Sei sulla pagina 1di 12

Not a Member Yet? Join Now!

Email:
Password:

LOGIN

Featured Alternative Space Sci-tech Money Politics Health Global Spirituality Self-Sufficiency Unexplained Lifestyle Classic Home

Visitors Now: 3,979


HOME ALTERNATIVE FREE NEWSLETTER: Enter email Sign Up
Total Visits: 666,352,706
Total Stories: 5,475,280
13 Story Views

7 Now: 65
Last Hour: 908
By Christopher Watson
Last 24 Hours: 9,377
Contributor profile | More stories
Total: 9,377

The Real Abe Lincoln: What They Won’t Teach You


in School!
Monday, September 7, 2015 6:44

Get FREE private and secure Email and Messaging click now!

Alex Jones Secret Divorce Revealed!

Alert American The White Hats Are Coming Do


(Before It's News)
Not Turn On Each Other‐New Info Added

We were taught in school that Abraham Lincoln Planet X Nibiru The Navy Knows about the
Coming Pole Shift
was a great guy, a sensitive patriot and sort of
a savior that freed the black man from the shackles The Real Abe Lincoln: What They Won't Teach
You in School!
of slavery.
David Icke – An Outstanding Summary of our
But history records a different Lincoln than we’re Situation
accustomed to hearing about. One who racked up Dabhoo77‐ Is China Hinting At Using Weapons
for himself a multitude of unconstitutional, With UFO Technology In New Simulation?
freedom‐stripping acts. But you won’t hear this First China Now Russia Facing War With
side of the famous historical figure, who graces a America?? And Why is Russia Fighting In Syria??
copy of every five dollar bill, taught in the All That and More…
propaganda machine known as the Public School system. Steve Quayle: "The Coming Planned Genocide
Against Americans Has Started”

WWIII Already In Play? If Not Then Why Is


Everyone Preparing For it? Russia, China,
Europe, the US…Is an EMP In Our Future?

Melting Ice in Yellowstone is Revealing Ancient


Native Artifacts Faster Than Researchers Can
Handle

The goal of abolishing the white race is on its


face so desirable..........++

Ginza,Tokyo by Yuma Yamashita

Morning Glow by Kenji Yamamura

From the Desk of John Rourke – September


8th, 2015

September is National Preparedness Month

Rourke’s Weekly Recommendations

In Gold We Trust – 2015 Edition

Massachusetts: Bringing the farm to Lowell’s


inner city

African Invaders Destroying Southern Italy

Tackling New York’s housing crisis

 
This man, who some call a “tyrant” is credited with, among other things: launching an invasion
without the consent of Congress, blockading Southern ports before formally declaring war,
unilaterally suspending the writ of habeas corpus, arresting and imprisoning thousands of Northern
citizens without a warrant, censoring telegraph communications, promoting racist
views, confiscating private property, including firearms, effectively gutting the Ninth and Tenth
Amendments, robbing, raping and burning the homes of undefended Southern civilians, not just
men and women, but as Sherman would freely admit in his memoirs, children as well.
Even worshipful Lincoln biographers and historians called him a “dictator.” In his book,
Constitutional Dictatorship, Clinton Rossiter devoted an entire chapter to Lincoln and calls him a
“great dictator.” “Lincoln’s amazing disregard for the . . . Constitution was considered by nobody
as legal,”

Abraham Lincoln, named the great emancipator and champion of the constitution by government
school textbooks, was more concerned with exercising federal control over sovereign states, than
he was in freeing the negro from the shackles of slavery. He himself made this clear in no uncertain
terms.

On March 4th 1861 Lincoln clarified his position on slavery in his first inaugural address on the East
Portico of the Capital building:

“I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States
where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.”

While America’s children continue to be brainwashed into believing that Lincoln was the savior of
the black man, the Congressman from Illinois tells a different tale in his Fourth debate with Stephen
Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, on September 18, 1858):
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about, in any way, the social
and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of
making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with
white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the
white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of
social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together
there must be the position of superior and inferior. And I, as much as any other man, am in favor of
having the superior position assigned to the white race.”Abraham Lincoln
(1809‐1865) 16th US President
Source:

Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858
(The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, pp. 145‐146.)

