Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CO1 Study the reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety,
legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional
engineering practice. [PO6, LO5, SS3];{ A3}.
The Engineer And Society :
Able to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety,
PO6
legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering
practice.
INSTRUCTIONS
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the concept whereby companies act to balance their
own economic growth with the sustainable social and environmental development of their
areas of operation. The student shall form a team of max 6 persons per group. Students are
expected to carry out systematic steps which may include:
1. Research on CSR
The team needs to clearly understand the principle underlying CSR activities, the benefits and
challenges as well as how other peoples are doing it in Malaysia as well as all over the world.
Reminder: There are no assessment mark (ZERO) will be given to students who fail to
participate in CSR activities.
Evident of activities
- Allocation mark on this section because the student will be acknowledged the
involvement in CSR program
Assessment Criteria
Weightage
0-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10
I. Good CSR Comprehensive
Some Acceptable CSR explanation and explanations &
Subject
explanations explanation sufficient characterization 5%
Knowledge Insufficient
on the CSR with limited examples on of CSR as well
on CSR
concept example CSR as past
implementation examples
II. The Problem is
Weak
The problem The problem is The Problem is clearly
Problem problem
is mentioned identified with identified with identified with 15%
Identification, identification
without Acceptable Strong Objective Strong
Objective & without
Objective & Objective but and acceptable Objective and
KPI objective and
KPI without KPI KPI Measureable
KPI
KPI
III. Step by step Systematic A clear
Task were
Program was development development statement on
Program developed to
not in producing plan which vision, mission 15%
Planning and meet limited
systematically limited produce and values were
development objective of the
developed program task Adequate task systematically
program
information details align to the task
IV. Details of
overall program
Some level of
Activity of the activities, time 10%
Implementati The details of time line is Time line with
program is line and
on & activity was available specific
available but responsible
monitoring not clearly without milestone been
not person and
plan identified monitoring developed
structured department
element
were clearly
stated
V. Impact of the Measurement
Low impact to Huge impact to
Impact and No impact activity on the impact
society with society ,with
sustainability and measured but was available 20%
acceptable concrete
of CSR sustainable no with limited
sustainable sustainable
program assessment sustaianable concern on
consideration design
asessment sustainability
VI. Creative and
Some level of Awareness and
Inspired
Public awareness promotion Acceptable
method of
Awareness No awareness and available with awareness and
awareness and 15%
and and promotion traditional promotion with
promotion
promotion on promotion but weak method- limited assess
through wide
the program distribution hardcopy, fliers by society
coverage
method etc.
medium
VII.
Evident of Allocation mark on this section because the student will be acknowledged the 20%
activities involvement in CSR program
Total 100%
GROUP NO
No Name Student ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
REMARKS: