‫منهــج النقض والبنـــاء‬

‫صنــد اإلمام الغزالي‬

‫م‪.‬م‪ .‬احمد صباح شهاب‬

‫كلية العلوم اإلسالمية‪ /‬جامعة بغداد‬

 Conclusion

At the end we will con clued with the following:

1- ammam al qazali : has defied all his foes in

tellectually which enhauced his knowledge and his in
farwation about their weakeness.
2- ammam al qazali has no problem with the translator of
book or maths physics or other sciences buthe was
against thebooks oftheology it is against religion

3- the philosophy of al qazali and his thoughts was

considered as to the thought of the sunai with their
evidenees he neverdelet or mislead but he only defvder
about his slogans

4- the trans lating the greek philosophyical books was in

cowplete and the translation wasnot honest because it was
not true and not authent ic because the treans lutore were
not honest with their translations

5 – the idea of theology between the aucient philosphers

as aristo wes not clear because the idea of god was not
clear because the variet y of gods there the atmosphere
was pagan and their writings and researchers were paywn
ako
6- ave rose was accused by al qazali in his book ( tahaft al
falasfa ) became he was one of the Islamic philosopher
whobeliened in the philosophical th ought of god and was
the first to call for these thoughts that is why he found the
Greek philosopher the near est. to his believes and he
decleaned that in his book ( Risala adhawyia fi amr al
maad ) by denying the death and domes day which is
against our believe
‫املكدمة‬





‫املبحث األول‪ :‬حياة اإلمام الغزالي‬
 ‫املبحث الثاني‬
‫موقف اإلمام الغزالي مو الفلشفة‪ ،‬وأصهاف الفالسفة‬
‫املبحث الثالث‪ :‬فلشفة اإلمام الغزالي‪:‬‬
‫املبحث الرابع‪ :‬ترمجة كتب الفلشفة اليونانية الكدمية‬
‫املبحث اخلامص‪ :‬تهافت الفالسفة‬

‫اخلامتــة‬
‫املصـادر‬