The long list of Lincoln’s recorded remarks which would readily and fervently be condemned as
racist hate speech today, includes his views on

the expansion of slavery. Lincoln wrote,

“There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people to the idea of indiscriminate
amalgamation (mixture) of the white and black races … A separation of the races is the only perfect
preventive of amalgamation, but as an immediate separation is impossible, the next best thing is to
keep them apart where they are not already together. If white and black people never get together
in Kansas, they will never mix blood in Kansas …”

Abe Lincoln: What They WON'T Teach in School


On equality, Lincoln said,

“I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races.

There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever

forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes

a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race,

to which I belong, having the superior position.”..

On interracial Marriage, Lincoln said,

“Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live
with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the
increase of mixed breed bastards may someday challenge the supremacy of the white man.”

http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm

Ironically, rather than freeing slaves, Lincoln through the Enrollment Act, which conscripted men
between the ages of 20 and 45 to be “liable to perform military duty in the service of the United
States,” created a slave class to be used as enforcers of the Federal will.

Though many erroneously believe that the Civil War was fought primarily over the issue of slavery,
that notion is undermined by a well publicized letter written to the New York Tribune’s editor,
Horace Greeley, on Aug 22, 1862, during the heart of the actual battle. In it, Lincoln himself reveals
his real reason for initiating the conflict when he wrote:

“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all
the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also
do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the
Union.” His focus was and had always been the saving or strengthening the Union and therefore
the power of the federal Government, NOT on extending a hand to lift the black man from the
plight of his slavery.

In the volume of his writings beginning in his first inaugural address, “saving the Union” is
synonymous with his desire to strengthen the grip of the federal government on any and all
citizens, any and all territories, any and all states. State succession, as addressed in his speeches,
was not only undesirable, it was unacceptable. And if it came to one state’s desire to separate
from his Union, he would (as seen his instigation of the War of Northern Aggression) set out to
teach them a lesson with the strong arm of Federal Power.

“no State” he said, “upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union; … resolves and
ordinances to that effect are legally void,” And, as if prophesying the events that he would
provoke just one month later by fortifying Fort Sumter which was situated on the sovereign soil of
Confederate‐controlled South Carolina, Lincoln declared that “acts of violence within any State or
States against the authority of the United States are insurrectionary or revolutionary.” He also
conveniently mentioned (40 days before the battle at Fort Sumpter), “there needs to be no
bloodshed or violence, and there shall be none UNLESS it be forced upon the national authority.”

In April 1861, after repeated calls by the South Carolina government to evacuate Union troops from
the newly seceded region went unheeded, Lincoln, took opportunity to knowingly incite the South
Carolinian troops to use “force upon the national authority,” by sending supply ships to fortify
Union‐controlled Fort Sumter in Charleston harbor. After Confederate troops fired on Fort Sumter,
Lincoln, 18 days later, admitted (in a letter to Captain G.V. Fox) that he expected the retaliation,
which he then used as the pretext to garner Northern support and launch a full scale war against
his own countrymen. In a May 1st, 1861 letter to Fox, Lincoln wrote, “You and I both anticipated
that the cause of the country would be advanced by making the attempt to provision Fort Sumter,
even if it should fail; and it is no small consolation now to feel that our anticipation is justified by
the result.” That result is what we now know as the Civil War. No one was killed or wounded in
the 36 hour battle at Fort Sumter, and the War of Northern aggression had begun.

The Lincoln myth today serves the purposes of the regime, both Democrat and Republican. It
serves the purpose of the regime in which power is completely centralized, in which
decentralization of power is viewed as suspect. People who promote a centralized authority claim
that those who object to it must want to bring back slavery if they favor states having sovereign
power. It is Lincoln who inaugurates this new version of the United States. A version that is
completely at odds with Liberty. Those who want to exercise unchecked power over the American
public continue to foster these myths.

Lincoln sternly threatened, “The Union, in any event, will not be dissolved. We don’t want to
dissolve it, and if you attempt it we won’t let you. With the purse and sword, the army and navy
and treasury, in our hands and at our command, you could not do it.” For Lincoln, contrary to
popular history, Government was a federal proposition that would be imposed with tyrannical fervor
upon those who did not want it. And apparently, it mattered not how many souls had to die to
accomplish his objective.

