by

Willie Loyola
on 20 October 2014
Transcript of Values of Research to Man
Research has led man to search for ways in improving his life. it has led him
to focus on improving processes and means by which he must love. the
quality of life has improved through research because man is a dreamer, is
ambitious, and is industrious in achieving his dreams
Research has deep-seated psychological aspects
Research stimulates and ennobles the human spirit. It challenges man to
remove the threat of stagnation. It is an open door to a better future and it
guides him in his efforts to obtain good results which contribute to his
satisfaction and self-fulfillment.
Research improves the exportation of food products
Through research, the exportation of food products has improved. Foods
being exported has longer shelf-life through employment of preservation
techniques that stemmed from research.
Research improves the quality of life

Empirical
Research is based on direct experience and observation by the researcher.
The collection of data relies on practical experience without benefit of the
scientific knowledge or theory.
Cyclical
Research is a cyclical process. It starts with a problem and ends with a
problem.For instance, a researcher who completes his study states his
finding and draws up his conclusions and recommendations. in his
recommendations, many problems may crop up as other subjects for study
hence, the cycle is repeated.

Logical
Research is based on valid procedure and principles. Scientific investigation
is done in an orderly manner so that the researcher has confidence on the
results. Logical examination of the procedures used in the research enables
the researcher to draw valid conclusions. thus, the logic of valid research
makes it important for decision making.
Research is valuable for:
The researcher is confidently precise in his interpretations on whether the
results are significant or insignificant, or whether to reject or accept the
hypothesis

 REFERENCES
1. Simon, B.S. 1978. Educational research: which way?. Research Intelligence, 4(1)

[Google Scholar]

2. Taylor, P.H. 1966. Does initial training prepare teachers to understand and take
part in educational research?. Educational Research, 9(1)

[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]

[Google Scholar]

3. Cronbach, L.J. 1962. Educational Psychology, 2nd edn, New York: Harcourt
Brace.

[Google Scholar]

4. Langeveld, M.J. 1965. “In search of research”. In The European Year Book of
Educational Research, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier. [5] Ibid.

[Google Scholar]

5. Thouless, R.H. 1969. Map of Educational Research, Slough: NFER.

[Google Scholar]

6. Ibid. [8] and Shulman, Lee S. 1970. Reconstruction of educational

research. Review of Educational Research, 40

[Web of Science ®]

[Google Scholar]
7. Ibid

[Google Scholar]

8. Suppes, Patrick. 1973. “Facts and fantasies of education”. In Alternatives from

Educational Research, Edited by: Wittrock, M.C. London: Prentice Hall.

[Google Scholar]

9. Rohwer, W.D. 1973. “Children and adolescents: should we teach them or let
them learn?”. In Changing Education, Edited by: Wittrock, M.C. London: Prentice Hall.

[Google Scholar]

10. Yates, Alfred, ed. 1971. The Role of Research in Educational Change, Palo
Alto: Pacific Books.

[Google Scholar]

11. Godwin, D. Bob. 1972. “Is educational research distinctive?”. In Philosophical

Redirection of Educational Research, Edited by: Thomas, Lawrence G. University of
Chicago Press.

[Google Scholar]

12. Ibid

[Google Scholar]

13. Lovell, K. and Lawson, K.S. 1970. Understanding Research in

Education, London: ULP.
 [Google Scholar]

14. Ibid

[Google Scholar]

15. Stephens, J.M. 1967. The Process of Schooling. A Psychological

Examination, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc..

[Google Scholar]

16. Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. 1963. “Experimental and quasi‐experimental
designs for research on teaching”. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, Edited
by: Gage, N.L. 171–246. Chicago: Rand McNally.

[Google Scholar]

17. Dewey, J. 1933. How We Think, Boston, D. C.: Heath.

[Crossref]

[Google Scholar]

18. Ibid Vol. 12,