THEORY? YOUR CASE THEORY CONTROLS Your discovery & trial preparation Jury selection Whats said in your opening statement What is asked on direct and cross examination Whats said in your closing argument What will be in your proposed jury charge WHY HAVE A CASE THEORY? EVERYTHNG WE DO AT TRIAL WILL BE CONTROLED BY YOUR CASE THEORY WHAT IS A CASE THEORY? A CASE THEORY CONSISTS OF--
LEGAL THEORY FACTUAL THEORY PERSUASIVE THEORY
EQUALS CASE THEORY
LEGAL THEORY THE LAW THAT ENTITLES YOU TO WIN JURY INSTRUCTIONS STATUTUES CASE LAW FACTUAL THEORY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE WAYS OF GETTING A HANDLE ON THE FACTS CHRONOLOGY PROOF CHART FACTS NOT CONCLUSIONS INFERENCES THAT CAN BE DRAWN FROM THE FACTS FACTUAL THEORY IF TRUE, WHAT ELSE MUST BE TRUE HARD FACTS VERSUS SOFT FACTS THE MOVIE SCRIPTWHAT WOULD/SHOULD HAPPEN IN THIS SITUATION MOTIVESWHY DID A PERSON ACT IN THE WAY CLAIMED COMMON SENSEDOES THE STORY COMPORT WITH COMMON SENSE PERSUASIVE THEORY WHY SHOULD YOU WIN AS A MATTER OF FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE WANT TO IDENTIFY THE HERO AND VILLIAN IN THE CASE SEE PERDUE EXCERPT POSTED ON WEBSITE THE GRANDMOTHER TEST SUMMARIZE YOUR CASE IN ONE PARAGRAPH Using simple, powerful language Incorporating your best facts Explicitly or implicitly refuting your worst facts This is a case about . . . . THE GRANDMOTHER TEST YOUR GRANDMOTHER, AFTER HEARING THE PARAGRAPH, WILL SAY YOU SHOULD WIN TEN COMMANDMENTS OF A GOOD CASE THEORY 1. SHORT 2. SIMPLE 3. SATISFIES LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 4. CONSISTENT WITH FACTS 5. ENOTIONALLY APPEALING PLACES MORAL BLAME AND APPEALS TO COMMON VALUES TEN COMMANDMENTS 6. EXPLAIN MOTIVES 7. TELLS A STORY 8. USE IMPACT WORDS AND PHRASES 9. LIMITED TO ONE THEORY 10. YOU MUST BELIEVE IT THEME THE ONE SENTENCE DISTILLATION MAKE SURE IT CANNOT BE FLIPPED HOW TO DO IT MANY METHODS. THIS IS JUST ONE MODEL WILL BE DOING NEXT WEEK W/ STATE V. ONEIL RESEARCH THE LAW (Done for us here) SELECT YOUR BEST __ GOOD FACTS AND YOUR WORST __ BAD FACTS HOW TO DO IT BRAINSTORM ABOUT GOOD FACTS AND BAD FACTS FACTS--NOT CONCLUSIONS DONT ARGUE AT THIS POINTCUTS OFF CREATIVITY IDENTIFY OUR (ARBITRARY #) BEST & WORST FACTS NOW WE CAN ARGUE ABOUT THE FACTS Is it admissible Is it understandable HOW TO DO IT Is it believable Is it a hard or soft fact Do we need to draw any inferences Are the inferences reasonable If this fact is true what other facts must be true (are they?) Is it consistent with common sense Does it square with the motives we would expect Will it be countered by other evidence In short, why should the judge or jury believe the best facts & disbelieve the worst facts HOW TO DO IT APPLY THE GRANDMOTHER DEVELOP A THEMEA ONE SENTENCE DISTILLATION OF YOUR CASE THEORY MAKE SURE YOUR THEME CANNOT BE FLIPPED
United States v. James Edward Smith, A/K/A Smitty, A/K/A Dumptruck Smitty, United States of America v. Richard Leander Smith, A/K/A Peter, 966 F.2d 1446, 4th Cir. (1992)