The letter

In doing this there needs to be no bloodshed or violence, and there shall be none unless it be
forced upon the national authority. The power confided to me will be used to hold, occupy, and
possess the property and places belonging to the Government and to collect the duties and imposts

It follows from these views that no State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the
Union; that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void, and that acts of violence within
any State or States against the authority of the United States are insurrectionary or revolutionary,
according to circumstances.” Lincoln, from his first inaugural address made it clear that no state
has authority over the Federal government.

I therefore consider that in view of the Constitution and the laws the Union is unbroken, and to
the extent of my ability, I shall take care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that
the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in all the States.

In doing this there needs to be no bloodshed or violence, and there shall be none unless it be
forced upon the national authority. The power confided to me will be used to hold, occupy, and
possess the property and places belonging to the Government and to collect the duties and
imposts; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion, no using
of force against or among the people anywhere. Where hostility to the United States in any interior
locality shall be so great and universal as to prevent competent resident citizens from holding the
Federal offices, there will be no attempt to force obnoxious strangers among the people for that
object.

When the states could not enforce it, Congress drew up their own plan. By the end of February,
both branches passed the Enrollment Act, and on this date, Lincoln signed it into law.

The Enrollment Act (technically called “An Act for enrolling and calling out the national Forces, and
for other Purposes”) declared that “all able‐bodies male citizens of the United States, and persons
of foreign birth who shall have declared on oath their intention to become citizens under and in
pursuance of the laws thereof, between the ages of twenty and forty‐five years, except as
hereinafter excepted, are hereby declared to constitute the national forces, and shall be liable to
perform military duty in the service of the United States when called out by the President for that
purpose.”

The great irony of the U.S. is that we tend to hail criminals while we imprision patriots.

For more videos like this:

Let’s stay connected:


https://www.facebook.com/HighImpactFlix
https://www.twitter.com/HighImpactFlix
Website: https://www.highimpactflix.com
Ads by Adblade
POPULAR OFFERS

Discover a The #1 trick to FIGHT These Images From Unnerving Historical


breakthrough in your Diabetes and "jump Insane Asylums Will Photos That Will
home viewing start" your Pancreas Give You Nightmares Leave You Speechless
experience with these (hint: you've NEVER (12 Photos)
state-of-the-art TVs. seen this before)

Consider THIS before The #1 drink to FIGHT If You Have Gas, The Most Random
dating an athletic the real cause of Bloating, Constipation Pics You Will Ever See
girl... diabetes (drink THIS or an Upset Stomach
daily)​ ​ Please Watch This
Video

Before It's News
19,274 likes

Like Page Share

Be the first of your friends to like this

Related Stories
New UN report reveals collaboration between Israel and Syrian rebels

VIDEO: Watch as Refugees are Welcomed To Germany With Cheers and Open Arms

Drinking and Writing: A Love Story

Careful Who You ‘Like’: Lenders Could Deny Loans Based on Facebook Friends

Nuclear War Theme Parks: Mass Destruction for the Whole Family

US demanded Greece close airspace to Russian humanitarian aid for Syria

Israel Plans to Demolish Up to 17,000 Palestinian Structures in West Bank, U.N. Says

Turning the Cradle of Civilization Into its Graveyard


Video Comparison: Visual Features Of “Real” Shooting vs. Parker/Ward Shooting Footage (VIDEO)

The 1947 Roswell Incident Theory You’ve Probably Never Heard Of (Video)

Comments
Your Comments

                                          SUBMIT

Total 25 comments

CrissCross

Lot of things are not taught in schools… 

Top 20 Still Unanswered Forbidden – History Questions 
http://humansarefree.com/2014/03/top-20-still-unanswered-forbidden.html

SEP 7, 2015, 7:43 AM
   

Cleareyes
I Lub Abram linkin! Mikel Jatson, and mokey the bear!

SEP 7, 2015, 8:00 AM
   

GK
This sounds like it was written by someone butthurt about losing the Civil War.

Go cry some more.

SEP 7, 2015, 8:13 AM
   

Christopher Watson
I’m a Northerner. And I don’t take kindly to over 600,000 of my people (Black, white,
Southern or Northern) destroyed because a tyrant wanted to exert power over his
sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution against ALL enemies.

