodindexlacrobat/readstep.html own purposes. The copies may be edited or modified
With this, all the details can be viewed on-screen to suit your purposes.
and their reference numbers noted for extraction from
3 You may not rent, lease or duplicate the CD-ROM
the data files. In addition (with version 4.0, or higher, containing the files, nor may you recompile the files,
of Adobe Acrobat Reader) the details may be cut modified or otherwise, for commercial resale.
and pasted to word processor applications and the
4 The Concrete Masonry Association of Australia
like, directly from the PDF file for creation of reports,
preliminary details, etc.
Limited and Standards Australia does not and cannot
warrant the performance or results you may obtain by
Data files for each of the details in Pait C:Chapter 3,
using the files.
containing most of the details as DXF (Document
5 In no event will Concrete Masonry Association of
Exchange Format) files, but some of the less
Australia Limited or Standards Australia be liable
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)
A')
A
CD-ROM DIRECTORY
S
Accessed by GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 05 Feb 2018 [SUPERSEDED] (Document currency not guaranteed when printed)