00 mi piace00 non mi piace

8 visualizzazioni15 pagineLaboratory Exercise Descriptions

Nov 01, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

Laboratory Exercise Descriptions

© All Rights Reserved

8 visualizzazioni

00 mi piace00 non mi piace

Laboratory Exercise Descriptions

© All Rights Reserved

Sei sulla pagina 1di 15

1. INTRODUCTION

In the triaxial test a cylindrical sample of soil is contained within membrane and end platens and

acted on by an all-round cell pressure. The sample is then loaded axially to failure. During loading,

axial and volumetric strains and pore water pressures may be measured enabling the total and

effective stress paths and strains to failure to be followed.

In this exercise the student should become acquainted with the main components of the triaxial

testing system, without performing an actual test, and should carry out the specified tasks using the

supplied results from an actual test.

The supplied results are from a multi-stage undrained triaxial test, with pore pressure measurement,

performed on a sample of clay. From these results the total and effective stress strength parameters

may be obtained for the clay, over the stress range tested, and the measured pore pressures also

enable the pore pressure parameters to be evaluated.

Ram

Perspex

Loading

cylinder

cap

Sample drainage and

Porous pore water pressure

discs measurement

Sample

supply pore water pressure

measurement

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 1 Triaxial Test

Notation

Ao initial sample cross-sectional area

Ap ram cross-sectional area

P ran force, measured externally by proving ring or load cell

L sample length

Lo initial sample length

+ 3 + 3

s = 1 ; s = 1 Mean normal stress

2 2

t = 1 3 = t = 1 3 deviatoric stress

2 2

u pore pressure

1 , 1 total and effective axial stress

3 , 3 total and effective cell pressure

1 axial strain = L / Lo

The data obtained from a triaxial test (with pore pressure measurement) comprises readings of P, u

and 1 . These are processed as follows:

1 3

(i) Calculation of total deviatoric stress, t = :

2

(1 3 ).A + 3 .A P = P

P 3 .A P

( 1 3 ) = (1)

A

For an undrained test on a saturated sample, the volume of the sample remains nearly

constant.

.L .o.L o

.L .L .L

and = o o = =

L L o L L (1 1 )

= (2)

1 1

The University of Queensland, 2009 1-2

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 1 Triaxial Test

( . )(1 )

1 3 =

3 1

Having obtained the total deviatoric stress for a given axial strain, values for 1 , s, s' and t may

readily be calculated.

From tabulated values of s, s' and t, the stress paths which the sample follows during the three

stages of the triaxial test may be plotted on s, t or s', t axes to obtain the failure envelope and total or

effective stress strength parameters, respectively. A typical stress path plot on s', t axes is shown,

together with the failure envelope and means of obtaining the effective stress strength parameters.

t

sin = tan

Failure Envelope

2.5%

2.0%

1.5%

1.0%

ccos

s'

u = B [3 + A (1 - 3)]

The parameter B may be obtained at the start of the triaxial test after consolidation under the all-

round cell pressure 3, but before the start of shearing. A small increment in cell pressure is applied

(1 = 3) and the resulting change in pore pressure (with no drainage) recorded. B is then

obtained from:

u = B 3

and will be unity for a saturated sample. (i.e. if B < 1 the sample is not saturated)

The parameter A may then be obtained for any level of axial strain as 1 is increased, with 3 held

constant, that is:

u = A.B.1

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 1 Triaxial Test

6. EXERCISE

Using the attached partially processed results from an actual triaxial test, carry out the following

tasks:

i) Prepare tables of 1 , u, 1 , s, s' and t for each of the three stages (three levels of cell pressure).

ii) Plot the stress paths on s, t and s', t' axes, marking the 1 values along the stress paths.

iii)Draw the failure envelopes and hence determine c, and c', '.

iv) Assuming B = 1, calculate A at 1.41%, 2.07% and 3.11% axial strain for stages 1,2 and 3,

respectively.

Based on the shape of the failure envelopes, was the clay normally consolidated or over-

consolidated?

Give an example of a situation where the results of multi-stage undrained triaxial test with pore

pressure measurement would be relevant.

