Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Term or
Definition
Acronym
AS Active Set
CN Core Network
DL Downlink
IE Information Element
LA Location Area
RA Routing Area
RB Radio Bearer
Radio Base Station another name for
RBS the Node B
Term or
Definition
Acronym
RF Radio Frequency
RL Radio Link
TRX Transceiver
TX Transmit
UE User Equipment
UL Uplink
Universal Mobile Telecommunication
UMTS Services
Microsoft Office
PowerPoint 97-2003 Presentation
Voice Access Failure Rate
The metrics measures user ability to access the mobile network for circuit switched
voice calls. The metrics consists of two components of CS Access call, RRC and RAB.
RRC part of the equation measures Conversational (originating and terminating) and
Emergency calls. The RAB part of the equation measures Speech RAB and is pegged
on the best cell in the active set in Serving RNC. The RRC measures Conversational
Voice and Data (CSV+CSD) while RAB part measures only Speech for both originating
and terminating causes. The non-access stratum (signaling) part of the access call
flow is not included in this KPI.
Voice Access Failure Rate (%) = 100 * (1 (Voice RRC Failure Rate* Voice RAB
Failure Rate))
This KPI shows the percentage of RRC access failures by the total number of RRC
attempts. Following formula is used for these KPI:
To understand clearly the causes for CS RRC access failures, we would divide it in two
main categories:
a) CS RRC Setup Failures: These failures are mainly associated with RRC
rejections due to MP load, Node-B / Transport network congestion or configuration
errors, Cell Congestion (Admission Control) and insufficient licensed capacity.
b) CS RRC Access (Radio reasons) Failures: These failures are mainly due to
radio reasons. By subtracting RRC setup failures from Total RRC access failures,
we can get the numbers for RRC access failures due to radio reasons.
In Ericsson RNC, counters are available to breakdown RRC Setup failures to aid
troubleshooting of such access issues. These single counter based KPIs are available
in the same Accessibility report.
CS RRC Setup Failures Counters: (Pegged for CS calls only)
Above mentioned counters can be used to determine the access failures caused by
Setup issues in the cell. These counters can also be used in conjunction with the
Total RRC failures for the trend analysis on the RNC/Market or Region level.
Subtracting their value from total RRC failures can give us the Voice RRC access
failures due to radio reasons
A special attention must be paid for using (RRC reject due to MP load control)
counter as this is pegged for both CS & PS calls, so contribution from CS & PS RRC
access failures to this counter value must be decided based on CS & PS total RRC
failures.
There are two additional counters available also which are pegged for both CS + PS
calls and Setup + Radio access failures together. So, these counters can be used
more for information & trending instead of troubleshooting.
RRC Failures Counters: (Pegged for CS + PS calls and Setup + Radio
Access failures together)
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : CS RRCs accessibility mostly influenced by Radio Access Failures,
however on certain days, RRC setup failures have also increased
significantly to 60%, for example on 1/1/2009)
In the next chart, we would break up the causes for these setup failures to identify
the prominent cause for such failures:
Figure : RRC rejects due to MP Load is the main cause for CS RRC setup
failures increasing as high as 100% on certain days.
Although this chart provides an overview of Setup issues impacting CS RRC
accessibility, yet the highlighting point of this chart is CS RRC failures due to -
NodeB Blocking (failures due to node configuration error, node limitations or
transport network layer service unavailability) which increased up to 95+% on
1/31/2009. This is where optimizers must focus their attention also to ensure Node-
Bs configuration is appropriate to meet traffic demand.
Since the counter for RRC rejects due to MP Load is stepped up for all network
access causes (CS call, PS call, SMS, Location update), hence appropriate estimation
should be made during analysis to count CS RRC failures due to this reason. This has
been done in to plot the values for RRC reject due to Mp load (CS calls) in graphs for
figure 3 & 4.
Following methodology was used
i) Ratio (%) for CS RRC attempts to total RRC attempts was calculated.
ii) Same ratio was then applied to RRC rejects due to MP Load counter value to
calculate the value for RRC reject due to Mp load (CS calls) used in this graph.
Plotting the same causes in Bar format graph to show number of failures per reason.
Figure RRC rejects due to MP Load is the main cause for RRC setup
failures increasing as high as 100% on certain days.
Cell Analysis
Also check the number of users in Compressed Mode. Current parameter settings
allow maximum 16 users in Compressed Mode. If the number of users in compressed
mode is high when there is no traffic in the cell it is also indicates that there is
hanging resources in the cell.
