Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
The diagnosis of infectious diseases is entering a new and interesting phase. Technologies based on paper
microfluidics, coupled to developments in isothermal amplification of Nucleic Acids (NAs) raise opportuni-
ties for bringing the methods of molecular biology in the field, in a low setting environment. A lot of work
has been performed in the domain over the last few years and the landscape of contributions is rich and
diverse. Most often, the level of sample preparation differs, along with the sample nature, the amplification
Received 4th January 2017, and detection methods, and the design of the device, among other features. In this review, we attempt to
Accepted 18th May 2017
offer a structured description of the state of the art. The domain is not mature and there exist bottlenecks
DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00013h
that hamper the realization of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) complying with the constraints of
the field in low and middle income countries. In this domain however, the pace of progress is impressively
rsc.li/loc fast. This review is written for a broad Lab on a Chip audience.
Introduction
a
MMN, Gulliver Laboratory, UMR CNRS 7083, ESPCI Paris, PSL Research
University, Paris, France. E-mail: patrick.tabeling@espci.fr Performing early diagnosis is critical to prevent the propaga-
b
Laboratory for Urgent Response to Biological Threats, Institut Pasteur, Paris, tion of infectious diseases. This is especially true in emergent
France countries, where difficult living conditions and limited health
c
HIV, Inflammation & Persistence Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
d care cause diseases to propagate more swiftly. The capacity to
Functional Genetics of Infectious Diseases Unit, CNRS URA3012, Institut Pasteur,
Paris, France perform early detection of an infection has been recognized
e
Antibody Engineering Platform, UtechS proteins, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France as critical in the case of Ebola virus disease. In West Africa,
an outbreak of Ebola Zaire virus disease caused the death of Chain Reaction (PCR) have been performed.3,4 However, be-
more than 11 000 persons in 2014.1 This was mostly due to cause of the lengthy analysis, the non-transportable, expen-
the difficulty and delay in identifying and isolating infected sive equipment, and the necessity to employ trained person-
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
persons, owing to a lack of rapid, accurate and portable field nel, only a few institutes in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone
diagnostic tests.2 In this context, molecular detection (the most affected countries) could afford using this technol-
methods can play an essential role. In the case of Ebola virus, ogy. Cost, transport and consumable availability have thus
serological techniques are not adapted because they detect represented limiting factors for providing access to molecular
the presence of the virus only once the immunologic re- diagnostics to most of the population.
sponse has taken off, i.e. after five days of infection (see Assessments by the World Health Organization (WHO)
Fig. 1). This is too late to proceed to isolation and hamper show that similar situations occur with other viral, bacterial
the patients from contaminating their environment. By con- or parasitic infections that propagate throughout the world
trast, Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) have on an even larger scale. Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most
undisputed potential for detecting the virus in the very first deadly infections though curable if quickly diagnosed and
days of the infection, along with an extremely small rate of treated. In 2015, 9.6 million people were infected and 1.5
false positives. In fact, during the Ebola outbreak, sensitive million died due to TB infection. Of these deaths, 95% oc-
NAATs, based on Reverse Transcription (RT) and Polymerase curred in economically developing countries.5 Malaria
Fig. 3 Paper based device patterning and microfabrication. a) Paper device fabrication: fabrication can be performed either by cutting the paper
in different ways or by patterning a paper sheet. This can be carried out indirectly with the use of a mask and different exposure techniques or
directly by controlled deposition of the hydrophobic material on the paper. Adapted with the permission from ref. 25. Copyright (2015) WILEYVCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. b) Illustration of a paper-based microfluidic channel. Hydrophilic paper is patterned with two hydrophobic barriers
constraining the flow in the paper channel. The height of the channel is the thickness of the paper and the width is the length between the two
barriers. Adapted with the permission from ref. 14. Copyright (2010) American Chemical Society. c) The quick and easy three-step process of paper
wax patterning. Design (1), wax printing (2) and melting (3) can be achieved in a few minutes. Adapted with the permission from ref. 16. Copyright
(2009) American Chemical Society. d) Paper cross section of the wax printing process for fabricating a 2D PAD. Adapted with the permission from
ref. 14. Copyright (2010) American Chemical Society. e) Stacking of several patterned layers of paper for fabricating a 3D PAD. Adapted with the
permission from ref. 16. Copyright (2009) American Chemical Society.
we show a four-layer device, which allows multiplexing of the crosslinking, covalent bonding or bioaffinity as displayed in
analysis of a sample with a certain simplicity. Fig. 5b. Covalent bonds enabling cellulose to graft with a bio-
molecule are sketched in Fig. 5c.
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
Fig. 4 SEM of various types of paper. a) Chromatography paper. Adapted with the permission from ref. 30. b) FTA matrix and trapped DNA31
(image adapted courtesy of GE Healthcare). c) Glass fibers (image adapted courtesy of Sterlitech Corporation). d) PES membrane (image adapted
courtesy of Sterlitech Corporation).
Fig. 5 Cellulose chemistry. a) Cellulose molecular structure. b) Various strategies for biomolecule immobilization on the cellulose substrate. c)
Covalent bonding by various chemical functions, between a biological target and cellulose fibers. Adapted from ref. 33. Copyright (2014) RSC
publishing.
sheet is limited to 34 centimeters. This limitation represents a time, by locally modifying the porous medium: partially
constraint for the design of paper devices. clogged59 or compressed.60 A valve function can also rely on a
2. Filtration. Pores are between 5 and 50 m in size, and mechanical displacement. This was demonstrated with a fluid-
therefore they arrest objects larger than these dimensions triggered expanding element.61 The actuator is connected on
while the rest of the suspension flows downstream. This fil- demand to a liquid reservoir. When it wicks, the actuator ex-
tering function is useful for the preparation of blood for ana- pands and displaces the main channel. This simple function
lytical purposes43 as discussed later. Surface chemistry obvi- can be used either to connect two channels (on-switch), to dis-
ously plays a role by adsorbing different species, in a specific connect two channels (off-switch) or to change the flow path-
manner. This capability has led paper to serve, for decades, way from one channel to another (diversion switch) as
as chromatographic or extraction units. displayed in Fig. 6c. Another device exploits paper
3. Storage. Storage is a functionality that is crucial for en- deformability.62 The systems include a multilayered structure
abling the portability of the diagnostics, as discussed in which an air spacer can break the fluidic connectivity. By
later.27,44,45 The porous structure of paper and the easy access of pressing the paper on this location, the liquid continuity is re-
the device to external actions, such as micro-pipetting, heating stored and the fluid can flow (Fig. 6d).
