Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By
George Asquith and Daniel Krygowski
(with sections by Steven Henderson and Neil Hurley)
Published by
The American Association of Petroleum Geologists
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Copyright © 2004
By the American Association of Petroleum Geologists
All Rights Reserved
ISBN: 0-89181-667-4
AAPG grants permission for a single photocopy of an ítem from this publication for personal use.
Authorization for additional copies of items from this publication for personal or intemal use is granted
by AAPG provided that the base fee of $3.50 per copy and $.50 per page is paid directly to the Copy-
right Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923 (phone: 978/750-8400).
Fees are subject to change.
The American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) does not endorse or recommend products or services that may
be cited, used, or discussed in AAPG publications or in presentations at events associated with AAPG.
¡¡¡
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements . . . . ............................................................. v
About the Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI
Preface (Second Edition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vm
Preface (First Edition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX
4: Porosity Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
General....................................................................... 37
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Sonic Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Density Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Neutron Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Porosity Measurement Combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Consistency in Lithology Prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
5: Resistivity Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
General....................................................................... 77
Laterologs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Induction Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Flushed Zone Resistivity Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
High Frequency (dielectric) Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Acknow ledgements
The idea for this revision carne from a discussion atan AAPG Annual Meeting, between George Asquith, mem-
bers of the AAPG Staff, and myself. At the time, George and I had been teaching the AAPG Basic Well Logging
short course for about a decade. We all agreed that a revision of Basic Well Log Analysis for Geologists was in
order, to capture the technological advancements in well logging that had been made since the book's publication.
George suggested that I start the revisions, to provide a different perspective on his original efforts. Our collab-
oration began in that way, with the revisions as a starting place for a continuing dialog which resulted in this edi-
tion. My sincere thanks and appreciation go to George for his confidence in my abilities, his willingness to put all
of his work on the table, and for his efforts as the managing partner in this endeavor.
Our thanks to Bob Cluff who critically reviewed the original book at the beginning of this project. His com-
ments were taken to heart. The review efforts of Rick Erickson and Gary Stewart are to be commended. Not only
did they review the text, but they also attacked the case study data in great detail, comparing log displays with printed
log values and final results. A special thanks goes out to Jack Thomas at AAPG who has shepherded this process
in its final stages.
Many charts and figures used in the text were provided by Baker Atlas, Schlumberger Oilfield Services, and
Halliburton. Our thanks for their willingness to share their information with this project.
The log displays from the original book were scanned by Neuralog and provided for the project. Neuralog soft-
ware converted those images to digital data for display and interpretive processing. The raw data were stored,
processed, and displayed using software from Landmark Graphics (a Halliburton Company). The PetroWorks and
OpenWorks products were used for this purpose. The log plots and crossplots in the text were produced using
PetraWorks software. Our thanks to both companies for providing the means to efficiently convert this work from
the paper realm to the digital realm.
And finally a very special thank you to my wife, Monica Krygowski, who has supported me in an effort that
took much longer than originally anticipated. Her comments, positive outlook, and encouragement are an integral
part of this publication.
Daniel A. Krygowski
Austin, Texas, U.S.A.
October, 2003
vi
DANIEL A. KRYGOWSKI
Daniel Krygowski is part of the software development staff in the Austin, Texas, office of Landmark Graphics
(a Halliburton company). As a Domain Expert in the research and development organization, he is focused on the
usability, user interface, and petrophysical technology content of PetroWorks and other software products. He
received a B.A. in physics from the State University of New York College at Geneseo and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees
in geophysics from the Colorado School of Mines. Previous to his employment at Landmark, he held a number of
technical and management positions in petrophysics and software development at Oties Service Company (now
Occidental) and Atlantic Richfield Company (now BP).
Dan is a member of the AAPG, Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, Society of Petroleum Engi-
neers, and Society of Exploration Geophysicists. He teaches the AAPG Basic Well Log Analysis continuing edu-
cation course wíth George Asquith.
vii
NEIL F. HURLEY
Neil Hurley received B.S. degrees in geology and petroleum engineering from the University of Southern Cal-
ifornia in 1976. He received his M.S. degree in geology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1978. His
thesis work involved stratigraphic studies in the Permian reef complex of the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico.
From 1978 through 1982 he worked as an exploration and research geologist for Conoco in Denver, Colorado;
Lafayette, Louisiana; and Ponca City, Oklahoma. In 1982, he entered the University of Michigan as an Exxon
Teaching Fellow. In 1986, he received his Ph.D. degree, doing his research on the geology of Devonian reefs in
Western Australia. From 1986 to 1996, he worked in reservoir characterization at Marathon's Petroleum Technol-
ogy Center in Littleton, Colorado. In 1991-92, he toured the U.S. asan AAPG Distinguished Lecturer. In 1996,
Neil Hurley was awarded the Charles Boettcher Distinguished Chair in Petroleum Geology, and he is now a Pro-
fessor in the Department of Geology and Geological Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. At CSM, he
teaches beginning and advanced log analysis, carbonate geology, field seminars, and integrated exploration cours-
es. He has been the Editor for AAPG, and he is a member of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Soci-
ety of Petroleum Engineers, Society for Sedimentary Geology, Society of Independent Earth Scientists, Interna-
tional Association of Sedimentologists, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, European Association of Geoscien-
tists and Engineers, Geological Society of America, and Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists. His special-
ties include carbonate sedimentology and diagenesis, fractured reservoirs, formation evaluation, borehole-imaging
logs, and horizontal drilling.
STEVE HENDERSON
Steve Henderson is a technical instructor at the Fort Worth Training Center of Halliburton Energy Services
where he is involved with the training of wireline engineers in measurement physics, field operations, and log
analysis. He received his B.S. in geological sciences from The University of Texas at Austin and M.S. and Ph.D.
in geosciences from Texas Tech University. His research interests include carbonate diagenesis, clay mineralogy,
and their implications in well log analysis. He has authored several published technical aiticles on the Permian San
Andres and Pennsylvanian Cross Cut formations of west Texas, and he is a member of the AAPG, Society for Sed-
imentary Geology, and Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts.
viii
George B. Asquith
Pioneer Production Corporation
Amarillo, Texas
October, 1982
Asquith, G., and D. Krygowski, 2004, Basic Relation-
Basic Relationships of
Well Log Interpretation
INTRODUCTION puter software, is intentional. It is only through expe-
rience with such manual methods that the reader can
This chapter provides a general introduction to well gain an appreciation for the effects of parameters on
logging principles and methods that will be used the calculations, and gain a better understanding of the
throughout the book. Succeeding chapters (2 through accuracy and precision of the techniques discussed
6) introduce the reader to specific log types. The text here.
discusses how different log types measure various When the first edition of this book was published,
properties in the wellbore and surrounding formations, virtually all well-logging data were acquired through
what factors affect these measurements, where on a the use of wireline-conveyed tools; that is, logging
standard log display a particular curve is recorded, and tools lowered in the borehole on a 7-conductor cable
how interpreted information is obtained from the logs over which power, operating instructions, and data
using both chaits and mathematical formulas. Unlike were sent. Since the mid-1980s, a second formation-
many other logging texts, the logging tools are evaluation technique, measurement while drilling
grouped according to their primary interpretation tar- (MWD) or logging while drilling (LWD), has devel-
get, rather than their underlying measurement physics. oped. In this method, the logging sensors are imbed-
Spontaneous potential (SP) and gamma ray logs are ded in the thick-walled drill collars used at the bottom
discussed first, as their primary use is correlation and of the drill string (near the bit), and measurement of
their primary interpretive target is gross lithology (the formation properties is done continuously during the
distinction between reservoir and nonreservoir). The drilling process (hence the name, MWD). Initially,
porosity logs (i.e., sonic, density, and neutron logs) are MWD logging technology borrowed heavily from
covered next, then the resistivity logs. Nuclear mag- wireline technology, with the goal being to produce
netic-resonance logs, although they provide porosity LWD measurements comparable to wireline measure-
(among other quantities of interest), are presented after ments. As LWD technology has progressed, sensor
resistivity logs. This is due in part to their recent design and other features of LWD have been incorpo-
arrival and to their relative absence in historical data rated back into wireline technology, for the improve-
archives. ment of those measurements.
The final four chapters again deal with interpreta- Unless specifically noted in the text, the interpreta-
tion of the data, this time in detail with example prob- tion of borehole data is the same irrespective of the
lems and their solutions. These chapters bring the source of the data, either wireline or LWD sensors and
introductory material of Chapter 1 together with the measurement systems. The techniques shown here are
specific measurement information and are intended to applicable to both data sources and can even be
provide a coherent view of the interpretation process. extended to incorporate equivalent core measure-
The reader is encouraged to work the examples to gain ments.
familiarity with the interpretation techniques and to
begin to understand the limitations on interpretation
that are present due to the nature of subsurface infor- GENERAL
mation. As logging tools and interpretive methods are
The use of charts and simple calculations through- developing in accuracy and sophistication, they are
out the text, rather than the use of petrophysical com- playing an expanded role in the geological decision-
2 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
making process. Today, petrophysical log interpreta- sorne property in the rock surrounding the wellbore
tion is one of the most useful and important tools (see Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 1984).
available to a petroleum geologist. Por the reader unfamiliar with petrophysical logging,
Besides their traditional use in exploration to corre- sorne confusion may develop over the use of the word
late zones and to assist with structure and isopach lag. In common usage, the word log may refer to a par-
mapping, logs help define physical rock characteristics ticular curve, a suite or group of curves, the physical
such as lithology, porosity, pore geometry, and perme- (paper) record of the measurements, a logging tool
ability. Logging data are used to identify productive (sonde), or the process of logging.
zones, to dete1mine depth and thickness of zones, to Rock properties or characteristics that affect log-
distinguish between oil, gas, or water in a reservoir, ging measurements are: porosity, lithology, mineralo-
and to estimate hydrocarbon reserves. Also, geologic gy, permeability, and water saturation. Additionally,
maps developed from log interpretation help with the resistivity of the rock is important because it is
determining facies relationships and drilling locations. directly measured and is an essential part in the inter-
Increasingly, the importance of petrophysics and well- pretation process. It is essential that the reader under-
log analysis is becoming more evident as more atten- stand these properties and the concepts they represent
tion is being devoted to the ongoing management of befare proceeding with a study of log interpretation.
reservoirs. The industry is realizing the importance of
detailed petrophysical analyses, based on the details of
the available data in monitoring, simulating, and
Porosity
enhancing reservoir performance to maximize the Porosity can be defined as the ratio of voids to the
retum on investment. total volume of rock. It is represented as a decimal
Of the various types of logs, the ones used most fre- fraction or as a percentage and is usually represented
quently in hydrocarbon exploration are called open- by the Greek letter phi, <)l.
hole logs. The name open hole is applied because . "' volume of pores
these logs are recorded in the uncased pmtion of the poros1ty,"' = - - - - - - - 1.1
total volume of rock
wellbore. All the different types of logs and their
curves discussed in this text are of this type. The amount of intemal space or voids in a given
A geologist's first exposure to log interpretation volume of rock is a measure of the amount of fluid a
can be a frustrating experience. This is not only rock will hold. This is illustrated by Equation 1.1 and
because of its lengthy and unfamiliar terminology, but is called the total porosity. The amount of void space
also because knowledge of many parameters, con- that is interconnected, and thus able to transmit fluids,
cepts, and measurements is needed befare an under- is called effective porosity. Isolated pores and pore vol-
standing of the logging process is possible. ume occupied by adsorbed water are excluded from a
Perhaps the best way to begin a study of logging is definition of effective porosity but are included in the
by introducing the reader to sorne of the basic con- definition of total porosity.
cepts of well log analysis. Remember that a borehole
represents a dynamic system; that fluid used in the Lithology and Mineralogy
drilling of a well affects the rock surrounding the bore-
hole and, therefore, log measurements. In addition, the In well-log analysis, the terms lithology and miner-
rock surrounding the borehole has certain properties alogy are used with sorne ambiguity. Lithology is often
that affect the movement of fluids into and out of it. used to describe the solid (matrix) portian of the rock,
The two primary parameters dete1mined from well generally in the context of a description of the primary
log measurements are porosity and the fraction of pore mineralogy of the rock (e.g., a sandstone as a descrip-
space filled with hydrocarbons (i.e., hydrocarbon satu- tion of a rock composed primarily of quartz grains, or
ration). The parameters of log interpretation are deter- a limestone composed primarily of calcium carbon-
mined directly or inferred indirectly and are measured ate). In the early days of log interpretation (with limit-
by one of three general types of logs: ed measurements), this was usually a sufficient
• electrical description. Probably the first instances of lithologic
effects on the logs were observed in shaly or clay-con-
• nuclear
taining sandstones. With the advent of multiple poros-
• acoustic or sonic logs ity measurements and the development of more
The names refer to the sources used to obtain the detailed interpretive methods, it has become possible
measurements. The different sources create records to estimate the primary solid constituents, normally as
(logs), which contain one or more curves related to a mineral pair or triad.
Basic Relationships of Well Lag lnterpretation 3
The literature has tended to follow the improved fcrently, formation water takes up space both in pores
understanding of the constitution of the solid part of and in the connecting passages between pores. As a
the fo1mations of interest, with most current literature consequence, it may block or otherwise reduce the
refen'ing to the determination of mineralogy instead of ability of other fluids to move through the rock.
lithology. When one considers the physics of logging Relative permeability is the ratio between effective
measurements, the ambiguity continues. Sorne meas- permeability of a fluid at partial saturation and the per-
urements (primarily nuclear) are made as the result of meability at 100% saturation (absolute permeability).
molecular-level interactions between the formation When relative permeability of a formation's water is
and the logging tool. These might be considered as zero, the formation produces water-free hydrocarbons
being affected by the formation's mineralogy. Others, (i.e., the relative permeability to hydrocarbons is
especially the acoustic measurements, interact with 100% ). With increasing relative permeabilities to
the formation on a bulk or framework level, and could water, the formation produces increasing amounts of
be considered to be more affected by lithology (S. L. water relative to hydrocarbons.
M01riss, 1999, personal communication).
The ambiguity between lithology and mineralogy is
best seen in porosity crossplots which, through time,
Water Saturation
have moved from estimating lithology to estimating Water saturation is the amount of pore volume in a
mineralogy, while the underlying measurements and rock that is occupied by formation water. It is repre-
interpretive techniques have remained essentially the sented as a decimal fraction or as a percentage and has
same. the symbol Sw·
As noted above, the first lithologic effects were
probably dueto the presence of clays and shales in for- . . S _ formation water occupying pores
water satmat10n, w - -------~-'---~--
mations of interest. One parameter that has been used total pore space in the rock 1.2
consistently to account for these effects has been shale
volume. As our understanding of geological processes Although hydrocarbon saturation is the quantity of
matured, it became understood that shale and clay interest, water saturation is usually used because of its
were different, and that shaly sands were usually not direct calculation in equations such as Archie's equa-
just sands with shales mixed in, but sands that con- tion, discussed in a later section in this chapter. Hydro-
tained clays - clays that could be very different from carbon saturation is usually determined by the differ-
the clays present in the shales near those sands of ence between unity and water saturation:
interest. Again, the literature and our interpretive tech-
niques often use the te1ms shale volume and clay vol- 1.3
ume interchangeably. In this text, shale volume will be
used preferentially because most of the interpretive
Irreducible water saturation or Sw irr is the term
techniques in which the volumes are used derive those
used to describe the water saturation at which all the
volumes from the properties of nearby shales.
water is adsorbed on the grains in a rock or is held in
the capillaries by capillary pressure. At irreducible
Permeability water saturation, water <loes not move and the relative
permeability to water is zero.
Pe1meability is the ability of a rock to transmit fluids.
It is related to porosity but is not always dependent
Resistivity
upon it. Permeability is controlled by the size of the
connecting passages (pore throats or capillaries) Resistivity is the rock property on which the entire
between pores. It is measured in darcys or millidarcys science of logging first developed. Resistivity is the
(md) and is represented by the symbol K. The ability inherent prope1ty of all materials, regardless of their
of a rock to transmit a single fluid, when it is com- shape and size, to resist the flow of an electric current.
pletely saturated with that fluid, is called absolute per- Different materials have different abilities to resist the
meability. Effective permeability refers to the ability of flow of electricity.
the rock to transmit one fluid in the presence of anoth- While the resistance of a material depends on its
er fluid when the two fluids are immiscible. shape and dimensions, the resistivity is an invariant
Formation water (connate water in the formation) property; the reciproca! of resistivity is conductivity.
held by capillary pressure in the pores of a rock serves In log interpretation, the hydrocarbons, the rock, and
to inhibit the transmission of hydrocarbons. Stated dif- the fresh water of the formation are all assumed to act
4 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
as insulators and are, therefore, nonconductive (or at where m is the cementation exponent whose value
least very highly resistive) to electric current flow. Salt varies with grain size, grain-size distribution, and the
water, however, is a conductor and has a low resistivity. complexity of the paths between pares (tortuosity),
The measurement of resistivity is then a measurement, and a is the tortuosity factor. The higher the tortuosity
albeit indirect, of the amount (and salinity) of the for- of the formation, the higher the value of m. The tortu-
mation water. The unit of measure used for the con- osity factor (a) is commonly set to 1.0, but is allowed
ductor is a cube of the formation, one meter on each to vary by sorne petrophysicists.
edge. The measured units are ohm-meters 2/meter and Water saturation (Sw) is determined from the water-
are called ohm-meters. filled resistivity (R 0 ) and the actual (true) formation
resistivity (R 1) by the following relationship:
R= rXA 1.4
L
1.7
where:
R = resistivity (ohm-m)
r = resistance (ohms) where nis the saturation exponent, whose value typi-
A = cross-sectional area of substance being meas- cally varies from 1.8 to 2.5 but is most commonly
ured (m2) assumed to be 2.
By combining equations 1.6 and 1.7, the water-sat-
L = length of substance being measured (m) uration fmmula can be rewritten in the following form:
Resistivity is a basic measurement of a reservoir's 1
fluid saturation and is a function of porosity, type of
fluid (i.e., hydrocarbons, salt water, or fresh water), S
w
=(FXRwJ-;;
R
1.8
amount of fluid, and type of rock. Because both the t
sw -(;,:~:.]"
often have different values. Resistivity is measured by
electric logs, commonly known (in the West) as lat- 1.9
erologs and induction logs.
Conrad Schlumberger in 1912 began the first exper-
iments which led, eventually, to the development of Table 1.1 illustrates the range of values for a and m.
modem-day petrophysical logs. The first electric log In first-pass or reconnaissance-level interpretations, or
was run September 5, 1927, by H. G. Doll in Alsace- where there is no knowledge of the local parameters,
Lorraine, France. In 1941, G. E. Archie with Shell Oil the following values can be used to achieve an initial
Company presented a paper to the AIME in Dallas, estimate of water saturation:
Texas, which set foith the concepts used as a basis for
modem quantitative log interpretation (Archie, 1942). a = 1.0; m =n = 2.0
Archie's experiments showed that the resistivity of
a water-filled formation (R 0 ) could be related to the re- Now that the reader is introduced to sorne of the
sistivity of the water (Rw) filling the formation through basic concepts of well log interpretation, our discus-
a constant called the formation resistivity factor (F): sion can continue in more detail about the factors that
affect logging measurements.
1.5
Table 1.1. Difieren! coefficients and exponents used to calculate formation factor (FJ. (Modified alter Asquith, 1980.)
is a schematic illustration of a porous and permeable tion pressure prevents blowouts. The density of the
formation that is penetrated by a borehole filled with mud is usually kept high enough so that hydrostatic
drilling mud. pressure in the mud column is greater than formation
Sorne of the more important symbols shown in Fig- pressure. This pressure difference forces sorne of the
ure 1.1 are: drilling fluid to invade porous and permeable forma-
tions. As invasion occurs, many of the solid particles
Ho/e Diameter (dh) (i.e., clay minerals from the drilling mud) are trapped
on the side of the borehole and form mud cake (having
The borehole size is determined by the outside a resistivity of Rmc; Figure 1.1). Fluid that filters into
diameter of the drill bit. But, the diameter of the bore- the formation during invasion is called mud filtrate
hole may be (with a resistivity of Rm¡; Figure 1.1). The resistivity
• larger than the bit size because of washout values for drilling mud, mud cake, and mud filtrate are
and/or collapse of shale and poorly cemented recorded on a log's header (Figure 1.2), and are used
porous rocks, or in interpretation.
• smaller than the bit size because of a build up of
mud cake on porous and permeable formations lnvaded Zone
(Figure 1.1).
Common borehole sizes normally vary from 7-7/8 The zone in which much of the original fluid is
in. to 12 in., and modern logging tools are designed to replaced by mud filtrate is called the invaded zone. It
operate within these size ranges. The size of the bore- consists of a flushed zone (of resistivity R xo) and a
hole is measured by a caliper log. transition or annulus zone (of resistivity R¡). The
flushed zone occurs elose to the borehole (Figure 1.1)
where the mud filtrate has almost completely flushed
Drilling mud Resistivity (R,,J out a formation's hydrocarbons and/or water (Rw). The
transition or annulus zone, where a formation's fluids
Today, most wells are drilled with rotary bits and and mud filtrate are mixed, occurs between the flushed
the use of a special fluid, called drilling mud, as a cir- zone and the uninvaded zone (of resistivity Rt). The
culating fluid. The mud helps remove cuttings from uninvaded zone is defined as the area beyond the
the wellbore, lubricate and cool the drill bit, and main- invaded zone where a formation's fluids are unconta-
tain an excess of borehole pressure over formation minated by mud filtrate.
pressure. The excess of borehole pressure over forma- The depth of mud-filtrate invasion into the invaded
6 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
confusing, because each tool also made a third meas- Hydrocarbon-bearing Iones
urement, which was shallower than the medium and
deep measurements. In the 1980s, array resistivity Figure 1.5 illustrates the borehole and resistivity
tools made their appearance. Through the use of more profiles for hydrocarbon-bearing zones where the
sensors, they investigate more distances into the for- resistivity of the mud filtrate (Rm¡) for a freshwater
mation (usually 5 to 7), which provides for a more mud is much greater than the resistivity of the fo1ma-
detailed picture of the formation and its invasion. tion water (Rw), and where R 111¡ of a saltwater mud is
An annulus profile is only sometimes recorded on a approximately equal to Rw. A hydrocarbon zone invad-
log, because it rapidly dissipates in a well. The annu- ed with freshwater mud results in a resistivity profile
lus profile is detected only by an induction log run where the shallow (Rx 0 ), medium (R¡), and deep (R 1)
soon after a well is drilled. However, it is very impor- resistivity measurements all record high resistivities
tant to a geologist, because the profile can only occur (Figure 1.5). In sorne instances, the deep resistivity is
in zones that bear hydrocarbons. As the mud filtrate higher than the medium resistivity. When this happens,
invades the hydrocarbon-bearing zone, the hydrocar- it is called the annulus effect. A hydrocarbon zone
bons are moved out first. Next, formation water is invaded with saltwater mud results in a resistivity pro-
pushed out in front of the mud filtrate, forming an file where the shallow (Rx 0 ), medium (R¡), and deep
annular (circular) ring at the edge of the invaded zone (R 1) resistivity measurements separate and record low
(Figure 1.3). The annulus effect is detected by a high- (Rx 0 ), intermediate (R¡) and high (R 1) resistivities (Fig-
er resistivity reading on a deep induction log than by ure 1.5). Figures 1.8 and 1.9 illustrate the resistivity
one on a medium induction log. curves for hydrocarbon zones invaded with either
Log resistivity profiles illustrate the resistivity val- freshwater or saltwater mud.
ues of the invaded and uninvaded zones in the f01ma-
tion being investigated. They are of particular interest BASIC INFORMATION NEEDED
because, by using them, a geologist can quickly sean a IN LOG INTERPRETATION
log and look for potential zones of interest such as
hydrocarbon zones. Because of their importance, Lithology
resistivity pro:files for both water-bearing and hydro-
carbon-bearing zones are discussed here. These pro- In quantitative log analysis, there are several rea-
files vary, depending on the relative resistivity values sons why it is important to know the lithology of a
of Rw and R1111• All the variations and their associated zone (i.e., sandstone, limestone, or dolomite). Porosi-
profiles are illustrated in Figures 1.4 and 1.5. ty logs require a lithology or a matrix constant before
the porosity (<P) of the zone can be calculated. The for-
mation factor (F), a variable used in the Archie water-
Water-bearing Iones saturation equation, also varies with lithology. As a
consequence, the calculated water saturation changes
Figure 1.4 illustrates the borehole and resistivity
as F changes. Table 1.1 is a list of several different val-
pro:files for water-bearing zones where the resistivity of
ues for calculating formation factor and illustrates how
the mud filtrate (Rm¡) for a freshwater mud is much lithology affects the formation factor.
greater than the resistivity of the formation water (Rw),
and where resistivity of the mud filtrate (Rm¡) for a salt-
water mud is approximately equal to the resistivity of Formation Temperature
the f01mation water (Rw)· A freshwater mud (i.e., Rm¡> Formation temperature (T¡) is also important in log
3 Rw) results in a wet log profile where the shallow analysis, because the resistivities of the drilling mud
(Rx 0 ), medium (R¡), and deep (Rr) resistivity measure- (Rm), the mud filtrate (Rmf), and the formation water
ments separate and record high (Rx0 ), intermediate (R¡), (Rw) vary with temperature. The temperature of a for-
and low (Rr) resistivities (Figure 1.4). A saltwater mud mation is dete1mined by knowing:
(i.e., Rw = Rm¡) results in a wet profile where the shal-
low (Rx0 ), medium (R¡), and deep (Rr) resistivity meas- • f01mation depth
urements all read low resistivity (Figure 1.4). Figures • bottom hole temperature (BHT)
1.6 and 1.7 illustrate the resistivity curves for wet zones • total depth of the well (TD)
invaded with either freshwater or saltwater mud. • surface temperature
8 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
A reasonable value for the f01mation temperature y= 166º f01mation temperature at 8,000 ft
can be determined by using these data and by assum- After a formation 's temperature is determined
ing a linear geothermal gradient (Figure 1.1 O). The either by chart (Figure 1.1 O) or by calculation, the
fo1mation temperature is also calculated (Asquith, resistivities of the different fluids (Rm, R 111¡. or Rw) can
1980) by using the linear regression equation: be corrected to formation temperature. Figure 1.11 is a
y=mx+c 1.10 chart that is used for coffecting fluid resistivities to the
fo1mation temperature. This chart is closely approxi-
where: mated by the Arp's formula:
X= depth
y = temperature R,emp (Temp + 6.77)
RTF = --,(T_¡_+_6_.7-7.,.--~-
m = slope (In this example it is the geothermal gra-
dient.) 1.10
e = a constant (In this example it is the mean annu- - R,emp (Temp + 21.0) for depth:
al surface temperature.) [- (r1 + 2l.O) in meters
<j> . -
_ ~ X [b.t1og - b.tmatrix ] Sonic log porosity Water saturation in the
somc 8 b.t 10g (Raymer-Hunt-Gardner equation) flushed zone
Water saturation,
Pmatrix - Pbulk(log) Density log porosity ratio method
<P Density
Pmatrix - Pfluid
Formation factor, F:
Permeability (estimated):
F = a/(pm General form of the equation
Permeability in
K 3 Jl2
= 250 X _<J>_ millidarcys, oil
[ ( swirr
F=l.O/(p20 Carbonates e
reservoir
F = 0.8l/<p
2
º Consolidated sandstones Permeability in
millidarcys, gas
F = 0.62/(p 2·15 Unconsolidated sands reservo ir
Formation-water resistivity:
SSP = -KXlog(R 11
if / RJ Basic SP response equation
O Rcs1sfr,'rly o! tr:s ione Figure 1. 1. The borehole environment and symbols used in lag interpretation.
O Rcs;s!iv1iy of tt10 wa\cr in the zor;e
f::.. V/a'.er s<i!urat1on in !he zo.<e This schematic diagram illustrates an idealized version of what happens when fluids from the
-·-- borehole invade the surrounding rock. Dotted lines indicate the cylindrical nature of the
invasion.
d 11 = hale diameter
d¡ = diameter of invaded zone (inner boundary of flushed zone)
di = diameter of invaded zone (outer boundary of invaded zone)
t:iri= radius of invaded zone (outer boundary)
hmc = thickness of mud cake
Rm = resistivity of the drilling mud
Rmc = resistivity of the mud cake
Rm¡ = resistivity of mud filtrate
Rs = resistivity of the overlying bed (commonly assumed to be shale)
R 1 = resistivity of uninvaded zone (true formation resistivity)
Adíacent bed Rw = resistivity of formation water
(!nvJ$ion diameters)
R xo = resistivity of flushed zone
Sw = water saturation of uninvaded zone
Sxo = water saturation flushed zone
día meter
Y:
"'
:¡: ·-
o
API No. 2222 Other Services 2. Basic well name and location information.
'.J
"" >-'° Location 1350' FWL& 2560' FNL SFT
~
OF BALCONES "A" LEASE
>-
z
<(
>- 3. More detailed information about the physical surface
o.
:;; j o zf- location of the well.
::J
o w o
ü s: 5 ü Sect N/A Twp N/A Rge NiA
·- 4. Other services that were run at the sorne time (during the
Permanen1 Datum G.L. Elev 291.00 K.B. 317.00
Elev. sorne trip to the well) as the services in this lag.
Log measured from T.K.B. 26.000 ft. above perm. datum D.F. 316.00
Figure 1.3. Resistivity profiles for three idealized versions of fluid distributions in Step Profile
the vicinity of the borehole. As mud filtrate (Rm1l moves into a porous and permeable
formation, it con invade the formation in several different ways. Various fluid / borehole wall
distributions are represented by the step, transition, or annulus profiles. All three profiles
A :
illustrate the effect of a freshwater mud; for profiles using saltwater mud see figures '
1.4 and 1.5. Mud cake thickness is indicoted by hmc·
Step profile:
This idealized model is the one inferred by the use of three resistivity logs to esti·
mate invasion. Mud filtrate is distributed with a cylindricol shape around the borehole
and creates an invaded zone. The cylindrical invaded zone is characterized by its abrupt
cantact with the uninvaded zone. The diameter of the cylinder is represented as d¡. In
the invaded zone, pores are filled with mud filtrate (Rm1l; pores in the uninvaded zone
are filled with formation water (Rw) and hydrocarbons. In this example, the uninvaded
zone is wet (water saturated and no hydrocarbons), thus the resistivity beyond the
invaded zone is low. The resistivity of the invaded zone is Rx0, and the resistivity of the hmc di dj
Distance from the borehole ~
uninvaded zone is R1 (where R1reduces to R0 when the formation is water bearing).
1
Transition profile:
This is the most realistic model of true borehole conditions. Here again invasion is Transition Profile
cylindrical, but in this profile, the invasion of the mud filtrate (Rm1l diminishes gradually,
rather than abruptly, through a transition zone toward the outer boundary of the invad· borehole wall
ed zone (see d¡on diagram for locotion of outer boundary). /:
In the flushed part (Rxol of the invaded zone, pores are filled with mud filtrate
(Rm1l, giving a high resistivity reading. In the transition part of the invaded zone, pores
are filled with mud filtrate (Rm1l, formation water (Rwl, and, if present, residual hydro-
carbons. Beyond the outer boundary of the invaded zone, pores are filled with either
formation water or formation water and hydrocarbons. In this diagram, hydrocarbons
are not present, so resistivity of the uninvaded zone is low. The resistivity of the invad·
ed zone is Rx0, and the resistivity of the uninvaded zone is R1 (where R1 reduces to R0
when the formation is water bearing).
Annulus profile:
This reflects a temporary fluid distribution and is a condition that should disappear hmc d¡ dj
from the borehole ~
with time (if the logging operation is delayed, it might not be recorded on the logs at
1 Distance
ali). The annulus profile represents a fluid distribution that occurs between the invaded
zone and the uninvaded zone and only exists in the presence of hydrocarbons.
Annulus Profile
In the flushed part (Rxol of the invaded zone, pores are filled with both mud fil.
trate (Rm1l and residual hydrocarbons. Thus the resistivity reads high. Pores beyond the / ~orehole wall
flushed part of the invaded zone (R;) are filled with a mixture of mud filtrate (Rm1l, for-
mation water (Rwl, and residual hydrocarbons.
Rxo ¡
Beyond the outer boundary of the invaded zone is the annulus zone, where pores
are filled with formation water (Rwl and residual hydrocarbons. When an annulus pro-
file is present, there is an abrupt drop in measured resistivity at the outer boundary of
the invaded zone. The abrupt resistivity drop is due to the high concentration of forma·
tion water (Rwl in the annulus zone. Formation water has been pushed ahead by the
invading mud filtrate into the annulus zone. This causes a temporary absence of hydro-
carbons, which hove been pushed ahead of the formation water. ...........
Beyond the annulus is the uninvaded zone, where pores are filled with formation
water (Rw) and hydrocarbons. The resistivity of the invaded zone is Rx0, and the resis- hmc d¡ dj
tivity of the uninvaded zone is R1 (where R1reduces to R0 when the formation is water
bearing). 1 Distance from the borehole ~
Basic Relationships of Well Log lnterpretation 13
Figure 1.5. Resistivily p¡ofile foro tronsition-style invosion Hor izontal section through
of ohydrocorbon-beoring formotion. a permeable oil-bearing bed
Freshwater muds:
Becouse the resistivities of both the mud filtrote (RJ ond
residual hydrocorbons ore much greoter thon formotion water
(Rw'J, the resistivity of the flushed zona (Rxol is comporotively
high (remember thot the flushed zone hos mud filtrote ond
sorne residual hydrocoibons).
Beyond its flushed port (Rxo), the invoded zone (Rp has
omixture of mud filtrote (Rim), formotion water (Rw), ond
sorne residual hydrocorbons. Such omixture causes high Annulus
resistivities. In sorne coses, resislivity of theinvoded zone (R;)
olmos! equols thot of the flushed zone (RxJ. Invaded Uninvaded
zone zone
Thepresence of hydrocorbons in the uninvodedzone mudcak
causes higher resistivily thon if the zone hod only formotion R1 R1
water (Rw), becouse hydrocorbons ore more resisto ni thon
formotion water. In such ocose, R1> Ro- The resistivity of the
uninvoded zona (R1) is normolly somewhot less thon the
resislivily of the flushed ond invoded zonas (Rxo ond R). fluid
However, sometimes when on onnulus profile is present, the resistivities
invoded zone's resistivily (R) con be sl~htly lower thon the
uninvoded zone's resislivity (R1).
To summorize: Rxo > R;> R1or R10 > R;< R1in
hydrocorbon-beoring zonas.
Saltwater muds: Radial
distribution of
Becouse the resistivily of the mud filtrote (Rmf) is resistivities
opproximotely equol to the resistivity of formotion water
(Rmr- Rwl, ond the omount of residuol hydrocorbons is low, Freshwater muds
the resistivity of the flushed zone (RxJ is low.
Rmf>> Rw 1 1
hme d, ~
Dístance from the borehole
Basic Relationships of Well Log lnterpretation 15
Feet
MD
-5870-
5900
ohm-m
Figure 1.6. Example of dual induction log curves through a water-bearing zone.
Given: the drilling mud is freshwater based (Rmr > 3Rw).
Where freshwater drilling muds invade a water-bearing formation (Sw > 60%), there is high resistivity in the flushed zone (Rx0), a lesser resistivity in the invaded zone (R¡), and a low
resistivity in the uninvaded zone (R1).
See Figure 1.4 for review. (Figure 1.8 shows the response of these resistivity curves in a hydrocarbon-bearing zone.)
Compare the three curves on the right side of the log (tracks 2 and 3). Resistivity increases from left to right. Akey for reading this logarithmic resistivity scale is shown al the bottom of
the log. Depth scale is in feet with each vertical increment equal to 2 ft.
Log curve ILD:
Deep induction log resistivity curves usually measure true formation resistivity (R1), the resistivity of the formation beyond the outer boundary of the invaded zone. In water-bearing zones
(in this case from 5870 to 5970 ft), the curve reads a low resistivity because the pores of the formation are saturated with low resistivity connote water (Rw).
Log curve ILM:
Medium induction log resistivity curves measure the resistivity of the invaded zone (R¡). In a water-bearing formation, the curve reads a resistivity between R1and Rxo because the fluid in
the formation is a mixture of formation water (Rw) and mud filtrate (Rmrl.
log curve SFLU:
Spherically focused log resistivity curves measure the resistivity of the flushed zone (Rx~. In a water-bearing zone, the curve reads a high resistivity because freshwater mud filtrate (Rmrl
has a high resistivity. The SFL pictured here records a greater resistivity than either the deep (ILO) or medium (ILM) induction curves.
16 ASOUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
.. ~
.... ,_ 2000
-~t -'±H:::::--
-- ,_ -
,_____
_, - ~p
·-· ~ ·~ ttt1 - 1-
i-
_. ....
-- -+~~
..
--
,_,_
,___
--
.___
-~
-
' fi-•
1-
1
- _,__,_
-- -
,_
>---
,_
_,_
I•
,_
-
,_
1-
- - ~ - ,_,_
- 1- -
,_
,_
,_
- --
- 1-
_,_
_,_
~r.
•
-- 1-
1- - - --
, _ _ ,_
_,_
- 1-
-
-
- -· -
·-
--l .<.:, ~
"' -
_,_
-!
;..._¡_.¡
-
\!:;.!
~~ , _ -l-
~ i-1
-
- ~ t-
.
--
-- 1 >---
- 1-
• - 1-
--
-- . ,_ ---
-- -
-·-
-
--- .
~
,_
--
- -
·- ~
-- -- -
- 1- t-
..
---·· -
-
-- ~-
_J.S .¡.,
-
' 1-J
-
_ ,,__
~
- ,_
- -
,_. - -
,_
•
-- 1-- i -~
1-
1
1- -
ILD
02 - - - - ~L'M- - - - woo
Feet 0.2-- -- -- - -- -- --ohlli-iñ - - - - - -- -- ----2000
MD
8700
8800
Figure 1.8. Example of dual induction lag curves through a hydrocarbon·bearing zone.
Given: the drilling mud is freshwater based (Rm1 > 3Rw).
Where freshwater drilling muds invade a hydrocarbon·bearing formation (Sw < 60%), there is high resistivity in the flushed zone (Rx0), high resistivity in the invaded zone (R¡), and high
resistivity in the uninvaded zone (R1). Normally, the flushed zone has slightty higher resistivity than the uninvaded zone.
See Figure 1.5 far review. (Figure 1.6 shows the response of these resistivity curves in a water-bearing zone.)
Compare the three curves on the right side of the lag (tracks 2 and 3). Resistivity increases from left to right.
Log curve ILD:
Deep induction lag resistivity curves usually measure true formation resistivity (R1), the resistivity of the formation beyond the outer boundary of the invaded zone. In hydrocarbon-bearing
zones (in this case from 87 48 to 877 4 ft), the curve records a high resistivity because hydrocarbons are more resistan! than saltwater in the formation (R1> R0).
Log curve ILM:
Medium induction lag resistivity curves measure the resistivity of the invaded zone (R¡). In a hydrocarbon·bearing zone, because of a mixture of mud filtrate (Rm1), formation water (Rw),
and residual hydrocarbons in the pares, the curve records a high resistivity. This resistivity is normally equal to ar slightly more than the deep induction curve (ILO). But, in an annulus situation,
the medium curve (ILM) can record a resistivity slightty less than the deep induction (ILO) curve.
Log curve SFLU:
Spherically focused lag resistivity curves measure the resistivity of the flushed zone (Rx0 ). In a hydrocarbon·bearing zone, the curve reads a higher resistivity than the deep (ILO) ar
medium (llM) induction curves because the flushed zone (Rx0) contains mud filtrate and residual hydrocarbons. The SFL pictured here records a greater resistivity than either the deep (ILO) ar
medium (ILM) induction curves.
18 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
LLD
GR 0.2 - - - - - - -tt:s- - - - - - 2000
O - - - API - - lOO -0-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - oilln-=tli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Feet
6 - - - - - - CALI
lnches - - - - - -
1
6 MD
. MSFL
9300
9400
5
2
10 3
o
o
;:?
X
:S 15
a 5 a
.e ºC/100 m .e
li li
<l> <l>
a 6 a
20
25
9
................_.._~~~~---~
¿
30L-~-'-~----~~'-'----~-'-~~-'-'..._-'-~~~-'-'"--"-"'--~~-'-.._
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
ª6,º0,1001 1 1 ,110, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1!
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
e---- 40 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Mean Surtace Formation Temperature, T1 (ºF)
Temperature, Tms
Figure 1.1 O. Chart for estimating formation temperatura (T¡) with depth (linear gradient assumed). (Western Atlas lnternational, lnc., 1995, Figure 2·1)
Given:
Surface temperature = 80ºF
Bottom hole temperature (BHT) = 200ºF
Total depth (TO) = 10,000 ft
Formation depth = 7000 feet
Procedure:
1. Locate BHT (200ºF) on the 80 sea le (bottom of the chart; mean surface temperatura = 80ºF).
2. Follow BHT (200ºF) vertically up until it intersects the 10,000 ft (TO) line. This intersection defines the temperature gradient.
3. Move parallel to the (diagonal) temperatura gradient line up to 7000 ft (formation depth).
4. Formation temperatura (l 64ºF) is read on the bottom scale (i.e., 80 scale) vertically down from the point where the 7000 ft line intersects the temperature gradient.
NOTE: In the United States (as an example), 80ºF is used commonly as the mean surface temperature in the southern states, and 60ºF is used commonly in the northern states. However, a
specific mean surface temperature can be calculated if such precision is desired. Another source for mean surface·temperatura gradients is any world atlas with such listings.
20 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Figure 1. 11 . Chort for odjusling Converslon approxlmated by A2 = A, [(T1 + 6.n)l(T2 + 6.n)JºF or A 2 =A, [(T, + 21.5)1(T2 + 21.S)JOC u.
íluid resislivities lor temperoture. ~
,...
(Schlumberger, 1998, Figure Gen·9.) Oí
Given: ~
~
·~
Resistivity of drilling mud (Rml (!)
equo~ 1.2 ohnrm ot 75°F. 1
10
Formotion temperatura (T~ =
160ºF.
15
Procedure:
20
1. locote the resistivity volue, 1.2
25
ohm·m, on the scoleot the lelt of the
30
chori.
40
2. Move lo the righl ho!izonlol~ olong
the 1.2ohnrm line until the vertical 50
lhe chort}.
100
o
E
3. Move porollel lo the (diagonal)
conslonl solinity tine lo where il
inlersects the verticol line
150
200
250
'ª
e
g
~
representing otemperoture volueol
l 60ºF(point Bon the chori). 300 ~
8
400 ü
4. From point B, lollow the horizontal z"'
500
line to the lelt to determine the
resislivity of lhe fluid ot the desired
temperoture (0.58 ohnrm ot
160ºF). 1000
16,000
ºF 50 20,000
ºC 10
1
Temperatura(º orºC)
Asquith, G., ond D. Krygowski, 2004, Spontoneous
Potentiol, in G. Asquith ond D. Krygowski, Bosic
Well Log Anolysis: AAPG Methods in Explorotion
16, p. 21-30.
Spontaneous
Potential
GENERAL An auxiliary use of the SP curve is in the detection of
hydrocarbons by the suppression of the SP response.
The spontaneous potential (SP) log was one of the The concept of static spontaneous potential (SSP) is
earliest measurements used in the petroleum industry, impmtant bccausc SSP represents the maximum SP
and it has continued to play a significant role in well that a thick, shale-free, porous, and permeable fmma-
log interpretation. Most wells today have this type of tion can have for a given ratio between Rm¡ and Rw.
log included in their log suites. Primarily, the SP log is SSP is determined by formula or chart and is a neces-
used for dete1mining gross lithology (i.e., reservoir vs. sary element for determining accurate values of Rw
nonreservoir) through its ability to distinguish perme- and volume of shale. The measured SP value is influ-
able zones (such as sandstones) from impermeable enced by bed thickness, bed resistivity, borehole diam-
zones (such as shales). It is also used to correlate zones eter, invasion, shale content, hydrocarbon content, and
between wells. However, as will be discussed later in most important: the ratio of Rm¡to Rw (Figure 2.lA).
this chapter, the SP log has several other uses that are
perhaps equally impmtant.
The SP log is a record of direct current (DC) volt- Betl Thickness
age (or potential) that develops naturally (or sponta- In a thin formation (i.e., less than about 10 ft [3 m]
neously) between a moveable electrode in the well thick), the measured SP is less than SSP (Figure 2. lB).
bore and a fixed electrode located at the surface (Doll, However, the SP curve can be corrected by chart for
1948). It is measured in millivolts (mV). Electric volt- the effects of bed thickness. As a general rule, when-
ages arising primarily from electrochemical factors ever the SP curve is narrow and pointed, the SP should
within the borehole and the adjacent rock create the SP be co1Tected for bed thickness befare being used in the
log response. These electrochemical factors are calculation of Rw.
brought about by differences in salinities between mud
filtrate and formation water within permeable beds.
Salinity of a fluid is inversely proportional to its resis- Betl Resistivity
tivity, and in practice salinity is indicated by mud fil-
trate resistivity (Rm¡) and formation water resistivity Higher resistivities reduce the deflection of the SP
(Rw). Because a conductive fluid is needed in the bore- curves.
hole for the generation of these voltages, the SP can-
not be used in nonconductive (e.g., oíl-base) drilling Borehole anti lnvasion
muds or in air-filled holes.
The SP log is usually recorded on the left track of Hilchie ( 1978) indicates that the effects of borehole
the log (track 1) and is used to diameter and invasion on the SP log are very small
• detect permeable beds and, in general, can be ignored.
