Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
1 We are very grateful to our collaborators in this investigation (Nadine Anyan, Katie Bekking,
Jeryl-Anne Churchill, Rebecca Fernandes, Amie Haines, Hayoon Kim, Valerie Kipfer, Vanessa Lau,
Cynthia Lussier, Melyssa Owens, Matthew Pich, Kayla Schnarr, Katie Spurgiasz, Richard Swan,
and Mary Wilson) for their creative spirits and insights.
2
Cultural assumptions about the nature and value of creativity are naturally
embedded within educational systems. Therefore, it is useful to provide a brief
background of the Canadian context.
A large country extending across upper North America, Canada is a nation of
immigrants. By law, ethnic groups are encouraged to maintain their individuality
within a multicultural mosaic overlaid on a grid of indigenous peoples and settlers
with European historical connections. The country is officially tri-lingual,
increasingly secular in values and outward looking. Canada ranks eighth in the UN
Human Development Index [HDI], that composite statistic of education, per capita
income and life expectancy indicators used to rank countries.2
The Canadian educational system -- including music education -- is
decentralized at the national level. There is universal access to education. Each
province or territory determines curricular guidelines, teacher education, and
other particulars of schooling, often with reference to other provinces.
Canadian music educators value creativity;3 however valuing is often
different than teaching.
Canadian Composer R. Murray Schafer wrote:
You cant tell people how to become creative, but you can reveal the
excitement of creative activity and hope that it may encourage them to try
something on their own. Allowing children to become creative does not
require genius: it requires humility. (Beynon and Veblen, 2012, p. vii)
Literature Review
While the demarcations and particulars of creativity are contested topics in
music education, the large body of work devoted to creativity in North America
and the UK over the past fifty years4 has been augmented by international
2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index
3 Music educators Elliott, Bowman, Younker, Willingham, Beynon, Beatty, Griffith, Bolden,
Veblen, and Russell among others are currently active in this area.
4
A comprehensive survey is beyond the scope of this literature review.
3
5Brazil (Beineke, 2013), Cyprus (Diakidoy and Kanari, 1999; Stavrou, 2012), Finland (Muhonen,
2014), Africa (Mans, 2012), Norway (Saetre, 2011), Slovenia (Rozman, 2009), Argentina and
Spain (Ruzinek, 2007; Bujez and Mohedo, 2013), Greece (Zbainos and Anastasopoulou, 2012),
Sweden-Iran-Gambia (Saether, Mbye and Sayesteh, 2012), Hong Kong-Australia-Singapore-US-
UK (Leong et al, 2012).
4
secondary school teachers which noted the importance for practitioners of having
grounded knowledge of different musical genres and composing to engage with
their students efforts.
The nature and extent of improvisation in the classroom has been studied in
very different settings. Gruenhagen and Whitcomb (2014) surveyed US
elementary music teachers and found that they were most likely to incorporate 1)
spontaneous rhythmic patterns, 2) melodic improvisation on pitched percussion
instruments, and 3) call-and-response singing. The authors noted that: These
teachers stated they were most interested in the quality of the improvisational
process rather than with the product and indicated that sequencing was crucial in
the instruction of improvisation. In an investigation of the collaborative practices
of three Norwegian music teachers with their primary level students, Saetres
(2011) found that each teacher had a unique approach to compositional
engagements. Regardless of the elements incorporated into a teachers
pedagogy, the teacher may be the vehicle by which the instruction is transmitted.
6This corresponds with Zbainos and Anastasopoulou (2008)s survey of Greek music teachers
who believed that creativity is an innate gift and can only be partly taught in a formal setting.
5
7In accordance with UWO Ethics Review, interviews were conducted after the class ended and
grades were submitted. Class members elected to use their names and complete questions via
email.
6
8The class text was Campbell, P.S. and Scott-Kassner, C., 2010. Music in childhood: from
preschool through the elementary grade. Boston: Schirmer Centgage Learning and interview
questions were adapted from Chapter 10, The Creating Child, pp. 248-269.
9The portfolios include circles exercises which prompt students to review music in their lives.
