5th Offshore South East Asia 21-24 February 1984 Singapore

SESSION 5: PRODUCTION

FACILITIES PLANNING FOR THE SEMANGKOK FIELD

- OFFSHORE PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

C C Wan
J L Soong
Esso Production Malaysia Inc.

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with facilities planning for Esso Production Malaysia Inc's
(EPMI's) Semangkok oil field and is supplementary to the Semangkok Field
Development Planning paper presented at this conference. The original plan
was to develop the field with three platforms but further studies indicated
that two platforms would reach all reserves utilizing higher angle wells.
The production facilities include a manned central processing platform,
Semangkok A, with gas re-injection facilities and an unmanned satellite
platform, Semangkok B. Remote operation of the unmanned satellite platform
is accomplished by a telemetry system operated from the ce~tral platform.
Crude production is pumped to the onshore Trengganu Crude Oil Terminal
(TCOT) via a pumping platform. Development planning had to consider the high
CO content of Semangkok gas which required careful selection of materials
2
in the facilities design.

INTRODUCTION
The location of Semangkok field relative to other EPMI fields in offshore
Peninsular Malaysia is shown in Figure 1. Semangkok field is 87 km from the
Tapis pumping platform which in turn is approximately 200 km from the
onshore Trengganu Crude Oil Terminal (TCOT) near Kerteh.

The Semangkok field crude reserves will be recovered from the Group E sand-
stones with average depths ranging from 1000m to 1200m. Oil accumulation is
of a rim-type which is underlain by water and overlain by gas. Although the
aquifer strength varies from weak to moderate no water injection is required
to maintain the reservoir pressure. Produced gas will be reinjected for
purpgses of §eservoir pressure maintenance. Compression design capacity is 1
x 10 std. m per day.

Field optimization studies have reduced the development of Semangkok field

to two production platforms - namely Semangkok A, which is manned and to be
a central processing platform and Semangkok B, which is unmanned and to be a
minimum facility satellite platform.

Semangkok A platform is an eight-legged, five-module platform. with 24 well-

slots and is located in 64 m of water. The jacket and deck modules were
installed in July 1983. Gas compression facilities will be installed in
April 1984 when drilling is in progress and production hCJ~ commenced.
Semangkok B is a four-legged platform containing two modules and having 18
well-slots. The modules were installed in September 1983.

The design production rates for Semangkok A are 3200 kl of oil per day, 2.8

5-65
 6 3
x 10 std. m of gas per day and 9500 kl of water per day. In the case of
Semangkok 8, the platform is designed for a maxim~m oil production rate of
2900 kl per day and a gas rate of 1.4 x 10 6 std. m per day.

Crude production from Semangkok B is transported by pipeline to the produc-

tion facilities
at Semangkok A. In turn all Semangkok crude production is
pumped via a pipeline to the Irang Barat A platform at which point i t )Olns
the Irong Barat pipeline to the Tapis pumping platform. From the Tapis pump-
ing platform this production is pumped via a 600 mm trunk pipeline to the
Trengganu Crude Oil Terminal (Figure 2).

ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS

The facilities planning for Semangkok field involved the follOWing consider-
ations:-

Number of Platforms/Conductors

It was originally planned to develop the Semangkok field with three plat-
forms. However, a field optimization study in eary 1982 indicated that two
rather than three platforms would be adequate to develop the field without
loss in oil recovery (see Figure 3). The details of this study are covered
in the previously referred to paper on Semangkok Field Development Planning.
This optimization to a two-platform scenario was made possible by the pro-
posed drilling of high angle wells of approximately 65 to 70 while main-
taining the same area coverage of the reservoir. The two-platform develop-
ment plan requires thirty-seven oil completions compared with thirty-eight
completions in the original three-platform case. The decision in favor of a
two-platform development required an increase in the number of conductors on
Semangkok A platform from 18 in the three-platform case to 24 for the two-
platform case. The number of conductors on Semangkok 8 platform remained the
scme at eighteen.

Cost savings obtained by the reduction from a three-platform to a two-

platform development have been considerable. The two-platform case reduced
investment by 60 million US dollars, primarily because of the elimination of
one satellite platform and its associated pipeline.

