Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CASE REPORT
Rehabilitation program in a patient
with tibial condyle fracture
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Personal data
Patient Complaints
Moderate pain and stiffness in both knees, swelling and tenderness of the knee, moderate disability in gait
Post surgical (complex fixation method of the type 3 lateral left tibial condyle fracture) rehabilitation status.
ANAMNESIS (history)
Our 61 year old woman suffered, three months ago, a left knee injury and has underwent surgical treatment.
She had previous history of knee osteoarthritis, cervical and lumbar spondylosis and postmenopausal osteoporosis
without fractures.
She performed daily activities in sitting postures in her professional life.
Her history reveals a knee fracture due to a fall from height in a housekeeping activity. When she fell, her left knee
was forced in valgus, and the lateral condyle is crushed by the opposing femoral condyle, which remained intact.
After injury, SA was unable to stand and bear weight on her own, immediately following the accident. She presented
to the emergency department on the same day and diagnosed with left lateral tibial plateau fracture with depression.
The surgical treatment was performed in the same day of the fracture - open reduction and internal fixation with
screw.
Sutures are removed after 14 days. Post operative period was uneventful. The patient was kept on knee leg cast for
6 weeks and was allowed to bear weight with the help of crutches only after 3 months.
SA is coming in our department to perform and to teach the rehabilitation measures for regain her gait and her
independence daily life.
Personal data
Questions (for assessment detailed answers see next page)
1. Why is the lateral tibial condyle fracture more frequent compare with the medial tibial condyle?
a. It is indifferent
b. Due to the anatomical features of bones
c. Due to muscle attach around knee
R=b
3. How can we explain the type of knee fracture and the mechanism of injury in our patient?
a. Valgus force on the knee in a female with postmenopausal osteoporosis
b. History of osteoarthritis
c. Varus force on the knee in a young female
R=a
Personal data
Questions` answers
1. Why is the lateral tibial condyle fracture more frequent compare with the medial tibial condyle?
The knee is a complex joint, exposed to forces that can exceed five times the weight of the body. The normal
knee is in physiologic valgus alignment. Most of the load transmitted across the knee is medial to the eminence,
and therefore, the knee has stronger cancellous bone. The medial plateau is generally larger than and rounded as
compared with the lateral condyle. So, during extension some of the anterior articular surface of the lateral
plateau is exposed. All these anatomical and biomechanical features cause the lateral plateau to be more
susceptible to bone injury and fracture.
3. How we can explain the type of knee fracture and the mechanism of injury in our patient?
This is a combined cleavage and compression fracture and involves vertical split of the lateral condyle combined
with depression of the adjacent load bearing part of the condyle. Caused by a valgus force on the knee; it is a low
energy injury, typically seen in individuals of the 4th decade or older with osteoporotic changes in the bone
density. Most common, and make up 75% of all tibial plateau fractures. Approximately half of the patients who
sustain a tibial plateau fracture are aged over 50.
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Clinical data
1. How can we explain the loss in range of motion in our patients left knee?
a. Because the cartilage is destroyed
b. Because our patient is female in menopausal status
c. Because concomitant damage to the soft tissue around bones
R = a, c
4. Why is it important to perform MMT (manual muscle testing) for all muscles of lower limb?
a. For gait are important both extension and flexion kinetic chains of lower limb
b. For control the knee pain
c. For chose the AINS medication
R=a
Clinical data
Questions` answers
1. How can we explain the loss in range of motion in our patients left knee?
The fractures of tibial plateau significantly affect the biomechanics, stability and range of motion of the knee
joint. Also, ligamentous and menisci injuries may be present in tibial plateau fracture.
4. Why is it important to perform MMT (manual muscle testing) for all muscles of lower limb?
All rehabilitation program for gait in patient with knee fracture take into consideration the global kinetic
exercises, after analytic kinetic program. Muscles atrophy after any fracture can make moving around painful
and slow. The kinetic muscle chains of the lower limb for extension and for flexion are very important for
independence in ambulation, so previous kinetic programs must do the MMT.
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Imagistic data
X-rays.
This type of scan is the most common and widely available diagnostic imaging technique. X-rays can show if the
bone is broken and whether there is displacement (the gap between broken bones).
Most tibial plateau fractures are easy to identify on standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral projections of the knee.
Lateral views should not be considered adequate if a rotational component obscures the visualization of the femoral
condyles as a single unit. Oblique projections should be added if a nondisplaced tibial plateau fracture is suspected but
not seen on the standard projections. After surgery, it can monitor the callusin time.
2. The imagistic findings of X-ray left knee can suggest the mechanism of injury suffered by our patient?
a. Yes
b. No
c. It is a MRI image of ankle
R=a
3. The ORIF can suggest the type of optimal management performed in our patient?
a. No
b. Yes
c. It is important to be performed in the future
R=b
Imagistic data
Questions` answers
2. The imagistic findings of X-ray ankle can suggest the mechanism of injury suffered by our patient?
A Schatzker type III fracture is a pure compression fracture of the lateral tibial plateau in which the articular surface
of the tibial plateau is depressed and driven into the lateral tibial metaphysis by axial forces, without the wedge
fracture . Our patient had central depression (type IIIB - the depressed portion of the plateau is typically elevated by
means of a submetaphyseal cortical window and may result in joint instability). These fractures represent more than
35% of all tibial plateau fractures and are more frequent in the older age groups (the 4th and 5th decades of life), in
whom some degree of osteopenia is more likely to occur, like in our female patient.
