Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
28
U1
TPS2140PWP
1 14
SWPG SWPLDN
Bus 2 13 Power
Power SWIN SWOUT to Other
+ 3 12 Peripherals
C1 SWIN SWOUT C3
4 11 0.1 µF
4.7 µF LDOIN LDOOUT
5 10 +
SWENA LDOPLDN C4
C2 6 9 4.7 µF
LDOENA ADJ
0.1 µF
7 8
PWP
GND LDOPG
R2
332 kΩ Power
to Hub
15
Switch
Enable Control
R1 C6
100 kΩ 0.1 µF
+
C5
4.7 µF
Table 2 compares the two approaches, internal versus external switch approach uses multiple semiconductor
external switches or pass elements. The pass elements packages compared with the single package of the inte-
have higher resistance in the internal switch approach, grated switch. Each of the packages has its own overhead
which occupies less than 60% of the external switch of assembly and test, making the overall system-level costs
approach. However, the silicon die area is more costly in about equivalent.
the internal switch because more mask levels are involved
in the IC’s device structure than in a simple MOSFET. Powering low-voltage digital electronics
Typically, the IC will use over 20 mask levels compared Generating low voltages, such as 3.3 V, from the USB can
with 8–10 levels of the MOSFET. The higher level of inte- be done in several ways. Regardless of the configuration
gration eliminates at least two semiconductor packages used, the output current for a 3.3-V output is limited to
and the resulting poor interconnect efficiency. In addition, 0.65 A (assuming 95% efficiency) due to the 2.25-W input
the higher level of integration provides a higher reliability power limitation. The options to provide these lower volt-
as bond wires and solder joints are eliminated. Reliability ages include linear regulators, switching power supplies,
is further enhanced with the over-temperature protection and charge pumps. Within switching power supplies, there
of the internal switch. With the external switch, there is are two further subgroups, synchronous and conventional.
no cost-effective method to measure MOSFET tempera- The synchronous is more efficient and costly and will be
ture to protect it from shorted loads. Current foldback and used to get as much power from the USB as possible.
power cycling techniques can help but do not provide the The linear regulator is the lowest-cost and highest-
robustness of the thermal shutdown. The last column of density option for generating lower voltages from the 5-V
the table presents a cost comparison between the two USB. When there is no power issue, it will be the circuit
approaches. The costs are almost the same and would of choice. However, when power becomes an issue,
bear a closer examination on a particular requirement. switching regulators can more efficiently power the
Generally, the reason the costs are so close is that the
29
peripheral. Figure 2 shows one of the lowest-cost buck design, allowing lower on resistance devices to be used
switching regulator options available. In this circuit, the compared with integrated FET controllers, and possibly
switching of the FET, Q2, is controlled to “buck” the achieving greater efficiency.
average voltage presented to the output filter, which then In Figure 2, a large percentage of the overall power loss
smooths the switching waveform. The drawback of this is dissipated in the freewheeling diode D2. In Figure 3 this
circuit is that the lack of controller integration requires an diode is replaced with an N-channel FET, making this
external FET and drive circuit, which makes the circuit circuit a synchronous buck converter, which significantly
relatively large. An external FET provides flexibility in the improves the converter efficiency. Efficiency improvements
5 VIN
C1
+ 470 µF
Q1 6.3 V
C2 U1 R1
100 pF TL5001D 499 Ω 2N3904
2
VCC
R2 6 3 2 1
DTC
30.1 kΩ 3 1
COMP OUT 4
C3 Q2 L1
0.033 µF D1
4 MBRM140 TPS1101 47 µH
FB 8 7 6 5
7 5
RT SCP 3.3 V
8 GND
D2 C5
R4 + 470 µF
R3 C4
100 kΩ MBRS340T3 6.3 V
R5 100 kΩ 1 µF
43.2 kΩ
R6 C6
10 kΩ 1000 pF
Q1 L1
Si3443DV 5.0 µH
5 VIN 4 6 3.3 V
5
C3 2 + C1 C2
3
22 µF 1 120 µF 22 µF
6.3 V 4V 6.3 V
U1
R1
TPS43000
1 kΩ
1 SYNC/SD SWN
16
R2 2 15 1 2 5 6