SEP 7, 2015, 8:16 AM
   

BiggusDickus
Couldn’t agree more! I too, am a Northerner. Always have been; always will
be. And think Lincoln is one of the WORST presidents in the country’s
history (Lyndon Johnson is not far behind). The indoctrination propaganda
we (the people) have been fed over the years about him is largely self-
serving for those advocate more big brother central government. Just read
the some of the books by Thomas Dilorenzo to get ‘the other side’ of
Lincoln – beyond the contrived and manufactured myth.

SEP 7, 2015, 9:00 AM
   

Brenda Starr
I was born in the South, and that is not why I agree with you Christopher.
The fact Honest Abe went to war with the South was to control the sea
ports…period. maybe freeing the slaves was just an after thought. Anyway,
regardless of the circumstances, slaveery should never have happened.
History should not have been rewritten and Americans need to not take
everything at face value…Wise up America, do your homework. One of the
biggest problems killing this once great Nation, is sin. We need a moral
compass, we need to get back to Jesus. Thank you Christopher Watson!

SEP 7, 2015, 10:42 AM
   

LifeIs
GK the Civil War ended long before my grandparents were born. I could not possibly
lose the Civil War.
I spent my early childhood among Lincoln-worshipers. Roaming the reconstructed (by
William Randolph Hearst) village of New Salem. Visiting Lincoln’s house, where I was
utterly shocked to learn that our hero had been shot.

But even at age 6, I had better sense than to touch the nose of the Gutzon Borglum
bust at Lincoln’s Tomb, for “good luck.”

GK the million or so freed slaves who died in Lincoln’s camps should not be forgotten.
It’s not easy to kill a million people. You have to work at it. Lincoln killed as many
African-Americans as he could, with the stated intention of deporting the rest.

With the freed slaves, Lincoln did on a large scale what he did to Sioux indians in
Minnesota. He confined them under conditions that would kill them. The difference is,
the Sioux understood what was being done to them, and they fought back.

Lincoln killed nearly three-quarters of a million people for the sake of government
revenue. His 1st inaugural address states his intention to invade the South and shed
blood for the sake of collecting tariffs on imported goods. That’s what he SAID.

And GK if you read the article, don’t ignore the facts contained therein.

SEP 7, 2015, 1:09 PM
   

Eagle Scout
This article seems familiar somehow…

SEP 7, 2015, 8:19 AM
   

Anonymous
How great can someone be that pushed the country into civil war and caused the death of
700,000 of it’s countrymen? He was the one that started to destroy state representation and
centralized the power in the Federal government in Washington.
Now we have a man that wants to be king in the white house. Every week he is making a new
decree by order of the king.

SEP 7, 2015, 8:30 AM
   

Anonymous
No, I was taught exactly what you are purporting in my school. It was very disappointing and
frustrating. It was as if to say don’t be thankful, don’t ever believe in MLK’s dream, don’t ever
believe that a white person can be trusted. This defeats organization between the races, which is
what would be needed to eliminate corruption and having a government that actually serves its
people equally. If not true or out of context, this is very nasty disinformation.

However, in my studies, I have found quotes from Lincoln after election to office stating that it was
his belief that slavery was an abomination that needed to be stopped at all cost. Frederick
Douglas, a man of great intelligence and accomplishment, knew Lincoln well, called each other
friends, and Douglas said of him, “There is not a racist bone in that man’s body.” I remember him
chastising other whites who didn’t want slaves free because they were inferior. Lincoln said, “If
you believe blacks are inferior, then why would you have a problem competing with him in the
work force. It is just too sad to think about how great he would have made this country if his able
leadership was present during Reconstruction.

SEP 7, 2015, 8:58 AM
   

Anonymous
There is also much documentation about how he did his utmost to make Northern
troops behave well. I don’t think he approved of Sherman’s March. I don’t know of one
leader that, during the time of war, who does not take on tyrannical powers.

SEP 7, 2015, 9:09 AM
   

KG!#@!
Abraham Lincoln was no “tyrant.” Only an Ayn Rand/Von Mises idiot would think that. Lincoln
suspended Habeus Corpus because the Capitol – Washington D.C. was SURROUNDED by
southern rebels. And the Southerners were seditious traitors to America. To think that men who
thought race based chattel slavery were “honorable” is a direct insult to any real American.