• detect boundaries of permeable beds
• determine formation-water resistivity (Rw) Shale Content
• determine the volume of shale in permeable The presence of shale in a permeable formation
beds reduces the SP deflection (Figure 2.lB). In water-bear-
21
22 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
ing zones, the amount of SP reduction is related to the FORMATION WATER RESISTIVITY {Rw)
amount of shale in the formation. DETERMINATION
Figure 2.2 is an induction electric log with an SP
Hydrocarbon Content curve from a Pennsylvanian upper Morrow sandstone
In hydrocarbon-bearing zones, the SP deflection is in Beaver County, Oklahoma. In this example, the SP
reduced. This effect is called hydrocarbon suppression curve is used to find a value for Rw by the following
(Hilchie, 1978). Hydrocarbon suppression of the SP is procedure:
a qualitative phenomenon, and cannot be used to 1. After determining the fo1mation temperature,
determine the hydrocarbon saturation of the forma- conect the resistivities of the mud filtrate (Rm¡) and
tion. drilling mud (Rm) (obtained from the log heading) to
The SP response of shales is relatively constant and fo1mation temperature (see Chapter 1).
follows a straight line called a shale baseline. The SP 2. To minimize the effect of bed thickness, the SP
value of the shale baseline is assumed to be zero, and is conected to static SP (SSP). SSP represents the
SP curve deflections are measured from this baseline. maximum SP a formation can have if unaffected by
Permeable zones are indicated where there is SP bed thickness. Figure 2.3 is a chart used to c01Tect SP
deflection from the shale baseline. Por example, if the to SSP. The data necessary to use this chart are:
SP curve moves either to the left (negative deflection; • bed thickness,
Rm¡> Rw) orto the right (positive deflection; Rm¡< Rw) • resistivity from the shallow-reading resistivity
of the shale baseline, permeable zones are present. tool (R¡)
Permeable bed boundaries are placed at the points
• the resistivity of the drilling mud (Rm) at forma-
of inflection from the shale baseline.
tion temperature
Note that when recording through impermeable
zones or through permeable zones where Rm¡ is equal 3. Once the value of SSP is dete1mined, it is used on
to Rw, the SP curve does not deflect from the shale the chart illustrated in Figure 2.4 to obtain a value for
baseline. The magnitude of SP deflection is due to the the Rm¡ !Rwe ratio. Equivalent resistivity (Rwe) is ob-
difference in salinity between mud filtrate and forma- tained by dividing Rm¡ by the Rm¡ fRwe value from the
tion water and not to the amount of permeability. This chart (Figure 2.4).
salinity difference produces a difference in the resis- 4. The value of Rwe is then conected to Rw, using
tivities of the mud filtrate (Rm¡) and formation water the chart illustrated in Figure 2.5, for average devia-
(Rw). tion from sodium chloride solutions, and for the influ-
Over long intervals (several hundreds to thousands ence of formation temperature.
of feet), the SP baseline can drift, either in the positive A careful examination of Figures 2.2 to 2.5 should
or negative direction. While this is of little conse- help you gain an understanding of the procedure to
quence when making calculations local to a specific dete1mine Rw from the SP. But, rather than using
formation, it may introduce errors if the SP magnitude chaits in the procedure, you might prefer using the
is being calculated over that long interval, especially mathematical formulas listed in Table 2.1.
by means of a computer. Accordingly, the baseline It is important to remember that normally the SP
drift can be removed (many programs have such edit- curve has less deflection in hydrocarbon-bearing
ing routines) so that the SP baseline retains a constant zones (i.e., hydrocarbon suppression). Using a hydro-
value (usually set to zero) over the length of the logged carbon-bearing zone to calculate Rw results in too high
interval. a value for Rw calculated from SSP. Using a too-high
value of Rw in Archie 's equation to determine water
saturation produces a value of Sw that is also too high,
creating the chance for missed production in the inter-
pretive process. Therefore, to determine Rw from SP it
is best, whenever possible, to use the SP curve pro-
duced by a zone that is known to contain only water.
Spontaneous Potential 23
Table 2. 1. Mathematical Calculation of Rw from SSP, for temperatures in ºF (alter Western Atlas Logging Services, 1985).
Throughout this text, italics are used to indicate variable names with numeric
values. The notation SP is the abbreviation for spontaneous potential, and the variable
SP indicates the numerical value (in m V) taken from the SP log.
Spontaneous Potential 25
CILD
1000 mS/m o
SP Feet o
rnV MD o ofim..m
-160 40 50
w ,__ t - - ·
1
--i( .
~I
7400 ,_ --- , 1
·'-
-- -
'-
' -1-
- µ
tt
µ _
-- - - 1)
---- "
(
¡____ 1 -
'- 1-
=\ 1-
-
¡~
'- '-
'- -
_,,,
'-- 1-
,__ f-
-L --. ___
1-
(- - -- -- - - "' , ~
~
,
e--
--- -
-
- - \
~
'-
+_,·' - - - ,- -
'-- - ~
-
__
~
1-
6
\
- -
._
_{i /-- 1 - -
--- - -"-
!...--
._
'-
'-- 1- H 1-- - - - ._ '-
-
f-
1 -1 -
J - l-..
11 ·
1--J
1
--
1-
,__ ~
~
---· 1 - -
'
'-
---lo-
w. - ..
_,_ ._ 1'1. - -
Spontaneous Potential 27
Figure 2.2. Determination of formation water resistivity (Rw) from an SP log. This example uses the choris on Figures 2.3 through 2.5.
Given:
Rm1 = 0.51 ohm-m at l 35ºF (BHT)
Rm = 0.91 ohm-mal l 35ºF (BHT)
Surface temperature = 60ºF
Total depth =8007 ft
Bottom hole temperature (BHT) = l 35ºF
From the log:
Formation depth at maximum SP deflection is 7446 ft.
The maximum SP deflection in the sand coincides with -50 mV on the log scale, and the shale base line is at -5 mV. Note that the SP scale goes from -160 mV on the left to +40 mV
on the right and has 20 mV per division.
Bed thickness is 8 ft (7442 to 7450 ft).
Short-normal (SN) resistivity (R¡) is 33 ohm-m. The short-normal (or 16-inch normal) log measures the shallow formation resistivity (i.e., the resistivity of the invaded zone, R¡).
Procedure:
1. Determine Tr.
Use Figure 1.10 and the information above to calculate the formation temperatura (T¡).
Tr= 130ºF.
2. Corree! Rm and Rm¡to Tr.
Use Figure 1.11 and the information above to corree! Rm and Rm1 to formation temperature.
Rm = O. 94 ohm-m at l 30ºF and Rmr = 0.53 ohm-m at l 30ºF.
3. Determine Sf.
Read the maximum deflection directly from the SP curve in Figure 2.2. In this case, because the SP baseline has a nonzero value (-5 mV), its value must be subtracted from the value
of the SP curve.
The 5Pvalue is: SP (read from log) -baseline value = (-50 mV) - (-5 mV) = -45 mV
5P=-45mV.
4. Correct SPto SSP (correct for a thin bed):
See the procedure in Figure 2.3
SSP= -59 mV
5. Determine Rm1 /Rwe ratio, and from that, determine Rwe:
See the procedure in Figure 2.4
Rwe =0.096 ohm-m
6. Correct Rwe to Rw:
Use the chart in Figure 2.5, and the Rwe value in step 6
Rw= 0.10 ohm-m at T¡
28 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
30
SP from Log SSP -9
·-
120 20 - 8
20
1\\\ 110
100
30
40 -6
7
~~ A 90 50
5
15
\ \
80 - 60
\ \
, ' ' SP Correction Factor 4
- - -
\ \ \
70 .. 1.o
1.1
¡. 70 - -- >----
@:
\
I
,.
\
\ \ ' 7. 3.5
.e
ti
Q) 10
\ \ 1\ \
...--f-
60
50
1·'1
·S
¡. 80
- 3
.e
ui
tJ)
Q)
'~ '
\ 90
~
e:
.!:l
,¡;;;
9 1
' \
\
r--
Í\
<.o
~
.!::!
.e
,,
1-
8 \ ~
40
:?.s 100 _,_ - 2.5 1-
~
.o
\ \ 1\
Q)
\ CD
ID
Í\ 1\ 30· ~ .J.s 110
7
'\
-- <t.o
\
6 \ \ \. '\
""' ' "'
20 s.o
·O
120
.
2
Í\ "'\ ""-
' ,, '
\ \ '\
5 1.5
\ \
\
" "" ~
....
~
4 _,_
..5.. = l
Rm '\
21
' ....
""' '
5(
'
" 100
' ....
I'--.:: 200
- - - ·-
3
1.0 1.2
'1\
1.5 2.0
~
2.5
--~
.........
3.0
............
4.0
i'--.. .........
5.0
--- ---
6.0 7.0
r--..,.
8.0 9.0 10.0
SP Correctlon Factor Courtesy Boker Arlas,© 1996·1999 Boker Hughes, lnc.
Figure 2.3. SP bed·thickness correction todetermine 55Pfrom SP. (Western Atlas, 1995, Figure 3-1)
Procedure, using the volues from thelag in Figure 2.2:
1. Cokulote the ratio R/Rm using the volues determinad in Figure 2.2, where R¡ is equol to the short-normol (SN) resistivity ond Rm is the volue determined ot formotion temperoture.
R; =SN =34 ohm·m
Rm =O.94 ohm-m
R/Rm =36
2. Locoteobed thickness on the vertical scole. Bed thickness =8 ft.
3. Follow the bed-thickness volue horizontollyocross until it intersects the R/Rm curve.
(Becouse R/Rm = 36, the point lies between the R/Rm =20 ond the R/Rm = 50 curves.)
3. Orop verticolly from this intersection ondreod the SPcorrection factor on the scole ocross the bottom.
SPcorrection factor is opproximotely1.3.
4. Multiply SP by the SP correctionfactor tofind SSP.
SSP = SP X correction factor The nomogrom in the upper right por! of this figure olso gives SSP. Orow ostroight line
from 45on theSP scole on the left side of the nomogrom through 1.3 on the diagonal SP
SSP= -45 mV x 1.3 (5Pvolue token ot 7446 ft, see Figure 2.2) correction factor scole. Continua this stroight line to where il crosses the 55Pscole ot 59
SSP=-59 mV mV. Remember that the SP valueis negativa, so the SSP value is also negativa.
Spontoneous Potentiol 29
-200
500°F Figure 2.4. Chort used for
250°C determining the Rm1/Rwe ratio from SSP
-175 volues. (Western Mas, 199 5, Figure 3-2)
400°F Procedure, using the log datoin Figure
200ºC 2.2 and the volues from figure 2.3:
- 150 l . Loco te the SSP volue on the seole
on the lelt edge of the chart.
150°C
SSP=-59 mV
-125 2. Follow the volue horizontolly until it
intersects thesloping formation
temperoture line (l30ºF; imagine
100ºF oline belween the lOOºF ond
S" - 100 200ºFtemperoture lines).
g
o.. 3. Move verticolly from this
~ intersection ond read the ratiovalue
¡¡j
ze: on the scole al the bottom of the
- 75 1
2 chori.
~
t/) The Rm1/Rwe ratiovolue is 5.5
:::>
g 4. Divide the corrected volue for Rm1
~e: - 50 by the ratio Rm1/Rwe volue.
8.
en Rwe =Rmr/(Rm¡/Rwe)
Rwe =0.53/5.5
N
en -25
Rwe =0.096 ohm-m
50
2
/
En gfü h ,
,_ ~~
'" --,,,.
75°F
,,,. 100ºF
", 17 .¿j 150ºF
, ,...f .... ~
¡;;¡
7 ,__
/ __
~r 200°F
,_..t, ·,-_ ,_
0.5 ....
.,, !,... e_..
V
-
300°F
400°F
L.. ~-
,9'
-:
e:; ¡..
c.-!...- "' !.. ...-
SOOºF
0.2 .........
~I ....-~· ~-- .,i...
E - ~ ,,:;
... lf?~
e ...... ~ z ._ -
~
0.1
...... ~-
1 z. ,_ , __ ..__
:iE o.os ... ~
J '-
a:
...o 1 /'
-
I/,~
"1'.L.- ,
1
i
a!
l
~/,
íJ
I
~
1
0.02
- ~v.(i ¡
~t11
tur!ltion
)•
0.01 1 ~
-
.,.
/ I I I -
0.005 f!/li ~t l ¡,... --
IOC ol
I I
'/ -
... .... , ,o';
f- :1.J¡./ j_ -'" . ~ 00° 1
0.002
f_/l L_ - '.1.. ~0!
~'/
L!I ~Oj
Í. ~~~º ..
~
0.001
¡... • . '•
0.005 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.1 02 0.3 0.5 2
Rw or Rmf' (Q · m)
Courtesy BokerAtlas,© 1996-1999 Boker Hughes, lnc.
Figure 2.5. Chori far determining the volue of Rw lrom Rwe. (Western Atlas, 1995, Figure 3-3)
Procedure, using the volues fromFigure 2.4:
1. locote the volue of Rwe onthe vertical scole. Rwe =0.096 ohm-m
2. Follow it horizontollyuntil it inte1sects the temperatura curve desired. 130ºFlies between the 1OOºF ond 1SOºF temperoture curves.
3. Drop verticolly from theintersection ond reod ovolue far Rw on the scole ot the bottom.
Rw =0.10 ohm·m
Asquith, G., and D. Krygowski, 2004, Gamma Ray, in G.
3
Asquith and D. Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analysis:
AAPG Methods in Exploration 16, p. 31-35.
GammaRay
31
32 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
The nonlinear responses, in increasing optimism Important uses of the spectral gamma ray log
(lower calculated shale volumes), are: include (Dresser-Atlas, 1981):
Larionov (1969) for Tertiary rocks: • determining shale (clay) volume CVs1ia1e) in sand-
V,h =0.083(2 3·Hc• - J) stone reservoirs that contain uranium minerals,
3.2 potassium feldspars, micas, and/or glauconite
Steiber (1970): • differentiating radioactive reservoirs from shales
• source-rock evaluation
V = ¡GR
3.3 • evaluation of potash deposits
sh 3-2 XIGR
• geologic correlations
Clavier ( 197 L): • clay typing
Tf.,1, =1.7 -[3.38- (J GR -0.7)2]~ 3.4 • fracture detection
• rock typing in crystalline basement rocks
Larionov (1969) for older rocks: In most log analyses, the first two uses listed above are
V,1, =0.33 X (2 2·10• -1) 3.5 the most important uses of spectral log data.
In determining shale volume CVshale) in sandstones,
See Figures 3.1 and 3.2 for an example of a shale Dewan (1983) has suggested the use of only the thori-
volume calculation using the gamma ray log. um and potassium components instead of total GR in
the V shale equations, because uranium salts are soluble
SPECTRAL GAMMA RAY LOG and can be transported and precipitated in the forma-
tion after deposition. If potassium minerals are present
The response of the normal gamma ray log is made in the sandstone, Dewan (1983) suggested the use of
up of the combined radfation from uranium, thorium, only the thorium component in the Vshale equations.
potassium, and a number of associated daughter prod- Radioactive reservoirs like the "hot" dolomites of the
ucts of radioactive decay. Because these different Permian (west Texas and New Mexico) and Williston
radioactive elements emit gamma rays at different (Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota) basins of
energy levels, the radiation contributed by each ele- the United States are normally differentiated from
ment can be analyzed separately. Potassium (potassi- shales by the low thorium and potassium contents and
um 40) has a sing le energy of 1.46 MeV (million elec- high uranium content.
tron volts). The thorium and uranium series emit radi-
ation at various energies; however, they have promi-
nent energies at 2.614 Me V (thorium) and 1.764 Me V
REVIEW
(uranium). By using energy-selective sensor windows, 1. Gamma ray Logs are lithology logs that measure
the total gamma ray response can be separated into the the natural radioactivity of a formation.
gamma rays related to each of these elements (Dewan, 2. Because radioactive material is concentrated in
1983). Figure 3.3 illustrates one format used to display shale, shale has a high gamma ray reading.
output from the spectral gamma ray log. In addition to Shale-free sandstones and carbonates, therefore,
the individual elements shown in tracks 2 and 3, the usually have low gamma ray readings.
spectral gamma ray data can be displayed in track 1 as 3. Gamma ray logs are used to identify lithologies,
total gamma radiation (SGR-dashed curve) and total cor.relate between formations, and calculate volu.me of
gamma radiation minus uranium (CGR-solid curve). shale.
Gamma Ray 33
!···· <--··- ·-
-·-·
,
- Tracks 2 and 3 (used together, to the right of the
1~
-- 3.6
'
-
- · ·-···· '~- !·-·-·
--·· ·-· ··-·-
" ...
··-·· ....
1-·1·-t---1~-i-··j---j--j--"!-·-i-··,~+·-,
··-- ····- -- ,·
·+--+-··
Procedure: <ii
.e
(/) 0.4
1. For each zone below, find the gamma ray
index value (/GR) on the horizontal scale on
the bottom. 0.3'
2. Follow the value vertically to where it
intersects curve each of the curves listed 0.2
below.
3. From each curve, move horizontally to the
scale at the left and read the shale volume.
This is the amount of shale in the formation
expressed as a decimal fraction.
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Feet
MD
Symbols:
SGR Total gamma ray (dashed curve, track 1)
CGR Total gamma ray minus uranium (solid curve, track 1)
POTA Potassium 40 in weight percent (tracks 2 and 3)
URAN Uranium in ppm (tracks 2 and 3)
THOR Thorium in ppm (tracks 2 and 3)
Asquith, G., and D. Krygowski, 2004, Porosity Logs, in
4
G. Asquith and D. Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analy·
sis: MPG Methods in Explorotion 16, p. 37-7 6.
Porosity Logs
37
38 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
curve (SPHI) is sometimes displayed in tracks 2 and 3, porosities of carbonates with vuggy or fracture poros-
along with the DT curve. Track 1 usually contains a ity are calculated by the Wyllie formula, porosity val-
caliper (CALI), and a gamma ray (GR) or an SP. ues are too low. This happens because the sonic log
The interval transit time (~t) is dependent upon only records matrix porosity rather than vuggy or frac-
both lithology and porosity. Therefore, a formation's ture secondary porosity. The percentage of vuggy or
matrix interval transit time (Table 4.1) must be known fracture secondary porosity can be calculated by sub-
to derive sonic porosity either by chart (Figure 4.2) or tracting sonic porosity from total porosity. Total poros-
by the following formulas: ity values are obtained from one of the nuclear logs
Wyllie time-average equation (Wyllie et al., 1958): (i.e., density, neutron, or preferably the combination of
density and neutron). The percentage of secondary
Atlog -Atma porosity, called SPI or secondary porosity index, can
<l>s == A A 4.1 be a useful mapping parameter in carbonate explo-
tfl -D.tma
ration.
Raymer-Hunt-Gardner (RHG) equation (Raymer et Where a sonic log is used to determine porosity in
al., 1980): unconsolidated sands, an empirical compaction factor
(Cp) should be added to the Wyllie et al. (1958) equa-
4.2 tion:
where:
<Ps = sonic-derived porosity where:
~tma = interval transit time in the matrix (Table 4.1) ep = compaction factor
~tlog = interval transit time in the f 01mation
The compaction factor is obtained from the follow-
~tfl = interval transit time in the fluid in the forma-
ing formula:
tion (freshwater mud = 189 µsec/ft; saltwater mud
= 185 µsec/ft) Ats1i X C
4.4
100
Unconsolidated Formations where:
tsh = interval transit time in a shale adjacent to the
The Wyllie et al. (1958) formula for calculating
formation of interest.
sonic porosity can be used to determine porosity in
consolidated sandstones and carbonates with inter- C = a constant which is n01mally 1.0 (Hilchie,
granular porosity (grainstones) or intercrystalline 1978).
porosity (sucrosic dolomites). However, when sonic Interval transit time values from selected depths on
Table 4.1. Sanie Velacities and lnterval Transit Times for Different Matrixes. These constants are used in the sanie porasity formulas abave (alter Schlumberger, 1972).
the login Figure 4.1 are listed in Table 4.5. Those val- gamma rays that return to the detectors in the tool are
ues are used in the chart in Figure 4.2 to determine measured in two energy ranges. The number of return-
sonic porosity, which is listed in Table 4.6. ing gamma rays in the higher energy range, affected by
Compton scattering, is proportional to the electron
density of the formation. For most earth materials of
Hydrocarbon Ellects interest in hydrocarbon exploration, the electron den-
The interval transit time (~t) of a formation is sity is related to formation bulk density through a con-
increased due to the presence of hydrocarbons (i.e., stant (Tittman and Wahl, 1965), and the bulk density is
hydrocarbon effect). If the effect of hydrocarbons is related to porosity. Gamma ray interactions in the
not coffected, the sonic-derived porosity is too high. lower energy range are governed by the photoelectric
Hilchie (1978) suggests the following empirical cor- effect. The response from this energy range is strong-
rections for hydrocarbon effect: 1y dependent on lithology and only very slightly
dependent on porosity.
<!> =<Ps X 0.7 (gas) 4.5 The bulk-density curve (RHOB) is recorded in
tracks 2 and 3 (Figure 4.3). The photoelectric-effect
<j>=<j> 5 X0.9 (oil) 4.6 curve (Pe in barns per electron, b/e) is displayed in
either track 2 or track 3, with its placement set to min-
imize its overlap with the bulk-density curve. A cor-
DENSITY LOG rection curve (DRHO in g/cm3 or Kg/m 3), is also dis-
Density is measured in grams per cubic centimeter, played in either track 2 or track 3 (Figure 4.3). This
g/cm3 (or Kg/m 3 or Mg/m3), and is indicated by the curve indicates how much coffection has been added
Greek letter p (rho). Two separate density values are to the bulk-density curve during processing due to
used by the density log: the bulk density (Pb or RHOB) borehole effects (primarily mudcake thickness) and is
and the matrix density (Pma). The bulk density is the used primarily as a quality-control indicator. Whenev-
density of the entire formation (solid and fluid parts) er the correction curve (DRHO) exceeds 0.20 g/cm3,
as measured by the logging tool. The matrix density is the value of the bulk density obtained from the bulk-
the density of the solid framework of the rock. It may density curve (RHOB) should be considered suspect
be thought of as the density of a particular rock type and possibly invalid. A density-derived porosity curve
(e.g., limestone or sandstone) that has no porosity. (DPHI) is sometimes present in tracks 2 and 3 along
Since the late 1970s, the density log has also been used with the bulk-density (RHOB) and correction (DRHO)
for the photoelectric-effect measurement (Pe• PE, or curves. Track 1 usually contains a gamma ray log and
PEF) to determine lithology of a f01mation. The den- a caliper (Figure 4.3).
sity log can assist the geologist to: The photoelectric-effect curve appeared as pait of
the second-generation density tools, which are com-
• identify evaporite minerals monly refeffed to as Litho or Spectral tools and were
• detect gas-bearing zones introduced around 1978.
• dete1mine hydrocarbon density Formation bulk density (pb) is a function of matrix
• evaluate shaly-sand reservoirs and complex lith- density, porosity, and density of the fluid in the pores
ologies (Schlumberger, 1972) (saltwater mud, freshwater mud, or hydrocarbons). To
determine density porosity, either by chart (Figure 4.4)
The density logging tool has a relatively shallow or by calculation, the matrix density (Table 4.2) and
depth of investigation, and as a result, is held against type of fluid in the formation must be known. The for-
the side of the borehole during logging to maximize its mula for calculating density porosity is:
response to the formation. The tool is comprised of a
medium-energy gamma ray source (cobalt 60, cesium .+. _ Rna - Pb
'l'D - 4.7
137, or in sorne newer designs, an accelerator-based Pma - Pfl
source). Two gamma ray detectors provide sorne mea- where:
sure of compensation for borehole conditions
(similar to the sonic logging tool). <!>D = density derived porosity
When the emitted gamma rays collide with elec- Pma = matrix density (see Table 4.2 for values)
trons in the formation, the collisions result in a loss of Pb = formation bulk density (the log reading)
energy from the gamma ray particle. The scattered Pf/ =fluid density (see Table 4.2 for values)
40 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
Table 4.2. Motrix densities ond photoelectric·effect (Pe) volues of common lithologies ty (p.fi) in the density-porosity formula if gas density is
(Courtesy Holliburton, 1991). unknown. Because the presence of oil has little effect
on the density log, this tool usually provides the best
Lithology/ Pma or PJL indication of porosity in liquid-filled boles.
Fluid g/cm3 [Kg/m 3] Pe (b/e)
Sandstone 2.644 [2644] 1.81 Heavy Minerals
Limestone 2.710 [2710] 5.08
Any time the bulk density of a formation (Pb) is
Dolomite 2.877 [2877] 3.14 greater than the assumed matrix density (Pma) of the
Anhydrite 2.960 [2960] 5.05 formation [e.g., when measurements are made in an
anhydrite (Pma = 2.96 g/cm3) but are recorded using a
Salt 2.040 [2040] 4.65 limestone matrix (Pma = 2.71 g/cm 3)], the resulting
Fresh water 1.0 [1000] density porosity is negative. It is important to note that
in cases like this the logging tool is operating proper-
Salt water 1.15 [1150]
ly, but the assumptions made in the conversion
Barite (mud 267 between bulk density and density porosity are incor-
additive) rect. In cases like this, where the porosity is clearly
erroneous (because it is negative ), the log still yields
lmportance ol Correct Pma and Pfl values good information. Negative density porosity is often a
good indication of the presence of anhydrite or other
A computer in the logging unit calculates density heavy minerals, as shown in Figure 4.5 over the inter-
porosity from the measured bulk density of the forma- vals 11,550 to 11,567 ft and 11,600 to 11,618 ft.
tion using Equation 4.7. The wellsite geologist or log- Powdered barite is commonly added to mud to
ging unit engineer specifies the matrix and fluid den- increase mud density. When heavy muds are used
sities that are to be used. If the formation's actual (e.g., 14 lb/gal), the high Pe of the barite (Table 4.2) in
matrix density (Pma) is less than the matrix density the mud can mask the Pe of the adjacent rock layers.
used to calculate the porosity [e.g., calculating porosi-
ty of a sandstone (Pma = 2.64 g/cm3) using a limestone
matrix density (Pma = 2.71 g/cm3)], the log shows a NEUTRON LOG
calculated porosity that is higher than the actual poros-
Neutron logs are porosity logs that measure the
ity of the formation. If the formation's actual fluid den-
hydrogen concentration in a formation. In clean for-
sity is less than the fluid density used to calculate the
mations (i.e., shale-free) where the porosity is filled
porosity [e.g., calculating the porosity of a saltwater-
with water or oil, the neutron log measures liquid-
filled f01mation (p.fi = 1.1 g/cm3) using a freshwater
filled porosity (<\>N, PHIN, or NPHI).
value (p.fi = 1.0 g/cm3)], the log shows a ~alculated
Neutrons are created from a chemical source in the
porosity that is lower than the actual poros1ty of the
neutron logging tool. The chemical source is usually a
formation. Because of the wider range of matrix-den-
mixture of americium and beryllium which continu-
sity values than fluid-density values, enws in estimat-
ously emit neutrons. When these neutrons collide with
ing the matrix density have a larger impact on the cal-
the nuclei of the formation the neutron loses sorne of
culated porosity.
its energy. With enough collisions, the neutron is
Bulk-density values from selected depths on the log
absorbed by a nucleus and a gamma ray is emitted.
in Figure 4.3 are listed in Table 4.7. Those values are
Because the hydrogen atom is almost equal in mass to
used in the chart in Figure 4.4 to determine density
the neutron, maximum energy loss occurs when the
porosity, which is listed in Table 4.8.
neutron collides with a hydrogen atom. Therefore, the
energy loss is dominated by the formation's hydrogen
Hydrocarbon Ellects concentration. Because hydrogen in a porous forma-
tion is concentrated in the fluid-filled pores, energy
Where invasion of a formation is shallow, the low loss can be related to the f01mation's porosity.
density of the formation's hydrocarbons causes the The neutron curves are commonly displayed over
calculated density porosity to be greater than the actu- tracks 2 and 3, in units referenced to a specific lithol-
al porosity. Oil <loes not significantly affect density ogy (usually either limestone or sandstone, depending
porosity, but gas <loes (gas effect). Hilchie (1978) sug- on the geologic environment expected to be encoun-
gests using a gas density of 0.7 g/cm3 for fluid densi- tered), as illustrated in Figure 4.5.
Porosity Logs 41
Neutron log responses vary, depending on: two detectors. Like the sidewall neutron log, it direct-
• differences in detector types and what they ly displays values of porosity. The advantage of com-
detect (gamma rays and/or neutrons of different pensated neutron logs over sidewall neutron logs is
energies) that they are less affected by borehole ilTegularities.
Both the sidewall and compensated neutron logs can
• spacing between source and detector
be recorded in apparent limestone, sandstone, or
• lithology (i.e., sandstone, limestone, and dolo- dolomite porosity units. If a formation is limestone,
mite) and the neutron log is recorded in apparent limestone
While the variations due to detector types and tool porosity units, apparent porosity is equal to true poros-
design are fixed (and are accounted for in the data pro- ity. However, when the lithology of a formation is
cessing), the variations in response due to lithology sandstone or dolomite, apparent limestone porosity
must be accounted for by using the appropriate charts must be corrected to true porosity by using the appro-
(Figures 4.6 and 4.7). A geologist should remember priate chart (Figure 4.6 illustrates the lithology correc-
that the responses of different neutron logs differ from tions for one model of Halliburton neutron log, and
each other (unlike all other logs) and must be inter- Figure 4.7 the cmTections for a Schlumberger neutron
preted from the specific chart designed for a specific log). The procedure is identical for each of the charts
log (i.e., Schlumberger charts for Schlumberger logs and is shown in Figures 4.6 and 4.7.
and Halliburton charts for Halliburton logs). The rea- Neutron-porosity values from selected depths on
son for this is that while other logs are calibrated in the login Figure 4.5 are listed in Table 4.9. Those val-
basic physical units, neutron logs are not (Dresser ues are used in the chart in Figure 4.6 to determine
Atlas, 1975). sonic porosity, which is listed in Table 4.10.
Table 4.11 shows the results of lithology correc-
tions that are made to neutron measurements using the
correct and incorrect charts for the specific neutron Hydrocarbon ellects
tool. Whenever pores are filled with gas rather than oil
The first neutron logs detected the gamma rays that or water, the reported neutron porosity is less than the
were products of neutron capture by f mmation nuclei. actual formation porosity. This occurs because there is
Initially, each logging company had its own calibra- a lower concentration of hydrogen in gas than in oil or
tion system, but eventually the American Petroleum water. This lower concentration is not accounted for by
Institute (API) developed calibration pits to provide a the processing software of the logging tool, and thus is
common standard for measurement (Serra, 1984). interpreted as low porosity. A decrease in neutron
Generally these logs were displayed in counts per sec- porosity by the presence of gas is called gas effect.
ond (cps) or API Neutron Units rather than porosity.
Although charts to convert from displayed units to
porosity exist (Bassiouni, 1994), arbitrary conversions Shale Ellect
using core data or estimated formation porosities have
Whenever clays are part of the formation matrix,
most often been used. It should be noted that the neu-
the reported neutron porosity is greater than the actual
tron log response is inversely proportional to porosity
formation porosity. This occurs because the hydrogen
so that low-measurement unit values correspond to
that is within the clay's structure and in the water
high porosities, and high-measurement unit values
bound to the clay is sensed in addition to the hydrogen
correspond to low porosities.
in the pore space. Because the processing software of
The first modem neutron log (where porosity was
the logging tool expects all hydrogen in the fonnation
directly displayed) was the sidewall neutron log. Like
to reside in the pores, the extra hydrogen is interpreted
the density log (and for the same reason of limited
as being part of the porosity. An increase in neutron
depth of investigation), the sidewall neutron log has
porosity by the presence of clays is called shale effect.
both the source and detector in a pad that is pushed
against the side of the borehole. Although the sidewall
neutron log was relatively insensitive to lithologic POROSITY MEASUREMENT COMBINATIONS
effects, it was sensitive to borehole effects, such as
rugosity (roughness) which caused measurement diffi- Although the advent of porosity logs provided a
culties. substantial improvement in log interpretation, the sig-
The most commonly used neutron log is the com- nificant change, from a geological viewpoint, was the
pensated neutron log which has a neutron source and development of interpretive techniques that combined
the measurements from different porosity tools. With
42 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
combinations of two or three measurements, lithology combination to determine formation lithology and to
could be interpreted (rather than having to be known) estimate porosity. The reconnaissance technique
and a better estimate of porosity produced. The inter- works best with the following constraints:
pretation of lithology and porosity is accomplished • Both the neutron and density curves are in
through crossplots. These are x-y plots of the quanti- porosity (decimal or percent) referenced to lime-
ties of interest, usually overlain with lines for "pure" stone units.
lithologies (normally sandstone, limestone, and
• The formations are clean (no clays in the forma-
dolomite) with porosity indicated on each lithology
tions ).
line (e.g., Figure 4.11).
• There is no gas in the formations, only water or
oil.
Neutron-áensity Combination: . Using only the neutron-porosity and density-poros-
Quick-/ook Lithology aná Porosity 1ty curves, single lithologies can be predicted with lit-
The combination of the neutron and density meas- tle ambiguity. Adding the gamma ray may help, as in
urements is probably the most widely used porosity identifying dolomite from shale. In mixed lithologies,
log combination. The neutron-density log display con- such as the sandy limestone and sandy dolomite
sists of neutron-porosity (NPHI) and density-porosity shown, even the addition of the gamma ray <loes not
(DPHI) curves recorded in tracks 2 and 3 (Figure 4.5) help.
anda caliper (CALI) and gamma ray (GR) in track l. If the density log is of the newer litho or spectral
Both the neutron and density curves are n01mally type and a photoelectric curve (Pe) is available, the
recorded in limestone porosity units, however, porosi- ambiguity can be further lessened, especially in the
ty referenced to sandstone and dolomite can also be case of mixed lithologies. The value of the Pe curve in
recorded. mixed lithologies falls between the single lithology
The extensive use of the neutron-density combina- value of each member, so sorne distinction can be
tion may be due in part to the fact that they were made. Table 4.3 summarizes the patterns and values
among the first logging tools that could be physically for common lithologies.
combined and their data acquired in a single logging The estimation of porosity is equally straightfor-
run. The response of the combination is such that for ward: the formation porosity can be estimated to with-
reconnaissance evaluation one can forego the crossplot in about 2 porosity units (0.02) by taking the average
and rely on recognition of the curve patterns (the posi- of the neutron porosity and density porosity.
tion of the curves with respect to each other) to quick- In areas of the world where sand and shale intervals
ly dete1mine the most likely predominant lithology predominate, the neutron and density are referenced to
and formation porosity. sandstone rather than limestone to eliminate the need
Figure 4.8 illustrates the use of the neutron-density for matrix conversion. (This also helps highlight the
gas crossover effect described below.) While Figure
Table 4.3. Estimation of formation lithologies using the neutron-density combination (Campaign, W. J., personal communication).
Neutron and density are run with a limestone matrix; formation is water filled ar oil filled
Sonic Density Best for identifying radioactive reservoirs, The choice of lithology pair has a
(Figure 4.14) rather than predicting lithology and significant effect on the estimation of
porosity: porosity.
Potential reservoirs plot along the closely The lithology lines are closely spaced, so
spaced lithology lines while shales tend to any uncertainty in the measurements
fall toward the lower right of the plot. produces large changes in the lithology
This can indicate the presence of radioactive and porosity estimates.
reservoirs which are inte1mingled with
shales (which tend to have high radioactivity).
Table 4.5. Values to be used with the chart in Figure 4.2 to determine the sonic porosity, SPHI.
11,545 57
11,560 48
11,593 50
11,615 51
11,631 67
11,645 52
11,655 57
11,665 52
11,696 50
Table 4.7. Values to be used with the chori in Figure 4.4 to determine the density porosity, DPHI.
Table 4.9. Values will be used with the chart in Figure 4.4 to determine the neutron porosity, NPHI, referenced to other lithologies (dolomite and sandstone).
11,545 57 2.67 0.130 0.067 0.092 0.125 0.170 0.022 0.110 0.105 0.185
11,560 48 2.96 -0.010 0.005 0.031 0.010 0.073 <0 <0 <0 <0
11,593 50 2.70 0.000 0.017 0.045 0.040 0.098 0.005 0.095 <0 0.015
11,615 51 2.97 -0.010 0.024 0.051 0.053 0.010 <0 <0 <0 <0
11,631 67 2.50 0.290 0.138 0.163 0.203 0.235 0.125 0.200 0.250 0.365
11,645 52 2.82 0.140 0.032 0.059 0.070 0.122 <0 0.030 0.115 0.200
11,655 57 2.64 0.160 0.067 0.092 0.125 0.170 0.042 0.125 0.135 0.220
11,665 52 2.68 0.010 0.032 0.059 0.070 0.122 0.020 0.105 <0 0.030
11,696 50 2.76 0.010 0.017 0.045 0.040 0.098 <0 0.063 <0 0.030
48 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 4. 11. Differences in neutron porosity using corree! and incorrect charts far the specific neutron tool.
NPHI NPHI
Zone LogValues (incorrect chart f or (incorrect chart jor
the example data) the example data)
Depth NPHI RHOB DT dolo sand dolo sand
11,508
11,631 0.29 2.50 67 0.250 0.365 0.210 0.335
11,645
11,655 0.16 2.64 57 0.135 0.220 0.080 0.210
11,665 0.01 2.68 52 <0 0.030 <0 0.040
11,696
Table 4.12. Lithology determination on the data from the intervals in Figure 4.5, using the curve patterns in Figure 4.8.
RawData ND Quicklook
Depth Zone range
RHOB DPHI PE NPHI Lithology
11,508 11,490-11,518 2.73 -0.013 5.0 0.005 Limestone
11,522 11,518-11,528 2.75 -0.022 3.2 0.090 Dolomite
11,528-11,543 Dolomite w/anhydrite
11,545 11,543-11,546 2.67 0.020 3.7 0.130 Dolomite
11,560 11,546-11,570 2.96 <0 4.8 -0.010 Anhydrite
11,570-11,580 Dolomite (w/anhydrite?)
11,593 11,580-11,598 2.70 0.005 5.6 0.000 Limes tone
11,615 11,598-11,625 2.97 <0 5.1 -0.010 Anhydrite
11,631 11,625-11,641 2.50 0.125 3.8 0.290 Dolomite
11,645 11,641-11,649 2.82 <0 3.5 0.140 Dolomite (w/anhydrite?)
11,655 11,649-11,659 2.64 0.042 3.5 0.160 Dolomite
11,665 11,659-11,680 2.68 0.020 5.5 0.010 Limestone
11,696 > 11680 2.76 -0.028 5.1 0.010 Limestone w/anhydrite
Table 4.13. Log values from Figures 4.1, 4.3, and 4.5, used to determine porosity and lithology.
Table 4.14. Log volues from Figures 4.1, 4.3, and 4.5, used to determine porosity and lithology.
Table 4.15. Lag values from Figures 4.1, 4.3, and 4.5, used to determine porosity and lithology.
Table 4.16. Log values from Figures 4.1, 4.3, and 4.5, lisis of values of Mand Ncalculoted from the equations obove, and lithology estimates from the M-N crossplot.
<!>Ns = neutron-sonic crossplot porosity show the calculation of apparent matrix values. Figure
The neutron and density data (through the neutron- 4.18 and Table 4.19 show the application of those
density crossplot) produce an apparent matrix density apparent matrix values to determine lithology.
(as well as a neutron-density crossplot porosity), and A variation on this technique was developed with
the neutron and sonic data (through the neutron-sonic the advent of the Pe curve on the more recent density
crossplot) produce an apparent matrix travel time (as logs. Using the Pe curve, the bulk-density curve, and
well as a neutron-sonic crossplot porosity). the neutron porosity another matrix parameter, appar-
These two apparent matrix values are then applied ent matrix volumetric photoelectric factor (Umaa), can
to a crossplot (Figure 4.18). In Figure 4.18, the three be determined (as shown in Figure 4.19), or its value
common lithologies, highlighted in the previous cross- can be calculated from (Western Atlas, 1995):
plots, occur on the plot as points which are connected
U = (PeXpb)-(cpNDX Ufl)
to form a triangle. The location of the point on the plot, 4.13
maa l-q>ND
with respect to that mineral triangle, indicates the rel-
ative lithologic mixture. In practice, any three miner- where:
als that have unique values (with respect to each other)
U¡1 = fluid volumetric cross section (0.398
can be used as endpoints in a mineral triangle (e.g., a
barns/cm 3 for fresh water, 1.36 barns/cm3 for salt
calcite, dolomite, and anhydrite choice is common in a
water)
known carbonate area). As with the M-N plot
described previously, data from a single pure mineral- <l>ND = porosity from the neutron-density crossplot
ogy plot around the point representing that mineralo- This apparent matrix crossplot then uses apparent
gy. For binary mineral systems, the data plot along a matrix density, Pmaa• and apparent matrix volumetric
line connecting the two mineralogical members, with cross section, Umaa• to determine formation lithology
the location of the points along the line indicative of (Figure 4.20). As with the Pmaa-i).tmaa crossplot, the
the mineral mixture of each point. Note that porosity is three common lithologies are connected in a mineral
not predicted from this plot, but is dete1mined from the triangle, but any three unique mineralogies can be
earlier two-component crossplots. used to estímate a three-mineral solution.
Figures 4.16 and 4.17 and Tables 4.17 and 4.18 Figures 4.16 and 4.19, and Tables 4.17 and 4.20
52 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 4.17. Log volues from Figures 4.1, 4.3, ond 4.5, ond o list of volues of opporent motrix density determined from the crossplot.
Table 4.18. Lag volues from Figures 4.1, 4.3, ond 4.5, ond olist volues of opporent mollix tronsit time determined from the crossplot.
Table 4.19. lag values from Figures 4.1, 4.3, and 4.5, apparent matrix values from Figures 4.16 and 4.17, and a list of the estimates of lithology determined from the crossplot.
Table 4.20. Log values from Figures 4.1, 4.3, and 4.5, anda list of values of apparent matrix transit time determined from the crossplot.
Table 4.21. Log values from Figures 4.1, 4.3, and 4.5, apparent matrix values from Figures 4.16 and 4.19, and a list of the estimates of lithology determined from the crossplot.
11,545 57 2.67 3.7 0.130 0.110 47.5 2.88 11.2 Dolomite w/limestone
and anhydrite
11,560 48 2.96 4.8 -0.010 0.000 48.0 2.97 14.3 Anhydrite
11,593 50 2.70 5.6 0.000 0.000 50.0 2.70 15.2 Limes tone
11,615 51 2.97 5.1 -0.010 0.000 52.0 2.99 15.3 Anhydrite
11,631 67 2.50 3.8 0.290 0.230 43.0 3.07 12.4 ???
11,645 52 2.82 3.5 0.140 0.100 44.0 3.15 11.l ???
11,655 57 2.64 3.5 0.160 0.130 45.5 2.91 10.7 Dolomite w/anhydrite
11,665 52 2.68 5.5 0.010 0.010 51.0 2.70 15.0 Limes tone
11,696 50 2.76 5.1 0.010 0.005 49.5 2.77 14.5 Limestone w/anhydrite?
show the calculation of apparent matrix values. Figure lmplications far Correlation and Mapping
4.20 and Table 4.21 show the application of those
apparent matrix values to determine lithology. Standard correlation (and mapping) practices use
the raw logs (gamma ray, resistivity, etc.) to trace for-
mation boundaries in the subsurface. With the exis-
Beyond the three-mineral model tence of software that can easily and quickly estimate
formation lithologies and porosities, the correlation
For more complex mineralogical solutions, the use process might be better served (and be more accurate)
of other log measurements is required. These tech- if correlations were made on the actual quantities of
niques go beyond the crossplotting techniques dis- interest (like lithology), instead of on the raw logs,
cussed here. Sorne techniques are dete1ministic in many of which respond to multiple properties of the
nature (as are the crossplot techniques) but rely on formations in the subsurface.
iterative computational techniques for a solution. This section summarizes the crossplot methods
Other techniques rely on the use of statistical tech- previously discussed.
niques to estímate the most likely solution.
Figure 4.21 is an example of a deterministic solu-
tion. In this case, shale volume is calculated independ- CONSISTENCY IN LITHOLOGY PREDICTION
ently (the gamma ray was used for this example) and Seven methods to determine lithology have been
was used as one of the input curves. With the addi- covered in this chapter. One is based on pattern recog-
tional inputs of interval transit time, neutron porosity, nition (quick-look neutron-density), three on the
bulk density, and Pe• the software sol ved for four min- simultaneous use of two porosity tools, and three on
erals (beyond the shale volume ): calcite, dolomite, the simultaneous use of three porosity tools. Table
anhydrite, and quartz. In the figure, porosity and fluid 4.22 compares the lithology prediction results of these
saturations (from the deep resistivity log) were also methods. With sorne exceptions, the results are fairly
determined and are shown incorporated into the same consistent, but they are not identical. The variation in
display. the results has many sources. Borehole conditions may
Porosity Logs 55
Table 4.22: Comparison of lithology estimation from the various crossplot methods.
Lithology
Neutron- Neutron-
Zone Neutron- Neutro o- Neutro o- Spectral- Density- Spectral-
Depth range Density Density Soni e Density M-N Sonic Density
Quicklook Crossplot Crossplot Crossplot Crossplot MID Plot MID Plot
11,508 11,490- Limes tone Limestone Sandy Limestone Sandy Dolomitic Limestone
11,518 limestone (with dolomite sand
anhydrite?)
11,522 11,518- Dolomite Dolomite Dolomite Dolomite Limy Dolomite Dolomite
11,528 dolomite
11,528- Dolomite
11,543 with
anhydrite
11,545 11,543- Dolomite Dolomite Limestone Limy Dolomite Dolomite Dolomite and
11,546 dolomite (with with limestone
anhydrite?) anhydrite
11,560 11,546- Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite
11,570
11,570- Dolomite
11,580 (with
anhydrite?)
11,593 11,580- Limestone Limes tone Limes tone Limes tone Limestone Sandy Limes tone
11,598 limes tone
11,615 11,598- Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite? Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite Anhydrite
11,625
11,631 11,625- Dolomite Dolomite Dolomite Limy Dolomite Dolomite? off chart
11,641 (with dolomite
anhydrite?)
11,645 11,641- Dolomite Dolomite Dolomite Limy Dolomite? off chart off chart
11,649 (with (with dolomite
anhydrite?) anhydrite?)
11,655 11,649- Dolomite Dolomite Limy Limy Dolomite Dolomite Dolomite
11,659 dolomite dolomite with with
anhydrite anhydrite
11,665 11,659- Limestone Limestone Sandy Limestone Dolomite Sandy Limestone
11,680 limestone limestone
(with
dolomite?)
11,696 > 11680 Limestone Dolomitic Sandy Limes tone Dolomite Sandy Limes tone
with limes tone limes tone (with dolomite (with
anhydrite anhydrite?) anhydrite?)
