Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
© Copyright 2002 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All
Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This book, or parts thereof, may not be re-
produced in any form without permission of the publishers.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
2001-2002
VOTING MEMBERS
Officers:
Regional Represematives:
NON-VOTING MEMBERS
ii
' ..
'
'
~.
IDGHWAY SUBCOMMITTEE ON
BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES
2002
0
MARYLAND, Earle S. Freedman NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, John Bowen
MASSACHUSETTS, Alexander K. Bardow NOVA SCOTIA, Alan MacRae, Mark Pertus
MICHIGAN, Steve Beck ONTARIO, Vacant
MINNESOTA, Dan Dorgan, Kevin Western SASKATCHEWAN, Herve Bachelu
MISSISSIPPI, Harry Lee James
MISSOURI, Shyam Gupta FHWA, Shoukry Elnahal
MONTANA, William S. Fullerton MASS. METRO. DIST. COMM., David
NEBRASKA, Lyman D. Freemon Lenhardt
NEVADA, William C. Crawford, Jr. N.J. TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, Richard
NEW HAMPSHIRE, Mark Richardson Raczynski
NEW JERSEY, Harry A. Capers, Jr., Richard NY STATE BRIDGE AUTHORITY, William
W. Dunne Moreau
NEW MEXICO, Jimmy D. Camp PORT AUTH. OF NY AND NJ, Joseph J.
NEW YORK, James O'Connell, George Kelly, Joseph Zitelli
Christian BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, Wade Casey
NORTH CAROLINA, Gregory R. Perfettie MILITARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
NORTH DAKOTA, Terry Udland COMMAND, Robert D. Franz
OHIO, Timothy Keller U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS-DEPT.
OKLAHOMA, Robert J. Rusch, Veldo Goins OF THE ARMY, Paul Tan
OREGON, Mark E. Hirota U.S. COAST GUARD, Jacob Patnaik
PENNSYLVANIA, R. Scott Christie U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE-
PUERTO RICO, Jaime Cabre FOREST SERVICE, Nelson Hernandez
RHODE ISLAND, Kazem Farhoumand
0
' iii
PREFACE
to
Seventeenth Edition
iv
INTRODUCTION
The compilation of these specifications began in 1921 with the organization of the
0 ' Committee on Bridges and Structures of the American Association of State Highway
Officials. During the period from 1921, until printed in 1931, the specifications were
gradually developed, and as the several divisions were approved from time to time,
they were made available in mimeographed form for use of the State Highway
Departments and other organizations. A complete specification was available in 1926
and it was revised in 1928. Though not in printed form, the specifications were valu-
able to the bridge engineering profession during the period of development.
The first edition of the Standard Specifications was published in 1931, and it was
followed by the 1935, 1941, 1944, 1949, 1953, 1957, 1961, 1965, 1969, 1973. 1977,
1983, 1989, 1992, and 1996 revised editions. The present seventeenth edition consti-
tutes a revision of the 1996 specifications, including those changes adopted since the
publication of the sixteenth edition and those through 2002.
In the past, Interim Specifications were usually published in the middle of the cal-
endar year, and a revised edition of this book was generally published every 4 years.
However, since the Federal Highway Administration and the States have established a
goal that the LRFD standards be used on all new bridge designs after 2007, only edits
related to technical errors in the seventeenth edition will be made hereafter. These
Standard Specifications are applicable to new structure designs prior to 2007 and for
the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing structures. Future revisions will have
the same status as standards of the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and are approved by at least two-thirds of the
Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures. These revisions are voted on by the
Association Member Departments prior to the publication of a new edition of this book,
and if approved by at least two-thirds of the members, they are included in a new edition
as standards of the Association. Members of the Association are the 50 State Highway
0 or Transportation Departments. the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Each mem-
ber has one vote. The U.S. Department of Transportation is a nonvoting member.
Future revisions will be displayed on AASHTO's website via a link from the
title's book code listing, HB-17, in the Bookstore of www.transportation.org. An e-mail
notification will also be sent to previous purchasers notifying them that a revision is
available for download. Please check the site periodically to ensure that you have the
most up-to-date and accurate information.
The Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges are intended to serve as a stan-
dard or guide for the preparation of State specifications and for reference by bridge
engineers.
Primarily, the specifications set forth minimum requirements which are consistent
with current practice, and certain modifications may be necessary to suit local condi-
tions. They apply to ordinary highway bridges and supplemental specifications may be
required for unusual types and for bridges with spans longer than 500 feet.
Specifications of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), the
American Welding Society, the American Wood Preservers Association, and the
National Forest Products Association are referred to, or are recognized. Numerous re-
search bulletins are noted for references.
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials wishes to
express its sincere appreciation to the above organizations, as well as to those univer-
sities and representatives of industry whose research efforts and consultations have
been most helpful in continual improvement of these specifications.
Extensive references have been made to the Standard Specifications for
Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing also published by
AASHTO, including equivalent ASTM specifications which have been reproduced in
the Association's Standard Specifications by permission of the American Society for
Testing and Materials.
v
Attention is also directed to the following publications prepared and published by
the Bridge Subcommittee:
AASHTO Guide for Commonly Recognized (CoRe) Structural Elements-I998
Edition
AASHTO Guide Specifications for Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Highway
Bridges witlz Design Examples for /-Girder and Box-Girder Bridges-2002
Edition
AASHTO Guide Specifications-Thermal Effects in Concrete Bridge Super-
structures- I 989 Edition
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications-1998 Edition
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 2nd Edition. Sf- I 998 Edition
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 2nd Edition. US-1998 Edition
AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications, 1st Edition-
200 I Edition
AASHTO/AWS-DJ.5MID1.5:2001 An American National Standard: Bridge
Welding Code and its Commentary-2002 Edition
Bridge Data Exchange (BDX) Technical Data Guide-1995 Edition
Construction Handbook/or Bridge Temporary Works-1995 Edition
Guide Design Specifications for Bridge Temporary Works-1995 Edition
Guide for Painting Steel Structures-1991 Edition
Guide Specifications and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway
Bridges-1991 Edition
Guide Specifications for Alternative Load Factor Design Procedures for Steel
Beam Bridges Using Braced Compact Sections-1991 Edition
Guide Specifications for Aluminum Highway Bridges-1991 Edition
Guide Specifications for Design and Construction of Segmental Concrete
Bridges, 2nd Edition-1999 Edition
Guide Specifications for Design of Pedestrian Bridges, 1997 Edition
Guide Specifications for Distribution of Loads for Highway Bridges-1994
Edition
Guide Specifications for Fatigue Evaluation of Existing Steel Bridges-1990
Edition
Guide Specifications for Highway Bridge Fabrication with HPS070W Steel-
2000 Edition
Guide Specifications for Seismic Isolation Design, 2nd Edition-1999 Edition
Guide Specifications for Strength Design of Truss Bridges (Load Factor
Design)-1985 Edition
Guide Specifications for Strength Evaluation of Existing Steel and Concrete
Bridges-1989 Edition
Guide Specifications for Structural Design of Sound Barriers- I 989 Edition
Guide Specification for the Design of Stress-Laminated Wood Decks-1991
Edition
Guidelines for Bridge Management Systems-1993 Edition
Manual for Condition Evaluation of Bridges-2000 Edition
vi
Movable Bridge Inspection, Evaluation and Maintenance Manual-1998 Edition
Standard Specifications for Movable Highway Bridges-1988 Edition
The following have served as chairmen of the Committee since its inception in 1921:
Messrs, E.R Kelley, who pioneered the work of the Committee, Albin L. Gemeny, R. B.
McMinn, Raymond Archiband, G. S. Paxson, E. M. Johnson, Ward Goodman, Charles
Matlock, Joseph S. Jones, Sidney Poleynard, Jack Freidenrich, Henry W. Derthick,
Robert C. Cassano, Clellon Loveall. James E. Siebels, David Pope, and Tom Lulay. The
Committee expresses its sincere appreciation of the work of these men and of those ac-
tive members of the past, whose names, because of retirement, are no longer on the roll.
Suggestions for the improvement of the specifications are welcomed. They should
0 be sent to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures, AASHTO, 444
North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 249, Washington, D.C. 20001. Inquiries as to the
intent or application of the specifications should be sent to the same address.
ABBREVIATIONS
AASHTO -American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ACI -American Concrete Institute
AISC -American Institute of Steel Construction
AITC -American Institute of Timber Construction
ASCE -American Society of Civil Engineers
ASME -American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASTM -American Society for Testing and Materials
ANSI -American National Standards Institute
AWS -American Welding Society
AWPA -American Wood Preservers Association
CRSI -Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute
cs -Commercial Standards
NOS -National Design Specifications for Stress Grade Lumber and Its
Fastenings
NFPA -National Forest Products Association
RMA -Rubber Manufacturers Association
SAE -Society of Automotive Engineers
SSPC -Steel Structures Painting Council
WPA -Western Pine Association
WRI -Wire Reinforcement Institute
0
'
WWPA -Western Wood Products Association
vii
1997 Interim Specifications
Table of Contents
The 1997 Interim Specifications include the following revisions and additions to articles of the 16th
edition of the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 1996.
DMSION I-DESIGN
ARTICLE PAGE
DIVISION II-CONSTRUCTION
COMMENTARIES:
DIVISION I: SECTIONS 8, 10, 12, 14, I7 AND 18 ....... : . ............C-11-C-30
DIVISION II: SECTIONS 3 AND I 8 ... ·............................. C-31-C-35
viii
AASHTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIVISION I
DESIGN
SECTION 3-LOADS
SECTION 4-FOUNDATIONS
0 4.4.7.1.1.6
4.4.7.1.1.7
4.4. 7.1.1.8
Ground Water ........................................55
Layered Soils ........................................55
Inclined Base .........................................57
4.4.7.1.2 Factors of Safety ........................................ 57
4.4.7.2 Settlement ............................................... 57
4.4.7.2.1 Stress Distribution .......................................57
4.4.7.2.2 Elastic Settlement .......................................58
4.4.7.2.3 Consolidation Settlement .................................58
4.4.7.2.4 Secondary Settlement ....................................61
4.4.7.2.5 Tolerable Movement .....................................61
4.4.7.3 Dynamic Ground Stability .................................. 61
4.4.8 Geotechnical Design on Rock .................................61
4.4.8.1 Bearing Capacity ..........................................62
4.4.8.1.! Footings on Competent Rock ..............................62
4.4.8.1.2 Footings on Broken or Jointe~ Rock ........................62
4.4.8.1.3 Factors of Safety ........................................63
4.4.8.2 Settlement ...............................................63
4.4.8.2.1 Footings on Competent Rock ..............................63
4.4.8.2.2 Footings on Broken or Jointed Rock ........................63
4.4.8.2.3 Tolerable Movement .....................................64
4.4.9 Overall Stability ...........................................64
4.4.10 Dynamic/Seismic Design .....................................66
4.4.11 Structural Design ..........................................66
4.4.11.1 Loads and Reactions .......................................66
4.4.11.1.1 Action of Loads and Reactions .............................66
4.4.11.1.2 Isolated and Multiple Footing Reactions .....................67
~
,·J
xiv CONTENTS Division I
4.5.6.7 Vertical Ground Movement ..... o ••• 0 ••••• 720 •••• 0 •••••••••••••
SECTION 6-CULVERTS
SECTION 7-8UBSTRUCTURES
7.6 GENERAL . 0. o.... 0..•.•• 0....•... 0•.••.••. 0•• 0•. 0.. 0•..••. 187
PART B-ANALYSIS
PART C-DESIGN
8.16.4.2
8.16.4.2.1
Compression Member Strengths .............................204
Pure Compression ...................................... 204
8.16.4.2.2 Pure Flexure .......................................... 205
8.16.4.2.3 Balanced Strain Conditions ............................... 205
8.16.4.2.4 Combined Flexure and Axial Load .........................205
8.16.4.3 Biaxial Loading .......................................... 205
8.16.4.4 Hollow Rectangular Compression Members ...................205
8.16.5 Slenderness Effects in Compression Members .................. 206
8.16.5.1 General Requirement.c; ..................................... 206
8.16.5.2 Approximate Evaluation of Slenderness Effects ................206
8.16.6 Shear ....................................................207
8.16.6.1 Shear Strength ........................................... 207
8.16.6.2 Shear Strength Provided by Concrete ......................... 208
8.16.6.2.1 Shear in Beams and One-Way Slabs and Footings ............. 208
8.16.6.2.2 Shear in Compression Members ........................... 208
8.16.6.2.3 Shear in Tension Members ...............................208
8.16.6.2.4 Shear in Lightweight Concrete ............................208
8.16.6.3 Shear Strength Provided by Shear Reinforcement ............... 208
8.16.6.4 Shear Friction ...........................................209
8.16.6.4.4 Shear-Friction Design Method ............................209
8.16.6.5 Horizontal Shear Strength for Composite Concrete
Flexural Members ....................................210
8.16.6.5.5 Ties for Horizontal Shear ................................ 210
8.16.6.6 Special Provisions for Slabs and Footings ..................... 2 10
8.16.6.7 Special Provisions for Slabs of Box Culverts ................... 211
0 8.16.6.8
8.16.7
8.16.8
Special Provisions for Brackets and Corbels ................... 211
Bearing Strength ..........................................212
Serviceability Requirements ................................ 212
8.16.8.1 Application ............................................. 212
8.16.8.2 Service Load Stresses ..................................... 212
8.16.8.3 Fatigue Stress Limits ...................................... 212
8.16.8.4 Distribution of Flexural Reinforcement ....................... 212
PART D-REINFORCEMENT
PART B-ANALYSIS
0 9.12
9.12.1
9.12.2
DECK PANELS ............................................ 231
General ..................................................231
Bending Moment ..........................................231
PART C-DESIGN
0 9.16.2.1.4
9.16.2.2
Relaxation of Prestressing Steel ........................... 234
Estimated Losses .........................................236
xxviii CONTENTS Division I
PART D-DETAILING
0 9.26.2
9.26.3
9.26.4
Minimum Spacing .........................................248
Bundling .................................................248
Size of Ducts ..............................................248
9.27 POST-TENSIONING ANCHORAGES AND COUPLERS ......... 248
9.28 EMBEDMENT OF PRESTRESSED STRAND ..................249
9.29 BEARIN'GS ................................................ 249
SECTIONl~TRUCTURALSTEEL
0 10.3
PART B-DESIGN DETAILS
0 10.27.2
10.28
10.29
Packing of Eyebars ........................................285
FORKED ENDS ............................................ 285
FIXED AND EXPANSION BEARINGS ........................ 285
10.29.1 General ..................................................285
10.29.2 Bronze or Copper-Alloy Sliding Expansion Bearings ............ 285
10.29.3 Rollers ..................................................285
10.29.4 Sole Plates and Masonry Plates .............................. 286
10.29.5 Masonry Bearings ......................................... 286
10.29.6 Anchor Bolts ............................................. 286
10.29.7 Pedestals and Shoes ........................................ 286
10.30 FLOOR SYSTEM ........................................... 286
10.30.1 Stringers .................................................286
10.30.2 Floor Beams .............................................. 286
10.30.3 Cross Frames ............................................. 286
10.30.4 Expansion Joints .......................................... 286
10.30.5 End Floor Beams .......................................... 287
10.30.6 End Panel of Skewed Bridges ............................... 287
10.30.7 Sidewalk Brackets ......................................... 287
10.30.8 Stay-in-Place Deck Forms .................................. 287
10.30.8.1 Concrete Deck Panels ..................................... 287
10.30.8.2 Metal Stay-in-Place Forms ................................. 287
0 10.56.1.2
10.56.1.3
10.56.1.4
Welds .................................................. 331
Bolts and Rivets ......................................... 331
Slip-Critical Joints ....................................... 333
10.56.2 Bolts Subjected to Prying Action by Connected Parts ........... 333
10.56.3 Rigid Connections ......................................... 333
10.57 OVERLOAD ............................................... 333
10.57.1 Noncomposite Sections .....................................334
10.57.2 Composite Sections ........................................334
10.57.3 Slip-Critical Joints ....................................... .334
10.58 FATIGUE ..................................................335
10.58.1 General .................................................. 335
10.58.2 Composite Construction .................................... 335
10.58.2.1 Slab Reinforcement ....................................... 335
10.58.2.2 Shear Connectors ........................................335
10.58.3 Hybrid Beams and Girders .................................335
10.59 DEFI.,ECTION ............................................. 335
10.60 ORTHOTROPIC SUPERSTRUCTURES ...................... .335
10.61 CONSTRUCTffiiLITY ..................................... .336
10.61.1 Web Bend Buckling ....................................... .336
10.61.2 Web Shear Buckling ....................................... 336
10.61.3 Lateral-Torsional Buckling of the Cross Section ................ 336
10.61.4 Compression Flange Local Buckling ......................... .336
0 11.2
11.3
BRIDGES .................................................337
SOIL-METAL PLATE INTERACTION SYSTEMS .............. 337
STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS FOR mGHWAY SIGNS,
11.4
LUMINAIRES, AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS ............. .337
11.5 BRIDGE RAILING .........................................337
0 12.7
12.7.1
12.7.2
LONG-SPAN STRUCTURAL PLATE STRUCTURES ............348
General .................................................. 348
Structure Design ..........................................348
12.7.2.1 General ................................................348
12.7.2.2 Acceptable Special Features ................................349
12.7.3 Foundation Design ........................................349
12.7.3.1 Settlement Limits ........................................ 349
12.7.3.2 Footing Reactions (Arch Structures) .........................350
12.7.3.3 Footing Design ..........................................350
12.7.4 Soil Envelope Design ...................................... .350
12.7.4.1 Soil Requirements ........................................ 350
12.7.4.2 Construction Requirements ................................ .350
12.7.4.3 Service Requirements ..................................... 350
12.7.5 End Treatment Design .................................... .351
12.7.5.1 Standard Shell End Types ................................. .351
12.7.5.2 Balanced Support ........................................ 352
12.7.5.3 Hydraulic Protection ..................................... .352
12.7.5.3.1 Backfill Protection .................................... .352
12.7.5.3.2 Cut-Off (Toe) Walls ....................................352
12.7.5.3.3 Hydraulic Uplift ....................................... 354
12.7.5.3.4 Scour ................................................ 354
12.7.6 Multiple Structures ........................................ 354
12.8 STRUCTURAL PLATE BOX CULVERTS ..................... .354
12.8.1 General ..................................................354
12.8.1.1 Scope .................................................. 354
12.8.2 Structural Standards ...................................... 354
0 12.8.3
12.8.4
Structure Backfill ........................................ .354
Design ...................................................355
12.8.4.1 Analytical Basis for Design ................................ 355
12.8.4.2 Load Factor Method ......................................355
12.8.4.3 Plastic Moment Requirements ............................. .355
12.8.4.4 Footing Reactions ........................................356
12.8.5 Manufacturing and Installation .............................. 356
0
.
....
13.9.4 Washers ................................................. 383
SECTION 14-BEARINGS
DIVISION I-A
SEISMIC DESIGN
SECTION I-INTRODUCTION
0 3.1
3.2
APPLICABILITY OF SPECIFICATIONS ......................447
ACCELERATION COEFFICIENT ............................447
3.3 IMPORTANCE CLASSIFICATJON ...........................449
3.4 SEISMIC PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES ....................449
3.5 SITE EFFECTS ............................................449
3.5.1 Site Coefficient ............................................449
3.6 ELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT ...............450
3.6.1 Elastic Seismic Response Coefficient for Single Mode Analysis ... .450
3.6.2 Elastic Seismic Response Coefficient for Multimodal Analysis ... .450
3.7 RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTORS ......................450
3.8 DETERMINATION OF ELASTIC FORCES
AND DISPLACEMENTS .............................450
3.9 COMBINATION OF ORTHOGONAL SEISMIC FORCES ....... .450
3.10 MINIMUM SEAT·WIDTH REQUIREMENTS ..................451
3.11 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE SPAN BRIDGES ..... .451
3.12 REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPORARY BRIDGES AND STAGED
CONSTRUCTION ................................. .452
0 7.2.2(B)
7.2.3
7.2.4
Bents with Two or More Columns .......................... .466
Column and Pile Bent Design Forces ........................ .467
Pier Design Forces .........................................467
7.2.5 Connection Design Forces ................................. .467
7.2.5(A) Longitudinal Linkage Forces .............................. .467
7.2.5(B) Hold-Down Devices ......................................467
7.2.5(C) Column and Pier Connections to Cap Beams and Footings ....... .467
7.2.6 Foundation Design Forces ................................. .467
7.2.7 Abutment and Retaining Wall Design Forces .................. .468
7.3 DESIGN DISPLACEMENT FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE
CATEGORIES C AND D ............................ .468
7 .3.1 Minimum Support Length Requirements for Seismic Performance
Categories C and D ................................. .468
7.4 FOUNDATION AND ABUTMENT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES
CANDD ..........................................468
7.4.1 General ..................................................468
7.4.2 Foundation Requirements for Seismic Performance
Category C .........................................469
7.4.2(A) Investigation ............................................469
7.4.2(B) Foundation Design ...................................... .469
7.4.2(C) Special Pile Requirements ................................ .469
7.4.3 Abutment Requirements for Seismic Performance
Category C .........................................470
7.4.3(A) Free-Standing Abutments ................................. .470
7.4.3(B) Monolithic Abutments ................................... .470
0
'
DIVISIONU
CONSTRUCTION
INTRODUCTION .....................................................476
0
.
3.2.3.3
3.2.3.4
3.2.3.5
Construction ............................................485
Thbe Forms .............................................485
Stay-in-Place Forms ......................................486
3.2.4 Removal of Falsework and Forms ........................... .486
3.2.4.1 General ................................................486
3.2.4.2 Time of Removal ........................................486
3.2.4.3 Extent of Removal .......................................486
3.3 COFFERDAMS AND SHORING ..............................487
3.3.1 General ..................................................487
3.3.2 Protection of Concrete .................................... .487
3.3.3 Removal .................................................487
3.4 TEMPORARY WATER CONTROL SYSTEMS ................. .487
3.4.1 General ..................................................487
3.4.2 Drawings ................................................ 487
3.4.3 Operations ...............................................487
3.5 TEMPORARY BRIDGES ................................... .488
3.5.1 General ..................................................488
3.5.2 Detour Bridges ...........................................488
3.5.3 Haul Bridges .............................................488
3.5.4 Maintenance .............................................488
3.6 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ........................... .488
0 5.4.2
5.4.3
5.4.4
Construction Sequence .....................................500
General Methods and Equipment ............................ 500
Dry Construction Method ..................................500
5.4.5 Wet Construction Method ..................................500
5.4.6 Temporary Casing Construction Method ......................501
5.4.7 Permanent Casing Construction Method ......................50 I
5.4.8 Alternative Construction Methods ...........................50 I
5.4.9 Excavations ..............................................501
5.4.10 Casings ..................................................501
5.4.11 Slurry ...................................................502
5.4.12 Excavation Inspection ......................................502
5.4.13 Reinforcing Steel Cage Construction and Placement ............502
5.4.14 Concrete Placement, Curing, and Protection ...................503
5.4.15 Test Shafts and Bells .......................................503
5.4.16 Construction Tolerances ....................................503
5.4.17 Integrity Testing .......................................... 504
5.5 DRILLED SHAFT LOAD TESTS .............................504
5.6 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ............................504
5.6.1 Measurement .............................................504
5.6.1.1 Drilled Shaft ............................................ 504
5.6.1.2 Bell Footings ............................................504
5.6.1.3 Test Shafts ..............................................505
5.6.1.4 Test Bells ...............................................505
5.6.1.5 Exploration Holes ........................................505
5.6.1.6 Permanent Casing ........................................505
5.6.1.7 Load Tests ..............................................505
0 5.6.2
5.6.2.1
5.6.2.2
Payment ................................................. 505
Drilled Shaft ............................................505
Bell Footings ............................................505
5.6.2.3 Test Shafts ..............................................505
5.6.2.4 Test Bells ...............................................505
5.6.2.5 Exploration Holes ........................................505
5.6.2.6 Permanent Casing ........................................505
5.6.2.7 Load Tests ..............................................505
5.6.2.8 Unexpected Obstructions .................................. 505
0 6.4.4
6.5
Tendon Storage and Handling ...............................509
INSTALLATION ............................................509
Iii CONTENTS Division II
SECTION tO-PRESTRESSING
c
~ .
10.3
10.3.1
10.3.1.1
MATERIALS ............................................... 554
Prestressing Steel and Anchorages ........................... 554
Strand ................................................. 554
10.3.1.2 Wrre ................................................... 554
10.3.1.3 Bars ...................................................554
10.3.2 Post-Tensioning Anchorages and Couplers ....................554
10.3.2.1 Bonded Systems .........................................554
10.3.2.2 Unbonded Systems ....................................... 554
10.3.2.3 Special Anchorage Device Acceptance Test ....................555
10.3.2.3.7 Cyclic Loading Test ....................................555
10.3.2.3.8 Sustained Loading Test .................................. 555
10.3.2.3.9 Monotonic Loading Test .................................555
10.4 PLACEMENT OF DUCTS, STEEL, AND ANCHORAGE
HARDWARE .......................................556
10.4.1 Placement of Ducts ........................................ 556
10.4.1.1 Vents and Drains .........................................556
10.4.2 Placement of Prestressing Steel .............................. 556
10.4.2.1 Placement for Pretensioning ................................ 556
10.4.2.2 Placement for Post-Tensioning .............................. 557
10.4.2.2.1 Protection of Steel After Installation ........................557
10.4.3 Placement of Anchorage Hardware ...........................557
10.5 IDENTIFICATION AND TESTING ............................557
10.5.1 Pretensioning Method Tendons ..............................558
10.5.2 Post-Tensioning Method Tendons ............................558
10.5.3 Anchorage Assemblies and Couplers .........................558
0 10.6
10.7
10.8
PROTECTION OF PRESTRESSING STEEL ...................558
CORROSION INHIBITOR .................................. .558
DUCTS ....................................................558
10.8.1 Metal Ducts ..............................................559
10.8.2 Polyethylene Duct ......................................... 559
10.8.3 Duct Area ................................................559
10.8.4 Duct Fittings ............................................. 559
10.9 GROUT ................................................... 559
10.9.1 Portland Cement .......................................... 559
10.9.2 Water ...................................................559
10.9.3 Admixtures .............................................. 560
10.10 TENSIONING ..............................................560
10.10.1 General Tensioning Requirements ........................... 560
10.10.1.1 Concrete Strength ........................................560
10.10.1.2 Prestressing Equipment .................................... 560
10.10.1.3 Sequence of Stressing .....................................561
10.10.1.4 Measurement of Stress ....................................561
10.10.2 Pretensioning Method Requirements .........................561
10.10.3 Post-Tensioning Method Requirements .......................562
10.11 GROUTING ...............................................562
10.11.1 General .................................................. 562
10.11.2 Preparation of Ducts .......................................562
10.11.3 Equipment ............................................... 562
10.11.4 Mixing of Grout ..... : .....................................562
10.11.5 Injection of Grout .........................................563
10.11.6 Temperature Considerations ................................563
10.12 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ............................563
Iviii CONTENTS Division II
0 11.4.3.2
11.4.3.2.1
11.4.3.2.2
Plate Cut Edges .......................................... 570
Edge Planing ..........................................570
Oxygen Cutting ........................................570
11.4.3.2.3 Visual Inspection and Repair of Plate Cut Edges .............. 570
11.4.3.3 Bent Plates .............................................570
11.4.3.3.1 General .............................................. 570
11.4.3.3.2 Cold Bending ......................................... 570
11.4.3.3.3 Hot Bending .......................................... 571
11.4.4 Fit of Stiffeners ...........................................571
11.4.5 Abutting Joints ...........................................571
11.4.6 Facing of Bearing Surfaces .................................. 571
11.4.7 Straightening Material .....................................571
11.4.8 Bolt Holes ................................................ 571
11.4.8.1 Holes for High-Strength Bolts and Unfinished
Bolts ..............................................571
11.4.8.1.1 General .............................................. 571
11.4.8.1.2 Punched Holes ........................................ 572
11.4.8.1.3 Reamed or Drilled Holes ................................572
11.4.8.1.4 Accuracy of Holes ......................................572
11.4.8.2 Accuracy of Hole Group ...................................572
11.4.8.2.1 Accuracy Before Reaming ...............................572
11.4.8.2.2 Accuracy After Reaming ................................. 572
11.4.8.3 Numerically Controlled Drilled Field Connections ..............572
11.4.8.4 Holes for Ribbed Bolts, Turned Bolts,
or Other Approved Bearing Type Bolts ................... 572
11.4.8.5 Preparation of Field Connections ............................573
11.4.9 Pins and Rollers ........................................... 573
11.4.9.1 General ................................................ 573
11.4.9.2 Boring Pin Holes .........................................573
11.4.9.3 Threads for Bolts and Pins .................................573
11.4.10 Eyebars ..................................................573
11.4.11 Annealing and Stress Relieving ..............................573
11.4.12 Curved Girders ...........................................574
11.4.12.1 General ................................................574
11.4.12.2 Heat Curving Rolled Beams and Welded Girders ...............574
11.4.12.2.1 Materials .............................................574
11.4.12.2.2 Type of Heating ........................................574
11.4.12.2.3 Temperature ..........................................57 4
11.4.12.2.4 Position for Heating ....................................574
11.4.12.2.5 Sequence of Operations .................................575
11.4.12.2.6 Camber ..............................................575
11.4.12.2. 7 Measurement of Curvature and Camber ..................... 575
11.4.13 Orthotropic-Deck Superstructures ...........................575
11.4.13.1 General ................................................57 5
11.4.13.2 Flatness of Panels ........................................575
11.4.13.3 Straightness of Longitudinal Stiffeners Subject to Calculated
Compressive Stress, Including Orthotropic-Deck Ribs .......576
11.4.13.4 Straightness of Transverse Web Stiffeners and Other Stiffeners
Not Subject to Calculated Compressive Stress ..............576
11.4.14 Full-Sized 'I'ests ...........................................576
11.4.15 Marking and Shipping .....................................576
11.5 ASSEMBLY ................................................576
lx CONTENTS Division ll
0 12.2.4
12.3
12.4
Skid Resistance ...........................................587
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS ............................. 587
PROVISION FOR CAMBER .................................588
12.5 FIELD ASSEMBLY .........................................588
12.6 CONNECTION TO SUPPORTS ...............................588
12.7 WELDING ................................................. 588
12.8 REPAIRING DAMAGED GALVANIZED COATINGS ............588
12.9 PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE FILLER ....................... 588
12.9.1 Forms ................................................... 588
12.9.2 Placement ................................................ 589
12.10 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ........... ·................. 589
SECTION 13-PAINTING
0 13.2.3.3
13.2.3.4
13.2.4
Solvent Cleaning ......................................... 593
Hand Cleaning .......................................... 593
Application of Paints ....................................... 593
13.2.4.1 Application of Zinc-Rich Primers ............................594
13.2.5 Measurement and Payment ................................. 594
13.3 PAINTING GALVANIZED SURFACES ........................594
13.4 PAINTING TIMBER ........................................595
13.4.1 General .................................................. 595
13.4.2 Preparation of Surfaces ....................................595
13.4.3 Paint .................................................... 595
13.4.4 Application .............................................. .595
13.4.5 Painting Treated Timber ...................................595
13.4.6 Payment ................................................. 595
13.5 PAINTING CONCRETE .....................................595
13.5.1 Surface Preparation .......................................595
13.5.2 Paint ....................................................595
13.5.3 Application ...............................................595
13.5.4 Measurement and Payment ................................. 596
c
. . 15.3.1
15.3.2
15.3.3
15.3.4
Weather Conditions .......................................604
Laying Block and Brick ....................................604
Placement of Reinforcement ................................604
Grouting of Voids .........................................604
15.3.5 Copings, Bridge Seats, and Backwalls ........................605
15.4 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ............................606
0 16.3.3
16.3.3.1
16.3.3.2
1'reated Timber ........................................... 609
Handling ...............................................609
Framing and Boring ......................................609
16.3.3.3 Cuts and Abrasions .......................................610
16.3.3.4 Bored Holes ............................................610
16.3.3.5 Temporary Attachment ....................................61 0
16.3.4 Installation of Connectors .................................. 610
16.3.5 Holes for Bolts, Dowels, Rods, and Lag Screws .................610
16.3.6 Bolts and Washers .........................................610
16.3.7 Countersinking ........................................... 611
16.3.8 Framing .................................................611
16.3.9 Framed Bents .............................................611
16.3.9.1 Mud Sills ...............................................611
16.3.9.2 Concrete Pedestals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......611
16.3.9.3 Sills ...................................................611
16.3.9.4 Posts ..................................................611
16.3.9.5 Caps ...................................................611
16.3.9.6 Bracing ................................................611
16.3.10 Stringers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .611
16.3.11 Plank Floors ..............................................612
16.3.12 Nail Laminated or Strip Floors ..............................612
16.3.13 Glue Laminated Panel Decks ................................ 612
16.3.14 Composite Wood-Concrete Decks ............................612
16.3.15 Wheel Guards and Railing ..................................612
16.3.16 1'russes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 613
16.4 PAINTING .................................................613
lxiv CONTENTS Division ll
SECTION 18-BEARINGS
18.7.2.7 Bearing Friction Test {for sliding surfaces only) .... 0...........628
18.7.2.8 Long-term Deterioration Test . 0.... oo.. o.. o............ oo...629
18.7.2.9 Bearing Horizontal Force Capacity {Fixed or
Guided Bearings Only) .................. 0.............629
18.7.3 Performance Criteria .. o...................................629
18.7.4 Special Testing Requirements ................ o..............629
18.7.4.1 Special Test Requirements for Rocker and Roller Bearings .... 0...629
18.7.4.2 Special Test Requirements for PTFE Sliding Bearings ...... 0....629
18.7.4.3 Special Test Requirements for Curved Sliding Bearings .. ooo.....630
18.7.4.4 Special Test Requirements for Pot Bearings ....................630
18.7.4.4.1 Material Certification Tests .. 0. o.... 0..... o.. 0.. 0.. 00.... o630
18.7.4.4.2 Testing by the Engineer . o. 00. ooooooooo. o..... 0.... o.. 00o630
18.7.4.4.3 Bearing Tests 0.... 0.... 00..................... 000......630
18.7.4.5 Test Requirements for Elastomeric Bearings ..... 0.............630
18.7.4.5.1 Scope. 0. 0. ooo00..... ooo000.... 0. 0. 00.... 00. 0. 000.. 0..630
18.7.4.5.2 Frequency of Testing .. 0.... 0. o.. 00. 0.. 0.. 0000... 0.... 00o630
18.7.4.5.3 Ambient Temperature Tests on the Elastomer .... 0.. 0. oo.... o631
18.7.4.5.4 Low Temperature Tests on the Elastomer 0... oo........ 0. 0. 0.631
18.7.4.5.5 Visual Inspection of the Finished Bearing . 0.... 000...... 0.. o631
18.7.4.5.6 Short-Duration Compression Tests on Bearings . 0. 00.. 0. 0000. o631
18.7.4.5.7 Long~Duration Compression Tests on Bearings 000.... 0. 00. 00o631
18.7.4.5.8 Shear Modulus Tests on Materials from Bearings 000. 0... 0000.631
18.7.4.7 Test Requirements for Bronze and Copper Alloy Bearings ...... 0.631
18.7.4.8 Test Requirements for Disc Bearings .........................632
18.7.4.8.1 Material Certification Tests ..................... 0.........632
18.7.4.802 Testing by the Engineer ........ o. 0......................632
18.7.4.8.3 Bearing Tests ....... 0.... 0. 0o............ 0o0. 0.. o......632
18.7.5 Cost of Transporting ... o...... o............... o...... o.....632
18.7.6 Use of Tested Bearings in the Structure .......................632
1808 PACKING, SHIPPING AND STORING ............... o.... o...632
18o9 INSTALLATION .. o.... o.. o.. o............ o.... oo...... o.. o.632
18.9.1 General Installation Requirements . 0o... 0...... o.............632
18.9.2 Special Installation Requirements ............................633
18.9.2.1 Installation of Rocker and Roller Bearings .....................633
l8o9.2.2 Installation of Elastomeric Bearings ..........................633
18.9.2.3 Installation of Guideways and Restraints ......................633
18.9.2.4 Installation of Anchorages ..... 0...........•...............633
18.10 DOCUMENTATION ........................................633
18.10.1 Working Drawings ........................................633
18.10.2 Marking 0............................... o................633
18.1003 Certification .......... o...................................633
18.11 MEASUREMENT .............. o... o. oooo.. 0. oo.... o.... o...634
18.12 PAYMENT .. o.. ooo.. o. oo. o.... oo. oo. o.... o............ o... o634
SECTION 20-RAILINGS
0 20.7
20.7.1
20.7.2
MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ............................ 638
Measurement .............................................638
Payment .................................................638
SECTION 21-WATERPROOFING
0 22.5.1.5
22.5.1.6
22.5.2
Precast Concrete Slope Paving ..............................650
Filter Fabric ............................................. 650
Payment .................................................650
22.5.2.1 General ................................................650
22.5.2.2 Stone Riprap ............................................650
22.5.2.3 Sacked Concrete Riprap ...................................650
22.5.2.4 Wrre-Enclosed Riprap (Gabions) ............................650
22.5.2.5 Cast-in-Place Concrete Slope Paving ..........................650
22.5.2.6 Precast Concrete Slope Paving ..............................650
22.5.2.7 Filter Blanket ........................................... 650
22.5.2.8 Filter Fabric ............................................. 650
22.5.2.9 Geocomposite Drain System ................................650
0 24.1
24.2
DESCRIPTION .............................................653
MATERIALS ...............................................653
24.2.1 Cement, Aggregate, Water, and Admixtures ...................653
24.2.2 Reinforcing Steel .......................................... 653
24.2.3 Anchor Bolts or Studs ......................................653
24.3 PROPORTIONING AND MIXING ............................653
24.3.1 Proportioning ............................................653
24.3.2 Mixing ..................................................653
24.4 SURFACE PREPARATION ...................................654
24.4.1 Earth ....................................................654
24.4.2 Fonns ...................................................654
24.4.3 Concrete or Rock .........................................654
24.5 INSTALLATION ............................................654
24.5.1 Placement of Reinforcing ...................................654
24.5.2 Placement of Mortar .......................................654
24.5.2.1 Weather Limitations ......................................655
24.5.2.2 Protection of Adjacent Work ................................655
24.5.3 Finishing ................................................655
24.5.4 Curing and Protecting .....................................655
24.6 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ............................655
0 25.1
25.2
SCOPE ....................................................657
DESCRIPTION ............................................. 657
lxx CONTENTS Division ll
LIST OF FIGURES
DIVISION I
DESIGN
SECTION 3-LOADS
SECTION 4--FOUNDATIONS
SECTIONl~TRUCTURALSTEEL
SECTION 14--BEARINGS
0 DIVISION 1-A
SEISMIC DESIGN
SECTION I-INTRODUCTION
0 Requirements ....................................452
lxxviii CONTENTS Figures
DIVISION II
CONSTRUCTION
SECTIONl&-~BERSTRUCTURES
LIST OF TABLES
DIVISION I
DESIGN
SECTION 3-LOADS
SECTION 4-FOUNDATIONS
0
.
Table 4.4.8.1.28
(Modified after Hoek (1983)) .........................63
Typical Range of Uniaxial Compressive Strength (C0 ) as a
Function of Rock Category and Rock Type .............64
Table 4.4.8.2.2A Summary of Poisson's Ration for Intact Rock, Modified
after Kulhawy (1978) ...............................65
Table 4.4.8.2.28 Summary of Elastic Moduli for Intact Rock, Modified after
Kulhawy (1978) ....................................65
Table 4.5.6.2A Recommended Factor of Safety on Ultimate Geotechnical
Capacity Based on Specified Construction Control ......72
Table 4.5. 7.3A Allowable Working Stress for Round Timber Piles ......... 73
Table 4.6.5.1.1 A Recommended Values of a and f, 1 for Estimation of
Drilled Shaft Side Resistance in Cohesive Soil,
Reese and O'Neill (1988) ............................82
Table 4.6.5.1.4A Recommended Values of qT* for Estimation of Drilled Shaft
Tip Resistance in Cohesionless Soil, after Reese and O'Neill
(1988) ............................................83
Table 4.10.6-1 Performance Factors for Strength Limit States for Shallow
Foundations .......................................94
Table 4.10.6-2 Performance Factors for Geotechnical Strength Limit States
in Axially Loaded Piles ..............................95
Table 4.10.6-3 Performance Factors for Geotechnical Strength Limit
States in Axially Loaded Drilled Shafts ................96
Table 4.11.4.1.4-1 Presumptive Allowable Bearing Pressures for Spread
Footing Foundations, Modified after U.S. Department
of the Navy, 1982 ...................................99
Table 4.11.4.2.4-1 Presumptive Bearing Pressures (tsO for Foundations on
0 '
Rock (after Putnam, 1981) .......................... 101
lxxx CONTENTS Tables
SECTIONS-RETAINING WALLS
SECTIONl~TRUCTURALSTEEL
Table 10.32.3A Allowable Stresses for Low-Carbon Steel Bolts and Power
Driven Rivets (in psi) .............................. 290
Tables CONTENTS lxxxi
0 Table 10.32.3C
Material (ksi) .....................................290
Nominal Slip Resistance for Slip-Critical Connections
(Slip Resistance per Unit of Bolt Area, F5 , ksi) .......... 291
Table 10.32.4.3A Allowable Stresses-Steel Bars and Steel Forgings ........ 293
Table 10.32.5.1A Allowable Stresses-Cast Steel and Ductile Iron ......... 294
Table 10.36A Bending-Compression Interaction Coefficients ...........302
Table 10.48.l.2A Limitations for Compact Sections ..................... .318
Table 10.48.2.1 A Limitations for Braced Noncompact Sections ............318
Table 10.56A Design Strength of Connectors ........................332
Table I0.57 A Design Slip Resistance for Slip-Critical Connections (Slip
=
Resistance per Unit of Bolt Area, <fJFs <fJTbf.L, ksi) .......334
0 Table 13.2.1A
Table l3.2.2A
Net Dry Dimensions for Dressed Lumber ...............358
Standard Net Finished Widths of Glue Laminated Timber
Manufactured from Western Species or Southern Pine ...359
Table 13.5.lA Tabulated Design Values for Visually Graded
Lumber and Timbers ..............................361
Table 13.5.1 B Tabulated Design Values for Mechanically Graded
Dimension Lumber ................................368
Table 13.5.2A Tabulated Design Values for Bearing Parallel to Grain ....369
Table 13.5.3A Design Values for Structural Glued Laminated Softwood
Timber with Members Stressed Primarily in Bending ... 370
Table 13.5.38 Design Values for Structural Glued Laminated Softwood
Timber with Members Stressed Primarily in Axial Tension
or Compression ................................... 373
Table 13.5.4A Representative Tabulated Design Values for Laminated
Veneer Lumber ...................................375
Table 13.5.48 Representative Tabulated Design Values for Parallel Strand
Lumber, Design Values in Pounds Per Square Inch (psi) ...376
Table 13.5.5A Load Duration Factor, C0 • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . • . . • 377
Table 13.6.1A Values of the Bearing Area Factor, Cb, for Small
Bearing Areas .................................... 380
Table 13.7.1A Support Condition Coefficients for Tapered Columns .....382
SECTION 14-BEARINGS
DIVISION I-A
SEISMIC DESIGN
DIVISIOND
CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 13-PAINTING
SECTIONl~TIMBERSTRUCTURES
SECTION IS-BEARINGS
APPENDICES:
A-Live Load Tables ................................................691
B-'I'ruck 'Ii'ain Loadings ............................................695
C-Columns .......................................................696
lxxxiv CONTENTS Commentary
INDEX ..............................................................797
As referenced in Section 4.12.3.3. 7b and 4.13.2, the following figures have been reprinted
from the 1993 Commentary of the 1993 Interims to the Standard Specifications for Highway
Bridges:
0
.
0
Section 1
GENERAL PROVISIONS
tected by rip-rap, flexible mattresses, retards, spur dikes 1.4 CULVERT LOCATION, LENGTH, AND
or other appropriate construction. Clearing of brush and WATERWAY OPENINGS
trees along embankments in the vicinity of bridge open-
ings should be avoided to prevent high flow velocities and Culvert location, length. and waterway openings
possible scour. Borrow pits should not be located in areas should be in accordance with the AASHTO Guide on the
which would increase velocities and the possibility of Hydraulic Design of Culverts in Highway Drainage
scour at bridges. Guidelines.
take account of the direction of blast when the locomotive the standard practice of the commission for the highway
0
0
Section 2
GENERAL FEATURES OF DESIGN
0 2.7.4B)
L =post spacing (Figure 2.7.4B)
P = railing design loading = l 0 kips (Article 2. 7 .1.3
For recommendations on roadway widths for various
volumes of traffic, see AASHTO A Policy on Geometric
Design of Highways and Streets, or A Policy on Design
and Figure 2.7.4B) Standards-Interstate System.
P' = railing design loading equal to P, P/2 or P/3 (Article
2.7.1'.3.5) 2.2.3 Vertical Clearance
t = flange or web thickness (Article 2.7.4.3)
w =pedestrian or bicycle loading (Articles 2.7.2.2 and Vertical clearance on state trunk highways and inter-
2.7.3.2) state systems in rural areas shall be at least 16 feet over
the entire roadway width with an allowance for resurfac-
ing. On state trunk highways and interstate routes through
2.1.2 Width of Roadway and Sidewalk urban areas, a 16-foot clearance shall be provided except
in highly developed areas. A 16-foot clearance should be
The width of roadway shall be the clear width mea- provided in both rural and urban areas where such clear-
sured at right angles to the longitudinal center line of the ance is not unreasonably costly and where needed for de-
bridge between the bottoms of curbs. If brush curbs or fense requirements. Vertical clearance on all other high-
curbs are not used, the clear width shall be the minimum ways shall be at least 14 feet over the entire roadway
width measured between the nearest faces of the bridge width with an allowance for resurfacing.
railing.
The width of the sidewalk shall be the clear width, 2.2.4 Other
measured at right angles to the longitudinal center line of
the bridge, from the extreme inside portion of the handrail The channel openings and clearances shall be accept-
to the bottom of the curb or guardtimber. If there is a truss, able to agencies having jurisdiction over such matters.
girder, or parapet wall adjacent to the roadway curb, the Channel openings and clearances shall conform in
width shall be measured to the extreme walk side of these width, height, and location to all federal, state, and local
requirements.
0 members.
7
8 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 2.2.5
The provisions of Article 2.2.3 shall be used. 2.5 HIGHWAY CLEARANCES FOR TUNNELS
~ ~
t-
en 0
...
l5... ...
c(
0
t-
c( t=
a:
w
>
-
w-~ ~l
~
r:.-O"MIN. PAVEMENT a:
0
I -I
GENERAL CONDITION
SHOULDER
PAVEMENT
~1>
SHOULDER MIN.
LIMITED CONDITION
0
'
'
•The barrier to face of wall or pier distance should not be less than the dynamic deflection of the barrier for impact by a full-sized automobile at
impact conditions of approximately 25 degrees and 60 miles per hour. For information on dynamic deflection of various barriers. see AASHTO Road-
side Design Guide.
FIGURE 2.4A Clearance Diagrams for Underpasses (See Article 2.4 for General Requirements.)
I·
HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE .,
-
w
0
z
t: <
[[
CURB OR CURB OR ~ <
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
y-
w
..J
1- 0
Cl)
18 INCHES 18 INCHES < ..J
MINIMUM MINIMUM w
..J <
I 0
..... [[
t=
< w
j_ ~ I--
>
ROADWAY WIDTH
l· AT LEAST 2 FT. GREATER THAN
APPROACH TRAVELLED WAY
.. f z
~
0
[[
BUT NOT LESS THAN 24 FT. 0
The clearances and width of roadway for two-lane traf- railing or barrier with a pedestrian railing along the edge
fic shall be not less than those shown in Figure 2.5. The of the structure. On urban expressways, the separation
roadway width shall be increased at least 10 feet and shall be made by a combination railing.
preferably 12 feet for each additional traffic lane.
2.7.1 Vehicular Railing
2.5.2 Clearance between Walls
2.7.1.1 General
The minimum width between walls of two-lane tunnels
shall be 30 feet. 2. 7.1.1.1 Although the primary purpose of traffic
railing is to contain the average vehicle using the struc-
2.5.3 Vertical Clearance ture, consideration should also be given to (a) protection
of the occupants of a vehicle in collision with the railing,
The vertical clearance between curbs shall be not less (b) protection of other vehicles near the collision, (c) pro-
than 14 feet. tection of vehicles or pedestrians on roadways underneath
the structure, and (d) appearance and freedom of view
2.5.4 Curbs from passing vehicles.
The width of curbs shall be not less than 18 inches. The 2. 7.1.1.2 Materials for traffic railings shall be con-
height of curbs shall be as specified for bridges. crete, metal, timber, or a combination thereof. Metal ma-
For heavy traffic roads, roadway widths greater than terials with less than l 0-percent tested elongation shall
the above minima are recommended. not be used.
If traffic lane widths exceed 12 feet the roadway width
may be reduced 2 feet 0 inches from that calculated from 2. 7.1 .1.3 Traffic railings should provide a smooth,
Figure 2.5. continuous face of rail on the traffic side with the posts set
back from the face of rail. Structural continuity in the rail
members, including anchorage of ends, is essential. The
2.6 HIGHWAY CLEARANCES FOR
railing system shall be able to resist the applied loads at
DEPRESSED ROADWAYS
all locations.
2.6.1 Roadway Width
2. 7.1.1.4 Protrusions or depressions at rail joints
shall be acceptable provided their thickness or depth is no
The clear width between curbs shall be not less than
greater than the wall thickness of the rail member or 3/s
that specified for tunnels.
inch, whichever is less.
2.6.2 Clearance between Walls
2.7.1.1.5 Careful attention shall be given to the treat-
ment of railings at the bridge ends. Exposed rail ends,
The minimum width between walls for depressed road-
posts, and sharp changes in the geometry of the railing
ways carrying two lanes of traffic shall be 30 feet.
shall be avoided. A smooth transition by means of a con-
tinuation of the bridge barrier, guardrail anchored to the
2.6.3 Curbs
bridge end, or other effective means shall be provided to
protect the traffic from direct collision with the bridge rail
The width of curbs shall be not less than 18 inches. The
ends.
height of curbs shall be as specified for bridges.
2.7.1.2 Geometry
2.7 RAILINGS
2. 7.1.2.1 The heights of rails shall be measured rela-
Railings shall be provided along the edges of struc- tive to the reference surface which shall be the top of the
tures for protection of traffic and pedestrians. Other suit- roadway, the top of the future overlay if resurfacing is an-
able applications may be warranted on bridge-length cul- ticipated, or the top of curb when the curb projection is
verts as addressed in the AASHTO Roadside Design greater than 9 inches from the traffic face of the railing.
Guide.
Except on urban expressways, a pedestrian walkway 2.7.1.2.2 Traffic railings and traffic portions of
may be separated from an adjacent roadway by a traffic combination railings shall not be less than 2 feet 3 inches
2.7.1.2.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 11
from the top of the reference surface. Parapets designed load of the rail. The vertical load shall be applied alter-
0
.
with sloping traffic faces intended to allow vehicles to
ride up them under low angle contacts shall be at least 2
feet 8 inches in height.
nately upward or downward. The attachment shall also be
designed to resist an inward transverse load equal to one-
fourth the transverse rail design load.
2.7.1.2.3 The lower element of a traffic or combina- 2. 7.1.3.5 Rail members shall be designed for a mo-
tion railing should consist of either a parapet projecting ment, due to concentrated loads, at the center of the panel
at least 18 inches above the reference surface or a rail and at the posts of P'U6 where L is the post spacing and
centered between 15 and 20 inches above the reference P' is equal to P, P/2, or P/3, as modified by the factor C
surface. where required. The handrail members of combination
railings shall be designed for a moment at the center of the
2.7.1.2.4 For traffic railings, the maximum clear panel and at the posts of 0.1 wL2•
opening below the bottom rail shall not exceed 17 inches
and the maximum opening between succeeding rails shall 2.7.1.3.6 The transverse force on concrete parapet
not exceed 15 inches. For combination railings, accom- and barrier walls shall be spread over a longitudinal length
modating pedestrian or bicycle traffic, the maximum of 5 feet.
opening between railing members shall be governed by
Articles 2.7.2.2.2 and 2.7.3.2.1, respectively. 2.7.1.3.7 Railings other than those shown in Figure
2.7.4B are permissible provided they meet the require-
2. 7.1.2.5 The traffic faces of all traffic rails must be ments of this Article. Railing configurations that have
within 1 inch of a vertical plane through the traffic face of been successfully tested by full-scale impact tests are ex-
the rail closest to traffic. empt from the provisions of this Article.
2. 7. 1.3. 1 When the height of the top of the top traffic 2.7.2.1 General
rail exceeds 2 feet 9 inches, the total transverse load dis-
0 vertical load equal to one-fourth of the transverse design apply to one or the other, but not to both. Chain link fence
12 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 2.7.2.2.2
is exempt from the rail spacing requirements listed ter of gravity of the upper rail, but at a height not greater
above. In general, rails should project beyond the face of than 54 inches.
posts and/or pickets.
2. 7.2.2.3 The minimum design loadings for bicycle 2.7.2.2.6 Refer to Figures 2.7.4A and 2.7.48 for
railing shall be w = 50 pounds per linear foot transversely more information concerning the application of loads.
and vertically, acting simultaneously on each rail.
2. 7.2.2.4 Design loads for rails located more than 54 2.7.3 Pedestrian Railing
inches above the riding surface shall be determined by the
designer. 2.7.3.1 General
2.7.2.2.5 Posts shall be designed for a transverse 2.7.3.1.1 Railing components shall be proportioned
load of wL (where Lis the post spacing) acting at the cen- commensurate with the type and volume of anticipated
(To be used adjacent to a sidewalk when highway traffic is separated from pedestrian
traffic by a traffic railing.)
PEDESTRIAN RAILING
BICYCLE RAJLING
NOTE:
If screening or solid face is presented, number of rails may be reduced; wind loads must be added if solid face is
utilized.
NOTES:
1. Loadings on left are applied to rails.
2. Loads on right are applied to posts.
3. The shapes of rail members are illustrative only. Any material or combination of materials listed in Article
2.7 may be used in any configuration.
4. The spacing illustrated are maximum values. Rail elements spacings shall conform to Articles 2. 7 .2.2.2 and
2.7.3.2.1.
NOMENCLATURE:
w = Pedestrian or bicycle loading per unit length of rail
L = Post spacing
pedestrian traffic. Consideration should be given to ap- 2. 7.3.2.2 The minimum design loading for pedestrian
railing shall be w = 50 pounds per linear foot, transversely
0
'
'
'
pearance, safety and freedom of view from passing vehi-
cles. and vertically, acting simultaneously on each longitudinal
member. Rail members located more than 5 feet 0 inches
2.7.3.1.2 Materials for pedestrian railing may be above the walkway are excluded from these requirements.
concrete, metal, timber, or a combination thereof.
2. 7.3.2.3 Posts shall be designed for a transverse load
2.7.3.2 Geometry and Loads of wL (where Lis the post spacing) acting at the center of
gravity of the upper rail or, for high rails, at 5 feet 0 inches
2. 7.3.2.1 The minimum height of a pedestrian railing maximum above the walkway.
shall be 42 inches measured from the top of the walkway
to the top of the upper rail member. Within a band bor- 2.7.3.2.4 Refer to Figures 2.7.4A and 2.7.4B for
dered by the walkway surface and a line 27 inches above more information concerning the application of loads.
it, all elements of the railing assembly shall be spaced
such that a 6-inch sphere will not pass through any open- 2.7.4 Structural Specifications and Guidelines
ing. For elements between 27 and 42 inches above the
walking surface, elements shall be spaced such that an 2.7.4.1 Railings shall be designed by the ela()tic meth-
eight-inch sphere will not pass through any opening. od to the allowable stresses for the appropriate material.
e
::) E p E
:::s
e :::s
·c:
·e
e
·c: c
~~:;
·c:e c
~
c., ~
c:
·e ~;q
·e
~
·e t(~: ·e ·e c
; :
ap ·e
c., ~
0
,.·\_·.
N C') N I
(1b be used when curb projects more than 9" from the traffic face of railing.)
(To be used where there is no curb or curb projects 9" or less from traffic face of railing.)
TRAFFIC RAILING
~
e
·r:
·e
~ c
~~·:~ • e ' :·..~
:,
·'
.. .
...~
l
N
' '
·.)
•
NOTES:
1. Loadings on left are applied to raiJs.
2. Loadings on right are applied to posts.
3. The shapes of rail members are illustrative only. Any material or combination of materials listed in Article
2.7 may be used in any configuration.
4. The spacings illustrated are maximum values. Rail element spacings shall conform to Article 2. 7.1.2.4.
NOMENCLATURE:
P = Highway design loading = 10 kips.
h = Height of top of top rail above reference surface (in.).
L = Post spacing (ft).
w = Pedestrian loading per unit length of rail.
C = 1 + b- 33 i:!:: I
18
For aluminum alloys the design stresses given in the Square and rectangular steel tubes and steel W and
Specifications for Aluminum Structures Fifth Edition, De- I sections in bending with tension and compression
cember 1986, for Bridge and Similar 'JYpe Structures pub- on extreme fibers of laterally supported compact sec-
lished by the Aluminum Association, Inc. for alloys 6061- tions having an axis of symmetry in the plane of
T6 (Table A.6), 6351-T5 (Table A.6) and 6063-T6 (Table loading may be designed for an allowable stress Fb =
A.6) shall apply, and for cast aluminum alloys the design 0.60Fy.
stresses given for alloys A444.0-T4 (Table A.9), A356.0-
T61 (Table A.9) and A356.0-T6 (Table A.9) shall apply. 2.7.4.3 The requirements for a compact section are
For fabrication and welding of aluminum railing, see as follows:
Article 11.5. (a) The width to thickness ratio of projecting elements
of the compression flange of W and I sections shall not
2.7.4.2 The allowable unit stresses for steel shall be exceed
as given in Article I 0.32, except as modified below.
For steels not generally covered by these Specifica-
tions, but having a guaranteed yield strength, Fy. the al- (2-1)
lowable unit stress, shall be derived by applying the gen-
eral formulas as given in these Specifications under "Unit
Stresses" except as indicated below.
(b) The width to thickness ratio of the compression
The allowable unit stress for shear shall be Fv = flange of square or rectangular tubes shall not exceed
0.33Fy.
Round or oval steel tubes may be proportioned using
an allowable bending stress, Fb = 0.66Fy. provided the Rlt (2-2)
ratio (radius/thickness) is less than or equal to 40.
2.7.4.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 15
(c) The D/t ratio of webs shall not exceed (e) the distance between lateral supports in inches of
0 .
(2- 3)
W or I sections shall not exceed
< 2,400b
(2 -6)
-~
(d) If subject to combined axial force and bending, the
D/t ratio of webs shall not exceed or
D 13,3~1-1.43
(;. )]
< 20,000,000Ar
- dFy
(2-7)
- < ---=--==-----= (2-4)
t ~
D 7,000
-<-- (2-5)
t~
0
0
.
Section 3
LOADS
Part A
TYPES OF LOADS
3.1 NOTATIONS
0 Ca
D
D
= steel shear stress coefficient (Article 3.25.1.5)
= parameter used in determination of load fraction of wheel load (Article 3.23.4.3)
= degree of curve (Article 3.1 0.1)
D = dead load (Article 3.22)
D.F.= fraction of wheel load applied to beam (Article 3.28.1)
DL = contributing dead load
E =width of slab over which a wheel load is distributed (Article 3.24.3)
E =earth pressure (Article 3.22)
EQ = equivalent static horizontal force applied at the center of gravity of the structure
Be: = modulus of elasticity of concrete (Article 3.26.3)
Es =modulus of elasticity of steel (Article 3.26.3)
Ew = modulus of elasticity of wood (Article 3.26.3)
F =horizontal ice force on pier (Article 3.18.2.2.1)
Fb = allowable bending stress (Article 3.25.1.3)
Fv = allowable shear stress (Article 3.25.1.3)
g = 32.2 ft./sec. 2
I = impact fraction (Article 3.8.2)
I = gross flexural moment of inertia of the precast member (Article 3.23.4.3)
ICE = ice pressure (Article 3.22)
J = gross Saint-Venant torsional constant of the precast member (Article 3.23.4.3)
K = stream flow force constant (Article 3.18.1)
K =stiffness constant (Article 3.23.4)
K = wheel load distribution constant for timber flooring (Article 3.25.1.3)
k = live load distribution constant for spread box girders (Article 3.28.1)
L = loaded length of span (Article 3.8.2)
L = loaded length of sidewalk (Article 3.14.1.1)
17
18 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.1
3.2.2 Members shall be proportioned either with refer- 3.3.2.1 If differential settlement is anticipated in a
ence to service loads and allowable stresses as provided structure, consideration should be given to stresses result-
in Service Load Design (Allowable Stress Design) or, al- ing from this settlement.
ternatively, with reference to load factors and factored
strength as provided in Strength Design (Load Factor De-
3.3.3 If a separate wearing surface is to be placed when
sign).
the bridge is constructed, or is expected to be placed in the
future, adequate allowance shall be made for its weight in
3.2.3 When stress sheets are required, a diagram or no- the design dead load. Otherwise, provision for a future
tation of the assumed loads shall be shown and the wearing surface is not required.
stresses due to the various loads shall be shown separately.
3.3.4 Special consideration shall be given to the neces-
3.2.4 Where required by design conditions, the concrete sity for a separate wearing surface for those regions where
placing sequence shall be indicated on the plans or in the the use of chains on tires or studded snow tires can be
special provisions. anticipated.
20 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.3.5
3.3.5 Where the abrasion of concrete is not expected, traffic lanes, spaced across the entire bridge roadway
the traffic may bear directly on the concrete slab. If con- width measured between curbs.
sidered desirable, Y4 inch or more may be added to the
slab for a wearing surface. 3.6.3 Fractional parts of design lanes shall not be used,
but roadway widths from 20 to 24 feet shall have two de-
3.3.6 The following weights are to be used in comput- sign lanes each equal to one-half the roadway width.
ing the dead load:
3.6.4 The traffic lanes shall be placed in such numbers
#/cu.ft. and positions on the roadway, and the loads shall be
Steel or cast steel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490 placed in such positions within their individual traffic
Cast iron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 lanes, so as to produce the maximum stress in the mem-
Aluminum alloys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 ber under consideration.
Timber (treated or untreated)............... 50
Concrete, plain or reinforced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Compacted sand, earth, gravel, or ballast . . . . . 120 3.7 IDGHWAY LOADS
Loose san~ earth, and gravel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 00
Macadam or gravel, rolled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 3.7.1 Standard Truck and Lane Loads*
Cinder filling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Pavement, other than wood block . . . . . . . . . . . ISO
Railway rails, guardrails, and fastenings 3.7.1.1 The highway live loadings on the roadways
(per linear foot of track) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 of bridges or incidental structures shall consist of standard
Stone masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 trucks or lane loads that are equivalent to truck trains. Two
Asphalt plank, 1 in. thick . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 lb. sq. ft. systems of loading are provided, the H loadings and the
HS loadings-the HS loadings being heavier than the cor-
responding H loadings.
3.4 LIVE LOAD
3.7.1.2 Each lane load shall consist of a uniform load
The live load shall consist of the weight of the applied per linear foot of traffic lane combined with a single con-
moving load of vehicles, cars, and pedestrians. centrated load (or two concentrated loads in the case of
continuous spans-see Article 3.11.3), so placed on the
3.5 OVERLOAD PROVISIONS span as to produce maximum stress. The concentrated
load and uniform load shall be considered as uniformly
3.5.1 For all loadings less than H 20, provision shall be distributed over a 10-foot width on a line normal to the
made for an infrequent heavy load by applying Loading center line of the lane.
Combination lA (see Article 3.22), with the live load as-
sumed to be H or HS truck and to occupy a single lane 3.7.1.3 For the computation of moments and shears,
without concurrent loading in any other lane. The over- different concentrated loads shall be used as indicated in
load shall apply to all parts of the structure affected, ex- Figure 3.7.68. The lighter concentrated loads shall be
cept the roadway deck, or roadway deck plates and stiff- used when the stresses are primarily bending stresses, and
ening ribs in the case of orthotropic bridge super- the heavier concentrated loads shall be used when the
structures. stresses are primarily shearing stresses.
3.6 TRAFFIC LANES *Note: The system of lane loads defined here (and illustrated in Figure
3.7.6.B) was developed in order to give a simpler method of calculating
moments and shears than that based on wheel loads of the truck.
3.6.1 The lane loading or standard truck shall be as- Appendix B shows the truck train loadings of the 1935 Specifications
sumed to occupy a width of I 0 feet. of AASHO and the corresponding lane loadings.
In 1944, the HS series of trucks was developed. These approximate the
effect of the corresponding 1935 truck preceded and followed by a train
3.6.2 These loads shall be placed in 12-foot wide design of trucks weighing three-fourths as much as the basic truck.
3.7.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 21
3.7.2 Classes of Loading gross weight in tons of the tractor truck. The variable axle
The H loadings consist of a two-axle truck or the cor- 3.8.2 Impact Formula
responding lane loading as illustrated in Figures 3.7.6A
and 3.7.68. The H loadings are designated H followed by 3.8.2.1 The amount of the impact allowance or in-
a number indicating the gross weight in tons of the stan- crement is expressed as a fraction of the live load stress,
dard truck. and shall be determined by the formula:
3.7.6 HS Loading
50
I= L + 125 ( 3 -I)
The HS loadings consist of a tractor truck with semi-
trailer or the corresponding lane load as illustrated in Fig- in which,
ures 3.7.7A and 3.7.68. The HS loadings are designated
0 by the letters HS followed by a number indicating the I = impact fraction (maximum 30 percent);
22 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.8.2. 1
14'-0"
rl .I .
i,II. . ,; cu5
2'-0"
.1• .t··
6'-0" 2'-0"
*In the design of timber floors and onhotropic s teel decks (excluding transverse beams) for H 20 Loading. one
axle load of24,000 pounds or two axle loads of 16,000 pounds each spaced 4 feet apan may be used, whichever
produces the greater stress, instead of the 32,000-pound ax le shown.
••For slab design, the center line of wheels s hall be assumed to be I foot from face of curb. (See Aniclc 3.24.2.)
3.8.2.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 23
H20-44 LOADING
HS20-44 LOADING
H15-44 LOADING
HS15-44 LOADING
L = length in feet of the portion of the span that is 3.8.2.3 For culverts with cover
loaded to produce the maximum stress in the 0'0" to 1'-0" inc. I = 30%
member. 1'-1" to 2' -0" inc. I = 20%
2'-1" to 2'-11" inc. I= 10%
3.8.2.2 For uniformity of application, in this formula,
the loaded length, L, shall be as follows:
(a) For roadway floors: the design span length. 3.9 LONGITUDINAL FORCES
(b) For transverse members, such as floor beams: the
Provision shall be made for the effect of a longitudinal
span length of member center to center of supports.
(c) For computing truck load moments: the span force of 5% of the live load in all lanes carrying traffic
length, or for cantilever arms the length from the mo- headed in the same direction. All lanes shall be loaded for
bridges likely to become one directional in the future. The
ment center to the farthermost axle.
(d) For shear due to truck loads: the length of the load used, without impact, shall be the lane load plus the
loaded portion of span from the point under consider- concentrated load for moment specified in Article 3.7,
ation to the far reaction; except, for cantilever arms, with reduction for multiple-loaded lanes as specified in
Article 3.12. The center of gravity of the longitudinal
use a 30% impact factor.
(e) For continuous spans: the length of span under force shall be assumed to be located 6 feet above the floor
consideration for positive moment, and the average of slab and to be transmitted to the substructure through the
superstructure .
0
.
two adjacent loaded spans for negative moment.
24 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.9
~I ~~ ~~
~· 14'-0" d!
-io.,::r----~-----4:4wl-
d v
W = COMBINED
+----$----·--{$-
WEIGHT ON THE FIRST TWO AXLES WHICH IS THE SAME
AS FOR THE CORRESPONDING H TRUCK.
V = VARIABLE SPACING - 14 FEET TO 30 FEET INCLUSIVE. SPACING TO BE
USED IS THAT WHICH PRODUCES MAXIMUM STRESSES.