and cooling, facilitate the freeze-drying of the reagents. Reagents 6. Multiplexing. A multiplexed assay simultaneously char-
can be uniformly distributed on the paper sheet46 or locally de- acterizes multiple samples in a single run so as to diagnose
posited. The latter possibility led to the achievement of se- several diseases on the same PAD. The importance of this
quences of reactions in ref. 47 and multiple analyses in ref. 48. functionality has recently been underlined.63 Since different
4. Concentrator. Because of their exposure to air, liquids cir- diseases, such as Ebola, dengue or malaria develop similar
culating in paper are subject to evaporation. This property en- symptoms in the first days following the infection, it is cru-
ables paper to concentrate, in a non-specific manner, cial to perform a multiplexed test in order to identify the in-
analytes.4952 In many situations however, concentration is not fection and apply the right treatment. With each test associ-
sought after and it is more appropriate to reduce evaporation.15 ated to two controls (negative and positive), a system
In such cases, devices are enclosed in plastic housings, using including the identification of the three diseases needs nine
adhesive plastic foil53,54 and multilayered paper geometries.55 reactions to be simultaneously performed. Individual paper
5. Valving. The possibility to fold paper has led to the design spots shown in Fig. 7a are equivalent to multiwell plates.46
of actuators. In fact, by folding a paper sheet, one can stop or Several examples of multiplexed structures are shown in
initiate a flow, which is the definition of valving.56 The same is Fig. 7b and c.15,64 Fig. 7d and e show devices using multilay-
true for cutting. Such operations are simple to perform and ered structures55 and folding56 to multiplex with a minimal
they have been used to design complex devices, such as number of pipetting. Other examples are shown in Fig. 7f.65
multiplexed assays. More sophisticated valving systems have
also been reported in the literature: for instance, by inserting a
dissolvable porous bridge between two paper channels57 (see Hybrid technology: paper microfluidics combined with
Fig. 6a). Solid component dissolution has also been exploited microfluidic devices
to induce flow retardation58 (Fig. 6b). Several authors proposed Often, the diagnostics of diseases based on the detection of
to delay liquid flows without changing its composition over NA, from the clinical sample to the readout, involve a number
Fig. 6 Valve functions in paper devices. a) Stop-flow by a dissolvable bridge. Adapted from ref. 57. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society.
b) Sequential reagent arrivals thanks to sugar delays. Adapted from ref. 58. Copyright (2013) RSC publishing. c) Expanding actuator for valve func-
tions. Adapted from ref. 61. Copyright (2015) RSC publishing. d) On-button in a multilayered device obtained by air-spacer and paper
deformability. Adapted from ref. 62. Copyright (2010) RSC publishing.
of steps that are difficult to integrate on a single PAD. For this the paper. In a second configuration and for the same objec-
reason, a number of investigators have combined paper micro- tive, a paper disc is introduced anywhere in the microsystems
fluidics with standard lab-on-a-chip technology.6669 A recent through a punched hole closed with a PDMS cork as shown in
work made in our laboratory49 provides examples of such hy- Fig. 8b. In these systems, the liquid injected, either in the paper
brid microsystems, i.e. coupling paper microfluidics and PDMS or in the microchannel elutes the dried samples stored in the
(polydimethylsiloxane) devices. In the first case, a paper strip is paper matrix (Fig. 8c) and therefore conveys the sample in a
inserted as an accessible inlet and liquid flows are driven by a PDMS microfluidic device. Fig. 8d shows a dried fluorescein
negative pressure (i.e. below the ambient pressure) from the sample eluted from paper, driven along a microchannel and
outlet (Fig. 8a). The goal here is to retrieve a sample dried on eventually encapsulated in droplets.
Fig. 7 Paper geometries for multiplexed analysis. a) Hydrophilichydrophobic contrast implemented on paper by photolithography to design
microzone plates. Adapted from ref. 46. Copyright (2009) American Chemical Society. b) Urine analysis in a tree-shaped paper device for simulta-
neous and colorimetric determination of BSA and glucose contents in artificial urine. Adapted from ref. 15. Copyright (2007) Wiley-VCH Verlag
GmbH & Co. c) The many possible geometries for paralleled LFTs in cut paper. Adapted from ref. 64. Copyright (2008) American Chemical Society.
d) Paper and tape multilayered device for rehydration of 1024 detection zones through 4 inlets. Independent trajectories are illustrated with dyes.
Adapted from ref. 55. Copyright (2008) National Academy of Sciences, USA. e) Origami-like device: a patterned paper can be folded and sealed for
liquid flows from one layer to the other. Adapted from ref. 56. Copyright (2011) American Chemical Society. f) Three dimensional hydrophilic pat-
terns in one single paper sheet, obtained by printing and baking wax of various amounts on both sides. Adapted from ref. 65. Copyright (2014)
Springer.
When samples from humans are to be analyzed, they most of- The diversity of biological fluids (blood, urine, sputum...) re-
ten need preparation before being processed with the stan- quires the ability to work with a large range of viscosities:
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
dard methods of molecular biology.70 This leads to questions from 1 103 to 30 Pa s.8486 In paper, according to the Lu-
in the sample preparation. Sample preparation typically con- casWashburn law,42 where the speed decreases as the inverse
sists of mixing (with reagents), filtration, lysis purification, of the square of the viscosity, reduction can be of one order of
pre-concentration and NA extraction. These steps allow elimi- magnitude. This may limit the practical distance of travel of
nation of the inhibitors of RT and amplification reactions. In the sample to a few millimeters. However, in practice, most
some cases, however, such preparation is not needed or re- authors have found ways to circumvent this difficulty.
mains minimal. For instance, RT-PCR has been demonstrated The case where viscosity does not raise issues is urine,
on crude serum71 and LAMP on untreated preheated blood.72 since its viscosity is 8 mPa s, i.e. only 10 times higher than
It is interesting to note that, in contrast with PCR,73 isother- that of water at 37.5 C.87 Dipstick urine analysis,88 preg-
mal amplification techniques appear more tolerant of the in- nancy lateral flow tests,26 and first PADs15 demonstrated the
hibitors present in the sample.74 Still, in most cases, sample direct handling of urine samples with paper. However, from
preparation is needed and this remains a challenge for paper an infectious disease diagnosis perspective, although being
microfluidic technology.75 In practice, preparation is attractive for its low viscosity and high accessibility, urine
performed externally to the PAD, using automated devices or utility is debated:89 for example, urine composition enables
manual processes. Examples are sputum,76 saliva swabs,77 TB detection only for HIV-infected patients.
stool78 and urine,79 which make use of instruments unfortu- Saliva (8 mPa s (ref. 90)) can also be handled without di-
nately non-transportable in the field. Today, most of the avail- lution. In ref. 91, it is shown that saliva flows in 2 cm long
able commercial POC devices performing sample preparation paper channels within a range of time compatible with diag-
use this type of instrument.75 However, sample preparation is nostic applications (a few minutes). In a recent work how-
in full bloom with a growing number of contributions.8083 ever92 (Fig. 9a), the authors had to include a dilution step
Fig. 8 Hybrid technology devices.49 a) Paper strip inserted at the glassPDMS interface of a microsystem. Liquid flows at the papermicrochannel
junction are obtained thanks to the rehydration of the paper combined with the negative pressure from the outlet of the microsystem. b) A paper
disc can be introduced into a microsystem through any punched hole that can be closed using a PDMS cork. Liquid flows can be handled like
those in any other microchip. c) Elution curves of dried fluorescein samples on paper eluted and measured in microchannels by fluorescence,
according to the flow rate. d) Microscopy visualization of the papermicrochannel junction in a flow-focusing geometry. The water flow from pa-
per is divided into droplets by two oil and surfactant flows.
allowing flows with longer distance. Dilution is achieved by lance) blood on paper cartridges as displayed in Fig. 10c. Dried
overlapping paper strips, as displayed in Fig. 9b.39 In this samples are stored for days or months afterwards and trans-
case, the dilution ratio could be tuned. Note that over the last ported for analysis in equipped laboratories. It is remarkable
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
years, there is growing interest in considering salivary tests93 that paper storage does not produce any significant damage on
for HIV, hepatitis C and human papillomavirus, using sero- the biological information. For example, in the case of HIV,
logical methods or NAATs.94 DNA can be stored for 4 years,106 under various conditions.107
Although raw semen is substantially viscous (30 times For some viruses, a diminution of the viral activity, caused by
more than water95), it is still compatible with paper without cell lysis under drying, has been reported.108 This characteristic
dilution, if shorter distances are designed in the paper de- is not general: the hepatitis B virus remains infectious at least
vice.96 Similarly, sputum samples have a quite high viscosity seven days on paper.109 Today, either for early diagnosis or
(2070 mPa s (ref. 97)). Until now, there is no paper device global health monitoring, it is frequent to analyze the presence
operated with sputum samples directly. Today, the existing and concentration of more than 45 analytes contained in the
systems performing NAATs for early diagnostics of tuberculo- blood sample.45 In the NAAT field, several articles report NA ex-
sis98 uses expensive instrumentation: for example, GeneXpert traction and amplification from Dried Blood Spot (DBS) speci-
cost more than US $17 000 and each cartridge US $10. Finally, mens, mainly for HIV diagnostics by RT-PCR110,111 but also for
paper devices for fecal sample analysis for Salmonella detec- detection of other diseases112 such as hemoglobinopathies,
tion99 were demonstrated. Since sample viscosities range Duchenne muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis.
from 20 to 2000 Pa s,100 dilution is obviously necessary.
