Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering Vol:8, No:8, 2014
and module efficiency of the system for stationary system and for II. DESIGN SYSTEM FOR TWO AXIS TRACKING SYSTEM
tracking system. The results for energy production show that the total The most commonly used system in sun tracking systems is
energy output is 114GWh/year for stationary system and
controlling the motor which moves the panel by evaluating the
148GWh/year for tracking system. The average module efficiency for
the stationary system is 16.6% and 16.2% for the tracking system. signals received from photo sensors.
The values of electricity generation capacity factor (CF) and solar This section discusses the system which employs full two-
capacity factor (SCF) for stationary system were found to be 26% axis tracking, ensuring that the PV modules always face
and 62.5% respectively and 34% and 82% for tracking system. The directly towards the suns position in the sky. An HIT type PV
GCR (Ground Cover Ratio) for a stationary system is 0.7, which module from Sanyo rated at 200W has been selected and
corresponds to a tilt angle of 24. The GCR for tracking system was
modeled. The selected module specifications are summarized
found to be 0.12. The estimated ground area needed to build a 50MW
PV plant amounts to approx. 0.55km2 for a stationary PV field in Table I.
constituted by HIT PV arrays and approx. 91MW/ km2. In case of a
TABLE I
tracker PV field, the required ground area amounts approx.2.4km2
SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PV MODULE [3]
and approx. 20.5MW/ km2.
Electrical specification
KeywordsLarge PV power plant, solar energy, environmental Model HIT Power 200
impact, Dual-axis tracking system, stationary system. Rated Power (Pmax)1 200 W
Maximum Power Voltage (Vpm) 55.8 V
I. INTRODUCTION Maximum Power Current (Ipm) 3.59 A
Open Circuit Voltage (Voc) 68.7 V
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 8(8) 2014 558 scholar.waset.org/1999.6/9998977
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering Vol:8, No:8, 2014
TABLE III
substation would feed the generated electricity to the 11kV
SPECIFICATIONS OF PROPOSED DC/AC INVERTER [5]
grid through a 1000kVA transformer and each 8kW PV Rated power (kVA) 200
channel has been equipped with a grid-connected inverter to Maximum power (kVA) 245
convert the DC power from the PV into three - phase AC Rated input DC voltage (V) 640
power for the primary of the 1000kVA transformer. The Maximum input DC voltage (V) 800
output from the 50MW station connects to the national grid Rated input DC current (A) 400
(220kV) through a 50MVA transformer. Each 1MW AC output Three-phase 415V10%
substation therefore consists of 5000 modules. The Output frequency 50Hz
specification of the proposed inverter is shown in Table III. Efficiency 10%load:90%
50%:load96%
100%load:96%
Size (mm) 2000x2100x800
Weight 1400kg
Fig. 1 Flow chart for the computer model for two-axis tracking
system [2]
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 8(8) 2014 559 scholar.waset.org/1999.6/9998977
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering Vol:8, No:8, 2014
B. Performance
The expected performance of a 50MW PV plant, located in
Al-Kufra, Southern-East Libya, is shown in the Table IV; the
tracker PV system produces approximately 30% more energy
per annum than a stationary PV system, with the same
nominal installed power. Furthermore, the cost of a PV
tracking system is greater than the cost of stationary PV
system.
TABLE IV
PV POWER PLANTS PERFORMANCE TABLE
Stationary PV Tracker PV
System system
Total slope radiation GWh/m2/year 592 767
Solar field total surface m2 290,500 290,500
Total Plant area km2 0.55 2.4
Installed PV peak power MW 50 50
Total energy output GWh/year 114 148
Fig. 2 Schematic of hexagonal field layout of 50MW PV power plant Capacity factor % 26 34
International Science Index, Energy and Power Engineering Vol:8, No:8, 2014 waset.org/Publication/9998977
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 8(8) 2014 560 scholar.waset.org/1999.6/9998977
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering Vol:8, No:8, 2014
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to thank Omar Al Mokhtar University and
the Libyan Government for their support of this work.
REFERENCES
[1] Aldali Y, Henderson D, Muneer T. A 50 MW very large-scale
photovoltaic power plant for Al-Kufra, Libya: energetic, economic and
environmental impact analysis. International Journal of Low-Carbon
Technologies. 2011 December 1, 2011; 6(4):277-93
[2] Aldali Y, F.Ahwide. Evaluation of a 50MW Two-axis Tracking
Photovoltaic Power Plant for Al-jagbob, Libya: Energetic, Economic
and Environmental Impact Analysis. International Conference on
Environmental, Energy and Waste Management, UAE, 2013.
[3] Sanyo.[cited; Available from: http://www.sunwize.com/info_center/pdf/
sanyo_HIT200W_8-08.pdf.
[4] Stromsta K-E. Masdar connects 10MW solar farm to UAE's power
grid. RECHARGE. 2009
[5] Kurokawa K, Keiichi,K,. Energy from the Desert: Earthscan in UK
and USA 2007.
[6] J.M. Gordon HJW. Central-station solar photovoltaic systems: Field
layout, tracker, and array geometry sensitivity studies. Solar Energy.
1991;46(4):211-7.
[7] L Narvarte EL. Tracking and Ground Cover Ratio. Prog Photovolt.
2008;16:703-14.
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 8(8) 2014 561 scholar.waset.org/1999.6/9998977