CLEARANCE AND
LANE WI
10'-Q"
*In the design of timber floors and orthotropic steel decks (excluding transverse beams) for H 20 Loading, one
axle load of 24.000 poundc; or two axle loads of 16,000 pounds each, spaced 4 feet apart may be used, whichever
produces the greater stress. instead of the 32.000-pound axle shown.
**For slab design. the center line of wheels shall be assumed to be I foot from face of curb. (See Article 3.24.2.)
3.10 DIVISION I-DESIGN 25
0 mum loading.
3.12 REDUCTION IN LOAD INTENSITY
3.10.4 Lane loads shall not be used in the computation
of centrifugal forces. 3.12.1 Where maximum stresses are produced in any
member by loading a number of traffic lanes simultane-
3.10.5 When a reinforced concrete floor slab or a steel ously, the following percentages of the live loads may be
grid deck is keyed to or attached to its supporting mem- used in view of the improbability of coincident maximum
bers, it may be assumed that the deck resists, within its loading:
plane, the shear resulting from the centrifugal forces act-
ing on the live load. Percent
One or two lanes .......................... 100
Three lanes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.11 APPLICATION OF LIVE LOAD
Four lanes or more ........................ 75
3.11.1 Traffic Lane Units
3.12.2 The reduction in load intensity specified in Arti-
In computing stresses, each 10-foot lane load or single c1e 3.12.1 shall not be applicable when distribution factors
standard truck shall be considered as a unit, and fractions from Table 3.23.1 are used to determine moments in lon-
of load lane widths or trucks shall not be used. gitudinal beams.
3.11.2 Number and Position of Traffic Lane Units 3.12.3 The reduction in intensity of loads on transverse
members such as floor beams shaH be determined as
The number and position of the lane load or truck loads in the case of main trusses or girders, using the number
shall be as specified in Article 3. 7 and, whether Jane or of traffic lanes across the width of roadway that must
truck loads, shall be such as to produce maximum stress, be loaded to produce maximum stresses in the floor
3.13 ELECTRIC RAILWAY LOADS 3.14.2.2 Where sidewalk, curb, and traffic rail form
an integral system, the traffic railing loading shall be ap-
If highway bridges carry electric railway traffic, the plied and stresses in curbs computed accordingly.
railway loads shall be determined from the class of traffic
which the bridge may be expected to carry. The possibil- 3.14.3 Railing Loading
ity that the bridge may be required to carry railroad freight
cars shall be given consideration. For Railing Loads, see Article 2.7.1.3.
When a reinforced concrete floor slab or a steel grid This load shall be applied at a point 6 feet above the
0
'
Skew Angle
ofW'md
Degrees
Lateral
Load
PSF
Longitudinal
Load
PSF
Lateral
Load
PSF
Longitudinal
Load
PSF
skewed to the substructure, this force shall be resolved
into components perpendicular to the end and front ele-
vations of the substructure. The component perpendicular
0 75 0 50 0 to the end elevation shall act on the exposed substructure
15 70 12 44 6 area as seen in end elevation and the component perpen-
30 65 28 41 12 dicular to the front elevation shall act on the exposed areas
45 47 41 33 16
60 24 so 17 19 and shall be applied simultaneously with the wind loads
from the superstructure. The above loads are for Group II
and Group V loadings and may be reduced by 70%
The loads listed above shall be used in Group II and for Group ill and Group VI loadings, as indicated in Arti-
Group V loadings as given in Article 3.22. cle 3.22.
0
28 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.16
3.16 THERMAL FORCES ity distribution and thus a triangular pressure distribution,
shall be calculated by the formula:
Provision shall be made for stresses or movements re-:
suiting from variations in temperature. The rise and fall in Pavg = K(V Dvg} 2 (3-4)
temperature shall be fixed for the locality in which the
structure is to be constructed and shall be computed from where,
an assumed temperature at the time of erection. Due con- Pavs =average stream pressure, in pounds per square
sideration shall be given to the lag between air tempera- foot,
ture and the interior temperature of massive concrete V11vs = average velocity of water in feet per second,
members or structures. computed by dividing the flow rate by the flow
The range of temperature shall generally be as follows: area,
Metal structures: K = a constant, being 1.4 for all piers subjected to
Moderate climate, from 0 to 120"R drift build-up and square-ended piers, 0.7 for
Cold climate, from -30 to 120"R circular piers, and 0.5 for angle-ended piers
Thmperature Thmperature where the angle is 30 degrees or less.
Rise Fall
Concrete structures: The maximum stream flow pressure, P~· shall be
Moderate climate ......... . equal to twice the average stream flow pressure, Pavs• com-
Cold climate ........... .. puted by Equation 3-4. Stream flow pressure shall be a tri-
angular distribution with Pmax located at the top of water
3.17 UPLIFT elevation and a zero pressure located at the flow line.
3.17.1 Provision shall be made for adequate attachment 3.18.1.1.2 The stream flow forces shall be computed
of the superstructure to the substructure by ensuring that by the product of the stream flow pressure, taking into ac-
the calculated uplift at any support is resisted by tension count the pressure distribution, and the exposed pier area.
members engaging a mass of masonry equal to the largest In cases where the corresponding top of water elevation is
force obtained under one of the following conditions: above the low beam elevation, stream flow loading on the
superstructure shall be investigated. The stream flow pres-
(a) 100% of the calculated uplift caused by any load- sure acting on the superstructure may be taken as Pmax with
ing or combination of loadings in which the live plus a uniform distribution.
impact loading is increased by 100%.
(b) 150% of the calculated uplift at working load
3.18.1.2 Pressure Components
level.
3.17.2 Anchor bolts subject to tension or other elements When the direction of stream flow is other than normal
of the structure stressed under the above conditions shall to the exposed surface area, or when bank migration or a
be designed at 150% of the allowable basic stress. change of stream bed meander is anticipated, the effects
of the directional components of stream flow pressure
shall be investigated.
3.18 FORCES FROM STREAM CURRENT AND
FLOATING ICE, AND DRIFr CONDITIONS
3.18.1.3 Drift Lodged Against Pier
All piers and other portions of structures that are sub-
ject to the force of flowing water. floating ice, or drift shall Where a significant amount of drift lodged against a
be designed to resist the maximum stresses induced pier is anticipated, the effects of this drift buildup shall be
thereby. considered in the design of the bridge opening and the
bridge components. The overall dimensions of the drift
3.18.1 Force of Stream Current on Piers buildup shall reflect the selected pier locations. site con-
ditions, and known drift supply upstream. When it is an-
3.18.1.1 Stream Pressure ticipated that the flow area will be significantly blocked
by drift buildup, increases in high water elevations,
3.18.1././ The effect of flowing water on piers and stream velocities, stream flow pressures, and the potential
drift build-up, assuming a second-degree parabolic veloc- increases in scour depths shall be investigated ..
3.18.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 29
3.18.2 Force of Ice on Piers 3.18.2.2.3 The following values of effective ice
0 3.18.2.1 General
strength appropriate to various situations may be used as
a guide.
Ice forces on piers shall be selected, having regard (a) In the order of 100 psi where breakup occurs
to site conditions and the mode of ice action to be ex- at melting temperatures and where the ice runs as
pected. Consideration shall be given to the following small "cakes" and is substantially disintegrated in its
modes: structure.
(b) In the order of 200 psi where breakup occurs at
(a) Dynamic ice pressure due to moving ice-sheets melting temperatures, but the ice moves in large pieces
and ice-floes carried by streamflow, wind, or currents. and is internally sound.
(b) Static ice pressure due to thermal movements of (c) In the order of 300 psi where at breakup there is an
continuous stationary ice-sheets on large bodies of initial movement of the ice sheet as a whole or where
water. large sheets of sound ice may strike the piers.
(c) Static pressure resulting from ice-jams. (d) In the order of 400 psi where breakup or major ice
(d) Static uplift or vertical loads resulting from adher- movement may occur with ice temperatures signifi-
ing ice in waters of fluctuating level. cantly below the melting point.
3.18.2.2 Dynamic Ice Force 3.18.2.2.4 The preceding values for effective ice
strength are intended for use with piers of substantial mass
3.18.2.2.1 Horizontal forces resulting from the pres- and dimensions. The values shall be modified as neces-
sure of moving ice shall be calculated by the formula: sary for variations in pier width or pile diameter, and de-
sign ice thickness by multiplying by the appropriate coef-
F = Cnp · t • w (3-5) ficient obtained from the following table:
forces transverse to the longitudinal axis shall in no case holes and crushed rock, pipe drains or gravel drains, or by
be taken as less than 20% of the total force. perforated drains.
3.19 BUOYANCY
3.22 COMBINATIONS OF LOADS
Buoyancy shall be considered where it affects the de-
sign of either substructure, including piling, or the super- 3.22.1 The following Groups represent various combi-
structure. nations of loads and forces to which a structure may be
subjected. Each component of the structure, or the foun-
dation on which it rests, shall be proportioned to with-
3.20 EARTH PRESSURE stand safely all group combinations of these forces that
are applicable to the particular site or type. Group loading
combinations for Service Load Design and Load Factor
3.20.1 Structures which retain fills shall be proportioned Design are given by:
to withstand pressure as given by Coulomb's Equation or
by other expressions given in Section 5, "Retaining Group (N) = 'Y[J31> · D + f3t (L + I) + f3cCF + J3EE
Walls"; provided, however, that no structure shall be de- + f3sB + f3sSF + f3w W + f3wLWL
signed for less than an equivalent fluid weight (mass) of + J3L • LF + J3R (R + s + T)
30 pounds per cubic foot. + (3EQEQ + J3JcEICE] (3-10)
where,
3.20.2 For rigid frames a maximum of one-half of the
moment caused by earth pressure (lateral) may be used to N = group number;
reduce the positive moment in the beams, in the top slab, 'Y = load factor, see Table 3.22.1 A;
or in the top and bottom slab, as the case may be. J3 =coefficient, see Table 3.22.1A;
D = dead load;
L = live load;
3.20.3 When highway traffic can come within a hori- I = live load impact;
zontal distance from the top of the structure equal to one- E = earth pressure;
half its height, the pressure shall have added to it a live B = buoyancy;
load surcharge pressure equal to not less than 2 feet of W = wind load on structure;
earth. WL = wind load on live load-I 00 pounds per linear
foot;
LF = longitudinal force from live load;
3.20.4 Where an adequately designed reinforced co~ CF = centrifugal force;
crete approach slab supported at one end by the bridge is R = rib shortening;
provided, no live load surcharge need be considered. S = shrinkage;
T = temperature;
EQ =earthquake;
3.20.5 All designs shall provide for the thorough SF = stream flow pressure;
drainage of the back-filling material by means of weep ICE = ice pressure.
3.22.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 31
0 Col. No. 1 2 8 8A 4· 5 6 7 8
fj FACTORS
9 10 11 12 18 14
Q
IB 1.0 1 0 1 1 IJE 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ••
~ II 1.0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 125
0 III 1.0 1 1 0 1 IJE 1 1 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 126
.J
w IV 1.0 1 1 0 1 IJE 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 125
->
0
Cl:
fll
v 1.0
VI 1.0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
13E
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
140
140
fl) VII 1.0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 188
VIII 1.0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 o· 0 0 1 140
IX 1.0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 160
X 1.0 1 1 0 0 13E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Culvert
I 1.8 liD 1.67• 0 1.0 /SE 1 1 0 0 1) 0 0 0
lA 1.3 Jo 2.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0
z
...
~ 18 1.8 /Jo 0 1 1.0 13E 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
.!
:1Q II 1.3 liD 0 0 0 IJE 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 .D
a:
0
111 1.3
IV 1.8
,Jo
_!!_o
1
1
0
0
1
1
/Jr,
IJE
1
1
1
1
0.3
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0 =3
Q,
Q,
foe
0
v 1.25 ;Jo 0 0 0 IJE 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 ~
...
~ VI 1.26 .Jo 1 0 1 II& 1 1 0.8 1 1 1 0 0 0
r. VII 1.8 .so 0 0 z
Q 0 IJ& 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
~ VIII 1.8 ifD 1 0 1 IJE 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 IX 1.20
..:a /Jo 0 0 0 13E 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
• 1.25 may be used for design of outside roadway beam when com- For culvert loading specifications. see Article 6.2.
bination of sidewalk live load as well as traffic live load plus impact
governs the design, but the capacity of the section should not be less f3E : : : 1.0 and 0.5 for lateral loads on rigid frames (check both load-
than required for highway traffic live load only using a beta factor of ings to see which one governs). See Article 3.20.
1.67. 1.00 may be used for design of deck slab with combination of For Load Factor Design
loads as described in Article 3.24.2.2.
f3E = 1.3 for lateral earth pressure for retaining waDs and rigid
frames excluding rigid culverts. For lateral at-rest earth
pressures, PE = 1.15
*"' Pe ta _ Maximum Unit Stress (Operating Rating) PE = 0.5 for lateral earth pressure when checking positive
rcen ge - Allowable Basic Unit Stress x 100 moments in rigid frames. This complies with Article 3.20.
PE 1.0 for vertical earth pressure
Po 0. 75 when checking member for minimum axial load and
For Service Load Design maximum moment or maximum eccentricity ..... For
Po 1.0 when checking member for maximum axial Column
~(Column 14) Percentage of Basic Unit Stress load and minimum moment ................... Design
(3 0 1.0 for flexural and tension members
No increase in allowable unit stresses shall be permitted for members f3E 1.0 for Rigid Culverts
or connections carrying wind loads only. PE 1.5 for Flexible Culverts
For Group X loading (culverts) the PE factor shall be applied to verti-
0 Pe = 1.00 for vertical and lateral loads on all other structures. cal and horizontal loads.
32 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.22.2
3.22.2 For service load design, the percentage of the culations of horizontal shear in rectangular timber beams
basic unit stress for the various groups is given in Table shall be in accordance with Article 13.3.
3.22.1A.
The loads and forces in each group shall be taken as ap- 3.23.2 Bending Moments in Stringers and
propriate from Articles 3.3 to 3.21. The maximum section Longitudinal Beams**
required shall be used.
3.23.2.1 General
3.22.3 For load factor design, the gamma and beta fac-
tors given in Table 3.22.1A shall be used for designing In calculating bending moments in longitudinal beams
structural members and foundations by the load factor or stringers, no longitudinal distribution of the wheel
concept. loads shall be assumed. The lateral distribution shall be
determined as follows.
3.22.4 When long span structures are being designed by
load factor design, the gamma and beta factors specified 3.23.2.2 Interior Stringers and Beams
for Load Factor Design represent general conditions and
should be increased if, in the Engineer's judgment, The live load bending moment for each interior
expected loads, service conditions, or materials of stringer shall be determined by applying to the stringer the
construction are different from those anticipated by the fraction of a wheel load (both front and rear) determined
specifications. in Table 3.23.1.
3.22.5 Structures may be analyzed for an overload that 3.23.2.3 Outside Roadway Stringers and Beams
is selected by the operating agency. Size and configuration
of the overload, loading combinations, and load distribu- 3.23.2.3. 1 Steel-Timber-Concrete T-Beams
tion will be consistent with procedures defined in permit
policy of that agency. The load shall be applied in Group 3.23.2.3.1.1 The dead load supported by the outside
IB as defined in Table 3.22.1 A. For all loadings less than roadway stringer or beam shall be that portion of the floor
H 20, Group lA loading combination shall be used (see slab carried by the stringer or beam. Curbs, railings, and
Article 3.5). wearing surface, if placed after the slab has cured, may be
distributed equally to all roadway stringers or beams.
TABLE 3.23.1 Distribution of Wheel Loads in members with the narrow edges of the laminations bearing on the sup-
Longitudinal Beams ports (see Article 16.3.13-Division II).
IJn this case the load on each stringer shall be the reaction of the
wheel loads, assuming the flooring between the stringers to act as a sim-
Bridge Designed plebeam.
Bridge Designed for for Two or more '"Design of 1-Beam Bridges" by N. M. Newmark-Proceedings.
Kind of Floor One Traffic Lane Traffic Lanes ASCE, March 1948.
liJbe sidewalk live load (see Article 3.14) shall be omitted for inte-
Timber:• rior and exterior box girders designed in accordance with the wheel load
Plankb S/4.0 S/3.75 distribution indicated herein.
Naillam.inatedc iDistribution factors for Steel Bridge Corrugated Plank set forth
4" thick or multiple above are based substantially on the following reference:
layer' floors over 5"
thick S/4.5 S/4.0 Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol. 67. No. 2, 1977
Naillaminatedc "Wheel Load Distribution of Steel Bridge Plank," by Conrad P. Heins,
6" or more thick S/5.0 S/4.25 Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Maryland.
If S exceeds 5' If S exceeds 6.5' These distribution factors were developed bused on studi.es using
use footnote f. use footnote f. 6" X 2" steel corrugated plank. The factors should yield safe results for
Glued laminatedc other corrugated configurations provided primary bending stiffness is
Panels on glued the same as or greater than the 6" X 2" corrugated plank used in the stud-
laminated stringers ies.
4" thick S/4.5 S/4.0
6" or more thick S/6.0 S/5.0 3.23.2.3.1.5 In the case of a span with concrete floor
If S exceeds 6' If S exceeds 7.5' supported by 4 or more steel stringers. the fraction of the
use footnote f. use footnote f.
On steel stringers wheel load shall not be less than:
4" thick S/4.5 S/4.0
6" or more thick S/5.25 S/4.5
If S exceeds 5.5' If S exceeds 7' s
use footnote f. use footnote f. 5.5
Concrete:
On steeli-Beam
stringefS'l and where, S = 6 feet or less and is the distance in feet be-
prestressed tween outside and adjacent interior stringers, and
concrete girders sn.o S/5.5
If S exceeds 10' If S exceeds 14'
use footnote f. use footnote f. s
On concrete
T-Beams S/6.5 S/6.0 4.0+0.258
If S exceeds 6' If S exceeds 10'
use footnote f. use footnote f.
where, S is more than 6 feet and less than 14 feet. When
On timber
stringers S/6.0 S/5.0 S is 14 feet or more, use footnote f, Table 3.23.1.
If S exceeds 6' If S exceeds 10'
use footnote f. use footnote f.
Concrete box
3.23.2.3.2 Concrete Box Girders
girders~' S/8.0 sn.o
IfS exceeds 12' If S exceeds 16'
use footnote f. use footnote f. 3.23.2.3.2. 1 The dead load supported by the exterior
On steel box girders See Article 10.39.2. girder shall be determined in the same manner as for steel,
On prestressed con- timber, or concrete T-beams, as given in Article
crete spread box
Beams See Article 3.28. 3.23.2.3.1.
Steel grid:
(Less than 4" thick) S/4.5 S/4.0 3.23.2.3.2.2 The factor for the wheel load distribu-
(4"ormore) S/6.0 S/5.0 tion to the exterior girder shall be WJ7, where W c is the
If S exceeds 6' If S exceeds 10.5' width of exterior girder which shall be taken as the top
use footnote f. use footnote f.
Steel bridge slab width. measured from the midpoint between girders
Corrugated plank' to the outside edge of the slab. The cantilever dimension
(2" min. depth) S/5.5 S/4.5 of any slab extending beyond the exterior girder shall
S = average stringer spacing in feet. preferably not exceed half the girder spacing.
"limber dimensions shown are for nominal thickness.
bPlank floors consist of pieces of lumber laid edge to edge with the
wide faces bearing on the supports (see Article 16.3.11-Division II). 3.23.2.3.3 Total Capacity of Stringers and Beams
"Nail laminated floors consist of pieces of lumber laid face to face
with the narrow edges bearing on the supports. each piece being nailed
to the preceding piece (see Article 16.3.12-Division II). The combined design load capacity of all the beams
.SMultiple layer floors consist of two or more layers of planks, each and stringers in a span shall not be .less than required to
layer being laid at an angle to the other (see Article 16.3.11-Division II).
"Glued laminated panel floors consist of vertically glued laminated support the total live and dead load in the span.
34 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.23.3
3.23.3 Bending Moments in Floor Beams TABLE 3.23.3.1 Distribution of Wheel Loads
(Transverse) in Transverse Beams
W = overall width of bridge measured perpendicular In lieu of more exact methods. "J" may be estimated using
to the longitudinal girders in feet; the following equations:
3.23.4.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 35
For Non-voided Rectangular Beams, Channels, Tee 3.24.1.2 The following effective span lengths shall
0 1
'
Beams:
Multi-beam Non-voided rectangular beams 0.7 The bending moment per foot width of slab shall be
Rectangular beams with circular voids 0.8 calculated according to methods given under Cases A and
Box section beams 1.0
Channel, single- and multi-stemmed tee beams 2.2
0
'
clear span plus thickness of slab. Laboratory Tests and Proposed Design Method:'
36 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.24.3
The live load moment for simple spans shall be deter- 3.24.5.1 Truck Loads
mined by the following formulas (impact not included):
Under the following formulas for distribution of loads
HS 20 Loading:
on cantilever slabs, the slab is designed to support the load
( S+
2
)P
20 =Moment in foot-pounds (3-15) independently of the effects of any edge support along the
end of the cantilever. The distribution given includes the
32 per foot - width of slab
effect of wheels on parallel elements.
HS 15 Loading:
3.24.5.1.1 Case A-Reinforcement
2 Perpendicular to Traffic
( S + ) P15 =Moment in foot- pounds (3- 16)
32 per foot- width of slab Each wheel on the element perpendicular to traffic
shall be distributed over a width according to the follow-
In slabs continuous over three or more supports, a conti- ing formula:
nuity factor of 0.8 shall be applied to the above formulas
E = 0.8X + 3.75 (3-17)
for both positive and negative moment.
The moment per foot of slab shall be (PIE) X foot-
3.24.3.2 Case B-Main Reinforcement Parallel pounds, in which X is the distance in feet from load to
to Traffic point of support.
For wheel loads, the distribution width, E, shall be 3.24.5.1.2 Case B-Reinforcement
(4 + 0.06S) but shall not exceed 7.0 feet. Lane loads are Parallel to Traffic
distributed over a width of 2E. Longitudinally reinforced The distribution width for each wheel load on the ele-
slabs shall be designed for the appropriate HS loading. ment parallel to traffic shall be as follows:
For simple spans, the maximum live load moment per
foot width of slab, without impact, is closely approxi- E = 0.35X + 3.2, but shall not exceed 7.0 feet (3-18)
mated by the following formulas:
The moment per foot of slab shall be (PIE) X foot-
HS 20 Loading: pounds.
is used and equal to E = 0.8X + 5.0 feet where a parapet beam integral with and deeper than the slab, or an integral
3.24.6.2 Where the length of the slab exceeds 1Y:~ 3.24.1 0 Distribution Reinforcement
times its width, the entire load shalJ be carried by the
transverse reinforcement.
3.24.10.1 To provide for the lateral distribution of the
0 3.24.6.3 The distribution width, E. for the load taken
by either span shall be determined as provided for other
concentrated live loads. reinforcement shall be placed
transverse to the main steel reinforcement in the bottoms
of all slabs except culvert or bridge slabs where the depth
slabs. The moments obtained shalJ be used in designing of fill over the slab exceeds 2 feet.
the center half of the short and long slabs. The reinforce-
ment steel in the outer quarters of both short and long
3.24.10.2 The amount of distribution reinforcement
spans may be reduced by 50%. In the design of the sup-
shalJ be the percentage of the main reinforcement steel
porting beams, consideration shall be given to the fact that
required for positive moment as given by the following
the loads delivered to the supporting beams are not uni-
formulas:
formly distributed along the beams.
For main reinforcement parallel to traffic,
3.24.7 Median Slabs
Percentage = ~ Maximum 50% (3- 21)
Raised median slabs shalJ be designed in accordance
with the provisions of this article with truck loadings so For main reinforcement perpendicular to traffic,
placed as to produce maximum stresses. Combined dead,
live, and impact stresses shall not be greater than 150% of Percentage=~ Maximum 67% (3- 22)
the allowable stresses. Flush median slabs shall be de-
signed without overstress. where, S = the effective span length in feet.
0
HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.25
38
3.25 DISTRIBUTION OF WHEEL LOADS ON support. The maximum moment is for a wheel position as-
TIMBER FLOORING sumed to be centered between the supports.
For the calculation of bending moments in timber M.-c = P(.51 1og 10 s- K) (3-23)
flooring each wheel load shall be distributed as follows. (3- 24)
Rx =.034P
Ry = 6Ps/l,OOO for s ~50 inches (3- 28) 3.25.2.2 Normal to the direction of the span the
Q " or,
wheel load shall be distributed as follows:
0
.875
.
1.0 1,520 3,630 7.75 10.2 14.50 wheel load determined from the fo11owing equations:
I
.
1.125 1,790 4,680 5.94 7.15 15.50
1.25 2,100 5,950 4.69 5.22 17.00
1.375 2,420 7,360 3.78 3.92 18.00
TWO OR MORE TRAFFIC LANES
1.5 2,770 8,990 3.11 3.02 19.50
w w
Load Fraction = L or _P_, whichever is
P
3.75+- 5.00
3.25.1.5 In addition, the dowels shall be checked to 2R
ensure that the allowable stress of the steel is not exceeded
using the following equation: greater.
Load Fraction =
wP L w
or _P_, whichever is
where, 4.25+- 5.50
28
= mtmmum yield point of steel pins in
pounds per square inch (see Table greater.
10.32.1A);
n, Ry. My = as previously defined; where, W r = Width of Panel; in feet (3.5 ~ WP ~ 4.5)
CR. eM = steel stress coefficients as given in pre-
ceding table. L = Length of span for simple span bridges and the
length of the shortest span for continuous brldges in
3.25.2 Plank and Nail Laminated Longitudinal feet.
Flooring
*This shear transfer may be accomplished using mechanical fasteners,
3.25.2.1 In the direction of the span, the wheel load splines, or dowels along the panel joint or spreader beams located at in-
shall be distributed over 10 inches. tervals along the panels or other suitable means.
40 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.25.3.2
3.26.1 Distribution of Concentrated Loads for ~ = 18.75 (for Douglas fir and Southern pine)
Bending Moment and Shear
in which,
3.26.1.1 For freely supported or continuous slab Ec = modulus of elasticity of concrete;
spans of composite wood-concrete construction, as de- Ew = modulus of elasticity of wood;
scribed in Article 16.3.14, Division ll, the wheel loads Es =modulus of elasticity of steel.
3.27 DIVISION I-DESIGN 41
3.27 DISTRIBUTION OF WHEEL LOADS ON 3.27.3.3 Edges of open grid steel floors shall be sup-
0 3.27.1
STEEL GRID FLOORS*
General
ported by suitable means as required. These supports may
be longitudinal or transverse, or both, as may be required
to support all edges properly.
3.27.2 Floors Filled with Concrete D.F.= 2NL +k! (3- 33)
N8 L
3.27.2.1 The distribution and bending moment shall where,
be as specified for concrete slabs, Article 3.24. The fol- NL = number of design traffic lanes (Article 3.6);
lowing items specified in that article shall also apply to N8 =number of beams (4 s N8 s 10);
concrete filled steel grid floors: S =beam spacing in feet (6.57 s S s 11.00);
L = span length in feet;
0
Longitudinal edge beams k = 0.07 W- NL (O.lONL- 0.26)- 0.20Ns- 0.12;
Unsupported transverse edges (3-34)
Span lengths W = numeric value of the roadway width between
curbs expressed in feet (32 s W s 66).
3.27.2.2 The strength of the composite steel and con-
crete slab shall be determined by means of the "trans-
3.28.2 Exterior Beams
formed area" method. The allowable stresses shall be as
set forth in Articles 8.15 .2, 8.16.1, and I 0.32. The live load bending moment in the exterior beams
shall be determined by applying to the beams the reaction
3.27.3 Open Floors of the wheel loads obtained by assuming the flooring to
act as a simple span (of lengthS) between beams, but shall
3.27.3.1 A wheel load shall be distributed, normal to
not be less than 2NJNa.
the main elements, over a width equal to 1Y4 inches per
ton of axle load plus twice the distance center to center of
3.29 MOMENTS, SHEARS, AND REACTIONS
main elements. The portion of the load assigned to each
main element shall be applied uniformly over a length
Maximum moments, shears, and reactions are given
equal to the rear tire width (20 inches for H 20, 15 inches in tables, Appendix A, for H 15, H 20, HS 15, and HS 20
for H 15). loadings. They are calculated for the standard truck or
the lane loading applied to a single lane on freely sup-
3.27.3.2 The strength of the section shall be deter- ported spans. It is indicated in the table whether the
mined by the moment of inertia method. The allowable standard truck or the lane loadings produces the maxi-
stresses shall be as set forth in Article 10.32. mum stress.
0
42 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 3.30
Foundations shall be designed to support all live and The settlement of foundations may be determined
dead loads, and earth and water pressure loadings in ac- using procedures described in Articles 4.4, 4.5, or 4.6 for
cordance with the general principles specified in this sec- service load design and Articles 4. I 1, 4.12, or 4.13 for
tion. The design shall be made either with reference to ser- strength design, or other generally accepted methodolo-
vice loads and allowable stresses as provided in SERVICE gies. Such methods are based on soil and rock parameters
LOAD DESIGN or, alternatively, with reference to load mea'iured directly or inferred from the results of in situ
factors, and factored strength as provided in STRENGTH and/or laboratory tests.
DESIGN.
4.2.2.3 Overall Stability
4.2 FOUNDATION TYPE AND CAPACITY The overall stability of slopes in the vicinity of.
foundations shall be considered as part of the design of
4.2.1 Selection of Foundation Type foundations.
depth to suitable bearing materials, evidence of previous Geologic and environmental conditions can influence
flooding, potential for liquefaction, undermining or the performance of foundations and may require special
scour, swelling potential, frost depth and ease and cost of consideration during design. To the extent possible, the
construction. presence and influence of such conditions shall be evalu-
ated as part of the subsurface exploration program. A rep-
4.2.2 Foundation Capacity resentative, but not exclusive, listing of problem condi-
tions requiring special consideration is presented in Table
Foundations shall be designed to provide adequate 4.2.3A for general guidance.
structural capacity, adequate foundation bearing capacity
with acceptable settlements, and acceptable overall sta- 4.3 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND
bility of slopes adjacent to the foundations. The tolerable TESTING PROGRAMS
level of structural deformation is controlled by the type
The elements of the subsurface exploration and testing
and span of the superstructure.
programs shall be the responsibility of the designer based
on the specific requirements of the project and his or her
4.2.2.1 Bearing Capacity
experience with local geologic conditions.
The bearing capacity of foundations may be estimated
4.3.1 General Requirements
using procedures described in Articles 4.4, 4.5, or 4.6 for
service load design and Articles 4.11, 4.12, or 4.13 for As a minimum, the subsurface exploration and testing
strength design, or other generally accepted theories. Such programs shall define the following, where applicable:
theories are based on soil and rock parameters measured
by in situ and/or laboratory tests. The bearing capacity • Soil strata
may also be determined using load tests. -Depth, thickness, and variability
0 43
44 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.3.1
Problem
Type Description Comments
Organic soil; highly plastic clay Low strength and high compressibility
Sensitive clay Potentially large strength loss upon large straining
Micaceous soil Potentially high compressibility (often saprolitic}
Soil Expansive clay/silt; expansive slag Potentially large expansion upon wetting
Liquefiable soiJ Complete strength loss and high deformations due to earthquake
loading
Collapsible soil Potentially large deformations upon wetting (Caliche; Loess)
Pyritic soil Potentially large expansion upon oxidation
Laminated rock Low strength when loaded parallel to bedding
Expansive shale PotentialJy large expansion upon wetting; degrades readily upon
exposure to air/water
Pyritic shale Expands upon exposure to air/water
Rock Soluble rock Soluble in flowing and standing water (Limestone, Limerock,
Gypsum)
Cretaceous shale Indicator of potentially corrosive ground water
Weak claystone (Red Beds} Low strength and readily degradable upon exposure to air/water
Gneissic and Schistose Rock Highly distorted with irregular weathering profiles and steep
discontinuities
Subsidence Typical in areas of underground mining or high ground water
extraction
Sinkholes/solutioning Karst topography; typical of areas underlain by carbonate rock
strata
Condition Negative skin friction/ Additional compressive/uplift load on deep foundations due to
expansion loading settlement/uplift of soil
Corrosive environments Acid mine drainage; degradation of certain soiVrock types
Permafrost/frost Typical in northern climates
Capillary water Rise of water level in silts and fine sands leading to strength loss
-Identification and classification qc}, and sample recovery and RQD for rock strata. The
-Relevant engineering properties (i.e., shear drilling equipment and method, use of drilling mud, type
strength, compressibility, stiffness, permeability, of SPT hammer (i.e. safety, donut, hydraulic} or cone pen-
expansion or collapse potential, and frost suscep- etrometer (i.e., mechanical or electrical), and any unusual
tibility} subsurface conditions such as artesian pressures, boulders
• Rock strata or other obstructions, or voids shall also be noted on the
-Depth to rock exploration logs.
-Identification and classification
-Quality (i.e., soundness, hardness, jointing and 4.3.2 Minimum Depth
presence of joint filling, resistance to weathering,
if exposed, and solutioning) Where substructure unit"l will be supported on spread
-Compressive strength (e.g.• uniaxial compres- footings. the minimum depth of the subsurface explo-
sion, point load index) ration shall extend below the anticipated bearing level a
-Expansion potential minimum of two footing widths for isolated, individual
• Ground water elevation footings where L s 2B, and four footing widths for foot-
• Ground surface elevation ings where L > 5B. For intermediate footing lengths, the
• Local conditions requiring special consideration minimum depth of exploration may be estimated by lin-
ear interpolation as a function of L between depths of 2B
Exploration logs shall include soil and rock strata de- and 5B below the bearing level. Greater depths may be re-
scriptions, penetration resistance for soils (e.g., SPT or quired where warranted by local conditions.
4.3.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 45
Where substructure units will be supported on deep 4.4.1.2 Footings Supporting Non-Rectangular
foundations, the depth of the subsurface exploration shall Columns or Piers
extend a minimum of 20 feet below the anticipated pile or
shaft tip elevation. Where pile or shaft groups will be Footings supporting circular or regular polygon-
used, the subsurface exploration shall extend at least two shaped concrete columns or piers may be designed as-
times the maximum pile group dimension below the an- suming that the columns or piers act as square members
ticipated tip elevation, unless the foundations will be end with the same area for location of critical sections for mo-
bearing on or in rock. For piles bearing on rock, a mini- ment, shear, and development of reinforcement.
mum of 10 feet of rock core shall be obtained at each ex-
ploration location to insure the exploration has not been 4.4.1.3 Footings in Fill
terminated on a boulder. For shafts supported on or ex-
tending into rock, a minimum of 10 feet of rock core, or a Footings located in fill are subject to the same bearing
length of rock core equal to at least three times the shaft capacity, settlement, and dynamic ground stability con-
diameter for isolated shafts or two times the maximum siderations as footings in natural soil in accordance with
shaft group dimension for a shaft group, whichever is Articles 4.4.7.1 through 4.4.7.3. The behavior of both the
greater, shall be obtained to insure the exploration has not fill and underlying natural soil shall be considered.
terminated in a boulder and to determine the physical
characteristics of rock within the zone of foundation in- 4.4.1.4 Footings in Sloped Portions of
fluence for design. Embankments
4.3.3 Minimum Coverage The earth pressure against the back of footings and
columns within the sloped portion of an embankment
A minimum of one soil boring shaiJ be made for each
shall be equal to the at-rest earth pressure in accordance
substructure unit. (See Article 7 .1.1 for definition of sub- with Article 5.5.2. The resistance due to the passive earth
structure unit.) For substructure units over I 00 feet in pressure of the embankment in front of the footing shall
width, a minimum of two borings shall be required. be neglected to a depth equal to a minimum depth of
4.3.4 Laboratory Testing 3 feet, the depth of anticipated scour, freeze thaw action,
and/or trench excavation in front of the footing,
Laboratory testing shalJ be performed as necessary to whichever is greater.
determine engineering properties including unit weight,
shear strength, compressive strength and compressibility. 4.4.1.5 Distribution of Bearing Pressure
In the absence of laboratory testing, engineering proper-
ties may be estimated based on published test results or Footings shall be designed to keep the maximum soil
local experience. and rock pressures within safe bearing values. To prevent
unequal settlement, footings shall be designed to keep the
4.3.5 Scour bearing pressure as nearly uniform as practical. For foot-
ings supported on piles or drilled shafts, the spacing be-
The probable depth of scour shall be determined by tween piles and drilled shafts shall be designed to ensure
subsurface exploration and hydraulic studies. Refer to nearly equal loads on deep foundation elements as may be
Article 1.3.2 and FHWA (1988) for general guidance practical.
regarding hydraulic studies and design. When footings support more than one column, pier, or
wall, distribution of soil pressure shall be consistent with
PartB properties of the foundation materials and the structure,
SERVICE LOAD DESIGN METHOD and with the principles of geotechnical engineering.
ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN
4.4.2 Notations
4.4 SPREAD FOOTINGS
The foJiowing notations shall apply for the design of
4.4.1 General spread footings on soil and rock:
4.4.1.1 Applicability
A = Contact area of footing (ft2)
Provisions of this Article shall apply for design of iso- A' =Effective footing area for computation of
lated footings, and to combined footings and mats (foot- bearing capacity of a footing subjected to
0 ings supporting more than one column, pier, or wall). eccentric load (ft2); (See Article 4.4. 7 .1.1.1)
46 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4.2
be, b-y, bq =Base inclination factors (dim); (See Article ~ = Soil modulus (ksf)
4.4.7.1.1.8) F = Total force on footing subjected to an in-
B = Width of footing (ft); (Minimum plan di- clined load (k); (See Article 4.4. 7 .1.1.1)
mension of footing unless otherwise noted) f~ =Unconfined compressive strength of con-
B' =Effective width for load eccentric in direc- crete (ksf)
tion of short side, L unchanged (ft) FS = Factor of safety against bearing capacity,
c = Soil cohesion (ksf) overturning or sliding shear failure (dim)
c' =Effective stress soil cohesion (ksf) H = Depth from footing base to top of second
c* = Reduced effective stress soil cohesion for cohesive soil layer for two-layer cohesive
punching shear (ksf); (See Article 4.4. 7 .I) soil profile below footing (ft); (See Article
Ca = Adhesion between footing and foundation 4.4.7.1.1.7)
soil or rock (ksf); (See Article 4.4.7.1.1.3) He · = Height of compressible soil layer (ft)
Cv = Coefficient of consolidation (ft2/yr); (See Herit = Critical thickness of the upper layer of a
Article4.4.7.2.3) two-layer system beyond which the under-
c1 = Shear strength of upper cohesive soil lying layer will have little effect on the bear-
layer below footing (ksf); (See Article ing capacity of footings bearing in the upper
4.4.7.1.1.7) layer (ft); (See Article 4.4.7 .1.1.7)
c2 = Shear strength of lower cohesive soil Hd = Height of longest drainage path in com-
layer below footing (ksf); (See Article pressible soil layer (ft)
4.4.7.1.1.7) Hs = Height of slope (ft); (See Article 4.4.7.1.1.4)
Ce =Compression index (dim); (See Article = Slope angle from horizontal of ground sur-
4.4.7.2.3) face below footing (deg)
Ccr =Recompression index (dim); (See Article ie, i..,, iq =Load inclination factors (dim); (See Article
4.4.7.2.3) 4.4.7.1.1.3)
Cee == Compression ratio (dim); (See Article IP = Influence coefficient to account for rigidity
4.4.7.2.3) and dimensions of footing (dim); (See Arti-
Co = Uniaxial compressive strength of intact cle4.4.8.2.2)
rock (ksf) t = Center-to-center spacing between adjacent
Crt =Recompression ratio (dim); (See Article footings (ft)
4.4.7.2.3) L = Length of footing (ft)
Cae = Coefficient of secondary compression de- L' =Effective footing length for load eccentric
fined as change in height per log cycle of in direction of long side, B unchanged (ft)
time (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.4) Lt = Length (or width) of footing having positive
D = Influence depth for water below footing contact pressure (compression) for footing
(ft); (See Article 4.4. 7 .1.1.6) loaded eccentrically about one axis (ft)
Dr = Depth to base of footing (ft) n = Exponential factor relating BIL or UB ra-
e = Void ratio (dim); (See Article 4.4. 7.2.3) tios for inclined loading (dim); (See Article
er = Void ratio at final vertical effective stress 4.4.7.1.1.3)
(dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.3) N = Standard penetration resistance (blows/ft)
eo = Void ratio at initial vertical effective stress N1 = Standard penetration resistance corrected
(dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.3) for effects of overburden pressure (blows/
t;, = Void ratio at maximum pac;t vertical effec- ft); (See Article 4.4.7.2.2)
tive stress (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.3) Nc, Nl, Nq = Bearing capacity factors based on the value
e8 = Eccentricity of load in the B direction mea- of internal friction of the foundation soil
sured from centroid of footing (ft); (See Ar- (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.1)
ticle 4.4.7.1.1.1) Nm = Modified bearing capacity factor to account
eL = Eccentricity of load in the L direction mea- for layered cohesive soils below footing
sured from centroid of footing {ft); (See (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.1.1.7)
Article4.4.7.1.1.1) Nms = Coefficient factor to estimate qu11 for rock
Eo = Modulus of intact rock (ksf) (dim); (See Article 4.4.8.1.2)
Em = Rock mass modulus (ksf); (See Article Ns =Stability number (dim); (See Article
4.4.8.2.2) 4.4.7.1.1.4)
4.4.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 47
Nc:q, N-,q =Modified bearing capacity factors for ef- =Time factor (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.3)
0 P
fects of footing on or adjacent sloping
ground (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.1.1.4)
= Tangential component of force on footing
= Depth from footing base down to the high-
est anticipated ground water level (ft); (See
Article4.4.7.1.1.6)
(k) a = Angle of inclination of the footing base
Pmax = Maximum resisting force between footing from the horizontal (radian)
base and foundation soil or rock for sliding =Reduction factor (dim); (See Article
failure (k) 4.4.8.2.2)
q = Effective overburden pressure at base of = Length to width ratio of footing (dim)
footing (kst) =Punching index = BU[2(B + L)H] (dim);
Q = Normal component of force on footing (k) (See Article 4.4. 7.1.1. 7)
qui = Allowable uniform bearing pressure or con- = Factor to account for footing shape and
tact stress (ksf) rigidity (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.2)
qc = Cone penetration resistance (ksf) 'Y = Total unit weight of soil or rock (kct)
qmax = Maximum footing contact pressure (kst) -y' = Buoyant unit weight of soil or rock (kct)
Q11111x = Maximum normal component of load sup- 'Ym = Moist unit weight of soil (kef)
ported by foundation soil or rock at ultimate 8 = Angle of friction between footing and foun-
bearing capacity (k) dation soil or rock (deg); (See Article
qmin = Minimum magnitude of footing contact 4.4.7.1. J.3)
pressure (kst) 8' = Differential settlement between adjacent
qo =Vertical stress at base of loaded area (ksf); footings (ft); (See Article 4.4.7.2.5)
(See Article 4.4. 7 .2.1) = Vertical strain (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.3)
qurt = Ultimate bearing capacity for uniform bear- = Vertical strain at final vertical effective
ing pressure (ksf) stress (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.3)
q1 =Ultimate bearing capacity of footing sup- = Initial vertical strain (dim); (See Article
ported in the upper layer of a two-layer sys- 4.4.7.2.3)
tem assuming the upper layer is infinitely = Vertical strain at maximum past vertical
thick (kst); (See Article 4.4.7.1.1.7) effective stress (dim); (See Article
q2 = Ultimate bearing capacity of a fictitious 4.4.7.2.3)
footing of the same size and shape as the ac- e =Angle of load eccentricity (deg)
tual footing, but supported on surface of the K =Shear strength ratio (clc 1) for two layered
second (lower) layer of a two-layer system cohesive soil system below footing (dim);
(kst); (See Article 4.4. 7 .1.1. 7) (See Article 4.4.7 .1.1.7)
R = Resultant of pressure on base of footing (k) = Reduction factor to account for three-di-
r = Radius of circular footing or B/2 for square mensional effects in settlement analysis
footing (ft); (See Article 4.4.8.2.2) (dim); (See Article 4.4.7.2.3)
RQD = Rock Quality Designation (dim) v = Poisson's ratio (dim)
Sc, s1 , Sq =Footing shape factors (dim); (See Article cr( = Final vertical effective stress in soil at depth
4.4.7.1.1.2) interval below footing (ksf); (See Article
Su = Undrained shear strength of soil (kst) 4.4.7.2.3)
Sc =Consolidation settlement (ft); (See Article = Initial vertical effective stress in soil at
4.4.7.2.3) depth interval below footing (kst); (See Ar-
Se =Elastic or immediate settlement (ft); (See ticle 4.4.7.2.3)
Article4.4.7.2.2) cr'p = Maximum past vertical effective stress in
S5 = Secondary settlement (ft); (See Article soil at depth interval below footing (ksO;
4.4.7.2.4) (See Article 4.4.7.2.3)
S, =Total settlement (ft); (See Article 4.4.7.2) =Angle of internal friction (deg)
t = Time to reach specified average degree = Effective stress angle of internal friction
of consolidation (yr); (See Article (deg)
4.4.7.2.3) <P* = Reduced effective stress soil friction angle
t., t2 = Arbitrary time intervals for determination for punching shear (ksf); (See Article
of S5 (yr); (See Article 4.4. 7 .2.4) 4.4.7.1)
48 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4.2
The notations for dimension units include the follow- 4.4.4 Soil and Rock Property Selection
ing: dim = Dimensionless; deg = degree; ft = foot; k =
kip; k/ft = kip/ft; ksf = kip/ft2; kef = kip/ft3; lb = pound; Soil and rock properties defining the strength and com-
in. = inch; and psi = pound per square inch. The dimen- pressibility characteristics of the foundation materials are
sional units provided with each notation are presented for required for footing design.·Foundation stability and set-
illustration only to demonstrate a dimensionally correct tlement analyses for design shall be conducted using soil
combination of units for the footing capacity procedures and rock properties based on the results of field and/or
presented herein. If other units are used, the dimensional laboratory testing.
correctness of the equations shall be confirmed.
4.4.5 Depth
Refer to Figure 4.4.3A for terminology used in the de- Footings not otherwise founded on sound, non-de-
sign of spread footing foundations. gradeable rock surfaces shall be embedded a sufficient
depth to provide adequate bearing, scour and frost heave vented by properly designed, graded soil filters or geotex-
0 . ·
protection, or 2 feet to the bottom of footing, whichever is
greatest. For footings constructed on slopes, a minimum
horizontal distance of 4 feet, measured at the top of foot-
tile drainage systems .
4.4.6 Anchorage
ing, shall be provided between the near face of the foot-
ing and the face of the finished slope. Footings founded on inclined, smooth rock surfaces
and which are not restrained by an overburden of resistant
material shall be effectively anchored by means of rock
4.4.5.2 Scour Protection anchors, rock bolts, dowels, keys, benching or other suit-
able means. Shallow keying or benching of large footing
Footings supported on soil or degradable rock strata areas shall be avoided where blasting is required for rock
shall be embedded below the maximum computed scour removal.
depth or protected with a scour countermeasure. Footings
supported on massive. competent rock formations which
are highly resistant to scour shall be placed directly on the 4.4.7 Geotechnical Design on Soil
cleaned rock surface. Where required. additional lateral
resistance should be provided by drilling and grouting Spread footings on soil shall be designed to support the
steel dowels into the rock surface rather than blasting to design loads with adequate bearing and structural capac-
embed the footing below the rock surface. ity, and with tolerable settlements in conformance with
Footings on piles may be located above the lowest an- Articles 4.4. 7 and 4.4.11. In addition, the capacity of
ticipated scour level provided the piles are designed for footings subjected to seismic and dynamic loads, shall
this condition. Assume that only one-half of the maximum be evaluated in conformance with Articles 4.4.7.3 and
anticipated scour has occurred when designing for earth- 4.4.10.
quake loading. Where footings on piles are subject to The location of the resultant of pressure (R) on the base
damage by boulders or debris during flood scour, ade- of the footings shall be maintained within B/6 of the cen-
quate protection shall be provided. Footings shall be con- ter of the footing.
structed so as to neither pose an obstacle to water traffic
0 '
nor be exposed to view during low flow. 4.4.7.1 Bearing Capacity
0 through drainage backfills behind abutments shall be pre- Additiona11y, the bearing capacity of cohesive soils shall
50 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4.7.1
~ Nc Nq N., ~ Nc Nq N"
0 5.14 1.00 0.00 26 22.25 11.85 12.54
1 5.38 1.09 0.07 27 23.94 13.20 14.47
2 5.63 1.20 0.15 28 25.80 14.72 16.72
3 5.90 1.31 0.24 29 27.86 16.44 19.34
4 6.19 1.43 0.34 30 30.14 18.40 22.40
5 6.49 1.57 0.45 31 32.67 20.63 25.99
6 6.81 1.72 0.57 32 35.49 23.18 30.22
7 7.16 1.88 0.71 33 38.64 26.09 35.19
8 7.53 2.06 0.86 34 42.16 29.44 41.06
9 7.92 2.25 1.03 35 46.12 33.30 48.03
10 8.35 2.47 1.22 36 50.59 37.75 56.31
11 8.80 2.71 1.44 37 55.63 42.92 66.19
12 9.28 2.97 1.69 38 61.35 48.93 78.03
13 9.81 3.26 1.97 39 67.87 55.96 92.25
14 10.37 3.59 2.29 40 75.31 64.20 109.41
15 10.98 3.94 2.65 41 83.86 73.90 130.22
16 11.63 4.34 3.06 42 93.71 85.38 155.55
17 12.34 4.77 3.53 43 105.11 99.02 186.54
18 13.10 5.26 4.07 44 118.37 115.31 224.64
19 13.93 5.80 4.68 45 133.88 134.88 271.76
20 14.83 6.40 5.39 46 152.10 158.51 330.35
21 15.82 7.07 6.20 47 173.64 187.21 403.67
22 16.88 7.82 7.13 48 199.26 222.31 496.01
23 18.05 8.66 8.20 49 229.93 265.51 613.16
24 19.32 9.60 9.44 50 266.89 319.07 762.89
25 20.72 10.66 10.88
be checked for undrained loading conditions using bear- calculate the ultimate load capacity of the footing. The re-
ing capacity factors based on undrained s.hear strength duced footing dimensions shall be determined as follows:
parameters.
A modified form of the general bearing capacity equa- L' = L- 2eL (4.4.7.1.1.1-2)
tion may be used to account for the effects of footing
shape, ground surface slope, base inclination, and inclined The effective footing area shall be determined as
loading as follows: follows:
footing and a positive pressure along each footing edge) ic: =l - (nP/BLcNc:) (for <t> = 0) (4.4.7.1.1.3-2)
0 .
shall be used for structural design of the footing.
The actual distribution of contact pressure for a rigid
footing with eccentric loading about one axis is shown
iq = [I - P/(Q + BLc cot<1>)] 11
(4.4.7.1.1.3-3)
in Figure 4.4. 7.1.1.1 B. For an eccentricity (ed in the L iy = [1 - P/(Q + BLc cot<l>)]l" + H (4.4.7.1.1.3-4)
direction, the actual maximum and minimum contact
pressures may be determined as follows: n = [(2 + UB)/(1 + UB)]cos29
+ [(2 + B/L)/(1 + BIL)]sin28 (4.4.7.1.1.3-5)
foreL < U6:
Refer to Figure 4.4. 7 .1.1.1 A for loading definitions and
qllUL\ = Q[ I + (6eLIL)l/BL (4.4.7.1.1.1-4) footing dimensions. For cases in which the loading is ec-
centric, the terms L and B shall be replaced by L 1 and B1 ,
qmi11 = Q[I - (6etfL)]/BL (4.4.7.1.1.1-5) respectively, in the above equations.
Failure by sliding shall be considered by comparing
for U6 < eL < U2: the tangential component of force on the footing (P) to the
maximum resisting force (Pmax) by the following:
q~ = 2Q/(3B[U2)- cd) (4.4.7.1.1.1-6)
Pmax = Qtan8 + BLcn (4.4.7.1.1.3-6)
(4.4.7.1.1.1-7)
FS = Pmn.,.IP;::: 1.5 (4.4.7.1.1.3-7)
L 1 = 3[(L/2) - ed (4.4.7.1.1.1-8)
In determining Pmnx• the effect of passive resistance
For an eccentricity (ep) in the B direction, the maxi- provided by footing embedment shall be ignored, and BL
mum and minimum contact pressures may be determined shall represent the actual footing area in compression as
using Equations 4.4. 7.1 .1.1-4 through 4.4. 7. 1.1.1-8 by re- shown in Figure 4.4.7.1.1.18 or Figure 4.4.7.1.1.1C.
placing terms labeled L by B, and terms labeled B by L.
0
.
Footings on soil shall be designed so that the eccen-
tricity of loading is less than X, of the footing dimension
in any direction.
4.4. 7.1.1.4 Ground Suiface Slope
For footings located on slopes or within 3B of a slope
crest, quit may be determined using the following revised
4.4.7.1.1.2 Footing Shape version of Equation 4.4. 7.1.1-1 :
For circular footings, B equals L. For cases in which Overall stability shall be evaluated for footings on or
the loading is eccentric, the terms L and B shall be re- adjacent to sloping ground surfaces as described in Arti-
placed by L' and B', respectively, in the above equations. cle 4.4.9.
0 (4.4.7.1.1.3-1) followed.
52 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4.7.1.1.5
F" _____ Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURE 4.4.7.1.1.1A Definition Sketch for Loading and Dimensions for Footings
Subjected to Eccentric or Inclined Loads
Modified after EPRI (1983)
<b~
B
-----· - ..
q7Q=R
~ l
.I L
PLAN
.A6IL
L 1- La
qmini
(o) FOR eL S t-
FIGURE 4.4.7.1.1.18 Contact Pressure for Footing Loaded Eccentrically About One Axis
4.4.7.1.1.5 DIVISION I-DESIGN 53
05
~CD
CD
n
~
z
F=
0
0
IJ..
Ll-
0
FE
0
~
.........
~
0
~
z
L&J
0
0
L&J
L&J
(/')
0:::
~
(/)
z
<
~
0
'
.
ru ~ M
LONG111JOINAL ECCENTRICITY / LENGll-f OF FOOTING = eL/L
SOUO CURVES GIVE VALUES OF K.
M M
CASE I
CASE J[
q_ = KR I BL
x AND y FROM CHART
FIGURE 4.4.7.1.1.1C Contact Pressure for Footing IJOaded Eccentrically About Two Axes
Modified after AREA (1980)
54 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4. 7.1.1.5
8 600
Foumlatitm Uplh/wldlh *Pfll/wlt:lh
~
f.:: 1--
~ 0(19:0-
DfiB=-t - - -
.....
~
' .. ~
-,
'fiJIIJt:O-
U~r
---
lttterpolatloo fot
1.....
~, I l I I
....
·- ' 1'\. lflllertMdlol• dePHtl
Etttctfole
Ang,. of llltvnol -
6 Slo,. .,ability - _ ....
ftfcl/011 f'
~ 1',
c r".
!'-- N ~ ......... f'. ~
.. 1-.. ·-..... t'-.. ....."' ' ' ' ' r. . . .
.,
...
-:--
r-.. .. f" ~ ~
"'
.....,_
- --~
~' ~ '
-
~
'"I~
' ~
-.......
....,
r-. ...J
5.53- I"-= ~
I"'
" ~
....... ...... ~ ,
!J
~ .......
- " ' -~
-.....
~·
..... ~
0 H7 oill ~ ED"
Inclination at slope ( "'
8(? 0 ~ C:C1"'
lndlnatlon of slope {
3()l' 4()"
FIGURE 4.4. 7.1.1.4A Modified Bearing Capacity Factors for Footing on Sloping Ground
Modified after Meyerhof(1957)
_
........
FOflltdGiion cflplltiWcfllt
~lfi:O-
~·--- ..,.,_
f« iflftnMifloft *Pills
r·- Etlecl~v•l I
IMIIniJIItm of Antle of in,.,nGI
r-
~=~-~ ftlciiOIJ ••
Ql
II:
...
;1',~
~..~
-~ ~ ,.
·~
-· ·- *' - , .. ~-
14ll•
:...
i ·*- L~ ~
,......
Na •0 (FOR B < ...) 50 1/
1.10"
·-- ~-
N1 • Vctts(FOR 8 ~ fia)
--~ .,.riM
.. I
~
lCI ...
~,, j
55"
I
0
Dilrt~tta
I
"' toundGtlota 1tc1n , . 111 .,..
I 0 I .
b/Bitor N,•Diot biHIIGt N,•OI
FIGURE 4.4.7.1.1.48 Modified Bearing Capacity Factors for Footing Adjacent Sloping Ground
Modified after Meyerhof (1957)
4.4.7.1.1.6 DIVISION I-DESIGN 55
location. The effect of ground water level on the ultimate D = 0.5Btan(45° + 4>/2)
bearing capacity shall be considered by using a weighted (4.4.7.1.1.6-5)
average soil unit weight in Equation 4.4. 7 .1.1-1. If 4> <
37°, the following equations may be used to determine the
4.4.7.1.1. 7 Layered Soils
weighted average unit weight:
If the soil profile is layered, the general bearing capac-
for Zw 2: B: use -y = 'Ym (no effect) (4.4.7.1.1.6-1) ity equation shall be modified to account for differences
in failure modes between the layered case and the homo-
for Zw < B: use -y = -y' + (z"/B)('Ym - -y') geneous soil case assumed in Equation 4.4. 7 .1.1-1.
(4.4.7.1.1.6-2)
Undrained Loading
for Zw :s; 0: use -y = -y' (4.4.7.1.1.6-3) For undrained loading of a footing supported on the
upper layer of a two-layer cohesive soil system, q 1111 may
Refer to Figure 4.4.7.1.1.6A for definition of terms
be determined by the following:
used in these equations. If <t> ~ 37°, the following equa-
tions may be used to determine the weighted average unit
weight: (4.4.7.1.1.7-1)
0 .
'
y,
z.
+ W.T.
sz
- '-
~., •
Q
'
.
FIGURE 4.4.7.1.1.6A Definition Sketch for Inftuence of Ground Water Table on Bearing Capacity
56 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4.7.1.1.7
Refer to Figure4.4.7.1 .1.7A for the definition of c 1• For The subscripts l and 2 refer to the upper and lower
undrained loading, c 1 equals the undrained soil shear layers, respectively. K = (1 - sin2<J> 1')/( l + sin2<J> 1')
strength Suh and <!> 1 = 0. and q2 equals qu11 of a fictitious footing of the same size and
If the bearing stratum is a cohesive soil which overlies shape as the actual footing but supported on the
a stiffer cohesive soil, refer to Figure 4.4.7. 1.1.78 to de- second (or lower) layer. Reduced shear strength values shall
termine Nm. If the bearing stratum overlies a softer layer, be used to detennine q2 in accordance with Article 4.4.7.1.
punching shear should be assumed and Nmmay be calcu- lf the upper layer is a cohesion less soil and <!>' equals
lated by the following: 25° to 50°, Equation 4.4.7.1.1.7-3 reduces to
100
90
aob QuJI
70 t .~l~
60
HI -s- c: •0
C2
i 50 ·2·0
z .,.
.. 40 " "'
~
"'"'
,. " " "'
u
.!!
!: :50
u
,. ,. "
0
Q,
0 /
/ "
u
/ "CXI
(a)
0
."'
.~ 20
/
•
.0 - LI B • I (square or cir cle)
'Q
15
-
.!
'Q
0
2
10
9
2
3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10
(b)
0
.
.
and secondary components and may be determined using
the following:
ford, et al., ( 1987) for guidance regarding application of
these procedures.
GROUND SURFACE
~ ~ ~ ~~ fMI -
I ~.
,~
~
8 ' ... ' ,-
~~./
~~ ~~ '~o.l..-1
f/1 \~ ~,
I I ' ~ - ....
~
~1.t"" rt-
'\
~
~":":!·-- If
J ~
\ '\
1....
1!!1. ~ _)_
,.. lL
~-
1/ 1 ~ t.. " v L
0.~....
\, ~..
·-- ~ I••
j 'I
' ~ .ft!.. .. ~
\ J
-- j_ v II
lj
4 ...
' / ' ·- t..•
--- ........ v
/ 1-..
~
sa·- I I \ -·-- J f"-..
'l ·-
\ v : r--
...·- 1\ ~ v :: ··-
~ I ' v v I --
,,
~0.1 .....
~
118
- \
1\ "~
~ ...
,_ 1'-
·- 171
...........
t-- -~·
~ j
--...
.......
\ r--...... ......... -,., ~ _;_ ~I
Ia•
--
l'
\
98 \ ~,
lcaa
_,, ·'
~
oa
·- " ~
~~
r....
- ~-~
-- ~ ....
10I
....
·-
Ill Ill
48 !I za a o 0 a ZB !I 48
lnfinatelr Lane Foundation Sqawe F'aunattGn
(a) (/,J
--
FIGURE 4.4.7.2.1A Boussinesg Vertical Stress Contours for Continuous and Square Footings
Modified after Sowers (1979)
~
4.4.7.2.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 59
0 Modified after U.S. Department of the Navy (1982) and Bowles (1982)
Clay:
Soft sensitive 50-300 0.4-0.5 Silts, sandy silts, slightly 8Nt< 2>
Medium stiff 300-1,000 (undrained) cohesive mixtures
to stiff 1,000·2,000 Clean fine to medium sands 14N 1
Very stiff and slightly silty sands
Coarse sands and sands with 20Nt
little gravel
Loess 300-1 ,200 0.1-0.3 Sandy gravel and gravels 24Nt
Silt 40-400 0.3-0.35
Fine sand:
Estimating E8 From Su<3>
Loose 160-240
Medium dense 240-400 0.25
Soft sensitive clay 400Su·l ,OOOsu
Dense 400-600
Medium stiff to stiff clay 1,500Su·2,400su
Sand: Very stiff clay 3,CKMlsu--4,<M>Osu
Loose 200-600 0.2-0.35
Medium dense 600-1,000
Estimating E5 From qc<4>
Dense 1,000-1 ,600 0.3-0.4
Gravel:
0 Loose
Medium dense
Dense
60()..1,600
1,600-2,000
2,000-4,000
0.2-0.35
0.3-0.4
Sandy soils 4qc
Pz Pz
lJB Flexible (average) Rigid
(4.4.7 .2.3-2)
Vertical effective stress, rr' Uo9 scale)
If laboratory test results are expressed in terms of ver-
tical strain (Ev), consolidation settlement may be estimated
FIGURE 4.4.7.2.3A Typical Consolidation
using the following:
Compression Curve for Overconsolidated Soil-
Void Ratio Versus Vertical Effective Stress
• For initial overconsolidated soils (i.e., up' > uo'): EPRI (1983)
(4.4.7.2.3-3)
(4.4.7.2.3-4)
(4.4.7.2.3-5) :t."
..:'
-a
0
-
u
Refer to Figure 4.4.7.2.3C for values of J.lc.
0.5
The time (t) to achieve a given percentage of the total c: a
estimated 1-D consolidation settlement may be estimated
using the following:
-
,g
u
~
'a ~He
0
a: 0
t = THi/ev (4.4.7.2.3-6)
c
cess pressure distributions. Values of Cv may be estimated (8' /f) between adjacent footings. 8'It shall be limited to
' .; from the results of laboratory consolidation testing of 0.005 for simple span bridges and 0.004 for continuous
undisturbed soil samples or from in-situ measurements span bridges (Moulton, et al., 1985). These 8'/f. limits are
using devices such as a piezoprobe or piezocone. not applicable to rigid frame structures. Rigid frames shall
be designed for anticipated differential settlements based
4.4.7.2.4 Secondary Settlement on the results of special analysis.
Tolerable movement criteria for horizontal foundations
Secondary settlement of footings on cohesive soil may
displacement shall be developed considering the potential
be estimated using the following:
effects of combined vertical and horizontal movement.
Where combined horizontal and vertical displacements
(4.4.7.2.4-1)
are possible, horizontal movements should be limited to I
inch or less. Where vertical displacements are small, hor-
t1 is the time when secondary settlement begins {typi- izontal displacements should be limited to 1Y2 inch or less
cally at a time equivalent to 90-percent average degree of (Moulton, et al. 1985). If estimated or actual movements
consolidation), and his an arbitrary time which could rep- exceed these levels, special analysis and/or measures to
resent the service life of the structure. Values of Cat may limit movements should be considered.
be estimated from the results of consolidation testing of
undisturbed soil samples in the laboratory. 4.4.7.3 Dynamic Ground Stability
4.4.7.2.5 Tolerable Movement Refer to Division 1-A-Seismic Design and Lam and
Tolerable movement criteria (vertical and horizontal) Martin ( 1986a; 1986b) for guidance regarding the devel-
for footings shall be developed consistent with the func- opment of ground and seismic parameters and methods
tion and type of structure, anticipated service life, and used for evaluation of dynamic ground stability.
consequences of unacceptable movements on structure
performance. Foundation displacement analyses shall be 4.4.8 Geotechnical Design on Rock
based on the results of in-situ and/or laboratory testing to
characterize the load-deformation behavior of the foun- Spread footings supported on rock shall be designed to
Time facTor, T
ti
0
a
'a
.,0 Initial ~u
c: 60
0
u
-
c:
G
...
u
Ql
80
Oa·U
Q,.
0
62 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4.8
of pressure (R) on the base of footings shall be maintained Figure 4.4.8.1.1A (Peck, et al. 1974). In no instance shall
within B/4 of the center of the footing. . the maximum allowable contact stress exceed the allow-
The bearing capacity and settlement of footings on able bearing stress in the concrete. The RQD used in Fig-
rock is influenced by the presence, orientation and condi- ure 4.4.8.1.1 A shall be the average RQD for the rock
tion of discontinuities, weathering profiles, and other sim- within a depth of B below the base of the footing, where
ilar features. The methods used for design of footings on the RQD values are relatively uniform within that inter-
rock should consider these factors as they apply at a par- val. If rock within a depth of 0.5B below the base of the
ticular site, and the degree to which they should be incor- footing is of poorer quality, the RQD of the poorer rock
porated in the design. shall be used to determine Qa11.
For footings on competent rock, reliance on simple and
direct analyses based on uniaxial compressive rock 4.4.8.1.2 Footings on Broken or Jointed Rock
strengths and RQD may be applicable. Competent rock is
The design of footings on broken or jointed rock must
defined as a rock mass with discontinuities that are tight
or open not wider than Ya inch. For footings on less com- account for the condition and spacing of joints and other
petent rock, more detailed investigations and analyses discontinuities. The ultimate bearing capacity of footings
should be used to account for the effects of weathering, on broken or jointed rock may be estimated using the fol-
lowing relationship:
the presence and condition of discontinuities, and other
geologic factors.
(4.4.8.1.2-1)
4.4.8.1 Bearing Capacity
Refer to Table 4.4.8.1.2A for values of Nms. Values of
4.4.8.1.1 Footings on Competent Rock Co should preferably be determined from the results of
laboratory testing of rock cores obtained within 28 of the
The allowable contact stress for footings supported on base of the footing. Where rock strata within this interval
level surfaces in competent rock may be determined using are variable in strength, the rock with the lowest capacity
.;
•.•.,.
--a
u
-c:
0
u
-a•
.0
If RQO is fairly uniform,
use average RQO within d • 8
s If RQO within d • 8/4 is lower,
-0
cC
use lower RQO
10
0 20 40 60 80 100
RQO (Y.)
Note:
qall sha II not exceed the unconfined compressive strength
of the rock or O.S9!5 f 'c of the concrete.
FIGURE 4.4.8.1.1A Allowable Contact Stress for Footings on Rock with Tight Discontinuities
Peck, et al. (1974)
4.4.8.1.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 63
should be used to determine qu11 • Alternatively, Table mass characteristics must be made. For rock masses which
4.4.8.1.2B may be used as a guide to estimate C 0 • For have time-dependent settlement characteristics, the proce-
rocks defined by very poor quality, the value of qu 11 should dure in Article 4.4. 7 .2.3 may be followed to determine the
be determined as the value of qu 11 for an equivalent soil time-dependent component of settlement.
mass.
