Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CA and Comaserco
G.R. No. 125355 March 30, 2000
Facts:
Commonwealth Management and Services Corporation (COMASERCO) is a domestic corporation. It is an
affiliate of Philippine American Life Insurance Co. (Philamlife). It was organized by the latter to perform collection,
consultative and other technical services, including functioning as an internal auditor, of Philamlife and its other
affiliates.
In 1992, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued an assessment to private respondent COMASERCO
for deficiency value-added tax (VAT) amounting to P351,851.00 for taxable year 1988. In the same year,
COMASERCO filed with the BIR, a letter-protest objecting to the latter’s finding of deficiency VAT. Afterwards, the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue sent a collection letter to COMASERCO demanding payment of the deficiency
VAT. The following month of the same year, COMASERCO filed with the CTA a petition for review contesting the
Commissioner’s assessment. COMASERCO asserted that: 1) it was on a “no-profit, reimbursement-of-cost-only”
basis; 2) it was not engaged in the business of providing services to Philamlife and its affiliates; 3) COMASERCO was
established to ensure operational orderliness and administrative efficiency of Philamlife and its affiliates, not on the
sale of services; and 4) it even did not generate profit but suffered a net loss in taxable year 1988. Thus, it was not
liable to pay VAT.
In 1995, the CTA rendered a decision in favor of the Commissioner with slight modifications. COMASERCO
was liable to pay the amount of P335,831.01. During the same year, COMASERCO filed with the CA, a petition for
review of the decision of the CTA. The CA ruled in favor of the respondent and based its decision in another tax case
involving the same parties where it was held that COMASERCO was not liable to pay fixed and contractor’s tax and
it was not engaged in business of providing services to Philamlife and its affiliates. Hence, this petition was filed before
the SC.
Issue:
Whether or not COMASERCO is engaged in the sale of services, thus liable to pay VAT.
Held: