Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The aim of this study was to determine the ability of Lemna minor to remove Cr (VI) ions from wastewater
Received 4 June 2013 in a continuous ow pond system. This system was used to simulate a wastewater treatment pond
Received in revised form 25 July 2013 and a natural wetland as habitat of plants. In order to nd optimal conditions for chromium removal,
Accepted 3 October 2013
ponds were operated with aqueous solutions having different pH (4.07.0) and chromium concentration
Available online 11 October 2013
of 0.25 mgCr+6 /L, then plants were exposed to different chromium concentrations (0.255.0 mgCr+6 /L)
at pH 4.0. Chromium concentrations, both in biomass and wastewater, were measured and removal
Keywords:
efciency was determined throughout water ow. Growth factors such as growth rates, chlorophyll
Chromium
Biosorption
contents and dry/fresh weight ratios of plants were also determined to measure toxic effects of chromium.
Duckweed The percentages of chromium uptake (PMU) and bioconcentration factors (BCF) were calculated for each
Lemna minor run. The highest accumulated chromium concentration (4.423 mgCr/g) was found in plants grown in the
Wastewater rst chamber of pond operated at pH 4.0 and 5.0 mgCr/L, while the minimum accumulated chromium
concentration (0.122 mgCr/g) was in plants grown in the last chamber of pond operated at pH 4.0 and
0.25 mgCr+6 /L.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0304-3894/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.006
Y. Uysal / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 486492 487
2. Experimental
In order to determine any possible toxic effects of chromium
on plants, biochemical parameters such as growth rates, dry/fresh
2.1. Terminology
weight ratios and chlorophyll contents of plants were determined.
Duckweed growth was determined by measuring fresh weight
In this study, differentiation between chromium oxidation
(FW, biomass) according to the Standard Methods [7]. Plants were
states is not a concern; similarly to other works [5,6], biouptake
surface-dried between layers of paper towels, and fresh weight
including active incorporation into living cells as well as physical
was determined. To measure dry weight, plants were dried at
adsorption will be referred to total Cr. Two separate experiments
80 C up to constant weight (usually 24 h). Since experiments were
were conducted: (1) to determine chromium removal from water
carried out in the ponds, and amount of plants was too high to
by duckweed and (2) to determine the inuence of Cr on duckweed
count of frond number, special rings were used to limit the area
growth and its biochemical parameters.
of plants. These rings were set into chambers of ponds of 1st, 3th,
5th, 8th, 10th and 12th to calculate growth rates. The inner space
2.2. Experimental plant material areas of rings were about 20 cm2 and plants (1 g) were put into
them at the beginning of each experiment. Typical plant size was
Plants were collected from freshwater canals in Kahraman- two to four fronds on each plant; and plant density was sufcient
maras, and transferred to the climate chamber in the laboratory. to exclude any signicant algae or other plant growth.
488 Y. Uysal / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 486492
Percentage removal of Cr +6
K2 HPO4 , 1.04 g/L; CaCl2 2H2 O, 4.41 g/L; MgCl2 , 5.70 g/L; FeCl3 ,
0.096 g/L; MnCl2 , 0.26 g/L; MgSO4 .7H2 O, 14.7 g/L; H3 BO3 , 0.186 g/L;
Na2 MoO4 2H2 O, 7.26 mg/L; ZnCl2 , 3.27 mg/L; CoCl2 , 0.78 mg/L; and 60
CuCl2 , 0.009 mg/L. This stock solution was diluted with deionized
water at the ratios of 1:100 to make the plant nutrient medium.
Chromium solutions at nominal concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 40
2.0, 4.0 and 5.0 mg/L were added directly to the DNS. The initial
pH of solutions was adjusted by using HCI and NaOH solutions,
and the change of pH was monitored daily. In order to determine 20
Table 1
PMU% and BCF values of Lemna at different pH values (pH 47; Cr+6 = 0.25 mg/L).
Chambers of pond pH
0,6 chromium pond but they were healthier up to pond end. Similarly,
pH 4
in the control pond, plants grown in the chambers of 6th11th were
pH 5 healthier than others. There was an interest nding in the obser-
0,5
pH 6 vations that the healthiest plants in bright color were obtained at
pH 7
pH 4.0 similarly growth rate results. It is suggested that chromium
0,4 concentration of 0.25 mg/L induced the plant growth at this pH
value. However, D/F ratios of plants growing in the rst cham-
Cr (mg/g)
a 0,25 b 0,08
CHAMBERS vs GROWTH
CHAMBERS vs GROWTH CHAMBERS vs D/F RATIO
CHAMBERS vs D/F RATIO pH 4 pH 5
GROWTH-C
GROWTH-C D/F-C
0,20 D/F RATIO-C
0,06
0,15
0,04
0,10
0,02
0,05
0,00 0,00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Chambers of ponds Chambers of ponds
c 0,08
CHAMBERS vs GROWTH d 0,08 CHAMBERS vs GROWTH
CHAMBERS vs DRY/FRESH RATIO CHAMBERS vs DRY/FRESH RATIO
pH 6 pH 7
GROWTH -C GROWTH-C
D/F RATIO-C DRY/FRESH RATIO-C
0,06 0,06
0,04 0,04
0,02 0,02
0,00
0,00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Chambers of ponds
Chambers of ponds
Fig. 4. (a)(d) Effect of culture pH on the growth of Lemna minor grown in the different chambers of ponds.
