Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
G00056612
ENG 234-01
Section 1
Introduction
Strong belief are deep rooted in our culture about how men and women should behave and are
expected to behave. A huge chunk of this based on how we speak which has evolved into a field
of ‘folklinguistic’. These ideologies are brought to light by the huge amount of books on etiquette
such ‘The Woman’s Book: Contains Everything a Woman Ought to Know.’ (Jack and Strauss,
1911) that were highly in demand at the end of the twentieth century which portray people’s
thoughts on a woman’s expected behavior as “male behavior has traditionally been seen as the
norm and in need of no particular advice or attention.” (Goddard & Patterson, 2000).This topic of
Linguistics and the distinction in the use of language by the genders gained sensitivity and
seriousness in the early 1960s with the rise of feminist studies. Writers such as Jesperson (1922)
wrote about women speech and how women are more refined, less coarse and uninventive which
forces men to be constrained in their conversation with women and results in a state of boredom.
(Jesperson 1922).
Newer research was done by Anthony Mulac (1999) where features were presented, and the
conclusion was that there are differences in the usage of words between male and female. Women
use intense words such as “very” or “really” and also tend to involve more questions in general
and hedges. (Braun, 2004) This can be taken as the lack of dominant behavior whereas men are
more direct and competitive in their speech. They usually interrupt and talk more often when in
Methodology
This research was primarily done with the purpose to investigate the difference in the language of
male and female. As this is a controversial topic in today’s world, previous studies were taken as
a base when reaching a conclusion. For this a study done by James Broadbridge in 2003 was used
where a conversation between two men and two women was recorded for a period of one hour.
This recording was done in full knowledge of the participants and was done in their own
workplace. This helped the author to get an understanding about the style of speech, and
perceptions of the people involved. Broadbridge was able to divide his analysis based on
conversational dominance, swearing and vulgar language, verbosity, and assertive and tentative
speech styles. He was able to realise that men were more likely to interrupt and less likely to be
interrupted. Also the tendency of men to swear and use vulgar language was more during the
conversation. Also men spoke the most and women spoke the least while women used more hedges
which corresponds to tentative speech. Other secondary resources were used to reach the
conclusion of this essay which were obtained from the AUS Library, online library database and
Google scholar.
Section 2
It is a common belief about language that women are more tentative in their speech. Lakoff
emphasized the use of ‘tag questions to portray this. By claiming that women use tag questions
more than men, it appears that men are more assertive, who use it less. More research uncovered
that tag questions are usually associated with women’s language (Siegler and Siegler, 1976), which
demonstrates people’s attitudes to women’s speech and seeming lack of confidence. However, a
study conducted by James Broadbridge (2003) demonstrated very different results with men
actually using more tag questions than female. Tag questions can have a modal or affective
meaning (Mooney & Evans, 2015). Modal refers to the amount of certainty a speaker is expressing
while affective tags signal speaker’s attitude to the address or even the topic being discussed.
Research shows that though women do use more tag questions, they are more likely to be affective
tags that facilitate conversation (Holmes, 1984). While on the contrary, the majority of the tag
The use of hedges has also been identified as being tentative speech, for example, kind of, sort
of, etc. In 1975, Robin Lakoff published a powerful interpretation of women’s language in her
Language and Woman’s Place. Lakoff (1975) labelled them as a feature of women’s language
which makes their language more indirect. A set of rudimentary expectations about what marks
the language of women was also published by her. There, she made the claim that women ‘hedge’
using phrases like “sort of”, “kind of”, “it seems like”, and so on. Similar lists of Lakoff’s work
on “women’s language” were also constructed by O´Barr and Atkins (1998) and Holmes (2001).
It is noteworthy that some proclamations are easier to verify by study and observation than
others. In their research about “powerless language”, O’ Barr and Atkins (1980) demonstrate that
language differences are not gender based but rather based on power or situation-specific
authority. It is also apparent that there may be social situations where female are in a similar
position to those who lack power. In fact, this claim is more limiting than the one made by Dale
Spender (1980), who recognizes power in a male patriarchal order - the theory of dominance.
Thus, O'Barr and Atkins (1980) established that the cited speech patterns were not typical of
all women and definitely not limited to women either. Hence, the females using the women's
language traits in the least regularity had a remarkably high status. These were women who were
educated professionals with middle class upbringings. The men who spoke with a low regularity
of women's language traits had an equivalent pattern. O'Barr and Atkins tried to accentuate that a
powerful status might originate from either social status in the larger society and/or standing
This shows that women are thought to use less powerful language as a reflection of their lower
position in social hierarchy (Mooney & Evans, 2015). Even though women do not actually use
Verbosity
The question of whether men talk more or women has been a long standing field of argument.
