LETTER OF PROTEST SUPERIOR COURT COVER UP

POLICE MISCONDUCT LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

Fresno superior court case number F13906789 *

* People of the state of California VS PHILLIP SANDERS

FORMER PUBLIC DEFENDER SABRINA DENISE ASHJIAN WANTED FOR LEGAL

MALPRACTICE RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT AND INTENTIONAL NEGLECT

ATTENTION!! FRESNO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE PLEASE ASSIGN A NEW

PUBLIC DEFENDER TO THIS CASE AND FIX THE PROFESSIONAL
NEGLIGENCE ERRORS

NO ONE SHOULD HAVE TO SUFFER THE RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT OF A

PENDING WARRANT BECAUSE THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE REFUSED TO
FILE A STAY ON PROBATION HEARING ONCE THE APPEAL WAS GRANTED
AND FIX THE ERRORS OF THE COURTS EXCESSIVE SENTENCE THAT THE
WINNING APPEALS HAD TO REVERSE

IN ORDER FOR THE POLICE TO GET AWAY WITH POLICE MISCONDUCT COMBINED WITH
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT YOU NEED THE HELP OF A BAD PUBLIC DEFENDER USING LEGAL
MALPRACTICE TACTICS WORSE THAN A BLACK MAN WITH A KKK ATTORNEY IN THE SIXTIES

AFTER THROWING ME UNDER THE BUS SO RUTHLESSLY THIS PUBLIC

DEFENDER WAS HIRED BY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO BACK THE
BUS OVER ME AGAIN WRONG DOING SHOULD NEVER BE REWARDED

THIS LETTER WILL SHOW HOW A BROKEN JUDICIAL SYSTEM REACTS

WORSE THAN A ISIS TERRORIST FOR MEN OF COLOR EXPOSING NUMEROUS
UNITED NATIONS VIOLATIONS AS WELL AS INTENTIONAL UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION VIOLATIONS

EVEN THE A L C U SUED A FAILING FRESNO PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEM

STATING THOUSANDS OF FRESNO RESIDENTS ARE FORCED TO NAVIGATE
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM WITHOUT THE ADEQUATE LEGAL
REPRESENTATION THAT IS GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION

fill free to follow the complete case on our face book at repealingcivilrights/go funding
 CASE HISTORY

A LADY WITH A HISTORY OF MENTAL PROBLEMS KICKED IN MY DOOR AT MY HOME I THRU

HER OUT WITHOUT ANY GREAT BODY INJURY SHE MADE A CALL TO THE POLICE SIMILAR TO A
PRANK SWATTING CALL AND STAYED ON THE PHONE ALL THE TIME UNTIL THE POLICE
ARRIVED

THE ARRESTING K9 OFFICER DID NOT WRITE A REPORT WHILE THE LEAD OFFICER WROTE A
REPORT SO FABRICATED IT DID NOT MATCH THE 911 CD OR PHONE EVENT REPORT I WAS
CHARGED FOR A ALLEGED ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON AND FELONY ASSAULT

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DROPPED THE DEADLY WEAPON BEFORE THE 1ST COURT
DATE MOST LIKELY BECAUSE THE WEAPON WAS NOT HEARD ON THE 911 CD AND DID NOT
MATCH THE FABRICATED POLICE REPORT

THE PUBLIC DEFENDER REFUSED TO ASK THE COURT FOR A BAIL REDUCTION THEN GAVE ME
A COPY OF A MANIPULATED POLICE REPORTS SUGGESTED A BAD PLEA DEAL RENEGED ON
THE PLEA DURING SENTENCING AND FAILED TO OBJECT TO THE COURTS EXCESSIVE SENTENCE
THEN REFUSED TO FILE A STAY ON PROBATION WHEN THE APPEAL WAS GRANTED THAT I
WON

