14 ALGAL BLOOMS AND MEMBRANE BASED DESALINATION TECHNOLOGY
1.2 Membrane filtration
In addition to RO, other types of pressure-driven membranes have been applied for drinking and industrial water production. Separation processes using polymeric membranes can cover a wide size spectrum of contaminants, from suspended solids to dissolve organic compounds to inorganic ions (Figure 1-3). The physical and operational characteristics of different categories of membrane filtration processes are presented in Table 1-1.
Figure 1-3: Contaminants which can be removed by membrane filtration processes. Adopted from Cath (2010) via The National Academies Press.
Table 1-1: Characteristics of different membrane filtration processes.
Process and Pore size MWCO* Pressure Materials typically retained abbreviations (nm) (kDa) (bar) Microfiltration, MF 50-5000 > 500 0.1-2 particles + large colloids + large bacteria as above + small colloids + small bacteria Ultrafiltration, UF 5-50 2 - 500 1-5 + viruses + organic macromolecules Nanofiltration, NF <1 0.2 - 2 5-20 as above + multi-valent ions Reverse osmosis, RO << 1 < 0.2 10-100 as above + mono-valent ions * Molecular weight cut-off = molecular weight of solutes with similar weight of which 90% were rejected by the membrane.
Low pressure-driven membranes such as microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF)
membranes are usually used in treating waters with high turbidity or high particulate matter loading. MF/UF can remove particulate (e.g., bacteria, algae) and some colloidal materials (e.g., biopolymers). Physical sieving is the main rejection mechanism, where water permeates through the membrane due to the applied driving pressure. Over time, the deposits on the membrane can serve as a self-rejecting layer and retain even smaller particles than the pore size of the membrane. UF have finer pores than MF, hence, it is expected to have higher contaminant rejection efficiency as well as higher operating pressure than MF. UF has been shown to be more effective than MF in removing bacteria, viruses and other pathogenic microorganisms in the water (Jacangelo et al., 1995). Both MF and UF are widely applied in surface and