Platform Design

Both Semangkok A and B platforms have integrated production and utility

facilities which is typical of EPMI s offshore platform configurations. It
is important that the design criteria are such that they will provide full
flexibility for future equipment with the minimum of initial investment.

Platform construction is of a modular design which allows all facilities

such as production equipment, piping. cabling and instrumentation to be
installed at an onshore fabrication yard. Considerable cost savings are
realised by this approach relative to offshore installations of these faci-
lities.

Preliminary engineering design work for Semangkok A and B platforms was

initiated in September 1981.

Semangkok A pLatform facility design was based upon the latest of E?MI's
"five-module" .olatforms that had developed from the first of the "five-
module" platfor11s installed in 1977. Semangkok B platform facility was based
on a standardized two-module type design which was first utilized by EPMI in
1982.

5-66
SPE12390
 Gas Compression Requirements

Three-dimensional reservoir studies indicated that gas injection will be

required in the Semangkok reservoir for pressure maintenance. No water
injection facilities are planned as the reservoirs were interpreted to have
sufficient aquifer strength. The original field development plan provided
for an gventual §as compression capability of 11000 kW at a design rate of
2.8 x 10 std. m per day. This was to be installed in three phases, 40% in
the first year, 40% in the third year, and 20% in the fourth year of opera-
tion. Subsequent to the original field development plan and with the availa-
bility of further ~eservoir data, additional model studies were conducted in
1983. The results showed that there is no immediate requirement for Phases 2
and 3 gas compression to maintain reservoir performance and the decision to
install these facilities has been deferred. Therefore, the current develop-
ment plan is tg instal~ phase 1 compression with 4500kW capacity at a design
rate of 1 x 10 std. m per day.

Future gas compression requirements will be further evaluated as additional

reservoir performance data becomes available.

Telemetry System

Semangkok B satellite platform is designed for unmanned operation. A micro-

processor based telemetry system operated via a radio link was installed for
remote operation of Semangkok B from Semangkok A. The following aspects of
the Semangkok B operation are remotely handled on Semangkok A:

individual well testing

monitoring of well status and production measurements

monitoring and control of critical equipment

initiation of a process and emergency shutdown

Corrosion Control - Production Facilities

One of the most significant engineering considerations in the planning of

the Semangkok facilities was the control of corrosion caused by the high CO
content of the wellstream. The Semangkok well$tream contains 27 mole percen~
of carbon dioxide. This high CO content in the well-stream requires proper
2
material selection and corrosion protection measures in the facilities
design.

The produced water from Semangkok wellstream is highly alkaline which should
have a neutralizing effect. Carbon steel has been specified for well tubu-
lars, flowlines and separator vessels for the Semangkok process facilities.
For the wellheads, it was considered advisable to have stainless steel lower
master valve and alloy steel valve trims for the remainder. Process vessels
on both platforms in direct contact with free water were internally coated
with coal tar-epoxy and fitted with sacrificial anodes.

Corrosion inhibitor is injected into the flowlines and the crude oil produc-
tion pipelines. Corrosion monitoring pOints were installed to enable a close
scrutiny of susceptible areas in the system.

Corrosion Control - Compression Facilities

Potential CO corrosion p~oblems are much more likely in the compression

2
facilities as alkaline water is not present to neutralize the CO and the
2

5-67
SPE123 9 0
... I. .;.
,,,,~ .,.~

~'.' .,.,.
CO 2 fraction is much higher. Semangkok separator gas contains 60 percent
carbon dioxide and as such, demands more extensive corrosion control mea-
sures. T~e pres:nce of ~02 and free wa~er ~n the high pressure environment
results 1n a h1gh part1aI pressure Wh1Ch 1n turn indicates that severe
corrosion potential exists. To reduce corrosion, stainless steel was used
for all suction lines to the gas scrubbers and air-fin coolers. The gas
scrubbers were internally clad with 410 stainless steel (5.5.). Stainless
steel pipe having an operating temperature above 60 C was externally coated
to prevent corrosion due to atmospheric chlorides.

