Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
I cant even begin to tell you how many times Ive gotten into arguments with friends about which actor played Batman the best in the movies (Christian Bale is the
best Bruce Wayne, Keaton is the best Batman, FYI). Its a simple fact that geeks love to debate each other about inane bits of trivia, be it Kirk vs. Picard, Ewoks:
good or bad, or RoboCop vs. The Terminator. Thanks to the arrival of The Amazing Spider-Man in theaters, however, a new debate has arisen: Tobey Maguire or
Andrew Garfield? Both have gotten terrific marks and fan appreciation for their performances, but who makes the best on-screen web-slinger?
To figure out an answer to this question in the most logical fashion, I have divided the character of Peter Parker into six different personality traits established in
the comics and previous incarnations, and have put the two actors head to head to determine which one is better at portraying particular qualities. Read on to find
comic that Spider-Man ever appeared in. In just about every adaptation and version of the character Peter is seen by his peers as a total nerd/geek/spaz/whatever
other high school insult you want to include here. Its an important quality for him to have because in works in contrast with how he is presented as a hero after the
spider bite (more on that later). But who played up this angle of the character better, Maguire or Garfield?
Before he gets his special spider bite, Maguires Peter Parker is a true blue loser. Were first introduced to him as he is chasing down the school bus on his way to
class, and not only are all the other students laughing, but so is the bus driver. Even once he catches up to the bus he cant find a damn seat because even the
other losers dont want him on the other side of their bench. He gets regular hazing from Flash Thompson and his buddies and basically relies on Harry Osborn
Garfield is a different kind of outcast. Hes a loser in the eyes of his classmates, but a much less helpless one. In Garfields first scenes on the high school campus
he rushes to defend another student who is being abused by Flash (which happens to result in Peter taking the other nerds place). Its a new take on an old idea,
and while Maguires version may be a more accurate version of the comics, Garfields is more interesting in this respect.
machinery and technology that can help him better defeat his foes, and because so many of his enemies are science-based, he needs to keep up in order to better
In fairness to Maguire on this one, Sam Raimi kind of screwed the pooch on this category when the idea for organic web-shooters was hatched. In the original
Spider-Man trilogy we constantly hear about Peters intelligence from other characters, be it Harry talking to Norman Osborn or Dr. Curt Connors talking to Dr.
Octavius, but hes never seen using his science knowledge in a practical way.
In contrast, Webb puts Garfields geekery on full display. Without organic web-shooters a big part of the Becoming Spider-Man montage is Peter building his
wrist-based devices and he is seen regularly nerding out with Dr. Connors about formulas and research. You find some evenhanded categories in his feature, but
damn well better use that ability right. For Peter Parker specifically, however, it means that if you have the powers of a spider then you damn well have the
responsibility to be a hero. In the movie adaptations the approach to the concept is complex and different in both versions of the character.
Maguires performance in Spider-Man 2 may be one of the most perfect examples of the journey of heroism ever put to screen. Set some time after Peter has
become Spider-Man, the movie allows the character to begin questioning his own motives for being a hero and has him struggling with the desire for a normal life
where he can be with MJ and live happily ever after. It affects him on a deep, psychological level, to the point where his powers actually begin to fade and
malfunction, but when he finally puts a strong focus on what he wants he discovers who he really is: Spider-Man.
Because the reboot is a retelling of the origin story, the hero concept is a bit shallow in comparison. Garfields Spidey does have to overcome feelings of anger and
the desire for revenge, but the transition into helping the troubled citizens of New York comes fairly easy to the young man who was rescuing dorks from bullies
even before he had superpowers. Im not saying the new interpretation of the character isnt a hero, but the impact isnt as strong as it was previously. It may be
unfair to Garfield at this point because hes only had one movie while Maguire had three, but the truth is that the younger actor has a lot to catch up to.
and quips that he makes. Web heads sense of humor is legendary, so how does it come across in both Raimis films and The Amazing Spider-Man?
Raimis Spider-Man movies were largely beloved by fans because of their fidelity to the character, but something just went plain wrong here. Sure, Maguire
managed to frustrate his enemies, but it was rarely because of a taunting phrase or wisecrack. Once under the mask the actors dialogue was basically limited to
lines like, It's you who's out, Gobbie. Out of your mind. Not exactly Oscar Wilde.
The Amazing Spider-Man doesnt reach the levels of, say, Spider-Man: The Animated Series from back in the 90s (which was legitimately hilarious at times), but
there is definitely more of an effort made to give the wall-crawler a sense of humor while in costume. The perfect example of this is Spideys encounter with a car
thief early in the movie. He makes fun of the burglar for dressing like a burglar, pins him to the wall with webbing in all kinds of interesting ways, and isnt even
afraid to go for the crotch shot on occasion. Garfield may not have consistency down just yet, but hes definitely funnier than Maguire.
agility and super strength, he is a challenge for any foe, be it The Lizard, Green Goblin, Doctor Octopus, or Sandman.
Raimi didnt have much experience in the action genre prior to making hisSpider-Man trilogy, but you would never guess that while watching the films. Maguires
Spider-Man (lets face it, in these movies its not the stars who are doing most of the fighting) is quite capable in combat, as seen in the last Goblin fight in Spider-
Man, the subway scuffle in Spider-Man 2and the final battle of Spider-Man 3. The fights are gritty and intense and we believe them.
Andrew Garfields Spider-Man is just as skilled a fighter as Maguires, but the melee sequences in The Amazing Spider-Man simply arent that strong.
Physicality comes into play Garfield is much skinnier than Maguire but the movie also lacks any really long, extended battle scenes, instead choosing to quickly
cut from location to location. Theres potential for Garfield to be a strong, physical Spider-Man, but his debut doesnt really have it.
Peter has had many beautiful women on his arm, from Betty Brandt to Gwen Stacy to Mary Jane Watson. While weve never seen a romantic relationship between
Peter and Betty on screen (poor Elizabeth Banks), how do Maguire and Garfield compete when it comes to Spider-Mans dating skills?
Its strange to say, but one of the best parts of Raimis trilogy was just how tragic the relationship between Peter and Mary Jane is. Every ending, including 3 has a
sad element to it and while the upside-down kiss in the rain is iconic, its one of very few bright spots in their time together. Its handled well and with a sense of
reality, but its also one of the biggest bummer relationships in the comic book movie genre.
Prior to taking on The Amazing Spider-Man, Webbs only other directorial feature effort was the romantic dramedy (500) Days of Summer, so it actually makes
total sense that the relationship between Peter and Gwen is one of the best things about the new webhead movie. Garfield and Stone share terrific chemistry
(better than Maguire and Kirsten Dunst) and story gives the relationship time to breathe while also slowly pulling them closer to each other. Its such a natural
pairing that by the end of the film youre rooting for the love story as much as youre rooting for Spidey in the battle against The Lizard.
Spider-Man. But the truth is that Andrew Garfield does an absolutely brilliant job with the part in The Amazing Spider-Man. Its not one of the best superhero
movies weve ever seen and therefore some parts of the character arent as well done as others, but there is incredible potential for Garfield in the future of the