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 1 Triaxial Test

1 (%) u (kPa) 1 3 (kPa) 1 (kPa) s (kPa) s' (kPa) t (kPa)

0.00 0 0

0.56 52 60

0.71 58 82

0.99 60 119

1.41 69 146

1.83 77 162

2.26 82 172

2.68 88 178

3.10 90 183

3.53 92 187

3.95 93 189

4.37 95 192

1 (%) u (kPa) 1 3 (kPa) 1 (kPa) s (kPa) s' (kPa) t (kPa)

0.00 0 0

0.15 102 162

0.44 112 230

0.74 126 280

1.18 139 329

1.62 150 359

2.07 160 377

2.51 167 388

2.95 170 397

3.39 172 403

3.83 173 409

4.28 173 413

4.72 174 416

1 (%) u (kPa) 1 3 (kPa) 1 (kPa) s (kPa) s' (kPa) t (kPa)

0.00 0 0

0.15 212 305

0.30 218 357

0.46 220 405

0.78 240 489

1.24 280 594

1.71 315 670

2.17 342 709

2.64 362 726

3.11 372 732

3.57 380 741

4.04 382 744

4.34 382 745

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 2 Direct Shear Test

1. INTRODUCTION

In the direct shear test a sample of soil is contained within a box split horizontally and is loaded

vertically between rigid, rough top and bottom platens. The two halves of the split box are then

forced in opposite directions inducing a shearing surface within the soil sample. The applied shear

force is resisted by the cohesion of the soil, friction between soil particles and by the work required

to dilate the soil under the normal load to enable shearing. The test may be conducted under

saturated conditions, but pore pressures are not measured.

For clays the total stress strength parameters are obtained by multi-stage shearing at a rapid rate

(undrained) and the effective stress strength parameters are obtained by multi-stage shearing at a

slow rate (drained), both under saturated conditions. For sands (cohensionless) the effective angle

of internal friction is obtained by rapid shearing (drained, since sands are highly permeable) at an

appropriate normal stress and often under dry conditions. The shearing resistance of soils on other

materials such as steel or concrete may be obtained by placing a block of the material in the bottom

half of the shear box to be flush with the horizontal split.

In this exercise a loose sample of dry uniform beach sand is sheared under an initial normal stress of

100 or 300 kPa. The rate of shearing is given and shearing is continued to the maximum travel of

the machine (about 15% strain).

Normal load

and toothed grid

Sample

Shear force

Split box

Shear force

and toothed grid

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 2 Direct Shear Test

Notation

Ao initial sample cross-sectional area

B shear box dimension

N normal load

S shear force

h change in height of sample

L shear displacement of top of box

shear stress

f frictional component of shear stress

n normal stress

The data obtained from a direct shear test comprises readings of S (proving ring divisions x proving

ring constant), h and L

S

= (1)

A

N

n = (2)

A

= . ( L )

L

= 1 (3)

Equating the total work done in shearing the sample with the work done against the normal

stress and the work done in overcoming friction between sand particles.

. L = n h + f .L

h

f = n . (4)

L

4. EXERCISE

Two loose samples of dry uniform beach sand have been prepared in separate shear boxes. The

samples have an initial nominal density of 1.7 Mg/m3 and occupy a depth of about 25mm in the

60mm by 60mm shear box so that the horizontal split is roughly at the mid-height of the sample.

The University of Queensland, 2009 2-2

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 2 Direct Shear Test

Experimental Procedure

(i) mount the shear box in the direct shear machine with the brass locking screws still in place;

(ii) hand-wind the machine so that the shear box just makes contact with the proving ring;

(iii) locate the dial gauges for measuring horizontal and vertical movement;

(iv) zero all three dial gauges and record the zeros;

(v) apply the appropriate normal load (to give an initial normal stress of 100 or 300 kPa) and

record the vertical dial gauge reading;

(vi) remove the locking screws and give the brass lifting screws a half turn clockwise

simultaneously to separate the halves of the shear box, before retracting the lifting screws.

Record the vertical dial gauge reading;

(vii) commence shearing at the rate set, taking readings of all three dial gauges at one minute

intervals (constant intervals of horizontal movement) until the maximum travel of the

machine is reached.

Reporting of Results

(i) Prepare tables of time (min.), h (mm), L (mm), proving ring divisions (mm), S (kN), A

(mm2), (kPa) and n (kPa) for each of the initial normal stress levels, recording the proving

ring constant.

(ii) Plot versus L and h versus L for each of the initial normal stress levels.

