INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM

SHARIFFA NUR-RAIZZAH JEANIBVIVE H.

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: ARIEL M. ERALDO
MOHAMMAD
Position: TEACHER 1 Position: PRINCIPAL
Review Period: JUNE-APRIL 2017 Date of Review:
District: IPIL

BAKALAN
School:
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY
Teaching-Learning 5-All daily lesson plans had the following 5- 100% & above of Lesson Plans & Daily
Lessons plans 50%
Process objectives Lesson Logs
Prepares ______ lesson subject matter, procedures, evaluation and w/ appropriate/ low-cost instructional
& daily logs June-March 10%
plans / daily logs assignment materials prepared
Each part had a full description of what to do with 4- 80%-99% of Lesson Plans & Daily
with IMs of activities including
an example Lesson Logs
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, w/ appropriate / low-cost instructional
prepared instructional materials
result-oriented materials prepared
3- 60%-79% of Lesson Plans & Daily
and time-bound
Lesson Logs
100% and above developed high order thinking w/ appropriate / low-cost instructional
skills materials
Attains 100% and above of the desired learning 2- 40%-59% of Lesson Plans & Daily
competencies Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate / low-cost instructional
4-Had four of the five parts of lesson plan
materials prepared
Each part had a partial description of what to do 1- 39% & below of Lesson Plans & Daily
with an example Lesson Logs
Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is w/ appropriate / low-cost instructional
missing materials prepared
80-99% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 80-99% of the desired learning
3- Had 3 of the five parts
Each part had a partial description without
example
Objective was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicator
missing
60-79% developed high order thinking skills
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY
Attained 60-79% of the desired learning
competencies
2- Had 2 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do with
example
Objective was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicators
missing
40-59% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 40-59% of the desired learning
competencies
1- Had 1 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do and
example

Objective was stated without behavioral indicators

39% and below develop high order thinking skills

39% and below attain the desired learning

competencies at all

Facilitates teaching and 5 -a.Established challenging and measurable goals 5- 100% & above of instructional materials
Teaching- 20%
learning in all subjects for were used appropriately
through functional lessons Managed time and resources efficiently in
learning student learning aligned with the curriculum guide.
plans/ 100% & above of lessons taught
daily logs and innovative 4- 80%-99% of instructional materials were
facilitated b.Teaching methods and strategies elicited
teaching strategies used appropriately

Managed time and resources efficiently in

at the end of school year interaction from a class
of 80%-99% lessons taught

c.Cooperative learning strategies was effective 3- 60%-79% of instructional materials were

when used used appropriately

Managed time and resources efficiently in

60%-79% of lessons taught

2-40%-59% of instructional materials were

d. ICT integration is evident
used appropriately
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY

Managed time and resources efficiently in

e.Provided appropriate activities of lessons taught
40%-59% of lessons taught

1- 39% & below of instructional materials

4- 4 out of 5 strategies were evident
were used appropriately

Managed time and resources efficiently in

3- 3 out of 5 strategies were evident
39% & below of lessons taught

2- 2 out of 5 strategies were evident

1-1 out of 5 strategies were evident

5-90-100% mastery learning

4-75-89 % mastery learning
3-60-74 % mastery learning
2-45-59 % mastery learning
1-44 %and below mastery learning

learners'
Implements classroom 5- 100 % of the learners observed classroom rules 5- classroom rules/guidelines/policies
discipline 10%
rules and regulations and regulations prepared/installed within 1 month
initiated
4- 80-99 % of the learners observed classroom 4- classroom rules/guidelines/policies
rules and regulations prepared/installed within 2 months
3- 60-79% % of the learners observed classroom 3- classroom rules/guidelines/policies
rules and regulations prepared/installed within 3 months
2- 40-59% % of the learners observed classroom 2- classroom rules/guidelines/policies
rules and regulations prepared/installed within 4 months
1- 39 % and below of the learners observed 1- classroom rules/guidelines/policies
classroom rules and regulations prepared/installed within 5 months

Manages classrom routines 5-classroom routines installed and observed

10% 5-*Safe, orderly and clean classroom and toilets
during the school year within 2 weeks from the start of school year

4-classroom routines installed and observed

*Attendance checking systematically carried out
within 1 month from the start of school year
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY

3-classroom routines installed and observed

*Updated Classroom structuring within 2 months from the start of school
year
attendance,
cleanliness of
classroom 2-classroom routines installed and observed
atmosphere *proper waste disposal maintained within 3 months from the start of school
year
monitored
1-classroom routines installed and observed
*DRRM policies observed within 4 months from the start of school
year

