Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Background
An Eigenvalue Buckling analysis predicts the theoretical buckling strength of an ideal
elastic structure. This method corresponds to the textbook approach to an elastic
buckling analysis: for instance, an eigenvalue buckling analysis of a column matches the
classical Euler solution. However, imperfections and nonlinearities prevent most real-
world structures from achieving their theoretical elastic buckling strength. Therefore, an
Eigenvalue Buckling analysis often yields quick but non-conservative results.
Note: The content of this Help page is based on the use of the ANSYS Mechanical
APDL Solver.
Points to Remember
An Eigenvalue Buckling analysis must be linked to (proceeded by) a Static
Structural Analysis. This static analysis can be either linear or nonlinear and
the linear perturbation procedure refers to it as the "base analysis" (as either
linear or nonlinear).
The nonlinearities present in the static analysis can be the result of
nonlinear:
o Geometry (the Large Deformation property is set to Yes)
o Contact status (a contact definition other than Bonded and No
Separation type with MPC formulation)
o Material (e.g., definition of nonlinear material properties
in Engineering Data, such as hyperelasticity, plasticity, etc.)
o Connection (e.g., nonlinear joints and nonlinear springs)
A structure can have an infinite number of buckling load factors. Each load
factor is associated with a different instability pattern. Typically the lowest
load factor is of interest.
Based upon how you apply loads to a structure, load factors can either be
positive or negative. The application sorts load factors from the most
negative values to the most positive values. The minimum buckling load
factor may correspond to the smallest eigenvalue in absolute value.
For Pressure boundary conditions in the Static Structural analysis: if you
define the load with the Normal To option for faces (3D) or edges (2-D),
you could experience an additional stiffness contribution called the "pressure
load stiffness" effect. The Normal To option causes the pressure acts as a
follower load, which means that it continues to act in a direction normal to
the scoped entity even as the structure deforms. Pressure loads defined
with the Components or Vector options act in a constant direction even as
the structure deforms. For a same magnitude, the "normal to" pressure and
the component/vector pressure can result in a significantly different buckling
load factors in the follow-on Eigenvalue Buckling analysis.
Buckling mode shapes do not represent actual displacements but help you to
visualize how a part or an assembly deforms when buckling.
The procedure that the MAPDL solver uses to evaluate buckling load factors
is dependent upon whether the pre-stressed Eigenvalue Buckling analysis is
linear-based (linear prestress analysis) or nonlinear-based (nonlinear
prestress analysis). The subsequent Help topics examine each case.
Note the following when you have created an Eigenvalue Buckling analysis when
the base analysis is linear:
One strategy that you can use to achieve this end is to iterate on the
Eigenvalue buckling solution, adjusting the variable loads until the
load factor becomes 1.0 (or nearly 1.0, within some convergence
tolerance).
If you receive all negative buckling load factor values for your
Eigenvalue Buckling analysis and you wish to see them in the positive
values, or vice versa, reverse the direction of all of the loads you
applied in Static Structural analysis.
You can apply a nonzero constraint in the static analysis. The load
factors calculated in the buckling analysis should also be applied to
these nonzero constraint values. However, the buckling mode shape
associated with this load will show the constraint to have zero value.
where:
Note: You can verify the ultimate buckling load of the above
equation using the buckling of a one dimensional column.
However, calculating the ultimate buckling load for 2D and 3D
problems with different combinations of loads applied in the
Static Structural and Eigenvalue Buckling analyses may not be
as straightforward as the 1D column example. This is because
the FRESTART and FPERTRUB values are essentially the effective
loading values in the static and buckling analyses, respectively.
Consider, for example, a cantilever beam that has a theoretical
ultimate buckling strength of 1000N and which is subjected to a
compressive force (A) of 250N. The procedure to calculate the
ultimate buckling load (F), based on the load factors evaluated by
Mechanical for Linear-Based and Nonlinear-Based Eigenvalue Buckling
analyses is illustrated in the following schematic.
Because this analysis is based on the Static Structural solution, a Static Structural
analysis is a prerequisite. This linked setup allows the two analysis systems to share
resources such as engineering data, geometry, and boundary condition type definitions
made in Static Structural analysis.
From the Toolbox, drag a Static Structural template to the Project Schematic.
Then, drag a Eigenvalue Buckling template directly onto the Solution cell of
the Static Structural template.
Attach Geometry
Define Connections
Springs with linear stiffness definition are taken into account if they are
present in the static analysis.
Only Bushing and General joints enable you to solve an analysis with
nonlinear Joint Stiffness. Mechanical considers all other joint types to be
linear. The application accounts for linear joints if they are present in the
static analysis.
Options
Note: Output Controls are only exposed for the ANSYS solver.
Analysis Data Management
You must point to a static structural analysis of the same model in the initial condition
environment.
Loads are supported by Eigenvalue Buckling analysis only when the pre-stressed
environment has nonlinearities defined.
The following loads are allowed for a nonlinear-based Eigenvalue Buckling analysis:
Note:
Choosing to keep the default setting (Yes) for the Keep Pre-
Stress Load-Pattern property retains the pre-stress loading
pattern for the buckling analysis and no additional load
definition is necessary.
For Nodal Pressure, the only definition option is Normal To.
This results in the "pressure load stiffness" effect. To avoid the
pressure stiffness effect, apply an equivalent Nodal
Force load to the same surface and set the Divide Load by
Nodes property to Yes. The equivalent force is equal to the
value of the pressure multiplied by the area of the scoped
surface.
The node-based Named Selections used with the above Direct
FE Loads cannot contain nodes scoped to a rigid body.
Solve
Solution Information continuously updates any listing output from the solver and
provides valuable information on the behavior of the structure during the analysis.
Review Results
You can view the buckling mode shape associated with a particular load factor by
displaying a contour plot or by animating the deformed mode shape. The contours
represent relative displacement of the part.
Buckling mode shape displays are helpful in understanding how a part or an assembly
deforms when buckling, but do not represent actual displacements.
Stresses from an Eigenvalue Buckling analysis do not represent actual stresses in the
structure, but they give you an idea of the relative stress distributions for each mode.
You can make Stress and Strain results available in the buckling analysis by setting
the proper Output Controls before the solution is processed.