Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Fmax = 5.50 MN
Part volume:
V = A0 h0 = .3068X10−3 m3
Total work required:
N (.3068X10−3 m3 )
KV n+1 530X106 m
(.2231)1.26 = 19.5 kN-m
2
Work = 1 =
n+1 1.26
1
Sample Calculation for Predicting Roll Separating Force
Note: The calculations shown below are based on the following data, starting from a 4.70
mm (.185 inch) thick 6061-T0 aluminum plate (your calculations should use your data from
the Rolling Lab):
Previous Pass:
ti = 2.41 mm; L = 582 mm; w = 99 mm; Fact = 121 kN; σyf = 195 MPa
Current Pass:
Calculations:
Δt = to − ti = 0.38 mm
√ 133
LR = RΔt = mm (.38 mm) = 5.03 mm
2
tinit 4.70 mm
1,total = ln = ln = 0.840
to 2.03 mm
2
e = √ 1,total = .969
3
K = 205 MPa; n = 0.20 (K&S Table 2.3)
σyf = Kne = (205 MPa)(.969)0.20 = 204 MPa
1
Y ≈ (195 MPa + 204 MPa) = 200 MPa
2
2
σ 3 = − √ Y = −231 MPa
3
|F | = LR w |σ3 | = (5.03X10−3 m)(99X10−3 m)(231X106 Pa) = 115 kN
134 kN − 115 kN
= 14%
134 kN
Therefore, the predicted roll separating force is within 14% of the actual value for this pass.
This is a reasonable result, considering all of our modeling assumptions.
For all data points that I analyzed for this example, the results were best in the middle and
“so-so” at the ends. However, the order of magnitude of the forces was correct even at the
extremes.