Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
A primary goal in neuroscience research is to understand the activity of individual neuronal populations within a
specific behavioral context. This goal is presented with challenges such as the heterogeneity of cell types within
the brain as well as the high speed (millisecond timescale) of brain activity. In addition, animal models are
needed for high throughput, controlled studies of brain activity. Many researchers use mouse models for
behavioral research, but mice present additional constraints due to their small size. To confront these challenges,
researchers have combined genetic methods with small scale engineering to develop tools to specifically target
and record from neuronal populations within awake and behaving mice. The combined use of optical
modulation and electrode recording has coined the term ‘optrode’ within the field. This paper addresses the
Introduction
In recent studies researching neural signals, the use of in vivo electrophysiology probes has become
more prevalent. These probes allow for the very precise monitoring of individual neurons. The use of multiple
electrophysiology wires or multi-array silicon probes can also allow for simultaneous monitoring of numerous
individual neurons. This can be extremely beneficial when the precise location of a phenomenon in the brain is
already known, but data on the activity in that location is needed. For example, if a neuron has been seen to
activate in response to the subject viewing the color green, electrophysiology probes may be beneficial to
determine the effects on that specific neuron while viewing different intensities of green.
Through the use of optogenetics, certain proteins that are responsive to light can be genetically inserted
into cells. The presence of these proteins can be used to modulate various cellular functions such as excitation or
inhibition of action potentials. The neurons can then be either stimulated to initiate an action potential or
inhibited when exposed to certain wavelengths of light. The light exposure is often delivered by the controlled
use of optical fibers. Two of the primary proteins used in neuroscience today are Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)
and halorhodopsin (NpHR). These were discovered to have an open channel effect when exposed to certain
wavelengths of light. ChR2, opens when exposed to blue light and allows the flow of ions which, depolarize the
cell and stimulate an action potential. NpHR will conversely open when exposed to yellow light and will allow
the flow of ions that hyperpolarize the cell and inhibit action potentials. Due to their difference in wavelength
trigger activation they are often used in tandem. This practice can be used in research to determine the effects of
the stimulation as well as to treat certain diseases if the effect is already known.
Due to the heterogeneity of neuronal cell types, we can use cell targeting abilities of optogenetics to
introduce these protein to specific cells in the brain. This is often done via cell type specific promoter fragments
that are introduced into to the subject or specified breeding. They are often introduced into the cells via viral
vectors that carry the promoters. These promoters are then read many times and the corresponding proteins are
The combination of electrophysiology probes, optogenetics, and optical fibers can be used to stimulate
and monitor that stimulation in a specific neuron or group of neurons. The controlled perturbation of local
circuits allows the researcher to gain a better understanding of how the circuit is connected. With that
Paper 1
Targeting and Readout Strategies for Fast Optical Neural Control In Vitro and In Vivo
As previously mentioned, the heterogeneity of the neuronal cells is a major reason why optogenetics
have become so useful. In 2007, Gradinaru et al. wrote a review on the first strategies combining optogenetic
modulation with electrophysiological recording. They described that optogenetics allow for the targeting of cells
in various ways such as viral mediated injection during development to incorporate the proteins into neural
layers, injection with promoter fragments that only promote in specific subtypes of neurons or specific
subcellular portions of the neurons, and also the simple projection of the photo stimulus. All of these targeting
methods allow for more specified research from locations and subtypes of cells even to the subcellular level of a
single neuron. The group showed examples of research that had been done that shows these methods were all
The group described that the implementation of optically stimulated proteins can be paired with
numerous methods of data recording. A major benefit being the fact that optically stimulating a neuron will not
produce any electrical artifacts. It can be paired quite effectively with physio electrical signal recording done via
a simple electrode. Due to the high speed of these signals and effective recording, very high temporal resolution
can be seen. Optical neural control can also be paired with other methods such as luminescent optical recording
and long term biochemical analysis. If the speed of acquisition and optical stimulation delivery is sufficient,
luminescent optical recording can be used to determine the molecular and ionic information concerning neuronal
and local circuit action potentials. The long term biochemical analysis on the other hand, may allow for the
long-term tracking and validation of the effects optical neural control has on neurons and circuits. Through
simple visual analysis however, larger scale changes can be seen through the use of optical neural control.
Specifically, the behavior of conscious rodents can be altered via optogenetic stimulation. This could be seen in
THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPTRODE
an experiment in which, only the right side of a rodent's brain was optogenetically stimulated while awake. This
experiment resulted in the continued tendency for the rodent to turn left and walk in a counterclockwise spiral
Paper 2
Multi-array silicon probes with integrated optical fibers: light-assisted perturbation and recording of local
Once the idea of the optrode was exposed to the field, there was a major push to increase the spatial
resolution of the devices. In order to achieve this aim, Royer et al., (2010) developed multi-array silicon probes
equipped with micron-scale optical fibers for optogenetic probing of neural circuits. Figure 3 shows the general
engineering design and images of the completed device. The group etched the optical fiber using hydrofluoric
acid and then cured the fiber to the silicon probe via UV curable epoxy (Figure 3A-B). The optical fiber
equipped shanks were then arranged in either 4 or 8 shank probes (Figure 4). The shanks were designed such
that the optical fiber could terminate between 300 micrometers before the tapering of the shank to 100
micrometers past the end of the shank, allowing for versatility in where the light modulation was occurring.