It is generally accepted that, women are more talkative than men. A very big misconception is
women use 20,000 words a day while men only use 7000 which has no scientific study to support
such claim (Moony & Evans, 2015). Tannen (1990) studied conversations between married
couples and discussed extensively about the stereotypes of wives “who barely stop talking” and of
husbands who come home and refuse to utter a single word to their spouse about work. Some
typical responses are phrases like ‘She never stops talking’ and ‘He never talks to me about work’.
The belief that women talk more than men is a pervasive one. As the proverbs listed above suggest,
One of the most important things to consider when discussing ‘who talks more’ is knowing
there are different types of talk (Coates, 2004). It is important to consider whether the talk is taking
place in public or private domain as these domains have different qualities. Public talk has the
purpose of informing or persuading and is usually associated with power or higher status while
private talks serve more interpersonal functions like making social connections, developing
relationship and so on (Mooney & Evans, 2015). Thus, some talks are highly valued over others.
According to a research, men do indeed talk more than women (Swacker, 1975). Tannen (1990)
also acknowledged the fact that the same men who remarked that nothing much had happened at
work were the ones to tell interesting stories to their friends. It was concluded from the research
that men do talk more than women, but do it with their friends rather than their partners. For which
the perception of chatty women still prevail due to socialization, which warps our views of how
Broadbridge’s (2003) research justifies this view as one of the female participant who spoke
the least was perceived by all involved in the conversation to have spoken the most or second most
in the group while one of the males, who had spoken the most was in fact perceived to have spoken
the least. A plausible reason for this impression is the different style of speech used by males and
females. It is evident from the study that the women involved used a larger number of active
listening devices (mmm, yeah, etc.) than the men, where the aforementioned female used them the
most (Broadbridge, 2003). The use of such devices could have made the other participants think
that she was talking more as her involvement in the conversation was more while the above
mentioned male, although spoke the most, used the least of said active devices, and as such the
Thus, it is evident that women do not have to truly dominate a conversation in order to be
perceived as doing so. The talkativeness of women has not been compared to that of men, rather
with silence. Women are thus not judged on whether they talk more than men but whether they
talk more than silent women. The use of active listening devices which signal attentiveness in
Conversational Dominance
A major difference in the use of language by male and female is the domination that men have
over conversations through the use of interruptions and overlaps, and there is a significant rise in
these conversational irregularities when men are talking to women. In a study conducted by
Zimmerman and West (1975), eleven mixed-sex pairs men were found to interrupt of overlap their
female peers total of fifty-five times, but were themselves interrupted or overlapped only twice. In
contrast, discussions involving single sex pairs had significantly fewer disruptions and overlaps
by men on men. Women were also found to be much more likely to interrupt their own sex.
Demonstrating how “women are concerned not to violate the man’s turn but to wait until he has
finished.” (Coates, 1986). This leads us to explore the recently coined term, Mansplaining. The
term consists of two words; ‘man’ and ‘explaining’ and describes the phenomenon of a man
interrupting a woman to explain to her something she already knows in a way of exerting the power
of the male gender over female gender at an androcentric level that leads men to be taken more
The term Mansplaining became popular recently after the infamous incident of American
writer Rebecca Solnit being explained by a man the content of a book he believed she should read,
that he had not read and which in fact was written by Solnit herself. This event was the inspiration
for Solnit to write the book Men Explain Things to Me in 2008 when the term ‘mansplaining’ was
first coined by Solnit. The term consists of two words; ‘man’ and ‘explaining’ and describes the
phenomenon of a man interrupting a woman to explain to her something she already knows in a
way of exerting the power of the male gender over female gender at an androcentric level that
Mansplaining is a part of the androcentric rule that causes women to be more interrupted
then men. Women are interrupted by both men and women more often than men are, according to
a study published in the year 2014 in the Journal of Language and Social Psychology. In that
review, Adrienne Hancock, a researcher at the Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, and
Benjamin Rubin, a Master’s student at George Washington University gave an account of a test
where they put 20 ladies and 20 men in sets, then recorded and interpreted their discussions. The
outcome: Over the course of every three-minute discussion, ladies interrupted men only once, on
average, however interrupted other women 2.8 times. Men interrupted their male discussion
accomplice twice, on average, and interrupted a female about 2.6 times (Hancock & Rubin, 2014).
