Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
0 OBJECTIVE
transmission tower.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Historically, wood has been again the traditional material preferred and used by
network companies around the world due to its strength, durability, and electrical
wood or timber were used as cross-arms on 132kV suspension towers in 1963 after a
during lightning strikes was recorded on 66kV towers which was first commissioned in
1929.[1, 2] By the year 90s, Malaysia has recently put in service an all 132kV quadruple
quadruple circuit line as shown in Fig. 1 of (a) and (b) below. Clearly, the integrity of such
particular its single-, double-, triple- and quadruple-circuit outage rate during operation in
order to compensate the conduction behavior of two types of cross-arms materials, viz.
wood and steel. The use of wooden cross-arms which have been rather successful in
improving the lightning performance of the 275kV and 132kV double-circuit line.[3, 4] The
275kV cross-arm is made from four pieces of Chengal timber woods, two struts and two
tie members and the 132kV design is made from three pieces of Chengal timber woods,
two struts and one tie. Due to its structural strength limitation, wooden cross-arms are used
only in light suspension tower while the heavy suspension and tension towers are fitted
Fig. 1: Malaysian typical 275kv/132kv quad-circuit transmission tower with all (a)
especially with materials such as steel and fiber composites; for example, fiberglass. That
is because, in the late 90s, it was found that matured Chengal can no longer be found easily
available to make good quality cross-arms. It was also found that these old woods started
to fail due to aging after more 24 years of service. Much later, in 2010, a defective wood
cross-arm was found after only 14 years of service. The cross-arm was found failed due
wood natural defect from the fungi and microorganism attacks. Few other cases were also
reported such as the flashover from the surge of lightning strike which has created an
electricity pole. The materials used for cross-arms in overhead distribution and
transmission lines by TNB on the existing designs are currently steel and wood. Steel is
always a conductor in any condition, so it does not have an insulation resistance. Whilst,
wood has low electrical strength at Alternating Current (AC) especially under wet
condition, and also low mechanical strength per unit weight.[6] The utilization of wood as
extinguishing property which empowers it to extinguish the bend started from lightning
strikes. Unfortunately, a few cases were given an account of fizzled cross-arm because of
lightning strikes after an immediate hit from lightning although having lightning strike
Besides that, Malaysia lies near the equator where it is characterized by high lightning
Services indicate that thunders occur 200 days a year in the tropics region of Malaysia.
Thunderstorms have been suspected to have caused between 50 and 60 percent of the
transient tripping in the transmission and distribution networks in TNB. [7] In the tropics,
lightning occurrences are higher in certain months. It is also reported that Southeast Asia
has sharp increases of lightning activity in April and October, particularly Malaysia which
experiences high ash rates in April to May and October to November. This is due to shifts
in the season from pre-monsoon to monsoon called inter-monsoon period which increases
the progression of thunderstorm activity. [8] The cross-arms removed from service indicated
the effects of surface aging as a result of the electrical field and atmospheric conditions
degrading the cross-arm surface. Plus, most flashovers took place around one of the main
fiberglass cross-arms. A few flashovers were around the strain rod of the cross-arms.[9]
4.0 SOLUTIONS & MEASURES
As the cost and time being the crucial elements in providing the best adequate
solutions for the deteriorating and failure of the wooden cross-arms, some
preventive measures have been proposed in order to overcome the problem in short-
term of life expectancy. The useful life and structural integrity of those wooden
the existing woods. Wood treatment refers to protecting wood from damage caused
by insects, fungi, decay, climate, and extreme weather conditions. Treating wood
with the right chemical preservatives can extend the life expectancy and protect it
from the harsh environment. Choosing the right wood preservative can save a utility
time, frustration, and money, whereas the three most common wood treatments
includes;
i. Pentacholorphenol (Penta);
iii. Creosote.
determining which preservative is best suited for use in a particular region of the
country. These decisions are based on a variety of factors, including the physical
and performance characteristics of the preservative, the location of the service area,
another in any particular setting; for instance, the use of Penta- or Creosote-treated
wood in hot, dry climates, other variables such as costs, supply, and worker
acceptability are important factors in selecting the type of treated wood used in a
particular setting.
Penta treatment is the preferred option over CCA- and Creosote-treated wood
are constantly exposed to direct sunshine, differential drying, and shrinking occurs.
The differential stresses cause severe twisting and warping of cross-arms, a physical
action that strains electrical wires. The strains are often severe enough to cause
unplanned electrical outages. This type of failure risk is plainly unacceptable from
an operational perspective. Thus, the oil carrier for Penta prevents exaggerated
treatment of cross-arms because, over time, there may be drippage onto wires,
insulators, or electrical equipment located below the cross-arms on the same pole.
Penta-treated cross-arm may have greater flex (due to oil content) than CCA-treated
cross-arm, which are dry and stiffer. Creosote may be specified in areas prone to
impact loads such as ice and/or wind which is not common in the tropic region of
Malaysia. Moreover, Penta is oil-borne and the oil repels rain and moisture from
the cross-arm surface, thus, contributing to reduced decay. The oil also reduces
checking and splitting which minimizes physical avenues that would otherwise
allow easy access for insects and fungi to interior cross-arm locations where
is used as a reinforcing agent for many polymer products; the resulting composite
work areas all at a higher strength-to-weight ratio than steel. The structural
metals and resist the corrosive effects of harsh environments, especially those
insulation or dielectric strength and its long-life expectancy can be achieved using
cross-arm and wood cross-arm.[6] As its insulation level is high enough to cater the
flashover surged of the lightning strike, fiberglass is being installed widely over the
world. TNB should also consider the fiberglass substitution as the preferable
alternatives for lightning proof overhead transmission line and/or tower. Fig. 3
with a combination of fiberglass strain rod. If the insulation length of a strain rod,
L'', is not proportional with the insulation length of fiberglass cross-arms, L', the
flashover may occur around the strain rod instead around the fiberglass cross-arm,
which then making the fiberglass alternatives among the most reliable configuration
structure with a combination of fiberglass strain rod, whereby; (a) Top view (b)
Front view.[6]
5.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, these failure measurement study concluded that the existing materials
used for cross-arms in overhead distribution and transmission lines by TNB are wood and
steel. These two materials are susceptible to many risks of degrading attacks or effects and
while all of the three preservatives discussed above are designed to prevent decay, the
preservatives are not always interchangeable, because decay is not a function of identical
vary depending on the type of wood that is used and the environment the wood is used in.
preventive measure. Plus, the preservatives also have certain associated risks of side-effects
to the person handling them and environment which regulated the usage of Penta for not
self-application. Moreover, the corrective measure that should be taken by TNB in order to
overcome the cross-arm problems can be suggested for another reliable material
substitution of fiberglass composite. When taking all parameters into the account,
[1] Boon, K. T. (2009). A study on the usage of wooden poles and crossarms in the New
Zealand electricity network industry (Bachelors thesis). Retrieved from New Zealand
[2] I. Mohamed Rawi, M. S. A. Rahman, M. Z. A. Ab. Kadir, & M. Izadi. (2017). Wood
Transmission Lines with Steel and Wooden Crossarms. Journal of Electric Power
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037877969390032A
from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/248310/
[5] Siti Rugayah Dugel. (2007). Insulation coordination of quadruple circuit high voltage
[6] Grzybowski, S., & Disyadej, T. (2008). Electrical performance of fiberglass crossarm
Implementation and use of lightning network in Malaysia. Paper presented at the 2nd
[8] I. Mohamed Rawi1, M. Z. A. Ab. Kadir, & M. Izadi. (2017). Seasonal Variation of
[9] Grzybowski, S., & Jenkins, E. B. (1993). AC and Lightning Performance of Fiberglass
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/248302/
Retrieved from
https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/documents/2008/EB/EB/USWAG%20co
mments%20on%20the%20Pentachlorophenol%20Revised%20Risk%20Assessments.