See Barrett, McCoy, & Veblen (1997) pp 1-7. A complete analysis of portfolios is beyond the
scope of this chapter.
10The teacher-as-facilitator model is an ideal. Striving for this ideal does not negate the unequal
and weighted roles of professor and student, nor does it counteract very real pressures for
grades or responsibilities of all involved in an academic institution.
7
During this year-long study, each student chose and presented on two
topics, taught several songs, reported on four structured observations of music
classrooms, read systematically, and attended outside events. The class hosted
five guest lecturers who shared songs and games and discussed music therapy,
motivation in the classroom, and composition. Students were challenged with
both structured and unstructured creativity projects. For example, in one
exercise, the class broke into groups of four, each with a different task:
Group 1: Choose percussion instruments and a 7/8 metre. Over this
generate a repetitive melody with or without words, try
harmony, improvised parts.
Group 2: Using three Orff instruments and recorders, choose a
familiar song to arrange. Incorporate an improvised section.
8
Interview Findings
1) What role does composing, improvising, and/or arranging music play in your
life?
These pre-service teachers described themselves at three levels of expertise: a)
novice, b) learning, or c) adept. Mary considers herself a novice: I personally find
myself a very creative person (mainly through visual art and crafts) but when it
comes to improvising, I find myself lacking. Katie S. states she has previously
found little occasion to compose or improvise: I have never felt that I have much
9
talent in this area and have not had time to develop the skills. However, in my
future career as a teacher, I will likely spend time arranging music and will find
that it is a rewarding experience.
The next level of capability is typified by Katie B. who recalls childhood
experimentation but says: Now that I am older, I rarely try to compose or arrange
music unless I have to for an assignment. I dont feel as though composing is my
strongest skill; therefore, it seldom plays a role in my life anymore."
Eight of the respondents describe themselves as adept. Amie perceives
creativity as freedom, as self-exploration and development of her inner ear. She
has composed since childhood, choosing notes first and then gradually adding
rhythmic changes and building up chords. At the university, Amie studies clarinet
to a professional level, always playing from notation. However, in her leisure
time, Amie improvises from memory on guitar and ukulele.
Melyssa also elaborates on her creative musical engagement:
Matt also notes the outside nature of composition and improvisation, even
though these activities hold a significant place in his life:
provided at home . . . and thankfully for me, I had a creative musical father
who could encourage and direct that creativity.11
Although most collaborators came to creative work informally, for some, the
groundwork was laid through formal schooling. Katie B. says:
11 Matt also stated: I was never taught to be creative in a school music setting until high school
jazz class.
12
3) How comfortable do you feel with your ability to guide children to improvise,
compose, and/ or arrange music? Do you feel more confident now that youve had
these experiences?
A few students voiced discomfort with their abilities to guide children in
improvisation or composition. "The question I ask myself is: how can bring out
musical creativity in my students, when I have a hard time bringing it out in
myself? ponders Mary.
Melyssa volunteered that this course provided the first and only
opportunities she has had to create. Matt agreed: It is not every day that
university students are given this flexibility with a project, and I think the varying
interpretations displayed the uniqueness of us as individuals, and our ability to
truly be creative. Cynthia adds:" [O]ne half-credit course on Improvisation in the
Classroom, being the only experience Ive had with improvising, I am not
comfortable with composing or improvising on either of my main instruments . . . I
do recognize the challenge in elementary music classes, where music class is only
provided once a week or, if lucky for some, twice a week, providing teachers
limited time and pressure to teach certain topic areas over others. But, time
should be made for creative opportunities.
Those who are the most comfortable with generating musical ideas also felt
ready to take on the teaching role. Half of the class noted that they felt
unprepared, generally, but that they were certain they could guide their students
creativity.
13
4) How able are children to compose on their own with minimal guidance from
their teacher? How motivated do you think children are to do this?
There was general consensus that children could compose spontaneously but that
impulse and motivation varied. Matt opined: [C]hildren are often natural
composers and can be found making up songs or humming their own tunes
outside of a regimented class. Unlike any talent or subject in school, motivation to
grow that ability varies from child to child." Jeryl-Anne believes that children are
very able to compose on their own without guidance but that: [T]hey need to
take the whole exercise seriously.
