Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Introduction Concept
2. Frequency Response of the typical Graphics
elements of the linear systems mode
3. Bode diagram of the open loop system
4. Nyquist-criterion
5. System analysis based on the frequency
Analysis
response
6. Frequency response of the closed loop
systems
5.1 Introduction
Three advantages:
* Frequency response(mathematical modeling) can be obtained
directly by experimental approaches.
* easy to analyze the effects of the system with sinusoidal
voices.
* easy to analyze the stability of the systems with a delay
R
element
5.1.1 frequency response
For a RC circuit:
If : ur A sin(t 0 ) ur C uc
then: U c ( j ) G( j )U r ( j )
We have: uc (t ) U cm sin(t c )
Here: U cm U c ( j ) G( j ) U r ( j ) c U c ( j ) G ( j ) U r ( j )
1 tg -1 ( RC ) 0
A
( RC ) 2 1
U c ( j ) 1
We call: G( j )
U r ( j ) jRC 1
Change frequency
Get the amplitude ratio of the output versus input
Get the phase difference between the output and input
y
Data processing
5.1.2 approaches to get the frequency characteristics
2. Deductive approach
Theorem: If the transfer function is G(s), we have:
G( j ) G( s )
s j
Proof :
C ( s) M ( s)
assume : G ( s )
R( s ) ( s p1 )( s p2 ) ( s pn )
A
and r(t) A sint R( s )
s2 2
Where — pi is assumed to be distinct pole (i=1,2,3…n).
then C ( s ) G( s ) R( s )
M ( s) A
( s p1 )( s p2 ) ( s pn ) ( s j )( s j )
In partial fraction form:
K1 K2 Kn A1 A2
C ( s)
( s p1 ) ( s p2 ) ( s p 3 ) ( s j ) ( s j )
M ( s)
Here: Ki ( s pi ) R( s )
( s p1 )( s p2 ) ( s p3 ) s pi
A
A1 G ( s ) ( s j )
( s j )( s j ) s j
A A G ( j ) j ( G ( j )90o )
G ( j ) e
2j 2
A G( j ) j (G( j )90o )
A2 A1 e
2
5.1.2 approaches to get the frequency characteristics
Taking the inverse Laplace transform:
n
c( t ) K i e pi t A1e jt A2 e jt
i 1
n j (t G ( j )90o ) j ( t G ( j ) 90 o
)
e e
Kie pi t
A G ( j )
2
i 1
n
K i e pi t A G ( j ) sin(t G ( j ))
i 1
For the stable system all poles (-pi) have a negative real parts,
we have the steady-state output signal:
n
lim c( t ) c s ( t ) lim [
t t
K i e pi t A G ( j ) sin(t G ( j ))]
i 1
A G ( j ) sin(t G ( j ))
5.1.2 approaches to get the frequency characteristics
the steady-state output:
cs (t ) A G( j ) sin(t G( j ))
Compare with the sinusoid input r (t ) A sint , we have:
The amplitude ratio of the steady-state output cs(t) versus
sinusoid input r(t):
A G ( j ) C ( j )
G(jω) magnitude characteristic
A R( j )
The phase difference between the steady-state output and
sinusoid input:
[t G( j )] t G( j ) C ( j ) R( j )
phase characteristic
Then we have :
C ( j )
G( j ) G( s )
R( j ) s j
5.1 Introduction
Examples 5.1.1
tg 1 (2 )
10 10 10
Example 5.1.2 G( s ) G( j )
2s 1 j 2 1
1 ( 2 ) 2
G ( j ) G( j )
G ( j ) G ( j ) 10
0 10 0o
5
0.5 7.07 45o
1 4.47 63.435o 1
0
o
2 2.4 75.964 0. 5 1 2 3 4 5
3 1.64 80.538o
4 1.24 82.875o
5 0 .995 84.29o - 90o
5.1.3 Graphic expression of the frequency response
2. Polar plot
The polar plot is easily useful for investigating system stability.