Fig. 9 Mixing in paper. (a) Modified lateral flow test for salivary diagnostics. Adapted from ref. 92. Copyright (2010) RSC publishing. (b) Mixing by
diffusion between two stacked paper strips according to their length. Adapted from ref. 39. Copyright (2015) RSC publishing.
Fig. 10 Whole blood on paper. a) Plasma extraction on paper by red blood cell filtration or aggregation. Adapted from ref. 43. Copyright (2012)
RSC publishing. b) Visualization of red blood cell agglutination on antibody coated paper for blood typing. Adapted from ref. 103. Copyright (2012)
American Chemical Society. c) Dried blood spot: fingerstick blood stored on a Guthrie card (adapted from vitas.no).
Another example of cell lysis and NA extraction on paper remaining bacteria, cells, viruses, proteins and lipids close
was demonstrated with Chlamydia trachomatis, using urine to the inlet to be captured, whereas NAs are further trans-
samples.79 To diagnose this sexually transmitted infection by ported in the paper channel. Either directly with an interca-
isothermal amplification (Helicase Dependent Amplification: lating dye or with PCR on small paper parts, it is possible
HDA), NA extraction and isolation is necessary. The idea is to to quantify the amount of NA on different locations. The
mix the sample with a buffer containing components for cell compared results of cellulose and nitrocellulose membranes
lysis and alcohol precipitation of DNA. This mixture is then demonstrated that cellulose better extracts NA (lower limit
added into a pipette tip for which the end is filled with either of detection) but there is less NA chromatographic retention
compressed paper or porous polymer monoliths (Fig. 11b). in nitrocellulose. This sample preparation can be accom-
By pressurizing the liquid, the mixture flows in the porous plished on-field within 5 minutes and can be coupled with
media whereas DNA precipitates remain on top of it. A wash- any other NAATs.
ing step with ethanol enables the elution of DNA from the pa- An origami-based paper device, illustrated in Fig. 11d, uses
per support and its recovery for amplification and detection. the valve function of folding/unfolding several paper layers to
Fabrication of the support material at the end of the pipette perform DNA bacterial extraction from raw viscous samples
tip remains very easy with paper and only requires 10 mi- (pig mucin simulating sputum).118 All reagents (lysis solution,
nutes versus the 20 hours for the polymer. However results of extraction buffer, washing buffers...) are preloaded into the de-
extraction are substantially less reproducible with paper. This vice and dried for storage in order to make it fully ready-to-use
simple device still requires external equipment like a pres- only with nuclease-free water and ethanol. A raw sample can
sure supply to make liquid flows within 510 minutes for be introduced into the central inlet of the device while a cell ly-
each washing step. A natural paper capillary pump could re- sis buffer pad is rehydrated with water. By folding a layer, the
place this function but within longer durations. liquid communication enables the mixing of these compo-
Similarly, Salmonella extraction was demonstrated from nents and the mixture is incubated for 30 minutes. By remov-
poultry packaging liquid, whole blood and fecal samples ing the first layer and folding another one, the lysis stops and
thanks to an initial step of mixing sample with lysis a washing step can start with ethanol addition. These two sim-
buffer.99 This mixture is then loaded on a paper channel as ple operations enable efficient DNA capture on filter paper.
displayed in Fig. 11c. The capillary pump spatially disperses
and conveys the liquid components in the paper channel
according to their size (filter effect of the porous media) Concentration on paper
and to their interaction with the cellulose or nitrocellulose In order to keep the amplification reaction sensitive, it
membrane (chromatography effect, interactions according to may be useful to include concentration steps. So far,
the surface chemistry). Paper properties enable the apart from a few exceptions based on microbeads,119
Fig. 11 Cell lysis and NA extraction on paper. a) NA extraction and purification from whole blood on a two-layered paper device. Adapted from
ref. 115. Copyright (2009) American Society for Microbiology. b) Filtration of lysed cells and precipitated DNA on a paper support in a pipette tip,
followed by washing steps for elution. Adapted from ref. 79. Copyright (2014) RSC publishing. c) NA isolation through capillary flow on paper.
Adapted from ref. 99. Copyright (2014) RSC publishing. d) Origami paper device for sample lysis and NA extraction from raw viscous samples.
Adapted from ref. 118. Copyright (2012) RSC publishing.
concentration techniques use solvent removal and/or target configuration, the same process can be turned to be more
capture on membranes. These techniques can be specific. For example, in ref. 52, a paper strip is used for
nonspecific and performed on paper thanks to evapora- increasing the initial concentration of the target DNA rela-
tion. In ref. 51, a localized heat source accelerates the sol- tive to the non-specific background (see Fig. 12c). The pa-
vent evaporation process, whereas the capillary pump con- per strip contains an area coated with complementary oli-
stantly renews the material. This is shown in Fig. 12a, in gonucleotides. The target DNA is captured in this area
which a sample dipstick operation and a small heater when the sample flows in the paper, whereas background
concentrate a given analyte at the end of a paper strip. A DNA strains are conveyed downstream. Finally, by cutting
more selective analyte concentration can be obtained with and specifically eluting the capture area, the sample is
specific ionic surface interactions (Fig. 12b).120 In another enriched with target DNA.
Nucleic acid amplification and nucleic acid and a LAMP reaction is directly performed in it.
detection on paper An FTA card for LAMP amplification within a membrane has
been further used by Zhang et al.129 in a microcapillary sys-
Nucleic acid amplification on paper
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
Fig. 12 NA concentration step. a) Evaporative concentration of analytes at the end of a paper strip. Adapted from ref. 51. Copyright (2014)
American Chemical Society. b) Tunable focalization according to the biochemical properties of the porous media surface. Adapted from ref. 120.
Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society. c) A lateral flow strip for target DNA concentration relative to non-specific background DNA.
Adapted from ref. 52. This is an unofficial adaptation of an article that appeared in an ACS publication. ACS has not endorsed the content of this
adaptation or the context of its use.
