IN RE: RAMON E. GALANG, alias ROMAN E. GALANG, 1971 Bar Examinee, respondent. Topic: Requirements for application to the Bar – no filed or pending case of moral turpitude FACTS: 1. The case is one of the consolidated cases in In re anue!o. ". Ramon #. $alang passed the 1%&1 'ar e(amination 'ut his e(am papers )ere su'*ected to unauthori+ed re,correction and re,e!aluation '- e(aminers. /. An in!estigation '- the 0BI re!ealed • that Ramon Roman2Rom-3 )as a student of School of a) of 4 567 • that in Sept 89 1% %9 he )as charged )ith the crime of slight ph-sical in*uries S I3 of another student of the same uni!ersit-7 • that in a 1%&/ hearing9 he )as confronted )ith this information 'ut declared he does not remem'er 'eing charged )ith the same. ;. <ictim )as summoned and narrated the case and identified $alang as the !er- same person charged )ith S I in that case. . An administrati!e proceeding )as filed for his dis'arment along )ith Bar Confidant anue!o. ISS6#: =hether or not $alang must 'e stric>en off in the roll of attorne-s for concealing his case of S I. ?#CISI@0: #S 1. 6nder Rule 1"&9 Sec " e!er- applicant is dut- 'ound to la- 'efore the Court all his in!ol!ement in an- criminal case9 pending or other)ise terminated9 to ena'le the Court to full- ascertain or determine applicant s moral character. ". As to )hat crime in!ol!es moral turpitude9 is for the Supreme Court to determine. ence9 the necessit- of la-ing 'efore or informing the Court of one s personal record D )hether he )as criminall- indicted9 acquitted9 con!icted or the case dismissed or is still pending D 'ecomes more compelling. /. In 1%E/ and 1%E;9 )hen $alang too> the Bar for the second and third time9 respecti!el-9 the application form pro!ided '- the Court for use of applicants alread- required the applicant to declare under oath that he has not 'een accused of9 indicted for or con!icted '- an- court or tri'unal of an- offense in!ol!ing moral turpitude7 and that there is no pending case of that nature against him. ;. B- 1%EE9 )hen $alang too> the Bar e(aminations for the fourth time9 the application form prepared '- the Court for use of applicants required the applicant to re!eal all his criminal cases )hether in!ol!ing moral turpitude or not. et9 $alang continued to intentionall- )ithhold or conceal from the Court his criminal case of slight ph-sical in*uries )hich )as then and until no) is pending in the Cit- Court of 4anila7 and thereafter repeatedl- omitted to ma>e mention of the same in his applications to ta>e the Bar e(aminations in 1%E&9 1%E% and 1%&1. . That the concealment of an attorne- in his application to ta>e the Bar e(aminations of the fact that he had 'een charged )ith9 or indicted for9 an alleged crime9 is a ground for re!ocation of his license to practice la) is )ell D settled. E. 6nder the circumstances in )hich respondent Ramon #. $alang9 alias Roman #. $alang9 )as allo)ed to ta>e the Bar e(aminations and the highl- irregular manner in )hich he passed the Bar9 =# ha!e no other alternati!e 'ut to order the surrender of his attorne- s certificate and the stri>ing out of his name from the Roll of Attorne-s.