4.4.8.2.2 Footings on Broken or Jointed Rock
4.4.8.1.3 Factors of Safety Where the criteria for competent rock are not met, the
influence of rock type, condition of discontinuities and de-
Spread footings on rock shall be designed for Group 1
gree of weathering shall be considered in the settlement
loadings using a minimum factor of safety (FS) of 3.0
analysis.
against a bearing capacity failure.
The elastic settlement of footings on broken or jointed
rock may be determined using the following:
4.4.8.2 Settlement
For footings on competent rock, elastic settlements will p = q11 (I - v2)ri 1/Em, with 111 = (y;;;)/()l
generally be less than Y2 inch when footings are designed
in accordance with Article 4.4.8.1.1. When elastic settle- (4.4.8.2.2-1)
ments of this magnitude are unacceptable or when the rock
is not competent, an analysis of settlement based on rock • For rectangular footings;
TABLE 4.4.8.1.2A Values of Coefficient Nms for Estimation of the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Footings on
Broken or Jointed Rock (Modified after Hoek, (1983))
Rock Mass RMR< 1> NGJ<2> RQD< 3> N ms<4>
u
~ .
Quality
Excellent
General Description
100 500
(%)
95-100 3.8
A
4.3
B c
5.0
D
5.2
E
6.1
Very good Tightly interlocking, undis- 85 100 90-95 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.3
turbed rock with rough
unweathered joints spaced 3 to
10 feet apart
Good Fresh to slightly weathered 65 10 75-90 0.28 0.32 0.38 0.40 0.46
rock, slightly disturbed with
joints spaced 3 to 10 feet apart
Fair Rock with several sets of mod- 44 50-75 0.049 0.056 0.066 0.069 0.081
erately weathered joints spaced
1 to 3 feet apart
Poor Rock with numerous weathered 23 0.1 25-50 0.015 0.016 0.019 0.020 0.024
joints spaced 1 to 20 inches
apart with some gouge
Very poor Rock with numerous highly 3 0.01 <25 Use quu for an equivalent soil mass
weathered joints spaced < 2
inches apart
CI'Geomecbanics Rock Mass Rating (RMQ) System-Bieniawski, 1988.
<Z>Norwegian Geotedlllicallnstitute (NGI) Rock Mass ClassifiC81ion System, Barton, et al., 1974.
<3>Raoge of RQD values provided for general guidance only; actual determination of rock mass quality should be based on RMR or NG1 rating
systems.
<4 >value Of Nms as a function of rock type; refer to Table 4.4.8.1.2B for typical range of values of Co for different rock type in each category.
64 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.4.8.2.2
c .
'
TABLE 4.4.8.2.2A Summary of Poisson's Ratio for Intact Rock
No. of
Modified after Kulhawy (1978)
No. of
Rock Poisson's Ratio, v Standard
Rock1)rpe Values 1)rpes Maximum Minimum Mean Deviation
Granite 22 22 0.39 0.09 0.20 0.08
Gabbro 3 3 0.20 0.16 0.18 0.02
Diabase 6 6 0.38 0.20 0.29 0.06
Basalt 11 11 0.32 0.16 0.23 0.05
Quartzite 6 6 0.22 0.08 0.14 0.05
Marble 5 5 0.40 0.17 0.28 0.08
Gneiss 11 11 0.40 0.09 0.22 0.09
Schist 12 11 0.31 0.02 0.12 0.08
Sandstone 12 9 0.46 0.08 0.20 0.11
Siltstone 3 3 0.23 0.09 0.18 0.06
Shale 3 3 0.18 0.03 0.09 0.06
Limestone 19 19 0.33 0.12 0.23 0.06
Dolostone 5 5 0.35 0.14 0.29 0.08
0 .
Q
.
_,.p ~~
.,.
~:$)
"'/"
UPPER AND
MIDDLE CHALK
(H088S) CONCRETE
,,
#
GHIISS OI!ERI!
LtMISIONI!,
DOLOMITE
• BASALT AND OTMIA
F\.OW ROCKS
0.01 1000
UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Co- Pli a lo'
FIGURE 4.4.8.2.2A Relationship Between Elastic Modulus and Uniaxial Compressive Strength for Intact Rock
Modified after Deere (1968)
4.4.1 1.1.2 Isolated and Multiple Footing Reactions porting a column, pier, or wall. For footings supporting
4.4. 11.2.1 Critical Section • Entire reaction from any pile or drilled shaft whose
center is located dp/2 or more outside the critical
External moment on any section of a footing shall be section shall be considered as producing shear on
determined by passing a vertical plane through the foot- that section.
ing, and computing the moment of the forces acting over • Reaction from any pile or drilled shaft whose center
the entire area of the footing on one side of that vertical is located dp/2 or more inside the critical section
plane. The critical section for bending shall be taken at the shall be considered as producing no shear on that
face of the column, pier, or wall. In the case of columns section.
that are not square or rectangular, the section shall be • For the intermediate position of pile or drilled shaft
taken at the side of the concentric square of equivalent centers, the portion of the pile or shaft reaction to be
area. For footings under masonry walls, the critical sec- considered as producing shear on the critical section
tion shall be taken halfway between the middle and edge shall be based on linear interpolation between full
of the wall. For footings under metallic column bases, the value at dp/2 outside the section and zero value at
critical section shall be taken halfway between the column dp/2 inside the section.
face and the edge of the metaJlic base.
No piling shall be used to penetrate a soft or loose Piles shall be classified as ••friction" or "end bearing"
upper stratum overlying a hard or firm stratum unless the or a combination of both according to the manner in
piles penetrate the hard or firm stratum by a sufficient dis- which load transfer is developed.
tance to fix the ends against lateral movement of the pile
tip. Driving points or shoes may be necessary to accom-
4.5.2.1 Friction Piles
plish this penetration.
A pile shall be considered to be a friction pile if the
4.5.1.5 Estimated Lengths
major portion of support capacity is derived from soil re-
sistance mobilized along the side of the embedded pile.
Estimated pile lengths for each substructure shall be
shown on the plans and shall be based upon careful eval-
uation of available subsurface information, static and lat- 4.5.2.2 End Bearing Piles
eral capacity calculations, and/or past experience.
A pile shall be considered to be an end bearing pile if
4.5.1.6 Estimated and Minimum Tip Elevation the major portion of support capacity is derived from the
resistance of the foundation material on which the pile tip
Estimated and minimum pile tip elevations for each rests.
substructure should be shown on the contract plans. Esti-
mated pile tip elevations shall reflect the elevation where
4.5.2.3 Combination Friction and End Bearing
the required ultimate pile capacity can be obtained. Min-
Piles
imum pile tip elevations shall reflect the penetration re-
quired to support lateral pile loads (including scour con-
Under certain soil conditions and for certain pile ma-
siderations where appropriate) and/or penetration of
terials, the bearing capacity of a pile may be considered as
overlying, unsuitable soil strata.
the sum of the resistance mobilized on the embeddea shaft
0
.
4.5.1.7 Piles Through Embankment Fill
and that developed at the pile tip. even though the forces
that are mobilized simultaneously are not necessarily
maximum values.
Piles to be driven through embankments shall pene-
trate a minimum of 10 feet through original ground unless
refusal on bedrock or competent bearing strata occurs at a 4.5.2.4 Batter Piles
lesser penetration. Fill used for embankment construction
shall be a select material which shall not obstruct pile pen- When the lateral resistance of the soil surrounding the
etration to the required depth. The maximum size of any piles is inadequate to counteract the horizontal forces
rock particles in the fill shall not exceed 6 inches. Pre- transmitted to the foundation, or when increased rigidity
drilling or spudding pile locations may be required, par- of the entire structure is required, batter piles should be
ticularly for displacement piles. used in the foundation. Where negative skin friction loads
are expected, batter piles should be avoided, and an alter-
4.5.1.8 Test Piles nate method of providing lateral restraint should be used.
Test piles shall be considered for each substructure unit 4.5.3 Notations
(See Article 7 .1.1 for definition of substructure unit) to de-
termine pile installation characteristics, evaluate pile ca- The following notations shall apply for the design of
pacity with depth and to establish contractor pile order driven pile foundations:
lengths. Piles may be tested by static loading, dynamic
testing, conducting driveability studies, or a combination As = Area of pile circumference (ft2)
thereof, based upon the knowledge of subsurface condi- A, = Area of pile tip (ft2)
tions. The number of test piles required may be increased B =Pile diameter or width (ft)
in non-uniform subsurface conditions. Test piles may not f: =Concrete compression strength (ksi)
be required where previous experience exists with the fpc = Concrete compression stress due to prestressing
same pile type and ultimate pile capacity in similar sub- after all losses (ksi)
surface conditions. FS =Factor of safety (dim)
70 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.5.3
Fy =Yield strength of steel (ksi) The allowable design axial capacity shall be deter-
L = Pile length (ft) mined from:
Q 1111 = Design capacity (k)
Qs = Ultimate shaft resistance (k) (4.5.6.1-2)
QT = Ultimate tip resistance (k)
Qu11 = Ultimate pile capacity (k) 4.5.6.1.1 Factors Affecting Axial Capacity
r5 = Unit side resistance (ksi)
In determining the design axial capacity, consideration
Rs = Side resistance (k)
shall be given to:
r1 =Unit tip resistance (ksi)
R. = Tip resistance (k)
• The difference between the supporting capacity of a
p = Percentage of reinforcement (dim)
single pile and that of a group of pi1es;
O"a =Allowable stress (ksi)
• The capacity of an underlying strata to support the
load of the pile group;
The notations for dimension units include the follow- • The effects of driving piles on adjacent structures or
ing: dim = Dimensionless; ft = foot; square feet = ft 2 ; slopes;
k = kip; ksi = kip/in. 2; and in. = inch. The dimensional • The possibility of scour and its effect on axial and
units provided with each notation are presented for illus- lateral capacity;
tration only to demonstrate a dimensionally correct com- • The effects of negative skin friction or downdrag
bination of units for the footing capacity procedures pre- loads from consolidating soil and the effects of up-
sented herein. If other units are used, the dimensional lift loads from expansive or swelling soils;
correctness of the equations shall be confirmed. • The influence of construction techniques such as
angering or jetting on capacity; and
4.5.4 Design Terminology • The influence of fluctuations in the elevation of the
ground water table on capacity.
Refer to Figure 4.5.4A for terminology used in the de-
sign of driven pile foundations. 4.5.6.1.2 Axial Capacity in Cohesive Soils
4.5.5 Selection of Soil and Rock Properties The ultimate axial capacity of piles in cohesive soils
may be calculated using a total stress method (e.g., Tom-
Soil and rock properties defining the strength and com- linson, 1957) for undrained loading conditions, or an ef-
pressibility characteristics of the foundation materials, are fective stress method (e.g., Meyerhof, 1976) for drained
required for driven pile design. Refer to Article 4.3 for loading conditions. The axial capacity may also be calcu-
guidelines for subsurface exploration to obtain soil and lated from in-situ testing methods such as the cone pene-
rock properties. tration (e.g., Schmertmann, 1978) or pressuremeter tests
(e.g., Baguelin, I 978).
c
-
c
.
r-....-.~o-- HEAD
R9 = SHAFT RESISTANCE
Rr = TIP RESISTANCE
t L
0
=
=
PILE LENGTH
EMBEDMENT DEPTH
~rs 8 = PILE DIAMETER
L D As ::a CIRCUMFERENTIAL AREA
t
SHAFT t
t
0 t
TIP
t
rt-j!l
tRr = At rt
The selection of the factor of safety to be applied to The settlement of axially loaded piles and pile groups
the ultimate axial geotechnical capacity shall consider at the allowable loads shall be estimated. Elastic analysis,
the reliability of the ultimate soil capacity determination load transfer and/or finite element techniques (e.g., Vesic,
and pile instalJation control. Recommended values for 1977 or Poulos and Davis, 1980) may be used. The set-
the factor of safety depending upon the degree of con- tlement of the pile or pile group shall not exceed the tol-
struction control specified on the plans are presented in erable movement limits of the structure.
Table 4.5.6.2A. All factors of safety are based on full-
time observation of pile installation. The design pile ca- 4.5.6.4 Group Pile Loading
pacity shall be specified on the plans so the factor of
safety can be adjusted if the specified construction con- Group pile capacity should be determined as the prod-
trol is altered. uct of the group efficiency, number of piles in the group,
IDGHWAY BRIDGES 4.5.6.4
72
•IIX = Construction Control Specified on Contract Plans. 4.5.6.7 Vertical Ground Movement
tllfor any combination of construction control that includes an
approved static load test, a factor of safety of 2.0 may be used. The potential for external loading on a pile by vertical
ground movements shall be considered as part of the de-
sign. Vertical ground movements may result in negative
skin friction or downdrag loads due to settlement of com-
and the capacity of a single pile. In general, a group efii-
pressible soils or may result in uplift loads due to heave of
ciency value of 1.0 should be used except for friction piles
expansive soils. For design purposes, the full magnitude
in cohesive soils. The efficiency factor for friction piles in
of maximum vertical ground movement shall be assumed.
cohesive soils with a center-to-center pile spacing less
than 3.08 should be 0.7. Center-to-center pile spacings
less than 2.58 are not recommended. 4.5.6.7.1 Negative Skin Friction
The potential for external loading on a pile by negative
4.5.6.5 Lateral Loads on Piles skin friction/downdrag due to settlement of compressible
soil shall be considered as a part of the design. Evaluation
The design of laterally loaded piles is usually governed of negative skin friction shall include a load-transfer
by lateral movement criteria. The design of laterally method of analysis to determine the neutrdl point (i.e.,
loaded piles shall account for the effects of soiVrock- point of zero relative displacement} and load distribution
structure interaction between the pile and ground (e.g., along shaft (e.g., Fellenius, 1984, Reese and O'Neill,
Reese, 1984). Methods of analysis evaluating the ultimate 1988). Due to the possible time dependence associated
capacity or deflection of laterally loaded piles (e.g., with vertical ground movement, the analysis shall con-
8roms, 1964a and 1964b; Singh,et al.,l971) may be used sider the effect of time on load transfer between the
for preliminary design only as a means to evaluate appro- ground and shaft and the analysis shall be performed for
priate pile sections. the time period relating to the maximum axial load trans-
fer to the pile. If necessary, negative skin friction loads
4.5.6.6 Uplift Loads on Piles that cause excessive settlement may be reduced by appli-
cation of bitumen or other viscous coatings to the pile sur-
The uplift design capacity of single piles and pile faces before installation.
groups shall be determined in accordance with Articles
4.5.6.6.1 and 4.5.6.6.2, respectively. Proper provision 4.5.6.7.2 Expansive Soil
shall be made for anchorage of the pile into the pile cap.
Piles driven in swelling soils may be subjected to up-
lift forces in the zone of seasonal moisture change. Piles
4.5.6.6.1 Single Pile
shall extend a sufficient distance into moisture-stable
The uplift design capacity for a single pile shall not ex- soils to provide adequate resistance to swelling uplift
ceed one-third of the ultimate frictional capacity deter- forces. In addition, sufficient clearance shall be provided
mined by a static anruysis method. Alternatively, the uplift between the ground surface and the underside of pile caps
capacity of a single pile can be determined by uplift load or grade beams to preclude the application of uplift loads
tests in conformance with ASTM D 3689 (ASTM, 1988). at the pile cap. Uplift loads may be reduced by application
If determined by load tests, the allowable uplift design ca- of bitumen or other viscous coatings to the pile surface in
pacity shall not exceed 50% of the failure uplift load. the swelling zone.
4.5.6.8 DIVISION I-DESIGN 73
c .
4.5.6.8 Dynamic/Seismic Design
0
Pine, Southern 1,200
ceed the following limits in severe subsurface conditions. Pine, Southern, dense 1,400
Where pile damage or deterioration is possible, it may be Poplar. yellow 800
prudent to use a lower stress level than the maximum al- Redwood 1,100
lowable stress. Spruce, Eastern 850
Tupelo 850
• For steel H-piles, the maximum allowable stress
shall not exceed 0.25Fy over the cross-sectional area
of the pile, not including the area of any tip rein-
forcement. The maximum allowable stress may be • For precast concrete piles, the maximum allowable
increased to 0.33Fy in conditions where pile damage stress shall not exceed 0.33f~ on the gross cross-sec-
is unlikely. Static and/or dynamic load test and eval- tional area of the concrete.
uation confirming satisfactory results should be per- • For prestressed concrete piles fully embedded in
formed when using 0.33Fy. soils providing lateral support, the maximo~ allow-
• For unfilled steel pipe piles, the maximum allowable able stress shall not exceed 0.33f: - 0.27fpc on the
stress shall not exceed 0.25Fy over the minimum gross cross-sectional area of the concrete.
cross-sectional area of the pile. The maximum al- • For round timber piles, the maximum allowable
lowable stress may be increased to 0.33Fy in condi- stress shall not exceed the values in Table 4.5.7.3A
tions where pile damage is unlikely. Static and/or for the pile tip area. For sawn timber piles. the val-
dynamic load test and evaluation confirming satis- ues applicable to "wet condition" for allowable com-
factory results should be performed when using pression parallel to grain shall be used in accordance
0.33Fy. with Article 13.2.
• For concrete filled steel pipe piles, the maximum
allowable stress shall not exceed 0.25Fy + 0.40f: 4.5.7.4 Cross~Section Adjustment for Corrosion
applied over the cross-sectional area of the steel
pipe and on the cross-sectional area of the concrete, For concrete-filled pipe piles where corrosion may be
respectively. expected, y,6 inch shall be deducted from the shell thick-
74 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.5.7.4
c
4.5.14.2 Concrete Piles 4.5.16 Precast Concrete Piles
.
.
A concrete pile foundation design shall consider that 4.5.16.1 Size and Shape
'
deterioration of concrete piles can occur due to sulfates in
soil, ground water, or sea water; chlorides in soils and Precast concrete piles shall be of approved size and
chemical wastes; acidic ground water and organic acids. shape but may be either of uniform section or tapered. In
Laboratory testing of soil and ground water samples for general, tapered piling shall not be used for trestle con-
sulfates and ph is usually sufficient to assess pile deterio- struction except for the portion of the pile which lies
ration potential. A full chemical analysis of soil and below the ground line; nor shall tapered piles be used in
ground water samples is recommended when chemical any location where the piles are to act as columns.
wac;tes are suspected. Methods of protecting concrete pil-
ing can include dense impermeable concrete, sulfate re- 4.5.16.2 Minimum Area
sisting portland cement, minimum cover requirements for
reinforcing steel, and use of epoxies, resins. or other pro- In general, concrete piles shall have a cross-sectional
tective coatings. area, measured above the taper, of not less than 98 square
inches. In saltwater a minimum cross-sectional area of
4.5.14.3 Timber Piles 140 square inches shall be used. If a square section is em-
ployed, the comers shall be chamfered at least 1 inch.
A timber pile foundation design shall consider that de-
terioration of timber piles can occur due to decay from 4.5.16.3 Minimum Diameter of Tapered Piles
wetting and drying cycles or from insects or marine bor-
ers. Methods of protecting timber piling include pressure The diameter of tapered piles measured at the point
treating with creosote or other wood preservers. shall be not less than 8 inches. In all cases the diameter
shall be considered as the least dimension through the
4.5.15 Spacing, Clearances, and Embedment center.
4.5.16.7 Reinforcement Cover equate lateral restraint. Where the shell is smooth pipe and
more than 0.12 inch in thickness, it may be considered as
The reinforcement shall be placed at a clear distance load carrying in the absence of corrosion. Where the shell
from the face of the pile of not less than 2 inches and, is corrugated and is at least 0.075 inch in thickness, it may
when piles are used in saltwater or alkali soils, this clear be considered as providing confinement in the absence of
distance shall not be less than 3 inches. corrosion.
Piles may be spliced provided that the splice develops Sufficient reinforcement shall be provided at the junc-
the full strength of the pile. Splices should be detailed on tion of the pile with the superstructure to make a suitable
the contract plans. Any alternative method of splicing that connection. The embedment of the reinforcement into the
provides equal results may be considered for approval. cap shall be as specified for precast piles.
In computing stresses due to handling, the static loads The shell shall be of sufficient thickness and strength
shall be increased by 50% as an allowance for impact and so that it will hold its original form and show no harmful
shock. distortion after it and adjacent shells have been driven and
the .driving core, if any, has been withdrawn. The plans
4.5.17 Cast-in-Place Concrete Piles shall stipulate that alternative designs of the shell must be
approved by the Engineer before any driving is done.
4.5.17.1 Materials
4.5.17.7 Splices
Cast-in-place concrete piles shall be, in general, cast in
metal shells that shall remain permanently in place. How- Piles may be spliced provided the splice develops the
ever, other types of cac;t-in-place piles, plain or reinforced, full strength of the pile. Splices should be detailed on the
cased or uncased, may be used if the soil condi_tions per- contract plans. Any alternative method of splicing pro-
mit their use and if their design and method of placing are viding equal results may be considered for approval.
satisfactory.
4.5.17.8 Reinforcement Cover
4.5.17.2 Shape
The reinforcement shall be placed a clear distance of
Cast-in-place concrete piles may have a uniform cross- not less than 2 inches from the cased or uncased sides.
section or may be tapered over any portion. When piles are in corrosive· or marine environments, or
when concrete is placed by the water or slurry displace-
4.5.17.3 Minimum Area ment methods, the clear distance shall not be less than
3 inches for uncased piles and piles with shells not suffi-
The minimum area at the butt of the pile shall be 100 ciently corrosion resistant.
inches and the minimum diameter at the tip of the pile
shall be 8 inches. Above the butt or taper, the minimum 4.5.18 Steel H-Piles
size shall be as specified for precast piles.
4.5.18.1 Metal Thickness
4.5.17.4 General Reinforcement Requirements
Steel piles shall have a minimum thickness of web of
Cast.:.in-place piles, carrying axial loads only where the 0.400 inch. Splice plates shall not be less than % in. thick.
possibility of lateral forces being applied to the piles is in-
significant, need not be reinforced where the soil provides 4.5.18.2 Splices
adequate lateral support. Those portions of cast-in-place
concrete piles that are not supported laterally shall be de- Piles shall be spliced to develop the net section of pile.
signed as reinforced concrete columns in accordance with The flanges and web shall be either spliced by butt weld-
Articles 8.15.4 and 8.16.4, and the reinforcing steel shall ing or with plates that are welded, riveted, or bolted.
extend 10 feet below the plane where the soil provides ad- Splices shall be detailed on the contract plans. Prefabri-
4.5.18.2 DMSION I-DESIGN 77
cated splicers may be used if the splice can develop the a portion of the pile, the pile will be investigated for col-
net section of the pile in compression, tension, shear, and umn action. The provisions of Article 4.5.8 shall apply to
bending. unfilled tubular steel piles.
In general, caps are not required for steel piles embed- 4.5.20.1 Size and Shape
ded in concrete.
Prestressed concrete piles that are generally octagonal,
4.5.18.4 Lugs, Scabs, and Core-Stoppers square or circular shall be of approved size and shape. Air
entrained concrete shall be used in piles that are subject to
These devices may be used to increase the bearing ca- freezing and thawing or wetting and drying. Concrete in
pacity of the pile where necessary. They may consist of prestressed piles shall have a minimum compressive
structural shapes-welded, riveted, or bolted-of plates strength, f~, of 5,000 psi at 28 days. Prestressed concrete
welded between the flanges, or of timber or concrete piles may be solid or hollow. For hollow piles, precau-
blocks securely fastened. tionary measures should be taken to prevent breakage due
to internal water pressure during driving, ice pressure in
4.5.18.5 Point Attachments trestle piles, and gas pressure due to decomposition of ma-
terial used to form the void.
If pile penetration through cobbles, boulders, debris fill
or obstructions is anticipated, pile tips shall be reinforced 4.5.20.2 Main Reinforcement
with structural shapes or with prefabricated cast steel
points. Cast steel points shall meet the requirements of Main reinforcement shall be spaced and stressed so as
ASTMA27. to provide a compressive stress on the pile after losses, fpe,
general not less than 700 psi to prevent cracking during
4.5.19 Unfilled 'fubular Steel Piles handling and installation. Piles shall be designed to resist
stresses developed during handling as well as under ser-
0 ture or where heavy scour is anticipated that would expose than 2 inches.
78 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.5.20.4
Large diameter hollow cylinder piles shall be of ap- Drilled shafts may be considered when spread footings
proved size and shape. The wall thickness for cylinder cannot be founded on suitable soil or rock strata within a
piles shall not be less than 5 inches. The grouting of post- reasonable depth and when piles are not economically vi-
tensioning tendons shall be in accordance with Article able due to high loads or obstructions to driving. Drilled
4.33.9. Division II. shafts may be used in lieu of spread footings as a protec-
tion against scour. Drilled shafts may also be considered
4.5.20.5 Splices to resist high lateral or uplift loads when deformation tol-
erances are small.
When prestressed concrete piles are spliced, the .splice
shall be capable of developing the full section of the pile: 4.6.1.2 Materials
Splices shall be detailed on the contract plans.
Shafts shall be cast-in-place concrete and may include
4.5.21 Timber Piles deformed bar steel reinforcement, structural steel sections,
and/or permanent steel casing as required by design. In
4.5.21.1 Materials every case, materials shall be supplied in accordance with
the provisions of this Standard.
Timber piles shall conform to the requirements of the
"Specifications for Wood Products," AASHTO M 168.
Timber piles shall be treated or untreated as indicated on 4.6.1.3 Construction
the contract plans. Preservative treatment shall conform to
the requirements of Section 16. "Preservative Treatments Drilled shafts may be constructed using the dry, casing,
for Lumber.., or wet method of construction, or a combination of meth-
ods. In every case, hole excavation, concrete placement,
4.5.21.2 Limitations on Untreated Timber and all other aspects of shaft construction shall be
Pile Use performed in conformance with the provisions of this
Standard.
Untreated timber piles may be used for te~porary con-
struction, revetments, fenders, and similar work, and in 4.6.1.4 Embedment
permanent construction under the following conditions:
Shaft embedment shall be determined based on verti-
• For foundation piling when the cutoff is below per- cal and lateral load capacities of both the shaft and sub-
manent ground water level. surface materials.
• For trestle construction when it is economical to do
so, although treated piles are preferable.
• They shall not be used where they will, or may, be 4.6.1.5 Shaft Diameter
exposed to marine borers.
• They shall not be used where seismic design con- For rock-socketed shafts which require casing through
siderations are critical. the overburden soils, the socket diameter should be at
least 6 inches less than the inside diameter of the casing
4.5.21.3 Limitations on Treated Timber Pile Use to facilitate drill tool insertion and removal through the
casing. For rock-socketed shafts not requiring casing
Treated timber piles shall not be used where seismic through the overburden soils, the socket diameter can be
design considerations are critical. equal to the shaft diameter through the soil.
4.6.1 General The use of battered shafts to increase the lateral capac-
ity of foundations is not recommended due to their diffi-
The provisions of this article shall apply to the design culty of construction and high cost. Instead, consideration
of axially and laterally loaded drilled shafts in soil or ex- should first be given to increasing the shaft diameter to ob-
tending through soil to or into rock. tain the required lateral capacity.
4.6.1.7 DIVISION I-DESIGN 79
Nc
=Standard penetration test blow count corrected
for effects of overburden (blows/ft)
= Bearing capacity factor (dim); (See Article
or competent bearing strata occurs at a lesser penetration. 4.6.5.1.3)
Fill used for embankment construction shall be random Ni = Number of depth intervals into which shaft is di-
fill material having adequate capacity which shall not ob- vided for determination of side resistance (dim);
struct shaft construction to the required depth. Negative (See Articles 4.6.5.1.1 and 4.6.5.1.2)
skin friction loads due to settlement and consolidation of P =Lateral load on shaft (k)
embankment or underlying soils shall be evaluated for Q = Total axial compression load applied to shaft butt
shafts in embankments. (See Article 4.6.5.2.5.) (k)
QE = Ultimate unit tip capacity for an equivalent shaft
4.6.2 Notations for a group of shafts supported in strong layer
overlying weaker layer (ksf); (See ArticJe
The following notations shall apply for the design of 4.6.5.2.4.3)
drilled shaft foundations in soil and rock: qLo = Ultimate unit tip capacity of an equivalent shaft
bearing in weaker underlying soil layer (ksf);
a =Tip bearing factor to account for large diameter (See Article 4.6.5.2.4.3)
shaft tip (dim); (See Article 4.6.5.1.3) Qu = Total axial uplift load applied to shaft butt (k)
A =Area of shaft (ft2) qup = Ultimate unit tip capacity of an equivalent shaft
A, = Area of shaft tip (ft2) bearing in stronger upper soil layer (ksf); (See
b = Tip bearing factor to account for large diameter Article4.6.5.2.4.3)
shaft tip (dim); (See Article 4.6.5.1.3) Q5 = Ultimate side resistance in soil (k); (See Articles
B = Shaft diameter (ft); (See Article 4.6.3) 4.6.5.1.1 and 4.6.5.1.2)
Bb =Diameter of enlarged base (ft); (See Article qsR = Ultimate unit shear resistance along shaft/rock
4.6.3) interface (psi); (See Article 4.6.5.3.1)
B, = Least width of shaft group (ft); (See Article QsR =Ultimate side resistance of rock socket (k); (See
0 Br
B,
4.6.5.2.4.3)
= Diameter of rock socket (ft); (See ArticJe 4.6.3)
= Tip diameter (ft); (See Article 4.6.5.1.3)
qT
Article4.6.5.3.1)
= Ultimate unit tip resistance for shafts (ksf); (See
Articles 4.6.5.1.3 and 4.6.5.1.4)
Cm = Uniaxial compressive strength of rock mass qTR = Ultimate unit tip resistance for shafts reduced for
(ksf); (See Article 4.6.5.3.1) size effects (ksf); (See Equations 4.6.5.1.3-:3 and
Co = Uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock 4.6.5.1.4-2)
(ksf) ~ =Ultimate tip resistance in soil (k); (See Articles
D = Shaft length (ft); (See ArticJe 4.6.3) 4.6.5.1.3 and 4.6.5.1.4)
Dr = Length of rock socket (ft); (See Article 4.6.3) QTR = Ultimate tip resistance of rock socket (k); (See
Ec = Elastic modulus of concrete shaft or reinforced Article 4.6.5.3.2)
shaft (ksf) Qu11 = Ultimate axial load capacity (k); (See Article
= Elastic modulus of intact rock (ksf) 4.6.5.1)
Eo
= Elastic modulus of rock mass (ksf) RQD =Rock Quality Designation (dim)
Em
FS = Factor of safety (dim) Sui = Incremental undrained shear strength as a func-
fsi = Ultimate load transfer along shaft (ksf); (See Ar- tion over ith depth interval (ksf); (See Article
ticles 4.6.5.1.1 and 4.6.5.1.2) 4.6.5.1.1)
H = Distance from shaft tip to top of weak soil layer Su1 =Undrained shear strength within 2B below shaft
(ft); (See Article 4.6.5.2.4.3) tip (ksf); (See Article 4.6.5.1.3)
=Depth interval (dim); (SeeArtic1es4.6.5.1.1 and W = Weight of shaft (k)
4.6.5.1.2) Z; = Depth to midpoint of ith interval (ft); (See Arti-
Ips =Displacement influence factor for rock-socketed cle 4.6.5.1.2)
shafts loaded in compression (dim); (See Article a =Adhesion factor (dim)
4.6.5.5.2) ai = Adhesion factor as a function over ith depth in-
lpu =Displacement influence factor for rock-socketed terval (dim); (See Article 4.6.5.1.1)
shafts loaded in uplift (dim); (See Article ae = Reduction factor to estimate rock mass modulus
and uniaxial strength from the modulus and
0 4.6.5.5.2)
80 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.6.2
uniaxial strength of intact rock (dim); (See Article values used for design shall be confirmed by field and/or
4.6.5.3.1) laboratory testing.
~i = Load transfer factor in the ith interval (dim); (See
Article 4.6.5.1.2) 4.6.4.2 Measured Values
-yj = Effective soil unit weight in ith interval (kef);
(See Article 4.6.5 .1.2) Foundation stability and settlement analyses for final
6Zi = ith increment of shaft length (ft) design shall be performed using soil and rock properties
t =Factor to account for reduced individual capac- based on the results of field and/or laboratory testing.
ity of closely spaced shafts in group (dim); (See
Article4.6.5.2.4.1)
4.6.5 Geotechnical Design
Pe = Elastic shortening of shaft (ft); (See Articles
4.6.5.5.1.1 and4.6.5.5.1.2)
Drilled shafts shall be designed to support the design
Ps = Total settlement displacement at butt for shaft
with rock socket (ft); (See Article 4.6.5.5.2) loads with adequate bearing and structural capacity, and
Pu = Total uplift displacement at butt for shaft with with tolerable settlements in conformance with Articles
rock socket (ft); (See Equation 4.6.5.5.2) 4.6.5 and 4.6.6. In addition, the response of drilled shafts
1T = 3.1415 (dim) subjected to seismic and dynamic loads, materials and
u =Poisson's ratio (dim) shaft shall be evaluated in conformance with Articles
O'c =Unconfined compressive strength of rock mass 4.4.7.3 (dynamic ground stability) and 4.6.5.7, respec-
or concrete, whichever is weaker (psi); (See Ar- tively.
ticle 4.6.5.3.1) Shaft design shall be based on working stress princi-
cr:i =Effective vertical stress at midpoint of ith depth ples using maximum unfactored loads derived from cal-
interval (kst); (See Article 4.6.5.1.2) culations of dead and live loads from superstructures, sub-
structures, earth (i.e., sloping ground), wind and traffic.
The notations for dimension units include the follow- Allowable axial and lateral loads may be determined by
ing: dim = Dimensionless; deg = degree; ft = foot; k = separate methods of analysis.
kip; klft = kip/ft; ksf = kip/ft2; and kef= kip/ft3 • The di- The design methods presented herein for determining
mensional units provided with each notation are presented axial load capacity assume drilled shafts of uniform cross-
for illustration only to demonstrate a dimensionally cor- section, with vertical alignment, concentric axial loading,
rect combination of units for the shaft capacity and settle- and a relatively horizontal ground surface. The effects of
ment procedures presented below. If other units are used, an enlarged base, group action, and sloping ground are
the dimensional correctness of the equations should be treated separately.
confirmed.
4.6.5.1 Axial Capacity in Soil
4.6.3 Design Terminology
The ultimate axial capacity (Qu1t) of drilled shafts shall
Refer to Figure 4.6.3A for terminology used in design be determined in accordance with the following for com-
of drilled shafts. pression and uplift loading, respectively:
Presumptive values for allowable bearing pressures on Shafts in cohesive soils may be designed by total and
soil and rock may be used only for guidance, preliminary effective stress methods of analysis, for undrained and
design or design of temporary structures. The use of pre- drained loading conditions, respectively. Shafts in cohe-
sumptive values shall be based on the results of subsur- sionless soils shall be designed by effective stress meth-
face exploration to identify soil and rock conditions. All ods of analysis for drained loading conditions.
4.6.5.1.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 81
eun
§
1
Q
liP
1lP RESISTANCE (Q 1)
4.6.5.1. 1 Side Resistance in Cohesive Soil from a consolidating clay), effective stress methods (Ar-
ticle 4.6.5.1.2) should be used to compute Qs in the zone
For shafts in cohesive soil loaded under undrained
where such changes may occur.
loading conditions, the ultimate side resistance may bees-
timated using the following:
4.6.5.1.2 Side Resistance in Cohesionless Soil
N
:t a.s
Qs = 1tB i=J .!J.z.I
I Ul
(4.6.5.1.1-1) For shafts in cohesionless soil or for effective stress
analysis of shafts in cohesive soils under drained loading
The ultimate unit load transfer in side resistance at any conditions, the ultimate side resistance of axially loaded
depth fsi is equal to the product of ai and Sui· Refer to Table drilled shafts may be estimated using the following:
4.6.5.1.1 A for guidance regarding selection of ai and lim- N
iting values of fsi for shafts excavated dry in open or cased Qs =1tB i~t Yi zi (3i !J.zi (4.6.5.1.2- 1)
holes. Environmental, long-term loading or construction
factors may dictate that a depth greater than 5 feet should The value of ~i may be determined using the follow-
be ignored in estimating Q5 • Refer to Figure 4.6.5.1.1A ing:
for identification of portions of drilled shaft not consid-
ered in contributing to the computed value of Q8• For (3i = 1.5- 0.135~; 1.2 > (3i > 0.25 (4.6.5.1.2- 2)
shafts in cohesive soil under drained loading conditions,
Qs may be determined using the procedure in Article The value of 'Yi should be determined from measure-
4.6.5.1.2. ments from undisturbed samples along the length of the
Where time-dependent changes in soil shear strength shaft or from empirical correlations with SPT or other in-
0
'
may occur (e.g., swelling of expansive clay or downdrag situ test methods. The ultimate unit load transfer in side
82 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.6.5.1.2
TABLE 4.6.5.1.1A Recommended Values of« and fs~ resistance at any depth, fsh is equal to the product of ~i and
for Estimation of Drilled Shaft Side Resistance in a~. The limiting value of fsi for shafts in cohesionless soil
Cohesive Soil Reese and O'Neill (1988) is 4 ksf.
Limiting
Value of Load 4.6.5. 1.3 Tip Resistance in Cohesive Soil
Value 'ftansfer, fsi For axially loaded shafts in cohesive soil subjected to
Location Along Drilled Shaft of a (ksO undrained loading conditions, the ultimate tip resistance
From ground surface to depth 0 of drilled shafts may be estimated using the following:
along drilled shaft of S ft*
(4.6.5.1.3-1)
Bottom 1 diameter of the 0
drilled shaft or 1 stem diame- Values of the bearing capacity factor Nc: may be deter-
ter above the top of the bell (if mined using the following:
skin friction is being used)
All other points along the 0.55 5.5 (4.6.5.1.3-2)
sides of the drilled shaft
The limiting value of unit end bearing (qT = Nc:Su1) is
• The deplh of S ft may need adjustment if the drilled shaft is installed 80ksf.
in expansive clay, or if there is substantial groundline deflcc:tion
from lateral loading. The value of S01 should be determined from the results
of in-situ and/or laboratory testing of undisturbed samples
'+
Top Five Feet
Noncontributing
+
Bottom One Oiam11er *
of Stem
Noncontributing
f Periphery of Bell
*
Bottom One Diameter
Noncontributing Nonccmrtbuting
t ..._______ _1_
Straight Shalt Belled Shaft
obtained within a depth of 2B below the tip of the shaft. TABLE 4.6.5.1.4A Recommended Values of qT•
Standard
not be evaluated, the value of qT should be reduced to qTR Penetration Resistance
as follows: N
(Blows/Foot) ValueofqT
qTR =FAT= (2.5/[aBl12 + 2.5b])qT (4.6.5.1.3-3) (uncorrected) (kst)
shear strength of soil shall not be reduced by any factor design. For design purposes, it shall be assumed that the
(e.g., a 1) to determine the Qs component of Qu1tt the total full magnitude of maximum potential vertical ground
base area of the equivalent pier shall be used to determine movement occurs.
the Qr component of Qu~., and the additional capacity of Evaluation of negative skin friction shall include a
the cap shall be ignored. load-transfer method of analysis to determine the neutral
If the cap is not in firm contact with the ground, or if point (i.e., point of zero relative displacement) and load
the soil at the surface is loose or soft, the individual ca- distribution along shaft (e.g., Reese and O'Neill, 1988).
pacity of each shaft should be reduced to t times Qr for an Due to the possible time dependence associated with ver-
isolated shaft, where t = 0.67 for a center-to-center tical ground movement, the analysis shall consider the ef-
(CTC) spacing of 38 and t = 1.0 for a CTC spacing of fect of time on load transfer between the ground and shaft
68. For intermediate spacings, the value oft may be de- and the analysis shall be performed for the time period re-
termined by linear interpolation. The group capacity may lating to the maximum axial load transfer to the shaft.
then be computed as the lesser of ( 1) the sum of the mod- Shafts designed for and constructed in expansive soil
ified individual capacities of each shaft in the group, or (2) shall extend to a sufficient depth into moisture-stable soils
the capacity of an equivalent pier as described above. to provide adequate anchorage to resist uplift movement.
In addition, sufficient clearance shall be provided between
4.6.5.2.4.2 Cohesionless Soil the ground surface and underside of caps or beams con-
necting shafts to preclude the application of uplift loads at
Evaluation of group capacity of shafts in cohesionless the shaft/cap connection from swelling ground conditions.
soil shall consider the spacing between adjacent shafts. Uplift capacity shall rely only on side resistance in con-
Regardless of cap contact with the ground, the individual formance with Article 4.6.5.1. If the shaft has an enlarged
capacity of each shaft should be reduced to t times Qr for base, Qs shall be determined in conformance with Article
an isolated shaft, where t = 0.67 for a center-to-center 4.6.5.2.3.
(CTC) spacing of 3B and t = 1.0 for a CTC spacing of
88. For intermediate spacings. the value oft may be de-
4.6.5.2.6 Method of Constntction
termined by linear interpolation. The group capacity may
be computed as the lesser of (I) the sum of the modified The load capacity and deformation behavior of drilled
individual capacities of each shaft in the group or (2) the shafts can be greatly affected by the quality and method(s)
capacity of an equivalent pier circumscribing the group, of construction. The effects of construction methods are
including resistance over the entire perimeter and base incorporated in design by application of a factor of safety
areas. consistent with the expected construction method(s) and
level of field quality control measures (Article 4.6.5.4).
4.6.5.2.4.3 Group in Strong Soil Overlying Where the spacing between shafts in a group is re-
Weaker Soil stricted, consideration shall be given to the sequence of
construction to minimize the effect of adjacent shaft con-
If a group of shafts is embedded in a strong soil deposit struction operations on recently constructed shafts.
which overlies a weaker deposit (cohesionless and cohe-
sive soil), consideration shall be given to the potential for
a punching failure of the tip into the weaker soil strata. For
4.6.5.3 Axial Capacity in Rock
this case, the unit tip capacity of the equivalent shaft (qE)
may be determined using the following: Drilled shafts are socketed into rock to limit axial dis-
placements, increase load capacity and/or provide fixity
for resistance to lateral loading. In determining the axial
capacity of drilled shafts with rock sockets, the side resis-
If the underlying soil unit is a weaker cohesive soil tance from overlying soil deposits may be ignored.
strata, careful consideration shall be given to the potential '!Ypically, axial compression load is carried solely by
for large settlements in the weaker layer. the side resistance on a shaft socketed into rock until a
total shaft settlement (p5 ) on the order of 0.4 inches oc-
4.6.5.2.5 Vertical Ground Movement curs. At this displacement, the ultimate side resistance,
QsR, is mobilized and slip occurs between the concrete
The potential for external loading on a shaft by verti- and rock. As a result of this slip, any additional load is
cal ground movement (i.e., negative skin friction/down- transferred to the tip.
drag due to settlement of compressible soil or uplift due The design procedures assume the socket is con-
to heave of expansive soil) shall be considered as a part of structed in reasonably sound rock that is little affected by
4.6.5.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 85
(4.6.5.3.1-2)
4.6.5.3.3.1 Rock Stratification
Refer to Article 4.4.8.2.2 for the procedure to deter- Rock stratification shall be considered in the design of
mine aE as a function of RQD. rock sockets as follows:
'i' 400
-a.
r- _,_
-- --
~
~
,
y
/
v
v ,"'
LJ 200 ------ - - -- ./ ~
r--- --
/
vv
0
z
~ -- -f-- , /
II)
iii
~
v / 7
l&J
~
100 -· -- ·- - - ,. ··/ 1- --
l&J -· !.""' _/
...,.Iii"
-
0
iii
t-
~: ~---
-/ . ~~
~
z -----
...... v /
/
::::> 50
v __ -
ti
~
0
en
7-· -.-- - - ,
-f-- -
~
0
~ 20
200 500 1000 2000 5000 10,000 20,000
UNCONnNED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ROCK OR CONCRElE. WHia-tEVER IS WEAKER,ac(psi)
FIGURE 4.6.5.3.1A Procedure for Estimating Average Unit Shear for Smooth Wall Rock-Socketed Shafts
• Sockets embedded in alternating layers of weak and 4.6.5.5 Deformation of Axially Loaded Shafts
strong rock shall be designed using the strength of
the weaker rock. The settlement of axially loaded shafts at working or
• The side resistance provided by soft or weathered allowable loads shall be estimated using elastic or load
rock should be neglected in determining the required transfer analysis methods. For most cases. elastic analysis
socket length where a socket extends into more com- will be applicable for design provided the stress levels in
petent underlying rock. Rock is defined as soft when the shaft are moderate relative to Qu11 • Where stress levels
the uniaxial compressive strength of the weaker rock are high, consideration should be given to methods of load
is less than 20% of that of the stronger rock, or transfer analysis.
weathered when the RQD is less than 20%.
• Where the tip of a shaft would bear on thin rigid rock 4.6.5.5.1 Shafts in Soil
strata underlain by a weaker unit, the shaft shall be
extended into or through the weaker unit (depending Settlements should be estimated for the design or
on load capacity or deformation requirements) to working load.
eliminate the potential for failure due to flexural ten-
sion or punching failure of the thin rigid stratum. 4.6.5.5.1.1 Cohesive Soil
• Shafts designed to bear on strata in which the rock
The short-term settlement of shafts in cohesive soil
surface is inclined should extend to a sufficient depth
may be estimated using Figures 4.6.5.5.1.1 A and
to ensure that the shaft tip is fully bearing on the rock.
4.6.5.5.1.18. The curves presented indicate the propor-
• Shafts designed to bear on rock strata. in which bed-
tions of the ultimate side resistance (Qs) and ultimate tip
ding planes are not perpendicular to the shaft axis
resistance (Qr) mobilized at various magnitudes of settle-
shall extend a minimum depth of2B into the dipping
ment. The total axial load on the shaft (Q) is equal to the
strata to minimize the potential for shear failure sum of the mobilized side resistance (Qs) and mobilized
along natural bedding planes and other slippage sur- tip resistance (Q1).
faces associated with stratification. The settlement in Figure 4.6.5.5.1.JA incorpomtes the
effects of elastic shortening of the shaft provided the shaft
4.6.5.3.3.2 Rock Mass Discontinuities is oftypicallength (i.e., D < 100ft). For longer shafts, the
The strength and compressibility of rock will be af- effects of elastic shortening may be estimated using the
fected by the presence of discontinuities (joints and frac- following:
tures). The influence of discontinuities on shaft behavior
will be dependent on their attitude, frequency and condi- Pe = PD/AEc (4.6.5.5.1.1-1)
tion, and shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis as nec-
essary. For a shaft with an enlarged base in cohesive soil, the
diameter of the shaft at the base (8b) should be used in
4.6.5.3.3.3 Method of Construction Figure 4.6.5.5.1.18 to estimate shaft settlement at the tip.
Refer to Article 4.4. 7 .2.3 for procedures to estimate the
The effect of the method of construction on the engi- consolidation settlement component for shafts extending
neering properties of the rock and the contact between the into cohesive soil deposits.
rock and shaft shall be considered as a part of the design
process.
4.6.5.5.1.2 Cohesionless Soil
4.6.5.4 Factors of Safety The short-term settlement of shafts in cohesion-
less soil may be estimated using Figures 4.6.5.5. I .2A
Drilled shafts in soil or socketed in rock shall be de- and 4.6.5.5. I .28. The curves presented indicate the
signed for a minimum factor of safety of 2.0 against bear- proportions of the ultimate side resistance (Qs) and
ing capacity f()ilure (end bearing, side resistance or com- ultimate tip resistance (Qr) mobilized at various magni-
bined) when the design is based on the results of a load test tudes of settlement. The total axial load on the shaft (Q)
conducted at. the site. Otherwise. shafts shall be designed is equal to the sum of the mobilized side resistance (Qs)
for a minimum factor of safety 2.5. The minimum recom- and mobilized tip resistance (Q1). Elastic shortening
mended factors of safety are based on an assumed normal of the shaft shall be estimated using the following rela-
level of field quality control during shaft construction. If a tionship:
normal level of field quality control cannot be assured,
higher minimum factors of safety shall be used. Pe = PD/AEc (4.6.5.5.1.2-1)
4.6.5.5.1.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 87
- Range of Res&llts
- - Trend Une - Range of Results
· - - - Trend Une
0.2
0.1
o.o ~~---_...._.......__,j..._......._"'----'--_,_--.1
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.8 2.0
Settlement
------,%
Diameter of Shaft
2 3 4 s a 1
Settlement of Base , %
a s ro
Diameter of Base
FIGURE 4.6.5.5.1.1A Load Transfer in
Side Resistance Versus Settlement Drilled Shafts in FIGURE 4.6.5.5.1.18 Load Transfer in
Cohesive Soil Tip Bearing Settlement Drilled Shafts in
After Reese and O'Neill (1988) Cohesive Soil
l8
tO
- - - Trend Unt
0.00.0 o.2 0.4 0.6 o.8 lO 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 w " ~
Settlement , % Settlement of Base , "
Diameter of Shaft Diameter of ease
0 '
-·
Ec
Em , ·0
0·2
0·5
0·6
l,os 0·~ 0·1 11
m•0·2~
0·4
0·01
0·08
0·07
0·3 O·Oe ~-~-~-~-~-~--+--:--:-~
0
0•2
4.6.5.7 Dynamic/Seismic Design not be less than 3 times the diameter of the bundled bars.
Where heavy reinforcement is required, consideration
Refer to Division 1-A and Lam and Martin (1986a; may be given to an inner and outer reinforcing cage.
J986b) for guidance regarding the design of drilled shafts
subjected to dynamic and seismic loads. 4.6.6.2.2 Splices
Splices shall develop the full capacity of the bar in ten-
4.6.6 Structural Design and General Shaft sion and compression. The location of splices shall be
staggered around the perimeter of the reinforcing cage so
Dimensions
as not to occur at the same horizontal plane. Splices may
be developed by lapping, welding, and special approved
4.6.6.1 General
connectors. Splices shall be in conformance with the re-
Drilled shafts shall be designed to insure that the shaft quirements of Article 8.32.
will not collapse or suffer loss of serviceability due to ex-
cessive stress and/or deformation. Shafts shall be de- 4.6.6.2.3 Transverse Reinforcement
signed to resist failure following applicable procedures Transverse reinforcement shall be designed to resist
presented in Section 8. stresses caused by fresh concrete flowing from inside the
All shafts should be sized in 6-inch increments with a cage to the side of the excavated hole. Transverse rein-
minimum shaft diameter of I 8 inches. The diameter of forcement may be constructed of hoops or spiral steel.
shafts with rock sockets should be sized a minimum of 6
inches larger than the diameter of the socket. The diame-
4.6.6.2.4 Handling Stresses
ter of columns supported by shafts shall be less than or
equal to B. Reinforcement cages shall be designed to resist han-
dling and placement stresses.
Where the potential for lateral loading is insignificant, The reinforcement shall be placed a clear distance of
driJied shafts need to be reinforced for axial loads only. not less than 2 inches from the permanently cased or 3
Those portions of drilled shafts that are not supported inches from the uncased sides. When shafts are con-
laterally shall be designed as reinforced concrete structed in corrosive or marine environments, or when
columns in accordance with Articles 8.15.4 and 8.16.4, concrete is placed by the water or slurry displacement
and the reinforcing steel shall extend a minimum of 10 methods, the clear distance shall not be less than 4 inches
feet below the plane where the soil provides adequate for uncased shafts and shafts with permanent casings not
lateral restraint. sufficiently corrosion resistant.
Where permanent steel casing is used and the shell The reinforcement cage shall be centered in the hole
is smooth pipe and more than 0.12 inch in thickness, it using centering devices. All steel centering devices shall
may be considered as load carrying in the absence of be epoxy coated.
corrosion.
The design of longitudinal and spiral reinforcement 4.6.6.2.6 Reinforcement into Superstructure
shaH be in conformance with the requirements of Articles
Sufficient reinforcement shall be provided at the
8.18. I and 8.18.2.2, respectively. Development of de-
junction of the shaft with the superstructure to make a
formed reinforcement shall be in conformance with the
suitable connection. The embedment of the reinforcement
requirements of Articles 8.24. 8.26, and 8.27.
into the cap shall be in conformance with Articles 8.24
and 8.25.
4.6.6.2.1 Longitudinal Bar Spacing
4.6.6.3 Enlarged Bases
The minimum clear distance between longitudinal
reinforcement shall not be less than 3 times the bar diam- Enlarged bases shall be designed to insure that plain
eter nor 3 times the maximum aggregate size. If bars are concrete is not overstressed. The enlarged base shall slope
bundled in forming the reinforcing cage, the minimum at a side angle not less than 30 degrees from the vertical
clear distance between longitudinal reinforcement shall and have a bottom diameter not greater than 3 times the
4.6.6.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 91
c
diameter of the shaft. The thickness of the bottom edge of • Apparatus for measuring movements.
'
the enlarged base shall not be less than 6 inches. • Apparatus for measuring loads.
'
0 ~
'
4.6.7.2 Load Testing Procedures
A simplified procedure for testing drilled shafts per- Note to User: Article Number 4. 7 has beell omitted ill-
mitting determination of the relative contribution of side temionally.
resistance and tip resistance to overall shaft capacity is
also available (Osterberg, 1984).
As a minimum, the written test procedures should in- 4.8 SCOPE
clude the following:
Provisions of this section shall apply for the design
• Apparatus for applying loads including reaction sys- of spread footings, driven piles, and drilled shaft
Foundations shall be proportioned such that the fac- Provisions of this article shall apply to design of iso-
tored resistance is not less than the effects of factored lated footings, and where applicable, to combined foot-
loads specified in Section 3. ings. Special attention shall be given to footings on fill.
Footings shall be designed to keep the soil pressure
as nearly uniform as practicable. The distribution of soil
4.10.4 Strength Requirement pressure shall be consistent with properties of the soil
and the structure, and with established principles of soil
Foundations shall be proportioned by the methods mechanics.
specified in Articles 4.11 through 4.13 so that their design
strengths are at least equal to the required strengths. 4.11.1.2 Depth
The required strength is the combined effect of the fac-
tored loads for each applicable load combination stipu- The depth of footings shall be determined with respect
lated in Article 3.22. The design strength is calculated for to the character of the foundation materials and the possi-
each applicable limit state as the nominal resistance, Rm bility of undermining. Footings at stream crossings shall
multiplied by an appropriate performance (or resistance) be founded at depth below the maximum anticipated
factor, <f>. Methods for calculating nominal resistance are depth of scour as specified in Article 4.11.1.3.
provided in Articles 4.11 through 4.13, and values of per- Footings not exposed to the action of stream current
formance factors are given in Article 4.1 0.6. shall be founded on a firm foundation and below frost
level.
Consideration shall be given to the use of either a
4.10.5 Load Combinations and Load Factors geotextile or graded granular filter layer to reduce sus-
0 .
4.10.6 Performance Factors In regions where freezing of the ground occurs during
the winter months, footings shall be founded below the
Values of performance factors for different types of maximum depth of frost penetration in order to prevent
foundation systems at strength limit states shall be as damage from frost heave.
specified in Tables 4.1 0.6-1, 4.1 0.6-2, and 4.1 0.6-3, unless
regionally specific values are available. 4.11.1.5 Anchorage
If methods other than those given in Tables 4.1 0.6-1,
4.10.6-2, and 4.10.6-3 are used to estimate the soil capac- Footings which are founded on inclined smooth solid
ity, the performance factors chosen shall provide the same rock surfaces and which are not restrained by an overbur-
reliability as those given in these tables. den of resistant material shall be effectively anchored by
94 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4. I 1.1.5
TABLE 4.10.6-1 Perfonnance Factors for Strength Limit States for Shallow Foundations
Performance
1}rpe of Limit State Factor (~)
1. Bearing capacity
a. Sand
-Semi-empirical procedure using SPT data 0.45
-Semi-empirical procedure using CPT data 0.55
-Rational method-
using ~r estimated from SPT data 0.35
using ~' estimated from CPf data 0.45
b. Clay
-Semi-empirical procedure using CPT data 0.50
-Rational method
using shear strength measured in lab tests 0.60
using shear strength measured in field vane tests 0.60
using shear strength estimated from CPf data 0.50
c. Rock
-Semi-empirical procedure (Carter and Kulhawy) 0.60
2. Sliding
Sliding on clay is controlled by the strength of the clay when the clay shear
strength is less than 0.5 times the normal stress, and is controlled by the normal
stress when the clay shear strength is greater than 0.5 times the normal stress.
a. Precast concrete placed on sand
using 4»t estimated from SPT data 0.90
using 4»t estimated from CPT data 0.90
b. Concrete cast in place on sand
using 4»f estimated from SPT data 0.80
using 4»f estimated from CPT data 0.80
c. aay (where shear strength is less than 0.5 times normal pressure)
using shear strength measured in lab tests 0.85
using shear strength measured in field tests 0.85
using shear strength estimated from CPT data 0.80
d. aay (where the strength is greater than 0.5 times normal pressure) 0.85
where «1»1 = frictional angle of sand,
SPT = Standard Penetration Test,
CPT = Cone Penetration Test.
means of rock anchors, rock bolts, dowels, keys or other 4.11.1.7 Uplift
suitable means. Shallow keying of large footing areas
shan be avoided where blasting is required for rock Where foundations may be subjected to uplift forces,
removal. they shall be investigated both for resistance to pullout
and for their structural strength.
4.11.1.6 Groundwater
4.11.1.8 Deterioration
Footings shan be designed for the highest anticipated
position of the groundwater table. Deterioration of the concrete in a foundation by
The influence of the groundwater table on bearing sulfate, chloride, and acid attack should be investi-
capacity of soils or rocks, and settlements of the struc- gated. Laboratory testing of soil and groundwater
ture shall be considered. In cases where seepage samples for sulfates, chloride and pH should be suffi-
forces are present, they should also be included in the cient to assess deterioration potential. When chemical
analyses. wastes are suspected, a more thorough chemical anal-
4.11.1.8 DIVISION I-DESIGN 95
c TABLE 4.10.6-2
Method/Soil/Condition
Skin friction a-method
Performance
Factor
0.70
of single piles P-method 0.50
A-method 0.55
End bearing Oay (Skempton, 1951) 0.70
Sand (Kulhawy, 1983)
ct»r from CPT 0.45
ct»r from SPT 0.35
Rock (Canadian 0.50
Geotech. Society,
1985)
Skin friction and end bearing SPT-method 0.45
CPf-method 0.55
Load test 0.80
Pile driving analyzer 0.70
Block failure Clay 0.65
Uplift capacity a-method 0.60
of single piles p-method 0.40
A-method 0.45
SPT-method 0.35
CPT-method 0.45
Load Test 0.80
4.11.4.1.1 Theoretical Estimation sure that: (l) the product of the bearing capacity and an
appropriate performance factor exceeds the effect of ver-
The bearing capacity should be estimated using ac-
tical design loads, and (2) eccentricity of loading, evalu-
cepted soil mechanics theories based on measured soil pa-
ated based on factored loads, is less than ~ of the footing
rameters. The soil parameter used in the analysis shall be
dimension in any direction for footings on soils.
representative of the soil shear strength under the consid-
For structural design of an eccentrically loaded foun-
ered loading and subsurface conditions.
dation, a triangular or trapezoidal contact pressure distri-
bution based on factored loads shall be used.
4.11.4.1.2 Semi-empirical Procedures
The bearing capacity of foundation soils may be esti-
4.11.4.1.6 Effect of Groundwater Table
mated from the results of in situ tests or by observing
foundations on similar soils. The use of a particular in situ Ultimate bearing capacity shall be determined based
test and the interpretation of the results shall take local ex- on the highest anticipated position of groundwater level
perience into consideration. The following in situ tests at the footing location. In cases where the groundwater
may be used: table is at a depth less than 1.5 times the footing width
below the bottom of the footing, reduction of bearing
-Standard penetration test (SPT), capacity, as a result of submergence effects, shall be
-Cone penetration test (CPT), and considered.
-Pressuremeter test.
TABLE 4.11.4.1.4-1 Presumptive Allowable Bearing Pressures for Spread Footing Foundations
0 .
HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.11.4.2.2
100
The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on rock The structural design of footings shall comply to the
shall be determined using established rock mechanics provisions given in Articles 4.4.11 and 8.16.
principles based on the rock mass strength parameters.
The influence of discontinuities on the failure mode shall 4.11.6 Construction Considerations for
also be considered. Shallow Foundations
4.11.4.3 Failure by Sliding Compaction shall be carried out in a manner so that the
fill material within the section under inspection is as close
Failure by sliding shall be investigated for footings that as practicable to uniform. The layering and compaction of
support inclined loads and/or are founded on slopes. the fill material should be systematic everywhere, with the
For foundations on clay soils, possible presence of a same thickness of layer and number of passes with the
shrinkage gap between the soil and the foundation shall be compaction equipment used as for the inspected fill. The
considered. If passive resistance is included as part of the control measurements should be undertaken in the form
shear resistance required for resisting sliding, considera- of random samples.
tion shall also be given to possible future removal of the
soil in front of the foundation. 4.12 DRIVEN PILES
The overall stability of footings, slopes and foundation The provisions of the specifications in Articles 4.5.1
soil or roc~ shall be evaluated for footings located on or through 4.5.21 with the exception of Article 4.5.6, shall
near a slope using applicable factored load combinations apply to strength design (load factor design) of driven
in Article 3.22 and a performance factor of0.75. piles. Article 4.5.6 covers the allowable stress design of
4.12.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 101
TABLE 4.11.4.2.4-1 Presumptive Bearing Pressures (tsf) for Foundations on Rock (After Putnam, 1981~
piles and shall be replaced by the articles in this section Es = soil modulus
for load factor design of driven piles, unless otherwise f\ = sleeve friction measured from a CPT at point con-
stated. sidered
H =distance between pile tip and a weaker underly-
4.12.2 Notations ing soil layer
H5 = depth of embedment of pile socketed into rock
as = pile perimeter I =influence factor for the effective group embed-
Ap = area of pile tip ment
As = surface area of shaft of pile Ip = moment of inertia of a pile
CPT = cone penetration test K = coefficient of lateral earth pressure
d = dimensionless depth factor for estimating tip ca- Kc = correction factor for sleeve friction in clay
pacity of piles in rock Kr. = correction factor for sleeve friction in sand
D = pile width or diameter K~11 = dimensionless bearing capacity coefficient
D' = effective depth of pile group Lr = depth to point considered when measuring sleeve
Db = depth of embedment of pile into a bearing stratum friction
D~ = diameter of socket nh = rate of increase of soil modulus with depth
ex =eccentricity of load in the x-direction N = Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow count
ey = eccentricity of load in the y-direction N = average uncorrected SPT blow count along pile
NCOIT =average SPT-N value corrected for effect of a~ = vertical effective stress
overburden U8 v = average shear stress along side of pile
Npne = number of piles in a pile group ~ = performance factor
OCR = overconsolidation ratio ~8 = performance factor for the bearing capacity of a
P0 = unfactored dead load pile group failing as a unit consisting of the piles
P8 = factored total axial load acting on a pile group and the block of soil contained within the piles
Px.y = factored axial load acting on a pile in a pile group; ~q = performance factor for the total ultimate bearing
the pile has coordinates (X,Y) with respect to the capacity of a pile
centroidal origin in the pile group ~qs = performance factor for the ultimate shaft capacity
PI = plasticity index of a pile
q = net foundation pressure ~qp = performance factor for the ultimate tip capacity of
Qc = static cone resistance a pile
q1 = limiting tip resistance ~u = Performance factor for the uplift capacity of a sin-
qo = limiting tip resistance in lower stratum gle pile
qp = ultimate unit tip resistance fiSug = performance factor for the uplift capacity of pile
q!) = ultimate unit side resistance groups
qu = average uniaxial compressive strength of rock
cores 4.12.3 Selection of Design Pile Capacity
qu11 = ultimate bearing capacity
QP = ultimate load carried by tip of pile Piles shall be designed to have adequate bearing and
Q~ = ultimate load carried by shaft of pile structural capacity, under tolerable settlements and toler-
Qug = ultimate uplift resistance of a pile group or a able lateral displacements.
group of drilled shafts The supporting capacity of piles shall be determined by
Qu11 = ultimate bearing capacity static analysis methods based on soil-structure interaction.
R = characteristic length of soil-pile system in cohe- Capacity may be verified with pile load test results, use of
sive soils wave equation analysis, use of the dynamic pile analyzer
sd = spacing of discontinuities or, less preferably, use of dynamic formulas.
S = average spacing of piles
Su = undrained shear strength 4.12.3.1 Factors Affecting Axial Capacity
SPT = Standard Penetration Test
Su = average undrained shear strength along pile shaft See ArticJe 4.5.6. I .1. The following sub-articles shall
ftt = width of discontinuities supplement Article 4.5.6.1.1.
T = characteristic length of soil-pile system in cohe-
sionless soils 4.12.3. 1.1 Pile Penetration
W8 = weight of block of soil, piles and pile cap
x = distance of the centroid of the pile from the cen- Piling ~sed to penetrate a soft or loose upper stratum
troid of the pile cap in the x-direction overlying a hard or firm stratum, shall penetrate the hard
X = width of smallest dimension of pile group or firm stratum by a sufficient distance to limit lateral and
y = distance of the centroid of the pile from the cen- vertical movement of the piles, as well as to attain suffi-
troid of the pile cap in the y-direction cient vertical bearing capacity.
Y = length of pile group or group of drilled shafts
Z = total embedded pile length 4.12.3.1.2 Groundwater Table and Buoyancy
a = adhesion factor applied to Su
Ultimate bearing capacity shall be determined using
~ =coefficient relating the vertical effective stress
the groundwater level consistent with that used to calcu-
and the unit skin friction of a pile or drilled shaft
late load effects. For drained loading, the effect of hydro-
-y' =effective unit weight of soil
static pressure shall be considered in the design.
8 = angle of shearing resistance between soil and pile
~ = empirical coefficient relating the passive lateral
earth pressure and the unit skin friction of a pile 4.12.3.1.3 Effect Of Settling Ground and
T) = pile group efficiency factor Downdrag Forces
p = settlement Possible development of downdrag loads on piles shall
Pcol = tolerable settlement be considered where sites are underlain by compressible
a~ = horizontal effective stress clays, silts or peats, especially where fill has recently been
4.12.3.1.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 103
placed on the earlier surface, or where the groundwater is veloped considering the potential effects of combined ver-
4.12.3.2.1 General
The lateral displacement of a pile foundation shall not
exceed the tolerable lateral displacement, as selected ac-
cording to Article 4.12.3.2.2.
For purposes of calculating the settlements of pile The lateral displacement of pile groups shall be esti-
groups, loads shall be assumed to act on an equivalent mated using procedures that consider soil-structure inter-
footing located at two-thirds of the depth of embedment action.
of the piles into the layer which provide support as shown
in Figure 4.12.3.2.1- 1. 4.12.3.3 Resistance at Strength Limit States
Service loads for evaluating foundation settlement
shall include both the unfactored dead and live loads for The strength limit states that shaU be considered in-
piles in cohesionless soils and only the unfactored dead clude:
load for piles in cohesive soils.