experiments (about 9965% of the added Cr for L. minor). Chromium Effect of increasing chromium concentration on the growth
removal efciency is in the range 6641% for rst 7 days (HRT rst), parameters (RGR, dry weight, dry/fresh weight ratio) of Lemna
and this range decreased to range 4823% for 714 days (HRT sec- were summarized in Table 2. The change of these parameters of
ond) while, it was again decreased to the range 4922% for 1421 plants by chromium exposure was shown with ponds chambers
days (HRT third). During the experimental period (21 days), L. minor (water ow). According to the results, it can be seen that Cr con-
removed approximately 40.8%, 48.5%, 29.0%, 26.0% and 21.8% of the centration in the water inuenced the average relative growth rate
added chromium ions in the concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and (RGR) of plants presenting a signicant negative linear correla-
5.0 mg/L, respectively. tion. Dry weights of plants increased between the chambers of
rst to 10 in the concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0 mgCr/L. This increase
180
pH 4 100
160 pH 5 90
pH 6
140 pH 7 80
Percentage Removal of Cr+6
Chlorophyll (control=100%)
Control
70
120
60
100
50
80 40
30
60
20
40
10
20 0
0 5 10 15 20 25
0 Time (days)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.5 ppm 1 ppm 2 ppm 4 ppm 5 ppm
Chambers of ponds
Fig. 6. Percentage removal of chromium from feed solutions having different Cr (VI)
Fig. 5. Chlorophyll content of Lemna minor at different pH 4.07.0 (Cr+6 = 0.25 mg/L). concentration (pH = 4.0; Cr+6 = 0.55.0 mg/L).
Y. Uysal / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 486492 491
Table 2 Table 3
Growth parameters of Lemna with increasing chromium concentration of culture Change of chromium accumulation (mg/g), BCF, PMU%, and chlorophyll content
medium (pH 4; Cr+6 = 0.25-5.0 mg/L). of Lemna with increasing chromium concentration of culture medium (pH 4;
Cr+6 = 0.255.0 mg/L).
Cr (mg/L) Chambers of chromium pond
Cr (mg/L) Chambers of chromium pond
1 3 5 8 10 12
1 3 5 8 10 12
0.25
Dry weight (g) 0.101 0.105 0.187 0.515 0.474 0.117 0.2
RGR 0.035 0.033 0.070 0.067 0.050 0.038 Cr (mg/g) 0.499 0.281 0.233 0.278 0.268 0.122
D/F 0.062 0.067 0.070 0.203 0.235 0.069 BCF 1996 1123 932 1112 1072 488
PMU% 16.4 11.8 17.4 57.2 50.8 5.7
0.5
Chlorophyll (control %) 41.69 29.95 51.30 51.54 37.79 51.80
Dry weight (g) 0.051 0.115 0.126 0.145 0.149 0.121
RGR 0.001 0.055 0.040 0.063 0.050 0.047 0.5
D/F 0.050 0.045 0.064 0.050 0.064 0.055 Cr (mg/g) 0.484 0.335 0.375 0.232 0.227 0.160
BCF 968 670 750 464 454 320
1.0
PMU% 4.9 7.7 9.5 6.7 6.7 3.9
Dry weight (g) 0.038 0.147 0.136 0.176 0.183 0.132
Chlorophyll (control %) 42.48 46.94 49.22 51.57 58.07 46.55
RGR 0.005 0.054 0.031 0.047 0.031 0.047
D/F 0.042 0.047 0.071 0.066 0.095 0.050 1.0
Cr (mg/g) 1.038 0.426 0.487 0.238 0.326 0.311
2.0
BCF 1038 426 487 238 326 311
Dry weight (g) 0.108 0.125 0.128 0.150 0.118 0.106
PMU% 22.5 5.5 7.3 6.6 8.6 9.1
RGR 0.020 0.021 0.023 0.035 0.013 0.014
Chlorophyll (control %) 48.11 48.46 47.71 43.26 55.49 57.18
D/F 0.082 0.088 0.087 0.082 0.094 0.083
2.0
4.0
Cr (mg/g) 0.634 0.616 0.392 0.353 0.343 0.298
Dry weight (g) 0.108 0.125 0.128 0.150 0.118 0.106
BCF 317 308 196 177 172 149
RGR 0.016 0.023 0.005 0.008 0.001 0.019
PMU% 3.4 3.9 2.5 2.6 2.0 1.6
D/F 0.135 0.085 0.139 0.132 0.120 0.148
Chlorophyll (control %) 9.16 14.00 17.10 21.68 27.00 30.31
5.0
4.0
Dry weight (g) 0.033 0.029 0.026 0.021 0.026 0.019
Cr (mg/g) 1.611 0.995 1.203 0.908 0.647 0.958
RGR 0.066 0.055 0.077 0.067 0.062 0.122
BCF 403 249 301 227 162 240
D/F 0.102 0.074 0.096 0.065 0.075 0.150
PMU% 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.6 0.9 0.9
Chlorophyll (control %) 16.51 19.68 13.24 22.38 13.04 29.17
5.0
was observed between the chambers of rst to 8. However, in the Cr (mg/g) 4.423 3.782 4.412 3.459 4.099 3.544
5.0 mgCr/L, dry weights of plants showed slightly decrease with BCF 885 756 882 692 820 709
PMU% 2.9 2.2 2.3 1.4 2.1 1.3
ponds chambers due to toxic effect of chromium. Bioaccumulated
Chlorophyll (control %) 1.62 1.43 1.40 1.77 2.00 2.11
