Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Higher education in the United States has long been a part of the nation’s cultural fabric.
Not long after European colonizing forces came to the Mid-Atlantic coast, the first institution of
higher learning, Harvard, would be founded as part of the Massachusetts Bay Colony charter.
Soon after that, William and Mary would join the ranks of colonial colleges. From there, it has
only grown.
Growth in United States’ higher education is evident in nearly every possible data point
one could consider. The number of institutions has certainly skyrocketed since the Colonial Era;
the breadth of available educational degrees has grown; the cost of obtaining a college education
But, perhaps most importantly, the availability of access for more people—people
different from the first collegegoers—to higher education is much different today than it was in
the Colonial Era. It has certainly increased; this is certain. However, the nation has long
“Who goes to college” had a very particular answer during the United States’ Colonial
Era. Over the course of the several hundred years since Harvard’s charter, the answer to that
question has changed dramatically, though not without difficulty, strain, and challenge. That
change has been largely due to numerous actions of various levels of government. Specifically,
monumental shifts in access to higher education came by way of federal and state legislation
with the creation of Land-Grant colleges and normal schools in the nineteenth century.
To put the later governmental actions into perspective, one must have a baseline of
knowledge of who went to college before those actions took place. Given the first colleges’
WHO GOES TO COLLEGE 3
respective beginnings in the Colonial Era, it is helpful to look at who was a college student in
To go to college in the Colonial Era required one to meet one of several criteria, largely
speaking. The primary collegegoer in this time would have been, in some order, male, white,
wealthy, and religious. When colonists arrived in Massachusetts Bay, the climate differences
made settlement all that more difficult, and economic issues arose in the early period of the
colony. As such, “few families could afford the loss of an able-bodied young man from the
The economics of the new colony played a very large role in creating a social strata.
Having fled persecution from the English crown, it did not take very long for a new society of
class divisions to emerge. And the separations in the newly-created social sphere extended to
higher education, as “The college was a conservative institution that was essential to transmitting
Higher education in the Colonial Era was for the education and advancement of those at
the given social order. Few non-wealthy families could afford to send their sons to college, and
fewer still could withstand the combined cost of the tuition and loss of the son’s productivity and
contribution to the family’s finances. So, only white young men from wealth were able to, more
easily, attend college. But an even closer look at the time period adds a winkle to understanding
Early Colonial colleges, like Harvard and William and Mary, educated more than just
white, wealthy men. In addition to this group, the colleges also educated sons of Native
American families. Wright, in “For the Children of Infidels” (1988) even asserts that
“Indians…offered the impetus for establishing and maintaining among the nation’s most
WHO GOES TO COLLEGE 4
enduring and prestigious halls of higher learning—such…as Harvard College, [and] the College
of William and Mary” (Wright, 1988, p. 2). Given the context of the social classes created in the
early Massachusetts colony, this could be surprising. However, it is clear that the education
provided by these early colleges for Native sons shows that the educational goal was to further
One major component of early Colonial culture was the importance of religion. Most of
those in Massachusetts Bay Colony were getting away from the religious persecution of the
crown, but their beliefs, they thought, were right and just, and thus should spread to all of those
who did not believe as they did. The Native Americans did not share the same religious belief
Though this included skirmishes and battles and violence, conversion also included
education, and higher education played a role, too. Harvard’s charter is rather clear about its aims
in whom they would educate and what would be taught. Including provisions about physical
space and other such needs, the charter states that “…the education of the English and Indian
Who goes to college? In the Colonial Era, it was wealthy, white men who would be a part
of and reinforce a social order. But, in small instances, collegegoers also included sons of Native
American families. Their education was also to reinforce a social order. The difference, however,
was that they were educated to convert their religious beliefs, thus ostracizing and marginalizing
But who went to college would not always remain this way, as governmental acts at
various levels would provide for a larger base of students whose identities and financial means
The Morril Act of 1862 is federal legislation that was signed into law and saw the
government give a number of states federal land. Though not explicitly for chartering flagship
state college campuses, the Morril Act nonetheless gave rise to flagship state universities in
many states, which are often the largest and most prolific degree-granting institutions in the
What makes this legislation and the resulting colleges important, however, is whom they
would serve and what they would teach to students. Unlike founding colleges’ religiously-
motivated education, and their ultimate goal of creating an elite class and enforcing a social
order, the programs offered by these land grant colleges was markedly different; so, too, were
The programs offered at these schools were largely different from colonial colleges and
the elite institutions common at the time. Instead of a liberal or classic arts education, these
(Thelin, 2011, p. 76). While not enabling the same types of careers reserved for only those at the
top of the social order, these degrees offered greater understanding of jobs and tasks both
necessary and valued in the Westward Expansion Era. Many schools, given their offerings in
That is not to say that the change in who went to college was immediate. Johnson notes in
“Misconceptions About the Early Land-Grant Colleges” (1981) that “Reaching out to sons, and
later daughters, of farmers and artisans…to whomever the existing system passed by was a noble
egalitarian ideal that remained just that—an ideal—for decades…” (Johnson, 1981, p. 336).