I FILED A FEDERAL CIVIL LAW SUET I WAS GRANTED A ORDER TO PROCEED AGAINST THE
OFFICERS FOR UNLAWFUL ARREST I TRY TO INCLUDE THE PUBLIC DEFENDER WHICH WAS
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITHOUT MEANING I HAD A CASE AGAINST THE PUBLIC
DEFENDER HAD I SITED THE RIGHT FEDERAL CLAWS FOR INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF
COUNSEL NEVERTHELESS AS LONG AS THE WARRANT IS PENDING THE STATUE OF
LIMITATION SHOULD CONTINUES TO RUN GIVING ME A CHANCE TO AMEND

ERRORS OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER

IF DISSUADING A WITNESS TO TESTIFY IN A ALLEGED ASSAULT CASE IS A CRIME

PERSUADING THE DEFENDANT TO TAKE A BAD PLEA DEAL WITHOUT REVIEWING
ALL DISCOVERY TAKING NO WITNESS STATEMENT OR ASSIGNING NO
INVESTIGATOR SHOULD ALSO BE A CRIME

THE LEGAL REPRESENTATION WAS ADEQUATELY RUTHLESS AND INTENTIONAL

THE NUMEROUS ERRORS LISTED BELOW DISPLAY A BEHAVIOR SIMILAR
TO HITLERS GENERALS LEADING JEWS TO THE GAS CHAMBER OF BOLD FACE
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS WHILE THEY THINK NOTHING OF WHAT
THEY ARE DOING LOOK CLOSELY AT THE NUMEROUS ERRORS THIS WAS A
OBVIOUS SETUP !!
1, ASSIGNING NO INVESTIGATOR TO A CASE LOSING VIDEO FOOTAGE THAT WOULD
REBUT THE POLICE REPORTS

2, TAKING NO WITNESS STATEMENTS REFUSING TO ASK THE COURT FOR A BAIL REDUCTION
A APPEALABLE OFFENSE IF THE COURT REFUSED

3, SUGGESTING A BAD PLEA DEAL WITHOUT REVIEWING ALL DISCOVERY RENEGING ON THE
PLEA DEAL DURING SENTENCING

4, FAILING TO OBJECT TO THE COURTS EXCESSIVE SENTENCE

5, REFUSING TO FILE A STAY ON PROBATION HEARING ONCE APPEAL WAS GRANTED THAT
WOULD CORRECT COURT ERRORS

6, AND ISSUING MANIPULATED COPIES OF THE POLICE REPORT FROM THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY

THIS TWO FACED PUBLIC DEFENDER DID NOT DO ONE THING IN MY CASE
NOR DID SHE INTEND TO DO ONE THING WHILE VIOLATING SEVERAL
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS DISPLAYING PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE

6TH AMENDMENT THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSELING

14TH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS FAILING TO FILE A PROBATION STAY HEARING

8TH AMENDMENT AIDING IN CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT EXCESSIVE SENTENCING OF

THE COURT BY FAILING TO OBJECT

LEGAL MALPRACTICE REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS

THE RESPONSIBLY TO FIX THESE ERRORS OF THE PRIOR PUBLIC DEFENDER FALL CLEARLY ON
THE LEAD SUPERVISOR OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE BECAUSE SABRINA DENISE
ASHJIAN NO LONGER WORKS THERE AS WELL AS THE HEAD OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
MS DIAZ

ALTHO THEY DID NOT CAUSE THE MALPRACTICE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE
PUBLIC FALL ON THEM ONCE PROPERLY NOTIFIED OF ANY LEGAL MALPRACTICE STILL ACTIVE

THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MOTIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND ATTACHED SO
THAT THE ERRORS CAN BE FIX GOD SPEED BEFORE THE POLICE KILL ME FOR TRUMPED
UP CHARGES THAT THE WINNING APPEALS STATED SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN IMPOSED
1 EX PARTE MOTION TO CLEAR THE RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT OF THE
WARRANT THAT APPEALS STATED SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN IMPOSED