Go and peddle your neo-Confederate propaganda on an appropriate site – like Personal Liberty or
Von Mises. 

SEP 7, 2015, 9:02 AM
   

Factory Farms Fear the MooCow
The South was poor got their butts handed to them.
Eat More GMO 

SEP 7, 2015, 12:09 PM
   
LifeIs
Anonymous, Lincoln commanded the Union army and Lincoln targeted the civilian
population.

KG!#@! certainly Lincoln was a tyrant. He did not tolerate political opposition or free
speech. He waged war against his own people, for the sake of collecting more taxes.

SEP 7, 2015, 1:30 PM
   

BiggusDickus
This buffoon -> (KG!#@!) is exactly the type of ‘low information’ lemming that the
Lincoln indoctrination campaign in the schools and media have targeted to be their
useful idiots.

SEP 7, 2015, 4:49 PM
   

ednoonan7
This just adds more fire to the other 2 of the 3 strikes against the pretend “USA”. Chester Arthur
was a British citizen and could not prove that he was a US CITIZEN in 1881 when he became the
1st bogus POTUS. And, of course, the 3rd strike was in 2009 when Barry Soetoro (aka BHO)
another non-citizen usurped the white house and the office of Sodomite-in-Chief.

But, this was a good factual article and find no untruths in it. I would like to add the following:

Please note the Lincolnized-thought found in the 1864 “Rights from our Creator” aka NEVADA
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS:

1864 Nevada State Constitution ARTICLE 1. – Declaration of Rights.

Sec:2. Purpose of government; paramount allegiance to United States.
All political power is inherent in the people[.] Government is instituted for the protection, security
and benefit of the people; and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public
good may require it. BUT THE PARAMOUNT ALLEGIANCE OF EVERY CITIZEN IS DUE TO
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have
been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States;
AND NO POWER EXISTS IN THE PEOPLE OF THIS OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE
FEDERAL UNION TO DISSOLVE THEIR CONNECTION THEREWITH or perform any act tending
to impair[,] subvert, or resist the Supreme Authority of the government of the United States. The
Constitution of the United States confers full power on the Federal Government to maintain and
Perpetuate its existance [existence], AND WHENSOEVER ANY PORTION OF THE STATES,
OR PEOPLE THEREOF ATTEMPT TO SUCEDE FROM THE FEDERAL UNION, OR FORCIBLY
RESIST THE EXECUTION OF ITS LAWS, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MAY, BY WARRANT
OF THE CONSTITUTION, EMPLOY ARMED FORCE IN COMPELLING OBEDIENCE TO ITS
AUTHORITY.

Sooooooooooo… please add Sec 2 of the Nevada State Constitution to any future writing that
you do about Lincoln. This epitomizes Lincoln in a nutshell and continues to this day. We have
been occupied by a FEDERAL GOVERNMENT which EMPLOYS ARMED FORCE IN
COMPELLING OBEDIENCE TO ITS AUTHORITY!

Edward C. Noonan

2002 Winner AIP Primary – CA Secretary of State
2006 Winner AIP Primary – CA Governor
2006-2008 CA State Party Chairman American Independent Party
2010 Winner AIP Primary – CA US Senate
2012 Winner AIP Primary – President of the United States
2012-2015 Founder & National Committee Chairman:
American Resistance Party
http://www.americanresistanceparty.org

SEP 7, 2015, 9:08 AM
   

VomitO
Stinkin Linkin

SEP 7, 2015, 10:04 AM
   

Man
don’t forget he is a vampire hunter

SEP 7, 2015, 10:14 AM
   

bdn
A good book is “Lincoln Unmasked” that makes similar arguments. He points out that only in
America was a civil war fought to free the slaves. Slavery was dying a natural death all over the
world. Why? Because economically it’s a bad deal. It’s not “free” labor. Think about it – you have
to provide a house, all clothing, all fuel, all food, all water. And you don’t get an able bodied
person until they are at least 10 years old. So you pay for all that and get nothing in return.
Compare that to cheap foreign labor that was immigrating here in grand numbers. You paid for the
work that was it.

Face it America was no better than France that fought the French Revolution or Russia that
fought the Russian Revolution. In all cases it was the brotherhood of the country savagely killing
each other. It’s the saddest chapter in American history. And Lincoln lead the way, with the help
and backing of the bankers and other interests that really run the show in the shadows.