56 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
play a part in the variation, especially since, in this pressional sound wave through the formation. The unit
case, the data were used directly from the logs with no of measure is microseconds per foot (µsec/ft) or
attempt at environmental coffections. Formation thick- microseconds per meter (µsec/m). Interval transit time
ness and, hence, the effect of adjacent beds on the is related to formation porosity.
measurement in the target bed also play a part. 3. The density log is a porosity log that measures
The variability of the formations themselves proba- the electron density of a formation. The fo1mation's
bly has a more significant effect. In a geologic envi- electron density is related to a formation's bulk densi-
ronment like this one (Figure 4.21), it can be expected ty (RHOB or Pb)· Bulk density is measured in g/cm3 or
that the lithologies encountered are not always pure. Kg/m3 . Bulk density, in tum, can be related to forma-
The response of the individual measurements to that tion porosity.
mixture vary between measurements and contribute to 4. Density logs made since about 1980 also have a
the variation seen here. photoelectric curve (Pe, PE, or PEF) that responds pri-
The results of the crossplots, while not wildly vari- marily to formation lithology and is affected in only a
able, underscores the need for other data, in this case, minor way by porosity and the type of fluids in the
samples of the formations themselves. Cores through pore space.
the section would be ideal, but their cost would prob- 5. The neutron logis a porosity log that measures
ably be prohibitive. Cuttings samples would be a good the hydrogen concentration in a fo1mation. In shale-
source of lithology informaton, even given the poten- free formations where porosity is filled with water, the
tial mixing and contamination problems. Sidewall neutron log can be related to water-filled porosity
cores, either in this well (if the log analysis could be (PHIN, or NPHI, or <i>N)·
completed quickly) or in subsequent wells in zones 6. In gas reservoirs, the neutron log records a lower
with questionable predicted lithology, would help to porosity than the formation's true porosity because gas
reconcile the results shown here. has a lower hydrogen concentration than oíl or water
(gas effect).
7. The neutron-density combination is the most
REVIEW widely used porosity measurement combination.
1. The three common types of porosity logs are: Porosity, adjusted for lithology, can be determined
from the neutron-density combination either by a
• sonic
crossplot chart or by formula.
• density 8. Additional uses of the neutron-density combina-
• neutron tion are:
2. The sonic log is a porosity log that measures the • detection of gas bearing zones
interval transit time (delta t, or DT, or /).t) of a com- • determination of lithology
Porosity Logs 57
11700
SS ASOUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
40
::-
-~ 25
o
o.
-e-
Figure 4.2. Chart for converting interval ITOnsit time (6~ to sonic porosity (cps).
Procedure:
l. Find the intervol transit time CDD token from the sanie log in figure 4.1 on the scole ot the bottom of the chart.
2. To colculote sanie limestone porosity using the Wyllie time-average equotion (labeled "Time Average"), follow the DT value verlicolly until il intersects the colcite line, then move
horizontally ta intersect the y1lxis andread the porosity volue.
3. To colculote sonic dolomile porosity using the Wyllie time-average equotion, follow the procedure in step 2 obove, except intersect the dolomita line inslead of the colcite line.
4. To calculote sonic limestone porosity using the Roymer-Hunt-Gardner (RHG) equotion (curvad lines, lobeled "Empiricol"), follow lhe OT volue verticolly until it inlersects lhe curved colcite
line, lhen move horizontal~ to intersect the y-axis ond reod the porosity volue.
5. To colculote sonic dolomile porosity using lhe Roymer·HunHiordner (RHG) equation, follow lhe piocedure in step 4 obove, except intersect the curved dolomite line insteod of the curved
cokite line.
NOTE: While the values in Table 4.6 ore in decimal, the porosity values on lhe chori ore in percent.
Porosity Logs 59
11700
60 ASQUITHAND KRYGOWSKI
50
...
Figure 4.4. Chori for converting bulk density (p1¡, RHOB) todensity porosity ($0, DPHI).
Procedure:
1. Findthe bulk density (RHOB) token from the density log inFigure 4.3 on the scale at the bottom of the chori. Note thot the scole is displayed from high values on the left to low values
on the right.
2. Follow the RHOB volue verticolly unlil it intersects the proper motrix line [colcite Uimestone) or dolomite] then move horizontally to intersect the y-oxis representing the proper fluid
density, inthis case 1.00 g/cm 3 (freshwater, the middlescole) toread the porosity (DPHI).
NOTE: The volues in Table 4.8 ore decimalfroctions, the porosity volues on the chori ore in percent.
Porosity Logs 61
GR
Figure 4.5. Example combination
neutron density lag with gamma ray and
caliper.
This exomple is shown to illustrate a
common presentotion formal far a neutron
density combination, to be used in applying
a lithology conversion to the neutron
porosity in Figure 4.6, and in determining
lithology and crossplot porosity from the
neutron-density crossplot in Figure 4.8.
Track 1: This track contains both gamma
ray (GR) and caliper (CALI). Note that the
gamma ray scale reads from Oto 100 API
units and the caliper measures a borehole
size from 6 to 16 inches.
Track 2: The photoelectric effect (PEF) is
displayed from Oto 1Ob/e. The density
correction (DRHO) is displayed from -0.05
to +0.45 g/cm 3.
Tracks 2 and 3: Both neutron porosity
(NPHI) and density porosity (DPHI) are
plotted across tracks 2 and 3. The sea le far
both is the sorne, ranging from -0.1 O
(-10%) to 0.30 (+30%), and is
expressed in limestone porosity units.
On this lag the density porosity (DPH 1) is
represented by a salid line, and the neutron
porosity (NPHI) is represented by a dashed
line.
62 ASQUITHANO KRYGOWSKI
-5
-5 o 5 m m m u ~ ~ 40 a
4>NLs • Neutron Llmestone Poroslty (%)
~
NOTE: For neutronlogs, the chori usedto correct the logged porosity far
lithology MUSTcorrespondto the type of neutron log run, ond the
...... ~!fe"- TNPH l.
,,,.
...
- ~
1 j
log used ond the chori used for the conversionconleod to significont _L ,__ l.J
In the exomple, the Halliburton neutron log from figure 4.5, is corrected , , ... "'
using oSchlumberger chort (NPHIcurves). Note the difference in porosity ........
11> ~
results between the choris. ¡¡;, f/ 1/
, ,
... ·"'.
11> .1
,._ º~ V /
~~~ '""' /
1 1
~~t ~ ~~ , ...
f8.
G> 1 I
"' >- t;
l ...
1
5 10 A /
,,,. ...
.; 1/ /
1/ .1 1
1- t - -
,( ~~ t-
• ,...
+ >- - ...
... 1...
.1
- 1
o
1-1-1-
- .1
....
......... >-
+ 1
- ,_
o 10 20 30 40
fcNt.co•• apparent llmestone neutron poroslty (p.u.)
Courtesy Schlumberger Wireline &Testing, ©1998 Schlumberger
Porosity Logs 63
tf:4=:f~
'''" ..... ,,,,,,,,,
,,,, information.
shale '"''" , ____
¡
·'"'·····
Procedure:
~
,,,,.,
'·--··
limes ton e • '"
'--····· ' ..... "'
The neutron·porosity and density·
' porosity curves are scanned for their
. , L ,...
. .. • . , , , , ' '·
'""' '
their values. The relative position of
!-~- --~ . "'''""
"'"''
..... ¡ . . . "'
'"' '""
. . . 1 . .,.
¡,,,,
,,,
'"
,, the curves is an indicator of the
""
.,.,. lithology encountered, and the
¡.,, ¡.,, ,,,, '''''"
''
""'" ''""'
''"" '"'
¡,,,, ¡...... ,,,,, '""' "'''
L .... L ..
average of the two curves at any
'''
..... ''"
'"'
shale '''"
'"" '"' k· ,,¡,,,,
'--··
""
"'" "'' ''''" '"'" ' ' ' ' '
1
,,,
F~I
'"'
''
¡ .......
~- '"
¡.,, ..
'""' ''" '""
,
¡,,,,
.,,., 1 ,, ,,, distinguish ambiguous patterns, like
!---1 '''" ,,, '"'
,.
"' '"
!,.,,.
.,, .,,,,
'"'' '"'
¡,,,
'""
¡.,,,,,,
'""" The photoelectric effect may be used
''""'
,,
''" "' '"'
,, ''" to distinguish ambiguous patterns
''
shale '"' """''
•,.
,,., !www '"'
,,,,, •" "'" '"
' ....... ,,, ,,,,
(sandy limestone from dolomitic
;,· ' ' ''"''
salt ,,
\
'", '.;: ,, ~· th :A' .. ·.,,· ·'
·.,···_,.
·'
'
t
sand) or to confirm the neutron-
density interpretation.
8700 ,,,,, ''"' '' '"" ... . ;.... ,,,
shale
''" '"
,, ' ' ......
Assumptions:
'"" '"" ,,
,-.
"
not contain clay (except for the
¡.., . , ' . . .,
ite
" '" ''' !·· '''" "'' ''"'
""'
' ' '
¡,,.• shale).
"'"''
,,,,
,,
,, " "
,,,,,
L,,,
'•''''
'""
'
'"' L . . . !I
one '''"
fÍ !F
!fü ¡,,,
,,,, referenced to limestone.
'""' ti" '"''
,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,•.... ''" ,,,, ''"' ,,
' '
Note the lithology interpretations listed
--:t- ,,,,
, ... ¡,,,
and
"
on the log.
"iT"
,,,,, ¡...... ¡. . . I··
'
¡,,.,, ;_,
¡,,,, ¡,,, ,,,. '''Y'''
,,,,, •.....
shale '·"- ,...
'" ,, ,,,,
''" '-. .... ,,,, '"
'"
,,,,..
····+ .. !····
'"
,,,,, ,,,, ' '
,,
!... i., ,,j,,,,.t~g
,,, ' ,... ''" ¡,,.,,
•,,, ¡,,
'"" '""' , '"'
~-- '' '·-"_,,,\-,.•<~o•,•' •-••
··••··--.:.-~ .. l.~~·'-~··-·--·
,,, '"'" ,, ,;,,.,,.,
64 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
PHIE
Ü.6- - - - - - - - - - - - -;¡y dec~;r- - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ü
PHID
Feet 0.6 v/v decimal O
GR _ _ _ _ _ _ _PHIN_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
MD 0.6 .... •.. ,
v/v decimal
....o
··---
.....•. .....
...... . .. ....... ........
. ......
..........
1·~~i~~l~t~~~~l~~~ .......
8500 ........ ,
...... .....
..... ..
shale ....
1
- -
salt
1 ... .......
-
shale ,......
..... .....
·I· · - · ......
......
..,.
. .....
.. ,...... ...... , .... 1
1 ...... ,
...
.......
...
,......
.
shaly gas sand
·-<··-··--· 1
..
and
...... ··-·
......
.,....
-1!11
, .....
-~-
...... . ..... ....
...... ...
............. ······•·····
......
.. . . ......
...... ...
...• ,...
,..... ,.........
,
!-·--
....... ...... ......
. ................ ........
......
shale
.... ....... .......
--···- ...
..,
..L ...... .......
·--- +··. ..... ......
.....
.... -
~~1~
....... ...... ..
+
a2
dolomite ..
......
... ........
.... ...... . ...
•·
shale ....
......
.... . ...... ....
~-- ······ : -
8600
e .......
....... ........
,....... .......
.. ..... ......
clean wet sand ........ ...... ......
. .. . ..
...
shale ~-+·· .J:l ......... ....
... J+--· ¡ .....
Figure 4. 9. Example of the generalized lithologic response of the neutron and density logs, used as a quick-look lithology technique. This example is primarily far
showing lag response in shaly formations, and when the porosity curves are referenced to sandstone.
Procedure:
The neutron·porosity and density·porosity curves ore sconned far their relationship to each other, and far their values. The relative position of the curves is an indicotor
of the lithology encountered.
Assumptions:
• There is liquid in the pare space, either water or oíl, but not gas, except in the intervals where noted.
• The formations encountered do not contain clay (except in the intervals where noted).
• The density and neutron·porosity curves (PHID and PHIN) are referenced to sandstone. PHIE is the effective porosity, colculated from PHIN and PHID.
The lnterpretation:
The neutron and density measurements depend on the amount of doy present in the formation and the physical properties of that doy. In general, the presence of doy in
a liquid·filled formation causes the neutron lag to read higher than actual porosity, while the density log reads lower than actual porosity. In a liquid·filled sandstone
(when the measurements are referenced to sandstone), the curves separate with the neutron higher than the density.
Gas in the formation drives the neutron value lower than actual porosity and the density value slightly higher than actual porosity, resulting in the neutron log reading
lower than the density log, the dassic crossover response.
With both gas and days in the formation, the response is not fully predictable becouse the two effects simultaneously work in opposite ways on both measurements. In
very shaly formations with low to medium gas saturations, the presence of gas may be noted only by a decrease in the crossover effect. In formations with medium gas
saturations and small amounts of shale, there may be no noticeable gas effect, with the curves at approximately the sorne values.
The illustration here is but one of many possible examples of the log responses in shaly gas·beoring formations.
Porosity Logs 65
o DPHI
Feet v/v decimal -0.15
6 NPHI
MD 0v decimar- -0.15
-----·----- +- F :::_
---+----
J
...,
----- -------- ,__ ·r
~
::::-¡ ---·-----·--- ·-----
--- ·----- ----- ·---- ·------- -----
- -- ::::¡: ---- ---- -.._"
-----~
1
--1- -------- ---:
-+
--------~
1
~
---
______¡
·--- ---1-
""- -=:- - - -
---
-
---- ----
----
--
----- ·~------.·~~-=-~ 1
-
-. ----- ~=+~~ e-:::___
------- ------ ----------
'
---- ·-----
---- :------
-- ·-----
-----
---
,____ r----- '
/
/
-
.._ - '-
----- 1--- -+----
-- ------
- ·--
------ ·---- ,--r----- ... ___ ,
------
-+ -- ----- ---- ---
----
------ -----
'
- -
-
-
14600 -
,,_ ------ -------- ---- ·-----
------- ,- (--- ----- ---- - ----- - -- --- ------
----1------
--------
...._
,.. j
- - -----
---
-- ----
-+-
---
·----
- r__, __,111-+---+------ --- -- --~-·-~--~--~e.---- ,, )::: ----- ------ ---- --
---:: 1 -'-,fL +-----l -----+-----+-----1-----+----+-----I , ,..,/ ·------ ---
( 11 ',,¿__ - ·----
---- ~ ----
,".)- ------- ------
- ---- ----- --- --- --- ------ ------
' -- .:::.., ----- -- ----
--
_ :r:r:~
----- ·------ -- -- ---
---- ----
¡-~:r~~
---------
,-,_ ,____ --- -----
-~-- r --- ----
-~
---- --·------ / -+ -
------ ·----- ----- ----
- - __--
- ----
;l~;~
-- ---------- --
1 ---+--+- • -- 0 ----+----+-----;-------j----I
-----i----~.,, = -- --- ----
- ----::~~~-~- :_J ____ -~--=--· ~-,..,,.--,-~-cl- ----1---1---- i
- •-1+--,,~-•--r--~-----,=~-c---¡
Figure 4. 1O. An example of neutron and density porosity response in a gas zone.
The interval from 14,601 ft to 14,624 ft shows the (low) gamma ray response of a reservoir and the neutron·density crossover (NPHI < DPHI) of a gas·bearing
zone. The neutron· and density·porosity curves are referenced to the lithology of the zone.
NOTE: Curves recordad in apparent limestone units show a false crossover in a sandstone, because of the lithologic effect.
66 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Figure 4. 11. Neutron-density crossplot. Fluíd Density = 1.00 g/cc (1000 kg/m3 )
1.9
Lithology ond porosity con be determinad
:MI~ -
/ _,_ 45
from the neutron-density crossplot. __
, ·1- -
-1- - 1 -
1-
- .•
Procedure:
1. The point is locotedon the plot from
2.0
...... Q .~ alit
V
/
- 40
~ ...:
- ,_ 'li
...
- ¡.... ~
~ - /.
.... 35
density (left axis of chori) or density ~
6:'>._ .. !) / /
¡;;. - ¡e¡;
porosity (right axis al chori). 2.2 ' 30
... ~
~
'):
-
~t ¡(
V
.;< :.-' ,...
'!i
- -
values in Table 4.13 ore decimal froctions, ~
A
..
, , lo-
-
-
f "
Q
and the neutron limestone porosity values ,.,
in Figure 4.11 are in percent. Avalue ,.. ""
l.A
-- •¡¡
/
"'
listed as O.OJO in the tableis equal to a
Oi
2.5
Q. ~
... /V
,,
-
·-
,_,_
value of 1%on the figure.
3. The lithology of the point is determined ª 2.6
-
'
r.>
·~ 1/
. ' I
I~
I/
....
by its locotion relative to the two lithology ~ - !>' .<
2.7 .... o
indicotion of the percentage of each of the / /
~ <
-
mineral pairs. Note that !he lithology V
,,_ - ·+- -
determination con be ombiguous (e.g., a
point lying between the colcite ond
2.8
-
1/
,_
-- -·- - · 1- -
-5
-5 o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
<l>NLS, Neutron Llmestone Porosity (%)
-- -
- 1-
_,_ 1- - - J ,_ -
- ~ ~· 1
, ,_
?. - 380
_,_ __,_
... .__._ -- lilhology and porosity can be determined
.¡- - --1 - ~- 1- - 1-- ó C• y - -t-
- J from !he neutron-sonic crossplot.
1--:.,_ - -;
1 - - 1- 1-
} ~
-
.Y' _/
1
,~
1--
1
110
t T ,__ r J
Procedure:
·LJ
--- Time Average
- - - Empirical
1 -
1-
1-
1 1
! f-
11
7- l y., T
J'i 360
-¡ ·- / i-+-
V- 1-J } '/~
100 2. The porosity of !he poi ni is
- ,_ - ·- 1 1 '/
l '/ '/ - 320
J
1-
- I ,_
~ti ,-
~
- -- -,_ -- - - V f- ,__
·1-
- f- determined by its locolion relative to
- :: ~ .,¡
1- ' ·· -1 - - -1-
,__ - 1-
1-
-
- .
- I V
lines connecting poinls of equol
- -- ,_ --_,_
,_ ' '?
1- 1- -
1- -
J porosily on the two lithology lines
--
-
1- -
_,_
~
¡~
-- -- ,_ . 1// I
-~
.l
- 300 between which it is plotted. Note
-- -- --, l. ~. /
90 "" thot !he neulion porosity (NPHI)
,_·-_,_ --
~ _,_ - -- ,_ - ,_ - _,_ - ·1 ~ _,_ -- !I 1
1- - 1-
~ .¡ i>I
·- -,_ '..,€
1- -
~ _,_ ,_ - - ,_·-
,_ 1- 1- ~) ._ - volues in Table 4.13 ore decimal
+ j
1- ") 1
~-
Q)
.;
1-
: - 280-: fractions, and !he neutron limestone
1-
4- - >--
,__ 1-
~y
I
!
1-
•- / )' V ! ~ po¡osily volues in F~ure 4.12 ore in
~
,_ 1- - 1- - 1-
.¡ ._ }. V 11 ~I 1
-1- 1-
1 percent. Avolue tisted as O.oJ Oin
.,
e 80
- -- ,_ - __,_
-- / J '> ,
,,
-
o;
e
t:-
,_
1-
_,_ 1- - 1-,- j
'T 11
1\ !<) 11 - -1 - 1 V¡
- V- 1-i- -1 - -
1--1-
,_ 260 ~ !he table is equal to a value of 1%
--- ----
ca ~j 1- -1- ;¡ on !he figure.
p,l r"> J. >' J
~
Q)
1-
--- - 1- 1- - f- .~
.1 1- - >
;¡;
:¡; 3. The lirhology of !he point is
--- _,__
-<- - I 1- -
~ ,_ -
IV
"' 11
240 ..;.
j i- "' determinad by its location relotive to
--
- 1- -
.J> 1- )'
~ ) 1/
<I
1-
!he two lithology lines, with rhe
<I 70
:\' v i V . ·1- "7' r¡ _..c .. } ,_
-- ·--
1- - -
,_
IJ
/~ I
..., /
' >, 11 --.,ºtJ
~-
•·
1-
·- 1-
1-
- 220 proximity to eoch line on indicotion of
the percentoge of eoch of the minero!
J~ :.: >-"" ti
V
lv/l/ 'I
- -- _._ poirs. Note that !he lithology
-
,,,, --
i
.:- !I S>. ;- .,, 'l(
1- -
1- ·- 1--- 200 determinotion con be ombiguous
60 L < (e.g., opoint ~ing between !he
~rw "'1-t
-/! ,. , ~ "'"' .;-v. ~ 1 / 1-
,_ 1-
-
'
·- 1- -
~ "/. ~
7. !:) ~
i,,.c
~- - 1- · -
,_
- 160 bosed on the Gordner·Hunl·Raymer
equotion.
7~ - > .> _ - t-1-- 1-- -
- ·1-- - 1- 1- - 1--
1- -
1-t= - H - 1- ,
- 140
Note: On this groph, anhydrite plots at
- - - the point where neutron limestone
- -
40 porosily =-1 %and inteival transit time
-5 o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
=50 lsec/ft.
4>NLs, Neutron Umestone Porosity (o/o)
Figure 4. 13. Spectrol density crossplot (bulk density ond Fresh water, liquíd-filled holes (p1 " 1.0)
photoelectric effect). 1.9
1-
2.6
2.7
o
2.8
Time Average
~ Although this crossplot couldbe used in
f --- Empirical ll-rH-t--t-Hrr•-_.,_,_,_,_,_,_H-t·H-H-t-+-HH++H++t-H-H-H-1·
..
~.
.. the sorne woy os the previous three
crossplots, il is not usuollyused inthot
2.0 l+Fl=m;::¡::¡=FfR=fFffffFFFl:fl+++l-H-H-tt+H+H-H-tt+ttt-lttl+ttttt-fttisl-!;f.ffíl~tttttH
V ~
o 2.3 1 ~
plol inthe lower righl (southeos~
oo ~
..
quodronl of the plot, usuolly well owoy
,.... ~ by ~
'J ~·
from the lithology lines. In this cose,
5 ~ 1
-
o 2.4 'V even though the lithology ond porosily
.!:1 1 K
~
.. connot be determined without signifkont
!!} Vi
1 -~y
~ ~ ~V
Dr ~ .. V r uncertoinly, rodiooctive reservoirs con be
f ..
- D 1 ..
distinguished from sholes in o
Q) 2.5 9 ~
o ~ L
stroightforword monner.
~
', --H-iH+t-H-H-t-H+t-t-1
2.6
' o ~
.o
o.
P1 = 1.00 g/cc (1000 kg/m3 )
A t 1 • 189 µs/ft (620 µs/m)
H-t-t+t-t-ttt-iH-t-1-t-IH-+H -
-f--H-!+H-1-++-IH++H-++·l-+-t-H -
m oo oo u oo w
Ate, lnterval Transit Time 4-tstft)
=1 ~.000 tvsec
12 r 4
Pb -pfl Dotomlte ,.., ~I' e "' ,_ L...
M 324 1 1
1
1
'
1
0.7 _ / Á nhydrite
!J.tB= 189 µsec/ft for freshwoter mud ond 1 / 1/
185 µsec/ft for soltwoter mud / ¡f
p¡¡= 1.0 g/cml for fresh water ond 1.15 Sulfur ,....__ r-
g/cml for solt water
- - Approxlmate
<l>Nfl= l.O 0.6 shate
2. Plot lhe points on the crossplot. The relotive -- region
mineral percentoges ore inverselyproportional to Ofresh mud -
the distonce from each mineral vertex. Points p1 = 1.0 Mg/m3, t,1 = 620 µsec/m _
lying along a line between two minerols is p1 = 1.0 g/cms, t,1 = 189 µsec/ft
composed of those twominerols only, withnone 0.5 • Sattmud
of the thirdmineral present. =
p, 1.1 Mg/m3, 1,1 = 607 µsec/m
=
p1 1.1 g/cm3, L1 = 185 µsec/ft -
Note thot the numbers al the dolomite ond quortz
1 1 1
sondstone points correspond to the expected
porosity ronge of the formolion os follows: 1: <I> = 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
0.00 (tight formation); 2: <I> =0.00 to 0.1 2; 3: N
<I> =0.12 to 0.27; 4: <I> > 0.27.
Courtesy Schlumberger Wireline &Testing, ©1998 Schlumberger
Porosity Logs 71
>-
~
ái 2.5
o
8>
d 2.6
~
.o
a. 2.7
2.8
2.9
o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
4>NLS• Neutron Limestone Porosity (%)
~
determined by its locotion ~
e:
,¡_._
-- .-- I - ¡ -~J fJ - / - ·- - •. 300 ~
90
relotive tothe opporent tronsil .="' .. ,_ 61 - -/ V 7 I
~
--,. ..
- ~, ro--
- J f-í-
time lines. The voluecon be _,. -:. ,, ... - f - ,
280 ~
interpoloted when the point folls
(ij
c: ~ í- í- 1- ,¡r.. - -- -
s
G>
.. ..
2 ~ /- ~_,.¡
between the lines. .!: 80 / ..~ ~. ~ /- / - 260 j
o ,_.... --4;... <I
<í
~ v- 1- 7 -
..
.. ~ 'l
70
. ...
. '"-
._ ,__ =~
60 _,__ _:"' r-
- ........
.,."! "7 - -1-- ....
!?) ~. - - - ..
.-
.....:. : .::~~
,_._,_ ·._"._.
...... . ..
·1- , '-·
~~
...... ~ - -· .e .. ...~ ,, f-
50 ::::,__
.. - _,.
. ..
/. 160
1=1+-i:---=:µ-
"'!!:............
~:::¡:::::¡::¡=.¡...+J'- ;.
:::: ~ ""1 ....
..
>- •
o 10 15 20 25
- - ~
- f-
...... ¡,...
!:í~·
40
""- -
140
5 30 35 45
~ NLS , Neutron Limestone Porosity (%)
120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Figure 4. 18. Motñx idenlificotion plot,
using neutron, sanie, ond density.
-al--
1 1 1 1 1
2.4
2.0
--__ ,__
,_ This ~ot uses the opporent molrix volues
- - - -- ,__ -
~t - -·-· ,_
·-
--
- - ,__-
1- -
---H -- --
Ha ite e
-
~ ,_
-
....
cokuloted in Figures 4.16 ond 4.17 to estimote
formotion lithology.
,__
2.5 2.1 Procedure:
--- -- -- __ ·-·- - - 60 70
1-1-- - -- -- -
,1- -
-- t- Qltt '"'
ocia ~e
1. Plot the points on the crossplot. The
relotive mineral percentoges ore inversely
%
O> 2.6
.ll!
o
-~
_,_ - -
-·- · 1~ ~ 1~
---
j lb te e
--
-- ,_ - ·- -
,_ - ,_ ·- -
,_ -
-- ,_
·1- proportionol to the distonce from eoch
mineral vertex. Points lyingolong o line
belween twominerols will be composed of
j 2.7
,_ Cé lci e '!'
I/_...,
~
,/
Z'
- y
,_ - ,_ - _,_
--- t--
- - ,_
-
J+ ____ -- l/ y'¡-
1--1-
'éii /
~ k ~
- 1-
e
CI> ,_ - t--
V' - - -
o ,
)(
J i<> L< n , b~ir tE -·- ·- -
~ 2.8 , 1
~ l- --- ~ - 1 - _¡
e:~
«I
o.
o.
-Y-
---- ,_
1-
,__ 1 - -
>---'
j/
y ,_.
~ ....
1
1 ,_ ---
-- -- ,_ _,_
t
·-- ,_ --...
<(
-
o.e
. 2.9 1
_¡.__
,__
·--
1
.1
1
-- 1--
,___ - -- ·--+-· ,_ -
il
L- - ,_ ._. -- .ent ydri e::> --
·- ~
i
-
·-
--··-
--
.
,__
1 l
3.0
_,.._ -
--
· ~ ·-·~ ,_ - -- -- -- --
_, __._
-- - -,-
-
1- -1-
Mi se o it __ ,___ t -
-
l (~
,_ ,
1~ -
- - ,_.._ - 1
3.1 1 -n
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
~tma , Apparent Matrlx Transit Time (µs!f t)
•
Courtesy Holliburton Energy Services, ©1994 Holliburton Energy Services
14 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
-
- - - ---- -
- 2.0
- >--
- identificotion plot, using neutron ond
spectrol densify.
- - -- 81 IRh ~u
- This plot uses theopporent motrix
-- 1- - 1-
-- ,__
"'l:la it 0
volues colculoted in Figures 4.16 ond
2.5
1- - >- -
1-
-
1-
-
- - -
-
-
- -
>-- 1-
(.)o
- -
th< cla se
,_
~
-
-
2.1
12
,-- 13 14
-
15 16
--
17
4.19 to estimo te formotion lithology.
Procedure:
1. Plot the points onthe
crossplot. The relotive mineral
- 1 - - 1- 1- - ~
- 1 ~
- 1- ~
o
o
$2
Qü ~t. ~
-- - - - 20
-- - r--
%-
4 •l
~Re
- - f - 1- olong a line between two
minerals will be composed of
~
\. /'< 60 those two minerols only, with
5 - - - -
~
vr --
\ r\_I/ r\1- --ªº1\
o
.!:! 2.7
.!!J
>-
ti:
< -- \
'\.V \ /
V
\
/
,__~
'\
,___ ' -i\. /
/
V - 7-> Cal ;ite
-
none of the third mineral present.
-b -
/
~
~ V
,_ ~ ¡:)~
eQ)
- ~ \ / _ 17'1 )
+.~/
1-
o
~ \
~~ ~ir -
Cl
,_
~
X
2.8
>-
~ 0 ~~ \- '),.
- -
~ ' 'o~
~ /V -- -
~ ~ ;/o~
e:
Q)
·:) - ,_
(ü
o. - - - - - .sb ~- L. ... - - - - -
o. - ,_ - - - ~- - - ,_
. >-
/
1- 1--- . .
- - - - - - ~~
<(
-., -- - - ,_ ,_ -
D>lor iite
~ 2.9
- ,_ - - - -
- ... -
>--
--
1-
1- ... - - - 1- 1- - - ,_ -
-- - -
-
,_
-
<:>Mu$eo vit - ,_ - - -- -
... -
3.1
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Urna., Apparent Matrix Volumetric Photoelectric Factor
••
Figure 4.21: Lithology determinad by software using ofour·
mineral model of the subsurfoce. Anbydrite
This is on exampleof a deterministic solution. In this cose, shole [] Quartz
volume incolculated independently(the gamma ray was used far
lhis example) and was used as ane of theinput curves. The
Calcite
g Sbale
8
•
software solved for four mineral volumes (in oddition tothe shale Dolomite
volume): colcite, dolomita, onhydrite, ond quartz.
The mineralvolumes ore disployed inthe following order (from left
to right):
Hydrocarbons
D Water
-
Asquith, G., and D. Krygowski, 2004, Resistivity Logs, in
5
G. Asquith and D. Krygowski, Basic Well Lag Analy-
sis: AAPG Methods in Exploration 16, p. 77-101.
Resistivity Logs
77
78 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
advent of induction logs and laterologs, the use of as part of the service. These measurements seek to
these older tools diminished quickly. However, the interrogate the fo1mation at different distances from
short normal is useful for measuring the resistivity of the borehole, so that invasion into the formation can be
the invaded zone, and its use continued in combination detected and so that the resistivity of the part of the
with induction logs. formation undisturbed by the drilling process (the true
In all the cases above, e-logs, induction logs, and lat- formation resistivity) can be determined.
erologs, at least two resistivity measurements are made
formation at a shallow distance from the wellbore, and Resistivity values obtained from the three curves on a
comparison of the two measurement values, RsN and dual induction log are used to correct deep resistivity
R1L, was an indication of invasion and, thus, formation to true resistivity (Rt) from a tornado chart (Figure
permeability. 5.9). This tomado chart can also help determine the
The short-normal tool can record a reliable value diameter of invasion (d¡) and the ratio of Rx0 IRt. An
for resistivity from a bed thickness of four feet or example of the correction procedure is presented in
greater. The short-normal curve is usually recorded in Figure 5.9.
track 2 on a linear scale. The short-normal tool works The three resistivity curves on the dual induction
best in freshwater muds (where Rm¡ > 3 Rw), so salt- log are usually recorded on a four-cycle logarithmic
water muds (where Rm¡ ~ Rw) are not a good environ- scale ranging from 0.2 to 2000 ohm/m (Figure 5.8)
ment for its use. In addition to providing a value for R¡, and correspond to tracks 2 and 3 on the induction elec-
the short-n01mal curve can be used to calculate a value tric log. Usually, a spontaneous potential ora gamma
for resistivity-derived porosity if a correction is made ray curve is placed in track l.
for unflushed oíl in the invaded zone. To obtain a more The deep induction log does not always record an
accurate reading of R¡ from the short-normal curve, an accurate value for deep resistivity in thin, resistive
amplified short-n01mal curve (the same data displayed zones (where R 1 > 100 ohm-m). Therefore, an altemate
on a more sensitive scale) is sometimes displayed in method to determine true resistivity (R 1) should be
track 2 along with the short-normal curve. used. The technique is called R 1 minimum (Rt min) and is
The induction log has a transmitter-receiver spac- calculated by the following formula:
ing of 40 inches and can measure a reliable value for
resistivity down to a bed thickness of about five feet. Rtmin = R, X Rw
The induction curve on the induction electric log R,,if 5.3
appears in track 2 (Figure 5.7). Because the induction where:
device is a conductivity measuring tool, a conductivi- R 1 min =true resistivity (also called R 1 mínimum)
ty curve is presented in track 3. The track 3 conductiv-
Rm¡ = resistivity of mud filtrate at formation tem-
ity curve is useful to more accurately determine the
perature
resistivity value in low-resistivity formations and to
eliminate possible errors in the acquisition system's Rw = resistivity of formation water at f01mation
derivation of resistivity from conductivity. Because the temperature
induction log <loes not require the transmission of R¡ = resistivity tool measuring in the invaded zone,
electrical cmTent through drilling fluid, it can be run in usually laterolog-8 or spherically focused log
nonconducting borehole fluids such as air, oil, or The rule for applying R 1 min is to determine Rt from
foam. both the dual induction log tomado chart (Figure 5.9)
and from the Rt min formula, and use whichever value
Dual lnduction Lag of Rt is the greater. In addition to the Rt min method for
determining R1 in thin resistive zones, correction
The second-generation induction log is called the curves (Schlumberger, 1979) or forward modeling
dual induction (Tixier et al., 1963) and was introduced algorithms are available to correct the deep induction
in the mid-1960s (Maute, 1992). This log (Figure 5.8) log resistivity to Rt.
consists of a deep-reading induction device, which
attempts to measure Rt, anda medium-reading induc-
tion device which measures R¡. The deep-reading
Other resistivity devices
measurement is similar to the induction curve from an Induction logs have undergone sorne advancement
induction electric log. The dual induction log also has in recent years. The first such advancement, in the
a third resistivity curve, a shallow-reading, focused, mid-1980s, was the measurement of another signal
laterolog-type measurement that is similar in depth of (the X-signal) from the formation (Barber, 1983),
investigation to the short normal. The shallow-reading using the standard sensor configuration of the induc-
laterolog may be either a laterolog-8 (LL8) ora spher- tion tool. This phase measurement, sometimes com-
ically focused log (SFL). bined with measurements at different transmitter fre-
The dual induction log is useful in formations that quencies, improved responses of the induction tool to
are deeply invaded by mud filtrate. Because of deep the borehole and formation environments and in-
invasion, the deep reading induction may not accurate- creased the depth of investigation of the measurement.
ly measure the true resistivity of the formation (Rt). The second advancement in induction logs was the
Resistivity Logs 81
introduction of the array tools, first by BPB Wireline contact with the borehole wall for a valid measure-
Services (now Reeves Wireline) in 1983 (Maute, ment, and a thick mudcake or a rough hole adversely
1992). Induction logs of this type are generally com- a:ffects the measurement.
posed of a single transmitter and several receivers and,
depending on the vendar, may also operate at several
frequencies. The focusing is done mathematically
Microlog (ML}
rather than physically through the coil arrangements The microlog (Figure 5.12) is a pad-type resistivi-
used by the standard induction log. The processing can ty device that primarily detects mudcake (Hilchie,
yield di:fferent depths of investigation and di:fferent 1978). The pad is in contact with the borehole and
vertical resolutions, depending on the needs of the consists of three electrodes spaced one inch apart.
client. Figure 5.10 is an example of an array-type Two resistivity measurements are made; the micro-
resistivity tool. normal (R 2) and the microinverse (R1x1). The micro-
Resistivity sensors on the drill string (measurement normal device investigates three to four inches into
while drilling, MWD, or logging while drilling, LWD) the formation (measuring Rx0 ) and the microinverse
made their debut around 1980, with the 16-inch nor- investigates approximately one to two inches into the
mal (sh011 normal). This was followed in 1983 with formation and is significantly a:ffected by the resistiv-
the introduction of the propagation resistivity meas- ity of the mudcake (Rmc)· The detection of mudcake
urement, essentially an induction-type device. The by the microlog indicates that invasion has occurred
original propagation tools provided two resistivity and the formation is permeable. On the microlog, per-
measurements with slightly di:fferent apparent depths meable zones show up when the micronormal curve
of investigation. Many presently available tools have reads higher resistivity than the microinverse curve
multiple transmitters and receivers and produce two or (R2 > RJx1). This is known as positive separation (Fig-
more measurements with significantly different depths ure 5.12). The microlog tool also has a caliper that
of investigation into the formation. measures the borehole diameter. A decrease in bore-
Interpretation of the newer versions of wireline hole diameter can indicate mudcake and support the
measurements and LWD measurements is no different interpretation of permeability. In Figure 5 .12, mud-
than interpretation of the resistivity logs explicitly cake is indicated where the caliper shows a borehole
mentioned here. Often, the newer versions of induc- size smaller than the diameter of the drill bit used to
tion logs, laterologs, and LWD measurements have drill the hole.
environmental corrections applied in realtime (as the Shale zones are indicated by no separation or neg-
data are being acquired), so it is important to check for ative separation (i.e., micronormal < microinverse).
that condition and not make the corrections to the Positive separation can only occur when Rmc > Rm >
already-corrected data. Rm¡. If there is any doubt, check the log heading for
resistivity values uf the mudcake, drilling mud, and
FLUSHED ZONE RESISTIVITY LOGS mud filtrate.
Remember that even though the resistivity of the
At the same time that resistivity tools were being mud filtrate (Rm¡) is less than the resistivity of the
designed to interrogate the undisturbed region of the mudcake (Rmc), the micronormal curve reads a higher
formation, another class of tools, based on the same resistivity in a permeable zone than the shallower
physical principies, was being designed expressly to reading microinverse curve. This is because the fil-
interrogate the region very close to the borehole. This trate has invaded the formation, and part of the resis-
region is usually flushed of original formation fluids tivity measured by the microno1mal curve is read
by the drilling mud. By knowing the resistivity of the from the rock matrix, whereas the microinverse curve
flushing fluid (the resistivity of the mud filtrate, Rm¡) measures only the mudcake (Rmc) which has a lower
and making sorne assumptions about the fluid satura- resistivity than rock. However, in enlarged boreholes,
tion of the flushed zone, formation porosities and sat- a shale zone can exhibit minor, positive separation. To
urations could be better estimated. These microresis- detect zones of erroneous positive separation, a
tivity devices are either unfocused electrode or focused microcaliper logis run in track 1(Figure5.12), so that
electrode (laterolog) devices. Because of their very borehole irregularities are detected. Nonporous and
shallow depths of investigation (on the order of a few impermeable zones have high resistivity values on
inches), the electrodes are mounted on pads that are both the micronormal and microinverse curves (Fig-
pressed against the borehole wall. Figure 5.11 is a ure 5.12). Hilchie (1978) states that resistivities of
schematic of two such tools. The tool must make good approximately ten times the resistivity of the drilling
82 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 5.2. Typical percentages of residual hydrocarbon saturation (RHS) as a function of hydrocarbon density and porosity (modified alter Hilchie, 1978).
Gas 40 to 5 60 to 95
High-graviity oil 40 to 50 10 to 5 90 to 95
Medium-gravity oil 20 to 40 20 to 10 80 to 90
Low-gravity oil 10 to 20 30 to 20 70 to 80
Porosity ( % ) RHS (%) Sxo (%)
25 to 35 30 70
15 to 20 15 85
the predominant influence on the wave is the conduc- by the different service companies. The Halliburton
tivity of the substance it is traveling through. In a (and older Gearhart and Welex) and Atlas Wireline
reservoir, the conductivity is strongly influenced by logs are called dielectric logs and the Schlumberger
the salinity and distribution of the formation water, log is called an electromagnetic propagation tool
and the distribution of formation water is controlled by (EPT). These logs measure propagation time of the
the pore type and formation wettability. electromagnetic wave by reduction in wave amplitude
At higher frequencies [in the 20 MHz (million and by shifts in the phase of the wave (Se1rn, 1984).
hertz) to 1.1 GHz (billion hertz) range], the dielectric Table 5.4 is a list of dielectric constants and propa-
properties of a substance become very important to gation times for various materials. It is apparent that
wave propagation (Hilchie, 1982). High dielectric-con- water has a much greater wave travel time and dielec-
stant values are associated with polar compounds such tric constant than any other material on the list. The
as water. Since water is a polar compound, it requires dielectric log therefore can be used to detect water-
energy to orient all its dipoles in the direction of the bearing versus hydrocarbon-bearing zones, and unlike
electromagnetic wave (dipolar polarizability, Schlum- the resistivity logs, the dielectric measurement is inde-
berger, 1984). Thus, an electromagnetic field moving pendent of water distribution (and depending on the
through water is weakened. Rock matrix and hydrocar- measurement frequency, independent of water salini-
bons are both nonpolar compounds with very low ty). Therefore, pore type and wettability do not influ-
dielectric constants, and therefore weaken an electro- ence its value. For a detailed discussion of the dielec-
magnetic field less than water does. tric and EPT logs, see Se1rn (1984), Dewan (1983),
Table 5.3 is a list of the various dielectric logs run and Hilchie (1982).
Table 5.3. List of the Various Dielectric Logs from Different Service Companies
Table 5.4. Dielectric Constants and Propagation Times for Various Materials (modified alter Dewan, 1983)
The most common ways of presenting dielectric S¡ = invaded zone water saturation
logging data is in the form of a log which either dis-
plays neutron-density crossplot porosity versus water- EPT Log:
filled dielectric porosity, or a value for flushed-zone or
,¡., = tpo -tpma
invaded-zone water saturation (Sxo or S¡) calculated 't'EPT 5.11
from the dielectric log. The equations for calculating tp ji - tpma
water-filled porosity C<l>w) and water saturations (Sxo or
S¡) from the dielectric constant logs and EPT logs are: S = [(tpo -tpmJ+~ND X (tpma -4.1)]
5.12
xo ~NDX(tpjl-4.l)
Dielectric Logs:
0.5 0.5)
where:
~ (E
-
't'w - (
-Ema
0.5xp 0.5) 5.8 = water-filled porosity from EPT log
<l>EPT
<l>ND = neutron-density porosity (from crossplot)
8w -Ema
+,'-(~~:)r
~ND
1
5.13
tp.
s =~ (200 MHz, 1.0 and
xo ~ND
1.1 GHz tools) 5.10 tpfl = travel time in water
where:
<Pw = water-filled porosity
tp ji = 20 X
710- Tf
3
j 5.14
<l>ND = neutron-density crossplot porosity [ 444+ Tf
E = dielectric constant from the log 3
Ew = dielectric constant of water
tPma = travel time in the matrix (see Table 5.4 for
Ema = dielectric constant of rock matrix
values)
p = a constant that varíes with water salinity. A tp¡ = travel time from login ns/m (nanoseconds/
value of 1.2 can be used, or the value for p can be meter)
calculated from a nearby water zone by substituting
EAC = fixed spreading losses correction: EAC =
<l>ND for <l>w·
ATT- 50
Sxo = flushed zone water saturation
Resistivity Logs 85
log(~J
Figure 5.15 is a gamma ray neutron-density log
over the same interval. The neutron-density crossplot
Rst) porosities in the upper sandstone (12 to 14%) and
w= log(~J 5.15
lower sandstone ( 14 to 16%) are similar. Archie water
saturations for the upper sandstone are 25 to 29% and
where:
are 70 to 72% for the lower sandstone. The drastically
w = single textura! parameter to use in the Archie lower resistivities and higher water saturations in the
water saturation equation (w = m = n) (Guillotte, et lower sandstone indicate that it should produce water.
al., 1979) The more resistive upper sandstone with much lower
R2 = mixed water resistivity: water saturations should, therefore, produce hydrocar-
1 bons.
Rz =¡ 1-z]
z 5.16
Figure 5 .16 is a computer generated log through the
basal Chester sandstones. In Figure 5.16, note that
Rw + Rmf
neutron-density porosity (PHIA) is greater than water-
filled EPT porosity (ECMP) indicating hydrocarbons
z = 0.025 for very deep invasion in both sandstones. The calculated values for flushed-
0.035 for deep invasion zone water saturations (Sx 0 ) using the EPT log for the
0.05 for average invasion upper sandstone are 43 to 50% and 43 to 44% for the
lower sandstone. These similar Sxo values indicate that
0.075 for shallow invasion both sandstones should produce hydrocarbons. This
0.1 very shallow invasion well was perforated from 5700 to 5738 ft (gross per-
Rs1 = resistivity from shallow resistivity log (i.e., forations) and hadan initial production of 157 BOPD.
SFL) After 90 days, the well had a cumulative production of
9000 BO and 230 BW, thus verifying the interpretation
<Pw = water-filled porosity from dielectric or EPT
log from the EPT log. The impmtant question to ask is
why are the resistivities so much lower in the lower
If the shallow-reading logis in fact a microresistiv- sandstone. The answer is the lower sandstone has thin
ity log (that is, it reads the flushed zone of the forma- clay coatings of mixed-layered illite-smectite on the
tion), then Rsz = Rxo and R2 = Rm¡. grains and the upper sandstone has no clay coatings
The water saturation equation is: (Asquith, 1991). The presence of these clay coatings
86 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
causes an increase in surface conductance, which low- 2. A formation's res1st1v1ty can be measured by
ers resistivity. However, the dielecttic log (EPT) meas- either induction logs or laterologs.
ures the bulk distribution of water-filled porosity and 3. Induction logs should be run where the drilling
is therefore not effected by the clay coatings. fluid is air, foam, freshwater mud, or oil-based mud
Asquith (1991) calculated an average value for w of (where Rm¡> 3 Rw).