Service loads for evaluating lateral displacement of -bearing capacity of piles,
foundations shall include all lateral loads in each of the -uplift capacity of piles,
load combinations as given in Article 3.22. -punching of piles in strong soil into a weaker layer,
and
4.12.3.2.2 Tolerable Movement -structural capacity of the piles.
Tolerable axial and lateral movements for driven pile 4.1 2.3.3. 1 Axial Loading of Piles
foundations shall be developed consistent with the func-
tion and type of structure, fixity of bearings. anticipated Preference shall be given to a design process based
service life and consequences of unacceptable displace- upon static analyses in combination with either field mon-
ments on performance of the structure. itoring during driving or load tests. Load test results may
Tolerable settlement criteria for foundations shall be be extrapolated to adjacent substructures with similar sub-
developed considering the maximum angular distortion surface conditions. The ultimate bearing capacity of piles
according to Article 4.1 1.3.3. may be estimated using analytic methods or in situ test
4.12.3.3.2 Analytic Estimates of Pile Capacity When piles are subjected to uplift, they should be in-
vestigated for both resistance to pullout and structural
Analytic methods may be used to estimate the ultimate
ability to resist tension.
bearing capacity of piles in cohesive and cohesionless
soils. Both total and effective stress methods may be used
4.12.3.3.7a Single Pile Uplift Capacity
provided the appropriate soil strength parameters are eval-
uated. The performance factors for skin friction and tip re- The ultimate uplift capacity of a single pile shall be es-
sistance, estimated using three analytic methods, shall be timated in a manner similar to that for estimating the skin
as provided in Table 4.10.6-2. If another analytic method friction resistance of piles in compression in Article
is used, application of performance factors presented in 4.12.3.3.2 for piles in cohesive soils and Article 4.12.3.3.3
Table 4.10.6-2 may not be appropriate. for piles in cohesionless soils. Performance factors for
the uplift capacity of single piles shall be as provided in
4.12.3.3.3 Pile of Capacity Estimates Based Table 4.10.6-2.
on In Situ Tests
4.12.3.3.7b Pile Group Uplift Capacity
In situ test methods may be used to estimate the ulti-
mate axial capacity of piles. The performance factors for The ultimate uplift capacity of a pile group shall be es-
the ultimate skin friction and ultimate tip resistance, esti- timated as the lesser of the sum of the individual pile up-
mated using in situ methods, shall be as provided in Table lift capacities, or the uplift capacity of the pile group con-
4.10.6-2. sidered as a block. The block mechanism for cohesionless
soil shall be taken as provided in Figure C4.12.3.7.2-1 and
4.12.3.3.4 Piles Bearing on Rock for cohesive soils as given in Figure C4.12.3.7.2-2. Buoy-
ant unit weights shall be used for soil below the ground-
For piles driven to weak rock such as shales and mud-
water level.
stones or poor quality weathered rock, the ultimate tip
The performance factor for the group uplift capacity
capacity shall be estimated using semi-empirical meth-
calculated as the sum of the individual pile capacities shall
ods. The performance factor for the ultimate tip resistance
be the same as those for the uplift capacity of single piles
of piles bearing on rock shall be as provided in Table
as given in Table 4.10.6-2. The performance factor for the
4.10.6-2.
uplift capacity of the pile group considered as a block
shall be as provided in Table 4.10.6-2 for pile groups in
4.12.3.3.5 Pile Load Test
clay and in sand.
The load test method specified in ASTM D 1143-81
may be used to verify the pile capacity. Tensile load test- 4.12.3.3.8 Lateral Load
ing of piles shall be done in accordance with ASTM D
3689-83 Lateral load testing of piles shall be done in ac- For piles subjected to lateral loads, the pile heads shall
cordance with ASTM D 3966-81. The performance factor be fixed into the pile cap. Any disturbed soil or voids cre-
for the axial compressive capacity, axial uplift capacity ated from the driving of the piles shall be replaced with
and lateral capacity obtained from pile load tests shall be compacted granular material.
as provided in Table 4.10.6-2. The effects of soil-structure or rock-structure interac-
tion between the piles and ground, including the number
4.12.3.3.6 Presumptive End Bearing Capacities and spacing of the piles in the group, shall be accounted
for in the design of laterally loaded piles.
Presumptive values for allowable bearing pressures
given in Table 4.11.4.1.4-1 on soil and rock shall be used 4.12.3.3.9 Batter Pile
only for guidance, preliminary design or design of tem-
porary structures. The use of presumptive values shall be The bearing capacity of a pile group containing batter
based on the results of subsurface exploration to identify piles may be estimated by treating the batter piles as ver-
soil and rock conditions. All values used for design shall tical piles.
be confirmed by field and/or laboratory testing.
4.12.3.3.10 Group Capacity
4.12.3.3. 7 Uplift
Uplift shall be considered when the force effects cal- 4.12.3.3.10a Cohesive Soil
culated based on the appropriate strength limit state load If the cap is not in firm contact with the ground, and if
combinations are tensile. the soil at the surface is soft, the individual capacity of
4.12.3.3.10a DIVISION I-DESIGN 104.1
0 JJ:(\\ 1/;(\\
Equivalent
footing
(a)
0.4
mw
Soft layer 0.3
)t.t
'a
•
0
.
"
/lA\
Firm layer
j
0.2
0.1
Equivalent
footing o--~------_. __________________________
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
(b) AatloiJD
FIGURE C4.12.3.2.1-l Location of Equivalent FIGURE C4.12.3.3.4-1 Bearing capacity coefficient, Ksp
Footing (After Duncan and Buchignani, 1976) (After Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, 1985)
0
104.2 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 4.12.3.3.10a
XbyY
,._
1.1 .,.
1.0
_. 0.4
..
0
uCD
0.9
0.8
ij
II. 0.7
G 0.3
u t
c: 0.6 X
CD
.a ~
Ha '8
:5 0.5
\"" ~ ~ o,
-·- ~!£-
e, __ j
c o.• 0.2
IJ
E 0.3
~~ r-'10-
! I" ~ ~ .......
'CD ~
Cl) 0.2 ........ r-- so-
. . r--... ~
0.1
..... 1- 100-
5000s:: 0.1
~
0 2 • 6 8 10 12 .... 20
Embedment Ratio HiD,
0~__.___.___~--~--~--._--~--~---L--~
FIGURE C4.13.3.3.4-l Elastic Settlement 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.1 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Influence Factor as a Function of
RatloiJD1
Embedment Ratio and Modulus Ratio
(After Donald, Sloan and Chiu, 1980, FIGURE C4.13.3.3.4-4 Bearing Capacity Coefficient, Ksp
as presented by Reese and 0 'Neill, 1988) (After Canadian Geotechnical Society, 1985)
4.12.3.3.1 OA DIVISION I-DESIGN 105
each pile shall be multiplied by an efficiency factor 1}. sign of driven piles subjected to dynamic and seismic
where 11 = 0.7 for a center-to-center spacing of three di- loads.
ameters and 11 = 1.0 for a center-to-center spacing of six
diameters. For intermediate spacings, the value of 11 may 4.12.4 Structural Design
be determined by linear interpolation.
If the cap is not in firm contact with the ground and The structural design of driven piles shall be in accor-
if the soil is stiff, then no reduction in efficiency shall be dance with the provisions of Articles 4.5.7, which was de-
required. veloped for allowable stress design procedures. To use
If the cap is in firm contact with the ground, then no re- load factor design procedures for the structural design of
duction in efficiency shall be required. driven piles, the load factor design procedures for rein-
The group capacity shall be the lesser of: forced concrete, prestressed concrete and steel in Sections
8, 9, and 10, respectively, shall be used in place of the al-
-the sum of the modified individual capacities of each lowable stress design procedures.
pile in the group, or
-the capacity of an equivalent pier consisting of the 4.12.4.1 Buckling of Piles
piles and a block of soil within the area bounded by
the piles. Stability of piles shall be considered when the piles ex-
tend through water or air for a portion of their lengths.
For the equivalent pier, the full shear strength of soil
shall be used to determine the skin friction resistance, the 4.12.5 Construction Considerations
total base area of the equivalent pier shall be used to de-
termine the end bearing resistance, and the additional ca- Foundation design shall not be uncoupled from con-
pacity of the cap shall be ignored. struction considerations. Factors such as pile driving, pile
The performance factor for the capacity of an equiva- splicing, and pile inspection shall be done in accordance
with the provisions of this specification and Division II.
lent pier or block failure shall be as provided in Table
4.10.6-2. The performance factors for the group capacity
calculated using the sum of the individual pile capacities, 4.13 DRILLED SHAFTS
0
.
are the same as those for the single pile capacity as given
in Table 4.1 0.6-2. 4.13.1 General
If the rock is degradable, consideration of special con- or structural failure of the drilled shaft. The design oflat-
struction procedures, larger socket dimensions, or re- erally loaded drilled shafts shall account for the effects of
duced socket capacities shall be considered. interaction between the shaft and ground, including the
The performance factors for drilled shafts socketed in number of piers in the group.
rock shall be as provided in Table 4.1 0.6-3.
4.13.3.3.8 Group Capacity
4.13.3.3.5 Load Test
Possible reduction in capacity from group effects shall
Where necessary, a full scale load test or tests shall be
be considered.
conducted on a drilled shaft or shafts to confirm response
to load. Load tests shall be conducted using shafts con-
structed in a manner and of dimensions and materials 4.13.3.3.8a Cohesive Soil
identical to those planned for the production shafts. The provisions of Article 4.12.3.3.1 Oa shall apply. The
Load tests shall be conducted following prescribed performance factor for the group capacity of an equivalent
written procedures which have been developed from ac- pier or block failure shall be as provided in Table 4.10.6-
cepted standards and modified, as appropriate, for the 2 for both cases of the cap being in contact, and not in con-
conditions at the site. Standard pile load testing proce- tact with the ground. The performance factors for the
dures developed by ASTM as specified in Article group capacity calculated using the sum of the individual
4.12.3.3.5 may be modified for testing drilled shafts. drilled shaft capacities are the same. as those for the single
The performance factor for axial compressive capac- drilled shaft capacities.
ity, axial uplift capacity, and lateral capacity obtained
from load tests shall be as provided in Table 4.1 0.6-3.
4.13.3.3.8b Cohesionless Soil
4.13.3.3.6 Uplift Capacity Evaluation of group capacity of shafts in cohesionless
Uplift shall be considered when (i} upward loads act on soil shall consider the spacing between adjacent shafts.
the dri1led shafts and (ii) swelling or expansive soils act Regardless of cap contact with the ground, the individual
on the drilled shafts. Drilled shafts subjected to uplift capacity of each shaft shall be reduced by a factor 11 for
forces shall be investigated, both for resistance to pullout an isolated shaft, where 11 = 0.67 for a center-to-center
and for their structural strength. (CTC) spacing of three diameters and 11 = 1.0 for a cen-
ter-to-center spacing of eight diameters. For intermediate
4.13.3.3.6a Uplift Capacity of a Single spacings, the value of 11 may be determined by linear
Drilled Shaft interpolation.
See Article 4.13.3.3.3 for a discussion on the selection
The uplift capacity of a single straight-sided drilled
of performance factors for drilled shaft capacities in co-
shaft shall be estimated in a manner similar to that for hesionless soils.
estimating the ultimate side resistance for drilled shafts
in compression (Articles 4.13.3.3.2, 4.13.3.3.3, and
4.13.3.3.4). 4.13.3.3.8c Group in Strong Soil Overlying
The uplift capacity of a belled shaft shall be estimated Weaker Compressible Soil
neglecting the side resistance above the bell, and assum-
The provisions of Article 4.12.3.3.10c shall apply as
ing that the bell behaves as an anchor.
applicable.
The performance factor for the uplift capacity of
drilled shafts shall be as provided in Table 4.1 0.6-3.
4.13.3.3.9 Dynamic/Seismic Design
4.13.3.3.6b Group Uplift Capacity
Refer to Division I-A for guidance regarding the design
See Article 4.12.3.3. 7b. The performance factors for of drilled shafts subjected to dynamic and seismic loads.
uplift capacity of groups of drilled shafts shall be the same
as those for pile groups as given in Table 4.10.6-3.
4.13.4 Structural Design
4.13.3.3. 7 Lateral Load
The structural design of drilled shafts shall be in
The design of laterally loaded drilled shafts is usually accordance with the provisions of Article 4.6.6,
governed by lateml movement criteria (Article 4.13.3.2) which was developed for allowable stress design proce-
4.13.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 109
c
.
.
dures. In order to use load factor design procedures for
the structural design of drilled shafts, the load factor
design procedures in Section 8 for reinforced concrete
shall be used in place of the allowable stress design
procedures.
4.13.4.1 Buckling of Drilled Shafts
0
0
Section 5
RETAINING WALLS
Part A
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND MATERIALS
5.1 GENERAL cept they rely more on structural resistance through can-
tilevering action, with this cantilevering action providing
Retaining walls shall be designed to withstand lateral the means to mobilize dead weight for resistance. Non-
earth and water pressures, including any live and dead gravity cantilever walls rely strictly on the structural resis-
load surcharge, the self weight of the wall, temperature tance of the wall and the passive resistance of the soiVrock,
and shrinkage effects, and earthquake loads in accordance in which vertical wall elements are partially embedded in
with the general principles specified in this section. the soiVrock to provide fixity. Anchored walls derive their
Retaining walls shall be designed for a service life capacity through cantilevering action of the vertical wall
based on consideration of the potential long-term effects elements (similar to a non-gravity cantilever wall) and ten-
of material deterioration, seepage, stray currents and other sile capacity of anchors embedded in stable soil or rock
potentially deleterious environmental factors on each of below or behind potential soiVrock failure surfaces.
the material components comprising the wall. For most
5.2.1 Selection of Wall Type
0 applications, permanent retaining walls should be de-
signed for a minimum service life of 75 years. Retaining
walls for temporary applications are typically designed Selection of wall type is based on an assessment of
for a service life of 36 months or less. the magnitude and direction of loading, depth to suitable
A greater level of safety and/or longer service life (i.e., foundation support, potential for earthquake loading,
100 years) may be appropriate for walls which support presence of deleterious environmental factors, proximity
of physical constraints, wall site cross-sectional geometry,
bridge abutments, buildings, critical utilities, or other fa-
tolerable and differential settlement, facing appearance,
cilities for which the consequences of poor performance
and ease and cost of construction.
or failure would be severe.
The quality of in-service performance is an important
consideration in the design of permanent retaining walls. 5.2.1.1 Rigid Gravity and Semi-Gravity Walls
Permanent walls shall be designed to retain an aestheti-
Rigid gravity walls use the dead weight of the structure
cally pleasing appearance, and be essentially maintenance
itself and may be constructed of stone masonry, unrein-
free throughout their design service life.
forced concrete, or reinforced concrete. Semi-gravity can-
tilever, counterfort, and buttress walls are constructed of
5.2 WALL TYPE AND BEHAVIOR reinforced concrete. Rigid gravity and semi-gravity retain-
ing walls may be used for bridge substructures or grade
Retaining walls are generally classified as gravity, semi- separation. Rigid gravity and semi-gravity walls are gen-
gravity, non-gravity cantilever, and anchored. Examples erally used for permanent wall applications. These types of
of various types of walls are provided in Figures 5.2A. walls can be effective for both cut and fill wall applications
5.2B, and 5.2C. Gravity walls derive their capacity to re- due to their relatively narrow base widths which allows ex-
sist lateral loads through a combination of dead weight and cavation laterally to be kept to a minimum.
lateral resistance. Gravity walls can be further subdivided Gravity and semi-gravity walls may be used without
by type into rigid gravity walls, mechanically stabilized deep foundation support only where the bearing soiVrock
earth (MSE) walls, and prefabricated modular gravity is not prone to excessive or differential settlement. Due to
0
'
walls. Semi-gravity walls are similar to gravity walls, ex-
Ill
their rigidity, excessive differential settlement can cause
112 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.2.1.1
.........,.
r""' !""""'" ~ CEOSYNTHETIC ,·I~
CIP CCIHCRETE R£1 WCJRCI NG
~ ·;'
NG---...
CIA SHO TCAETE
f='ACI
cRANULAR F'l LL
cracking, excessive bending or shear stresses in the wall, Permanent nongravity cantilevered walls may be con-
or rotation of the overall wall structure. structed of reinforced concrete, timber, and/or metals.
Temporary nongravity cantilevered walls may be con-
5.2.1.2 Nongravity Cantllevered Walls structed of reinforced concrete, metal and/or timber. Suit-
able metals generally include steel for components such as
Nongravity cantilevered walls derive lateral resistance piles, brackets and plates, lagging and concrete reinforce-
through embedment of vertical wall elements and support ment. Nongravity cantilevered walls may be used for the
retained soil with facing elements. Vertical wall elements same applications as rigid gravity and semi-gravity walls,
may consist of discrete vertical elements (e.g., soldier or as well as temporary or permanent support of earth slopes,
sheet piles, caissons, or drilled shafts) spanned by a struc- excavations, or unstable soil and rock masses. This type of
tural facing (e.g., wood or reinforced concrete lagging,
wall requires little excavation behind the wall and is most
precast or cast-in-place concrete panels, wire or fiber re-
inforced shotcrete, or metal elements such as sheet piles). effective in cut applications. They are also effective where
The discrete vertical elements typically extend deeper into deep foundation embedment is required for stability.
the ground than the facing to provide vertical and lateral Nongravity cantilevered walls are generally limited to
support. Alternately, the vertical wall elements and facing a maximum height of approximately 5 meters (15 feet),
are continuous and, therefore, also form the structural fac- unless they are provided with additional support by means
ing. Typical continuous vertical wall elements include of anchors. They generally cannot be used effectively
piles, precast or cast-in-place concrete diaphragm wall where deep soft soils are present, as these walls depend on
panels, tangent piles, and tangent caissons. the passive resistance of the soil in front of the wall.
5.2.1.3 DIVISION I- DESIGN 11 3
5.2.1.3 Anchored Walls Anchors are usually required for supp01t of both temporary
and permanent nongravity cantilevered walls higher than
Anchored walls are typically composed of the same el- about 5 meters ( 15 feet), depending on soil conditions.
ements as nongravity cantilevered walls (Article 5.2. 1.2), Anchored walls are typically constructed in cut situa-
but derive additional lateral resistance from one or more tions, in which construction occurs from the top down to
tiers of anchors. Anchors may be prestressed or deadman the base of the wall. Anchored walls have been success-
type elements composed of strand tendons or bars (with fully used to support fi lls; however, certain difficulties
corrosion protection as necessary) extending from the arising in fill wall applications require special considera-
wall face to a ground zone or mechanical anchorage lo- tion during design and construction. In particular, there is
cated beyond the zone of soil applying load to the wall. a potential for anchor damage due to settlement of back-
Bearing elements on the vertical support elements or fac- fill and underlying soil s or due to improperly controlled
ing of the wall transfer wall loads to the anchors. In some backfilling procedures. Also, there is a potential for unde-
cases, a spread footing is used at the base of the anchored sirable wall deflection if anchors are too highly stressed
wall facing in lieu of vertical element embedment to pro- when the backfi ll is only partially complete and provides
vide vertical support. Due to their fl exibility and method li mited passive resistance.
of support, the distribution of lateral pressure on anchored The base of the vertical wall elements should be lo-
walls is influenced by the method and sequence of wall cated below any soft soils which are prone to settlement,
construction and anchor prestressing. as settlement of the vertical wall elements can cause de-
Anchored walls are applicable for temporary and per- stressing of the anchors. Also, anchors should not be lo-
manent support of stable and unstable soi I and rock masses. cated within soft clays and silts, as it is difficult to obtain
HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.2.1.3
114
FIGURE 5.2C Typical Rigid Gravity, Semi-Gravity Cantilever, Nongravity Cantilever, and Anchored Walls
adequate long-term capacity in such materials due to inforced soil mass behind the facing. For relatively thick
creep. facings, such as segmental concrete block facings, the
dead weight of the facing may also provide a significant
5.2.1.4 Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls contribution to the capacity of the wall system.
MSE walls are typically used where conventional
MSE systems, whose elements may be proprietary, gravity, cantilever, or counterforted concrete retaining
employ either metallic (strip or grid type) or geosynthetic walls are considered, and are particularly well suited
(geotextile, strip, or geogrid) tensile reinforcements in the where substantial total and differential settlements are an-
soil mass, and a facing element which is vertical or near ticipated. The allowable settlement of MSE walls is lim-
vertical. MSE walls behave as a gravity wall, deriving ited by the longitudinal defonnability of the facing and the
their lateral resistance through the dead weight of the re- performance requirements of the structure. MSE walls
5.2.1.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 115
have been successfully used in both fill and cut wall ap- lutants, other environmental conditions which are defined
0 .
plications. However, they are most effective in fill wall
applications. MSE walls shall not be used under the fol-
lowing conditions.
as aggressive as described in Division II, Article 7 .3.6.3,
or where deicing spray is anticipated .
0 contaminated by acid mine drainage, other industrial pol- cal seismic coefficient kv equal to zero.
116 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.2.2.3
It must be noted that, even if overall stability is satis- 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6. For gravity and semi-gravity walls, lat-
factory, special exploration, testing and analyses may be eral movement results from a combination of differential ·~.
required for bridge abutments or retaining walls con- vertical settlement between the heel and the toe of the wall . J
structed over soft subsoils where consolidation and/or lat- and the rotation necessary to develop active earth pressure
eral flow of the soft soil could result in unacceptable long- conditions (see Table 5.5.2A). If the wall is designed for
term settlements or horizontal movements. at-rest earth pressure conditions, the deflections in Table
Stability of temporary construction slopes needed to 5.5.2A do not need to be considered. For anchored walls,
construct the wall shall also be evaluated. deflections shall be estimated in accordance with Article
5.7.2. For MSE walls, deflections may be estimated in ac-
5.2.2.4 Tolerable Deformations cordance with Article 5.8.10.
Where a wall is used to support a structure, tolerable
Tolerable vertical and lateral deformation criteria for re- movement criteria shall be established in accordance with
taining walls shall be developed based on the function and Articles 4.4.7.2.5, 4.5 and 4.6. Where a wall supports soil
type of wall, unanticipated service life, and consequences of on which an adjacent structure is founded, the effects of
unacceptable movements (i.e., both structural and aesthetic). wall movements and associated backfill settlement on the
Allowable total and differential vertical deformations adjacent structure shall be evaluated.
for a particular retaining wall are dependent on the ability For seismic design, seismic loads may be reduced, as
of the wall to deflect without causing damage to the wall result of lateral wall movement due to sliding, for what is
elements or exhibiting unsightly deformations. The total calculated based on Division 1A using the Mononobe-
and differential vertical deformation of a retaining wall Okabe method if both of the following conditions are met:
should be small for rigid gravity and semi-gravity retain-
ing walls, and for soldier pile walls with a cast-in-place • the wall system and any structures supported by the
facing. For walls with anchors, any downward movement wall can tolerate lateral movement resulting from
can cause significant destressing of the anchors. sliding of the structure,
MSE walls can tolerate larger total and differential ver- • the wall base is unrestrained regarding its ability to
tical deflections than rigid walls. The amount of total and slide, other than soil friction along its base and min-
differential vertical deflection that can be tolerated de- imal soil passive resistance.
pends on the wall facing material, configuration, and tim-
ing of facing construction. A cast-in-place facing has the Procedures for accomplishing this reduction in seismic
same vertical deformation limitations as the more rigid re- load are provided in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
taining wall systems. However, an MSE wall with a cast- Specifications, 2nd Edition. In general, this only applies to
in-place facing can be specified with a waiting period be- gravity and semi-gravity walls. Though the specifications
fore the cast-in-place facing is constructed so that vertical in Division 1A regarding this issue are directed at struc-
(as well as horizontal) deformations have time to occur. tural gravity and semi-gravity walls, these specifications
An MSE wall with welded wire or geosynthetic facing can may also be applicable to other types of gravity walls re-
tolerate the most deformation. An MSE wall with multi- garding this issue provided the two conditions listed above
ple precast concrete panels cannot tolerate as much verti- are met.
cal deformation as flexible welded wire or geosynthetic
facings because of potential damage to the precast panels 5.2.3 SoU, Rock, and Other Problem Conditions
and unsightly panel separation.
Horizontal movements resulting from outward rotation Geologic and environmental conditions can influence
of the wall or resulting from the development of internal the performance of retaining walls and their foundations,
equilibrium between the loads applied to the wall and the and may require special· consideration during design. To
internal structure of the wall must be limited to prevent the extent possible, the presence and influence of such
overstress of the structural wall facing and to prevent the conditions shall be evaluated as part of the subsurface ex-
wall face batter from becoming negative. In general, if ploration program. A representative, but not exclusive,
vertical deformations are properly controlled, horizontal listing of problem conditions requiring special considera-
deformations will likely be within acceptable limits. For tion is presented in Table 4.2.3A for general guidance.
MSE walls with extensible reinforcements, reinforcement
serviceability criteria, the wall face batter, and the facing 5.3 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND
type selected (i.e., the flexibility of the facing) will influ- TESTING PROGRAMS
ence the horizontal deformation criteria required.
· Vertical wall movements shall be estimated using con- The elements of the subsurface exploration and testing
ventional settlement computational methods (see Articles programs shall be the responsibility of the Designer, based
5.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 117
on the specific requirements of the project and his or her local conditions. Where the wall is supported on deep foun-
~l experience with local geological conditions. dations and for all non-gravity walls, the depth of the sub-
~ surface explorations shall extend a minimum of 6 meters
5.3.1 General Requirements (20 feet) below the anticipated pile, shaft, or slurry wall tip
elevation. For piles or shafts end bearing on rock. or shafts
As a minimum, the subsurface exploration and testing extending into rock, a minimum of 3 meters (10 feet) of
programs shall define the following, where applicable: rock core, or a length of rock core equal to at least three
times the shaft diameter, which ever is greater, shall be ob-
• Soil strata: tained to insure that the exploration has not been tenninated
-Depth, thickness, and variability on a boulder and to determine the physical characteristics of
-Identification and classification the rock within the zone of foundation influence for design.
-Relevant engineering properties (i.e., natural
moisture content, Atterberg limits, shear strength, 5.3.3 Minimum Coverage
compressibility, stiffness, permeability, expan-
sion or collapse potential, and frost susceptibility) A minimum of one soil boring shall be made for each
-Relevant soil chemistry, including pH, resistivity, retaining wall. For retaining walls over 30 meters ( 100
and sulfide content feet) in length, the spacing between borings should be 30
• Rock strata: meters ( l 00 feet). The number and spacing of the bore
-Depth to rock holes may be increased or decreased from 30 meters
-Identification and classification ( l 00 feet), depending upon the anticipated geological con-
-Quality (i.e., soundness, hardness, jointing and ditions within the project area. In planning the exploration
presence of joint filling, resistance to weathering, program, consideration should be given to placing borings
if exposed, and solutioning) inboard and outboard of the wall line to define conditions
-Compressive strength (e.g., uniaxial compres- in the scour zone at the toe of the wall and in the zone be-
sion, point load index) hind the wall to estimate lateral loads and anchorage or re-
-Expansion potential inforcement capacities.
• Ground water elevation, including seasonal varia-
Regardless of the wall foundation type, borings shall ex- The following notations apply for design of retaining
tend into a bearing layer adequate to support the anticipated walls:
foundation loads, defined as dense or hard soils, or bedrock.
In general, for walls which do not utilize deep foundation A =Acceleration coefficient (dim); (See Article
support, subsurface explorations shall extend below the an- 5.8.9.1)
ticipated bearing level a minimum of twice the total wall Ac = Reinforcement area corrected for corrosion
height. Greater depths may be required where warranted by losses (mm2); (See Article 5.8.6)
118 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.4
Am = Maximum wall acceleration coefficient at the FH = Horizontal component of active lateral earth
centroid (dim); (See Article 5.8.9.1) pressure force (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.2)
b = Width of discrete wall backfill element (m); (See FT =Resultant active lateral earth pressure force
Article 5.8.6) (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.2)
br = Width of vertical or horizontal concentrated dead FS = Factor of safety (dim); (See Article 5.5.5)
load (m); (See Article 5.8.12.1) FSOT =Factor of safety against overturning (dim); (See
B = Total base width of wall, including facing ele- Article 5.8.2)
ments (m); (See Article 5.5.5) FSro =Safety factor against pullout (dim); (See Article
B' = Effective base width of retaining wall foundation 5.8.5.2)
(m); (See Article 5.8.3) FSsL =Factor of safety against sliding (dim); (See Arti-
C = Overall reinforcement surface area geometry fac- cle 5.8.2)
tor (dim); (See Article 5.8.5.2) Fv = Vertical component of active lateral earth pres-
Cr = Distance from back of wall facing to front edge sure force (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.2)
of footing or other concentrated surcharge load Gu = Distance to center of gravity of a modular block
(m); (See Article 5.8.12.1) facing unit, including aggregate fill, measured from
CRr. = A reduction factor to account for reduced con- the front of the unit (m); (See Article 5.8.7 .2)
nection strength resulting from pullout of the h = Equivalent height of soil representing surcharge
connection (dim); (See Article 5.8.7.2) pressure or effective total height of soil at back of
CRu = A reduction factor to account for reduced ulti- reinforced soil mass (m); (See Article 5.8.2)
mate strength resulting from rupture of the con- hp = Vertical distance Fp is located from bottom of
nection (dim); (See Article 5.8.7.2) wall (m); (See Article 5.8.12.1)
Cu = Soil coefficient of uniformity (dim); (See Article H = Design wall height (m); (See Article 5.8.1)
5.8.5.2) H1 = Equivalent wall height (m); (See Article 5.8.5.1)
d = Distance from back of wall face to center of con- H2 = Effective wall height (m); (See Article 5.8.9.1)
centrated dead load (m); (See Article 5.8.12.1); Hh = Hinge height for block facings (m); (See Article
also, the effective depth relative to stem of con- 5.8.7.2)
crete semi-gravity walls for locating critical sec- Hs = Surcharge height (m of soil); (See Article 5.5.2)
tion for shear (m); (See Article 5.5.6.1) Hu = Facing unit height (m); (See Article 5.8.7.2)
Di = Effective width of applied load at depth within or Hw = Height of water in backfill above base of wall (m)
behind wall due to surcharge (m); (See Article I = Average slope of broken back soil surcharge
5.8.12.1) above wall (deg); (See Article 5.8.2)
D* = Reinforcement bar diameter corrected for corro- ib = Inclination of wall base from horizontal (deg);
sion losses (mm); (See Article 5.8.6) (See Article 5.8.7.2)
e, e' = Eccentricity of forces contributing to bearing kh = Horizontal seismic coefficient (dim); (See Article
pressure (m); (See Articles 5.8.3 and 5.8.12.1) 5.8.9.1)
Ec = Thickness of metal reinforcement at end of ser- kv = Vertical seismic coefficient (dim); (See Article
vice life (mm); (See Article 5.8.6) 5.8.9.1)
En = Nominal thickness of steel reinforcement at con- K = Earth pressure coefficient (dim); (See Article 5.5.2)
struction (mm); (See Article 5.8.6.1.1) Kae = Total Mononobe-Okabe seismic lateral earth
~ = Equivalent sacrificed thickness of metal expected pressure coefficient (dim); (See Article 5.8.9.1)
to be lost by uniform corrosion to produce ex- 4Kae = Dynamic increment of the Mononobe-Okabe
pected loss of tensile strength during service life seismic lateral earth pressure coefficient (dim);
of structure (nun); (See Article 5.8.6.1.1) (See Article 5.8.9.1)
f = Friction factor (dim); (See Article 5.5.2) Knr = Active earth pressure coefficient for the soil be-
F* = Pullout resistance factor (dim); (See Article 5.8.5.2) hind the MSE wall reinforcements (dim); (See
FP = Lateral force resulting from KruilCTv (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.2)
Article 5.8.12.1) Kr = Lateral earth pressure coefficient for the soil
Fy = Yield strength of the steel (kN/mm2); (See Article within the MSE wall reinforced soil zone (dim);
5.8.6.1.1) (See Article 5.8.4.1)
F, =Active lateral earth pressure force for level back- Ka =Active earth pressure coefficient (dim); (See Ar-
fill conditions (k.N/m); (See Article 5.8.2) ticle 5.5.2)
F2 = Lateral earth pressure force due to traffic or other Ko =At-rest earth pressure coefficient (dim); (See Ar-
continuous surcharge (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.2) ticle 5.5.2)
5.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 119
K, = Passive earth pressure coefficient for curved fail- Pw = Force due to hydrostatic water pressure behind
0 K'p
ure surface (dim); (See Article 5.5.2)
= Passive earth pressure coefficient for planar faiJ-
ure surface (dim); (See Article 5.5.2)
q
wall (kN/m); (See Article 5.5.3)
=Traffic live load pressure (kN/m2 ); (See Article
5.8.2)
1., h = Depth from concentrated horizontal dead load 1o- qc = Cone end bearing resistance (kN/m2). (See Arti-
cation that force is distributed (m); (See Article cle 5.3.1)
5.8.12.1) QL =Line load force (kN/m); (See ArticJe 5.5.2}
L = Length of soil reinforcing elements (m); (See Ar- Qp = Point load force (kN); (See Article 5.5.2)
ticle 5.8.2); length of structural footings (m); (See R = Resultant of foundation bearing pressure (kN or
ArticJe 5.8.12.1) kN/m); (See ArticJe 5.8.3)
Lu =Length of reinfor~ement in the active zone (m); R' = Distance above walJ base to resultant of lateral
(See Article 5.8.5.2) pressure due to surcharge (m); (See Article 5.5.2)
Le = Length of reinforcement in the resistant zone (m); Rc = Soil reinforcement coverage ratio (dim); (See Ar-
(See Article 5.8.5.2) tide 5.8.6)
Lei =Effective reinforcement length for layer i (m); RF = Reduction factor applied to the ultimate tensile
(See ArticJe 5.8.9.2) strength to account for short and long-term degra-
m = Relative horizontal distance of point load from dation factors such as instalJation damage, creep,
back of wall face (dim); (See Article 5.5.2) and chemical aging (dim); (See ArticJe 5.8.6.1.2)
MA = The moment about point z at base of segmental RFc: = Reduction factor applied to the ultimate tensile re-
concrete facing blocks due to force W A (m- inforcement-facing connection strength to account
kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7.2) for long-term degradation factors such as creep
Ma = The moment about point z at base of segmental and chemical aging (dim); (See ArticJe 5.8.7.2)
concrete facing blocks due to force W 8 (m- RF10 = Reinforcement strength reduction factor to ac-
kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7.2) count for installation damage (dim); (See ArticJe
n =Relative depth below top of wall when calculat- 5.8.6.1.2)
ing lateral pressure due to point load above wall RFcR = Reinforcement strength reduction factor to ac-
(dim); (See Article 5.5.2) count for creep rupture (dim); (See Article
0 N
Pa
= Number of reinforcement layers vertically within
MSE wall (dim); (See Article 5.8.9.2)
=Active earth pressure force (kN/m); (See Article
5.8.6.1.2)
RFo = Reinforcement strength reduction factor to ac-
count for rupture due to chemical/biological
5.5.2) degradation (dim); (See Artide 5.8.6. I .2)
Pir = Inertial force caused by seismic acceleration of the s = Equivalent soil surcharge height above wall (m);
reinforced soil mass (kN/m); (See Artide 5.8.9.1) (See Article 5.8.4.1)
pi!> = Inertial force caused by seismic acceleration of sh = Horizontal reinforcement spacing of discrete re-
the sloping soil surcharge above the reinforced inforcements (mm); (See Article 5.8.6)
soil mass (kN/m); (See ArticJe 5.8.9.1) sr!o = The reinforcement strength needed to resist the
Po = At-rest earth pressure force (kN/m); (See ArticJe static component of load (kN/m); (See Artide
5.5.2) 5.8.9.2)
PR = Earth pressure force resulting from uniform sur- srt = The reinforcement strength needed to resist the
charge behind wall (kN/m); (See ArticJe 5.5.2) dynamic or transient component of load (kN/m);
PAE = Dynamic horizontal thrust due to seismic loading (See Artide 5.8.9.2)
(kN/m); (See Article 5.8.9.1) s. = Transverse grid element spacing (mm); (See Ar-
Pu = Concentrated horizontal dead load force (kN/m); ticle 5.8.5.2)
(See Articles 5.5.2 and 5.8.12.1) Sv = Vertical spacing of soil reinforcement (mm); (See
Pt = Inertial force of ma"s within active zone due to Article 5.8.4.1)
seismic loading (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.9.2) =Transverse grid or bar mat element thickness
PIR = Reinforced wall mass inertial force due to seis- (mm); (See ArticJe 5.8.5.2)
mic loading (kN/m); (See ArticJe 5.8.9.1) T = Total load applied to structural frame around ob-
PN = Resultant horizontal load on wall due to point struction (kN); (See Article 5.8.12.4)
load (kN/m), (See ArticJe 5.5.2) Ta = The allowable load which can be applied to each
Pv = Concentrated vertical dead load force for strip soil reinforcement layer per unit width of rein-
load (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.12.1) forcement (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.6)
Pv' = Concentrated vertical dead load force for isolated Tac = The allowable load which can be applied to each
0 footing or point load (kN/m); (See Article 5.8. 12. I) soil reinforcement layer per unit width of rein-
120 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.4
forcement at the connection with the wall face ~ = Depth where effective surcharge width Di inter-
(kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7 .2) sects back of wall face (m); (See Article 5.8.12.1)
Tmu = Maximum load applied to each soil reinforce- a = Scale effect correction factor (dim); (See Article
ment layer per unit width of wall (kN/m); (See 5.8.5.2)
Article 5.8.4.1) ~ = Inclination of ground slope behind wall measured
T111 =Allowable long-term reinforcement tension per counterclockwise from horizontal plane (deg);
unit reinforcement width for ultimate limit state (See Article 5.5.2)
(kN/m); (See Article 5.8.6.1.2) 8 = Friction angle between two dissimilar materials
T1ot = The ultimate wide width tensile strength for the (deg); (See Article 5.5.2)
reinforcement material lot used for connection 8mu = Maximum lateral wall displacement occurring
strength testing (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7.2) during wall construction (mm); (See Article 5.8.1 0)
Tmd = Incremental dynamic inertia force at level i 8R = Relative lateral wall displacement coefficient
(kN/m of structure); (See Article 5.8.9.2) (dim); (See Article 5.8.10)
To = Applied reinforcement load per unit width of wall d = Lateral Rotation at top of wall (mm); (See Article
at the connection with the facing (kN/m); (See 5.5.2)
Article 5.8.4.2) dah = Horizontal stress at the soil reinforcement loca-
T~ = The peak load per unit reinforcement width in the tion resulting from a concentrated horizontal load
connection test at a specified confining pressure (kN/m2); (See Article 5.8.12.1)
where reinforcement pullout is known to be the Aav 1 = Vertical stress at the soil reinforcement location
mode of failure (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7.2) resulting from a concentrated vertical load (kNfm2);
T,ota~ = The total static plus seismic load applied to each (See Article 5.8.12.1)
reinforcement layer per unit width of wall 'Y = Soil unit weight (kN/ml)
(KN/m); (See Article 5.8.9.2) 'Yr = Soil unit weight for random backfill behind and
Tuh = Ultimate tensile strength of geosynthetic rein- above reinforced backfill (kN/m3); (See Article
forcement per unit reinforcement width (kN/m); 5.8.1)
(See Article 5.8.6.1.2.) 'Yr = Soil unit weight for reinforced wall backfill
Tulle: = The peak load per unit reinforcement width in the (kN/m3); (See Article 5.8.4.1)
connection test at a specified confining pressure 'Y' = Effective unit weight of soil or rock (kN/ml)
where reinforcement rupture is known to be the 'Yw = Unit weight of water (kNfml)
mode of failure (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7.2) <t> =Friction angle of the soil (deg); (See Article
v. = Weight of reinforced soil mass (kN/m); (See Ar- 5.5.2)
ticle 5.8.2) <t>' = Effective stress angle of internal friction (deg);
(See Article 5.5.2)
V2 = Weight of sloping soil surcharge on top of rein- = Friction angle of the soil behind the MSE wall re-
<f>r
forced soil mass (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.2)
inforcements (deg); (See Article 5.8.1 or 5.8.4.1)
w = Weight of reinforced wall mass (kN/m); (See Ar-
<J>, = Friction angle of the soil within the MSE wall re-
ticle 5.8.9.1)
inforcement zone (deg); (See Article 5.8.1 or
WA = Weight of facing blocks outside the heel of the 5.8.4.1)
base unit (kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7.2) e = Inclination of back of wall measured clock-wise
Wa = Weight of facing blocks inside the heel of the base from horizontal plane (deg); (See Article 5.5.2)
unit within hinge height {kN/m); (See Article p = SoiVreinforcement interface friction angle (deg);
5.8.7.2) (See Article 5.8.2)
Ww = Weight of facing blocks over the base unit 0'2 = Vertical stress due to equivalent horizontal soil
(kN/m); (See Article 5.8.7.2) surcharge above wall when sloping ground pre-
Wu = Width of wall facing or facing blocks (mm); (See sent (kN/m2); (See Article 5.8.4.1)
Article5.8.7.2) O'g = Active pressure on the back of a wall (kN/m2);
x. = Horizontal distance of concentrated dead load (See Article 5.5.2)
from Point 0 toe of wall {m); (See Article 5.8.12.1) O'h = Horizontal soil stress at the soil reinforcement
z = Depth below effective top of wall or to reinforce- (kN/m2); (See Article 5.8.4.1)
ment (m); (See Article 5.8.4.1 or 5.8.12.1) O'v = Vertical stress on the soil reinforcement (kN/mZ);
Zp = Depth to reinforcement at beginning of resistant (See Articles 5.8.4.1 and 5.8.5.2)
zone for pullout computations (m); (See Article O'H = Horizontal stress due to point load above wall
5.8.4.1) (kN/m2); (See Article 5.5.2)
5.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 121
r.
~
w
'IF
=Wall face batter due to setback per course (deg);
(See Article 5.8.5. I)
= Inclination of internal failure surface from hori-
5.5.2 Earth Pressure and Surcharge Loadings
0 .
STRUCTURAL KEY
BETWEEN CONCRETE
POURS
FRONT FACE
I
BUTTRESS
1'I
STRUCTURAL KEY
0 .
" ~-m~
f.+-..,_
H .L.
__,
i.~........__._
SE~TION SECTION PLAN
'• 0.4~--~-----.----~--~~~~
N
c
0
l
. 0. 6 t----+--....;,j~,......---+-~R-.--t
0.60K
0.60H
0.&6H
0.48H
I
1.0 .._.........._.........._ _ _ _ _ ___,
0 0.8 0.8 1.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Value of CTH (.Ji)
QL
Value of CTH
<cfp)
LINE LOAD POINT LOAD
FIGURE 5.5.2B Procedure to Determine Lateral Pressure Due to Point and Line Loads, Modified after Thrzaghi (1954)
paction shall be considered in estimating the lateral earth of disturbance (e.g., a utility trench excavation in front of
pressure distribution used for design. the wall). Where passive earth pressure in front of a wall
In addition to the earth, surcharge and water pressures, can be considered, refer to Figures 5.5.2C and 5.5.2D for
the backwalls of abutments shall be designed to resist loads procedures to determine the magnitude and location of
due to design live and impact loads. For design purposes, the passive earth pressure resultant for gravity and semi-
it shall be assumed that wheel loads are positioned to gen- gravity walls. Development of passive earth pressure in
erate the maximum tensile stresses at the back of the back- the soil in front of a rigid wall requires an outward rota-
wall when combined with stresses caused by the backfill. tion of the wall about its toe or other movement of the wall
The resistance due to passive earth pressure in front of into the soil. The magnitude of movement required to mo-
the wall shall be neglected unless the wall extends well bilize passive pressure is a function of the soil type and
0 below the depth of frost penetration, scour or other types · condition in front of the wall as defined in Table 5.5.2A.
. 124 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.5.2
?.
I I I I J
EDUC110N FACTOR _J~l,':
1
~
H
VAitlCUS RATIOS 't rt II I I
.J
1.1.1--·~
-
~
13
az~A
I
~;;7
i
I
I I( IJ
n~~
I
"7~ j J
•
)
~~·· I &JIM
1-
~~
....... ,.
-I -
1.3111.:
I.DSIJ
;.
!- o 7
'If '(
-If'~
if /
If tt:} fl
jf )
if
v
J
1/
• I
1
r
VI) ~7 J ~
I I
I I ,..:s-.l-zWso!wz - I I I J1/
j I .a I
T .,
II rl/ "
t\·~~~.1}~
' .,_ /,,. 17l
7 'I
If 1/ j J I
..,__! ~ ,I I v 11 •) J
~
Hlap'ICp~ I
7 7 l1 ) I I
<..LDGMtntc
SPUIAI.l/
~
ll .,/ v
v
~·.au
IJ )
ICp•AtKp~&/+•·1)
)
ll
(KpRlA~•·Il•U ~'fj_V 17[/'
~ rj'/ v /
v v
z
Kp=.lllai.Z•S.&S
v l/
~v v / / v
) v v 1/ / v /
t 'l ., v v I v.,
~ ,/
v
~
~?Jr,- ~
A\SS~ v v v
/1
v
/ .,J
~
~ _.. ~ ~ v ~
8
.v ..-.Jill"'
.6
.5
.4
.l
.I
0 10 20 30 45
AHGLl OFIHTERHAL FAICT10N••• OEGAE£S
FIGURE 5.5.2C Computational Procedures for Passive Earth Pressures for Sloping Wall
with Horizontal Backfill (Caquot and Kerisel Analysis), Modified After U.S. Department of Navy (1982)
5.5.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 125
tO.O Ill+···~
_j """);
...
•"
0 I'EDUCTIOH FACTOR UU OF Kp
RUt VAIIIOUS RATIOS OF
ro.r
·II+ IOD
10.0
soo
Sl···~::::..7L1 W'
-_q.f
J
rJj I )
T
.,~· .971 v
-GI -<l5 -Q4 -ell -Q2 -QI 0.0 ~
30D
ll~
VI ,,,
~~
~ v II
J
r7
)
J
IJ
L
"ZOD
45 .711 .ICO .500 414 .331 .276 .ZZI .IT4
~ v v 1/ v )
~
'i:;, ~'-;a
T ~
,,,' ~ vvvv/ !/
I
~ ~ / vv[/ ll
~
..............·-..... I s.~,~~URE'
i ~ .a ....... -;,~~~
SURFAC£
J
~co ~~~~
/ ~~
>= t.DGARtn4WIC II Ill" ~ 17
i :.~ :l~
~ 7.0
~ 6.0
'(l\PN
t
!--ap rl(p YH
PR£SSUA£
--- ,
,.,~' ~· SPIRAL
~ v, v~ " v IL
"' !/
~
~
""/
~ 7 17 l/ /
v v~
/
.J~
v "
~
~
/
l/
a r'r,•Kfl)")4lt'z;'t.•Ppa:JS
5.0
MSSIV£
a; Py•PpSIHI ~ v v Iii" ~
E ~NOTE:CIJRV'ES
40 AA£
StCWN ~ ·~ ~ t/ v ~ ~
-KpaR(KpFOA&/.•-i) ~~ ~ / ~ t--o""'
........ ~
Ar.TU ~~~~r;:,~ ~ ~
L.--" ~
2.0
~(Kpii'OR~~~~~v ~ ~ ......
~!---"'~ ~
ICp•.7UalQr
I--" 1----
0 1-Z.lll·~~ 1--~--"~ 1-
./
v. ~
--~~~~ ~ w_
2:':- ...
1.0
.I
.a
.7
--- ~
IJ
~~
-tz.
'S
s
.5
,.
.3
.z
I I 45
FIGURE 5.5.20 Computational Procedures for Passive Earth Pressures for Vertical Wall
with Sloping Backfill (Caquot and Kerisel Analysis), Modified After U.S. Department of Navy (1982)
0
126 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.5.3
5.5.3 Water Pressure and Drainage Refer to Figure 5.5.5A for computational procedures to
determine the factors of safety for sliding and overturning
Walls shall be designed to resist the maximum antici- failure modes using the Coulomb analysis.
pated water pressure. For a horizontal, static ground water Unfactored dead and live loads shall be used to deter-
table, the total hydrostatic water pressure should be deter- mine the FS against sliding and overturning. In determin-
mined using the following relationship: ing the FS, the effect of passive soil pressure resistance in
front of a wall shall only be considered when competent
(5.5.3-1) soil or rock exists which will not be removed or eroded
during the structure life. Table 5.5.2B may be used for gen-
If the ground water levels differ on opposite sides of a eral guidance in selecting coefficients of sliding friction
wall, the effects of seepage forces on wall stability or pip- between the wall base and foundation soil or rock.
ing potential shall be considered. Seepage forces may be For static loading, the location of the bearing pressure
determined by flow net procedures or various analytical resultant (R) on the base of the wall foundation shall be
methods. Hydrostatic pressures and seepage shaH be con- within B/6 of the center of the foundation for foundations
troJled by providing free-draining granular backfill and a on soil and within B/4 of the center of the foundation for
positive drainage collection system. The positive drainage foundations on rock where B is the width of the wall base
system shall be located at the lowest elevation that will or footing.
permit gravity drainage. Portions of the walls below the For seismic loading, the location of R shall be within
level of the drainage system shall be designed for full hy- B/3 of the center of the foundation for foundations on soil
drostatic pressure unless a deeper drainage system is pro- and rock.
vided behind and at the base of the wall. See Article 4.4.5 for procedures to determine the re-
quired embedment depth of wall foundations; Articles
5.5.4 Seismic Pressure 4.4. 7 and 4.4.8, respectively, for procedures to design
spread footings on soil and rock; and Articles 4.5 and 4.6,
Refer to Section 6 of Division 1-A for guidance regard- respectively, for procedures to design pile and drilled
ing the lateral earth pressure on gravity and semi-gravity shaft foundations.
retaining walls subjected to seismic loading. In general,
the pseudo-static approach developed by Mononobe-
5.5.6 Structure Design
Okabe may be used to estimate equivalent static forces for
seismic loads. The estimation of seismic design forces
Structural design of individual wall elements shall be
shall account for wall inertia forces in addition to the
by service load or load factor design methods in confor-
equivalent static forces. Where a wall supports a bridge
mance with Article 3.22.
structure, the seismic design forces shall also include
seismic forces transferred from the bridge through bear-
ing supports which do not slide freely (e.g., elastomeric
5.5.6.1 Base or Footing Slabs
bearings).
The rear projection or heel of base slabs shall be de-
5.5.5 Structure Dimensions and External Stability signed to support the entire weight of the superimposed
materials, unless a more exact method is used. The base
Gravity and semi-gravity walls shall be dimensioned to slabs of cantilever walls shall be designed as cantilevers
ensure stability against possible failure modes by satisfy- supported by the wall. The base slabs of counterforted and
ing the following factor of safety (FS) criteria: buttressed walls shall be designed as fixed or continuous
beams of spans equal to the distance between counterforts
• Sliding - FS 2: 1.5 or buttresses.
• Overturning - The critical sections for bending moments in footings
FS 2: 2.0 for footings on soil shall be taken at the face and back of the stem. The criti-
FS 2: 1.5 for footings on rock cal sections for shear in the footings shall be taken at a
• Bearing Capacity for Static Loading - distanced (d = effective depth) from the face of the stem
See Article 4.4. 7 for footings on soil for the toe section and at the back of the stem for the heel
See Article 4.4.8 for footings on rock section.
• The factors of safety against sliding and overturning
failure under seismic loading may be reduced to 5.5.6.2 Wall Stems
75% of the factors of safety listed above.
• Bearing capacity for Seismic Loading - The upright stems of cantilever walls shall be designed
FS ~ 1.5 for footings on soil and rock as cantilevers supported at the base. The upright stems or
5.5.6.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 127
c
'
.
QEj:INITIDNS
DISIGll PACTOBS
, .~~'==sr.c~u ~-:2l.
CMTILEVIA MD CGUNTEAFOAT IMLLS.
= r
c
SOIL DR ROQC, FROM MSHTD TML£ 5.5.21.
C • COMESION OF FCJUIOlTION SOl~.
S • SHEilA STRENGTH OF FOUNDATION RaCIC AT ZERO NORMAL LOtiO.
II
L-
..- p
c;. •AOMESION 1ETV££N COCSIYE SOIL NG CDIG£T£,
FROM IASMTD TAIL£ 5.5.28.
~
•• • EFFECTIVE MOLE DF INTER*L FRICTION CJF SOIL QR AOCIC.
FS • FACTOR OF WETY.
r-- M • ME I GMT OF tHILL
MEEL DIC • OEPTM OF ICET
I~ ME POINTS ON BASE OF ICEYID WALLS
0 COUNT£RF01 •• 2.1
Pwb
t. 5 uiDA BASE DN ROOU
CFDA 8*5£ DN SOIL,
R£SISTMCE TD SLIDING
UNDRAUEO C:OCSI VE SO I~ I •• • I h
F • -=.<& _..., • ocMI • Pp
GRMULM SOIL OR DMINEO COtES IV£ SOt~ CC • I I
F • IV • P., I _,. I • Pp
ROCK•
F • IW • ~ J_,. I • ...... Pp
F~·
,
...... ,
,-•t.5
• 2.01(
...
NOTE• FDA COESIVE SOIL• OCCIC BOtM ORAl NED ..:J IHJRAINED
CASES TO DETERMINE MOST CAITIC"L CONDITION.
0
end 4.6 COralled Sherul
FIGURE 5.5.5A Design Criteria for Rigid Retaining Walls, (Coulomb Analysis)
128 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.5.6.2
TABLE 5.5.28 Ultimate Friction Factors and Friction Angles for Dissimilar Materials,
After U.S. Department of the Navy (1982)
Friction Factor
f=tan Friction Angle,
Interface Materials 8 (dim) 8 (degrees)
Mass concrete or masonry on the following foundation materials:
-Clean sound rock 0.70 35
-Clean gravel, gravel-sand mixtures, coarse sand 0.55 to 0.60 29 to 31
-Clean fine to medium sand, silty medium to coarse sand, silty or clayey gravel 0.45 to 0.55 24 to 29
-Clean fine sand, silty or clayey fine to medium sand 0.35 to 0.45 19 to 24
-Fine sandy silt, nonplastic silt 0.30 to 0.35 17 to 19
-Very stiff and hard residual or preconsolidated clay 0.40 to 0.50 22 to 26
-Medium stiff and stiff clay and silty clay 0.30 to 0.35 17 to 19
Steel sheet piles against the following soils:
-Clean gravel, gravel-sand mixtures, well-graded rock fill with spalls 0.40 22
-Clean sand. silty sand-gravel mixtures, single size hard rock fill 0.30 17
-Silty sand, gravel or sand mixed with silt or clay 0.25 14
-Fine sandy silt, nonplastic silt 0.20 11
Formed concrete or concrete sheet piling against the following soils:
-Clean gravel, gravel-sand mixtures, well-graded rock fill with spalls 0.40 to 0.50 22 to 26
-Clean sand, siJty sand-gravel mixtures, single size hard rock fill 0.30 to 0.40 17 to 22
-Silty sand, gravel or sand mixed with silt or clay 0.30 17
-Fine sandy silt, nonplastic silt 0.25 14
Various structural materials:
-Masonry on masonry, igneous, and metamorphic rocks
• Dressed soft rock on dressed soft rock 0.70 35
• Dressed hard rock on dressed soft rock 0.65 33
• Dressed hard rock on dressed hard rock 0.55 29
-Masonry on wood (cross grain) 0.50 26
-Steel on steel at sheet pile interlocks 0.30 17
face walls of counterfort and buttress walls shall be de- foot) of height shall be provided near exposed surfaces not
signed as fixed or continuous beams. The face walls (or otherwise reinforced to resist the formation of tempera-
stems) shall be securely anchored to the supporting coun- ture and shrinkage cracks.
terforts or buttresses by means of adequate reinforcement. The reinforcement in each construction panel (i.e., be-
Wall stems shall be designed for combined axial load tween vertical construction joints) of wall with height
(including the weight of the stem and friction due to back- varying uniformly from one end to another, shall be de-
fill acting on the stem) and bending due to eccentric ver- signed for the loading condition acting at one-third of the
tical loads, surcharge loads and earth pressure. panel length from the high end of the panel. If practical,
the thickness of the footings shan be maintained constant
5.5.6.3 Counterforts and Buttresses in each panel or in each group of panels. The width of the
footings, however, may vary according to the height of the
Counterforts shall be designed as rectangular beams. wall as require4 by design.
In connection with the main tension reinforcement of Tension reinforcement at the bottom of the heel shall
counterforts, there should be a system of horizontal and be provided if required during the construction stage prior
vertical bars or stirrups to anchor the face walls and base to wall backfill. The adequacy of the reinforcement shan
slab to the counterfort. These stirrups should be anchored be checked due to the dead load of the stem and any other
as near to the outside faces of the face walls, and as near vertical loads applied to the stem prior to backfilling.
to the bottom of the base slab as practicable. Reinforcement in wall and abutment stems shall be ex-
tended a minimum distance equal to the effective depth of
5.5.6.4 Reinforcement the section or 15 bar diameters, whichever. is greater, but
not less than 0.3 meter ( 1 foot) beyond the point at which
Except in gravity walls, not less than 81 mm2 ( •Is computations indicate reinforcement is no longer needed
square inch) of horizontal reinforcement per 0.3 meter ( 1 to resist stress.
5.5.6.5 DIVISION I-DESIGN 129
0
1
0( r, H+_g_3 >'21 01
( 2y: H +y~D)
H H
D ROCK
P _ sO
p -(I-+ TAN /3') W-+nb)
FIGURE 5.6.2A Simplified Earth Pressure Distributions for Permanent Flexible Cantilevered Walls
With Discrete Vertical Wall Elements
The backfill material behind aU retaining walls shaH be Lateral earth pressures shall be estimated assuming
free draining, nonexpansive, noncorrosive material and wedge theory using a planar surface of sliding defined by
shall be drained by weep holes with french drains or other Coulomb theory.
positive drainage systems, placed at suitable intervals and For determining lateral earth pressures on permanent
elevations. In counterfort walls, there shall be at least one walls, effective stress methods of analysis and drained
drain for each pocket formed by the counterforts. Silts and shear strength parameters for soil shall be used.
clays shall not be used for backfill unless suitable design For permanent walls and for temporary walls in granu-
procedures are followed and construction control mea- lar soils. the simplified earth pressure distributions shown in
sures are incorporated in the construction documents to Figures 5.6.2A and 5.6.28. or other suitable earth pressure
account for their presence. distributions. may be used. If walls will support or are sup-
ported by cohesive soils for temporary applications, walls
5.5.8 Overall Stability may be designed based on total stress methods of analysis
and undrained shear strength parameters. For this latter
0 Refer to Article 5.2.2.3. case, the simplified earth pressure distributions shown in
130 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.6.2
NOlES: C1) suaatMGE AND ta'J'ER PltESSURES tiJS'l' 8E ADDED TO 'mZ MOVE b. SIMPLIFIED DESIGN PROCEDURE
DR'l1l RtESSUaS.
FIGURE 5.6.28 Simplified Earth Pressure Distributions and Design Procedures for Permanent Flexible
Cantilevered Walls with Continuous Vertical Wall Elements Modified after Teng (1962)
COHESIVE SOIL(~')
1-....:.~t-t--A _JYs'H-2Su)Hl
a- 2
/3'
)5'H-2Su
p • 3b0
P (I+ TAN/3')
'--t:'Su- Y~
a EMBEDMENT IN COHESIVE SOIL
H ~S.,-y~H
b EMBEDMENT IN COHESIVE SOIL
RETAINING GRANULAR SOU. RETAINING COHESIVE SOIL
FIGURE S.6.2C Simplified Earth Pressure Distributions for Temporary Flexible Cantilevered Walls
with Discrete Vertical Wall Elements
5.6.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 131
c
'
'
'
'
COHESIVE
SOIL
0
Q
00
.
N
l4Su-y~H)
o. EMBEDMENT IN COHESIVE SOIL b. EMBEDMENT IN COHESIVE SOIL
RETAINING GRANULAR SOIL RETAINING COHESIVE SOl L
Nl'IUI Cll reB NW.S DIDaa:D IN GMICANl SOU., Urt.111Q FIQJII£ 5.6.28 IJI SdiCIWlC£ AND W.TER i'IIZSSUI&S IIJST BE ADDED 1Q 111£ AllCNE
AND USI .Nia4 DUGMN fOR 1\E'rAIID COIICSIVE SOIL NIIEM rAimt l'IICSSUIIU •
.vnoNIATE.
141 f'OICU SlOtt ARC HR IIORIIOft'N. root 01 IIEIIfiCAL 1W.1.
111 RUal 'Pl FIGJRE 5.6.2a fOil AIIIPLIFim DUICN PIIOCDlUU. a.a.r.
FIGURE 5.6.2D Simplified Earth Pressure Distributions for Temporary Flexible Cantilevered Walls
with Continuous Vertical Wall Elements
Modified after Teng (1962)
0 TABLE 5.6.2A General Notes and Legend Simplified Earth Pressure Distributions for Permanent and
Temporary Flexible Cantilevered Walls with Discrete Vertical Wall Elements
LEGEND:
= Effective unit weight of soil
= Vertical element width
= Spacing between vertical wall elements (c/c)
= Undrained shear strength of cohesive soil
= Shear strength of rock mass
= Passive resistance per vertical wall element
= Active earth pressure per vertical wall element
= Ground surface slope behind wall { + for slope up from wall }
= Ground surface slope in front of wall - for slope down from wall
= Active earth pressure coefficient; Refer to Figure 5.5.2A
= Passive earth pressure coefficient; Refer to Figures 5.5.2C and 5.5.2D
= Effective angle of soil friction
NarES:
(1) For temporary walls embedded in granular soil or rock, refer to Figure 5.6.2A to determine passive resistance and use diagrams on Figure
5.6.2C to determine active earth pressure of retained soil.
(2) Surcharge and water pressures must be added to the indicated earth pressures.
(3) Forces shown are per vertical wall element.
(4) Pressure distributions below the exposed portion of the wall are based on an effective element width of 3b, which is valid for 2:: 5b. For < Sb,
refer to Figures 5.6.28 and 5.6.20 for continuous wall elements to determine pressure distributions on embedded portions of the walll
132 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.6.2
Figures 5.6.2C and 5.6.20, or other suitable earth pressure freezing and expansion. In such cases, insulation shall be
distributions, may be used with the following restrictions: provided on the walls to prevent freezing of the soil, or
consideration should be given during wall design to
• The ratio of overburden pressure to undrained shear the pressures which may be exerted on the wall by
strength (i.e., stability number N = 'YHic) must be frozen soil.
<3.
• The active earth pressure shall not be less than 0.25 5.6.4 Seismic Pressure
times the effective overburden pressure at any depth.
Refer to Section 6 of Division I-A for guidance re-
Where discrete vertical wall elements are used for sup- garding the design of flexible cantilevered walls subjected
port, the width of each vertical element shall be assumed to dynamic and seismic loads. In general, the pseudo-
to equal the width of the flange or diameter of the element static approach developed by Mononobe-Okabe may be
for driven sections and the diameter of the concrete-filled used to estimate the equivalent static forces. Forces
hole for sections encased in concrete. resulting from wall inertia effects may be ignored in esti-
The magnitude and location of resultant loads andre- mating the seismic lateral earth pressure.
sisting forces for permanent walls with discrete vertical
elements embedded in soil and rock for lateral support 5.6.5 Structure Dimensions and External Stability
may be determined using the earth pressure distributions
presented in Figures 5.6.2A and 5.6.2C, or other earth Flexible cantilevered walls shall be dimensioned to en-
pressure distributions developed for use in the design of sure stability against passive failure of embedded vertical
such walls. The procedure for determining the resultant elements such that FS ~ 1.5. Unfactored dead and live
passive resistance of a vertical element embedded in soil loads shall be used to evaluate the factor of safety against
assumes that net passive resistance is mobilized across
passive failure of embedded vertical elements.
a maximum of three times the element width or dia-
Vertical elements shall be designed to support the full
meter (reduced, if necessary, to account for soft clay or
design earth, surcharge and water pressures between the
discontinuities in the embedded depth of soil or rock) and
elements. In determining the depth of embedment to mo-
that some portion of the embedded depth below finished
bi1ize passive resistance, consideration shall be given to
grade (usually 2 to 3 feet for an element in soil, and 1 foot
planes of weakness (e.g., slickensides, bedding planes.
for an element in rock) is ineffective in providing passive
and joint sets) that could reduce the strength of the soil or
lateral support.
rock determined by field or laboratory tests. Embedment
In developing the design lateral pressure, the lateral
in intact rock, including massive to appreciably jointed
pressure due to traffic, permanent point and line surcharge
rock which should not fail through a joint surface, should
loads, backfill compaction, or other types of surcharge
be based on an allowable shear strength of 0.1 OCo to
loads shall be added to the lateral earth pressure in accor-
0.15C0 of the intact rock.
dance with ArticJes 3.20.3 and 5.5.2.
Flexible cantilevered walls shall be designed to resist Structural design of individual wall elements may be
the maximum anticipated water pressure. For a horizontal performed by service load or load factor design methods
static ground water table, the total hydrostatic water pres- in conformance with Article 3.22.
sure shall be determined using Equation 5.5.3-l. For dif- The maximum spacing between vertical supporting el-
fering ground water levels on opposite sides of the wall, ements depends on the relative stiffness of the vertical el-
the water pressure and seepage forces shall be determined ements and facing, and the type and condition of soil to be
by flow net procedures or other appropriate methods of supported. Mma" in a 1-foot height of wall facing at any
analysis, where necessary. Seepage shall be controlled by level may be determined by the following, or other ac-
installation of a drainage medium (e.g., preformed ceptable design procedures:
drainage panels, sand or gravel drains or wick drains) be-
hind the facing with outlets at or near the base of the wall. • Simple span (no soil arching)
Drainage panels shall maintain their drainage characteris-
tics under the design earth pressures and surcharge load- MllUIX = Paf218 (5.6.6-1)
ings, and shall extend from the base of the wall to a level
I foot below the top of the wall. • Simple span (soil arching)
Where thin drainage panels are used behind walls, sat-
urated or moist soil behind the panels may be subject to (5.6.6-2)
5.6.6 DIVISION I-DESIGN 133
• Continuous (no soil arching) sidered adequate with respect to the decay hazard and ex-
pected service life of the structure.
Mlllllx = Paf 2/l0 (5.6.6-3)
5.6.7 Overall Stability
• Continuous (soil arching)
Refer to Article 5.2.2.3.
(5.6.6-4)
5.6.8 Corrosion Protection
Equation 5.6.6-1 is applicable for simply supported fac-
ing behind which the soil will not arch between vertical Refer to Article 5.7.8.
supports (e.g., in soft cohesive soils or for rigid concrete
facing placed tightly against the in-place soil). Equation
5.6.6-2 is applicable for simply supported facing behind 5.7 ANCHORED WALL DESIGN
which the soil will arch between vertical supports (e.g., in
granular or stiff cohesive soils with flexible facing or rigid 5.7.1 Design Terminology
facing behind which there is sufficient space to permit the
in-place soil to arch). Equations 5.6.6-3 and 5.6.6-4 are ap- Refer to Figure 5.7.1 A for terminology used for the de-
plicable for facing which is continuous over several verti- sign of anchored retaining walls.
cal supports (e.g., reinforced shotcrete or concrete).
Timber facings should be constructed of stress-grade 5.7.2 Earth Pressure and Surcharge Loadings
lumber in conformance with Article 13.2.1. If timber is
used where conditions are favorable for the growth of The development of lateral earth pressures for design
decay-producing organisms, wood should be pressure shall consider the method and sequence of construction,
treated with a wood preservative unless the heartwood of the rigidity of the wall/anchor system, the physical char-
a naturally decay-resistant species is available and is con- acteristics and stability of the ground mass to be sup-
0
--
: I:
1-
:I:
~ WALL BEARING
:I: ELEMENT
z
<!I
in
1.1.1
0
WALL (VERllCAL
ELEMENTS WllH
FACING) ---.-.t ANCHOR INCUNAllON
AS REQUIRED
PRIMARY GROUT
·~·
FIGURE 5.7.1A Typical Terms Used in Flexible Anchored Wall Design
HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.7.2
134
APPARENT EARTH
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION NOTATION
SOIL TYPE
~- H- FINAL WALL HEIGHT
~
'.
~
K0 - ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE
SAND (4 ) COEFFICIENT
H
(OR PERMANE NT y'- EFFECTIVE SOIL UNIT WEIGHT
WALLS IN CLA~l - 1J
y - TOTAL SOIL UNIT WEIGHT
If C 11:
m- REDUCTION FACTOR
,.. --i (I) Qu- UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE
0.65Kay'H STRENGTH
. .
..~.25H
~
NOTES
~
~
4)
SOFTTO l (2)
MEDIUM CLA~ Ka =1-m ( 2qulyHl BUT NOT
o.75H LESS THAN 0.25
(qu "0.25 TO 1.0 TSF)
-
- ,, m = I FOR OVERCONSOUDATED
CLAYS
m~: 0.4 FOR NORMALLY
II',, •
t- KciyH -'i (2)
CONSOLIDATED CLAY
FIGURE 5.7.2A Guidelines for Estimating Earth Pressure on Walls with 1\vo or More Levels of Anchors
Constructed from the Top Down Modified after Thrzaghi and Peck (1967)
ported, allowable wall deflections, the space between incorporate the effects of anchors or which consider in-
anchors, anchor prestress, and the potential for anchor terstice equilibrium and provide information on interslice
yield. forces. In developing the design earth pressure for a par-
For stable ground masses, the final distribution and ticular wall section, consideration shall be given to waH
magnitude of lateral earth pressure on a completed an- displacements that may affect adjacent structures or un-
chored wall with two or more levels of anchors con- derground utilities. Very approximate estimates of settle-
structed from the top down may be computed using the ments adjacent to braced or anchored flexible walls can be
apparent earth pressure distributions shown in Figure made using Figure 5. 7 .2B. If waH deflections estimated
5.7.2A or any other applicable earth pressure distribution using Figure 5.7.2B are excessive for a particular appli-
developed for this purpose. For unstable or marginally cation, a more detailed analysis using beam on elastic
stable ground masses, the design earth pressure may ex- foundation, finite element or other methods of analysis
ceed those shown in Figure 5.7.2Aand loads should bees- which consider the soil-structure interaction effects of an-
timated using methods of slope stability analysis which chored walls may be warranted.
