Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260829452
CITATIONS READS
2 134
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Eleonora Agustine on 26 June 2016.
Downloaded 17 Sep 2013 to 202.249.25.26. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://proceedings.aip.org/about/rights_permissions
Magnetic Susceptibility Properties of Pesticide
Contaminated Volcanic Soil
Eleonora Agustine1,2,*, Dini Fitriani2, La Ode Safiuddin3, Gerald Tamuntuan4 and
Satria Bijaksana1
1
Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung,
Jl. Ganesha 10Bandung 40132, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran,
Jl Raya Bandung-Sumedang km 21, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
3
Faculty of Teaching and Educational Sciences, Universitas Haluoleo, Kendari 93132, Indonesia
4
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung,
Jalan Ganesha 10 Bandung 40132, Indonesia
* leo@phys.unpad.ac.id
Abstract. Pesticides, unfortunately, are still widely used in many countries as way to eradicate agricultural pests. As
they are being used continuously over a long period of time, they accumulate as residues in soils posing serious threats to
the environment. In this study, we study the changes in magnetite-rich volcanic soils that were deliberately contaminated
by pesticide. Such changes, in any, would be useful in the detection of pesticide residue in contaminated soils. Two
different types of magnetically strong volcanic soil from the area near Lembang, West Java, Indonesia were used in this
study where they were contaminated with varying concentrations of pesticide. The samples were then measured for
magnetic susceptibility at two different frequencies. The measurements were then repeated after a period of three months.
We found a reduction of magnetic susceptibility as well as a reduction in SP (superparamagnetic) grains proportion in
contaminated soil. These might be caused by pesticide-induced magnetic dissolution as supported by SEM analyses.
However the impact of pesticide concentration as well as exposure time on magnetic dissolution is still inconclusive.
230
Downloaded 17 Sep 2013 to 202.249.25.26. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://proceedings.aip.org/about/rights_permissions
METHODS grains were extracted from the samples by mixing the
samples with aqua bidest to form very thin slurries. A
Volcanic samples were obtained from Bukit plastic covered strong neodymium magnet was then
Tunggul Cinchona Plantation (6° 50´ 5.1948 S; 107° placed and stirred inside the slurries. Extracted
43´ 42.1148 E, elevation 1499 masl) located about 25 magnetic grains were then placed in a covered petri
km to the northeast of Bandung, the capital-city of dish ready for SEM analyses.
West Java Province. The soil samples were obtained
from a soil-outcrop about 3 m in height. They were RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
obtained from two distinct layers, namely the topmost
organic layer (horizon 1) and the blackish block and Table 1 shows the average values of magnetic
ash-flow deposit (horizon 2). Within each horizon, parameters ȤLF, ȤHF, and ȤFD% of control samples for
thirty cylindrical samples (2 cm in diameter and 2.2 horizon1 and horizon 2. Samples of horizon 1, in
cm in height) were obtained at about 10 cm intervals. general, has more Fe-bearing minerals than that of
Thus, there were 60 samples in this study. First ten horizon 2 as indicated by their higher ȤLF values. This
samples from each horizon were considered to be the might be due to magnetic enhancement towards the
control samples. The second ten samples from each soil surface. Although the samples of horizon 2 have
horizon were contaminated by pesticide with varying lower magnetic concentration, they have greater
concentration. The first concentration is made by variation in SP content as shown by their ȤFD% values.
mixture of 5 ml pesticide with 45 ml aqua bidest
distilled water, the second concentration is of 10 ml TABLE 1. Results of magnetic measurement for control
pesticide with 40 ml of aqua bidest, the third samples in both horizons 1 and 2.
concentration is of 15 ml of pesticide with 35 ml of Horizon ȤLF ȤHF ȤFD%
aqua bidest etc. The tenth concentration was only pure
(108 m3/kg) (108 m3/kg) (%)
pesticide. The second ten samples were kept for three
months before analyses. The last ten samples were Horizon 1 779.5 ± 69.3 751.5 ± 55.2 3.4 ± 2.2
treated similarly to the second ten samples, but they Horizon 2 421.0 ± 35.5 399.8 ± 21.8 4.9 ± 3.3
were kept until 6 months.
All the samples were subjected to magnetic
susceptibility measurement. This was carried out on a For contaminated samples of horizon 1, the results
a Bartington MS2 system (Bartington Instruments of magnetic measurement are summarized in Fig. 1.
