Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Problem: It is possible that more wells in the future around Hassi Messaoud will
encounter virgin pressure. Virgin formation pressures are predicted to be 1.456 SG
(6,969 psi) at a total vertical depth of 3,365m, which results in a 6,029 psi maximum
surface pressure (assuming a gas/oil gradient of .23 SG), which occurs during a tubing
leak (see attached StressCheck results). This would exceed the API Spec 6A (19th
Edition) / ISO 10423 specifications for the 13 5/8” 5K x 11” 5K Casing Head Spool. The
API test pressure for this spool is 7,500 psi (1.5 times the rated pressure). Previous
editions of RP6A called for a 10,000 psi test pressure (2 times rated pressure) for 5K
equipment so most wellheads and spools are constructed to withstand this pressure. If
this is the case, a manufacturer should be able to certify a wellhead to 6,650 psi since
the equipment will test to 10,000 psi (or 1.5 times the working pressure).
Solution: The major suppliers of wellheads should be contacted and it verified that they
can certify a 5K casing head spool to 6,650 psi working pressure. Of course the casing
head spool won’t contain the API or ISO 10423 stamps but RP 6A, API states:
“API standards are published to facilitate the broad availability of proven, sound
engineering and operating practices. These standards are not intended to obviate the
need for applying sound engineering judgment regarding when and where these
standards should be utilized. The formulation and publication of API standards is not
intended in any way to inhibit anyone from using any other practices.
ITAG was contacted (Martin Scheurer 00-49-51-41-914-267) and the problem was
discussed and Martin informed me that they had already been approached on this and a
letter had been written. They can either supply new 5,000 psi wellhead spools that had
been tested to 10,000 psi or verify that existing wellheads would test to 10,000 psi. That
letter is attached.
FMC was contacted (Martin Frain 029-738-417) and they stated that their 5,000 psi
spools could be tested to 10,000 psi and they would pass once the lockdown screws
and packing materials were upgraded to 10,000 psi specs. Valve components would
also have to be upgraded to withstand the 10,000 psi test. They said they would certify
in writing to this test pressure. A letter from them as well as their design calculations for
6,650 psi. is attached.
Cameron was contacted (Philip 029-737-391) and they also stated their 5,000 spools
should have no problem testing to 10,000 psi and they would document accordingly.
Conclusion:
All three major manufacturers of wellheads stated that they could test and certify their
5,000 psi casing spools to 10,000 psi, which at 1.5 times the working pressure of 6,650
psi follows the testing guidelines in API RP 6A. This will allow 5,000 psi casing spools to
be used on the wells in Hassi Messaoud where virgin formation pressures are being
encountered and a maximum surface pressure of 6,029 psi predicted. Of course
accurate formation pressure measurements and gas/oil gradient calculation will assure
that the 6,650 working pressure of these casing spools is not exceeded.
This concept is not new to Algeria. The wellhead manufacturers have supplied 6,650 psi
working pressure wellhead equipment to operators here for some time. Those operators
include, but are not limited to, El Gassil, RKF, BHP and Talisman.
Note: Time and cost were not taken into consideration for this analysis only the technical
feasibility.
2) StressCheck Analysis
a) Test method
Subject assembled equipment to a hydrostatic body test prior to shipment from the
manufacturer’s facility. The hydrostatic body test shall be the first pressure test
performed. Do not apply test pressure as a differential pressure across closure
mechanisms of valves. Use water or water with additives as the testing fluid. Complete
tests prior to painting; however if the bodies and other pressure-containing parts have
been made of wrought material, tests may be completed after painting.
Loose connectors, bullplugs and valve-removal plugs do not require a hydrostatic test.
The hydrostatic body test for assembled equipment shall consist of three parts:
the primary pressure-holding period;
the reduction of the pressure to zero;
the secondary pressure-holding period.
Conduct tests prior to the addition of body-filler grease. Lubrication applied during
assembly is acceptable.
Both pressure-holding periods shall not be less than 3 min; do not start the timing until
the test pressure has been reached, the equipment and the pressure-monitoring gauge
have been isolated from the pressure source, and the external surfaces of the body
members have been thoroughly dried.