Suction and interstage air-fin cooler headers were made of 304L 5.5. and the
tubes were made of 444 5.5. which is resistant to chloride corrosion. Corro-
sion probes, coupons and inhibitor injection pOints were provided throughout
the compression process.

Other Design Considerations

3
The high CO content in this gas reduces the heating value to 16 MJ/std.m .
2
To operate with this fuel gas, a special combustor and a dual fuel system
were designed for the compressor turbine drivers. Initially the turbines
will be started on diesel fuel and then automatically switched to the low MJ
value fuel gas at idling speed which is equivalent to 60% of the gas genera-
tor speed.

Potential corrosion problems associated with handling gas with a high CO

2
content resulted in a departure from EPMI's standard approach to flareboom
design. Usually, EPMI uses the tubular structural members of a flareboom to
pipe gas to the flare tip. However, on each of the Semangkok platforms, a
dedicated flareline was installed on top of the flareboom. This will allow
replacement of corroded sections of the flareline, or the entire line if
necessary, without removel of the flareboom.

The capacity of the instrument/power gas dryer system On Semangkok B was

increased to handle gas streams, which would not normally be dried, in order
to protect the piping system.

SEMANGKOK A FACILITIES DESCRIPTION

Process Flow

The process flow for Semengkok A is shown in Figure 4. Gas, oil and water
separation consists of three separation stages. Initial operating pressures
will be at 1380 kPa for the first stage, 690 kPa for the second stage and
near atmospheric conditions for the surge vessel. A receiver separator,
installed for Semangkok Bproduction, operates in parallel with the first
stage separator. All production separators are three-phase vessels with the
exception of the Semangkok A first stage separator which is a two-phase
vessel. Individual well testing is accomplished using a three-phase test
separator which will operate at 1380 kPa.

Gas produced from all separators is measured. Oil measurements include test
production and total production.

Free water removed fr·om the production vessels is treated in three oily
water separators (corrlJgated plate inteceptors) before disposal through a
caisson separator.

In the initial phose of operation, gas from the test separator, first stage
separator and receiver separator is compressed for injection into the reser-

5-68
SPE1239Q
voir. Low pressure gas from the second stage separator and surge vessel is
flared.

The system is designed such that the second stage separator and surge vessel
pressures can be raised in future to compressor suction pressure. Low pres-
sure gas, initially flared, will then remain as solution gas in the crude
oil and will be separated and processed at the TeaT.

Three 220 kW electrically driven centrifugal pumps take suction from the
surge vessel and pump Semangkok crude into a 300 mm pipeline to the Irong
Barat A Platform. The 300 mm line connects to the 400 mm pipeline from Irong
Barat A platform to the Tapis Pumping platform.

Module Arrangement

The overall dimensions of Semangkok A platform topside facilities are 29m by

61m which includes seven modules as shown in Figure 5. The process module,
module 1 and the wellhead module, module 2, are 16m by 29m by 6m high. The
remalnlng madules are approximately 11m by 29m by 6m high. All modules,
except the living quarters module, are of 'open' construction with enclosed
areas provided for critical equipment and operations.

Module 1 contains production facilities, including separators, crude oil

pumps, and flare scrubbers. This module also supports a flare boom which is
centilevered from its north wall. The flare boom is a tubular space frame
equipped with a low radiation flare designed to produce a smokeless flame.

Module 2 contains the production wellheads and manifolds, test separator,

fuel gas system and the wellhead control panel.

Module 3 is essentially a materials storage area, together with produced

water treatment facilities (such as Oily Water Separators to remove residual
oil) and crane supports for a 9-tonne and a 36-tonne crane.

Module 4 contains the platform power generators, seawater lift pumps. water
makers and maintenance workshops. Power generation is provided by three
1350 kW turbine-generator units in an enclosed room.

Module 5 houses the remaining utilities and services such as electrical

switchgear, air compressors, fire water pumps, a 600 kW emergency generator,
water makers, control room and three 50-man escape capsules.

Module 6 is the gas compression module and contains two gas turbine driven
centrifugal compressors and associated facilities installed above Module 1.

