Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Age Gender Reach Frequency Impressions Result Rate Result Indicator Event Responses
1304 1.723926 2248 0.756228 actions:rsvp 17
45-54 female 131 1.427481 187
18-24 female 262 1.770992 464 0.862069 actions:rsvp 4
25-34 female 437 1.814645 793 0.75662 actions:rsvp 6
65+ female 34 1.323529 45
35-44 female 355 1.825352 648 0.925926 actions:rsvp 6
55-64 female 84 1.321429 111 0.900901 actions:rsvp 1
Age Group 18-24 Cost us the least amount of money to advertise to.
This is because ages 18-24 had the best reach/results ratio. This could be because this
generation is more connected to Facebook Functions and is more likely to respond and
follow through with an event. Either way this is an important group to target as they
Here is a sample of the
might not be our ideal they will bring traction and attention to the event.
advertisement that we
ran. Age Group 55-64 Cost us the most money to advertise to.
Because this group viewed our ad more with only a single response they wound up
being the most expensive age group. I would suggest editing future age groups to
exclude 55-65+. These two groups were the most costly and had very little response. I
believe this is because people in this age group are not looking for advertisements
through FB and it is not cost effective to advertise to them for this product.