Determine the hydrostatic body test pressure by the rated working pressure of the
equipment. Hydrostatic test pressures shall be as given in Table 19.
b) Special considerations
For equipment with end or outlet connections having different working pressures, use the lowest working
pressure
rating to determine the hydrostatic body test pressure (except for cross-over connectors and chokes).
Test a cross-over connector at a test pressure based on the pressure rating for the upper connection.
Apply test
pressure inside and above the restricted-area packoff of the lower connection. The lower connection shall
be tested
below the restricted area packoff to a level based on its pressure rating.
For chokes having an inlet connection of a higher pressure rating than the outlet connection, test the body
hydrostatically, from the inlet connection to the body-to-bean seal point of the replaceable seat or flow
bean, to the
appropriate pressure for the inlet connection. Test the remainder of the body, downstream from the seal
point, to
the appropriate pressure for the outlet connection. Temporary seat seals may be used to facilitate testing.
Valves and chokes shall be in the partially open position during testing.
Test each bore of multiple-bore equipment individually.
c) Acceptance criteria
The equipment shall show no visible leakage under the test pressure. Leakage by the thread during the
hydrostatic
testing of a threaded wellhead member when joined with a threaded test fixture is permissible above the
working
pressure of the thread.
File: Design #1 Date: May 21, 2008 Page: 1
GENERAL DATA
Description: Wellbore #1
Well Options, Deviated: Yes
Well Options, Offshore: No
Well TD (MD): 4500.00 m
Reference Point: RKB
Air Gap: 0.00 m
Origin N: 0.00 m
Origin E: 0.00 m
Azimuth: 290.00 °
Section View
0
Section View
300
600
900
1200
1500
True Vertical Depth (m)
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
3300
3600
0 35 70 105 140 175 210 245 280 315 350 385 420
VSection (m)
700
1050
1400
1750
Measured Depth (m)
2100
2450
2800
3150
3500
3850
4200
4550
4900
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00
Equivalent Mud Weight (sg)
WELL SUMMARY
Depth (MD) Gas Kick Tubing Leak Fluid Gradients w/ Pore Press
(m) (psi) (psi) (psi)
500
750
1000
1250
1500
Measured Depth (m)
1750
2000
2250
2500
2750
3000
3250
3500
0 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 5400 6300 7200 8100 9000 9900 10800 11700
Pressure (psi)
page 1 of 1
A technical request has been issued on 23.04.2008 for up-rating the 5.000 psi WP
Casing Spool 13 5/8" x 11" to a maximum working pressure (MWP) of 6.600 psi.
Up-rating of 5k Wellhead Equipment to a MWP of 6.500 psi or 6.600 psi is a praciable and economical
solution when just a slightly higher working pressure is required than the standard 5.000 psi.
All dimensions and flange interfaces remain as specified by API 6A for 5M equipment.
We can propose 2 reliable and save ways to supply Sonatrach with up-rated Casing Spools:
1. To supply new Casing Spools, which are manufactured, tested and certified to 6.600 psi MWP.
2. To upgrade already supplied Casing Spools from 5.000 psi to 6.600 psi - this has to be done
by a 2-step-program:
A – First, to check each individual Casing Spool Assembly for material properties and, if passed
B – Second, re-testing (pressure testing) according to API 6 A standard FAT procedure but with
increased test pressures (shell test 10.000 psi / closure test 6.600 psi)
API 6A as the framework for Wellhead Equipment standardizes basic dimensions as e.g. flange interfaces,
inner and outer diameters and also the corresponding pressure classes. In cooperation with dimensions and
pressures, API 6A has also specified the minimum material properties and has classified 4 standard strength
classes (material designations).
For 5.000 psi flange connections, it is possible to use material of the next higher strength class (designation)
which gives the necessary increase of yield strength to withstand a MWP of 6.600 psi.
By experience, most ITAG Wellhead Equipment has higher mechanical properties than the specified
minimum values. When performing an up-rating of previously delivered 5k equipment, we can not guarantee
that all parts will pass, but empirically it will be a figure of 70 - 90%.
It is mandatory that each spool assembly needs to be checked and has to pass a pressure test for getting
uprated and recertified.