2 997 MOTION FOR MISDEMEANORS CHARGES WERE DEFENDED DOES NOT

HAVE TO BE PRESENT

3. 170.1 MOTION FOR A NEW JUDGE BECAUSE OF HIS INTENTIONAL

EXCESSIVE SENTENCE

4 MOTION TO SET JUDGEMENT ASIDE BECAUSE THE CASE IS PAST WINNING

APPEAL STAGE

5 RECALL WARRANT

6 CHANGE OF PLEA BECAUSE ONCE ALL THE DISCOVERY WAS OBTAINED IT

HAD ENOUGH OVER WHELMING EVIDENCE OF MY INNOCENTS

7 BAIL REDUCTION IF NEEDED BECAUSE THERE WAS NO GREAT BODY

INJURY THE ALLEGED VICTIMREFUSED MEDICAL TREATMENT ALL THE
POLICE REPORTS SAID MINOR INJURIES AND THE POLICE REPORT ALSO
SAID NO PRIORS MEANING I MET THE CRITERIA FOR THE
MISDEMEANOR WOBBLIER

8 HAD THE 1ST PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSIGNED A INVESTIGATOR AND HAVE

THE POLICE FILL OUT MY PRE PREPARED ADMISSIONS WITNESS
STATEMENT UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY AS TO THE
CONTRADICTIONS IN THE FABRICATED POLICE REPORT

THE OFFICERS WOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED UNDER Title 18, United States
Code Section 241 & 242 VIOLATIONS OF CONSPIRACY TO FABRICATE A POLICE
REPORT

AS WELL AS California Penal Code 118.1 MAKING IT A CRIME TO

DELIBERATELY PUT FALSE INFORMATION ON A POLICE REPORT

IF NEEDED A FEW OF THESE QUESTIONS WOULD HAVE CAUGHT THESE

OFFICER DIRECTLY IN BOLD FACE LIES AND A PRELIM WOULD HAVE NOT
BEEN NEEDED

FOR EXAMPLE THE K9 ARRESTING OFFICER DID NOT WRITE A REPORT

WHILE THE TIME CONTRADICTION IN THE PHONE EVENT REPORT WERE SO
FAR OFF THESE OFFICERS DIDN'T KNOW WHOSE CUSTODY I WAS IN FOR
ALMOST 1 HOUR SEE QUESTIONS IN FEDERAL CIVIL DOCKET EASTERN
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15-CV-00395 -LJO-EPG
1 WAS ALLEGED VICTIM ON THE PHONE ALL THE TIME UNTIL POLICE
ARRIVED

2 WAS ANY MENTION OF A BOTTLE AS A DEADLY WEAPON IN THE 911 CD OR

PHONE EVENT REPORT

3 WHAT OFFICER MADE THE ARREST

4 WHAT TIME DID HE MAKE THE ARREST

5 WERE IN THE PHONE EVENT REPORT INDICATES HE MADE THE ARRESTS

6 WHAT TIME DID THE 911 CD START THE CALL

7 WHAT TIME DID THE 911 PHONE EVENT REPORT TIME START

8 WERE WAS THE ARRESTING OFFICER LISTED IN THE PHONE EVENT

REPORT BEFORE AND AFTER THE ARREST

9 WERE WAS THE OFFICER THAT WROTE THE REPORT LISTED IN THE PHONE
EVENT BEFORE THE ARREST AND AFTER THE ARREST

10 HOW LONG WAS DEFENDANT IN HIS CUSTODY BEFORE TRANSFERRING TO

ANOTHER OFFICER

8 NEVERTHELESS NERNA MOTION TO DISMISS A good route to dealing with a

very old case 2013

9 EXPUNGE RECORD CLEAR STATE ARREST REPORT OPPRESSING MY

VOTING PASSPORT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES

REMOVE FINES DECREASING MY CREDIT SCORE AS I REQUEST

FOR INJUNCTIONS BY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND FEDERAL JUDGE
 REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIONS

1ST INJUNCTION KEEP OLD CASES WITH WARRANTS IN OFFICE AND STOP
RETURNING THEM IN 1 WEEK

2ND DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND PUBLIC DEFENDER SHOULD HAVE THE SAME
POLICE REPORTS

3RD NO ONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MANIPULATE ANY POLICE REPORTS