(iii) Plot the peak shear strength failure envelopes on versus n axes and hence obtain values for

the peak angle of internal friction.

Comment on the relative advantages, disadvantages and limitations of the triaxial and direct shear

tests for obtaining the shear strength of (i) a sand, and (ii) a clay.

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 3 Permeability and Seepage

A. PERMEABILITY

1. Introduction

Due to the very large range of permeability in soils, no one method is suitable for the laboratory

determination of permeability for all soils. For soils with coefficients of permeability (k) down to

about 10-4 m/s, the constant head permeameter is generally used. Clean sands and gravels fall into

this category. For soils with k values between 10-4 and 10-7 m/s, the falling head permeameter is

generally used and this category covers fine grained sands and silty and clayey sands. Indirect

methods, based on a consolidation test of dissipation test, are generally used for soils with k values

below 10-7 m/s.

In this exercise the coefficient of permeability of a clean sand is determined in a constant head

permeameter.

Constant water

Water supply level

Waste

Constant water

level h

L Sample

Porous disc

Notation

H head difference between input and output pots

L overall sample length between porous stones

h head difference between measuring points

i hydraulic gradient = h/_

k coefficient of permeability

x distance between measuring points

q flow rate from sample (volume/unit time)

The University of Queensland, 2009 3-1

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 3 Permeability and Seepage

3. Calculations

For the flow of water through a water saturated soil Darcy's law applies, that is:

q q.x

= = (1)

A.i A.h

Darcy's law becomes invalid for a degree of saturation of less than about 85%.

4. Exercise

(i) Obtain the k value of the clean sand by measuring the parameters in equation (1).

(ii) By comparing the overall hydraulic gradient with that between measuring points, determine

the head loss external to the measuring length.

Why does Darcy's law become invalid for a degree of saturation of less than about 85%?

B. SEEPAGE

1. Introduction

Based on the analogy between the differential equations governing the flow of electric current and

those governing the flow of water in homogeneous isotropic media, flow nets may be determined

using an electrical analogue. Voltage in the electrical analogue corresponds to piezometric head,

conductivity to permeability and current to velocity. The electrical analogue involves the use of

conducting paper in place of a seepage zone. To obtain equipotential lines, the conducting paper is

cut through at all impervious boundaries and a voltage potential is applied to the equipotential

boundaries, such as a free surface. To ensure low electrical resistance where the voltage potential is

applied the equipotential boundaries are covered with a silver paint. Flow lines may be obtained by

cutting through the conducting paper at all equipotential boundaries and applying a voltage

potential to the impervious boundaries. Voltage drops are located using a probe and voltmeter to

obtain either equipotential lines or flow lines.

In this exercise the equipotential lines and flow lines for a particular seepage case are obtained

using an electrical analogue.

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 3 Permeability and Seepage

2. Seepage Zone

7m 15 m

Weir

1m

1m

x y z

6m

10 m

Permeable Soil

Impermeable Rock

3. CALCULATIONS

The flow rate per unit width through each flow tube of a flow net is given by:

k.

q=

is the number of potential drops between equipotential lines within the seepage zone.

The flow rate per unit width through the entire seepage zone is given by :

q= k. ,

where N is the number of flow tubes.

At any point within the seepage zone the pore pressure is calculated from the total head equation

H = u/w + z. where H is the total head and z is the elevation at the point.

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 3 Permeability and Seepage

4. Exercise

(i) Using an electrical analogue, obtain the flow net for the seepage case given.

(ii) Count the number of flow tubes N and the number of potential drops between

equipotential lines to obtain the value of N /

(iii) If the soil represented by the conducting paper has a coefficient of permeability k equal to

that obtained in Part A, calculate the rate of flow per unit width through the seepage zone.

(iv) Calculate the approximate pore pressures at points x, y and z and comment on the values

obtained.

(v) Calculate and plot the hydrostatic uplift pressure acting on the base of the structure.

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 4 Rod Model Exercises

1. Introduction

In this exercise theoretical solutions are compared with the results of exercises using a rod model in

place of real soil. The rod model is also used to demonstrate failure mechanisms.

2. Exercise

a) Theory

Calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing for embedments of 15 mm and 50 mm

using Terzaghi's formula:

1

qu = c.c + .D.q + ..