Example 5.1.3 K K
G( s ) G( j ) G( s )
s(Ts 1) s j j ( jT 1)
The magnitude and phase response:
; ( ) G( j ) [90o tg 1 (T)]
K
A( ) G( j )
1 (T ) 2
Im L( ), ( )
( ) 0o
K Re
L( ) 20 log K dB
0dB, 0o (log )
0.1 1 10 100
Polar plot Bode diagram
5.2 Frequency response of the typical elements
2. Integrating element
C ( s) 1
Transfer function: G ( s )
R( s ) s
Frequency response:
1
1 G ( j ) L( ) 20 log G ( j ) 20 log
G ( j )
j o
( ) G ( j ) 90
L( ), ( )
Im
0dB, 0o (log )
0 0.1 1 10 100 ( ) 90o
Polar plot
Bode diagram
5.2 Frequency response of the typical elements
3. Inertial element
C ( s) 1 1
Transfer function: G( s ) G ( j )
R( s ) Ts 1 jT 1
0 1 T
1
G( j ) L( ) 20 log 1 (T ) 2 3dB 1 T
1 (T ) 2 20 log(T ) 1 T
( ) tg (T )
1
K 1
1/T: break frequency G ( s ) :
T2 s 1 T2
L( ), ( )
1
Im 0 20 log K
0dB, 0o
T
(log )
1 Re 0.1 1 10 100
45 o 20dB/ dec
90 o
Im L( ), ( ) 20 log M r
0 n 1 / T 20 log( 1 )
Re 2
1 r
0dB, 0o (log )
0.1 1 10 100
1 90o
j ( n )
2 40dB/ dec
Re Re Re
1 1
Polar plot
5.2 Frequency response of the typical elements
Because of the transfer functions of the differentiating elements
are the reciprocal of the transfer functions of Integrating
element, Inertial element and Oscillating element respectively,
that is: inverse
s 1
s
inverse
Ts 1 1
Ts 1
inverse
T 2 s 2 2Ts 1 1
T 2 s 2 2Ts 1
L( ), ( ) L( ), ( )
180 o
L( ) : 20dB / dec 40dB / dec
( ) 90o
(log ) 90 o
0dB, 0o n 1 T
0.1 1 10 100
0dB, 0o (log )
differential 0.1 1 10 100
L( ), ( )
20 log( 1 )
o 2
90
o
20dB / dec 20 log M r
45
0dB, 0o (log ) 2th-order differential
0.1 1 10 100
1th-order differential
5.2 Frequency response of the typical elements
6. Delay element
e s
C ( s)
Transfer function: G ( s )
R( s )
j G ( j ) 1 L( ) 0
G ( j ) e
( ) G ( j )
Im L( ), ( )
R=1
0dB, 0o (log )
Re 0.1 1 10 100
10( s 1)
Example 5.3.1 G( s ) H ( s )
s 2 (0.01s 1)
5.3 Bode diagram of the open loop systems
G(s)H(s) could be regarded as:
① ②③ ④
10( s 1) 1 1
G ( s) H ( s) 10 (s 1)
2
s (0.01s 1) s2 0.01s 1
Then we have:
L( ), ( ) 20dB/dec
②
-40dB/dec
40dB, 90o
①
20dB, 45o
-20dB/dec
0dB, 0o (log )
0.1 1 10 100 -20dB/dec
-20dB, -45o ④
-40dB/dec
-40dB, -90o
-40dB/dec
-60dB.-135o
③
-80dB,-180o
5.3.2 Facility method to plot the magnitude response
of the Bode diagram
Summarizing example 5.3.1, we have the facility method to plot
the magnitude response of the Bode diagram:
1) Mark all break frequencies in theω-axis of the Bode diagram.
2) Determine the slope of the L(ω) of the lowest frequency band
(before the first break frequency) according to the number of the
integrating elements:
-20dB/dec for 1 integrating element
-40dB/dec for 2 integrating elements …
3) Continue the L(ω) of the lowest frequency band until to the
first break frequency, afterwards change the the slope of the L(ω)
which should be increased 20dB/dec for the break frequency of
the 1th-order differentiating element .
