CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 1 of 13

CLIENT : PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO)

CONTRACTOR : PT WIJAYA KARYA (PERSERO) TBK
PROJECT NAME : RELOKASI PIPA M1-M2 & PEMASANGAN HYDRANT
SYSTEM TERMINAL KARGO
BANDARA SOEKARNO-HATTA
LOCATION : BANDAR UDARA CENGKARENG, BANTEN
CONTRACT NO. :

0 10/11/2017 Issued For Approval BGS PAS DA

PREPD CHECKED APPRD CHECKED APPRD

Rev. DATE DESCRIPTION
PT. PERTAMINA
PT. WIJAYA KARYA (PERSERO)
(PERSERO)
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 2 of 13

REVISION TABLE

REVISION CODE
Page Page Attachment
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 3 of 13

REVISION SHEET

Rev.
Section Page Description
No.

TABLE OF CONTENT

REVISION TABLE 2
REVISION SHEET 3
TABLE OF CONTENT 4
1. INTRODUCTION 5
1.1 Project Overview 5
1.2 Purpose 5
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 4 of 13

1.3 Definition 5
2. REFERENCES 5
3. REQUIREMENT CRITERIA 6
Table 1 7
3.2 Computerized Analysis 9
3.3 Input Analysis 9
3.4 Acceptance Criteria 10
3.5 Load Case Definitions 10
3.6 Calculation Result11
3.7 Restraint Summary 12
3.8 Displacement Summary 12
3.9 Conclusion 13

1. INTRODUCTION
1 Project Overview
PT. Pertamina (PERSERO) plans to build a new aviation fuel supply facilities in international
terminal cargo Soekarno-Hatta International Airport and relocation 2 line pipeline in M1-M2
area. The expansion plant will accomodate all requirement in Terminal #1 and #2 Soekarno-
Hatta International Airport, Cengkareng.

2 Purpose
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 5 of 13

This document present the Piping Stress Analysis Report for Relokasi Pipa M1-M2 &
Pemasangan Hydrant System Terminal Kargo BSH Project.

3 Definition
Project - RELOKASI PIPA M1-M2 & PEMASANGAN PIPA HYDRANT SYSTEM
TERMINAL KARGO BANDARA SOEKARNO-HATTA
Client - PT. PERTAMINA (Persero) as an Owner of the PROJECT.

2. REFERENCES
2.1 Code and Standards
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEER (ASME)
ASME B31.4 : Pipeline Transportation System for Hydrocarbon Liquids and
Other Liquids.
ASME B16.34 : Valves Flanged, Threaded and Welding End.

AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE (API)

API 5L : Specification for Line Pipe.
API 608 : Metal Ball Valves Flanged, Threaded and Welding Ends.

2.2 Project Specification

M1M2-DB-30-01-A4
M1M2-SP-30-02-A4
M1M2-DB-60-01-A4
2.3 Project Drawing
M1M2-DWG-30-04-A3
M1M2-ISO-30-102-A3
M1M2-ISO-30-103-A3
Piping Design Basis
General Specification for Piping
Civil and Structural Design Basis
Piping General Arrangement Area DPPU
Pipeline Isometric Drawing Existing Hydrant Pump VC32 (N)
Pipeline Isometric Drawing Existing Hydrant Pump VC32 (S)

3. REQUIREMENT CRITERIA
3.1 Critical Line Selection Criteria

Formal stress analysis is not required for piping system that meet following requirement:

Duplicates, or replace without significant change, a system operating with successful service record

Can be readily be judge adequate by comparison with previously analyzed system

It is laid out with a conservative margin of inherent flexibility, or employs joining methods or
expansion joint devices, or a combination of these methods

Formal stress analysis shall be performed for critical piping system, such as:
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 6 of 13

Lines with temperature equal to or above 180oC, and NPS equal to or larger than 6

Hydrocarbon lines NPS 4 and larger, connected to strain sensitive equipments such as rotating
machinery (pumps, compressors, turbines, fans,and etc) and heat exchanger.

Hydrocarbon lines NPS 2 and larger, connected to reciprocating equipment.

High pressure piping 600# with temperature above 302 oF for size 3-12 and all condition for size
12 above

Line 18 and larger with temperature 104oF and above.

Line with temperature above 122oF, if made of non-ferrous materials

Line with temperature above 212oF, if made of non-metallic materials.

Any other lines which might operate under particulary severe conditions.

Lines subjected to Dynamic Force, Reaction Force (e.g from Relief Valves)

All Process piping connected to pressure vessel designed to ASME VIII, Div.2, or heavy wall BS 4500
vessels, having operating temp, of 149oF and higher.

Table 1

1. Piping except that connected to Equipment (Run Pipe)

1.1 For Carbon Steel Piping

 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 7 of 13

1.2 For Low Alloy, ITCS & Stainless Steel Piping (Run Pipe)
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 8 of 13

Analysis Method for Each Piping Section

Grade Method

A Visual check by Designer

B Visual check by Stress Engineer

C Detail analysis made by using computer which meet the analysis method
specified in ANSI B31.4
Outline of the computer program shall be AUTO PIPE or CAESAR II.

3.2 Computerized Analysis

 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 9 of 13

Piping material shall be in accordance with doc. no. M1M2-SP-30-02-A4 General Specification for
Piping. If formal analysis is required then it shall be performed using computerized tool. The
calculation will be using CAESAR II version 5.3, software developed by integraph and the analysis
use the following coordinates :

NORTH (-X) +Y

+Z +X

3.3 Input Analysis

3.3.1 Minimum ambient temperature used for

calculations during installation used at 18.6 C.

3.3.2 Design pressure shall be taken as the

pressure for piping flexibility analysis calculation unless otherwise specified. Pressure used for
hydrostatic test pressure is 1.5 design.

