Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Lesson 1 Resources
Worksheet 1
Worksheet 2
Worksheet 3
Worksheet 4
Worksheet 5
Agree/Disagree Statements
Lesson Plan 2
Lesson 2 Resources
Textbook Scans
4x4 Squaresaw
3x3 Squaresaw
Lesson Plan 3
Lesson 3 Resources
Instructions
Coupons.
Justification
References
Cross Curriculum priorities & General capabilities: Explicit subject specific concepts and
- Information and communication technology skills:
capability.
- Literacy Conceptual understanding of percentages
- Numeracy through multiple problems, which gradually
- Personal and social capability expand on knowledge. Also introducing
percentages greater than 100% and
percentages including decimals, such as
2.2%.
How are the quality teaching elements you have identified achieved within the lesson?
Intro First Five activity (Gerver & Sgroi, 2011). Teacher: Walk around room, giving hints if S
5-10mins Students begin work on the questions when needed, guide discussion.
they enter the room. They must complete
one to begin the next. Students: Work through questions then share.
These are then explained as class, and Resources: Lesson 1 First Five Slide
students are called upon to share answers
and their process.
Body Percentages Brainstorm. Students asked Teacher: Guide and connecting student input. S
5mins to brainstorm about percentages - what are (mostly)
they, how do they work, etc.. Students: Sharing and whiteboard writing.
Resources: Whiteboard.
25-30mins Students work through worksheets. Teacher: Form groups, give out worksheets, S
Teacher forms groups of 3-4 members, help students.
numbering students 1-8, then grouping
same numbers. Students: Do activities.
Conclusion Consolidate as Class. Teacher asks Teacher: Choose students and ask questions. S
10-15mins students to do and explain one activity (mostly)
from each sheet for class. Students: Share with class.
Resources: Whiteboard.
(if time) Agree/Disagree Statements: Students Teacher: Ask students for answers, create S
5-10mins work through the statements individually discussion.
(Keeley & Tobey, 2011).
Students: Answer then defend answer.
Show of hands with answers and students
defend answers. Resources: Agree/Disagree Statements Sheet.
Other considerations
Complete the table below by inserting the AITSL graduate standards that you are demonstrating and indicates
the evidence from this lesson that should comply with the standard.
2.2, 3.2, 3.3 Lesson sequence - diagnostic questions, body and conclusion.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this lesson? Using your
syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be
applied in this lesson?
None.
Gerver, R., & Sgroi, R. (2011) Fortifying the First Five. Retrieved August 14, 2016, from Cengage
Learning, http://www.cengagesites.com/academic/assets/sites/FortifyingtheFirstFive2011.pdf
Keeley, P. D., & Tobey, C. R. (2011). Mathematics formative assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press.
Resources Attached:
You must list all the resources that you have created or found in this space.
Lesson 1 Resources
Lesson 1 First Five Slide
100 2
100 2
100 2
6
Answer is $6.
Exercises:
Complete the following, filling in the gaps like the example.
100
100
100
100
100
100 100
100 100
50 100
100
100
50
The answer is $10.
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Explain to your partner how you got the answers to these questions.
Check your understanding by seeing if you get the same answer using the calculator as what
youve already got for the other worksheet questions.
1. 3% of 750 is 23.
4. 12 % of 200 is 24.
Cross Curriculum priorities & General Explicit subject specific concepts and skills:
capabilities:
- Numeracy Understanding the equivalent forms of percentages,
decimals and fractions.
How are the quality teaching elements you have identified achieved within the lesson?
3
Q1: Write as a percentage.
25
What did we do to write a percentage as a
fraction?Yes, we divided by 100. So we do the
opposite now. We write
3 3 100 300
100 = = =12 .
25 25 1 25
Q2: 1.5 as percentage.
Conclusion Squaresaw: Students put the squaresaw together, Teacher: Walk around S
matching percentages, fractions and decimals which room, answer
10-15mins are equivalent. (4x4 if 15 mins, 3x3 if less) questions.
Resources:
Squaresaws.
Reflection
Other considerations
Complete the table below by inserting the AITSL graduate standards that you are demonstrating and indicates
the evidence from this lesson that should comply with the standard.
2.2, 3.2, 3.3 Lesson sequence with starter, diagnostic questions, then body
and then conclusion to assess learning.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this lesson? Using your
syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be
applied in this lesson?
None.
Ley, J., Hughes, S., & Fuller, M. (2014). Insight Mathematics: Australian Curriculum for NSW. Sydney,
Australia: Oxford University Press.
Ley, J., Hughes, S., & Fuller, M. (2014). Insight Mathematics: Australian Curriculum for NSW. Sydney,
Australia: Oxford University Press.
Cross Curriculum priorities & General capabilities: Explicit subject specific concepts and skills:
- Critical and creative thinking
- Information and communication technology Understanding of percentage increase and
capability decrease within word problems, giving a
- Literacy contextual understanding of the place of
- Numeracy percentages in everyday life.
- Personal and social capability
- Work and enterprise
How are the quality teaching elements you have identified achieved within the lesson?
Conclusion Presentations. Each group has a turn Teacher: Ask students questions Mainly S
presenting their solutions, and
10-15 mins explaining why they used certain Students: Present findings and answer
coupons where. questions.
Other considerations
Complete the table below by inserting the AITSL graduate standards that you are demonstrating and indicates
the evidence from this lesson that should comply with the standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this lesson? Using your
syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be
applied in this lesson?
None.
Victorian Department of Education. Fractions and Decimals: Online Interview Classroom Activities.