Fig. 13 NA amplification on paper. a) Schemes of LAMP, HDA and RPA isothermal amplifications. Adapted from ref. 137. Copyright 2011 Elsevier
b) HIV DNA RPA performed on various types of cellulose and glass fibers. G041 bound glass fiber (at the right side of the gel) and GF/DVA bound
glass fiber seem to be well suited for RPA amplification. Adapted from ref. 124. Copyright (2012) RSC publishing c) RT-LAMP and d) RT-HDA reac-
tions performed on various types of membranes: CHR = chromatography paper, PES = polyethersulfone membrane, PC = polycarbonate mem-
brane, GF = glass microfiber matrix and NC = nitrocellulose membrane. RT-LAMP and RT-HDA are realized respectively for Influenza A and N.
gonorrhoeae RNA strands both with excess liquid and within the membrane. Agarose gel electrophoresis and lateral flow detection (LFD) strips are
shown. Relative LFD test line intensities are displayed on the graphs below each gel. Adapted from ref. 121. Springer Science + Business Media
New York 2016.
complementarities of amplicons produce double-strain DNA flow well conveys reagents in the membrane. Similar proto-
bearing both antigens (Fig. 14a). Without target RNA, no am- cols can be applied on HIV LAMP primers and are compati-
plification occurs and the two primers have no reason to ble with commercial products (Fig. 14b and c).139
match. The associated LFT is built with anti-biotin and anti- Another NA-LFT technique relies on complimentary oligo-
FAM antibodies to form a sandwich format around oligonu- nucleotides.140 In this case, the LFT device is designed with
cleotides. The FAM/anti-FAM complex is associated with gold free gold nanoparticles coated with small DNA strains that
for a visible signal and also as a control line to ensure the match the DNA target (Fig. 14d). The detection zone is also
coated with small DNA strains that are complementary to the non-specific luminescent reporter associates with any present
other end of the DNA target. The capillary flow conveys the miRNA to form a pink duplex molecule. In the presence of
sample and the nanoparticles towards the location of grafted the target RNA, the capturing molecule (complementary
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
DNA strains for the formation of the sandwich format. strain of the target) is also involved, matching with lumines-
Detection based on a chemical modification of paper. cent reportermiRNA, changing its color to orange (Fig. 15d).
Capillary pumping, chemical grafting, and DNA hybridization All reagents are only loaded on the polymeric paper (PVDF:
can be integrated in paper-based NA detection devices but in polyvinylidenedifluoride) layer without chemical grafting
a format different from LFT. Schematics of such devices, steps. This facilitates the fabrication but jeopardizes the pos-
presented in Fig. 15 is reminiscent of thin-layer chromatogra- sibility of performing multiplexed analysis.
phy protocols: migration of species on a porous membrane Detection in a microzone plate format. Wax-patterned
that is dipped into a liquid preparation. Chemical treatments technology enables the realization of microzones on paper,
locally modify paper surfaces in order to capture a DNA tar- evoking the 96-multiwell plates currently used in biology. In
get. For example, through alcohol functions, cellulose fiber- this configuration, paper is considered as a substrate, able to
based paper is easily functionalized with oligonucleotides store reagents, and there is essentially no fluid dynamics. In
grafted thanks to amino groups141 (Fig. 15a). With comple- ref. 144, this geometry is used for the detection of Dengue vi-
mentary strains and probe-bearing DNA, the paper enables rus after RT-LAMP amplification is performed in tubes. Here,
rapid detection thanks to the capillary pump and DNA hy- fluorescence is the readout of the amplification process
bridization. The chemical treatment is not necessary global, (Fig. 16a). Recent developments led to the proposal of a col-
it can be local. With several spots grafted with various DNA orimetric version of this protocol.145
sequences, multiplexed detection can be performed on a sin- By assembling several layers of paper microzone plates,
gle device (Fig. 15b and c). Recently, the number of targets fluids and stored reagents are put into contact when the device
has increased from four to eight and the observation could is folded. This provides a method for generating a readout. An
be made with the naked-eye by replacing fluorescent probes example (Fig. 16b) consists of a competitive hybridization be-
with micrometer-sized beads.142 tween a fluorophore-labeled single strain DNA (F1), a smaller
The visual paper-based detection of miRNA has been complementary DNA bearing a quencher (Q1) and a target DNA
reported and is based on duplex and triplex species.143 A matching F1.146 Each component is stored on different layers.
Fig. 14 NA detection on a LFT device. a) Schematics of the RPA principles of product generation and lateral flow strip detection. Adapted from
ref. 12. 2006 Piepenburg et al. b) Picture of commercial Milenia strips for detection of FITC/biotin-labeled amplicons. Adapted from ref. 138.
2014 Singleton et al. c) Picture of commercial Best II cassettes for detection of FITC/biotin-labeled amplicons. Adapted from ref. 138. 2014
Singleton et al. d) Schematics of NALF thanks to nanoparticles coated with template complementary strains. Adapted from ref. 139. Rohrman
et al.
Fig. 15 NA detection on a thin-layer chromatography plate-like device. a) Illustration of the chemical protocol to graft single strain DNA on a cel-
lulose surface through 1,4-phenylenediisothiocyanate activation. Adapted from ref. 140. Copyright (2012) American Chemical Society. b) Configu-
ration of immobilized oligonucleotide: a negative control (neg), a positive control (S_1) and four target amplicons (T_1, T_2, T_3, T_4). Adapted
from ref. 140. Copyright (2012) American Chemical Society. c) Multiplexed fluorescence detection of DNA hybridization for the various samples.
Adapted from ref. 140. Copyright (2012) American Chemical Society. d) Paper platform for naked eye detection of miRNA by formation of duplex
or triplex species. Adapted from ref. 142. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society.
Because the target is longer than Q1, the strand displacement tection spot. In the presence of the target, the preferential inter-
kinetics makes the assembly F1-target (fluorescent) more prob- action between the target and aptamers destroys the hydrogel.
able than F1-Q1 (quenched). When folded, the fluorescence sig- The liquid can freely flow towards all the layers of the device,
nal directly provides readout for the target. rehydrating the dye that can be detected by the naked-eye at the
Detection mediated by or exploiting a flow. As said before, end of the paper channel (Fig. 17b). Because aptamers are ver-
the challenge of detection is to reach large sensitivities with satile molecules, multiple biomarkers can be targeted and the
transportable minimal equipment, like a smartphone or the parallelization of the geometry enables the distribution of the
naked eye, in a way similar to paper pregnancy tests. This leads sample towards at least four analysis spots with their own asso-
to the idea developed in ref. 147. In this reference, use is made ciated color. By replacing aptamers with target-matched DNA
of magnetic bead aggregation in the presence of the very long strains, it could be possible to develop similar colorimetric spe-
DNA strands produced by LAMP. The aggregates produce a cific DNA detection.
dark spot while non-agglutinated beads are dispersed by the
flow, thus mimicking in some way a readout technique often
used in LFTs (Fig. 17a). In ref. 148, biomarker detection on pa- Integrated sample-in-answer-out devices
per is demonstrated by using a flow regulator. Without the As seen above, sample preparation, NA amplification and DNA
target, an aptamer-cross-linked hydrogel blocks the liquid flow target detection have been demonstrated on paper. It is unsur-
and the dye stored in the device is not conveyed towards the de- prising that some investigators attempted to integrate all these
Fig. 16 NA detection on microzone wax-patterned devices. a) Fluorescence detection of RT-LAMP products on microzone plate paper. Adapted
from ref. 143. Copyright (2013) RSC publishing. b) Origami paper analytical device: each layer contains a component for competitive hybridization
between a target DNA, a fluorophore-labelled DNA and a quencher bearing DNA. Adapted from ref. 145. Copyright (2013) American Chemical
Society.
functionalities to build sample-in-answer-out devices. This captured on the paper and removed by the washing opera-
section reviews the main contributions made in this area. tion. Here, paper is used as a capture medium, demonstrat-
Hybrid paper-microsystems. First demonstration of NA ing that amplification is possible in porous media.