5.7.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 135
0 0.3
0.5 t-----....--
z
0
F=
<
~ ~ 1.0
L&J(.)
::ex
L&JL&J
gL&..
wo
tnF
a..
L&J
c 2.0t------
Anchored walls with one level of anchors may be de- For the conditions where there is no or one anchor
signed using a triangular earth pressure distribution in ac- level, the magnitude and distribution of lateral resisting
cordance with Article 5.6.2 or using another suitable earth forces for embedded vertical elements in soil or rock shall
pressure distribution consistent with the expected wall de- be determined following procedures described in Article
flection. For the case where excavation has advanced 5.6.2. When two or more levels of anchors have been in-
down to the first anchor level but the first row of anchors stalled, the magnitude of lateral resistance provided by
has not yet been installed, the wall shall be treated as a embedded vertical elements will depend on the element
nongravity cantilevered wall and the earth pressure distri- stiffness and deflection under load.
bution loading on the wall shall be assumed as triangular The earth pressures on anchored walls constructed in
in accordance with Article 5.6.2. Overstressing of the an- fill situations from the bottom up are affected by the
chors should be avoided as excessive anchor loads rela-
method and sequence of construction. Therefore, the
tive to the capacity of the retained ground mass to support
method and sequence of construction must be considered
the anchor loads can result in undesirable deflections, or
when selecting appropriate lateral earth pressures for an-
passive failure of the wall into the retained soil.
chored walls in fill situations. As a general guide, the fol-
In developing the design lateral pressure for walls con-
lowing may be considered:
structed from the top down, the lateral pressure due to
traffic or other surcharge loading, shall be added to the lat-
eral earth pressure in accordance with Articles 3.23.3 and • For walls with a single anchor level-A triangular
• For walls with multiple anchor levels-A rectangu- Refer to Article 5.7.2 for general guidance regarding
lar pressure distribution derived by increasing the wall deflections.
total force from the triangular pressure distribution
described above by one-third and applying the force 5.7.6 Structure Design
as a uniform pressure distribution.
Depending on the characteristics of the wall, the wall
5.7.3 Water Pressure and Drainage components shall be designed by service load or load fac-
tor methods in conformance with Article 3.22.
Refer to Article 5.6.3.
5.7.6.1 General
5.7.4 Seismic Pressure
The procedure for anchored wall design depends on
the number of anchor rows and the construction sequence.
Refer to Section 6 of Division I-A for guidance re- For a typical wall with two or more rows of anchors
garding the design of anchored retaining walls subjected constructed from the top down, the procedure requires
to dynamic and seismic loads. In general, the pseudo-sta- · design for the final structure with multiple rows of an-
tic approach developed by Mononobe-Okabe may be used chors and checking the design for the various stages of
to estimate the equivalent static forces provided the max- wall construction.
imum lateral earth pressure be computed using a seismic The required horizontal component of each anchor
coefficient kh= 1.5A. Forces resulting from wall inertia force shall be computed using the apparent earth pressure
effects may be ignored in estimating the seismic lateral distributions in Figure 5.7.2A, or other applicable earth
earth pressure. pressure distributions, and any other horizontal water
pressure, surcharge or seismic forces acting on the wall.
5.7.5 Structure Dimensions and External Stability The total anchor force shall be determined based on the
anchor inclination. The horizontal anchor spacing and an-
The design of anchored walls includes determination chor capacity shall be selected to provide the required
of the following: total anchor force.
The vertical wall elements shall be designed to resist
• Size, spacing, and depth of embedment of vertical all horizontal earth pressure, surcharge, water pressure,
wall elements and facing; anchor and seismic loadings as well as the vertical com-
• 'JYpe, capacity, spacing, depth, inclination and cor- ponent of the anchor loads and any other vertical loads.
rosion protection of anchors; and Supports may be assumed at each anchor location and at
• Structural capacity and stability of the wall, wall the bottom of the wall if the vertical element is extended
foundation, and surrounding soil mass for all inter- below the bottom of the wall.
mediate and final stages of construction. The stresses in and the design of the wall facing shall
be computed in accordance with the requirements of Ar-
The bearing capacity and settlement of vertical wall el- ticle 5.6.6. ·
ements under the vertical component of the anchor forces All components of the anchored wall system shall be
and other vertical loads shall be determined in accordance checked for the various earth pressure distributions and
with Articles 4.4, 4.5, or 4.6. other loading conditions which will exist during the
For walls supported in or through soft clays with Su < course of construction.
0.3'Y'H, continuous vertical elements extending well
below the exposed base of the wall may be required to pre- 5.7.6.2 Anchor Design
vent heave in front of the wall. Otherwise, the vertical el-
ements are embedded several feet as required for stability Anchor design shall include an evaluation of the feasi-
or end bearing. (Where significant embedment of the wall bility of using anchors, selection of an anchor system, es-
is required to prevent bottom heave, the lowest section of timates of anchor capacity, determination of unbonded
wall below the lowest row of anchors must be designed to length, and determination of corrosion protection require-
resist the moment induced by the pressure acting between ments. In determining the feasibility of employing an-
the lowest row of anchors and the base of the exposed wall, chors at a particular location, consideration shall be given
and the force Pb = 0.7('YHBe - 1.4cH - pcBc) acting at to the availability or ability to obtain underground ease-
the midheight of the embedded depth of the wall.) ments, proximity of buried facilities to anchor locations,
The required embedment depth (D or 0 0 ) may be de- and the suitability of subsurface soil and rock conditions
termined in accordance with Article 5.6.2. within the anchor stressing zone.
5.7.6.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 137
TABLE 5.7.6.2A Presumptive Ultimate Values of Load Transfer for Preliminary Design of Anchors
in Soil Modified after Cheney (1982)
Estimated
Relative DensityI Ultimate 'Ihlnsfer Load
Soill)'pe Consistency< I) (kips/lineal foot)
Sand and Gravel Loose 10
Medium dense 15
Dense 20
Sand Loose 7
Medium dense 10
Dense 13
Sand and Silt Loose 5
Medium dense 7
Dense 9
Silt-clay Mixture with Minimum Stiff 2
LL, PI, and LI Restrictions, or Hard 4
Fine Micaceous<2>Sand or Silt
Mixtures
<t> Values corrected for overburden pressure.
<Z> The presence of mica tends to increase the volume and compressibility of sand and soft deposits due to bridging action
and subsequent flexibility under increased pressures.
TABLE 5.7.6.2B Presumptive Ultimate Values of Load in soil and 3.0 for anchors in rock. Bearing elements for
Transfer for Preliminary Design of Anchors in Rock anchors shall be designed to maintain shear stresses in the
Modified after Cheney (1982) vertical wall elements and facing within allowable values.
Estimated The capacity of each anchor shall be verified as part of a
Ultimate 'fransfer Load stressing and testing program. (See Division II.)
Rockl)'pe (kips/lineal foot) Determination of the unbonded anchor length shall con-
sider the location of the critical failure surface farthest from
Granite or Basalt 50 the wall, the minimum length required to insure minimal
Dolomitic Limestone 40 loss of anchor prestress due to long-term ground move-
Soft Limestone 30 ments, and the depth to adequate anchoring strata. As shown
Sandstone 30 in Figure 5.7.1A, the unbonded (or free) anchor length
Slates and Hard Shales 25 should not be less than 15 feet and should extend beyond
Soft Shales 10 the critical failure surface in the soil mass being retained by
the wall. For granular soils or drained cohesive soils, the
critical failure surface is typically assumed to be the active
The required anchor forces shall be determined in ac- failure wedge which is defined by a plane extending upward
cordance with Article 5. 7 .6.1. The ultimate anchor capac- from the base of the wall at an angle of 45 + <1> '/2 from the
ity per unit length may be preliminarily estimated using horizontal. Longer free lengths may be required for anchors
the guidelines presented in Tables 5.7.6.2A and 5.7.6.28 in plastic soils or where critical failure surfaces are defined
for soil and rock, respectively. These guidelines are for by planes or discontinuities with other orientations.
preliminary design of straight shaft anchors installed in Selection of an anchor inclination shall consider the lo-
small diameter holes using a low grout pressure. Other an- cation of suitable soil or rock strata, the presence of buried
chor types and installation procedures could provide other utilities or other geometric constraints, and constructabil-
estimated ultimate anchor capacities. Final determination ity of the anchor drill holes. The component of vertical
of the anchor capacity and required bond length shall be load resulting from anchor inclination shall be included in
the responsibility of the anchored wall specialty contrac- evaluating the end bearing and settlement of vertical wall
tor. The allowable anchor capacity for small diameter an- elements.
chors may be estimated by multiplying the ultimate The minimum horizontal spacing of anchors should be
anchor capacity per unit length times the bonded (or either three times the diameter of the bonded zone or 4
stressing) length and dividing by a FS of 2.5 for anchors feet, whichever is larger. If smaller spacings are required,
138 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.7.6.2
consideration can be given to differing anchor inclinations (5.8.5.2) shall also be satisfied, as well as overall stability
between alternating anchors. requirements as provided in Article 5.2.2.3.
The soil reinforcement length shall be calculated based
5.7.7 Overall Stability on external and internal stability considerations in accor-
dance with Articles 5.2.2.3 and 5.5.5, and all relevant por-
Refer to Article 5.2.2.3. tions of Article 5.8. Soil reinforcement length shall be as a
minimum approximately 70% of the wall height (as mea-
5.7.8 Corrosion Protection sured from the leveling pad) and not less than 2.4 meters (8
feet). The wall height is defined as the difference in eleva-
Prestressed anchors and anchor heads shall be pro- tion between the top of the wall at the wall face (i.e., where
tected against corrosion consistent with the ground and the finished grade intersects the back of the wall face) and
ground water conditions at the site. The level and extent the top of the leveling pad. The reinforcement length shall
of corrosion protection shall be a function of the ground be uniform throughout the entire height of the wall, unless
environment and the potential consequences of an anchor substantiating evidence is presented to indicate that varia-
failure. Corrosion protection shall be applied in accor- tion in length is satisfactory. External loads such as sur-
dance with Section 6 of Division II-Ground Anchors. charges will increase the minimum reinforcement length.
Greater reinforcement lengths may also be required for very
5.7.9 Anchor Load Testing and Stressing soft soil site.~ and to satisfy global stability requirements.
The minimum embedment depth of the bottom of the
All anchors shall be tested in accordance with Section reinforced soil mass, which is the same as the top of the
6 of Division 11-Ground Anchors, Article 6.5.5, Testing leveling pad, shall be based on bearing capacity, settle-
and Stressing. ment, and stability requirements determined in accordance
with Articles 5.2.2.1, 5.2.2.2 and 5.2.2.3, and pertinent
5.8 MECHANICALLY STABILIZED portions of Article 5.8, including the effects of frost heave,
EARTH (MSE) WALL DESIGN scour, proximity to slopes, erosion, and the potential fu-
ture excavation in front of the wall. The lowest backfill re-
MSE walls shall be designed for external stability of inforcement layer shall not be located above the long-term
the wall system as well as internal stability of the rein- ground surface in front of the wall. As an alternative to
forced soil mass behind the facing. Internal design of being below the depth of frost penetration, the soil below
MSE wall systems requires knowledge of short and long- the wall but above the depth of frost penetration can be
term properties of the materials used as soil reinforce- removed and replaced with nonfrost susceptible clean
ments as well as the soil mechanics which govern MSE granular soil. In addition to general bearing capacity, set-
wall behavior. Structural design of the wall facing may tlement, and stability considerations, the minimum em-
also be required. bedment required shall consider the potential for local
The specifications provided herein for MSE walls do bearing capacity failure under the leveling pad or footing
not apply to geometrically complex MSE wall systems due to higher vertical stresses transmitted by the facing.
such as tiered walls (walls stacked on top of one another), A minimum horizontal bench 1.2 meters (4 feet) wide
back-to-back walls, or walls which have trapezoidal sec- shall be provided in front of walls founded on slopes.
tions. Design guidelines for these cases are provided in For walls constructed along rivers and streams. embed-
FHWA publication No. FHWASA-96-071 "Mechanically ment depths shall be established at a minimum of 0.6 me-
Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design ters (2 feet) below potential scour depth as determined in
and Construction Guidelines." Compound stability should accordance with Article 5.3.5.
also be evaluated for these complex MSE wall systems
(see Article 5.8.2). 5.8.2 External Stability
WlL,ACIIG
PMELS DA UNJ TS
I
RIINFGRCCD SDI L .... I I
~ y I( I '"IL&Mr SUWICE 'DII
t---r_r_r_ __.,_ _ _ _ _ EXTERNAL STMILI TY'/
I
I I
H I
ACTIVE ZO.C
I I R£TAI lCD ,. LL
I I
I .,_ Yr Kor
For external and 1nt.er-nol st.obaht.y colculot.tons, the wetght. end damensaons or the
focang elements o,.e typ1colly agnor-ed. Ho..,ever, 1t. as occept.oble t.o anclude the rocang
dtmensaons and weaght 1n shdang, over-t.urnang, end beerang cepect tA;j celculot.aons. For
snt.ernol st.obth~ colculottons, the ..,all damensaons ere consadered t.o beg1n et. the bock
of the roctng e[oment.s. .
FIGURE 5.8.1A MSE Wall Element Dimensions Needed for Design
at the wall base. Passive pressures shall be neglected in used. as illustrated in Figure 5.8.2.C. Alternatively. a bro-
stability computations. ken back slope design can be performed for the actual
The active earth pressure coefficients for retained slope geometry by using a graphical Coulomb procedure
backfill (i.e .• fill behind the reinforced soil mass) for ex- such as the Culmann method:
ternal stability calculations only is computed as shown in For sliding stability, the coefficient of sliding used to
Figure 5.5.2A. with 8 = (3. calculate frictional resistance at the base of the wall shall
Figures 5.8.2A, 5.8.28, and 5.8.2C illustrate external be the minimum of the following determinations:
stability equations for MSE walls with horizontal back-
slope, inclined backslope, and a broken backslope, re- • Tan Q> at the base of the wall, where Q> is the friction
spectively. Dead load surcharges, if present. shall be angle of the backfill or the foundation soil. which-
taken into account in accordance with Figures 5.8. I 2.1 A, ever is lowest.
5.8.12.l.B. and 5.8.12.1C. • Tan p if continuous or near continuous reinforcement
If a break in the slope behind the wall facing is located layers are used, where p is the soiVreinforcement
horizontally within two times the height of the wall (2H). interface angle for the bottom of the lowest rein-
a broken backslope design (A.R.E.A. method) shall be forcement layer.
140 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.2
M-----\t-z =q H \ r
H ~...-t!---1'
V1 : Y., H L
,._.._ _ ......,:~= %fH2~r
'
%
~~-- _ - - . . L_ __..j
,.. B ~
FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST OVERTURNING lMOMENTS ABOUT POINT OJ•
I Moments Resastana (M,.J _ Ya (L/2)
FSoT = I Moments Ove,.turnang tMoJ - F 1 (H/J) + Fz lH/2r 2 •0
h
H
V1 ·~HL
h/3
rt.
~
,·_~
I
II L
•
8 ·I
FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST OVERTURNING <MOMENTS ABOUT POINT 0)•
I Moments Reststtng CM.-J v, <LI2J + v,<2L/3J + F, CLJ
I Moments Over-tur-ntng CMoJ • FH (h/3J 21
!: •
• Ten p 15 r Or' cont.tnuous SOil r-etnr or-cements (e.g., gr-tds end sheets).
Fo,. dtsconttnuous soal r-etnfor-cemenu (e.g., strsps)use Ten •· PIS the sotl/
r'Otnfor-cement tnt.er-fece rr-sctaon angle. Use the lower- of Tan • et the base of the
well or- Tenp et t.he lo-..est r-esnfor-cement layer- for- contsnuous r-esnfor-cements.
Not.e: For- r-elottvely thtck fectng elements <e.g •• segmental concr-et.e foctng blocks)
1 t me~:~ be des tr-eble t.o tnclude the r ec1ng dtmensLons end wetght. an shdtng end
ove,.t.u,.nlng celculottons h.e., use '8' 1n heu of 'L ').
FIGURE 5.8.28 External Stability for Wall with Sloping Backslope
0
HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.2
142
H
~
V1=l;HL
ct.
I
~ i ~
FH: ~ cos (I)
Fv: Fy san U )
FOR INFINITE SLOPE I =B
K. Fo,. Re~aned F11l Us1ng & = S = I (See Fsgu,.e 5.5.2Ah
Ssn2 (8 ••' )
-------------------2
K. :
2
5 '" IS&nCB- a) l
[
+
s,nc•'+&J Ssn c•'- I)
Su,CB -a )Ssnll +I )
J
FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST OVERTURNING CMOMENTS ABOUT POINT OJ•
I Moments Ressst.ang (M,.) _ v, (L/2) + VzC2L/3) + Fv (l) !: •
28
FSoT = I Moments Ove,.tu,.nsng (Mo) - F" (h/3)
See Appendix A ofFHWAPublication No. FHWA SA- compound failure surfaces which pass through a portion of
96-071 "Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wails and Rein- the reinforced soil mass as illustrated in Figure 5.8.2D shall
forced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines" be analyzed, especially where the wall is located on slop-
for how to detennine Tan p from pullout or direct shear ing or soft ground where overall stability is marginal. Fac-
tests. H site specific data for tan p is not available, use tors of safety and methods of analysis provided in Article
0.67Tan ~ for the coefficient of sliding for continuous or 5.2.2.3 are still applicable. The long-term strength of each
near continuous reinforcement layers. backfill surface should be considered as restoring forces in
For calculations of external stability, the continuous the limit equilibrium slope stability analysis.
traffic surcharge loads shall be considered to act beyond the
end of the reinforced zone as shown in Figure 5.8.2.A. 5.8.3 Bearing Capacity and Foundation Stability
Overall stability analyses shall be performed in accordance
with Article 5.2.2.3. Additionally for MSE walls with com- Allowable bearing capacities for MSE walls shall be
plex geometries, or where walls support steep, infinite, computed using a minimum factor of safety of 2.5 for
sloping surcharges (i.e., a slope greater than 2H in length as Group 1 loading applied to the calculated ultimate bear-
shown in Figure 5.8.2C and a slope of 2H: IV or steeper), ing capacity. A lesser FS. of 2.0. could be used if justified
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
,//"'Ovo"oll Stoboh t,j
I 1 Fo&lur-e sur-foce
I I
I I
I
I I
/ /
I /
I /
/
/ /
/ /
/ /
,,
/ / /
, /
/
/
--------~----,-'-------/" ,
,,
,' ,', , , ,' , ,,
,
_,, , ,,
," ,
__ ....... , ,"
_,, ,'
... ---- __ , , , " ' ""'
--~-------- ---
FIGURE 5.8.20 Overall and Compound Stability of Complex MSE Wall Systems
144 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.3
by a geotechnical analysis. The width of the footing for ul- crete wall facings are used due to their weight. Further-
timate bearing capacity calculations shall be considered to more, differential settlements between the facing ele-
be the length of the reinforcement calculated at the foun- ments and the reinforced soil zone of the wall due to con-
dation level. The location of the resultant center of pres- centrated bearing stresses from the facing weight on soft
sure shall be as stated in Article 5.5.5. Provided the resul- soil could create concentrated stresses at the connection
tant location meets this criteri~ an overturning stability between the facing elements and the wall backfill rein-
analysis is not necessary. Bearing pressures shall be com- forcement. In both cases, the leveling pad shall be em-
puted using the Meyerhof distribution, which considers a bedded adequately to meet bearing capacity and settle-
uniform base pressure distribution over an effective base ment requirements or dimensioned and designed to keep
width of B' = L - 2e, as shown in Figures 5.8.3A and bearing stresses beneath the leveling pad and the remain-
5.8.38. It is acceptable to use "B" in lieu of "L,,. espe- der of the wall as uniform as possible.
cially for walls with relatively thick facing units.
Where soft soils are present or if on sloping ground, the 5.8.4 Calculation of Loads for Internal Stability
difference in bearing stress calculated for the wall rein- Design
forced soil zone relative to the local bearing stress beneath
the facing elements shall be considered when evaluating Reinforcement loads calculated for internal stability
bearing capacity. This is especially important where con- design are dependent on the soil reinforcement extensi-
'
V1 = Y.,HL
I r hove concentr-ot.ed deod loads, such os those allusvet.ed an fagures 5.8.12.1A ond
5.8.12.18, 'the exteP"nel forces P"esul tang r .. om those deed loods should be odded to the
80P"t.h pressuP"e r OP"Ces shown obove by superposa t.aon (see F agu... 5.8.12.1C).
No"ta: Fo... r:.elotavely 'thack foc1ng elements (e.g., segmental concrete focang blocks) at moy
be desaroble 'to anclude the f ocang d1mensaons end we1ght. an beor1ng cepoca t.y colculotaons
h.e., use ·a· an heu or 'l..,.
FIGURE 5.8.3A Calculation of Vertical Stress for Bearing Capacity Calculations (for Horizontal Backslope Condition)
5.8.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 145
I Rettuned Fall
" . L(h·H) » •, Yr K.r
2
I
Reanr or-ced
Soal Moss
.p yp Kr
h
H
h/3
' '
NOTE:
rr concentr-ated deed load
B surchar-ges pr-esen~ such os
those allus'trot.ed an F agur-es
SUMMING MOMENTS ABOUT POINT C• 5.8.t2.1A end 5.812.18,
anclude arrect or those sur-char-ges
e =F,Ccos B) h/3- Fr (san B ) L/2- ~ ( L/6 J as shown 1n F agu.-e 5.8.12.tC.
rr br-oken beckslope condatlon
V a + Vz + Fr sanS oxasu, desagn usang equavolent.
slope •t• os shown an Fagur-e 5.8.2C.
tTy = V1 +L·2e
Vz + F, san@
H IS the t.otol wall heaght. at the race.
bility and material type. In general, inextensible rein- account through an equivalent uniform surcharge and as-
forcements consist of metallic strips, bar mats, or welded suming a level backslope condition. For these calculations,
wire mats, whereas extensible reinforcements consist of the depth "Z" is referenced from the top of the wall at the
geotextiles or geogrids. Inextensible reinforcements reach wall face, excluding any copings and appurtenances.
their peak strength at strains lower than the strain required The lateral earth pressure coefficient "K," is determined
for the soil to reach its peak strength. Extensible rein- by applying a multiplier to the active earth pressure coef-
forcements reach their peak strength at strains greater than ficient. The active earth pressure coefficient shall be deter-
the strain required for soil to reach its peak strength. In- mined using the Coulomb method as shown in Figure
ternal stability failure modes include soil reinforcement 5.5.2A, but assuming no wall friction (i.e., set 8 = ~).Note
rupture (ultimate limit state), soil reinforcement pullout that since it is assumed that 8 = ~. and ~ is assumed to al-
(ultimate limit state), and excessive reinforcement elon- ways be zero for internal stability, for a vertical wall, the
gation under the design load (serviceability limit state). Coulomb equation simplifies mathematically to the sim-
The serviceability limit state is not evaluated in current plest form of the Rankine equation:
practice for internal stability design. Internal stability is
determined by equating the tensile load applied to the re- K11 = Tan2 (45 - <l>'/2) (5.8.4.1-1)
inforcement to the allowable tension for the reinforce-
If the wall face is battered, the following simplified
ment, the allowable tension being governed by reinforce-
form of the Coulomb equation can be used:
ment rupture and pullout.
The load in the reinforcement is determined at two crit- 2
K = Sin (a+$') (5.8.4.1-2)
ical locations, i.e., at the zone of maximum stress and at
the connection with the wall face, to assess the internal " SinJe[J +Sin$']
Sin a
stability of the wall system. Potential for reinforcement
rupture and pullout are evaluated at the zone of maximum
with variables as defined in Figure 5.5.2A.
stress. The zone of maximum stress is assumed to be lo-
The multiplier to Kn shall be determined as shown in
cated at the boundary between the active zone and the
Figure 5.8.4.1 C. Based on this figure, the multiplier to K.. is
resistant zone. Potential for reinforcement rupture and a function of the reinforcement type and the depth of there-
pullout are also evaluated at the connection of the rein- inforcement below the wall top. These multipliers are suffi-
forcement to the wall facing. ciently accurate for the reinforcement types covered in Fig-
The maximum friction angle used for the computation ure 5.8.4.1 C. Multipliers for other reinforcement types can
of horizontal force within the reinforced soil mass shall be be developed as needed through analysis of measurements
assumed to be 34°, unless the specific project select back- of reinforcement load and strain in full scale structures.
fill is tested for frictional strength by triaxial or direct The applied load to the reinforcements, T11111X• shall be
shear testing methods, AASHTO T 234 and T 236, calculated on a load per unit of wall width basis. There-
respectively. fore, the reinforcement load, accounting for the tributary
area of the lateral stress, is determined as follows:
5.8.4.1 Calculation of Maximum Reinforcement
Loads (5.8.4.1-3)
'··'
5.8.4.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 147
z
'
V1 =Y,. ZL
Any level
1n well I
ZSH~
not be used without full scale waH data (e.g .• reinforce- 5.8.5 Determination of Reinforcement Length
ment loads and strains, and overall deflections) which Required for Internal Stability
supports the acceptability of larger vertical spacings.
These MSE wall specifications also assume that inex- 5.8.5.1 Location of Zone of Maximum Stress
tensible reinforcements are not mixed with extensible
reinforcements within the same walL MSE waJis which The location of the zone of maximum stress for inex-
contain a mixture of inextensible and extensible rein- tcnsible and extensible wall systems, which forms the
forcements are not recommended. boundary between the active and resistant zones, is de-
termined as shown in Figure 5.8.5.1 A. For all wall sys-
5.8.4.2 Determination of Reinforcement Tensile tems. the zone of maximum stress shall be assumed
Load at the Connection to the Wall Face to begin at the back of the facing elements at the toe of
the wall.
The tensile load applied to the soil reinforcement con- For extensible wall systems with a face batter of
nection at the wall face, T0, shall be equal toTrna' for all less than I oo from the vertical, the zone of maximum
0 wall systems regardless of facing and reinforcement type. stress should be determined using the Rankine method.
148 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.5.1
H- _ L<TenS
"'2- 2 >y r
·-----~~
An\1 Level
tn Welllj
J- V1 •Y,.ZL I
I
/
I
Z~H I
I
I
I
Since the Rankine method cannot account for wall face 5.8.5.2 Soil Reinforcement Pullout Design
batter or the effect of concentrated surcharge loads
above the reinforced backfill zone, the Coulomb The reinforcement pullout resistance shall be checked
method shall be used for walls with extensible rein- at each level against pullout failure for internal stability.
forcement in cases of significant batter (defined as 10° Only the effective pullout length which extends beyond the
from vertical or more) and concentrated surcharge loads theoretical failure surfaces shall be used in this computa-
to determine the location of the zone of maximum tion. Note that traffic loads are neglected in pullout calcu-
stress. lations (see Figure 5.8.4.l.A).
'
5.8.5.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 149
0
N
-
0
3
•
...0
6m
Q.
0
t-
-
I
0
G
CD
L
.
Q.
G
0
I
I
i
v
1.0 1.2
FIGURE 5.8.4.1 C Variation of the Coefficient of Lateral Stress Ratio Kr/K" with Depth in a Mechanically
Stabilized Earth Wall
The effective pullout length required shall be deter- forced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines."
mined using the foJlowing equation: For standard backfill materials (see Artide 7.3.6.3 in Divi-
sion II), with the exception of uniform sands (i.e., coefficient
of uniformity Cu < 4 ), it is acceptable to use conservative
(5.8.5.2-1)
default values for F* and a as shown in Figure 5.8.5.2A and
Table 5.8.5.2A. For ribbed steel strips, if the specific Cu for
where Le is the length of reinforcement in the resisting the wall backfill is unknown at the time of design, a Cu of
zone, FSPO is the safety factor against pullout (minimum 4.0 should be assumed for design to determine F*.
of 1.5), F* is the pullout resistance factor, a is a scale ef- A minimum length, Le, in the resistant zone of 0.9 me-
fect correction factor, rrv is the vertical stress at the rein- ters (3 feet) shall be used. The total length of reinforce-
forcement in the resistant zone, C is an overall reinforce- ment required for pullout is equal to L11 + Le as shown in
ment surface area geometry factor based on the gross Figure 5.8.5.1A.
perimeter of the reinforcement and is equal to 2 for strip, For grids, the spacing between transverse grid ele-
grid, and sheet type reinforcements (i.e., two sides), Rc: is ments, St shall be uniform throughout the length of the re-
the reinforcement coverage ratio (see Article 5.8.6), and inforcement rather than having transverse grid members
other variables are as defined previously. F*acrvCLe is the concentrated only in the resistant zone.
pullout resistance P, per unit of reinforcement width. These pullout calculations assume that the long-term
F* and a shall be determined from product specific pull- strength of the reinforcement (see Article 5.8.6.1) in the
out tests in the project backfill material or equivalent soil, or resistant zone is greater than T max·
they can be estimated empirically/theoretically. Pullout test-
ing and interpretation procedures (and direct shear testing 5.8.6 Reinforcement Strength Design
for some parameters), as well as typical empirical data, are
provided in Appendix A of FHWA Publication No. FHWA The strength of the reinforcement needed, for internal
0 SA-96-071 "Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Rein- stability, to resist the load applied throughout the design
150 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.6
.!:h..
2
•• u ,
L
I•
For- walls wa1h • rece bot.t.er 11. OP" Cft0P"8 r ..om the ¥8P"'tacal.
tan ,.,_ . , =·t.an•· 8) • ft.anc•·B ltanc•- Bl• cot~+ I- qa)][l + tan C8+ '11 ·I Jco\ ,.. I -C!I)]
1 • tan ca• • • e, [ \an c.-a, • co\ c•• s-qan
w&1h a= a end all ot.he,. VOP"I~1·• defaned an Faguroe 5.5.2A
Cb) Exwnsablo Reanr o..cemenu
FIGURE 5.8.5.1A Location of Potential Failure Surface for Internal Stability Design of MSE Walls
5.8.6 DIVISION I-DESIGN 151
0 r-----------.-~--~---2_0_<t.~'~s~~-,--------------~2.;0______~
]
a. tQ! TO
N
\.
SCALE
0
N
.
0
::.
'-
0
Q.
G~od ~bee,.ong membe~
0 6m
s
0 I .. ~I
I
c
. . c:
•c:
~LZZZZ Z
I -"'
aJ sl
c c
= I
Cl
!. s i J
'.,"'
II t- t-
~
-::; • I 0
0
Q.
aJ II !!
t.l
I
(D
csi
CD
csi
II
•
L...
La ~
I II
...•
.nl
a.
II
...
• u..• "'
Q.
I• s.
i .,
\.
.,"' •I
" i
I
I
I
I
~
.,
C)
L
.,
.,
en
Q)
tn
.,
.,.,
en
-5
0
0
e
en
-
~
en
Q)
)(
.,
Q)
0
Q)
C)
Ul
"tJ
L
CJ\
01
~I
en
Q)
.,Q)
en
"tJ
Q)
.c
.c
a:
s.J
TABLE 5.8.5.2A Default Values for the Scale Effect Correction Factor, ex.
Reinforcement Type Default Value for ex
All Steel Reinforcements 1.0
Geogrids 0.8
Geotextiles 0.6
IDGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.6
152
life of the wall shall be determined where the reinforcement maintaining allowable material stresses to the end of the
load is maximum {i.e., at the boundary between the active 75 or 100 year service life.
and resistant zones) and at the connection of the reinforce- Temporary MSE walls are typically designed for a ser-
ment to the wall face. The reinforcement strength required vice life of 36 months or less.
shall be checked at every level within the wall for ultimate
limit state. The serviceability limit state is not specifically 5.8.6.1.1 Steel Reinforcement
evaluated in current practice to design backfill reinforce- For steel reinforcements, the required sacrificial thick-
ment for internal stability. A first order estimate of lateral ness shall be provided in addition to the required struc-
deformation of the entire wall structure, however, can be tural reinforcement thickness to compensate for the ef-
accomplished as shown in Article 5.8.10. fects of corrosion.
Therefore, where the load is maximum, The structural design of galvanized steel soil rein-
forcements and connections shall be made on the basis of
(5.8.6-1) Fy, the yield strength of the steel, and the cross-sectional
area of the steel determined using the steel thickness after
T11 shall be determined in accordance with Article corrosion losses, Ec. defined as follows:
5.8.6.2.1 for steel reinforcement and Article 5.8.6.2.2 for
geosynthetic reinforcement. (5.8.6.1.1-1)
At the connection with the wall face,
where ER is the total loss in thickness due to corrosion to
(5.8.6-2) produce the expected loss in tensile strength during the re-
quired design life. See Figure 5.8.6A for an illustration of
Tuc shall be determined at the wall face connection in how to calculate the long-term strength of the reinforce-
accordance with Article 5.8.7.1 for steel reinforcement ment based on these parameters. The sacrificial thickness
and Article 5.8.7 .2 for geosynthetic reinforcement. Fur- (i.e., corrosion loss) is computed for each exposed surface
thermore, the difference in the environment occurring im- as follows, assuming that the soil backfill used is non-
mediately behind the wall face relative to the environment aggressive:
within the reinforced backfill zone and its effect on the
long-term durability of the reinforcement/connection shall Galvanization loss 15 J.Ulllyear {0.60 mils/year) for
be considered when determining Tac· first 2 years
To shall be determined on a long-term strength per unit 4 J.lrnlyear {0.16 mils/year) for
of reinforcement width basis and multiplied by the rein- subsequent years
forcement coverage ratio R: so that it can be directly com- Carbon steel loss 12 J.lrnlyear {0.47 mils/year)
pared to Tmo,. which is determined on a load per unit of after zinc depletion
wall width basis {this also applies to Tac and T0). For dis-
crete (i.e., not continuous) reinforcements, such as steel These sacrificial thicknesses account for potential pitting
strips or bar mats, the strength of the reinforcement is con- mechanisms and much of the uncertainty due to data scat-
verted to a strength per unit of wall width basis by taking ter, and are considered to be maximum anticipated losses for
the long-term strength per reinforcement, dividing it by soils which are defined as nonaggressive. Soils shall be con-
the discrete reinforcement width, b, and multiplying it by sidered nonaggressive if they meet the following criteria:
the reinforcement coverage ratio, Rc. as shown in Figures
5.8.6A and 5.8.68. For continuous reinforcement layers, pH of5 to 10
b 5 I and Rtjl = I. Resistivity of not less than 3,000 ohm-em
Chlorides not greater than 100 ppm
Sulfates not greater than 200 ppm
5.8.6.1 Design Life Requirements
If the resistivity is greater than or equal to 5,000 ohm-
Reinforcement elements in MSE walls shall be de- em, the chlorides and sulfates requirements may be
signed to have a corrosion resistance/durability to ensure waived. Recommended test methods for soil chemical
a minimum design life of 75 years for permanent struc- property determination include AASHTO T 289 for pH,
tures. For retaining structure applications designated as AASHTO T 288 for resistivity, AASHTO T 291 for chlo-
having severe consequences should poor performance or rides, and AASHTO T 290 for sulfates.
failure occur, a 100-year service life shall be considered. These sacrificial thickness requirements are not applic-
The allowable reinforcement tension shall be based on able for soils which do not meet one or more of the nonag-
5.8.6.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 153
0 "
s..
0
'
154 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.6.1
T9 t R,
= (See Ar-t1cle 5.8.6.2.2>
<FS>
Wker-e T0 = elloweble long-ter-m tens1le strength of r-e1nf or-cement
(strengt.h/unlt r-e1nfor-cement wLdth)
T ol : long-ter-m t.ensLle strength r-equ1r-ed to pr-event r-uptur-e
<strengt.h/unLt r-e1nfor-cement w1dthJ
Soil backfill not meeting the particle size, electro- tion of Soil Reinforcements for Mechanically Stabilized
chemical, and in-ground temperature requirements pro- Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes" is not obtained. Of
vided herein shall be considered to be aggressive. course, polymer materials not meeting the requirements in
A single default reduction factor shall not be used in Table 5.8.6.1.2A could be used if this detailed product spe-
aggressive soil conditions. The environment at the face, in cific data extrapolated to the design life intended for the
addition to within the wall backfill. shall be evaluated, es- structure is obtained.
pecially if the stability of the facing is dependent on the 4) Calculation of Long-Term Reinforcement
strength of the geosynthetic at the face, i.e., the geosyn- Strength: For ultimate limit state conditions,
thetic reinforcement forms the primary connection be-
tween the body of the wall and the facing.
(5.8.6.1.2-1)
The chemical properties of the native soil surrounding
the mechanically stabilized soil backfill shall also be con-
where,
sidered if there is potential for seepage of ground water
from the native surrounding soils to the mechanically sta- RF = RF10 X RFcR X RFo (5.8.6.1.2-2)
bilized backfill. If this is the case, the surrounding soils
shall also meet the chemical criteria required for the back- T 01 is the long-term tensile strength required to prevent
fill material if the environment is to be considered non- rupture calculated on a load per unit of reinforcement
aggressive, or adequate long-term drainage around the width basis, Tu11 is the ultimate tensile strength of the re-
geosynthetic reinforced mass shall be provided to ensure inforcement determined from wide width tensile tests
that chemically aggressive liquid does not enter into the (ASTM D 4595) for geotextiles and geogrids, or rib ten-
reinforced backfill. sile test for geogrids (GRI:GGl, but at a strain rate of
3) Polymer Requirements: Polymers which are likely 10%/minute ), RF is a combined reduction factor to ac-
to have good resistance to long-term chemical degrada- count for potential long-term degradation due to installa-
tion shall be used if a single default reduction factor is to· tion damage, creep, and chemical aging, RF10 is a strength
be used, to minimize the risk of the occurrence of signifi- reduction factor to account for installation damage to the
cant long-term degmdation. The polymer material re- reinforcement, RFCR is a strength reduction factor to pre-
quirements provided in Table 5.8.6.1.2A shall therefore be vent long-term creep rupture of the reinforcement, and
met if detailed product specific data as described in FHWA RF0 is a strength reduction factor to prevent rupture of the
Publication No. FHWA SA-96-071 "Mechanically Stabi- reinforcement due to chemical and biological degrada-
lized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and tion. The value selected forT ull shall be the minimum av-
Construction Guidelines"-Appendix B, and in FHWA erage roll value (MARV) for the product to account for
Publication No. FHWA SA-96-072 "Corrosion/Degrada- statistical variance in the material strength.
TABLE 5.8.6.1.2A Minimum Requirements for Geosynthetic Products to Allow Use of Default Reduction Factor
for Long·Term Degradation
Polymer Type Property Test Method Criteria to AUow Use of Default RF*
Polypropylene UV Oxidation Resistance ASTMD4355 Min. 70% strength retained after 500 hrs in
weatherometer
Polyethylene UV Oxidation Resistance ASTMD4355 Min. 70% strength retained after 500 hrs in
weatherometer
Polyester Hydrolysis Resistance Inherent Viscosity Method Min. Number Average Molecular Weight
(ASTM D 4603 and GRI Test Method of25,000
GG8**) or Determine Directly Using
Gel Penneation Chromatography
Polyester Hydrolysis Resistance GRI Test Method GG7 Max. of Carboxyl End Group Content of 30
All Polymers Survivability Weight per Unit Area (ASTM D 5261) Min. 270 glm2
All Polymers % Post-Consumer Recycled Certification of Materials Used Maximum of 0%
Material by Weight
*Polymers not meeting these requirements may be used if product specific test results obtained and analyzed in accordance with FHWA Publication No.
FHWA SA-96-071 "Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines.,-Appendix B, and in FHWA
Publication No. FHWASA-96-072 "Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes..
are provided.
**These test procedures are in draft form. Contact the Geosynthelic Research lnslitute, Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA.
5.8.6.1.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 157
TABLE 5.8.6.1.2B Default and Minimum Values for the Total Geosynthetic Ultimate Limit State
Strength Reduction Factor, RF
Application Total Reduction Factor, RF
All applications. but with product specific data obtained and analy1..ed in All reduction factors shall be based on product
accordance with FHWA Publication No. FHWA SA-96-071 specific data. RFm and RF0 shall not be Jess
"Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design than 1.1.
and Construction Guidelines"-Appendix B. and FHWA Publication No.
FHWA SA-96-072 "Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for
Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes"
Pennanent applications not having severe consequences should poor 7.0
performance or failure occur. nonaggressive soils, and polymers meeting
the requirements listed in Table 5.8.6.1.2A, provided product specific data
is not available
Temporary applications not having severe consequences should poor 3.5
performance or failure occur, nonaggressive soils. and polymers meeting
the requirements listed in Table 5.8.6.1.2A. provided product specific data
is not available
Values for RF10, RFcR• and RFt> shall be determined sile stress may be increased by 40%. The global safety fac-
from product specific test results. Even with product spe- tor of 0.55 applied to Fy for permanent structures accounts
cific test results, RFm and RF0 shall be no less than I. I for uncertainties in structure geometry, fill properties, ex-
each. Guidelines for how to determine RFID, RFcR• and ternally applied loads, the potential for local overstress due
· RF0 from product specific data are provided in FHWA to load nonuniformities, and uncertainties in long-term re-
Publication No. FHWA SA-96-071 "Mechanically Stabi- inforcement strength. Safety factors less than 0.55, such as
Jized Earth Wa11s and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and the 0.48 factor applied to grid members, account for the
Construction Guidelines"-Appendix B, and in FHWA greater potential for local overstress due to load nonuni-
Publication No. FHWA SA-96-072 "Corrosion/Degrada- formities for steel grids than for steel strips or bars.
tion of Soil Reinforcements for MechanicalJy Stabilized The allowable reinforcement tension is determined by
Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes." For wall appli- multiplying the allowable stress by the cross-sectional
cations which are defined as not having severe conse- area of the steel reinforcement after corrosion losses., (See
quences should poor performance or failure occur, having Figure 5.8.6A.) The loss in steel cross-sectional area due
nonaggressive soil conditions, and if the geosynthetic to corrosion shall be determined in accordance with Arti-
product meets the minimum requirements listed in Table cle 5.8.6.1.1. Therefore,
5.8.6.1.2A, the long-term tensile strength of the rein-
forcement may be determined using a default reduction
factor for RF as provided in Table 5.8.6.1.28 in lieu of (5.8.6.2. I- I)
product specific test results.
where, all variables are as defined in Figure 5.8.6A. ~
5.8.6.2 Allowable Stresses
5.8.6.2.2 Geosynthetic Reinforcemellts
5.8.6.2. I Steel Reinforcements
The aJlowable tensile load per unit of reinforcement
The allowable tensile stress for steel reinforcements and width for geosynthetic reinforcements for permanent
connections for permanent structures (i.e., design lives of structures (i.e., design lives of 75 to 100 years) is deter-
75 to 100 years) shall be in accordance with Article 10.32, mined as follows: (See Figure 5.8.68.)
in particular Table I0.32. 1A. These requirements result in
an allowable tensile stress for steel strip reinforcement, in T = Tult (5.8.6.2.2-1)
the wall backfill away from the wall face connections, of a FSxRF
0.55Fy. For grid reinforcing members connected to a rigid
facing element (e.g., a concrete panel or block), the allow- where, FS is a global safety factor which accounts for un-
able tensile stress sha11 be reduced to 0.48Fy. Transverse certainties in structure geometry, fill properties, externally
and longitudinal grid members shall be sized in accordance applied loads. the potential for local overstress due to load
with AASHTO M 55 (ASTM A 185). For temporary struc- nonuniformities, and uncertainties in long-term reinforce-
tures (i.e., design lives of 3 years or less), the allowable ten- ment strength. For ultimate limit state conditions for per-
HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.6.2.2
158
manent walls, a FS of 1.5 shall be used. Note that the un- forced soil mass shall be considered when assessing po-
certainty of determining long-term reinforcement strength tential corrosion losses.
is taken into account through an additional factor of safety,
which is typically about 1.2, depending on the amount of 5.8.7.2 Connection Strength for Geosynthetic
creep data available, through the creep extrapolation pro- Reinforcements
tocol provided in Appendix B of the FHWA-SA-96-071,
"Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil To evaluate the long-term geosynthetic strength at the
Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines." connection with the wall facing, reduce Tult using the
connection/seam strength determined in accordance with
5.8.7 Soil Reinforcement/Facing Connection ASTM D 4884 for structural (i.e., not partial or full fric-
Strength Design tion) connections. ASTM D 4884 will produce a short-
term connection strength equal to Tult X CRu. (See Equa-
5.8.7.1 Connection Strength for Steel Soil tion 5.8.7.2-1.) Note that ASTM D 4884 will need to be
Reinforcements modified to accommodate geogrid joints such as a Bodkin
joint. The portion of the connection embedded in the con-
Connections shall be designed to resist stresses result- crete facing shall be designed in accordance with Article
ing from active forces (T0, as described in Article 5.8.4.2) 8.31.
as well as from differential movements between the rein- For reinforcements connected to the facing through
forced backfill and the wall facing elements. embedment between facing elements using a partial or
Elements of the connection which are embedded in the full friction connection (e.g., segmental concrete block
facing element shall be designed with adequate bond faced walls), the capacity of the connection shall be re-
length and bearing area in the concrete to resist the con- duced from Tu 11 for the backfill reinforcement using the
nection forces. The capacity of the embedded connector connection strength determined from laboratory tests.
shall be checked by tests as required in Article 8.31. Con- (See Equation 5.8.7.2-1.) This connection strength is
nections between steel reinforcement and the wall facing based on the lessor of the pullout capacity of the connec-
units (e.g., welds, bolts, pins, etc.) shall be designed in ac- tion, the long-term rupture strength of the connection and
cordance with Article 10.32. T111 as determined in Article 5.8.6.1.2. An appropriate lab-
Connection materials shall be designed to accommo- oratory testing and interpretation procedure, which is a
date losses due to corrosion in accordance with Article modification of NCMA Test Method SRWU-1 (Simac, et.
5.8.6.1.1. Potential differences between the environment al., 1993 ), is discussed in Appendix A of FHWA Publica-
at the face relative to the environment within the rein- tion No. FHWA SA-96-071 ''Mechanically Stabilized
TABLE 5.8.7.2A Default and Minimum Values for the Total Geosynthetic Ultimate Limit State
Strength Reduction Factor at the Facing Connection, RFr
All applications, but with product specific data obtained and analyzed in All reduction factors shall be based on product
accordance with FHWA Publication No. FHWA SA-96-071 specific data. RF10 and RF0 shall not be less
"Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design than 1.1.
and Construction Guidelines"-Appendix B, and FHWA Publication No.
FHWA SA-96-072 "Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for
Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes."
Permanent applications not having severe consequences should poor 4.0
performance or failure occur, nonaggressive soils, and polymers meeting
the requirements listed in Table 5.8.6.1.2A, provided product specific data
is not available. If using polyester reinforcement, the pH regime at the
connection must be investigated and determined to be within the pH
requirements for a nonaggressive environment. (See Division II, Article
7.3.6.3.)
Temporary applications not having severe consequences should poor 2.5
performance or failure occur, nonaggressive soils, and polymers meeting
the requirements listed in Table 5.8.6.1.2A, provided product specific data
is not available.
5.8.7.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 159
0
C~ang Unn.. H c:u
A
•'- Hange Heagh"
Hal"'ge Heaghs.. Hh. The full •eagh'- or ell ••t•en"-l fec:al"'g bloc:k unau
•• \han Hh
r oc:ang block.
wall be C:Ofta&de,.ed ~ ec:" 0'- 1he boM or 1he lo•et"Men'- sepen~l
wher-e:
'"\, = Segmen't.Ol f ecang block una 't. he&gh't. (m)
'Wu = Segmen~l foc&ng block un&'t. w&!=f~. fr-on't. 't.o beck (m)
Gu = d&a't.Once 't.Q· 'the cent-er-
or gr-ev&'t.y of e hor-&zon~l
segmen't.Ol focang block un&'t.. &nclud&ng ogg... ega't.e r,u. measur-ed
r.-om the r.-on't. of the un&'t. (m)
W = ..,oll bo't.'t.er- due 't.O ae't.bock per- cour-ae Cdeg)
H : -to't.Ol he&gh't. or wall (m)
Hh = hange he&gh't. (m)
FIGURE 5.8.7.2A Determination of Hinge Height for Segmental Concrete Block Faced MSE Walls
Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and Con- mode of failure, Tsc is the peak load per unit of reinforce-
struction Guidelines." ment width in the connection test at a specified confining
From this test, a peak connection strength load as a func- pressure where pullout is known to be the mode of failure,
tion of vertical confining stress, Tu 1 ~e or Tsc, are obtained, T101 is the ultimate wide width tensile strength (ASTM
which can be used to determine CRu and CRs as follows: D 4595) for the reinforcement material lot used for the
connection strength testing, CRu is a reduction factor to
(5.8.7.2-1) account for reduced ultimate strength resulting from the
connection where rupture is the mode of failure, and CRs
is a reduction factor to account for reduced strength due
CR = Tsc (5.8.7.2-2)
s Tlot
to connection pullout.
Therefore, determine the long-term geosynthetic con-
where, Tuttc is the peak load per unit reinforcement width nection strength Tac on a load per unit reinforcement width
whichever is less, and the maximum facing height above 5.8.9.IA. Values of PAE and P1R for structures with hori-
of the proposed segmental concrete facing unit. Am= (1.45- A)A (5.8.9.1-1)
Geosynthetic facing elements shall not. in general, be
left exposed to sunlight (specifically ultraviolet radia- (5.8.9.1-2)
tion) for permanent walls. If geosynthetic facing ele-
ments must be left exposed permanently to sunlight, the (5.8.9.1-3)
geosynthetic shall be stabilized to be resistant to ultravi-
olet radiation. Furthermore, product specific test data ..A" is defined as the ground acceleration coefficient
shall be provided which can be extrapolated to the in- as determined in Division I-A, Article 3.2. in particular
tended design life and which proves that the product will Figure 3. Am is defined as the maximum wall accelera-
be capable of performing as intended in an exposed tion coefficient at the centroid of the wall mass. For
environment. ground accelerations greater than 0.45 g, Am would be
calculated to be less than A. Therefore, if A> 0.45 g, set
5.8.8.3 Corrosion Issues for MSE Facing Design Arn = A. The equation for PAE was developed assuming
a friction angle of 30°. P AE may be adjusted for other soil
Steel to steel contact between the soil reinforcement friction angles using the Mononobe-Okabe method, with
connections and the concrete facing steel reinforcement the horizontal acceleration kh equal to Am and kv equal
sha11 be prevented so that contact between dissimilar met- to zero.
als (e.g., bare facing reinforcement steel and galvanized For structures with sloping backfills, the inertial force
soil reinforcement steel) does not occur. Steel to steel con- (P1R) and the dynamic horizontal thrust (PAE) are based
tact in this case can be prevented through the placement of on a height H2 near the back of the waH determined as
a nonconductive material between the soil reinforcement follows:
face connection and the facing concrete reinforcing steel.
(Iii\ _ H Tan~ x 0.5H
v 5.8.9 Seismic Design H 2 - + ---=----
(1- 0.5Tan~)
(5.8.9.1-4)
Re&nrorcement. Loyer
0.6H
\.."----..zv-.....- - -../
..... fOP .......... , ......
l
I
l
T
0.6~
'
"'"'---.....v.....----I
..._ '• ~··""' reran
Res1sten't
Zone
~ .. """..._
~
...... . .
h-~,___...;;..;;..;;;....;;.,;;;__;;,--4 3
.......
r... = The load per unit wall width applied to each reinforcement
due to static forces.
T_. = The load per unit wall width applied to each
reinforcement due to dynamic forces.
The total load per unit wall width applied to each layer, T.....a = T... + T-.:~
For seismic loading, the dimensions of the active zone are the same as
for the static loading. (See Rgure 5.8.5.1A.)
0
164 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.9.2
For seismic loading conditions, the value of F*, the If the seismic performance category is uc" or higher
pullout resistance factor, shall be reduced to 80% of the (see Section 3, Division 1-A), facing connections in seg-
values used for static design. Factors of safety under com- mental block faced walls shall not be fully dependent on
bined static and seismic loads for pullout and breakage of frictional resistance between the backfill reinforcement
reinforcement may be reduced to 75% of the factors of and facing blocks. Shear resisting devices between the
safety used for static loading. facing blocks and backfill reinforcement such as shear
For geosynthetic reinforcement rupture, the reinforce- keys, pins, etc. shall be used.
ment must be designed to resist the static and dynamic For steel reinforcement connections, safety factors for
components of the load as follows: combined static and seismic loads may be reduced to 75%
For the static component, of the safety factors used for static loading. Ba'ied on these
safety factors, the available connection strength must be
greater than T,otlll·
(5.8.9.2-3)
For the static component,
Therefore, the ultimate strength of the geosynthetic re- T S Srt X CRu <o.s(Srt x CR 1 ) (5.8.9.3-2)
inforcement required is, md FS x RF0 FS
-
Tull- s + srt
rs
(5.8.9.2-5) The reinforcement strength required for the static com-
ponent, Srs, must be added to the reinforcement strength
For reinforcement pullout, required for the dynamic component, sri. to determine the
total ultimate strength required for the reinforcement, Tu 11 •
3~----~~--------~--------~
&max • 'A ·H/250UNEXTENSIBLE>
~
&mex •&R · H/75 (EXTENSIBLE>
z I
L&J
2: WHERE: & = MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENT
L&J mex IN UNITS OF H
u 2
([
...J
Q..
H : HEIGHT OF WALL IN m•
C/)
0~--------~--------~~--------~
0 0.5 1.0 1.5
L/H
For MSE walls utilizing metallic backfill reinforce- · 5.8.12 Special Loading Conditions
ments supporting roadways which are chemically deiced
in the winter, an impervious membrane should be placed 5.8.12.1 Concentrated Dead Loads
below the pavement and just above the first row of rein-
forcements to intercept any flows containing deicing Concentrated dead loads shall be incorporated into
chemicals. The membrane should be sloped to drain away the internal and external stability design by using a sim-
from the facing to an inten;epting longitudinal drain out- plified uniform vertical distribution of 2 vertical to 1
letted beyond the reinforced zone. Typically, a minimum horizontal to determine the vertical component of stress
membrane thickness of0.8 mm (30 mils) should be used. with depth within the reinforced soil mass as shown in
All seams in the membrane shall be welded to prevent Figure 5.8.12.1A. Figure 5.8.12.18 shows how concen-
leakage. trated horizontal dead loads are distributed within and
0
166 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.12.1
- d
--- (Foou"g br• L
I l
/1 . br •I\
I
,,z
y.
\
-- I o,
~~
Z2
2
I
12 \
I \
I \
,. I \
II
\
For- z~Z.s \
o,
=b( ·~ = b(c-z. __\
llcr • P~ /Z.
v 01(L~>
For- poant lood1
A -
1..\ - ¥
•
7p: ..._
WI~
b
f' : "'
,.
I
01 = Errec:tave wadth or apphed load ot any depth. calculated o•
shown obove
br::.. Wadth or apphed load. Fo,.. f"ootangs whac:h or-e ec:cen"t.r-.acolly
loaded (e.g •• b.-adge obu~ent roatangs). se't. b, equal 't.O the
equavolen't. rootang wadth B" by r-eduCing It by 2e". wher-e e" IS
occenvaca'C.y or the rootang lood h.e •• br -2e").
L : Leng'th or roo"C.ang
P., :: Lood pe.- hneor- mete,.. (foo"C.> or str-ap footang
P,;= Lood on asoloted r-ec:"C.angulo,.. f'ootang or- poan'C. lood
z 1 = dep'th whe.-e ef'rec:"C.ave wadth an~r-sect• bock of' woll roc• = 2d - br
Assume 't.he anc,..eased ve.-tacol s't.,..oss due t.o the •u,..cha.-go load has no
anrluonc• on atr-ot~ses used 'Coo ovoluote anter-nol st.obahty ar the
aur-cho.-~.. load as loca"C.ed bohand the r-oanfor-ced aoal moss. Fo.- oxte.-nol
Stoblll~ ~saume the sur-chor-ge hos no anfluonCO ar It IS }ocot&d
oytsade 't.h oc't.1vo zo,e behand tho wall.
FIGURE S.8.12.1A Distribution of Stress from Concentrated Vertical Load Pv for Internal
and External Stability Calculations
5.8.12.1 DIVISION I- DESIGN 167
"'-- br
r1· ·I
\Atr~mox = 2 IF/1
n
1
q
1
p..
::~
f IF=P.. +F1 +Fz
lote.r._ol f OI"Ce due to
la eo.- v. p.-easu.-e
loter-ol for-ce due to
voff1c sUf'cho.-ge
Otsv&buf.lon lote.-ol ro.-ce due to
1uper-svuctur-e o.- ot.he.-
11=1C ,•br -2e')tonlo45+ ~/2) concenvoted l o~r-o l loods
,_~-~-----;
L
o' = o cconvlCltlj of lood on foof.lng l1eo F&gu.-e 5.8.12.1C
r01" exomple of how to colculote th&l)
o. Oa •v•b~o~1.ton or Svess fo.- lnto,.nol Stobaht.y Co lc~o~lo1.&ons.
c,
q
PIQ
·~I
11 mox.=2 IFII.z
I I
~··12
12
P" 2 = lo~.-ol fo.-ce due to
L
I I s upe .-sv...ctu.-e o.- othe.-
behind the reinforced soil mass. Concentrated horizon- above or within the reinforced soil zone are present, the
tal loads at the top of the wall shall also be di stributed reinforcement connections to the wall face shall be de-
within the reinfo rced soil mass as shown in this figure. sig ned fo r 100% of Tm" (or T,0 , , 1 for seismic loads)
Figure 5.8.12.1 C shows how these loads can be com- throughout the height of the wall.
bined using superposition principles to evaluate external If concentrated dead loads are located behind the rein-
and internal wall stability. Depending on the size and lo- forced soil mass, they shall be distributed in the same way
cation of the concentrated dead load, the location of the as would be done within the reinforced soil mass. The ver-
boundary between the active and resistant zones may tical stress distributed behind the reinforced zone in this
need to be adjusted. Figure 5.8.1 2. 1D illustrates how this way shall be multiplied by K,r to determine the effect this
adjustment should be made. When dead load surcharges surcharge load has on external stability. The concentrated
168 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.12.1
Concentrated Concentrated
Deed Load •t Deed Load •2
(ill
.PHt- I Jill
PH2 I
e
tPvz
1-. ~ ...,
VPYl
qt I
' *
*
Re1nfo,.ced
Sosl Mess<t
Rete1ned
lz/3 F1l1
.,. Y,. K,. •r Yr K.r
H
1
V1 =Y,. HL
''''''''''
I .L-2e
JlO.~~~--~----~
Not.e: Fo,. r-elatively thsck fecsng elements (e.g., segmental conc.-ete fec1ng blocks)
It moy be de~nr-eble to snclude the focang d1mensaons end we1ght sn shdsng, overturn
end beer-sng capocs ty calculetsons h.e.,.use '8' sn heu of 'L ').
Note: Py1 , PHI. Pvz• P.tz·&fvt·~·Mvz·end 12 Ol"'e as detel"'mlned from
Fagures 5.8.12.1A end 5.8.12.18 end Fp results from Py2 h.e., K Mvz from fsgur-e 5.8.12.1A).
H IS the toto I wall hesght at the face.
FIGURE 5.8.12.1 C Superposition of Concentrated Dead Loads for External Stability Evaluation
5.8.12.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 169
0 p
y
0.3H
H
2
ACTIVE
ZONE
RESISTANT ZONE
H
2
FIGURE 5.8.12.1D Location of Maximum Tensile Force Line in Case of Large Surcharge Slabs
(lnextensible Reinforcements)
horizontal stress distributed behind the wall can be taken barrier and slab to resist the impact load in sliding and over-
into account directly. turning without directly transmitting load to the top facing
units.
5.8.12.2 Traffic Loads and Barriers For checking pu11out safety of the reinforcements, the
lateral traffic impact load shall be distributed to the upper
Traffic loads shall be treated as uniform surcharge loads soil reinforcement and facing units using Figure
in accordance with the criteria outlined in Article 3.20.3. 5.8.12. I B, assuming br equal to the width of the base
The live load surcharge pressure shall be equal to not less slab. The full length of reinforcements shall be consid-
than 0.6 meter (2 feet) of earth. Pampets and traffic barri- ered effective in resisting pullout due to impact load. The
ers, constructed over or in line with the front face of the wall upper row(s) of soil reinforcement shall have sufficient
shall be designed to resist overturning moments by their pullout capacity to resist a horizontal load of 45 kN (I 0
own mass. Base slabs shall not have any tmnsverse joints kips) distributed over the full6 meters (20 feet) base slab
except construction joints, and adjacent slabs shall be length. The force distribution for pullout computations is
joined by shear dowels. The upper row(s) of soil reinforce- different than what is used for tensile capacity computa-
ment shall have sufficient tensile capacity to resist a con- tions because the entire base slab must move laterally to
centrated horizontal load of 45 kN ( 10 kips) distributed initiate a pullout failure due to the relatively large defor-
over a barrier length of 1.5 meters (5 feet). This force dis- mation required, This distributed force would be equal to
tribution accommodates the local peaking of force in the PH 1 in Figure 5.8.12.1B.
soil reinforcements in the vicinity of the concentrated load. Due to the transient nature of traffic barrier impact
This distributed force would be equal to PH 1 in Figure loads, when designing for reinforcement rupture, the
5.8.12. 1B, and would be distributed to the reinforcements geosynthetic reinforcement must be designed to resist the
assuming br equal to the width of the base slab. Adequate static and transient (impact) components of the load as
room shall be provided laterally between the back of the follows:
facing panels and the traffic barrier/slab to a11ow the traffic For the static component, see equation 5.8.9.2-3.
~
v
170 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.8.12.2
For the transient component, described in Article 5 .8.12.4. The upper two rows of rein-
forcement shall be designed for an additional horizontal
load of 4,400 N per linear meter of wall (300 pounds per
A s < ___s~rt~x_R....:c::,.._._ (5.8.12.2-1)
u.(Jh v - linear foot of wall).
FS x RF10 X RF0
Str-uctu.-ol F.-ome
requirements in Article 7 .3.6.3 of Division II is not con- face where it joins the obstruction. To this end, a collar
sidered to be rapid draining. next to the wall face around the obstruction may be
needed.
5.8.12.4 Design for Presence of Obstructions in If driven piles must be placed through the reinforced
the Reinforced Soll Zone zone, the recommendations provided in Section 7 of
Division I shall be followed.
If the placement of an obstruction in the wall soil rein-
forcement zone such as a catch basin, grate inlet, signal or
sign foundation, guardrail post, or culvert cannot be 5.9 PREFABRICATED MODULAR
avoided, the design of the wall near the obstruction shall WALL DESIGN
be modified using one of the following alternatives:
5.9.1 Structure Dimensions
(1) Assuming reinforcement layers must be partially
or fully severed in the location of the obstruction, de- Prefabricated modular walls shall be dimensioned
sign the surrounding reinforcement layers to carry the to ensure that the applicable factors of safety outlined in
additional load which would have been carried by the Article 5.5.5 are satisfied.
severed reinforcements. Minimum embedment and scour protection shall sat-
(2) Place a structural frame around the obstruction isfy the requirements of Article 5.8.1.
which is capable of carrying the load from the rein-
forcements in front of the obstruction to reinforce-
ments connected to the structural frame behind the ob- 5.9.2 External Stability
struction. This is conceptually illustrated in Figure
5.8.12.4A. Stability computations shall be made by assuming that
(3) If the soil reinforcements consist of discrete strips the system acts as a rigid body.
or bar mats rather than continuous sheet~. depending on Lateral pressures shall be computed by wedge theory
the size and location of the obstruction, it may be pos- using a plane surface of sliding (Coulomb theory). Where
sible to splay the reinforcements around the obstruction. the rear of the prefabricated modular systems forms an ir-
regular surface (stepped modules), pressures shall be
For the first alternative, the portion of the wall facing computed on an average plane surface drawn from the
in front of the obstruction shall be made stable against a lower back heel of the lowest module to the upper rear
toppling (overturning) or sliding failure. If this cannot be heel of the top module, as shown in Figures 5. 9.2A and
accomplished, the soil reinforcements between the ob-
5.9.2B.
struction and the wall face can be structurally connected The following wall friction angles, 8, shall be used un-
to the obstruction such that the wall face does not topple,
less more exact coefficients are demonstrated:
or the facing elements can be structurally connected to ad-
jacent facing elements to prevent this type of failure.
For the second alternative, the frame and connections Wall Friction
shall be designed in accordance with Article 10.32 for steel Case Angle (8)
frames. Note that it may be feasible to connect the soil re- (a) Significant vibrations of back-
inforcement directly to the obstruction depending on the fill or modules settling more
reinforcement type and the nature of the obstruction. than backfill 0
For the third alternative, the splay angle, measured (b) Continuous pressure surface of
fr9m a line perpendicular to the wall face, shall be small precast concrete (uniform
enough that the splaying does not generate moment in the width modules) 1/2cp
reinforcement or the connection of the reinforcement to
(c) Averaged pressure surface
the wall face. The tensile capacity of the splayed re-
(stepped modules) 3/4cfJ
inforcement shall be reduced by the cosine of the splay
angle.
If the obstruction must penetrate through the face of Computations for stability shall be made at every mod-
the wall, the wall facing elements shall be designed to ule level. At each level, the required factors of safety with ·
fit around the obstruction such that the facing elements respect to overturning shall be provided. The value of
are stable (i.e., point loads should be avoided) and such Ka used to compute the lateral thrust resulting from the
that wall backfill soil cannot spill through the wall random backfill and other loads shall be computed on
172 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.9.2
r
H
I
1
1~
the basis of the friction angle of the backfill behind the ules is effective in resisting overturning moments. In the
modules. absence of specific data, a total unit weight of 1I 0 pounds
If sufficient amounts of structural backfill are used be- per cubic foot shall be assumed.
hind the prefabricated modules, a value of 34 o may be Computations for sliding stability may consider that
used for <f>. In the absence of specific data, a maximum I 00% of the soil-fill weight inside the modules is
friction angle of 30° shall be used. The coefficient of slid- effective in resisting sliding motion. The value of <f>
ing friction at the wall base shall be the lesser of the coef- of the foundation soils shall be used in these computa-
ficients of the backfill or the foundation soil. Passive pres- tions.
sures shall be neglected in stability computations. For structures loaded with sloping surcharges, refer to
Computations for overturning stability shall consider Article 5.2.2.3 regarding overall stability analysis of
that only 80% of the soil-fill unit weight inside the mod- slopes.
5.9.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 173
5.9.3 Bearing Capacity and Foundation Stability ports per unit length, at the rear and front of the modules
or at the location of the bottom legs.
Allowable bearing capacities for concrete modular For modules supported on integrally cast legs, the re-
systems shall be computed using a minimum factor of actions shall be similarly calculated.
safety of 3 for Group I loading applied to the ultimate For this computation, a minimum of 80% of the soil
bearing capacity or to a bearing capacity obtained in ac- weight inside the modules shall be considered effective. If
cordance with At1icles 4.4.7 and 4.4.8. foundation conditions require a footing under the total
Footing loads shall be computed by assuming that dead area of the module, I 00% of the soil weight inside the
loads and earth pressure loads are resisted by point sup- modules shall be considered.