The slope of the L(ω) should be decreased 20dB/dec for the
break frequency of the Inertial element …
5.3.2 Facility method to plot the magnitude response of
the Bode diagram
Plot the L(ω) of the rest break frequencies by analogy .
Example 5.3.2 10( s 1)
G ( s)
s(0.1s 1)( 0.012 s 2 0.01s 1)
20log10 20logω ( 1) ( ) 90o tg 1 tg 1 (0.1 )
20log10 20log
0.01
(1 10) tg 1
20log
1 ( 0.01 ) 2
L( ) 20log10 20log 51.3o
(10 100) 1
20log 20log(0.1 )
56.5o 10
20log10 20log ( )
20log 20log(0.1 ) (100 ) 174 . 9 o
100
179.6o 104
40log(0.01 )
G1 ( s ) G2 ( s )
(Ts 1) (Ts 1) G1 ( ) G2 ( ) G3 ( ) G4 ( )
T
K ( s 1) K (s 1)
G3 ( s) G4(s) ( ) 2 1
(Ts 1) (Ts 1) K
(T ) 2 1
The magnitude responses are the same.
But the net phase shifts are different when ω vary from zero to
infinite. It can be illustrated as following:
Sketch the polar plot:
G1 ( j ) tg 1 (T ) tg 1 ( ), G2 ( j ) tg 1 (T ) 180o tg 1 ( )
G3 ( j ) tg 1 (T ) tg 1 ( ), G4 ( j ) 180o tg 1 (T ) tg 1 ( )
5.3.3 Determine the transfer function in terms of the
Bode diagram
The polar plot:
Im
, K
Im T
0
, K Im 0, K
K T Re
Re Re
0, K
, K
T
Example 5.3.3
5.3.3 Determine the transfer function in terms of the
Bode diagram
we can get the G(s) from L( )
- 40dB/dec
and :
L( ) 2o log K 20 log 2 20 log( 0.5 ) 0 K 40
20
Example 5.3.4 L( )
we can get the G(s) from the 20dB
20dB/dec -20dB/dec
0.5 200
Bode diagram : (log )
0dB 10 100
0.1 1
Ks
G ( s)
(T1s 1)(T2 s 1)
5.3.3 Determine the transfer function in terms of the
Bode diagram
L( )
we can get the G(s) from the 20dB
20dB/dec -20dB/dec
Bode diagram : 0.5 200
(log )
0dB 10 100
Ks 0.1 1
G ( s)
and : (T1s 1)(T2 s 1)
L( ) 20 log K 20 log 0.5 0 K 2
L( ω) 20 log 2 20 log 1 / T 20 dB T1 0.2
1
L( ) 20 log 2 20 log 20 log( 0.2 ) 20 log(T2 ) 200 0 T2 0.05
Example 5.3.5 L( )
-20dB/dec
we can get the G(s) from
8.136 dB
the Bode diagram : 20 dB
(log )
2 0dB
K ( 0.01s 1) 0.1 1 10 100
G ( s) -60dB/dec
s(T s 2Ts 1)
2 -20dB/dec
1
10 T 0.1
T
L( ) 20 log K 20 log 10 20 dB K 100 then :
1 100(0.01s 1) 2
20 log 8.136 0.2 G(s)
2ζ 1 2 s(0.01s 0.04s 1)
( s si ) 0 si
Similarly we have:
p j is enclosed by Γ : ( s p j ) 2 Fig. 5.4.1
F ( s) 1 G( j ) H ( j ) G( j ) H ( j ) 1 F ( s )
s j
Because the origin of the F(s)-plane is Fig. 5.4.2
equivalent to the point (-1, j0) of the G(jω)H(jω)-plane, we have
another statement of the argument principle:
When ω vary from - (or 0) →+ , G(jω)H(jω) Locus mapped
in the G(jω)H(jω)-plane will encircle the point (-1, j0) in the
counterclockwise direction:
N P Z [or N (P Z)/ 2 for from 0 ]
here: P — the number of the poles of G(s)H(s) in the right hand
of the s-plane.