Module 7 is a four-storey, 120-man living quarters. The quarters module is

designed to provide full accommodation for personnel working on the platform
during the peak-manning phase, which occurs during drilling.

The quarters module is equipped with kitchen/dining and recreational facili-

ties as well as a dispensary. offices. prayer-room. and laundry. The top
deck of the modules serves as a helipad designed far use by a Sikorsky S-61N
helicopter.

Drilling is planned to start in February 1984, utilizing a platform drilling

rig installed over Modules 2, 3 and 4.

Fire/Gas Detection And Fire Suppression Systems

The fire and gas detection and fire suppression facilities on EPMI's off-

SPE12390
shore platforms are designed to provide a high level of safety. The platform
i~ ~lassified into hazardous areas (where potentially explosive gases or
llqUlds are present) and non-hazardous areas in accordance to the API-RP-
5008 code.

The fire detection system includes fusible plugs, ultra-violet detectors,

thermal switches and ionization (smoke) detectors located in open and enclo-
sed areas. Activation of any of these devices in the event of a fire automa-
tically triggers an emergency shutdown (ESD) of the platform with the excep-
tion of the living quarters. In the quarters a fire alarm will be initiated
when the above devices are activated.

Gas detectors are located in enclosed areas, ventilating air ducts, turbine
enclosures, open process modules and drilling areas. They activate the
safety systems as follows:

i) at 20% lower explosive limit (LEL) - an alarm is triggered in the

platform control room;

ii) at 60% LEL - resulting in equipment shutdown and Halon purge if

detected in enclosed areas (except the quarters) or a total shutdown
if detected in an open process module.

In addition to the aforementioned automatic devices, there are manual pneu-

matic and electrical ESD switches strategically placed around the platform
facilities.

The fire suppression system for electrical systems and enclosed areas
(except the quarters where a water sprinkler system is used) depends on
isolation and extinguishment by denial of oxygen using Halon or CO . For
2
fires in process and utility areas (the ESD system stops the supply of fuel
from upstream sources), various combination of deluge systems, light water
stations (a foam system), hose reels and fixed monitors are provided. Fire-
water pumps located in a safe area (Module 5) provide water for the fire
monitors and deluge system. Each module is equipped with wheeled and por-
table dry chemical extinguishers and CO extinguishers in easily accesible
2
areas. The genera! arrangement of the fire suppression system on Semongkok A
is shown in Figure 6.

Protective wolls are also used to isolate hazardous areas from safe areas
and to provide protection and escape time for platform personnel. A heat
shield barrier is provided between the production and compression modules
and the flareboom. A vapour barrier isolates the wellhead area (Module 2)
from the general utilities area (Module 3). A fire wall installed on the
northern face of the living quarters and utility module is capable of with-
standing 1100 C for 30 minutes. During this time temperatures in the living
quarters and the utility module is kept from rising above 65 C.

Escape craft are prOVided near the living quarters to permit rapid evacua-
tion of all personnel should the need arise. Life rafts, life jackets and
life rings are also placed in strategic locations around the platform.

Gas Compression

The Semangkok A gas compression facility was planned for installation in

phases according to the gas-ail-ratiO performance of the oil wells. Turbine
driven centrifugal compressors were chosen because of the high power output
and low weight and space requir ments for these machines. Phose 1 with a
6 3
design gas rate of 1 x 10 std.m per day requires an equivalent compressor
power of 4500 kW and consists of two compression trains.

5-70 SPE12390
 Phase I is planned for the second half of 1984, operating concurrently with
the drilling program. The produced gas will be compressed from 1380 kPa to
an injection pressure of 13100 kPa.

The process flow for the Semangkok A gas compression facility is shown in
Figure 7. Gas from the first stage separator and receiver separator passes
through a air-fin pre-cooler and scrubber prior to entering the gas compres-
sor inlet. Condensed hydrocarbon Liquid and water slugs present at the
module inlet are removed at the suction scrubber. There are two stages of
compression with interstage cooling and scrubbing. Fuel gas is withdrawn
from the suction of the interstage scrubber to a fuel gas filter and heater.
Gas from the second stage compressor discharge is cooled to a temperature of
121 C by an aftercooler and will be re-injected into the reservoir at
Semangkok A.