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
amplification on paper has been performed in hybrid devices A more recent amplification ion type of paper is reported
that combine paper and microchips. Amplification of HIV in ref. 152 (see Fig. 19b). It relies on a specific synthetic gene
RNA by RT-LAMP from oral fluids was demonstrated in a dis- network, able to reproduce cell functions like transcription
posable cassette shown in Fig. 18a thanks to washing steps and translation. All reagents are freeze-dried on individual
through an integrated FTA membrane in the micro- paper spots, can be stored and only need rehydration. If the
channel.68 Similarly, in a microcapillary format (Fig. 18b), a target RNA matched synthetic molecular construction, it en-
whole blood droplet is loaded in a trapped FTA mem- ables ribosome activity to translate a repressed gene. This
brane.129 Droplets containing purification reagents, buffers gene translation is responsible for a fluorescence signal or a
and LAMP mixtures, are brought sequentially to the paper to color change after two hours of incubation. Paper appears as
perform all the diagnostics steps. a powerful substrate for reagent storage, amplification and
The recovery of DBS, which relies on passive elution149 in an detection of parallel reactions. The initial publication applied
appropriate buffer, provides another example of a hybrid system to synthetic Ebola virus RNA was then completed by the same
(see Fig. 18c). Examples of active elution and on-line analysis in team with Zika virus detection.153 This work, although based
a microdevice have also appeared in the literature. In ref. 69, a on sophisticated biochemistry, exposing a possible lack of ro-
filter paper containing whole blood is inserted between two lay- bustness in on-field applications, may inspire design of new
ered microchannels. Liquid flows through the paper enable the amplification schemes optimized for NAATs on paper.
rehydration of the sample, removal of inhibitors, extraction of A sliding device was developed to perform sample prepara-
DNA and specific amplification of the biological target. tion, LAMP and NA fluorescence detection.130 It consists of a
In other hybrid microdevices for NAATs, paper plays a sig- paper disc that can be moved to several positions (Fig. 19c). In
nificant role in the visual detection of the amplified prod- the first one, there is an absorbent pad underneath that en-
ucts67 thanks to a LFT or in the reagent storage.150 In the sures capillary suction, forcing the blood sample to flow
same article, the authors argue that paper enables more uni- through the paper disc, removing all inhibitors while the DNA
form reagent distribution and longer conservation of reagent strains are captured. In a second position, buffers complete the
properties than a standard microchip. washing. In the third position, LAMP reagents are added. The
Paper material alone. The first NA amplification on a pa- paper is slid again to a closed location to prevent evaporation
per strip has been reported in ref. 151 (see Fig. 19a). A paper during the 65 C incubation. A final position enables the DNA
strip is coated with DNA-conjugated microgels (D1-MG). The fluorescent intercalating dye to be pipetted and the result be vi-
target DNA is complementary to D1 and to a second detec- sualized. This device, which is autonomous and requires only a
tion DNA (D2). By dipping the paper in a microtube few manual actions, is the most advanced system adapted for
containing the sample and D2, the complex hybridization of on-field diagnostics coupling NAAT and paper technology.
D1target DNAD2 occurs only if the target DNA is present. A The realization of HDA (Helicase Dependant Amplifica-
washing step enables the removal of all the liquids in the tion) from dried reagents stored in paper discs136 shown in
tube, except for the components attached on the microgels. Fig. 19d overcomes the challenge of Mycobacterium tuberculo-
Then, RCA (Rolling Cycle Amplification) reagents and a fluo- sis (MTB) diagnosis in low-income countries. Indeed, the
rescent probe are added in the microtube in order to specifi- large genome GC content (over 65%) makes it non-
cally amplify D2. If the target DNA is not present, D2 is not compatible with most of the isothermal amplifications
Fig. 17 NA detection through a liquid flow. a) Visualization of magnetic bead aggregation on paper in the presence of LAMP products. Adapted
from ref. 146. Copyright (2016) RSC publishing. b) Target-responsive DNA hydrogel that stops the flow in the absence of the target. Adapted from
ref. 147. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society.
Fig. 18 Typical hybrid papermicrochip devices. a) FTA membrane in a two layered microchannel for DNA extraction and purification. Adapted
from ref. 68. Copyright (2011) RSC publishing. b) FTA membrane in a microcapillary for DNA extraction and purification. Adapted from ref. 129.
This is an unofficial adaptation of an article that appeared in an ACS publication. ACS has not endorsed the content of this adaptation or the
context of its use. c) Dried sample stored on filter paper is analyzed in a microchip. Adapted from ref. 69. Copyright (2014) RSC publishing.
Fig. 19 NAAT on the paper substrate. a) NAAT on paper strip thanks to DNA-conjugated microgels and RCA. Adapted from ref. 150. Copyright
(2009) RSC publishing. b) Principle of forming an enzyme-free synthetic gene network freeze-dried on paper. Adapted from ref. 151. Copyright
(2014) Cell Press. c) Paper substrate for DNA extraction, LAMP and fluorescence detection through a sliding device. Adapted from ref. 130. Copy-
right (2015) American Chemical Society. d) HDA amplification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA on paper discs. Adapted from ref. 136. Copyright
(2016) RSC publishing.
where no specific denaturation step is operated. The au- reaction authorizes some tolerance to the temperature con-
thors used chromatography paper coated with BSA to pre- ditions (from the optimal 65 C to 50 C) and to the biolog-
vent DNA and enzyme adsorption. Detection relies on fluo- ical inhibitors. Under these conditions, the final experi-
rescence signals or electrophoresis migration. The HDA ments were performed with low-cost heaters like hand
warmers, on MTB DNA diluted in the viscous environment unskilled operators, the device is not really ready-to-use; it re-
of artificial sputum. quires the user to load all pads with various liquids.
PAD variations. A paper and plastic device can perform The first success in developing a modular paper device that
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
HIV detection through RPA reaction.124 It uses the origami combines NA isolation from crude biological samples, isother-
principle or valve function: three pads respectively contain mal amplification and Lateral Flow (LF) detection was demon-
the master mix, magnesium acetate and the sample. By fold- strated for Human Papillomavirus DNA detection from cervical
ing the device, the sample pad is enclosed between the two specimens53 (see Fig. 20b). A sample is loaded on a PES mem-
others and the reagents can mix together (Fig. 20a). The au- brane as well as several buffers and washing solutions. An ab-
thors suggest using this paper device in conjunction with sorbent pad, in contact with the membrane, induces the capil-
DBS and LF strips to obtain a full paper diagnostics from lary force responsible for extraction and removal of impurities.
sample-to-answer. However only some RPA reagents are These washing steps enable the precipitation of the DNA that
stored in the device so it still requires several fresh reagent is trapped in the membrane. The absorbent pad can then be
additions. The same research group develops a sliding device discarded. The LAMP mix is added into the membrane to
for RPA reaction, buffer dilution and LF detection.125 Several achieve isothermal amplification. Finally, the cover film is
individual pads are fixed in a plastic housing and contain peeled back to connect the sample port with the LF strip. The
buffers and reagents. Two mobile pads on the layer under- result of amplification can be visually read on the strip. By
neath can selectively be in contact with the fixed pads thanks connecting and disconnecting pieces of paper, all the diagnos-
to the very easy sliding operations and transport the sample tic steps can be performed in a simple device. However, except
and a dilution buffer. If sliding operations are performed by for the LF strip, none of the reagents are stored thus the device
Fig. 20 Multistep operating devices for NAATs on paper. a) RPA of HIV DNA by folding a paper device: sample pad enclosed between a
master mix and magnesium acetate pads. Adapted from ref. 124. Copyright (2012) RSC publishing. b) Modular fluidic paper device for
Human Papillomavirus DNA extraction, amplification (LAMP) and LF detection. Adapted from ref. 53. Copyright (2012) RSC publishing. c)
Two parallel strips for LAMP reaction and LF detection. Adapted from ref. 133. Copyright (2016) RSC publishing. d) Multiplexed detection of
Plasmodium parasites with internal control, from a whole blood droplet in an origami paper device. Adapted from ref. 154. Copyright
(2016) Wiley.
still relies on several pipetting operations. The idea of why, although publications on POC devices are increasingly ori-
connecting on demand a reaction LAMP pad and a LF strip ented towards emerging countries, only one155 out of 60
for detection was also investigated in a two-parallel strips for- could be evaluated for on-field applications.