Ltd., Oxon, UK) equipped with a dual frequency Fig. 1a show that the ȤLF of contaminated samples
sensor (type MS2B), respectively at 470 and 4700 (both 3 and 6 months) are significantly lower than that
Hertzs. The measured values are given as mass- of control samples inferring that the presence of
specific magnetic susceptibilities at low or 470 Hz pesticide might reduce the quantity of Fe bearing
frequency (ȤLF) and as that at high or 4700 Hz minerals in volcanic soil. Moreover, the presence of
frequency (ȤHF). In general, parameter ȤLF is often pesticide might also reduce the proportion of SP grains
referred as the bulk-magnetic susceptibility that in volcanic soils as shown by the lower values of ȤFD%
approximates the total concentration of Fe-bearing in contaminated samples (Fig. 1b). Both Figs. 1a and
minerals in the samples. In this study we use a 1b, however, do not clearly shown the impact of
parameter termed frequency-dependent susceptibility pesticide concentration as well as the exposure time to
or FDS that approximates to the proportion of the above changes. Higher concentration of pesticide
superparamagnetic (SP) ferrimagnetic minerals. In this does not necessarily means greater magnetic reduction.
study FDS is defined as Eq. (1). Similarly, longer exposure time (6 months) does not
necessarily means greater magnetic reduction.
( F LF F HF ) (1) Fig. 2 summarizes the results of magnetic
F FD % 100% u measurements for contaminated soils of horizon 2.
F LF Like that in horizon 1, the ȤLF values of contaminated
Later selected samples were subjected to SEM samples in horizon 2 are also significantly lower than
analyses on a JEOL scanning electron microscope type that of control samples (Fig. 2a). The ȤFD% values of
3060LA (Jeol Ltd, Japan) that is equipped with BSE these samples are also lower than that of control
(Back Scattering Electron) and EDX (Energy samples (Fig. 2b). Moreover, the results for
Dispersive X-Ray) features. BSE capability is contaminated samples of horizon 2 also show that
important in imaging grains high sizable iron or there is no significant impact of the impact of pesticide
metallic content, while that of EDX allows the concentration as well as the exposure time to magnetic
estimation of elements through their oxides. Magnetic reduction.
231
Downloaded 17 Sep 2013 to 202.249.25.26. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://proceedings.aip.org/about/rights_permissions
Thus it is plausible that the smallest concentration magnetic dissolution process [6]. Magnetic grains
of pesticide in this study is more than enough to shown in both Figs. 3b and 3c were extracted from the
initiate the magnetic reduction or dissolution. most contaminated samples after 3 and 6 months
Increasing the pesticide concentration might have little respectively.
effect. Similarly, the shortest exposure time to Similar to that of horizon 1, magnetic grains
pesticide (3 months) might be sufficient to initiate the extracted from control samples in horizon 2 also have
process of magnetic reduction so that longer exposure relatively smooth surface (see marked grain in Fig.
time (6 months) would have similar results. 4a). Magnetic grains extracted from contaminated
Figs. 3 and 4 show the results of SEM analyses samples in horizon 2 also show evidence of early stage
for control samples as well a contaminated samples in of dissolution in fractured surfaces (see marked grains
horizons 1 and 2 respectively. Fig. 3a depicted typical in Figs. 4b and 4c). Few smaller magnetic grains were
magnetic grains extracted from control samples. also seen attached to larger grains. This might be due
Marked grain in this picture depicts the abundance of to growth of new but non-SP magnetic grains as the
bitetrahedral-shaped iron oxide, magnetite lite which is overall values of ȤFD% in contaminated samples are
often associated with titanium. Such grain is typically lower than that of control samples.
found in volcanic soil [7]. In general, magnetic grains Higher concentration of pesticide is expected to
from control samples have relatively smooth surface speed up magnetic dissolution process. Prolonged
(Fig. 3a) while that from contaminated samples have exposure is also expected to increase the severity of
rough or cracked surface (Figs. 3b and 3c) suggesting dissolution. However, there is no evidence for either
the presence of expectation in SEM analyses.
FIGURE 1. Results of magnetic measurement for contaminated volcanic soil samples from horizon 1 presented as
variation of ȤLF (a) and ȤFD% (b).The dashed lines indicate the average values for control samples. The sample
numbers in the abscissa refers to pesticide concentrations. Smaller number means lower pesticide concentration.
FIGURE 2. Results of magnetic measurement for contaminated volcanic soil samples from horizon 2 presented as
variation of ȤLF (a) and ȤFD% (b).The dashed lines indicate the average values for control samples. The sample
numbers in the abscissa refers to pesticide concentrations. Smaller number means lower pesticide concentration.
232
Downloaded 17 Sep 2013 to 202.249.25.26. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://proceedings.aip.org/about/rights_permissions
FIGURE 3. SEM images of magnetic grains extracted from samples from horizon 1. (a) grains from control
sample, (b) grains from 3 months contaminated sample, and (c) grains from 6 months contaminated sample. See
text for specially marked grains.
FIGURE 4. SEM images of magnetic grains extracted from samples from horizon 2. (a) grains from control
sample, (b) grains from 3 months contaminated sample, and (c) grains from 6 months contaminated sample. See
text for specially marked grains.
233
View publication17
stats
Downloaded Sep 2013 to 202.249.25.26. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://proceedings.aip.org/about/rights_permissions