CCS SWP
37.4 kΩ 3 14
RT VP C4
4 13 0.47 µF 3 D1
CCM PDRV Q2
5 12 ZHCS2000
BUCK GND 4 Si3442DV
6 PFM NDRV
11
7 COMP VOUT
10
8 FB VIN
9
C7 C5 C6
C8 270 pF C9 0.47 µF 0.47 µF
3.0 pF R3
R4 5.76 kΩ
560 pF
R5 115 kΩ
32.4 kΩ R6
100 kΩ
30
5 VIN
U1 C1
TPS60501DGS 4.7 µF
R1
6.3 V
1 10 499 kΩ
EN FB
2 9 U1 L1
PG GND 15 µH
TPS6734D
3 C2F– C1F–
8 C2 1 8
EN VCC
4 7 C2 .01 µF
C1 C2F+ OUT 2 7
1 µF 5 6 1 µF REF FB
VIN C1F+
16 V 16 V 3
SS OUT
6 12 V
C3 4 5 D1
5 VIN 3.3 V .01 µF
COMP GND MBRS130T3
C3 C4
4.7 µF 22 µF
C5
6.3 V 6.3 V C4 10 µF
1000 pF
16 V
can be realized over a wide load range with this circuit. At solution. The controller utilizes internal FETs that connect
very light loads, pulse skipping can decrease gate-drive two flying capacitors in various series or parallel configu-
losses. When the output voltage drops 2% below the nomi- rations, dumping their energy to the output. The input
nal voltage set point, the converter senses it and switches voltage and the load are used to set the internal FET
until the output reaches an upper threshold; it then puts configuration automatically. At loads heavier than 150 mA,
itself in sleep mode until the load discharges the output the controller acts as an LDO and stops using the switched
capacitor to the lower threshold again. This circuit provides capacitors altogether. Output current is limited to a maxi-
excellent efficiency but is more costly than the one in mum of 0.25 A, which limits this circuit to low-power
Figure 2. Its circuit area is also slightly smaller, mainly applications. Efficiency is between 80 and 90% for light
because the controller can operate at frequencies of up to loads between 1 mA and 50 mA, but drops off to approxi-
1 MHz, which allows the inductor and input/output capaci- mately 65% above that when operating in LDO mode. The
tors to be noticeably smaller. cost of Figure 4 is one of the lowest, due to the low cost of
Integrating the top FET, bottom FET, drive circuit, and the ceramic capacitors.
feedback compensation into the controller provides for a Table 3 provides a summary of the low-voltage step-down
small, integrated, and efficient converter solution. This is options discussed. Efficiency, cost, and circuit area are
becoming a very popular solution because it is generally also listed for reference. So what’s the right choice? Linear
simple to design and has a very short design cycle time. regulators, when you can afford the losses. Then take a
Software is available that aids in the design, making it look at charge pumps and determine their losses based on
possible for novices to design power supplies. Controllers conversion ratios. Finally, evaluate non-synchronous and
such as the TPS5431x and TPS5461x SWIFT TM series pro- then synchronous regulators. In each case, the system
vide such integration, but their cost is higher due to the cost and size increase, but more power is available for the
added performance and features. load. A second trade-off in the switching power supplies
Circuit area is often a critical design parameter. The step- involves deciding between internal and external FETs.
down charge pump in Figure 4 represents an extremely The cost is usually lowest with external FETs; while the
small solution. Four ceramic capacitors and the charge design time, component count, and size will be smaller
pump controller are the only components required for this with internal FETs.
31
5 VIN
L1 R1 C2
C1
22 µF 47 µH 10 Ω 1 µF
6.3 V C3
1 µF R2
U1 86.6 kΩ
R3 UCC39421PW
5 6 7 8
1 kΩ
1 16
D1 RSEN RSEL
B240 Q1 2
VOUT COMP
15
4 IRF7404 3 14
RECT FB
4 13
PGND PFM
5 VOUT 1 2 3 5 6 7 8
5 12 R4
CHRG GND
169 kΩ
6 11 C4
VPUMP RT
Q2 4
7 10 R5 68 pF
CP SYNC/SD
IRF7401 28 kΩ
8 9
1 2 3 VIN ISENSE
C6 C7 C5
100 µF L2 4700 pF
22 µF 47 µH R6
6.3 V 6.3 V 169 kΩ
R7 C8 C9
0.1 Ω 1 µF 1 µF D2
0.25 W BAT54
R8
3.01 kΩ
32
between the two windings of L1. The voltage across C1 is synchronous and non-synchronous operation, as well as in
stacked on the 3.3-V regulated output; so, for a 5-V auxiliary an internal versus external switch, as in the buck regulator.
output, an additional 1.7 V needs to be developed across
L1’s secondary. A turns ratio of 2:1 will work well in this USB-powered DSL modem power supply example
application. For low current levels, the voltage drops The circuit in Figure 8 (next page) is an example of a
developed across the internal bottom FET and Q1 (which complete USB power supply with 3.3-V, 5-V, and 12-V
turn on in phase with each other) are small and often can- outputs. With the 3.3-V powered at 0.32 A, the 5-V at
cel each other out. These FET drops may not significantly 0.05 A, and the 12-V at 0.05 A, the overall efficiency is
add to the output-voltage tolerance error, and good regu- 89.5%, which allows the input power to remain below the
lation can be achieved. 2.25-W maximum limit. In operation, only the 3.3-V output
Table 4 presents a comparison of some of the options is allowed to power up at turn-on, with the 5-V and 12-V
for generating higher voltages for analog loads. Here again, enable pins being held low by the bus controller. No more
the decision involves a trade-off between cost, performance, than 100 mA is drawn off the 3.3-V output during power-
and loss. If power is not a problem, the first choice to up in low-power mode. Enumeration then comes from the
consider is a charge pump. When loss becomes an issue, a bus controller to allow the 5-V and 12-V to power up. A
switching regulator may become warranted. The first boost topology was used for both the 5-V and 12-V outputs,
circuit to consider, particularly if a buck regulator is being with the 5-V power stage input powered from the 3.3-V
used, is the auxiliary winding scheme of Figure 7. It adds output. The controller chosen for both boost regulators
minimal cost and degrades efficiency the least. Next come was the low-cost TL1451A dual controller. The approach
the SEPIC and boost regulator. The need for short-circuit taken for this design example is geared toward low cost
protection will determine which approach will be favored. and high efficiency rather than small area. Figure 9 shows
Usually a boost will be chosen for its higher efficiency if a photograph of the completed hardware, which measures
current limiting is not needed or can be accommodated 1.5" × 2".
elsewhere in the system. There are also trade-offs in
33
U1
5 VIN TPS62000DGS
J1 L1
1 1 10 10 µH
4.5 - 5.5 VIN VIN PGND J2
2 2 9
GND FC L 4
3.3 V @ 500 mA
3 8
C2 GND EN 5 V @ 100 mA
C1 4 7 R3 C4 3
4.7 µF 0.1 µF PG SYNC 825 kΩ 10 µF 2
GND
5 6 R5
6.3 V FB ILIM 6.3 V 1
12 V @ 100 mA
130 kΩ
C5 R6 C6 R7
0.1 µF 100 kΩ 0.1 µF 100 kΩ 4
4
Q2
Q1 3
3 IRLMS6802
IRLMS6802 R9
R8
10 kΩ 10 kΩ 1 2 5 6
1 2 5 6
Q3
5-V & 12-V 2N7002 Q4
Enable 2N7002 C9
C7 R10 C8 R11 4.7 µF
0.1 µF 10 kΩ 0.1 µF 10 kΩ 6.3 V
L2
3.8 µH
R13
84.5 kΩ C11 Q5
1 µF R14 MMBT3904 D1
1 2 5 6
R15 499 Ω MBRS130T3
C13 C12
0.1 µF 28.0 kΩ 10 µF
U2 3 Q7 16 V
1 kΩ
TL1451ACNS Q6 4
IRLMS2002
9 R16 MMBT3906
16 VREF VCC
C14 11 Q8
0.1 µF 2DTC R17 MMBT3906
C16 R22 12 8 499 Ω
R20 2FB GND
R21 .01 µF 100 kΩ 13
C15 12.7 kΩ 2IN–
0.1 µF 12.7 kΩ 14 10
2IN+ 2OUT
6 1DTC
C18 R25 5 7 C17
1FB 1OUT L3
R23 R18 .01 µF 100 kΩ 4 4.7 µF
20 kΩ 1 kΩ 1IN– 10 µH
3 6.3 V
1IN+
R24 R27 2 15
20 kΩ R19 20 kΩ RT SCP
1 C19
20 kΩ CT Q9
R28 1 µF R29 MMBT3904 D2
13.3 kΩ 1 2 5 6
C20 499 Ω MBRS130T3 C21
C24 C22 1 µF 10 µF
R26
1 µF 150 pF 3 Q11 16 V
1 kΩ R30
Q10 IRLMS2002
4
1 kΩ MMBT3906
Q12
R31 MMBT3906
499 Ω
R34 R32
10 kΩ 84.5 kΩ
Conclusion Reference
The design of a power supply powered from the USB port 1. USB Implementers Forum Inc., “Universal Serial Bus
is heavily driven by the 2.25 W of available input power Specification Revision 2.0,” www.usb.org
and the peripheral load requirements. The design process
should involve a very careful analysis of load currents Related Web sites
followed by a program to minimize them. Once the loads www.ti.com/sc/device/partnumber
have been determined, the power-supply engineer should Replace partnumber with TL1451A, TL5001, TPS2140,
develop multiple block diagrams with the topologies TPS6734, TPS43000, TPS54310, TPS54610, TPS54611,
described in this article to develop the lowest-cost, most TPS60130, TPS60500, TPS62000 or UCC39421
power- and area-compliant approach. The array of inte- www.usb.org
grated circuits to support these designs is very diverse;
the designer has the options of striving for maximum
integration, minimum cost, and ease of use.
34