A site reset normally corrects these problems, if the problem does not clear or
repeats a ticket should be open with the field technicians to investigate. Potential
issues on the site that can cause this problem can be:
Incorrect configuration data (audit the commissioning file for any discrepancies)
Corrupt files in the NodeB (Recommissioning should resolve this problem)
Corrupt software in the NodeB (Software upgrade/ downgrade can be used to
reload the software in the site)
Faulty hardware (System module).
This counter value is generally stepped whenever the issue is RNC wide or multiple
sites connected to Main / Extension sub-Rack of RNC. It is unlikely that this will step
up for a cell specific issue.
So, please check for Core network (MSS/SGSN) outages if this counter value is
exceptionally high on any given day. MP load counters are available from Capacity 1
report to correlate these rejections with high load.
For the regularly reported values of this counter, please check sites configuration on
Main & Extension sub-racks of the RNC. As this may require, rehoming of sites from
one rack to another or addition of new Extension Sub-rack to decrease MP load on all
sub-racks.
Formula:
Following formulas are used for these KPIs:
Similar to CS RRC access failures breakdown, CS RAB access failures are also broken
down in two main categories:
c) CS RAB Setup Failures: These failures are mainly associated with RRC
rejections due to MP load, Node-B / Transport network congestion or configuration
errors, Cell Congestion (Admission Control), Lack of hardware resources, lack of
ASE and UE capability.
d) CS RAB Access (Radio reasons) Failures: These failures are mainly due to
radio reasons. By subtracting RRC setup failures from Total RRC access failures,
we can get the numbers for RRC access failures due to radio reasons.
Above mentioned counters can be used to determine the access failures caused by
Setup issues in the cell. These counters can also be used in conjunction with the
Total CS RAB failures for the trend analysis on the RNC/Market or Region level.
Subtracting their value from total RRC failures can give us the CS RAB access
failures due to radio reasons
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : New Jersey RABs accessibility mostly influenced by Radio Access
Failures. Everyday ~90% of the failures are reported due to Radio Reasons.
In the next chart, we would break up the causes for these setup failures to identify
the prominent cause for such setup failures:
VoiceRABSetupFailuresDistribution
CSRABBlock -Node Congestion/Failure(Best Cell) CSRABFailures_AdmControl
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
9
0
2
/1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure 6: CS RAB failures due to Node Congestion is the main cause for
CS RAB setup failures.
VoiceRABSetupFailuresDistribution
CSRABBlock -Node Congestion/Failure(Best Cell) CSRABFailures_AdmControl
CSRABBlock -TN Congestion/Failure(Blocked cell) CSRABBlock -TN Congestion/Failure(Best Cell)
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
9
0
2
/1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : CS RAB failures due to Node Congestion is the main cause for
CS RAB setup failures.
Following flowchart also explains how Capacity management system works in E/// OSS
system.
Per Cell:
RBS hardware utilization in uplink (both DCH and EUL) and downlink (both DCH
and MTCH)
To monitor the system resources, Capacity Management performs periodic and event
based measurements and keeps track of every radio connection setup, deletion and
modification in a cell.
In the next chart, counters for Downlink path has been shown for clear visibility in the
graph as RAB setup failures due to admission control are only in downlink & not in
uplink.
RABSetupFailuresDistribution
RABfailures - Lackof DLpower RABfailures - Lackof DLChannelization code
RABfailures - Lackof DLASE RABfailures - Lackof DLhardwareresources
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
9
0
2
/1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : CS RAB setup failures due to lack of Downlink Tx power is the
main cause for CS RAB setup failures.
Although this chart highlights lack Downlink Tx Power is the prominent cause
triggering admission control in this market, however attention must be paid to RAB
setup failures due to lack of channelization code.
In the next section, root causes for such failures have been explained.
PS Interactive Access Failures (%) = 100 * (1 (PS Int RRC Failure Rate* PS Int RAB
Failure Rate))
PS Interactive Access failures Breakdown
These metrics can be used to determine the breakdown of access failures on an RNC,
Market or Region level and can be shown as following.
Figure : PS RRC Access Failures are the main cause for PS Access failures.
Cell/RBS Analysis
PS access failure metrics are pegged on Cell level. The Worst Offenders in an
RNC/Market/Region level could be ranked by the following metrics:
Now in the next 3 sub sections, we would discuss in detail the following 3 main KPIs.
a) Packet Interactive RRC Access Failure Rate (common for both R99 & HSDPA)
b) R99 Interactive RAB Access Failure Rate
c) HSDPA Interactive RAB Access Failure Rate
PS Interactive RRC Accessibility
The KPI for PS Int RRC access failures is the PS Interactive RRC Access Failure Rate%.
