Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_theory
Literature
Major forms
Genres
Media
Techniques
Prose
Poetry
History
modern
Outline
Glossary of terms
Discussion
Literature portal
The literary theory in a strict sense is the systematic study of the nature of literature and
of the methods for analyzing literature.[1] However, literary scholarship since the 19th
century often includes—in addition to, or even instead of literary theory in the strict sense—
considerations of intellectual history, moral philosophy, social prophecy, and other
interdisciplinary themes which are of relevance to the way humans interpret meaning.[1] In
humanities in modern academia, the latter style of scholarship is an outgrowth of critical
theory and is often called simply "theory".[2] As a consequence, the word "theory" has
become an umbrella term for a variety of scholarly approaches to reading texts. Many of
these approaches are informed by various strands of Continental philosophy and sociology.
History
The practice of literary theory became a profession in the 20th century, but it has historical
roots that run as far back as ancient Greece (Aristotle's Poetics is an often cited early
example), ancient India (Bharata Muni's Natya Shastra), ancient Rome (Longinus's On the
1/7
Sublime) and medieval Iraq (Al-Jahiz's al-Bayan wa-'l-tabyin and al-Hayawan, and ibn al-
Mu'tazz's Kitab al-Badi),[3] and the aesthetic theories of philosophers from ancient
philosophy through the 18th and 19th centuries are important influences on current literary
study. The theory and criticism of literature are, of course, also closely tied to the history of
literature.
However, the modern sense of "literary theory" only dates to approximately the 1950s when
the structuralist linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure began to strongly influence English
language literary criticism. The New Critics and various European-influenced formalists
(particularly the Russian Formalists) had described some of their more abstract efforts as
"theoretical" as well. But it was not until the broad impact of structuralism began to be felt in
the English-speaking academic world that "literary theory" was thought of as a unified
domain.
In the academic world of the United Kingdom and the United States, literary theory was at
its most popular from the late 1960s (when its influence was beginning to spread outward
from elite universities like Johns Hopkins, Yale, and Cornell) through the 1980s (by which
time it was taught nearly everywhere in some form). During this span of time, literary theory
was perceived as academically cutting-edge, and most university literature departments
sought to teach and study theory and incorporate it into their curricula. Because of its
meteoric rise in popularity and the difficult language of its key texts, theory was also often
criticized as faddish or trendy obscurantism (and many academic satire novels of the
period, such as those by David Lodge, feature theory prominently). Some scholars, both
theoretical and anti-theoretical, refer to the 1970s and 1980s debates on the academic
merits of theory as "the theory wars".
By the early 1990s, the popularity of "theory" as a subject of interest by itself was declining
slightly (along with job openings for pure "theorists") even as the texts of literary theory
were incorporated into the study of almost all literature. By 2010, the controversy over the
use of theory in literary studies had quieted down, and discussions on the topic within
literary and cultural studies tend now to be considerably milder and less lively. However,
some scholars like Mark Bauerlein continue to argue that less capable theorists have
abandoned proven methods of epistemology, resulting in persistent lapses in learning,
research, and evaluation.[4] Some scholars do draw heavily on theory in their work, while
others only mention it in passing or not at all; but it is an acknowledged, important part of
the study of literature.
About
One of the fundamental questions of literary theory is "what is literature?" – although many
contemporary theorists and literary scholars believe either that "literature" cannot be
defined or that it can refer to any use of language. Specific theories are distinguished not
only by their methods and conclusions, but even by how they create meaning in a "text".
However, some theorists acknowledge that these texts do not have a singular, fixed
meaning which is deemed "correct".[5]
Broad schools of theory that have historically been important include historical and
biographical criticism, New Criticism, formalism, Russian formalism, and structuralism, post-
structuralism, Marxism, feminism and French feminism, post-colonialism, new historicism,
deconstruction, reader-response criticism, and psychoanalytic criticism.
In the late 1950s, the Canadian literary critic Northrop Frye attempted to establish an
approach for reconciling historical criticism and New Criticism while addressing concerns of
early reader-response and numerous psychological and social approaches. His approach,
laid out in his Anatomy of Criticism, was explicitly structuralist, relying on the assumption of
an intertextual "order of words" and universality of certain structural types. His approach
held sway in English literature programs for several decades but lost favor during the
ascendance of post-structuralism.
For some theories of literature (especially certain kinds of formalism), the distinction
between "literary" and other sorts of texts is of paramount importance. Other schools
(particularly post-structuralism in its various forms: new historicism, deconstruction, some
3/7
strains of Marxism and feminism) have sought to break down distinctions between the two
and have applied the tools of textual interpretation to a wide range of "texts", including film,
non-fiction, historical writing, and even cultural events.