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
mat.133 Here, LAMP occurs in a glass fiber pad, protected by Recently, in our laboratory, we realized a NAAT on a paper
adhesive tape. Removing the disposable tape enables the con- device and brought it to Guinea for detecting Ebola virus in
nection of the LAMP pad to the LF strip (Fig. 20c). clinical samples.126 The device is shown in Fig. 21. The PAD
Sample-to-answer and multiplexed analysis were first made consists of RT-RPA freeze-dried reagents in microzones
in a multilayered device (Fig. 20d) performing Plasmodium designed to be rehydrated and heated at 40 C for the detec-
(parasite responsible for malaria disease) LAMP detection in tion of the presence of sequences specific for Ebola virus in
whole blood.154 Sequential steps of DNA extraction, amplifica- clinical samples (Fig. 21a). This system is combined to a carry-
tion and fluorescence detection on paper required minimal on type of equipment in which all technical elements are an-
handling operations, 45 minutes and low-cost instrumenta- chored in a suitcase, as shown in Fig. 21b. All experiments
tion (heater and handheld flashlight). Three species of Plas- performed included a sample test and two internal controls
modium were detected from a finger-prick volume of human (positive and negative) to ensure no reagent degradation and
blood over 80 patient samples in an operator-blinded study, no external source of contamination (Fig. 21c). Fig. 21d shows
and associated for the first time with an internal control. an extension of this approach to multiplex detection.
Fig. 21 Toward on-field validation of NAAT paper devices for Ebola virus diagnostics.126 a) Freeze-dried RT-RPA reagents on paper. b) Carry-on
equipment for heating step and fluorescence detection. c) Experiments on paper with internal controls to detect viral RNA in clinical samples. d)
Multilayered device to simultaneously perform nine reactions: three sample tests and six associated controls.
Lab Chip
Table 1 Comparison of paper-based devices for NAAT: type of sample considered, reaction of amplification and performances and substrate used
Equipment- # of
Ref. Device Prep. Target Pathogen Fluid free Reaction LOD Storage operations Detection Paper Shape
Paper & Wang PCR DNA B. cereus Extractions PCR 0.1 X 4 Visual Nitrocellulose Strip
Microchip 2006 disposable ng L1 membrane
(ref. 67) cassette
Liu LAMP RNA HIV-1 Saliva RT-lamp 0.1 7 Fluorescence FTA cards Disc
2011 reactor with particle
(ref. 56) isolation per L
membrane
Zhang Integrated X DNA CYP2C19 gene Whole blood LAMP 5000 X 3 Fluorescence FTA cards Disc
2014 microcapillary copies
(ref. 129) per L
Dou Microfluidic DNA N. Meningitidis Cerebrospinal LAMP 3 copies X 3 Fluorescence Chroma- Disc
2014 platform fluid tography
(ref. 150) paper
Gan Microdevice X DNA Amelogenin Whole blood PCR 20 7 Electrophoresis Filter paper Disc
2014 for filter- maker saliva swabs ng L1 FTA cards
(ref. 69) paper DNA
extraction
PAD Ali Bioactive DNA Oligonucleotides Synthetic RCA 10 fM 4 Fluorescence Filter paper Strip
2009 paper strips
(ref. 151)
Pardee Synthetic RNA Ebola, Zika Synthetic X Gene 30 nM X 1 Visual Filter paper Disc
2014/16 gene network
(ref. 151 network
and 152)
Connelly Paper X DNA Escherichia Whole blood LAMP 1 copy 4 Fluorescence FTA cards Disc
2015 machine coli per L
(ref. 130)
Prasad Amplification DNA Mycobacterium Artificial HDA 25 copies X 3 Fluorescent Chroma- Disc
2016 on paper tuberculosis sputum per L electrophoresis tography
(ref. 136) substrate paper + BSA
Rohrman Paper and DNA HIV Whole X RPA 1 copy 6 Visual Glass Disc
2012 plastic blood per L fiber + strip
(ref. 140) device for
RPA HIV
Cordray Paper and DNA Plasmodium Synthetic X RPA 5 copies 8 Visual Glass fiber Disc
2015 plastic per L chroma- + strip
(ref. 125) device tography
or blotted
paper
Magro Experiments RNA Ebola Synthetic/viral RPA Equivalent X 2 Fluorescence Chroma- Disc +
2017 in Guinea & of 34 tography origami
(ref. 126) multiplexed PCR qc paper
device
View Article Online
Origami
2 strips
+ strip
Shape
sensitive as the gold standard PCR, while working in an iso-
Disc
thermal way (6065 C). Another amplification technique that
raised attention is RPA that requires conditions close to am-
nitrocellulose
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
filter paper
membrane
membrane
Glass fiber
Substrate
Glass
fiber
agents in paper. This leads to several consequences such as
PES
Fluorescence
ment dependence, especially cold-chain for reagent preserva-
Storage operations Detection
Visual
rameter, which gives good hope for the systematic use of the
10
freeze-dried configuration.
Type of detection. Despite the large number of solutions
described in the literature to detect NA on paper, PADs
performing NAATs mainly rely on either fluorescence detec-
3000 copies
5 parasites
100 copies
per L
per L
LAMP
LAMP
Synthetic
Cervical
Plasmodium
DNA
DNA
based
(ref. 133)
(ref. 153)
(ref. 53)
Table 1 (continued)
2016
2016
Ref.
column of Table 1.
Xu
samples, pipetting buffers, folding paper layers or peeling sues that stand beyond the scope of the review, but will cer-
plastic foils, which is feasible in the field. One opportunity tainly play a major role in the future of NAAT on paper.
to improve the feasibility of these operations relies on the
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
After having embarked the reader on a brief tour in the do- References
main of paper microfluidics, we reviewed the state of the art
of NAATs on paper, by listing different subjects including 1 S. Baize, D. Pannetier, L. Oestereich, T. Rieger, L. Koivogui,
sample preparation, nucleic acid amplification and detection. N. D. Magassouba, B. Soropogui, M. S. Sow, S. Keta, H. D.
The variety of contributions to the domain is important and Clerck, A. Tiffany, G. Dominguez, M. Loua, A. Traor, M.
we hope that Table 1, which attempts to organize them in a Koli, E. R. Malano, E. Heleze, A. Bocquin, S. Mly, H.
systematic way, while conveying a lot of important details, Raoul, V. Caro, D. Cadar, M. Gabriel, M. Pahlmann, D.
will be useful for researchers willing to enter the field and Tappe, J. Schmidt-Chanasit, B. Impouma, A. K. Diallo, P.
who laboriously try to acquire a global vision of the state of Formenty, M. V. Herp and S. Gnther, N. Engl. J. Med.,
the art. Every detail counts in the domain. Working with 2014, 371, 14181425.
model systems is not the same as working with clinical sam- 2 J. M. Broadhurst, T. J. Brooks and N. R. Pollock, Clin.
ples, because the latter contains inhibitors working against Microbiol. Rev., 2016, 29, 773793.
the amplification reaction inexistent in the former. Working 3 M. Yang, Y. Ke, C. Liu and Z. Chen, Infect. Dis. Transl.
with fresh reagents is not the same as working with freeze- Med., 2015, 1, 7379.
dried reagents on paper, because freeze-drying complex bio- 4 P. Cherpillod, M. Schibler, G. Vieille, S. Cordey, A. Mamin,
molecules on cellulose surfaces a still very empirical do- P. Vetter and L. Kaiser, J. Clin. Virol., 2016, 77, 914.
main may cause degradation of their activity. Sometimes, 5 World Health Organization, Fact sheet, 2016, vol. 104.
claims are made suggesting that the device is ready for on- 6 World Health Organization, Fact sheet, 2016, vol. 94.
field applications whereas it stands far from it. 7 World Health Organization, Fact sheet, 2016, vol. 117.