chromium concentrations, BCF, PMU% and relative chlorophyll con-
tent values for different chromium concentrations were shown in
Table 3. greater extent than those of A. pinnata and A. liculoides. Landolt and
An increase in the amount of accumulated chromium concen- Kandeler [18] listed BCF values for different species of Lemnaceae
trations by plant biomass was observed with increasing metal in their book (which name is The Family of Lemnaceae a mono-
concentration of medium (Table 3). In the chromium solutions of graphic study), and showed them to be in the range 38040000 for
4.0 and 5.0 mgCr/L, L. minor was able to accumulate chromium ions chromium. In the present study, BCF values for different chromium
in its body up to concentrations of 1.611 and 4.423 mg/g, respec- concentrations were obtained in the range 1491996, and this
tively. These values are quite higher than those of other plants range shows that L. minor appears to be a poor accumulator for
reported in the literature such as water lily, Nymphaea spontanea chromium.
as 1.466 mg/g [20], and Bacopa monnieri as 1.600 mg/g [21] when When considering relative chlorophyll contents of plants as the
exposed to same chromium concentration. According to the results percent of control, it was shown that total chlorophyll amounts
summarized in Table 3, the highest BCF value was obtained in were not affected by increasing chromium concentration up to
the lowest Cr supply (0.25 mg/L) as 1996. BCF values decreased 1.0 mg/L. Chlorophyll contents of plants was average 50% of control
when Cr supply was increased from 0.25 to 2.0 mg/L and with plants in the 0.1 mg/L chromium concentration while, it decreased
water ow through the pond. The lowest BCF value was obtained to about 20% for chromium concentration of 2.0 mg/L. However,
in the last chamber of pond having 2.0 mg/L inuent chromium this value signicantly decreased to 1.8% for 5 mg/L chromium con-
concentration as 149, and these values showed an increase again centration, because all plants were whitened and died in the rst
for inuent chromium concentrations higher than 2.0 mg/L. It can 24 h of this run. Similar results were also reported in the literature
be seen from the results that BCF values are higher for chromium that chlorophyll content of P. stratiotes decreased with increas-
concentrations of 4.0 and 5.0 mg/L than those of 2 mg/L (Table 3). ing metal concentration upper than 1.0 mg/L in medium [13].
However, decreasing of chlorophyll contents of plants in these Decreasing of chlorophyll content of plants suggests that metals
high chromium concentrations showed that this increase was not affected the chlorophyll synthesizing system and chlorophyllase
resulted from biouptake or biochemical metabolism by plants. activity. A decrease in the photosynthetic pigment content is well
When BCF values are investigated in the literature, it can be seen known from many other works concerning chromium stress in
that these values are higher in the studies performed at very low plants and it is attributed to the oxidative stress [21]. Augustynow-
metal ion concentrations than those in performed with moderate icz et al. [1] reported that very strong declining of photosynthetic
and high metal ion concentrations. Arora et al. [22] investigated activity was observed when plants exposed to chromium ions. They
the potential of Azolla spp. namely A. microphylla, A. pinnata and A. reported that 100 M Cr was the border concentration at which
liculoides to tolerate chromium ions in their growth environment some symptoms of the metal toxicity on the C. cophocarpa (water-
and bioconcentrate them. They reported that BCF values were in starwort) were found. They observed inhibition of growth and
the range 2434617 for three species. A. microphylla showed high- decrease in the photosynthetic pigment content at this concentra-
est bioconcentration potential, while its growth was affected to tion. Shanker et al. [14] reported that disorganization of chloroplast
492 Y. Uysal / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 486492