2

where qu is ultimate bearing capacity

c is rod model cohesion = 0

is bulk unit weight = 11 kN/m3

D is footing embedment = 15 mm and 50 mm

Nq = 18 ( =27)

B is footing width = 100 mm

N = 13 ( =27)

b) Rod Model

Using the model strip footing in the rod model, with initial footing embedments of 15 mm and 50

mm, apply load to the footing via a lever to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of the footing at

the two embedments. Sketch any observed movements within the rods as the ultimate bearing

capacity is approached. Compare the exerciseally determined ultimate bearing capacities with the

theoretical values and discuss any differences.

mechanisms for retaining walls.

a) Using the model gravity retaining wall with no rods in front of the wall, add rods (backfill)

behind the wall to cause failure. What is the mechanism of failure? Sketch any observed

movements within the rods on failure.

b) Using the model gravity retaining wall with rods (backfill) behind the wall to its crest and

initially with rods up to about half height in front of the wall, remove (excavate) rods from in

The University of Queensland, 2009 4-1

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 4 Rod Model Exercises

front of the wall to cause failure. What is the mechanism of failure? Sketch any observed

movements within the rods on failure.

c) Using the model cantilever retaining wall with rods in front of the wall, add rods (backfill)

behind the wall to cause failure. What is the mechanism of failure? Sketch any observed

movements within the rods on failure.

a) Theory

For the propped bulkhead shown calculate the prop load required to just support the bulkhead with

(i) 220 mm depth of rods in front of the bulkhead and (ii) 110 mm depth of rods in front of the

bulkhead. Assume Rankine active and passive states behind and in front of the bulkhead,

respectively. The thickness of the rod model is 134 mm. The rod model has zero cohesion, and

angle of internal friction of 27 and a unit weight of 11 kN/m3. Add 20% to the calculated prop

loads to allow for the approximate lateral pressure distribution used.

110 mm

ACTIVE

Prop

Aluminium

435 mm

Model Bulkhead

PASSIVE

b) Rod Model

Install the aluminium model bulkhead in the rod model about 200 mm from the load cell and to a

depth such that the prop between the load cell and the model bulkhead is located about 110 mm

down from the top of the bulkhead. Commerce with rods to within 150 mm of the top of the

bulkhead and to the top of the bulkhead in front of and behind the bulkhead, respectively, and with

the prop just in contact. Remove (excavate) rods from in front of the bulkhead to levels given by (i)

and (ii) in (a). At each level, plot the deflected shape of the bulkhead and record the prop load.

Simulate a yielding of the prop by slowly shortening it by 10 mm. Plot the new deflected shape and

record the prop load.

Carefully remove further rods from in front of the bulkhead to cause failure. Describe the

mechanism of failure and sketch the observed movements within the rods.

The University of Queensland, 2009 4-2

CIVL3210 Geotechnical Engineering Exercise 4 Rod Model Exercises

Compare the exerciseally and theoretically determined prop loads and discuss any differences.

a) Theory

For the strutted excavation shown calculated a set of strut loads assuming the Rankine active state

exists behind the sheeting. Ignore any contribution from the sheeting. The thickness of the rod

model is 134 mm. The rod model has zero cohesion, an angle of internal friction of 27 and a unit

weight of 11 kN/m3.

Strut 80 mm

320 mm

Strut 80 mm

Sheeting

80 mm

Also calculate the strut loads based on a uniform distribution of lateral pressure given by 0.65KaH,

and H is the height of the excavation.

b) Rod Model

Install the Perspex model sheeting in the rod model about 200 mm from the load cells and with the

indentations for struts in line with the centre of each load cell. Commence with rods ot the top of

the sheeting on both sides. Remove (excavate) rods from between the sheeting and load cells,

progressively installing struts. Excavate to the full depth of the sheeting. Record the loads on

existing struts before each new strut is installed and on all struts on final excavation. Plot graphs of

strut load against excavation depth.

Simulate failure of the strutted excavation by progressively removing struts, starting from the top.

Record loads on remaining struts up to failure and comment on any changes in strut load. Describe

the mechanism of failure and sketch the observed movements within the rods.

Compare the measured and theoretically determined strut loads and discuss any differences.

## Molto più che documenti.

Scopri tutto ciò che Scribd ha da offrire, inclusi libri e audiolibri dei maggiori editori.

Annulla in qualsiasi momento.