Z — the number of the zeros of F(s) in the right hand of the
s-plane.
5.4.2 Nyquist-criterion
If the systems are stable, should be Z = 0, then we have:
The sufficient and necessary condition of the stability of the
linear systems is : When ω vary from - (or 0) →+ , the
G(jω)H(jω) Locus mapped in the G(jω)H(jω)-plane will encircle
the point (-1, j0) as P (or P/2) times in the counterclockwise
direction. ——Nyquist criterion
Here: P — the number of the poles of G(s)H(s) in the right hand
of the s-plane.
Discussion :
i) If the open loop systems are stable, that is P = 0, then:
for the stable open-loop systems, The sufficient and necessary
condition of the stability of the closed-loop systems is :
When ω vary from - (or 0) →+ , the G(jω)H(jω) locus
mapped in the G(jω)H(jω)-plane will not encircle the point (-
1, j0).
5.4.2 Nyquist-criterion
ii) Because that the G(jω)H(jω) locus encircles the point (-1, j0)
means that the G(jω)H(jω) locus traverse the left real axis of
the point (-1, j0) , we make:
G(jω)H(jω) Locus traverses the left real axis of the point (-1, j0)
in the counterclockwise direction —―positive traversing‖.
G(jω)H(jω) Locus traverses the left real axis of the point (-1, j0)
in the clockwise direction —―negative traversing‖.
Then we have another statement of the Nyquist criterion:
The sufficient and necessary condition of the stability of the
linear systems is : When ω vary from - (or 0) →+ , the
number of the net ―positive traversing‖ is P (or P/2).
Here: the net “positive traversing” —— the difference between the
number of the “positive traversing” and the number of the “negative
traversing” .
5.4.2 Nyquist-criterion
Example 5.4.1
The polar plots of the open loop systems are shown in
Fig.5.4.3, determine whether the systems are stable.
Im Im
stable stable
(-1, j0)
(-1, j0)
Re Re
0
(1) P=2 (2) P=0
0 0
Im Im
unstable unstable
(-1, j0)
Re (-1, j0)
Re
0
(3) P=2
Fig.5.4.3 (4) P=0
5.4.2 Nyquist-criterion
Note: the system with the poles (or zeros) at the imaginary axis
10
Example 5.4.2 G ( s ) H ( s )
s( s 1)( 0.5s 1)
There is a pole s = 0 at the origin in this system, but the Nyquist
path can not pass through any poles of G(s)H(s).
Idea: We consider a semicircular Radius
detour around the pole (s = 0) repre- s j Im
r
sented by setting s e j ( 0) 0 0
at the s = 0 point we have: Re
j 90 o 1 1 j 90 o -2 -1
0 s εe G( j0 ) H ( j0 ) e Radius
o
εe j 90 0 0
j 0o 1 1 j 0o
0 s εe G ( j 0) H ( j 0) e s j s j
o
εe j 0
Fig. 5.4.4
o 1 1 o
0 s εe j 90 G ( j 0 ) H ( j 0 ) e j 90
j 90 o
εe
5.4.2 Nyquist-criterion
It is obvious that there is a phase saltation of the G(jω)H(jω) at
ω=0, and the magnitude of the G(jω)H(jω) is infinite at ω=0.
Radius
s j Im 0
r Im
0 0
Re G ( s) H ( s)
Re
Radius
10 (-1, j0)
0 0 s( s 1)( 0.5s 1) 0
s j s j 0
Fig. 5.4.4 Fig.5.4.5
In terms of above discussion , we can plot the system’s polar
plot shown as Fig.5.4.5.
The closed loop system is unstable.