2008-04-29/MS
Head Office: Itagstrasse, 29221 Celle, Germany · Telephone +49 / 51 41 / 9 14-0 · Telefax +49 / 51 41 / 9 14-2 34 · E-mail ivop@itag-ce.de
FMC Technologies SA
Surface Wellhead
Route des Clérimois
BP 705
89107 Sens Cedex France
Phone +33 3 86 95 87 18
Fax +33 3 86 95 89 87
! " #
$ ! # # # "
! % $ & #
! ! # !
$ # # #
% ' # ! " !
$ $ # & $
( $ " !
" ! $ ) $ * ! $
# + #
, ! )
" # ! $ #
" - . % ! "
! " % / #
" # - . $ $ % # !
# $ ) "
% + 0
# " * ! $ !
" ! #
!
123 # $ $ $ $ #
# ) ! / $ $ !
! / 4 # $ 5667 5117 $ $
% 8# $ !
! / - .9 # $ #
#
% :+ ; #
" # $ $ < ! # # ' +=;3
' +& ! 6 :+ ;- .
1 ! $ # #
9 $ # $
! ! < ! #
) ! # 8* -4>? @ .# " !
#
5667 5117 3 $ $ $ +
9 ! $ > 3 $ $
) # A ! #
$ ! "
1 ( " # # +
/ $ #
( ! # # +
"
# # # #
8 4
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
The design calcs referenced within this document relate to the wellhead referred to
as ROD-R-031, FMC Reference TF 00527 and cover the upgrade of the system to 6650
psi
Calculation 7
Latch Ring
Calculation 8
6650 psi
Lockdown Screws
6650 psi
Tubing Spool can be Calculation 1
uprated to 6650 without Tubing Hanger load
changes to equipment shoulder
Calculation 3
To uprate 9-5/8” Hanger
9-5/8” Packoff to 9-5/8”
to 6650 psi, the type of
Hanger load shoulder
hanger requires to
change (from flutes to
thru’ holes)
Calculation 4
9-5/8” Hanger load
Calculation 5 shoulder
13-3/8” Hanger weakest
point Calculation 6
Landing Ring
BHP Algeria ROD 6650 psi
The following table defines the limitations of each load shoulder. The calculations
are in accordance with API 6A and follow the guidelines laid out in the John
Fowler "Design Handbook for API 6A/16A/17D"
Note 1 The Tubing Spool load shoulder should not be loaded with a pressure greater than 6650 psi
applied across the bore. If testing above 6650 psi a high strength load ring requires to be fitted.
Note 2 This hanger has 4-off flowby slots which has the effect of greatly reducing the bearing area and
as a consequence the capacity of the hanger. The alternative hanger has thru’ holes instead of
slots thus maximizing the bearing area and increasing the hanger capacity, This type of hanger
is used in 10K applications.
Note 3 The calculations are based on the following casing loadings (mud buoyancy is not taken into
account)
N.B. On no account
should a pressure
greater than 6650 psi
be applied to the plug
Input Data
Maximum ID of shoulder surface
ID := 13.130
Minimum OD of mating part
(in inches)
OD := 13.453
OD of shoulder (in inches)
DT := 13.505
OD of head (in inches)
ODH := 19.094
Wall thickness at large end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − DT
T1 := T1 = 2.795
2
Wall thickness at small end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − ID
T2 := T2 = 2.982
2
Diameter to point of contact (in inches) BOP Test Plug situated at Tub Hgr load shldr
OD ID
D := + D = 13.291 PT := 13.505 THOD := 0
2 2
π
θ r := θ ⋅
180
Test Pressure (In psi)
p := 6650
Effective angle, summing the friction angle and the taper angle, up to 90 deg max.
0 (
A := arctan( f ) + θ r ) A = 0.934
0
π
A := A = 1.571
1 2 1
−Fa
Sb :=
(
π⋅ OD2 − ID2
)
4
Sb = −141255.156 Fc = 0
%All = 97.754 %
Fa
Fh :=
( 2⋅ π⋅ tan( Aeff ) )
Metal Area Resisting Hoop Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
horizontal reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material within a 45 deg
cone of the support surface.
