Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Paediatr Child Health Vol 18 No 9 November 2013 ©2013 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved 459
Commentary
that the most common cause of the so-called ‘right middle lobe It has been the author’s experience that salbutamol delivered by
syndrome’ is asthma. The confusion surrounding this issue dates wet nebulization alone is particularly beneficial. Rarely has the
back to the 1950s and 1960s (10,11). Kjellman (11), in his study author encountered a child with this asthma phenotype who could
investigating the relationship between asthma and recurrent pneu- be successfully managed using metered-dose inhalers, although
monia, noted that 14 of 125 asthmatic children fulfilled the cri- they may exist. Oral steroids, such as prednisolone, may be
teria for recurrent pneumonia and, radiographically, the RML was required for more severe exacerbations. Following an explanation
over-represented but, unfortunately, as the author stated, no dis- and reassurance that their otherwise healthy child has no reason to
tinction was made between atelectasis and pneumonia. experience recurring episodes of pneumonia (including written
Probably the most illustrative study was that by Eigen et al (4), instructions), the parents are instructed to initiate therapy at
who examined 81 patients referred to their clinic with a diagnosis of home at the onset of the child’s symptoms and continue, generally
persistent or recurrent pneumonia. The diagnosis was based on abnor- for seven to 10 days. Antibiotics are not prescribed. Children with
mal chest radiographs demonstrating “segmental or subsegmental recurrent, more severe episodes benefit from the use of daily
densities or an increase in bronchovascular associated densities.” inhaled steroids, similar to other children with asthma (16).
Twenty of 81 patients had an apparent cause for their persistent or Having had the opportunity to follow these patients for many
recurrent pneumonia. Of the 61 with no obvious etiology, 30 had a years, it has become apparent that the recurring wet cough eventu-
history of allergy or family history of asthma, 19 had a history of ally becomes a dry one and none have developed bronchiectasis.
wheezing and 11 had wheezing noted on physical examination. In 30 years, the author has never observed recurrent bacterial
Nineteen patients with no underlying etiology underwent pulmonary pneumonia in an otherwise normal child, yet hardly a week passes
function testing, and nine had airflow obstruction, with four of five without being referred such a child subjected to multiple chest
demonstrating a bronchodilator response. Twelve patients were radiographs and an abundance of antibiotics. Physicians should
recalled for pulmonary function testing and three had airways obstruc- consider a diagnosis of hypersecretory asthma in these children
tion and bronchodilator response. The nine with normal lung func- and provide more appropriate and effective therapy.
tion underwent a methacholine challenge, and eight had positive
responses. In total, 92% of the no-etiology group had evidence of air- Educational REsouRcEs foR PaREnts: Hypersecretory
ways hyperreactivity. The authors concluded that their study had Asthma – Information for Parents. Chest Clinic, IWK Health Centre
“identified a group of asthmatics in whom excessive mucus production (Halifax, Nova Scotia).
rather than bronchospasm caused the majority of symptoms and in
whom the recurrent chest infiltrates originated as atelectasis from REfEREncEs
1. Wald E. Recurrent and nonresolving pneumonia in children.
mucus plugging rather than as infectious processes”. Semin Respir Infect 1993;8:46-58.
Hypersecretory asthma does not completely fit the description 2. Shann F, Hart K, Thomas D. Acute lower respiratory tract
of a newly discovered entity referred to as ‘persistent or protracted infections in children: Possible criteria for selection of patients for
bacterial bronchitis’ (PBB) because the latter is described as antibiotic therapy and hospital admission. Bull World Health Organ
chronic wet cough lasting longer than four weeks and resolution of 1984;62:749-53.
3. Elphick H, Ritson S, Rodgers H, et al. When a “wheeze” is not a
cough with antibiotic treatment (12). However, there is the pos- wheeze: Acoustic analysis of breath sounds in infants.
sibility that some patients with PBB have hypersecretory asthma. Eur Respir J 2000;16:593-7.
Of 81 patients with PBB, Donnelly et al (13) noted a diagnosis of 4. Eigen H, Laughlin J, Homrighausen J. Recurrent pneumonia in
asthma in 31%. The author suggested that PBB is often misdiag- children and its relationship to bronchial hyperreactivity.
nosed as asthma; however, an alternative explanation is that Pediatrics 1982;70:698-704.
5. Phelan P, Olinsky A, Robertson C. Respiratory illness in children,
asthma is misdiagnosed as PBB. 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994:146-7.
It must be emphasized that this author is referring to children 6. Kramer M, Roberts-Brauer R, Williams R. Bias and “overcall” in
with recurring wet cough associated with viral respiratory tract interpreting chest radiographs in young febrile children.
infections, not chronic wet cough with or without sputum produc- Pediatrics 1992;90:11-3.
tion. In the latter situation, bronchiectasis should be considered. 7. Davies H, Wang E, Manson D, et al. Reliability of the chest
radiograph in the diagnosis of lower respiratory infections in young
Evidence of bronchiectasis on the chest radiograph includes persis- children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996;15:600-4.
tent patchy infiltrates, dilated mucous-filled bronchi resembling 8. Owayed A, Campbell D, Wang E. Underlying causes of recurrent
fingers in a glove or dilated air-filled bronchi resembling tram pneumonia in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:190-4.
tracks. Bronchiectasis may be confirmed using computed tomog- 9. Lodha R, Puranik M, Natchu U, et al. Recurrent pneumonia in
raphy of the chest. Causes of bronchiectasis include cystic fibrosis, children: Clinical profile and underlying causes. Acta Paediatr
2002;91:1170-3.
primary ciliary dyskinesia, immunodeficiency, retained foreign 10. Ratner B. Asthma in children: Salient diagnostic problems.
body and recurrent aspiration (5). JAMA 1950;142:538-42.
The diagnostic confusion between asthma and recurrent pneu- 11. Kjellman B. Bronchial asthma and recurrent pneumonia in children
monia has recently been discussed by Brand et al (14). The authors – clinical evaluation of 14 children. Acta Paediatrica Scand
state that asthma is not a common underlying cause of recurrent 1967;56:651-9.
12. Chang A, Redding G, Everard M. Chronic wet cough: Protracted
pneumonia but the probability remains that the diagnosis of recur- bronchitis, chronic suppurative lung disease and bronchiectasis.
rent pneumonia itself is questionable. It is recommended that the Pediatr Pumonol 2008;43:519-31.
consultant limit investigations to a review of previous chest radio- 13. Donnelly D, Critchlow A, Everard M. Outcomes in children treated
graphs, sweat testing, serum immunoglobulins and, for individuals for persistent bacterial bronchitis. Thorax 2007;62:80-4.
old enough, spirometry. Young children swallow rather than 14. Brand P, Hoving M, deGroot E. Evaluating the child with recurrent
lower respiratory tract infections. Paediatr Respir Rev
expectorate and, consequently, sputum is rarely available for cul- 2012;13:135-8.
ture or examination (15). 15. Rogers D. Pulmonary mucus: Pediatric perspective. Pediatr Pulmonol
For children with recurrent ‘pneumonia-like’ symptoms due to 2003;36:178-88.
underlying asthma and/or hypersecretory asthma, exacerbations 16. Kovesi T, Schuh S, Spier S, et al. Achieving control of asthma in
typically improve with intermittent administration of salbutamol. preschoolers. CMAJ 2010;182:E172-83.