4-4 out of 5 routines observed and sustained

3-3 out of 5 routines observed and sustained

2-2 out of 5 routines observed and sustained
1-1 out of 5 routines observed and sustained

learners' learners'
progress 30%
Outcomes
monitored &
evaluated Tracks, evaluates and
5-Records of learners progress tracked,evaluated,
maintains records of 4%
and maintained:
learner's progress
a. Class record reflected the bases of 100% and
above of pupils ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
b. Learners portfolio contained 100% and above
of his accomplishment
c.Anecdotal Record

d.Phil-Iri/ECCDA/EGRA_ARATA

4-3 out 4 evident

3-2 out of 4 evident
2-1 out 0f 4 evident
1-none
Prepares appropriate
4% 5-Appropriate assessment tools prepared :
assessment tools
a. Test questions prepared with Table of
Specifications
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY

b. Test questions followed the elements of test

constructions(Stimulus
Material,STEM,options,destructors,correct
answers)

c. Pretest and Post-test were administered

in all classes/subject area

d. Performance Rubrics prepared

e.alternative
assessment(checklist,observation,focus group
discussion,interviews)
4-4 out of 5 prepared
3-3 out of 5 prepared
2-2 out of 5 prepared
1-1 out of 5 prepared

Remedial & Conducts

enrichment remediation/enrichment 5-Remediation/ Enrichment Program conducted to
programs 7%
programs to imrove 100% of identified learners
conducted performance indicators
4-Remediation/ Enrichment Program conducted to
80-99% of identified learners
3-Remediation/ Enrichment Program conducted to
60%-79% of identified learners
2-Remediation/ Enrichment Program conducted to
40%-59% of identified learners

1-Remediation/ Enrichment Program conducted to

39% and below of identified learners

Attains the required

Required 15% 5-3 points increased from GSA baseline
MPS /GSA for grade level

GSA in and learning areas 4-2.5points increased from GSA baseline

 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY
learning 3-2 points increased from GSA baseline
areas 2-1.5 points increased from GSA baseline
attained 1-1 point increased from GSA baseline

5- 3pts & above increased of NAT6 / 80% & above NAT 6 MPS
4- 2pts increased of NAT6 / 75% - 79% NAT 6 MPS
3- 1.5 pt. increased of NAT6
2- 1pt. increased of NAT6
1- 0.5pt.& below increased of NAT6

Community
7%
Involvement

Conducts regular/periodic 5- 100% and above accomplishments with set

Regular/ 4%
PTA meetings/conferences agreements met

4 - 80-99% accomplishments with set agreements

Periodic
met

3 - 60-79% accomplishments with set agreements

PTA meetings
met

2 - 40-59% accomplishments with set agreements

conducted
met

1 - 39% and below accomplishments with set

agreements met

5 - 100% identified LARDOs (learner's at risk of

Parents of Conducts home visitation 3%
dropping out) visited
4 - 80-99%identified LARDOs (learner's at risk of
learners
dropping out) visited
3 - 60-79% identified LARDOs (learner's at risk
needing
of dropping out) visited
2 - 40-59% identified LARDOs (learner's at risk
academic
of dropping out) visited
1 - 39% identified LARDOs (learner's at risk of
follow-up
dropping out) visited
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY
visited

Professional
5- 1 action research submitted and approved to the
Growth and 8%
Division Office
development

action research
Prepares Action Research 2% 4- 1 action reseach submitted at the District Office
conducted

3- 1 action research prepared and noted by the

principal/school head/department head

2- 1 action research partially prepared and noted

by the principal/school head/department head

1- identified problem for research

5-Conducted 1 action research with reported

Conducts Action Research 2%
results
4-Conducted 1 action research with results but not
reported

3-Conducted 1 action research with partial results

2-Conducted 1 action research without results

 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY

1-1 action research partially conducted

Initiates/Participates in co- 5- 100% co - curricular/school activities were

Co-curricular 2%
curricular/school initiated /participated
4- 80% - 99% co - curricular/school activities were
school association, etc.
initiated /participated
3 - 60% - 79% co - curricular/school activities
association
were initiated/participated
2 - 40% - 59% co - curricular/school activities
participated
were initiated/participated

1 - 39% and below co - curricular/school activities

were initiated/participated

5-Observed proper decorum(wearing of

proper decorum Observes proper decorum
2% uniform,punctuality,attendance,courtesy,human
observed at all times
relation)
4-4 out of 5 observed
3-3 out of 5 observed
2-2 out of 5 observed
1-1 out of 5 observed

Division/ district/ Special

school training Assignments/Ta 5%
facilitated sks
5- facilitated 5 trainings in the dist./ 2 in the div. / 1
region
Facilitates training in
2%
school/district/division 4-facilitated 4 trainings / 1 div.
3-facilitated 3 trainings
2-facilitated 2 trainings
1-facilitated 1 training
Division/ district/ Acts as chair of a
school committee in the 5- acted as chair/member of 5 working committee
committee chair
Division/ district/ WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MFO
school KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA OBJ QUALITY EFFICIENCY
committee chair
acted /division/district/school 1.0%
4- acted as chair/member of 4 working committee

3- acted as chair/member of 3 working committee

2- acted as chair/member of 2 working committee

1- acted as chair/member of 1 working committee

school special
programs/ Serves as coordinator in
2%
projects served subjects/
5- served as coordinator of 3 programs/projects
special programs/ projects
in the school 4- served as coordinator of 2 programs/projects
3- served as coordinator of 1 program/project

2- served as member of atleast 2 programs/projects

1- served as member of 1 program/project

100%
SHARIFFA NUR-RAIZZAH JEANIBVIVE
H. MOHAMMAD ARIEL M. ERALDO
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
FORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT

RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

5- 100% lesson plan/dll prepared a day before

4 5 4 4.3333333 0.4333333

4- 100% lesson plan/dll prepared during the

day

3- 100% lesson plan/dll prepared 1 day late

2 - 100% lesson plan/dll prepared 2 days late

1 - 100% lesson plan/dll prepared 3 or more

days late
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

5-100% of the lessons delivered on time 4 5 4 4.3333333 0.8666667

4- lessons delivered exceeded 5 minutes

3- lessons delivered exceeded 7 minutes

2- lessons delivered exceeded 9 minutes

1- lessons delivered exceeded 11 minutes and

above
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

5 5 5 0.5

4 4 5 4.3333333 0.4333333

5- Report Submitted one day before the due

date
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

4- Report Submitted on due date

3- Report Submitted one day after due date

2- Report Submitted 2 days after due date

1- Report Submitted 3 days or more after due

date

3.025

5-Report Submitted one day before the due date 5 4 4.5 0.18

4-Report Submitted on due date

3-Report Submitted one day after due date

2-Report Submitted 2 days after due date

1-Report Submitted 3 days or more after due
date

5-Assessment tools prepared 5 days before the 3 3 3 0.12

test
4-Assessment tools prepared 4 days before the
test
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

3-Assessment tools prepared 3 days before the

test

2 Assessment tools prepared 2 days before the

test
1 Assessment tools prepared 1 day before the
test

5 - remediation conducted ahead of scheduled 4 4 4 0.28

time

4 - remediation conducted on scheduled time

3- remediation conducted 1 day after the

scheduled time
2 - remediation conducted 1 week after
scheduled time

1 - remediation conducted 2 weeks ahead of

scheduled time

3 3 0.45
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

5- conducted HRPTA conferences/meeting on 5 4 4 6.5 0.26

scheduled date every quarter

4- conducted HPTA conferences/meeting 1-2

days late on scheduled date every quarter

3- conducted HPTA conferences/meeting 3-4

days late on scheduled date every quarter

2- conducted HPTA conferences/meeting 5-6

days on scheduled date every quarter
1- conducted HPTA conferences/meeting 1
weeks and more days late on scheduled date
evry quarter

5 - conducted visitation on scheduled date 5 4 4.5 0.135

4- conducted visitation 1-2 day late on

scheduled date
3- conducted visitation 3-4 days late on
scheduled date
2- conducted visitation 5-6 days late on
scheduled date
1- conducted visitation 1 week or more days
late on scheduled date
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

5- Action Research submitted/Approved and

recommended by the Division Action Research 3 5 4 0.08
Team 2 weeks before implementation

4 -Action Research submitted/Approved and

recommended by the Division Action Research
Team 1 week before implementation

3 -Action Research submitted/Approved and

recommended by the Division Action Research
Team 4-5 days before implementation

2- Action Research submitted/Approved and

recommended by the Division Action Research
Team 2-3 days before implementation

1 - Action Research submitted/Approved and

recommended by the Division Action Research
Team 1 day before implementation

5-Action Research conducted based on the 3 5 4 0.08

timeline
4-Action Research conducted 1-2 days after the
timeline
3-Action Research conducted 3-4 days after the
timeline
2-Action Research conducted 5-6 days after the
timeline
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average
1-Action Research conducted 1 week or more
after the timeline

5 - Participated/Initiated co-curricular activities 5 5 5 0.1

based on timeline
4 - Participated/Initiated co-curricular activities
1-2 days behind the timeline
3 - Participated/Initiated co-curricular activities
3-4 days behind the timeline
2- Participated/Initiated co-curricular activities
5-6 days behind the timeline

1 - Participated/Initiated co-curricular activities

1 week or more behind the timeline

5 5 0.1

2 2 0.1

3 3 0.03
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULT
RATING SCORE
TIMELINESS Q E T Average

4 4 0.08

4.2283333333
Overall Rating
VS-VERY SATISFACTORY
Descriptive Rating