The first and second stage compressors in each train are driven by dual
fuelled industrial gas turbines. Turbine and compressor speed is controlled
by the suction pressure with high discharge pressure overide. Each indivi-
dual compressor stage is provided with its own surge control loop. A module
bypass system is prOVided between the discharge and suction headers for
module testing at the onshore fabrication yard. The bypass also serves as a
backup for the compressor surge and speed control system.

It is envisaged that at a later date in the life of the field, a sidestream

of this gas may be used for gas lift at Semangkok B. A gas pipeline is ten-
tatively planned for this purpose.

SEMANGKOK B FACILITIES DESCRIPTION

Process Flow

The process flow for Semangkok B platform is shown in Figure 8. Wellstreams

flow into manifolds and headers then on to either the test or production
separator. The production separator operates at 1700 to 2070 kPa. Oil, water
and gas from this three phase separator are metered, recombined and pres-
sured through the pipeline to Semangkok A.

Individual well testing on Semangkok B will be carried out remotely from

Semangkok A via a telemetry system. The test separator is also a three-
phase separator and fluid flows are metered and recombined to join the main
production flow to Semangkok A.

During the drilling phase, the platform will operate on an instrument air
system with air supplied from the drilling tender. On completion of drilling,
the instrument gas system on the platform will be utilized. The gas source
is obtained via a sidestream from the production separator gas outlet then
through a gas cooler and scrubber and finally to a gas dryer package. Knock-
out liqUids from the scrubber are sent to the drain vessel.

Module Arrangement

Semangkok B platform has two modules as shown in Figure 9.

Module J, the wellhead module, measures 27m by 14m by 7m high and contains
the production wellheads and manifolds, test separator, production separator,
wellhead control panel, diesel storage and filtering system and instrument
gas system. Module 1 also provides a structural attachment for a SSm flare-
boom and a flare scrubber at the base of the boom. A 20-tonne crane is
located on the southwest corner of the module.

5-71
; .. SPE12390
Module 2, the utility module, measures 27m by 9m by 7m high. It contains a
work-party generator, battery banks and associated chargers, fire water
pumps, a workshop, storage and control rooms, an emergency shelter, fresh-
water tank and a 14-man escape capsule. A 19m by 21m helipad completes the
platform.

The development studies for Semangkok B did not identify a need for initial
manning of the platform but it is possible that, in the case of significant
future water production, expansion of the process facilities may need to be
considered. This in turn could require manning of the platform. It is for
this reason that the platform is designed with structural capability to sup-
port possible future process, utilities and quarters modules. Sufficient
space for the future utility module on the south end of the platform has
been provided for in the design. The living quarters module will be set
directly above the utility module and the process module will be located
above Module 2.

Drilling will be accomplished by the use of a tender assisted drilling rig.

The availability of tender assisted drilling rigs in South East Asia has
improved significantly over the past few years which in turn has enhanced
the concept of satellite platform installation.

Telemetry System

As a satellite platform, Semangkok B is designed for unmanned operation and

consequently a remote supervisory link is provided for operation from
Semangkok A platform. The installed system is a microprocessor based system
which operates via a full duplex radio link at 1200 baud between the Remote
Terminal Unit (RTU) on Semangkok B and the Master Terminal Unit (MTU) on
Semangkok A.

The master station hardware includes a color monitor, a cassette data stor-
age unit, a data printer, an alarm printer and a keyboard for operator input
into the system. A 24 VDC power supply is required for the main control unit
and a 120 VAC source is required to power the peripherals.

The system can be expanded if required. The RTU in the Semangkok B control
room is linked to end devices at various locations around the platform. The
option also exists for end devices to be operated locally from the RTU to
facilitate equipment maintenance and testing.

The telemetry system enables daily operation of the satellite to be moni-

tored and controlled from Semangkok A. The system provides the following : a
record of all alarms and system upsets, the status of end devices, meter
readings, the ability to open and close valves and switch equipment on/off,
and the ability to change meter factors or alarm limits.

