Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Charles Hockett
1
Defining language
• Is remarkably difficult
• An alternative would be to provide a set of features/
characteristics that would identify/describe language
• Only systems that display these features can be called
language
• Features proceed from the most universal to the most
particular
2
Mode of Communication
3
1. Semanticity
4
2. Pragmatic Function
• Serve a purpose
• Seeking help and giving help
• Seeking information
• Modifying behaviour
• Achieve certain outcomes
• Social give and take, social bonding, establishing
relationships, understanding the social environment
5
3. Interchangeability
• Ability to switch from sender to receiver
• Speak (sender)
• Listen (receiver)
6
4. Cultural Transmission
• Aspects of the system that can be learnt only through
interaction with members in the community
• Cuckoo’s call and crow’s cawing
• Zebra Finch’s song
• Marathi, Hindi or Russian
7
5. Arbitrariness
• Connection between form [kæt] , cat and
• Sound-meaning pairs are arbitrary and
conventionalized (product names, Xerox, Accenture,
Vodafone, Garmin, Haagen-Das)
• When such meaning is transparent or there, is a clear
connection then we see non-arbitrariness
8
Evidence for arbitrariness
• Single meaning but many words/forms within and across
languages
• Within a language
• Pit, stone, seed (peach)
• िव ालय, पाठशाला, ू ल(school)
• Across languages
• Water (English), Wasser (German), Eau (French), पानी
(Hindi), søy (Cantonese)
• Tree (English) , arbre (French), derevo (Rusiian), ki
(Japanese), namu (Korean), Baum (German), पे ड़(Hindi)
9
Evidence for arbitrariness
• Single form mapped to many meanings within and
across languages
• Within a language:
• Pit (seed or hole in the ground)
• Not, naught, knot [nɔt]
• Across languages:
• [li] – Lee (English), ‘bed’ (French), borrowed
(German), this (Cantonese), participle of take
(Hindi)
10
Non-arbitrariness
• Sound-meaning transparency
• Onomatopoeia – splat, burble, cock-a-doodle-doo; croon-
hum-moan-murmur
The moan of doves in immemorial elms
And murmuring of innumerable bees (Tennyson)
• Sound symbolism
• teeny, petite, wee, mikros (Greek, small), perrito
(Spanish, little dog)
• Large, vast; splish vs splash; plink and plonk; squeak and
squawk
11
• Glow, glimmer, glisten, gleam, glitter, glad; smash, crash,
bash, slash, dash, lash
• Iconicity –
• small
•tall
• Fat
12
13
14
15
6. Discreteness
• Meaningless sounds to words; words pattern into sentences.
And vice-versa
• Blending systems vs. Discrete Combinatorial systems
• A finite number of discrete elements are sampled,
combined and permuted to create larger structures with
properties that are quite distinct from those of their
elements. – Steven Pinker
• Geology, paint mixing, cooking, sound, light, weather
16
Another such system in nature
• In genetics, an unlimited number of different genes can
be strung based on only sixty-four codons (3 nucleotide
sequence), which are formed from only four nucleotides
(A,T,C,G) that make up the DNA molecule
17
Discreteness
• Sounds – some 10-100
• Vocabulary, about 50,000 words
• Rules of combination
18
7. Productivity
• The capacity to build novel messages out of the discrete
units
• Finite means, infinite productions
• All rules of a language allow for productivity
Allows us to produce and understand any number of novel
utterances previously unheard and propositions previously
unexpressed
19
8. Displacement
9. Reflexiveness
10. Learnability
20