This KPI is cumulative for R99 Interactive + HSDPA interactive.
Following counters are directly making up these PS interactive RRC access failures:
To understand clearly the causes for PS RRC access failures, we would divide it in two
main categories:
a) PS RRC Setup Failures: These failures are mainly associated with RRC
rejections due to MP load, Node-B / Transport network congestion or configuration
errors, Cell Congestion (Admission Control) and insufficient licensed capacity.
b) PS RRC Access (Radio reasons) Failures: These failures are mainly
due to radio reasons. By subtracting RRC setup failures from Total RRC access
failures, we can get the numbers for RRC access failures due to radio reasons.
PS RRC Setup Failures Counters: (Pegged for PS calls only)
A special attention must be paid for using (RRC reject due to MP load control)
counter as this is pegged for both CS & PS calls, so contribution from CS & PS RRC
access failures to this counter value must be decided based on CS & PS total RRC
failures.
There are two additional counters available also which are pegged for both CS + PS
calls and Setup + Radio access failures together. So, these counters can be used
more for information & trending instead of troubleshooting.
RRC Failures Counters: (Pegged for CS + PS calls and Setup + Radio
Access failures together)
In the next chart, we would break up the causes for these setup failures to identify the
prominent cause for such failures:
Figure : RRC rejects due to MP Load is the main cause for PS RRC setup
failures increasing as high as 99% on certain days,
Although this chart provides an overview of Setup issues impacting CS RRC accessibility,
yet the highlighting point of this chart is CS RRC failures due to - NodeB Blocking
(failures due to node configuration error, node limitations or transport network layer
service unavailability) which increased up to 100+% on 1/31/2009. This is where
optimizers must focus their attention also to ensure Node-Bs configuration is appropriate
to meet traffic demand.
Since the counter for RRC rejects due to MP Load is stepped up for all network access
causes (CS call, PS call, SMS, Location update), hence appropriate estimation should be
made during analysis to count PS RRC failures due to this reason. This has been done in
to plot the values for RRC reject due to Mp load (PS calls) in graphs for figure 3 & 4.
Following methodology was used
iii) Ratio (%) for PS RRC attempts to total RRC attempts was calculated.
iv) Same ratio was then applied to RRC rejects due to MP Load counter value to
calculate the value for RRC reject due to Mp load (PS calls) used in this graph.
Plotting the same causes in Bar format graph to show number of failures per reason.
PSRRCSetupFailuresDistribution
RRC reject due to MP load control (PS Calls) PSRRC rejectsdue to Admission control
PSRRC denied - Insufficient Licensed Capacity PSRRC fails - TN Congestion/Blocking
PSRRC Fails - NodeB Blocking
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
9
0
2
/1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : RRC rejects due to MP Load is the main cause for RRC setup
failures increasing as high as 99% on certain days; e.g. 1/31/2009
Cell Analysis
However, this formula is not implemented in XPM and we only get the values of PS
R99 Interactive RAB access failures based on following formula and not the failure
rate (%).
In Ericsson RNC, there are counters available that breakdown some of R99 interactive
RAB Access failures to aid the troubleshooting of issues. All these single counter
based KPIs are available in T-PIM Accessibility detailed report.
The counter is
stepped for the best
cell in the active set
but only if the cell is
in the SRNC.
pmNoFailedREstAttExcConnLi Number of failed PS Counter is stepped when UtranC
mit (PS RAB failures - RAB establishment admission control fails ell
Exceeded connection attempts due to with reject reason value
limit) exceeding the SF8, SF16, or SF32.
configured connection
limit when allocating
Spreading Factor ('SF
Histogram' in
Admission Reject
signal)
Since, there is no direct counter available for R99 Interactive RAB Failures due to
Admission Control, so we can calculate it by using the following formula based on
other 2 KPIs from this accessibility report (listed as # 1 & #2 in the table shown
above).
R99 Int RAB Failures due to Admission Control =
(PS Int RAB Failures due to Admission Control) (HSDPA Int RAB Failures
due to Admission Control)
To calculate the values for R99 RAB failures due to radio reasons, we can use the
following formula
R99 RAB access failures (Radio Reasons) =
(Total R99 RAB access failures) (R99 RAB setup
failures)
The counter is
stepped for the
best cell in the
active set but only
if the cell is in the
SRNC.
pmNoFailedREstAttExcConnLi Number of failed PS Counter is stepped UtranCell
mit (PS RAB failures - RAB establishment when admission
Exceeded connection attempts due to control fails with
exceeding the reject reason value
Counter Description Condition MO Class
limit) configured connection SF8, SF16, or SF32.
limit when allocating
Spreading Factor ('SF The counter is
Histogram' in stepped for the
Admission Reject best cell in the
signal) active set in the
SRNC for both R99
& HS RABs .
To calculate the values for HSDPA RAB failures due to radio reasons, we can use
the following formula
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : HSDPA RABs accessibility was mostly influenced by Radio Access
Failures. But after launching new sites on 2/1/2009, failures due to setup
causes are also increasing .
In the next chart, we would break up the causes for these setup failures to identify
the prominent cause for such setup failures:
HSDPARABSetupFailuresdistribution
HSRABBlock -NodeCongestion/Failure(Best Cell) HSDPARABFailures_AdmControl
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
9
0
2
/1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : HS RAB failures due to Admission Control is the main cause for
HSDPA RAB setup failures, however HS RAB failures due to Node
Congestion are also on rise in the last 2 days.
Plotting the same causes in Bar format graph to show number of failures per reason.
HSDPARABSetupFailuresdistribution
HSRAB Block -Node Congestion/Failure(Best Cell) HSDPARABFailures_AdmControl
HSRAB Block -TN Congestion/Failure(Blocking cell) HSRAB Block -TN Congestion/Failure(Best Cell)
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
/1 9
0
2
/2
1 9
0
/2
1 9
0
3
/2
1 9
0
4
/2
1 9
0
5
/2
1 9
0
6
/2
1 9
0
7
/2
1 9
0
8
/2
1 0
9
/1
2 9
0
/0
2 9
/3
2 9
0
/4
2 9
0
/5
2 9
0
/6
2 9
0
/7
2 9
0
/8
29
0
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : HS RAB failures due to Admission control is the main cause for
HSDPA RAB setup failures.
RABSetupFailuresDistribution
RABfailures - Lackof DL power RABfailures - Lackof DL Channelization code
RABfailures - Lackof DL ASE RABfailures - Lackof DL hardware resources
HSDPARABFailures_AdmControl_Usersallowed
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
9
0
2
/1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/1
2
9
/0
2
9
0
/3
2
9
0
/4
2
9
0
/5
2
9
0
/6
2
9
0
/7
2
9
0
/8
2
0
/9
2
9
2
/0
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
2
/4
1
9
0
2
/5
1
9
0
2
/6
1
9
0
2
/7
1
9
0
2
/8
1
0
2
/9
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
/2
1
9
0
3
/2
1
9
0
4
/2
1
9
0
5
/2
1
9
0
6
/2
1
9
0
7
/2
1
9
0
8
/2
1
0
9
/2
1
9
2
0
/3
1
9
0
2
/3
1
9
0
/1
2
9
0
/1
2
Figure : HS RAB setup failures due to Admission control triggered by
number of users allowed in the cell is the main cause for HS RAB setup
failures.
Although this chart highlights the limitation of HS Users allowed in the cell is the
prominent cause triggering admission control for HSDPA RABs access failures,
however attention must be paid to HSDPA RAB setup failures due to lack of Downlink
Tx Power to troubleshoot all causes.
In the next section, root causes for such failures have been explained.
xConfig should also be used to ensure all parameters are consistent with the FSC
Baseline Set unless otherwise agreed for performance reasons.
Troubleshooting Tools
The following tools can be used for troubleshooting:
GPEH
The General Performance Event Handling (GPEH) tool is a feature in
Ericsson OSS that provides capability similar to a protocol analyzer. This
also has visibility of internal RNC events such as Missing neighbour etc
This can be run on an RNC level
More detail on this tool can be found in ALEX
CTR
The Call Trace (CTR) tool is a feature in Ericsson OSS that provides
capability similar to the GPEH Tool
This can be run on a Cell level for specific cell troubleshooting. These
files can be read in Actix
More detail on this tool can be found in ALEX
UETR
The User Equipment Trace (UETR) tool is a feature in Ericsson OSS that
provides capability similar to the GPEH Tool
This is run on a particular IMSI for specific issue troubleshooting,
typically a test SIM attempting to recreate problem conditions. These
files can be read in Actix
More detail on this tool can be found in ALEX