This proves that females are on average interrupted more by both men and women than their male
counterparts. Not only are they interrupted more, but also are subjected to explanations of the
something that a woman has already stated. Due to subverted gender roles, a man’s statement will
be considered more important even if the exact same thing has been stated by a woman. There are
many examples of this occurrence, like the female FBI agent whose warning about Al Qaeda was
ignored or women who need a male witness to verify their rape (Solnit & Fernandez, 2015). In the
article “10 Simple Words Every Girl Should Learn”, journalist Soraya Chemaly (2014) talks about
how she constantly finds herself in mixed-gender environments where men interrupt her and also
go hand-in-hand with this last one: A woman, speaking clearly and out loud, can say
something that no one appears to hear, only to have a man repeat it minutes, maybe seconds
How different groups of people should use language varies across cultures and what can
be found in the detail of these assumptions is that women are thought to use less powerful language
as a reflection of their lower position in the social hierarchy. Even though women do not use ‘less
powerful’ language, the ideology still remains and it is a reflection of the lower rank women hold
in the social hierarchy, and hence the less importance given to their language.
To further explain the mansplaining phenomenon, one can look at the differences in use of
language by men and women and what it means to be a woman or man in linguistic contexts.
Linguist Robin Lakoff argues that women’s language is characterized by a number of features
including the avoidance of swear words, the use of hedges or fillers (‘you know’, ‘sort of’), the
use of tag questions, empty adjectives, intensifiers, specific color terms, more standard syntax,
rising intonation on declaratives and high levels of politeness (Lakoff, 1975). This is born off the
social expectation of women to be more polite and attain submissive habits which is associated
with uncertainty and lack of power. On the other hand, men are more assertive in their statements
which is linked to confidence and authority. This subjugates women to a lower position to men in
language and leads them to interrupt women more and make them think it is okay to reassert the
Moreover, women prefer a shared floor in a conversation where more than one speaker talk
at once without any participants of the conversation expressing an objection to that. Women
provide small utterances and minimal response like ‘mmm’, ‘yeah’ without disrupting the current
speaker and the speaker does not consider these minimal responses as interruption, rather a form
of encouragement. However, men prefer holding the floor to be esteemed and that is why there
might be competition for it. For women silence may signal a breakdown of communication, for
men it appears to be acceptable (Pilkington, 1998). So, when a man decides to interrupt a woman
he does so with the intention of taking the floor and a woman apprehending it as an encouragement,
lets the man speak but by then the conversation dynamic shifts towards the man stopping her
abruptly.
Mansplaining has become a part and parcel of our society and something so embedded in our
language that it sometimes becomes hard to notice it. It is a blaring example of how inequality
between males and females is still an important issue in the society and how women continue to
Conclusion
Although this research has aimed to determine the differences between male and female
language and while generalizations are highly discouraged it does refer to the certitude that in
certain areas conversation styles vary greatly. The notion of sexual equality and women’s right
has been existing for quite some time now and is now lodged into our daily life that it is a part and
parcel of our society and is difficult to notice it. All conclusions derived lead to the verdict that
discrimination between males and females is still a prominent issue in the society and women
Braun, Friederike, 2004, “Reden Frauen anders? Entwicklungen und Positionen in der
https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-
artslaw/cels/essays/sociolinguistics/JamesBroadbridgeSociolinguisticsAnInvestigationint
oDifferencesbetweenWomensandMensSpeech.pdf.
Chemaly, S. (2014, May 06). 10 Simple Words Every Girl Should Learn. Retrieved October 12,
words-every-girl-learn/
Goddard A. & L.M. Patterson (2000) Language and Gender The Eihosha LTD.
Hancock A. B. & Rubin B. A. (2014). Journal of Language and Social Psychology Vol 34, Issue
1, pp. 46 – 64.
Holmes, J. (1984) ‘Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: some evidence for
Limited.
Jack F.B. and R. Strauss (1911) The Woman’s Book: Contains Everything a Woman Ought to
Jesperson, O. (1922) Language: It’s Nature, Development and Origin Allen & Unwin, New York.
Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Woman’s Place, New York: Harper and Row.
Mooney, A., & Evans, B. (2015). Language, society and power: An introduction (4th ed. ed.).
Mulac, Anthony, 1999, “Perceptions of women and men based on their linguistic 53 behavior: The
Pilkington, J. (1998) ‘“Don’t try and make out that I’m nice!” The different strategies
women and men use when gossiping’ in J. Coates (ed.) Language and Gender:
Solnit, R., & Fernandez, A. (2015). Men explain things to me (Updated edition with two new
Tannen, Deborah (1990). You just don’t understand. Women and men in conversation. William