Retrieved August 23, 2016, from https://vuws.westernsydney.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid-2358658-dt-
content-rid-20590028_1/courses/102087_102088_102089_maths_2016_2h/fracdecactivities.pdf
Resources Attached:
You must list all the resources that you have created or found in this space.
Victorian Department of Education. Fractions and Decimals: Online Interview Classroom Activities.
Retrieved August 23, 2016, from https://vuws.westernsydney.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid-2358658-dt-
content-rid-20590028_1/courses/102087_102088_102089_maths_2016_2h/fracdecactivities.pdf
lesson plan. This essay examines three lesson plans and justifies the activities chosen within
them. The lesson plans are the first (L1), second (L2) and fourth (L4) lessons used in teaching
a year eight mathematics class about percentages. These lessons are structured such that L1
L2 which develops student ability to manipulate percentages and convert them to equivalent
forms which aid in calculation. The third lesson is omitted but introduces students to
investigate percentage change in shopping catalogues. Each lesson follows the same structure
of introduction, body and conclusion, with each segment fulfilling an important role.
As teachers must provide learning which is at a suitable stage for students, each lesson begins
with an introductory quiz which acts as a diagnostic assessment and warm up activity. This
quiz, called the First Five (FF), is based upon Gerver and Sgrois Quiz Policy (2011, p.3) and
Leys Five Focus Questions (2014, p.2). It is a set of five questions which the students are
expected to begin as soon as they enter the classroom. The first four questions act as a
diagnostic assessment (Gerver et.al, 2011, p.4) highlighting gaps in student understanding
which is relevant to the remainder of the lesson. For example, in L2, the FF include questions
on fraction and decimal conversion and percentage calculation, which underlie the planned
study of the conversion of percentages. These questions also give students feedback as to
their progress and allow them to identify areas of weakness. Furthermore, the fifth question in
each FF quiz is open-ended and prompts student thinking about the concepts related to the
lesson. This is achieved as in L1, students grapple with a visual representation related to
world scenario. In each case, the final question allows students to begin to consider concepts
Following the introductory section, each lesson plan contains a body of learning where
students wrestle with new ideas and hopefully achieve the learning goals. The body of L1
learning and connections between ideas (Fang, 2013, p.13). This is important as percentages
has not yet been taught in Stage 4. The remainder of the body is based around a series of
worksheets which are adapted from MCTP (n.d.). The same method of answering questions is
followed in the adapted worksheets but some guidance is removed to allow students to learn
in a more constructive way. Furthermore, the content is condensed to fit the lesson length and
important for L4. Hence, following the brainstorm, the teacher introduces the process of
calculating percentages using first principles. The teacher performs one example based on the
student where only the numbers are changed. A third question is given and students work
individually on it and then the answer is discussed as a class. This method reflects the
Teaching-Learning model by Ley (2014, p.2) and aims to scaffold learning for the students.
Following this students work on the first worksheet individually and are then divided into
mixed-ability groups so that they may share and learn from each other (Boaler, 2009, p.54).
Students complete the remaining worksheets as a group at their own pace and are encouraged
to find shortcuts. During this time, the teacher moves through the room to monitor student
progress and give hints where needed (Goos, Stillman & Vale, 2007, p.137).
In contrast, L2 takes a different approach to teaching because of the skills-based nature of the
decimals or fractions. Through the Teaching-Learning segments, the teacher can scaffold the
learning. Following each segment, the students work on a series of exercises which are
similar in form and difficulty to the examples performed. During this the teacher walks
around the room as in L1 and for the same reason; to monitor student understanding.
percentages in the world around them. The investigation is based upon an open-ended
question and as such caters to students of all abilities and provides a broader potential for
learning (Judy, Peter & Zevenbergen, n.d., p.467). The groups are chosen by the teacher to
ensure that they are all mixed ability, and the members are all assigned roles to enable
effective teamwork and avoid the potential weakness of cooperative learning identified by
Anderson, Reder and Simon (1999, p.9) of unequal participation by members. Furthermore,
an additional question is given to further differentiate learning (Judy, et.al., n.d., p.468) if
Finally, all lessons end with a conclusion section which provides feedback of learning to the
teacher, enabling them to cover problem content again and know which content students
understood. Because of the importance of assessing that students have learnt the content, if
time is running short, the body activities will be stopped and the conclusion will be done. The
conclusion has two activities in L1. Firstly, following the group work, the teacher leads a
discussion about the problems. As they monitored progress, the teacher is able to choose
students who understood the questions to share their method used in answering them.
Secondly, the use of Agree/Disagree Statements (Keeley & Tobey, 2011) gives the teacher an
understanding of student knowledge. In L2, Squaresaws which are based on Grid Games
(Gerver, et.al., 2011, p.30) are use to confirm that students understood the content in an
engaging way. Finally, in L4, student presentations to the class display their understanding of
understanding.
As such, each lesson follows a clear and strategic sequence of events and aids in student
understanding of percentages. The tasks include diagnostic and formative assessment, varied
Boaler, J. (2009). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children learn and Love
Maths. United Kingdom: Souvenir Press.
Fang, N. (2013). Increasing High School Students Interest in STEM Education
Through Collaborative Brainstorming with Yo-Yos. Journal of STEM Education:
Innovations and Research,14(4), 814.
Gerver, R., & Sgroi, R. (2011) Fortifying the First Five. Retrieved August 14, 2016,
from Cengage Learning,
http://www.cengagesites.com/academic/assets/sites/FortifyingtheFirstFive2011.pdf
Goos, M., Stillman, G., & Vale, C. (2007). Teaching secondary school mathematics:
Research and practice for the 21st century. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Judy, M., Peter, S., & Zevenbergen, R. (n.d.). Keeping All Students on the Learning
Path.