About half of the students advocated structuring creative opportunities.
Several noted that while children have an innate creative capacity, sequenced and
comprehensive instruction with ample time for experimentation effect the
optimal setting for success. Katie S. remembers working with children at summer
camp where she had not had prior experience but quickly realized the need to
structure improvisation:
I was given a group of eight mini campers (ages four and five) and a box of
percussion instruments (bells, triangle, small drums). As a music major, I was
assumed to be well able to direct their activity for the next twenty minutes.
When I let them just pick instruments and bang them around for a bit, most
of them got bored fairly quickly. I decided to sing some easy songs that they
knew and could sing along to if they chose, like Jingle Bells, and asked
them to play the percussion instruments along with the song. This kept their
attention because it gave them some guidelines with which to focus their
improvisation . . . it is easier for the children to come up with ideas if there is
some broad outline, like a theme, or certain required elements, from which
to start the process.
Not all class members agreed with the need to structure creativity. Katie B.,
recommended fewer guidelines:
regardless of their levels of music education, most reported few opportunities for
innovative musicing in formal school settings. Although individuals could make
musical decisions freely in the context of their own private music making, when
creativity was included in an academic context with an emphasis on future
teaching, they saw their choices as being limited. The constant tension between
freedom and structure, imposed both internally and externally is logical given the
constraints of their musical schooling and the demands of the academic
institution.
During the course of the study, a number of themes and motifs surfaced. The
class considered aspects of creativity as 1) natural and innate characteristics
needing minimal guidance, and 2) creativity as process or processes. Creativity
was linked with self-expression and childhood activities. Some class members
noted a sense of loss for the lack of experiences in their earlier years, having
missed something important in their development as musicians. Others regarded
creative music-making as a pleasurable pastime and a choice for self-expression
but not one that should overrule or interfere with the serious work of a music
major in a competitive academic setting. At the same time, creativity was ever-
present: there were many brief and incandescent moments in this short, year-
long class.
References
Barrett, J.R., McCoy, C.W. and Veblen, K.K. 1997. Sound ways of knowing: Music in
the interdisciplinary curriculum. New York: Schirmer.
Barrett, M. S., 2006. Inventing songs, inventing worlds: the genesis of creative
thought and activity in young childrens lives. International Journal of Early
Years Education, 14(3), pp. 201-220.
Beegle, A. C., 2010. A classroom-based study of small-group planned
improvisation with fifth-grade children. Journal of Research in Music
Education, 58(3), pp. 219-239.
Beineke, V., 2013. Creative learning and communities of practice: perspectives for
music education in the school. International Journal of Community Music,
6(3), pp. 281290.
Bernhard, H. C., 2013. Music education majors confidence in teaching
improvisation. Journal Of Music Teacher Education, 22(2), pp. 65-72.
Beynon, C.A. and Veblen, K. K. Eds. 2012. Critical perspectives in Canadian music
education. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Bujez, A. V. and Mohedo, M. D., 2014. Creativity in the music classroom. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, pp. 237 241.
Burnard and Dragovic, T, 2014. Characterising communal creativity in
instrumental group learning. Departures in Critical qualitative Research, 3(3),
336-362.
Burnard, P. & Fautley, M. 2014. Assessing diverse creativities in music: A spectrum
of challenges, possibilities and practices. In M. Fleming (Eds.). The Routledge
International Handbook of Arts in Education. London: Routledge.
Burnard, P., 2007. Routes to understanding musical creativity. In: L. Bresler, (ed).
2007. International handbook of research in arts education. Chapter 82. pp.
11991214.
Burnard, P., 2012a. Musical creativities in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burnard, P. 2012b. Commentary: musical creativity as practice. In: G. E.
McPherson and G. F. Welch, (eds) 2012. The Oxford handbook of music
education. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Vol.2, Ch.4.1, pp. 319-336.
Burnard, P. and Younker, B. A., 2008. Investigating children's musical interactions
18