Using these multi-shank silicon probes, the group injected a parvalbumin targeting
halorhodopsin virus into the hippocampus of mice. By implanting a 4-shank probe with one light equipped
shank into the halorhodopsin expressing animals, the group was able to show spatial specificity in neural
modulation via the light equipped channel (Figure 5). The 8-shank probe was capable of recording from “50 to
140 well-clustered neurons,” which was a significant increase in spatial resolution compared to previous
methods. Using this technique, the group went on to show an example of a behavioral task in which light
modulation was applied, selectively activating specific neurons during the task (Figure 6).
Paper 3
The flexDrive: an ultra-light implant for optical control and highly parallel chronic recording of neuronal
Chronic recording of neuronal ensembles is challenging, especially in behaving mice. The complexity
of available drive mechanisms, implant weight tolerated by mice, and finding the precise positioning for high-
THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPTRODE
quality recording, limits current methods to recordings from no more than 4–8 electrodes in a single target area.
This becomes even more complicated when integrating optic fibers for optogenetic manipulations. Mice comfort
and survivability imposes weight limit of about 4g, and even 2g when a combination of recording with
behavioral phenotyping is desired (motion and videography needs). Previous studies bypassed the weight
problem by offsetting the implant weight with a pulley system or attaching a helium-filled balloon to the
implant, or by placing the animal on a headpost, which aren’t ideal. Another method utilizes static electrode
arrays to make large-scale recordings within a lightweight device. However, in case of inaccurate positioning or
glial encapsulation, use of static electrodes prevents an easy change in position. There is a need for a low
weight, with high number of individually movable electrodes, high placement stability, and independently
adjustable optical fibers that would allow high-quality recording in behaving mice.
A highly miniaturized drive design that replaces the drive mechanisms found in current implants with a
one-piece spring design was developed. “FlexDrive” fits 16 individually movable tetrodes (up to 64 channels),
can maintain stable recording conditions for months, integrates 2+ optic fibers, and only weighs ~2g (Figure
7B). Electrodes are positioned by an array of flexible polyimide guide tubes, while the electrode sits in a
movable “shuttle tube” that can be laterally adjusted using screws (Figure 7A), where each screw turn
corresponds to a 250μm lateral motion. This allows the user to adjust the position of individual electrode, even
after surgery, which is important for several reasons like in the case of glial encapsulation.
An injection of adenovirus was used to deliver the gene for channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) to the SI region
and the device was mounted, all in the same surgical procedure (Figure 8A). The authors were able to show
recorded activity from relevant neurons in response to laser pulses (Figure 8B). In addition, a multi-site
recording from both the SI region and the thalamic reticular nucleus (RTN) was achieved by adjusting
individual electrodes, showing that the design can produce parallel recordings from 16 electrodes from two sites
with the accuracy required to observe neurons in small, deep targets such as the TRN. To conclude, the
flexDrive presents a straightforward method for obtaining stable and high-quality electrophysiological data from
multiple target sites in awake, behaving mice. This permits researchers to make full use of the precision and
THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPTRODE
specificity of optogenetic methods by directly probing the concerted function of neural circuits, rather than
individual neurons.
Paper 4
Continuing on the trend of increasing spatial resolution during neural recording, Jun et al. (2017) took
the silicon probe to a new level of spatial specificity. With the goal of high spatial resolution across a large
recording area, the group fabricated a silicon probe, which they coined ‘Neuropixels.’ The probe incorporated
384 recording channels capable of programmably addressing 960 individual recording sites along the 10-mm
long, 70×20-micrometer cross-section shank (Figure 9). The probe was fabricated and programmed similar to
computer chips and allows for electrical recording across large neuronal populations and multiple brain regions.
In awake, head fixed mice, the group was able to implant two probes and record from more than 700
well-isolated single neurons within 5 brain structures (Figure 10). Each probe is capable of recording from
approximately 300 neurons at a time. This has only been accomplished with a 16 shank silicon probe similar to
those described in the second paper (Royer et al., 2010). Thus, the Neuropixels probe drastically improves
The group also showed that the probe was compatible with optical excitation conditions used for
optogenetic modulation. In a saline solution, the probe showed little recording artifact due to direct illumination
suggesting that the probe would be viable for in vivo recording in tandem with optical stimulation. Preliminary
data from such recordings suggests that the Neuropixels silicon array may be a glimpse at the future of the
optrode.