1.45 for the lower sandstone using the EPT porosity. 4. Laterologs should be run in saltwater drilling
When water saturations are recalculated for the lower muds (where Rm¡~ Rw)·
sandstone using w = 1.45, the saturation values range 5. By use of tornado charts, the deep resistivity log
from 30 to 41 %. This example illustrates how impor- on either the dual induction log or the dual laterolog
tant dielectric logs can be in the interpretation of diffi- with Rxo can be conected for the effects of invasion to
cult log-analysis problems. determine a more accurate value of true formation
resistivity (Rt). The resulting estimate of true forma-
tion resistivity is lower than the deep induction read-
REVIEW ing, and higher than the deep laterolog reading.
l. Resistivity logs are used to: 6. Most minerals that make up the matrix of the
rock and the hydrocarbons in the pores are noncon-
• determine hydrocarbon-bearing versus water-
ductive. Therefore, the ability of the roc;k to transmit
bearing zones
an electric cunent is almost entirely a function of the
• indicate permeable zones water in the rock's pores.
• determine porosity when no porosity measure-
ments are available
Resistivity logs 87
6.0 t--;:::::=±==::::±===:t;---~
The shodedoreo indicares higheruncerlointies in
S.O Generally, when R1/Rm < 3000, bothmeosurements becouse of the borehole ond
induclíon devices have reference. formotion conditions. Under these condijions, it is
4.01-...=::::::::::::::::¡:== =::¡::::::=== =i=---
often best to runbothtypes of resistivity logs until
il con be determined which works bes! for the
specific conditions. Then onlythe meosurement
withthe bes! response need be used.
0.61--- - - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - ----t
o.s1--- - - 1 - - - - -1 - - - - -1---- - + - - -- + - - - - + - - ----1
0.4 1--- - - 1 - - - - -1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - + - -- - + - - - - + - - ----t
Generally, when R 1Rm > 8000,
0.3 t-----1----1 dual laterolo s have1 reference.
0.2 1--- - - 1 - - - - -1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - + - - - - + - -- - + - - - -1
0.15'-----'-----'-----..___ _ _..___ __ ..__ _ _..__ ___,
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o
Porosity (%)
o o o
ohm·m 50 ohm·m 50
provides on exomple for picking log volues. These
K~
-
. .J
1
logs ore used when Rmf- Rw- L .
1f
!-+
---
_, --
..., J ] 1 ~- 1
- .+:::-':gd__
- .
!
1 1 t
gommo roy (GR) ond coliper (CAU) cuives, shown t
os solid ond doshed lines respective~. Gamma roy
logs common~ occompony loterologs. This one is ~
/
1 l
r
-
!_¡:-.--.
1 - 1 r-
- 't ..._ ±=; •
recordad in units thot predote APl units, microgrom- '· ~
,_ L
J
.. - t "
Rodium equivolents per ton (µgRo-eq/ton) . •'--
·-
Trock 2: This disploys the loterolog (ll3), which
-
1 ..¡
J_
- ~ t f ~
..
1 ,__
meosures !he deep resistivily or true resistivity (R1)
of !he formotion. Note thot !he scole increoses
-
- ,r
' !(
=-~= .
-
-- - -
1 1
.L
--· . -+
_..,__
-
lineorlyfrom left lo right inincrements of 5ohm·m
from Olo 50. Loterologs oresomelimes disployed
_,..... I
- ·-
- -- - -- e-
T
l ,_ >-
r-
on ohybrid scole thot increoses linear~ from Olo 50 i ,_
on its left hoff ond nonlineorty from 50 lo infinily on :1
¡
I
I
r .,. -- -
r-~ -
,_____
- .¡ t-1-t
its r~hl holf. The hybrid sea le is not shown here. ' ~___s:::.
-,-, - - -,
'
.,....,""2§§s=-i~~
-~ ~ == l
l-- ,_
- , 1 _
·- - -r
-~
J
_,_ -
scolestorts with zero ot the left edge of trock3. The t---·
,..._
·-
i-- >-· -
scole ronges from Oto SO ohm·m in increments ol 5
ohm111.
-
-
--- '
,_
--t-=: > >-~·
. ·-._
1 '
-s
_(D.~
l
f
Al !he depth ol 3948 ft !he microloterolog reods 8 r
(
-4- ·, _J
ohffi111.
~ ~. ! 1 ! 1 ' -
~
l. ' t
--
·-- (
(
' 1 1
·-t-
~+
·-
·- ·.¡:
_., ,_
- ,_
-
-· · I ,__ 1
,_ ,_
-- -- -\ - -
-
- ,-,....~----+---+---+---+--·+-
4100
.,. :1
--·
'- /
Note: To corree! !he loterolog (lor invosion) to true resislivity (R1), use !he lollowing formulo hom {Hilchie, 1979). Using !he
exomple ot 3948 lt:
R1=l.67 (Ru) - 0.67 (Rxr) R1=l.67 (21) - 0.67 (8)
R1=29.7 ohm·m
where:
R, = resistivily of !he uninvoded zone
Ru =loterolog resistivity (21 ohffi111 ot 3948 lt)
Rxo =microloterolog resislivily (8 ohffi111 al 3948 ft)
Resistivily logs 89
LLD
GR
--------~ --------
0.2 LLS 2000
o - - APIUiihs- - loo Fcct 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~~~ - - - - - - - - - - - - 2000
CALI MD
6 - - - - - - lnchcs - - - - - - 16 0.2 Ohm·m 2000
<- --~ '
--·
1--
1--
1-- =J
1--
1--
-> -- -
_!._
- -
·''- 9300
- -- - -,- -- --
'
,___ ':'.\
1--
1
'
,_
¡.
-
'-;;;
- •
- ·--
1--
~7-
'
>- 1- 1-++ll+H---I
1--
1--
- e- --
~. - -- - _¡.,
- >-- - l-+-H-HH--1
- --- - - / ''
J
-~
1
-- _._ ._
- - -l-+-H-H>+----1
-
1--
1--
--
1--
1-- 1--
-·-
1--
1--
p
._ ,__
1--
1-"t \" -..--
1 '
r::;
t\"S
--
-
- ~ .......!':!..:
1--
LF ' - 1--
,,
,
- '
.!.
,_ ,_ - ._,_ ~ .> 1-- -
~,...,
- ~~ --- - ...........,.,_--+--+--1--H-+++---<
--
-
._,
- -
-, _
~....> e--
'
_ ..
- ._
,_ - ,___ - ,_
9400
-- --
..
- ,_ - - ,_,___
1
~=-
-- -
.,.,- 1 ._ -
1
-- ,_ - - .,___
-
Figure 5.4. Exomple of duol loterolog with microsphericollyfocused log.
These logs ore used when Rm1 - Rw ond invosion is deep.
The resistivi1y scole introcks 2ond 3is ofour-cycle logorithmic scole ronging from 0.2 to 2000 ohm1T1; lhe volues increose from left to right.
Deep laterolog resistivity:
The UD (lonQifoshed line) meosures the deep resistivily of the formotion, lf invasion is not deep and the bed of interest is lhick (>2 ft), the deep reoding
commanly opproximotes true formotion reslstivily (RJ.
At the depth of 9324 ft, the deep loterolog reslslivity (RiW is 16 ohm1Tl.
Shallow laterolog resistivity:
The LLS (short-doshed nne) meosures the shollow resislivily of lhe formolion or the resistivity of lhe invoded zone (R~.
At 9324 ft, the shollow loterolog reslslivity (Ru9 is 1Oohlll1Tl.
Microspherically focused log (MSFL) resistivity:
The MSFL (solid line) measures the resistivity of the flushed zone (RxJ.
Al 9324 ft, lhe MSFL resistivity (R~isn> is 4. 5ohm·m.
The following rotios ore needed for work on lhe lomado chori (figure 5.5), ondthe volues representad ore picked from the log os shown obove:
lLO/MSFL =RLLo/R1,1m= 16/4.5= 3.6
llO/llS =RLLo/Riss = 16/10 =1.6
90 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
20
1 --!': -1
.,...1 1 -:- ........... l+r.l ttttl.lltfllltll
. ! ¡ -8 j ¡.: f
? : 1 l' . .. - im:ti !ll!!L
3
•
t-1-·1-t-,H+,_ f.± 1 !+H-H-H-HH+ll;ll
-
1+.-l+t-H-l+ll+H+t+I
-~
i!-.''.tllttilH¡-t+l+· t1Ftlt 1
1 l1
T 1 lli
• 1
. titl
: :! l i ;: .¡
. , l' •.
:L1 ' . u. •
'
. , ~.,
¡.! :
.;
3 4 6 8 10
I+
15
t
20 30 40
11 50
Figure 5.5. Dual laterolog·Rxo tornado chart for correcting deep resistivity to R1. (Schlumberger, 1998, Chart Rint-9b)
Log values in this exercise are picked from the example dual laterolog-MSFL in Figure 5.4.
Given:
LLD = Ruo = 16.0 ohm-m
LLS = Rus= l O.O ohm-m
MSFL = RMSFL = 4.5 ohm-m
RuolRMsFL = Ruo/Rxo = 3.6
Ruo/Rus = 1.6
Procedure:
Plot Ruo/Rxo (= 3.6) on the vertical axis and Ruo/Rus (= 1.6) on the horizontal axis. Plot the intersection of these values on the tornado chart, and determine subsequent ratio values.
R1/Ruo: The scale for this value is represented by the solid red lines. The scale values are in red and range from l. l to 1.8. Our value folls between the scale values 1.3 and 1.4, so we
assign a value of 1.32.
d¡: The diameter of invasion around the borehole is picked from the chart by following the dashed, blue lines to the scales al the top of the chart. The scale from 20 to 120 gives d¡ in inches,
and the scale from O.SO to 3.04 gives d¡ in meters. Our value folls between the scale values of 40 and 50 inches, so we assign a value of 43 inches.
R1/Rx0: The scale for this ratio value is represented by the heavy, blue, solid lines. The scale values are in black, increase from bottom to top, and range from 1.5 to l 00. Our value falls
between the scale values 3 and 5 (much closer to 5), so we assign a value of 4.8.
Finally, corrected values for true resistivity of the formation (R1) and resistivity of the flushed zone (Rxol are determined using these ratios.
(R1/Ruo) x Ruo = R1 (corrected)
(ratio) X log value = R1 (corrected)
1.32 x 16.0 ohm-m = 21. l ohm-m (= R1, true formation resistivity).
And:
R1(corrected)/(R1/Rx0l = Rxo
R1 (corrected)/(ratio value from chart) = Rxo
21. l ohm-m/4.8 = 4.4 ohm-m (= Rx0, resistivity of flushed zone)
When !he deep laterolog log reading is corrected for invasion via the tornado chart, the resulting estimate of true formation resistivity is always greater than the deep laterolog reading.
92 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
CILD
1000 mSJm o
SP Feet 0-- º~"FS - - -50
MD
1·160 mV 4C o
,;. ..,,....., .......r--··rº-'".....º""'..... 50 --- -1-1+-:~::: ·¡ r··- ::
·--- ........ ,::- ~~=: -1 ______ ,_,, ·-1~-"{:---...:+'::-·+--+--- ¡~-----¡----
i---1 .......... i.l
i "\. ---
l+-i -·- --
-~---!------l ---- -------- ------ -------
7400
"l ·--- ·- ---
-¡ ....:__
+,--:__+,_·__·:+,:.....----",_--__·.+_..·--........'.·__··--___..._•--..::··; ....·+ ....._. . . .'+' --__:"..;,•:-+'-__:..¡+:. . . .::-'..."..."'__',-.....__·_+,.....
...._--" + ---- ...
H, ....................... ,..... ,......, ..............,.... + ..... -, ........,..
Figure 5.7. lnduction Electric Lag.
The lnduction Electric Lag is normally used !---+----... ¡-----+----¡-----¡(-- ........ - ..... -- ...-.+_ .... ......,.._~.?..,____ + ... +- __-+....·--_--·,···_····..•...·-+,.::-...:·:,':..".:.:..':·....:,'::·___ ,'_... _
,""---·+ ....,........;. ___ --·.,C/...............-..-,
....... ,. ......
when Rm¡> Rw.
Trock 1: The lag track on the far left '
contoins the spontaneous potentiol (SP) r ...d¡-----¡--.. •1--...l -----1~-1 --- - --·!--·----- -· -->------- ----+...·-f-·-+---...¡---... +--+---+--+----
1
lag. The SP scole increoses from -160 mV l···'+l-----1---·--+····..·l···-l···..,·l····-i·--··-..•-· .. ·I.......... ----- ------i------ "" --- ----- "··+ ·+----+..... ,.......¡
,-r--+------·------ --~~--'~'~ +~\----------~=~~:~=
on the left to +40 mV lag on the right and :J , ..... ,......,........., ........,. ____ ~----- ---J-- ·------f- - -.. ----- ........,........ ,.___,
----;--- -- ·------·
has 1Oincrements of 20 mV. The value al ~--r I·--·
,.._., "''""""'""
----'-·-· :----\-·--- ---~'-·----f----- ------:~--
--···:------>------ ,,,_ ___ ,,,___ ......... +..... ~.¡
~------!--·---
...... , ......... ¡ .........+....... ,............... .
!---•-1;......... ,,..... .¡ ..........¡........¡...... ...¡.. ......,....... ,. -- +-·-· - ----- -------i--·----l- __ ,,..,_~....,+<·--- ..+____--..-,'-: ....¡ ......+--··
the depth of 7446 ft is about -50 mV. The 1 11-- +----·+-----+----+.. ·+---- 1---+ ---_,_ ___-.;....."--i------+'"..·:".+'-·-.. .- . .';.....·:..·-1,-__-__+-~-~--:-::t-~·:~-- -·-- :=-~-~~
value of the SP in is meosured from the
shale boseline (i.e., the SP volue in the
shales where the SP volue is zero), ond the 7500
deflection from the baseline is negative. ¡ ....... ,........ f ............ ,................., ......., ..... ,,.,.........,. .....+.:---~=-: ---f----- -----!--·~
!·---l!/----!---... "!---1- .... ¡ .. ---1-----+·----------1·-.. ·_ ........ ¡... -+-- -+
1---1¡-¡---;-·--;----.. ;-..--+·-·· -----~-;--·~¡·- ----·-~.~~;----- ---- i ·---- ---- ,--+----'.... ¡ .. __ ,___ __
Track 2: The middle lag !rack contains two resistivity curves. The short normal (SN, also callad the 16-inch normal) represented by the salid line, measures the invaded zone resistivity (R¡). The
induction lag (ILD), represented by the doshed line, measures the uninvaded zone resistivity (R1).
Al 7446 ft, the short normal has ovalue of 30 ohm-m. The induction value al the sorne depth is 1Oohm-m.
Tracks 2 and 3: These tracks contoin the conductivity curve (CILD) which is the basic induction-log meosurement. The conductivity curve can be used to convert values to resistivity. In this way,
!rock 2 resistivity values can be checked for accuracy, or volues con be derivad more accurotely al low resistivities.
Far example, to convert track 3 values to resistivity the procedure is os follows:
The values on the conductivity scale increase from right to left, from Oto l 000 are marked in 50 mmhos/meter increments. At a depth of 7446 ft, the curve in !rock 3 is or nearly 2
increments from the right ond shows ovalue of 97 mmhos/meter).
Because resistivity equals 1000/conductivity, the resistivity =1000/97 =10.3 ohm-m.
When the logs ore displayed on linear scales, as in this exomple, resistivity can determined more accurotely from conversion of the conductivity curve than from reading the resistivity curve
itself.
Resistivity Logs 93
,1
__•__·+·~i
.... Track l in this log suite contains gamma ray and SP
curves.
The resistivity scale in tracks 2 and 3 is o logorithmic
scale from 0.2 to 2000 ohm-m, increosing from left
to right. Note the following logs.
Deep induction log resistivity:
The doshed ILD curve meosures the deep resistivity of
the formotion, or close to true resistivity (R1). At the
: depth of 13,591 ft, the deep resistivity (ILD) is 70
ohm-m.
l···I<····:·~+-· ·--·[(:--+-·+ ··1
~-----~---~-·+···i--i-~~+ ~; ·:··i Medium induction log resistivity:
The dotted ILM curve meosures the medium resistivity
13600 of the formotion or resistivity of the invoded zone
(R¡). At 13,591 ft, the medium resistivity (ILM) is
l 05 ohm-m.
Spherically focused log resistivity:
The solid SFLU curve meosures the shollow resistivity
of the formotion or resistivity of the flushed zone
r-\,-+··+·+-:~-H-+···+--4·
(Rx0 ). At 13,591 ft, the resistivity of the flushed
--1~--·;v+-·+···+···+·\••-T--~-=== =-~
zone is 320 ohm-m .
.:.
The following rotios ore needed for work on the
E~i"~~¡:~f!~l~~~;rn=¡'~= tornado chori (Figure 5. 9), ond the volues ore picked
,.... , .. ¡.·: from the exomple log:
SFLU/ILD =RsFw/R1w =320 ohm-m/70 ohm-m
,.,,.,p.+:···•••i•···i
:· . ., ...........¡..•-+..... ,...•.. = 4.6
1
~-,··-~·~l+~i---1
ILM/ILD = R1u,¡/ R1w= l 05 ohm-m/70 ohm-m =
l.5
13700
94 ASQUITH ANOKRYGOWSKI
10
9
8
7
RsFJR10
6
5
0.50
4
5
3 tt
1
1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9
Figure 5. 9. Duol lntroductioo-SFL tornado chori used for correcting Rll.O volues to R~ true formotion reslstivity. (Schlumberger, 1998, Chori Rint·2c)
Log volues used in this exercise ore picked from the exompleduol induction log in Figure 5.8.
Given:
ILO = R110= 70 ohm-m
ILM = R1u.1 = 105 ohm·m
SFLU = Rs¡1 = 320 ohm-m
RSFt!Rno= 4.6
Ru»/RllD= 1.5
Procedure:
Plot lhe Rs¡¡/R110 ratio(= 4.6) on the vertical oxis (lobeled R5¡¡/RID on this chori) ond the R1u.VRito ratio (= 1.5) on the hoñzontol axis (lobeled Ru.VR1oon this chori). Plot the intersection
of these volues on the tornado chori, ond pitk the following volues:
R1/R110:The scolefor lhis volue is representad by the salidredlines. The scole volues orein red ondrange from 1.0 to0.8, decreosing from left to right. The R1/R1w volue folls on the 0.80
line.
dt The diameler of invosionoround the borehole is picked from the chori by following the doshed, blue lines to the oppropñote scole. Note thot the d; srnle is in inches ocross the top of the
tornado ond is in meters through the middle porl of the tornado chort; both scoles increose from left to right. Inthis exomple, the volue is be1ween the 6!Hnch ond 7!Hnch lines, ond dí is
obout 68 inches.
Rxo/R1: This is the ratio of resistivity of the ftushed zone (RJ over the true resistivity of the formotion {corrected R~. This ratio, derivad from the chori, is used in lolef colculotions. The scole is
represented by the heovy, blue, salid fines, ond !he seo le volues ore shovm os whole numbers midwoy ocross the tines. In this exomple, the ~olted som~e folls on the tine with ovolue of 7.O.
Finolly, with volues token from the chori, colculote corrected volues far R1ond Rxo-
(R/R1tol x R1to = R1 (corrected)
(ratio volue fromchori) x lag volue = R1 (corrected)
0.80 x 70 = 56 ohm-m (R1 corrected, or true formotion resistivity)
And:
(Rxx/R~ x R1{corrected) = Rxo {corrected)
(ratio volue from chori) X (corrected R1volue) = Rxo (corrected)
7 x 56 = 392 ohm111 (Rxo. corrected resistivity of the ftushed zone)
When the deep induction log reodingis corrected for invosion vio the tomado chori, the resulting es1imote of true formotion resistivity is olwoys less thon the deep induction reoding.
96 ASOUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
.2
...................................~9..~9-...................................
.2 OHM-M 200
·-········--»••····~-
.2
Q1º···-···--·····
OHM-M 200
························-·······..···CALI
..··......................................... ____________l!Q~Q ___________ :-t-:-_ _P_E_-..,..,..
1
7 17 .2 OH M-M 200 O 10
SP 1:240 DFL
·- - - - - -
-)20(• OHM-M 200 .3
FT. .2
~RTON
Do to Fiie: 0827 _1922_12100.38 .CIS
Form•t Fiie : llleld_ data/dltall
Plot Time: 02-08-2000 19:00 :17 Top Depth: 10890.00
Dltobue Time: 01-27-2000 12:01 :25 Bottom Depth: 12210.00
Pad
(a)
Mud cake
(b)
98 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
SP ILD
-160 mV 40 0.2 CiTiill-m-
GR
1Q - - AP!units- - -150 02 -----------2600
____ S:~L!_ ___ _ Feet SFLU
urnu-m
h inches H MD 0.2
-- ---
::::J+ 1-1-+FF
,___ / -----:-- ¡--
··---- ~
....
·1·········· --
____ , __ ·-
----· +- - ¡-··+
i+-- ,.. __ ,__ ¡-- ----:--
¡-,
--·---'---.. __
""'"'
---- ,__
.,,, •,,•,,
" i+
, -----
- --.
···----- ·-
~
:----
----- -------
- j _=
'
- " /
5700
,___
"' ---- ..
, ----
,____
'
,. __ r--·
.
,
,.;
. ,,,,___ ,____
,_ j
--
'
'-·!-/!::::::
Figure 5. 14. Dual induction·SFL lag through two Mississippian Chester sandstones in western Kansas.
The Chester sandstones ore from 5704 to 5718 ft and from 5724 to 5738 ft.
PEF
o ble-- 10
GR DPHI
o API units 100 Fe et o.3 v/N1i'Ht -0.1
¡;-------~n~!-i------16 MD Q.3------V"ivdCCTmñl-------ü.1
, __ ,_____ -----i-----
---~t----~-·-+-----¡- .. ---i----------------
- ' - -f :----:-----1-----------,------¡
,..
,
- 5700
-¡--¡--~~"o-----+--!----•
¡------¡-----;---,-:·---!-·----¡-------1---
H---+---- 1---- '----:---+----- <:;;;. ----i ----•----!---+-- -+-- --1
------•---!--"----
1----+-1'1-~-~---+-+-+--c--r-·'·---
1+-·-~,/-+----+ -+-~---+-~----:-----+
~-~·-1_--+-_--r---+--:---:----r---:--r---;-1
1--- --~-----~---~---_,__+--+---~·--1----j
---!---·-··•·--""'''"'"'''"'"" -· --·
Figure 5. 15. Neutron·density lag through two Mississippian Chester sandstones in western Kansas.
The Chester sandstones ore from 5704 to 5718 ft and from 5724 to 5738 ft. The gray shading indicotes neutron·density crossover (NPHI < DPHI), indicoting gas in the formation.
Resistivity Logs 1O1
GR ILM PHIA
!so 02-----01,ffi-m ____ zooo o 4
0 - - APiunits - Feet . ILD .
CALI
- - - --Tnclles- - - - - MD
5700
Figure 5.16. Computer-generated neutron-density porosity (PHIA) and EPT porosity (ECMP) lag through two Mississippian Chester sandstones ·1n western Kansas.
The Chester sandstones are from 5704 to 5718 ft and from 5724 to 5738 ft. Note that in both the upper sand and the lower sand, the EPT porosity (ECMP) is less than neutron-density
(PHIA) indicating that both sands should be productiva. The gray shading shows depths where ECMP<PHIA.
Henderson, Steven, 2004, Nuclear Mognetic Resononce
Logging, in G. Asquith ond D. Krygowski, Bosic
Well Lag Anolysis: AAPG Methods in Explorotion
16, p. 103-113.
Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance Logging
GENERAL vide few clues about other petrophysical information
such as hydrocarbon type (e.g., low-viscosity versus
At the time of publication of this book, nuclear high-viscosity oils), pore-size and grain-size distribu-
magnetic resonance (NMR) logs are still not widely tions, and permeability.
used, and their use in sorne geologic and drilling envi-
ronments is still problematic. At present, while they
create estimates of porosity that are equivalent to the NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE APPLICATIONS
other porosity logs (and have sorne advantages over Nuclear magnetic resonance is rapidly gaining pop-
those logs), they are most powerful when used in con- ularity in the petroleum industry as a means of over-
junction with that other data rather than instead of it. coming the limitations of conventional logs. The pri-
This chapter is focused on the interpretive applications mary advantages of NMR logging over conventional
of NMR logs. porosity measurements are that it uses no nuclear
(radioactive) sources and it provides a lithology-inde-
LIMITATIONS OF CONVENTIONAL LOGS pendent measure of porosity. Much like the neutron
tool, an NMR tool responds to the amount of hydrogen
Conventional porosity and resistivity logs provide in the formation or hydrogen index. However, unlike
the geologist with a first look at the reservoir, but there the neutron measurement, hydrogen existing in matrix
are practica! limits to the accuracy and usefulness of and clay minerals is transparent to the NMR porosity
these data. Neutron, density, and sonic porosities are measurement. The result is a porosity measurement
more sensitive to lithology than to reservoir fluids (this that is sensitive only to fluids occupying the pore
is not always the case in a gas-bearing formation). As space. Other petrophysical information may be
a result, even small amounts of clay minerals may deduced from the manner in which hydrogen protons
cause errors in porosity measurements. In addition, react to magnetic fields created by the tool.
reservoirs commonly contain clay-bound, capillary- At the wellsite, NMR tools are capable of provid-
bound, and moveable water. Resistivity tools are sen- ing measures of both effective and clay-bound porosi-
sitive to all water, and Archie water-saturation calcula- ty (a combination of which yields total porosity), esti-
tions can overestimate the amount of producible water. mates of permeability, hydrocarbon type, pore size
Thus, potential pay zones might remain elusive with distribution, and information pertaining to the move-
conventional logs. ability of fluids. In many cases, the data obtained from
Porosity measurements with neutron-density com- NMR logs are in close agreement with core data. Post-
binations provide an estímate of total porosity, which processing of the data away from the well site, incor-
is all the pore space in the reservoir whether the pores porating conventional logs and capillary pressure data
are interconnected or isolated. Still, with volume of from core analysis, may provide for a comprehensive
shale CVshale) corrections, it is possible to mostly elim- evaluation of the uninvaded zone.
inate the shale effect and arrive at an estimate of effec-
tive porosity or producible pore space. What remains
to be resolved in this situation is the critical difference PRINCIPLE OF NMR LOGGING
between any capillary-bound water and moveable All formation fluids contain hydrogen protons that
water. Furthermore, porosity and resistivity logs pro- are randomly oriented throughout the pore space.
103
104 HENDERSON
NMR tools use a strong permanent magnetic field to accurate method of distinguishing clay-bound porosi-
align, or polarize, the spin axes of these protons in a ty from effective pore space that may contain both cap-
prefeITed orientation. Por these protons to generate a illary-bound and moveable, or free, fluids.
measurable signal, they must be at a condition of res- In addition to identifying clay-bound fluids, a pri-
onance. Resonance is achieved by pulsing the fmma- mary benefit of NMR logging is its ability to differen-
tion with an oscillatory magnetic field which causes tiate between producible fluids (free-fluid index, or
the spin axes of the protons to tip away from their pre- FFI) and capillary-bound fluids (bulk volume irre-
feITed orientation. Once the oscillatory magnetic field ducible, or BVI). Free fluids generally occupy larger
is removed, the signal generated by the hydrogen pro- pores, whereas smaller pores contain fluids mostly
tons decays rapidly. bound by high capillary pressures. Because the T2 dis-
A sequence of repetitive pulses is applied with the tribution of a reservoir reflects a distribution of pore
NMR tool so that the protons generate a series of sizes, it can be used to determine the relative amounts
measurable signals or echoes. The initial amplitude of of producible fluids and capillary-bound fluids (Fig-
the measurable signal represents the amount of hydro- ures 6.3a and 6.3b). This is extremely valuable in shaly
gen in the formation and is therefore proportional to sands and other fine-grained sands where Archie
porosity. The amplitude of each successive echo, how- water-saturation calculations overestimate the amount
ever, never regains that of the previous echo. The result of producible water. When combined with convention-
of the pulsing sequence is a series of measurable al porosity and resistivity data, NMR logs can be used
echoes which, through a process called relaxation, effectively to identify the proportions of free water,
exhibit an exponential decay (Figure 6.1). After sorne clay-bound water, capillary-bound water, and hydro-
period of time, the amplitude of the echo is too small carbons in a reservoir.
to be of any use, and the hydrogen protons must be
allowed to realign with the permanent magnetic field
through a process called polarization.
NMR PERMEABILITY
The exponential decay of the measurable signal- In theory, pe1meability increases with pore size and
represented by the time constant T2 , or relaxation the amount of effective porosity. The larger the pores
time-is a composite of a number of individual fluid are and more interconnected the pore network is, the
decays in the formation. Through processing, the more capable a reservoir is of transmitting fluids.
relaxation time (T2 ) of each fluid component can be Because relaxation time (T2 ) is related to pore-size
determined. These relaxation times are a function of distribution, it can also be used to investigate pe1me-
the petrophysical properties of those fluids and the ability. Por a homogeneous pore network like that of
pores that contain them. The key to understanding the sandstones, small pore sizes generally result in lower
applications of NMR logs lies in the relationship of permeabilities, whereas larger pore sizes can be asso-
this relaxation time (T2 ) to pore size (and fluid proper- ciated with higher permeabilities.
ties). There is a variety of methods used to determine
NMR permeability, depending upon preference, reser-
PORE SIZE AND FLUID MOVEABILITY voir conditions, and service company. These methods
resolve only matrix permeability and underestimate
Mathematical modeling shows that the relaxation the permeability of a fractured formation. In many
time (T2 ) of a given fluid within a single pore is pro- cases, NMR peimeability estimates are comparable
portional to the size of that pore (Coates et al., 1999). with core data (Figure 6.4). The two most common
Water occupying small pores exhibits short relaxation pe1meability models are the free-fluid (or Coates)
times because of the rapid attenuation of proton move- model and the mean-T2 ( or SDR) model.
ment in close proximity to grain surfaces. In larger The free-fluid (Coates) model of permeability
pores where protons are not in such close proximity to determination uses a form of the following equation:
grain surfaces, water exhibits longer relaxation times.
As a first approximation, the distribution of T2 data
within a reservoir (Figure 6.2) depicts the pore-size 6.1
distribution. This may also be related to grain-size dis-
tribution of the reservoir. where:
Clay-bound water occupies micropores that are k = NMR-derived permeability
characterized by very fast relaxation times (T2 ). With a
$NMR = NMR-derived effective porosity
specialized pulse sequence, NMR tools may be con-
figured to identify clay-bound water. This provides an e = constant, depending on formation
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging 105
FFI = proportion of moveable fluids occupying mean-T2 model may provide a more accurate estímate
effective porosity of permeability through its use of the geometric mean
BVI =proportion of capillary-bound fluids occupy- of the T2 distribution (Logan et al., 1997; Figure 6.5).
ing effective porosity The presence of hydrocarbons influences the distri-
bution of T2 data, so pe1meability estimates can be
The free-fluid model uses the relative proportion of
slig~tly in error in oil-bearing and, particularly, gas-
free-fluid to capillary-bound fluid within effective
beanng zones. Both the free-fluid and mean-T2 mod-
pore space to determine permeability. In a basic sense,
els tend to underestimate pe1meability in a gas-bearing
smaller pores contain more capillary-bound fluid
reservoir. Because the NMR tool responds to the
(BV[) and result in lower calculated permeability,
hydrogen index, it underestimates porosity just as the
while larger pores contain more free-fluid (FF[) and
neutron to?l does in a gas-bearing zone. To compen-
result in higher calculated permeability. This approach
sate for th1s effect, hydrogen index corrections can be
is satisfactory for sandstones where the pore network
performed on the NMR measurements to obtain a
is rather homogeneous, but may be more problematic
more accurate value of effective porosity (<PNMR), or
in carbonates where there is commonly a wider distri-
effective porosity may be taken from an alternate
bution of pore sizes. In carbonates, isolated vuggy
so urce.
pores contain a large quantity of free-fluid (FF[) with
respect to capillary-bound fluid (BV[), but these pores
might not contribute to permeability. As a result, per- DIRECT HYDROCARBON TYPING
meability is overestimated. In reservoirs containing
heavy oils, permeability can be underestimated Reservoir fluids are characterized by different
because of the difficulty in distinguishing high-viscos- polarization times (T1 ) and relaxation times (T2 ) as
ity fluids from bound fluids on the basis of their fast illustrated in Table 1. NMR logging takes advantage of
relaxation times (T2 ). the differences in these time constants to provide sev-
The free-fluid model is sensitive to the selection of e~·al. stand-alone methods of hydrocarbon typing. Spe-
a T2 cutoff. For a given distribution of T 2 data (Figure ciahzed pulse sequences are required for successful
6.5), a cutoff may be determined to distinguish capil- direct hydrocarbon typing from NMR logs, and this
lary-bound fluids from free fluids. For sandstones, this requires careful planning before logging is started.
value is approximately 33 msec. Those pores with
relaxation times (T2 ) less than the selected cutoff are Table 6. 1. Typical NMR Properties of Reservoir Fluids (modified after Coates et al
assumed to contain mostly capillary-bound fluids, and 1999). ~
pores with relaxation times (T2 ) greater than the cutoff
Polarization Relaxation Viscosity
are assumed to contain mostly free fluids. The T2-cut-
Time T1 Time T2 (cp)
off selection depends upon lithology (carbonates may
(msec) (msec)
have a cutoff of as high as 100 rosee) as well as capil-
lary pressure. Therefore, conventional logs and core Brine 1-500 1- 500 0.2-0.8
data can assist in determining a more accurate NMR 3,000 - 4,000 300-1,000 0.2 - 1,000
Oil
permeability for a given reservoir.
An alternate method of pe1meability determination Gas 4,000 - 5,000 30-60 0.011 - 0.014
is the mean-T2 (or SDR) model which uses a form of (methane)
the following equation:
2
k = ª (<D NMR )4 (T2gm ) 6.2
The two most common methods of stand-alone
where: hydrocarbon typing are time-domain analysis (TDA)
and diffusion analysis. The basis for time-domain
k = NMR-derived permeability
analysis is that brine and hydrocarbons require dra-
a = a constant, depending on formation matically different polarization times (T1). TDA data
<PNMR = NMR-derived effective porosity are acquired using a pulse sequence with two separate
T2gm = geometric mean of the T 2 distribution wait times (dual Tw): one sh01t and one long. Brine is
fully polarized after both the short T w and the long T w;
The mean-T2 permeability model does not depend
therefore, its signal amplitude on T2 distributions for
on the selection of a T2 cutoff and, therefore, is not as
the two wait time measurements is almost the same
sensitive to lithology or capillary pressure. Fmther-
(Figure 6.6a). Hydrocarbons, however, are fully polar-
more, in carbonates where there is a wider distribution
ized only after the long T w· The difference in the two
of T2 values (i.e., wider distribution of pore sizes), the
106 HENDERSON
T2 distributions is used to detect the presence and require calibration of NMR data to core or conven-
determine the saturation of medium to light oils and tional logs for more accurate results; however, NMR
gas (Figure 6.7 and Figure 6.8). Hydrogen index cor- logs in carbonates provide much of the same informa-
rections can also be applied to the data to obtain more tion as in sandstones.
accurate values for porosity and permeability in oil- Though lithology plays little role in the NMR
bearing and gas-bearing fmmations. A requirement of measurement, it still must be considered to configure
TDA is that there be sufficient T2 contrast between the tool for obtaining accurate information. One
reservoir fluids. If very light hydrocarbons exist, it source of di:fficulty involves the fact that carbonates
might be difficult to distinguish them from brine and have longer polarization times (T1) than sandstones. If
gas based on their similar relaxation times (T2). a pulse sequence is initiated before all hydrogen in the
Rate of diffusion of hydrocarbons is related to the formation has been fully polarized, the NMR porosity
viscosity of the fluid that holds them, and dif.fusion would be underestimated. The potential underestima-
analysis takes advantage of this diffusion contrast tion of porosity can cause compounded errors in the
between hydrocarbons. Hydrogen in gas is more prone determination of fluid moveability, pe1meability, and
to diffusion than hydrogen in medium to heavy oils. hydrocarbon type.
Diffusion analysis data are acquired with a pulse Carbonates generally require a pulse sequence with
sequence using two separate spacings between pulses, long wait times (Tw)· While this may reduce the error
or interecho spacings (Te): one shmt and one long. in measurements, it may also translate into slower log-
Brine and medium oil relax much faster during long- ging spccds or require additives to the drilling fluid. In
Te measurements than during short-Te measurements. addition, the wider pore-size distributions (i.e., T2 dis-
Light oil exhibits a large difference in relaxation times tributions) of carbonates tend to introduce sorne prob-
(T2) between the two interecho spacings, and heavy lems into their interpretation. With information from
oils exhibit only a minor (if any) difference in T2 . conventional logs and core analysis, however, it is pos-
Brine can be distinguished from medium to light oil by sible to determine cutoff parameters in carbonates that
a shift in the T2 distribution between the short and long provide accurate estimates of fluid moveability, per-
interecho-spacing measurements (Figure 6.6b). An meability, and hydrocarbon type.
enhanced dif.fusion analysis method is also available
that uses a long Te and dual Tw to increase the signal
generated by more viscous intermediate oils, and it is REVIEW
reliable overa wider range of viscosities (Akkurt et al., l. NMR logs provide lithology-independent meas-
1998). Neither diffusion-analysis method is useful for urements of effective porosity as well as total porosity,
gas detection, however, because gas can experience thus overcoming many of the limitations of conven-
such an extreme shift in the T2 distribution that it is tional porosity measurements (i.e., neutron, density,
easily confused with capillary-bound water and clay- and sonic).
bound water. 2. A major advantage of NMR logs is the ability to
In a more conventional sense, NMR data can be differentiate between irreducible and moveable fluids
combined with density porosity data to provide a in a reservoir. This, combined with effective porosity
method of gas detection similar to neutron-density measurements, leads to more accurate estimates of the
combinations. Because of the low hydrogen index of amount of producible water.
gas-bearing zones, they are characterized by underes- 3. NMR logs provide estimates of permeability,
timated NMR porosities. Gas-bearing zones can grain-size and pore-size distributions, and even viscos-
therefore be identified where density porosity is ity; all of which are problematic or impossible to
greater than NMR porosity. determine with conventional porosity and resistivity
logs.
NMR APPLICATIONS IN CARBONATES 4. Through a variety of direct hydrocarbon-typing
methods, NMR logs are capable of identifying hydro-
The majority of NMR applications were developed carbons and determining their saturations without
for sandstone reservoirs, but these applications have incorporating data from conventional porosity and
been expanded to carbonate reservoirs as well. Inter- resistivity logs.
pretation of NMR logs in carbonates may be more 5. Although the NMR measurement is sensitive
problematic than in sandstones, primarily because of only to fluids, the best results are obtained when infor-
the complex heterogeneous nature of the pore net- mation about the lithology of a reservoir (e.g., core
work. In carbonates, there is a weaker relationship analysis or a conventional porosity log) is available.
between pore size and relaxation time (T2). This might
Nuclear Mognetic Resononce Logging 107
1 ¡
~
~
~ !:,; -
-"" ~
* I•
....
~ ::::;::..
I~
... .... i
Long TW Short TE
Figure 6.6. Changes in T2 distributions for different methods of NMR direct hydrocarbontyping.
60: Timeifomoin onolysis uses ocombinotion of short andlong woit times (Twl todetect and determine the soturotions of medium to light oils ond gas. Alter the short woit time, the water
signol is ot a moximum omplitude whileoil ondgas hove only been partiolly polorized. Alter the long wait time, the oil ond gas hove beenfully polarizad ondthere is no change in the
omplitude of the watersigno!. The difference in T2 distributions between the two woit time meosurements con be used todetermine the soturotions of oil ond gas.
6b: Diffusion anolysis uses ocombinotion of short ondlongínter-echo spocings (Te) to detect anddetermine thesoturotions of oil. Relaxation times (Tz) of water ond medium toheovy oils ore
much !aster using long·Te meosurements thon when using short-T8 meosurements. The shift inpeoks of the T2 distributions moy be usedto detect ond determine the soturotions of thesefluids.
Oiffusion onolysis is not effective for detectinggos because gas moy exhibit such odromatic shift in T2 thot it is confused with the irreducible water signo!.
112 HENOERSON
Figure 6.7. Exomple of duoHw Mognetic Resononce lmoging LogTM through on oi~
beoring sholy sond inthe Gulf of Mexico, North Americo.
Trock 1 illustrotes gamma roy ond coliper curves. Trock 2 shows the NMR permeobilily
curve (MRIL PERM). Trock 3 disploys the T2 distribution of the long·fiv meosurement (Tw
= 8 sec) ond Trock 4 disploys the T2 distribution far the short-Tw meosurement (Tw = 1
sec). Trocks 5ond 6 display effective porosily (MPHIJ ond irreducible fluid (BVn as
determined from both the long· ond short· Tw meosurements, respectively. InTrocks 5ond
6, the yellow·shoded region represents the proportion of moveoblefluid (ffn far the
different Tw meosurements.
Comporison of BVIond FFIvolues betv1een the long·Tw (trock 5) ond short-Tw (trock 6)
meosurements moy be used os oquick·look indicotor of hydrocorbons. Gas ond light oil
hove longer poloñzotion times (T¡) ond require olonger woit time (Tivl far ful!
polorizotion thon does water. Water, either bound or free, is fullypolorized alter the
short·fi·r Light oil ond gas (requiring longer polorizotion), is polorized onlyalter the
long·Tw- Therefare, if hydrocorbons ore present, the long·Twshould show olorger FFI
thon the short-Tw- Note thot the yellow-shoded region (FFI) in trock 5 Oong·Twl is wider
thon the yellow-shoded region (FFI) in trock 6 (short·Twl, indicoting the presence of light
oil or gas. Heovy oils, with very short reloxotion times (T2), might oppeor os on
increose in BVI between the short ond long woit times.
For this exomple, integrotion of resistivily meosurements from the induction lag showed
thot oll of the moveoble fluid occupying the zone of interest from XX690 to XX865 is
oil The reservoir is therefare determined to be al irreducible water sofurotion (Swirrl.
NMR permeobilily doto (trock 2) olso indicote thot there is sufficient permeobility to
produce this oíl.
Log Interpretation
GENERAL parison of the two helps clearly identify both the pres-
ence and amount of the hydrocarbons.
As shown in the previous chapters, determining the Figure 7 .1 is a flowchart for one such scanning
porosity and true resistivity of a zone is the first step in technique. Note that it has two paths, one for clastics
converting the raw log data into estimated quantities of and one for carbonates. In the clastic case, the resistiv-
oil, gas, and water in a formation. These estimated ity log is the primary reconnaissance measurement
quantities are used to evaluate a zone and to determine because clastics tend to consist of reservoirs surround-
whether a well completion attempt is wananted. This ed by shales of slowly varying resistivity. The changes
chapter covers sorne of the different methods from in resistivity due to changes in fluid content of the
which these estimates are derived. The methods dis- reservoirs tend to stand out against this relatively con-
cussed are: Archie water saturations (Sw and Sx0 ) and stant background. On the carbonate path, on the other
the ratio method, quick-look technique, bulk volume hand, formation resistivities tend to vary widely with
water (BVW), and saturation crossplots (Pickett plots changing rock types, and commonly there are few
and Ringle plots). Determination of log-derived per- shales against which to measure changes. In this case,
meability (Ke) and shaly sand analysis are also dis- the porosity log is the primary reconnaissance meas-
cussed. urement. By first finding the porous zones, those with
As important as this log-derived info1mation is, the capacity to hold fluids (of any type) can be identi-
however, it should not be applied without the inclusion fied.
of other data. This statement is, perhaps, obvious to Figure 7 .2 shows the details of a log interpretation,
the reader, but it can't be overemphasized. A geologist once zones of interest are identified, with references to
should always consider every item of relevant data, the chapters in which the information is discussed.
such as drill stem tests, sample shows, mud-log analy-
sis, nearby production, etc., befare making a decision
to set pipe. ARCHIE WATER SATURATIONS: Sw AND Sxo
Water saturation (Sw) of a reservoir's uninvaded
SCANNING THE LOGS: zone is calculated by the Archie (1942) fmmula:
A RECONNAISSANCE TECHNIQUE 1
115
116 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
~ ~J
temperature
Rxo = shallow resistivity from a very shallow read- : : = [ :: 2 7.4
ing device, such as laterolog-8, microspherically
focused log, or microlaterolog where:
cp = porosity Sw!Sxo = moveable hydrocarbon index
a = t01tuosity factor (Table 1.1; Chapter 1) Rxo = shallow resistivity from measurements such
as laterolog-8, microspherically focused log, or
m = cementation exponent (Table 1.1; Chapter 1)
microlaterolog
n = saturation exponent
R 1 = true formation resistivity (i.e., deep induction
Water saturation of the flushed zone (Sx0 ) can be or deep laterolog con-ected for invasion)
used as an indicator of hydrocarbon moveability. For
Rm¡ = resistivity of mud filtrate at formation tem-
example, if the value of Sxo is much larger than Sw,
perature
then hydrocarbons in the flushed zone have probably
been moved or flushed out of the zone nearest the Rw = resistivity of fo1mation water at formation
borehole by the invading drilling fluids (Rm¡). temperature
The cementation exponent (n) is assumed to be 2.0
Ratio Method If the ratio SwlSxo is equal to or greater than 1.0,
then hydrocarbons were not moved during invasion.
The ratio method identifies hydrocarbons from the This is true regardless of whether or not a formation
difference between water saturations in the flushed contains hydrocarbons. Whenever the ratio SwlSxo is
zone (Sx0 ) and the uninvaded zone (Sw)· When the less than 0.7 for sandstones or less than 0.6 for car-
uninvaded zone form of Archie's equation (Equation bonates, moveable hydrocarbons are indicated
7 .1) is divided by the flushed zone form (Equation (Schlumberger, 1972).
7 .2), the following results: To dete1mine water saturation by the ratio method
Lag lnterpretation 117
(Sw,.), you must know the flushed zone's water satura- can be estimated using the following equation (from
tion. In the flushed zone of formations with moderate Schlumberger, 1977):
invasion and average residual hydrocarbon saturation, 0.25
the following relationship n01mally works well:
1
(s\V )COR = s\VO X (
~wa )
7.8
wr
S'° = (s"').5 7.5
where:
where:
(SwJcoR = corrected water saturation of the unin-
Sxo =water saturation of the flushed zone
vaded zone
Sw =water saturation of the uninvaded zone
Swa = water saturation of the uninvaded zone
Substituting Equation 7.5 in Equation 7.4 and solv- (Archie method)
ing for Sw, the ratio method water saturation (Sw,.) is:
Swr = water saturation of the uninvaded zone (ratio
5
method)
Sw, = ( :n~; ~:v )8 7.6 4. If Swa < Sw,., the reservoir might be a carbonate
with moldic (i.e., oomoldic, fossil-moldic, etc.) poros-
or: ity and low pe1meability.
