Case 1:17-cv-24103-MGC Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2017 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT 3
 AT T O R N E Y S AT L AW
Case 1:17-cv-24103-MGC Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2017 Page 2 of 4
O N E B IS C A YN E T OW E R S U IT E 1500 TW O S O UT H B IS C A YN E B LV D . MIA MI , FL O R ID A 3313 1 -1822

www.sedgwicklaw.com 305. 670 . 4777 phone 877-540-6 951 fax

Ramn A. Abadin
305.671.2124
ramon.abadin@sedgwicklaw.com

September 28, 2017

Via Email

Lori Holcomb, Division Director

Ethics and Consumer Protection
The Florida Bar
651 East Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300
E-mail: lholcomb@floridabar.org

Re: Unlicensed Practice of Law Investigation of Christopher Riley/TIKD.com

The Florida Bar Case No. 20174035(11B) & 20144045(11B)

Dear Ms. Holcomb:

Along with Gregory Coleman from the law firm of Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP, we represent
Christopher Riley and Tikd Services LLC (Tikd) in connection with the above-referenced UPL
complaints. Please direct all future communications regarding this matter solely to the attention of Mr.
Coleman and me.

Thank you very much for reaching out to me on Tuesday, September 26, 2017, along with Elizabeth
Tarbert and Will Spillias, to discuss the problems Mr. Riley and Tikd are facing due to The Florida
Bars (the Bar) ongoing investigation of complaints lodged by The Ticket Clinic and its lawyers.

As I explained, lawyers who are associated with The Ticket Clinic, and others who see Tikd as
unwelcome competition, are threatening ethics complaints against any lawyer who provides legal
services to Tikds customers. Worse, these lawyers are claiming that the Bar has issued opinions or
letters concluding that Tikd is engaged in the unlicensed practice of law and illegal fee-splitting, and
that any lawyer performing services for Tikds customers is committing ethical breaches. As discussed
above, you confirmed the Bar has not issued any such opinions or made any such findings. Rather, a
UPL complaint brought by attorney Ted Hollander from The Ticket Clinic is being investigated by the
Bars UPL committee system, and has been forwarded from a local circuit committee to the UPL
Standing Committee for consideration in October. We all agree that only The Florida Supreme Court
has the authority to decide if Tikds business model is the practice of law.

Unfortunately, the combination of The Ticket Clinics highly-publicized complaints, the Bars
investigation, and public and inaccurate claims from lawyers at The Ticket Clinic that the Bar has
prejudged Tikds case is causing Mr. Riley and Tikd immediate harm. Lawyers are declining to
represent Tikds customers out of fear of Bar grievance actions from Mr. Hollander. Tikd faces the real
Lori
CaseHolcomb, Esq.
1:17-cv-24103-MGC Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2017 Page 3 of 4
Re: Unlicensed Practice of Law Investigation of Christopher Riley/TIKD.com
September 28, 2017
Page 2

possibility of being driven out of business before The Florida Supreme Court can decide whether The
Ticket Clinics complaints have merit.

Thank you for discussing possible solutions to minimize the threat posed to Tikd while the Bar
investigates The Ticket Clinics complaints. Given the misinformation that is being spread and
misattributed to the Bar, we would ask that the Bar make a public, written statement along the following
lines to clarify and preserve the status quo pending a resolution of the Bars consideration of these
complaints, or a ruling by The Florida Supreme Court:

Neither The Florida Bar nor the Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law has
reached the conclusion or made the finding that Tikd is engaged in the unlicensed practice of law
or illegal fee-splitting.
The Standing Committee will consider Mr. Hollander and The Ticket Clinics allegations against
Tikd at its meeting on October 13, 2017.
The Bars UPL Standing Committee is not a court and does not make findings or conclusions
regarding whether a party is engaged in the unlicensed practice of law.
After its meeting, the Standing Committee will make a decision to either close the investigation
or recommend further proceedings.
Only The Florida Supreme Court can decide whether Tikd is engaged in the unlicensed practice
of law.
The Bar will not proceed with grievances against attorneys representing Tikds customers until
the Bar concludes its investigation on Tikd or, alternatively, The Florida Supreme Court rules on
whether Tikd is engaged in the unlicensed practice of law or illegal fee-sharing.

None of these statements should be controversial for the Bar to make; in fact, they would help clarify
that the Bar is not engaged in actions that could expose it to liability under North Carolina State Bd. of
Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, 135 S. Ct. 1101 (2015). I am happy to work with you
as to specific wording, but this public message is essential to mitigating the anticompetitive harm that is
being caused by the misuse and inaccurate descriptions of the Bars current investigation into Tikd.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Ramn A. Abadin

Ramn A. Abadin
Sedgwick LLP

Gregory W. Coleman
Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP
303 Banyan Boulevard
Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
GColeman@lawclc.com
Lori
CaseHolcomb, Esq.
1:17-cv-24103-MGC Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2017 Page 4 of 4
Re: Unlicensed Practice of Law Investigation of Christopher Riley/TIKD.com
September 28, 2017
Page 3

RAA/imc
cc: John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar
Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director Designee, The Florida Bar
Jacquelyn P. Needelman, Branch UPL Counsel, The Florida Bar