174 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.9.3
The overall slope stability condition, of which the re- factor, and statistical reliability shall be considered when
taining wall may only be part, shall be evaluated in ac- selecting procedures for calculating resistance. The pro-
cordance with Article 5.2.2.3. cedures used in developing values of performance factors
contained in this Part are summarized in Appendix A of
5.9.4 Allowable Stresses the Final Report for NCHRP Project 24-4 (Barker, et al.,
1991 ). Other methods may be used if the statistical nature
Prefabricated modular units shall be designed for de- of the factors given above are considered, and are ap-
veloped earth pressures behind the wall and from pres- proved by the owner.
sures developed inside the modules. Rear face surfaces
shall be designed for the difference of these pressures. Al- 5.11 DEFINITIONS
lowable stresses and reinforcement requirements for con-
crete modules shall be in accordance with Section 8. Only terms relating to retaining walls are provided in
Inside pressures (bin) shall be the same for each mod- this Section. Definitions for terms relating to foundation
ule and shall not be less than as follows: types and LFD design are given in Article 4.8.
Cantilever Walls-Walls that resist the forces exerted
(5.9.4-1) on them by flexural strength. These walls consist of a con-
crete wall stem, a concrete slab, and possibly a shear key.
Concrete modules shall be designed for bending in Gravity Walls-Massive stone or concrete masonry
both vertical and horizontal directions between their sup- walls which depend primarily on their weights to maintain
ports. Steel reinforcing shall be symmetrical on both faces stability. Only a nominal amount of steel is placed near the
unless positive identification of each face can be ensured exposed faces of these walls to prevent surface cracking
to preclude reversal of units. Corners shall be adequately due to temperature changes.
reinforced. Retaining Walls-Structures that provide lateral sup-
Allowable stresses for steel module members shall port for a mass of soil and that owe their stability primar-
be in accordance with Article I0.32. The net section used ily to their own weights and to the weights of any soils lo-
for design shall be reduced in accordance with Article cated directly above their base.
5.8.6.1. Semi-gravity Walls-These walls are somewhat more
slender than gravity walls and require reinforcement con-
5.9.5 Drainage sisting of vertical bars along the inner face and dowels
continuing into the footing.
Prefabricated modular units in cut and side-hill fill
areas shall be designed with a continuous subsurface drain 5.12 NOfATIONS
placed at. or near, the footing grade and out-letted as re-
quired. In cut and side-hill fill areas with established or = sliding resistance
potential ground water levels above the footing grade, a = height of retaining wall
continuous drainage blanket shall be provided and con- Hr = factored horizontal load
nected to the longitudinal drain system. K = coefficient of earth pressure
For systems with open front faces, a surface drainage Ko = coefficient of earth pressure at rest
system shall be provided as needed above the top of the N = factored bearing pressure resultant
wall to collect and divert surface runoff and prevent ero- p = lateral earth pressure
sion of the front face. Po = active earth load
ph = lateral earth load
Parte Pv = vertical earth load
STRENGTH DESIGN METHOD qr =factored bearing capacity
LOAD FACTOR DESIGN qmax = maximum bearing pressure calculated using fac-
tored loads
5.10 SCOPE q, = surcharge loading
qult = ultimate bearing capacity
The provisions of this Part shall apply for the design of R1 = reduction factor due to load inclination effect
rigid gravity and semi-rigid gravity walls, and nongravity Rn = nominal resistance
cantilevered walls. Vr = factored vertical load
The probabilistic LFD basis of these specifications y = distance to the point of action for lateral earth
which produces an inter-related combination of load, load pressure
5.12 DIVISION I-DESIGN 175
The limit state which governs the design depends on: 5.14.1 Earth Pressure Due to Backfill
-type and function of retaining structure, The provisions of Articles 5.5.2 and 5.6.2 shall also
--earth pressures exerted on the wall by the retained apply to the load factor design of rigid gravity and semi-
backfill, gravity walls, and nongravity cantilevered walls respec-
-geometry of the ground and the structure, tively; with the exception that the loads shall be factored
-strength of the ground, according to the bottom half of Table 3.22.1A when
176 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.14.1
checking wall stability against bearing capacity. sliding and no significant pore pressures act in the backfill. If a
and overturning. Vertical earth pressure due to the dead thorough drainage system is not provided to dewater the
load of the backfill shall have an overall load factor, "Y[3E, failure wedge, or if its adequate performance cannot be
of 1.()-y. guaranteed, walls shall be designed to resist the maximum
Lateral earth pressures on walls backfilled with cohe- anticipated water pressure. For walls backfilled with co-
sionless soils shall be designed using effective stresses. hesionless soils, the lateral earth pressure shall be calcu-
Walls backfilled with cohesive soils shall be designed lated using buoyant unit weights below the groundwater
using equivalent fluid pressures. The backfill. whether co- level and multiplied by the load factor for lateral earth
hesionless or cohesive, shall be well drained, so that no pressure. The wall shall be designed for these factored lat-
water pressures act on the wall, and no significant pore eral earth pressures ("Yf3E) plus factored hydrostatic water
pressures act in the backfill. The load factor for lateral pressure ( l.(}y).
earth pressures calculated using equivalent fluid pressures In the case of an undrained analysis of cohesive back-
shall be the same as those calculated using effective fills, the lateral earth pressure shall be calculated using
stresses ("Y[3E = 1.3"Y). equivalent fluid pressure, which inherently includes water
The "Y and f3E coefficients specified for earth pressure pressure effects. The calculated lateral earth pressure shall
in Table 3.22.1 A are applicable directly to active or at rest then be multiplied by 1.3"Y.
earth pressures. The resistance due to passive eurth pres- If the groundwater levels differ on opposite sides of the
sure in front of the wall shall be neglected unless the wall wall, the effects of seepage on wall stability and the po-
extends wen below the depth of frost penetration, scour or tential for piping shall be considered. Pore pressures be-
other types of disturbance. Where passive pressure is as- hind the wall can be determined by flow net procedures or
sumed to provide resistance, the performance factor (<t>) various analytical methods. and shall be added to the ef-
shall be taken a~ 0.6. fective horizontal stresses when calculating total lateral
earth pressures on the wall. The effective lateral earth
5.14.2 Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge pressure shall be multiplied by "Yf3E (obtained from Table
3.22.1 A) and the hydrostatic pressure shall be factored by
In the design of retaining walls and abutments where 1.()-y. when designing the wall.
traffic can come within a horizontal distance from the top
of the wall equal to one-half the wall height, the lateral 5.14.4 Seismic Pressure
earth pressure shall be increased by a live load surcharge
pressure equal to not less than 2 feet of earth (Article The provisions of Article 5.6.4 shall apply to the load
3.20.3). Impact loads shall not be included in the design factor design of walls when considering earthquakes
of abutments (Article 3.8.1 ). Vertical earth pressure in- loads.
duced by live load surcharge and dead load surcharge
shall have overall load factors of 1.67"Y and 1.3"Y, respec- 5.14.5 Movement Under Serviceability Limit States
tively. Lateral earth pressure induced by live load
and dead load surcharge shall have an overall load factor The movement of wall foundation support systems
of 1.3"Y. shall be estimated using procedures described in Article
Where heavy static and dynamic compaction equip- 4.11.3, 4.12.3.2.2, or 4.13.3.2.2, for walls supported on
ment is used within a distance of one-half the wall height spread footings, driven piles, or drilled shafts, respec-
behind the wall, the effect of additional earth pressure that tively. Such methods are based on soil and rock parame-
may be induced by compaction shall be taken into ac- ters measured directly or inferred from the results of in
count. The load factor for compaction-induced earth pres- situ and/or laboratory tests.
sures shall be the same as for lateral earth pressures Tolerable movement criteria for retaining walls shall
("Y(3E= 1.3"Y). be developed based on the function and type of wall, an-
ticipated service life, and consequence of unacceptable
5.14.3 Water Pressure and Drainage movements. Tolerable movement criteria shall be estab-
lished in accordance with Articles 4.11.3.5, 4.12.3.2.3,
The provisions of Articles 5.5.3 and 5.6.3 shall and 4.13.3.2.3.
also apply to the load factor design of rigid gravity and
semi-gravity walls, and nongravity cantilevered walls, 5.14.6 Safety Against Soil Failure
respectively.
The backfill, whether cohesive or cohesionless, shall Gravity and semi-gravity walls, and cantilever walls
be well drained so that no water pressures act on the wall shall be dimensioned to ensure stability against bearing ca-
5.14.6 DIVISION I-DESIGN 177
The safety against bearing capacity failure shall be The safety against overturning shall be ensured by lim-
investigated: ( 1) by using factored soil pressures which iting the location of the factored bearing pressure resultant
are uniformly distributed over the effective base area, if (N) on the wall base. For walls supported by soil founda-
the wall is supported by a soil foundation (see Figures tions, location of the factored bearing pressure resultant
5.14.6-1 and 5.14.6-2); or (2) by using factored soil on the base of the wall foundation shall be within the mid-
pressures which vary linearly over the effective base area, dle half of the base. For walls supported by rock founda-
if the wall is supported by a rock foundation (see Figure tions, location of the factored bearing pressure resultant
5.14.6-3). on the base of the wall foundation shall be within the mid-
Retaining walls and their foundations are considered to dle three-quarters of the base.
be adequate against bearing capacity failure if the factored
bearing capacity (taking into consideration the effect of 5.14.6.4 Overall Stability (Revised Article
load inclination) exceeds the maximum soil pressure 5.2.2.3)
(qmax) determined using factored louds. Methods for
calculating factored bearing capacity are provided in Ar- The overall stability of slopes in the vicinity of walls
ticle 4.11.4 for walls founded on spread footings, and in shall be considered.
Articles 4.12.3.3 and 4.13.3.3 for walls supported on dri- The overall stability of the retaining wall, retained
ven piles or drilled shatls. respectively. slope, and foundation soil or rock shall be evaluated for
~
'J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t·
I
I
h H Earth Loads
I Pw Mel Ph biSedon ~a.
I with allawanCe fDr creep
J
I
I ,.o.4H
I
StabilitY Criteria
FIGURE 5.14.6-1 Earth Loads and Stability Criteria for Walls with Clayey Soils
in the Backfill or Foundation (After Duncan et al., 1990)
178 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 5.14.6.4
H H
EarlhLoads
Pa n P r.Cibdltld using CouiDmb ~dive 8lltta prlll&n Chearr
I 01 Pa esanatld using judglmlnt. ... IIDWII• fDr I'IIDVII1III1I
of blddlll'lllllveiD ....
r•0.4H
StabilitY Criteria
Uledfarblnlgelpdrc:hlck
FIGURE 5.14.6-2 Earth Loads and Stability Criteria for Walls with Granular Backfills
and Foundations on Sand or Gravel (After Duncan et al., 1990)
I
I
I
I
I
I Earth Loads
I
G I
H
Pt. based on 11-rest pessure
Pw estimated uUIQ )udgmenl
,.o.4H
I•
. •
I•
'
Stability Criteria
·------------- F.-nd~~
N q, • -Rtq•
FIGURE 5.14.6-3 Earth Loads and Stability Criteria for Walls with Granular Backfills
and Foundations on Rock (After Duncan et al., 1990)
5.14.6.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 179
.I
qmu
FICIIRd a.tng Clpldlr
-----------------· ql • ~R1 quit
5.14.7.1 Base of Footing Slabs
·I
See Artide 5.5.6.3.
all walls using limiting equilibrium methods of analysis. Where possible, the backfill material behind all
The Modified Bishop, simplified Janbu or Spence meth- retaining walls shall be free draining, nonexpansive,
ods of analysis may be used. Special exploration, testing noncorrosive and shall be drained by weep-holes and
and analyses may be required for bridge abutments or re- french drains placed at suitable intervals and eleva-
taining walls constructed over soft deposits where con- tions. In counterfort walls, there shall be at least one
solidation and/or lateral flow of the soft soil could result drain for each pocket formed by the counterforts.
in unacceptable long-term settlements or horizontal Silts and clays shall, if possible, be avoided for use as
movements. backfill.
-
Section 6
CULVERTS
6.1 CULVERT LOCATION, LENGTH, AND forced floor shall be used to distribute the pressure over
WATERWAY OPENINGS the entire horizontal area of the structure. In any location
subject to erosion, aprons or cutoff walls shall be used at
Recommendations on culvert location, length, and
both ends of the culvert and, where necessary, the entire
waterway openings are given in the AASHTO Guide on
floor area between the wing walls shall be paved. Baffle
Hydraulic Design o.f Culverts.
walls or struts across the unpaved bottom of a culvert bar-
rel shall not be used where the stream bed is subject to ero-
6.2 DEAD LOADS
sion. When conditions require, culvert footings shall be
Vertical and horizontal earth pressures on culverts may reinforced longitudinally.
be computed by recognized or appropriately documented
analytical techniques based on the principles of soil me- 6.4 DISTRmUTION OF WHEEL LOADS
chanics and soil structure interaction, or design pressures THROUGH EARTH Ji,ILLS
shall be calculated as being the result of an equivalent
fluid weight as follows. 6.4.1 When the depth of fill is 2 feet or more, concen-
trated loads shall be considered as uniformly distributed
6.2.1 Culvert in trench, or culvert untrenched on over a square with sides equal to 1¥.! times the depth of
yielding foundation till.
A. Rigid culverts except reinforced concrete boxes:
( 1) For vertical earth pressure- 120 pcf 6.4.2 When such areas from several concentrations over-
For lateral earth pressure- 30 pcf lap, the total load shall be uniformly distributed over the
(2) For vertical earth pressure-120 pcf area defined by the outside limits of the individual areas,
For lateral earth pressure- 120 pcf but the total width of distribution shall not exceed the total
B. Reinforced concrete boxes: width of the supporting slab. For single spans, the effect of
( 1) For vertical earth pressure- 120 pcf live load may be neglected when the depth of fill is more
For lateml earth pressure- 30 pcf than 8 feet and exceeds the span length; for multiple spans
(2) For vertical earth pressure-120 pcf it may be neglected when the depth of fill exceeds the dis-
For lateral earth pressure- 60 pcf tance between faces of end supports or abutments. When
C. Flexible Culverts: the depth of fill is less than 2 feet the wheel load shall be
For vertical earth pressure-120 pcf distributed as in slabs with concentrated loads. When the
For lateral earth pressure- 120 pcf calculated live load and impact moment in concrete slabs,
When concrete pipe culverts are designed by the Indirect ba.~ed on the distribution of the wheel load through earth
Design Method of Article 16.4.5, the design lateral earth fills, exceeds the live load and impact moment calculated
pressure shall be determined using the procedures given according to Article 3.24, the latter moment shaH be used.
in Article 16.4.5.2.1 for embankment installations and in
Article 16.4.5.2.2 for trench installations. 6.5 DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT
6.2.2 Culvert untrenched on unyielding foundation Where the depth of fill exceeds 2 feet, reinforcement to
provide for the lateral distribution of concentrated loads is
A special analysis is required.
not required.
6.3 FOOTINGS
6.6 DESIGN
Footings for culverts shall be carried to an elevation
sufficient to secure a firm foundation, or a heavy rein- For culvert design guidelines, see Section 16.
181
Section 7
SUBSTRUCTURES
Part A
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND MATERIALS
7.1.2 Loads The notations for dimension units include the follow-
ing: dim=dimensionless; ft =foot; and ksf = kip/ft 2• The
Where appropriate, piers and abutments shall be de- dimensional units provided with each notation are pre-
signed to withstand dead load, erection loads, live loads
sented for illustration only to demonstrate a dimensionally
on the roadway, wind loads on the superstructure, forces
correct combination of units for the design procedures
due to stream currents, floating ice and drift, temperature
presented herein. If other units are used, the dimensional
and shrinkage effects, lateral earth and water pressures,
correctness of the equations should be confirmed.
scour and collision and earthquake loadings.
7.1.3 Settlement
PartB
The anticipated settlement of piers and abutments
SERVICE LOAD DESIGN METHOD
should be estimated by appropriate analysis, and the ef- ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN
fects of differential settlement shall be accounted for in
the design of the superstructure. 7.3 PIERS
Refer to Section 4 for the design of spread footing, 7.3.1.1 Solid Wall Piers
driven pile and drilled shaft foundations and Section 5 for
the design of retaining walls. Solid wall piers are designed as columns for forces and
moments acting about the weak axis and as piers for those
7.2 NOTATIONS acting about the strong axis. They may be pinned, fixed or
free at the top, and are conventionally fixed at the base.
The following notations shall apply for the design of Short, stubby types are often pinned at the base to elimi-
pier and abutment substructure units: nate the high moments which would develop due to fixity.
Earlier, more massive designs, were considered gravity
B =Width of foundation (ft} types.
e = Eccentricity of load from foundation centroid in
the indicated direction (ft) 7.3.1.2 Double Wall Piers
H = Height of abutment (ft)
K =Coefficient of earth pressure (dim); (See Article More recent designs consist of double walls, spaced in
~ 7.5.4.) the direction of traffic, to provide support at the continu-
'A
183
184 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 7.3.1.2
7.4.2 Configuration
7.3.1.4 Single-Column Piers
The configuration can be as described in Article 7 .3.1
Single-column piers, often referred to as "T" or "Ham-
and, because of their vulnerability to lateral loadings,
merhead" piers, are usually supported at the base by a
spread- or pile-supported footing, and may be either inte- shall be of sufficient wall thickness to sustain the forces
gral with, or provide independent support for, the super- and moments for all loading situations as are appropriate.
structure. Their cross section can be of various shapes and Prismatic configurations may be sectionally precast or
the column can be prismatic or flared to form the pier cap prestressed as erected.
or to blend with the sectional configuration of the super-
structure cross section. This type pier can avoid the com- 7.5 ABUTMENTS
plexities of skewed supports if integrally framed into the
superstructure and their appearance reduces the massive- 7.5.1 Abutment Types
ness often associated with superstructures.
7.5.1.1 Stub Abutment
7.3.2 Pier Protection
Stub abutments are located at or near the top of ap-
7.3.2.1 Collision proach fills, with a backwall depth sufficient to accom-
modate the structure depth and bearings which sit on the
Where the possibility of collision exists from highway bearing seat.
or river traffic, an appropriate risk analysis should be
made to determine the degree of impact resistance to be 7.5.1.2 Partial-Depth Abutment
provided and/or the appropriate protection system.
Partial-depth abutments are located approximately at
7.3.2.2 Collision Walls mid-depth of the front slope of the approach embankment.
The higher backwall and wingwalls may retain fill mate-
Collision walls extending 6 feet above top of rail are rial, or the embankment slope may continue behind the
required between columns for railroad overpasses, and backwall. In the latter case, a structural approach slab or
similar walls extending 2.35 feet above ground should be end span design must bridge the space over the fill slope,
considered for grade separation structures unless other and curtain walls are provided to close off the open area.
protection is provided. Inspection access should be provided for this situation.
The scour potential must be determined and the de- Full-depth abutments are located at the approximate
sign must be developed to minimize failure from this front toe of the approach embankment, restricting the
condition. opening under the structure.
7.5.1.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 185
The filling material behind abutments shall be free The effective length used for calculations of internal sta-
draining, nonexpansive soil, and shall be drained by weep bility under the abutment footing shall always be the length
186 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 7.5.4
beyond the end of the footing or beyond a distance of zontal distance equal to 50% of the height of the abutment
0.3(H1) from the facing, whichever is less, where H1 is the wall.
height of wall plus surcharge. The horizontal forces transmitted to the piles shall be
The minimum distance from the center line of the resisted by the lateral capacity of the pile itself, or the soil
bearing· on the abutment to the outer edge of the facing reinforcements in the upper part of the wall designed to
shall be 3.5 feet. The minimum distance between carry the additional loads transmitted from the piles to the
the back face of the panel and the footing shall be 6 reinforced soil backfill. Where interference between the
inches. piles and the soil reinforcement occurs, the reinforce-
The abutment footing should be placed on a bed of com- ments must be designed around the piles, and the piles
pacted coarse aggregate 3 feet thick when significant frost treated as backfill obstructions (see Article 5.8.12.4). A
penetration is anticipated. clear distance of no less than 0.5 meters ( 1.5 feet) from the
Abutments shall not be constructed on mechanically back of the wall facing to the edge of the nearest pile or
stabilized embankments if anticipated differential settle- pile casing shall be provided. Piles should be driven prior
ments between abutments or between piers and abutments to wall construction and cased through fill if necessary.
are greater than one-half the limiting differential settle- Lateral loads transmitted from the piles to the rein-
mentS as shown in Figure 7.5.4A. This figure should be forced backfill may be determined using a P-Y lateral load
used for general guidance only. Detailed analyses will still analysis technique.
be required to address differential settlement problems.
For structures supporting bridge abutments, the maxi- 7.5.5 Abutments on Modular Systems
mum horizontal force shall be used for connection design Abutments seats constructed on modular units shall be
throughout the height of the structure. designed by considering, in addition to earth pressures, the
The density, length, and cross section of the soil rein- supplemental horizontal pressures from the abutment seat
forcements designed for support of the abutment wall beam and earth pressures on the back wall. The top module
shall be carried on the wing walls for a minimum hori- shall be proportioned to be stable, with the required factor
0 75 100 125
SPAN LENGTH (f11
FIGURE 7.5.4A Limiting Values ofDift'erential Settlement Based on Field Surveys of Simple
and Continuous Span Structures of Various Span Lengths, Moulton, et al. (1985)
7.5.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 187
of safety, under the combined actions of normal and sup- ments to tie them together. Such bars shall extend into the
Wingwalls shall be of sufficient length to retain the The provisions of Articles 7 .l through 7.5 shall apply
roadway embankment to the required extent and to fur- to the load factor design of abutments with the exception
nish protection against erosion. The wingwall lengths that: ( 1) Article 7.5 .2 on loading shall be replaced by the
shall be computed using the required roadway slopes. articles for loads, earth pressures and water pressures in
Articles 5.13 and 5.14 for retaining walls, and (2) Article
7.5.6.2 Reinforcement 7 .5.2.1 shall be replaced by the articles for stability in Ar-
ticles 5.13 and 5 .14. Abutments shall be designed to with-
Reinforcing bars or suitable rolled sections shall be stand earth pressures, water pressures and other loads sim-
spaced across the junction between wingwalls and abut- ilar to the design of retaining walls.
0
Section 8
REINFORCED CONCRETE*
Part A
(;ENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND MATERIALS
0 *The specifications of Section 8 are pauerned after and arc in general conformity with the provisions of ACI Standard 318 for reinforced concrete de-
sign and its commentary, ACI 318 R, published by the American Concrete Institute.
189
190 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.1.2
= factored moment component in the direction P ny = nominal axial load strength corresponding to
of the x axis (Article 8.16.4.3) Mny• with bending considered in the direction
Muy = factored moment component in the direction of they axis only (Article 8.16.4.3)
of the y axis (Article 8.16.4.3) Pnxy = nominal axial load strength with biaxial load-
= value of smaller end moment on compression ing (Article 8.16.4.3)
member due to gravity loads that result in no Pu =factored axial load at given eccentricity
appreciable sidesway calculated by conven- r = radius of gyration of cross section of a com-
tional elastic frame analysis, positive if mem- pression member (Article 8.16.5.2.2)
ber is bent in single curvature, negative if s = spacing of shear reinforcement in direction
bent in double curvature (Article 8.16.5.2.4) parallel to the longitudinal reinforcement, in.
= value of larger end moment on compression Sw = spacing of wires to be developed or spliced,
member due to gravity loads that result in no
in.
appreciable sidesway calculated by conven-
S = span length, ft
tional elastic frame analysis, always positive
V = design shear force at section (Article
(Article 8.16.5.2.4)
8.15.5.1.1)
= value of larger end moment on compression
v = design shear stress at section (Article
member due to lateral loads or gravity loads
that result in appreciable sidesway, defined 8.15.5.1.1)
by a deflection fl., greater than ejl500, cal- Vc = nominal shear strength provided by concrete
culated by conventional elastic frame analy- (Article 8.16.6.1)
sis, always positive. (Article 8.16.5.2) Vc =permissible shear stress carried by concrete
n = modular ratio of elasticity = E/Ec (Article (Article 8.15.5.2)
8.15.3.4) vdh = design horizontal shear stress at any cross
N = design axial load normal to cross section oc- section (Article 8.15.5.5.3)
curring simultaneously with V to be taken as vh = permissible horizontal shear stress (Article
positive for compression, negative for ten- 8.15.5.5.3)
sion and to include the effects of tension due Vn = nominal shear strength (Article 8.16.6.1)
to shrinkage and creep (Articles 8.15.5.2.2 Vnh = nominal horizontal shear strength (Article
and 8.15.5.2.3) 8.16.6.5 .3)
= design tensile force applied at top of bracket V" = nominal shear strength provided by shear re-
of corbel acting simultaneously with V, to be inforcement (Article 8.16.6.1)
taken as positive for tension (Article 8.15.5.8) Vu = factored shear force at section (Article
= factored axial load normal to the cross sec- 8.16.6.1)
tion occurring simultaneously with Vu to be We =weight of concrete, lb per cu ft
taken as positive for compression, negative y, =distance from centroidal axis of gross sec-
for tension, and to include the effects of ten- tion, neglecting reinforcement, to extreme
sion due to shrinkage and creep (Article fiber in tension (Article 8.13.3)
8.16.6.2.2) z = quantity limiting distribution of flexural rein-
Nuc = factored tensile force applied at top of forcement (Article 8.16.8.4)
bracket or corbel acting simultaneously with a (alpha)= angle between inclined shear reinforcement
v u• to be taken as positive for tension (Arti- and longitudinal axis of member
cle 8.16.6.8)
ar =angle between shear-friction reinforcement
= nominal axial load strength of a section at bal-
and shear plane (Articles 8.15.5.4 and
anced strain conditions (Article 8.16.4.2.3)
8.16,6.4) I
= absolute value of ratio of maximum dead Design load-All applicable loads and forces or their
load moment to maximum total load mo- related internal moments and forces used to proportion
ment, always positive members. For design by SERVICE LOAD DESIGN, de-
= ratio of depth of equivalent compression sign load refers to loads without load factors. For design
zone to depth from fiber of maximum com- by STRENGTH DESIGN METHOD, design load refers
pressive strain to the neutral axis (Article to loads multiplied by appropriate load factors.
8.16.2.7) Design strength-Nominal strength multiplied by a
= correction factor related to unit weight for strength reduction factor, <j>.
concrete (Articles 8. I5.5.4 and 8.16.6.4) Developmelltlength-Length of embedded reinforce-
J.l (mu) = coefficient of friction (Article 8.15.5 .4.3) ment required to develop the design strength of the rein-
p (rho) = tension reinforcement ratio = A/bwd, AJbd forcement at a critical section.
p' = compression reinforcement ratio = A:Jbd Embedment length-Length of embedded reinforce-
Ph = reinforcement ratio producing balanced strain ment provided beyond a critical section.
conditions (Article 8.16.3.1.1) Factored load-Load, multiplied 'by appropriate load
Ps = ratio of volume of spiral reinforcement to factors, used to proportion members by the STRENGTH
total volume of core (out-to-out of spirals) of DESIGN METHOD.
a spirally reinforced compression member Nominal strength-Strength of a member or cross sec-
(Article 8.18.2.2.2) tion calculated in accordance with provisions and as-
Pw =reinforcement ratio used in Equation (8-4) sumptions of the STRENGTH DESIGN METHOD be-
and Equation (8-48) fore application of any strength reduction factors.
= moment magnification factor for members Plain reitiforcement-Reinforcement that does not
braced against sidesway to reflect effects of conform to the definition of deformed reinforcement.
member curvature between ends of compres- Required strength-Strength of a member or cross sec-
sion member tion required to resist factored loads or related internal
=moment magnification factor for members
moments and forces in such combinations as are stipu-
not braced against sidesway to reflect lateral
lated in Article 3.22.
drift resulting from lateral and gravity loads
Sen'ice /oad....:..Loads without load factors.
<I> (phi) = strength reduction factor (Article 8.16.1.2)
Spiral rebiforcemem-Continuously wound reinforce-
8.1.3 Definitions ment in the form of a cylindrical helix.
Splitting tensile strength (fct)-Tensile strength of con-
The following terms are defined for general use in crete determined in accordance with "Specifications for
Section 8. Specialized definitions appear in individual Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete,"
Articles. AASHTO M 195 (ASTM C 330).
Stirrups or ties-Lateral reinforcement formed of in-
Bracket or corbel-Short (haunched) cantilever that dividual units, open or closed, or of continuously wound
projects from the face of a column or wall to support a reinforcement. The term "stirrups" is usually applied to
concentrated load or beam reaction. See Articles 8.15.5.8 lateral reinforcement in horizontal members and the term
and 8.16.6.8. "ties" to those in vertical members.
Compressil•e strength of concrete (f; )-Specified Tension tie member-Member having an axial tensile
compressive strength of concrete in pounds per square force sufficient to create tension over the entire cross sec-
inch (psi). tion and having limited concrete cover on all sides. Ex-
Concrete, structural lightweight-A concrete contain- amples include: arch ties, hangers carrying load to an
ing lightweight aggregate having an air-dry unit weight as overhead supporting structure, and main tension elements
determined by "Method of Test for Unit Weight of Struc- in a truss.
tural Lightweight Concrete" (ASTM C 567), not exceed- Yield strength or _vield point (fy)-Specified minimum
ing 115 pcf. In this specification, a lightweight concrete yield strength or yield point of reinforcement in pounds
without natural sand is termed "all-lightweight concrete" per square inch.
and one in which all fine aggregate consists of normal
weight sand is termed "sand-lightweight concrete." 8.2 CONCRETE
Defonned reinforcement-Deformed reinforcing bars,
deformed wire, welded smooth wire fabric, and welded The specified compressive strength, f:, of the con-
deformed wire fabric. crete for each part of the structure shall be shown on
8.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 193
the plans. The requirements for f ~ shall be based on tests of 8.3.3 Designs shall not use a yield strength, fy, in excess
cylinders made and tested in accordance with Section 4- of 60,000 psi.
Division II.
8.3.4 Deformed reinforcement shall be used except that
plain bars or smooth wire may be used for spirals and
8.3 REINFORCEMENT ties.
8.3.1 The yield strength or grade of reinforcement shall
be shown on the plans. 8.3.5 Reinforcement shall conform to the specifica-
tions listed in Division II, Section 5, except that, for
8.3.2 Reinforcement to be welded shall be indicated on reinforcing bars, the yield strength and tensile strength
the plans and the welding procedure to be used shall be shall correspond to that determined by tests on full-sized
specified. bars.
PartB
ANALYSIS
All members of continuous and rigid frame structures 8.6.1 Any reasonable assumptions may be adopted for
shall be designed for the maximum effects of the loads computing the relative flexural and torsional stiffnesses of
8.5.1 In general, provisions for temperature changes 8.7 MODULUS OF ELASTICITY AND
shall be made in simple spans when the span length ex- POISSON'S RATIO
ceeds 40 feet.
8.7.1 The modulus of elasticity, Ec, for concrete~may be
8.5.2 In continuous bridges, the design shall provide for taken as wP 33 v'fJ in psi for values of We between 90
thermal stresses or for the accommodation of thermal and 155 pounds per cubic foot. For normal weight con-
movement with rockers, sliding plates, elastomeric pads, crete (wc = 145 pcO, Ec may be considered as 57 ,ooov'f;.
or other means.
8.7.2 The modulus of elasticity, Es, for nonprestressed
8.5.3 The coefficient of thermal expansion and contrac- steel reinforcement may be taken as 29,000,000 psi.
tion for normal weight concrete may be taken as 0.000006
8.7.3 Poisson's ratio may be assumed as 0.2.
perdeg F.
8.5.4 The coefficient of shrinkage for normal weight 8.8 SPAN LENGTH
concrete may be taken as 0.0002.
8.8.1 The span length of members that are not built in-
8.5.5 Thermal and shrinkage coefficients for light- tegrally with their supports shall be considered the clear
weight concrete shall be determined for the type of light- span plus the depth of the member but need not exceed the
weight aggregate used. distance between centers of supports.
194 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.8.2
8.8.2 In analysis of continuous and rigid frame mem- TABLE 8.9.2 Recommended Minimum Depths for
bers, distances to the geometric centers of members shall Constant Depth Members
be used in the determination of moments. Moments at Minimum Depth
faces of support may be used for member design. When in Feef
Superstructure 1}rpe Simple Spans Continuous Spans
fillets making an angle of 45° or more with the axis of a
continuous or restrained member are built monolithic with Bridge slabs with main
reinforcement parallel
the member and support, the face of support shall be con- to traffiC l.2(S + 10)130 (S + 10)130 i!: 0.542
sidered at a section where the combined depth of the T-Girders 0.0705 0.06SS
member and fillet is at least one and one-half times the
thickness of the member. No portion of a fillet shall be Box-Girders 0.0605 o.osss
considered as adding to the effective depth. Pedestrian Structure
Girders 0.033S 0.033S
8.8.3 The effective span length of slabs shall be as spec- a When variable depth members are used, values may be adjusted to
account for change in relative stiffness of positive and negative mo-
ified in Article 3.24.1. ment sections.
S =span length as defined in Article 8.8 in feet.
8.9 CONTROL OF DEFLECTIONS
thickness of the slab or one-half the clear distance to the
8.9.1 General next web.
Flexural members of bridge structures shall be de- 8.10.1.2 For girders having a slab on one side only, the
signed to have adequate stiffness to limit deflections or effective overhanging flange width shall not exceed Y12 of
any deformations that may adversely affect the strength or the span length of the girder, six times the thickness of the
serviceability of the structure at service load plus impact. slab, or one-half the clear distance to the next web.
8.9.2 Superstructure Depth Limitations 8.10.1.3 Isolated T-girders in which the T-shape is
used to provide a flange for additional compression area
The minimum depths stipulated in Table 8.9.2 are rec- shall have a flange thickness not less than one-half the
ommended unless computation of deflection indicates that width of the girder web and an effective flange width not
lesser depths may be used without adverse effects. more than four times the width of the girder web.
8.9.3 Superstructure Deflection Limitations
8.10.1.4 For integral bent caps, the effective flange
width overhanging each side of the bent cap web shall not
When making deflection computations, the following exceed six times the least slab thickness, or Y,o the span
criteria are recommended. length of the bent cap. For cantilevered bent caps, the span
length shall be taken as two times the length of the
8.9.3.1 Members having simple or continuous spans
cantilever span.
preferably should be designed so that the deflection due to
service live load plus impact shall not exceed Ysoo of the span,
except on bridges in urban areas used in part by pedestrians 8.10.2 Box Girders
whereon the ratio preferably shall not exceed Y.cm.
8.10.2.1 The entire slab width shall be assumed
8.9.3.2 The deflection of cantilever arms due to ser- effective for compression.
vice live load plus impact preferably should be limited to
Y100 of the cantilever arm except for the case including 8.10.2.2 For integral bent caps, see Article 8.1 0.1.4.
pedestrian use, where the ratio preferably should be Yns.
8.1 0.1 T-Girder 8.11.1 The thickness of deck slabs shall be designed in
accordance with Article 3.24.3 but shall not be Jess than
8.10.1.1 The total width of slab effective as a T- specified in Article 8.9.
girder flange shall not exceed one-fourth of the span
length of the girder. The effective flange width overhang- 8.11.2 The thickness of the bottom slab of a box girder
ing on each side of the web shall not exceed six times the shall be not less than y,6 of the clear span between girder
8.11.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 195
8.11.3 When required by design, changes in girder web 8.13.3 Deflections that occur immediately on applica-
thickness shall be tapered for a minimum distance of 12 tion of load shall be computed by the usual methods or
times the difference in web thickness. formulas for elastic deflections. Unless stiffness values
are obtained by a more comprehensive analysis, immedi-
ate deflections shall be computed taking the modulus of
8.12 DIAPHRAGMS elasticity for concrete as specified in Article 8.7 for nor-
mal weight or lightweight concrete and taking the mo-
8.12.1 Diaphragms shall be used at the ends ofT-girder ment of inertia as either the gross moment of inertia, lg, or
and box girder spans unless other means are provided the effective moment of inertia, Ie as follows:
to resist lateral forces and to maintain section geometry.
Diaphragms may be omitted where tests or structural
analysis· show adequate strength.
8.12.3 Straight box girder bridges and curved box girder and fr = modulus of rupture of concrete specified in Arti-
bridges with an inside radius of 800 feet or greater do not cle 8.15.2.1.1.
require intermediate diaphragms. For curved box girder For continuous members, effective moment of inertia
bridges having an inside radius less than 800 feet, inter- may be taken as the average of the values obtained from
mediate diaphragms are required unless shown otherwise Equation (8-1) for the critical positive and negative mo-
by tests or structural analysis. For such curved box gird- ment sections. For prismatic members, effective moment
ers, a maximum diaphragm spacing of 40 feet is recom- of inertia may be taken as the value obtained from Equa-
mended to assist in resisting torsion. tion (8-1) at midspan for simple or continuous spans, and
as the value at the support for cantilevers.
8.13 COMPUTATION OF DEFLECTIONS
8.13.4 Unless values are obtained by a more compre-
8.13.1 Computed deflections shall be based on the hensive analysis, the long-time deflection for both normal
cross-sectional properties of the entire superstructure sec- weight and lightweight concrete flexural members shall
tion excluding railings, curbs, sidewalks, or any element be the immediate deflection caused by the sustained load
not placed monolithically with the superstructure section considered, computed in accordance with Article 8.13.3,
before falsework removal. multiplied by one of the following factors:
Parte
DESIGN
8.14.1.1 The design of reinforced concrete members 8.14.1.2 All applicable provisions of this specifica-
shall be made either with reference to service loads and tion shall apply to both methods of design, except Articles
196 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.14.1.2
3.5 and 3.17 shall not apply for design by STRENGTH nected elements. Design for horizontal shear shall be in
DESIGN. accordance with the requirements of Article 8.15.5.5 or
Article 8.16.6.5.
8.14.1.3 The strength and serviceability require-
ments of STRENGTH DESIGN may be assumed to be 8.14.3 Concrete Arches
satisfied for design by SERVICE LOAD DESIGN if the
service load stresses are limited to the values given in 8.14.3.1 The combined flexure and axial load
Article 8.15.2. strength of an arch ring shall be in accordance with the
provisions of Articles 8.16.4 and 8.16.5. Slenderness ef-
8.14.2 Composite Flexural Members fects in the vertical plane of an arch ring, other than tied
arches with suspended roadway, may be evaluated by the
8.14.2.1 Composite flexural members consist of pre- approximate procedure of Article 8.16.5.2 with the un-
cast and/or cast-in-place concrete elements constructed in e
supported length, u• taken as one-half the length of the
separate placements but so interconnected that all ele- arch ring, and the radius of gyration, r, taken about an axis
ments respond to superimposed loads as a unit. When con- perpendicular to the plane of the arch at the quarter point
sidered in design, shoring shall not be removed until the of the arch span. Values of the effective length factor, k,
supported elements have developed the design properties given in Table 8. J4.3 may be used. In Equation (8-41 ), Cm
required to support all loads and limit deflections and shall be taken as 1.0 and <I> shall be taken as 0.85.
cracking.
8.14.3.2 Slenderness effects between points oflateral
8.14.2.2 The entire composite member or portions support and between suspenders in the vertical plane of a
thereof may be used in resisting the shear and moment. tied arch with suspended roadway, shall be evaluated by a
The individual elements shan be investigated for aU criti- rational analysis taking into account the requirements of
cal stages of loading and shall be designed to support all Article 8.16.5 .I. I. ·
loads introduced prior to the full development of the de-
sign strength of the composite member. Reinforcement 8.14.3.3 The shape of arch rings shall conform, as
shall be provided as necessary to prevent separation of the nearly a-; is practicable. to the equilibrium polygon for full
individual elements. dead load.
8.14.2.3 If the specified strength, unit weight, or 8.14.3.4 In arch ribs and barrels, the longitudinal re-
other properties of the various elements are different, the inforcement shall provide a ratio of reinforcement area to
properties of the individual elements, or the most critical gross concrete area at least equal to 0.01, divided equally
values, shall be used in design. between the intrados and the extrados. The longitudinal
reinforcement shall be enclosed by lateral ties in accor-
8.14.2.4 In calculating the flexural strength of a com- dance with Article 8.18.2.ln arch barrels, upper and lower
posite member by strength design, no distinction shall be levels of transverse reinforcement shall be provided that
made between shored and unshored members. are designed for transverse bending due to loads from
columns and spandrel walls and for shrinkage and tem-
perature stresses.
8.14.2.5 When an entire member is assumed to resist
the vertical shear, the design shall be in accordance with
the requirements of Article 8.15.5 or Article 8.16.6 as for 8.14.3.5 If transverse expansion joints are not pro-
a monolithically cast member of the same cross-sectional vided in the deck slab, the effects of the combined action
shape. of the arch rib, columns and deck slab shall be considered.
Expansion joints shall be provided in spandrel walls.
8.14.2.6 Shear reinforcement shall be fully anchored
into the interconnected elements in accordance with Arti- TABLE 8.14.3 Effective Length Factors, k
c1e 8.27. Extended and anchored shear r~inforcement may Rise-to-Span 3-Hinged 2-Hinged Fixed
be included as ties for horizontal shear. Ratio Arch Arch Arcb
0.1-0.2 1.16 1.04 0.70
8.14.2.7 The design shall provide for fuli transfer of · 0.2-0.3 1.13 1.10 0.70
horizontal shear forces at contact surfaces of intercon- 0.3-0.4 1.16 1.16 0.72
8ol4.3.6 DIVISION I-DESIGN 197
8.14.3.6 Walls exceeding 8 feet in height on filled within the support and having for its upper base the loaded
spandrel arches shall be laterally supported by transverse area, and having side slopes of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal.
diaphragms or counterforts with a slope greater than 45 When the loaded area is subjected to high-edge stresses
degrees with the vertical to reduce transverse stresses in due to deflection or eccentric loading, the allowable .bear-
the arch barrel. The top of the arch barrel and interior ing stress on the loaded area, including any increase due
faces of the spandrel waiJs shall be waterproofed and a to the supporting surface being larger than the loaded area,
drainage system provided for the fill. shall be multiplied by a factor of 0.75.
8.15.2.2 Reinforcement
8.15 SERVICE LOAD DESIGN METHOD
(ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN) The tensile stress in the reinforcement, f.., shall not ex-
ceed the following:
8.15.1 General Requirements
Gmde 40 reinforcement ............................... 20.000 psi
8.15.1.1 Service load stresses shall not exceed the Grade 60 reinforcement ...............................24,000 psi
values given in Article 8.15.2.
In straight reinforcement, the range between the max-
8.15.1.2 Development and splices of reinforcement imum tensile stress and the minimum stress caused by live
shall be as required in Articles 8.24 through 8.32. load plus impact shall not exceed the value given in Arti-
cle 8.16.8.3. Bends in primary reinforcement shall be
8.15.2 Allowable Stresses avoided in regions of high-stress range.
Stresses in concrete shall not exceed the following: 8.15.3.1 For the investigation of stresses at service
loads, the straight-line theory of stress and strain in flex-
8.15.2.1.1 Flexure ure shall be used with the following assumptions.
Extreme fiber stress in compression, ( .. o •••• 0.40f~ 8.15.3.2 The strain in reinforcement and concrete is
Extreme fiber stress in tension for plain directly proportional to the distance from the neutral axis.
concrete, f, .................................................0.21 fr except that for deep flexural members with overall depth
to span ratios greater than¥.~ for continuous spans and 'Y.s
Modulus of rupture. fr, from tests, or, if data are not for simple spans, a nonlinear distribution of strain shall be
available: considered.
Normal weight concrete .................7.5 v'f! 8.15.3.3 In reinforced concrete members, concrete
"Sand-lightweight" concrete ..... 6.3 0 ••••••• v'f! resists no tension.
"All-lightweight" concrete ............... 5.5 v'f!
8.15.3.4 The modular ratio, n = EJEc. may be taken
8.15.2.1.2 Shear as the nearest whole number (but not less than 6 ). Except
For detailed summary of allowable shear stress, Vc, see in calculations for deflections. the value of n for light-
weight concrete shall be assumed to be the same as for
Article 8.15.5.2.
normal weight concrete of the same strength.
8.15.2.1.3 Bearing Stress
8.15.3.5 In doubly reinforced flexural members, an
The bearing stress. fb. on loaded area shall not exceed effective modular ratio of 2EiEc shall be used to trans-
o.3o f:. form the compression reinforcement for stress computa-
When the supporting surface is wider on all sides tions. The compressive stress in such reinforcement shall
than the loaded area. the allowable be~stress on the not be greater than the allowable tensile stress.
loaded area may be multiplied by V AiA .. but not by
more than 2. 8.15.4 Compression Members
When the supporting surface is sloped or stepped, A2
may be taken as the area of the lower base of the largest The combined flexural and axial load capacity .of com-
frustrum of the right pyramid or cone contained wholly pression members shall be taken as 35% of that computed
198 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.15.4
in accordance with the provisions of Article 8.16.4. Slen- taken as 0.95 Vf!. A more detailed calculation of the al-
derness effects shall be included according to the require- lowable shear stress can be made using:
ments of Article 8.16.5. The term Pu in Equation (8-41)
shall be replaced by 2.5 times the design axial load. In
using the provisions of Articles 8.16.4 and 8.16.5, ~shall
be taken as 1.0.
Note:
8.15.5 Shear
(a) M is the design moment occurring simultaneously
8.15.5.1 Shear Stress with V at the section being considered.
(b) The quantity V diM shall not be taken greater than
8.15.5.1.1 Design shear stress, v, shall be computed 1.0.
by:
8.1 5.5.2.2 Shear in Compression Members
(8-3) For members subject to axial compression, the allow-
able shear stress carried by the concrete, vc, may be taken
as 0.95 Vf!. A more detailed calculation can be made
where V is design shear force at section considered, bw is using:
the width of web, and d is the distance from the extreme
compression fiber to the centroid of the longitudinal ten- (8-5)
sion reinforcement. Whenever applicable, effects of tor-
sion* shall be included.
The quantity N/A8 shall be expressed in pounds per square
8.15.5.1.2 For a circular section, bw shall be the di- inch.
ameter and d need not be less than the distance from the
extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the longitu- 8.15.5.2.3 Shear in Tension Members
dinal reinforcement in the opposite half of the member.
For members subject to axial tension, shear reinforce-
8.15.5.1.3 For tapered webs, bw shall be the average ment shall be designed to carry total shear, unless a more
width or 1.2 times the minimum width, whichever is detailed calculation is made using
smaller.
0.85 for "sand-lightweight" concrete. Linear interpola- 8.15.5.3.9 The value of (v - Vc) shall not exceed
tion may be used when partial sand replacement is used. 4Vff.
8.15.5.3 Shear Stress Carried by Shear 8.15.5.3.10 When flexural reinforcement located
Reinforcement within the width of a member used to compute the shear
strength is terminated in a tension zone, shear reinforce-
ment shall be provided in accordance with Article 8.24.1.4.
8.15.5.3.1 Where design shear stress v exceeds shear
stress carried by concrete, Vc, shear reinforcement shall 8.15.5.4 Shear Friction
be provided in accordance with this article. Shear rein-
forcement shall also conform to the general requirements 8.15.5.4.1 Provisions for shear-friction are to be ap-
of Article 8.19. plied where it is appropriate to consider shear transfer
across a given plane, such as: an existing or potential
crack, an interface between dissimilar materials, or an in-
8.15.5.3.2 When shear reinforcement perpendicular
tetface between two concretes cast at different times.
to the axis of the member is used:
8.15.5.4.2 A crack shall be assumed to occur along
the shear plane considered. Required area of shear-fric-
tion reinforcement Avr across the shear plane may be de-
signed using either Article 8.15.5.4.3 or any other shear
8.15.5.3.3 When inclined stirrups are used: transfer design method that results in predicti9n of
strength in substantial agreement with results of com-
prehensive tests. Provisions of Articles 8.15.5.4.4
through 8.15.5.4.8 shall apply for all calculations of
shear transfer strength.
8.15.5.3.4 When shear reinforcement consists of a
single bar or a single group of parallel bars all bent up at 8.15.5.4.3 Shear-friction Design Method
the same distance from the support:
(a) When shear-friction reinforcement is perpendicu-
lar to the shear plane, area of shear-friction reinforce-
A = (v-vc)bwd (8-9) ment Avr shall be computed by:
v f8 sina
8.15.5.3.5 When shear reinforcement consists of a where 1.1 is the coefficient of friction in accordance with
series of parallel bent-up bars or groups of parallel bent- Article 8.15.5.4.3(c).
up bars at different distances from the support, the re- (b) When shear-friction reinforcement is inclined to
quired area shall be computed by Equation (8-8). the shear plane such that the shear force produces ten-
sion in shear-friction reinforcement, the area of shear-
8.15.5.3.6 Only the center three-fourths of the in- friction reinforcement Avr shall be computed by:
clined portion of any longitudinal bent bar shall be con-
sidered effective for shear reinforcement.
(8 -11)
8.15.5.3. 7 Where more than one type of shear rein-
forcement is used to reinforce the same portion of the where lXr is the angle between the shear-friction rein-
member, the required area shall be computed as the sum forcement and the shear plane.
of the values computed for the various types separately. In (c) Coefficient of friction 1.1 in Equations (8-10) and
such computations, vc shall be included only once. (8-11 ) shall be:
concrete placed monolithically ............ 1.4A
8.15.5.3.8 When (v - Vc) exceeds 2 Vff the maxi- concrete placed against hardened concrete with
mum spacings given in Article 8.19 shall be reduced by surface intentionally roughened as specified in
one-half. Article 8.15.5.4.7 .................... ~ .. LOX.
200 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.15.5.4.3
load or reaction area. For this condition, the slab or but vc shall not exceed 1.8 Vf[. For single cell box culverts
footing shall be designed in accordance with Articles only, Vc for slabs monolithic with walls need not be taken
8.15.5.1 through 8.15.5.3, except at footings supported less than I.4Vf[, and Vc for slabs simply supported need
on piles, the shear on the critical section shall be de- not be taken less than 1.2\l'f7. The quantity Vd/M shall not
tennined in accordance with Article 4.4.11.3. be taken greater than 1.0 where M is the moment occurring
(b) Two-way action for the slab or footing, with a crit- simultaneously with V at the section considered. For slabs
ical section perpendicular to the plane of the member of box culverts under less than 2 feet of fill, applicable pro-
and located so that its perimeter bo is a minimum, but visions of Articles 3.24 and 6.4 should be used.
not closer than d/2 to the perimeter of the concentrated
load or reaction area. For this condition, the slab or 8.15.5.8 Special Provisions for Brackets and
footing shall be designed in accordance with Articles Corbels*
8.15.5.6.2 and 8.15.5.6.3.
8.15.5.8.1 Provisions of Article 8.15.5.8 shall apply
8.1 5.5.6.2 Design shear stress, v, shall be computed by: to brackets and corbels with a shear span-to-depth ratio
aid not greater than unity, and subject to a horizontal ten-
(8-12) sile force Nc not larger than V. Distance d shall be mea-
sured at the face of support.
where V and bn shall be taken at the critical section de- 8. I 5.5.8.2 Depth at outside edge of bearing area shall
fined in Article 8.15.5.6.1 (b). not be less than 0.5d.
8. 15.5.6.3 Design shear stress, v, shall not exceed Vc 8.15.5.8.3 The section at the face of support shall be
given by Equation (8-13) unless shear reinforcement is designed to resist simultaneously a shear V, a moment
~ provided in accordance with Article 8.15.5.6.4. [Vav + Nc (h- d)], and a horizontal tensile force Nc. Dis-
'J tance h shall be measured at the face of support.
(8 -13)
(a) Design of shear-friction reinforcement. Avr• tore-
sist shear, V, shall be in accordance with Article
8.15.5.4. For nonnal weight concrete, shear stress v
~c is the ratio of long side to short side of concentrated
shall not exceed 0.09f: nor 360 psi. For "all light-
load or reaction area.
weight" or "sand-lightweight" concrete, shear stress v
shall not exceed (0.09-0.03avfd)f: nor (360-l26ajd)
8.1 5.5.6.4 Shear reinforcement consisting of bars or
psi.
wires may be used in slabs and footings in accordance
(b) Reinforcement Ar to resist moment [Vav + Nc(h -
with the following provisions:
d)] shall be computed in accordance with ~icle~
8.15.2 and 8.15.3.
(a) Shear stresses computed by Equation (8-12) shall
(c) Reinforcement An to resist tensile force Nc shall be
be investigated at the critical section defined in Article
computed by An = N/f5 • Tensile force Nc shall not be
8. J5.5.6.1 (b) and at successive sections more distant
taken less than 0.2V unless special provisions are made
from the support.
to avoid tensile forces.
(b) Shear stress Vc at any section shall not exceed 0.9
(d) Area of primary tension reinforcement, As• shall be
v1! and v shall not exceed 3\l'f7. made equal to the greater of (Ar+ An)• or (2Avr13+ An).
(c) cWhere v exceeds 0.9 \l'f7. shear reinforcement
shall be provided in accordance with Article 8.15.5.3.
8. 15.5.8.4 Closed stirrups or ties parallel to ~. with
a total area Ah not less than 0.5(As- An), shall be uni-
8.15.5.7 Special Provisions for Slabs of Box
Culverts
*These provisions do not apply to beam ledges. The PCA publication,
For slabs of box culverts under 2 feet or more fill, shear
~
"Notes on ACI 318-83," contains an example design of beam ledges-
stress Vc may be computed by: Part 16, example 16·3.
'J
202 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.15.5.8.4
formly distributed within two-thirds of the effective depth the structure in the combinations stipulated in Article
adjacent to As. 3.22. All sections of structures and structural members
shall have design strengths at least equal to the required
8.15.5.8.5 Ratio p = AJbd shall not be taken less strength.
than 0.04(fc:' /fy).
8.16.1.2 Design Strength
8.15.5.8.6 At the front face of a bracket or corbel,
primary tension reinforcement, As. shall be anchored by
8.16.1.2.1 The design strength provided by a mem-
one of the following:
ber or cross section in terms of load, moment, shear, or
stress shall be the nominal strength calculated in accor-
(a) a structural weld to a transverse bar of at least
dance with the requirements and assumptions of the
equal size; weld to be designed to develop specified
strength-design method, multiplied by a strength-reduc-
yield strength fy of As bars;
(b) bending primary .tension bars As back to form a tion factor <J>. *
horizontal loop; or
8.16.1. 2. 2 The strength-reduction factors, <J>, shall be
(c) some other means of positive anchorage.
as follows:
8.15.5.8. 7 Bearing area of load on a bracket or cor-
bel shall not project beyond the straight portion of primary (a) Flexure .......................... <I> = 0.90
tension bars As. nor project beyond the interior face of a (b) Shear ........................... <I> = 0.85
(c) Axial compression with-
transverse anchor bar (if one is provided).
Spirals .......................... <I> = 0.75
Ties ............................. <I> = 0.70
(d) Bearing on concrete ................ <I> = 0.70
1~~==~===~
A8 or <I>Pb, whichever is smaller, to zero.
.r
! I ..------~-=--~~ 8./6.1.2.3 The development and splice lengths. of re-
inforcement specified in Articles 8.24 through 8.32 do not
h d
' require a strength-reduction factor.
ll_ --,~====fl
_l
8.16.2 Design Assumptions
Att(closed
stirrups or ties)
8.16.2.1 The strength design of members for flexure
Framing bar to anchor J and axial loads shall be based on the assumptions given in
stirrups or ties
this article, and on the satisfaction of the applicable con-
ditions of equilibrium of internal stresses and compatibil-
FIGURE 8.15.5.8 ity of strains.
Pb _
__ ~~r: (
o.85__..:.....:....::.. 87,ooo ) (8-18)
8.16.2.7 A compressive stress/strain distribution, fy 87,000+fy
which assumes a concrete stress of 0.85 f~ uniformly dis-
tributed over an equivalent compression zone bounded by
the edges of the cross section and a line parallel to the neu- 8.16.3.3 Flanged Sections with Tension
tral axis at a distance a = j3 1c from the fiber of maximum Reinforcement Only
compressive strain, may be considered to satisfy the re-
quirements of Article 8.16.2.6. The distance c from the 8.16.3.3.1 When the compression flange thickness is
fiber of maximum strain to the neutral axis shall be mea- equal to or greater than the depth of the equivalent rec-
sured in a direction perpendicular to that axis. The factor tangular stress block, a, the design moment strength, <t>Mn,
j3 1 shall be taken as 0.85 for concrete strengths. fc', up to may be computed by Equations (8-15) and (8-16).
and including 4,000 psi. For strengths above 4,000 psi,j3 1
shall be reduced continuously at a rate of 0.05 for each 8.16.3.3.2 When the compression flange thickness is
1,000 psi of strength in excess of 4,000 psi but j3 1 shall not less than a, the design moment strength may be computed
be taken less than 0.65. by:
8.16.3.3.4 ForT-girder and box-girder construction, stress and strain compatibility using assumptions given in
the width of the compression face, b, shall be equal to the Article 8.16.2. The requirements of Article 8.16.3.1 shall
effective slab width as defined in Article 8.1 0. also be satisfied.
8.16.3.5 Other Cross Sections For design, pure compressive strength is a hypothetical
condition since Article 8.16.4.1.2 limits the axial load
For other cross sections the design moment strength, strength of compression members to 85 and 80% of the
<f>Mn, shall be computed by a general analysis based on axial load at zero eccentricity. ·
8.16.4.2.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 205
The strength of a cross section is controlled by tension 8.1 6.4.4.4 The local buckling strain of the widest
when the nominal axial load strength, P0 , is less than the flange of the cross section may be computed assuming
balanced load strength, Pb, and is controlled by compres- simply supported boundary conditions on all four edges
sion when Pn is greater than Pb. of the flange. Nonlinear material behavior shall be con-
The nominal values of axial load strength, P"' and mo- sidered by incorporating the tangent material moduli of
ment strength, Mn, must be multiplied by the strength re- the concrete and reinforcing steel in computations of the
duction factor, <1>. for axial compression as given in Arti- local buckling strain. I
cle 8.16.1.2.
8.16.4.4.5 In lieu of the prov1s1ons of Articles
8.16.4.3 Biaxial Loading 8.16.4.4.2, 8.16.4.4.3 and 8.16.4.4.4, the following ap-
proximate method may be used to account for the strength
In lieu of a general section analysis based on stress and reduction due to wall slenderness. The maximum· usable
strain compatibility, the design strength of noncircular strain at the extreme concrete compression fiber shall be
members subjected to biaxial bending may be computed taken as 0.003 for all wall slenderness ratios up to and in-
cluding 35.0. A strength reduction factor <l>w shall be ap-
by the following approximate expressions:
plied in addition to the usual strength reduction factor, <f>,
in Article 8.16.1.2. The strength reduction factor cl»w shall
1 1 1 1 be taken as 1.0 for all wall slenderness ratios up to and
--=-+--- (8- 36)
Pnxy Pnx Pny Po including 15.0. For wall slenderness ratios greater than
206 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.16.4.4.5
15.0 and less than or equal to 25.0, the strength reduction support for the compression member. Where haunches are
factor <f>w shall be reduced continuously at a rate of 0.025 present, the unsupported length shall be measured to the
for every unit increase in the wall slenderness ratio above lower extremity of the haunch in the plane considered.
15.0. For wall slenderness ratios greater than 25.0 and less
than or equal to 35.0, the strength reduction factor <l>w shall 8.16.5.2.2 The radius of gyration, r, may be assumed
be taken as 0.75. equal to 0.30 times the overall dimension in the direction
in which stability is being considered for rectangular com-
8.16.4.4.6 Discontinuous. non-post-tensioned rein- pression members, and 0.25 times the diameter for circu-
forcement in segmentally constmcted hollow rectangular lar compression members. For other shapes, r may be
compression members shall be neglected in computations computed for the gross concrete section.
of member strength.
8.16.5.2.3 For compression members braced against
8.16.5 Slenderness Effects in Compression sidesway, the effective length factor, k, shall be taken as 1.0,
Members unless an analysis shows that a lower value may be used. For
compression members not braced against sidesway, k shall
8.16.5.1 General Requirements be determined with due consideration of cracking and rein-
forcement on relative stiffness and shall be greater than 1.0.
8.16.5.1.1 The design of compression members shall
be based on forces and moments determined from an 8.16.5.2.4 For compression members braced against
analysis of the structure. Such an analysis shall include sidesway, the effects of slenderness may be neglected
the influence of axial loads and variable moment of iner- when klJr is less than 34-( 12MJtiM2b>·
tia on member stiffness and fixed-end moment~. the effect
of deflections on the moments and forces, and the effect 8.16.5.2.5 For compression members not braced
of the duration of the loads. against sidesway, the effects of slenderness may be ne-
glected when ktJr is less than 22.
8.16.5.1.2 In lieu of the procedure described in Arti-
cle 8.16.5.1.1, slenderness effect~ of compression mem- 8.16.5.2.6 For all compression members where ktJr
bers may be evaluated in accordance with the approxi- is greater than I00, an analysis as defined in Article
mate procedure in Article 8.16.5.2. 8.16.5.1 shall be made.
where (a) When the computed end eccentricities are less than
(0.6 + 0.03h) inches, the computed end moments may
be used to evaluate M 11,1M 2b in Equation (8-45).
(8- 41) (b) If computations show that there is essentially no
moment at either end of the member, the ratio M11,1M2b
shall be equal to one.
(8-41A)
8.16.5.2.9 In structures that are not braced against I
8.16.6 Shear
(8- 43)
8.16.6.1 Shear Strength
(8-46)
(8- 44)
where Vu is the factored shear force at the section consid-
ered and Vn is the nominal shear strength computed by,
where ~d is the ratio of maximum dead load moment to
maximum total load moment and is always positive. For (8-47)
members braced against sidesway and without transverse
loads between supports. Cm may be taken as where Vc is the nominal shear strength provided by the
concrete in accordance with Article 8.16.6.2, and V,. is the
(8-45) nominal shear strength provided by the shear reinforce-
ment in accordance with Article 8.16.6.3. Whenever ap-
plicable, effects of torsion* shall be included.
but not less than 0.4.
For all other cases, Cm shall be taken as 1.0.
8.16. 6.1. 2 When the reaction, in the direction of ap-
plied shear. introduces compression into the end regions
8.16.5.2.8 If computations show that there is no mo- of a member, sections located less than a distance d from
ment at either end of a compression member braced or on- the face of support may be designed for the same shear,
braced against sidesway or that computed end eccentrici- Vu• as that computed at a distance d. An exception occurs
ties are less than (0.6 + 0.03h) inches, M 2b and M 2 ~. in when major concentrated loads are imposed between that
Equation (8-40) shall be based on a minimum eccentric- point and the face of support. In that case, sections closer
ity of (0.6 + 0.03h) inches about each principal axis sep-
arately. The ratio M 11,1M2b in Equation (8-45) shall be de- *The design criteria for combined torsion and shear given in "Build-
termined by either of the following: ing Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete" ACI 318 may be used.
208 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.16.6.1.2
Vc =(t.9v'f: +2,500pw ~~}wd (8-48) The provisions for shear stress, Vc, carried by the con-
crete apply to normal weight concrete. When lightweight
aggregate concretes are used, one of the following modi-
or, fications shall apply:
(8-49) (a) When fc, is specified, the shear strength, Vc• shall
be modified by substituting fc/6.7 for Vfj, but the
where bw is the width of web and dis the distance from the value of fc/6.7 used shall not exceed Vf:.
extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the longitu- (b) When fa is not specified, Vc shall be multiplied by
dinal tension reinforcement. Whenever applicabl'e, effects 0.75 for "all lightweight" concrete, and 0.85 for "sand-
of torsion shall be included. For a circular section, bw shall lightweight" concrete. Linear interpolation may be
be the diameter and d need not be less than the distance used when partial sand replacement is used.
from the extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the
longitudinal reinforcement in the opposite half of the 8.16.6.3 Shear Strength Provided by Shear
member. For tapered webs, bw shall be the average width Reinforcement
or 1.2 times the minimum width, whichever is smaller.
8.16.6.3.1 Where factored shear force Vu exceeds
Note: shear strength <f> Vc• shear reinforcement shall be provided
(a) Vc shall not exceed 3.5 Vf: bwd when using more to satisfy Equations (8-46) and (8-47), but not less than
detailed calculations. that required by Article 8.19. Shear strength Vs shall be
(b) The quantity VudiMu shall not be greater than 1.0 computed in accordance with Articles 8.16.6.3.2 through
where Mu is the factored moment occurring simultane- 8.16.6.3.1 0.
ously with Vu at the section being considered.
8.16.6.3.2 When shear reinforcement perpendicular
8.16.6.2.2 Shear in Compression Members
to the axis of the member is used:
For members subject to axial compression, Vc may be
computed by: Av fy d
vs =------
s
(8-53)
Vc = 2(1 + Nu
2,000A 8
J.Ji: (bwd) (8-50)
where Av is the area of shear reinforcement within a
or, distances.
Note: V = _A_v_f::;_Y_(s_in_a_+_c_os_a_)_d
The quantity NJAg shall be expressed in pounds per s s (8-54)
square inch.
8.1 6.6.3.4 When a single bar or a single group of par-
8.16.6.2.3 Shear in Tension Members
allel bars all bent up at the same distance from the support
For members subject to axial tension, shear reinforce- is used:
ment shall be designed to cany total shear, unless a more
detailed calculation is made using: (8-55)
8.16.6.3.5 DIVISION I-DESIGN 209
8.16.6.3.7 Where more than one type of shear rein- Yn = Avrfy (J.l sin cxr + cos cxr) (8-56A)
forcement is used to reinforce the same portion of the
member, shear strength Vs shall be computed as the sum where cxr is the angle between the shear-friction rein-
of the V,. values computed for the various types. forcement and the shear plane.
(c) Coefficient of friction J..l in Equations (8-56) and
8.16.6.3.8 When shear strength Yr. exceeds 4 Vf7 (8-56A) shall be:
bwd, spacing of shear reinforcement shall not exceed one-
half the maximum spacing given in Article 8.19.3. Concrete placed monolithically .............. 1.4)\
Concrete placed against hardened concrete with
8.16. 6.3. 9 Shear strength V., shall not be taken surface intentionally roughened as specified in Ar-
greater than 8 v'fi bwd. ticle 8.16.6.4.8 .......................... .1.0)\ 1
8.16.6.4 Shear Friction where A = 1.0 for normal weight concrete; 0.85 for
"sand lightweight" concrete; and 0. 75 for "all light-
8.16.6.4.1 Provisions for shear-friction are to be ap- weight" concrete. Linear interpolation may be applied
plied where it is appropriate to consider shear transfer when partial sand replacement is used.
across a given plane, such as: an existing or potential
crack, an interface between dissimilar materials, or an in-
8.16.6.4.5 Shear strength Vn shall not be ;taken
terface between two concretes cast at different times.
greater than 0.2f: Acv nor 800 Acv in pounds, where Acv is
the area of the concrete section resisting shear transfer.
8.16.6.4.2 Design of cross sections subject to shear
transfer as described in Article 8.16.6.4.1 shall be based
on Equation (8-46), where shear strength Vn is calculated 8.16.6.4.6 Net tension across the shear plane shall be
in accordance with provisions of Article 8.16.6.4.3 or resisted by additional reinforcement. Permanent net com-
8.16.6.4.4. pression across the shear plane may be taken as additive
to the force in the shear-friction reinforcement, A.,rfy,
8.16.6.4.3 A crack shall be assumed to occur along when calculating required Avr·
the shear plane considered. Required area of shear-friction
reinforcement Avr across the shear plane may be designed 8. I 6.6.4. 7 Shear-friction reinforcement shall be ap-
using either Article 8.16.6.4.4 or any other shear transfer propriately placed along the shear plane and shall be an-
design methods that result in prediction of strength in sub- chored to develop the specified yield strength on both
stantial agreement with results of comprehensive tests. sides by embedment, hooks, or welding to special devices.
Provisions of Articles 8.16.6.4.5 through 8.16.6.4.9 shall
apply for all calculations of shear transfer strength. 8.16.6.4.8 For the purpose of Article 8.16.6.4, when
concrete is placed against previously hardened concrete,
8.16.6.4.4 Shear-Friction Design Metlwd the interface for shear transfer shall be clean and free
(a) When the shear-friction reinforcement is perpen- of laitance. If J.l is assumed equal to 1.0)\, the interface
dicular to the shear plane, shear strength, V"' shall be shall be roughened to a full amplitude of approximately
computed by: V.. inch.
210 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.16.6.4.9
8.16.6.4.9 When shear is transferred between as- tal shear strength cf> Vnh in accordance with Article
rolled steel and concrete using headed studs or welded re- 8.16.6.5.3, except that the length of the segment consid-
inforcing bars, steel shall be clean and free of paint. ered shall be substituted for d.