4TH STOP THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FROM GOING TO COURT WITHOUT THE
POLICE REPORT IN THE FILE

INTRO AFTER GOING TO COURT SEVERAL TIMES WHEN THE PUBLIC

DEFENDER DIDN'T HAVE THE POLICE REPORT IN THE FILE THIS CASE GIVES
ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER TO DO THE SAME
WITH A CASE BEING SO OLD AND THE REPORTS IN ARCHIVES

IF ARRESTED ON THE WARRANT IT WOULD TAKE THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AT

LEAST ONE WEEK TO RETRIEVE THE FILES THIS HAS CONCERNED FOR AN
INJUNCTION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OR FEDERAL JUDGE

STATING WHEN ANY CASES WAS A WARRANT PENDING OLD OR NEW THE
PUBLIC DEFENDER NEED TO KEEP THE RECORDS CLOSE AT HAND SO THAT
THEY WOULDN'T VIOLET DEFENDANTS RIGHT THROUGH INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSELING

BY NOT HAVING THE POLICE REPORTS IN FILE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF THE

ARREST IF CALLED THE INJUNCTION SHOULD ALSO STOP THE. FILE FROM
BEING RETURN TO ARCHIVES IN ONE WEEK THE NORMAL POLICY FOR OLD
CASES ENCASE A NEW ATTORNEY IS APPOINTED HE WONT HAVE TO DELAY
NEW HEARINGS

SECOND INJUNCTION

NO DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MANIPULATE POLICE

REPORTS THEN GIVE THEM TO THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AND OR NO PUBLIC
DEFENDER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MANIPULATE POLICE REPORTS AND
GIVE THEM TO DEFENDANTS

HISTORY] WHEN I ORDERED A COPY OF THE POLICE REPORTS FROM THE

PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE OUT OF ARCHIVES AROUND 12 /13/17 THEY
EMAILED THEM TO ME
AND I COMPARED THEM WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY POLICE REPORTS ALSO
EMAILED TO ME ON 11/6/17 FOR MY FEDERAL CIVIL CASE DISCLOSURES

THEN I COMPARED THEM WITH THE POLICE REPORTS GAVE TO ME BY

MY PUBLIC DEFENDER SABRINA ASHJIAN IN 2013 THAT I ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS WITH
THE FEDERAL CIVIL COMPLAINT I FILED ON DOCKET IN 2015 SEE FEDERAL CIVIL DOCKET
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15-CV-00395 -LJO-EPG

I HAD 3 SETS OF POLICE REPORTS THAT ALL CAME BACK DIFFERENT SEE ATTACHED REPORTS

WHEN I ASKED THE RECORDS SUPERVISOR MS TAILLAC AND PARALEGAL Camille

Slack WHAT IT WOULD COST FOR A COPY OF MY COMPLETE FILE SO THAT I CAN CROSS
REFERENCE ANY ERRORS

THEY STARTED GETTING SMART WOULD NOT REPLY TO MY CALLS OR EMAILS AND SEEM TO
BE PROVOKING ME INTO A ANGRY OUT BURST WHILE CALLING THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
ABOUT THE WARRANT

THEN THEY TRIED TO GIVE ME LEGAL ADVICE TELLING ME TO PUT MYSELF ON COURT
CALENDAR FOR THE WARRANT THE PUBLIC DEFENDER CREATED KNOWING THE JUDGE
WOULD LOCK ME UP AND THE NEW PUBLIC DEFENDER WOULDN'T HAVE THE FILE

JUST LIKE THEY DID IN 2 CASES IN THE PAST IT IS STARTING TO BECOME COMMON PRACTICE
FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER TO GO TO COURT WITHOUT THE POLICE REPORT IN THE FILE

NOW IT SEEMS THEY DON'T HAVE THE SAME POLICE REPORT THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
HAVE I CAN GIVE YOU CASE NUMBER AS WELL AS COURT REPORTS TRANSCRIPTS

NEVERTHELESS PLEASE FIX YOU ERRORS AND STOP THIS RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT

SIGNED UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY PHILLIP SANDERS