Modeling Personal Wellness

Welcome to our online forum, everyone! I cant wait to read about all of your voices as you all
have such unique backgrounds. To ensure that everyone feels comfortable in our new learning
environment, I will assign groups of 4-9 in which peer collaboration and design will take place in.
My role will be to facilitate an authentic experience for everyone.

Part 1 - Modeling Personal Wellness: Becoming a Change Agent and Advocating Effectively
Read: Pages 220-223
http://healthadvocate.com/downloads/whitepapers/WorkplaceWellnessGuide.pdf
Unknown Author (2016). Guide to Workplace Wellness, 220-223. Retrieved from
http://www.healthadvocate.com

Read: Pages 2-6

https://hbr.org/2015/02/you-dont-have-to-be-the-boss-to-change-how-your-company-works
Overbeck, Jen (2015). You dont have to be the boss to change how your company works. 2-6.
Retrieved from http://www.hbr.org

Part 2 - Comprehensive Health Program Data Assessment based on Off-Line Interactions within
your Local Community

Read: Part 2, Chapters 6-7, Pages 131-162

http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/lib/asulib/reader.action?docID=10053516
Jamner et al (2001). Promoting Human Wellness: New Frontiers for Research, Practice, and
Policy. 131-162. Retrieved from http://www.site.ebrary.com

Read: Pages 220-223

https://books.google.com/books?id=KN3T5OEvOVsC&pg=PA220&lpg=PA220&dq=Comprehen
sive+Health+Program+Data+Assessment&source=bl&ots=T67Cbc9Mp_&sig=omNwuyC7iTDd
MY5ptxTYE8mCV9M&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiE9NzR5tzNAhUT-
mMKHZAFDJcQ6AEIJTAB#v=onepage&q=Comprehensive%20Health%20Program%20Data%
20Assessment&f=false
ODonnell, Michael (2002). Health Promotion in the WorkPlace. 220-223. Retrieved from
http://www.hbr.org

Directions:
Within your assigned discussion group members, collaborate via the discussion forum to identify
major risk factors contributing to environmental health, including risk factors/obstacles in
geographical, physical, mental/psychological, and social health. Identify strategies listed within
the text to combat these obstacles from a micro to macro scale. You are expected to submit this
at the end of Lesson 2.

Your group will solve simple problems and compare experiences via owning a hypothetical
company named ____ (or you may choose a current company you are working at now if you
wish). Currently, this company does not promote health and wellness as the backbone to
successful employees and products. Together, develop an informal business plan modeling
personal and professional wellness opportunities in your company. Include how each of you
would become the Change Agent at your workplace and an advocate of promoting a healthy
change. Provide examples within your comprehensive health data assessment that personally
affect your company and explain how you would strategically combat these environmental
factors to promote a healthier environment for its inhabitants.

Lastly, each individual member will submit the same business plan. All discussions will take
place in the discussion forum until the final product is completed. A portion of your grade will
depend on the contribution you made to your groups discussion board. To give each member a
grade on BB, each member will need to submit as an individual.

Embed your business plan into your healthy leadership section of your personal E-Portfolio,
which you will build in 1:3 Assignment.

Your business plan must include:

-APA 6.0 formatting
-Title Page
-Reference Page with two credible sources (this reading plus one outside source) in APA 6.0
format
-Running Header and Page numbers formatted per APA 6.0
-500 700 words
-Word Document.DOC

PPE 310 Assignment HALL OF FAME WINNERS/Student Work Examples:

*Please note that these examples will have a different twist since this is the first class, however
you will have a great idea of what is expected, as it relates to your workplace not a school
setting.

http://jportfolio001.weebly.com - Jasmine: Fall 2015 HALL OF FAME WINNER

http://taolson3.weebly.com - Tori: Fall 2015 HALL OF FAME WINNER
http://valeriehernandezl.weebly.com/teaching-video.html - Valorie: Fall 2015 HALL OF FAME
WINNER

Rubric
 Exceeds Meets Needs
[18-20 Points] [15 - 17 Points] [0 - 14 Points]

Personal Consistent and Made some Did not make an

Contribution timely engagement contribution to the effort to participate in
To the in the discussions discussion. the discussions.
Learning (See due dates).
Community Occasionally made Made a marginal
Discussion Frequent attempts reflections on the effort to become
to advance group group discussion. involved with the
discussion. group.
Presented basic Did not respond to
Response post ends information on the topics/prompts as
with a question to topics/prompts as they related to group
engage the reader they related to the discussion.
further. group discussion

Presented creative
approaches to
topic/prompts as
they related to the
group discussion.

Exceeds Meets Needs

[9 - 10 Points] [8 - 6 Points] [0 - 5 Points]

Quality and Consistent use of Evidence of some Used poor spelling

Content of grammatically errors in spelling and grammar in
Posts correct posts and and grammar posts.
free of misspellings.
Most posts Posts appeared
Posts were well evidenced some hastily thought out
thought out and thought and were and were
language was satisfactory for this unsatisfactory for this
appropriate for this level of instruction. level of instruction.
level of instruction.
Most online Online formatting is
Online formatting is formatting is easy to hard to read: double
easy to read: Single read: Either double spaced, no space
spaced, one space spaced, or one long between lines,
between every 3-5 paragraph with no indents
sentences, no space or indents
indenting No Sources are listed
 At least 1 outside At least 1 outside
source and 1 from source and 1 from
our reading are cited our text are cited but
in APA format only not in APA format
for the final product. only on the final
product

Substantive, Provided thoughtful Responses to other Responses to others

Clear and and understandable posts were not posts were unclear,
Consistent responses to others. always short, and were not
Responses Response posts understandable and related or
showed an were superficial. understandable.
understanding of the
content offered. Response posts Response posts
were not always on showed no
Engaged in back target with the connection to the
and forth dialogue, content offered. content offered.
not just one
response or one Inconsistent back No back and forth
question. and forth dialogue dialogue with others.
with others.
Responded to all Participated only
prompts in a timely Often responded when prompted by
fashion, not always later in the faculty.
last to post. discussion.
Appropriately Always last to post
responded to Did not respond to
feedback from all prompts. Did not respond to
colleagues. feedback from
Responded most of colleagues
the time to feedback
from colleagues. I agree statements
were used with no
supportive details

Evidence of Readings, prior Some evidence of There was no

Learning experiences and the content of evidence that
outside sources are readings, prior readings or course
evident in the posts. experiences and materials were
outside sources are understood or used in
Knowledge gained evident in the posts. the learners posts.
was incorporated
appropriately, Opinions and ideas Irrelevant remarks
objectively and were stated clearly were made that were
effectively into but not consistently unrelated to the topic
posts. connected to the being discussed.
topic or readings. No evidence of
Learner shows Some evidence of integration of course
excellent integration integration of course content or
of course content content and application.
evidenced by their application.
critical analysis and
application.