A1 := 0⋅ ( T1)
2
( )
Lt := ( DT − ID) ⋅ cotan θ r ⋅ 0.5
A2 := 0.5⋅ ( T1 + T2) ⋅ Lt
2
A3 := 0.5⋅ T2
Ah := A1 + A2 + A3
Ah = 4.988
Fh
Sh :=
Ah
Metal Area Resisting Radial Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
radial reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material between the centre lines
of the thick and thin section with load acting at diameter D (Point of contact between hanger
and head).
T2
h := + Lt
2
−Fa
Sr :=
h ⋅ π⋅ D⋅ tan( Aeff )
Pl := Sh − Sr Pl = 32512.396 psi θ = 45 Fc = 0
Pl
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
SLM
%All = 54.187 %
2
θr
sin
Ss := ( −Sb ) ⋅
2 θ = 45 Fc = 0
( )
sin θ r
Ss = 29254.901 psi
Ssmax := 0.577⋅ Sy
Ss
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
Ssmax
%All = 84.503 %
Input Data
Maximum ID of shoulder surface
ID := 12.000
Minimum OD of mating part
(in inches)
OD := 12.740
OD of shoulder (in inches)
DT := 13.086
OD of head (in inches)
ODH := 19.094
Wall thickness at large end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − DT
T1 := T1 = 3.004
2
Wall thickness at small end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − ID
T2 := T2 = 3.547
2
PED :=
(
π⋅ PT − THOD
2 2 ) ⋅p
4
Axial force (in lb-f) acting on taper
Fa := PED + Fc
Coefficient of friction (dimensionless)
PED = 607421 lbs
f := 0.15
Minimum Yield Strength of Material (psi)
Sy := 75000
Minimum Tensile Strength of Material (psi)
St := 95000
Calculated Data
Effective angle, summing the friction angle and the taper angle, up to 90 deg max.
0 (
A := arctan( f ) + θ r ) A = 0.934
0
π
A := A = 1.571
1 2 1
−Fa
Sb :=
(
π⋅ OD2 − ID2
)
4
Sb = −60441.085 Fc = 261647
%All = 45.444 %
Fa
Fh :=
( 2⋅ π⋅ tan( Aeff ) )
Metal Area Resisting Hoop Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
horizontal reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material within a 45 deg
cone of the support surface.
A1 := 0⋅ ( T1)
2
( )
Lt := ( DT − ID) ⋅ cotan θ r ⋅ 0.5
A2 := 0.5⋅ ( T1 + T2) ⋅ Lt
2
A3 := 0.5⋅ T2
Ah := A1 + A2 + A3
Ah = 8.069
Fh
Sh :=
Ah
Metal Area Resisting Radial Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
radial reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material between the centre lines
of the thick and thin section with load acting at diameter D (Point of contact between hanger
and head).
T2
h := + Lt
2
−Fa
Sr :=
h ⋅ π⋅ D⋅ tan( Aeff )
Pl
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
SLM
%All = 26.407 %
2
θr
sin
Ss := ( −Sb ) ⋅
2 θ = 45 Fc = 261647
( )
sin θ r
Ss = 12517.759 psi
Ssmax := 0.577⋅ Sy
Ss
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
Ssmax
%All = 28.926 %
Input Data
Maximum ID of shoulder surface
ID := 11.346
Minimum OD of mating part
(in inches)
OD := 12.591
OD of shoulder (in inches)
DT := 12.591
OD of head (in inches)
ODH := 12.591
Wall thickness at large end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − DT
T1 := T1 = 0
2
Wall thickness at small end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − ID
T2 := T2 = 0.622
2
Diameter to point of contact (in inches) BOP Test Plug situated at Tub Hgr load shldr
OD ID
D := + D = 11.968 PT := 13.130 THOD := 0
2 2
Angle from vertical in radians Worst Case Total Loading is BOP Test Plug, where Fc,
casing load would be zero.
π
θ r := θ ⋅
180
Fc := 0
Test Pressure (In psi)
p := 5000
PED :=
(
π⋅ PT − THOD
2 2 ) ⋅p
4
Axial force (in lb-f) acting on taper
Fa := PED + Fc Fc = 0
Coefficient of friction (dimensionless)
PED = 677001 lbs
f := 0.15
Fa = 677001
Minimum Yield Strength of Material (psi)
Sy := 75000
Minimum Tensile Strength of Material (psi)
St := 95000
Calculated Data
Effective angle, summing the friction angle and the taper angle, up to 90 deg max.