Future Directions
The Neuropixels silicone probe, described in James J. Jun et al., constitutes a real advancement when it
comes to spatiotemporal resolution and coverage of large volume. However, the paper is lacking two obvious
components that were present in other papers featured in this review. First, it would be interesting and necessary
to examine the results of these superior neuronal recordings when modulated by optogenetics in behaving mice.
Then it would be possible to investigate whether the new data allows us to better control/predict/ identify free
THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPTRODE
behaviors in mice. Second, the Neuropixels lack the ability for adjusting individual electrode post-surgery. A
device with comparable spatiotemporal resolution that would have such an ability would be superior since it
Another interesting future research direction is the ability to incorporate multi-site recordings for
investigation of coordination dynamics. The “flexDrive”, featured here and designed by Voigts et al., showed
limited potential for multi-site recording, but it is very restricted in application and comes on the expense of
spatial resolution (less electrodes for each site). A device that would adhere to the weight and size constrictions,
but would allow high resolution, multi-site recording via, for example, two different drivers, would be a nice
Lastly, we want to jump many years forward and discuss possible clinical applications. Even though we
still need to translate these designs to larger animals, and eventually humans, when we finally achieve that goal
and implant such an optrode-based device in humans, the exciting possibilities seem endless. One example
would be the trend that is currently being investigated in almost all monitoring fields- a closed-loop therapeutic
system. Such a system would be able to predict upcoming adverse events (an epileptic attack, a stroke, etc.) and
apply the needed neuronal stimulation to prevent it or substantially ease the symptoms.
References
Gradinaru, V., Thompson,K.R., Zhang, F., Mogri, M., Kay, K., Schneider, M.B., & Deisseroth, K.
(2007). Targeting and Read out Strategies for Fast Optical Neural Control In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Neurosci.
27(52):14231–14238.
Jun, J.J., et al. (2017). Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural
activity.Nature. 551(7679):232-236.
Royer,, S., Zemelman, B.V., Barbic, M., Losonczy, A., Buzsáki, G., & Magee, J.C. (2010). Multi-array
silicon probes with integrated optical fibers: light assisted perturbation and recording of local neural circuits in
Voigts, J., Siegle, J.H., Pritchett, D.L. & Moore, C.I. (2013). The flexDrive: an ultra-light implant for
optical control and highly parallel chronic recording of neuronal ensembles in freely moving mice. Front. Syst.
Figures
Figure 2: Optical Control of Behavior – Walking behavior of a mouse before (green), during (black), and after
(red) optical stimulation. Optical control of the right motor cortex caused the animal to walk in left hand circles.
(Gradinaru et al., 2007)
THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPTRODE
Figure 3: Silicon Array Schematic – A-top) Etching of optical fiber via hydrofluoric acid; B) Securing of
optical fiber to silicon array via UV curable epoxy; C) Images of completed silicon array; A-bottom) Schematic
of implantation into a rodent. (Royer et al., 2010)
Figure 4: Multi-Shank Silicon Probe – A) 4-shank probe with one light equipped channel; B) 8-shank silicon
probe with 4 light equipped channels; C) 8-shank silicon probe with 4 light equipped channels of variable fiber
optic termination location. (Royer et al., 2010)
Figure 5: Light Modulation – Sinusoidal light modulation on one channel of a 4-shank probe showing spatial
specificity in neural activity modulation. (Royer et al., 2010)
THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPTRODE
Figure 6: Neural Modulation During Behavior – A) Behavioral set up; B) Light modulation during specific
behavioral region; C) Recordings from 10 cells during behavior showing specificity inn responsiveness. (Royer
et al., 2010)
Figure 7: flexDrive Schematic - A) Internal view of flexDrive featuring the interface board, the 16 adjusting
screws, the polyimide drive body, and the drive spring; B) External view of the flexDrive mounted on a mouse’s
head, weighing only ~2g and 22mm head to cap; C) Adjustable electrode mechanism. The mobile shuttle tube is
adjustable by the drive spring (connected to the screw) and slides laterally inside the guiding tube to control the
position of the electrode. (Voigts et al., 2013)
Figure 8: Optical Modulation with flexDrive - A) Activation of neurons in S1 region with ChR2; B) Trace of an
identified neuron on one of the tetrodes for one session. (Voigts et al., 2013)
THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPTRODE
Figure 9: Fully Integrates Silicon Array Schematic – Silicon array containing 960 recording sites with 384
live channels. (Jun et al., 2017)
Figure 10: In Vivo Recording with Fully Integrated Array – A) Probe 1 site and isolated unknit recording from
3 brain regions; B) Probe 2 site and isolated unknit recording from 2 brain regions. (Jun et al., 2017)