Though it took many years to grab hold, the ideal of wide swaths of the population going to
WHO GOES TO COLLEGE 6
college became more realized following the establishment of Land-Grant colleges spurred to
creation by the Morril Act of 1862. As Johnson concludes “[Land-Grant colleges] were ahead of
their times…When the ideal did blossom, it did so magnificently, and these new institutions were
Normal Schools
Normal schools were colleges that began, primarily, as institutions set to educate students
how to become teachers. Largely established by individual states, the lasting effects of normal
schools can still be seen today, as many state colleges—non-flagship, tier 1, state institutions—
However, given that normal schools were not federally established, and thus less likely to
be uniformly created with specifically defined missions and structures, a normal school from one
state to the next—or even within states—would yield difference experiences. One common
theme that is widely true about normal schools and their expansion across the United States in
the mid-to-late 19th century is that they—like land-grant colleges—would serve different
Thelin (2011) states that “Normal schools reflected the diversity of their constituencies.
Some were created for women. Others were coeducational. And in some of the coeducational
institutions, women became the majority” (Thelin, 2011, p. 85). This is a seismic shift in the
answer of the question “Who goes to college?”. And it did not stop there. Groups other than
white women attended normal schools, as “…state normal schools made higher education
available to a significant number of students from minority racial and ethnic groups” (Ogren,
2003, p. 643). Though many normal schools did not offer the same type of education as seen in
WHO GOES TO COLLEGE 7
Colonial Era colleges, they did offer an education that typically expanded beyond secondary
school, and thus fit within the umbrella of higher education in the United States.
The lasting effect of normal schools is rather clear today. Many of these institutions exist
today, though rarely under the same name with which they were founded. In Massachusetts, both
Salem State and Framingham State are former normal schools, and even today their curriculum
largely centers around degree programs in education. And, most importantly, the students that
normal schools served would prove to be wildly different than the students who went to college a
century or even half century prior, and this shift was largely due to the establishment of normal
Conclusion
Higher education in the United States historically, including in its Colonial Era, is not
something which has attainable or accessible by the vast majority of society. Women, ethnic and
racial minoritized groups, and most white men below the top of the social order were excluded at
Through actions by both the federal and many state governments, greater access to
postsecondary learning became possible for a greater cross-section of people throughout the
nineteenth century. Thanks in large part to Land-Grant colleges and normal schools, a
framework was laid for future generations of people attending college who were and are different
than colonial collegegoers. “Who goes to college?” is a question that has had a changing answer
for centuries in the United States, and one which the country continues to wrestle with today.
Governmental action will continue to play a part in how this question is answered beyond today,
References
http://library.harvard.edu/university-archives/using-the-collections/online-
resources/charter-of-1650
Johnson, E. L. (1981). Misconceptions About the Early Land-Grant Colleges. The Journal of
Ogren, C. A. (2003). Rethinking the "nontraditional" student from a historical perspective: State
normal schools in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Journal of Higher
Thelin, J. R. (2011). A history of american higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Wright, B. (1988). “For the children of the infidels”?: American indian education in the colonial
doi:10.17953/aicr.12.3.ht5837m3502m57w1