0 (
A := arctan( f ) + θ r ) A = 1.72
0
π
A := A = 1.571
1 2 1
N.B. There are 4-off 3" slots provided in the casing hanger to cater for drilling returns
−Fa
Sb :=
( )
π⋅ OD2 − ID2 OD ID
− − ⋅ 4⋅ 3
4 2 2
Sb = −42482.243 Fc = 0
%All = 44.718 %
Fa
Fh :=
( 2⋅ π⋅ tan( Aeff ) )
Metal Area Resisting Hoop Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
horizontal reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material within a 45 deg
cone of the support surface.
A1 := 0⋅ ( T1)
2
( )
Lt := ( DT − ID) ⋅ cotan θ r ⋅ 0.5
A2 := 0.5⋅ ( T1 + T2) ⋅ Lt
2
A3 := 0.5⋅ T2
Ah := A1 + A2 + A3
Ah = 0.194
Fh
Sh :=
Ah
Metal Area Resisting Radial Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
radial reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material between the centre lines
of the thick and thin section with load acting at diameter D (Point of contact between hanger
and head).
T2
h := + Lt
2
−Fa
Sr :=
h ⋅ π⋅ D⋅ tan( Aeff )
− 11
Pl := Sh − Sr Pl = 3.759 × 10 psi θ = 90 Fc = 0
Pl
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
SLM
− 14
%All = 5.012 × 10 %
2
θr
sin
Ss := ( −Sb ) ⋅
2 θ = 90 Fc = 0
( )
sin θ r
Ss = 21241.122 psi
Ssmax := 0.577⋅ Sy
Ss
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
Ssmax
%All = 49.084 %
Input Data
Maximum ID of shoulder surface
ID := 12.520
Minimum OD of mating part
(in inches)
OD := 13.086
OD of shoulder (in inches)
DT := 13.130
OD of head (in inches)
ODH := 19.094
Wall thickness at large end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − DT
T1 := T1 = 2.982
2
Wall thickness at small end
of shoulder (in inches)
ODH − ID
T2 := T2 = 3.287
2
Diameter to point of contact (in inches) BOP Test Plug situated at Tub Hgr load shldr
OD ID
D := + D = 12.803 PT := 13.130 THOD := 0
2 2
PED :=
(
π⋅ PT − THOD
2 2 ) ⋅p
4
Axial force (in lb-f) acting on taper
5
Fa := PED + Fc Fc = 3.39 × 10
Coefficient of friction (dimensionless)
PED = 677001 lbs
f := 0.15
Fa = 1016001
Minimum Yield Strength of Material (psi)
Sy := 75000
Minimum Tensile Strength of Material (psi)
St := 95000
Calculated Data
Effective angle, summing the friction angle and the taper angle, up to 90 deg max.
0 (
A := arctan( f ) + θ r ) A = 0.934
0
π
A := A = 1.571
1 2 1
Bearing Stress
N.B. There are 4-off 3" slots provided in the casing hanger to cater for drilling returns
−Fa
Sb :=
( )
π⋅ OD2 − ID2 OD ID
− − ⋅ 4⋅ 3
4 2 2
Sb = −127210.466 Fc = 339000
%All = 95.647 %
Fa
Fh :=
( 2⋅ π⋅ tan( Aeff ) )
Metal Area Resisting Hoop Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
horizontal reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material within a 45 deg
cone of the support surface.
A1 := 0⋅ ( T1)
2
( )
Lt := ( DT − ID) ⋅ cotan θ r ⋅ 0.5
A2 := 0.5⋅ ( T1 + T2) ⋅ Lt
2
A3 := 0.5⋅ T2
Ah := A1 + A2 + A3
Ah = 6.358
Fh
Sh :=
Ah
Metal Area Resisting Radial Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
radial reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material between the centre lines
of the thick and thin section with load acting at diameter D (Point of contact between hanger
and head).
T2
h := + Lt
2
−Fa
Sr :=
h ⋅ π⋅ D⋅ tan( Aeff )
Pl
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
SLM
%All = 37.839 %
2
θr
sin
Ss := ( −Sb ) ⋅
2 θ = 45 Fc = 339000
( )
sin θ r
Ss = 26346.15 psi
Ssmax := 0.577⋅ Sy
Ss
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
Ssmax
%All = 60.881 %
Angle from vertical in radians Worst case loading will be 1,000,000 lbs
Fc := 1000000
π
θ r := θ ⋅
180
Test Pressure (In psi)
p := 0
PED :=
( 2
π⋅ PT − THOD ) ⋅p
2
4
Axial force (in lb-f) acting on taper
6
Fa := PED + Fc Fc = 1 × 10
Coefficient of friction (dimensionless)
PED = 0 lbs
f := 0.15
Fa = 1000000
Minimum Yield Strength of Material (psi)
Sy := 75000
Minimum Tensile Strength of Material (psi)
St := 95000
Effective angle, summing the friction angle and the taper angle, up to 90 deg max.
0 (
A := arctan( f ) + θ r ) A = 1.72
0
π
A := A = 1.571
1 2 1
Bearing Stress
−Fa
Sb :=
(
π⋅ OD2 − ID2
)
4
6
Sb = −66311.275 Fc = 1 × 10
%All = 69.801 %
Fa
Fh :=
( 2⋅ π⋅ tan( Aeff ) )
Metal Area Resisting Hoop Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
horizontal reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material within a 45 deg
cone of the support surface.
A1 := 0⋅ ( T1)
2
( )
Lt := ( DT − ID) ⋅ cotan θ r ⋅ 0.5
A2 := 0.5⋅ ( T1 + T2) ⋅ Lt
2
A3 := 0.5⋅ T2
Ah := A1 + A2 + A3
Ah = 0.06
Fh
Sh :=
Ah
Metal Area Resisting Radial Stress - Based on the 45 deg rule which assumes that the
radial reaction force in a support shoulder is carried by the material between the centre lines
of the thick and thin section with load acting at diameter D (Point of contact between hanger
and head).
T2
h := + Lt
2
−Fa
Sr :=
h ⋅ π⋅ D⋅ tan( Aeff )
− 10 6
Pl := Sh − Sr Pl = 1.705 × 10 psi θ = 90 Fc = 1 × 10
Pl
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
SLM
− 13
%All = 2.273 × 10 %
2
θr
sin 6
Ss := ( −Sb ) ⋅
2 θ = 90 Fc = 1 × 10
( )
sin θ r
Ss = 33155.638 psi
Ssmax := 0.577⋅ Sy
Ss
%age of allowable %All := ⋅ 100
Ssmax
%All = 76.616 %
Page 1
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 2
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 3
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 4
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 5
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 6
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 7
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 8
Load Ring Printed: 22/08/2001
Page 9
CASING HANGER LOAD SHOULDER ANALYSIS, BHP
To API 6A/16A/17D CM Latch @ 6650 psi
This set of calculations considers a hoop stress induced failure and a shear stress induced failure.
Input Data
Maximum ID of shoulder surface
ID := 9.000
Minimum OD of mating part
(in inches)
OD := 9.364
PED :=
( 2) ⋅p
π⋅ PT
4
Calculated Data
Bearing Stress
−PED
Sb :=
(
π⋅ OD2 − ID2
) 5
PED = 5.029 × 10
4
Sb = −95798.029
%All = 73.691 %
Ats = 18.378
PED
τ :=
Ats
PAS :=
τ 100
σA
PAS = 41.463 %
Tubing Hanger is held in place by 10-off 1.29" Diameter Lock Down Screws each having a
capacity of 101,945 lbs and 130,000 psi (Reference Calculation below and FMC Guideline
G20.24)
Using H2S Service Lockdown Screws, SYMS, Minimum Yield Strength is 130000 psi
π⋅ Dr2
Fr := ⋅ SMYS⋅ 0.6
4
Fr = 101945
Maximum Capacity of N-off Lockdown Screws (Ft), where N := 10
Ft := N⋅ Fr
Ft = 1019445 lbs
OD := 13.51 in ID := 4.5 in
A :=
( 2
π⋅ OD − ID
2)
4
A = 127.447 in sq SF := 1
N⋅ Fr
Pr :=
( A ⋅ SF)
Pr = 7999 psi
Thus 130,000 psi yield lockdown screws are suitable for 6650 psi applications