0.625
S = Rxo j R,
·wr
( R ) 7.7
R,,1f / "' QUICK-LOOK METHODS
where:
General
Swr = moveable hydrocarbon index
Rxo = shallow resistivity from measurements such Quick-look methods are helpful to the geologist
as laterolog-8, microspherically focused log, or because they provide flags, or indicators, that point to
possible hydrocarbon zones requiring further investi-
microlaterolog
gation. The four quick-look methods discussed here
R 1 = true f01mation resistivity (i.e., deep induction are:
or deep laterolog corrected for invasion)
• RxofR1
Rm¡ = resistivity of mud filtrate at fo1mation tem-
• apparent water resistivity (Rwa)
perature
• conductivity-derived porosity
Rw = resistivity of formation water at formation
temperature • Wet resistivity (R 0 )
To use the ratio method in an interpretation process,
the water saturation of the uninvaded zone should be
calculated by both the Archie equation (Swa) and the
ratio method (Sw,.)· The following observations can be The Rx0 /R 1 technique relies on the comparison of
made: the resistivity ratio, plotted as a curve on the log dis-
1. If Swa ~ Sw,., the assumption of a step-contact play, to the SP curve.
invasion profile is indicated to be correct, and all val-
ues determined (Sw, Rt, Rxo• and d¡) are correct. Procedure
2. If Swa > Sw,., then the value for Rx0 fRt is too low. 1. Calculate the Rx0 fRt ratio from the deep and shal-
Rxo is too low because invasion is very shallow, or R 1 low reading resistivity measurements;
is too high because invasion is very deep. Also, a tran- 2. Plot the ratio in the same track as the SP, and
sition-type invasion profile might be indicated and Swa look for the following pattems.
is considered a good value for the zone's actual water
saturation. Patterns to observe
3. If Swa < Sw,., then the value for Rx0 /R 1 is too high. 1. In a shale, the ratio is relatively constant, like the
Rxo is too high because of the effect of adjacent, SP, and usually close to 1.
high-resistivity beds, or Rt estimated from the deep 2. In a water-bearing zone, the Rx0 /R 1 ratio tracks
resistivity measurement is too low because Rxo is less the SP.
than Rt. Also, an annulus-type invasion profile might 3. In a hydrocarbon-bearing zone, the Rx0 /R 1 ratio
be indicated and/or Sxo < Swl/5 (from Equation 7.5). In moves away from the SP [a deflection to the right for
this case, a more accurate value for water saturation the case of a no1mal (negative) SP].
118 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Patterns to observe
R = F X R"'
0 (uninvaded zone) 7.11 1. The zone with the lowest value of Rwa is the most
likely to be water-bearing, and the value of Rwa is
Solving Equations 7.2 and 7.3 for Rm¡ and Rw closest to the actual value of Rw in the formation.
respectively, and substituting the results in Equation 2. Zones with values of Rwa greater than the míni-
7.1 yields: mum observed are likely to have sorne hydrocarbon
SP=-KX lo{~: J 7.12
saturation.
Interpretation pitfalls
The Rx0 fR 0 ratio is then related to the SP through a The Rw values in the zones that are compared are
constant. Since R 0 is just a special case of Rt (R 0 is the assumed to be the same.
resistivity in the undisturbed, water-bearing zone), Rt In low-porosity zones (less than about 10% porosi-
can be substituted for R 0 for the more general case. In ty), the Rwa value is lower than the actual Rw value.
water-bearing intervals, the Rx0 fRt ratio parallels the
response of the SP, and both curves move in the same Basis f or the technique
direction from their respective baseline values. In a Recall from Chapter 1 that
hydrocarbon-bearing interval, while the SP still
responds to the differences in connate water and mud
filtrate resistivities and moves accordingly, the Rx0 fRt 7.13
ratio decreases (because of increasing Rt) and the and
Rx0 fRt curve moves away from the SP.
The Rxo curve usually used for the ratio is derived 7.14
from a shallow-reading measurement, such as a
microspherically focused log or a microlaterolog. The Combining Equations 7.5 and 7.6, and solving for
R 1 curve is derived from a deep-reading measurement Rw yields:
such as the deep induction log or deep laterolog. In
practice, especially when the ratio is calculated and R X ~m
Rw=--- 0
7.15
displayed as part of the logging job, the measurements a
are normally used without any environmental correc- From Equation 7. 7 above, define apparent water
tions being applied. resistivity (Rwa) as:
Apparent water resistivity (R waJ R X ~
111
R wa =-'-- 7.16
The Rwa technique relies on the comparison of cal- a
culated values of water resistivity between intervals in When a given zone is water bearing, R 1 reverts to
a well. This comparison can be made between differ- the water-bearing resistivity (R 0 ) and Rwa equals Rw. If
ent zones or within the same zone if a water-hydrocar- the zone contains hydrocarbons, Rt is greater than R°'
bon contact is suspected in that zone. The assumption and Rwa is greater than Rw. By comparing a number of
is that this lowest value of Rwa is the closest approxi- zones (or different depths in the same zone, where a
mation to the true formation water resistivity (Rw) and water-hydrocarbon contact is suspected) and assuming
that values of Rwa greater than the mínimum value are the zone with the lowest value of Rwa is wet, the mín-
indicative of the presence of hydrocarbons. A water imum value of Rwa can be used as an estimate for the
saturation can also be calculated from the values of value of Rw in all the zones being considered. If the
Rwa· zone with the mínimum Rwa value actually contains
Lag lnterpretation 119
sorne hydrocarbons, then the other zones contain even ty to porosity from one of the porosity measurements
more hydrocarbons than anticipated. . (sanie, density, or neutron).
In practice, especially when calculated and ~1s Patterns to observe
played as a curve during a logging job, the followmg
l. In water-bearing zones, the conductivity-derived
values are used for simplicity: a = 1.0, m = 2.0. The
porosity is high and approximately equal to the true
deep induction log or deep laterolog is used as R 1, usu-
formation porosity.
ally without any environmental coTI"ections. Porosity is
2. In zones that contain hydrocarbons, the conduc-
usually derived from the sanie or density log usin~ the
tivity-derived porosity is low, lower than the true for-
proper matrix and fluid parameters for the format10ns
mation porosity.
to be encountered. If available in real time during log-
ging, the neutron-density crossplot porosity should be
Jnterpretation pitfalls
used for the best estimate of porosity.
The choice of an incorrect value for Rw would
An Archie water saturation can also be calculated
change the value of conductivity-derived porosity, and
from the ratio of the Rwa values.
might make its comparison to true formation porosity
inaccurate. It would not, however, change the results
S = Rwa mínimum
7.17 of comparison of the curve values in different zones.
w Rwazone
7.19
to as resistivity-porosity}
By using the form of the equation above (7.19), the
Although this technique originated with the use of water-filled porosity is determined. Where the forma-
the conductivity curve (Dresser Atlas, 1975), the con- tion is actually water filled, R 1 reverts to thc water-
ductivity curve is now rarely presented on log dis- bearing resistivity (R 0 ). The porosity calculated from
plays, and the technique is described here using the this equation is close to the actual formation porosity,
resistivity measurement. assuming that the parameters in the equation are clase
This technique calculates a porosity from Archie's to the actual formation parameters. When the forma-
equation, using the form of the equation for water- tion contains hydrocarbons, R 1 is greater than R 0 , and
bearing zones (Sw = 1). The porosity values are gener- the calculated porosity is less than the actual formation
ated as a curve and are normally displayed in the same porosity. .
track as the SP, scaled from high porosity values on the Traditionally this curve has been plotted m the
left to low porosity values on the right. same log track as the SP curve, and its movement com-
pared to the SP. It can also be plotted in the s~me track
Pro ce dure as a porosity curve from one of the poros1ty tools,
l. Calculate the porosity from Archie's equation where decreases in conductivity-derived porosity with
(assuming Sw = 1.0), using the uninvaded zone resis- respect to the porosity curve indicate the presence of
tivity measurement. hydrocarbons. .
2. Compare the curve values and the relative posi- Water saturation can be estimated by the followmg
tion of the curve in porous and permeable zones. equation:
3. If desired, an Archie water saturation can be cal-
culated by comparing the conductivity-derived porosi- S = ~ conductiviO' 7.20
w ,J.
\f' actual
120 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
Wet resistivity (R 0 ) constant, they indicate that the zone is of a single rock
type and at iffeducible water saturation (Sw irr). When
The wet-resistívity curve (R 0 ) is one of the oldest a zone is at ÍITeducible water saturation, water in the
quick-look techniques. Unlike the other curves, which uninvaded zone (Sw) does not move because it is held
tend to be compared to the SP curve, it is plotted as an on grains by capillary pressure. Therefore, hydrocar-
overlay on the resistívity curve. bon production from a zone at iffeducible water satu-
ration should be water free (Moffis and Biggs, 1967).
Procedure A formation not at irreducible water saturation (Sw irr)
1. Calculate R 0 from the porosity and an estímate of exhibits wide variations in bulk volume water values.
formatíon water resistívity (Rw)· The Buckles plot (Buckles, 1965) is a graph of poros-
2. Plot R 0 as a curve at the same scale as the resis- ity (<jl) versus Sw. Points of equal BVW form hyperbol-
tivity curves and compare the values to the value of the ic curves across this plot. Figure 7.3 illustrates Buck-
deep-resistivity measurement. les plots using data from three wells in the Ordovician
3. If desired, an Archie water saturation can be cal- Red River B-zone, Beaver Creek Field, North Dakota.
culated in any zone from the values of R 0 and the deep If BVW is plotted using data from a formation at iffe-
resistivity measurement. ducible water saturatíon, the points fall along a single
hyperbolic curve (Figure 7.3a). If the data come from
Patterns to observe reservoirs with higher percentages of produced water,
l. In water-bearing zones, R 0 and the deep resistiv- the points are more scattered (Figures 7.3b and 7.3c).
ity should overlay. Because the amount of water a formation can hold
2. In hydrocarbon-bearing zones, the deep resistiv- by capillary pressure increases with decreasing grain
ity is higher than R°' with the separation increasing size, the bulk volume water also increases with
with increasing hydrocarbon saturatíon. decreasing grain size. Table 7 .1 illustrates the relation-
ship of bulk volume water values to decreasing grain
lnterpretation pitfalls size and lithology.
If the value of Rw chosen to calculate R0 is incor-
rect, the curves would not align in water-bearing
zones.
Table 7.1. Bulk volume water (BVW! as a function of grain size and lithology. A
Basis far the technique comparative chori.
Recall from chapter 1 that:
Lithology Grain Size Bulk Volume
7.21 (millimeters) Water (BVW)
SATURATION CROSSPLOTS mic scale), one can dete1mine the product (a X Rw)
from intercept of the line (b ), and the cementation
Saturation crossplots, also called resistivity-porosi- exponent (m) from the slope of the line (m). In prac-
ty crossplots (or specifically, Pickett plots and Ringle tice, the resistivity (R 1) is usually plotted on the x-axis
plots) are similar to the porosity crossplots discussed and the porosity (<\>) on the y-axis (Figure 7.4). This
in Chapter 4. They are x-y plots of log data from which convention stems from the availability of full-logarith-
quantities of interest are derived; in this case, that mic graph paper (both scales logarithmic) at the time
quantity is water saturation (Sw). Both the Pickett and Pickett developed the technique. The best format to
Hingle methods are essentially graphical solutions to use (for the best data resolution) is two decades for
the Archie saturation equation. They were created porosity (0.01 to 1.0, or 1% to 100%) and three
befare the use of computers to aid log interpretation. decades for the resistivity (0.1 to 100, or 1 to 1000).
These techniques minimize the number of calculations The only 2-by-3 full-logarithmic paper available was
that must be done and aid the comparison of potential- constructed with 2 decades on the y-axis and 3 decades
ly productive zones. With the advent of early (mostly on the x-axis so the plot was modified to fit the paper
nongraphic) log-interpretation software, their use (G. R. Pickett, personal communication).
declined, but this decline was reversed as people real- Using the convention driven by graph-paper avail-
ized the power of the techniques to use the ability of ability, the equation becomes:
the human mind to recognize pattems in data. These
techniques are cunently regarded as necessary compo-
log(<j>) = log(a X R,, )- __!__ log(R, )- n log(S w) 7 .26
nents of full-functioned computer-based log-interpre- m
tation systems.
Plotting a mixture of water-bearing and hydrocar-
bon-bearing points on a Pickett plot results in the fol-
Pickett Crossplot Method lowing attributes (as shown in Figure 7.4):
The Pickett plot (Pickett, 1966, 1973) is one of the • Water-bearing points of different porosities plot
simplest and most effective crossplot methods in use. along a straight line with a slope of (-1/m) and
This technique estimates water saturation and can also an intercept (at porosity = 1.0) of (a X Rw)·
help dete1mine: From this line, the cementation exponent (m)
• f01mation water resistivity (Rw) can be determined, and if the tortuosity factor
(a) is known (or can be estimated), Rw can be
• cementation factor (m) predicted. This is the water-bearing, or R°' line.
• matrix parameters for sonic and density logs
Hydrocarbon-bearing points lie away from the
(!..,_.tma and Pma)
line, moved horizontally to the right frorn the
The Pickett method is based on the observation that water-bearing line by their increased resistivity.
true resistivity (R 1) is a function of porosity (<\>),water The horizontal distance of a point from the
saturation (Sw), and cementation exponent (m). It is water-bearing line depends on the water satura-
actually a graphical solution of Archie's equation in tion (Sw) of that point. If the saturation exponent
terms of resistivity. Archie 's equation (Equation 7 .1) is (n) is known (or can be estimated), the water sat-
solved for resistivity: uration can be determined. Lines of constant
R = a X Rw water saturation lie parallel to the water-bearing
XS" 7.23
t ,t.m
'!' w line.
Taking the logarithm of the equation produces: The power in the Pickett plot is that water resistiv-
ity (Rw) and cementation exponent (m) can be estimat-
ed from the data, rather than having to be derived from
log(R, )= log(a X Rw )- m log(<J> )- n log(Sw) 7 .24
local knowledge or from expensive core measure-
If the zone is water-bearing, Sw = 1, log(Sw) = O, and ments.
the equation reduces to: Although porosity is now normally plotted on the
Pickett plot, Pickett originally used two other quantities:
log(R, )= log(a X R"' )- m log(<1>) 7 .25 (Pb - Pma) instead of the dcnsity porosity
where:
This form of the equation (y = b + mx) indicates
Pb = formation bulk density (from the log)
that by plotting R 1 on the y-axis (on a logarithmic
scale) against porosity (<\>) on the x-axis (on a logarith- Pma = formation matrix density
122 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
and: Table 7.2. Factors far positioning water·saturation lines on Pickett and Hingle plots.
(~t - ~t ma) instead of the sanie porosity
where:
Multiplier Sw (for n =2.0)
~t = formation sanie travel time (from the log) 1.56 0.80
2.04 0.70
~t ma =formation matrix travel time
Both quantities are the numerators in porosity 2.78 0.60
equations (Pb - Pma) from the density porosity equa- 4 0.50
tion (Chapter 4, Equation 4.7), and (~t - ~t ma) from
6.25 0.40
the Wyllie time-average sanie equation (Chapter 4,
Equation 4.1). The quantities are plotting sh01tcuts to 11.11 0.30
avoid the calculation of porosity, but they serve anoth- 0.20
25
er purpose as well. If there is a range of porosities in
the zones defining the water-bearing line on the Pick-
ett plot, and if the matrix value is chosen correctly, the
line is straight. If the chosen matrix value is either too Hingle Crossplot Method
high or too low, the line is curved. Thus, with a spread
of good data in the water-bearing zone, the proper The oldest of the resistivity-porosity crossplot
matrix value can be chosen by trial and error by mod- methods that can be used to determine water saturation
ifying the matrix value until the water-bearing line is (Sw) is the Hingle (1959) plot. As in other crossplot
straight and not curved. techniques, a significant benefit of Hingle's technique
The water saturation of a point plotting away from is that a value for water saturation (Sw) can be deter-
the water-bearing line can be dete1mined by the equa- mined even if matrix properties (Pma or ~t ma) of a
tion: reservoir are unknown. This is also true if a reservoir's
water resistivity (Rw) is unknown.
7.27 As with the Pickett plot, the Hingle plot seeks to
plot resistivity against porosity. Plotting resistivity
In practice, this means reading the resistivity of the against porosity on linear scales produces a family of
point (R 1) and the resistivity of the water-bearing line nonlinear trends. By solving Archie's equation (Equa-
(R 0 ) at the same porosity value as the point, estimating tion 7 .1) in the following form, the nonlinear trends
a value for saturation exponent (n) and making the cal- become straight lines (Bassiouni, 1994):
culation.
The table below can be used to draw saturation
lines on a Pickett plot, as a reference. The technique is: 7.28
• At sorne value of porosity (0.10 is often conven-
ient), note the resistivity value of the R 0 line. While porosity is plotted on a linear scale, the resis-
• Multiply that resistivity value by the factors tivity is plotted on a very nonlinear scale. In practice,
below, and plot those values on the Pickett plot the resistivity is plotted on a grid that has been con-
at the same porosity. structed for specific values of tortuosity factor (a) and
cementation exponent (m). The grid constructed using
• Draw the saturation lines parallel to the water- a = 1.0 and m = 2.0 is usually used for sandstones
bearing line, with each line going through the (Figure 7 .5), and the grid constructed using a = 0.62
calculated points. and m =2.15 is used for carbonates (Figure 7 .6). Using
• Those parallel lines can be labeled with the the constructed grids, resistivity values can be plotted
value of water saturation shown. Note that the directly on the graph without the need for any calcula-
lines are for a saturation exponent (n) of 2.0. tions.
In its fullest use, then, the Pickett plot can be used Plotting a mixture of water-bearing and hydrocar-
to dete1mine formation water resistivity (Rw), cemen- bon-bearing points on a Hingle plot results in the fol-
tation exponent (m), and formation matrix values (Pma lowing attributes (as shown in Figure 7.7):
or ~t ma)· As expected, there are assumptions to the • Water-bearing points of different porosities plot
interpretation. The prime assumption is that in the along a straight line. The x-intercept of the line
zones being compared, all the parameters (matrix (where conductivity is zero and resistivity is
value, a, m, n, and Rw) do not change. infinite) occurs at the point where porosity is
Log lnterpretation 123
zero. If the bulk density or acoustic travel time mating a value for saturation exponent (11), and making
of the formation, instead of the porosity, is plot- the calculation.
ted along the x-axis, the x-intercept predicts the Table 7 .2, previously used for the Pickett plot, can
matrix value (matrix density or matrix travel be used to draw saturation lines on a Ringle plot. The
time) of the formation. The line extends to the technique is:
northeast quadrant (i.e., upper right) from its x- • At sorne value of porosity (0.1 O is often conven-
intercept. ient), note the resistivity value of the R 0 line.
• Rydrocarbon-bearing points lie below the line of Multiply that resistivity value by the factors in
100% water saturation, moved downward from Table 7 .2, and plot those values on the Ringle
the water-bearing line by their increased resis- plot at the same porosity.
tivity. The vertical distance from a point to the
• Draw the saturation lines to intersect the water-
water-bearing line depends on the water satura-
bearing line at the zero porosity point on the x-
tion (Sw) of that point. If the saturation exponent
axis, with each line going through the calculated
(11) is known (or can be estimated), the water
points.
saturation can be determined. Lines of decreas-
ing water saturation radiate from the x-axis • Those lines can be labeled with the value of
intercept and spread like a fan toward the right water saturation shown. Note that the lines are
side of the chart. for a saturation exponent (11) of 2.0.
As with the Pickett plot, the Ringle plot allows the In routine analyses, many people favor one of the
interpreter to predict sorne of the parameters from the crossplots over the other, as a matter of personal pref-
logs rather than estimating them by other methods. erence or experience. Bassiouni (1994), however,
The formation water resistivity (Rw) can be estimated describes an iterative technique using both plots to
by choosing any point along the water-bearing line. refine the estimates of the matrix values and cementa-
The point's resistivity (R 0 ) and porosity can be read tion exponents in areas where both are unknown. Table
from the plot, and values of tortousity factor (a) and 7.3 lists advantages and limitations of both plots.
cementation exponent (m) are assumed based on the
chart that is chosen. Formation water resistivity is
then: PERMEABILITY FROM LOGS
Rº X ~111
Rw=----'---- 7.29 Log-derived permeability formulas are only valid
a for estimating permeability in formations at irre-
By plotting the bulk density (pb) or sonic travel ducible water saturation (Schlumberger, 1977). When
time (~t) values on the x-axis, rather than the porosity, a geologist evaluates a formation by using log-derived
the matrix density or matrix travel time (Pma or ~tma) permeability fo1mulas, the permeability values, if pos-
can be estimated. If there is a sufficient range of sible, should be compared with values of nearby pro-
porosities used to dete1mine the water-bearing line, the ducing wells from the same formation. Productivity
line can be extrapolated to the zero-conductivity value estimates can be based on log-derived permeabilities if
(the bottom of the chart). The value of this intercept is the formation evaluated is compared with both good
the matrix value for the porosity equation. On Figure and poor production histories in these nearby wells.
7 .5 or Figure 7 .6, the placement of the zero porosity By using comparisons of log-derived peimeabilities
point is arbitrary. If porosity is plotted on the x-axis, from severa! wells, a geologist is not using an absolute
setting the zero porosity point at the left side of the value for log-derived permeability.
plot makes the most sense. If Pb or ~t is used, the Four methods for calculating log-derived perme-
anticipated zero porosity point (the anticipated matrix ability are discussed here. Before these fo1mulas can
value) could be displaced from the lower left comer if be applied, a geologist must first determine whether or
the matrix value is different than the expected matrix not a formation is at irreducible water saturation.
value. Regardless of the values used on the x-axis Whether or nota formation is at irreducible water sat-
(porosity, pb, or ~t), the values increase from left to uration depends upon bulk volume water values (BVW
right. = Sw X <j)). When the bulk volume water values of a
The water saturation of a point plotting away from formation are constant (Figure 7.3a), the zone is at
the water-bearing line can be determined by Equation irreducible water saturation. lf the values are not con-
7.26. In practice, this means reading the resistivity of stant, a zone is not at irreducible water saturation (Fig-
the point (Rt) and the resistivity of the water-bearing ures 7 .3b and 7 .3c ), and the estimates of permeability
line (R 0 ) at the same porosity value as the poi11t, esti- are suspect.
124 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 7.3. Advantages and Limitations of Pickett and Hingle plots (alter Bassiouni, 1994).
Limitations A wide range of porosity must be present to positively determine a water-bearing line. Formation
for both lithology and water resistivity must be constant over the intervals compared in the plot.
techniques
L)
2
Table 7.4. Data for use with Pickett plot (Figure 7.4) and Hingle plot (Figure 7.7).
Morrow Sandstone, Cimarron County, Oklahoma. K = (79 X dry gas) 7.31
SWIIT
Zone Depth Pb <Pv Rt
where:
number (ft) (g/cm 3) (decimal) (ohm-m)
1 4400 2.38 0.163 1.7
K = permeability in millidarcys
<j> = porosity
2 4402 2.44 0.127 2.1
Sw irr = water saturation (Sw) of a zone at ine-
3 4410 2.35 0.181 1.3 ducible water saturation
4 4414 2.42 0.139 1.6
5 4426 2.42 0.139 1.8 Timur (1968) 2
93 X ~
22
6 4430 2.33 0.194 1.0 K=
( )
7.32
swirr
7 4438 2.30 0.212 0.9
8 4536 2.30 0.212 40
Coates aná Dumanoir (1973)
9 4540 2.30 0.212 45
10 4546 2.30 0.212 40 A more complex method for calculating permeabil-
ity is the Coates and Dumanoir (1973) fo1mula. Unlike
the Wyllie and Rose (1950) formulas, hydrocarbon
density is explicitly part of the equation, instead of
Wyllie aná Rose (1950) being indirectly accounted for by changing a constant.
This method for determining permeability utilizes a The following data are required to calculate perme-
chart (Figure 7 .8) or the two fo1ms of the following ability by the Coates and Dumanoir formula.
formula: Rw = formation water resistivity at formation tem-
(2so xL)
2 perature
K = Cn:edium-gravity R 1 irr = true formation resistivity from a formation
swirr 01ls) 7.30 at ineducible water saturation
Lag lnterpretation 12 S
Ph = hydrocarbon density in g/cm3 other parameters) to account for those effects. As our
understanding of geological processes matured, it
$ = porosity became understood that shale and clay are different
A first step in the Coates and Dumanoir permeabil- and that shaly sands are usually not just sands with
ity formula is calculation of values for two constants: shales mixed in but sands that contain clays. These
e and w. clays could be very different from the clays present in
C = 23+465 X p" -188 X p/ 7.33 the shales near those sands of interest. Again, the liter-
ature and our interpretive techniques commonly use
where: the terms shale volume and clay volume interchange-
C = constant in Coates and Dumanoir pe1meability ably. Most of the shaly sand techniques developed
formula over the years concern themselves with shale volume,
P1i = hydrocarbon density in g/cm3 but a few, notably the Waxman-Smits and dual water
methods, seek to use the electrical properties of the
clays in the formations to predict an accurate water
saturation.
Beginning in the late 1960s, the work of Waxman
and Smits (1968) and Waxman and Thomas (1974)
where: helped to better understand the physical causes of the
W = constant in Coates and Dumanoir permeability responses of logging measurements to shaly sands and
formula to develop interpretive models to better approximate
$ = porosity the physical reality of formations. Clavier et al. (1977)
built on the work of Waxman and his colleagues with
Rw = formation water resistivity at formation tem- the introduction of the dual water model for the de-
perature termination of water saturation. The dual water model
R1 ¡,.,. = deep resistivity from a zone at irreducible postulates two different types of water in a shaly for-
water saturation (Sw ¡,.,.) mation, a immovable water layer next to the clay sur-
Once dete1mined, the constants C and W can be faces (bound water) and movable water that can be dis-
used to calculate permeability. placed by hydrocarbons (free water). This technique,
2
while more complex in its use, continues to gain popu-
ex ~1w larity because of its closer approximation to the re-
[ ] 7.35 sponses of shaly sands in a wide variety of conditions.
The presence of shale or clay minerals in a reser-
where: voir can cause erroneous values for water saturation
K = permeability in millidarcys (md) and porosity derived from logs. These erroneous val-
C = constant based on hydrocarbon density ues are not limited to sandstones but also occur in
limestones and dolomites.
W = constant
Essentially all measurements, then, are affected in
$ = porosity sorne way by the presence of clays and/or shales.
Rr irr = deep resistivity from a zone at irreducible Hilchie (1978) notes that the most significant effect of
water saturation (Sw iff) shale in a formation is to reduce the resistivity contrast
Rw = formation water resistivity at formation tem- between oil or gas, and water. The net result is that if
perature enough shale is present in a reservoir, it may be very
difficult, or perhaps impossible, to determine if a zone
SHALY SAND ANALYSIS is productive. Hilchie (1978) suggests that for shale to
significantly affect log-derived water saturations, shale
Not long after the work of Archie and others in content must be greater than 10 to 15%.
devising a method to quantify water saturation from Remember that all shaly sandstone formulas reduce
logs, it became clear that there were limitations to the the water saturation value from the value that would be
method, especially in f01mations containing shale calculated if shale effect were ignored. However, this
and/or clay and commonly referred to as shaly sands. lowering of water saturation can be a problem in log
The early literature tended to refer to the formations as evaluation, because, if a geologist overestimates shale
containing shale, and a number of modifications were content, a water-bearing zone might appear to be a
made to Archie's equation using shale volume (among hydrocarbon-bearing zone.
126 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
M easurement Effect
Spontaneous SP is decreased in magnitude with respect to the shale baseline.
potential, SP
Gammaray Increased radioactivity is apparent as less movement away from the nearby shale values than an
equivalent clean sand.
Sonic Sonic porosity is higher than the actual formation porosity due to the higher travel time of the
clays/shales.
Neutron Neutron porosity is higher than the actual formation porosity due to the water that is part of the clay
structure and is adsorbed on the clay surfaces.
Density Density porosity is higher than the actual formation porosity due to the generally lower matrix
densities of most clay minerals. If the matrix density of the clay is close to that of the formation
matrix, there is little or no effect on porosity.
Resistivity Resistivity is less than that in an equivalent clean formation due to the conductivity of the clay. This
produces a calculated water saturation greater than the actual formation water saturation. (Archie's
equation assumes that all conductivity is from the formation water and that the formation matrix is
completely nonconducting.)
s = _!_x[
\V <!>
Rw (a X Vshale)
¡¡+ t
2
2
-
aX 2Vshale l 7.46
where ~t =total porosity (from the neutron and density).
chlorite have extremely low cation-exchange values; 2. The ratio method for determining water satura-
illite and montmorillonite have high cation-exchange tion (Sw) does not require a value for porosity (cp).
values. Therefore, montmorillonite and illite decrease 3. The ratio between the water saturations in the
resistivity much more than kaolinite and chlorite. In invaded (Sx 0 ) and uninvaded (Sw) zones (i.e., Sw1Sx0 )
shaly sand analysis, a geologist must make an assump- can be used as an index for the degree of hydrocarbon
tion that resistivity of an adjacent shale (Rsh) is the moveability.
same as resistivity of shale in the fo1mation. This 4. Bulk volume water (BVW) is important because
assumption is not always correct. it indicates when a reservoir is at irreducible water sat-
Most shaly sand interpretation problems occur in uration (Sw ¡,.,.).
formations with Rw values that are not too salty [NaCl 5. Quick-look methods are important because they
< 20,000 ppm or Rw > 0.3 ohm-m at 80ºF (Hilchie, provide flags that indicate zones of potential interest.
1978)]. Where formation water is very salty, shale has 6. Ringle and Pickett crossplot techniques are sim-
less effect on the formation's resistivity. Therefore, ple and rapid methods for determining a formation's:
calculated water saturations without correction for • water saturation (Sw)
shale are close to true formation water saturation.
• water resistivity (Rw)
This chapter discussed severa! log-interpretation
techniques. These techniques are based on many of the • cementation factor (m)
fo1mulas already presented in the text. What the for- • matrix values (travel time or density)
mulas are, and where they are found is summarized on 7. Log-derived data can be used to estimate perme-
the log-interpretation flow chart included at the end of ability of a formation, but only if the formation is at
this chapter (Figure 7.2). irreducible water saturation.
8. The flow charts included in this chapter (Figures
REVIEW 7.1 and 7.2) will help you review the steps used in log
interpretation and will also provide an index of where
l. The Archie equation is used to calculate a for- different pieces of information are located.
mation's water saturation in both the invaded (Sx0 ) and
uninvaded (Sw) zones.
Lag lnterpretotion 129
Figure 7.1. Flowchort far sconning logs to identify zones of interest (both poy ond wet).
Look for clean zones
1
r-1---~
Clastics
l
Carbonates
The sconning flowchort has two poths, one far clostics ond one far carbonates.
Clastics:
The resistivity lag is the primory reconnoissonce meosurement becouse clostics tend to consist
of reservoirs surrounded by sholes whose resistivities vory groduolly with depth. Differences in
Look for resistivity
2
Look for porosity the fluid content of the reservoirs tend to produce reservoir resistivities thot stand out ogoinst
the relotively constan! resistivity of the surrounding sholes.
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
v Carbonates:
Water zone Tight.
Use as Unlikely pay.
Formotion resistivities tend to vory widely with chonging rock types, ond commonly there ore
baseline (wet) few sholes ogoinst which to meosure chonges. In this cose, the porosity lag is the primory
comparison. reconnoissonce meosurement. By first finding the porous zones, the zones with the copocity to
Check resistivity
hold fluids (of ony type) con be identified.
Check porosity Using this sconning technique in combinotion with the neutron-density quick-look technique
•
LOW HIGH discussed in Chopter 4 (if those logs ore ovoiloble) ollows one to identify lithology (ond
LOW HIGH
sometimes fluid type) in the course of identifying the zones of interest.
Water zone
Tight. Use as baseline (wet)
Unlikely pay. comparison.
Density
Neutron
Sonic
SP
Permeability
GammaRay
Wellsite Reserves
measurements
Laboratory
measurements
Local
knowledge
130 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
a) b) e)
.70 .70 .10
IPF• 212 80+1008\llPO IP•\ll~TER OaA
IPF•2S2 80t13 8\llPO
,6() t0%óU.• O'Ji;OH.-
.6() tf;%0U. .60
.~
;;:
.40
,!(/"-......_ -~
.40
.!::
.'IO
J.
(fJ .30
...................
;;:
(fJ .30 ·"'···-.........
.06 ...............
;;:
(fJ .30
...·"'~
.o•~ ·06~ M~
·º·---
.20 ,20 .20
.o•...__
.10
o
o ,0$ .10 .l&
.01 _ _
Ἴ"--
.ro
POR0$1n,
·°'--
.«t~W"9xSw
.2&
ti
.30 .35
"º
.!()
o
o
·º'--
.oo~-
.20
.ot~V>:ióXSw
o
o .o& .10
.0.0!t--
.1& ~
POROSITV,
.01~~9xSw
,Clf..._
.25
ti
.30 .M .40
1.00
' ...... '
'
r-... ........
' ~
..........._
'...._ '
~
'r-.
""" ..........
.......... r-." ............... '"-....._
' ..........._
r-."
~~~ .......... '- "' '-...._ •
r--, ~
~ """ .......... ............_
......
........ ' ' 30
t--.... ' ,, 50
' ~ '...._ '
!'.......
.......... '
1
'170
' 100
11
Sw
11
O.O!
O.JO 1.00 10.00 100.00
True resistivity, Rt
Figure 7.4. Pickett plot (soturotion crossplot or resistivity·porosity crossplot) illustroting woter·beoring and hydrocorbon·beoring zones in a well.
Doto ore from the Morrow Sandstone, Cimorron County, Oklohoma (Table 7.4).
Density porosity wos calculated ossuming o motrix density of 2.65 g/cm 3 anda fluid density of 1.0 g/cm 3. The woter·beoring line (Sw = 100%) wos drown through the cluster of points with
oslope of -1 /2 (m =2). (Because of the limited porosity ronge of the points and their scatter, other values of mfrom 1.8 to 2.15 could be ¡ustified.)
The intercept of the water·bearing line ot 100% porosity (OPHI = 1.0) is o x Rw. lf the intercept were not off the plot in this illustrotion, the value could be read directly from the plot. In
coses such as this, the value for o X Rw con be determined from R0 by using Equation 7.28.
_ R 0 X cj>"'
Rw-~-
a
Remember that R0 is the resistivity in the undisturbed, water·beoring zone, ond for all points on the water·beoring line R1= R0 .
Procedure to calculate Rvi
For sorne porosity value, reod the volue of R0 from the water·beoring line on the crossplot. In this case, for a porosity of 10% (DPHI =0.10), R0 =4.6 ohm·m.
Assume ovalue of tortuosity factor (o). In this cose, o= 1.0.
The value of cementotion exponen! (m) is determined from the crossplot. In this case, m= 2.0.
By substitution in the above equation,
R = 4.6 X 0.10 20
w 1.0
Rw = O. 046 ohm·m al formotion temperoture
The water saturotion lines are constructed on the plot from the volue for R0 and the multipliers from Table 7.2. The multipliers are for a saturotion exponen! (n) of 2.0. For eoch line to be
plotted, multiply R0 by the multiplier to gel the y-intercept and drow a line from the y-intercept porollel to the woter·bearing line. To plot the line for 50% water saturotion, for example, if R0 (at
DPHI =0.10) is 4.6 ond the multiplier (from Table 7.2) is 4, the y-intercept for the 50% water saturotion line (ot DPHI =0.10) is 18.4.
To determine the water soturotion of the anomalous points (with more accurocy than estimating the volues from the crossplot), the following equation can be used:
(R J:,
S,,. = l R:
In this cose, the value for R0 is the value at the water·bearing line ot the some porosity os the point of interest. For the two points of interest (both having the sorne porosity), R0 = 0.80 ohm·
m. For the point who's resistivity is 40 ohm·m, the saturotion is found by:
l
s w
= (º·8 J2:0
40
s,,. = 0.14
For comparison interpretation, Figure 7.7 is a Hingle plot with the sorne data shown.
132 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Conductivity, Ca Resistivity, Ra
(mmho/m) (Q •m)
2000 0.5
.
.
. 0.6
1500 .
0.7
.
. 0.8
.
1000
. 1
- 1.2
.
. 1.5
500 2
400 2.5
300 . 3
250
200 5
:
.
150 .
.
-
100 .- 10
.. 15
50
. 20
20 50
10 100
5 200
1000
o 00
Figure 7.5. Hingle plot (saturation crossplot or resistivity·porosity crossplot) generally used for sandstones. (Western Atlas lnternational, lnc., 1995, Chart 7-79)
The y-axis is constructed with tortuousity factor (a) = 1.0 and cementation exponen! (m) = 2.0.
Lag lnterpretation 133
Conductivíty, Ca Resistivity, Rª
(mmho/m) (Q • m)
100 10
l 1
¡
80 . ¡
!
1 ·-r l
60 .
--- --
1
.. ·- -- -- ~- ~-
·-+~
t
;..,,...,.,,..,
15
50
! .1
!
! 20
' ll
¡
40 -t-- ~-
¡ 25
~4'._,,_,
~- .. ... ·-- l 30
¡
30
20 . 50
. 1 - ~-
.__.
... =t4~· --
15 -- ~- '
¡
- ¡
..
-+-· ·-· ... ¡'
!
10 100
: 1 ¡
5
.- -+ 1 ~
·-- ,__. .
~--
150
200
.-
""'""'~
'
f ..,..,...,.,..., '""""'"'... ..-- . _J___ ! J._._
. ·- ·-·-+-·--- --
0.5
2
1
o
~ •= ·-
.,.
~----
m
"'"'""'"'
-
500
1000
5000
20,000
00
Figure 7.6. Hingle plot (saturation crossplot ar resistivity·porosity crossplot) generally used far carbonates. (Western Atlas lnternational, lnc., 1995, Chori 7·80)
The y-axis is constructed with tortuosity factor (a) = 0.62 and cementation exponen! (m) = 2.15
134 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
4.1 xo.10 2 º
100 I
j
, I
"
/
- ........
30
lO
/ i/ ~ [/"
1.0
/ ~ ........ 15
O. 041 ohm·m ot farmation temperature 50 20
Rw =
1/
, ,
j
/
:/'
,,.
_.../
••
20 I I
/
- 50
The water soturation lines are constructed on the plot 10 , ... 100
from the volue far R0 and the multipliers from Table
7.2. The multipliers are far osaturation exponen! (n)
5 I
- 200
1000
of 2.0. o •'
For eoch line to be plotted, multiply R0 by the multiplier and plot thot line so that it intersects the woter·bearing line ot infinite resistivity. In this exomple, R0 (ot bulk density = 2.485
g/cm 3) is 4.1. The intercept far the 50% woter·soturation line (ot bulk density =2.485 g/cm 3) is 16.4.
To determine the water soturation of the onomalous points (with more accuracy than estimating the volues from the crossplot), the fallowing equation con be used:
1
sw =( ~: J
In this cose, the volue far R0 is the value ot the water·bearing line at the same porosity as the point of interest. Far the two points of interest (both having the sorne porosity), R0 =0.83
ohm·m. Far the point who's resistivity is 40 ohm·m, the saturation is faund by:
1
s
w
= (0.83
40
Jiü
sw == 0.144
For comparison of interpretation, Figure 7.4 is o Pickett plot with the sorne data shown.
Lag lnterpretation l 3S
50
;?
t.,
©
e
oN
e: 40
g
'fi>
e
~
_,_.
<])
o>
..a 30
ro
e:
o
~
:;
¡¡¡
1/)
20
©
(il
5:
~
(j)
o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
qi, porosity (p.u.)
Figure 7.8. Chori of porosity (<ji) versus irreducible water saturation (Sw ;rrl far estimating permeability and determining bulk volume water. (Schlumberger, 1998, Chori K-3)
Given: Porosity (<ji) = 0.25 (= 25 porosity units, p.u.) and irreducible water saturation (Sw ¡11) = 40% far an oil-bearing sandstone. The chori is constructed with the assumption of a medium-
gravity oil.
Procedure:
1. Find porosity (<ji= 25 p.u.) on the bottom horizontal scale, and find irreducible water saturation (Sw irr = 40%) on the left vertical scale.
Note that irreducible water saturation is labeled Sw; on this chori.
Follow the two values into the chart to the point where they intersect.
2. The heavy curve on which this point falls represents permeability. In this case, permeability, K= 130 md.
3. The light hyperbolic curves (C = Sw irr X <ji) represen! lines of equal value far bulk volume water. In this example, the bulk volume water equals 0.1 O(BVW = 0.10).
Note: lt is importan! to remember that this chori is only valid far estimating permeability (!() in zones at irreducible water saturation (5w irrl.
Zones at irreducible water saturation hove bulk volume water values that are fairly constan!. On the chart, data points from different intervals in a zone at irreducible saturation plot in a
coherent pattern, on ar parallel to one of the hyperbolic curves. Data points from zones not at Sw irr scatter from this pattern.
Asquith, G., and D. Krygowski, 2004, Petrophysical
Petrophysical Techniques
137
138 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
Table 8. 1. Matrix Coefficients of Severa! Minerals and Types of Porosity (Liquid-filled Boreholes).
Sandstone (2): V111 a = 19,500 ft/sec; cp < 0.10 51.2 2.65 -0.035ª -0.005 1.81
Limes tone 47.5 2.71 0.00 0.00 5.08
Dolomite (1): cp = 0.055 to 0.30 43.5 2.87 0.035ª 0.085ª 3.14
Dolomite (2): cp = 0.015 to 0.055 and cp > 0.30 43.5 2.87 0.02ª o.o6sa 3.14
Dolomite (3): cp =O.O to 0.015 43.5 2.87 0.005ª 0.04ª 3.14
Anhydrite 50.0 2.98 -0.005 -0.002 5.06
Gypsum 52.0 2.35 0.49b 0.6 3.99
Salt 67.0 2.03 0.04 -0.01 4.65
ªAverage values
b Based on hydrogen-index computation
*<PsNPma and <PcNLma values are specific to Schlumberger neutron tools.
From Schlumberger (1972). Courtesy Schlumberger Well Services.
Table 8.2. Values of Mand Nlithology parameters, calculated for common minera Is.
M N M N
Sandstone (1): V111 a = 18,000 ft/sec; cp > 0.10 0.810 0.628 0.835 0.669
Sandstone (2): V111 a = 19,500 ft/sec; cp < 0.10 0.835 0.628 0.862 0.669
Limestone 0.827 0.585 0.854 0.621
Dolomite (1): cp = 0.055 to 0.30 0.778 0.516 0.800 0.544
Dolomite (2): cp = 0.015 to 0.055 and cp > 0.30 0.778 0.524 0.800 0.554
Dolomite (3): cp =O.O to 0.015 0.778 0.532 0.800 0.561
Anhydrite 0.702 0.505 0.718 0.532
Gypsum 1.015 0.378 1.064 0.408
Salt 1.269 1.032
From Schlumberger Log lnterpretation Principles, © 1972 Schlumberger. Courtesy Schlumberger Well Services.
140 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
where:
Table 8.3. Apparent matrix values for calculated for common minerals
Umaa = apparent volumetric cross section in bams/
electron
Mineral Pmaa b.tmaa Umaa
(g/cm 3)
Pe = photoelectric absorption in bams/electron
(µsec/ft) (barns/cm3)
Pb = bulk density
Sandstone 2.65 55.5 4.78
<PND = neutron-density porosity
Limestone 2.71 47.5 13.80
U¡¡ = photoelectric absorption of fluid
Dolomite 2.87 43.5 8.98 When matrix parameters (Pma• Pe and <PNma; Table
Anhydrite 2.98 50.0 14.90 8 .1) are used in the matrix identification cquations
instead of formation parameters, U maa and Pmaa values
Gypsum 2.35 52.0 13.97
can be obtained for the various minerals (Table 8.3).
Salt 2.03 67.0 9.68 Figure 8.8 is a matrix identification plot (Umaa _vs.
P ) of data from the Silurian Fusselman Formatlon
maa
illustrated in Figures 8.1 and 8.2. The data above a
Figure 8.7 is a matrix identification plot of data
depth of 9088 ft and the data from the vuggy porosity
from the Silurian Fusselman F01mation illustrated in
zone (9088 to 9126 ft) all plot in the quartz-calcite-
Figures 8.1 and 8.2. The data above a depth of 9088 ft
dolomite triangle with the calculated lithologies pre-
plot in the quartz-calcite-dolomite triangle with the
sented in the column to the right of the matrix identi-
calculated lithologies presented in the column to the
fication plot. Because the Pe measurement is insensi-
right of the matrix identification plot. The porous
tive to the presence of vuggy porosity, the lithologies
interval with vuggy porosity (9088 to 9126 ft) plots
are all reliable.
above the quartz-calcite-dolomite triangle as it did on
Therefore, if only two lithologies are present in a
the M-N plot (Figure 8.6). The calculated lithologies
vuggy reservoir the prefened lithology plots are neu-
are illustrated in the column to the right of the litholo-
tron-density and matrix identification (Umaa vs. Pmaa);
gy plot (Figure 8.7). Therefore, as with the M-N pl~t
however if three lithologies are present in a vuggy
(Figure 8.6), the lithologies determined for the poros1-
reservoi; the prefened lithology plot is the matrix
ty zone (9088 to 9126 ft) from the matrix identification
identification plot (Umaa vs. Pmaa). If the porosity is
plot (Figure 8.7) are unreliable.
matrix intergranular or intercrystalline the neutron-
Petrophysical Techniques J41
density, neutron-sonic, and density-sonic plots work The problem with alpha mapping from an SP log is
for two lithologies and the M-N and both matrix iden- that SP response is decreased, not only by shale, but
tification plots work for three lithologies. also by thin beds (less than 10 ft) and the presence of
Figure 8.9 is a plot of the lithologies from the hydrocarbons (Chapter 2). Bed thickness problems are
matrix identification plot (Umaa vs. Pmaa) (Figure 8.8) minimized by making an SP log bed thickness correc-
and neutron-density porosities for the Silurian Fussel- tion (Chapter 2). But the SP log can't be corrected for
man Formation. The digital lithology and porosity data hydrocarbons.
together with depths can be used in a mapping pro-
gram for further analysis.