8. I 6.6.6.3 Shear reinforcement consisting of bars or 8.16.6.8.2 Depth at the outside edge of bearing area
wires may be used in slabs and footings in accordance shall not be less than 0.5d.
with the following provisions:
8.16.6.8.3 The section at the face of the support shall
(a) Shear strength V n shall be computed by Equation be designed to resist simultaneously a shear V u• a moment
(8-47), where shear strength Vc shall be in accordance (V uav + Nuc (h - d)), and a horizontal tensile force Nuc·
with paragraph (d) and shear strength Vfo shall be in ac- Distance h shall be measured at the face of support.
cordance with paragraph (e).
(b) Shear strength shall be investigated at the critical (a) In all design calculations in accordance with Arti-
section defined in Article 8.16.6.6.1 (b}, and at succes- cle 8.16.6.8. the strength reduction factor <1> shall be
sive sections more distant from the support. taken equal to 0.85.
(c) Shear strength Vn shall not be taken greater than 6 (b) Design of shear-friction reinforcement A.. r to resist
Vf7b0 d, where bois the perimeter of the critical section shear V u shall be in accordance with Article 8.16.6.4.
defined in paragraph (b). For normal weight concrete, shear strength V nshall not
(d) Shear strength Vc at any section shall not be taken be taken greater than 0.2f;bwd nor 800bwd in pounds.
greater than 2 VfJb0 d, where b0 is the perimeter of the For "all lightweight" or "sand-lightweight" concrete.
critical section defined in paragraph (b). shear strength V 11 shall not be taken greater than (0.2-
(e) Where the factored shear force Vu exceeds the shear 0.07a/d)f:bwd nor (800- 280avfd)bwd in pounds.
strength <f> Vcas given in paragraph (d), the required area (c) Reinforcement Ar to resist moment (Vuav +
Av and shear strength Vs of shear reinforcement shall be Nuc (h- d)) shall be computed in accordance with Ar-
calculated in accordance with At1icle 8.16.6.3. ticles 8.16.2 and 8.16.3.
(d) Reinforcement An to resist tensile force Nuc shall
8.16.6.7 Special Provisions for Slabs of Box be determined from Nuc :5 <t>Anfy. Tensile force Nuc:
Culverts shall not be taken less than 0.2V 11 unless special provi-
sions are made to avoid tensile forces. Tensile force Nuc
shall be regarded as a live load even when tension re-
8. /6.6. 7. I For slabs of box culverts under 2 feet or
sultc; from creep, shrinkage. or temperature change.
more fill, shear strength Vc may be computed by:
(e) Area of primary tension reinforcement As shall be
made equal to the greater of (Ar + An) or:
vc =(2.14.[1'1 +4,600p ~~)bd (8-59)
2Avr A
-3-+ n·
but V c shall not exceed 4 Vf7 bd. For single cell box cul-
verts only, Vc for slabs monolithic with walls need not be
taken less than 3 Vf7 bd, and Vc for slabs simply sup-
ported need not be taken .less than 2.5 Vf7 bd. The quan-
tity V ud!Mu shall not be taken greater than 1.0 where Mu
is the factored moment occurring simultaneously with Vu bearlng
at the section considered. For slabs of box culverts under plate,
A.(prfmary
less than 2 feet of fill, applicable provisions of Articles relnlorcement)
3.24 and 6.4 should be used.
8.16.6.8.4 Closed stirrups or ties parallel to As, with at service load shall be limited to satisfy the requirements
a total area Ah not less than 0.5(As - An), shall be uni- for fatigue in Article 8.16.8.3, and for distribution of rein-
formly distributed within two-thirds of the effective depth forcement in Article 8.16.8.4. The requirements for con-
adjacent to As. trol of deflections in Article 8.9 shall also be satisfied.
8.16.6.8.5 Ratio p = AJbd shall not be less than 8.16.8.2 Service Load Stresses
0.04(f:lfy).
For investigation of stresses at service loads to satisfy
8.16.6.8.6 At front face of bracket or corbel, primary the requirements of Articles 8.16.8.3 and 8.16.8.4, the
tension reinforcement As shall be anchored by one of the straight-line theory of stress and strain in flexure shall be
following: used and the assumptions given in Article 8.15.3 shall
apply.
(a) a structural weld to a transverse bar of at least
equal size; weld to be designed to develop specified 8.16.8.3 Fatigue Stress Limits
yield strength fy of As bars,
(b) bending primary tension bars A5 back to form a The range between a maximum tensile stress and min-
horizontal loop, or imum stress in straight reinforcement caused by live load
(c) some other means of positive anchorage. plus impact at service load shall not exceed:
= effective tension area, in square inches, of con- calculation purposes, the thickness of clear con-
0 A
crete surrounding the flexural tension reinforce-
ment and having the same centroid as that re-
crete cover used to compute de shall not be taken
greater than 2 inches.
inforcement, divided by the number of bars or
wires. When the flexural reinforcement con- The quantity z in Equation (8-61) shall not exceed
sists of several bar or wire sizes, the number 170 kips per inch for members in moderate exposure
of bars or wires shall be computed as the total conditions and 130 kips per inch for members in severe
area of reinforcement divided by the area of the exposure conditions. Where members are exposed
largest bar or wire used. For calculation pur- to very aggressive exposure or corrosive environments,
poses, the thickness of clear concrete cover such as deicer chemicals, protection should be provided
used to compute A shall not be taken greater by increasing the denseness or imperviousness to
than 2 in. water or furnishing other protection such as a waterproof-
de = distance measured from extreme tension fiber to ing protecting system, in addition to satisfying Equa-
center of the closest bar or wire in inches. For tion (8-61 ).
PartD
REINFORCEMENT
8.17 REINFORCEMENT OF FLEXURAL not less than 0.4% of the excess slab area shall be pro-
MEMBERS vided in the excess portions of the slab.
8.17.1 Minimum Reinforcement 8. 17.2.1.2 For integral bent caps ofT-girder and box-
girder construction, tension reinforcement shall be rplaced
8.17.1.1 At any section of a flexural member where within a width not to exceed the web width plus an over-
tension reinforcement is required by analysis, the rein- hanging slab width on each side of the bent cap web equal
forcement provided shall be adequate to develop a mo- to one-fourth the average spacing of the intersecting
ment at least 1.2 times the cracking moment calculated on girder webs or a width as defined in Article 8.1 0.1.4 for
the basis of the modulus of rupture for normal weight con- integral bent caps, whichever is smaller.
crete specified in Article 8.15.2.1.1.
8.17.2.1.3 If the depth of the side face of a member
(8-62) exceeds 3 feet, longitudinal skin reinforcement shall be
uniformly distributed along both side faces of the member
8.17.1.2 The requirements of Article 8.17 .1.1 may be for a distance d/2 nearest the flexural tension reinforce-
waived if the area of reinforcement provided at a section ment. The area of skin reinforcement Au per foot of height
is at least one-third greater than that required by analysis on each side face shall be=::: 0.012 (d - 30). The maxi-
based on the loading combinations specified in Article 3.22.
mum spacing of skin reinforcement shall not exceed the
8.17.2 Distribution of Reinforcement lesser of d/6 and 12 inches. Such reinforcement may be
included in strength computations if a strain compatibil-
8.17.2.1 Flexural Tension Reinforcement in ity analysis is made to determine stresses in the individual
Zones of Maximum Tension bars or wires. The total area of longitudinal skin rein-
forcement in both faces need not exceed one-half of the
8./7.2.1.1 Where flanges ofT-girders and box-gird- required flexural tensile reinforcement.
ers are in tension, tension reinforcement shall be distrib-
uted over an effective tension flange width equal to one- 8.17.2.2 Transverse Deck Slab Reinforcement in
tenth the girder span length or a width as defined in Article T-Girders and Box Girders
8.1 0.1, whichever is smaller. If the actual slab width, cen-
ter-to-center of girder webs, exceeds the effective tension At least one-third of the bottom layer of the transverse
~ flange width, and for excess portions of the deck slab reinforcement in the deck slab shall extend to the exterior
'-4 overhang, additional longitudinal reinforcement with area face of the outside girder web in each group and be an-
214 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.17.2.2
chored by a standard 90° hook. If the slab extends beyond designed and detailed to provide adequate strength and
the last girder web, such reinforcement shall extend into ductility to resist expected seismic movements.
the slab overhang and shall have an anchorage beyond the
exterior face of the girder web not less than that provided 8.17.4 Reinforcement for Hollow Rectangular
by a standard hook. Compression Members
8.17.2.3 Bottom Slab Reinforcement for Box 8.17.4.1 The area of longitudinal reinforcement in
Girders the cross section shall not be less than 0.0 I times the gross
area of concrete in the cross section.
8.17. 2.3./ Minimum distributed reinforcement of
0.4% of the flange area shall be placed in the bottom slab 8.17.4.2 1\vo layers of reinforcement shall be pro-
vided in each wall of the cross section, one layer near each
parallel to the girder span. A single layer of reinforcement
face of the wall. The areas of reinforcement in the two lay-
may be provided. The spacing of such reinforcement shall
ers shall be approximately equal.
not exceed 18 inches.
8.17.4.3 The center-to-center lateral spacing of lon-
8.17.2.3.2 Minimum distributed reinforcement of
gitudinal reinforcing bars shall be no greater than 1.5
0.5% of the cross-sectional area of the slab, based on the
times the wall thickness, or 18 inches, whichever is less.
least slab thickness, shall be placed in the bottom slab trans-
verse to the girder span. Such reinforcement shall be dis-
8.17.4.4 The center-to-center longitudinal spacing of
tributed over both surfaces with a maximum spacing of I 8 lateral reinforcing bars shaii be no greater than 1.25 times
inches. All transverse reinforcement in the bottom slab shall the wall thickness, or 12 inches, whichever is less.
extend to the exterior face of the outside girder web in each
group and be anchored by a standard 90° hook. 8.17.4.5 Cross ties shall be provided between lay-
ers of reinforcement in each wall. The cross ties shall in-
8.17.3 Lateral Reinforcement of Flexural Members clude a standard 135° hook at one end, and a standard
90° hook at the other end. Cross ties shall be located at
8.17.3.1 Compression reinforcement used to in- bar grid intersections, and the hooks of all ties shall en-
crease the strength of flexural members shall be enclosed close both lateral and longitudinal bars at the intersec-
by ties or stirrups which shall be at least No. 3 in size for tions. Each longitudinal reinforcing bar and each lateral
longitudinal bars that are No. I 0 or smaller, and at least reinforcing bar shall be enclosed by the hook of a cross
No. 4 in size for No. 11, No. I 4, No. I 8, and bundled lon- tie at a spacing not to exceed 24 inches.
gitudinal bars. Welded wire fabric of equivalent area may
be used instead of bars. The spacing of ties shall not ex- 8.17.4.6 For segmentally constructed members, ad-
ditional cross ties shall be provided along the top and
ceed 16 longitudinal bar diameters. Such stirrups or ties
bottom edges of each segment. The cross ties shall be
shall be provided throughout the distance where the com-
placed so as to link the ends of each pair of internal and
pression reinforcement is required. This paragraph does
external longitudinal reinforcing bars in the walls of the
not apply to reinforcement located in a compression zone
cross section.
which has not been considered as compression reinforce-
ment in the design of the member.
8.17.4.7 Lateral reinforcing bars may be joined at the
corners of the cross section by overlapping 90° bends.
8.17.3.2 Torsion reinforcement, where required, shall Straight lap splices of lateral reinforcing bars are not per-
consist of closed stirrups, closed ties, or spirals, combined mitted unless the overlapping bars are enclosed over the
with longitudinal bars. See Article 8.15.5.1.1 or 8.16.6.1.1. length of the spJice by the hooks of at least four cross ties
located at intersections of the lateral bars and longitudinal
8.17.3.3 Closed stirrups or ties may be formed in one bars.
piece by overlapping the standard end hooks of ties or stir-
rups around a longitudinal bar, or may be formed in one or 8.17.4.8 When details permit, the longitudinal rein-
two pieces by splicing with Class C splices (lap of 1.7 fd). forcing bars in the corners of the cross section shall be en-
closed by closed hoops. If closed hoops cannot be pro-
8.17.3.4 In seismic areas, where an earthquake that vided, then pairs of "U" shaped bars with legs at least
could cause major damage to construction has a high twice as long as the wall thickness. and orientated 90° to
probability of occurrence, lateral reinforcement shall be one another, may be substituted.
8.17.4.9 DIVISION I-DESIGN 215
8.17.4.9 Post-tensioning ducts located in the cor- where fy is the specified yield strength of spiral reinforce-
ners of the cross section shall be anchored into the ment but not more than 60,000 psi.
corner regions with closed hoops, or by stirrups having
a 90° bend at each end which encloses at least one lon- 8.18.2.2.3 The clear spacing between spirals shall
gitudinal bar near the outer face of the cross section. not exceed 3 inches or be less than 1 inch or 1Yl times the
maximum size of coarse aggregate used.
8.18.2 Lateral Reinforcement Tie reinforcement for compression members shall con-
form to the following:
8.18.2.1 General
8.18.2.3. 1 All bars shall be enclosed by lateral ties
In a compression member that has a larger cross sec- which shall be at least No. 3 in size for longitudinal bars
tion than that required by conditions of loading, the lateral that are No. I 0 or smaller, and at least No.4 in size for No.
reinforcement requirements may be waived where struc- 11 , No. 14, No. 18, and bundled longitudinal bars. De-
tural analysis or test-, show adequate strength and feasi- formed wire or welded wire fabric of equivalent area may
bility of construction. be used instead of bars.
8.18.2.2 Spirals 8.18.2.3.2 The spacing of ties shall not exceed the
least dimension of the compression member or 12 inches.
Spiral reinforcement for compression members shall When two or more bars larger than No. 10 are bundled to-
conform to the following: gether. tie spacing shall be one-half that specified above.
8./8.2.2.1 Spirals shall consist of evenly spaced con- 8.18.2.3.3 Ties shall be located not more than half a
tinuous bar or wire, with a minimum diameter of % inch. tie spacing from the face of a footing or from the nearest
longitudinal reinforcement of a cross-framing member.
8.18.2.2.2 The ratio of spiral reinforcement to total
yolume of core, p~, shall not be less than the value given 8.18.2.3.4 No longitudinal bar shall be more than 2
by: feet, measured along the tie, from a restrained bar on ei-
ther side. A restrained bar is one which has lateral support
~ Ag
Ps =0.45 ( --1
)- f: (8 -63)
provided by the comer of a tie having an included angle
\)}I A c
f y
of not more than 135°. Where longitudinal bars are lo-
216 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.18.2.3.4
cated around the perimeter of a circle, a complete circular (d) Combinations of stirrups and bent longitudinal re-
tie may be used. inforcement.
(e) Spirals.
8.18.2.4 Seismic Requirements
8.19.2.2 Shear reinforcement shall be developed at
In seismic areas, where an earthquake which could both ends in accordance with the requirements of Article
cause major damage to construction has a high probabil- 8.27.
ity of occurrence, lateral reinforcement for column piers
shall be designed and detailed to provide adequate 8.19.3 Spacing of Shear Reinforcement
strength and ductility to resist expected seismic move-
ments. Spacing of shear reinforcement placed perpendicular
to the axis of the member shall not exceed d/2 or 24
8.19 LIMITS FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT inches. Inclined stirrups and bent longitudinal reinforce-
ment shall be so spaced that every 45° line extending to-
8.19.1 Minimum Shear Reinforcement ward the reaction from the mid-depth of the member, d/2,
to the longitudinal tension reinforcement shall be crossed
8.19.1.1 A minimum area of shear reinforcement by at least one line of shear reinforcement.
shall be provided in all flexural members, except slabs and
footings, where
8.20 SHRINKAGE AND TEMPERATURE
(a) For design by Strength Design, factored shear REINFORCEMENT
force Vu exceeds one-half the shear strength provided
by concrete <I>Vc· 8.20.1 Reinforcement. for shrinkage and temperature
stresses shall be provided near exposed surfaces of walls
(b) For design by Service Load Design, design shear and slabs not otherwise reinforced. The total area of rein-
stress v exceeds one-half the permissible shear stress forcement provided shall be at least Ys square inch per foot
carried by concrete vc· in each direction.
8.19.1.2 Where shear reinforcement is required by 8.20.2 The spacing of shrinkage and temperature rein-
Article 8.19 .1.1 , or by analysis, the area provided shall not forcement shall not exceed three times the wall or slab
be less than: thickness, or 18 inches.
where bw and s are in inches. 8.21.1 For cast-in-place concrete the clear distance be-
tween parallel bars in a layer shall not be less than 1.5 bar
8.19.1.3 Minimum shear reinforcement require- diameters, 1.5 times the maximum size of the coarse ag-
ments may be waived if it is shown by test that the re- gregate, or IY2 inches.
quired ultimate flexural and shear capacity can be devel-
oped when shear reinforcement is omitted. · 8.21.2 For precast concrete (manufactured under plant
control conditions) the clear distance between parallel
8.19.2 Types of Shear Reinforcement bars in a layer shall be not less than I bar diameter, I Yl
times the maximum size of the coarse aggrega_te, or 1
8.19.2.1 Shear reinforcement may consist of: inch.
(a) Stirrups perpendicular to the axis of the member or 8.21.3 Where positive or negative reinforcement is
making an angle of 45° or more with the longitudinal placed in two or more layers, bars in the upper layers shall
tension reinforcement. be placed directly above those in the bottom layer with the
(b) Welded wire fabric with wires located perpendic- clear distance between layers not less than 1 inch.
ular to the axis· of the member.
(c) Longitudinal reinforcement with a bent portion 8.21.4 The clear distance limitation between bars shall
making an angle of 30° or more with the longitudinal also apply to the clear distance between a contact lap
tension reinforcement splice and adjacent splices or bars.
8.21.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 217
8.21.5 Groups of parallel reinforcing bars bundled in con- TABLE 8.23.2.1 Minimum Diameters of Bend
tact to act as a unit shall be limited to 4 in any one bundle. Bar Size Minimum Diameter
Bars larger than No. 11 shall be limited to two in any one
Nos. 3 through 8 6-bar diameters
bundle in beams. Bundled bars shall be located within stir- Nos. 9, 10, and 11 8-bar diameters
rups or ties. Individual bars in a bundle cut off within the Nos. 14 and 18 10-bar diameters
span of a member shall terminate at point.li at least 40-bar
diameters apart. Where spacing limitations are based on bar
diameter, a unit of bundled bars shall be treated as a single concrete or other means. Other means of positive corro-
bar of a diameter derived from the equivalent total area. sion protection may consist of, but not be limited to,
epoxy-coated bars, special concrete overlays, and imper-
8.21.6 In walls and slabs the primary flexural reinforce- vious membranes; or a combination of these means.*
ment shall be spaced not farther apart than 1.5 times the
wall or slab thickness, or 18 inches. 8.22.4 Exposed reinforcement, inserts, and plates in-
tended for bonding with future extensions shall be pro-
8.22 PROTECTION AGAINST CORROSION tected from corrosion.
8.22.1 The following minimum concrete cover shall be 8.23 HOOKS AND BENDS
provided for reinforcement:
8.23.1 Standard Hooks
Minimum
Cover The term "standard hook" as used herein shall mean
(inches) one of the following:
Concrete cast against and permanently
(I) 180° bend plus 4dh extension, but not less than 2Y2
exposed to earth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
inches at free end of bar.
Concrete exposed to earth or weather:
(2) 90° bend plus 12db extension at free end of bar.
Primary reinforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
(3) For stirrup and tie hooks:
Stirrups, ties, and spirals . . . . . . . . . . . I Y2
(a) No. 5 bar and smaller, 90° bend plus 6db exten-
Concrete deck slabs in mild climates:
sion at free end of bar, or
Top reinforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
(b) No. 6, No. 7, and No. 8 bar, 90° bend plus 12dh
Bottom reinforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
extension at free end of bar, or
Concrete deck slabs which have no positive
(c) No. 8 bar and smaller, 135° bend plus 6db ex-
corrosion protection and are frequently
tension at free end of bar.
exposed to deicing salts:
Top reinforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Y2
8.23.2 Minimum Bend Diameters
Bottom reinforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Concrete not exposed to weather or in
8.23.2.1 Diameter of bend measured on the inside of
contact with ground:
the bar, other than for stirrups and ties, shall not be less
Primary reinforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Y2
than the values given in Table 8.23.2.1.
Stirrups, ties, and spirals . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Concrete piles cast against and/or
8.23.2.2 The inside diameter of bend for stirrups and
permanently exposed to earth . . . . . . . . 2
ties shall not be less than 4 bar diameters for sizes No. 5
and smaller. For bars larger than size No. 5 diameter of
8.22.2 For bundled bars, the minimum concrete cover
bend shall be in accordance with Table 8.23.2.1.
shall be equal to the equivalent diameter of the bundle, but
need not be greater than 2 inches, except for concrete cast 8.23.2.3 The inside diameter of bend in smooth or de-
against and permanently exposed to earth in which case
formed welded wire fabric for stirrups and ties shall not be
the minimum cover shall be 3 inches. less than 4-wire diameters for deformed wire larger than D6
and 2-wire diameters for all other wires. Bends with inside
8.22.3 In corrosive or marine environments or other se-
vere exposure conditions, the amount of concrete protec- *For additional information on corrosion protection methods, refer to
tion shall be suitably increased, by increasing the dense- National Cooperative Highway Research Report 297, "Evaluation of
ness and imperviousness to water of the protecting Bridge Deck Protective Strategies."
218 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.23.2.3
diameters of less than 8-wire diameters shall not be less 8.24.1.4.3 For No. 11 bars and smaller, the continu-
than 4-wire diameters from the nearest welded intersection. ing bars provide double the area required for flexure at the
cutoff point and the shear does not exceed three-fourths
8.24 DEVELOPMENT OF FLEXURAL that permitted.
REINFORCEMENT
8.24.1.5 Adequate end anchorage shall be provided
8.24.1 General for tension reinforcement in flexural members where re-
inforcement stress is not directly proportional to moment,
8.24.1.1 The calculated tension or compression in such as: sloped, stepped, or tapered footings; brackets;
the reinforcement at each section shall be developed on deep flexural members; or members in which the tension
each side of that section by embedment length. hook or reinforcement is not parallel to the compression face.
mechanical device, or a combination thereof. Hooks may
be used in developing bars in tension only. 8.24.2 Positive Moment Reinforcement
8.24.1.2 Critical sections for development of rein- 8.24.2.1 At least one-third the positive moment rein-
forcement in flexural members are at points of maximum forcement in simple members and one-fourth the positive
stress and at points within the span where adjacent rein- moment reinforcement in continuous members shall ex-
forcement terminates or is bent. The provisions of Article tend along the same face of the member into the support.
8.24.2.3 must also be satisfied. In beams, such reinforcement shall extend into the support
at least 6 inches.
8.24.1.2.1 Reinforcement shall extend beyond the
point at which it is no longer required to resist flexure for 8.24.2.2 When a flexural member is part of the lateral
a disumce equal to the effective depth of the member, 15 load resisting system, the positive moment reinforcement
bar diameters, or Yw of the clear span, whichever is required to be extended into the support by Article
greater. except at supports of simple spans and at the free 8.24.2.1 shall be anchored to develop the specified yield
ends of cantilevers. strength, fy. in tension at the face of the support.
8.24.1.2.2 Continuing reinforcement shall have an 8.24.2.3 At simple supports and at points of inflec-
embedment length not less than the development length .ed tion, positive moment tension reinforcement shall be lim-
beyond the point where bent or terminated tension rein- ited to a diameter such that .ed computed for f) by Article
forcement is no longer required to resist flexure. 8.25 satisfies Equation (8-65); except Equation (8-65)
need not be satisfied for reinforcement terminating beyond
8.24.1.3 Tension reinforcement may be developed center line of simple supports by a standard hook, or a me-
by bending across the web in which it lies or by making it chanical anchorage at lea~t equivalent to a standard hook.
continuous with the reinforcement on the opposite face of
the member. (8- 65)
8.24.1.4 Flexural reinforcement within the portion of
the member used to calculate the shear strength shall not where M is the computed moment capacity assuming all
be terminated in a tension zone unless one of the follow- positive moment tension reinforcement at the section to
ing conditions is satisfied: be fully stressed. V is the maximum shear force at the
ea
section. at a support shall be the embedment length be-
8.24.1.4.1 The shear at the cutoff point does not ex- yond the center of the support. At a point of inflection, fa
ceed two-thirds of that permitted, including the shear shall be limited to the effective depth of the member or
strength of shear reinforcement provided. 12 db. whichever is greater. The value MN in the devel-
opment length )imitation may be increased by 30% when
8.24. 1.4. 2 Stirrup area in excess of that required for the ends of the reinforcement are confined by a compres-
shear is provided along each terminated bar over a dis- sive reaction.
tance from the termination point equal to three-fourths the
effective depth of the member. The excess stirrup area, A"' 8.24.3 Negative Moment Reinforcement
shall not be less than 60 bwslf). Spacing, s, shall not
exceed d/(8 f3b) where f3b is the ratio of the area of rein- 8.24.3.1 Negative moment reinforcement in a con-
forcement cut off to the total area of tension reinforcement tinuous, restrained, or cantilever member, or in any mem-
at the section. ber of a rigid frame, shall be anchored in or through the
8.24.3.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 219
supporting member by embedment length, hooks, or me- "all lightweight" concrete ........ 1.33
0 chanical anchorage. "sand lightweight" concrete ...... I . I 8
Linear interpolation may be
8.24.3.2 Negative moment reinforcement shall have applied when partial sand
an embedment length into the span as required by Article replacement is used.
8.24.1.
8.25.2.3 Bars coated with epoxy with
8.24.3.3 At least one-third of the total tension rein-
cover less than 3db or clear
forcement provided for negative moment at the support
spacing between bars
shall have an embedment length beyond the point of in-
less than 6db . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 .5
flection not less than the effective depth of the member, 12-
bar diameters or Y16 of the clear span, whichever is greater. All other cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1.15
The product obtained when combining
the factor for top reinforcement
8.25 DEVELOPMENT OF DEFORMED BARS with the applicable factor for
AND DEFORMED WIRE IN TENSION epoxy coated reinforcement need
not be taken greater than I. 7
The development length, .fd, in inches shall be com-
puted as the product of the basic development length de-
8.25.3 The basic development length, modified by the
fined in Article 8.25.1 and the applicable modification fac-
appropriate factors of Article 8.25.2, may be multiplied by
tor or factors defined in Article 8.25.2 and 8.25.3, but fd
the following factors when:
shall be not less than that specified in Article 8.25.4.
8.25.1 The basic development length shall be: 8.25.3.1 Reinforcement being developed in the
length under consideration is spaced later-
No. 11 bars and smaller ................... 0.04Abfy ally at least 6 inches on center with at least
{i~ 3 inches clear cover measured in the direc-
tion of the spacing .................0.8
but not less than ........................0.0004dbfy
0 When fct is not specified the basic development length of Article 8.26.1 and ap-
220 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.26
plicable modification factors of 8.26.2, but ed shall not be 8.27.2.4.1 1\vo longitudinal wires at 2-inch spacing
less than 8 inches. along the member at the top of the U.
8.26.1 The basic development length shall be ...... . 8.27.2.4.2 One longitudinal wire located not more
0.02dbf/v'f7 than d/4 from the compression face and a second wire
but not less than .................0.0003~fy closer to the compression face and spaced at least 2 inches
from the first wire. The second wire may be located on the
8.26.2 The basic development length may be multiplied stirrup leg beyond a bend or on a bend with an inside di-
by applicable factors when: ameter of bend of not less than S-wire diameters.
8.26.2.1 Anchorage or development for reinforce-
8.27.2.5 For each end of a single-leg stirrup of
ment strength is not specifically required, or
welded smooth or welded deformed wire fabric, there
reinforcement is in excess of that required
shall be two longitudinal wires at a minimum spacing of
by analysis ..............(As required)/
(As provided) 2 inches and with the inner wire at least the greater of d/4
or 2 inches from mid-depth of member d/2. Outer longi-
8.26.2.2 Reinforcement is enclosed in a spiral of not tudinal wire at the tension face shall not be farther from
less than ~ inch in diameter and not more the face than the portion of primary flexural reinforcement
than 4-inch pitch .................0.75 closest to the face.
Critical
section
8.29.3.5 Lightweight aggregate concrete ...... 1.3 *The 20,000 has units of psi.
222 IDGHWAY BRIDGES 8.30.1.2
but not less than, a bundle. The length of lap, as prescribed in Article 8.32.3
or 8.32.4 shall be increased 20% for a three-bar bundle
and 33% for a four-bar bundle. Individual bar splices
(8- 67)
within the bundle shall not overlap.
8.30.1.3 The basic development length of welded 8.32.1.3 Bars spliced by noncontact lap splices in
deformed wire fabric, with no cross wires within the de- flexural members shall not be spaced transversely farther
velopment length, shall be determined as for deformed apart than one-fifth the required length of lap or 6 inches.
wire in accordance with Article 8.25.
8.32.1.4 The length, edt shall be the development
8.30.2 Smooth Wire Fabric length for the specified yield strength, f,, as given in Arti-
cle 8.25.
The yield strength of welded smooth wire fabric shall
be considered developed by embedment of two cross 8.32.2 Welded Splices and Mechanical Connections
wires with the closer cross wire not less than 2 inches
from the point of critical section. However, development 8.32.2.1 Welded splices or other mechanical connec-
length td measured from the point of critical section to tions may be used. Except as provided herein, all welding
outermost cross wire shall not be Jess than: shall ~onform to the latest edition of the American Weld-
ing Society publication, "Structural Welding Code Rein-
forcing Steel."
(8-68)
Equal to Or Greater than 2 Class A Class A Class B 8.32.5.1 The minimum length of lap for lap splices
Less than 2 Class B Class C Class C of welded deformed wire fabric measured between the
•Ratio of area of reinforcement provided to area of reinforcement ends of each fabric sheet shall not be less than 1.7 ed or
required by analysis at splice location. 8 inches, and the overlap measured between the outermost
224 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 8.32.5.1
cross wires of each fabric sheet shall not be less than 8.32.6.1 When the area of reinforcement provide'cl is
2 inches. less than twice that required by analysis at the splice lo-
cation, the length of overlap measured between the outer-
8.32.5.2 Lap splices of welded defonned wire fabric, most cross wires of each fabric sheet shaH not be less than
with no cross wires within the lap splice length, shall be one spacing of cross wires plus 2 inches or less than 1.5
determined as for defonned wire in accordance with Arti- ed. or 6 inches.
cle 8.32.3.1.
8.32.6.2 When the area of reinforcement provided is
8.32.6 Splices of Welded Smooth Wire Fabric in at least twice that required by analysis at the splice loca-
Tension tion, the length of overlap measured between the outer-
most cross wires of each fabric sheet shall not be less than
The minimum length of lap for lap splices of welded
1.5 .fd or 2 inches.
smooth wire fabric shall be in accordance with the fol-
lowing:
0
Section 9
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
Part A
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND MATERIALS
fps = guaranteed ultimate tensile strength of the SH = loss of prestress due to concrete shrinkage
prestressing steel, Atf! (Article 9.16)
fr = the modulus of rupture of concrete, as defined s = longitudinal spacing of the web reinforcement
in Article 9.15.2.3 (Article 9.18) (Article 9.20)
Af5 = total prestress loss, excluding friction (Article =noncomposite section modulus for the ex-
9.16) treme fiber of section where the tensile stress
fse = effective steel prestress after losses is caused by externally applied loads (Article
ft = average stress in prestressing steel at ultimate 9.18)
load = composite section modulus for the extreme
f: = ultimate stress of prestressing steel (Articles fiber of section where the tensile stress is
9.15 and 9.17) caused by externally applied loads (Article
f..y =yield stress of non-prestressed conventional 9.18)
reinforcement in tension (Articles 9.19 and = average thickness of the flange of a flanged
9.20) member (Articles 9.17 and 9.18)
t; = yield stress of non-prestressed conven- =steel stress at jacking end (Article 9.16)
tional reinforcement in compression (Article =steel stress at any point x (Article 9.16)
9.19) = permissible horizontal shear stress (Article
f~ = yield stress of prestressing steel (Article 9.1 5) 9.20)
= 0.90 f! for low-relaxation wire or strand = nominal shear strength provided by concrete
f:
= 0.85 for stress-relieved wire or strand (Article 9.20)
= 0.85 f! for Type I (smooth) high-strength bar = nominal shear strength provided by concrete
= 0.80 f! for Type II (deformed) high-strength when diagonal cracking results from com-
bar bined shear and moment (Article 9.20)
h =overall depth of member (Article 9.20) Vcw = nominal shear strength provided by concrete
I = moment of inertia about the centroid of the when diagonal cracking results from exces-
cross section (Article 9.20) . sive principal tensile stress in web (Article
K = friction wobble coefficient per foot of pre- 9.20)
stressing steel (Article 9.16) = shear force at section due to unfactored dead
L = length of prestressing steel element from jack load (Article 9.20)
end to point x (Article 9 .16) = factored shear force at section due to exter-
Mer = moment causing flexural cracking at sec- nally applied loads occurring simultaneously
tion due to externally applied loads (Article with Mlllllll (Article 9.20)
9.20) = nominal horizontal shear strength (Article
M~ =cracking moment (Article 9.18) 9.20)
Me11c = composite dead load moment at the section = verticaJ component of effective prestress force
(Commentary to Article 9.18) at section (Article 9.20)
Me~~nc = noncomposite dead load moment at the sec- = nominal shear strength provided by shear re-
tion (Article 9.18) inforcement (Article9.20)
Mma:\ = maximum factored moment at section due to =factored shear force at section (Article 9.20)
externally applied loads (Article 9.20) = distance from centroidal axis of gross section,
Mn = nominal moment strength of a section neglecting reinforcement, to extreme fiber in
Mu = factored moment at section ~ <f>Mn (Articles tension (Article 9.20)
9.17 and 9.18} fJ = friction curvature coefficient (Article 9.16)
p = Aibdt ratio of non-prestressed tension rein- a = total angular change of prestressing steel pro-
forcement (Articles 9.7 and 9.17-9.19} file in radians from jacking end to point x (Ar-
p* = Atlbd, ratio of prestressing steel (Articles ticle 9.16)
9.17 and 9.19) ~. = factor for concrete strength, as defined in Ar-
p' = A~/bd,' ratio of compression reinforcement ticle 8.16.2.7 (Articles 9.17, 9.18 and 9.19)
(Article 9.19) -y* =factor for type of prestressing steel (Article
Pu = factored tendon force 9.17)
Q = statical moment of cross-sectional area, above = 0.28 for low-relaxation steel
or below the level being investigated for shear, = 0.40 for stress-relieved steel
about the centroid (Article 9.20) = 0.55 for bars
9.1.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 227
PartB
ANALYSIS
Members shall be proportioned for adequate strength The effective span lengths of simply supported beams
using these specifications as minimum guidelines. Con- shall not exceed the clear span plus the depth of the beam.
tinuous beams and other statically indeterminate struc- The span length of continuous or restrained floor slabs and
tures shall be designed for adequate strength and satisfac- beams shall be the clear distance between faces of sup-
tory behavior. Behavior shall be determined by elastic port. Where fillets making an angle of 45° or more with
analysis, taking into account the reactions, moments, the axis of a continuous or restrained slab are built mono-
shear, and axial forces produced by prestressing, the ef- lithic with the slab and support, the span shall be mea-
fects of temperature, creep, shrinkage, axial deformation, sured from the section where the combined depth of the
restraint of attached structural elements, and foundation slab and the fillet is at least one and one-half times the
settlement. thickness of the slab. Maximum negative moments are to
be considered as existing at the ends of the span, as above
defined. No portion of the fillet shall be considered as
9.5 EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION adding to the effective depth.
9.5.1 In all bridges, provisions shall be made in the 9.7 FRAMES AND CONTINUOUS
design to resist thermal stresses induced, or means shall CONSTRUCTION
be provided for movement caused by temperature
changes. 9.7.1 Cast-in·Piace Post-Tensioned Bridges
9.5.2 Movements not otherwise provided for, including The effect of secondary moments due to prestressing
shortening during stressing, shall be provided for by shall be included in stress calculations at working load. In
means of hinged columns, rockers, sliding plates, elas- calculating ultimate strength moment and shear require-
tomeric pads, or other devices. ments, the secondary moments or shears induced by pre-
9.7.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 229
stressing (with a load factor of 1.0) shall be added alge- segment weights and erection loads shall be accommo-
braically to the moments and shears due to factored or ul- dated in pier design or with auxiliary struts. Erection
timate dead and live loads. equipment which can eliminate these unbalanced mo-
ments may be used.
9.7.2 Bridges Composed of Simple-Span Precast
Prestressed Girders Made Continuous 9.7.3.2 Flexure
9.7.2.1 General
The transverse design of segmental box girders for
When structural continuity is assumed in calculating flexure shall consider the segments as rigid box frames.
live loads plus impact and composite dead load moments, Top slabs shaH be analyzed as variable depth sections con-
the effects of creep and shrinkage shall be considered in sidering the fillets between top slab and webs. Wheel
the design of bridges incorporating simple span precast, loads shall be positioned to provide maximum moments,
prestressed girders and deck slabs continuous over two or and elastic analysis shan be used to determine the effec-
more spans. tive longitudinal distribution of wheel loads for each load
location. (See Article 3.11.) Transverse prestressing of top
9.7.2.2 Positive Moment Connection at Piers slabs is generally recommended.
9.7.3 Segmental Box Girders 9.8.1.3 For monolithic prestressed design of isolated
beams, the flange width shall not exceed 15 times the web
9.7.3.1 General
width and shan be adequate for all design loads.
9.7.3.1.1 Elastic analysis and beam theory may be
used in the design of segmental box girder structures. 9.8.2 Box Girders
9.7.3.1.2 In the analysis of precast segmental box 9.8.2.1 For cast-in-place box girders with normal
girder bridges, no tension shall be permitted across any slab span and girder spacing, where the slabs are consid-
joint between segments during any stage of erection or ered an integral part of the girder, the entire slab~ width
service loading. shall be assumed to be effective in compression.
9.7.3.1.3 In addition to the usual substructure design 9.8.2.2 For box girders of unusual proportions, in-
considerations, unbalanced cantilever moments due to cluding segmental box girders, methods of analysis which
230 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 9.8.2.2
9.8.3.1 For composite prestressed concrete where Diaphragms or other means shall be used at span ends
slabs or flanges are a~sumed to act integrally with the pre- to strengthen the free edge of the slab and to transmit lat-
cast beam, the effective web width of the precast beam eral forces to the substructure. Intermediate diaphragms
shall be the lesser of ( 1) six times the maximum thickness shall be placed between the beams at the points of maxi-
of the flange (excluding fillets) on either side of the web mum moment for spans over 40 feet.
plus the web and fillets, and (2) the total width of the top
flange. 9.10.3 Box Girders
9.8.3.2 The effective flange width of the com- 9.10.3.1 For spread box beams, diaphragms shall
posite section shall be the lesser of ( I) one-fourth of be placed within the box and between boxes at span ends
the span length of the girder, (2) six (6) times the and at the points of maximum moment for spans over
thickness of the slab on each side of the effective web 80 feet.
width as determined by Article 9.8.3.1 plus the effec-
tive web width, and (3} one-half the clear distance on 9.10.3.2 For precast box multi-beam bridges, di-
each side of the effective web width plus the effective web aphragms are required only if necessary for slab-end
width. support or to contain or resist transverse tension ties.
Changes in girder stem thickness shall be tapered for Deflection calculations shall consider dead load, live
a minimum distance of 12 times the difference in web load, prestressing, erection loads, concrete creep and
thickness. shrinkage, and steel relaxation.
9.11.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 231
Parte
DESIGN
9.13.1.2 Design shall be based on strength (Load 9.13.3 Composite Flexural Members
Factor Design) and on behavior at service conditions (Al-
lowable Stress Design) at all load stages that may be crit- Composite flexural members consisting of precast
ical during the life of the structure from the time pre- and/or cast-in-place concrete elements constructed ,in sep-
stressing is first applied. amte placements but so interconnected that all elements
respond to superimposed loads ac; a unit shall confonn to
9.13.1.3 Stress concentrations due to the prestressing the provisions of Articles 8.14.2. 1 through 8.14.2.4,
shall be considered in the design. Article 8.14.2.6, and the fo11owing.
The following assumptions are made for design pur- 9.13.3.2 The design shall provide for full transfer
poses for monolithic members. of horizontal shear forces at contact surfaces of inter-
connected elements. Design for horizontal shear shall
9.13.2.1 Strains vary linearly over the depth of the be in accordance with the requirements of Article
member throughout the entire load range. 9.20.4.
232 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 9.13.3.3
9.13.3.3 In structures with a cast-in-place slab on At the end of the seating loss zone ...... 0.83 fl
precast beams, the differential shrinkage tends to cause Tensioning to 0.90 f1' for short periods of
tensile stresses in the slab and in the bottom of the beams. time prior to seating may be permitted to
Because the tensile shrinkage develops over an extended offset seating and friction losses provided
time period, the effect on the beams is reduced by creep. the stress at the anchorage does not exceed
Differential shrinkage may influence the cracking load the above value.
and the beam deflection profile. When these factors are · Stress at service loadt after losses ......... 0.80 fl
particularly significant, the effect of differential shrinkage
should be added to the effect of loads.
9.15.2 Concrete
The design of precast prestressed members ordinarily 9.15.2.2 Stress at Service Load After Losses
shall be based on f~ = 5,000 psi. An increase to 6,000 psi Have Occurred
is permissible where, in the Engineer's judgment,
it is reasonable. to expect that this strength will be ob- Compression:
tained consistently. Still higher concrete strengths may be (a) The compressive stresses under all load combina-
considered on an individual area basis. In such cases, tions, except as stated in (b) and (c), shall not exceed
the Engineer shall satisfy himself completely that the 0.60f~.
controls over materials and fabrication procedures will (b) The compressive stresses due to effective prestress
provide the required strengths. The provisions of this plus permanent (dead) loads shall not exceed 0.40f:.
Section are equally applicable to prestressed concrete (c) The compressive stress due to live loads plus one-
structures and components designed with lower concrete half of the sum of compressive stresses due to prestress
strengths. and permanent (dead) loads shall not exceed 0.40fc.
Tension in the precompressed tensile zone:
9.15.1 Prestressing Steel (a) For members with bonded reinforce-
ment* ............................... 6~
Pretensioned members: For severe corrosive exposure conditions,
Stress immediately prior to transfer- such as coastal areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3~
Low-relaxation strands ................ 0.75 f~
Stress-relieved strands ................ 0. 70 fs
Post-tensioned members:
*Includes bonded prestressed strands.
Stress immediately after seating- tService load consists of all loads contained in Article 3.2 but does not
At anchorage ........................ 0.70 f! include overload provisions.
9.15.2.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 233
(b) For members without bonded reinforce- tions. Rigid ducts shall have sufficient strength to main-
ment ......................................0 tain their correct alignment without visible wobble during
Tension in other areas is limited by allowable temporary placement of concrete. Rigid ducts may be fabricated with
stresses specified in Article 9.15 .2.1. either welded or interlocked seams. Galvanizing of the
welded seam will not be required.
9.15.2.3 Cracking Stress*
9.16.2 Prestress Losses
Modulus of rupture from tests or if not available.
For normal weight concrete .............. 7 .5~ 9.16.2.1 General
For sand-lightweight concrete ............. 6.3~
For aiJ other lightweight concrete .......... 5.5~ Loss of prestress due to all causes, excluding friction,
may be determined by the following method.** The
9.15.2.4 Anchorage Bearing Stress
method is based on normal weight concrete and one of the
Post-tensioned anchorage at service load ... 3,000 psi following types of prestressing steel: 250 or 270 ksi,
(but not to exceed 0.9 f:i) seven-wire, stress-relieved or low-relaxation strand; 240
ksi stress-relieved wires~ or 145 to 160 ksi smooth or de-
9.16 LOSS OF PRESTRESS formed bars. Refer to documented tests for data regarding
the properties and the effects of lightweight aggregate
9.16.1 Friction Losses concrete on prestress losses.
**The relaxation losses are based on an initial stress equal to the stress
*Certain tensioning procedures may alter the elastic shortening losses. at anchorages allowed by Article 9.15.1.
0
"
"
0
--<
0
"
-
CZI
0
0
0
c: -I
z
0
" rn
•
sa ~
....
... -z
0
';I
9.16.2.2 Estimated Losses satisfy Equation (9-24), the design flexural strength shall
be assumed as:
In lieu of the preceding method, the following ·
estimates of total losses may be used for prestressed 4>M = "'{A* f* d[l- 0.6 ( p •fs: + ~ pfsy )]
members or structures of usual design. These loss values n 'I' s su f' d f'
c c
are based on use of normal weight concrete, normal
prestress levels, and average exposure conditions. For +A f d [1-0.6(.! p*fS: + pfsy )]}
s sy t d f' f'
exceptionally long spans, or for unusual designs, the t c c
method in Article 9.16.2.1 or a more exact method shall (9-13a)
be used.
9.17.3 Flanged Sections
TABLE 9.16.2.2 Estimate of Prestress Losses
Total Loss For sections having prestressing steel only, in which
'l)'peof
Prestressing Steel f~ = 4,000 psi f~ = 5,000 psi
the depth of the equivalent rectangular stress block,
defined as (Asrf1u)/(0.85f~b') is greater than the
Pretensioning Strand 45,000psi compression flange thickness "t," and which satisfy
Post-'Thnsioning8 Equation (9-21), the design flexural strength shall be as-
Wire or Strand 32,000psi 33,000 psi
Bars 22,000psi 23,000 psi sumed as:
't' n = "'[A*f*d(l-0
"'M 't' s su ·6 f' p*fs~)] (9-13)
Au= A~- A,r in Equation (9-14); (9-15)
c Ar.r =A~+ (Asfs/f'tu)- Asr,
in Equation (9-14a) (9-15a)
For rectangular or flanged sections with non-
prestressed tension reinforcement included, in which
Asr = 0.85 f: (b- b'}t/f~u; (9-16)
the depth of the equivalent rectangular stress block, A,r = the steel area required .to develop the ultimate
defined as (At ftu + Asf\y)/(0.85 f~b), is not greater compressive strength of the overhanging por-
than the compression flange thickness "t," and which tions of the flange.
9.17.4 DIVISION I-DESIGN 237
( 1) The stress-strain properties of the prestressing 9.18.2.1 The total amount of prestressed and non-
steel approximate those specified in Division II. Arti- prestressed reinforcement shall be adequate to develop an
cle 10.3.1.1. ultimate moment at the critical section at least 1.2 times
(2) The effective prestress after losses is not less than the cracking moment M~
0.5 f~.
t 2
f*
su D + -3 f5e
= _.!., (9 -19)
greater than that required by analysis based on the load- wire fabric with wires located perpendicular to the axis
ing combinations specified in Article 3.22. of the member. Web reinforcement shall extend to a
distance d from the extreme compression fiber and shall
9.18.2.3 The requirements of Article 9 .18.2.1 may be be carried as close to the compression and tension sur-
waived if the area of prestressed and non-prestressed re- faces of the member as cover requirements and the
inforcement provided at a section is at least one-third proximity of other reinforcement permit. Web rein-
greater than that required by analysis based on the load- forcement shall be anchored at both ends for its design
ing combinations specified in Article 3.22. yield strength in accordance with the provisions of
Article 8.27.
9.18.2.4 The minimum amount of non-prestressed
longitudinal reinforcement provided in the cast-in-place 9.20.1.3 Members subject to shear shall be designed
portion of slabs utilizing precast prestressed deck panels so that
shall be 0.25 square inch per foot of slab width.
(9-26)
9.19 NON-PRESTRESSED REINFORCEMENT where Vu is the factored shear force at the section consid-
ered, V c is the nominal shear strength provided by con-
Non-prestressed reinforcement may be considered as crete and V~~is the nominal shear strength provided by web
contributing to the tensile strength of the beam at ultimate reinforcement.
strength in an amount equal to its area times its yield
point, provided that 9.20.1.4 When the reaction to the applied loads in-
troduces compression into the end regions of the member,
For rectangular sections sections located at a distance less than h/2 from the face
of the support may be designed for the same shear V u as
( r: )~+(p
pfsy
d
*f~t )-( p'f;) ~ 0.36R
f: f: 1-'t
(9- 24) that computed at a distance h/2.
shall be computed from the load combination causing 9.20.3.3 The minimum area of web reinforcement
maximum moment at the section. shall be
(9- 29) where b' and s are in inches and f\Y is in psi.
(a) When fc1 is specified, the shear strength, Vci and where Vu is factored shear force at section considered, Vnh
v CWt Shall be modified by SUbStituting fc/6. 7 forvn, is nominal horizontal shear strength in accordance with
but the value of fc/6. 7 used shall not exceed v'f[. the following, and where d is for the entire composite sec-
(b) When fct is not specified, V ci and Vcw shall be mod- tion.
ified by multiplying each term containing v'f[ by 0.75
for "all lightweight" concrete, and 0.85 for "sand-light- (a) When contact surface is clean, free oflaitance, and
weight" concrete. Linear interpolation may be used intentionally roughened, shear strength V nh shall not be
when partial sand replacement is used. taken greater than 80bvd, in pounds.
(b) When minimum ties are provided in accordance
9.20.3 Shear Strength Provided by Web with Article 9.20.4.5, and contact surface is clean and
Reinforcement free of laitance, but not intentionally roughened~ shear
strength v nh shall not be taken greater than 80bvd, in
9.20.3.1
I
span, the change in compressive or tensile force to be 9.21.2 General Zone and Local Zone
transferred, and provisions made to transfer that force as
horizontal shear between interconnected elements. The 9.21.2.1 General Zone
factored horizontal shear force shall not exceed horizon-
tal shear strength <f>Vnh in accordance with Article 9.21 .2. 1.1 The geometric extent of the general zone
9.20.4.3, except that length of segment considered shall be is identical to that of the overall anchorage zone as defined
substituted for d. in Article 9 .21.1 and includes the local zone.
9.20.4.5 Ties for Horizontal Shear 9. 21 .2. 1.2 Design of general zones shall meet the re-
quirements of Articles 9.14 and 9.21.3.
(a) When required, a minimum area of tie reinforce-
ment shall be provided between interconnected ele- 9.21.2.2 Local Zone
ments. Tie area shall not be less than 50 bvslfy. and tie
spacing "s" shall not exceed four times the least web 9.21.2.2.1 The local zone is defined as the rectangu-
width of support element, nor 24 inches. lar prism (or equivalent rectangular prism for circular or
(b) Ties for horizontal shear may consist of single bars oval anchorages) of concrete surrounding and immedi-
or wire, multiple leg stirrups, or vertical legs of welded ately ahead of the anchorage device and any integral con-
wire fabric. All ties shall be adequately anchored into fining reinforcement. The dimensions of the local zone are
interconnected elements by embedment or hooks. defined in Article 9.21.7.
9.21.1.2 For anchorage zones at the end of a member 9.21.2.3.1 The engineer of record is responsible for
or segment, the transverse dimensions may be taken as the the overall design and approval of working drawings for
depth and width of the section. The longitudinal extent of the general zone, including the specific location of the ten-
the anchorage zone in the direction of the tendon (ahead dons and anchorage devices, general zone reinforcement,
of the anchorage) shall be taken as not less than the larger and the specific stressing sequence. The engineer of
transverse dimension but not more than 1Y2 times that record is also responsible for the design of local zones
dimension. based on Article 9.21.7.2 and for the approval of special
anchorage devices used under the provisions of Article
9.21.1.3 For intermediate anchorages in addition to
9.21.7.3. All working drawings for the local zone must be
the length of Article 9 .21.1.2 the anchorage zone shall be
approved by the engineer of record.
considered to also extend in the opposite direction for a
distance not less than the larger transverse dimension.
9.21.2.3.2 Anchorage device suppliers are responsi-
9.21.1.4 For multiple slab anchorages, both width ble for furnishing anchorage devices which satisfy the an-
and length of the anchorage zone shall be taken as equal chor efficiency requirements of Division II, Article I 0.3.2.
to the center-to-center spacing between stressed tendons, In addition, if special anchorage devices are used, the an-
but not more than the length of the slab in the direction of chorage device supplier is responsible for furnishing an-
the tendon axis. The thickness of the anchorage zone shall chorage devices that satisfy the acceptance test require-
be taken equal to the thickness of the slab. ments of Article 9.21.7.3 and of Division II, Article
10.3.2.3. This acceptance test and the anchor efficiency
9.21.1.5 For design purposes, the anchorage zone test shall be conducted by an independent testing agency
shall be considered as comprised of two regions; the gen- acceptable to the engineer of record. The anchorage de-
eral zone as defined in Article 9.21.2.1 and the local zone vice supplier shall provide records of the acceptance test
as defined in Article 9.21.2.2. in conformance with Division II, Article I 0.3.2.3.12 to the
9.21.2.3.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 241
engineer of record and to the constructor and shall spec- methods identical with the curing of the member, is at
ify auxiliary and confining reinforcement, minimum edge least 4,000 psi.
distance, minimum anchor spacing, and minimum
concrete strength at time of stressing required for proper 9.21.3.3 Use of Special Anchorage Devices
performance of the local zone.
Whenever special anchorage devices which do not
9.21.2.3.3 The responsibilities of the constructor are meet the requirements of Article 9.21.7.2 are to be used,
specified in Division II, Article I 0.4. reinforcement similar in configuration and at least equiv-
alent in volumetric ratio to the supplementary skin rein-
9.21.3 Design of the General Zone forcement permitted under the provisions of Division II,
Article I 0.3.2.3.4 shall be furnished in the corresponding
9.21.3.1 Design Methods regions of the anchorage zone.
The following methods may be used for the design of 9.21.3.4 General Design Principles and Detailing
general zones: Requirements
(1) Equilibrium based plasticity models (strut-and-tie Good detailing and quality workmanship are essential
models) (see Article 9.21.4) for the satisfactory performance of anchorage zones.
(2) Elastic stress analysis (finite element analysis or Sizes and details for anchorage zones should respect the
equivalent) (see Article 9.21.5) need for tolerances on the bending, fabrication and place-
(3) Approximate methods for determining the com- ment of reinforcement, the size of aggregate and the need
pression and tension forces, where applicable. (See for placement and sound consolidation of the concrete.
Article 9.21.6.)
9.21.3.4.1 Compressive stresses in the concrete
Regardless of the design method used, all designs shall ahead of basic anchorage devices shall meet the require-
conform to the requirements of Article 9.21.3.4. ments of Article 9.21.7.2.
The effects of stressing sequence and three-dimen- I
sional effects shall be considered in the design. When 9.2/.3.4.2 Compressive stresses in the concrete
these three dimensional effect~ appear significant, they ahead of special anchorage devices shall be checked at a
may be analyzed using three-dimensional analysis proce- distance measured from the concrete-bearing surface
dures or may be approximated by considering two or more equal to the smaller of:
planes. However, in these approximations the interaction
of the planes' models must be considered, and the model ( I) The depth to the end of the local confinement re-
loadings and results must be consistent. inforcement.
(2) The smaller lateral dimension of the anchorage de-
9.21.3.2 Nominal Material Strengths vice.
9.21.3.2.1 The nominal tensile strength of bonded re- These compressive stresses may be determined according
inforcement is limited to fsy for non-prestressed reinforce- to the strut-and-tie model procedures of Article 9.21.4,
ment and to fy for prestressed reinforcement. The nominal from an elastic stress analysis according to Article
tensile strength of unbonded prestressed reinforcement is 9.21.5.2, or by the approximate method outlined in Arti-
limited to (c.e + 15,000 psi. cle 9.21.6.2. These compressive stresses shall not exceed
0.7r:r
9.21.3.2.2 The effective nominal compressive
strength of the concrete of the general zone, exclusive of 9.21 .3.4.3 Compressive stresses shall also be
confined concrete, is limited to 0.7 fc'. The tensile strength checked where geometry or loading discontinuities within
of the concrete shall be neglected. or ahead of the anchorage zone may cause stress concen-
trations.
9.21.3.2.3 The compressive strength of concrete at
transfer of prestressing shall be specified on the construc- 9.21.3.4.4 The bursting force is the tensile force in
tion drawings. If not otherwise specified, stress shall not the anchorage zone acting ahead of the anchorage device
be transferred to concrete until the compressive strength and transverse to the tendon axis. The magnitude of the
of the concrete as indicated by test cylinders, cured by bursting force, Tburstt and its corresponding distance from
242 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 9.21.3.4.4
the loaded surface, dburstt can be determined using the stressed or prestressed reinforcement located close to the
strut-and-tie model procedures of Article 9.21.4, from an longitudinal and transverse edge of the concrete. Arrange-
elastic stress analysis according to Article 9.21.5.3, or by ment and anchorage of the edge tension reinforcement
the approximate method outlined in Article 9.21.6.3. shall satisfy the following:
Three-dimensional effects shall be considered for the de-
termination of the bursting reinforcement requirements. (I) Minimum spalling reinforcement satisfying Arti-
cle 9.21.3.4.8 shall extend over the full width of the
9.21.3.4.5 Resistance to bursting forces, <f>Asf,Y member.
and/or <f>Arf:, shall be provided by non-prestressed or (2) Spalling reinforcement between multiple anchor-
prestressed reinforcement, in the form of spirals, closed age devices shan effectively tie these anchorage de-
hoops, or well-anchored transverse ties. This reinforce- vices together.
ment is to be proportioned to resist the total factored burst- (3) Longitudinal edge tension reinforcement and
ing force. Arrangement and anchorage of bursting rein- spalling reinforcement for eccentric anchorage devices
forcement shall satisfy the following: shall be continuous. The reinforcement shall extend
along the tension face over the fuli length of the an-
(I) Bursting reinforcement shall extend over the ful1 chorage zone and shall extend along the loaded face
width of the member and must be anchored as cJose to from the longitudinal edge to the other side of the ec-
the outer faces of the member as cover permits. centric anchornge device or group of anchorage devices.
(2) Bursting reinforcement shall be distributed ahead
of the loaded surface along both sides of the tendon 9.21.3.5 Intermediate Anchorages
throughout a distance of 2.5 dburs• for the plane consid-
ered, but not to exceed 1.5 times the corresponding lat- 9.21.3.5.1 Intermediate anchorages shall not be used
eral dimension of the section. The centroid of the burst- in regions where significant tension is generated behind
ing reinforcement shall coincide with the distance dbur~>l the anchor from other loads. Whenever practical, blisters
used for the design. shall be located in the comer between flange and webs, or
(3) Spacing of bursting reinforcement shaH exceed shall be extended over the fu11 flange width or web height
neither 24-bar diameters nor 12 inches. to form a continuous rib. If isolated blisters must be used
on a flange or web, local shear, bending and direct force
9.21.3.4.6 Edge tension forces are tensile forces effects shall be considered in the design.
in the anchorage zone acting parallel and close to
the transverse edge and longitudinal edges of the mem-
9.2/.3.5.2 Bonded reinforcement shall be provided
ber. The transverse edge is the surface loaded by the
to tie back at least 25% of the intermediate anchorage un-
anchors. The tensile force along the transverse edge is
factored stressing force into the concrete section behind
referred to as spa/ling force. The tensile force along the
the anchor. Stresses in this bonded reinforcement are lim-
longitudinal edge is referred to as longitudinal edge
tension force. ited to a maximum of 0.6f,y or 36 ksi. The amount of
tie back reinforcement may be reduced using Equation
9.21.3.4.7 Spalling forces are induced in con- (9-32), if permanent compressive stresses are generated
centrically loaded anchorage zones, eccentrically loaded behind the anchor from other loads.
anchorage zones, and anchorage zones for multiple
anchors. Longitudinal edge tension forces are induced (9-32)
when the resultant of the anchorage forces considered
causes eccentric loading of the anchorage zone. The where, Tia = the tie back tension force at the interme-
edge tension forces can be determined from an diate anchorage;
elastic stress analysis, strut-and-tie models, or in Ps =the maximum unfactored anchorage
accordance with the approximate methods of Article stressing force;
9.21.6.4. feb = the compressive stress in the region be-
hind the anchor;
9.21.3.4.8 In no case shall the spalling force be Acb = the area of the continuing cross section
taken as less than 2% of the total factored tendon force. within the extensions of the sides of the
anchor plate or blister. The area of the
9.21.3.4.9 Resistance to edge tension forces, <f>Alsy blister or rib shall not be taken as part of
and/or <f>Atf-/, shall be provided in the form of non-pre- the cross section.
9.20.3.5.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 243
f1ll"\ 9.21.3.5.3 Tie back reinforcement satisfying Article 9.21.3.7.2 Reinforcement shall be provided for the
\_) 9.21.3.5.2 shall be placed no further than one plate width bursting force in the direction of the thickness of the slab
from the tendon axis. It shall be fully anchored so that the and normal to the tendon axis in accordance with Articles
yield strength can be developed at a distance of one plate 9.21.3.4.4 and 9.21.3.4.5. This reinforcement shall be an-
width or half the length of the blister or rib ahead of the chored close to the faces of the slab with standard hooks
anchor as well as at the same distance behind the anchor. bent around horizontal bars, or equivalent. Minimum re-
The centroid of this reinforcement shall coincide with the inforcement is two #3 bars per anchor located at a distance
tendon axis, where possible. For blisters and ribs, the re- equal to one-half the slab thickness ahead of the anchor.
inforcement shall be placed in the continuing section near
that face of the flange or web from which the blister or rib 9. 21.3. 7.3 Reinforcement in the plane of the slab and
is projecting. normal to the tendon axis shall be provided to resist edge
tension forces, T .. between anchorages (Equation (9-33))
9.21.3.5.4 Reinforcement shall be provided through- and bursting forces, T 2• ahead of the anchorages (Equation
out blisters or ribs are required for shear friction, corbel ac- (9-34)). Edge tension reinforcement shall be placed im-
tion, bursting forces, and deviation forces due to tendon mediately ahead of the anchors and shall effectively tie
curvature. This reinforcement shall be in the form of ties adjacent anchors together. Bursting reinforcement shall be
or U-stirrups which encac;e the anchorage and tie it effec- distributed over the length of the anchorage zones. (See
tively into the adjacent web and flange. This reinforcement Atticle 9.21.1.4.)
shall extend as far as possible into the flange or web and
be developed by standard hooks bent around transverse
bars or equivalent. Spacing shall not exceed the smallest of (9- 33)
blister or rib height at anchor, blister width, or 6 inches.
Local zones which meet the provisions of Article 9.21.5.1 Analyses based on assumed elastic material
9.2 J .7 or Division II, Article 10.3.2.3 are considered as properties, equi1ibrium, and compatibility of strains are
properly detailed, adequate nodes. The other nodes in the acceptable for analysis and design of anchorage zones.
anchorage zone are adequate if the effective concrete
stresses in the struts meet the requirements of Article 9.21.5.2 If the compressive stresses in the concrete
9.21.4.3 and the tension ties are properly detailed to de- ahead of the anchorage device are determined from a lin-
velop the full-yield strength of the reinforcement. ear-elastic stress analysis, local stress maxima may be av-
eraged over an area equal to the bearing area of the an-
9.21.4.3 Struts chorage device.
9.2/.4.3.1 The effective concrete compressive 9.21.5.3 Location and magnitude of the bursting
strength for the general zone shall usually be limited to force may be obtained by integration of the corresponding
0.14> f:, In areas where the concrete may be extensively tensi1e bursting stresses along the tendon path.
cracked at ultimate due to other load effects, or if large
plastic rotations are required, the effective compressive 9.21.6 Approximate Methods
strength shall be limited to 0.6~ f~i·
9.21.6.1 Limitations
9.2/.4.3.2 In anchorage zones the critical section for
compression struts is ordinarily located at the interface In the absence of a more accurate analysis, concrete
with the local zone node. If special anchorage devices are compressive stresses ahead of the anchorage device, loca-
used, the critical section of the strut can be taken as that tion and magnitude of the bursting force, and edge tension
section whose extension intersects the axis of the tendon forces may be estimated by Equations (9-35) through
at a depth equal to the smaller of the depth of the local (9-38), provided that:
confinement reinforcement or the lateral dimension of the
( 1) The member has a rectangular cross section and its
anchorage device.
longitudinal extent is at least equal to the largest trans-
verse dimension of the cross section.
9.21.4.3.3 For thin members with a ratio of member
(2) The member has no discontinuities within or ahead
thickness to anchorage width of no more than three, the of the anchorage zone.
dimension of the strut in the direction of the thickness of (3) The minimum edge distance of the anchorage in
the member can be approximated by assuming that the the main plane of the member is at least 1Y:! times the
thickness of the compression strut varies linearly from the corresponding lateral dimension. a, of the anchorage
transverse lateral dimension of the anchor at the surface device.
of the concrete to the total thickness of the section at a (4) Only one anchorage device or one group of closely
depth equal to the thickness of the section. spaced anchorage devices is located in the anchorage
zone. Anchorage devices can be treated as closely
9.21.4.3.4 The compression stresses can be assumed spaced if their center-to-center spacing does not exceed
as acting parallel to the axis of the strut and as uniformly 1Y:z times the width of the anchorage devices in the
distributed over its cross section. direction considered.
9.21.6.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 245
(5) The angle of inclination of the tendon with respect If a group of anchorages is closely spaced in two direc-
to the center line of the member is not larger than 20° tions, the product of the correction factors, K, for each di-
if the anchor force points toward the centroid of the rection is used in Equation {9-36).
section and for concentric anchors, and is not larger
than 5° if the anchor force points away from the cen- 9.21 .6.2.3 Effective bearing area, Ab, in Equation
troid of the section. (9-35) shall be taken as the larger of the anchor bearing
plate area, Aplute• or the bearing area of the confined
concrete in the local zone, Aeonf• with the following limi-
9.21.6.2 Compressive Stresses tations:
( 1) If Arlutc controls, Aplute shall not be taken larger than
9.21.6.2.1 No additional check of concrete compres- 4/'Tr Acunr·
sive stresses is necessary for basic anchorage devices sat- (2) If A,..10r controls, the maximum dimension of A,"'nr
isfying Article 9 .21. 7 .2. shall not be more than twice the maximum dimension
of Aplute or three times the minimum dimension of Aplate·
9.21.6.2.2 The concrete compressive stresses ahead If any of these limits is violated the effective-bearing
of special anchorage devices at the interface between local area, Ab, shall be based on Aplute·
zone and general zone shall be approximated by Equa- (3) Deductions shall be made for the area of the duct
tions (9-35) and (9-36). in the determination of Ab.
where:
dbum = 0.5(h - 2e) + 5e sina (9-38)
fen = the concrete compressive stress ahead of the an-
chorage device; where, IPu =the sum of the total factored tendon
K = a correction factor for closely spaced anchor- loads for the stressing arrangement
ages; considered;
Ab = an effective bearing area as defined in Article a = the lateral dimension of the anchorage
9.21.6.2.3; device or group of devices in the direc-
Ucrr =the lateral dimension of the effective bearing tion considered;
area measured parallel to the larger dimension of e = the eccentricity (always taken as posi-
the cross section or in the direction of closely tive) of the anchorage device or group
of devices with respect to the centroid
spaced anchors;
of the cross section;
bc:rr = the lateral dimension of the effective bearing
h = the lateral dimension of the cross sec-
area measured parallel to the smaller dimension
tion in the direction considered;
of the cross section;
a = the angle of inclination of the resultant
fe = the longitudinal extent of confining reinforce-
of the tendon forces with respect to the
ment for the local zone, but not more than the
center line of the member.
larger of 1.15 Ucrr or 1.15 herr;
Pu = the factored tendon load; 9.21.6.4 Edge-Tension Forces
t = the thickness of the section;
s = the center-to-center spacing of multiple anchor- 9.21.6.4.1 For multiple anchorages with a center-to-
ages; center spacing of less than 0.4 times the depth of the sec-
n = the number of anchorages in a row. tion, the spalling forces shall be given by Article
246 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 9.21.6.4.1
9.21.3.4.8. For larger spacings. the spalling forces shall be the bottom of each bearing surface plus the maximum
determined from a more detailed analysis. such as strut- dimension of that bearing surface.
and-tie models or other analytical procedures.