Mikhail Bakhtin argued that the "utter inadequacy" of literary theory is evident when it is
forced to deal with the novel; while other genres are fairly stabilized, the novel is still
developing.[6]
Schools
Listed below are some of the most commonly identified schools of literary theory, along
with their major authors. In many cases, such as those of the historian and philosopher
Michel Foucault and the anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss, the authors were not primarily
literary critics, but their work has been broadly influential in literary theory.
4/7
structural purposes of a particular text
German hermeneutics and philology
Marxism (see Marxist literary criticism) – which emphasizes themes of class conflict
Narratology
New Criticism – looks at literary works on the basis of what is written, and not at the
goals of the author or biographical issues
New Historicism – which examines the work through its historical context and seeks
to understand cultural and intellectual history through literature
Postcolonialism – focuses on the influences of colonialism in literature, especially
regarding the historical conflict resulting from the exploitation of less developed
countries and indigenous peoples by Western nations
Postmodernism – criticism of the conditions present in the twentieth century, often
with concern for those viewed as social deviants or the Other
Michel Foucault, Roland Barthes, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari and Maurice
Blanchot
Post-structuralism – a catch-all term for various theoretical approaches (such as
deconstruction) that criticize or go beyond Structuralism's aspirations to create a
rational science of culture by extrapolating the model of linguistics to other discursive
and aesthetic formations
Psychoanalysis (see psychoanalytic literary criticism) – explores the role of
consciousnesses and the unconscious in literature including that of the author,
reader, and characters in the text
Queer theory – examines, questions, and criticizes the role of gender identity and
sexuality in literature
Reader-response criticism – focuses upon the active response of the reader to a text
Russian formalism
Victor Shklovsky, Vladimir Propp
Structuralism and semiotics (see semiotic literary criticism) – examines the universal
underlying structures in a text, the linguistic units in a text and how the author
conveys meaning through any structures
Other theorists: Robert Graves, Alamgir Hashmi, John Sutherland, Leslie Fiedler,
Kenneth Burke, Paul Bénichou, Barbara Johnson, Blanca de Lizaur
See also
Notes
1. ^ Jump up to: a b Culler 1997, p.1
2. Jump up ^ Searle, John. (1990) The Storm Over the University, The New York
Review of Books, December 6, 1990.
3. Jump up ^ van Gelder, G. J. H. (1982), Beyond the Line: Classical Arabic Literary
Critics on the Coherence and Unity of the Poem, Brill Publishers, pp. 1–2, ISBN 90-
04-06854-6
4. Jump up ^ https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2014/11/13/essay-critiques-role-
theory-humanities. "Jay treats it [theory] as transformative progress, but it impressed
us as hack philosophizing, amateur social science, superficial learning, or just plain
5/7
gamesmanship."
5. Jump up ^ Sullivan, Patrick (2002-01-01). ""Reception Moments," Modern Literary
Theory, and the Teaching of Literature". Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 45
(7): 568–577.
6. Jump up ^ Bakhtin 1981, p.8
References
Peter Barry. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory.
ISBN 0-7190-6268-3.
Jonathan Culler. (1997) Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. ISBN 0-19-285383-X.
Terry Eagleton. Literary Theory: An Introduction. ISBN 0-8166-1251-X.
Terry Eagleton. After Theory. ISBN 0-465-01773-8.
Jean-Michel Rabaté. The Future of Theory. ISBN 0-631-23013-0.
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism. ISBN 0-8018-4560-2.
Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Ed. David Lodge and Nigel Wood. 2nd Ed.
ISBN 0-582-31287-6
Theory's Empire: An Anthology of Dissent. Ed. Daphne Patai and Will H. Corral.
ISBN 0-231-13417-7.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist.
Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas
Press.
René Wellek. A history of modern criticism : 1750-1950. Yale University Press, 1955-
1992, 8 volumes.
1: The later eighteenth century
2: The romantic age
3: The age of transition
4: The later nineteenth century
5: English criticism, 1900-1950
6: American criticism, 1900-1950
7: German, Russian, and Eastern European criticism, 1900-1950
8: French, Italian and Spanish criticism, 1900-1950
Further reading
Carroll, J. (2007). Evolutionary Approaches to Literature and Drama. In Robin Dunbar
and Louise Barrett, (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology.
Chapter 44. Full text
Castle, Gregory. Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing, 2007.
Culler, Jonathan. The Literary in Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.
Terry Eagleton. Literary Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
(http://www.upress.umn.edu/)
Literary Theory: An Anthology. Edited by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
6/7
Lisa Zunshine, ed. Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore: The Johns
Hopkins University Press, 2010
External links
7/7