CLEAN SANO OR CARBONATE MAPS
FROM GAMMA RAY LOG
ALPHA MAPPING FROM THE SP LOG
The gamma ray log can be used to map clean
The spontaneous potential (SP) log (Chapter 2) can (shale-free) sandstones or carbonates vs. shaly sand-
be used to map clean (shale-free) sands vs. shaly stones and carbonates. Because shales are more radio-
sands. The technique is called alpha (a) mapping active than clean sandstones or carbonates (Chapter 3),
(Dresser Atlas, 1974) and is based on the observation when the percentage of shale increases in these rock
that the presence of shale in a formation decreases the types, the gamma ray reading also increases.
SP response. Figure 8.11 is a gamma ray density neutron log
The alpha method can be extremely valuable in through the Mississippian, upper Mission Canyon For-
mapping because it can more narrowly define desir- mation in Roosevelt County, Montana. In this interval,
able zones. Alpha values from nearby wells can be crinoid and fenestrate-bryozoan bioherms are com-
used to construct clean-sand (high-energy) maps (in monly developed. Because the biohe1m facies is com-
effect, mapping isoalpha values). posed of clean carbonate relative to the facies that is
To construct an alpha map, the static spontaneous not bioherm, the gamma ray log can be used to map
potential (SSP) that a sand would have, if it were com- the bioherm facies. The procedure for obtaining a
pletely shale-free and unaffected by bed thickness, is clean carbonate cutoff from a gamma ray log is
calculated. The equation for SSP is: described in Figure 8.10.
lo{~:~ J
A gamma ray value of 20 API units on the gamma
SSP = -KX 8.6 ray log (Figure 8.11) represents clean carbonate with a
volume of shale (Vsha/e) equal to or less than 0.05
where: (5% ). By drawing a vertical line on the gamma ray log
SSP = static spontaneous potential equal to 20 API units (Figure 8.10), the geologist can
K = 60 + [0.133 X fo1mation temperature (ºF)] identify and map the clean carbonate (or sand).
Figure 8.12 is an isopach map of clean carbonate
Rm¡ = resistivity of mud filtrate at formation tem-
for the upper Mission Canyon Formation in Roosevelt
perature County, Montana. Because the relationship between
Rw = resistivity of formation water at formation clean carbonate and the crinoid fenestrate-bryozoan
temperature bioherm facies is already established, the map (Figure
The SSP must be calculated for the f01mation in 8.12) delineates the distribution of the bioherm facies.
each well, so that variations in R111¡ and Rw can be Clean carbonate maps have also been used to map the
accounted for. Next, the alpha values are determined Pennsylvanian banks (bioherms) of north central
by the method shown in Figure 8.10. The alpha cutoff Texas (Wermund, 1975).
(0.75a, 0.50a, or whatever value chosen) is arbitrary,
but should be based on production histories in the area. ROCK TYPING ANO FACIES MAPPING
The resulting alpha (a) map delineates clean sand
environments. In the above example (Figure 8.10), the An important contribution to subsurface analysis of
greater alpha thickness for a given alpha cutoff (i.e., carbonate rocks has been the attempt to establish rela-
0.75a or 0.50a) indicates a greater thickness of high- tionships between log responses and carbonate facies.
er energy, low-shale sandstones. Also, because the Pickett (1977), Asquith (1979), and Watney (1979,
presence of shale in a sandstone can decrease its per- 1980) used crossplots to identify the relationship of
meability, an alpha map indicates better reservoir con- log response to rock type. Table 8.4 is a list of the
ditions. crossplots applied by these authors.
142 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 8.4. Types of Carbonate Rock·identificotion Crossplots (ofter Pickett, 1977; Grove B-zone in Ochiltree County, Texas. Clusters for
Asquith, 1979; ond Wotney, 1979 ond 1980). the three carbonate rock types (oolite grainstone,
oolitic wackestone, and argillaceous bioclastic wacke-
11t (interval transit time) vs. c!>N (neutron porosity) stone) were established by petrographic analysis of
Pb (bulk density) vs. c!>N (neutron porosity) cores and cuttings (open circles). The solid circles rep-
resent data from wells with only log control. Figure
p b (bulk density) VS. 11t (interval transit time) 8.15 is a facies map of the Council Grove B-zone
R 1 (deep resistivity) VS. '1>N (neutron porosity) based on the percentage distribution of the three car-
bonate rock types established by the resistivity/sonic-
GR (gamma ray) vs. '1>N (neutron porosity)* porosity crossplot (Figure 8.14).
Rt (deep resistivity) vs. c!>s (sonic porosity) The advantage of log crossplot techniques is that
they maximize use of available information. Cores and
*Watney (1979 and 1980) also uses neutron log readings
cuttings are required from only a few control wells
measured in counts/second.
rather than all wells. This is very important in subsur-
face facies mapping because of the difficulty in obtain-
To date, crossplots have been used to establish log ing cores and cuttings from every well in an area. Also,
vs. lithology relationships only when petrographic because petrographic analysis of every well is unnec-
data are available from cores or cuttings in selected essary, a great deal of time can be saved.
wells. Petrographic analysis from selected wells is However, it should be emphasized that petrograph-
essential to firmly establish rock type. ic analysis of cores or cuttings from control wells is an
When establishing log/lithology relationships, log essential first step to firmly establish the rock-type
responses from control wells (i.e., wells with petro- cluster used in the crossplots.
graphic analysis) are crossplotted. Next, areas that
delineate rock-type clusters are outlined (see Figure
8.13) on the crossplot. Finally, log responses from REVIEW
wells without cores or cuttings are added to the cross-
plot. The carbonate rock type and depositional envi- l. Neutron and density logs can be used in a cross-
ronment of wells without petrographic analysis can plot to determine lithology when a limited number of
then be determined by the cluster in which each occurs rock types are present.
on the crossplot chart (see Figure 8.13). 2. Where lithology is more complex, a sonic log or
In Figure 8.13, the solid black circles and squares a Pe curve used in conjunction with the neutron and
represent data from wells where petrographic analysis density curves is necessary to construct M-N lithology
was used to determine carbonate rock type and depo- or matrix identification crossplots.
sitional environment. The open circles represent data 3. Spontaneous potential (SP) and gamma ray logs
from wells without petrographic analysis. The carbon- can be used to map shaly vs. nonshaly carbonates or
ate rock types and depositional environments were sandstones.
determined by the cluster in which the open circles 4. Crossplotting of multiple log responses can be
were plotted. used to establish relationships between log responses
Figure 8.14 is a crossplot of deep resistivity (R 1) vs. and rock types, provided sorne petrographic data from
sonic porosity (<!>s) for the Lower Permian, Council cores or cuttings are available.
Petrophysical Techniques 143
SP
-160 mV 40 Feet
GR
- - - - --AP!unils- -- -- MD
9100
Figure 8. 1. lnductian, neutron, and density lag thraugh the Silurian Fusselman Farmatian, West Texas.
Feet
GR
MD
9100
Figure 8.2. Sanie lag through the Silurian Fusselman Farmatian, West Texas.
144 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
2.20 FEET
MD Lithology
t
2.40 10 ft
t
¡:Q
o
::e:
~
.~00 2.60
¡::::: 9100
Q.)
o
~
::s
¡:Q
2.80
3.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Figure 8.3. Neutron-density crossplot and resulting lithology estimation, Fusselman Formation, West Texas. Data are from Figures 8.1 and 8.2. Alithology key is shown in Figure 8.6.
80
FEET
MD Lithology
t--< 70
Ci
<Ú
Ei
¡:::
o >
ro
....
t--< 60
Q.)
9100
~
~
u
·.:::i
00
::s
o
u
<!; 50
40
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Neutron Porosity, NPHI
Figure 8.4. Neutron-sonic crossplot and resulting lithology estimation, Fusselman Formation, West Texas. Data are from Figures 8.1 and 8.2. Alithology key is shown in Figure 8.6.
Petrophysical Techniques 145
2.201 FEET
MD
¡~- --- 1 ---l-
¡
1 ........
2.40 !----~+¡ . -- ···.111............ .
L ...•....•
--}
1 !
1 !
1----~-
I i
!
2.60 ¡ --- __i ___ ~--
1
9100
1
1
1
2.80 1-
o
40 50 60 70 80
Acoustic W ave Travel Time, DT
Figure 8.5. Density-sonic crossplot and resulting lithology estimation, Fusselman Formation, West Texas. Data are from Figures 8.1 and 8.2. Alithology key is shown in Figure 8.6.
FEET
MD Lithology
0.80
:;s
:>,
bJl
o
o
..¡:; 9100
;.'.3 0.70
Limestone Dolomite
I ·.·.:_·.: . ·._·I
Figure 8.6. M-N lithology crossplot and resulting lithology estimation, Fusselman Formation, West Texas. Data are from Figures 8.1 and 8.2.
146 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
2.50 FEET
MD Lithology
2.60
""8
o
~
.~ 2.70
"'¡::;:<1l
Ci
>< 9100
·5
o:l
:;s 2.80
~
<1l
~
<r:°'
°' 2.90
Figure 8.7. Matrix identification plot (apparent matrix density vs. apparent matrix traveltime) and resulting lithology estimation, Fusselman Formation, West Texas. Data are from Figures
8.1 and 8.2. Alithology key is shown in Figure 8.6.
FEET
MD
'
L
1
9100
2.80 I___
1
.L1 - j -
2.90
r ·¡
1
r. 1· ... -.· -¡
! Dolomlte
·-·!·
•
:r-¡-·
80
t·+·-
1
¡-
•••wi•-~-
3.00
1 1 + i ~, 1 ~ l""'l
L__l ___L ..J ...l _ L __ l 1
i
wl_
AohyJúte
1
·o
Figure 8.8. Matrix identification plot (apparent matrix density vs. apparent matrix capture cross section) and resulting lithologic estimation. Fusselman Formation, West Texas. Data are
from Figures 8.1 and 8.2. Alithology key is shown in Figure 8.6.
Petrophysical Techniques 147
FEET Lithology
PhiND Figure 8. 9. Lithologies
MD
0.4 v/v decimal o from the matrix identification
plot and porosities from the
Limestone neutron-density crossplot,
Fusselman Formation, West
Texas.
Dolonúte
¡1;; 0 5 51
2 ' , ¡
Sandstone
9100 1-.-.. ·. ·._·I
Shale
•a= 100% (-130 mV) Figure 8. l O. Determining alpha (ex) from an SP lag.
1
a= 75% (-98 mV) Two difieren! cutoffs are demonstrated: 50% alpha (ex< 0.50) and 75% alpha
1
a= 50% (-65 mV) (ex <0.7 5). The alpha percentage is determined as an inverse function of
1
Shale baseline (O m V) shaliness [100% alpha (1.0 ex) is shale-free; 50 %alpha (0.50 ex) is shaly].
Given: You must first determine SSP. From Chapter 2:
SSP=-KX log(Rmr/ Rw) 2.2
where:
K= (0.133 X T¡) + 60 2.3
and:
Rmr= 2.0al120ºF,
Rw = 0.04 al 120ºF,
··-·- -- . ..
-
...
Next, determine the gamma roy index
' '
from the chori in Figure 3.2, Chopter 3 ~
' /
,/
~··
Remember:
...
... ...
C..
'
~---
....
•
-·
..
or !V11"1u11 Canyon .:::
'.-: f;::lj
---
...
. ... ,. . .
where:
----
·- -- ·---· ....._
-·
.....
,
GR10g= gamma ray lag ' ---···-- 6 percent porosity
~
........-
.. _
_
-----
1
.....
(shole) }
~:-~-·¡
GRmin = gamma roy minimum (shale- e .... ...... _ f ::
-
From the lag: Then, rearranging the equotion obove to salve far GR¡0g:
GRmox = 90 API units (from shole zone on lag) GRtog = 19 .8 (round off to 20 API units)
GRmin = 12 API units (from cleon carbonate zone on lag) 20 API units represents cleon carbonate where the volume of shole is equol to (ar less thon)
S%.
/GR= 0.1 O(/GR far Vshole =O.OS; given)
Drow overticol line from the scole value of 20 API units and determine the thickness ond
limits of the clean carbonate formotion (bioherm) much as you determined olpha volues in
Figure 8.1 O.
R 55 E
6
-tº
+ + + + +
+ +
T
+ + 29
N
•
..------------------¡••....
10,000·-------------------,
10,000
~
1 o¡::
ce
Iº ~
1• U)
1,000
1,000
I SUBTIDAL
FOSSILIFEROUS 8
\ 10
10 ( SUCROSIC DOLOMITE
+
\ : /
'-...
-·-- 1 L__ __¡__ __¡__ _L.,__
ARGILLACEOUS BIOCLASTIC
WACKESTONES
__¡__ __l__ __Jc..__ _J
12LB--~24--~20--~1L6--1L2--.L----':--~o 28 20 16 12
ll)N J1s
Figure 8.13. Example crossplot of formation resistivity, R1 (in this case from a deep Figure 8. 14. Example crossplot of formation resistivity (R1) (in this case from deep
laterolog) vs. neutron porosity. induction) with sanie porosity ((j>5).
This comparison of log response to facies helps the geologist develop rock-type clusters. As with Figure 8.13, the rock·type clusters are developed by core or cuttings analysis, but
This example is from the Ordovician Red River Cand Dzones and Richland and Roosevelt well logs are all that's necessary once the relationship is defined. This example comes from
Counties, Montana (alter Asquith, 1979). the Lower Permian Council Grove B·zone, Ochiltree County, Texas. Alter Asquith (1979).
Salid squares and circles represen! wells with core or cuttings available, in addition to log Open circles represen! wells with both core/cuttings analysis and log control. Salid block
response. Open circles represen! wells with log control only. Facies classifications are first circles represen! wells with only log control.
confirmed by core or cuttings analysis, but once clusters are established only log control is
necessary far facies prediction.
OKLAHOMA
- - -rE>ci\s ____ _
Borehole Images
151
152 HURLEY
on conventional logging tools. Por example, the EMI As a result, not every surface that shows electrical con-
tool is designed to withstand 350º F (177º C) temper- trast is exactly on depth.
ature and 20,000 psi (137,900 kPa) pressure. Electrical Borehole images are created by assigning color
borehole images can only be acquired openhole. Cur- maps to different bins or ranges of resistivity values.
rently, there are no cased-hole applications. Colored pixels are then arranged in their proper geo-
metric position around the wellbore. By convention,
low-resistivity features, such as shales or fluid-filled
Data Processing fractures, are displayed as dark colors. High-resistivi-
A processed electrical borehole image is basically a ty features, such as sandstones and limestones, are dis-
map of rock resistivity at the borehole face. Because it played as shades of brown, yellow, and white (Figures
is more difficult to examine borehole images in 3-D, it 9.7 and 9.8).
is common to split the borehole along true north, then Two main types of processed borehole images are
unroll the cylinder until it becomes a 2-D view (Figure available: static and dynamic (Figure 9.9). Static
9-4). In highly deviated and horizontal wells, it is com- images are those which have had one contrast setting
mon to split the borehole image along the top of the applied to the entire well. They provide useful views
hole (Figure 9.5). Planar features that intersect the of relative changes in rock resistivity throughout the
cylindrical borehole appear as sine waves in the 2-D borehole. Static images can be calibrated in ohm-m to
view. devices such as the LLS (Shallow Latero-log), a shal-
Data processing is done by service companies or low-reading resistivity log. With normal processing,
individuals on workstation, PC, or mainframe comput- borehole images are uncalibrated. Images can be cor-
ers using commercially available or proprietary soft- rected for EMEX voltage, a background voltage that is
ware. Processing steps involve correcting the direc- adjusted on the logging truck to improve image quali-
tional data, that is, pad 1 azimuth (tool orientation) and ty. Dynamic images, which have had variable contrast
hole azimuth, for magnetic declination. Sorne pro- applied in a moving window, provide enhanced views
grams also correct for magnetic inclination. Note that of features such as vugs, fractures, and bed bound-
magnetic declination varies with time and space. aries. Dynamic images bring out subtle features in
Charts and computer programs are available to com- rocks that have very low resistivities, such as shales,
pute magnetic declination for any location in the world and very high resistivities, such as carbonates and
on any logging date. Next, accelerometer corrections crystalline rocks.
are applied, making sure that the accelerometer curve
is on depth with the resistivity traces. The accelerom- ACOUSTIC BOREHOLE IMAGES
eter accounts for differential sticking, speed variations,
and resonant vibrations that occur as the tool moves up Acoustic borehole images, also known as borehole
the hole (Figure 9.6). Finally, resistivity traces must be televiewers, are based on technology first developed in
depth shifted using physical tool specifications, so that the 1960s (Zemanek et al., 1970). In these tools, which
different rows of buttons are in line where the same are centralized in the well, a rotating transducer emits
slice of the borehole, perpendicular to the tool, was and records sound waves which bounce off of the
imaged. At very small scales (less than 6 in; 15 cm), borehole wall (Figure 9.10). Both acoustic amplitude
nonlinear depth shifts occur that may not be cor- and travel time are recorded and processed into
rectable by conventional data-processing algorithms. images.
Borehole lmages 153
Data Acquisition CAST, for example, requires arate of 1200 ft/hr (365
m/hr). Because these devices do not depend on electri-
The tool is run into the hole with a stiff, spring-like cal conductivity, they can be run in nonconducting
centralizer. It is very important that the transducer is in muds. In fact, the ability to run in oil-based mud has
the center of the well because reflections must strike been a major advantage of this tool. Because of signal
the borehole wall and return to the tool at the proper dispersion, acoustic imaging logs do not work well
reflection angle (Figure 9 .11). The transducer rotates with mud weights in excess of 12 pounds/gallon (1.44
as it emits and records signals. The frequency of the kg/l). Also, because of increased travel time, the tools
emitted signal is generally in the severa! hundred kilo- do not perform well ifborehole diameter exceeds 12 in
hertz range. The CBIL tool, for example, rotates at a (30 cm). Pressure and temperature limitations are
rate of 6 revolutions/s, and has a sample rate of 250 comparable to the those placed on conventional log-
samples/rotation. Ve1tical resolution is about 0.3 in ging tools. The CAST tool, for example, is designed to
(0.8 cm) at a logging speed of 1200 ft/hr (365 m/hr). withstand 350° F (177º C) temperature and 20,000 psi
Commercially available tools and the associated serv- (137,900 kPa) pressure. Acoustic images are useful in
ice companies are listed in Table 9.2. Acoustic bore- both cased and openhole applications.
hole images basically acquire a spiral trace of first-
aiTival amplitude and travel time to and from the bore-
hole face. Acoustic caliper readings can be extracted Data Processing
from the logs. Orientation and borehole deviation are
Acoustic borehole images are basically compressed
computed from an attached orientation device with x-,
helical ultrasonic travel time or amplitude maps of the
y-, and z-axis magnetometers. Accelerometer readings
borehole wall. Data processing is n01mally done by
may or may not be recorded.
service companies or individuals on workstation, PC,
or mainframe computers using commercially available
Table 9 .2. Acoustic Borehole·lmaging Tools or proprietary software packages. Logging companies
generally provide files in which the images have been
Company Trade Useful
corrected to true north. Individual amplitude and trav-
Name References
el-time measurements are assigned colors based upon
Halliburton CAST Seiler et al. their different ranges of values. Colored pixels are
(Circumferential (1990) arranged in their proper geometric position around the
Acoustic Scanning wellbore. By convention, low-amplitude or high trav-
Tool) el-time features, such as shales, borehole irregularities
Schlumberger UBI (Ultrasonic Schlumberger (breakouts, washouts), and fluid-filled fractures are
Borehole Imager) (1993) shown as dark colors (Figure 9.12). High-amplitude or
low travel-time features, such as sandstones and lime-
Baker Atlas CBIL Baker Atlas stones, are shown as shades of brown, yellow, and
(Circumferential Web Page white. Accelerometer corrections are applied if they
Borehole are available.
Imaging Log) Acoustic borehole images have the cylinder split
Baker Atlas STAR (SimulTaneous Lacazette into 2-D views along true north, or along the top of the
Acoustic and (1996) hole in deviated wells, in a manner illustrated in Fig-
Resistivity Imager) ures 9.4 and 9.5. Planar features which intersect the
borehole appear as sine waves in the 2-D view. Static
and dynamic images can be created, as with electrical
borehole images.
Again, because the sample rate is high, digital file
size can be large. As with electrical images, it is com-
mon to record tens to hundreds of megabytes of data DOWNHOLE VIDEO IMAGES
from one log run. Depth of investigation is zero,
because this logging tool truly images the exposed Downhole photographic images have been avail-
borehole face. Areal coverage of the borehole face is able since the 1960s (Mullins, 1966). However, limita-
100%, which is a significant advantage of these tools. tions on the strength of the light source, maximum
Vertical resolution is a function of logging rate, which temperatures allowed, and data-transmission capabili-
is generally slower than other openhole logs. Maxi- ties prevented them from gaining widespread accept-
mum resolution (100 samples/in) for the openhole ance. In recent years, however, better light sources,
154 HURLEY
changes in the type or amount of matiix porosity. pads which are pressed against the borehole wall.
Cemented versus open-fracture and breccia porosity can Images are resistivity maps of the borehole face.
commonly be imaged. Sedimentary structures, such as 3. Electrical images are generally run in conducting
fluid-escape features, ripples, cross beds, and imbri- mud. They work because there is resistivity contrast
cated clasts can be apparent (Figure 9.16). The observa- between various lithologies, like sands and shales, and
tion of such structures may yield paleocun-ent, facies, mud-filled fractures.
and depositional environment interpretations (Luthi and 4. Acoustic borehole images have a rotating trans-
Banavar, 1988; Can- et al., 1997; Witton, 1999). ducer which emits a high-frequency sound signal that
Thinly bedded sands and shales have bedding bounces off of the borehole wall. Processed images are
thicknesses on the scale of 2 to 20 in (5 to 50 cm). helical maps of acoustic amplitude and travel time for
Such beds are below the resolution limits of most log- the reflected sound waves.
ging tools. Thin beds have been successfully resolved 5. Acoustic images can be run in oil-based mud.
and quantified using borehole images (Sovich et al., They work because there is commonly acoustic con-
1996). Such analyses have led to better estimates of trast between different lithologies, mud-filled frac-
net reservoir thickness to gross reservoir thickness and tures, and borehole inegularities such as washouts or
improved volumetric calculations (Reid and Enderlin, breakouts.
1998). 6. Downhole video logs have seen significant tech-
nological improvements, especially in the form of
REVIEW fiber-optic cables. They provide real-time, dynamic
images of the well and flowing fluids. They are useful
1. The three most common types of borehole for casing inspection, fluid-flow documentation, frac-
images are electrical, acoustic, and downhole video. ture detection, and other applications, assuming the
The advantage of these tools is that they give high-res- borehole fluid is relatively clear.
olution pictures of the geologic features that occur in 7. Borehole images have been used to document
the borehole. Borehole images are best used in combi- fracture and fault occun-ence and orientation, fracture
nation with other logs and rock information to allow ape1ture widths, borehole breakouts and in situ stress
more definitive interpretations of the downhole log orientation. They are also commonly used for strati-
signatures. graphic and sedimentologic interpretations, including
2. Electrical borehole-imaging logs are sophisticat- paleocun-ent analysis, vug quantification, and thin-bed
ed dipmeters. A1rnys of electrodes occur on 4, 6, or 8 detection.
Borehole lmages 157
Wireline DIPMETER
SHDT (1982)
2 buttons/pad
10 mm diameter
8 buttons total
/
-- '
" \
\
\
g. .
/
\ \ \
3-Axis Accelerometer
I '\
\
\
\
\ 4 Flaps FMI (1991)
24 buttons/pad
4 Pads .......
1't 3 Magnetometers
1 1
5 mm diameter
192 buttons total
\ '
\ I //
g. .
\ / / /
/
. /ji( / EMI (1994)
// / 25 buttons/pad
/
/ ....... 5 mm diameter
/ 6 Pads 150 buttons total
/
Pad 1
6 Pads
g. .
.......
STAR (1996)
24 buttons/pad
4 mm diameter
144 buttons total
Figure 9 .2. Schematic illustration of pad and electrode configurations for one
Figure 9. 1. Basic principies of electrical dipmeter tools are illustrated by this diagram of commercially available dipmeter and all of the common electrical borehole-imaging logs.
Schlumberger's SHDT (Stratigraphic High Resolution Dipmeter Tool), which became commercially Numbers in parentheses represen! the year in which the tool was released. Refer to Table 9.1
available in 1982. Two measuring electrodes on each of four pads generate eight raw electrode for tool and company names. Modified from Grace and Newberry (1998).
traces, as shown at the bottom. Magnetometers measure borehole deviation. Accelerometers record
high-frequency tool·speed variations which occur as the tool is being run. Formation dip is computed
from planes that are lit through correlative peaks and troughs on the speed-corrected electrode
traces. Caliper logs record borehole diameter between pads l and 3 and between pads 2 and 4.
Alter Schlumberger (l 983) and Hocker et al. (1990).
158 HURLEY
4, 6, or 8 Pads
on Sprung Arms
Too! Length ±10 m
Pad
.
±lOcm
~
Depth ~
Figure 9.5. Schemoticdiagrom of ohorizontal, cylindricol borehole intersectedby oplonor feoturesuch os obedding plone. The intersection belween the plone ondthecylinder is eilher o
circle or onoval. To view the borehole in two dimensions, the cylinder is generolly cut along the top of the borehole. Whenlhe cylinder is flottened, the line of intersection of on oval trace
becomes asinusoidal curve. Modified from Serro (1 989).
2 197
2435
2198
2436
2199
2200
2437
Figure 9.7. FMI display in osondstooe of portio!~ heoled fractures, which oppeor os Figure 9.8. Smolkcole fouh, or miaofoult (M), ond bed boundories (8) in osond
discontinoous conductive segments. Conductiva feotures ore imoged os dork colors. Red ond shole intervol. The sholes occur in the lower por! of the sectioo. Vertical offset on the
sine woves show fracture troces. Vertical scole is in lt. N-5-N refers to the true-north microfoult is opproximotely 0.25 lt (8 cm). Vertical scole is in lt. N-S.N refers to the true-
reference shown in Figure 9.4. Alter Knight (1999). north reference shown in Figure 9.4. Alter Knight (l 999).
O GR(API) 200 N s N
8280
Si¡¡nal
Bounces
offof
Borcholc 8285
Wnll
Spinning
Piczoelcc1ric
Tmnsduccr
8290
Figure 9.1 O. Schemotic illustrotion of the bosic operoting princi~es
behind ocoustic borehol&imoging logs. Arototing tronsducer emits ond
records sound pulses. First-orrivol amplitudes ond ITovel times ore recorded
ond mopped into processed logs. Tool nomes ond componies ore shown in
Table 9.2. Modified from Zemonek et al. (1970).
-~ -
Bo1·cholc 8295
Figure 9. 12. Exomple of on omplitude imoge from o CBIL lag in ofroclured sond ond shole intervol.
Note the open froclure (F). This fracture, which terminotes (T) ot oshole bed, is thought to be drilling
induced. Borehole breokouts (8), which ocwr os dork p<1tches 180º from eoch other, ore well imoged by
this log. Oepth is in ft. N-S·N refers to the true-north reference shown in Figure 9.4.
/
1 1
/
--
/
1 1
Figure 9. 13. Exomples of downhole video still shots. (o) Topof o rubingfish. (b) Halein casing. (c) Production deposits (scole) withoil flow (blockbubbles). (d) Openhole fractures.
From Halliburton (1996).
d3 dp KA dp
Qx = Ly 12µ dx = µ dx
d2
K= TI
Borehole lmoges 163
N s N (a)
2280
2281
(b)
2282
2283
Figure 9.15. Stolic FMI imoge of interbedded sonds (l~ht color) ond sholes (dork color).
Bosed on core studies, the sondy lominoted sediments represent storm deposits. Sho~ bioturboted
sediments (8) represen! loir·weather deposits. Vertical scale is in ft. N·S-N refers to the true-norlh
reference shown inFigure 9. 4. Aher Knight (1999).
Log Interpretation
Case Studies
INTRODUCTION asked to do very little, but to solve the final example
the reader should be prepared to work almost inde-
A major hurdle for geologists is leaming how the pendently. An effort is made to define variables and
theory and the many formulas of log interpretation are terms in the case studies, even though they may have
translated into practice. The learning process is slow, been defined earlier in the text.
and takes place only after a good deal of repetitive No matter how significant log interpretation is to a
effort is supported by actual experience with logs. geologist as an exploration method, it must also be
There are absolutely no sh011cuts. Memorizing log viewed in the larger context of exploration decision-
pattems and curve values just doesn't work, and can, making. That's why each case study includes a volu-
in fact, prove disastrous. However, to assist the process metric calculation of reserves. In several studies, the
of changing what's done into how it's done, case stud- reader is asked to determine a rate of return on invest-
ies can be an invaluable asset. The ones presented here ment. As everyone intimately connected with petrole-
cover several geographical areas, geologic ages, um exploration knows, wells can be geologic success-
lithologies and log packages. This variety is not nec- es but economic failures. In a successful exploration
essarily a classic representation of any of the cate- program, petrophysical log interpretation is used as a
gories. The reader will need to engage his or her intel- way to tip the risk scale toward economically success-
lect in finding appropriate solutions for each problem, ful wells.
and will also need to apply material already learned The list of equations that follows is an important
from thorough study of the preceding text. part of petroleum exploration. Derivation of variables
In these case studies, the authors are trying to: is included in this listing, although in most instances
• show examples of evaluation under a range of the reader is not asked to solve them. Instead, the val-
conditions: clastic rocks and carbonate rocks, oil ues will be given, for use in the formulas.
and gas;
• show examples with ranges of data, from mini-
mal to substantial, from old to new; and ltems of note
• move the reader from observing an illustration In all the case studies, only a small number of rep-
of an interpretation to interpretation as a self- resentative depths is used in the Work Tables to illus-
directed exercise (with a solution provided, to trate reading the raw-curve data and making the calcu-
verify the reader's conclusions). lations, whereas the graphical displays (crossplots and
Although all the case studies are based on actual log plots) show data from every half-foot of the inter-
field examples, in sorne studies the amount of log data vals of interest.
analyzed would be superfluous in practice. In many In the solutions to these case studies, the values of
instances, to set pipe or not doesn't require a complete the raw log data-resistivity, bulk density, neutron
log analysis. The unusual amount of detail is offered porosity, and so on-were determined from visual
here far use in a learning experience. Nevertheless, inspection of the data and verified with the digital
careful study of a log almost always yields informa- data, which itself was derived from paper copies of the
tion that furthers the development of expertise. logs. In that process, the number of significant digits
These case studies are a progressive series of prob- determined in the visual inspection was retained.
lems. In solution of the first example the reader is Those numbers were believed to be more representa-
165
166 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Equations uselul lor the lollowing case studies Equations used lor calculating volumetric
producible hydrocarbon reserves
The equations are presented in most, if not all, the
case studies. They are reproduced here and referenced Oil-bearing formations:
from those studies. Equations specific to each study
will appear in the cmTesponding text. N = _77_5_8_X_A_X_h_X____:_<j>_X_S__:.h,__X_RF_
J B 10.8
01
S
xo
=[a<j>"' X Rxo ]~
XRmf
10.2 (Equation 7.2)
<!> = porosity (decimal fraction)
-[459.7 + 60 X
- 15
P
zx(459.7+1f)
l 10.12
Rule of thumb for static bottom-hole pressure:
Table l 0.1. Case Study 1: Atoka Sandstone, Permian Basin, U.S.A.: Work table.
The work table shows values of the raw data-extracted from Figures 10.1 and 10.2-and sample calculations for several depths. You should verify this operoting assumption: your
reading of the logs produces the "sorne" values for the original data, ond for the calculated quantities. The values may differ, but they should be close. As you work through the problem,
do the calculations, to ensure that you understand the mechanics of the computations and of the plots. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 75ºF Rw (measured): (not given)
Total Depth: 15,962 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.065 ohm-m@ ºF
Bottom Hole Temp: 197°F Rmf (measured): 1.34 ohm-m @ 87ºF
Formation Depth: 14,600 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.65 ohm-m @ºF
Formation Temperature: 187ºF
GRclean: 15 API GRshale: 65 API
1a:0.81 lm:2 1n:2
Raw data
Depth ILD ILM LL8 DPHI NPHI
feet ohm-m ohm-m ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal
14,604 130 260 510 0.180 0.068
14,607 160 240 1100 0.214 0.064
14,609 190 210 1300 0.185 0.070
14,613 300 410 1500 0.260 0.085
14,618 160 250 520 0.245 0.100
14,622 110 100 190 0.215 0.115
Calculati ons
Depth PhiNDgas Swa Sxo BVW ROS MOS MHI
feet v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal
14,604 0.136 0.242 0.262 0.033 0.738 0.020 0.924
14,607
14,609
14,613 0.193 0.081 0.108 0.016 0.892 0.027 0.750
14,618
14,622 0.172 0.141 0.339 0.024 0.661 0.198 0.416
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 171
ILD
Ohi11-m- Figure 1O.1. Dual induction
0.2 2000
GR laterolog 8 with spontaneous potential
o - - - API - - !so
Feet log and gamma ray log, Atoka
SP LLS
MD ohm-m Sandstone, Permian Basin, U.S.A.
-80 0.2 2000
.. ... :~ . , ..
'
,.. ...
... .
.,
... ·~·>
........., .... i---'\............ ·•
.... ....
,
.... .. .. F ..
Depth Track, showing the depths of the
log readings;
......
,......
~-+
14600 Track 2, which shows the main measure-
'JE
¡...., .. , ..
.........
.. .... ,.......
. ....... j .! ,
'
....•... -
......... '
ments, such as resistivity; and
Track 3, which also shows main
- /
..........
+
.... i. ~
f
!/ measurements, such as porosity.
.......
........ .....
·f ...........
combined for a single display. In this
....
figure the tracks show resistivity over
.. j ...
··•·· four decades of values, with no physical
....
,,--~ ,--·~-·- -L.--¡'.:_--,--""""' ···+• .•, ··+··+-J'•·•!
"
>
distinction made of the boundary
, ...... ' .. . between tracks 2 and 3. Even when this
.. :: ..! type of combinad display is used, it is
common practica to reference the com-
binad track to the right of the depth
Environmental information: track as "tracks 2 and 3."
Total depth = 15, 962 ft In this log, and in the other logs
bottom hale temperatura (BHD = 197°F (maximum recordad temperatura) shown in this chapter, depth is indicated
bit diameter = 8'./iin. by a fine line every 2ft, a medium-thick
type of fluid in hale =freshwater mud line every 1Oft, and a heavy line every
Rm1at measured temperatura= 1.34 ohm-m at 87ºF 50 ft.
Rmc at measured temperatura= 3.34 ohm-m at 87ºF
Rm at measured temperatura= 1.67 ohm-m at 87ºF
Note the following attributes of the logs in the interval from 14,600 ft to 14,625 ft.
1) Resistivity curves in tracks 2 and 3 show high resistivities.
2) Gamma ray count in the Atoka Sandstone interval (track l, dashed line) is less than that in shales above and below.
3) The SP curve (track 1, salid line) shows evidence of hydrocarbon suppression, especially in the upper part of the zone. (lf water saturation were
l 00%, the shape of the SP curve would be strongly similar to the shape of the gamma ray curve. lf the zone were shaly and water saturation
were l 00%, the gamma ray curve would mimic the shape of the SP curve shown here.)
172 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
DPHI
0.45 v/vdecimal -0.15
Feet
MD -
0.45
- - - - - - -v/vNPHI
- - - - - - - --0.15
decimal -
'iftJ~
'
f ' I '
'
h~
"'
,_:::
' ~ ' -
/ <-
l~~
~
"
/
t~l -
r
/
14600
Fs -
'
'
- ~
'
~
.~
·--""' .>
''''·' i'''''''
,...
, •¡ '' ---
Figure 10.2. Combination neutron·density log with gamma ray log and caliper log, Atoka Sandstone, Permian Basin, U.S.A.
Neutron and density porosities were recorded in sandstone·porosity units.
Note the following attributes of the logs in the stratigraphic interval from 14,600 ft to 14,625 ft.
1) Mudcake is shown by the caliper curve (CALI) in track 1; the hole diameter is smaller than the diameter of the bit (8Yz in.).
2) Strong gas effect is shown in tracks 2 and 3. The density·porosity curve (DPHI) shows much higher porosities than the neutron·porosity
curve (NPHI), and both logs show high porosity.
Log lnterpretotion Case Studies 173
and other pe1tinent information." The estimates of the case at hand, what is significant is the high resid-
water saturation are consistently low (Table 10.2), ual gas saturation in the flushed zone (1.0 - Sxo = resid-
which is an indication that the reservoir may be at ÜTe- ual hydrocarbon saturation, (ROS) (Equation 10.6)).
ducible water saturation. The flushed zone water satu- Hígh residual gas saturation is the result of bypassing
ration (Sx 0 ) is also calculated from Archie's equation, of gas by drílling fluids during invasion of a reservoir.
with Rm¡ substituted for Rw, and Rxo substituted for R 1• Residual gas saturation can be read and interpreted
Por the calculations in this case study, the laterolog 8 erroneously by the logs as being the consequence of
(LL8) values should be used for Rxo· stationary hydrocarbons.
Bulk volume water (BVW) is calculated from Equa- You were justifiably concemed about negative
tion 10.5. It shows low, fairly consistent values for all information from the drill-penetration rate, and the
the zones, suggesting-as do the water saturations- pessimistic moveability data. Neve1theless, you decid-
that the formation is at ÜTeducible water saturation. ed that when considered altogether, evidence of shows
Figure 10.4 shows BVW graphically, by the plot of in bit cuttings, gas shows recorded by the mud logger,
water saturation (Swa) versus porosity (PhiNDgas). A and qualitative and quantitative log interpretation
large sample of points plots near the líne that is equiv- overrode the negative evidence and supported the deci-
alent to BVW of 0.02. Clustering of points around a sion to set pipe. Log-interpretation info1mation that
constant BVW líne supports the conclusion that the was especially significant to your decision included:
reservoir is at ÍlTeducible water saturation. • high porosities shown on the neutron-density
Another crossplot that provides supportive infor- logs;
mation is Figure 10.5. Porosity is plotted against water
• strong gas effect on the display of the neutron-
saturation, with estimates of permeabílity (derived
density logs;
from Equation 7.31) superimposed on the data. The
plot indícates that permeability of the sandstone may • low water saturation, calculated by the Archie
be very good, especially if the reservoir is at irre- equation;
ducible water saturation, as indicated by water satura- • high log-derived permeabilities, from cross-
tions and BVW values (Table 10.2 and Figure 10.4). plots; and
The increase in penetration rate downward through • low bulk-volume-water values.
the Atoka was unfavorable information; there is addi-
Although you belíeve that the well penetrated a
tional negative information. Residual oíl saturations
gas-filled reservoir, you are quite interested in whether
(ROS), calculated by Equations 10.2 and 10.6, are
the well would be a commercial success. Equation
high (Table 10.2). This fact is anomalous because
10.11 is used to calculate volumetric gas reserves.
other evidence, discussed above, supp01ts the conclu-
Estimated gas recovery of 11 BCF is calculated by
sion that the reservoir has high porosity and pe1me-
using the following parameters:
ability. Ordinarily, under these conditions of porosity
and pe1meability, mobility of hydrocarbons would be • geothermal gradient = 0.014º/ft X formation
expected. Furthe1more, calculations of moveable oíl depth;
saturation (MOS) (Equation 10.7), produce low values • pressure gradient = 0.35 psi/ft X formation
(Table 10.2). Inítíally, this is puzzlíng; in a reservoir depth;
with high porosity and permeability, moveable oil sat- • drainage area = 560 acres;
uration should be high. Additional anomalous infor-
• reservoir thickness = 15 ft;
mation is produced by calculation of the moveable
hydrocarbon index (MHI) (Equation 10.4 and Table • effective porosity = 0.15 (15%);
10.2). Most values are greater than 0.7, but in the gen- • water saturation = 0.13 (13%);
eral case, movable hydrocarbon indices of productive • gas gravity = 0.65;
reservoirs are less than 0.7. Analyses of ROS, MOS,
• recovery factor= 0.85;
and the moveable hydrocarbon index MHI suggest that
hydrocarbons will not move. Indeed, all these factors • formation temperature = 205ºF;
give notíce that most of the hydrocarbons would re- • initial bottom hole pressure = 5, 117 psi; and the
main in place, in the reservoir. • Z factor= 0.988.
In the initial evaluation of logs, info1mation about
inadequate moveabílity of hydrocarbons should not be TheAtoka Sandstone was perforated from 14,610 ft
ignored; however, sometimes evidence of deficient to 14,615 ft. The calculated absolute open flow
moveability can be explained in the following way. In (CAOF) was 21,900,000 cu ft of gas per day (21,900
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 175
mcfgpd) with a high shut-in tubing pressure (S/TP) of and water saturation (Swa), among other calculated
3758 pounds per square inch (psi) and a high initial values. Log displays containing both raw and calculat-
bottom hole pressure (IBHP) of 5556 psi. The gas ed values are available at the well site, either during or
gravity was 0.599 at bottom hole temperature of immediately after data acquisition. The same calcula-
219ºF. The well's first-year cumulative production tions and displays can be made by commercially avail-
was 3,268,129 mcf plus 95,175 barrels of condensate. able software packages; however, the calculated
Figure 10.6 is a computer-derived log of the Atoka results are only as accurate and reliable as the log data
Sandstone. It shows calculated porosity (PhiNDgas) and the parameters that are used for computations.
17 6 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table l 0.2. Case Study l: Atoka Sandstone, Permian Basin, U.S.A.: Solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for·volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 75ºF Rw (measured): (not given)
Total Depth: 15,962 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.065 ohm-m@ ºF
Bottom Hale Temp: 197ºF Rmf (measured): 1.34 ohm-m @ 87ºF
Formation Depth: 14,600 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.65 ohm-m @ºF
Fmmation Temperature: 187ºF
GRclean: 15 API GRshale: 65 API
1 a: 0.81 1 m:2 1n:2
Raw data
Depth ILD ILM LL8 DPHI NPHI
feet ohm-m ohm-m ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal
14,604 130 260 510 0.180 0.068
14,607 160 240 1100 0.214 0.064
14,609 190 210 1300 0.185 0.070
14,613 300 410 1500 0.260 0.085
14,618 160 250 520 0.245 0.100
14,622 110 100 190 0.215 0.115
Calculations
Depth PhiNDgas Swa Sxo BVW ROS MOS MHI
feet v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal
14,604 0.136 0.242 0.262 0.033 0.738 0.020 0.924
14,607 0.158 0.122 0.138 0.019 0.862 0.016 0.884
14,609 0.140 0.120 0.144 0.017 0.856 0.024 0.832
14,613 0.193 0.081 0.108 0.016 0.892 0.027 0.750
14,618 0.187 0.116 0.170 0.022 0.830 0.054 0.681
14,622 0.172 0.141 0.339 0.024 0.661 0.198 0.416
Log lnterpretotion Cose Studies 177
~
VJ.
0.40
.t~f
'¿¡j
....
...,;::::
o::!
VJ.
a:>
+-'
~ 0.20
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40
Porosity, PhiNDgas
1.00
Figure 10.5. Crossplot, water saturation
(Swal versus porosity (Ph¡), far estimating
permeability, Atoka Sandstone, Permian Basin,
U.S.A.
0.80
The estímate of permeability is valid only if water
satur ation is irreducible. Permeability lines were
extracted from Timur (1968). Permeability is
scaled in millidarcies.
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40
Porosity, PhiNDgas
log lnterpretation Case Studies 179
Rt Swa PhiNDgas
0.2 - - -ohm-m - - 2000 1 v/vdecimal O 0.25 \/vdec1mal
14600
Figure 10.6. Computer-processed evaluation log, Atoka Sandstone, Permian Basin, U.S.A.
In the interval from 14,600 ft to 14,625 ft, note:
1) In track 1, volume of shale (Vsha/e) was calculated from the gamma ray log. These criterio were the basis for calculation:
GRc1ean = 15 API units; GRshale = 65 API units.
2) In track 2, shading emphasizes the separation between resistivity of the sandstone at water saturation of 100% (R0) and true
formation resistivity (R1), as derived from the deep resistivity (!LO), which shows the presence of hydrocarbons. The greater the
separation, the greater the hydrocarbon saturation.
3) In track 3, these five importan! quantities are shown, in order from left to right: (1) water saturation of the uninvaded zone,
computed by the ratio method (Swrl; (2) water saturation of the uninvaded zone, computed by the Archie method (Swal;
(3) the differential caliper log (DiffCab, which is the caliper value minus the bit size; (4) porosity (PhiNDgas); and (5) bulk
volume water (BVW). The block orea (between PhiNDgas and BVW) shows the proportion of pore space occupied by hydro-
carbons (in this instance, gas). The gray orea (between BVW and zero, at the track edge) shows the proportion of pore space
occupied by water.
180 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Case Study 2: for production of oil and gas. Your company agrees
with your suggestion to runa very complete log pack-
MISSISSIPPIAN MISSION CANYON FORMATION, age, because the well is exploratory and carbonate
WILLISTON BASIN, U.S.A.: rocks commonly are more difficult to evaluate than
sandstones. The logs are shown in Figures 10.7, 10.8,
The Problem. and 10.9.
Case Study 2 illustrates the interpretation of mixed- Well site inlormation and other pertinent inlormation:
lithology carbonate rock. Sorne lithology-porosity
crossplots are used to confüm the types of rock seen in • mean annual surface temperature = 40ºF
a core. Por the various crossplots the stratigraphic
• formation temperature (T¡) = 207ºF
interval is divided into two zones, based on the pro-
duction potential estimated from observation of the • formation water resistivity (Rw) at T¡ = 0.023
logs. ohm-m
• mud filtrate resistivity (Rm¡) at T¡= 0.017 ohm-m
Background • Dtfl = 185 µsec/ft, the acoustic-wave fluid tran-
sit time of saltwater mud filtrate
A wildcat well is in progress in the Williston Basin, • RHOfl = 1.1 gm/cc, which is the density of salt-
to be drilled to the Ordovician Red River Formation. water mud filtrate
As drilling proceeds, two zones are encountered that
• tortuosity factor (a) = 1, cementation exponent
have hydrocarbon shows-the Mississippian Mission
(m) = 2, and saturation exponent (n) = 2
Canyon and the Devonian Duperow. The well has just
penetrated the Devonian Duperow, the second "show" Preliminary examination of the logs indicates that
zone. A decision is made to stop and drill-stem test several zones in the Mission Canyon are quite porous.
(DST) the Duperow. Unfortunately, the drill-stem-test Log data and core data indicate that the zone is poten-
tool is stuck in the borehole. Several attempts are made tially productive. A reliable estímate of the amount of
to remove the tool but none succeed. Meanwhile, col- oil in place is needed; but first, verify the quality of the
lapse of the borehole wall (caving) begins. log data, confirm the estímate of formation water
Now you face the choice of either halting drilling- resistivity, and calculate porosity and fluid saturations.
with hope that the first show zone, the Mississippian
Mission Canyon Formation, might be a productive Tasks required far interpretation of the logs
reservoir-or continuing effmts to remove the DST
tool. If the "fish" (the stuck DST tool) is removed from • General comparison of lithologies described
the hole successfully, the Duperow can be tested and from the core with lithologies predicted from the
the hole can be deepened to the Red River Fmmation. logs would give you sorne opinion about
However, more attempts to recover the fish undoubt- whether the logging tools operated properly. The
edly will lead to further deterioration of the hole, and neutron porosity-density porosity and neutron
logging measurements taken when walls of the bore- porosity-sonic interval transit time crossplots
hole are enlarged may be unreliable. Also, the DST would provide the necessary information. In
tool might not be dislodged. addition, a mineral identification ("MID") plot
Because the well is a wildcat, you made a decision (apparent matrix density, RHOmaa, vs. apparent
several weeks ago to core the Mission Canyon. The matrix traveltime, DTmaa) and an M-N litholo-
Mission Canyon is at approximately 9297 ft to 9409 ft. gy plot would test the proposition that the rock
Rock was cored from 9302 ft to 9358 ft. Twenty-five is composed of more than two significant miner-
feet of oil-stained, fractured, microcrystalline dolo- als. Also, neutron-density crossplot porosity can
mite was recovered; the remaining core consisted of be estimated from the neutron-density crossplot.
microcrystalline limestone and anhydrite. After cor- This quantity (shown in the crossplots as PHIE,
ing, several drill-stem tests were tried; when none effective porosity) will be used in later calcula-
were successful, drilling was resumed. tions.
You decided that information from coring is favor-
• To confüm the estímate of formation water sat-
able enough to halt drilling, to log to the top of the fish
uration (Rw) several methods could be used.
while hole conditions seem still to be reasonably good,
Apparent water resistivity (Rwa) generally is de-
and then to assess the potential of the Mission Canyon
pendable, but in this case the most useful
Lag lnterpretation Case Studies 181
Table 10.3a. Case Study 2: Mission Canyon Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Raw data work table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for·volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 40ºF Rw (measured): (not given)
Total Depth: 11,122 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.023 ohm-m@ 207°F
Bottom Hole Temp: (thetmometer failed) Rmf (measured): 0.046 ohm-m@ 74ºF
Formation Depth: 9,300 ft Rmf@fm. temp.: 0.017 ohm-m@ 207ºF
Formation Temperature: 207ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 47.6 µsec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 185 µsec/ft
RHO matrix: 2.71 g/cm3 RHO fluid: 1.1 g/cm3
PHIN fluid: 1
1 a: 1 1 m:2 1 n: 2
182 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
Table l 0.3a. Case Study 2: Mission Canyon Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Raw data work table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for-volume decimal fraction. (Cont'd.)
Raw data
Depth ILD ILS MSFL DT DPHI NPHI
feet ohm-m ohm-m ohm-m µsec/ft v/v decimal v/v decimal
9,310 26 20.5 1.2 63 0.090 0.260
9,322
9,326 17 8.3 3.8 53.5 0.030 0.120
9,332 9 6.1 2.4 58 0.050 0.140
9,335
9,347
9,353
9,362
9,367 22 16 8.8 52.5 -0.015 0.125
9,373 11 7.7 3.5 53.5 0.000 0.155
9,376
9,383
9,387
9,398
9,406 5.1 3.5 2.2 55 0.030 0.150
Table l 0.3b. Case Study 2: Mission Canyon Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Work table far determination of lithology. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for-volume decimal fraction.
Lithology Calculations
Depth RHOB PhiNDxpt RHOmaa PhiNSxpt DTmaa
feet g/cm 3 v/v decimal g/cm 3 v/v decimal µsec/ft M N
9,310 2.57 0.170 2.865 0.145 42.3 0.833 0.505
9,322
9,326 2.66 0.075 2.788 0.065 44.4 0.842 0.563
9,332 2.63 0.095 2.790 0.090 45.4 0.830 0.562
9,335
9,347
9,353
9,362
9,367 2.73 0.060 2.838 0.060 44.0 0.811 0.535
9,373 2.71 0.085 2.860 0.070 43.6 0.817 0.525
9,376
9,383
9,387
9,398
9,406 2.66 0.090 2.816 0.075 44.5 0.832 0.544
Lag lnterpretotion Cose Studies 183
Table 10.3c. Case Study 2: Mississippion Mission Conyon Formotion, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Work table far colculotion of water soturotion ond other estimators. The symbol "v/v"
indicotes volume-for-volume decimal froction.
-
0.2
- - - - - - -LLD
- - - - - - - -2000
ohm-m -
GR LLS
o API 100
0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -º¡;;;,:;;; - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2000
Feet
CALI
MD MSFL
6 inches
16 0.2 ohm-m 2000
-
f--+~~0---+--~--+---+----i<-----~----~~--· --- __ ¡ __,___
--- ! ---
1---.,,..._.__+--+1-- ---- - --
!---•--•--~-V---'---+--+--
-+-- --l-- ----- - ~.:_
1--- , ____ ---- 1---- --¡t¡ -~
f----l---\,cl----fr--+---1---+---+- - ------
:-----
1- -+--
,. !-J ·---1---•-i-¡- ' ,____
---
- '""'
:::::::::L
¡:::¡::~, ~l J=::__-¡ -J I< - ,
:l· ..__•
--,--¡
;-- :--
' ::::::;-::::::i-::::::
F::-r-::r ,; ,,______
l----+----'\---1/---+---I--- 1---+---i--+ -
·-
r.::..-.¡,;_ --------
---1- ;_ j ~- !---1- ·l::t ·--------
___ ,___ 1-1 _, b;::=::-
---
•-t_j:J:I+ +-------: --- ¡--
-~
r-·"'\t::·--- ---+ :-----
':~---!·-+
·-_::Li 1' 3,=;;;--- ••-: ,.._ , __
·+----- ·-----
·---i 1+ - J-., 1--- +-- -,--:-- '.-' i----
r+
~~t
¡· 11::::::
i--'-
,_,_ , _______ ,____ ,J+t , _______
+--
-H '!°""-= .... H+
1--+-- "-----:...,.1-cl-l"'--- i--
,_
!------
----- - ~ -
~--
- ;:::
-L
--i ---- -
1--
--·--· ----¡------¡------
t::J:
j----t-
ri
n +-- :--:- Lf:
~ ;e.e; i' ·'
1------
~--
i---- -
1=1~ ,____
--- --
,__________
,___
,__
__, ___ -'-,-
,_________
!=r j:i ,__ ~
1
L::t-:-;
j..
-- -- ,_ •------ :--1--- ¡¡ , ________
,_______
j--- ;·;-- ¡-~ '-' ,-----
¡ --
Hi ---
:=e_¡_ '::<:>... :-::::::!:.: •:: H ,____ ¡-;-
·-------
9400
, ___
-
i---L
,¡
f::t
j-----
e----¡~
q- :fH
+ H
1-:::::t·
1--- ¡ ____ , __
,----L..
-
Ej ¡¡· -
·--------
1- ----
..... .. - ,, ,..
Figure 10.7. Dual laterolog·MSFL with gamma ray log and caliper log, Mission Canyon Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.
From 9308 ft to 9408 ft: Note the separation of the three resistivity logs, which read the following resistivities: lowest resistivity, MSFL (Rx0),
intermediate resistivity, LLS (R¡), and highest resistivity, LLD (R1). On a Dual Laterolog·MSFL this type of resistivity profile indicates presence of
hydrocarbons (see Chapter 1).
Log lnterpretotion Cose Studies 185
-------º~~Q _____ _
-0.05 g/cm3 0.45
GR DPHI
0---API ---100 Feet 0.45 v/v decimal -0.15
CALI MD
6 menes 16 Figure l 0.8. Combinotion neutron·
;...... ~
¡.-.+.. : .....1. ,.....
density log with gamma roy log and
'-·
:-·· ;,..c. k .•
-:---· .....
-+-·· , ,....
i···· ...... coliper log, Mission Conyon Formotion,
9300
~-· LL
' ·- ..
•...... ' • • · ·
~
•····· c...,, ¡.... ! --·· porosity than the density log, indicoting
-
\.
+·~ i··~ ..... ..... ....
···•·
.......
thot the rock is dolomite.
...
......
--
!s::-1=~ - --
¡ .....
i··- ~··
..... .....
...•...
·=- ..'.(. ,\ .. =
..
-- ..
.. ,..... .
;.........•..¡
~ ..... , ...
r=-.:L~~ -· ..... - ·
¡,,,
- · - '-·· ,_
~-
; ......
,_ ~
... , .....
; ...
~ ./.. ; .. ·- !-··
"'"' ~ ·~·
,.._
; ....
,:r:; !·······-· · - -·-
¡:..+. . . ;
i+ -l==t=
GR
0- - -API
100 Feet
CALI
MD DT
6 inches 16 us/ft 40 Figure 10.9. Sonic log with
gamma roy log and coliper log, Mission
- . . . . . . . . . . . .1 -. . . . . . . . ¡ ·i Conyon Formation, Williston Bosin,
9300
.::·'i'--•.¡..·-C\-- i · --· :~:::.: ~.::. · ' " ' ,......
..' '_,..····· ~·!--:...==~~:- f:l:"" ...
···+··-1 ... •··· ·:~·t:. ····" ,_ ...
U.S.A.
' - · A · . J . ....¡ c_~-r=-~>·-----·->-----~ w·-- ·-- - - ----- -- -- ,__ "•w·'--w-••
From 9308 ft to 9408 ft, note thot
•.. ..•. i · · · " · · · zones of porous rock ore numerous .
' -¡--- --- -~-~~-
(They ore indicoted by increose of
wn
interval tronsit time in trocks 2
ond 3.)
1
'--•-oic·-l-·i·-+··+··i
· ·•· - · ;.c
!-··-1~...... -\,.....f·· -1·-· e- !··.. +-+--!
,..... .<: r,· ···· ,_ ···-+·-1--+···:· ..·1
¡.... , - -
,,. ,
..... ;..••.;... ·~·-1
··•····+··.-·i··~c--~; -~·-·
F=~ j··'·· ~-
•-+-···~•-1~,_, __ ,.. ,....,.... r·· 9400
í-+-+- -"".•""'-..·'·~¡···· l....+-··1-·I
,_ .f_., .... f..~,·-·1-~·- ..·I
186 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Case Study 2: curves were not separated you could conclude that
either the f01mation wasn't invaded, or that hydrocar-
MISSISSIPPIAN MISSION CANYON FORMATION, bons were not present.)
WILLISTON BASIN, U.S.A.: Also, note that the zones of porous rock low in the
fo1mation (9370 ft to 9409 ft) show less separation
The Solution. between the MSFL and the deep laterolog, LLD. The
lessening of separation in the lower zones indicates
Information from the logs and cores produced the higher water saturations. (Remember: Higher water
following positive indicators: (1) 25 ft of oil-stained saturations mean lower hydrocarbon saturations.)
core, (2) porous zones, indicated on the neutron-densi- Porous and permeable zones in the interval from
ty and sonic logs, and (3) separation of curves on resis- 9308 ft to 9409 ft are identified by inspecting the neu-
tivity logs, indicative of invasion in the porous zones. tron-density log (Figure 10.8) and the sonic log (Fig-
The information also produced this negative indicator: ure 10.9); more than eleven zones of porous and per-
evidence that water saturation is greater in the lower meable rock can be identified. On the neutron-density
part of the logged interval. log (Figure 10.8), the zones of porosity and perme-
In this case, there is no significant conflicting infor- ability are evident as concurrent increase in neutron
mation; all information points to the presence of porosity (NPHI) and density porosity (DPHI). They
hydrocarbons in the rock. Therefore, the task is com- are identified on the sonic log by increase in the inter-
posed of two parts: (1) to assess the quality of the logs val transit time (DT).
and of the well site processing, so that a confident esti-
mate of the oil in place can be made, and then (2) to lnformation lrom crossplots
judge whether the Mission Canyon is a reservoir that
will produce oil and gas in volumes sufficient for a As evaluation of the Mission Canyon continues,
suitable return on investment. you decide to compare your observations of the core
lithologies with inferences about lithology, derived
from log data. Study of the core indicates that the rock
lnformation lrom the logs is microcrystalline dolomite, limestone and anhydrite.
The log package run in this well is complete; it To compare this information with log data, construct a
includes a suite for measurement of resistivity, and a neutron-density porosity crossplot, a neutron-sonic
combination neutron-density log and a sonic log for porosity crossplot, a matrix identification plot, and an
measurement of porosity and estimation of lithology. M-N lithology plot. (Ordinarily only one or two of the
Because walls of the borehole have caved, your crossplots described here would be created, but all are
assessment begins with a careful check of the caliper discussed here for experience in learning.) On the
curve, CALI (Figure 10.8). The caliper log shows rel- basis of observations from the logs, you divide the
atively constant hole diameter and no significant, dif- zone into two intervals on the crossplots: the "Upper
ferential enlargement. Consistency of the hole diame- MC," from 9308 ft to 9370 ft, and the "Lower MC,"
ter indicates that log measurements should be reliable. from 9370 ft to 9409 ft.
The next step in evaluation includes examination of The first crossplot is a neutron-density crossplot
the resistivity logs (Figure 10.7). The salt-saturated (Figure 10.10). It is consistent with the core descrip-
drilling mud (Rm¡ ~ Rw) necessitated using a dual lat- tion, showing a mixture of lithologies ranging from
erolog with a microspherically focused log (MSFL). limestone to dolomite. The scatter of rock types in the
The MSFL measures resistivity of the flushed zone crossplot is more than the rock types described in the
(Rx 0 ), whereas the shallow laterolog (LLS) and deep core, because the limits of vertical resolution of the
laterolog (LLD) measure resistivities of the invaded logging tools introduce averaging ("smearing") of
(R¡) and uninvaded (R 1) zones, respectively. lithologic effects on signals, especially among thin
Next, scrutinize the resistivity curves to identify beds. From Figure 10.10, neutron-density crossplot
invasion profiles; they are useful for location of zones porosity (PhiNDxpt) can be estimated; it is determined
that merit detailed analysis. from the location of each point with respect to the
Between 9308 ft and 9409 ft, the resistivity curves porosity indications on each lithology line. These
(MSFL, LLS, and LLD) show different values of R XO> numbers will be used to construct a Pickett plot, to
R¡, and R1; the curves are separated. The separation calculate apparent water resistivity (Rwa), and to esti-
suggests that the rock is invaded, and that hydrocar- mate water saturation (Sw). Neutron-density crossplot
bons are in the porous and permeable zones. (If the porosity also will be used to calculate apparent matrix
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 187
density, RHOmaa, for use in a matrix identification water resistivity is a Pickett plot (Figure 10.15). The
plot. deep laterolog (LLD) is used for plotting resistivity
The second crossplot is a neutron-sonic crossplot along the X-axis. Neutron-density crossplot porosity
(Figure 10.11). It too is consistent with core data, (PHIE: "effective porosity"), is plotted on the Y-axis.
showing scatter of points between the limestone and The water-bearing line-drawn through the lower part
dolomite lines. Neutron-sonic crossplot porosity of the lowest cluster of points-estimates formation
(PhiNSxpt) can be estimated in the same manner as water resistivity (Rw) to be 0.023 ohm-m, in agreement
neutron-density crossplot porosity was estimated; it with the published value. From the slope of the R 0
will be used to calculate apparent matrix density, line-the line signifying that water saturation is
DTmaa, one of the variables in the matrix identifica- 100%-data on the Pickett plot also indicate that the
tion plot. cementation exponent (m) is 2.
The third crossplot augments results of the first As discussed previously, deep induction resistivity
two. In the matrix identification (MID) plot (Figure of the stratigraphic section from 9370 ft to 9409 ft is
10.12) apparent matrix density and apparent matrix less than that of the upper Mission Canyon (Figure
traveltime (estimated from Figures 10.10 and 10.11, 10.7). The likelihood of production of water from stra-
and Equations 10.21 and 10.22) are used to display a ta at 9370 ft to 9409 ft also is indicated by evidence
complex model of the rock. Figure 10.12 shows that from the Pickett crossplot (Figure 10.15). Most data
most of the points are of limes tone or dolomite (or a points that show water saturations greater than 0.75
mixture) with fewer points that tend slightly toward (75%) are of the "Lower MC" zone.
anhydrite. Saturation lines on the Pickett plot (Figure 10.15)
The fourth crossplot is the M-N plot (Figure 10.13). are based on the saturation exponent (n) of 2.
Like the MID plot, it is a complex model of lithology, At this juncture in your evaluation of the Mission
based on the plotting of two calculated parameters, M, Canyon from 9308 ft to 9409 ft, you have reason to be
a function of sonic and bulk density, and N, a function optimistic about the potential of the well. The interval
of bulk density and neutron porosity (Equations 10.23 shows evidence of porosity and invasion, it comprises
and 10.24). The M-N plot (Figure 10.13) shows that interbedded permeable strata and "tight" strata, and
the Mission Canyon Formation consists of limestone the rock type, dolomite, generally is a good reservoir.
and dolomite. However, you should be concemed about whether
Calculations to determine porosities, apparent completion of the lower Mission Canyon should be
matrix values, and M and N are based on raw log data attempted, especially from 9370 ft to 9409 ft. The well
shown in Table 10.4a. Porosities, apparent matrix den- site log calculation, the diminished separation of resis-
sity, matrix interval transit time, and the lithology- tivity curves with depth, and high water saturations on
dependent variables M and N are shown in Table the Pickett crossplot (Figure 10.15) all strongly sup-
10.4b. port your judgment that fluid from the lower Mission
The next step is to verify the estímate of formation Canyon will not be water-free. How much water these
water resistivity. Although a single method usually is zones will produce, relative to oil, is not known.
sufficient, two are shown here for aid in leaming. The In order to support the decision to not perforate the
methods are described in detail in Chapter 7. The first lower Mission Canyon, a bulk-volume-water (BVW)
method is calculation of Rwa (apparent water resistivi- crossplot is constructed (Figure 10.16). On the bulk-
ty) from the LLD and neutron-density crossplot poros- volume-water plot, data points above 0.035 are mostly
ity (Equation 10.25). As shown in the Solution Table from porosity zones of the lower Mission Canyon;
(Table 10.4c) the two lowest values of Rwm hence the these zones are not at irreducible water saturation, and
best estimates of Rw, are 0.033 ohm-m (at 9387 ft) and they will produce sorne water.
0.041 ohm-m (at 9406 ft). These numbers are only a The positions of data points on a bulk-volume-
bit higher than the reported Rw of 0.023 ohm-m. The water crossplot can indicate differences in types of
difference could be due to the manner in which logs carbonate-rock porosity. Points that are below 0.035
were read, the effects of properties of adjacent beds on generally represent rock with vuggy porosity, with
log readings, orto residual hydrocarbons. Rwa also is sorne intercrystalline porosity (Table 7 .1).
presented in a log format (Figure 10.14), plotted in the One of the last log evaluation procedures is finding
same logarithmic track as the deep laterolog, LLD. In values for the moveable hydrocarbon index (MHI), for
sorne cases, Rwa plotted in this format allows for a bet- moveable oil saturation (MOS), and for residual-oil
ter estímate of Rw· saturation (ROS). Most of the moveable hydrocarbon
The second method to approximate formation- index values are less than 0.7, and these are concen-
188 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
trated in the upper Mission Canyon (Table 10.4c); so estimated recovery of oil from the Mission Canyon
oil in these beds is moveable. Moveability of oil also Formation is 376,650 stock-tank batTels (STB) (Equa-
is apparent from the high values of moveable oil satu- tion 10.8). This number is based on the following
ration and low values of residual oil saturation (Table parameters:
10.4c). • drainage area = 160 acres;
A log of water saturation, porosity, and bulk vol-
• reservoir thickness = 28 ft;
ume water is shown in Figure 10.17.
Your log evaluation of this well has been uncom- • average porosity = 0.11 (11 %);
monly detailed. In part, the extensive evaluation was • average water saturation = 0.49 (49%);
necessary; the well is a wildcat well, and visual • recovery factor = 0.20; and
inspection of logs of the lower Mission Canyon sug-
• B 0 ¡ (estimated) = 1.35.
gested that water would be produced. Fortunately,
because of the log package used for this well a large The Mission Canyon Formation was perforated
amount of data was available for analysis. selectively from 9308 ft to 9357 ft. After a light acid
Rather early in the evaluation the fact was apparent clean-up, the well's production was 569 batTels of oil
that the data seemed to support a decision to set pipe. per day (BOPD), 31 baITels of water a day (BWPD),
Nevertheless, to know the cotTect interval for perforat- and 700,000 cubic feet of gas per day (700 mcfgpd);
ing was important, so that production of water could the gas/oil ratio was 1230:1. During the first five
be minimized. months the well produced 56,495 baITels of oil and
Por the gross interval from 9308 ft to 9357 ft, the 5,802 batTels of water.
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 189
Table l 0.4a. Case Study 2: Mission Canyon Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Raw data solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 40ºF Rw (measured): ohm-m@ ºF
Total Depth: 11,122 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.023 ohm-m@ 207ºF
Bottom Role Temp: (thermometer failed) Rmf (measured): 0.46 ohm-m@ 74ºF
Formation Depth: 9 ,300 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.017 ohm-m@ 207ºF
Formation Temperature: 207ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 47.6 µsec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 185 usec/ft
RHO matrix: 2.71 g/cm3 RHO fluid: 1.1 g/cm3
PHIN fluid: 1
1 a: 1 lm: 2 1n:2
Raw data
Depth ILD ILS MSFL DT DPHI NPHI
feet ohm-m ohm-m ohm-m µsec/ft v/v decimal v/v decimal
9,310 26 20.5 1.2 63 0.090 0.260
9,322 18 10 5.7 52 0.020 0.060
9,326 17 8.3 3.8 53.5 0.030 0.120
9,332 9 6.1 2.4 58 0.050 0.140
9,335 32 6.8 13 52.5 0.035 0.085
9,347 4.8 2.4 0.8 61.5 0.100 0.230
9,353 4.7 2.3 1.6 61.5 0.045 0.250
9,362 40 17 11 53 -0.015 0.135
9,367 22 16 8.8 52.5 -0.015 0.125
9,373 11 7.7 3.5 53.5 0.000 0.155
9,376 5.1 3.3 2.1 57.5 0.075 0.165
9,383 3.3 1.5 1.2 62 0.090 0.220
9,387 3.3 1.5 1.3 62 0.080 0.135
9,398 6.4 3.2 2.2 58 0.055 0.135
9,406 5.1 3.5 2.2 55 0.030 0.150
190 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 10.4b. Case Study 2: Mission Canyon Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Work table far determination of lithology. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction.
Lithology Calculations
Depth RHOB PhiNDxpt RHOmaa PhiNSxpt DTmaa
feet g/cm 3 v/v decimal g/cm 3 v/v decimal µsec/ft M N
9,310 2.57 0.170 2.865 0.145 42.3 0.833 0.505
9,322 2.68 0.040 2.744 0.035 47.2 0.843 0.596
9,326 2.66 0.075 2.788 0.065 44.4 0.842 0.563
9,332 2.63 0.095 2.790 O.ü90 45.4 0.830 0.562
9,335 2.65 0.055 2.744 0.075 41.8 0.853 0.589
9,347 2.55 0.160 2.825 0.125 43.9 0.852 0.531
9,353 2.64 0.140 2.888 0.130 43.0 0.803 0.488
9,362 2.73 0.065 2.848 0.065 43.8 0.808 0.529
9,367 2.73 0.060 2.838 0.060 44.0 0.811 0.535
9,373 2.71 0.085 2.860 O.ü70 43.6 0.817 0.525
9,376 2.59 0.120 2.792 0.095 44.1 0.856 0.561
9,383 2.57 0.150 2.824 0.125 44.4 0.840 0.532
9,387 2.58 0.100 2.746 0.105 47.6 0.830 0.584
9,398 2.62 0.090 2.772 0.090 45.4 0.835 0.569
9,406 2.66 0.090 2.816 0.075 44.5 0.832 0.544
Table l 0.4c. Case Study 2: Mission Canyon Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Calculations far solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for-volume decimal fraction.
¡:e¡
o
~
¡:.::: 2.60
~
.~
.,
e/)
;:l
¡::¡
:::1;:l
¡:e¡
2.80
3.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Neutron Porosity, NPHI
e UpperMC
o LowerMC
·3
~
o
()
<
Figure 1O.12. Matrix identification plot, Mission Canyon 2.60 r·····-- ········--······ ·· .....................
Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.: Values far apparent matrix
density (RHOmaa) and apparent matrix traveltime (DT moa)
were recorded from Figure 10.1 Oand Figure 10.11. Two
mineral triangles are shown: quartz-calcite-dolomite, and calcite-
dolomite-anhydrite. Scatter of points in the plot suggests that
most of the rock is a mixture of calcite and dolomite.
2.701
1
·-········ 1· 1 o
1 j o ºo
2
J 1;
... =~~ilif
,_... ,
~
"'"' lle • •
1 , ..
Dolomite
11
2.90 ¡··· .. . . ..
1
3.001.... -···
40 45 50 55
• UpperMC
o LowerMC
Quartz
•
0.80
0.75
0.70······--···· ---~----·······--~---·······--·······--······--····················'··--······---·····'
9400
1.00 .,.._
... ~~
' ..
.N
p., 1''
%••• •3'•,.::
,
'-...
'· .~'
;;:; ~ i•
·~
o... I":~ .,.,,; ¡.,.
¡e:¡,~ ~" •
o
o..
0.10 ..... u
.::O~¡;l-!a =
.;.•
. "
~~ ... '
'C" ~
O)
!';.. I• l!a
·Eu ..... r:...
~
<.¡..<
r.LI ~.,~
"'' NI
'
lllJ - i't. r-
~ !'e '
"
~ ¡-...,!e'°',~
• to-
11
~~
0.01
0.10 1.00 10 100
Deep Resistivity, LLD
• UpperMC
o LowerMC
194 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
0.80
0.60
mi9 c:r¡ o
~
. •:-•
... Q:¡ ..•
·· ·:. ..
:
0.40 -- -----· ~- --~-·
~
• ••
••
0.20
• •
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Porosity, PHIE
• UpperMC
o LowerMC
~
plotted in track l with the gamma --.__,
ray log.
9300
Resistivity of rock at l 00% water -·· r>
saturation (Ro) is plotted in track 2,
with the deep laterolog. Separation of --
the two curves (shaded) indicates
hydrocorbons in the rock. '- -
Track 3 shows water saturation (Sw),
effective porosity (PHIE), and bulk
volume water (BVW). The dork shaded
orea between the porosity curve (left·
-
~
-
hand) and the bulk·volume·water curve
indicates the proportion of pare space
that is occupied by hydrocorbons,
whereas the light shaded orea between
'~
the bulk·volume-water curve and the
>
right morgin of the track (scale value of e
zero) indicates the proportion that is - -
m
-
occupied by water. OiffCal is the
differential caliper (caliper minus bit
size). Negative values indicate the -
presence of mudcake.
~
r•-
~
.~
R 9400
Lag lnterpretation Case Studies 195
l
15.4 lbs/gal, to confine the gas within the formation.
When drilling operations were resumed, gas continued
to cut the mud; mud weight was 15.4 lbs/gal going into PHIS = 11t lag -11t mo X -1
the hole and 15.2 lbs/gal coming out. Also, the mud [ Mfl -Mma Cp
10.26
logger's chromatograph maintained about 100 units of
gas, even when the well was deepened beyond the where:
zone of initial gas show. C _ 11ts" XC
p- 100
196 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
l::itma = 55.5 µsec/ft for Wilcox sandstones in this Tasks required far interpretation of the logs
province
l::itfl = 189 µsec/ft Eleven depths (or points) within the Wilcox sand-
l::itsh = 116 µsec/ft stone interval are selected, in the interval from 10,925
C=l ft to 10,982 ft. Depths are picked on the basis of an
Because the sonic log is strongly affected by gas, cor- approximately even distribution through the interval
rection of sonic porosity is necessary. being evaluated.
Table 10.5 is designed to assist you with your work.
~Sgascarrected = 0.7 X ~S 10.27 Sorne of the log values have been recorded, to guide
you in reading the log and completing the array of
data.
As you approach this problem, think about the
parameters and calculations necessary to determine
porosity and water saturation. Also, consider sorne of
the plots done in the first two case studies that may
help you understand the formation better.
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 197
Table 10.5. Case Study 3: Eocene Wilcox sandstone, Gulf Coast, U.S.A.: Work table. Depths in italics indicate data from the lower part of the Wilcox, the "B" zone. The symbol "v/v"
indicates volume-for·volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 80ºF Rw (measured): (not given)
Total Depth: 12,186 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.022 ohm-m@ 260ºF
Bottom Hole Temp: 280ºF Rmf (measured): 0.77 ohm-m@ 70ºF
Formation Depth: 10,950 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.222 ohm-m@ 260ºF
Formation Temperature: 260ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 55.5 µsec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 189 µsec/ft
DT shale: 116 µsec/ft Compaction C01Tection, Cp: 1.16
1 a: 0.62 1 m: 2.15 1 n: 2
Data
Depth IL SN DT PHIS Phia
feet ohm-m ohm-m µsec/ft v/v decimal v/v decimal
10,925 1.8 3.1 88 0.210 0.147
10,930
10,935
10,942
10,947 2.3 4.0 91 0.229 0.160
10,954
10,960
10,966 1.0 2.5 96 0.262 0.183
10,970 0.8 2.5 95 0.255 0.179
10,974
10,978
Calculations
Depth Rwa Swa Sxo BVW
feet ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal
10,925 0.047 0.684 >1.0 0.101
10,930
10,935
10,942
10,947 0.073 0.550 >1.0 0.088
10,954
10,960
10,966 0.042 0.725 >1.0 0.133
10,970 0.032 0.832 >1.0 0.149
10,974
10,978
198 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Rwa IL
o- - - - - - -;;h;;;_;;- - - - - - -oJ 0.2 - - -ohm-m- - -20
Feet
SP SN DT
-80 mV 20 MD 0.2 ohm-m 20 150 us/ft 50
[fJ / '
' ,___
e
- ,__ , __
µi1~~
---~
' !-·-
,___
~ ·--- ,
,
- !!---- ,.
--- -
'
1-· 1------
' J
- ~E~ '--- l------
- 1--- 1-·--
~
•----
-
L--·
;~. L_.
-
~
- ' ----
-:-- \
___
r=r~~;=€
,
,....._
-- f---- ·--~ -·---- ,____
11000
. ' ·--j
~- i-+--1:·-+:- "··--·~
', ;.
Figure 10.18. lnduction electric lag with SP lag, sanie lag, and Rwa curve, Wilcox sandstone, Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Note:
(1) In the upper part of the Wilcox (l O, 923 to l O, 958 ft), deflection of the Rwa quick-look curve (track l) to the right, opposite
general deflection of the SP curve. The deflection indicates the presence of oil or gas. Based on the mudlogger's report, gas is
present.
(2) In track 2, increase of resistivity in the upper part of the Wilcox (l O, 923 to l O, 958 ft). lncrease of resistivity also indicates the
presence of gas.
(3) In the lower part of the Wilcox (l O, 958 to l O, 982 ft), low resistivities and deflection of the Rwa curve to the left indicate a
probable water·bearing zone.
Lag lnterpretotion Cose Studies 199
deflection of the Rwa curve means higher water 10.6). From independent evidence, Rw of the Wilcox in
saturation. These observations alert you that the this province is known to be 0.022 ohm-m; therefore,
lower zone may be water productive. the log-derived value indicates that hydrocarbons
probably are in the interval, although not as much as
In order to establish whether the lower Wilcox zone
are in the overlying part of the Wilcox.
would produce water, you decide that a rather detailed
A Pickett crossplot (Figure 10.19; see also Chapter
log evaluatíon is necessary. The evaluation will
7) of deep-induction log resistivities (IL) versus cor-
include use of the Rwa quick-look curve, a Pickett rected sonic porosity (Phia) (i.e., porosity coITected
crossplot (to verify the value of Rw estimated from
for gas effect ) shows a water-saturated sandstone line
Rwa• and to estímate water saturations), water satura-
constructed with an Rw of 0.022 ohm-m. Water satura-
tions calculated from the Archie equatíon, and a cross-
tíons range from about 90% to less than 50%. Water
plot for estimation of bulk volume water. The follow-
saturations greater than 75% are from samples of the
ing calculations will be needed:
lower Wilcox B zone. This supports your suspicions
• Gas-coffected sonic porosity, from Equatíons about the potential for water production from the
10.26 and 10.27, for use in the Pickett plot, and lower Wilcox B.
for calculation of Sw and Sxo by the Archie equa- Compare bulk volume water and water saturations
tion. of the upper part, "A," and lower part, "B ," of the
• Sw, and Sxo• to calculate moveable oíl saturatíon Wilcox sandstone (Figure 10.20). The lower bulk-vol-
(MOS), bulk volume water (BVW), and the ume-water values and lower water saturations of the
moveable hydrocarbon index (MHI). Wilcox A indicate that only the Wilcox A is above a
Note that the short normal resistivity (SN) will be gas/water transition zone. Most of the bulk-volume-
used to calculate Sxo· The short normal curve actually water values that are much greater than 0.1 (Figure
measures resistivity of the invaded zone (R¡), and in 10.20) are in the Wilcox B, from 10,958 to 10,982 ft
the strictest sense, water saturation calculated from (Figure 10.18; Table 10.6). In this interval, the volume
200 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 10.6. Case Study 3: Eocena Wilcox sandstone, Gulf Coas! U.S.A.: Solution table. Depths in italics indicate data from the lower part of the Wilcox, the "B" zone. The symbol "v/v"
indicates volume·for·volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 80ºF Rw (measured): (not given)
Total Depth: 12,186 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.022 ohm-m@ 260ºF
Bottom Hole Temp: 280ºF Rmf (measured): 0.77 ohm-m@ 70ºF
Formation Depth: 10,950 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.222 ohm-m@ 260ºF
Formation Temperature: 260ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 55.5 µsec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 189 µsec/ft
DT shale: 116 µsec/ft Compaction Correction, Cp: 1.16
1 a: 0.62 1 m: 2.15 1 n: 2
Data
Depth IL SN DT PHIS Phi a
feet ohm-m ohm-m µsec/ft v/v decimal v/v decimal
10,925 1.8 3.1 88 0.210 0.147
10,930 1.3 3.0 98 0.274 0.192
10,935 1.8 3.0 96 0.262 0.183
10,942 1.5 3.2 97 0.268 0.188
10,947 2.3 4.0 91 0.229 0.160
10,954 1.3 3.1 100 0.287 0.201
10,960 1.1 2.9 94 0.249 0.174
10,966 1.0 2.5 96 0.262 0.183
10,970 0.8 2.5 95 0.255 0.179
10,974 0.8 2.2 93 0.242 0.170
10,978 0.9 2.1 92 0.236 0.165
Calculations
Depth Rwa Swa Sxo BVW
feet ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal
10,925 0.047 0.684 >1.0 0.101
10,930 0.060 0.603 >1.0 0.116
10,935 0.075 0.540 >1.0 0.099
10,942 0.066 0.576 >1.0 0.108
10,947 0.073 0.550 >1.0 0.088
10,954 0.067 0.574 >1.0 0.116
10,960 0.041 0.730 >1.0 0.127
10,966 0.042 0.725 >1.0 0.133
10,970 0.032 0.832 >1.0 0.149
10,974 0.029 0.864 >1.0 0.146
10,978 0.030 0.854 >1.0 0.141
Log lnterpretotion Cose Studies 203
1.00
Figure 1O.19. Pickett crossplot of resistivity, IL, versus
porosity from the sonic log, corrected for gas effect (Phia),
Eocene Wilcox sondstone, Gulf Coost, U.S.A.
Soturotion lines ore placed on the bosis of Rw = 0.022 ohm·m
o:l
ot formotion temperoture; owidely occepted volue for the
:.a
p.,
Wilcox in this oreo.
~
.;!l
h
o
P.
o
·ao 0.10
"'
"O
"'
tl
"'
h
h
o
'?
"'o:l
o
0.01
0.10 10 100
Induction log, IL
• Lower Wilcox A
o Lower Wilcox B
1.00
Figure 10.20. Bulk volume water crossplot (opporent
porosity, Phi vs. water soturotion, Swal, Eocene Wilcox
sondstone, Gulf Coost, U.S.A.
0.80 Bulk·volume·woter volues (BVW) plotted obove the 0.1
hyperbolic line ore from somples of the lower ("B") port of the
Wilcox sondstone; in this port of the reservoir the volume of
pore water is greoter thon irreducible water soturotion.
0.20
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Gas -conected sonic porosity, Phia
r-~~~~~~~~
• Lower Wilcox A
o Lower Wilcox B
204 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
SP BVW
-80 mV 20 Feet
0.25 v/v decimal
-------~F~-------
0 ohm-m O.l
MD
10900
11000
Figure l 0.21. Camputer-processed interpretation, Eacene Wilcox sandstane, Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Track 1 shows the SP curve andan Rwa curve calculated from the inductian curve, IL.
Track 2 shows the inductian lag, L.
1
Track 3 shows Archie water saturation, Swa, calculated from gas-corrected sanie porosity from the sanie lag (Phia) and bulk valume water
(BVW). The dork shaded orea between the porasity curve (ieft-hand) and the bulk-valume-water curve indicates the propartian af pare space
that is accupied by gas, whereas the light shaded orea between the bulk-valume-water curve and the right morgin af the track (scale value af
zero) indicates the propartian that is accupied by water.
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 20S
Well site information and other pertinent information: Tasks required far interpretation of the logs
• Rm¡ = 0.527 ohm-m at T¡ The key variable in dete1mining whether this well
• Rw = 0.11 ohm-m at T¡(a questioned value) will be successful is the estimated effect of water. You
• T¡= 130ºF have an estímate of Rw (shown above), but its accura-
cy is questioned and the estímate is regarded as being
• Archie parameters: a= 0.81; m = n = 2
unreliable. You will need to determine Rw befare cal-
• surface temperature = 70ºF culating water saturation (Sw); use the SP log and
Volumetric recoverable oil reserves are calculated charts (see "Formation Water Resistivity (Rw), Deter-
from the following parameters: mination," Chapter 2, or Equations 10.34 and 10.35,
• drainage area = 160 acres; above). Also, you may want to calculate Rwa to cor-
roborate the estimate of Rw from the SP curve.
• 1.3;
Boi =
Use the upper Morrow Sandstone log evaluation
• recovery factor (RF) = 0.15; table (Table 10.7) to complete the evaluation.
206 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 10.7. Case Study 4: Upper Morrow Sandstone, Anadarko Basin, U.S.A.: work table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for·volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 70ºF Rw (measured): (not given)
Total Depth: 8,007 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.140 ohm-m@ 130ºF
Bottom Role Temp: 135ºF Rmf (measured): (not given)
Formation Depth: 7,441 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.527 ohm-m@ 130ºF
Formation Temperature: 130ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 55.5 µsec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 189 µsec/ft
la: 0.81 lm: 2 In: 2
CILD
1000 S/m o
IL
Feet
O - - ---;,hm-m - - - 50
SP SN
MD o ohm-m 50
1 :---- __ J_____
----1---- ------
·{: ---
-, --+--
7400 "---- ----
·--1 :-----
-----:---- ·------+-----· J_ -----· ,___ ,
r
'- '-+- :J=-=t.:-~ :----
_! -- ------- ----- --!--- :---
----- f-._,,.,
, /_ __
-+-+-- ---- :--- '"""' :---
~-
-----
-¡ :-----
:; r'"'
----- i:.7
'''-._
:----- - -:-;;-
~=E
" ~- '"'
, _____
--~ --- ---
--- :-~
'----- """
1/
-- '"
----- ----
-1-' ---
' ___ !""-
--:---- -- , ___ """
""
-----
----
- ---
--· :"'
1
7500
1,! l".:-t::--- , ___ _¡ ____ ,----- -----
-+- l=•-r= ';--"--
\
,:_,,,,J"'""
Figure 10.22. lnduction electric lag with spontaneous potential, upper Morrow Sandstone, Anadorko Basin, U.S.A.
Note:
1. Deflection of the SP curve leftword in trock 1, away from the shale baseline (7 441 to 7452 ft), opposite the upper Morrow
Sandstone.
2. Separotion of the short normal resistivity curve (SN) and the induction resistivity curve (IL) in track 2; this indicates that the
sandstone was invaded by mud filtrote.
3. At the depth of the upper Morrow Sandstone, leftword deflection of the SP curve and seporation of the SN and induction resistivity
curves ore collaterol evidence that leads to this conclusion: the sandstone is porous and permeable.
4. Looking at all the logs together, the resistivity logs (IL and SN) show the formation to be from 7441 to 7460 ft, whereas the SP
shows the formotion to be from 7441 to 7452 ft. Clase inspection of the SP shows very slight deflection from the shale baseline
over the bottom 8 ft of formation (7 452 to 7460). The logs indicate that this interval is very shaly (SP response) and impermeable
(IL and SN read the sorne, except far minar voriation that is due to differences in vertical resolution of the measurements.).
208 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Feet
SP MD DT
Figure l 0.23. Sanie lag -160 mV 40 140 us/ft 40
with spontaneous potential, upper [~t ~
Cw------
Morrow Sandstone, Anadarko Basin, ·~.
-----
7400
U.S.A. e··-
~: ¡..-:--- ·--· - -
~-- ·- ....,,. :--·-- ---·-
Case Study 4: general, the Rwa results are consistent with the calcu-
lated value of Rw· The value of Rw calculated from the
PENNSYLVANIAN UPPER MORROW SANDSTONE, SP (0.14 ohm-m) is considered to be the estímate most
ANADARKO BASIN, U.S.A.: likely to be true; therefore it is used in the water satu-
ration equation.
The Solution. Archie water saturation (Swa) is calculated using
this estímate of Rw and values of porosity determined
lnformation from the logs above, and the other parameters noted previously.
Rw =0.140ohm-m
Estimated return on investment is:
The calculated Rw value is close to the suspect one stock tank barreis (STB)
(0.11 ohm-m at formation temperature). Return = X product price 10.37
X net revenue interest (NRJ)
Acoustic (sonic) porosity, SPHI, is calculated from
total cost
the Wyllie time-average equation, Equation 10.33. Use
the accepted values for matrix and fluid parameters:
78.000 X $32.00 X 0.8125 = 7.4:1.
~tma = 55.5 µsec/ft; ~tfl = 189 µsec/ft. Return =
$275,000
Apparent water resistivity (Rwa) (see Chapter 7) is
calculated from the induction log and the sonic porosity.
The ratio 7.4: 1 is an excellent return on investment;
The low value at the top of the formation (Table 10.8,
the company accepts your recommendation to re-enter
7442 ft) probably is due to boundary effects of shale
the well. (Note that the $32.00 per barrel price of oil
on the induction log, which produce a lower-than-
used in this example was the value at the time the well
actual resistivity value. The other low value, 0.028
was evaluated.)
ohm-m at 7455 ft, is higher than the value calculated
The upper Morrow Sandstone was perforated from
from the SP (0.014 ohm-m), and probably indicates
7443 to 7451 ft. Initial production flowing (/PF) was
residual hydrocarbons in that very shaly interval. In
21 O ASOUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
100 barreis of oíl per <lay (BOPD) and 6 barreis of salt production flowing (IPF) of 336 BOPD and no water,
water per day (BSWPD), with oíl gravity of 38.3. Dur- from a 19-ft upper Morrow sandstone. The sandstone
ing the first four months, production averaged 75 was 13 ft higher than Morrow sandstone in the well
BOPD, and after six months, production stabilized at that was the subject of this analysis.
50 BOPD. Two years after completion, an offset well Figure 10.25 Shows the results of detailed process-
was drilled 1320 ft away. The second well had initial ing of data over the interval.
Log lnterpretotion Cose Studies 211
Table 10.8. Cose Study 4: Upper Morrow Sondstone, Anodorko Bosin, U.S.A.: Solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicotes volume-for·volume decimal froction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 70ºF Rw (measured): (not given)
Total Depth: 8,007 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.140 ohm-m@ 130ºF
Bottom Hole Temp: 135ºF Rmf (measured): (not given)
F01mation Depth: 7,441 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.527 ohm-m@ 130ºF
Formation Temperature: 130ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 55.5 µsec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 189 µsec/ft
¡a: 0.81 ¡m: 2 In: 2
ro
~
r/J
¿
.8 0.60
-;;
<-<
B
ro
</)
<-<
2ro
.,~ 0.40
:.8ü
<-<
<é
BVW
Feet 0.5 v/v decimal o
SP MD IL - - - -
- - - -ohm-m
- Swa SPHI
-160 mV 40 0.2 201 v/v decimal 00.5 v/v decimal o
Figure 10.25. Upper Morrow .... H----·
l==i=~.::+-'
--
__ , ____ ....¡.
---· ¡_.
·-------·+i
,___
~---· ,... , .Jli .....
,
.... .... -~--
,....... ,.. --H
,.
........ ...............
..... .... ....
:-- ...... -----
::=r=:
(BVW) indicates the proportion of ,..... ,.... ---- ----- ,.......
~-
,____ ·---- ·-
.....
,... ...
..... ....
curve and the right margin of the ----.. .... -- =
..J......
............
.... .....
.::¡::¡ H i~--
.. ----- .... ¿¡.¡ ..... ,___ --l...i;
track (scale value of zero) indicates ...
'
the proportion that is occupied by F==l=-- -- __-::»· ... ·--- ·----·Í"¡-·-·!------- , .....
..
.. ., ... ....
=-1 - ...
....
.....
! .
----
7500 ---
; .... .....
...... --- .....
.... .......
H
+ .... ,., ..¡ w +---i---,-- ¡--- -----
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 213
Case Study 5: given for the area against a log-calculated Rw. (See
Table 2.1 for Rw fo1mulas, and charts in Figures 2.3 to
CRETACEOUS PICTURED CLIFFS SANDSTONE, 2.5.)
