Revised une 2008
CHEMISTRY 461
Experiment 5 - SPECTRA OF POLYENES AND NANOPARTICLES
(by Bryant Fujimoto, Philip Reid, and David Ginger)
L HAZARDS
Ethanol is flammable and should be kept away from flames. Zine Acetate, Zine Oxide and
Tetramethy! Ammonium Hydroxide are toxic, and should be disposed of as described below.
Il. WASTE DISPOSAL,
‘The product of the reactions is ZnO in ethanol. It should be placed in the marked bottle in the
hood. If you are not working in a hood, take a 250 ml erlenmeyer flask and label it nanoparticle
waste. Collect the waste solution in the flask until you have a chance to empty the flask into the
waste bottle in the hood.
IIL THEORY
Particle In a Box Model
‘Semiconductor nanoparticles are nanometer-sized crystals of semiconductors such as CdSe or
ZnO. The electronic absorption spectra of these particles is strongly dependent on size for
nanoparticles with diameters ranging from 1-20. Because the size dependence of the absorption
spectra arises from quantum-mechanical “particle-in-a-box” confinement effects, semiconductor
nanoparticles are often called “quantum dots” and their size-dependent absorption spectra
provide a simple and convenient way to monitor particle size during growth. In this laboratory
you will investigate the effects of quantum confinement on the optical properties of both one-
dimension systems (Linear alkenes) and three-dimension systems (semiconductor nanoparticles).
The dependence of an absorption spectrum on particle size can be understood using the particle-
in-a-box model introduced in undergraduate quantum mechanics. For a particle in a one
dimensional box of length L, the potential V(x) is given by:
wo x<0
V(x)=10 OsxsL
oO x>b
Ohm
Figure 1. The potential for a one dimensional particle in a box.‘The time-independent Schrédinger equation for a particle in this potential is:
~— St aky Osxsk
Where fis Planck’s constant divided by 2x, m is the mass of the particle, y is the wavefunction
describing the particle, and E is the total energy of the particle, Imposing boundary conditions
and normalizing, the solutions to the above equation are the familiar particle-in-a-box
‘wavefunctions and associated energy levels:
2. (nax
vac [2 sn( 2)
242
" 8mi?
A few of these wavefunctions are shown in Figure 2. The number 7 is called the quantum
number and is constrained to integer values beginning at one (i.e., n 3, ...). Different
wavefunctions or energy levels are specified using their corresponding quantum number
(Wis¥'21--- Ey» Eyy--.)- Notice that the number of nodes in the wavefunctions (points where the
wavefunction equals zero) increases as the energy increases,
E hea)
n=3 oh? a
Bma*
n=2
.. by
= L 0 z— h
Figure 2, Particle in a box energies, wavefunctions and probabilities.
Application of the Particle in a Box Model to Linear Alkenes
Chemical bonding can be described using molecular orbitals (MO) constructed from linear
combinations of atomic orbitals. As an example, consider ethene (CH»=CHa). In ethene, the
carbons are sp” hybridized such that the 2s, 2p,, and 2p, atomic are combined to produce sp”
orbitals localized on each carbon. Carbon-hydrogen bonds is formed by the overlap of one of the
(sp) orbitals with the H(Is) orbital. The o-bond between the two carbons is formed by overlap
of the C(sp’) orbitals from each carbon, Two 2p, orbitals remain on each carbon atom, labeled
2pa and 2pz, and these orbitals overlap to form a x bond. There are two ways to combine the p
orbitals as illustrated in Figure 3: (2p + 2pz2) and (2p. ~ 2pm). When the orbitals are combinedas (2p21 + 2p.2) a m bonding orbital is formed, and when combined as (2p.1 ~ 2pa) a7 anti-
bonding orbital is formed. The anti-bonding orbital has a reduced electron density between the
carbon atoms in comparison to the bonding orbital; therefore, the energy of the anti-bonding
orbital is greater as shown in Figure 3
Energy
at AntiBonding MO
. 8 ~|"
Figure 3. x bonding in ethene.
Figure 4 presents a qualitative energy diagram for ethene. Since o bonds are stronger than =
bonds, the c bonds are located at lower energy relative to the w bonds. Also, since the C-H bond
is stronger than the C-C bond (413 kJ/mole vs 347 kJ/mole) the C-H bond are placed at lowest
energy.
dl — to,
ieee he ace
Figure 4. Qualitative energy level diagram for Ethene. Left diagram is the ground state and the
right diagram is the first excited state,
‘The 12 valence electrons in ethene are added to these energy levels according to the Aufbau
principle and Hund's rules. Since the x electrons are “delocalized” between the carbon atoms,wwe can describe the energetics of the m orbitals using the particle-in-a-box model. ‘The lowest-
energy transition corresponds to the advancement of an electron from the highest occupied x
orbital to the lowest unoccupied 7 orbital. The energy difference between these levels can be
defined in terms of the quantum numbers j and n as:
‘The lowest-energy transition corresponds to j = n+1; therefore, that the energy difference is:
AE,
insta
_ Qn iP a
~ 8mi?
Emam Ey
Question 1: Derive the above expression,
For ethene, the highest occupied x orbital corresponds to n= I so that:
3
Ag, = 2"
8m?
2
This difference in energy is related to the wavelength of light corresponding to this transition
(162 nm as indicated in Figure 4), corresponding to a “box” length of:
pot
mc
1-4 =3.8x10" m=3.8A
ime
This length is quite different from the C=C bond length of 1.34 A (184% error!). Recall, the
particle-in-a-box model assumes an infinitely steep potential; however, the x orbitals extend past
the centers of the carbon nuclei such that this model potential is approximate.
How does this model work for linear alkenes of variable size or box length? To address this
question, we will apply the one-dimensional particle-in-a-box model to the following diphenyl
substituted alkenes:O~~9 O10
1,4 diphenyl-1,3-butadiene 1,6 dipheny!-1,3,5 hexatriene
Om)
1,8 diphenyl-1,3,5,7 octatetraene
The electrons in the x orbitals of the alkene chains are localized to a “box” defined by the
distance between the phenyl rings. To calculate a theoretical box length we will use 1.39 A as
the average length of a carbon-carbon bond in these molecules. For 1,4 diphenyl-1,3-butadiene,
there are 5 bonds between the two phenyl rings such that the length of the box is 5 x 1.39 A =
6.95 A. The number of electrons in the box is the number of electrons in the 1-bonding orbitals.
For 1,4 diphenyl-1,3-butadiene, there are 2 double bonds corresponding to 4 electrons in the box.
In the ground state electron configuration, there are two electrons in the n= 1 level and two in
the n=2 level. Therefore, the lowest-energy electronic transition corresponds to an
advancement of an electron from the n = 2 (the highest occupied molecular orbital) to the n = 3
(the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) level. According to the particle in a box model, the
difference is energy between these levels is given by:
Sr ye
Bm A
Sha
AEy =
8me
By measuring the location of the lowest-energy the absorption band of 1,4 diphenyl-1,3-
budatiene, one can determine 2, and use this information to determine L. This process is repeated
for the other two diphenyl alkenes.
Pat
je in an Infinite Spherical Well
Following our approximation of the linear alkenes as one-dimensional boxes, one is tempted to
treat the electronic properties of spherical nanoparticles using a “particle-in-a-sphere” model.
Indeed, this is a very useful starting point. In spherical polar coordinates, the time-independent
Schrédinger equation is:
(eo 28
S| 425 |r,
ee r Sve Om
For a particle confined to a sphere of radius a by an infinite potential, V(7)=0 for r