3.3.3 Threading allowances as per ASME B31.4

shall be considered for thickness calculation of such piping. Threaded connection shall be in
accordance with ASME B1.20.1. Coefficient of Wind Shape : 0.65

API RP 2A will be taken as wind load parameter

Basic wind speed is 130 km/h.

3.3.4 Based on Indonesia Earthquake Zoning Map

of the Ministry of public Works published in the year 2010, Soekarno-Hatta International
Airport area are in zones with Peak Ground Acceleration in bedrock in the range 0.4-0.5 g
where the map has a probability of exceeding of 10% om a span of 50%. 0.75 g has been
taken into calculation.

3.3.5 Friction effect shall be included in the thermal

expansion and contraction analysis for all size lines. Friction force shall be calculated based
on the properties of the sliding surface and contact material. The following static friction
coefficient shall be used :
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 10 of 13

Contact Surface Friction Coefficient

PTFE on PTFE 0.1

Steel on PTFE 0.1

Steel on Steel 0.3

Steel on Concrete 0.4

3.4 Acceptance Criteria

3.4.1 Basic allowable stress value shall be taken in

ASME B31.4 para. 402.3.1. Allowable stresses are the limit acceptable values of stress
analysis result for all cases as per ASME B31.4 code. Definition of allowable stress for all
cases are presented on the following section.

Allowable Expansion Stresses

a. Restrained line shall not exceed 90% of SMYS (Sy).

b. Unrestrained line shall not exceed 72% of SMYS (Sy).

Additive Longitudinal Stresses

Sum of longitudinal stresses shall not exceed 75% of SMYS (Sy).

3.4.2 Force and moments due to weight, expansion

loads and other loads imposed will be considered with the type and allowable of support.

3.4.3 Deformation of piping system to be checked

for operating case and to be ensured that piping system movement are limited by installing
sufficient guide and line support.

3.5 Load Case Definitions

The load cases for calculation are tabulated as follow:

Load Define Input

W Dead Weight HP Hydrotest U1 Seismic Load (X)

T1 Design Temp P1 Design Press WW Water Filled Weight

T2 Operating Temp P2 Operating Press

Load Load Case Description Method

 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 11 of 13

1 WW+HP (HYD) Case of Hydro test

2 W+T1+P1 (OPE) Operating Case at Design Condition

3 W+T2+P2 (OPE) Operating Case at Operating Condition

4 W+P1 (SUS) Sustained Case at Design Condition

5 W+P2 (SUS) Sustained Case at Operating Condition

6 W+P2+U1 (OCC) Occasional Seismic

7 L2-L4 (EXP) Expansion Case at Design Condition Algebraic

8 L3-L5 (EXP) Expansion Case at Operating Condition Algebraic

These load cases shall be applied to calculation depend on the stress analysis system and to
be adopted which are represent of each system calculation.

3.6 Calculation Result

3.6.1 Stress Summary

The result of maximum stress are tabulated as below :

Table 3.1 Maximum Stress Summary

Node Calculated Ratio

Case Allowable Stress (Kpa)
Load case Node Stress (Kpa) (%)
No.
S 0.54Sy 0.8Sy 0.9Sy 0.72Sy

WW+HP (HYD) Case1 200 50633.7 217184.8 23%

W+P1 (SUS) Case2 310 49678.7 130310.9 38%

W+P2 (SUS) Case3 200 45150.4 130310.9 35%

W+P2+U1 (OCC) Case4 310 103684.7 193053.2 54%

L2-L4 (EXP) Case5 310 41500.7 173747.9 24%

L3-L5 (EXP) Case6 200 3244.6 173747.9 2%

3.7 Restraint Summary

The result of maximum restraint load are tabulated as below :

 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 12 of 13

Table 3.2 Restraint Summary

Maximum Restrain Load (N)

Load case Case No.
Fx Node Fy Node Fz Node

WW+HP (HYD) Case1 0 - 55527 185 0 -

W+T1+P1 (OPE) Case2 28687 480 39746 205 15660 690

W+T2+P2 (OPE) Case3 155 10 53279 185 53 480

W+P1 (SUS) Case4 0 - 54166 185 0 -

W+P2 (SUS) Case5 0 - 54166 185 0 -

W+P2+U1 (OCC) Case6 76735 530 49608 185 61323 600

L2-L4 (EXP) Case7 28687 480 16189 185 15660 690

L3-L5 (EXP) Case8 155 10 887 185 53 480

3.8 Displacement Summary

The results of maximum movement are tabulated as below :

Table 3.3 Displacement Summary
Maximum Displacement Load (mm)
Load case Case No.
Dx Node Dy Node Dz Node

WW+HP (HYD) Case1 0.276 530 1.175 630 0.244 610

W+T1+P1 (OPE) Case2 3.086 49 1 690 1.65 50

W+T2+P2 (OPE) Case3 1.007 518 1.1 630 0.742 690

W+P1 (SUS) Case4 0.257 530 1.147 640 0.242 250

W+P2 (SUS) Case5 0.257 530 1.147 640 0.242 250

W+P2+U1 (OCC) Case6 3.444 619 1.691 629 3.656 170

3.9 Conclusion

Calculation result shows that stresses in the piping system are within the acceptable limit and
complies with ASME B31.4 (see table 3.1).
 CALCULATION

DOCUMENT NO: REV: 0

PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
M1M2-CAL-30-01-A4 CHAMBER PAGES: 13 of 13

Summary of load support maximum are furnished in the table 3.2, the result will be given to
the structural engineering discipline as input for pipe support design.
Maximum horizontal displacement are within acceptable limit explained in table 3.3.