Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
I. Rationale
II. Objectives:
Group Process
III. PROGRAM DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
Activity Output
Attainment of the Objectives
Group Process
IV. BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS AND MATERIALS
Certificates/Linen 200.00
Snacks &
Lunch( Resource
600.00
Speakers)
B. Tarpaulin 350.00 Materials:
Total 1150.00
Blackboard/Whiteboard
Marker
Name tag
Laptop
LCD Screen
LCD Projector
V. EXPECTED OUTPUT
A. Achievement of all the objectives of the activity that at
the end of the session, participants must have:
Part I - Seminar
Prayer
Group Process
VIII. ACTIVITIES/OUTPUT/EVALUATION
ACTIVITY 1
Objectives:
Materials:
Participants:
Activity:
1. Orientation:
The facilitator gives the introduction and background of the
activity.
2. Instruction:
1) Facilitator asks the participants to get themselves into
pairs and then tie the cloth around the eyes of one person
in each pair, so that they cannot see anything. The person
who is not blindfolded then leads the blindfolded person
around for ~5 mins.
2) After 5 mins, the facilitator groups the participants into
two. The blindfolded and the guide.
3) Each group is given the Manila paper and pentel pen. The
facilitator will give the discussion questions.
3. Experiencing:
4) Each member of the group will share on feelings and
experiences from the activity and write all their
consolidated answers on the Manila paper.
5) Each group are given 15 minutes to share and discuss with
each other.
6) After the 15-minutes allotted time, the facilitator asks
the each group to share their experiences to veryone. Each
will select one (1) representative to discuss it using the
manila paper.
Processing:
1. The Blindfolded
1. What did you feel when you could not see?
2. What did you feel about the person who was leading you
around? Did you trust him/her? Why or why not?
3. Did you feel that your guide cared for you or that s/he
made a fool of you? Why?
4. What did you learn from this activity?
2. The Guide
1. What did you feel leading a blind person?
2. What special efforts did you make to lead their partner?
3. Did you explain each situation beforehand?
4. What did you learn from this activity?
SENDING MESSAGES
Nonverbal Messages
Nonverbal Messages:
Paraverbal Messages
RECEIVING MESSAGES
Listening
1. Requires concentration and energy
2. Involves a psychological connection with the speaker
3. Includes a desire and willingness to try and see things from
another's
perspective
4. Requires that we suspend judgment and evaluation
understanding.
A good facilitator
a. Does not leave his/ her group to their own devices
b. Does not force others into his/her own plans.
c. Gives sensible and timely explanations, does not threaten
others, but does not hide constraints either.
d. Acts in accordance with the capabilities and emotions of
the group s/he is facilitating.
e. Delegates those tasks and responsibilities that can be
accomplished by other members of the group.
5. Integration:
The students responses composed of the following
The Blindfolded
Group Process
Processing: Responses
2. The Guide
Processing: Responses
1. What did
you feel
leading a
blind person?
2. What
special
efforts did
you make to
lead their
partner?
3. Did you
explain each
situation
beforehand?
4. What did
you learn
from this
activity?
Activity 3
Objective:
Group Process
At the end of the activity, the participants must have:
Materials: None
Participants:
The participants are the of thirty five (35) students of Caraga
Regional Science High School, Brgy. San Juan, Surigao City. These
participants are identified Peer Facilitator Club (PFC) officers and
members.
Activity:
1) Orientation
Facilitator gives the introduction of the activity.
2) Instruction
Facilitator asks the participants to get themselves into
dyads. She will explain that the members of each dyad will
be assuming different position (Facilitator and Client).
3) Experiencing
a. Participants are given thirty minutes (30 min.)to prepare
a scene (given situation by Facilitator) where they act
as Facilitator and client. They are instructed to
practice the applicable basic facilitating or core skills
of a facilitator during their play.
b. After their 30-minute simulation, the dyads are requested
to be with their groups and the assigned facilitators
will then process the activity.
Processing:
1. How did you feel playing the role of a facilitator?
2. As a Facilitator, what are those difficulty moments youve
encountered?
3. What did you learn from the activity?
1) Integration
Group Process
Processing Responses
1. How did you
feel playing
the role of a
facilitator?
2. As a
Facilitator,
what are those
difficulty
moments youve
encountered?
3. What did
you learn from
the activity?
Group Process
Brgy. San Juan, Surigao City
EVALUATION RESULTS
Prepared by:
EVALUATION RESULTS
OVERALL VERBAL
CATEGORY MEAN
MEAN DESCRIPTION
A. Content 4.47 Very good
1. Content coverage is relevant to
4.45 Very good
the objectives of the workshop
2. Topic is relevant to my career 4.35 Very good
3. Content coverage is sufficient and
4.55 Very good
comprehensive
B. Workshop Proper 4.35 Very good
1. Relevance to workshop Descriptive 4.35 Very good
C. Facilitator/ Resource Person 5.0 Excellent
1. Mastery of subject matter 4.6 Very good
2. Interaction/ rapport with
4.65 Very good
participants
3. Flexibility to adjust need of
4.45 Very good
participants
4. Methods/ Techniques used 4.6 Very good
5. Appropriate and adequacy of
4.45 Very good
handouts
6. Open forum/group interaction 4.6 Very good
7. Time allotment 4.25 Very good
8. Extent of participants agreement 4.4 Very good
D. Logistics 4.22 Very good
1. Conducive of the venue 4.25 Very good
2. Length of session 4.05 Very good
3. Place of activities 4.35 Very good
OVERALL 4.43 4.51 Very good
Prepared by:
Group Process
EVALUATION RESULTS
OVERALL VERBAL
CATEGORY MEAN
MEAN DESCRIPTION
E. Content 4.6 Very good
1. Content coverage is relevant to
4.6 Very good
the objectives of the workshop
2. Topic is relevant to my career 4.6 Very good
3. Content coverage is sufficient
4.6 Very good
and comprehensive
F. Workshop Proper 4.6 Very good
1. Relevance to workshop Descriptive 4.6 Very good
G. Facilitator/ Resource Person 4.33 Excellent
1. Mastery of subject matter 4.1 Very good
2. Interaction/ rapport with
4.1 Very good
participants
3. Flexibility to adjust need of
4.5 Very good
participants
4. Methods/ Techniques used 4.0 Very good
5. Appropriate and adequacy of
4.1 Very good
handouts
6. Open forum/group interaction 4.9 Excellent
7. Time allotment 4.1 Very good
8. Extent of participants agreement 4.8 Excellent
H. Logistics 4.37 Very good
1. Conducive of the venue 4.3 Very good
2. Length of session 4.4 Very good
3. Place of activities 4.4 Very good
OVERALL 4.41 4.48 Very good
Prepared by:
Group Process