A necessary feature is the ability to implement a process emergency shutdown

on command from the master station. However, the shutdown philosophy and
design of the system are such that the start-up of the satellite platform
after such a shutdown has to be performed manually on the satellite itself.
In the case of communication failure between the MTU and RTU, the system by
itself initiates a process shutdown on the Semangkok B facilities after a
predetermined time if communication has still not been restored. The flexi-
bility exist for the operator to change this time delay before initiation of
a shutdown for up to 48 hours.

Besides visual indication on the color monitor, the system also provides
permanent records of data on data and alarm loggers/printers. This can
either be performed on request or in the case of alarms, automatically, with

5-72
SPE12390
an accompanying audible alarm.

Printouts of daily/monthly production and operation reports are also obtai-

ned from the data logger. The production report contains the daily and
monthly production volume for the satellite and the operation report lists
all the current information on Semangkok B in the system. On request, any
data can also be stored on tape by the cassette unit.

CONSTRUCTION

Bid documents for EPMI furnished equipment, mainly long-lead material items,
were issued in February and March 1982 to meet antiCipated delivery dates so
as not to adversely impact the construction schedule.

Bid documents for the construction of the jacket and cap facilities for
Semangkok A and 8 were issued in January 1982 and contracts were awarded to
a Korean fabricator. Construction work on Semangkok A and 8 jacket and cap
facilities began in October of 1982. An EPMI site project team was esta-
blished in Korea to assist and to monitor the quality and progress of the
contractor's work. The completed Semongkok A jacket with twelve pre-
installed conductors weighed 2300 tonnes.

The launched weight of the Semangkok 8 jacket (with ten pre-installed con-
ductors) was 1400 tonnes. Loadout of the Semangkok A jacket and jacket cap
from the fabrication yard took place in May 1983 and loadout of Semangkok 8
in June 1983. This was followed by a two-week 4100 km tow to the installa-
tion sites off the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. 80th jackets were
successfully launched at site.

Bid documents for the production modules and flareboom fabrication for both
platforms were also issued in January 1982 and the contract was awarded to a
Japanese contractor. The living quarters module and helideck for Semangkok A
platform were awarded to a Malaysian fabricator. Actual construction of the
topside facilities began in May 1982.

At all stages of fabrication, the total weight of each module was closely
monitored to ensure the lift weight was within the maximum derrick barge
lifting capacity of 820 tonnes. For Semangkok A, the heaviest module was
Module 1 which weighed 730 tonnes and the total weight of all the five
modules was 2600 tonnes. In the case of Semangkok B, the maximum module
weight was 780 tonnes (Module 1) and the total weight of the two modules was
1200 tonnes.

The construction of Semongkok A and B modules proceeded well and was com-
pleted on schedule. This was mainly due to the contractor's familiarity with
the specifications and work requirements and a competent project team from
both the module contractor and EPMI onsite personnel. Loadout of the
Semangkok A modules from the fabrication yard took place in June 1982 and
loadout of Semangkok B in August 1982. The modules arrived on site two and a
half weeks after the loadout date and were successfully installed.

The Semongkok A gas compression module fabrication bid package was issued in
November 1982 and the module fabrication was awarded to a Japanese contrac-
tor. The turbomochinery package was awarded to an American vendor. In May
1982, the turbines were successfully full load tested on low heating value
fuel gas in the United States using a combination or carbon dioxide and
natural gas to obtain the correct heating value content. Subsequently, the
first and second stage compressors were individually full load, full speed
tested utilizing carbon dioxide gas. A mechanical string test of the turbo.-

5-73 SPE1239Q
machinery package was conducted during the months of September and October
1983. A closed loop test of the compression module, currently being fabri-
cated in Japan, is scheduled for March 1984 and startuo of the Semangkok gas
compression facilities is anticipated to be in July 1984.

Fabrication, installation, hookup and commissioning of the facilities for

the two platforms were all executed as separate individual lump sum con-
tracts. The project schedule for both platforms are shown in Figure 10.

PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Figure 13 shows the projected development costs for Semangkok field. The
total development cost for Semangkok A and B, including platform production
facilities, gas compression and wells, is estimated to be 260 million US as
spent dollars. The platform and production facilities on Semangkok A and B
includng Phase 1 gas compression are expected to account for 48% of total
investment; drilling and development of wells on Semangkok A and B for 30%
of total investment; additional gas compression, if required, is expected to
account for 22% of total investment.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank ESSO Production Malaysia Inc and PETRONAS
for permission to publish this paper and their colleagues in the Production
and Exploration departments of EPMI for their assistance in preparing this
paper.

SPE12390
•.• ,j

LDCATIDN OF EPMI'S PEN. MALAVSIA

PRDDUCINB SYSTEM

r--.,I
I r------,
I I
:SEMANGKOK I I
I I
I I ,.- ___ .J L ___ ,
I I : TAPIS PUMPlN& I
L __ ..J
PLATfORM :

Ktr!N~ ~ _ _ --,
IINGGI I
I )
,
UI I IEKOK
-...I
UI
L----------l
TO TCOT I
I I
INSTALLED PIPELINES I /
L __ -"

FIGURE 1
 SEMANBKDK FACILITIES PLAN

SEMANGKOK A

5 MODULES
24 CONDUCTORS
120 MAN QUARTERS
GAS COMPRESSION

Ul
I
TAPIS D
-.j
m AND
TCOT PUMPIN6
PLATFORM
IRONG BARAT
A
SEMANGKOK B
2 MODULES
18 CONDUCTORS 23 I(m
UNMANNED SATELLITE CDD mm Oil PlL

FIGURE 2
 SEMANBKDK FIELD DPTIMISATIDN
PLATPORM va Ii! - PLATPORM
-. 3 -
" ~-,!

DEVELOPMENT PLAN

,,
,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I .®
I I
I I
I
•I
I
\ ,

..
\
'", "'....
I
Ch

~( \
'"..... NORTH
'"~
\
,, \,
\
,
" .. ' ...... " , ' ........... _-- ,,-'"
L
1 MILE
-- --
1253 PROPOSEO PLATFORM

FIGURE 3
 PRDCESS FLC\I\I DIABRAM
SEMANGKOK A PLATFORM

TO COMPRESSION
TO H.P. FLARE ICOMP.
TO L.P. FLARE ICOMP.

SEMANGKOK A
WELLS
:::t:t:l---(

PIG
FROM LAUNCHER
SEMANGKOK B _ _'"-I METERS

TO CRUDE PUMP
TO
OILY WATER OILY WATER
SEPARATOR SEPARATOR

- NORMAL FLOW DIRM

o
TO PUMPING PLATFORM
- - - OIL - MAIN PROCESS VIA IRONG BARAT A
- - OIL - OTHERS
- - - GAS
- - - WATER

FIGURE 4
 SEMANGKOK A PLATFORM
TYPICAL MODULE ARRANGEMENT
DURING DEVELOPMENT DRILLING

RADIO
TOWER
HELIDECK

01
.....,
I CRANE
¥=-,~
(l)

M-7
PIPE
RACK "'-6
COMPRESSION
QUARTERS
DRILLING DRILLING FACILITY
RIG
EQUIPMENT

M-IS
UTILITIES
M-4
GENERATION
M-!
STORAGE
"'-2
WELLHEAD
M -I
PRODUCTION

ESCAPE
CAPSULES
JACKET CAP

JACKET
MSL

FIGURE 5
 SEMANGKOK A PLATFDRM
GENERAL ARRANBEMENT OF FIRE SUPPAESSION
SYSTEMS ON THE PRDDUCTION DECK

M-5 M-4 M-3 M-2 M - 1

~
<1>0
6 6 ~ I--'-~~'-L---i
6..--"'c:=J
MAINT. 0
FIREWATER OFFICE
PUM!!lc=J AND SHOPS

6 6
<J
6 66 /0
UI
I
6 lID PLATFORM <J 6CPI~0
())
o EMER CONTR GENERATORS
6 GEN. 6 ROOM ......... 0
<l
1RI6 6 <1> ~
FIREWALL
PROTECTIVE
METAL WALL