SAN JUAN BASIN, U.S.A.:
Well site information and other pertinent information:
The Problem.
• BHT = 89ºF at 2145 ft
Case Study 5 introduces a shaly sand interpretation,
• surface temperature = 65ºF
with equations for shale volume, effective porosities,
and the Simandoux (1963) form of Archie's equation • formation temperature, T¡ = 87ºF
for shaly sands. The effective porosity and water satu- • Rm¡ = 2.26 ohm-m at 65ºF
ration equations require the volume of shale (Vshale), Because of the infill-drilling program, your company
calculated from the gamma ray log. Entering the equa- is particularly interested in recoverable reserves based
tions into a spreadsheet program may be the most effi- on 80-acre units. Reservoir depletion will not be a
cient way to do these somewhat-complex calculations. problem, because Pictured Cliffs Sandstone wells nor-
mally don't drain 160 acres. Volumetric recoverable
Background gas reserves are estimated from the following parame-
ters:
The company that you work for has purchased a • drainage area (DA) = 80 acres
large block of acreage in the San Juan Basin, much of
• reservoir thickness (h) (to be determined)
it with gas production. The company is pursuing an
active development-drilling program of infilling new • effective porosity (<!>e) (to be determined)
Pictured Cliffs Sandstone wells on 80-acre units, • water saturation (Sw) (to be determined)
rather than on the 160-acre units required under previ- • recovery factor (RF) = 0.75
ous rules of spacing.
• gas gravity (estimated) = 0.51
You are presented with logs of a new infill well and
are asked to evaluate them. In this well, the depth of • reservoir temperature (estimated) = 87ºF
the Pictured Cliffs Sandstone is from 1920 to 1964 ft. • bottom hole pressure-estimated ) = 770 PSI
The log package includes an induction log with a • Z factor= 0.928
spherically focused log (SFL) and an SP log (Figure
10.26). (Note that the induction log plot shows the
spherically focused log as "SFLA," for Spherically Helpful equations
Focused Log, Averaged. The SFL has been averaged
so that its response resembles more closely the older In this older log-display format, res1stlv1ty is
short normal log. This allows better comparison of this recorded on a linear scale, but conductivity is also
new log with logs of older wells in the field.) A com- shown, on a more sensitive scale. In strata where resis-
bination neutron-density log (recorded in sandstone tivity is low, a more accurate estimate of resistivity can
porosity units) with a gamma ray log (Figure 10.27) be made by reading conductivity and reciprocating the
also was run. number to get formation resistivity. The equation is
From experience you know that shale in sandstone shown in Case Study 4 (Equation 10.36):
can affect logging measurements adversely. Water sat- R = 1000
urations calculated by the Archie formula tend to be ILD e ILD
too high (see Chapter 7, Log Interpretation), because
shale affects porosity logs and resistivity logs. Fur- Por shaly sand analysis of a formation, formulas for
thermore, shale in the reservoir tends to reduce perme- these calculations are required: volume of shale, cor-
ability. rected neutron and density porosity, and water satura-
Careful examination of the neutron porosity log tion, corrected for the effect of shale.
(NPHI) density porosity log (DPHI) and gamma ray Formulas for this shaly sand analysis are:
log (GR) (Figure 10.27) convinces you that the Pic- V =J = GR log -GR clean
tured Cliffs sandstone is shaly. A shaly sand analysis shale GR GR _GR 10.38
shale elean
will be necessary. However, before following this
investigative path, you decide to check the Rw value NPH!c = NPHI -V,hate xNPH!shate 10.39
214 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
DPH!c = DPHI - Vshaze x DPHis1iaze GRc1ean =gamma ray reading of the cleanest part
10.40
of the sandstone
GRshale =average gamma ray reading in anear-
DPH!c 2 + NPH!c 2 by shale
PHI= 10.41
2 NPH!c = neutron porosity corrected for shale
NPHlshale = neutron porosity of a nearby shale
w PHI
2
R, X Rw l
S = 0.4xRw J[5xPH/ +[Vshale
Rshale
2
)2 J~ DPH!c = density porosity corrected for shale
DPHishale = density porosity of a nearby shale
PHI= effective porosity: neutron-density poros-
10.42 ity corrected for shale and gas
where (fmmula variables):
Rshale = deep resistivity reading of a nearby
Vshale = calculated volume of shale shale
GRtog = gamma ray reading from several posi- Use Table 10.9 for the evaluation.
tions in Pictured Cliffs Sandstone
Table 10.9. Case Study 5: Pictured Cliffs Sandstone, Son Juan Bosin, U.S.A.: Work table. The symbol "v/v" indicotes volume-for-volume decimal froction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 65ºF Rw (measured): ohm-m@ ºF
Total Depth: 2145 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.24 ohm-m@ 87ºF
Bottom Hole Temp: 89ºF Rmf (measured): 2.26 ohm-m @ 65ºF
Formation Depth: 1930 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 1.73 ohm-m@ 87ºF
Formation Temperature: 87ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 55.5 µusec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 189 µsec/ft
RHO matrix: 2.65 g/cm3 RHO fluid: 1.0 g/cm3
GRclean : 63 API GRshale: 120 API
DPHishale: 0.14 NPHishale: 0.4
Rshale: 4.2 ohm-m
1 a: 1 lm: 2 1n: 2
Raw Data
Depth GR CILD ILD SFLA DPHI NPHI
fe et API mmho/m ohm-m ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal
1,928 70 90 11.l 16 0.175 0.275
1,935
1,942
1,945 75 72 13.9 16 0.150 0.225
1,949
1,953
1,958
1,962 83 100 10.0 10 0.120 0.260
Lag lnterpretation Case Studies 21 S
Table 10.9. Case Study 5: Pictured Cliffs Sandstone, Son Juan Bosin, U.S.A.: Work table. The syrnbol "v/v" indicotes volurne·for·volurne decimal froction. (Cont'd.)
Porosity calculations
Depth Vshale DPHic NPHic PHI
fe et v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal
1,928 0.123 0.158 0.226 0.195
1,935
1,942
1,945 0.211 0.121 0.141 0.131
1,949
1,953
1,958
1,962 0.351 0.071 0.120 0.098
CILD
400 S/m
Feet
SP MD
00 mV C
t::=t=t=t=E~~f
1'=~~c~;~~:.;,t,.
, .,_.__,. ,....
.. .•.
0.. .. I·-- e----· ~. ::=~
'e·-···-;-----·
. ...
1900
Figure l 0.26. lnduction·SFL log with spontaneous potential, Pictured Cliffs Sandstone, San Juan Basin, U.S.A.
Note:
SP deflection (negative, track 1) and resistivity (tracks 2 and 3) increase upward through the Pictured Cliffs Sandstone (1970 to 1924 ft),
the result of decrease of shale within the sandstone.
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 217
GR
o API 200
CALI
6 - - - - - - iñclie;- - - - - - -16 Feet 0.4
MD
1900
Figure 10.27. Combination neutron-density log with gamma ray and caliper logs, Pictured Cliffs Sandstone, San Juan Basin, U.S.A.
Note:
l) Neutron and density readings are recorded in units relative to sandstone.
2) On the caliper log (track l), decrease of hole diameter in the interval 1926 to 1958 ft indicates mudcake, and therefore indicates
that the sandstone is permeable.
3) Neutron porosity, NPHI, is greater than density porosity, DPHI (tracks 2 and 3), which is anomalous, for this reason: Sandstone-
calibrated neutron and density logs in a clean, gas·bearing sandstone should show neutron porosity that is less than density porosity,
because of gas effect (" crossover"). This explanation is justified by the evidence at hand: High neutron porosity of the Pictured Cliffs
formation is the result of shale in the sandstone. Concentration of hydrogen in doy minerals of shale is high; consequently neutron
porosity is recorded as being greater than the actual porosity.
218 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
of 0.52 to 0.81 (52% to 81 %). Such a substantial mod- the very low level of risk are altogether a compelling
ification illustrates the importance of shaly sand analy- basis to recommend completion of the well.
sis in the evaluation of sorne sandstone reservoirs. Consider the writing of a report on the Pictured
The bulk-volume-water plot (Figure 10.28) shows Cliffs Sandstone infill well: Summarize all of the
deviation of points from a constant BVW value, indi- favorable indicators. First, the formation is approxi-
cating the potential for sorne water production. mately 30 ft thick. Second, it is pe1meable, as shown
Below 1956 ft the caliper log (Figure 10.27) shows by the mudcake (caliper log, Figure 10.27). Perme-
no evidence of mudcake, indicating that permeability ability also is indicated by the moveable hydrocarbon
of the strata may be so low as to preclude production estimators (MHI and MOS, Table 10.10). Third,
of water. Also, resistivity curves below 1956 ft (Figure porosity that ranges from 10% to about 20% is docu-
10.26) are almost of the same value, showing no mented by the neutron and density logs (Table 10.10).
attributes of an invasion profile. The Pictured Cliffs was perforated from 1926 to
Volumetric calculations yield a production estímate 1954 ft. After an acid treatment and a sand frac, the
of approximately 0.19 BCF, based on the following well produced 350 mcfgpd with no water, on a %-in.
parameters: choke. During the first year of production, the well
• drainage area (DA)= 80 acres produced approximately 60 million cubic feet (60,000
mcf) of gas.
• reservoir thickness (h) = 30 ft
Figure 10.29 shows a computer-processed log of
• effective porosity (<Pe) = 0.15 (15%) the Pictured Cliffs interval. Track 3 shows water satu-
• water saturation (Sw) = 0.60 (60%) ration computed on the basis of the Simandoux (1963)
• recovery factor (RF) = 0.75 shaly sand equation, corrected porosity, and bulk vol-
ume water. The dark shaded area between the porosity
• gas gravity (estimated) = 0.51
curve (left-hand) and the bulk-volume-water curve
• reservoir temperature (estimated) = 87ºF indicates the proportion of pore space that is occupied
• bottom hole pressure (estimated) = 770 PSI by gas; the light shaded area between the bulk-vol-
• Z factor= 0.928 ume-water curve and the right margin of the track
(scale value of zero) indicates the proportion occupied
The information you have developed, the shallow
by water.
reservoir, the low cost of drilling and production, and
220 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table l 0.1 O. Case Study 5: Pictured Cliffs Sandstone, San Juan Basin, U.S.A.: Solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for-volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 65ºF Rw (measured): ohm-m@ ºF
Total Depth: 2145 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.24 ohm-m@ 87ºF
Bottom Hole Temp: 89ºF Rmf (measured): 2.26 ohm-m@ 65ºF
Formation Depth: 1930 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 1.73 ohm-m@ 87ºF
F01mation Temperature: 87ºF
DT matrix (Wyllie): 55.5 µusec/ft DT fluid (Wyllie): 189 µsec/ft
RHO matrix: 2.65 g/cmj RHO fluid: 1.0 g/cmj
GRclean : 63 API GRshale: 120 API
DPHishale: 0.14 NPHishale: 0.4
Rshale: 4.2 ohm-m
¡a: 1 ¡m: 2 1 n: 2
Raw Data
Depth GR CILD ILD SFLA DPHI NPHI
feet API mmho/m ohm-m ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal
1,928 70 90 11.1 16 0.175 0.275
1,935 74 70 14.3 19 0.160 0.240
1,942 72 60 16.7 20 0.170 0.230
1,945 75 72 13.9 16 0.150 0.225
1,949 70 65 15.4 19 0.180 0.260
1,953 63 87 11.5 15 0.120 0.220
1,958 82 95 10.5 12 0.155 0.240
1,962 83 100 10.0 10 0.120 0.260
Lag lnterpretation Cose Studies 221
Table 10.1 O. Case Study 5: Pictured Cliffs Sandstone, San Juan Basin, U.S.A.: Solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction. (Cont'd.)
Porosity calculations
Depth Vshale DPHic NPHic PHI
feet v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal
1,928 0.123 0.158 0.226 0.195
1,935 0.193 0.133 0.163 0.149
1,942 0.158 0.148 0.167 0.158
1,945 0.211 0.121 0.141 0.131
1,949 0.123 0.163 0.211 0.188
1,953 0.000 0.120 0.220 0.177
1,958 0.333 0.108 0.107 0.108
1,962 0.351 0.071 0.120 0.098
Figure l 0.28. Bulk·volume·water crossplot (porosity, PHI vs. 1.00 ··················er...................., .......................................,..• '"°" •• • .............. ••••••• ••,
0.80
:::
if¡
¿ 0.60
·Ero
,_,
B
ro
,_,"'
2ro 0.40
~
0.20
GR
0 - - - API - - -200
Feet
MD
Figure 10.29. Pictured Cliffs
Sandstane, San Juan Basin, U.S.A.
Camputer-processed lag.
Track 3: The dark shaded orea
between the parosity curve (left-hand)
and the bulk-valume-water curve
indicates the propartian af pare space
that is accupied by gas. The light-
shaded orea between the bulk-
valume-water curve and the right-hand
margin af the track (scale value af
zero) indicates the propartian af pare
space that is accupied by water.
1900
224 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table l 0.11. Case Study 6: Chimneyhill Subgroup, Hunton Group, Anadarko Basin, U.S.A.: Work table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 70ºF Rw (measured):
Total Depth: 16490 ft Rw@ fm. temp.:
Bottom Hole Temp: 222ºF Rmf (measured): 0.70 ohm-m@ 74ºF
Formation Depth: 16320 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.249 ohm-m@ 22ºF
Formation Temperature: 221 ºF
I
a: 1 m: 2 jn: 2 1
Raw data
Depth ILD SFL DPHI NPHI NPHlc
feet ohm-m ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal
16,305
16,308
16,310
16,315
16,321
16,325
16,330
16,339
16,345
16,351
16,357
16,361
16,367
16,371
16,376
16,382
16,389
16,400
16,410
226 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 10.11. Case Study 6: Chimneyhill Subgroup, Hunton Group, Anadarko Basin, U.S.A.: Work table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction. (Cont'd.)
!----- 1- -!---,H----1------i------'-"'~-l---
-- ,_ -¡---+1--1----+----_,'_--~---;;,::-_-~-k:-----_~'-- ---¡
, ____ ~-\--!--- --1---'---- .;~ ·--1----=-~ ,_ -~
!------:---1---+--H- --- ---+---+- ¡7/ --
16400
GR DRHO
~25----~~3-----Q~
0 API 150
CALI DPHI
5- - -- - - ln°"Zh~ - - - - - -16 Feet 0.3 v/v decimal -.01
MD
Figure l 0.31. Combination neutron·density log with gamma ray ond caliper, Chimneyhill Subgroup, Hunton Group, Anodarko Basin,
U.S.A.
Note:
(1) In Track 1, the decrease in hale diometer on the caliper curve, CALI, from 16,303 ft to 16,384 ft.: In this interval the thick mudcake
is evidence of permeable rock.
(2) From 16,303 ft to 16,384 ft, neutron porosity, NPHI, and density porosity, DPHI, are greater than in strato above and below. Also,
the neutron ond density porosity are approximately equal. Because the Chimneyhill is dolomite, if the rock were water saturated or oil
bearing, apparent neutron porosity should be greater than density porosity (the lithology effect of dolomite). This explanation would
account for the facts: Because the Chimneyhill is gas bearing, the neutron·density porosities are recordad as being approximotely
equal; gas effect compensated for the effect of dolomite.
Log lnterpretotion Cose Studies 229
rather than the underlying "C" zone. Because the logs lithology, or perhaps the zone is not at irreducible
show no evidence of a permeability barrier between water saturation. Scatter of the points (Figure 10.33),
the zones, a reasonable assumption is that lithology of as well as low resistivities, tend to indicate that water
the "C" zone is markedly different from lithology of would be produced.
zones A and B. Note that most of the points recorded Zone A of the Chimneyhill (16,303 ft to 16,324 ft)
from the highest zone, Chimneyhill A, show evidence has several favorable indicators. First, porosity ranges
of low water saturation.) from about 4% to about 9% (Figure 10.31); it is inter-
Rw determined from the Pickett plot (Figure 10.32) crystalline and vuggy. Water saturations and bulk-vol-
is 0.04 ohm-m at formation temperature, somewhat dif- ume-water values are low (Table 10.12). This evidence
ferent from the 0.021 ohm-m calculated from the SP. supports your decision to set pipe and to perforate the
You decide to use the higher value of Rw, based on your zone. In zone B (16,324 ft to 16,362 ft) water satura-
confidence in the Pickett plot and the fact that the SP is tions and bulk-volume-water values are higher (Table
unreliable in sorne carbonate-rock environments; also, 10.12); zone B may be water-productive. Because sub-
the SP is affected by hydrocarbons. The choice of 0.04 surface geologic maps indicate down-dip water, zone
ohm-m will produce pessimistic results (Sw values will B might be avoided in perforating; however, in com-
be higher than with an Rw of 0.021), but if the analysis parison to zone A, the higher water saturation and
using this value is favorable, you should have more bulk-volume-water values of zone B may be dueto a
confidence in the production potential of the well. distinct difference in lithology. Evidence of different
U sing the results of the calculations for porosity rock is the apparent reduction in vuggy porosity, indi-
and Rw, calculate Sw and Sxo from the Archie equation cated by the increase in bulk volume water from
(Equations 10.1 and 10.2); then calculate the move- 16,324 ft to 16,362 ft (Table 10.12). If, in fact, the
able oil saturation, MOS, moveable hydrocarbon abrupt transition to lower resistivities in zone B (Table
index, MHI, and bulk volume water. 10.12) is dueto diminished vuggy porosity, then zone
Now, consider the results (Table 10.12): In the B may be at irreducible water saturation-zone B may
Chimneyhill A and B zones (16,303 ft to 16,362 ft), all be productive. Unfortunately, with no core to analyze,
MHI values are less than 0.7; MOS values are high. this explanation could be tested only by perforating
The implication of these quantities is that hydrocar- the interval from 16,324 ft to 16,362 ft. This decision
bons in zones A and B were moved by invading mud is made: do not perforate the Chimneyhill B interval.
filtra te. Estimated recovery of gas is 3.27 BCF. Parameters
The bulk-volume-water crossplot (Figure 10.33) employed to arrive at this figure are:
confirms that the "A" zone is at irreducible water sat- • porosity (cp) = 0.06 (6%);
uration; BVW values are clustered around a line of
• water saturation (Sw) = 0.17 (17% ); and
about 0.008. This fact indicates that the fo1mation is
vuggy (Chapter 7, Table 7.1), consistent with the sam- • reservoir thickness (h) = 8 ft.
ple descriptions. Sorne data points of the Chimneyhill The Chimneyhill was perforated from 16,306 to
C zone lie along the 0.015 line (Figure 10.33), indicat- 16,314 ft with 27 holes. Completion was natural and
ing a mix of vuggy and intergranular porosity, but a the calculated open flow (CAO F) of the well was
significant number of points are plotted distant from 67,023 mcfgpd; shut-in tubing pressure was 4,639 psi.
that line, indicating that the zone would produce water. During the first six months of production, the well pro-
However, interpretation of the Chimneyhill B zone is duced 0.455 BCF and 2,030 barreis of condensate.
indistinct. Sorne of the points lie along a line of high- Figure 10.34 shows a computer-processed log of
er BVW (Figure 10.33), perhaps because of a different the Chimneyhill interval.
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 231
Table 10.12. Case Study 6: Chimneyhill Subgroup, Hunton Group, Anadarko Basin, U.S.A.: Solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Ann. Mean Surf. Temp: 70ºF Rw (measured):ohm-m@ ºF
Total Depth: 16490 ft Rw@ fm. temp.: 0.04 ohm-m@ 221 ºF
Bottom Hole Temp: 222ºF Rmf (measured): 0.70 ohm-m@ 74ºF
Formation Depth: 16320 ft Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.249 ohm-m@ 221 ºF
Formation Temperature: 221 ºF
1 a: 1 1 m: 2 1 n: 2
Raw data
Depth ILD SFL DPHI NPHI NPHic
feet ohm-m ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal
16,305 600 610 0.000 0.035 0.050
16,308 600 600 0.040 0.070 0.085
16,310 600 510 0.005 0.050 0.065
16,315 320 320 0.065 0.075 0.090
16,321 500 530 0.100 0.060 0.075
16,325 100 170 0.010 0.080 0.095
16,330 33 60 0.045 0.060 0.075
16,339 70 280 0.080 0.080 0.095
16,345 20 39 0.090 0.080 0.095
16,351 30 63 0.035 0.040 0.055
16,357 15 32 0.060 0.090 0.105
16,361 12 17 0.075 0.125 0.140
16,367 51 90 O.ülO 0.060 0.075
16,371 43 68 0.075 0.110 0.125
16,376 210 120 0.120 0.110 0.125
16,382 100 100 0.090 0.110 0.125
16,389 170 160 -0.060 0.025 0.040
16,400 200 370 -0.070 0.015 0.030
16,410 210 330 -0.035 0.010 0.025
232 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Table 10.12. Case Study 6: Chimneyhill Subgroup, Hunton Group, Anadarko Basin, U.S.A.: Solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction. (Cont'd.)
10 100 1000
Deep induction log, ILD.----------.
e Chirnney Hill A
" Chirnney Hill B
"' Chimney Hill C
" Lower Zone
0.80
¡;:::
1fl
¿ 0.60
o
."ª....
~
1fl
....
<l.l
0.40
~
0.20
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
0 Chirnney Hill A
o Chirnney Hill B
• Chirnney Hill C
x Lower Zone
234 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
-->1-~~~ir-+----1~--"-
16300
___ -1-·----- --!---- ----+----+-:------c-----1
j~--t---,+---l-+----i-----1----T----;----,---'-----
Figure l 0.34. Chimneyhill Subgroup, Hunton Group, Anadarko Basin, U.S.A. Computer-processed log.
Track 1 shows the SP curve and the gamma ray curve.
Track 2 shows the deep induction log and the spherically focused log.
Track 3 shows Archie water saturation, calculated from apparent (corrected) porosity. Also shown in track 3 are apparent porosity and bulk
volume water. The dark shaded orea between the porosity curve (left-hand) and the bulk-volume-water curve indicates the proportion of pare
space that is occupied by gas. The light-shaded orea between the bulk-volume-water curve and the right-hand margin of the track (scale value
of zero) indicates the proportion that is occupied by water.
Lag lnterpretation Case Studies 235
Table 10.13. Canyon Sandstone, New Mexico, U.S.A.: Work table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume·for·valume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Rw (measured): 0.03 ohm-m@ Tf Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.041 ohm-m@ Tf
1 a: 1 lm: 2 In: 2
Data
Depth LLD LLS MSFL Pe PHID PHIN
feet ohm-m ohm-m ohm-m b/electron v/v decimal v/v decimal
6760
6763
6768
Calculations
Depth Rt PhiNDgas Swa Sxo Swr
feet ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal MHI BVW
6760
6763
6768
236 ASQUITH AND KRYGOWSKI
_LLD_ Pe
0.2 10
--
ohm-m 2000 O b/elec
LLS PHID
Feet 0.i- - - - - ~~:L- -2060. 0.3 v/v decimal
-.01
GR MD PHIN
(}- - -API - ohrn-m v/v dcCíiñal-
100 0.2 -.01
,_ ,.___ -~ i---·+-·--+--+-1-··i~··+--·-!
P••·i--+--1•·-·r··i···"·~·~~··i-°'~i····l
--,l---'--+-...,...-~¡..---11--1~-»~
·-·-·+·--+·-···!·~ -------·---- ·--:--~~---~ :~---}----
'>""" . -- ----11--.,--·+- --'·--l
>-~1--~---~,,-'i"=f-,----1·-+-·i-·I
._,_,_, ___ .,_ ___ >-----·1 ·--·---1-----t--·-··-
¡._.• .¡..._¡ ----.\ ·-·•"'·'····· ... -·-·í·--·+·--+·-
6800
i---+---··1-·-- r..-
' ~+·- i----1·····+---·i·-···~...t--·
I·= :=:
·=" 1 -----
Figure 10.35. Dual laterolog-Rxo. Canyon Limestone, New Mexico, U.S.A. Vertical scale: 2 ft per chart division. Gamma ray curve scaled in API units.
Resistivity curves scaled in ohm-m. Density porosity and neutron porosity scaled in porosity units, 0.04 per chart division.
Dual laterolog-Rxo. Canyon Limestone, New Mexico, U.S.A.
In the interval 6758 to 6772 ft note the following facts:
l. The dual laterolog exhibits a salt-mud hydrocarbon invasion profile. (See Chapter l, Figure 1.5 for an example.)
2. The neutron and density porosity curves show crossover (<)> d><)> n) in the zone described from cutting samples as limestone; the crossover is indicative of
the presence of gas.
3. Average value of the Pe curve is about 5, which confirms that the zone is limestone.
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 237
Table 10.14. Case Study 7: Canyon Sandstone, New Mexico, U.S.A.: Solution table. The symbol "v/v" indicates volume-for-volume decimal fraction.
Parameters
Rw (measured): 0.03 ohm-m@ Tf Rmf@ fm. temp.: 0.041 ohm-m@ Tf
1 a: 1 lm: 2 ¡n: 2
Data
Depth LLD LLS MSFL Pe PHID PHIN
feet ohm-m ohm-m ohm-m b/electron v/v decimal v/v decimal
6760 170 150 80 5.0 0.135 0.050
6763 200 130 40 4.6 0.125 0.065
6768 130 95 35 4.9 0.230 0.115
Calculati ons
Depth Rt PhiNDgas Swa Sxo Swr
feet ohm-m v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal v/v decimal MHI BVW
6760 190 0.102 0.123 0.222 0.479 0.555 0.013
6763 270 0.100 0.106 0.321 0.249 0.329 0.011
6768 165 0.182 0.074 0.188 0.312 0.394 0.013
Log lnterpretation Case Studies 239
('j
~
ifl 0.40
¡:f
.s
Oí
~<h
....
~
~
O)
0.20
:.Eü
....
<i::
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Porosity, PhiNDgas
Pe
o-- ----b/clec _____ 10
Feet
GR MD
Gt~·~3=r=~~:3=
::::t:]:::J,;:-;;:--~~--1-
::::::¡:
--~~
--:----j-···+-·cj:· °" . -T--· --- ···+····
¡--~ ~~ -~ f----'\!----l--. ---------T--~~'--~~~-=
---- ·--- ...,. .. -'···-7 ······-·-- ---- ·-- ·---.
6800
Buckles, R. S., 1965, Conelating and averaging con- Dresser Atlas, 1975, Log interpretation fundamentals:
nate water saturation data, J oumal of Canadian Houston, Texas, Dresser Industries, Inc.
Petroleum Technology, v. 9, no. 1, p. 42-52. Dresser Atlas, 1979, Log interpretation charts: Hous-
Carothers, J. E., 1968, A statistical study of the forma- ton, Texas, Dresser Industries, Inc., 107 p.
tion factor relation to porosity: The Log Analyst, v. Dresser Atlas, 1981, Spectralog, Houston, Texas,
9, p. 38-52. Dresser Industries, Inc.
Carothers, J. E., and C. R. Porter, 1970, Fo1mation fac- Ekstrom, M. P., C. A. Dahan, M. Chen, P. M. Lloyd,
tor-porosity relation from well log data, Society of and D. J. Rossi, 1986, F01mation imaging with
Professional Well Log Analysts, 1 lth Annual Log- microelectrical scanning airnys: Society of Profes-
ging Symposium, Transactions, paper D. sional Well Log Analysts, 27th Annual Logging
Can, D. L., R. A. Johns, R.Y. Elphick, and L. S. Foulk, Symposium, Transactions, Paper BB, 21 p.
1997, High-resolution reservoir characterization of Ellis, D. V., 1987, Well Logging for Earth Scientists:
midcontinent sandstones using wireline resistivity New York, Elsevier, 532 p.
imaging, Boonsville (Bend Conglomerate) gas Fertl, W. H., 1975, Shaly sand analysis in development
field, Fort Worth Basin, Texas: The Log Analyst, wells, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts,
v. 38,no.6,p. 54-70. 16th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions,
Clavier, C., G. Coates, and J. Dumanoir, 1977, Theo- Paper A.
retical and experimental bases for the dual-water Fertl, W. H., 1978, Rwa Method-fast formation evalua-
model for interpretation of shaly sands: Society of tion, in Practica! log analysis-8: Oíl and Gas Jour-
Petroleum Engineers, Annual Meeting, paper SPE- nal, v. 76, no. 37, p. 73-76.
6859. Fertl, W. H., and W. C. Vercellino, 1978, Predict water
Clavier, C., W. R. Hoyle, and D. Meunier, 1971, Quan- cut from well logs, in Practica! log analysis-4: Oil
titative interpretation of the1mal neutron decay and Gas Joumal, v. 76, no. 25, p. 111-116.
time logs: Part l. Fundamentals and techniques: Gilbreath, J. A., 1987, Strategies for dipmeter interpre-
Joumal of Petroleum Technology, v. 23, p. 743- tation: Part I: The Technical Review, v. 35, no. 3, p.
755. 28-41.
Coates, G., and J. L. Dumanoir, 1973, A new approach Grace, L. M., and B. Newberry, 1998, Geological
to improve log-derived permeability: Society of applications of electrical images and dipmeter:
Professional Well Log Analysts, 14th Annual Log- Sh01t Course Notes, Schlumberger Oilfield Ser-
ging Symposium, Transactions, paper R. vices, v. 8.1.
Coates, G. R., L. Xiao, and M. G. Prammer, 1999, Guillotte, J. G., J. Schrank, and E. Hunt, 1979, Smack-
NMR Logging Principies and Applications: Hous- over reservoir: interpretation case study of water
ton, Texas, Halliburton Energy Services, 232 p. saturation versus production: Gulf Coast Associa-
Cobb, C. C., and P. K. Schultz, 1992, Real-time elec- tion of Geological Societies, Transactions, v. 29, p.
tro-fiber-optic downhole video system: presented 121-126.
at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Halliburton Energy Services, 1994, Log Interpretation
TX, p. 575-582, paper SPE 25137. Charts (third printing): Houston, Texas, Hallibur-
Davies, D. H., O. Faivre, M-T. Gounot, B. Seeman, J- ton Company.
e. Troullier, D. Benimeli, A. E. Feneira, D. J. Halliburton, 1996, Downhole video services: Applica-
Pittman, J-W. Smits, M. Randrianavony, B. I. tions and well preparation: Best Practices Series,
Anderson, and J. Lovell, 1992, Azimuthal resistiv- Document H00023, Houston, Texas, Halliburton
ity imaging-a new generation laterolog: Society Company, 20 p.
of Petroleum Engineers, Annual Conference and Haws, G. W., and N. F. Hurley, 1992, Applications of
Exhibition, p. 143-153, SPE-24676. pressure-interference data in reservoir characteri-
Dewan, J., 1983, Essentials of Modem Open-Hole Log zation studies, Big Hom basin, Wyoming: Society
Interpretation: Tulsa, Oklahoma, PennWell Pub- of Petroleum Engineers, Annual Conference and
lishing Company, 361 p. Exhibition, p. 53-62, paper SPE 24668.
Doll, H. G., 1948, The SP log, theoretical analysis and Hearst, J. R., P. H. Nelson, and F. L. Paillet, 2000, Well
principies of interpretation: Transactions, AIME, v. Logging for Physical Propeities (second edition):
179, p. 146-185. Chichester, England, John Wylie and Sons, 106 p.
Dresser Atlas, 1974, Log Review 1: Houston, Texas, Heffer, K. J., and J. C. Lean, 1993, Earth stress orien-
Dresser Industries, Inc. tation-a control on, and guide to, flooding direc-
tionality in a majority of reservoirs: in W. Linville
242 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
(ed.), Reservoir Characterization III, Tulsa, Okla- Koepsell, R. J., F. E. Jenson, and R. L. Langley, 1989b,
homa, PennWell, p. 799-822. Formation imaging-2, Imaging aids visualization
Hilchie, D. W., 1978, Applied openhole log interpreta- of faults: Oil & Gas Joumal, v. 87, no. 50, p.
tion: Golden, Colorado, D. W. Hilchie, Inc., 309 p. 85-86.
Hilchie, D. W., 1979, Old electric log interpretation: Lacazette, A., 1996, The STAR (SimulTaneous Acous-
Golden, Colorado, D. W. Hilchie, Inc., 161 p. tic and Resistivity) Imager: London Petrophysical
Hilchie, D. W., 1982, Advanced Well Log Interpreta- Society, Borehole Imaging Seminar, 3 p.
tion: Golden, Colorado, D. W. Hilchie, Inc., 300 p. Larionov, V. V., 1969, Borehole Radiometry: Moscow,
Ringle, A. T., 1959, The use of logs in exploration U.S.S.R., Nedra.
problems: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Lau, J. S. O., L. F. Auger, and J. G. Bisson, 1987, Sub-
29th Meeting. surface fracture surveys using a borehole television
Hocker, C., K. M. Eastwood, J. C. Herweijer, and J. T. camera and acoustic televiewer: Canadian Geot-
Adams, 1990, Use of dipmeter data in clastic sedi- echnical Joumal, v. 24, p. 499-508.
mentological studies: AAPG Bulletin, v. 74, p. Logan, W. D., J. P. Horkowitz, R. Laronga, and D.
105-118. Cromwell, 1997, Practical application of NMR
Hurley, N. F., 1994, Recognition of faults, unconformi- logging in carbonate reservoirs: Society of Petrole-
ties, and sequence boundaries using cumulative dip um Engineers, Annual Technical Conference and
plots: AAPG Bulletin, v. 78, p. 1173-1185. Exhibition, Proceedings (Formation evaluation and
Hurley, N. F., D. R. Thom, J. L. Carlson, and S. L. W. reservoir geology), p. 203-215, Paper SPE 38740.
Eichelberger, 1994, Using borehole images for tar- Luthi, S. M., and J. R. Banavar, 1988, Application of
get zone evaluation in horizontal wells: AAPG borehole images to three-dimensional geometric
Bulletin, v. 78, p. 238-246. modeling of eolian sandstone reservoirs, Permian
Hurley, N. F., 1996, Parasequence-scale stratigraphic Rotliegende, North Sea: AAPG Bulletin, v. 72, p.
correlations in deep-marine sediments using bore- 1074-1089.
hole images, in J. A. Pacht, R. E. Sheriff, and R. F. Luthi, S.M., and P. Souhaite, 1990, Fracture apertures
Perkins (eds.), Stratigraphic Analysis Utilizing from electrical borehole scans: Geophysics, v. 55,
Advanced Geophysical, Wireline, and Borehole p. 821-833.
Technology for Petroleum Exploration and Pro- Maute, R. E., 1992, Electrical Logging: State-of-the-
duction: Gulf Coast Section SEPM, 17th Annual Art: The Log Analyst, v. 33, p. 206-227.
Research Conference, p. 147-152. Martin, A. J., S. T. Solomon, and D. J. Hartmann, 1997,
Hurley, N. F., R. A. Zimmermann, D. Pantoja, 1998, Characterization of petrophysical flow units in car-
Quantification of vuggy porosity in a dolomite bonate reservoirs: AAPG Bulletin, v. 81, p. 734-
reservoir from borehole images and core, Dagger 759.
Draw Field, New Mexico: Society of Petroleum Morris, R. L., and W. P. Biggs, 1967, Using log-derived
Engineers, Annual Conference and Exhibition, 14 values of water saturation and porosity: Society of
p., paper SPE 49323. Professional Well Log Analysts, 8th Annual Log-
Jaafar, I. B., 1980, Depositional and diagenetic history ging Symposium, Transactions, Paper O.
of the B-zone of the Red River Formation (Ordovi- Mullins, J. E., 1966, Stereoscopic deep well photogra-
cian) of the Beaver Creek Field, Golden Valley phy in opaque fluids: Society of Professional Well
County, North Dakota: M.S. thesis, West Texas Log Analysts, 7th Annual Logging Symposium
State University, Canyon, Texas, 68 p. Transactions, Paper N, 9 p.
Knight, C. N., 1999, Structural and stratigraphic con- Newberry, B. M., L. M. Grace, and D. D. Stief, 1996,
trols on Mesaverde reservoir performance: North Analysis of carbonate dual porosity systems from
La Barge field, Sublette County, Wyoming: borehole electrical images: Society of Petroleum
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado School Engineers, Permian Basin Oil And Gas Recovery
of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 217 p. Conference, p. 123-129, paper SPE-35158.
Kobesh, F. P. and R. B. Blizard, 1959, Geometric fac- Paillet, F. L., C. Barton, S. Luthi, F. Rambow, and J.
tors in sanie logging: Geophysics, v. 24, p. 64-76. Zemanek (eds.), 1990, Borehole imaging: Society
Koepsell, R. J., F. E. Jenson, and R. L. Langley, 1989a, of Professional Well Log Analysts Reprint Volume,
Formation imaging-1, Formation imaging yields 472p.
precise fault orientation, minimizes dry offsets: Oil Parker, D. L., and P. D. Heffemen, 1993, Methods of
& Gas Joumal, v. 87, no. 49, p. 55-58. determining induced fracture orientation-Ferrier
References 243
field application: Canadian Well Logging Society Schlumberger, 1984, Electromagnetic Propagation
Annual Joumal, p. 284-298. Tool: Houston, Texas, Schlumberger Well Ser-
Pickett, G. R., 1966, A review of current techniques for vices.
determination of water saturation from logs: Jour- Schlumberger, 1993, Ultrasonic Imaging-USI, Ultra-
nal of Petroleum Technology, v. 18, no. 11, p. sonic Imager; UBI, Ultrasonic Borehole Imager:
1425-1433. Houston, Texas, Schlumberger Wireline and Test-
Pickett, G. R., 1973, Pattem recognition as a means of ing, Document No. SMP-9230, 28 p.
formation evaluation, Society of Professional Well Schlumberger, 1998, Log Interpretation Charts: Sugar
Log Analysts, 14th Annual Logging Symposium, Land, Texas, Schlumberger Wireline and Testing,
Transactions, Paper A. SMP-7006.
Pickett, G. R., 1977, Recognition of environments and Seiler, D., C. Edmiston, D. Torres, and J. Goetz, 1990,
carbonate rock type identification: in Formation Field performance of a new borehole televiewer
evaluation manual unit II, section exploration tool and associated image processing techniques:
wells: Tulsa, Oklahoma, Oil and Gas Consultants Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 31 st
Intemational, Inc., p. 4-25. Annual Logging Symposium, Transactions, Paper
Plumb, R. A., and S. H. Hickman, 1985, Stress-induced H, 20p.
borehole elongation-a comparison between the Seiler, D., G. King, and D. Eubanks, 1994, Field test
four-arm dipmeter and the borehole televiewer in results of a six aim microresistivity borehole imag-
the Aubum geothe1mal well: Joumal of Geophysi- ing tool: Society of Professional Well Log Ana-
cal Research, v. 90, no. B7, p. 5513-5521. lysts, 35th Annual Logging Symposium, Transac-
Poupon, A., and J. Leveaux, 1971, Evaluation of water tions, Paper W, 21 p.
saturation in shaly formations: The Log Analyst, v. Serra, O., 1984, Fundamentals of Well-log Interpreta-
12, no. 4, p. 3-8. tion: New York, Elsevier, 423 p.
Raymer, L. L., E. R. Hunt, and J. S. Gardner, 1980, An Serra, O., 1989, Fo1mation MicroScanner image inter-
improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform: pretation: Houston, Texas, Schlumberger Educa-
Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 21st tional Services, 117 p.
Annual Logging Symposium, Transactions, Paper Sethi, D. K., 1979, Sorne considerations about the for-
P. mation resistivity factor-porosity relationships:
Reid, R. R., and M. B. Enderlin, 1998, True pay thick- Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 20th
ness determination of laminated sand and shale Annual Logging Symposium, Transactions, paper
sequences using borehole resistivity image logs: L.
Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 39th Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 1984, Glos-
Annual Logging Symposium, Transactions, Paper sary of terms and expressions used in well logging:
GGG,9p. Houston, Texas, Society of Professional Well Log
Rosthal, R. A., R. A. Young, J. R. Lovell, L. Buffington, Analysts, 116 p.
and C. L. Arceneaux Jr., 1995, Formation evalua- Simandoux, P., 1963, Mesures dielectriques en milieu
tion and geological interpretation from the resistiv- poreux, application a mesure des saturations en
ity-at-the-bit tool: Society of Petroleum Engineers, eau: Etude du Comportement des Massifs
Annual Conference and Exhibition, p. 187-199, Argileux, Revue de l'institut Francais du Petrole,
paper SPE 30550. Supplementary Issue.
Schlumberger, 1972, Log Interpretation, Vol. I-Prin- Smits, J. W., D. Benimeli, I. Dubourg, O. Faivre, D.
ciples: New York, Schlumberger Limited, 112 p. Hoyle, V. Tomillon, J-C. Troullier, and B. I. Ander-
Schlumberger, 1974, Log Interpretation, Vol. II-Ap- son, 1995, High resolution from a new laterolog
plications: New York, Schlumberger Limited, 116 p. with azimuthal imaging: Society of Petroleum
Schlumberger, 1975, A guide to wellsite interpretation Engineers, Annual Conference and Exhibition, p.
for the Gulf Coast: Schlumberger Offshore Ser- 563-576, paper 30584.
vices, 58 p. Sovich, J., J. Klein, and N. Gaynor, 1996, A thin bed
Schlumberger, 1979, Log Interpretation Charts: Hous- model for the Kuparuk A sand, Kuparuk River
ton, Texas, Schlumberger Limited, 97 p. field, North Slope, Alaska: Society of Professional
Schlumberger, 1983, Stratigraphic high resolution dip- Well Log Analysts, 37th Annual Logging Sympo-
meter tool: Paris, Schlumberger Limited, Docu- sium, Transactions, Paper D, 13 p.
ment No. M-08630, 23 p.
244 ASQUITH ANO KRYGOWSKI
Springer, J., 1987, Stress orientations from wellbore Waxman, M. H., and L. J. M. Smits, 1968, Electrical
breakouts in the Coalinga area: Tectonics, v. 6, p. conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands: Society
667-676. of Petroleum Engineers Journal, v. 245, p. 107-
Steiber, S. J., 1970, Pulsed neutron capture log evalua- 122.
tion in the Louisiana Gulf Coast: Society of Petro- Waxman, M. H., and E. C. Thomas, 1974, Electrical
leum Engineers, 45th Annual Meeting, paper SPE- conductivity in shaly sands-I: Journal of Petrole-
2961. um Technology, v. 257, p. 213-225.
Suau, J., P. Grimaldi, A. Poupon, and G. Souhaite, Wermund, E. G., 1975, Upper Pennsylvanian limestone
1972, Dual Laterolog-Rxo tool: Society of Petro- banks, n01th central Texas: University of Texas,
leum Engineers, 47th Annual Meeting, paper SPE- (Austin), Bureau of Economic Geology Circular
4018. 75-3, 34 p.
Svor, T. R., and D.N. Meehan, 199la, Quantifying hor- Western Atlas International, Inc., 1995, Log Interpreta-
izontal well logs in naturally fractured reservoirs- tion Charts, Houston, Texas, Western Atlas, 300 p.
I: Society of Petroleum Engineers, Annual Con- Whittaker, J. L., and G. D. Linville, 1996, Well prepa-
ference and Exhibition, p. 469-480., paper SPE ration--essential to successful video logging: So-
22704. ciety of Petroleum Engineers, 66th Western Region
Svor, T. R., and D. N. Meehan, 1991b, Quantifying Meeting, p. 297-308, paper SPE 35680.
horizontal well logs in naturally fractured reser- Williams, C. G., P. D. Jackson, M. A. Lovell, and P. K.
voirs-II: Society of Petroleum Engineers, Annu- Harvey, 1997, Assessment and interpretation of
al Conference and Exhibition, p. 471-480, paper electrical borehole images using numerical simula-
SPE 22932. tions: The Log Analyst, v. 38, no. 6, p. 34-44.
Timur, A., 1968, An investigation of permeability, Witton, E. M., 1999, Outcrop and subsurface charac-
porosity, and residual water saturation relation- terization of the Lewis Shale, Carbon County,
ships for sandstone reservoirs: The Log Analyst, v. Wyoming: Unpublished M.S. thesis, Colorado
9, p. 8-17. School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 214 p.
Tittman, J., and J. S. Wahl, 1965, The physical founda- Wyllie, M. R. J., and W. D. Rose, 1950, Sorne theoret-
tions of formation density logging (Gamma- ical considerations related to the quantitative eval-
Gamma): Geophysics, v. 30, p. 284-294. uations of the physical characteristics of reservoir
Tixier, M. P., R. P. Alger, and C. A. Doh, 1959, Sonic rock from electric log data: Journal of Petroleum
logging, J oumal of Petroleum Technology, v. 11, Technology, v. 189, p. 105-110.
no. 5., p. 106-114. Wyllie, M. R. J., A. R. Gregory, and G. H. F. Gardner,
Tixier, M. P., R. P. Alger, W. P. Biggs, and B. N. Car- 1958, An experimental investigation of the factors
penter, 1963, Dual induction-laterolog-a new tool affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media:
for resistivity analysis: Society of Petroleum Engi- Geophysics, v. 23, p. 459-493.
neers, 38th Annual Meeting, paper SPE-713. Younes, A. I., T. Engelder, and W. Bosw01th, 1998,
Trnman, R., R. P. Alger, J. Connell, and R. L. Smith, Fracture distribution in faulted basement blocks:
1972, Progress report on interpretation of the dual Gulf of Suez, Egypt, in M. P. Coward, T. S. Dalta-
spacing neutron log (CNL): Society of Profession- ban, and H. Johnson, (eds.), Strnctural Geology in
al Well Log Analysts, 13th Annual Logging Sym- Reservoir Characterization: London, The Geologi-
posium, Transactions, paper U. cal Society, Special Publication 127, p. 167-190.
Watney, W. L., 1979, Gamma ray-Neutron cross-plots Zemanek, J., E. E. Glenn, L. J. Norton, and R. L. Cald-
as an aid in sedimentological analysis (p. 81-100), well, 1970, Formation evaluation by inspection
in D. Gill and D. F. Menfam (eds.), Geomathemat- with the borehole televiewer: Geophysics, v. 35, p.
ical and petrophysical studies in sedimentology: 254-269.
New York, Pergamon Press, 266 p. Zoback, M. D., D. Moos, L. Mastin, and R. N. Ander-
Watney, W. L., 1980, Cyclic sedimentation of the Lans- son, R. N., 1985, Well bore breakouts and in situ
ing-Kansas City groups in northwestem Kansas stress: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 90, no.
and southwestern Nebraska: Kansas Geological B7, p. 5523-5530.
Survey Bulletin 220, 72 p.