SEP 7, 2015, 10:18 AM
   

Anonymous
I as taught and raised in ‘northern’ schools, and indoctrinated with the standard doctrine that
Lincoln = good, south = evil. But it didn’t work. I rejected those lies from the beginning. Thank’s
for blogging the truth.

SEP 7, 2015, 11:45 AM
   

magusincognito
I did, in fact, begin this presentation with great enthusiasm. The key question I held in mind was
whether the masses were catching on to who this individual actually was. And as I worked
through it all, I found no mentions; indication that the name “Abraham Lincoln” is just a fictitious
name covering up more of the same (i.e. relationships to bankers et al).

A one A.A. Springs left a lot of land (e.g. Huntsville, AL)/wealth to his son Leroy Springs,
however, the name in the will was actually “Abraham Lincoln!” And let’s pause here. The name
“Springs” is also a fictitious name; is derived from Springstein. His mother was a Nancy Hanks,
who found herself in an uncompromising position whilst visiting family/friends in 1908 in
Lincolnton, North Carolina. Enter the one called “Abraham Lincoln,” who was also related to the
Rothchilds. Mr. “Lincoln” was to find himself in an awkward position down the line; a feud between
bankers (i.e. Hapsburgs & Rothschilds). In fact, one can find a record of the 1862 incident
between Hapsburg and Springstein/Lincoln in the Smithsonian National Archives. “The German
royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States,
Abraham Lincoln. ” And, of course, this story takes a lot of twists & turns. Isn’t truth stranger
than fiction?

We then have the illegitimate daughter, Elizabeth, of German King Leopold hooking up with
“Honest Abe.” Abraham’s wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, did not find out about Elizabeth, Ella and
Emily (i.e. the illegitimate kids) until 1865. However, Mrs. Lincoln was more focused on opium.
She got hers (i.e. supply) from a former member of the Confederate Intelligence community. It
was because of his involvement with the Southern Intelligence Community, Mary’s supplier –
John Wilkes Booth – knew about the lover and the illegal twins. After being spurned by the
Confederate intelligence community, Mary’s ‘candy man’ approached and became involved with
the Rothschild Empire of Europe, for he realized the European banking moguls would be very
interested in his pipeline to the White House. Ultimately Honest Abe chose the Hapsburgs over
the Rothschilds and the rest is history.

Oh, you thought John Wilkes Booth was the culprit? He was the scapegoat, but that’s another
story…

“The only new thing in this world is the history you don’t know” (President Harry S. Truman).

SEP 7, 2015, 11:53 AM
   

LifeIs
visiting family/friends in 1908 in Lincolnton — 1808 you meant.

SEP 7, 2015, 2:09 PM
   

anonymous

   WARNING!!!!!         

BIN HAS REMOVED FACTUAL COMMENTS ON THEIR STORIES! I questioned the criminal
Generals in a story and proven facts they are High Treasonous trait0rs to the US Flag, AND
THEY REMOVED IT! COME ON! REALLY?

/opinion-conservative/2015/09/the-americans-by-gen-paul-e-vallely-gen-charles-jones-ret-
3051562.html

BIN BANS COMMENTS AND CONTROLS WHAT YOU READ!!!!!!!!!!

SEP 7, 2015, 12:15 PM
   

Pink Slime
Very true. Lincoln was used by liberals for decades to introduce Negro worship to American
school children and the result has been disastrous with the illegal election of the first negro
sodomite and the parade of endless obligatory Negroes in just about every Hollywood movie.

The FINAL CURSE your leaders set upon you is here!

SEP 7, 2015, 2:54 PM
   

Robert Fallin
BRAVO!!! This and the articles on the Khazar mafia are the BEST articles even published in
BEFORE ITS NEWS.

SEP 7, 2015, 3:41 PM
   
About | Advertise With Us | FAQ | Contact | Editorial Guidelines | Privacy | Terms of Service | Copyright Notification | RSS Subscribe | Widgets

Portions copyright © 2013 Before It's News Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Before It's News® is a registered Service Mark of Before It's News Inc..

SHARE THIS STORY:

Potrebbero piacerti anche