We have not arrived yet at a sensitive paper-based NAAT 8 A. Goorhuis, K. J. v. Eije, R. A. Douma, N. Rijnberg, M. v.
system as simple as a pregnancy test. The most advanced sys- Vugt, C. Stijnis and M. P. Gorbusch, Travel Med. Infect. Dis.,
tem, proposed by DiagnosticsForAll, is based on a standalone 2016, 1315.
paper machine that performs the sample preparation, am- 9 J. Li and J. Macdonald, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2015, 64,
plification and readout of the target. It necessitates three 196211.
manual actions. Although this system can be qualified as a 10 V. Trger, K. Niemann, C. Grtig and D. Kuhlmeier,
field test device, according to the WHO classification, one J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol., 2015, 6, 100282.
may hope that much simpler devices will appear in the fu- 11 T. Notomi, H. Okayama, H. Masubuchi, T. Yonekawa, K.
ture. This motivates the development of new ideas, mobiliz- Watanabe, N. Amino and T. Hase, Nucleic Acids Res.,
ing advances in biochemistry, synthetic biology and materials 2000, 28, e63.
science. This represents an exciting period for research in 12 O. Piepenburg, C. H. Williams, D. Stemple and N. Armes,
which imagination and cross-disciplinarity form the basic pil- PLoS Biol., 2006, 4, 11151121.
lars. Cost is obviously a critical issue (a typical figure being 13 M. M. Ali, F. Li, Z. Zhang, K. Zhang, D.-k. Kang, J. A.
$1 per test). At the moment, paper as a material contributes Ankrum, X. C. Le and W. Zhao, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
negligibly to the cost of the devices, in comparison with the 2014, 33243341.
other materials that support or protect the paper, such as 14 A. W. Martinez, E. Carrilho, S. T. Philips and G. M.
plastic and foils. These materials themselves are much less Whitesides, Anal. Chem., 2010, 310.
expensive than the reagents. This does not mean that paper 15 A. Martinez, S. Phillips, M. Butte and G. M. Whitesides,
is inessential. In fact, beyond the cost argument (in a low- Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 13181320.
cost device, every saving is important) paper possesses func- 16 E. Carrilho, A. Martinez and G. M. Whitesides, Anal. Chem.,
tionalities that allow the simplification of the system and 2009, 81, 70917095.
therefore reduce costs while enabling on-field utilization. In 17 A. Martinez, S. Phillips, B. Wiley, M. Gupta and G. M.
this sense, paper appears as the best candidate for the devel- Whitesides, Lab Chip, 2008, 8, 21452150.
opment of NAAT for developing countries. The question of 18 E. Fenton, M. Mascarenas, G. Lopez and S. Sibbett, ACS
the cost on the other hand raises business and economic is- Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2008, 1, 124129.
19 J. Nie, Y. Liang, Y. Zhang, S. Le, D. Li and S. Zhang, 50 L. Magro, F. Monti and P. Tabeling, WO2015067912A3, 2013.
Analyst, 2013, 138, 671676. 51 S. Wong, M. Cabodi, J. Rolland and C. Klapperich, Anal.
20 L. Cai, C. Xu, S. Lin, J. Luo, M. Wu and F. Yang, Chem., 2014, 86, 1198111985.
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
78 S. Huang, J. Do, M. Mahalanabis, A. Fan, L. Z. L. Jepeal, S. 106 C.-C. Li, I. A. Beck, K. D. Seidel and L. M. Frenkel, J. Clin.
Singh and C. Klapperich, PLoS One, 2013, 8, e60059. Microbiol., 2004, 42, 38473849.
79 J. Linnes, A. Fan, N. Rodriguez, B. Lemieux, H. Kong and C. 107 S. Cassol, T. Salas, J. M. Gill, M. Montpetit, J. Rudnik, C. T.
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
Klapperich, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 4224542251. Sy and M. V. O'Shaughnessy, J. Clin. Microbiol., 1992, 30,
80 Y. Huang, E. L. Mather, J. L. Bell and M. Madou, Anal. 30393042.
Bioanal. Chem., 2002, 372, 4965. 108 L. Resnick, K. Veren, Z. S. Salahuddin, S. Tondreau and
81 M. Toner and D. Irimia, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2005, 7, P. D. Markham, JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 1986, 255,
77103. 18891891.
82 C. D. Chin, V. Linder and S. K. Sia, Lab Chip, 2006, 7, 109 W. Bond, M. Favero and N. E. A. Petersen, Lancet,
4157. 1981, 550551.
83 M. Ritzi-Lehnert, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 2014, 12, 189206. 110 S. Cassol, T. Salas, M. Gill, M. Montpetit, J. Rudnik, C. Sy
84 U. Windberger, A. Bartholovitsch, R. Plasenzotti, K. Korak and M. O'Shaughnessy, J. Clin. Microbiol., 1992, 30,
and G. Heinze, Exp. Physiol., 2003, 431440. 30393042.
85 J. Ueda, T. Furukawa, K. Higashino, S. Takahashi, Y. 111 I. Beck, K. Drennan, A. Melvin, K. Mohan, A. Herz, J.
Araki, K. Kubo and T. Nakashima, Acta Radiol., Alarcon, J. Piscoya, C. Velazquez and L. Frenkel, J. Clin.
1997, 10791082. Microbiol., 2001, 39, 2933.
86 J. C. Kirkman-Brown and D. J. Smith, Mol. Hum. Reprod., 112 E. McCabe, PCR Methods Appl., 1991, 1, 99106.
2011, 539544. 113 M. Queipo-Oruno, F. Tena, J. Colmenero and P. Morata,
87 B. A. Inman, W. Etienne, R. Rubin, R. A. Owusu, T. R. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2008, 27, 109114.
Oliveira, D. B. Rodriques, P. F. Maccarini, P. R. Stauffer, A. 114 Y. Maaroufi, N. Ahariz, M. Husson and F. Crokaert, J. Clin.
Mashal and M. W. Dewhirst, Int. J. Hyperthermia, 2013, 29, Microbiol., 2004, 42, 31593163.
206210. 115 S. Jangam, D. Yamada, S. McFall and D. Kelso, J. Clin.
88 W. Devill, J. Yzermans, N. Van Duijn, P. Bezemer, D. Van Microbiol., 2009, 47, 23632368.
der Windt and L. Bouter, Urology, 2004, 4, 14712490. 116 F. Osman and A. Rowhani, J. Virol. Methods, 2006, 133,
89 J. Peter, C. Green, M. Hoelscher, P. Mwaba, A. Zumla and 130136.
K. Dheda, Pulm. Med., 2010, 16, 262270. 117 H. Ahmed, E. MacLeod, G. Hide, S. Welburn and K. Picozzi,
90 S. J. Haward, J. A. Odell, M. Berry and T. Hall, Rheol. Acta, Parasites Vectors, 2011, 4, 17563305.
2011, 50, 869879. 118 A. Govindarajan, S. Ramachandran, G. Vigil, P. Yager and
91 S. Bhakta, R. Borba, M. Taba, C. Garcia and E. Carrilho, K. Bhringer, Lab Chip, 2012, 12, 174181.
Anal. Chim. Acta, 2014, 117122. 119 P. R. Levison, S. E. Badger, J. Dennis, P. Hathi, M. J. Davies,
92 Y. Zhang, J. Bai and J. Y. Ying, Lab Chip, 2015, 15, I. J. Bruce and D. Schimkat, J. Chromatogr. A, 1998, 816,
14651471. 107111.