3. The ORIF can suggest the type of optimal management performed in our patient?
Yes. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the gold standard treatment for these fractures. Anterolateral and
anteromedial surgical approaches do not permit adequate reduction and fixation of depressed portion. To achieve this,
it is necessary to reduce and fix them through specific posterolateral or posteromedial approaches that allow optimal
reduction and screw placement.
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Functional data
We used:
easily reproducible physical performance measures for activity limitation and participation restriction
VAS = 8 before, 3 after rehabilitation program;
6 Minute Walk, with cane = 140 meters before; 280 meters after rehabilitation program;
Timed Up and Go, with cane = 38 seconds before; 25 seconds after rehabilitation program;
scales for condition-specific health status measures
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) (a self-reported questionnaire intended for use on adults with lower
extremity conditions; it is a 20-item questionnaire assessing patient relevant outcomes of lower limb function; the
maximum possible score is 80 points, indicating very high function.; the minimum possible score is 0 points,
indicating very low function) = 41 before rehabilitation; 52 after rehabilitation program.
SF-36 (the lower the score the more disability - a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability; the higher the
score the less disability a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability) = 34 before rehabilitation; 42 after
rehabilitation program.
Functional data
Questions (for assessment detailed answers see next page)
2. The changes in body structures that appeared from surgery may explain?
a. A further disturbance in the neuromuscular status
b. Optimal balance and gait
c. Back pain and lumbar stifness
R=a
3. The final score of the two scales used for our patient The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and SF-36
are in concordance for disability status ?
a. Yes
b. No
c. It is no possible to compare the two score scales
R=a
4. How can we explain the values of the two tests used in functional assessment - 6 MWD and Timed Up and Go?
a. There are no explanations
b. The functional status is not improved after intervention
c. The rehabilitation program for muscular joint status takes a few weeks after intervention
R=c
Functional data
Questions` answers
2. The changes in body structures that appeared from surgery may explain?
Additionally, the changes in body structures that appeared from surgery may explain the picture of a further
disturbance in the neuromuscular status. This aspect has a great impact on the different parameters like lack of
extension, range of movement, instability, walking distance and pain score.
3. The final score of the two scales used for our patient The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and SF-36
are in concordance for disability status ?
Yes. The both scales contain the items for quality of life and various daily activities in which the lower limb, knee
especially, is responsible for balance and gait. These measurement instruments, based on scoring systems, are applied
so as to assess the benefits achieved by the surgical procedure and rehabilitation measures.
4. How can explain the values of the two tests used in functional assessment - 6 MWD and Timed Up and Go?
Patients recovering from knee fracture reclaim 2 3 months for plateau in strength and functional gains. The
outcome measures chosen for our patient study are common clinical measures and their associated impairments are
theoretically addressable by targeted rehabilitation techniques, in accordance with medical literature data.
1. Personal data
2. Clinical data
3. Imagistic data
4. Functional data
5. Complete diagnosis
6. Rehabilitation program
Complete diagnosis
1. Lateral left tibial condyle Schatzker type III fracture (operated 3 months ago, open reduction and internal
fixation surgery with the iliac graft)
2. Primary knee osteoarthritis
3. Cervical and lumbosacral spondylosis.
4. Postmenopausal osteoporosis (medication controlled)
Complete diagnosis
Questions (for assessment detailed answers see next page)
1. What are the arguments for a low energy injury on the knee in our patient?
a. Osteoporotic status
b. Bilateral knee osteoarthritis previous diagnosis
c. Spondylosis
R=a
2. The following diagnosis can we take into consideration for possible complications in our patient?
a. Knee stiffness and instability and angular deformities
b. Malunion or nonunion of the fracture site
c. Osteoarthrosis
R = a, b
1. What are the imagistic arguments for our patient complete diagnosis?
Our patient was diagnosed with type III Schatzker tibial fracture. This type of fracture is a focal depression of
articular surface with no associated split. This is a pure compression fracture of the lateral or central tibial plateau in
which the articular surface of the tibial plateau is depressed and driven into the lateral tibial metaphysis by axial
forces. A low energy injury, these fractures are more frequent in the 4th and 5th decades of life in females with
osteoporotic changes in bone.
2. The following diagnosis can take into consideration for possible complications in our patient?
Our patient was previous diagnosed with osteoarthritis, so this diagnosis had not be take into consideration for late
possible complication. Other, late complications are often associated with mechanical problems like knee stiffness
and instability and angular deformities or malunion of the fracture site.
2. Why we should respect the kinetic algorithm program in our patient rehabilitation ?
a. Because ROM exercises must preceded the strength exercise
b. Because it is the patient option
c. Because it is performed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)
R=a
3. What are the goals of RP in our patient, when she came in our department ?
a. Initiate functional weight bearing exercises , open kinetic chain AROM and isotonic strengthening exercises
b. Initiate proprioception and gradual gait exercises
c. Restoration of strength, power, and endurance
R = a, b
2. Why we should respect the kinetic algorithm program in our patient rehabilitation ?
The range of motion, strengthening, and proprioceptive exercises of the involved joint should be initiated and
progressed as indicated and tolerated by the individual.
3. What are the goals of RP in our patient, when she came in our department ?
The patient is coming in our department after she removed the knee cast, at 12 weeks after intervention. The
goals of the rehabilitation program are: continuing healing of the fracture site, normalizing AROM and impaired
proprioception, initiate gradual return to functional activities and light work activities. All rehabilitation has to respect the
progression for optimal control of patients impairments and functional limitation, to prevent falls.