RUNNING HEAD: NET NEUTRALITY 1

Net Neutrality

Name

Institution
NET NEUTRALITY 2

Net Neutrality

Net Neutrality is the basic belief that forbids internet service providers such as Verizon

and Comcast, AT&T from blocking, slowing down or speeding up any content apps and websites

that one wants to use (Faris, et al., 2015). It is the means the internet has continuously worked. It

the guiding principle of the internet and also reserves our rights to freely communicate online.

Net neutrality means an internet that protects and allows free communication. Internet neutrality

means that Internet Service Providers should provide us with an open network and should not

discriminate or block against any content or apps which ride over such internets. Just the same

way the phone companies should not decide who you call as well as what one says on that call,

the Internet Service Providers should not interfere with the content one views on posts online.

Why Net Neutrality Controversial

The European Congress is planned to vote on rules guiding net neutrality and the first

glimpse that suggested regulation seem very analogous to ones already in place in the U.S.A.

Both the European suggestion and the United States rules prevent ISPs from throttling or

blocking traffic, besides they imposed an injunction on “paid prioritization.”

In both the US and EU, the throttling and blocking rules have exclusions for sensible

network administration (Faris, et al., 2015), as well as the paid prioritization veto has an

exclusion for what are recognized as “specialized services.” Both the European Union and

United States similarly permit zero-rating, a practice that excuses definite online services from

counting against records caps.

Argument for and against

NET NEUTRALITY 3

Let us first note that the gigantic majority of individuals on both sides aren’t opposed on

the ideas of net neutrality, just on how to go about keeping and making it a veracity, probably

because it’s appealing much a defenseless position. The factual bottom of the matter is the way

two argument sides framed the discussion (Faris, et al., 2015).

Side “A” said that, since the entry cost into the Internet Service Providers markets is

costly, the current Internet Service Providers are capable and had at times utilized their position

infringe the hint of net neutrality by filibustering certain or apportioning less bandwidth to screw

content providers. Since the court don’t recognize the capacity of the administration to

implement the net neutrality rules that were delineated years ago.

Side “B” said that the government involvement would not merely lead to less “open”

internet, and that they utilize the existing broken state of net neutrality enforcement as a means

of getting in with little confrontation from the public

Net Neutrality has got numerous advantages and disadvantages against allowing network

operators to discriminate with regard to cost and access. The advantages and disadvantages are

discussed below:

Advantages

 No restraints on content access on the internet

 Reliable internet access speed on every content on the internet

 Confidentiality not attacked (Bourreau, Kourandi and Valletti, 2015)

NET NEUTRALITY 4

 Don’t have to pay premium price content thought “premium” by Internet Service

Providers.

Disadvantages

 Operators must pay more for internet service as Internet Service Providers would pass on

the cost of more bandwidth bought to make sure they aren’t overextended.

 Slower internet entrance speed if the Internet Service Providers are not able to have more

bandwidth the augment load

 Increase in high dormancy as well as high jitter rates owing to insufficient bandwidths

that will make Voice over Internet Protocol poorly performing (Bourreau, Kourandi and

Valletti, 2015)
NET NEUTRALITY 5

References

Bourreau, M., Kourandi, F., & Valletti, T. (2015). Net neutrality with competing internet

platforms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 63(1), 30-73.

Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Othman, D., & Benkler, Y. (2015). Score another one for the

Internet? The role of the networked public sphere in the US net neutrality policy debate.