In no case shall the length of the local zone be taken as
9.21.6.4.2 If the centroid of all tendons considered is greater than I Y2 times the width of the local zone.
located outside of the kern of the section both spalling
forces and longitudinal edge tension forces are induced. 9.21.7.1.4 For closely spaced anchorages an en-
The longitudinal edge-tension force shall be determined larged local zone enclosing all individual anchorages shall
from an axial-flexural beam analysis at a section located also be considered.
at one-half the depth of the section away from the loaded
surface. The spalling force shall be taken as equal to the 9.21.7.2 Bearing Strength
longitudinal edge-tension force but not less than specified
in Article 9.21.3.4.8. 9.21.7.2.1 Anchorage devices may be either basic
anchorage devices meeting the bearing compressive
9.21.7 Design of the Local Zone
strength limits of Articles 9 .21. 7 .2.2 through 9 .21.7 .2.4 or
special anchorage devices meeting the requirements of
9.21.7.1 Dimensions of the Local Zone
Article 9.21.7.3.
9.21. 7.1. 1 When no independently verified manufac-
9.21.7.2.2 The effective concrete bearing compres-
turer's edge-distance recommendations for a particular
sive strength fb used for design shall not exceed that of
anchorage device are available, the transverse dimensions
Equations (9-39) or (9-40).
of the local zone in each direction shall be taken as the
larger of:
(9-39)
(I) The corresponding bearing plate size plus twice
the minimum concrete cover required for the particu-
lar application and environment. but, (9-40)
(2) The outer dimension of any required confining re-
inforcement plus the required concrete cover over the where:
confining reinforcing steel for the particular applica-
tion and environment. fb =the maximum factoretl tendon load, Pu, divided
by the effective bearing area Ab;
9.21.7.1.2 When independently verified manufac- fci = the concrete compressive strength at stressing;
turer's recommendations for minimum cover. spacing and A = the maximum area of the portion of the support-
edge distances for a particular anchorage device are avail- ing surface that is geometrically similar to the
able, the transverse dimensions of the local zone in each loaded area and concentric with it;
direction shall be taken as the smaller of: A 8 = the gross area of the bearing plate if the require-
ments of Article 9.21.7.2.3 are met, or is the area
(I) Twice the edge distance specified by the anchorage calculated in accordance with Article 9 .21. 7 .2.4;
device supplier. Ab = the effective net area of the bearing plate calcu-
(2) The center-to-center spacing specified by the an- lated as the area A8 minus the area of openings in
chorage device supplier. the bearing plate.
The manufacturer's recommendations for spacing and Equations (9-39) and (9-40) are only valid if general zone
edge distance of anchorages shall be considered minimum reinforcement satisfying Article 9.21.3.4 is provided and
values. if the extent of the concrete along the tendon axis ahead
of the anchorage device is at least twice the length of the
9.21.7./.3 The length of the local zone along the ten- local zone as defined in Article 9.21.7.1.3.
don axis shall be taken as the greater of:
9.21.7.2.3 The full bearing plate area may be used
(I) The maximum width of the local zone. for A8 and the calculation of Ab if the anchorage device is
(2) The length of the anchorage device confining rein- sufficiently rigid. To be considered sufficiently rigid, the
forcement. slenderness of the bearing plate (nit) must not exceed the
(3) For anchorage devices with multiple-bearing sur- value given in Equation (9-41 ). The plate must also be
faces. the distance from the loaded concrete surface to checked to ensure that the plate material does not yield.
9.21.7.2.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 247
PartD
DETAILING
Bar reinforcement for cast-in-place T-beam and box 9.26.1 Minimum Cover
girder flanges shall confonn to the provisions in Articles
8.17 .2.2 and 8.17.2.3 except that the minimum reinforcement The following minimum concrete cover shall be pro-
0 in bottom flanges shall be 0.3% of the flange section. vided for prestressing and conventional steel:
248 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 9.26.1.1
251
252 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.1.1
b' = width of stiffeners (Articles 10.34.5.2, d =depth of beam or girder, in. (Table 10.32.1A
I0.34.6, 10.37.2.4, I0.39.4.5.1, and 10.55.2) and Articles 10.13, 10.48.2, I 0.48.4.1, and
b' = width of a projecting flange element, angle, 10.50.1.1.2)
or stiffener (Articles 10.34.2.2, 10.34.4. 7, d = diameter of rocker or roller, in. (Article
10.37.3.2, 10.39.4.5.1, I 0.48.5.3, I0.51.5.5, 10.32.4.2)
and 10.55.3) =beam depth (Article I0.56.3)
c = web buckling coefficient (Articles I0.34.4, =column depth (Article 10.56.3)
10.38.1.7, I0.48.5.3, and 10.48.8) = spacing of intermediate stiffener (Articles
c = compressive force in the slab (Article I0.34.4, I 0.34.5, 10.48.5.3, 10.48.6.3, and
I0.50.1.I.1) 10.48.8)
c = equivalent moment factor (Article 10.54.2.I) = distance from the centerline of a plate longi-
C' =compressive force in top portion of steel sec- tudinal stiffener or the gage line of an angle
tion (Article 10.50.1.1.1) longitudinal stiffener to the inner surface or
= bending coefficient (Table 10.32.1 A and Ar- the leg of the compression flange component
ticles 10.48.4.1 and 10.50.2.2) (Articles 10.34.3.2.1, 10.34.5.1, 10.48.4.1,
= column slenderness ratio dividing elastic and 10.49.3.2(a), and 10.61.1)
inelastic buckling (Table 10.32. 1A) E = modulus of elasticity of steel, psi (Table
= coefficient about X axis (Article 10.36) 10.32.1A and Articles 10.15.3, I0.36, 10.37,
= coefficient about the Y axis (Article 10.36) 10.39.4.4.2, 10.54.1, and 10.55.1)
= buckling stress coefficient (Article = modulus of elasticity of concrete, psi (Article
10.51.5.2) 10.38.5.1.2)
D =clear distance between flanges, in. (Article e = distance from the centerline of a splice to the
10.15.2) centroid of the connection on the side of the
D = clear unsupported distance between flange joint under consideration (Articles 1O.I8.2.3.3,
components (Articles 10.18.2.3.4, 10.18.2.3.7, 1O.I8.2.3.5, and 10.18.2.3. 7)
10.18.2.3.8, 10.18.2.3.9, 10.34.3, I0.34.4, F = maximum induced stress in the bottom
10.34.5, 10.37.2, I0.48.1, I0.48.2, 10.48.4, flange (Article 10.20.2.1)
10.48.5, 10.48.6, I0.48.8, I0.49.2, 10.49.3.2, F = maximum compressive stress, psi (Article
I0.50.1.1.2, 10.50.2.I, 10.55.2, and 10.61.1) 10.41.4.6)
D' = distance from the top of the slab to the neu- = allowable axial unit stress (Table I0.32.1A
tral axis at which a composite section in pos- and Articles I0.36, 10.37.1.2, and 10.55.1)
itive bending theoretically reaches its plastic- =allowable bending unit stress (Table 10.32.1A
moment capacity when the maximum strain and Articles 10.18.2.2.3, 10.37.1.2, and
in the slab is at 0.003 (Article I0.50.1.1.2) 10.55.1)
= clear distance between the neutral axis and the =compressive bending stress permitted about
compression flange (Articles 10.34.3.2.1, the X axis (Article 10.36)
10.34.5.1, 10.48.4.I, 10.49.2, 10.49.3, =compressive bending stress permitted about
I0.50{b), I0.57, and 10.61.1) the Y axis (Article 10.36)
= moments caused by dead load acting on com- = buckling stress of the compression flange
posite girder (Article 10.50.1.2.2) plate or column (Articles 10.48.2, 10.50.2.2,
Dcp = depth of the web in compression at the plas- 10.51.1, 10.51.5, 10.54.1.1, and I0.54.2.1)
tic moment (Articles 10.50(b), 10.50.1.1.2, Fer = local buckling stress of a stiffener (Articles
and 10.50.2.1) 10.34.4.7 and 10.48.5.3)
= depth of the web in compression of the non- = design stress for the controlling flange at a
composite steel beam or girder (Articles point of splice (Articles 10.18.2.2.3 and
10.34.5.1 and 10.49.3.2(a)) I0.18.2.3.8)
Feu = design stress for the controlling flange at a
= distance from the top of the slab to the plas-
tic neutral axis, in. (Article I 0.50.1.1.2) point of splice (Articles 10.18.2.2.1 and
10.18.2.3.4)
= moments caused by dead load acting on steel
girder (Article I0.50.1.2.2) = maximum horizontal force (Article
d = bolt diameter (Table I0.32.3B) 10.20.2.2)
d = diameter of stud, in. (Article 10.38.5.1) =Euler buckling stress (Articles 10.37.1,
10.54.2.1, and 10.55.1)
I O.l.I DIVISION I-DESIGN 253
F~ = Euler stress divided by a factor of safety (Ar- = computed axial compression stress (Articles
ticJe I 0.36) 10.35.2.IO, I0.36, 10.37, I0.55.2, and
Fncr =design stress for the noncontrolling flange at 10.55.3)
a point of splice (Article 10.18.2.2.3) = computed compressive bending stress (Arti-
Fncu =design stress for the noncontrolling flange at cJes I0.34.2, 10.34.3, 10.34.5.2, 10.37,
a point of splice (Article 1O.I8.2.2.I) 10.39, and 10.55)
FP =computed bearing stress due to design load = factored bending stress in the compression
(Table 10.32.3B) flange (Articles 10.48, 10.48.2.1 (b),
Fs = limiting bending stress (Article I0.34.4) 10.48.4.1, I 0.50.I.2.1, I 0.50.2.2, I 0.53, and
Fsr = allowable range of stress (Table 10.3.1 A) I0.53.1.2)
F: = reduced allowable tensile stress on rivet or = maximum factored noncomposite dead load
bolt due to the applied shear stress, ksi (Ar- compressive bending stress in the web (Arti-
ticles I 0.32.3.3.4 and I 0.56.1.3.3) cle 10.61.1)
F~ = specified minimum yield point of the rein- = unit ultimate compressive strength of con-
forcing steel (Article 10.38.5.1.2) crete as determined by cylinder tests at age of
F.S. = factor of safety (Table I 0.32.1 A and Articles 28 days. psi (Articles 10.38.1, 10.38.5.1.2,
10.32.1 and I 0.36) 10.45.3, and I0.50.1.1.1)
Fu = specified minimum tensile strength (Tables = maximum flexural stress at the mid-thickness
10.2A, 10.32.IA and 10.32.38 and Article of the flange under consideration at a point of
10.18.4) splice (Articles 10.18.2.2.3 and 10.18.2.3.8)
Fu = tensile strength of electrode classification = maximum flexural stress due to the factored
(Table 10.56A and Article 10.32.2) loads at the mid-thickness of the controlling
Fu = maximum bending strength of the flange flange at a point of splice (Articles 10.18.2.2.1
(Articles I 0.48.8.2, 10.50.1.2.1, and and 10.18.2.3.4)
10.50.2.2) =noncomposite dead load stress in the com-
Fv = allowable shear stress (Table 10.32.1A and pression flange (Articles 10.34.5.1 and
10.32.3B and Articles 10.18.2.3.6, 10.32.2, 10.49.3.2(a))
10.32.3, 10.34.4, 10.38.1.7, and 10.40.2.2) = top flange compressive stress due to the fac-
Fv = shear strength of a fastener (Article 10.56.1.3) tored noncomposite dead load divided by the
Pvc: = combined tension and shear in bearing-type factor Rb (Article 10.61.4)
connections (Article 10.56.1.3) =total noncomposite and composite dead-load
Fw =design shear stress in the web at a point of plus composite live-load stress in the com-
splice (Articles 10.18.2.3.6, 10.I8.2.3.7, and pression flange at the most highly stressed
10.18.2.3.9) section of the web (Articles I 0.34.5.1 and
Fy = specified minimum yield point of steel (Arti- I0.49.3.2(a))
cles 10.15.2.1, 10.15.3, 10.16.11, 10.32.1, =top flange compressive stress due to non-
I0.32.4, 10.34, 10.35, I0.37.1.3, I0.38.l.7, composite dead load (Articles I 0.34.2.1 and
I 0.38.5, 10.39 .4, I 0.40.2.2, I 0.41.4.6, I0.46, 10.34.2.2)
10.48, 10.49, 10.50, 10.51.5, 10.54, and fnd = flexural stress at the mid-thickness of the non-
10.61.4) controlling flange concurrent with fc:r (Articles
Fyr = specified minimum yield strength of the flange 10.18.2.2.3 and 10.18.2.3.8)
(Articles 1O.I8.2.2.I, I 0.48.1.1, 10.53.1, fncu = flexural stress due to the factored loads at the
10.57 .I, and 10.57 .2) mid-thickness of the noncontrolling flange at
Fy wrrcncr = specified minimum yield strength of a a point of splice concurrent with feu (Articles
transverse stiffener (Articles I 0.34.4. 7 and 10.18.2.2. I and 1O.I8.2.3.4)
10.48.5.3) = maximum flexural stress due to D + J3L (L + I)
Fyw = specified minimum yield strength of the web at the mid-thickness of the flange under
(Articles I 0.18.2.2.1, 1O.I8.2.2.2, I 0.18.2.3.4, consideration at a point of splice (Articles
10.53.1, and 10.61.1) 10.18.2.2.2 and I0.18.2.3.5)
Fy web = specified mimi mum yield strength of the web = flexural stress due to D + Pt. (L + I) at the mid-
(Articles 10.34.4.7 and 10.48.5.3) thickness of the other flange at a point of
f = the lesser of (ft/Rb) or Fy (ArticJes splice concurrent with fo in the flange under
I0.48.2.l(b}, 10.48.2.2, and I0.53) consideration (Article 1O.I8.2.3.5)
254 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.1.1
= range of stress due to live load plus impact, K = effective length factor in plane of buckling
in the slab reinforcement over the support (Table 10.32.I A and Articles 10.37, 10.54.1,
(Article 10.38.5.1.3) and 10.54.2)
fr = modulus of rupture of concrete specified in Kt, = effective length factor in the plane of bend-
Article 8.15.2.1.1 (Article 10.50.2.3) ing (Article 10.36)
= maximum longitudinal bending stress in the k =constant: 0.75 for rivets; 0.6 for high-
flange of the panels on either side of the strength bolts with thread excluded from
transverse stiffener (Article 10.39.4.4) shear plane (Article 10.32.3.3.4)
= factored bending stress in either the top or k =buckling coefficient (Articles 10.34.3.2.1,
bottom flange, whichever flange has the 10.34.4, 10.39.4.3, 10.48.~.1, 10.48.8,
larger ratio of ((JFu) (Article 10.48.8.2) 10.51.5.4, and 10.61.1)
f, = tensile stress due to applied loads (Articles k = distance from outer face of flange to toe of
10.32.3.3.3 and 10.56.1.3.2) web fillet of member to be stiffened (Article
f, = allowable tensile stress in the concrete spec- 10.56.3)
ified in Article 8.15.2.1.1 (Article l 0.38.4.3) k1 =buckling coefficient (Article 10.39.4.4)
= unit shear stress (Articles 10.32.3.2.3, L = distance between bolts in the direction of the
10.34.4.4, and 10.34.4.7) applied force (Table 10.32.38)
f~ = maximum shear stress in the web at a point of L = actual unbraced length (Table 10.32.1 A and
splice (Article 10.18.2.3.6) Articles 10.7 .4, 10.15.3, and 10.55.1)
=computed compressive bending stress about L = 1/2 of the length of the arch rib (Article
the x axis (Article 10.36) 10.37.1)
= computed compressive bending stress about L =distance between transverse beams (Article
they axis (Article 10.36) I0.41.4.6)
g = gage between fasteners, in. (Articles Lh = unbraced length (Table I 0.48.2.l.A and Arti-
10.16.14, 10.24.5, and 10.24.6) cles I 0.36, 10.48.1.1, I 0.48.2.1, I 0.48.4.1,
= height of stud, in. (Article 10.38.5.1.1) and 10.53.1.3)
= horizontal design force resultant in the web Lc = length of member between points of support,
at a point of splice (Articles 10.18.2.3.8 and in. (Article 10.54.1.1)
10.18.2.3.9) Lc = clear distance between the holes, or between
Hv.o = overload horizontal design force resultant the hole and the edge of the material in the di-
in the web at a point of splice (Article rection of the applied bearing force, in. (Table
10.18.2.3.5) 10.32.38 and Article 10.56.1.3.2)
= horizontal design force resultant in the web I., = limiting unbraced length (Article I 0.48.4.1)
at a point of splice (Articles I 0.18.2.3.4 Lr = limiting unbraced length (Article I 0.48.4.1)
and I0.18.2.3.5) e = member length (Table I 0.32.1 A and Article
h = average flange thickness of the channel 10.35.1)
flange, in. (Article I 0.38.5.1.2) . M = maximum bending moment (Articles
4
= moment of inertia. in. (Articles 10.34.4, I 0.48.8, I 0.54.2.1, and 10.50.1.1.2)
I 0.34.5, 10.38.5.1.I, 10.48.5.3, and M1 =smaller moment at the end of the unbraced
10.48.6.3) length of the member (Article 10.48.1.1 (c))
= moment of inertia of stiffener (Articles M1 & M2 =moments at two adjacent braced points (Ta-
10.37.2, 10.39.4.4.1, and 10.51.5.4) bles 10.32.1 A and I 0.36A and Articles
= moment of inertia of transverse stiffeners 10.48.4.1 and 10.50.2.2)
(Article 10.39.4.4.2) Me = column moment (Article I 0.56.3.2)
= moment of inertia of member about the ver- Mp = full plastic moment of the section (Articles
tical axis in the plane of the web, in4 (Article 10.50.I.1.2 and 10.54.2.1)
10.48.4.1) Mr = lateral torsional buckling moment or yield
= moment of inertia of compression flange moment (Articles 10.48.2, 10.48.4.1,
about the vertical axis in the plane of the web, 10.50.1.2.1, 10.50.2.2, and 10.53.1.3)
4
in (Table I 0.32.1 A and Article I 0.48.4.1) Ms = elastic pier moment for loading producing
J = required ratio of rigidity of one transverse maximum positive moment in adjacent span
stiffener to that of the web plate (Articles (Article 10.50.1.1.2)
10.34.4.7 and 10.48.5.3) Mu = maximum bending strength (Articles
J = St. Venant torsional constant, in4 (Table 10.18.2.2.1, I 0.48, I 0.49, I 0.50.1, I 0.50.2,
10.32.1 A and Article 10.48.4.1) 10.51.1, I 0.53.1, I 0.54.2.1, and 10.61.3)
10.1.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 255
Mv = design moment due to the eccentricity of the = allowable slip resistance (Article I 0.32.3.2.1)
design shear at a point of splice (Articles = maximum axial compression capacity (Arti-
10.18.2.3.7 and 10.18.2.3.9) cle I 0.54.1.1)
Mvo = overload design moment due to the eccentric- = design force for checking the strength of a
ity of the overload design shear at a point of bolted splice in a tension member (Article
splice (Article 10.18.2.3.5) 10.18.4.1)
Mvu = design moment due to the eccentricity of the p = allowable bearing (Article I 0.32.4.2)
design shear at a point of splice (Articles Q = prying tension per bolt (Articles 10.32.3.3.2
10.18.2.3.3 and I 0.18.2.3.5) and 10.56.2)
Mw = design moment at a point of splice represent- Q =statical moment about the neutral axis (Arti-
ing the portion of the flexural moment as- cle 10.38.5.1.1)
sumed to be resisted by the web (Articles R = radius (Article I 0.15.2.1)
10.18.2.3.8 and 10.18.2.3.9) R = number of design lanes per box girder (Arti-
Mwo = overload design moment at a point of splice cle 10.39.2.1)
representing the portion of the flexural mo- R = reduction factor for hybrid girders (Articles
ment assumed to be resisted by the web (Ar- I 0.18.2.2.1, I 0.18.2.2.2, 10.18.2.2.3,
ticle I O.I8.2.3.5) I 0.18.2.3.4, I 0.18.2.3.8, 10.40.2. J. J,
Mwu = design moment at a point of splice represent- I 0.53.I.2, and 10.53.1.3)
ing the portion of the flexural moment as- R = reduction factor applied to the design shear
sumed to be resisted by the web (Articles strength of fasteners passing through fillers
10.18.2.3.4 and 10.18.2.3.5) (Article I 0.18.1.2.1)
My = moment capacity at first yield (Articles = bending capacity reduction factor (Articles
10.18.2.2.1, 10.50.1.1.2, and 10.61.3) I 0.48.2, I 0.48.4.1, I 0.50.1.2.1, I 0.50.2.2,
N, & N2 =number of shear connectors (Article I 0.53.1.2, 10.53. J .3, and I 0.61.4)
I 0.38.5.1.2) R:r = absolute value of the ratio of Fer to fer for the
Ne = number of additional connectors for each controlling flange at a point of splice (Articles
beam at point of contraflexure (Article I 0.18.2.2.3 and I 0. J8.2.3.8)
I 0.38.5.I.3) = the absolute value of the ratio of Fc:u to feu for
N~ = number of slip planes in a slip-critical con- the controlling flange at a point of splice
nection (Articles 10.32.3.2.1 and 10.57.3.1) (Articles 10.18.2.2.I and I 0.18.2.3.4)'
Rev =a range of stress involving both tension and
Nw = number of roadway design lanes (Article
10.39.2) compression during a stress cycle (Table
I0.3.1B)
n = ratio of modulus of elasticity of steel to that
of concrete (Article I 0.38.1) = vertical force at connections of vertical stiff-
n = number of longitudinal stiffeners (Articles .eners to longitudinal stiffeners (Article
10.39.4.4.8)
I0.39.4.3, 10.39.4.4, and 10.51.5.4)
P =allowable compressive axial load on mem-
= vertical web force (Article I 0.39.4.4.7)
bers (Article I 0.35.1)
= radius of gyration, in (Articles 10.35.I,
I 0.37 .I. 10.41.4.6, I 0.48.6.3, I 0.54.1.1,
P = axial compression on the member (Articles
I 0.54.2.1, and I 0.55.I)
10.48.I.I, I 0.48 .2.1, and I 0.54.2.I)
= radius of gyration in plane of bending, in.
P, P., P2, = force in the slab (Article 10.38.5.1.2)
(Article I 0.36)
&P3
= radius of gyration with respect to the Y-Y
Per =design force in the controlling flange at a point axis, in. (Article I0.48.1.1)
of splice (Article I0.18.2.2.3) r' = radius of gyration of the compression flange
Pc:u = design force for the controlling flange at a
about the axis in the plane of the web, in.
point of splice (Article 10.18.2.2.1) (Table 10.32.1 A and Article I 0.48.4.1)
Pro = overload design force in the flange at a point of s = allowable rivet or bolt unit stress in shear
splice (Article I 0.18.2.2.2) (Article 10.32.3.3.4)
Pncr = design force for the noncontrolling flange at a s = section modulus, in. 3 (Articles 10.48.2,
point of splice (Article I 0.18.2.2.3) l 0.51.1, I 0.53.1.2, and I 0.53.1.3)
Pncu = design force in the noncontrolling flange at a s = pitch of any two successive holes in the chain
point of splice (Article 10.18.2.2.1) (Article 10.16.14.2)
Po = design force for checking slip of a bolted splice = range of horizontal shear (Article
in a tension member (Article I0.18.4.2) 10.38.5.1.1)
256 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.1.1
= section modulus of transverse stiffener, in. 3 10.37.2, 10.48, 10.49.2, I0.49.3, 10.55.2,
(Articles 10.39.4.4 and 10.48.6.3) 10.56.3, and 10.61.1)
S, = section modulus oflongitudinal or transverse = thickness of top flange (Article 10.50.1. I. I)
3
stiffener, in. (Article 10.48.6.3) = thickness of outstanding stiffener element
= ultimate strength of the shear connector (Ar- (Articles 10.39.4.5.1 and I 0.51.5.5)
ticle 10.38.5.1.2) v =shearing force (Articles 10.35.1, 10.48.5.3,
= section modulus with respect to the com- 10.48.8, and 10.51.3)
3
pression flange, in. (Table 10.32.1 A and v = maximum shear in the web at a point of
Articles 10.48.2, 10.48.4.1, 10.50.1.2.1, splice due to the factored loads (Article
I 0.50.2.2 and 10.53.1.2) I 0.18.2.3.2)
= section modulus with respect to the tension = maximum shear in the web at the point of splice
3
flange, in. (Articles 10.48.2 and 10.53.1.2) due to D + ~L (L + I) (Article 10. I 8.2.3.5)
s = computed rivet or bolt unit stress in shear = shear yielding strength of the web (Articles
(Article 10.32.3.3.4) 10.48.8 and 10.53.1.4)
T =range in tensile stress (Table 10.3.1B) = range of shear due to live loads and impact,
T = direct tension per bolt due to external load kips (Article I 0.38.5.1.1)
(Articles 10.32.3 and 10.56.2) = maximum shear force (Articles 10.18.2.3.2,
T = arch rib thrust at the quarter point from 10.34.4, I0.48.5.3, 10.48.8, and 10.53.3)
dead+ live+impact loading (Articles = vertical shear (Article 10.39.3.1)
10.37.1 and 10.55.1) = design shear for a web (Articles 10.39.3.1
t = thickness of the thinner outside plate or and 10.51.3)
shape (Article 10.35.2)
= design shear in the web at a point of splice
= thickness of members in compression (Arti-
(Articles I 0.18.2.3.2, 10.18.2.3.3, and
cle 10.35.2)
10.18.2.3.5)
= thickness of thinnest part connected, in (Ar- = overload design shear in the web at a point
ticles 10.32.3.3.2 and 10.56.2)
of splice (Article I 0.18.2.3.5)
= computed rivet or bolt unit stress in tension,
= design shear in the web at a point of splice
including any stress due to prying action (Ar-
(Articles 10.18.2.3.2, 10.18.2.3.3, and
ticle 10.32.3.3.4)
I 0.18.2.3.5)
t = thickness of the wearing surface, in. (Article w =length of a channel shear connector, in. (Ar-
10.41.2)
ticle 10.38.5.1.2)
t = flange thickness, in. (Articles 10.18.2.2.4,
= roadway width between curbs in feet or bar-
10.34.2.1, 10.34.2.2, 10.39.4.2, 10.48,
riers if curbs are not used (Article 10.39.2.1)
10.48.I.1, I 0.48.2, 10.48.2. I, I 0.5 I .5.1, and
I0.61.4) = least net width of a flange (Article 10.18.2.2.4)
= thickness of a flange angle (Article 10.34.2.2) =fraction of a wheel load (Article 10.39.2)
= thickness of the web of a channel, in. (Arti- = length of a channel shear connector in inches
cle·10.38.5.1.2) measured in a transverse direction on the
t =thickness of stiffener (Articles 10.34.4.7 and flange of a girder (Article 10.38.5.1.1)
10.48.5.3) w = unit weight of concrete, lb per cu ft (Article
= thickness of flange delivering concentrated 10.38.5.1.2)
force (Article 10.56.3.2) w = width of flange between longitudinal stiffen-
= thickness of flange of member to be stiffened ers (Articles 10.39.4.3, 10.39.4.4, and
(Article 10.56.3.2) 10.51.5.4)
tr =thickness of the flange (Articles 10.37.3, = distance from the neutral axis to the extreme
10.55.3, and 10.39.4.3) outer fiber, in. (Article 10.15.3)
= thickness of the concrete haunch above the y = location of steel sections from neutral axis
beam or girder top flange (Article 10.50.1.1.2) (Article 10.50.1.1.1)
=thickness of stiffener (Article 10.37.2 and z = plastic section modulus (Articles I 0.48.1,
10.55.2) 10.53.1.1, and 10.54.2.1)
=slab thickness (Articles 10.38.5.1.2, = allowable range of horizontal shear, in
10.50.1.1.1, and 10.50.1.1.2) pounds on an individual connector (Article
= web thickness, in. (Articles 10.15.2.1, 10.38.5.1)
10.18.2.3.4, I0.18.2.3.7, 10.18.2.3.8, a = constant based on the number of stress cycles
10.18.2.3.9, 10.34.3, 10.34.4, 10.34.5, (Article 10.38.5.1.1)
10.1.1 DIVISION I-DESIGN 257
= minimum specified yield strength of the web pounds per square inch.) The modulus of elasticity of all
divided by the minimum specified yield grades of structural steel shall be assumed to be
strength of the tension flange (Articles 29,000,000 psi and the coefficient of linear expansion
I0.40.2 and I 0.40.4) 0.0000065 per degree Fahrenheit.
= factor for flange splice design equal to 1.0,
except that a lower value equal to (MufMy) 10.2.3 Steels for Pins, Rollers, and Expansion
may be used for flanges subject to com- Rockers
pression at sections where Mu does not ex-
ceed My (Article 10.18.2.2.1) Steels for pins, rollers, and expansion rockers shall
a = constant equal to 1.3 for members without a conform to one of the designations listed in Tables: 10.2A
longitudinal stiffener and 1.0 for members and 10.2B, or shall be stainless steel conforming toASTM
with a longitudinal stiffener (Article I 0.61.1) A 240 or ASTM A 276 HNS 21800.
= area of the web divided by the area of the ten-
sion flange (Articles 10.40.2 and 10.53.1.2) 10.2.4 Fasteners-Rivets and Bolts
= factor applied to gross area of flange, splice
plate or tension member in computing the Fasteners may be carbon steel bolts (ASTM A 307);
I
effective area (Articles I 0.18.2.2.4 and power-driven rivets. AASHTO M 228 Grades 1 or 2
10.18.4.1) (ASTM A 502 Grades 1 or 2); or high-strength bolts,
'Y = the ratio of Ar to Ap (Article I 0.18.1.2.1) AASHTO M 164 (ASTM A 325) or AASHTO M 253
'Y = load factor equal to 1.3 (Article I 0.61) (ASTMA490).
p = Fyw!Fyr(Article 10.53.1.2)
6 = angle of inclination of the web plate to the
10.2.5 Weld Metal
vertical (Articles 10.39.3.1 and 10.51.3)
til = ratio of total cross-sectional area to the cross-
Weld metal shall conform to the current require-
sectional area of both flanges (Article 10.15.2)
ments of the ANSI/AASHTOIAWS Dl.5 Bridge Welding
til = distance from the outer edge of the tension
~
Code. I
Structural steels shall conform to the material desig- Cast iron castings shall conform to specifications for
nated in Table I 0.2A. (The stresses in this table are in Gray Iron Castings, AASHTO M I 05, Class 30.
258 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.2
TABLE10.2A
TABLE 10.28
Minimum Material Properties
Pins, Rollers, and Rockers
Expansion Rollers Shall be Not less 'Jban 4 Inches in Diameter
AASHTO Designation M 169 M 102 M 102 M 102 M 102
with Size Limitations 4 in. in dia. or to 20 in. in dia. to 20 in. in dia. to 10 in. in dia. to 20 in. in dia.
less
ASTM Designation A 108 A668 A668 A668 A668•
Grade or Class Grades 1016 to
1030 incl. ClassC Class D ClassF Class G
Minimum Yield Point, psi
Fy 36,000b 33,000 37,500 50,000 50,000
a May substitute rolled material of the same properties.
bfor design purpose only. Not a part of the A 108 specifications. Supplementary material requirements should provide guarantee that material will
meet these values.
10.3 DIVISION I-DESIGN 259
PartB
DESIGN DETAILS
10.3 REPETITIVE LOADING AND TOUGHNESS except for structures where other considerations indicate
CONSIDERATIONS a substantially different number of cycles, shall be
100,000 cycles.
10.3.1 Allowable Fatigue Stress Ranges
Members and fasteners subject to repeated variations 10.3.3 Charpy V-Notch Impact Requirements
or reversals of stress sha11 be designed so that the maxi-
mum stress does not exceed the basic allowable stresses 10.3.3.1 Main load carrying member component~)
given in Article 10.32 and that the actual range of stress subjected to tensile stress require supplemental impact
does not exceed the allowable fatigue stress range given properties as described in the Material Specifications.*
in Table 10.3.1 A for the appropriate type and location
of material given in Table 10.3.1 B and shown in Fig- 10.3.3.2 These impact requirements vary depending
ure l 0.3.1 C. For members with shear connectors provided on the type of steel, type of construction, welded or me-
throughout their entire length that also satisfy the provi- chanicaliy fastened, and the average minimum service
sions of Article I 0.38.4.3, the range of stress may be com- temperature to which the structure may be subjected.**
puted using the composite section assuming the concrete Table I 0.3.3A contains the temperature zone designations.
deck to be fully effective for both positive and negative
moment. 10.3.3.3 Components requiring mandatory impact
For unpainted weathering steel, A709, all grades, the properties shall be designated on the drawings and the ap-
values of allowable fatigue stress range, Table 10.3.1 A, as propriate zone shall be designated in the contract docu-
modified by footnote d, are valid only when the design ments.
and details are in accordance with the FHWA Technical
Adl'isory orz Uncoated Weathering Steel in Structures,
dated October 3, 1989. 10.3.4 Shear
Main load carrying components subjected to tensile
stresses that may be considered nonredundant load path 10.3.4.1 When longitudinal beam or girder members
members-that is. where failure of a single element could in bridges designed for Case I roadways are investigated
cause collapse-shall be designed for the allowable stress for "over 2 million" stress cycles produced by placing a
ranges indicated in Table I 0.3.1 A for Nonredundant Load single truck on the bridge (see footnote c of Table
Path Structures. Examples of nonredundant load path I 0.3.2A), the total shear force in the beam or girder under
members are flange and web plates in one or two girder this single-truck loading shall be limited to 0.58 FyDtwC.
bridges. main one-element truss members. hanger plates, The constant C. the ratio of the buckling shear stress to the
and caps at single or two-column bents. shear yield stress is defined in Article I 0.34.4.2 or Article
I0.48.8.1.
10.3.2 Load Cycles
TABLE 10.3.1A Allowable Fatigue Stress Range 10.5.3 For trusses the ratio of depth to length of span
Redundant Load Path Structures4 preferably should not be less than Yso.
Allowable Range of Stress, Fsr (ksi)b
10.5.4 For continuous span depth ratios the span length
Category For For For For over shall be considered as the distance between the dead load
(See 'Thble 100,000 500,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
10.3.1B) Cycles Cycles Cycles Cycles points of contraflexure.
A 63 (49)c 37 (29t 24 (18)C 24 (16)C 10.5.5 The foregoing requirements as they relate to
B 49 29 18 16
beam or girder bridges may be exceeded at the discretion
B' 39 23 14.5 12
c 35.5 21 13 10 of the designer.*
12d
D 28 16 10 7
E 22 13 8 4.5 10.6 DEFLECTION
E' 16 9.2 5.8 2.6
F 15 12 9 8 10.6.1 The term "deflection" as used herein shall be
the deflection computed in accordance with the assump-
tion made for loading when computing the stress in the
Nonredundant Load Path Structures member.
Allowable Range of Stress, Fsr (ksi)b
10.6.2 Members having simple or continuous spans
Category For For For For over preferably should be designed so that the deflection due to
(See Table 100,000 500,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
10.3.18) Cycles Cycles Cycles Cycles service live load plus impact shall not exceed Y1100 of the
span, except on bridges in urban areas used in part by
A 50 (39t 29 (23t 24 (16)c 24 (16)c pedestrians whereon the ratio preferably shall not exceed
8 39 23 16 16
8' 31 18 11 11
Ysooo. For checking deflection, the service live load prefer-
c 28 16 10 9 ably shall not exceed HS 20 loading.
12d lld
D 22 13 8 5 10.6.3 The deflection of cantilever arms due to service
Ec 17 10 6 2.3 live load plus impact preferably should be limited to Y.'IIO
E' 12 7 4 1.3
F 12 9 7 6 of the cantilever arm except for the case including pedes-
trian use, where the ratio preferably should be Y37S.
a Structure types with multi-load paths where a single fracture in a
member cannot lead to the collapse. For example, a simply supported
single span multi-beam bridge or a multi-element eye bar truss member 10.6.4 When spans have cross-bracing or diaphragms
bas redundant load paths. sufficient in depth or strength to ensure lateral distribu-
l»nte range of stress is defined as the algebraic difference between tion of loads, the deflection may be computed for the
the maximum stress and the minimum stress. 'Thnsion stress is
considered to have the opposite algebraic sign from compression standard H or HS loading (M or MS) considering all
stress. beams or stringers as acting together and having equal
cFor unpainted weathering steel, A 709, all grades, when used in
conformance with the FHWA Technical Advisory on Uncoated deflection.
WetJihmng Steel in Structures, dated October 3, 1989.
dFor transverse stiffener welds on girder webs or flanges. 10.6.5 The moment of inertia of the gross cross-sec-
e Partial length welded cover plates sball not be used on flanges more
than 0.8 inches thick for nonredundant load path structures. tional area shall be used for computing the deflections of
beams and girders. When the beam or girder is a part of a
composite member, the service live load may be consid-
10.5 DEPTH RATIOS ered as acting upon the composite section.
10.5.1 For beams or girders, the ratio of depth to length 10.6.6 The gross area of each truss member shall
of span preferably should not be less than Y2S. be used in computing deflections of trusses. If per-
forated plates are used, the effective area shall be the net
10.5.2 For composite girders, the ratio of the overall
depth of girder (concrete slab plus steel girder) to the
length of span preferably should not be less than YH, and *For considerations to be taken into account when exceeding these
limitations, reference is made to "Bulletin No. 19, Criteria for the De-
the ratio of depth of steel girder alone to length of span flection of Steel Bridges... available from the American Iron and Steel
preferably should not be less than %o. Institute, Washington, D.C.
10.6.6 DIVISION I-DESIGN 261
TABLE 10.3.18
r) Stress
Category
Dlustrative
Example
Kind of (See Table (See Figure
General Condition Situation Stress 10.3.1A) 10.3.IC)
Plain Member Base metal with rolled or cleaned surface. Flame-cut edges TorRev11 A 1,2
with ANSI smoothness of 1,000 or less.
Built-Up Members Base metal and weld metal in members of built-up plates or Tor Rev B 3,4.5,7
shapes (without attachments) connected by continuous full
penetration groove welds (with backing bars removed) or by
continuous fillet welds parallel to the direction of applied
stress.
Base metal and weld metal in members of built-up plates or Tor Rev B' 3,4.5,7
shapes (without attachments) connected by continuous full
penetration groove welds with backing bars not removed. or
by continuous partial penetration groove welds parallel to the
direction of applied stress.
Calculated flexural stress at the toe of transverse stiffener Tor Rev c 6
welds on girder webs or flanges.
Base metal at ends of partial length welded coverplates with Tor Rev B 22
high-strength bolted slip-critical end connections. (See Note b)
Base metal at ends of partial length welded coverplates
narrower than the flange having square or tapered ends, with
or without welds across the ends. or wider than flange with
welds across the ends:
(a) Flange thickness ::;; 0.8 in. Tor Rev E 7
(b) Flange thickness > 0. 8 in. Tor Rev E' 7
Base metal at ends of partial length welded coverplates wider Tor Rev E' 7
t)
'
Groove Welded
than the flange without welds across the ends.
Base metal and weld metal in or adjacent to full penetration Tor Rev B 8,10
Connections groove weld splices of rolled or welded sections having similar
profiles when welds are ground flush with grinding in.the
direction of applied stress and weld soundness established by
nondestructive inspection.
Base metal and weld metal in or adjacent to full penetration Tor Rev B 13
groove weld splices with 2 ft radius transitions in width.
when welds are ground flush with grinding in the direction
of applied stress and weld soundness established by
nondestructive inspection.
Base metal and weld metal in or adjacent to full penetration
groove weld splices at transitions in width or thickness, with
welds ground to provide slopes no steeper than 1 to 2Y2, with
grinding in the direction of the applied stress, and weld
soundness established by nondestructive inspection:
(a) AASHTO M 270 Grades I00/100W (ASTM A 709) Tor Rev B' ll,12
base metal
(b) Other base metals Tor Rev B 11,12
. Base metal and weld metal in or adjacent to full penetration Tor Rev c 8,10~11.12
groove weld splices, with or without transitions having slopes
no greater than 1 to 2%, when the reinforcement is not
removed and weld soundness is established by nondestructive
inspection.
Groove Welded Base metal adjacent to details attached by full or partial Tor Rev c 6,15
Attachments- penetration groove welds when the detail length, L, in the
Longitudinally direction of stress, is less than 2 in.
Loadedc Base metal adjacent to details attached by full or partial Tor Rev D 15
penetration groove welds when the detail length, L, in the
where Sf is equal to the allowable stress range for Category C given in Table 10.3.1A. This assumes no penetration at the weld root.
'Gusset plates attached to girder flange surfaces with only transverse fillet welds are prohibited.
volume divided by the length from center to center of 10.7 I..IMITING LENGTHS OF MEMBERS
perforations.
10.7.1 For compression members, the slenderness
10.6.7 The foregoing requirements as they relate to ratio, KL/r. shall not exceed 120 for main members, or
beam or girder bridges may be exceeded at the discretion those in which the major stresses result from dead or Jive
of the designer.* load, or both; and shall not exceed 140 for secondary
members, or those whose primary purpose is to brace the
*For considerations to be taken into account when exceeding these structure against lateral or longitudinal force, or to brace
limitations, reference is made to ••Bulletin No. 19, Criteria for the De-
flection of Steel Bridges," available from the American Iron and Steel or reduce the unbraced length of other members, main or
Institute, Washington. D.C. secondary.
264 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.7.1
4Q::J- 12
14
~ 18
~
23
- 19
-~-
9
• At End of Weld, Has No Length
-ClttJJ~
24
21
22
TABLE 10.3.2A Stress Cycles TABLE 10.3.3A Temperature Zone Designations for
Main (Longitudinal) Load Carrying Members Charpy V-Notch Impact Requirements
'lhlck Lane Minimum Thmperature
'JYpe of Road Case ADTr Loading l..oadingb Service Thmperature Zone Designation
Freeways, Expressways, 2,500 or 2,000,000C 500,000 oop and above 1
Major Highways, and more -l°F to -30°F 2
Streets -310f to -600f 3
Freeways, Expressways, n less than 500,000 100,000
Major Highways, and 2,500
Streets
length between panel point intersections or centers of
braced points or centers of end connections; for sec-
Other Highways and Ill 100,000 100,000
Streets not included in ondary members, the length between the centers of the
Case I orll end connections of such members or centers of braced
points.
'lhlnsverse Members and Details Subjected to Wheel Loads
1hlck 10.7.5 For tension members, except rods, eyebars. ca-
'JYpe of Road Case ADT'I"' Loading
bles, and plates, the ratio of unbraced length to radius of
Freeways, Expressways, 2,500or over gyration shall not exceed 200 for main members, shall not
Major Highways, and more 2,000,000
Streets exceed 240 for bracing members. and shall not exceed
140 for main members subject to a reversal of stress.
Freeways, Expressways, II less than 2,000,000
MajorHighways,and 2,500
Streets 10.8 MINIMUM THICKNESS OF METAL
Other Highways and III 500,000
Streets 10.8.1 Structural steel (including bracing, cross frames,
11
Average Daily 'lhlck Thlffic (one direction). and all types of gusset plates), except for webs of certain
bLongitudinal members should also be checked for truck loading. rolled shapes, closed ribs in orthotropic decks. filler~, and
cMembers shall also be investigated for "over 2 million" stress in railings, shall be not less than y,6 inch in thickness. The
cycles produced by placing a single truck on the bridge distributed to
the girders as designated in Article 3.23.2 for one traffic lane loadiruz. web thickness of rolled beams or channels shall not be
The shear in steel girder webs shall not exceed 0.58 F,.DtwC for this less than 0.23 inches. The thickness of closed ribs in or-
single truck loading. thotropic decks shall not be less than Y,tt inch.
10.7.2 In determining the radius of gyration, r, for the 10.8.2 Where the metal wi11 be exposed to marked cor-
purpose of applying the limitations of the KUr ratio, the rosive influences, it shall be increased in thickness dr spe-
area of any portion of a member may be neglected pro- cially protected against corrosion.
vided that the strength of the member as calculated with-
out using the area thus neglected and the strength of the 10.8.3 It should be noted that there are other provisions
member as computed for the entire section with the KUr in this section pertaining to thickness for fillers, segments
ratio applicable thereto, both equal or exceed the com- of compression members, gusset plates, etc. As stated
puted total force that the member must sustain. above, fillers need not be Y,tt inch minimum.
10.7.3 The radius of gyration and the effective area for 10.8.4 For compression members, refer to '"Trusses"
carrying stress of a member containing perforated cover (Article 10.16).
plates shall be computed for a transverse section through
the maximum width of perforation. When perforations are 10.8.5 For stiffeners and other plates, refer to "Plate
staggered in opposite cover plates, the cross-sectional Girders" (Article I0.34 ).
area of the member shall be considered the same as for a
section having perforations in the same transverse plane. 10.8.6 For stiffeners and outstanding legs of angles, etc.,
refer to Article 10.1 0.
10.7.4 Actual unbraced length, L, shall be assumed as
follows: 10.9 EFFECTIVE AREA OF ANGLES AND
TEE SECTIONS IN TENSION
For the top chords of half-through trusses, the length
between panel points laterally supported as indicated 10.9.1 The effective area of a single angle tension mem-
under Article 10.16.12; for other main members, the ber, a tee section tension member, or each angle of a dou-
266 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.9.1
ble angle tension member in which the shapes are con- under Strength Design as specified in Articles 10.48.1,
nected back to back on the same side of a gusset plate shall 10.50.1.1, and 10.50.2.1. When computing the strength of
be assumed as the net area of the connected leg or flange a flexural member at a section with holes in the tension
plus one-half of the area of the outstanding leg. flange, an effective flange area, Ac. specified by Equation
(I 0-4g) shall be used for that flange in computing the elas-
10.9.2 If a double angle or tee section tension member tic section properties. The diameter of the holes shall be
is connected with the angles or flanges back to back on op- taken as specified in Article I 0.16.14.6. In the case of the
posite sides of a gusset plate, the full net area of the shapes strength design method, the strength of compact sections
shall be considered effective. with holes in the tension flange shall not be taken greater
than the moment capacity at first yield.
10.9.3 When angles connect to separate gusset plates, as
in the case of a double-webbed truss, and the angles are
connected by stay plates located as near the gusset as prac- 10.13 COVER PLATES
ticable, or by other adequate means, the full net area of the
angles shall be considered effective. If the angles are not 10.13.1 The length of any cover plate added to a rolled
so connected, only 80% of the net areas shall be consid- beam shall be not less than (2d+ 3) feet, where (d) is the
ered effective. dep.th of the beam in feet. .
10.9.4 Lug angles may be considered as effective in 10.13.2 Partial length welded cover plates shall not be
transmitting stress, provided they are connected with at used on flanges more than 0.8 inches thick for nonredun-
least one-third more fasteners than required by the stress dant load path structures subjected to repetitive loadings
to be carried by the lug angle. that produce tension or reversal of stress in the member.
10.10 OUTSTANDING LEGS OF ANGLES 10.13.3 The maximum thickness of a single cover plate
on a flange shall not be greater than two times the thick-
The widths of outstanding legs of angles in compres- ness of the flange to which the cover plate is attached. The
sion (except where reinforced by plates) shall not exceed total thickness of all cover plates should not be greater
the following: than 2Yl times the flange thickness.
In main members carrying axial stress, 12 times the 10.13.4 Any partial length welded cover plate shall ex-
thickness. tend beyond the theoretical end by the terminal distance,
In bracing and other secondary members, 16 times the and it shall extend to a section where the stress range in
thickness. the beam flange is equal to the allowable fatigue stress
range for base metal adjacent to or connected by fillet
For other limitations, see Article I 0.35.2. welds. The theoretical end of the cover plate, when using
service load design methods, is the section at which the
stress in the flange without that cover plate equals the al-
10.11 EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION lowable service load stress, exclusive of fatigue consider-
ations. When using strength design methods, the theoret-
In all bridges, provisions shall be made in the design to ical end of the cover plate is the section at which the flange
resist thermal stresses induced, or means shall be provided strength without that cover plate equals the required
for movement caused by temperature changes. Provisions strength for the design loads, exclusive of fatigue require-
shall be made for changes in length of span resulting from ments. The terminal distance is two times the nominal
live load stresses. In spans more than 300 feet long, al- cover plate width for cover plates not welded across their
lowance shall be made for expansion and contraction in ends, and 1Y2 times for cover plates welded across their
the floor. The expansion end shall be secured against lat- ends. The width at ends of tapered cover plates shall be
eral movement. not less than 3 inches. The weld connecting the cover
plate to the flange in its tenninal distance shall be contin-
uous and of sufficient size to develop a total stress of not
10.12 FLEXURAL MEMBERS less than the computed stress in the cover plate at its the-
oretical end. All welds connecting cover plates to beam
Flexural members shall be designed using the elastic flanges shall be continuous and shall not be smaller than
section modulus except when utilizing compact sections the minimum size permitted by Article I 0.23.2.
10.13.5 DIVISION I-DESIGN 267
R EYO 850
10.15 HEAT-CURVED ROLLED BEAMS AND ~R = 0 for radii greater than I, 000
WELDED PLATE GIRDERS
where AoL is the camber in inches at any point along the
10.15.1 Scope length L calculated by usual procedures to compensate for
deflection due to dead loads or any other specified loads;
This section pertains to rolled beams and welded 1-sec- .dM is the maximum value of AoL in inches within the
tion plate girders heat-curved to obtain a horizontal cur- length L; E is the modulus of elasticity in ksi; Fy is the
vature. Steels that are manufactured to a specified mini- specified minimum yield point in ksi of the girder flange;
mum yield point greater than 50,000 psi, except for Grade Y11 is the distance from the neutral axis to the extreme
HPS70W steel, shall not be heat-curved. outer fiber in inches (maximum distance for nonsymmet-
rical sections); R is the radius of curvature in feet; and L
is the span length for simple spans or for continuous
10.15.2 Minimum Radius of Curvature spans, the distance between a simple end support and the
dead load contraflexure point, or the distance between
10.15.2.1 For heat-curved beams and girders, the points of dead load contraflexure. (L is measurcid in
horizontal radius of curvature measured to the center line inches.) Camber loss between dead load contraflexure
of the girder web shall not be less than I 50 feet and shall points adjacent to piers is small and may be neglected.
not be less than the larger of the values calculated (at any
and alJ cross sections throughout the length of the girder) Note: Part of the camber loss is attributable to construc-
from the following two equations: tion loads and will occur during construction of the
268 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.15.3
bridge; total camber loss will be complete after cover plates and at the bottom with perforated plates or
several months of in-service loads. Therefore, a stay plates and lacing.
portion of the camber increase (approximately Double Box sections, made with side channels, beams,
50%) should be included in the bridge profile. angles and plates or side segments of plates only, con-
Camber losses of this nature (but generally smaller nected with a conventional solid web, together. with top
in magnitude) are also known to occur in straight and bottom perforated cover plates or stay plates and
beams and girders. lacing.
"H" sections, made with two side segments (composed 10.16.4 Diaphragms
of angles or plates) with solid web, perforated web, or
web of stay plates and lacing. 10.16.4.1 There shall be diaphragms in the trusses at
Channel sections, made with two angle segments, with the end connections of floor beams.
solid web, perforated web, o~ web of stay plates and
lacing. 10.16.4.2 The gusset plates engaging the pedestal pin
Single Box sections, made with side channels, beams, at the end of the truss shall be connected by a. diaphragm.
angles, and plates or side segments of plates only, con- Similarly, the webs of the pedestal shall, if practicable, be
nected top and bottom with perforated plates or stay connected by a diaphragm.
plates and lacing.
10.16.4.3 There shall be a diaphragm between gusset
Single Box sections, made with side channels, beams, plates engaging main members if the end tie plate is 4 feet
angles and plates only, connected at top with solid or more from the point of intersection of the members.
10.16.5 DIVISION I-DESIGN 269
When perforated cover plates are used, the following welded to rolled segments of a member, the allowable
provisions shall govern their design. stress in the member shall be determined in accordance
270 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.16.9.2
with Article I 0.3. Terminations of butt welds shall be 10.16.10.6 The diameter of fasteners in lacing bars
ground smooth. shall not exceed one-third the width of the bar. There shall
be at least two fasteners in each end of lacing bars con-
10.16.9.3 The separate segments of tension members nected to flanges more than 5 inches in width.
composed of shapes may be connected by perforated
plates or by stay plates or end stay plates and lacing.
End stay plates shall have the same minimum length as 10.16.11 Gusset Plates
specified for end stay plates on main compression mem-
10.16.11.1 Gusset or connection plates preferably
bers, and intermediate stay plates shall have a minimum
shall be used for connecting main members, except when
length of Y.a of that specified for intermediate stay plates on
the members are pin-connected. The fasteners connecting
main compression members. The clear distance between
each member shall be symmetrical with the axis of the
stay plates on tension members shall not exceed 3 feet.
member, so far as practicable, and the full development of
the elements of the member shall be given consideration.
10.16.9.4 The thickness of stay plates shall be not
The gusset plates shall be of ample thickness to resist
less than Yso of the distance between points of support for
shear, direct stress, and flexure acting on the weakest or
main members, and Yt10 of that distance for bracing mem-
critical section of maximum stress.
bers. Stay plates shall be connected by not less than three
fasteners on each side, and in members having lacing bars
10.16.11.2 Re-entrant cuts. except curves made for
the last fastener in the stay plates preferably shall also pass
appearance, shall be avoided as far as practicable.
through the end of the adjacent bar.
10.16.11.3 If the length of unsupported edge of
10.16.10 Lacing Bars a gusset plate exceeds the value of the expres-
sion II ,000/VF; times its thickness, the edge shall be
When lacing bars are used, the following provisions stiffened.
shall govern their design.
10.16.11.4 Listed below are the values of the expres-
10.16.10.1 Lacing bars of compression members sion 11,000/VF; for the following grades of steel:
shall be so spaced that the slenderness ratio of the portion
of the flange included between the lacing bar connections 36,000 psi, Y.P. Min 58
will be not more than 40 or more than 7'J of the slender- 50,000 psi, Y.P. Min 49
ness ratio of the member. 70,000 psi, Y.P. Min 42
90,000 psi, Y.P. Min 37
10.16.10.2 The section of the lacing bars shall be de- 100,000 psi, Y.P. Min 35
termined by the formula for axial compression in which
L is taken as the distance along the bar between its con-
nections to the main segments for single lacing, and as
10.16.12 Half-Through Truss Spans
70% of that distance for double lacing.
10.16.12.1 The vertical truss members and the floor
10.16.10.3 If the distance across the member between beams and their connections in half-through truss spans
fastener lines in the flanges is more than 15 inches and a shall be. proportioned to resist a lateral force of not less
bar with a single fastener in the connection is used, the lac- than 300 pounds per linear foot applied at the top chord
ing shall be double and fastened at the intersections. panel points of each truss.
10.16.10.4 The angle between the lacing bars and the 10.16.12.2 The top chord shall be considered as a
axis of the member shall be approximately 45° for double column with elastic lateral supports at the panel points.
lacing and 60° for single lacing. The critical buckling force of the column, so determined,
shall exceed the maximum force from dead load, live load,
10.16.10.5 Lacing bars may be shapes or flat bars. and impact in any panel of the top chord by not less than
For main members, the minimum thickness of flat bars 50%.*
shall be Y40 of the distance along the bar between its con-
nections for single lacing and YtJO for double lacing. For
*For a discussion of columns with elastic lateral supports. refer to 1im-
bracing members, the limits shall be Yso for single lacing oshenko & Gere. "Theory of Elastic Stability, .. McGraw-Hill Book Co.,
and Y1s for double lacing. First Edition, p. 122.
10.16.13 DIVISION I-DESIGN 271
10.16.13 Fastener Pitch in Ends of Compression shall be considered in determining the unit stress on the
Members net section.
In the ends of compression members. the pitch of fas- 10.16.14.6 The diameter of the hole shall be taken as
teners connecting the component parts of the member Ys inch greater than the nominal diameter of the rivet or
shall not exceed four times the diameter of the fastener high-strength bolt, unless larger holes are permitted in ac-
for a length equal to I Y2 times the maximum width of the cordance with Article I 0.24.
member. Beyond this point, the pitch shaH be increased
gradually for a length equal to 1Y2 times the maximum
width of the member until the maximum pitch is
10.17 BENTSANDTOWERS
reached.
10.17.1 General
10.16.14 Net Section of .Riveted or High-Strength
Bolted Tension Members
Bents preferably shall be composed of two supporting
columns, and the bents usually shall be united in pairs to
10.16.14.1 The net section of a riveted or high-
form towers. The design of members for bents and towers
strength bolted tension member is the sum of the net sec-
is governed by applicable articles. 1
10.17.4 Bracing
The net section of the part is obtained from the chain that
gives the least net width.
10.17.4.1 Towers shall be braced, both transversely
10.16.14.3 For angles, the gross width shall be the and longitudinally, with stiff members having: either
sum of the widths of the legs less the thickness. The gage welded, high-strength bolted or riveted connections. The
for holes in opposite legs shall be the sum of gages from sections of members of longitudinal bracing in each panel
back of angle less the thickness. shall not be less than those of the members in corre- 1
10.17.5 Bottom Struts Ar =sum of the area of the fillers on the top and
bottom of the connected plate
The bottom struts of towers shall be strong enough to Ap =smaller of either the connected plate area or
slide the movable shoes with the structure unloaded, the the sum of the splice plate areas on the top
coefficient of friction being assumed at 0.25. Provision for and bottom of the connected plate
expansion of the tower bracing shall be made in the col-
umn bearings. The design slip force, specified in Article 10.57 .3.1 in the
case of the strength design method and in Article
10.18 SPLICES 10.32.3.2.1 in the case of the service load design method,
for slip-critical connections shalJ not be adjusted for the
10.18.1 General effect of the fillers. Fillers X inch or more in thickness
shall consist of not more than two plates, unless special
10.18.1.1 Design Strength permission is given by the Engineer.
Splices may be made by rivets, by high-strength bolts or 10.18.1.2.2 For bolted web splices with thick-
by the use of welding. In general, splices whether in tension, ness differences of Yt" inch or less, no filler plates are
compression, bending, or shear, shall be designed in the case required.
of the service load design or strength design methods for a
capacity based on not less than the average of the required I 0.1 8.1.2.3 Fillers for welded splices shaH conform
design strength at the point of spJice and the design strength to the requirements of the ANS//AASHTOIAWS D1.5
of the member at the same point but, in any event, not less Bridge Welding Code.
than 75% of the design strength of the member, except as
specified herein. Bolted splices in flexural members shall
satisfy the requirements of Article I0.18.2. Bolted splices in 10.18.1.3 Design Force for Flange Splice Plates
compression members shall satisfy the requirement~ of Ar-
ticle I 0.18.3. Bolted splices in tension members shall sat- For a flange splice with inner and outer splice plates,
isfy the requirements of Article 10.18.4. Welded splices the flange design force may be assumed to be divided
shall satisfy the requirements of Article I 0.18.5. Where a equally to the inner and outer plates and their connec-
section changes at a splice, the smaller section is to be used tions when the areas of the inner and outer plates do not
to satisfy the above splice requirements. differ by more than I 0%. When the areas of the inner and
outer plates differ by more than 10%, the design force in
10.18.1.2 Fillers each splice plate and its connection shall be determined
by multiplying the flange design force by the ratio of the
10.18.1.2.1 For fillers X inch and thicker in bolted or area of the splice plate under consideration to the total
riveted axially loaded connections, including girder flange area of the inner and outer splice plates. For this case, the
splices. additional fasteners shall be required to distribute shear strength of the connection shall be checked for the
the total stress in the member uniformly over the com- maximum calculated splice plate force acting on a sin-
bined section of the member and the filler. The filler shall gle shear plane. The slip resistance of high-strength
either be extended beyond the splice material and secured bolted connections for a flange splice with inner
by additional bolts, or as an alternate to extending the and outer splice plates shall always be checked for the
filler, an equivalent number of bolts may be included in flange design force divided equally to the two slip
the connection. Fillers X inch and thicker need not be ex- planes.
tended and developed provided that the design shear
strength of the fasteners, specified in Article 10.56.1.3.2 10.18.1.4 Truss Chords and Columns
in the case of the strength design method and in Table
10.32.3B in the case of the service load design method, is Splices in truss chords and columns shall be located
reduced by the following factor R: as near to the panel points as practicable and usually on
the side where the smaller stress occurs. The arrange-
R = [(1 + y) I (I+ 2y)] (10- 4a) ment of plates, angles, or other splice elements shall be
such as to make proper provision for the stresses, both
where: y=~ axial and bending, in the component parts of the mem-
AP bers spliced.
10.18.2 DIVISION I-DESIGN 273
10.18.2.2 Flange Splices Rc:u = the absolute value of the ratio of Fc:u to feu for the
controlling flange.
I 0.18.2.2. 1 As a minimum, in the case of the strength fncu = flexural stress due to the factored loads ,at the
design method, the splice plates on the controlling flange mid-thickness of the noncontrolling flange at the
shall be proportioned for a design force, Pcu· The control- point of splice concurrent with feu
ling flange shall be taken as the top or bottom flange for
the smaller section at the point of splice, whichever flange In calculating feu• fnc:u• Mu. My and R, holes in the flange
has the maximum ratio of the elastic flexural stress at its subject to tension shall be accounted for as specified in Ar-
mid-thickness due to the factored loads to its maximum ticle I 0.12. For a flange splice with inner and outer splice
strength. Pcu shall be taken equal to a design stress, Feu• plates, the flange design force shall be proportioned to the
times the smaller effective flange area. Ae. on either side inner and outer plates and their connections as specified
of the splice. Ae is defined in Article I 0.18.2.2.4 and Feu is in Article 10.18.1.3. The effective area, Ac, of each splice
defined as follows: plate shall be sufficient to prevent yielding of the splice
plate under its calculated portion of the design force. Ac of
each splice plate shall be taken as defined in Article
(10- 4b) 10. 18.2.2.4. As a minimum, the connections for both the
top and bottom flange splices shall be proportioned to de-
where: velop the design force in the flange through shear in the
et = 1.0 except that a lower value equal to (MiMy) bolts and bearing at the bolt holes, as specified in Article
may be used for flanges in compression at sec- 10.56.1.3.2. Where filler plates are required, the require-
tions where Mu is less than My. ments of Article 10.18.1.2.1 shall also be satisfied.
274 HIGHWAY BRIDGES 10.18.2.2.2
10.18.2.2.2 As a minimum, in the case of the strength As a minimum, the splice plates for the noncontrolling
design method, high-strength bolted connections for both flange shall be proportioned for a design force, p nef· p ncr
top and bottom flange splices shall be proportioned to pre- shall be taken equal to a design stress, Fnc:r• times the
vent slip at an overload design force, Pro· For the flange smaller effective flange area, Ac. on either side of the
under consideration, Pro shall be computed as follows: splice. Fncr is defined as follows:
(10-4f)
(10-4d)
where:
where:
Rcr = the absolute value of the ratio of Fer to fer for the
fo = maximum flexural stress due to D + ~L(L + at n controlling flange
the mid-thickness of the flange under considera- fncr = flexural stress at the mid-thickness of the non-
tion for the smaller section at the point of splice, controlling flange at the point of splice concur-
where ~L is defined in Article 3.22
rent with fer
R = reduction factor for hybrid girders specified in
Article I 0.53.1.2. R shall be taken equal to 1.0 In calculating Fer• fncr and R, holes in the flange subject to
when fo is less than or equal to Fyw• where Fyw is tension shall be accounted for as specified in Article
equal to the specified minimum yield strength of
I 0.12. For a flange splice with inner and outer splice
the web. For homogeneous girders, R shall al-
plates, the flange design force shall be proportioned to the
ways be taken equal to 1.0. .
inner and outer plates and their connections as specified
A, = smaller gross flange area on either side of the
in Article 10.18.1.3. The effective area, Ae. of each splice
splice
plate shall be sufficient to ensure that the stress in. the
splice plate does not exceed the allowable flexural stress
{0and R shall be computed using the gross section of the
under its calculated portion of the design force. Ae of each
member. The slip resistance of the connection shall be
splice plate shall be taken as defined in Article
computed from Equation ( 10-172).
I 0.18.2.2.4. As a minimum, the connections for both the
top and bottom flange splices shall be proportioned to de-
J0./8.2.2.3 As a minimum, in the case of the service
velop the design force in the flange through shear in the
load design method, the splice plates on the controlling
bolts and bearing at the bolt holes, as specified in Table
flange shall be proportioned for a design force, Per. The
10.32.3B. Where filler plates are required, the require-
controlling flange shall be taken as the top or bottom
ments of Article 10.18.1.2.1 shall also be satisfied. As a
flange for the smaller section at the point of splice,
minimum, high-strength bolted connections shall also be
whichever flange has the maximum ratio of the elastic
proportioned to prevent slip at a force equal to the maxi-
flexural stress at its mid-thickness to its allowable stress. Per
mum elastic flexural stress due to D + (L + I) at the mid-
shall be taken equal to a design stress, Fer, times the smaller
thickness of the flange under consideration for the smaller
effective flange area, Ac. on either side of the splice. Ac is
section at the point of splice times the smaller value of the
defined in Article I 0.18.2.2.4 and Fer is defined as follows:
gross flange area on either side of the splice. The slip re-
sistance of the connection shall be determined as specified
(l0-4e) in Article 10.32.3.2.1.
= flange or splice plate thickness /0.18.2.3.3 As a minimum, in the case of the strength
A8 = gross area of the flange or splice plate design method, web splice plates and their connections
(3 = 0.0 for M 270 Grade I 0011 OOW steels, or when shall be proportioned for a design moment, Mvu• due to the
holes exceed I !4 inch in diameter. eccentricity of the design shear at the point of splice de-
= 0.15 for all other steels and when holes are Jess fined as follows:
than or equal to I !4 inch in diameter.
(10-4k)
The diameter of the holes shall be taken a'i specified in Ar-
ticle I 0.16.14.6. where:
nation ofVwu• Mvu• Mwu and Hwu· The connections shall be 10.18.2.3.6 As a minimum, in the case of the service
proportioned as eccentrically loaded connections to de- load design method, web splice plates and their connec-
velop the resultant design force through shear in the bolts tions shall be proportioned for a design shear stress in the
and bearing at the bolt holes, as specified in Article web at the point of splice, Fw, defined as follows:
10.56.1.3.2. In addition, as a minimum, high-strength
bolted connections for web splices shall be proportioned For fv < 0.5Fv:
as eccentrically loaded connections to prevent slip under
the most critical combination of: I ) an overload design
(10-4r)
shear, V wo• 2) an overload design moment, M~o· due to the
eccentricity of the overload design shear, 3) an overload
For fv ~ 0.5Fv:
design moment, Mwo• applied at mid-depth of the web rep-
resenting the portion of the flexural moment that is as-
sumed to be resisted by the web, and 4) for sections where (10- 4s)
the neutral axis is not located at the mid-depth of the web,
an overload horizontal design force resultant, Hwo• applied where:
at mid-depth of the web, as follows:
fv =maximum shear stress in the web at the point of
splice
(10- 4n)
Fv = allowable shear stress in the web at the point of
splice
where:
V0 = maximum shear in the web due to D + ~L(L+ I) 10.18.2.3. 7 As a minimum, in the case of the service
at the point of the splice, where ~L is defined in load design method, web splice plates and their connec-
Article 3.22 tions shall be proportioned for a design moment, Mv. due
to the eccentricity of the design shear at the point of splice
(10- 4o) defined as follows:
where:
(10-4p)
Fw = design shear stress in the web at the point of
splice defined in Article 10.18.2.3.6
(10-4q) D =web depth
tw = web thickness
where:
I 0.18.2.3.8 As a minimum, in cases of the service
fo = maximum flexural stress due to D + {3 1.(L+ I) at
load design method, web splice plates and their connec-
the mid-thickness of the flange under consider-
tions shall be proportioned for a design moment at the
ation for the smaller section at the point
point of splice, Mw. representing the portion of the flex-
of splice (positive for tension; negative for com-
ural moment that is assumed to be resisted by the web. Mw
pression)
shall be applied at the mid-depth of the web. For sections
for = flexural stress due to D + (3._(L+ I) at the mid-
where the neutral axis is not located at the mid-depth of
thickness of the other flange at the point of splice
the web, a horizontal design force resultant in the web at
concurrent with fo in the flange under considera-
the point of splice, Hw. shall also be applied at the mid-
tion (positive for tension: negative for compres-
sion) depth of the web. Mw and Hw may be computed as follows: