Features Business Explore Marketplace Pricing This repository Search Sign in or Sign up

Vinyasi / circuitjs1-falstad-vinyasi Watch 0 Star 0 Fork 0

Code Issues 0 Pull requests 0 Projects 0 Wiki Insights

Google Group: Tesla's Pierce Arrow EV Experiment of

1931
Vinyasi edited this page 13 minutes ago · 22 revisions

pierce-arrow.cmf will run in CircuitMod. Pages 5

Converted my Pierce Arrow EV

Simulation to Run in
Considered separately...
CircuitMod

pierce-arrow.txt will run at these locations... Google Group: Tesla's Pierce

Arrow EV Experiment of 1931
http://vinyasi.info/ne
Simulating Tesla's Pierce
http://falstad.com/circuit/ Arrow EV Experiment of 1931

There's nothing wrong with the

http://lushprojects.com/circuitjs/circuitjs.html
JavaScript version of Paul
And it will run at the following link if you have Java installed in your browser and import the file's Falstad's Java coded
software...
contents...
Welcome...

Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
 http://www.falstad.com/circuit-java/
Clone this wiki locally
And is-this-realistic.txt is an idea that works in a similar manner to the above files.
https://github.com/Vinyas
As a side note, adding a small resistor near the antenna, in pierce-arrow-kaboom.txt, inverts
resistance (negative resistance) and blows up when the switch is closed!

Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
 All of this shows me that our theory of electronics is correct. Yet, we don't take full advantage of it
or else why on Earth would our so-called physics deny this?

It might be better to rename our study of physics to its new name, called: the study of public
policy?

My analysis is this...

Maybe the reason why Eric Dollard says that a bunch of capacitors and coils of wire are analogous
to Tesla's use of his Magnifying Transmitter as a wireless transmitter is because capacitors are the
electrical equivalent to the mathematical square root while coils are the electrical equivalence of
the mathematical exponentiation? Thus, if energy in a circuit, or subcircuit, has no where to go but
around and around and around in a bound circle (without ground), then why shouldn't we get
infinite power gain over a period of time? In other words, escalation towards infinity either very fast
or very slow? This escalation at any speed would be due to an initial energy value being inserted
into the circuit equivalent to making an unknown variable equal to some finite value - let's presume
some number other than one having a sign value of positive: 1.6. Then we take its square root
which will result in two answers: positive and negative 1.2649. Now, we have two entities not just
two possible answers taken one at a time, but both taken at the same time since both are true and
we're dealing here with the simulation of a real world situation: massaging energy inside of a
circuit.

So far, we've initiated a circuit by injecting some energy possibly a little voltage from the positive
pole of a battery giving the circuit +1.6 volts. Then, we passed this energy through a capacitor
which resulted in its dual square roots each of which were squared by passing these numeric
values through an iron cored winding. But we make both the capacitor and the iron cored winding
of a low value of capacitance and inductance to insure that they immediately reach saturation and
kick out the excess which they can't absorb. This results in the reprocessing of some of whatever
they receive through an endless cycle of repetition.

Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
 Using this system of energy management will always result in a multiplication of power beginning
with the low level capacitor (let's say, having a value of 1 pico Farad) square rooting its inception of
energy followed by the multiplication of each of those roots when this energy passes through the
iron cored inductor.

The reason why each mathematical process treats inputs as unique is due to another phenomenon
which has been taking place simultaneous with the above but which I have failed to mention: the
creation of more variety of waveforms. These waveforms might be of a unique frequency, or
geometry, or phase relation, or any other quality imaginable, or any combination. This gives a
unique identity to each wave making it possible to clone waves and at the same time increase the
overall power of the circuit by this simple Thevenin equivalence of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter
described by Eric Dollard as his "analog computer" of a transmission network in which the
capacitors are all in series and the inductors are all in parallel in this transmission network.

Reposted from...

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/teslas-pierce-arrow-ev-experiment-of-1931

Tesla's 1931 Pierce-Arrow EV Experiment Simulated in JavaScript

Tesla's 1931 Pierce-Arrow EV Experiment Simulated to Run in CircuitMod's Java

Tesla's Pierce-Arrow EV Experiment of 1931 - Google Group

© 2018 GitHub, Inc. Terms Privacy Security Status Help Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About

Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD