Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Project Proposal
November 2017
Relevance of the project
Tourism is an important source of income for many destinations around the world. However, increasingly a
negative attitude can be observed towards incoming visitors. Media reports on issues with overcrowding, noise
and other nuisances caused by tourists have become more frequent. This does not only take place in larger cities
like Amsterdam, Barcelona or Berlin, or in smaller cities such as Salzburg, Gent or Tallinn, but increasingly island
destinations are confronted with the negative aspects as a consequence of tourism. Especially due to the small
size of islands, the presence of visitors is much more noticeable particularly during peak season or in the case of
events.
Increased visitor pressure (or, overtourism) can become a huge problem, as it can result in a decrease of
hospitality towards visitors, which may make the islands less attractive and limit visitor numbers. Also it may
affect the satisfaction of inhabitants as they see visitor pressure negatively impact their quality of life. This
endangers the wider positive effects of tourism, which largely go unnoticed. For example, without tourism it
might be impossible to maintain the current level of facilities on islands that the local population expects.
Furthermore, the loss of clientele would lead to less employment opportunities and a loss of economic benefits
which are crucial for further development of the islands as a whole.
To deal with the pressures of tourist visitations and resident complaints, it is necessary to develop tourism on
inlands in a sustainable way. Finding new and better ways of managing the increasing pressure due to tourism
developments is an important step. As Taleb Rifai, Secretary General of the World Tourism Organization
(UNWTO) phrased it: growth is not the enemy; its how we manage it that counts.
If visitor flows are more adequately managed, visitor pressure can be relieved in the most visited areas and
islands will be able to provide visitors with a better hospitality experience. More importantly, it can also prevent
the opening up of those areas that are less visited. Currently increased tourist visitation may not be such an issue
here, but eventually visitor pressure can possibly lead to development and gentrification in these areas as well.
More insights are urgently needed on visitors in island destinations and how to handle this phenomenon.
Research on this matters is therefore highly valuable, especially when insights from different island destinations
facing similar problems can be compared.
The Centre of Expertise Leisure, Tourism and Hospitality (CELTH) has experience with undertaking this kind of
research programmes. In collaboration with its founding partners Stenden University and NHTV Breda, CELTH
initiated research on visitor pressure in six major European cities (Amsterdam, Barcelona, Berlin, Copenhagen,
Lisbon, Munich) in 2016 and subsequently seven small cities (Salzburg, Tallinn, Gent, Mechelen, Leuven, Brugge,
Antwerp) were researched in 2017. As a result, solutions were found which allow for a sustainable and non-
disruptive development of urban tourism. Expanding this research to island destinations is a logical next step.
Deliverables
The project aims to provide practical and implementable solutions. The deliverables include:
1. A printed report (5 copies), a pdf, and a presentation in PowerPoint for sharing the results on your island.
The report will contain a general section including:
o Introduction on visitor pressure
o Investigation of existing visitor pressure, events and management strategies based on interviews
with municipalities, tourism boards and destination management organisations
o Analysis of residents perspective.
o Scenarios regarding the direction of handling visitor pressure in islands
2. A section specific for each individual participating island, with results regarding residents perspective on
visitor pressure, events and management strategies as well as management strategies. This section is
exclusive to each participating islands and will not be shared with other islands.
Due to the international nature of this study, all correspondence and reports will be performed in English. While
the results are particularly targeted at participating islands, the core of the findings in this study and the previous
one (of course everything anonymised) is important for education. The results of the findings will help young
professionals and students to be more prepared to the needs of the market. Therefore we intend to publish a
handbook on visitor management later, and possibly an academic publication. Both will be provided free of
charge available to participants after publication.
Planning
Month of contracting is 0, all dates are relative to month off contracting.
Phase Moment of Fieldwork and in Analysis and initial Elaboration of
contracting depth research findings report results resulting in
first draft
Planning T T+ 3 months T+5 months T+6 months
Budget
CELTH and its partners institutions are contributing for 30% of the total project budget (combination of in-kind
by the partner institutions and in cash by CELTH) for developing new knowledge. Participation in this multi-client
project is based on 10-20 participants. Based on our calculations and the CELTH contribution, the experience in
the previous study and the feedback from the participants in the previous study, we calculate the participation
fee at 8.500 (excluding VAT). Without the contribution of CELTH the costs would be much higher.
In the execution of the study, some help is required of the participating island, like finding the right persons for
interviews, and the cost of overnight stay of 1 to 2 researchers (4 days maximum), and support for quantitative
inhabitants part (translation of the questionnaire and e-mail address providing). If islands are unable to provide
overnight stays for 1 to 2 researchers, these costs will have to be charged back.
Half of the participation fee for this multi-partner study is invoiced 4 week after your approval, and has to be
paid within 30 calendar days. The other half is paid with the delivery of the draft report, again to be paid within
30 calendar days.