LEGEND

(/)
rz.J AREAS COVERED BY DELUGE SYSTEM
<1> fiRE WATER MONITOR
-a IZI LIGHT WATER STATION
m
t-& o WHEELED DRY CHEMICAL
N 6 PORTABLE C02 a CHEM. EXTINGUISHER
'·.N
...0 (ffi HALON SYSTEM

o
FIGURE 6
 PROCSSS FLOW CIAGRAM
SEMANGKCK A GAS COMPRESSION

2110. STAU
co......saolt

!
TO INJECTION I
GAS L.IFT
lIT. STA_
CO......II01t

US ,ItO..
_ItATOftIl

L.IQIUO
TO
Sa_ATOft lSI

FIGURE 7

PRDCeSS FLOW DIAGRAM

SEMANGKOK a PLATFORM

r - - - -
1----'1'--------------
I
I"1.ARE
... NORMALLY
. . NO FLOW

t
- 'TEST
•••. I: r.
~ ~ I l
SEMANGKOK
8 WELLS
_I ...
(
I
-
r~--1
~ i I
- (
BULK SEP. !II 1
I • - ... TO
"SEMANGKOK

~ t
A

---- FI.OW DIRECTION -

-
011. MAIN PROCESS
011. - OTHER
GAS
WATER

IIIIGURE •

. 5-81
SPE12390
 ==--=
":11::' :=-="I:H';'L.~~~ =n
'i:.,-:"'-:"::'=
----,~-----n-----tl------I
'~ 11 FUTU~ II I
"'~ :: 28. MAN :: II'UTURe: I
~ II QUARTERS II "ROCESSES :
HEL DECK, I I
I
'I

M_a M_I
UTILITIES I WELLHEAD
CONTROL
ELE. +48 !'T.

I
JACKET CAl'

-+ JACKET

MSL

• •MANGlKCJK a Maau&.. AAAANClBM.NT

FIGUaE fa

PROJECT SCHEDULE FOR SEIIANGKOK A

& SEMANGKOK B PLATFORMS
1S1S1 I 1S1S2 T 1S1S3 I 1N4
sllllill J I F,_I A, _, JI Jill sl DIIIII JI FI_IAI_' JIJ IalsTIT ITII JLFJ-!11-

SIEMANGKOK A
JACIET • JACIET ca. £i;F.;..;"·::===::'''''·'~/ililIlll(;;';:'''-:OW;;:;''"":::·';;';:::·':;;';'~:::;.i.;::;~-'''
;i;~.\:': .;.; .;:·:r" ): ; ; ';·'~!; ;.; ;: :i.:; ;o;·/....
.~:'""!.i;,,,,,ii::~·
- .;:.:;"\.~....
:~ _

'IRlCTI.. . ...us

UIII. ,.aITOS
ClllPiESSIil _HlLE

SIEMANGKOK B
JaCiET • JACIET ca, I:,:::,:::::::::: ':':, ::':;::::::::::::":'M4::>·::~;.:i"-';::'f;::;:~:{:\'i:.:".~:-:.;:.;::·::·i;;i;:.:.:;:":'::;~·";:'-:~_

' ...ICTI. . . . . .us

E3 HI'" Em '....'f.." . .
~ II••,,,,,., ~ cor.ACT ...,B. m!!IIII UtA ••• r. ' ....,N.'.. "O ,
iiI!iiI I.sr.."."..

FIGURE 10

5-82
SPE12390
T·L·M-TRV MASTER T.AMINAL UNIT
FIGURE 11

SBMANGKDK A TYPE PLATFORM

FIGURE 12
 SEMANGKDK B TYPE PLATFORM

FIGURE 13

SEMANGKOK FIELD
DEVELOPMENT COSTS

48%
PRODUCTION FACILITII5S

t125MSl

22 96

30 % AOOITIONAL
COMPRESSION
DRILLING
t57MSl
tB1M$l

TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST - US$283M (AS SPENT)

FIGURE 14