93 C. B. L. Streckfus, Oral Dis., 2002, 8, 6976. 120 A. Abbas, A. Brimer, J. M. Slocik, L. Tian, R. R. Naik and S.
94 P. L. Corstjens, W. R. Abrams and D. Malamud, J. Am. Dent. Singamaneni, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85, 39773983.
Assoc., JADA, 2012, 143, 12S8S. 121 J. Linnes, N. Rodriguez, L. Liu and C. Klapperich, Biomed.
95 S. LaVignera, R. Condorelli, E. Vicari, R. D'Aagata, M. Microdevices, 2016, 1830.
Salemi and A. Calogera, Andrologia, 2012, 44, 556559. 122 S. Lutz, P. Wever, M. Focke, B. Faltin, J. Hoffman, C.
96 K. Matsuura, K. Chen, C. Tsai, W. Li, Y. Asano, K. Naruse Mller, D. Mark, G. Roth, P. Munday, N. A. Armes, O.
and C. Cheng, Microfluid. Nanofluid., 2014, 14, 857867. Piepenburg, R. Zengerle and F. von Stetten, Lab Chip,
97 R. Picot, I. Das and L. Reid, Thorax, 1978, 235242. 2010, 10, 887893.
98 A. Niemz and D. Boyle, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 2012, 12, 123 O. Piepenburg, C. H. Williams, D. L. Stemple and N. A.
687701. Armes, PLoS Biol., 2006, 4, 11151121.
99 C. Fronczek, T. Park, D. Harshman, A. Nicolini and J. Yoon, 124 B. Rohrman and R. Richards-Kortum, Lab Chip, 2012, 12,
RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 1110311110. 30823088.
100 S. Wooley, R. Cottingham, J. Pocock and C. Buckley, Water 125 M. Cordray and R. Richards-Kortum, Malar. J., 2015, 14.
SA, 2014, 40, 273276. 126 L. Magro, B. Jacquelin, C. Escadafal, P. Garneret, A.
101 W. A. Al-Soud, L. Jonhsson and P. Radstrom, J. Clin. Kwasiborski, J.-C. Manuguerra, F. Monti, A. Sakuntabhai, J.
Microbiol., 2000, 38, 345350. Vanhomwegen, P. Lafaye and P. Tabeling, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7,
102 W. A. Al-Soud and P. Radstrom, J. Clin. Microbiol., 2001, 39, 1347.
485493. 127 K. A. Curtis, D. L. Rudolph and S. M. Owen, J. Med. Virol.,
103 M. Al-Tamimi, W. Shen, R. Zeinedine, H. Tran and G. 2009, 181, 966997.
Garnier, Anal. Chem., 2012, 84, 16611668. 128 Y. Mori and T. Notomi, J. Infect. Chemother., 2009, 115,
104 L. Guan, R. Cao, J. Tian, H. McLiesh and G. G. W. Shen, 6269.
Cellulose, 2014, 21, 717727. 129 L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, Q. Feng, F. Fan, G. Zhang, X.
105 M. Khan, G. Thouas, W. Shen, G. Whyte and G. Garnier, Kang, X. Qin, J. Sun, Y. Li and X. Jiang, Anal. Chem.,
Anal. Chem., 2010, 82, 41584164. 2014, 86, 1046110466.
130 J. Connelly, J. Rolland and G. M. Whitesides, Anal. Chem., 144 S. Lo, S. Yang, D. Yao, J. Chen, W. Tu and C. Cheng, Lab
2015, 87, 75957601. Chip, 2013, 13, 26862692.
131 J. R. Choi, J. Hu, R. Tang, Y. Gong, S. Feng, H. Ren, T. Wen, 145 S. Lo, S. Yang, D. Yao, J. Chen and C. Cheng, IEEE
Published on 18 May 2017. Downloaded by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) on 03/07/2017 07:51:26.
X. J. Li, W. A. B. W. Abas, B. Pingguan-Murphy and F. Xu, Nanotechnol. Mag., 2012, 12, 2630.
Lab Chip, 2016, 116, 611621. 146 K. Scida, B. Li, A. Ellington and R. Crooks, Anal. Chem.,
132 J. R. Choi, R. Tang, S. Wang, W. A. B. W. Abas, B. Pingguan- 2013, 85, 97139720.
Murphy and F. Xu, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2015, 74, 427439. 147 S. Roy, I. Rahman and M. Ahmed, Anal. Methods, 2016, 8,
133 J. Choi, J. Hu, Y. Gong, S. Feng, W. B. W. Abas, B. 23912399.
Pingguan-Murphy and F. Xu, Analyst, 2016, 141, 148 X. Wei, T. Tian, S. Jia, Z. Zhu, Y. Ma, J. Sun, Z. Lin and C.
29302939. Yang, Anal. Chem., 2105, 87, 42754282.
134 Y. J. Jeong, K. Park and D. E. Kim, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 149 S. Mercader, D. Featherstone and W. Bellini, J. Virol.
2009, 166, 33253336. Methods, 2006, 137, 140149.
135 M. Vincent, Y. Xu and H. Kong, EMBO Rep., 2004, 15, 795800. 150 M. Dou, D. Dominguez, X. Li, J. Sanchez and G. Scott, Anal.
136 S. Prasad, G. Dipayan, S. Minakshi, T. Aparna and P. Chem., 2014, 86, 79787986.
Dabjani, RSC Adv., 2016, 5620556212. 151 M. Ali, S. Aguirre, Y. Xu, C. Filipe, R. Pelton and Y. Li,
137 A. Niemz, T. M. Ferguson and D. S. Boyle, Trends Chem. Commun., 2009, 66406642.
Biotechnol., 2011, 29, 240250. 152 K. Pardee, A. Green, T. Ferrante, D. Cameron, A. Daley-
138 C. Niemeyer, M. Adler and R. Wacker, Trends Biotechnol., Keyser, P. Yin and J. Collins, Cell, 2014, 159, 940954.
2005, 23, 208216. 153 K. Pardee, A. Green, M. Takahashi, D. Braff, G. Lambert, J.
139 J. Singleton, J. L. Osbor, L. Lillis, K. Hawkins, D. Guelig, W. Lee, T. Ferrante, D. Ma, N. Donghia, M. Fan, N. Daringer, I.
Price, R. Johns, K. Ebels, D. Boyle, B. Weigle and P. Bosch, D. Dudley, D. O'Connor, L. Gehrke and J. Collins,
LaBarre, PLoS One, 2014, 9, e113693. Cell, 2016, 165, 12551266.
140 B. Rohrman, V. Leautaud, E. Molyneux and R. Richards- 154 G. Xu, D. Nolder, J. Reboud, M. C. Oguike, D. A. van
Kortum, PLoS One, 2012, 7, 18. Schalkwyk, C. J. Sutherland and J. M. Cooper, Angew.
141 A. Araujo, Y. Song, J. Lundeberg, P. Stahl and H. Brumer, Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 1525015253.
Anal. Chem., 2012, 84, 33113317. 155 A. A. Kumar, J. W. Hennek, B. S. Smith, S. Kumar, P. Beattie,
142 Y. Song, P. Gyarmati, A. Arayhi, J. Lundeberg, H. Brumer S. Jain, J. P. Rolland, T. P. Stossel, C. Chunda-Liyoka and
and P. Stahl, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86, 15751582. G. M. Whitesides, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 58365853.
143 U. Yildiz, P. Alagappan and B. Liedberg, Anal. Chem., 156 N. Rodriguez, PhD thesis, Boston University College of
2013, 85, 820824. Engineering, 2016.