Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Submitted to:
Prof. Apolinar Ng
Submitted by:
Alialy, Ruy
De Guzman, Gizelle
Madrona, Mary Ahn
So, Hanzelle Louise
I. INTRODUCTION
The Kaizen philosophy in the service organization follows a straightforward with a goal of
eliminating waste in a process. That is, eliminating the non-value adding activities while trying
to continue to find ways in improving its process in order to discover value adding opportunities
for an organization.
For the topic of this paper, we will be focusing on the current situation of the Asset
Management Group- Retail Sales which relies heavily on customer information in order to drive
successful sale with its foreclosed assets. In this regard, information flow is highly valuable for
the team but the existing information flow and approval process, has becoming more and more
problematic for the team (highly dependent on manual encoding with too many
checkers/approvers) and a source of complaints from customer (due to slow turnover of
property).
Our aim is be able to apply the kaizen philosophy of “continuous improvement” to BDO
AMG-Sales team’s existing sales proposal process to improve their current situation by making
the problematic areas visible and reduce non value adding activities and develop a more
standardized process to expose value adding activities to its existing process.
BDO’s institutional strengths and value-added products and services hold the key to its
successful business relationships with customers. Its branches remain at the forefront of
setting high standards as a sales- and service-oriented, customer-focused force. BDO has one
of the largest distribution networks, with more than 1,000 operating branches and over 3,000
ATMs nationwide.
Asset Management Group-Retail Sales is the unit responsible for the marketing and
selling of bank’s acquired properties. These properties are known in the banking industry as
Real and Other Properties Acquired (ROPA). It is composed of one (1) Head, fifteen (15) Sales
Officers (SOs) and two (2) administration staff. Sales Officers are grouped into three (3) teams.
There are three stages in the selling process, the first is the bidding stage, the second is
the approval stage from Unit Head/Group Head, and the third is the approval stage from the
Top Management.
The average number of sales transactions per month for the entire retail sales unit is
twenty-five (25). In connection with its sales approval process, the turnaround time for any
client to receive a Notice of Approval (NOA) is eighteen (18) days. This very long process is
one of the complaints from the clients. Existing process flow using cross-functional process
map (see next page)
IV. OBJECTIVES
In order to address the delay, this paper aims to provide the process analysis to determine
the bottleneck and at the same time to make recommendations
The relevant facts are anchored on: (1) Information gathering, (2) Preparation of Sales
Proposal, (3) Checkers and reviewers, and (4) Issuance of Notice of Approval (NOA).
1. Information gathering
In this regard, the Retail Sales unit has no access to the current Management
Information System (MIS) system being used by Asset Management Group (AMG) for
acquired properties in connection with the pertinent data/information. In view of this, Sales
Officers (SOs) have to resort to manual gathering, meaning have to get information from
other units which have access on the system.
This process entails sending e-mail to concerned units for which the response time
from the source units is about a day the earliest and five days the latest. Once the pertinent
data/information are on hand already, then the preparation of sales proposals begins.
2. Preparation of Sales Proposals
3. Checkers/approvers
Sales Proposals made are endorsed to different units for review on the
data/information, and at the same time for approval.
Details Present Time
Process Responsible Unit
of (Minutes)
Proposed
AMG-Operations/
Review of data on book value Records/ Expense Unit 5
and Property Admin
Review of sale proposal by Property
AMG-Property Admin 60
Admin Head
For approval of Sales Unit Head AMG – Sales 20
In this aspect, it is very important to point out here the availability of Unit Head, the
office location of Remedial Group and the schedule of presentation to Top Management.
Unit Head comes to work thrice a week only, hence sales proposals can be endorsed to
her in three-day period only. The office of Remedial Group is located in the adjacent
building, and the time consumption of any messenger to bring the proposals to her is about
5 to 10 minutes. The schedule of presentation to Top Management is every Friday only.
Documentation Unit has no access as well to the MIS system of AMG, thus its way
of preparation of NOA is quite tedious because it has to go over all the pertinent
data/information again. Likewise, the preparation of it will start only once the approved
sales proposal folder is delivered to the documentation officers. The delivery usually takes
about 3 to 5 days.
SUMMARY OF TASKS
It shows indeed that the bottleneck confines to: 1> the task for the information
gathering, and 2> the task for the issuance of Notice of Approval (NOA).
Firstly, on the MIS system being used by AMG. Access must be given to both Retail Sales
and Documentation units. This system has to be enhanced as well. This includes
incorporation of templates for the Sales Proposal and Notice of Approval. Access must be
given as well to Retail Sales and Documentation units.
The access to be given is a feasible solution because SOs will no longer request
data/information from the source units (the ones tasked to encode them in the system). When
it comes to templates, once they are incorporated in the system, then only few fields are left to
be filled up and these are the name of buyer, the offered amount, the referrer and the
justifications of the proposal. Manual computation for the financial analysis will be eliminated
likewise since templates have fields for the computation.
Secondly, other tasks must be eliminated already since they are considered as redundant.
These include the review being made by Remedial and the requirement of initials of SOs on
the Notice of Approval (NOA)
The review by Remedial officer prior to the endorsement to Remedial Group Head for
approval is redundant because this task is being done by AMG Property Admin Head already.
For the initials of SOs and Unit Head on the NOA, since the sales proposals have been
prepared by SOs and approved by Unit Head, then this requirement of initials must be
eliminated already because it does not serve any purpose or bearing. This is in consideration
of the fact that SOs most of the time are not in the office and the Unit Head being in office for
thrice a week only.
AMG-Operations/ Eliminate
Review of data on book value Records/ Expense Unit 0 N
and Property Admin
Review of sale proposal by Property
AMG-Property Admin 60 N
Admin Head
For approval of Sales Unit Head AMG – Sales 20 N
Eliminate
Review of sale proposal by Remedial Remedial 0 N
For approval of AMG/Remedial Group
AMG/Remedial Group 480 N
Head
Executive Committee Simplify
For final approval of Top Management 180 N
(ExCom)
Issuance of Notice of Approval (NOA) 495
Automate
Preparation of NOA AMG-Documentation 480 Y
SUMMARY Analysis
Tasks Present process Proposed process Variance %
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The enhancement of the current MIS system in order to incorporate templates for the sales
proposals and Notice of Approval.
2. Access is given to Retail Sales and Documentation unit.
3. Elimination of tasks that are considered redundant and of no purpose or bearing.
VIII. REFERENCE