Example 5.4.3
10 10
G ( s) H ( s)
s( s 1)( s 4) s( s 1)( s j 2)( s j 2)
2
5 (- Re
K c1GH ( j ) 1 K c1 K 0 1, j0)
g 4 0.8
K 0GH ( j ) 1.5 and G(jω)H(jω)
g
2
K c 2GH ( j ) 1 Kc 2 Fig.5.4.9
g 3
K 0GH ( j ) 2 and
g
1
K c 3GH ( j ) 1 K c 3 K0
g 2
Then we have the stable range of the open loop gain K :
2 5 1
K 0 K K 0 or K K0
3 4 2
5.5 System analysis based on the frequency response
5.5.1 Performance specifications in the frequency domain
1. For the closed loop systems
The general frequency response of a closed loop systems is
shown in Fig. 5.5.1
(1) Resonance frequency ωr:
A(ω)
G ( j )
Assume : A( ) ( j ) Mr
1 G ( j ) H ( j )
d A(0)
r satisfy : A( ) 0 0.707A(0)
d r
ω
(2) Resonance peak Mr : 0
ωr ωb
Settling time ts
k
c
1
, k 2 1.5
1
1 2.5
1 350 c 900
sin c sin c
5.5.2 Relationship of the performance specifications between the
frequency and time domain
(3) A(0) → Steady state error ess
G ( j )
A( 0 ) A( ) 0
1 G ( j ) H ( j ) 0
1
assume : G ( s) KG G0 ( s) H ( s) K H H0 ( s)
v
s
1 For the unity feedback system, H(s) 1 :
K v 1
then : A(0) H 1 v 1
1
v0 A( 0) KG v0
KG K H 1 KG
G ( j ) △
A( ) A( 0) A(0)
1 G ( j ) H ( j ) 0.707A(0)
M
ω
: allowed reproducin g error 0
ωM ωr ωb
Fig. 5.5.2
b n (1 2 2 ) 2 4 2 4 4
2
r n 1 2 (0
2
)
2 , n p % , t s , t r ...
1
Mr
2 1 2
c n 1 4 4 2 2
2
c tg 1
, n p % , t s , t r ...
1 4 4 2 2
Kg
5.5 System analysis based on the frequency response
5.5.4 ―three frequency band‖ theorem
The performance analysis of the closed loop systems according
to the open loop frequency response.
1. For the low frequency band
the low frequency band is mainly concerned with the control
accuracy of the systems.
The more negative the slope of L(ω) is , the higher the control
accuracy of the systems. The bigger the magnitude of L(ω) is, the
smaller the steady state error ess is.
2. For the middle frequency band
The middle frequency band is mainly concerned with the
transient performance of the systems.
ωc↑—tr ↓; Kg and γc ↓—σp% ↑
5.5.4 ―three frequency band‖ theorem
Fig. 5.5.4
Ⅰ Ⅱ
5.5 System analysis based on the frequency response
Solution : L( ) 20 log G( j ) H ( j )
essⅠ> essⅡ
-40
σpⅠ% =σpⅡ%
trⅠ > trⅡ -20 ω
0dB
The ability of the system Ⅰ
-40
restraining the high frequency Fig. 5.5.4
noise is stronger than system Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅱ
L(ω)
Example 5.5.2 -20dB/dec
For the minimum phase system, the open loop
magnitude response shown as the Fig. 5.5.5. 1 ω
Determine the system’s parameter to make the 0.1 -40dB/dec
system being the optimal second-order system Fig. 5.5.5
and the steady-state error ess< 0.1.
Solution :
5.6 Frequency response of the closed loop systems
5.6 Frequency response of the closed loop systems
How to obtain the closed loop frequency response in terms of
the open loop frequency response.
5.6.1 The constant M circles: How to obtain the magnitude
frequency response of the closed loop systems in terms of the
open loop frequency response…… (refer to P495)
5.6.2 The constant N circles: How to obtain the phase frequency
characteristic of the closed loop systems in terms of the open
loop frequency response…… (refer to P496)
5.6.3 The Nichols chart: How to obtain the closed loop frequency
response in terms of the open loop frequency response……
(refer to P496)
Chapter 5 Frequency Response Methods