Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

One of conservatism�s most important insights is that all ideologies are wrong.

***Ideology takes an
intellectual system, a product of one or more philosophers, and says, �This system
must be true.�
Inevitably, reality ends up contradicting the system, usually on a growing number
of points. But the
ideology, by its nature, cannot adjust to reality; to do so would be to abandon
the system.

****Therefore, reality must be suppressed. If the ideology has power, it uses its
power to undertake this
suppression. It forbids writing or speaking certain facts. Its goal is to prevent
not only expression of
thoughts that contradict what �must be true,� but thinking such thoughts. In the
end, the result is
inevitably the concentration camp, the gulag and the grave.

***Just what is �Political Correctness?� Political Correctness is in fact cultural


Marxism (Cultural
Communism) � Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms./// The effort to
translate Marxism
from economics into culture did not begin with the student rebellion of the 1960s.
It goes back at least
to the 1920s and the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923,
in Germany, a group
of Marxists founded an institute devoted to making the transition, the Institute
of Social Research
(later known as the Frankfurt School). One of its founders, George Lukacs, stated
its purpose as
answering the question, �Who shall save us from Western Civilisation?� The
Frankfurt School gained
profound influence in European and American universities after many of its leading
lights fled and
spread all over Europe and even to the United States in the 1930s to escape
National Socialism in
Germany. In Western Europe it gained influence in universities from 1945.

The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as
well as Marxist)
added linguistics to create �Critical Theory� and �deconstruction.� These in turn
greatly influenced
education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what
we now call
�Political Correctness.� The lineage is clear, and it is traceable right back to
Karl Marx

***Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, that is,
without regard for the actual
behaviour of individuals. Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as
virtuous and the
bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital as evil. Cultural
Marxism defines all
minorities, what they see as the victims; Muslims, Feminist women, homosexuals and
some
additional minority groups as virtuous and they view ethnic Christian European men
as evil.
(Cultural Marxism does not recognise the existence of non-Feminist women, and
defines
Muslims, Asians and Africans who reject Political Correctness as evil, just like
native Christian
or even atheist Europeans.).

*** Economic Marxists, where they obtained power, expropriated the property of the
bourgeoisie and
handed it to the state, as the �representative� of the workers and the peasants.
Cultural Marxists,
when they gain power (including through our own government), lay penalties on
native European
men and others who disagree with them and give privileges to the �victim� groups
they favour.
Affirmative action is an example.

***Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour on


all Europeans
and is therefore totalitarian in nature.

In his view, a new �Communist man� had to be created before any political
revolution was possible.
This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and
culture. Gramsci
envisioned a long march through the society�s institutions, including the
government, the judiciary,
the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the
workers had a
Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals

Lukacs launched what became known as �Cultural Terrorism.� As part of this


terrorism he
instituted a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools. Hungarian
children were
instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle-class
family codes, the
out-datedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of
all pleasures.
Women, too, were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time. Lukacs�s
campaign of
�Cultural Terrorism� was a precursor to what Political Correctness would later
bring to Western
European school

Political Correctness is not at all about �being nice,� unless one thinks gulags
are nice places.
Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of
expression, thought control,
inversion of the traditional social order, and, ultimately, a totalitarian state.
If anything, the cultural
Marxism created by the Frankfurt School is more horrifying than the old, economic
Marxism that
ruined Russia. At least the economic Marxists did not exalt sexual perversion and
attempt to create
a matriarchy, as the Frankfurt School and its descendants have done.

Cultural Marxist profiles

Reich�s theory was expressed in his words: �The authoritarian family is the
authoritarian state in miniature. Man�s authoritarian character structure is
basically produced by the embedding of sexual inhibitions and fear in the living
substance of sexual impulses. Familial imperialism is ideologically reproduced in
national imperialism�the authoritarian family�is a factory where reactionary
ideology and reactionary structures are produced - Revolutionary sexual politics
would mean the complete collapse of authoritarian ideology. - Birth control was
revolutionary ideology

Though some pundits have claimed that the prevalence of the ideological
intolerance known as political correctness has been exaggerated, the opposite is
closer to the truth. Political correctness has become so deeply ingrained in
Western European and American higher education that many campuses are now dominated
by an atmosphere of uncertainty and apprehension. An increasing number of dedicated
students and faculty members now live in fear that their intellectual pursuit of
truth will offend the Grand Inquisitors of political correctness.

Ultimately, the origins of PC can be traced to the rise of modern ideology and its
quest for power. In contrast to the classical and Judeo-Christian traditions, which
stressed man�s need to understand the moral order and conform himself to it, modern
ideologies have sought to dominate and control the world. In the twentieth century
these ideologies gained political power in Communist states.

The turning point in the academy came in the 1960s, when militant students launched
a guerrilla attack on the traditions of Western culture and the liberal arts.
Seeing that they could not gain lasting power through demonstrations alone, many of
these militants opted to remain �in the system,� going on to become professors
themselves. This generation of �Cultural Marxist radicals� has now become the
establishment in the vast majority of our institutions of higher learning. As
university head masters, deans, and department chairmen, they have set about hiring
other ideologues in their own image and have instigated the repressive policies we
know as political correctness. These politicised academics will be extremely
difficult to dislodge from their current positions of power.

The Fire of True-Learning

Derridean deconstruction became a tool for these cultural critics. Simply stated,
deconstruction is a school of thought that posits that words have no meaning.
Instead, words have �traces� of meaning. The meaning of a word is continually
disappearing, leaving us with only the memory, or trace, of what that meaning once
was

Feminism was conceived and birthed in the 1830s, in the generation experiencing the
first stage of the industrial revolution. Women, who for centuries had shared the
challenges of surviving in an agrarian life, were becoming part of a middle-class
gentry with more time and energy to spend writing newspaper articles and novels for
their �sisters.�

Conclusions

Judge Robert Bork describes as �modern liberalism.� He defines its characteristics


as ��radical egalitarianism� (equality of outcomes rather than of opportunities)
and �radical individualism� (the drastic reduction of limits to personal
gratification).�

What you need to know, our falsified history and other forms of cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist propaganda

1.2 General characteristics of European Islamic Negationism

�When a land rejects her legends, Sees but falsehoods in the past; And its people
view their Sires in the light of fools and liars, 'Tis a sign of its decline and
its glories cannot last. Branches that but blight their roots yield no sap for
lasting fruits

Playing up unrepresentative facts

Potrebbero piacerti anche